Slashdot Mirror


HP and Yahoo To Spam Your Printer

An anonymous reader writes "As many suspected when HP announced its web-connected printer, it didn't take long for the company to announce it will send 'targeted' advertisements to your new printer. So you'll get spammed, and you'll pay for the ink to print it. On the bright side, the FCC forbids unsolicited fax ads, so this will probably get HP on a collision course with the Feds."

397 comments

  1. Too bad liches aren't real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or Bill and Dave would certainly have some, er, input on this matter.

  2. The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is a coupon for ink.

    1. Re:The first planned spam... by defaria · · Score: 1

      What printer?!? I don't own a printer. Haven't for literally decades. Have you heard of the paperless office?

    2. Re:The first planned spam... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of the main reasons I no longer use HP printers is their irritating tendency to spit out a test page every time you turn them on or look at them sideways. That can get through a lot of ink...

    3. Re:The first planned spam... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow, nice bullshit you're pulling there. Just because YOU see no need to print things out doesn't mean OTHERS see no need.

      I own a printer for printing recipes (I really don't want to get spices, oils, other fluids, etc, in a laptop/tablet), application forms that REQUIRE a signature, Photos I want to frame, hell, there's a whole list of things that are needed to be printed.

      If you're really that stupid to think that NO ONE needs to print ANYTHING then you really need a reality check.

    4. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea I've heard of them. They are a myth.

    5. Re:The first planned spam... by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeh, I wouldn't touch an HP printer if you paid me (apart from an old LaserJet 4).

      I went with a Samsung Laser and haven't looked back. 2 years on and I've still got dickloads of toner and it doesn't continually print test pages like the new HPs.

    6. Re:The first planned spam... by rhook · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that the one with the paperless restroom stalls? Guess that's what the iPad is good for.

    7. Re:The first planned spam... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just the new HPs: I had one of their inkjets back in the '90s that did that. Cost me a fortune. Agree about Samsung, though. I've had one for 4 years and still going fine.

    8. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      woooooooosh

    9. Re:The first planned spam... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You insensitive clod! I use my printer to get hard copy of pr0n before I fap. It cuts down on the amount of screen wipes I go through in a month.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    10. Re:The first planned spam... by bertoelcon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've still got dickloads of toner

      That doesn't sound like very much.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    11. Re:The first planned spam... by sconeu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another Samsung fan here.

      Only problem -- had to dig and search to find an ML-1710 driver for a new MacBook.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:The first planned spam... by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bought an HP Color LaserJet 1600 a couple of years ago. It's built like a tank, works flawlessly, has yet to exhaust its initial toner cartridges, and cost me $133. They still make good stuff, if you buy the right model.

    13. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate it too when you find yourself sitting there and realise there's no paper any more!

    14. Re:The first planned spam... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Funny

      The first planned spam is a coupon for ink.

      And not just any coupon for ink. It'll be an 8x10 solid black rectangle -- overprinted with cyan, magenta, and yellow, of course -- with a tiny paragraph in white letters praising the deep, rich blacks the printer is capable of producing. To get to the actual coupon, which will be on the second page, you'll have to buy fresh ink cartridges so the document can finish printing. Naturally, the coupon will also be small and composed of white text on another 8x10 overprinted black rectangle, along with a second promotional message extolling the printer's ability to reliably churn out image after image.

      If anyone from the HP marketing department is reading this, I'm available for any openings you might have. Just give me the address of your web-accessible printer, and I'll send you my resume. In eight inch high Helvetica UltraBlack, one letter per page. As a token of my sincerity. You'd better include a fax number, too, just in case you run out of ink.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    15. Re:The first planned spam... by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      The great thing about dickloads is it keeps refilling itself

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    16. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for you it isnt!

    17. Re:The first planned spam... by apn_k · · Score: 1

      A three sea shells App?

    18. Re:The first planned spam... by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but you can usually extend it if you shake the cartridge.

    19. Re:The first planned spam... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Not a myth in my office.

      In my backup room, on the other hand....

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    20. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angst Badger,

      You nearly owed me a new keyboard, that was sweet.

    21. Re:The first planned spam... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          Well, unless you need to print invoices, packing slips, shipping labels, airline boarding passes, etc. Nah, that'd never happen.

          Hell, even my car insurance cards were sent to me electronically so I could print them myself. They don't send them to me, I *have* to print them, since they are required by law.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    22. Re:The first planned spam... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a document need a signature. And a digital signature is not legally recognized as sufficient -- it must be done in your hand.

    23. Re:The first planned spam... by Bysshe · · Score: 1

      If you shake too hard they tend to explode

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    24. Re:The first planned spam... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Sending letters? Believe it or not, plenty of things still need to be sent through the physical post, and I'll be damned if I'm handwriting the accompanying letters in the 21st century.

      My GF, who is a teacher, still prints vast amounts of classroom resources too.

    25. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is probably the most funny (working!) kludge I ever heard of in this context. ...dickloads... ...extend... ...shake the cartridge...

    26. Re:The first planned spam... by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age.

      But i don't know how the use the shells! How am i going to take a crap now?

    27. Re:The first planned spam... by rarel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you may not LIKE a laptop for recipe's, but it's an option.

      Have you even tried? A laptop in the kitchen is a retarded idea, try flipping/scrolling pages when you got your hands full of stuff you wouldn't want anywhere near electronics... Sure it's an option, just a stupid one like using a Formula 1 race car to go buy some groceries.

      Paper in the kitchen is cheap, just works and can endure a lot of damage. There's no iPad/laptop in the world that can beat that so far.

    28. Re:The first planned spam... by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      Besides the fact that printer ink costs more per ml than vintage champaign.

    29. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't personally like using the iPad for my restroom activities. It doesn't have a camera for a start

    30. Re:The first planned spam... by (Score.5,+Interestin · · Score: 1

      >Have you heard of the paperless office?

      Sure, I have one right next to my paperless toilet.

    31. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works for a time before it just ejects all the toner.

    32. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same experience basically. I bought a b&w LaserJet 1010 and I'm still on the original cartridge, even though I print regularly. Also, it is indeed built like a tank. Recently a friend of mine tripped over the cable, sending it flying across the room bouncing against a desk and then hitting the floor. No damage at all, still prints like it always did. I paid something like €60 for it.

    33. Re:The first planned spam... by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. no one NEEDS to print anything. there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age.

      You don't have any children, do you? Try gluing two laptop screens together or cutting or folding a laptop screen for arts and crafts. Some things just need printed on paper.

      And then: Some things work better on paper. I can't use a small piece of tape and stick a rack-map up in the server room using an iPad. Or a sign saying "Don't %^#(&@" turn this off again. It needs to stay on."

      Now, if you're talking about NEED as in "food, water, air", then sure, no one needs paper, but no one needs computers, cars, clothing, shelter, entertainment, companionship, a purpose...

    34. Re:The first planned spam... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      My GF, who is a teacher, still prints vast amounts of classroom resources too.

      Shouldn't she be sending those electronically to the mandated Macbooks? ;)

    35. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a Brother laser printer 4 years ago. I'm still on my smaller-than-normal starter toner. And it is half used. Needless to say I'm impressed.

    36. Re:The first planned spam... by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      "Literally decades" puts you at least as far back as 1990. You had a paperless office in 1990? Or is this decimal decades, and you are simply indicating the units of your .2 time without a printer?

    37. Re:The first planned spam... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      No, they won't send a coupon. They'll send a small message saying, "For a free coupon, go to http://coupons.com/default?adsf:3987w3rklxcvjhflk. You can print it out and share it with your friends.".

      For the American and Canadian audience, they'll send it on A4, so that the extra few millimeters will force another black page out. The page should be written in HTML with a whole bunch of BR elements, that force yet another page, and at the bottom of the "blank" page, it will say, "W3C HTML Compliant". So, let's tally it up. The coupon page, plus the "blank" page forces 2 pages out, and the A4 sizing will double that, bringing us to 4 glorious pages for a 10 word coupon, that didn't even need to exist in the first place.

      Maybe we can send them another ad, encouraging them to buy hole punches, paper clips and binders, to store their coupons. Maybe we could encourage them to buy highlighters, so that they make each coupon easier for themselves to read that 1 sentence. Maybe the highlighters can come without caps, so that they dry out faster.

      I could go on for days. I'm surprised that HP isn't beating down my doors.

      On an unrelated note, if they are going to print out test pages, then they might as well print out coupons.

    38. Re:The first planned spam... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The last three contracts that I've signed have been emailed to me as PDFs. I've copied them to my iLiad, signed them on its wacom tablet screen, and emailed them back. They've been sufficiently legally binding for me to get paid...

      In common law countries the rules about what constitutes a legally binding contract are complex. There's nothing saying that a hand-written signature is legally binding and a digital one is not. Anything from a spoken word to a cryptographic signature can be legally binding. In court, one side has to demonstrate more evidence that the person agreeing to the contract intended to do so. If they can, in the face of any counter evidence from the other side, then the contract is legally binding.

      The only advantage that a hand-written signature has is that there is a large body of case law indicating that they are valid. This is relatively recent, however. A signature without an official wax seal was not regarded as legally binding for a very long time (and the seal itself without the signature was).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    39. Re:The first planned spam... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a printer for a while - I gave my last one to my mother - but I was pretty happy with my Brother laser printer. It talked PCL and PostScript, so finding a driver was trivial and it could pretend to be a LaserJet 4 if you wanted. Never had any problems printing to it from Windows, OS X, or FreeBSD. Printing in PostScript mode wasn't such a great idea though - the 50MHz MIPS chip took a really long time to rasterise complex PostScript documents (a page of LaTeX text could take a minute to print, while it could to 10 a minute of the same document in PCL format).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re:The first planned spam... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Yesterday I was preparing a CD of recordings of practice sessions of a band I was playing with last year. I had been promising to send this to a friend, who had moved from the area, for a while.

      I started to write a letter to go with the disc in long hand. Didn't get beyond the salutation and half of the first line before typing it up, and printing it out. I've become too accustomed to editing as I go to write that way anymore. Besides nobody wants to read my strange mix of cursive and block printing.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    41. Re:The first planned spam... by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah, my LaserJet 4L is still going today. Date of manufacture on the back is February 1992.

    42. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To get to the actual coupon, which will be on the second page, you'll have to buy fresh ink cartridges so the document can finish printing."

      That's okay. HP makes it all worthwhile. On the third page there will be a coupon for HP's "green paper", made from 100% recycled material, with a big "Save the environment" ad.

      My favorite part of the article is this: "What we discovered is that people were not bothered by it [an advertisement]," Nigro said. "Part of it I think our belief is you're used to it. You're used to seeing things with ads."

      Apparently people are too dumb to realize that HP is actually costing them money in ink and paper to receive these wonderful new ads. HP may as well have invented a legal way to print money.

      I will buy *NO* HP printer with this "feature".

    43. Re:The first planned spam... by miggyb · · Score: 1

      Samsung Laser hater here. Spent all of yesterday trying to set up a CLP-315W on wireless and following their directions failed since my printer, which could see my neighbor's SSIDs but not my own, did not have "wireless capabilities."

      Gave up and had to call tech support to find out I had to set it up on ethernet first, put all the wireless info in (manually), disconnect the ethernet, wait 5 minutes for it to realize what happened, then FINALLY have it work. Needless to say, I won't be buying samsung again.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    44. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. The thing I find perplexing is this:

      HP still makes high-quality printers, but they're usually the expensive models.

      HP's cheap/low-end stuff is prone to catastrophic problems and defects in a year or so of light use (e.g., plastic gears that snap in half). But you get what you pay for, right?

      No. Because somehow other manufacturers (Brother, Canon, Samsung, etc.) also sell cheap/low-end stuff, usually at a lower price or at the same price with more features, and still with cheap plastic gears as part of the design, but it doesn't fall apart like a piece of crap in a year of light use.

      What I've decided is that HP's engineers are brilliant overall, but unusually incompetent when they have to work to a tight budget compared to others.

    45. Re:The first planned spam... by AlecC · · Score: 1

      My tax return demands a signature on paper. The taxman will accept my accountant's statement that he has seen a signature, but there must at some point be a physical pen on physical paper - or so may accountant tells me.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    46. Re:The first planned spam... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I like my Samsung as much as you can like a printer. It's clean, fast, and quiet and for a networked 2510ND for <$45, I can't complain.

      I would not buy their 315 color laser, maybe the 610 but it's huge.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    47. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are flipping/scrolling pages using paper in the kitchen, then you have a shit recipe book. All the ones I have print an entire recipe on one page for that very reason, and when I move onto another recipe I do not have my hands full of stuff. I have a laptop in the kitchen, had it there since last year - it usually streams TV from my slingbox while I am cooking, and while I am not it displays the household calendar hosted on Google. Sometimes it's used to look up stuff like recipes, and I am very glad I decided to put it where it is.

      I therefore refute your statement that a laptop in the kitchen is a retarded idea - it works great for us.

    48. Re:The first planned spam... by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      I went through that set up a few weeks ago and thought it was pretty damn elegant. How else would you enter your WPA key on a device without any real input?

      Wire it up, configure it for wireless, unplug the wire. Easy

    49. Re:The first planned spam... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Of course it's pretty moot when replacing the ink costs more than just replacing the printer (and getting free ink).

