Then again... the work I do is what universities currently consider "IT Systems Engineering". My work integrates Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS X, NetApp, VMware and Citrix platforms as well as covering security, development, data archiving, and a host of other tasks. My skills extend beyond those areas, but those are the ones I use in my day job.
My degree, however, is physics.
Well, that's typical of systems engineers/whatever-the-heck-you-want-to-call-us for those of us who remember 300 baud, FidoNet and (later) Bitnet email accounts. Ever typed an assembler into an Apple//c by hand from a magazine? No? GET OFF MY LAWN!
When I started in IT there was NO SUCH THING as a degree in IT Systems Engineering. Does that mean I'm not an IT Systems Engineer? We don't have an official job title of "systems engineer". My job title is "Advanced Systems Specialist" at my workplace. There's not an official "Systems Engineer" title at all. Does that mean this HUGE university infrastructure was built without any engineers/engineering? Really?
My point: I find there are plenty of people that have titles they are "allowed" to use but to which they fall far, far short. I also know brilliant people that run circles around those folks who have no "official" title (some have no degree at all). My feeling: use whatever title *actually* describes what you do and are capable of doing (and I'm sorry if the law prevents you from doing so where you live). Using a lesser title is selling yourself short. Using a greater title is setting yourself up for failure, firing, and ridicule.
Be honest and accurate about your capabilities. No more. No less.
There are competing groups, but MakerBot was a sweet spot on openness, cost and ease of construction. That made the MakerBot Cupcake extremely popular. I have a Cupcake derivative that I built. I sourced some parts from MakerBot, others elsewhere, and fabricated some myself.
You can now buy a closed-source 3D printer much cheaper elsewhere. You can build a completely open source printer (see the RepRap project) and customize it exactly to your needs.
MakerBot is now offering a nice 3D printer (the Replicator 2) at much higher cost than its original sweet spot, but with all the disadvantages of a purely commercial product (no longer open and eminently hackable). Previous designs are still open, so they are free to go this way with their new printer if they like.
Now, however, they're alienating their best buyers/contributors at the same time they are pricing themselves too expensively for folks that want a low-end turnkey system. When they took venture capital I think they backed themselves into this corner. Too bad... I think they approached open source 3D printing honestly and enthusiastically and contributed greatly to its progress. The venture capital forces them to become much more commercial, but their open yet accessible approach is what made them so popular to begin with. It's a no-win situation.
Agreed! I'm spending less and less time on Facebook because of the rise of the "junkweb". I still go there to catch up on the activities of a few friends, but I'm filtering my stream more and more every day. Fewer and fewer people seem to be contributing original content.
Google+ also tends to be a big "repost-fest", but the reposted material is sometimes a bit more interesting. Even so, I'm not really interested in re-posts - they are a mediocre substitute for sharing *your own* thoughts, beliefs and ideas.
I sometimes resorted to calling up Synaptic and searching there to find the name of the program I needed via the description of the package... That tell you... something... about how successful Unity is.
That's what happened to me! After installing Natty I tried and tried and tried to get used to Unity, but it always seemed to be in my way. After a couple of months I noticed that I had starting doing 90% of my work on my Windows workstation rather than my Linux workstation (they sit side-by-side on my desk). That's when I switched to Mint and have been happily back on Linux ever since.
No. You have a DOCTOR cut it out. The question here is whether or not most ISP's are competent in determining what really is bot activity. A bunch of false positives will be miserable -- as will having to prove to some first-tier customer support person that your system is not infected (as in never was) or that it is actually cleaned and should be allowed back online.
And pity the person that has their ISP connection blocked that uses voice over IP to call customer support. If the ISP blocks the MODEM life is going to be interesting.
Oh, and you won't need to look up that phone number, will you?
Overall, getting infected systems of the net is a wonderful idea, but one that could be a complete mess if done poorly.
In your example the towing company partners with AAA (so AAA directs customers to them) and the towing company guarantees quick service.
Up to now on the net the idea has been that all packets are delivered by your ISP to you as quickly as possible. The new model will be about throttling/delaying packets from companies that don't pay up.
