No, as the program said, more pollution cannot bring under control the increasing global warming effect AND particle pollution is bad for us - it leads to whole range of breathing problems.
No, Newtons second law states that rate of change of momentum is directly proportional to force, therefore F = d(mv)/dt = m.dv/dt + v.dm/dt, when the mass is constant, F = m.dv/dt = ma. But we can't use F=ma for a rocket, because the mass of the rocket changes. F=d(mv)/dt is the definition of F.
Another way of writing the equation E=mc^2 is to we write what m is. m = m0 / [1 - v^2/c^2] (Where m0 is the rest mass - i.e. the mass of the particle when it is stationary - relativity states that the mass of a particle changes when its velocity increases - f=ma is only a newtonian approximation). Therefore, E = m0 c^2 / [1 - v^2/c^2}
Why has no one suggested sending them Linus's e-mails? His message in the comp.os.minix newsgroup and discussions with Andrew Taunenbaum are infamous. And e-mails between himself and his lieutenants are also pieces of history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds
Yes I think so too, The BBC unlike some other codec providers is putting the project on sourceforge. I also notice that the project is being put together at the R&D department of the BBC whereas the new iMP player (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/media/story.jsp? story=549713) from the BBC is not. Strange?
I notice that recently the Wikipedia server(s) have been down for repairs and replacements. When is this going to finish or is it an ongoing thing?
Also the text search function has been disabled for a while, but recently it was enabled for a short period, I thought it was great and quite a lot better than the google search, is it going to be brought back permanently?
Finally, how do you ensure that the content of articles are not too politically biased or don't totally reflect one side of story or issue other than other people changing or adding to an article when they read it?
The apology for the proof is dated March 18, 2003 on page 2, the documents 'riemann zeta functions' is dated May 24, 2004 on page 2, but where is latest proof?
The BBC said that it will opne up its archives, pehaps this is one step towards this. The BBC could be coming up with a method of transporting their video and/or audio.
The sound seems to remind me of the concorder flying over my house. Every time concorde flys (or flew as it should now be) over populated areas, it had a very deafning sound, but by the time it gets to heathrow airport (or JFK in america), it does seem to sound more like this. Spooky!
There was talk last month of a system called Y (check out the slashdot article). However this project is in its infancy, and so cannot be said to be an alternative so the question still remains is there an alternative and the answer would seem to be no (unless anybody can correct me on this). Intrestingly this reminds me of the British Conservative Party and the back-biting and in-fighting they are presently having with their leader IDS (Ian Duncan Smith)!
Why don't the coders just go and get some decent lo-key jobs and then in their spare time work on mozilla?
There are of course sevceral problems:
1.) Where exactly can you get lo-key jobs quickly and easily 2.) There is the possibility whne they do work on mozilla, their contributions will look more like what AOL want (pop-ups, etc..) and less what mozilla users want.
1.) Once of get past their homepage, e.g. by going to the source code or download page, the old site still remains!
2.) The conditions of the download clearly states: This source code is subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations and other U.S. law, and may not be exported or re-exported to certain countries (currently Afghanistan (Taliban controlled areas), Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) or to persons or entities prohibited from receiving U.S. exports (including Denied Parties, entities on the Bureau of Export Administration Entity List, and Specially Designated Nationals)., surely they should change Iraqs entry to Iraq (Saddam controlled areas only) - then again just the word Iraq would mean the same anyway!
Slashdot Mirror
This story was in The Times last week: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-18 791-1584294,00.html
In this weeks New Scientist: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7315 including links ot the people involved and their papers.
No, as the program said, more pollution cannot bring under control the increasing global warming effect AND particle pollution is bad for us - it leads to whole range of breathing problems.
The site is seemingly experienced the slashdot effect, but for those who see outside the box: http://support.bbc.co.uk.nyud.net:8090/support/ - most of the links, graph and stats work.
No, Newtons second law states that rate of change of momentum is directly proportional to force, therefore F = d(mv)/dt = m.dv/dt + v.dm/dt, when the mass is constant, F = m.dv/dt = ma. But we can't use F=ma for a rocket, because the mass of the rocket changes. F=d(mv)/dt is the definition of F.