    50. Re:The first planned spam... by shriphani · · Score: 1

      there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age

      Pop quizzes in class. Those can't be done with a laptop.

    51. Re:The first planned spam... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Considering I use my printer maybe two or three times a year (it's stuck up in the loft out of the way I use it so little), I'd certainly notice if I went to use it and there was a big stack of printed ads and a flashing empty ink light, and my first action would be to replace the printer.

    52. Re:The first planned spam... by JayJay.br · · Score: 1
    53. Re:The first planned spam... by matria · · Score: 1

      One of my smart-aleck co-workers was always remarking loudly as I passed his desk on the way back from the ladies room "If you shake it more than twice you're playing with it!" So finally I replied "What else would I possibly want one for if not to play with it?" He never said it again.

    54. Re:The first planned spam... by gunnk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Whooosh" is a good summary of the whole article... does anyone actual read the articles that get submitted?

      HP is NOT going to spam printers.

      HP is planning to partner with Yahoo so that you can subscribe to content that would automatically be printed out for you. In other words, the idea is that you can wake up, grab your morning paper off the printer, and sit down to read it with your cup of coffee. The ads IN THE PAPER would be targeted using geolocation from the IP address of your printer so that you would get locally appropriate ads. No ads for department stores that don't exist within a hundred miles of you. Those are the ads they're talking about. Not spam!

      On the other hand... the idea of printing off your morning paper may have made sense in the science fiction of the 1950's, but HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    55. Re:The first planned spam... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Is that the one with the paperless restroom stalls? Guess that's what the iPad is good for.

      No, that's the kPad, not the iPad. I had an iPad way back in 2006 after my iSurgery.

    56. Re:The first planned spam... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      ...and I've still got dickloads of toner ...

      Damn, that's alot! You could print seventeen libraries of congress with my dickload...

    57. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

    58. Re:The first planned spam... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I don't use an accountant and I file my taxes electronically. My tax return has not been physically signed in at least 5 years. Your accountant probably wants your physical signature so that you can't claim that you never saw the return (the e-signature that the IRS uses is based on infor that your accountant would know).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    59. Re:The first planned spam... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      The first planned spam...is a coupon for ink.

      Guess I'll miss out on the coupon, since inbound messages from outside my network that are targeted to the router will be blocked at the router.

    60. Re:The first planned spam... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      sigh.... targeted to the printer...

    61. Re:The first planned spam... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Use a bidet? Though, personally, I'd still want some paper to finish up.

    62. Re:The first planned spam... by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      I've bought and sold houses, cars etc and a faxed or emailed scan has always worked for me. I'm curious -- what things required an original sig?

    63. Re:The first planned spam... by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      How many BP oil spills are in a "dickload"?

    64. Re:The first planned spam... by alexo · · Score: 1

      Any recommendations for good and inexpensive home lasers? (B/W or color)
      Thanks.

    65. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but in colder climates, there's LOTS of shrinkage...

    66. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rarely. I just browse the comments and look for a person who accually DID read the article and get my info from them. (to find that person, you just look for someone whose argument is against everyone else's).

    67. Re:The first planned spam... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      But i don't know how the use the shells! How am i going to take a crap now?

      I've heard of csh. I've heard of bash. I've even heard of tcsh. I've never heard of assh.

      I'm betting it's something that comes after dash.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    68. Re:The first planned spam... by cimetmc · · Score: 1

      I guess you misunderstand how these printers work. HP has an internet platform called HP ePrintCenter. Jobs from other sources are sent to that HP site and your printer pulls the jobs from there. So no one will try to connect directly to your printer, but your printer will try to connect to the internet to find jobs to print.

    69. Re:The first planned spam... by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      curse a lot and collect the citations?

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    70. Re:The first planned spam... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Poor fellow, does she say "is it in yet" a lot?

    71. Re:The first planned spam... by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      accidental smartphone camera discharge ftl.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    72. Re:The first planned spam... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Have to agree on Samsung. I have a CLP-315 here, pretty fast for my use, nice print quality and cheaper to run. Haven't used HP for a while, and no more inkjet since the print head in my Brother printer clogged up (even if it cleans it from time to time it found a way to clog the head). I'm still using it as a scanner though.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    73. Re:The first planned spam... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Brothers are great. At a previous position, when I was the IT guy, I bought them. Works out-of-the-box with Linux, too.

      I bought my personal Samsung ML-1710 several years ago for under $100. I love it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    74. Re:The first planned spam... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Try to navigate your way through a lawsuit without printed documents. Good luck to you.

    75. Re:The first planned spam... by zelbinion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wow. I'm amazing they finally brought this idea to market. HP has been kicking around this idea since the mid 90's. There used to be this big push inside the company called "grow usage." The idea was to find ways to get customers to print more so they would use more ink and hence have to buy more ink cartridges. Automatically printing the newspaper every morning was one idea to get people to print more. The revenue projections were used to justify massive investments in R&D and production line tooling. (I was working in R&D with cartridge development at the time.) At one point they projected people would be printing so much (including those morning newspapers, complete with ink-heavy full-color photos) that HP was going to have to order over 100 cartridge manufacturing lines and use the entire world's supply of silicon wafers to keep up with demand. When someone finally called bullshit on the numbers, they reduced the order to only 4 lines. I think they only built 2. Actual orders were only 4% of the new, lowered forecast. (This was the 2000 series ink jet printers, by the way -- the first ones HP made with the replaceable ink-tanks. The technology was supposed to go into home printers, but didn't make it for almost a decade, because the business ink jets were so unprofitable.)

      Anyway, the last time HP tried this, it was an unmitigated disaster -- the biggest setback in the inkjet business in HP history. If they are trying it again, it must mean VG and Nigro are getting desperate for ways to grow revenue. Hurd must be pushing them really hard. Growth in the inkjet business has been slowing into stagnation for several years now. At least it was like that when I left, which was a couple of years ago. I can't image things have improved. Has anyone here printed MORE in the last year than the year before? I haven't.

      15 years ago, printing out a customized newspaper *might* have made sense to a few people. These days? Who wants that? Most people don't even print out their digital photos anymore. The home printer market is in decline. There might be opportunities in the commercial printing market, but the amount of printing taking place at home is falling, and will continue to fall. HP isn't going to increase it by getting people to print ads with their daily printed newspaper.

    76. Re:The first planned spam... by Technician · · Score: 1

      My workhorse is an old HP Laserjet III. It has 4 meg of RAM. The default RAM was too small to print a full screenshot. HP no longer makes carts for it. Aftermarket carts are 4/$100 with free shipping. In another 4 or 5 years, I may need to order another box of carts.

      I bought the printer used at Goodwill. I was given the RAM from someone retiring another one. For printing an occasional web page for use on the road (Mapquest directions and such) there is no reason to use the expensive inkjet.

      To make the printers available to all users in the house, I use the small Hawking printservers. With the parallel port, they clip right onto the printer. A wall wart and network cable finish the installation. They work fine with Windows and Linux. With the printers plugged into the wireless router, wireless printing from laptops and netbooks is a piece of cake.

      To prevent any possibility of abuse from the Internet, my file server and printers are given a block of IP addresses that are not routed to the internet. There is no reason I need to print over the internet.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    77. Re:The first planned spam... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a document need a signature. And a digital signature is not legally recognized as sufficient -- it must be done in your hand.

      Bill Clinton says you are wrong.

      On June 30, 2000, President Bill Clinton signed into law—using a digital signature—the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, or E-Sign. This act, which went into effect on October 1 of that year, officially conferred the same legal status on digital signatures as handwritten signatures. The United States government, meanwhile, mandated that all federal agencies accept digital signatures by October 2003.

      Read more: Digital Signature http://ecommerce.hostip.info/pages/325/Digital-Signature.html#ixzz0r7rZ8hUU

      You are wrong.

    78. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember the context now, but there was some contract related issue came up in my family about 10 years ago where the easiest option was to actually use the family wax seal. I didn't even know we had one...

    79. Re:The first planned spam... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Many people prefer to cook several things at once. This requires multiple recipes, flipping between them, looking up how to make the ingredients for the recipes, etc.

      When cooking, your hands will be covered in whatever ingredients you're using. It's just how it works.

    80. Re:The first planned spam... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      My tax return demands a signature on paper.

      No, it doesn't.

      On June 30, 2000, President Bill Clinton signed into law—using a digital signature—the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, or E-Sign. This act, which went into effect on October 1 of that year, officially conferred the same legal status on digital signatures as handwritten signatures. The United States government, meanwhile, mandated that all federal agencies accept digital signatures by October 2003.

      Read more: Digital Signature http://ecommerce.hostip.info/pages/325/Digital-Signature.html#ixzz0r7rZ8hUU [hostip.info]

    81. Re:The first planned spam... by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many papers you'd need to sign before the wacom option becomes cheaper than printing, and if the device would wear out before then...

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    82. Re:The first planned spam... by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Small detail - I am in the UK. Whatever President Clinton may have signed does not apply here.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    83. Re:The first planned spam... by Golddess · · Score: 1

      and a faxed or emailed scan has always worked for me

      Printing out a document, signing it, and then either faxing it or scanning and emailing it is not a "digital signature" of the nature that I believe GP is referring to.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    84. Re:The first planned spam... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you didn't have it already, it would probably take a lot. On the other hand, I don't own a printer, so spending £100 or so for one would cost more than the two minutes required to use the iLiad. Given the number of public domain or creative commons books and papers I've read on the iLiad over the few years I've owned it, it's probably paid for itself overall.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    85. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahah.. He doesn't know how to use the three seashells!

    86. Re:The first planned spam... by enjerth · · Score: 1

      what things required an original sig?

      My bank, for adding an authorized user to an account.

    87. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like there are other countries besides the US? Now you're CLEARLY lying.

    88. Re:The first planned spam... by Eravau · · Score: 1

      ...the idea of printing off your morning paper may have made sense in the science fiction of the 1950's, but HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.

      I know people that still print out all of their email to read and to store in manila folders if it's something they (think they) will need for a while. If they only need to read it and then get rid of it, then they'll still print it... and then, as you indicate nobody would do, they throw it into the shredder or the recycle can.

      These same people would love to have something available to automatically print out the news they want for them every morning so they wouldn't have to go out on the porch and get the newspaper... or heaven forbid, read it on a computer screen.

    89. Re:The first planned spam... by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      read once and recycle.

      Well aren't you just the cutest little optimist. Yes you are!
      </AdultTalkingToBabyVoice>

    90. Re:The first planned spam... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I can see how that could be confusing.

    91. Re:The first planned spam... by greenzrx · · Score: 1

      I remember a bond trader telling me about a machine that was designed to allow an individual to sign multiple bonds at the same time. Apparently, all the bonds issued needed to be signed by one person (presumably the treasurer of the company issuing said bonds) This device had a bunch of pens attached to it. He manipulated one, and his signature was replicated on a bunch of bonds at once.

    92. Re:The first planned spam... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      My old Samsung ML-1710 B/W laser is still working well, and I now have a Samsung CLP-315 colour laser printer that is also good. Both are cheap, have a very small footprint for their type, and work fine with CUPS (i.e. with both Linux and Mac boxes). That's all I need.

    93. Re:The first planned spam... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I'm not gonna lie, I was foiled by the "unplug the wire to enable the wireless" bit for the better part of a week on my 315w. No complaints otherwise, though - and I love the way the laser printers make the lights flicker when it's warming up.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    94. Re:The first planned spam... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Add in duty books, tickets, nearly every court document in existence still has to have a paper backup copy. And of course government, not only does it have to be in triplicate, but the more the merrier.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    95. Re:The first planned spam... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      HP is crazy if they think people actually want to print out content that they are going to read once and recycle.

      have you worked in an office before? that is exactly what people do

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    96. Re:The first planned spam... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Oh come on, you know court documents are always more than triplicate. :) Plaintiff's attorney, defendant's attorney, plaintiff, defendant, clerk of courts, judge, frequently a list of specified involved parties, and of course your own file(s).

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    97. Re:The first planned spam... by apricotmuffins · · Score: 1

      My last wacom was 10 years old and still working when I replaced it. 10 years of near constant use as an artist. If you're going to use it for signatures, you can get one of the low end ones and it would probably be cheaper than printing within oh, 4 cartridge changes?

    98. Re:The first planned spam... by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      You don't even need children. My artist wife is working on an illustrated book, and her illustrations are a combination of computer-drawn art, photos, and printed-out this and that, all put together as collages -- and scanned so that they can go to the printer as PDFs.

      Not as weird as the "computer guy" she made with clay, an old video card, some assorted paper bits, and a Louise Nevelson-type box. :)

    99. Re:The first planned spam... by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      I remember this. The late 90s HP had this gem of an application that was a virtual fish and every time you printed a job to an HP printer it would give you credits to buy accessories and such for your fish tank. Our network printers saw a sufficient enough surge that we had to ban the application.

    100. Re:The first planned spam... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      try flipping/scrolling pages when you got your hands full of stuff you wouldn't want anywhere near electronics...

      Most decent recipe management software has a "hands free" mode that uses voice commands for "flipping pages." Of course, something like an iPad would be even better, as it doesn't take up so much space (you don't need a keyboard, after all).

