Buh? Slashdot isn't social media. I can't post a photo of myself. Slashdot is a blog or link aggregator. I guess it has some thing where you can do your own blog, but nobody uses that. I guess people don't know what words mean.
Americans. It's no secret that globalists hate our guts and want us gone. Americans out of the picture = global prosperity for everyone. Well, the kind of prosperity that a Pakistani manual laborer would consider acceptable. This isn't some crazy conspiracy theory, I've read a lot of globalist and neo-liberal literature and Americans are standing in their way. The sooner we are out of the picture, the better. Even if it is a conspiracy theory, a year ago if I told you that Kevin Spacey was a sex offender that belonged in prison, what would you have said about that?
The United States is indivisible. We will crush you rebel scum if you try anything. Don't dare. We did it before and we'll do it again.
The Democrats were the rebels before and looks like they're going to try it again. Seriously, the Democratic Party just needs to cease to exist. It doesn't represent anyone but corporate donors and identity politics grievance-mongers.
Despite what the Slashdot hivemind says Trump's policies are largely reasonable - moderate, mildly-libertarian conservatism combined with economic nationalism, both an antidote to the aggressive globalist neoliberalism which has been crammed down our collective throats for 30-odd years. He takes on very strong right wing positions on some things, say illegal immigration and dealing with Islamic terrorism, but he's not a Bible thumping ideologue that the GOP has been moving towards in the recent years. He was a freaking Manhattan liberal socialite and registered Democrat most of his life, he's probably snorted coke off hooker's asses, been to many gay weddings, was once for legalizing all drugs and has been hiring women into high positions for decades. He straight up said he supports trans people using any bathrooms while the rest of the GOP made a ruckus over it, dissed the Iraq War and supported planned parenthood at the GOP debates to resounding boos from the Republican crowd, wants to let states decide on weed legalization and is completely against nation building wars. He's not some far right war hawk bigot Hitler as he is characterized on Reddit, in fact he was constantly called a liberal by other Republican candidates. The GOP has been terrible for a long time now, and went nuts during the Bush era with religious nonsense and neocon war mongering. Trump is a welcome change from that, a "New York values" conservative.
Well, we had a good run, 30 years or so for the old-fashioned global internet. But having that much information available is simply too threatening to powerful people. We the commoners are supposed to keep our heads down and do their work for them, not crowdsource cases of corruption and essentially solve them, nor correctly point out where the ruling class is totally full of shit.
Right now, all of that is happening on Youtube/Facebook/Twitter/etc. Trump's election was a severe shock not just to American elites but to ruling classes the world over. The writing on the wall is clear: if you want to remain ruling class, don't let the proles know the real story. Youtube is ruthlessly demonetizing, Facebook is censoring, Twitter is deleting accounts and governments are blocking off the outside world. The future will be national networks with limited access to the outside, like China's today. In February a VPN ban will go into effect in China and that will be the end of that. So there will be a Chinese network, a Russian network, and increasingly fragmented networks the world over that don't really connect to each other. Good try internet, you did some good there for a while, but you were just too threatening to allow to continue to exist.
Maybe next time you won't let things get so bad that we feel we have no other choice. Hillary was going to put an end to us. At least now you know what it's like to have a government that doesn't represent your interests, which had been our position for quite some time. Sucks, doesn't it? Get better. Represent our interests in government and this won't happen again. Though I doubt you've learned anything, the democrats are just doubling down on divisive identify politics.
States rights is an outdated concept that was destroyed in the civil war. Seems you morons didn't learn your lesson the first time. Don't forget we left a mile wide streak of destruction through rebel territory the last time you tried it. We'll do it again.
The Mueller investigation is no longer a search for Russian collusion with Trump in the 2016 race. It is now a much more far-reaching inquiry into corrupt lobbying practices all across Washington DC, the so-called "swamp". An investigation that is very likely to ensnare figures close to Hillary Clinton.
In press accounts, Mueller's investigation is still framed as a hunt for collusion between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the government of Russia, but that description is mostly bogus. The investigation has broadened now to determine which people and which organizations in Washington DC have spent years working *secretly* as de facto operatives on behalf of Russian government and business interests.
The Podesta Group is chief among these.
They are more focused on facilitators of Russian influence in America than they are on election collusion. The Podesta Group was hired by Paul Manafort on behalf of foreign clients because the company was perceived to have a direct line to powerful politicians, like Hillary Clinton.