It's as if AAA partnered with the towing company to get normal service for their customers, and in return the towing company would agree to show up late for everyone else.
Note also that Google already pays for all it's bandwidth to the net. You also pay for your bandwidth. Verizon is just acting to extract an extra tariff. Google is partnering with them to keep potential startups (without money to pay for normal service) in the slow lane so that they are unable to ever compete with Google's services.
"Whooosh" is a good summary of the whole article... does anyone actual read the articles that get submitted?
HP is NOT going to spam printers.
HP is planning to partner with Yahoo so that you can subscribe to content that would automatically be printed out for you. In other words, the idea is that you can wake up, grab your morning paper off the printer, and sit down to read it with your cup of coffee. The ads IN THE PAPER would be targeted using geolocation from the IP address of your printer so that you would get locally appropriate ads. No ads for department stores that don't exist within a hundred miles of you. Those are the ads they're talking about. Not spam!
On the other hand... the idea of printing off your morning paper may have made sense in the science fiction of the 1950's, but HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.
Wow... I'm going to disagree with you in a big way. The current issue (Make 22) has an in-depth article on converting your lawnmower to RC control. Circuit boards, wiring, assembly... it's a big project but with LOTS of good info to get you there. NOT an overview or a news article. The same is true for the article on hacking wireless power outlets. Then there is the Arduino-powered tweeting cat toy. The physics and construction of double pendulums. How about a sun tracker for solar projects?
There's a ridiculous amount of great material in that single issue! Not news articles but full, in-depth how-to's. There are some light mods (to borrow your phrase) as well, but many of the projects require a significant investment of time and energy.
I think Make is a great source for projects. No dumbing down that I see, at least not in the latest issue!
I'm a member at TechShop RDU as well. It's going through some growing pains, but I'm hoping the model works. The laser is definitely the most popular tool, with the ShopBot probably being second. I was able to knock out a retro-styled cocktail table for my living room in short order on it.
I'm also one of the folks building 3D printers. The group of us are building about 10 printers -- some of us to keep, some to sell to defray our costs, and maybe one or two to stay at TechShop. The original (purchased) 3D printer is a monster -- a Dimension dual-extrusion system.
TS RDU is currently closed for a move to a new location. Looks like it will be open again for anyone interested in the Triangle area sometime in May.
Our country puts money over everything else, and like the sick disgusting zombies that follow money, we look at each other and wonder why we're all so hungry for brains.
Maybe I need to get some sleep: that sentence makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Yes, I have a problem with that. The two "ideologies" should not be taught side-by-side.
Evolution is a scientific theory (and if you don't know the difference between a "theory" and a "hypothesis" PLEASE look it up). Creationism is a statement of religious belief that fails to meet the requirements of a scientific hypothesis (notably, testability), and therefore does not belong in a science class.
There is nothing wrong with your belief that God played a role in shaping the origin of humans. It's just that it is a religious belief. Many, many Christians (including many scientists and the Catholic Church) have no problem reconciling Christianity with evolution. Religious beliefs belong in churches. Scientific theories belong in science classes.
The retraining needed for moving to the current version of OpenOffice is no greater than moving to a new version MS Office from an older one except for the transition away from Access.
My wife and daughter have MacBooks. I have an HP Desktop running Ubuntu Linux. It was a matter of price and the ability to upgrade the hardware (this coming from someone whose machine slowly evolved from IBM AT to 486). I do like the Macs (and think they are well worth the price due to the quality of OS X and the bundled apps). However, I like the power of Linux (OK... and the pretty eye candy...) better.
Also, many people have old PC's and new Macs. They didn't throw out the old PC and still use it for their kids' games or the like. My mom has an old PC that just collects dust in the basement, but they still own it.
Actually, a fiat currency IS a type of planned economy. With a fiat currency the government can manipulate the value of its currency. In many, many cases said government finally gets too greedy and manipulates the currency to the point that no one trusts it and the value plummets towards zero. In any case, though, controlling the nominal value of the currency is a tool governments with fiat currencies use to manipulate (i.e.: plan) their economy.