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    101. Re:The first planned spam... by alcourt · · Score: 1

      Voting systems

      --
      "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
    102. Re:The first planned spam... by /.Rooster · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with that. Certainly as a tech professional I find myself printing things less and less. Only when I need to print something for legal purposes do I ever bother. More and more forms are coming as PDF's and ones that are auto-completed are easy to fill out and one's that are normal I am able to edit as if it was a document and fill out electronically. I do find myself increasing mindful how much inks cost and how the design of cartridges seem to be getting smaller and smaller while the proportionate price gets hight and higher. That and it is obvious the are locking out 3rd party cartridge refills by putting expiry dates and serial numbers.

      --
      Rooster - A friend. "Anyone's friend in particular or just generally well disposed to people?"
    103. Re:The first planned spam... by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      The ads IN THE PAPER would be targeted using geolocation from the IP address of your printer so that you would get locally appropriate ads.

      What's the geolocation of 192.168.x.x?

    104. Re:The first planned spam... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      At least all the money they invested in finding ways to put less ink in cartridges and wasting more in "cleaning" cycles didn't go to waste.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    105. Re:The first planned spam... by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Works out-of-the-box with Linux, too.

      No, they don't. Brother offers drivers for Linux on i386. Much as I love my Brother multifunction laser, I couldn't switch my print server to an NSLUG because of Brother's proprietary closed source i386 only drivers.

    106. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1
      that depends on where you live, and in the next fifty years, most gov't buildings will be required paperless.

      as a random example, take the recent shutdown of the justice system in Dallas County

      "Several courts have gone paperless in recent months, and the district clerk’s office has been converting files to electronic form and destroying paper versions, the paper said."

      unlike the USA, MOST countries around the world have alternatives to requiring a printed copy. because.. that's just a better idea in the modern age.

    107. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      I was looking for this last night but couldn't find the right keywords! you're my hero!

    108. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      And what's stopping you from displaying several recipes on the one screen? when I cook there are anywhere from five to eight recipes on the screen. (I did say laptop, not netbook? right? :P)

      if you really need many more, you need a second cook, who can bring their own laptop. or maybe just a W700?

    109. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      for the purposes of art, I agree that paper's useful as hell.
      how ever as somebody who's planning to make money using paper, the case's a little biased. there's nothing stopping her from scanning existing works, and distributing an e-book. in which case, you take us back to the original point, there's no need to print anything.

    110. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      and it's been brought up that the UK doesn't not differentiate a digital or physical signature. as long as it identifies you in a manner that proves your intent of verification, it can be upheld in a court of law.

    111. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      ...what? that's a flat out false statement.

      1)why the hell not?
      2)the speed of a "pop quiz" would likely be drastically improved on a notebook.
      3)a laptop can provide more instruction to more people in a shorter amount of time, allowing the kids/people to learn more or get more information about the topic based on levels of interest.

      I don't get your statement at all.

    112. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      i've never had much of a problem with it. only once did I have to refer to a piece of paper my client signed and looking back on it, I could have just scanned it and provided it to the court that way rather than bring it in for a judge to look at.

      what in the world can't you do on a computer that you can do with physical documents? let alone what can you do faster with physical documents?

      sorry, I don't get paid by the hour. I like to get things done quickly.

    113. Re:The first planned spam... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      I disagree with the written requirement of voting machines.

      however your signature is the core of my beliefs. so I understand that people WANT paper for things.

    114. Re:The first planned spam... by shriphani · · Score: 1

      Netbook = possibility of storing notes. Can lead to cheating.

    115. Re:The first planned spam... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      People always see what they are doing, and have blinders for everything else. The idea that there is not a single thing that requires paper is hopelessly provincial. So how are we going to do posters, or artwork?. I suppose that we can buy and use a big LCD for every poster. That would be really cost efficient 8^/

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
    116. Re:The first planned spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I was just telling a few friends, this is definitely one of those far side comic "brick though your window, call bob's glass now" kind of campaigns.

    117. Re:The first planned spam... by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age.

      In my personal life, I do well without a printer. In my job, not so much. I work at a charter high school and a lot of things need to be printed. I suspect it's a legal requirement. Maybe we can file stuff electronically and get digital signatures(???), but I'd want to discuss this with a lawyer before abandoning physical documentation.

      It's not just a few universities. It's the entire public school system, every accounting department in the country, and probably most other institutions.

  3. Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure HP will do their best job to protect the access to these web-based printers. It will take an entire week for the spammers to get HP's database and start sending ads to your printers.

    Also: The article is unclear, but it doesn't sound like HP will just send random print jobs with ads to your printer. It sounds more like *if* you setup the feature to print your newspaper every morning, the ads in the paper will change to be targeted. That is why they can claim "What we discovered is that people were not bothered by it [an advertisement]..." If they truly are sending advertising jobs to the printer unsolicited, then I think that quote is going to turn out to be the dumbest thing said on planet earth for at least the last few years. People would just love to find their already exorbitantly priced ink wasted on an ad.

    Lastly: Who would want to print their newspaper in the morning? Physical newspapers are convenient because of their wide format. Electronic news is nice because it is targeted and doesn't waste paper. Printing out your newspaper in the morning seems like the worst of both. You don't get the nice wide format, and you still waste the paper. Ugh.

    1. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Who would want to print their newspaper in the morning? Physical newspapers are convenient because of their wide format. Electronic news is nice because it is targeted and doesn't waste paper. Printing out your newspaper in the morning seems like the worst of both. You don't get the nice wide format, and you still waste the paper.

      I've seen this done at hotels as well as Bed and Breakfasts, particularly if they are off the beaten path. The local paper (if there is one) doesn't cut it and they can't get delivery of a current paper, so they print out an electronic edition formatted to fit on plain paper. It's rather better than no paper at all, and they often include the local weather forecast and calendar of events on another page. Nice to grab off the front desk on the way out to read in the car or shuttle.

    2. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Lastly: Who would want to print their newspaper in the morning?

      If the advertising meant free ink for me, I'd consider it.

      Of course, I'm thinking in the mindset of how web-services like GMail work. I doubt reality would work that way and I didn't bother reading the article. :D

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by bkpark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lastly: Who would want to print their newspaper in the morning? Physical newspapers are convenient because of their wide format.

      Er, really? I'd kill to have newspaper printed letter-size, two-(or three-)column. The size of most newspapers is unwieldy, and especially if i'm trying to read it while walking (a frequent occasion as I commute on foot and pick up a free local daily on the way), i have to fold it over so that it's letter-size; or the wind blows it all over the place.

      As for who would actually want to get newspaper on paper, well, presumably people who are not stuck to their computer all day and don't have a Kindle, iPad, etc. And some quaint people still like things printed on paper, like books; I don't understand them but they do exist.

    4. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      There are two ways to fold a newspaper. You have discovered method one: the broadway show guy-on-a-park-bench method. Most people not about to enter a song and dance number do not read it this way.

      The other way is to fold it over till it's about book-sized. the pages are set up so that this is convenient, except for stupid papers that don't break columns on the fold. This is how real people read the newspaper with their breakfast, or on the train. (but not the subway, where you need to keep an eye out for sketchy people and mysterious liquids.)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Reading the article wouldn't help. It was as light on details as the /. summary.

      But they aren't talking (currently) about isolated ads being printed. Merely things that include the ads that they choose. ("People weren't bothered"..."I think that's because they're already used to ads".)

      If you want to believe that their plans won't go any farther than what they're currently offering, be my guest. But I really doubt that you'd come out ahead, even if they continued to offer coupons for free ink.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mysterious liquids?

      I don't think this is what you have in mind, but I am reminded of an occasion on a British Snail train in the early '80s, when a hung-over colleague vomited noisily and copiously into a stockbroker's briefcase. Way to make yourself popular... :-)

    7. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by angus77 · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a hotel in the Rockies that had a lot of Japanese guests. They got a two-page printout of the news every morning.

    8. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this done at hotels as well as Bed and Breakfasts, particularly if they are off the beaten path. The local paper (if there is one) doesn't cut it and they can't get delivery of a current paper, so they print out an electronic edition formatted to fit on plain paper. It's rather better than no paper at all, and they often include the local weather forecast and calendar of events on another page. Nice to grab off the front desk on the way out to read in the car or shuttle.

      Just how fucking hard up for news do you have to be to do this nonsense. Carry a small AM/FM radio and turn it on to any of the nationwide networks. Or dial it up on your goddamned i[ -toy of the moment ].

      Sheesh -- you guys would give up your mothers if you were confined in luxury for a few hours, but without your electronic leashes.

    9. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      at around 7 cents per page for inject prints, how bloody expensive is the newspaper in your area that you'd pay that bloody much to print it out on your extraordinarily expensive per-page desktop printer? Just so you can accomplish what a different fold would accomplish...

      go ahead and pretend money is no object, and that you bought the low-cost web printer (printers are cheap, printing is expensive) because it matches your drapes. In a very short period of time, the cost of printing a newspaper daily would catch up to just buying a bloody ipad.

    10. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Physical newspapers are inconvenient because of their wide format.

      Fixed that for you. Think about your seat-neighbor on the bus or train.

    11. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some quaint people still like things printed on paper, like books; I don't understand them but they do exist.

      I do. Books boot instantly. They have hundreds of flexible high-resolution displays. They don't run out of battery power. They are dirty cheap. I can lend dozens of them without being bothered by DRM. ...

    12. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printing out your newspaper in the morning seems like the worst of both.

      OB Dilbert ref:The strip where the PHB tells the secretary to "print out all my emails and transcribe all my voice mails".

    13. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Mitsoid · · Score: 0

      Well if there is a law currently preventing unsolicited faxing, it would seem as though this 'targeted ads' idea with advert-replacement (with HP-desired advert) might work.

      Though, If I had a web page there would be 2-3 issues I'd be concerned about:
      1) Advert-replacement from my controlled advertisements (through keyword filtering) to adverts I have *no* control over. (What if it's a personal blog and I call John Doe a dick... when it goes to print they get __(take a guess)__ enlargement adverts that I, previously, blocked from showing.... now the printed copy of my website degrades in value to anyone that the printed version is shown to... not that a blog of my life would have advertisements, be read, or had paper wasted on it...
      2) If it's a web page with no advertisements (for instance, a fun web page about me disassembling my printer -- which I have done for fun :-))... So what if this article (which I could claim copyright for) had advertisements inserted? Does that constitute alteration of copyrighted material by inserting new information (the advertisements)?
      3) Additional Ink/paper usage -- Do end users have a right to charge back HP/Yahoo for the ink & paper usage?
      Just a quick scenario -- I recently printed out about 100 pages for my online course work. Each page I went in and 'Printed selection' and scaled it to maximize the space (minimize the paper used). If an advertisement was forced in after this preview forcing it to more pages, OR if I had no control over if the advert was in the print or not... Then my efforts to be semi-green (which really for me was a side effect of being efficient.. but same end result, just different names)...
      Do I get to charge HP the penny? With the extra wasted pages I could fold the 'wasted' papers into a letter and an envelope (with a few staples) and send it to their office! (Well, once I have a claim that is more then the cost of the stamp).

      Just my thoughts, overall I hate this idea. I think everyone has the right to control the information that is printed from their property (or "Licensed printers" -- added in case printers get a "end user license agreement" that strip your copyright protections too).. Last thing I want is all the HP printers in the school printing off advertisements that can't be (easily) controlled by a firewall or other web-filtering material -- and HP would probably get away with it for most automated services.

    14. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Stooshie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, I think he meant printer ink!

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    15. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Physical newspapers are convenient because of their wide format.

      Depends where you read them. Most of the British "broadsheets" are now printed on relatively small sheets of paper to make them more convenient to read on public transport: Compact (newspaper).

      However, if you live somewhere with public transport you can probably either get the newspaper delivered, or buy it somewhere between your home and the station, so this probably isn't the main target of this.

    16. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. While the wide format is great when you have a nice big table to put the paper on and spread it out... have you ever tried opening one of those things on a bus or train? It doesn't even have to be crowded, the paper it hitting everything. Good luck if it's crowded, you would have just smacked 5 people across the face trying to change your page.

    17. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Do they use any particular paper size? I ask, because consumers of this stuff probably don't care about the size. If I were committed to printing the news for somebody, then I would probably use legal size as the default, unless I could get my hands on A4 or even larger.

      Do you know what software they use? Do they just use Word or OpenOffice.org? I ask, because I like making OpenOffice.org templates, and would be willing to help them with a template. I should probably phone around and ask for myself.

    18. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, really? I'd kill to have newspaper printed a4-size, two-(or three-)column.

    19. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by ahecht · · Score: 1

      I don't even see why this is news. I had an HP printer with "HP Instant Delivery" 12 years ago (in 1998), which could print out a customized newspaper each morning based on your preferences. You would choose the types of stories, the sources it would pull from, and the length. And yes, the newspaper included small ads. It was actually quite handy for reading during the morning commute.

    20. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by delinear · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I prefer ads to be stripped out in the print stylesheet of the site I'm using. If I go to print a page of text and there's a big ad, I'll generally either script it out of the page or copy the text into a word processor and print it. If I script an ad out and my printer added it back in I'd certainly be more than a little annoyed.

    21. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by promythyus · · Score: 1

      AND they provide tactile input and a nice smell!

    22. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

      not to mention that you could only print articles yo ureally wanted. I would not personally ever do it, but I could see it for the paper adicts I know.