The chairman of one major presidential campaign colluded with a brother of the *other* major presidential campaign to enrich themselves by secretly advancing the interests of a foreign adversary. That happened. That's "the swamp" everyone is saying needs to be drained.
Texas is not remotely fascist, in fact it's pretty loose as far as laws are concerned. Basically, leave people the hell alone and you'll have a good time there. Californians are voting with their feet and leaving the workers' paradise. You simply don't know enough to criticize accurately, you've got some imaginary idea in your head and you criticize that. This happens a lot among leftists. Self-described leftists (or progressives) and conservatives were asked to describe how the other side would think of the issues. The conservatives proved to be pretty good at describing the left-liberals' positions, while the liberals were much worse at characterizing what their ideological opponents thought.
http://journals.plos.org/ploso...
I also love the "they're like Texans, but they have cowboy hats and boots." Need I say more about the ignorance department?
LOL Rolling Stone? Joking, right? They're not what you'd call, "credible". We know for a fact they will lie to bias a story to fit with their pre-existing politics.
I love how people who have heard of von Moltke once know all about military strategy and how to apply it. Training is useful because it gets you used to making decisions. Badly and catastrophically wrong LOL. Who says we're going to fight jihadis for the rest of history? Where'd you come up with that idea? Our elites are desperately trying to start a big shooting war with Russia or North Korea right now. Both of those are conventional militaries.
Yeah! Because all a 54 year old father of three needs to do is move to New York City, call around to some friends, and get a job in publishing.
A lot of people there were really optimistic that the solution to technological unemployment was to teach unemployed West Virginia truck drivers to code so they could participate in the AI revolution. I used to think this was a weird straw man occasionally trotted out by Freddie deBoer, but all these top economists were *super enthusiastic* about old white guys whose mill has fallen on hard times founding the next generation of nimble tech startups.
What makes you think our elites want to win against the jihadis? Where'd you get that idea?
They're useful. They provide constant war, which means a constant churn of military action, which is highly profitable. They create chaos, which our elites love because it means they get to change things. They love messing with things. Ever know one of those people who likes to take things apart just to mess with them? But they're not really good at putting them back together and tend to move on to the next project? That's our elites. Remember when Egypt was their big deal? Then Syria? Now it's Russia? How many of these situations were improved by their meddling? And yet without an enemy, they wouldn't get to make changes.
Well if you actually have any sympathy, you might want to lay off taking cheap shots at them. Just a thought. DURR HURR COAL HURR in a conversation about India and China's moon missions. Super-off topic and inflammatory.
I feel you don't know what the Black Death was. It did not destroy civilization. Whole parts of the world were completely unaffected. In Europe, only 30-40% of the population died, there were plenty left to repopulate afterwards. It did change the nature of their culture, for the better. Fewer workers meant better terms for them, and Europe thereby avoided a Malthusian famine catastrophe where the population outpaced the food supply.
It's not recognition, it's attention. I have been shocked at just how much some people crave attention, and how satisfying it is for them to get it. People will hit themselves in the nuts with a hammer and set themselves on fire to get attention. I always knew that there were attention whores out there, but I had no idea just how bad it was. Please not I'm not saying all people, and I certainly enjoy getting likes whenever I post to social media. But damn, they really take it not just to the next level, but to several levels above that. We're in a new era and we're far from figuring out how humans are going to handle this instant positive attention for negative behavior.
Just shows you how wealthy a lot of people are who aren't even aware of the fact, and their breathtakingly narrow comprehension of the universes inhabited by the rest of us.
Man, Trump really triggered you with his sympathy for coal miners. You won't shut up about it, and I see it get injected into irrelevant conversations all the time, which means it's in your brain constantly. Boy, it sure bugs you that those oppressed rural working class people have someone to represent their interests now. Burns you up, 24 hours a day.
You are assuming without any justification that the entire suite of functionality these frameworks provide is required. It is not. We just need one thing, but to implement that one thing, we need to massively expand our attack surface by bringing in huge amounts of foreign code. Your argument is that by reimplementing this entire framework vulnerabilities will be introduced, which is correct but it does not address the problem at hand. We aren't reimplementing the entire framework.
Slashdot Mirror
Buh? Slashdot isn't social media. I can't post a photo of myself. Slashdot is a blog or link aggregator. I guess it has some thing where you can do your own blog, but nobody uses that. I guess people don't know what words mean.