I think fiat currencies are inherently risky due to the high probability of government overreach, but I disagree with your comment that all fiat currencies are doomed to fail. The only failed fiat currencies that can be mentioned in history books are those that have failed. Ones that haven't failed still exist, so their failure is not recorded. You therefore cannot invoke history to claim that all fiat currencies fail as long as there are fiat currencies still in existence that have been viable for long time periods. (This is not to say they won't fail, only the the "history shows" argument is fallacious).
Finally, saying that "all systems of humanity eventually fail" suffers from the same sort of problems. I can point to many human systems that have existed for millennia and continue to work for us (think agriculture, trade, language, writing... none have passed away and few seem destined to do so in the foreseeable future).
For me in NC it's now Japanese Stiltgrass that's the big problem:
http://www.nps.gov/plants/ALIEN/fact/mivi1.htm
The deer don't eat it, so they've moved into suburbia and wrecked everyone's yard (and the occasional car). However, the deer do walk through it and spread the seeds. If you mow it, it flowers earlier and seeds. If you pull it, the disturbed ground gives the seeds an advantage. And the seeds? They can germinate up to five years after they're produced. About the only solution is to spray. Often.:-(
When I was a kid the woodland floor was brown. Now broad areas are green.
For decades companies would use radiation to induce random mutation, then search for offspring that had desirable properties. That's not labeled GM, but it IS "genetically modified".
Is having plants full of random mutations of unknown sort really better than plants with carefully controlled modifications? Your already getting the former at every meal.
The information over at Ubuntu says it's only in Koala during the development phase for testing parts of the Ubuntu custom search UI.
There does not seem to be any intention of deploying data mining extensions in any release. It would be nice if there was a little more warning in the dev version, but this doesn't seem malicious. Just a tool to help the developers optimize the custom search UI -- which in turn would generate additional revenue for Ubuntu because more people will choose to use it if it is very well done.
Re:Nope, it's the putative new users problem
on
Linux Needs Critics
·
· Score: 1
Hmm... you have some good criticism there (which just goes to show that Linux does have good sources of criticism).
I disagree with the bloat issue. It's gotten bigger, yes, but...
I just retired a Dell Optiplex as my primary work machine. I was running the Jaunty Jackalope alpha on it, including all that eye candy you mention. Now it's my Windows XP test machine. The performance is WAY down, especially video. I can't imagine just how bad Vista would be on it.
So, yes, Linux is getting a bit of bloat, but it still (in my personal experience) has less bloat than the aged XP.
On the subject of a help interface... well, on that one you're right on the spot. I use man pages (which, REALLY, isn't it time we stop expecting average users to need them?) or go Google. The help system is improving, but it still isn't anything I turn to when I need information.
The kits are for people that are interested in getting started with microcontroller-based projects. Do you remember just how hard it can be to figure out where to start?
Well-documented projects, all the components you need, support -- for $80 that sounds like a steal!
Yes, you can get the parts much cheaper, but this isn't about buying the parts.
If you really do want something a little cheaper you can get started with an Arduino board and browse the various guides (disclaimer: I wrote one there) on getting started. However, you are still going to spend $50 including a decent breadboard, components, etc.
For an all-inclusive getting started kit, $80 seems very reasonable to me.
Did you know that some REALLY old school DOS apps bypassed the OS and wrote files straight to the hard drive? That's the kind of behavior the GP is alluding to. I've seen it first hand... dang, have I been dealing with computers that long. How old am I? Oh...
That's one example, but there are PLENTY of really old DOS apps that want direct hardware access -- and plenty of companies still using some of them.
I don't mean to sound down on DOSbox, I'm just answering your question: the answer is that it won't always do the job.
Slashdot Mirror
Then again... the work I do is what universities currently consider "IT Systems Engineering". My work integrates Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS X, NetApp, VMware and Citrix platforms as well as covering security, development, data archiving, and a host of other tasks. My skills extend beyond those areas, but those are the ones I use in my day job.
My degree, however, is physics.