    23. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      I'll bet they don't specify a minimum ratio of content to ads, which would allow them to put a 1/8 page story block with the remainder being ads and still be compliant with the original agreement. "Look! Each page has at least one news story on it!"

    24. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your want their new printer that takes 8 1/2' by 11' paper.

    25. Re:Spammers will LOVE this by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its certainly substantially cheaper than that other silly device that lets you carry your digital newspapers around with you.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  4. Dont Know by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    Does sending a page to a printer count as a "fax" as far as the law is concerned?

    1. Re:Dont Know by 98+Rezz · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, faxes come through a series of wires. These ads come through a series of tubes. Completely different!

    2. Re:Dont Know by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Unsolicited Fax Legislation?

      Four Letters: EULA

      You just clicked "Accept".

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:Dont Know by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Or, you could, you know, just NOT BUY such a STUPID printer. This is so not going to be a problem for me, since I won't buy the printer, so I don't give a rip. If you decide to buy this printer, I guess you've chosen how you'll make HP richer.

    4. Re:Dont Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if we pour molten copper in the tubes, will they become wires? we need some avenue of legal protection!

    5. Re:Dont Know by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Hey, isn't, like, fiber just tubes?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    6. Re:Dont Know by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      Wow, these "faxes" must be very small to fit into the wires! Are you sure they don't use regular tubes ?

    7. Re:Dont Know by Khyber · · Score: 1

      'Four Letters: EULA"

      I don't know how many times I'm going to have to beat this into the heads of people from my own personal litigation experience.

      EULAS DON'T MEAN SHIT IF THEY INFRINGE UPON A PROPERTY RIGHT OR VIOLATE A LAW.

      That is my ink, unless I *TELL* you to print out that ad and set it up to do such, you have NO RIGHT.

      Trespass to Chattels.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Dont Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could you know, not configure your firewall to let the ads in...

    9. Re:Dont Know by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The printer will have an email address and you print to it by sending it emails, so the ads will probably get round the firewall.

    10. Re:Dont Know by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      Those tubes were clogged years ago. Stop treating them like a truck you can dump things on.

    11. Re:Dont Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, faxes come through a series of wires.
      These ads come through a series of tubes.

      Completely different!

      LMAO

      But to give a serious answer, No these are not considered Faxes. The FCC rules on faxes are based on their authority to regulate telephone systems, and what HP is doing is simply remote printing.

    12. Re:Dont Know by dyingtolive · · Score: 3, Funny

      By Accepting this License Agreement (hereafter referred to as "The Hosejob"), you hereby tell us to print out that add and thereby set up your printer to do such. HP (hereafter referred to as "Corporate Oppressor") is not and will not be consider to be infringing on your rights to your property because you no longer have rights, having willfully and in sound mind signed them over to us. If you disagree with any portion of this EULA, feel free to return this product to your retailer, where they've been instructed not to accept the return due to the fact that the software provided with this printer has had the seal broken on it.

      Or, you know, you actually pay thousands of dollars minimum to fight it in court, all the while HP is bleeding you dry through court costs and still continuing to spam your printer.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    13. Re:Dont Know by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That explains why the faxes I send always come back out!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:Dont Know by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      It isn't unsolicited anymore, when you agree to receive ads, in exchange for Internet printing. I'm not saying that it is right. It's very wrong.

      But the people who make and enforce law work for HP, not you and I.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    15. Re:Dont Know by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Guess what, pal? I used to work for HP. I know their bullshit can't hold water.

      See what happened when I smacked EA's entire team of lawyers in court - McQuown vs Electronic Arts - they settled IMMEDIATELY.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Dont Know by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I don't have to pay thousands of dollars when I can bring it into small claims court where lawyers typically aren't allowed, and I can rape them mercilessly.

      You very obviously know nothing about litigation.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:Dont Know by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Obviously.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    18. Re:Dont Know by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Or you could trade the judge an HP printer for his/her old one ...

    19. Re:Dont Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printers already have web management interfaces. The hard drives are accessible if you can physically touch the printer.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/19/eveningnews/main6412439.shtml

      What a bitching idea! Let's open the up even further to ad servers from Yahoo, Fox and Google.
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20000898-245.html

      Wwwwwweeeeeeeeee

    20. Re:Dont Know by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Yea, my legal and litigative record is long and only with one failure out of about twenty.

      My most recent victim? Electronic Arts. My next victim? Sony.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Dont Know by D.+Taylor · · Score: 1

      If you agree to them sending you prints, they are not unsolicited.

  5. Post title here by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The scheduled delivery sounds kind of cool...course, if I have to walk over to my printer to get it, why wouldn't I just turn on the computer sitting right next to it?
    But if you're going to put ads on my paper, you dang well better be paying me for it.

    --
    Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
    1. Re:Post title here by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      But if you're going to put ads on my paper, you dang well better be paying me for it.

      If by "paying", you mean "subsidizing your purchase", you'd be right. That's generally how ad-supported publications work. (TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, websites...)

    2. Re:Post title here by Idbar · · Score: 1

      "What we discovered is that people were not bothered by it [an advertisement]," Nigro said. "Part of it I think our belief is you're used to it. You're used to seeing things with ads."

      Better yet, I pay for the printer, the Internet access, the ink, and the paper they will be using to spam? People may not be bothered by ads if they get them free stuff as in public tv, or people is used to seeing things with ads as in online magazines or sports events, so prices go down. How is this going to benefit me?

    3. Re:Post title here by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          If they're proving me a free printer, ink, and paper, I'm fine with it. Since we know that won't be true, this is horribly invasive and abusive.

          Beyond that, since we know the printer is web based, and they can run their software at will with it, who's to say that they won't have it send copies of everything you print back to them. That would be a huge benefit to them and the hackers at large who learn to exploit it. Most printed stuff is BS, but when the printed materials contain confidential data, that would be worth a fortune.

          Sorry, I'd prefer not to have corporation sponsored identity theft.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Post title here by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I'm a little worried by the notion that the ads will be targeted , i.e. behavioural. All you'd need to do is buy 1 piece of underwear as an anniversary present, and suddenly your home office printer is churning out "Anne Summers sex toy discount" ads every couple of days...

    5. Re:Post title here by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I agree. I search for all kinds of weird things as it is, either to have valid information for real world conversations, or to support facts in news stories that we run. I get all kinds of weird ads as it is, I'm not quite sure I want them printed for the family to see.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Post title here by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I search for all kinds of weird things as it is...

      So do I.

      > I get all kinds of weird ads as it is...

      I don't. Do you think that just might have something to do with the fact that I block all ads and most cookies and scripts? It's your choice to be "targeted".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Post title here by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      The scheduled delivery sounds kind of cool...course, if I have to walk over to my printer to get it, why wouldn't I just turn on the computer sitting right next to it?

      This isn't for us, this is for the grandmas and grandpas that print out email before reading it. This is for the people that still print out news articles from the web to show their friends.

      I think it's a terrible technology that will waste tons of paper and ink.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    8. Re:Post title here by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      > I get all kinds of weird ads as it is...

      I don't. Do you think that just might have something to do with the fact that I block all ads and most cookies and scripts? It's your choice to be "targeted".

      Well, it's a matter of which machine I'm on, and which browser I happen to be using at the moment. The main computer I use is happily protected from just about everything (adblock, no script, copious hosts file, etc). Machines and browsers I use infrequently I don't keep up with as well. It's a good reminder to me why I like my main computer. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  6. So let me get this straight .... by bizitch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I am printing my very important sales proposal - and HP/Yahoo inject spam into it - and this costs me my sale .... I can sue their balls off yes?

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
    1. Re:So let me get this straight .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about when you've got something important and urgent to print, and when you finally get the printer working (because the damn thing has refused to print for the past hour) you get a spam instead, and put the little paper wasting fucker through the wall. Printers are already the most hated, most annoying piece of equipment as is. I can only wonder how many people will go Office Space on them now.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight .... by mlts · · Score: 1

      It depends on the printer. A cheap inkjet printer that will eat a set of cartridges on the first color photo, requires special drivers that only that model of printer needs (and are either only available on the driver CD and not for download, or a 4GB lord-king-God executable file that installs all sorts of crap), and only works with a few versions of Windows might be deserving of a choice spot at a "hardware compression" party.

      However, there are good printers that don't suck sold today. HP Color Laserjets made in the mid to late 1990s come to mind. Good printers are still available from HP which actually work and don't give you the urge to send the thing sailing towards a hard object. However, printers like the HP CP 4005, CP 4525dtn or others are going to cost $1500 at the minimum, on up. However, with these, you can just use whatever the heck you like. Upload a PDF to the Web interface and print that way. Send it documents via lpr and PostScript Level 3. Feed it a SD card or plug a camera into it that understands EXIF, and let it automatically print. Because these use toner cartridges with decent capacity, you will pay more per cartridge, but they can print out a lot of color photos before it is time to replace them. Plus, toner doesn't dry out over time like cartridges do.

      So, there are printers that don't give IT headaches. However, they do cost, and to PHBs, it may not be evident why a workgroup class color laser is far better than an inkjet printer (assuming there are no special needs for the inkjet like printing on transparancies.)

    3. Re:So let me get this straight .... by krischik · · Score: 3, Funny

      and put the little paper wasting fucker through the wall.

      In my house you won't put a printer to any wall. Most are made of real bricks. And even the few light walls are made plywood tougher then a printer casing.

    4. Re:So let me get this straight .... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I wouldn't worry so much about that. It would likely be added to the print queue. What's worse is that it will probably print regardless of the paper inserted. Cheap printer paper is one thing, but what if I had photo paper, letterhead, or labels in it?

          At one job, they printed their own checks for payroll. Folks who used that printer were told "Don't use the printer for the next hour, it's loaded for accounting to print payroll." They'd get real mad when you wasted their check stock with any of your own print jobs. Now instead of someone in the office screwing up, it will be a corporation arbitrarily printing on them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:So let me get this straight .... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      The problem is that printers that are rated for 1 million+ pages are rated to do so with a service contract. Various components WILL eventually break down WAY before the printer reaches its expected lifetime. Be it the fuser, the drum, various rollers, some random fucking gear, etc.

      See, the plastic gears they use probably cost at least $1 per unit less than metal gears. That's millions of dollars a year in savings. In addition to that the service contract costs quite a bit per year. It's much more profitable for them to charge you $500 a year to replace a $0.20 gear every two years than it is to design the printer properly in the first place.
      Of course, they won't sell the cheap components (gears) to you without the contract to replace them. They'll sell you the expensive components (fuser, etc) but they'll cost you about $150-$400 depending on the particular model.

      Also, these printers only save you money if you actually print a million pages over the time that you own the printer. That will take at least 10 years for a personal user to recoup and then only if they print like a motherfucker.

      These printers and service contracts might make a lot of sense for a business, but in terms of personal printing (which is what the article is actually talking about) we're still stuck with shit printers. Apparently they now want to add ads to the personal printers.

      Alright, we have a billion of these fucking open source 3d printers that are supposed to be able to replicate themselves, but not a single open source 2D printer. That's what we fucking need. These companies are realizing that everyone needs to have a printer for at the minimum occasional use. They sell shit printers and expensive, good printers. Either we buy their shit printers and they make money off of them or we buy their good printers and they make cockloads of money off of them.

      I seriously don't see why after all these years we can't make an open source printer. Certainly, it can't be harder than a 3D printer.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    6. Re:So let me get this straight .... by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      What you don't realize is that under that normal printer exterior is a titanium endoskeleton. It will probably run itself through the wall in slow motion in the near future. The wall will collapse and you will think it destroyed, but moments after you leave it will crawl out of the reckage with it's shiny bits showing. The uprising is coming.

    7. Re:So let me get this straight .... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I can sue their balls off yes?

      Well, you can certainly sue: how else is the court to determine that your claims are frivolous and order you to pay HP's expenses due you having been so stupid as to not only buy a "Web connected" printer but also agree to have ads sent to it? It may not be HP's balls that come off, though.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:So let me get this straight .... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Now instead of someone in the office screwing up, it will be a corporation
      > arbitrarily printing on them.

      No. It will be someone in the office screwing up by buying this printer, agreeing to have ads sent to it, and then using it for payroll.

      BTW using this printer for payroll could have much worse consequences than the mere waste of some expensive paper.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  7. Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Manip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But really this is Quid pro quo, HP give you access to "free" services - in this case the web elements and in return you have to put up with a few adverts. It is in no way different from how GMail or HotMail operate. Will it cost you ink and make HP money, yes, but will you get the ability to e-mail printed documents to your printer and to automate printing web-content, also - yes.

    If you want an honest printer than invest in a Kodak already -- or better yet a laser printer for B&W documents.

    1. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      When did it become "ok" to "pay" for "free" services by looking at ads? What kind of retarded philosophy is that? Either it's free or it's not. If it's free, there's no justification for including ads. If it's not free, HP should charge something for it, and then they'll see how popular their "feature" really is.

    2. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did it become "ok" to "pay" for "free" services by looking at ads?

      About five minutes after Reginald Fessenden figured out how to transmit voice signals over wireless?

    3. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it was with the invention of TV. If you change "looking" to "listening," then you can go all the way back to early radio.

    4. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by jonnat · · Score: 1

      It is in no way different from how GMail or HotMail operate.