Americans. It's no secret that globalists hate our guts and want us gone. Americans out of the picture = global prosperity for everyone. Well, the kind of prosperity that a Pakistani manual laborer would consider acceptable. This isn't some crazy conspiracy theory, I've read a lot of globalist and neo-liberal literature and Americans are standing in their way. The sooner we are out of the picture, the better. Even if it is a conspiracy theory, a year ago if I told you that Kevin Spacey was a sex offender that belonged in prison, what would you have said about that?
And it's coming apart at the seams now that they've let immigrants in their nice country. A pity.
The United States is indivisible. We will crush you rebel scum if you try anything. Don't dare. We did it before and we'll do it again.
The Democrats were the rebels before and looks like they're going to try it again. Seriously, the Democratic Party just needs to cease to exist. It doesn't represent anyone but corporate donors and identity politics grievance-mongers.
Despite what the Slashdot hivemind says Trump's policies are largely reasonable - moderate, mildly-libertarian conservatism combined with economic nationalism, both an antidote to the aggressive globalist neoliberalism which has been crammed down our collective throats for 30-odd years. He takes on very strong right wing positions on some things, say illegal immigration and dealing with Islamic terrorism, but he's not a Bible thumping ideologue that the GOP has been moving towards in the recent years. He was a freaking Manhattan liberal socialite and registered Democrat most of his life, he's probably snorted coke off hooker's asses, been to many gay weddings, was once for legalizing all drugs and has been hiring women into high positions for decades. He straight up said he supports trans people using any bathrooms while the rest of the GOP made a ruckus over it, dissed the Iraq War and supported planned parenthood at the GOP debates to resounding boos from the Republican crowd, wants to let states decide on weed legalization and is completely against nation building wars. He's not some far right war hawk bigot Hitler as he is characterized on Reddit, in fact he was constantly called a liberal by other Republican candidates. The GOP has been terrible for a long time now, and went nuts during the Bush era with religious nonsense and neocon war mongering. Trump is a welcome change from that, a "New York values" conservative.
Well, we had a good run, 30 years or so for the old-fashioned global internet. But having that much information available is simply too threatening to powerful people. We the commoners are supposed to keep our heads down and do their work for them, not crowdsource cases of corruption and essentially solve them, nor correctly point out where the ruling class is totally full of shit.
Right now, all of that is happening on Youtube/Facebook/Twitter/etc. Trump's election was a severe shock not just to American elites but to ruling classes the world over. The writing on the wall is clear: if you want to remain ruling class, don't let the proles know the real story. Youtube is ruthlessly demonetizing, Facebook is censoring, Twitter is deleting accounts and governments are blocking off the outside world. The future will be national networks with limited access to the outside, like China's today. In February a VPN ban will go into effect in China and that will be the end of that. So there will be a Chinese network, a Russian network, and increasingly fragmented networks the world over that don't really connect to each other. Good try internet, you did some good there for a while, but you were just too threatening to allow to continue to exist.
Maybe next time you won't let things get so bad that we feel we have no other choice. Hillary was going to put an end to us. At least now you know what it's like to have a government that doesn't represent your interests, which had been our position for quite some time. Sucks, doesn't it? Get better. Represent our interests in government and this won't happen again. Though I doubt you've learned anything, the democrats are just doubling down on divisive identify politics.
States rights is an outdated concept that was destroyed in the civil war. Seems you morons didn't learn your lesson the first time. Don't forget we left a mile wide streak of destruction through rebel territory the last time you tried it. We'll do it again.
The Mueller investigation is no longer a search for Russian collusion with Trump in the 2016 race. It is now a much more far-reaching inquiry into corrupt lobbying practices all across Washington DC, the so-called "swamp". An investigation that is very likely to ensnare figures close to Hillary Clinton.
In press accounts, Mueller's investigation is still framed as a hunt for collusion between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the government of Russia, but that description is mostly bogus. The investigation has broadened now to determine which people and which organizations in Washington DC have spent years working *secretly* as de facto operatives on behalf of Russian government and business interests.
The Podesta Group is chief among these.
They are more focused on facilitators of Russian influence in America than they are on election collusion. The Podesta Group was hired by Paul Manafort on behalf of foreign clients because the company was perceived to have a direct line to powerful politicians, like Hillary Clinton.
The chairman of one major presidential campaign colluded with a brother of the *other* major presidential campaign to enrich themselves by secretly advancing the interests of a foreign adversary. That happened. That's "the swamp" everyone is saying needs to be drained.