Another way of writing the equation E=mc^2 is to we write what m is. m = m0 / [1 - v^2/c^2] (Where m0 is the rest mass - i.e. the mass of the particle when it is stationary - relativity states that the mass of a particle changes when its velocity increases - f=ma is only a newtonian approximation). Therefore, E = m0 c^2 / [1 - v^2/c^2}
See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon /saturn_prog_summary.shtml it has a full transcript of the whole programme available, as well as a questions and answer page and summary of the programme.
There was something about stramlining the TCP protocal which could speed up the internet and other networks. See http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 93799 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAST_TCP
Why has no one suggested sending them Linus's e-mails? His message in the comp.os.minix newsgroup and discussions with Andrew Taunenbaum are infamous. And e-mails between himself and his lieutenants are also pieces of history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds
Yes I think so too, The BBC unlike some other codec providers is putting the project on sourceforge. I also notice that the project is being put together at the R&D department of the BBC whereas the new iMP player (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/media/story.jsp? story=549713) from the BBC is not. Strange?
I notice that recently the Wikipedia server(s) have been down for repairs and replacements. When is this going to finish or is it an ongoing thing?
Also the text search function has been disabled for a while, but recently it was enabled for a short period, I thought it was great and quite a lot better than the google search, is it going to be brought back permanently?
Finally, how do you ensure that the content of articles are not too politically biased or don't totally reflect one side of story or issue other than other people changing or adding to an article when they read it?
Love the site, keep up the good work.
The apology for the proof is dated March 18, 2003 on page 2, the documents 'riemann zeta functions' is dated May 24, 2004 on page 2, but where is latest proof?
The BBC said that it will opne up its archives, pehaps this is one step towards this. The BBC could be coming up with a method of transporting their video and/or audio.
Perhaps?
Remember when the microsoft Eolas source was posted on slashdot in its entirety!
This time it looks like that microsoft are going to get one up over eolas!
Something must be done!
Bring on posting the source of slashdot again!
Another more recent copy of the paper re-done by the american teachers institute
The Paper
BBC news article - with links to hilberts lecture, etc..
The sound seems to remind me of the concorder flying over my house. Every time concorde flys (or flew as it should now be) over populated areas, it had a very deafning sound, but by the time it gets to heathrow airport (or JFK in america), it does seem to sound more like this.
Spooky!
There was talk last month of a system called Y (check out the slashdot article). However this project is in its infancy, and so cannot be said to be an alternative so the question still remains is there an alternative and the answer would seem to be no (unless anybody can correct me on this). Intrestingly this reminds me of the British Conservative Party and the back-biting and in-fighting they are presently having with their leader IDS (Ian Duncan Smith)!
Here are the address of the three movies:
d /rev_theatre_0x3839_640_dl.zip
d /rev_theatre_0x3839_480_dl.zip
d /rev_theatre_0x3839_320_dl.zip
http://progressive.warnerbros.com/thematrix/us/me
http://progressive.warnerbros.com/thematrix/us/me
http://progressive.warnerbros.com/thematrix/us/me
Strange, but I'm sure this was on last months wired!? Is everbody impervious to this fact???
Why don't the coders just go and get some decent lo-key jobs and then in their spare time work on mozilla?
There are of course sevceral problems:
1.) Where exactly can you get lo-key jobs quickly and easily
2.) There is the possibility whne they do work on mozilla, their contributions will look more like what AOL want (pop-ups, etc..) and less what mozilla users want.
Two Points:
1.) Once of get past their homepage, e.g. by going to the source code or download page, the old site still remains!
2.) The conditions of the download clearly states: This source code is subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations and other U.S. law, and may not be exported or re-exported to certain countries (currently Afghanistan (Taliban controlled areas), Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) or to persons or entities prohibited from receiving U.S. exports (including Denied Parties, entities on the Bureau of Export Administration Entity List, and Specially Designated Nationals)., surely they should change Iraqs entry to Iraq (Saddam controlled areas only) - then again just the word Iraq would mean the same anyway!
If all copyright is greed, then the laws which unhold copyright are wrong and so using DeCSS is justified - whether it is legitimate or not!
Why don't they produce self-destructing DVD's which destruct if somebody trys to decrypt it using DeCSS?