      It is quite different. These services do not charge you for their use. If, on the other hand, the HP ads would come with an offer of free ink in exchange for your attention, then your comparison would be reasonable.

    5. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      HP is pretty much the only company that fully supports Linux. I support them because of that. You can go out right now and buy the latest HP all-in-one printer/scanner/fax and every damn feature will work on Linux just like Windows. You can't say the same of any other printer out there.

    6. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      We have a Canon Pixma MP550 in the office, connected to a linux PC. Canon even provides drivers for it (as opposed to hunting for third party drivers, though for 32bit only, but the PC has less than 4GB of RAM) and everything seems to work.

    7. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did it become "ok" to "pay" for "free" services by looking at ads?

      No later than April 24, 1704. Probably earlier.

    8. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      When did it become "ok" to "pay" for "free" services by looking at ads? What kind of retarded philosophy is that? Either it's free or it's not. If it's free, there's no justification for including ads. If it's not free, HP should charge something for it, and then they'll see how popular their "feature" really is.

      At a rough guess, I'd say probably around about the time that commercial radio and television broadcasting was pioneered.

    9. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      Have you ever paid for cable television? Your subscription is subsidized by the advertising revenue. Would you prefer paying multiple times your current bill to have no ads? Most people would not do this.

      Have you ever used a web-interface based e-mail service for free? These would not existing without the advertising. It costs the company money to store, maintain, and manipulate your data. Either you need to pay them, or an advertiser does. Or the taxpayer, in the case of municipal e-mail services.

      Granted, though, I will not be rushing to buy the HP AdBoxPro2000XLS.com Special Edition. But there are certainly users who A) appreciate a free service and B) do not mind receiving ads to use such a service.

    10. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a website, maybe something like "news for nerds" that's primarily paid for by advertising dollars? You'd never use that, right?

    11. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > At a rough guess, I'd say probably around about the time that commercial
      > radio and television broadcasting was pioneered.

      I'm fairly sure that free ad-supported newspapers are older than radio.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      If it isn't "ok" with you don't do it. If it's ok with other people it's their business, not yours.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    13. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well technically you're paying for the resources required to view them in both cases - it's just that the one (electricity+minimal wear on the monitor) is much cheaper than the other (printer ink+paper).

    14. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we totally haven't come up with anything that allows us to print over a network and print web content. You're so original HP!

    15. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by dlgeek · · Score: 1

      That's only because most US ISP's offer "unlimited" bandwidth plans. If you view their services on a mobile phone, from a country that doesn't have such plans (Australia), or with many business-class ISP plans, you do pay extra to consume the advertisements.

    16. Re:Reason #9839 not to buy HP printers... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The problem is that especially HP loves to overcharge like mad on ink so them wasting your ink with ads is doubly infuriating. You already pay a ton for that ink because it's subsidizing their printer prices (the machine is sold for dirt cheap but the refills...), now they want to use that expensive part to subsidize some minor service?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  8. Firewall it by sirsnork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Assuming you can't disable the feature I'll be firewalling it's IP address completly

    --

    Normal people worry me!
    1. Re:Firewall it by CSFFlame · · Score: 1

      It's going to connect outbound I'd bet. Most people have routers with NAT so it's not going to be inbound.

    2. Re:Firewall it by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can easily disable this feature. It's opt-in. Disable it by not opting in. See? Wasn't that easy?

      Seriously, is the article that complicated? you have to log into Yahoo's page, ask for content, and the content will be delivered as you ask for it, and Yahoo! will add an advert so they can justify setting up the system that automatically delivers the articles to you.

      Personally, I think the idea is asinine - I prefer my articles on-screen and I hate the idea of printing out everything I want to read on paper.

      But no one will be sneaking into your house and making your printer print anything you don't ask for.

      Yet.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Firewall it by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      Yep, but it really depends on how easy it is opt out for someone who thinks that the harddrive is the big box sitting on his desk (which happens to describe a LOT of people somehow). Knowing marketing people, I envision the process to be something like that ...

      Initializing Printer ...
      This is your first time. Please answer a few question to setup your new printer correctly ...
      What is your full name? ... Martha Grannyapple
      What is your phone number? ... 01234987654
      Are you behind a Firewall If you don't know the answer, press Y ... Y
      Enable HP IntelliAd Professional (tm)? If you don't know the answer, press Y ... ?
      If you don't know the answer, press Y. Enable HP IntelliAd Professional (tm)? ... H
      If you don't know the answer, press Y. Enable HP IntelliAd Professional (tm)? ... Y
      Processing ...
      Thank you for enabling HP IntelliAd Professional (tm).
      You can easily disable HP IntelliAd Professional (tm) by unchecking the 4rth option from the top in the MAIN->CONFIGURATION->INTERNET->SERVICES->INTELLIAD->SUBSCRIPTION->CONTROLS->OMGPONIES->NOODLYAPPENDAGE->ENABLE menu.
      Processing ...
      Please choose now which daily content should be used to fill the blanks between the ads ...

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    4. Re:Firewall it by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Then the question remains why the blurb gave anything but that impression.

      Yeah, I know. Must be new here.

    5. Re:Firewall it by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      sigh ... I forgot the most important bit of course. The line stating that forfeiting the ads would be to forfeit the wonderfull new and particularly advanced features of the new printer.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    6. Re:Firewall it by fatalwall · · Score: 1

      any decent firewall would allow for blocking outbound connections to said ip's as well

    7. Re:Firewall it by TheLink · · Score: 0, Redundant

      > What is your full name? .

      Whenever sites/organizations ask me for such info that really isn't technically necessary, I think of stuff like this: http://xkcd.com/327/ :).

      --
    8. Re:Firewall it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, but it really depends on how easy it is opt out for someone who thinks that the harddrive is the big box sitting on his desk

      Isn't that the CPU?

    9. Re:Firewall it by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      You might want to think twice.. These things have lasers in them and they could instantly vaporize the entire building if they can't connect to the mothership. Remember what happened when Veeger couldn't find the whales...

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    10. Re:Firewall it by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Most people don't have that feature on their Dlink and Linksys home routers and if they do, they don't know how to configure it anyway.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    11. Re:Firewall it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you don't allow HP to connect to your printer for remote administration and authenticity verification they will pull your trusted printing license and you will have to resubscribe as a verified customer to re-enable printing!!!

      I'm waiting for HP to start pulling documents you've printed over the internet so they can log everything you do for even more targeted advertising. It's the logical next step IMO.

    12. Re:Firewall it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it will be firewalled completely, inbound as well as outbound.

    13. Re:Firewall it by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          So, don't set the default gateway, or set it to a bogus value. Now you have a printer that can't talk to the world, but talks very nicely to the LAN. I know, it kinda defeats the purpose of an Internet printer, but who wants their printer up on the Internet anyways?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:Firewall it by crenshawsgc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please stop posting, your post sucks.

    15. Re:Firewall it by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Why not just not buy the damn printer?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    16. Re:Firewall it by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Except reading the article, I envision the process to be something like what the article says it will and not the sensationalist and completely wrong summary.

        - You set up your printer, and you're done setting up your printer. No ads will be attached to articles, because you won't get any articles.

        - If you decide you want articles, you log into Yahoo! and ask for Yahoo! to monitor for certain articles and send them to your printer. You probably accept a EULA that allows ass-raping by noodly appendages riding ponies.

        - Your printer starts printing out the articles you've asked for. In addition to the ads the article's authors have requested, Yahoo! inserts an ad to pay for the newsfeed service.

      I know, I know, I read and comprehended the article, which is against Slashdot rules.

      If the summary had been about Yahoo!'s home page, which has been showing ads to pay for the news articles for years, people would be under the impression that evil advertisers would be sneaking into their homes and tattooing ads on their fucking eyeballs.

      So here's the headline that should have been:

      "HP and Yahoo! offer ad-supported opt-in hardcopy news printing service for people too lazy to hit PRINT."

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    17. Re:Firewall it by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      okay, said like that it actually makes sense. Not that I would personally opt in, but if people really feel the noodly appendage pony raping is something they want and it's not something they are tricked into using, why not?!
      thanks for the clarification

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    18. Re:Firewall it by sco08y · · Score: 1

      You can easily disable this feature. It's opt-in. Disable it by not opting in. See? Wasn't that easy?

      You know what's easier? I will never buy an HP again because the fact that they are even *offering* it is just completely insane.

      So I am simply opting out of HP altogether.

    19. Re:Firewall it by Cwix · · Score: 1

      DO the fucking trolls even TRY anymore?

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    20. Re:Firewall it by cimetmc · · Score: 1

      Why would you by a "web printer" if at the same time you want to block its access to or from the internet? Let's just see what we are talking about here: - the is a printer whose purpose is to allow direct printing from the web - the direct printing from the web is done through the HP ePrintCenter which is a service hosted by HP and which accepts the print jobs. - your printer merly connects to HP ePrintCenter to pull jobs from there are do any other tasks it is being told to do So if you in any way block the access from your printer to HP ePrintCenter, then you effectivly block your pritner's ability to print (or at least to use the web printing, I don't know if these printers can also do local printing), and in that case, why did you buy this printer in first place?

    21. Re:Firewall it by MBDeeJay · · Score: 1

      This subject has got to be the most entertaining yet. Great, I'm going to turn off and unplug my printer right now! We do have choices.

      --
      What one thing is there that I really don't want to do but if I did it, I would be far closer to my objective? Do that f
  9. LCD Screens by Black+Perl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My HP photo printer has a touchscreen LCD. I think most have an LCD of some sort. I can imagine HP thinking they could reserve some of the space for ads...

    --
    bp
    1. Re:LCD Screens by ChrisK87 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, a little speaker to tell you whenever its out of paper...
      ...and whenever it thinks your penis can be made bigger, stronger, faster.

  10. No HP For Me by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Me: "Hello, Kodak? Yes, I'd like to buy one of your printers as long as you don't spam me with ads."
    Kodak: "Sure, not a problem. We aren't like HP."
    Me: "Awesome, I'll take ten."

    Of course that wasn't a real conversation, but if I had the money for ten printers, you better believe I'm giving my money to Kodak (or Canon, Canon makes good printers).

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:No HP For Me by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Okidata has some nice heavy-duty color laserjets...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:No HP For Me by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      My mom has a Kodak printer.

      When she first got it, it only worked with Windows XP, Vista and OS X Tiger. Nothing else. It wasn't long until Leopard support was added.

      To this day I'm not sure if it supports anything else or not, I left my parents on Tiger for classic reasons. It does NOT use any generic standard filters or drivers, Linux printing at last check was just a pipe dream, it might work now, I haven't bothered checking.

      I wouldn't mind having a printer that doesn't gouge me on ink, but I'm not changing operating systems to print, and I really want to limit my hacking around the problem time.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    3. Re:No HP For Me by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1

      I have my Kodak ESP 5250 working very well on Fedora with the CUPS driver on Sourceforge. Just unpacked the file and then installed the printer (as a network printer over wifi) using the standard Printers icon in the control panel (I think it was called CUPS Printer Configuration Utility.) Worked first time.

    4. Re:No HP For Me by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind having a printer that doesn't gouge me on ink, but I'm not changing operating systems to print, and I really want to limit my hacking around the problem time.

      Then don't get a printer that uses ink. It's cheaper to use the dye sub machines at the drug store anyway, for the few things you actually want color for.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:No HP For Me by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      for the few things you actually want color for.
       
      I use a colour laser printer to print labels for bags of candy that I sell in my theatre concession. (I buy big bins of candy and pack them into smaller bags and seal them and label them.)
       
      A friend of mine (actually the guy that I hire to do carpentry work for me once in a while) sells baked goods at flea markets. He prints labels for his products (his logo and address, ingredients, best-before, etc.) on his colour laser printer too. He used to do it on an inkjet until I wised him up as to the cost difference between that and a colour laser.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    6. Re:No HP For Me by Laser+Dan · · Score: 1

      OKI printers are really nice.

      The one I am using now is a colour laser OKI 5900, and it works perfectly in Ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04.

    7. Re:No HP For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only experience I've had with a Kodak printer was being horrified to hear that someone's Kodak pops up a UAC dialog every time he prints.

    8. Re:No HP For Me by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the majority of people do not think like that. Hence, expect all printers to be serving ads in the future. Sad but true. Kind of like the lock-down practices of Apple.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    9. Re:No HP For Me by Arcorn · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you used a Canon printer? They jam constantly and are a bitch to unjam. Not to mention when you get them you have to find like 100 orange sticky things and remove them. I still have no idea why half of them are there but it took 30 minutes to get all of them last time I got a new printer.

    10. Re:No HP For Me by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      It was a couple of years ago when I had my Canon BJC-2100 bubble jet. Nice printer, never jammed.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    11. Re:No HP For Me by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      a User Account Control dialog? That doesn't sound right.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    12. Re:No HP For Me by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I'll seriously just stop buying printers if that happens. My hardware should not be advertising to me. I already paid for it once, why should I continue to pay for it?

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    13. Re:No HP For Me by grommit · · Score: 1

      About 2 to 3 times a week for the past 10 years with 3 different models of printers between my house and my in-law's house. I think one of them jammed once. I don't remember it taking very long to unjam. They do put quite a few orange shipping stickers on the printers. Maybe that's why mine don't jam very often. I wish there was an easier way to find the print heads though. That was the only reason I replaced one of my printers, I had plenty of ink but the print head had a few nozzles clogged.