No icon, just shade it a different color when it starts using the CPU intensively.
Texas is not remotely fascist, in fact it's pretty loose as far as laws are concerned. Basically, leave people the hell alone and you'll have a good time there. Californians are voting with their feet and leaving the workers' paradise. You simply don't know enough to criticize accurately, you've got some imaginary idea in your head and you criticize that. This happens a lot among leftists. Self-described leftists (or progressives) and conservatives were asked to describe how the other side would think of the issues. The conservatives proved to be pretty good at describing the left-liberals' positions, while the liberals were much worse at characterizing what their ideological opponents thought. http://journals.plos.org/ploso...
I also love the "they're like Texans, but they have cowboy hats and boots." Need I say more about the ignorance department?
LOL Rolling Stone? Joking, right? They're not what you'd call, "credible". We know for a fact they will lie to bias a story to fit with their pre-existing politics.
I love how people who have heard of von Moltke once know all about military strategy and how to apply it. Training is useful because it gets you used to making decisions. Badly and catastrophically wrong LOL. Who says we're going to fight jihadis for the rest of history? Where'd you come up with that idea? Our elites are desperately trying to start a big shooting war with Russia or North Korea right now. Both of those are conventional militaries.
Yeah! Because all a 54 year old father of three needs to do is move to New York City, call around to some friends, and get a job in publishing.
http://slatestarcodex.com/2017...
What makes you think our elites want to win against the jihadis? Where'd you get that idea?
They're useful. They provide constant war, which means a constant churn of military action, which is highly profitable. They create chaos, which our elites love because it means they get to change things. They love messing with things. Ever know one of those people who likes to take things apart just to mess with them? But they're not really good at putting them back together and tend to move on to the next project? That's our elites. Remember when Egypt was their big deal? Then Syria? Now it's Russia? How many of these situations were improved by their meddling? And yet without an enemy, they wouldn't get to make changes.
the true, honest feelings of the nerds producing those songs
#GamerGate
Well if you actually have any sympathy, you might want to lay off taking cheap shots at them. Just a thought. DURR HURR COAL HURR in a conversation about India and China's moon missions. Super-off topic and inflammatory.
I feel you don't know what the Black Death was. It did not destroy civilization. Whole parts of the world were completely unaffected. In Europe, only 30-40% of the population died, there were plenty left to repopulate afterwards. It did change the nature of their culture, for the better. Fewer workers meant better terms for them, and Europe thereby avoided a Malthusian famine catastrophe where the population outpaced the food supply.
You can't force this one to give you a blowjob, though. So that's a loss for the music executives in Japan's version of the RIAA.
It's not recognition, it's attention. I have been shocked at just how much some people crave attention, and how satisfying it is for them to get it. People will hit themselves in the nuts with a hammer and set themselves on fire to get attention. I always knew that there were attention whores out there, but I had no idea just how bad it was. Please not I'm not saying all people, and I certainly enjoy getting likes whenever I post to social media. But damn, they really take it not just to the next level, but to several levels above that. We're in a new era and we're far from figuring out how humans are going to handle this instant positive attention for negative behavior.
Just shows you how wealthy a lot of people are who aren't even aware of the fact, and their breathtakingly narrow comprehension of the universes inhabited by the rest of us.
What exactly would be Christian services, and why would anyone want to buy any?
It is precisely this level of unsophisticated provincialism and lack of empathy that led to Hillary losing. It is not just acceptable, but fashionable to publicly express one's total ignorance in such a manner. Look at all these respected journalists express surprise, dismay, and a total lack of understanding that Hillary lost. They even admit it: "I geniunely do not understand America."
It raised later again, but that is not what I would call surviving.
This is literally what surviving means.
Man, Trump really triggered you with his sympathy for coal miners. You won't shut up about it, and I see it get injected into irrelevant conversations all the time, which means it's in your brain constantly. Boy, it sure bugs you that those oppressed rural working class people have someone to represent their interests now. Burns you up, 24 hours a day.
You are assuming without any justification that the entire suite of functionality these frameworks provide is required. It is not. We just need one thing, but to implement that one thing, we need to massively expand our attack surface by bringing in huge amounts of foreign code. Your argument is that by reimplementing this entire framework vulnerabilities will be introduced, which is correct but it does not address the problem at hand. We aren't reimplementing the entire framework.