Well, that's typical of systems engineers/whatever-the-heck-you-want-to-call-us for those of us who remember 300 baud, FidoNet and (later) Bitnet email accounts. Ever typed an assembler into an Apple //c by hand from a magazine? No? GET OFF MY LAWN!
When I started in IT there was NO SUCH THING as a degree in IT Systems Engineering. Does that mean I'm not an IT Systems Engineer? We don't have an official job title of "systems engineer". My job title is "Advanced Systems Specialist" at my workplace. There's not an official "Systems Engineer" title at all. Does that mean this HUGE university infrastructure was built without any engineers/engineering? Really?
My point: I find there are plenty of people that have titles they are "allowed" to use but to which they fall far, far short. I also know brilliant people that run circles around those folks who have no "official" title (some have no degree at all). My feeling: use whatever title *actually* describes what you do and are capable of doing (and I'm sorry if the law prevents you from doing so where you live). Using a lesser title is selling yourself short. Using a greater title is setting yourself up for failure, firing, and ridicule.
Be honest and accurate about your capabilities. No more. No less.
There are competing groups, but MakerBot was a sweet spot on openness, cost and ease of construction. That made the MakerBot Cupcake extremely popular. I have a Cupcake derivative that I built. I sourced some parts from MakerBot, others elsewhere, and fabricated some myself.
You can now buy a closed-source 3D printer much cheaper elsewhere. You can build a completely open source printer (see the RepRap project) and customize it exactly to your needs.
MakerBot is now offering a nice 3D printer (the Replicator 2) at much higher cost than its original sweet spot, but with all the disadvantages of a purely commercial product (no longer open and eminently hackable). Previous designs are still open, so they are free to go this way with their new printer if they like.
Now, however, they're alienating their best buyers/contributors at the same time they are pricing themselves too expensively for folks that want a low-end turnkey system. When they took venture capital I think they backed themselves into this corner. Too bad... I think they approached open source 3D printing honestly and enthusiastically and contributed greatly to its progress. The venture capital forces them to become much more commercial, but their open yet accessible approach is what made them so popular to begin with. It's a no-win situation.
Agreed! I'm spending less and less time on Facebook because of the rise of the "junkweb". I still go there to catch up on the activities of a few friends, but I'm filtering my stream more and more every day. Fewer and fewer people seem to be contributing original content.
Google+ also tends to be a big "repost-fest", but the reposted material is sometimes a bit more interesting. Even so, I'm not really interested in re-posts - they are a mediocre substitute for sharing *your own* thoughts, beliefs and ideas.
I sometimes resorted to calling up Synaptic and searching there to find the name of the program I needed via the description of the package... That tell you... something... about how successful Unity is.
That's what happened to me! After installing Natty I tried and tried and tried to get used to Unity, but it always seemed to be in my way. After a couple of months I noticed that I had starting doing 90% of my work on my Windows workstation rather than my Linux workstation (they sit side-by-side on my desk). That's when I switched to Mint and have been happily back on Linux ever since.
It's the manufacturers of the LCD panels. One form factor, one product line for HDTV's and computers. Cheaper.
No. You have a DOCTOR cut it out. The question here is whether or not most ISP's are competent in determining what really is bot activity. A bunch of false positives will be miserable -- as will having to prove to some first-tier customer support person that your system is not infected (as in never was) or that it is actually cleaned and should be allowed back online.
And pity the person that has their ISP connection blocked that uses voice over IP to call customer support. If the ISP blocks the MODEM life is going to be interesting.
Oh, and you won't need to look up that phone number, will you?
Overall, getting infected systems of the net is a wonderful idea, but one that could be a complete mess if done poorly.
In your example the towing company partners with AAA (so AAA directs customers to them) and the towing company guarantees quick service.
Up to now on the net the idea has been that all packets are delivered by your ISP to you as quickly as possible. The new model will be about throttling/delaying packets from companies that don't pay up.
It's as if AAA partnered with the towing company to get normal service for their customers, and in return the towing company would agree to show up late for everyone else.