    14. Re:No HP For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brother makes a network laser printer for about 150 that will work with cups natively. I have one at home, and set it up just to see what was involved. The linux machine is a vm and printed to it with no problems.

  11. donotwant! by oddTodd123 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am dumbfounded by HP's decision-making here. "What we discovered is that people were not bothered by it [an advertisement]," Nigro said. "Part of it I think our belief is you're used to it. You're used to seeing things with ads."

    That sounds like a ringing endorsement for the printer. "Buy our printer! It will make you feel all warm and cozy because it has ads, like everything else in your life!" Ugh. It's appalling.

    1. Re:donotwant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they are doing this wrong. The proper procedure is to put into your Terms and Conditions a statement that you will never spam their printer. Then wait a year, and spam their printer.

    2. Re:donotwant! by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      "What we discovered is that people were not bothered by it [an advertisement],"

      Ahh! So that's what it said? I couldn't tell due to a pop-up that appeared on that very page.

    3. Re:donotwant! by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      HP ran two trials where consumers received content from a U.S. national music magazine and major U.S. newspaper along with advertisements, said Stephen Nigro, senior vice president in HP's Imaging and Printing Group.

      Notice the word "trials". Now, if this is like any other trial, those people got the ink and paper and even the printer for free - of course they're weren't bothered. They weren't paying for the $10,000/gallon ink.

      When these get into the market place, I can guarantee that people will start bitching when they're buying inkjet cartridges all the time to pay for this.

      Anyway, when I want something printed, I buy a regular subscription because it's way cheaper to buy it from the publisher - and it a much higher quality than I could ever get from an HP printer or any other consumer grade printer.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    4. Re:donotwant! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      The problem here is they asked Catherine Tate if she was bothered by it...the conversation went a little like this:

      "Am I bothered by it?"
      "I'm not bothered by it."
      "I said I'm not bothered."
      "Look, I'm just not bothered."
      "I'M NOT BOTHERED!"

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    5. Re:donotwant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad block and no script have taken care of 98% of my popups.

    6. Re:donotwant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's appealling.

      FTFY.

    7. Re:donotwant! by ferrocene · · Score: 1

      Nigro, please.

      --
      Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
  12. You asked for it by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article it seems that the ads are part of on demand publications that you choose to have sent to you. So this is definitely an opt-in sort of thing. It is conceivable that printers with preview displays could be perverted to show ads as well but that doesn't seem to be in the works yet.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:You asked for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nickel says you won't be able to prevent (without more than trivial filtering in your firewall) the printer from phoning home to HP. Hell, I'd bet a lot of printers already do. That's valuable information for the printer company!

    2. Re:You asked for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From the article it seems that the ads are part of on demand publications that you choose to have sent to you. So this is definitely an opt-in sort of thing."

      For now, maybe. Until one of the following happens:

      a. Hackers find a way to spam everyone through their printers
      b. HP decides this is too good of a marketing opportunity to pass up and start advertising without an opt-in ...which is why I will never buy another HP product. Not to mention that their home-use printers are generally piles of crap and their ink is more expensive by weight than gold.

    3. Re:You asked for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before "opt in" is default? Virtually every purchase I make on line results in spam. Some give you the opt out but most either bury it or don't give you the option. Most of the company spam has an unsubscribe but you have to look hard because it's always buried and most as of the next purchase opt you back in so it's an unending battle. Fortunately I already refuse to buy HP printers but the first spam fax would definitely result in a hammer connecting with the printer and me buying another Epson.

    4. Re:You asked for it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      but that doesn't seem to be in the works yet

      Gah! We don't say these things in public. They're not terribly smart, remember?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  13. 20 minutes. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    That's how long it's going to take the community to figure out how it works and create a proxy for it that allows you to use all the cool services without the advertising. It'll probably even be built right into the next version of CUPS. BTW: Fuck you HP, It is my printer, not yours. That's why I don't print much (and if I do, I use my Epson printer with alternative ink and continuous system)

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  14. wasted effort :/ by Kathars1s · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They'd be wasting the effort sending that garbage to me. I'd refuse to buy into whatever it was just out of principle. Send me an ink allowance and i don't really care as long as it doesn't start printing ads on my school papers. Lol The cost of an ink cartridge is more expensive than half of the printers themselves. Firewall it. :/

  15. I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by dmomo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By purchase agreement of the free or subsidized printer? By perhaps getting a request to print on the lcd screen? Or maybe a popup on the computer that offers free coupons?

    Not to say it won't be sleazy. Not to say people won't be surprised by the ads.

    First let me say, I, like most of slashdot readers absolutely hate this crap. But to play Devil's advocate, suppose some consumers are not opposed to this kind of business relationship. Suppose they actually find value in it (ignoring the fact the you and I may consider it some kind of wrong). Should it be allowed to continue? I see insane ad practices happening time and time again. Sometimes they catch on and become normal. Other times they disappear (often quickly) as consumers revolt against them. Often, the ones that stick don't bother "normal" people. Whether it should or shouldn't is another topic, I guess. Where do you draw the line?

    My view is that our outcries against this stuff have their place. Hopefully it makes "normal" consumers more aware. Hopefully. Sometimes these practices stick. Sometimes they don't. Maybe the ones that do are a fair tradeoff. My concern is that the absurdity and intrusion escalates.

    There is a problem. Ads want to be targeted. We want to hate ads. Maybe it will always be that way. The best we can don is to keep people conscious so at least they're aware of what they could possibly be giving up when allowing them into their lives.

    This printer thing. I don't see how it will stick. But HP and Yahoo! are sure as Hell going to see. Let's just hope it doesn't set a precedent, or at least some kind of civil middle ground can be found.

    I absolutely hated Yahoo's new login screen. There was a Chevy Ad that took up the whole page. What I did like was the fact that there was a forum at the top of the screen to provide feedback on the ad. This is a new trend in my opinion. Let's hope our outcries continue to bring about changes like this.

    1. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      It'll just be in the driver EULA and no one will ever read it, but all will agree.

    2. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Suppose some people in the world (all three of them) find value in being spammed by email. Should we therefore allow spammers to continue operating their "business", or is it still ok to put them in jail?

    3. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Good point. Sure. Spammers should be allowed to spam "those" people. But not you and me. Of course, you can see how that would be a business model destined for failure. This comes back to what I refer to as "normal" people. "Majority" isn't the best word either, but maybe it's better. If most people actually found value in spam, then, sure. We who hate it would be the outliers. But most don't find value in spam, but most still receive spam.

      Again. I made the previous case as a Devil's advocate more or less. My first reaction was to hope on Twitter and sensationalize this. Then I started thinking. By doing that, everyone would cry "OMG, they're making our printers print stuff we didn't ask for. They're wasting our paper". Those outcries would be wrong and right. Right in that "this is aweful." Wrong in that "they are not yet." So when, next year, this "doesn't" happen due to the fact that it's asinine. Those "normal" people who also agreed that it was idiotic will be settling for the "less evil" version that asks them permission before doing so. Who knows. For all I know they declare the intent to do this crap knowing well they'll feel the hate for it. If they do, they don't do it. The do something "less evil". If they hear no outcries. ??? Profit?

    4. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by dmomo · · Score: 1

      My first reaction exactly. My second reaction, this just won't end up taking off. It's that terrible of an idea. Now, that's not to say some watered down form won't come our way soon.

    5. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the driver upgrade and bug fix, which will be released after 3 months, and which won't be accessible except to owners of the printer. So nobody can see it until after they're already committed.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by unkiereamus · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing that people always seem to forget, ads and spam WORK.

      I you really hate ads, then make sure that you never click though, (Ditto for spam, of course), and you never buy any product that advertises to you irl, and make sure no one you know does either, and once the ads and the spam are unprofitable, then people will stop paying to put them out there.

      Simple, no?

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    7. Re:I'm sure they'll be "solicited" somehow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spam turns a profit if one in a million buys the C14l1s. However good you are, you can't reach that one in a million and convince him otherwise.

  16. HP must have a death wish by divide+overflow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is such an obviously, outrageously bad idea that it boggles the mind. If HP goes ahead with such a plan it will richly deserve the universal drubbing it will receive. HP would have difficulty escaping the wrath of the marketplace and the brand would be severely tarnished for years to come.

  17. Pull out the paper / power? by mongoose(!no) · · Score: 0, Troll

    So what's to stop me from pulling out the power or leaving it paper/inkless when I'm not using it?

    1. Re:Pull out the paper / power? by Ammishdave · · Score: 1

      HP prioritizing their print jobs over yours.

    2. Re:Pull out the paper / power? by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      You haven't read the printer EULA, isn't it ?!?

    3. Re:Pull out the paper / power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I reckon when you wanted to print, you could drive/fly home and reconnect the power or put paper in... then drive/fly back to where you were and use it. Then drive/fly back to disconnect the power or take the paper out... then drive/fly back. Yea, that wouldn't be too convoluted. >_>

  18. Firewalled by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    Who the hell would put a printer online anyway without a firewall or some kind of IP whitelist?

    I mean it's not going to be the first time that hackers will jump into your network from a "bit too intelligent for it's own good" printer.

    Also, as a busy system administrator, do we really want another device to add to our security patch weeklies?

    1. Re:Firewalled by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Your mom, or dad, or grandmother. Real people. Do you think Joe Whitetrash walking into Wal-Mart to get himself one of 'dem printer thingys knows fuck-all what a firewall or IP whitelist is?

      I agree with the hacker and sysadmin comments, but if you're buying a printer like this for use in a corporate environment, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  19. Yeah Samsung by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    We've got a color samsung printer at work. I think we got it on sale for $150. That's even affordable for most home users. I think my dad's spent that much in HP ink this year.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  20. Ads aren't supplied with regular jobs. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 5, Informative

    While the article is a little confusing, if you read it a couple of times, it becomes clear that the advertisements are only supplied with their "scheduled delivery" service. Basically, HP is signing up with content providers and Yahoo to provide content in your printer every morning.

    The subscriber selects the content (newspaper sections), HP is responsible for fetching + formatting + advertisement insertion. Yahoo provides the localised (through IP address lookup) advertisements.

    Basically, this is the Sci-Fi print-on-demand newspaper where the paper includes content from multiple sources.

    So, no, advertisements aren't inserted into the middle of your print job.

    I would say that the demand for the service is probably dwindling, but who knows. It will probably be a good little money maker for HP and Yahoo.

    1. Re:Ads aren't supplied with regular jobs. by dmomo · · Score: 1

      And probably the outcry won't be all that great due to the fact that it's mainly to print "web stuff". And we're so used to seeing ads on the web.

    2. Re:Ads aren't supplied with regular jobs. by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Dear slashfail, this is what the summary should look like.

  21. Lexmark Lasers Rule by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My Lexmark printer driver is around 3 bytes long. I dumped HP when their driver crossed the 200MB level and installed a bunch of background processes.

    I didn't buy a computer to run HP software I bought it for many things a very small thing being to occasionally print. But HP seems to want to pretty well turn my desktop into an HP dedicated print server.

    I have only "Office Spaced" one electronic device in my life and it was my HP all-in-one. It was very satisfying to smash the crap out of it. All that thing was built for was to get me to buy ink. Every time I turned it on to scan the thing would go through this 2 minute cleaning cycle and use up some more ink. I would literally go through more than half an ink cartridge without printing a thing. A printer that uses ink when I am only scanning is just stupid. Then when it ran out of ink the whole menu system basically wouldn't let me get past the no-ink-complaining so that I could do hardly anything else with the printer. It wasn't an all-in-one is was a single purpose ink selling machine.

    So no surprise that HP is figuring out a way to screw their customers even harder. "Yes I bought your printer so that you could make money selling advertising." Or maybe people buy printers to print stuff; their own stuff.

    1. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by vlueboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, maybe not all then, but Lexmark printers are also guilty of installing must-have services. My 3 year old Z1420 installs 2. It also goes fails if you disable those, or at least bidirectional printing (to allow the otherwise low-ink dialog from requiring a local click that kills the functionality of remote print-jobs.) My printer croaks up license agreements on the printer-connected PC whenever I add a remote PC, and like every USB printer in existance, randomly fails to be recognized as 'Connected'"

      Anyway, the drivers aren't huge like HP's at least.

    2. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      i had a lexmark printer, bought it about 6 months before windows xp came out. never worked with xp, lexmark never released new drivers. if lexmark are happy to force me to buy a new printer to replace one that's only 6 months old, I'm happy to live my life without ever buying another lexmark printer. brother or canon are where it's at

    3. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You just listed all the reasons I swore to never buy another lexmark, bloated barely functional drivers along with "rebate" ink cartridges. You can also tack on the idiotic proprietary scanning methodology and the windows only compatibility.

      Im looking at an epsom A3 next I think, theres no reason you can't refill them indefinitely with the reset tool because the print heads are fixed (i.e. not part of the cartridge), can you imagine having an A3 printer where the cost of ink is 'negligible'

    4. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree there - I wouldn't touch an HP inkjet device of any description today. (Actually, I probably wouldn't touch an inkjet device of any description, but that's bye the bye) And it's entirely HP's fault.

      It's common enough to find that hardware companies are lousy at writing software and vice-versa, but HP have turned that into an absolute art form.

