And it would only be that document that you wrote which would be protected. In this case the performance was observed and someone reverse engineered it themselves so any copyrighted description Teller may have made is irrelevant.
(a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories:...
The choreography itself can't be protected, only a particular performance of it that has been recorded on some medium.
No, that doesn't describe all NASA employees, past or present. NASA employs many climate scientists who's opinions on climate change would be credible.
People also have different physical strengths and weaknesses, but we still have the same muscles in the same areas. It would be reasonable to assume the brain is the same way until we have evidence that suggests otherwise.
... and loads of heavy and mostly ineffective sound deadening are burdening the modern car.
Why do auto makers include so much ineffective sound dampening material? Seems it would be a no-brainer to leave it out if it could make a difference in gas mileage.
If you're going to post the same comments a dozen times it ought to be a good one. This one is not, it's just stupid. What's the point? Stuff in water spreads out over time, no kidding. Is this supposed to prove something?
The placebo effect only goes so far. People treating themselves with placebos are not going to seek real treatments which could potentially save their lives. I'd consider that real harm.
You really think that not being payed enough is the reason why a nurse would ignore a crying bleeding child? I really doubt that, this nurse would be a poor nurse no matter the pay. Good doctors and nurses choose their profession because of a desire to help people, anyone doing it just for the money is going to be bad at it.
But British accents have undergone enormous amounts of mutation as well. In some ways, they have made more changes than American English since Victorian times.
So, while Americans associate a British accent with what should be appropriate for medieval times, because they're living where the language was spoken during medieval times, the accent being used is still anachronistic, and just as inappropriate as a Jersey accent.
That may or may not be the case, but it's irrelevant. We're talking about entertainment. People think an British accent is more appropriate for a medieval setting and so that makes it more appropriate.
What is your point? Who cares where a street sign is from? None of them are private information. And you're wrong about US street signs, they vary regionally but the majority tend to be white on green. And we were talking about house numbers anyway, or so i thought. How is any of what you wrote relevant?
I see why people should try to get more fiscally conservative social liberals winning elections, but what are the advantages of using the Democrat party for that? Wouldn't it make more noise and sense, to use a party whose very platform includes those two things?
Since when does the Republican party platform include social liberalism? Sounds to me that fiscal conservatism and social liberalism fit better as a whole with the Democratic party.
...but if you ignore the idiot wing of the right, (believe me, there's one just as bad on the left)
I would argue the idiot wing of the left is not as bad as the idiot wing on the right. Not because they are lesser idiots, but because they have almost no political influence whereas the idiot wing on the right has a frightening amount of influence on American politics.
Slashdot Mirror
My codes says "Be sure to drink your ovaltine"
You mean slower? Cause that's what happened in this case.
And it would only be that document that you wrote which would be protected. In this case the performance was observed and someone reverse engineered it themselves so any copyrighted description Teller may have made is irrelevant.
You missed an important part:
The choreography itself can't be protected, only a particular performance of it that has been recorded on some medium.
First, you use a made-up word...
Care to give an example of a word that is not made-up?
I think if we are talking about a company that is using this sort of monitoring software it is safe to assume it is a rather large company.
No, that doesn't describe all NASA employees, past or present. NASA employs many climate scientists who's opinions on climate change would be credible.
People also have different physical strengths and weaknesses, but we still have the same muscles in the same areas. It would be reasonable to assume the brain is the same way until we have evidence that suggests otherwise.
It's not *my* hypothesis that the sound dampening is ineffective.
Why? Would you also say it's questionable to measure the pyramids of Egypt in meters?
... and loads of heavy and mostly ineffective sound deadening are burdening the modern car.
Why do auto makers include so much ineffective sound dampening material? Seems it would be a no-brainer to leave it out if it could make a difference in gas mileage.
Is that supposed to make Google sound evil? Cause it doesn't. Even if it was their only motivation for blocking spam, which is unlikely.
You would have a point of AMOLED was an eldritch term. It's not.
How is the rain relevant? Do criminals like getting wet in the rain more then non-criminals?
Yes, 15 years usually is more then a decade ;-)
If you're going to post the same comments a dozen times it ought to be a good one. This one is not, it's just stupid. What's the point? Stuff in water spreads out over time, no kidding. Is this supposed to prove something?
The placebo effect only goes so far. People treating themselves with placebos are not going to seek real treatments which could potentially save their lives. I'd consider that real harm.
You really think that not being payed enough is the reason why a nurse would ignore a crying bleeding child? I really doubt that, this nurse would be a poor nurse no matter the pay. Good doctors and nurses choose their profession because of a desire to help people, anyone doing it just for the money is going to be bad at it.
The article is dated March 26. If it's an April fools joke, they screwed it up.
But British accents have undergone enormous amounts of mutation as well. In some ways, they have made more changes than American English since Victorian times.
So, while Americans associate a British accent with what should be appropriate for medieval times, because they're living where the language was spoken during medieval times, the accent being used is still anachronistic, and just as inappropriate as a Jersey accent.
That may or may not be the case, but it's irrelevant. We're talking about entertainment. People think an British accent is more appropriate for a medieval setting and so that makes it more appropriate.
On the other hand, the Costcos in SoCal are cash-only
Not all of them. In fact not any of them that I've been to, I always use my card.
What is your point? Who cares where a street sign is from? None of them are private information. And you're wrong about US street signs, they vary regionally but the majority tend to be white on green. And we were talking about house numbers anyway, or so i thought. How is any of what you wrote relevant?
I see why people should try to get more fiscally conservative social liberals winning elections, but what are the advantages of using the Democrat party for that? Wouldn't it make more noise and sense, to use a party whose very platform includes those two things?
Since when does the Republican party platform include social liberalism? Sounds to me that fiscal conservatism and social liberalism fit better as a whole with the Democratic party.
...but if you ignore the idiot wing of the right, (believe me, there's one just as bad on the left)
I would argue the idiot wing of the left is not as bad as the idiot wing on the right. Not because they are lesser idiots, but because they have almost no political influence whereas the idiot wing on the right has a frightening amount of influence on American politics.
I opted-in, and yet my web history still says it's disabled.