Note also that Google already pays for all it's bandwidth to the net. You also pay for your bandwidth. Verizon is just acting to extract an extra tariff. Google is partnering with them to keep potential startups (without money to pay for normal service) in the slow lane so that they are unable to ever compete with Google's services.
This is evil through-and-through.
"Whooosh" is a good summary of the whole article... does anyone actual read the articles that get submitted?
HP is NOT going to spam printers.
HP is planning to partner with Yahoo so that you can subscribe to content that would automatically be printed out for you. In other words, the idea is that you can wake up, grab your morning paper off the printer, and sit down to read it with your cup of coffee. The ads IN THE PAPER would be targeted using geolocation from the IP address of your printer so that you would get locally appropriate ads. No ads for department stores that don't exist within a hundred miles of you. Those are the ads they're talking about. Not spam!
On the other hand... the idea of printing off your morning paper may have made sense in the science fiction of the 1950's, but HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.
Wow... I'm going to disagree with you in a big way. The current issue (Make 22) has an in-depth article on converting your lawnmower to RC control. Circuit boards, wiring, assembly... it's a big project but with LOTS of good info to get you there. NOT an overview or a news article. The same is true for the article on hacking wireless power outlets. Then there is the Arduino-powered tweeting cat toy. The physics and construction of double pendulums. How about a sun tracker for solar projects?
There's a ridiculous amount of great material in that single issue! Not news articles but full, in-depth how-to's. There are some light mods (to borrow your phrase) as well, but many of the projects require a significant investment of time and energy.
I think Make is a great source for projects. No dumbing down that I see, at least not in the latest issue!
I'm a member at TechShop RDU as well. It's going through some growing pains, but I'm hoping the model works. The laser is definitely the most popular tool, with the ShopBot probably being second. I was able to knock out a retro-styled cocktail table for my living room in short order on it.
I'm also one of the folks building 3D printers. The group of us are building about 10 printers -- some of us to keep, some to sell to defray our costs, and maybe one or two to stay at TechShop. The original (purchased) 3D printer is a monster -- a Dimension dual-extrusion system.
TS RDU is currently closed for a move to a new location. Looks like it will be open again for anyone interested in the Triangle area sometime in May.
No, Ubuntu ships with AppArmor rather than SELinux:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppArmor
Our country puts money over everything else, and like the sick disgusting zombies that follow money, we look at each other and wonder why we're all so hungry for brains.
Maybe I need to get some sleep: that sentence makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Yes, I have a problem with that. The two "ideologies" should not be taught side-by-side.
Evolution is a scientific theory (and if you don't know the difference between a "theory" and a "hypothesis" PLEASE look it up). Creationism is a statement of religious belief that fails to meet the requirements of a scientific hypothesis (notably, testability), and therefore does not belong in a science class.
There is nothing wrong with your belief that God played a role in shaping the origin of humans. It's just that it is a religious belief. Many, many Christians (including many scientists and the Catholic Church) have no problem reconciling Christianity with evolution. Religious beliefs belong in churches. Scientific theories belong in science classes.
The retraining needed for moving to the current version of OpenOffice is no greater than moving to a new version MS Office from an older one except for the transition away from Access.
My wife and daughter have MacBooks. I have an HP Desktop running Ubuntu Linux. It was a matter of price and the ability to upgrade the hardware (this coming from someone whose machine slowly evolved from IBM AT to 486). I do like the Macs (and think they are well worth the price due to the quality of OS X and the bundled apps). However, I like the power of Linux (OK... and the pretty eye candy...) better.
Also, many people have old PC's and new Macs. They didn't throw out the old PC and still use it for their kids' games or the like. My mom has an old PC that just collects dust in the basement, but they still own it.
Actually, a fiat currency IS a type of planned economy. With a fiat currency the government can manipulate the value of its currency. In many, many cases said government finally gets too greedy and manipulates the currency to the point that no one trusts it and the value plummets towards zero. In any case, though, controlling the nominal value of the currency is a tool governments with fiat currencies use to manipulate (i.e.: plan) their economy.