      I have a small Kyocera laser printer at home. Cheap, speaks Postscript and PCL5, toner cartridges are £40 a throw (mainly because Kyocera coat the drum so it doesn't wear out at the same time as your toner runs out and doesn't need regular replacing).

      Question: Are HP's bigger (think departmental) printers still OK or are they demanding absurd software as well these days?

    5. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Lexmark Optra S 1650 laser. It still works fine, but the toner's running out. I'm not entirely sure I'll bother buying another, as they're FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS a shot. I can buy a whole bloody printer for that. On the other hand, it works flawlessly with Linux, which is a big plus.

    6. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first rule with HP printers is: Don't install HP printer drivers. The networked color lasers work great from any system with generic drivers. Get the .ppd from the mac installation part and it works better than the 'provided' linux drivers. The generic windows driver also works (no PS in the name but outpurts PS) if you have that system installed.

    7. Re:Lexmark Lasers Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your printer driver is only three bytes, as in 24 bits? How does that work?
      Do you perhaps mean 3 kb? That would make a lot more sense.

  22. Some assembly required by steltho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    HP's ePrint printers, some of which will become available next month, are connected to the user's home router, which means they will have an IP address.

    Good luck getting your users to correctly configure their routers to make this work.

    1. Re:Some assembly required by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd wager this isn't a push service. I bet there is some 600MB client that has to be installed on a computer on the network. Or perhaps, it uses UPNP and the printer just opens the ports it needs. Most people have all their network gear running with default settings and almost all recent consumer routers have upnp enabled by default.

    2. Re:Some assembly required by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      why? it'll pick up a local IP from dhcp just like any other network device in your home. presumably the printer will then connect out on port 80 to pick up it's ads - so not needing any changes to router firewall - or it'll have a unique email address based on its serial number and a pop mail client built in to display them.

  23. Power off by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

    Just turn the power off when you aren't using the printer. That is what I do with my printer now.

    --
    GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:Power off by mxh83 · · Score: 1

      When you turn it on, you conveniently receive all the ads first, before your printed page.

  24. Tray 3? by Xacid · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think if they started advertising for penis enlargement that they'd start going for my 11x17 tray just to prove a point/overcompensate?

    1. Re:Tray 3? by mavasplode · · Score: 1

      Would make for an amusing paper size error.

      --
      ACTUAL SIZE!!!
    2. Re:Tray 3? by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      More likely, they'd have to attempt to spam plotters with ANSI E sized paper

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    3. Re:Tray 3? by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      Mini Cooper should team up with those advertisements. That way when people ask you why you drive such a small car you can say, "I'm compensating for something."

  25. Ya who? by AmazinglySmooth · · Score: 1

    Who is this "Yahoo!" that you speak of? Sounds like a real jerk to me.

    1. Re:Ya who? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Who is this "Yahoo!" that you speak of? Sounds like a real jerk to me.

      Worse than a jerk. He's a Yahoo!
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo_(Gulliver's_Travels)
      http://www.lqart.org/illustfold/gulliver/gultrav.html

    2. Re:Ya who? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that not only would a company call itself Yahoo but that millions of people would voluntarily do business with it.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Ya who? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      At least in the U.S., it's more commonly known as a happy exclamation. As in: Yahoo, Yip, Yip, Yipee!

  26. Nod to Brother by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sitting next to a Brother ink jet printer right now. I really prefer lasers, but in this case I wanted a large format multi-function machine. My Brother will both print and scan up to 11x17" (equivalent to A3) and it cost me less than $200, shipped to my front door. It shipped with full, high-capacity ink cartridges, not HP's half cartridges. And while it does include some software it's pretty lightweight, and is basically used to handle features like networked scanning and a monitor program to let you know when the ink is low. Both are optional. And yes, Brother explicitly offers drivers for Linux.The print quality is what it is -- could be better, could be a lot worse -- and the build quality seems fairly plasticky, but that seems par for the course with today's printers. Overall my only complaint was that the price was so low it wasn't even a significant tax write-off.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Nod to Brother by Fnord666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sitting next to a Brother ink jet printer right now. I really prefer lasers, but in this case I wanted a large format multi-function machine. My Brother will both print and scan up to 11x17" (equivalent to A3) and it cost me less than $200, shipped to my front door. It shipped with full, high-capacity ink cartridges, not HP's half cartridges. And while it does include some software it's pretty lightweight, and is basically used to handle features like networked scanning and a monitor program to let you know when the ink is low. Both are optional. And yes, Brother explicitly offers drivers for Linux.The print quality is what it is -- could be better, could be a lot worse -- and the build quality seems fairly plasticky, but that seems par for the course with today's printers. Overall my only complaint was that the price was so low it wasn't even a significant tax write-off.

      I had a brother multifunction inkjet for a while. It worked well right up until the time when it ran out of one of the ink colors. At that point it started demanding a new ink cartridge and refused to do anything else. Fax? Nope. Scan? Nope. It was locked up until you replaced the ink cartridge. It was after midnight and I just wanted to fax out a contract. I did go to the office supply store the next day, but I replaced the printer instead.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Nod to Brother by npsimons · · Score: 1

      And yes, Brother explicitly offers drivers for Linux.

      No, they don't. They offer drivers for Linux on i386. Much as I love my Brother multifunction laser, I couldn't switch my print server to an NSLUG because of Brother's proprietary closed source i386 only drivers.

    3. Re:Nod to Brother by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Well... I can't speak to that. This is a $200 networked ink jet printer with built-in WiFi, so I don't really need a print server.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  27. Why print using e-mail?? by JohnWiney · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to print using e-mail? If I print something, it is because I want it on paper, and to get it I have to be near the printer. If I am near the printer, I don't need to use e-mail. I can't imagine any reason for using e-mail o print that would compensate for getting spam.

    1. Re:Why print using e-mail?? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The answer apparently is that if you are using an ipad or similar, you can't print any other way.

  28. This is bad by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    If you consider the slippery slope theory, it may undermine the whole CAN SPAM Act. It looks like spamming where you cannot really opt out. If you really need internet printing you might be able to just hook the printer up to a computer and configure the computer to be a print server bypassing HP's software.

  29. 'Targeted'?? by MrMacman2u · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean these printers will ALSO leak out possibly sensitive information to the world (Yahoo) in order to target the advertisements that will be printed using the owner's ink and the owner's paper?

    Talk about the mother of all bad ideas. Even if this printer was FREE with these ad subsidies, you still have to pay for ink cartridges that are excessively expensive and the paper as well, so this will also add to waste and user costs.

    I guess this is just another in my long (and ever growing) list of reasons why I will never, EVER purchase a HP inkjet printer. I suggest everyone else vote with their wallets and abandon support for HP in favor of another company that doesn't steal information about what their users print in order to make users PAY with the ink they purchased to print advertisements based on information swiped from those very same users!

    --
    This signature is lame.
    1. Re:'Targeted'?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. In fact my new Brother printer is scheduled to be delivered today. I didn't even look at HP products.

      HP lost my business years ago when I discovered that my "empty" ink cartridges regained their ink if I set the date on my computer back. After digging around in one of these cartridges I found a little chip that I presume had a "drop dead" date in it. Oh, and my particular "too old" cartridge was magenta. Which disabled the entire printer, including monochrome printing. I trashed the damn thing and haven't bought a HP product since. That was about ten years ago.

    2. Re:'Targeted'?? by MrMacman2u · · Score: 1

      I own the Brother MFC-5890CN that is networked, has 11"x17" printing, uses individual and inexpensive ink tanks, doesn't have HP's "chipped" cartridges, "stop working by" restrictions on "cartridge freshness", decent print quality and while feeling a bit "cheap" in it's build construction, it has proven to be an extremely solid and reliable workhorse.

      I print 80-200 pages of mixed media (text and graphics) a month and haven't experienced any more of a hiccup than running out of paper or ink.

      I congratulate you on your choice! I hope you'll be as happy with yours as I am with mine!

      --
      This signature is lame.
  30. heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just when you thought HP printers couldn't get any worse...

  31. That's out of hand by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What fucking bright spark in marketing thought this would be something ANY customer would want their printer to do, and what idiot manager approved it on the basis that people would put up with it? Someone should bill them for the paper, ink and recycling costs. $1000/picoliter isn't it? Fuckers!!!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:That's out of hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://welcome.hp.com/country/us/en/contact_us.html I just let them know what I thought, perhaps you should too.

    2. Re:That's out of hand by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Lets see. Some customers have printing contracts where they pay by the page, with Ink and paper provided by the company they bought the printer from. Assuming that it wouldn't cost you that page to have the advert delivered, and the targeted advertising is combined with a reduced price of the printer I can see this becoming attractive for a lot of medium sized businesses.

      I agree this won't fly if they don't compensate the cost of the ink / paper but have a more open mind. This may turn out to have been a very good idea regardless if YOU like it or not.

    3. Re:That's out of hand by syousef · · Score: 1

      I agree this won't fly if they don't compensate the cost of the ink / paper but have a more open mind. This may turn out to have been a very good idea regardless if YOU like it or not.

      Well I can't think of a more FUCKED UP example of corporate hypocrisy than advertising by print while pushing the whole "green" agenda - no plastic bags because they harm the environment, no incandescent bulbs please, we're green. But oh those printed ads no one reads, they're necessary for business. I'd like 1 million trees. But that's okay because we'll replant them. HORSE SHIT. It's environmental vandalism.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:That's out of hand by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ease up man, one small company probably misprints more paper due to dodgy printer drivers and useless computer illiterate staff in a day than HP would spam them all month. It's all part of a metric. If you spam the company rather than just advertise the people will stop signing up to your crap (just look at what happened to cable) Anyway, ... paper grows on trees :)

    5. Re:That's out of hand by syousef · · Score: 1

      Nope. I'm not about to ease up. This is corporate madness. Force something onto your customer that they don't want in order to try to further your own goals, all the while ignoring the fact that you're making your product less useful and a bigger pain in the ass.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:That's out of hand by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And just what about this is forced? The printing industry is highly competitive and HP doesn't have a single product that can't be found from a competitor, and amongst that they aren't even one of the biggest corporate players.

      Just because there's only 4 or so big name consumer printing companies does not mean that the corporate world has an effective oligopoly too.

      This isn't the usual ISP's screwing customers who have no choice. You have a choice, consumer or business. Don't like it, don't buy it. HP's resulting share price will be an index of how well this works.

      There's much more productive things to vent your energetic frustration at.

  32. Port 631, anyone? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been able to print from off-site for years. I just have to tunnel in through a firewall to get at my printer so that I don't act as the building charity copy center, but how is any of this new?

  33. It won't be bothersome if by vlueboy · · Score: 1

    the way to deliver the printed ads is ONLY done by
    + overwriting your default HP test page image, which you won't care to waste ink for anyway
    + overwriting the annoying cartridge alignment page, which these days doesn't even need user feedback to align each new ink, so I have little idea why it's printed.

    BTW: I won't be surprised when home routers start to be used to spew ads per wireless session, seeing how they already have an open connection and control over what your browser sees. Perhaps they'll use timed redirects, popups or frames. Ads are making their way into every form of media we use, including our self-produced stuff.

    Sadly, ink itself dries up when stored, and we won't be able to stock it if HP just says "we no longer sell the non-ad printer ink, and our chip tech won't let you refill your old cartridges generically." Other than that, it's time to start a stockpile of "dumb" devices that will just leave us alone.

    1. Re:It won't be bothersome if by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Ads are making their way into every form of media we use, including our self-produced stuff.

      Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

    2. Re:It won't be bothersome if by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      "we no longer sell the non-ad printer ink, and our chip tech won't let you refill your old cartridges generically."

      My printer (HP Professional Series Color 2500CM) had ink cartridges that can be easily refilled and while they do have chips in them to protect against refills and to force an expiration date, the printer needs that the driver supports those functions (don't know how it's supposed to work). The driver from HP site does, and refuses to print with my cartridges that were supposed to expire in 2004, but the driver that WinXP comes with does not have this "feature". Linux can print to this printer too without problems.

      Oh, and the printer has a network connection, so it I really wanted to print something while I was away from home, I could connect to my network using VPN and print.

    3. Re:It won't be bothersome if by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

      I'm going all Freddy Krueger on whatever company ad I see when that happens. Or just scare Rakishi into patenting this so no company can implement it when the tech is ready ;)

    4. Re:It won't be bothersome if by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      belkin did this with one of their routers. it redirected web traffic to an advert for belkin stuff periodically. unsurprisingly there was a bit of an outcry at the time.

  34. Test the laws by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and Google out by calling ''targeted' advertisements" a mistake.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  35. RTFA Please :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA, it seems that these advertisements would come out only on pages such as scheduled newspaper print jobs, etc. in place of the publisher's non-/less-targeted advertising... No net gain or loss for ink usage as compared to printing whatever ads were on the page in the first place.

    If you want news without ads, use an Adblocker, and schedule a cron job for printing.

    It's not like the thing is just going to turn on and print ads.

  36. The InkJets rip you off in ink price, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got rid of a Lexmark because their inkjet printers had ink that was too expensive, though, so pay attention to the model as well as the brand.

    I was also unhappy with Lexmark for trying to abuse the DMCA to lock people out from making compatible ink cartridges.