I think fiat currencies are inherently risky due to the high probability of government overreach, but I disagree with your comment that all fiat currencies are doomed to fail. The only failed fiat currencies that can be mentioned in history books are those that have failed. Ones that haven't failed still exist, so their failure is not recorded. You therefore cannot invoke history to claim that all fiat currencies fail as long as there are fiat currencies still in existence that have been viable for long time periods. (This is not to say they won't fail, only the the "history shows" argument is fallacious).
Finally, saying that "all systems of humanity eventually fail" suffers from the same sort of problems. I can point to many human systems that have existed for millennia and continue to work for us (think agriculture, trade, language, writing... none have passed away and few seem destined to do so in the foreseeable future).
For me in NC it's now Japanese Stiltgrass that's the big problem:
:-(
http://www.nps.gov/plants/ALIEN/fact/mivi1.htm
The deer don't eat it, so they've moved into suburbia and wrecked everyone's yard (and the occasional car). However, the deer do walk through it and spread the seeds. If you mow it, it flowers earlier and seeds. If you pull it, the disturbed ground gives the seeds an advantage. And the seeds? They can germinate up to five years after they're produced. About the only solution is to spray. Often.
When I was a kid the woodland floor was brown. Now broad areas are green.
It's all GM...
For decades companies would use radiation to induce random mutation, then search for offspring that had desirable properties. That's not labeled GM, but it IS "genetically modified".
Is having plants full of random mutations of unknown sort really better than plants with carefully controlled modifications? Your already getting the former at every meal.
The information over at Ubuntu says it's only in Koala during the development phase for testing parts of the Ubuntu custom search UI.
There does not seem to be any intention of deploying data mining extensions in any release. It would be nice if there was a little more warning in the dev version, but this doesn't seem malicious. Just a tool to help the developers optimize the custom search UI -- which in turn would generate additional revenue for Ubuntu because more people will choose to use it if it is very well done.
Hmm... you have some good criticism there (which just goes to show that Linux does have good sources of criticism).
I disagree with the bloat issue. It's gotten bigger, yes, but...
I just retired a Dell Optiplex as my primary work machine. I was running the Jaunty Jackalope alpha on it, including all that eye candy you mention. Now it's my Windows XP test machine. The performance is WAY down, especially video. I can't imagine just how bad Vista would be on it.
So, yes, Linux is getting a bit of bloat, but it still (in my personal experience) has less bloat than the aged XP.
On the subject of a help interface... well, on that one you're right on the spot. I use man pages (which, REALLY, isn't it time we stop expecting average users to need them?) or go Google. The help system is improving, but it still isn't anything I turn to when I need information.
I think the biggest concern is that a large number of middle school kids watch the show and are QUITE likely to try to replicate what they see.
I know some of my experiments at that age were... less than successful.
All things considered... $80 is not a bad price.
The kits are for people that are interested in getting started with microcontroller-based projects. Do you remember just how hard it can be to figure out where to start?
Well-documented projects, all the components you need, support -- for $80 that sounds like a steal!
Yes, you can get the parts much cheaper, but this isn't about buying the parts.
If you really do want something a little cheaper you can get started with an Arduino board and browse the various guides (disclaimer: I wrote one there) on getting started. However, you are still going to spend $50 including a decent breadboard, components, etc.
For an all-inclusive getting started kit, $80 seems very reasonable to me.
Wine's nice, but it's still not quite there for me (and I'm posting from one of my Ubuntu boxes).
iTunes. 3d-accelerated games. Wine doesn't quite cut it in every case, so I still end up using a bit of Windows...
Not Vista, of course...
I'll bite...
Did you know that some REALLY old school DOS apps bypassed the OS and wrote files straight to the hard drive? That's the kind of behavior the GP is alluding to. I've seen it first hand... dang, have I been dealing with computers that long. How old am I? Oh...
That's one example, but there are PLENTY of really old DOS apps that want direct hardware access -- and plenty of companies still using some of them.
I don't mean to sound down on DOSbox, I'm just answering your question: the answer is that it won't always do the job.