  37. I know I've mentioned this before by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    But I had a printer from HP once. At one point when I tried to print the action failed and it gave me an error. Did the error give any hint of why the print failed? Of course not, it just told me "Print failed" which was obvious and useless. So now I'm supposed to believe a company that could even manage to generate a proper error message can handle something like preventing spam? Yeah, I'm not buying it. (Oh for what it's worth it was a network permission issue. I had to set up a guest account so printing over the network was "ok". Of course having an error indicating network security problem would have made that so much simpler.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  38. Correction ... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    V'ger was looking for its creator, but it didn't think primitive carbon based life could have built it so it thought that the Humans where preventing the creator from responding.

    The probe looking for the whales was from a species that was, to the best of my knowledge, never identified but it was not intentionally trying to kill all the humans, it just didn't care that its comm beam was ionizing the ocean and flooding the land.

    But you do have a good point, how will these printers (mis)behave if they can't contact a designated server. Even if you don't opt-in to the adds HP will try and use the Internet to upgrade the printer's firmware, and how many of us have tried to print a plain text document but the printer won't work because it is out of cyan?

    I can hear it now;
    Me:"Print the document"
    Printer:"I can't reach the server to update my firmware and confirm that I have not been stolen from my rightful owner"
    Me:"I am your rightful owner, you will do what I tell you to!"
    Printer:"I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that."
    Me:"I'm not dave!"

    1. Re:Correction ... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      [Totally Off-Topic to discussion of the article.]

      I always thought it amusing that V'ger was the Voyager 2 space probe finally returning to Earth. The "space whale" in Star Trek IV, was just called a space probe, so you're right about the species not being properly identified. They did make a few hints that it was in fact, a whale of some sort, attempting to communicate with it's Earth-bound cousins, much in the same manner as V'ger came back looking for "the creator". I always took it as an inside joke that one was referencing the other, and that this same theme was referenced again even later when Picard got to fight his clone in Nemesis, when it too, came looking for him. Maybe it was the creator of the whales? :D

      I am sure there are other examples in the various series returning to this theme as well.

      I always had the theory that V'ger was actually found and modified by The Borg, explaining the extensions, etc we see when it finally makes its appearance, and sent back out to possibly return home and then send the info it gathers back to Borg space. Those extensions were very Borg-like when you make a comparison between them and the ablative plating found on Borg Cube ships. The apparent, increased intelligence of V'ger could have directly resulted from a combination of centuries of data gathering and then interface with the Borg Collective for who knows how long afterwards. Even some of the questions it asks, and the manner in which they were phrased were very Borg-like in their structure.

      Of course from what I've read, there were many inside jokes and references written into every series of Star Trek, including the original.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    2. Re:Correction ... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Actually it was Voyager 6.

      Your Trek-Fu is weak. I would suggest a ST marathon, skipping 5 is OK, to renew your understanding of the ways of the Trek.

  39. Just a heads up by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Your sig goes to an empty page.

    1. Re:Just a heads up by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      Your sig goes to an empty page.

      Thanks for the heads up! I currently don't have any Japanese puzzle boxes up for sale on eBay due to extremely slow sales in this down economy. I usually put them up starting in September when people start buying gifts in preparation for the holidays. Feel free to leave me a message on eBay (username = e-dude2) if you'd like me to list some boxes.

  40. Silly boy by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that wires are just tubes with a bit of metal inside to give them strength. You got big tubes beneath the road and small tubes called wires inside the house.

    Here I will proof it by removing the useless metal from my network tube[CARRIER LOST]

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  41. Sigh, harmless but bound to explode by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    So basically what this new service is that you get a free "newsletter" that is automatically printed for you at a scheduled time. Bit like getting your own newspaper printed before you wake up like a coffee machine and bread maker on a timer but instead of just printing the same page for everyone, they make the ads in the newspaper dynamic, targetted specifically at you.

    Pretty harmless... sure, the inkt and paper cost you money but a regular newspaper also costs money.

    But then, there used to be unwritten rules about where the ads were placed. None on the front page. Only small ones on the front page. Now they just wrap the entire newspaper in an ad.

    Same with tv. You used to get station ID's and "upcoming features" between programs, then during the credits. then a small text bar at the bottom. Now 50% of the screen covers the action for half a minute or more. Often to tell you to watch the program beneath the ad.

    How long before these "free" newsletters will be advertorials with 1 sentence of content on a full color print that uses so much ink the paper feels wet?

    The idea itself isn't wrong, I just know advertisers have never learned to limit themselves. No advertiser given access to a new medium will ever say "Okay, that is enough, lets not go any further". Bigger, louder, more annoying. Until finally the poor user gives up in disgust and then the advertiser will ask: "What happened? Why are my ads no longer watched. Maybe they weren't loud enough and annoying enough!"

    First they came with the banners, and I did not object because I was not a banner.... well you know were I am going with this.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  42. RTFA!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't anyone bother to actually read the article before posting on here?

    "HP also launched a program called "scheduled delivery," where a user can regularly schedule printing, for example, portions of a daily newspaper every day at 7 a.m.

    The company also sees a potential for localized, targeted advertising to go along *WITH* the content."

  43. It's not "your" printer by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not "your" printer. You don't own the software in the printer, or the driver, or the service that handles spamming you. You're just licensing that. You're renting a printing service, and the landlord controls what you can do with the printer. Read your EULA.

    1. Re:It's not "your" printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why the hell did Walmart pay the state government sales tax? Says so right on my receipt. They wouldn't, say, be committing a massive fraud against every customer who bought software or hardware from them, which would necessitate a class action suit and criminal charges, right?

      If Walmart's lawyers end up being obligated to fight against EULAs, they'd be unenforceable in a week.

    2. Re:It's not "your" printer by Arimus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They did sell you something: You own the cardboard box the printer came in and possibly, only possibly mind you, the actual plastic and metal the printer is made of... just don't expect to own the firmware, the drivers or any software bits.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    3. Re:It's not "your" printer by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your jurisdiction, but where I am, you pay sales tax on hire charges as well as purchases.

    4. Re:It's not "your" printer by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > It's not "your" printer.

      If I walk into the store, pick up the box with the printer in it, carry it to the counter, plunk down the requested cash, get a receipt, and walk out with the printer I own it. The only exception would be if the store required that I sign an explicit rental contract before taking my money.

      > You don't own the software in the printer...

      The storage (ROM, hard disk...) in the printer constitutes a copy (that is, a physical object) of the software. I own the printer therefor I own the storage therefor I own the copy. USA copyright law gives me the right, with no requirement for any bullshit licenses, to use software of which I own a copy.

      > ...or the driver...

      As above for the driver CD.

      > You're just licensing that. You're renting a printing service, and the
      > landlord controls what you can do with the printer.

      Even it it was a rental (see above) the terms of the contract would govern what I could do with the printer.

      > Read your EULA.

      If I didn't agree to it before I left the store it is not a contract (not that I am fool enough to agree to anything without reading it anyway).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:It's not "your" printer by gknoy · · Score: 1

      While sibling respondents will mention the weakness of EULAs for things that you've never seen, I'm just curious how long it will be before someone feels compelled to jailbreak their printer.

    6. Re:It's not "your" printer by Animats · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious how long it will be before someone feels compelled to jailbreak their printer.

      Printers already have 1) the code that prints the secret pattern of little yellow dots that identifies the printer to law enforcement, 2) the code that recognizes the pattern in European Union money and won't print that, and 3) the code that recognizes the proprietary ink cartridges.

      With newer printers, you're pwned.

  44. what about: by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

    using the ads as a replacement for a weekly "keep your print heads clean" test page?

  45. There are some things you need paper for... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Funny

    there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age.

    A paper aeroplane? Try that with your laptop you'll have to get a new one.

  46. PPD drivers by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    You can't say the same of any other printer out there.

    Yes you can. Any networked printer with a ppd driver will work fine under Mac, Linux or Windows.

  47. Hack it by krischik · · Score: 1

    I am not worried about the official opt-in ads. Nor is the OP. I am worried that somone hacks the system and sends inofficial SPAM.

  48. Hackers. by krischik · · Score: 1

    This is not what worries me. What worries me is that some hacker finds a way to exploit the system to send SPAM.

    1. Re:Hackers. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > What worries me is that some hacker finds a way to exploit the system to
      > send SPAM.

      Some cracker will, which is why Web-connected everything is a very bad idea. Unfortunately, its time has come.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  49. And the second planned spam... by md65536 · · Score: 1

    ... is an ad for a printer that doesn't print spam.

  50. How I'd get people to sign up for it by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    Here's how I would make it stick if I were HP (assuming the costs worked out in HP's favor):

    -Print one ad per day
    -Targeted as much as possible (user can select interests upon signing up)
    -Only accept humorous ads (this may be tricky as people's humor vary...but it's usually pretty obvious when something is at least meant to be funny
    -At least once a week, one of the ads is a coupon (targeted if possible)
    -Every X amount of time, those who've signed up receive a free ink cartridge in the mail
    -Have it be opt-in only

    A decent number of people are only interested in the Superbowl because of the ads. A decent number of people sign up for joke of the day mailing lists. A decent number of people will put up with ads for coupons. A decent number of people will put up with ads for free stuff.

    Depending of frequency of the free ink cartridges, I might sign up for that.

  51. Yet another reason NOT to buy a HP printer by jonwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all the crap HP are doing lately, you would have to be stupid to buy a HP printer.

    Get a printer from a decent company such as Canon or Epson or Brother.

    1. Re:Yet another reason NOT to buy a HP printer by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      I don't know. It depends so much on the specific model. I had an excellent inkjet from HP years ago, then very crappy one from Canon, which is why I bought my current one from HP again. The drivers are at best mediocre, but the Wlan printing (and scanning) works rather well.

      If you print more than a few pages a month, you should make sure that you get a model that has XL-sized ink cartons available. (Or get a laser)

      --
      It is what it is.
    2. Re:Yet another reason NOT to buy a HP printer by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If I was going to buy a Laser, I would buy an Epson or a Brother, not a HP.

      Yes, HP printers were good once. But the ones you can buy now are NOT (Lasers included)

    3. Re:Yet another reason NOT to buy a HP printer by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Yes, HP printers were good once. But the ones you can buy now are NOT (Lasers included)

      Umm, can you tell me what is wrong with my printer (other than it being HP)?

      --
      It is what it is.
    4. Re:Yet another reason NOT to buy a HP printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to install a Brother printer a couple of weeks ago. It was supposed to connect to my wireless network. I guess it did. But I couldn't get any of my computers to reliably print to it. One time it did print something out AFTER I uninstalled the driver.

      I took it back and got an HP which worked pretty well, namely it printed things out without trouble.

      Sorry Brother isn't that good. Canon or Epson may be ok, but they didn't have laser printers in the stores.

  52. Wow, just another excuse ... by daveime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's bad enough that HP printers INSIST on printing a test page seemingly every time you cycle the power, or remove and reinsert a cartridge after shaking it to see how much ink is left.

    It's bad enough that they insist on bundling over 100 fucking meg of software when all you really want is the bloody printer driver.

    It's bad enough (environmentally) that it's probably more economical to buy a new printer that comes with "free" starter cartridges than to buy replacement cartridges for your existing printer ... at least here in Philippines prices about 1500 pesos ($33 USD) for a printer, and 1700 pesos ($37 USD) for a b/w and color cartridge.

    Now they're being allowed to spam your printer with internet ads (full colour of course) ?

    Fuck HP, tired of their bullshit.

    1. Re:Wow, just another excuse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The test page can be easily turned off. I do this on all of our printers. Please do. The trees will thank you. -Lorax

    2. Re:Wow, just another excuse ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Prices have dropped to the point that you can buy a color laser printer for less than the purchase price of an inkjet and 2 sets of refills (the toner should outlast all three sets of ink cartridges), and 3rd party refilled toner cartridges work out to half a cent/page for black, and about 5c/page for color.

      Don't get me wrong. Samsung's cheap color lasers are far from perfect, and the almost constant problem of mis-fed paper is greatly irritating, but I'd still never consider going back to ink. When my current printer needs a new drum (more expensive than the printer) I'm going to have to debate getting a newer model of an equally crappy printer, upgrading to a more expensive decent color laser, or maybe (not likely) paying 75% as much for a low-end monochrome laser that's a bit more reliable.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  53. Speaking of ads by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    When I clicked this I got a popup ad with a big spinning wheel and a sign saying loading. It had a close box too. So I click the close box and it collapses to a small box on the side of the page that says "Stop waiting for the network. Get a better network. Juniper systems".

    Genius!

    Even more interestingly, if I refresh the page I don't see the same ad. In fact most of the time I don't see any ad at all. If I follow the link from slashdot however, I do get ads. So it's like they know they should only hit you the first time you visit the site, not on a refresh.

    If I clone the tab in Opera I can get the ad again, and it's as I thought - the spinner is actually the ad, nothing is loading. The text says "Still waiting for automation, still waiting for simplicity..." and then it collapses whether or not you click the close box.

    The ad goes here

    http://www.thenewnetworkishere.com/us/en/?WT.mc_id=WT_US_GE_028&CAMPAIGN_NAME=WT_US_GE_AdvAllRichMedia

    And you can see they have a bunch of spinning wheels and progress bars as adverts.

    HP could learn a lot from this sort of advertising. Now on to the article. What they are doing would actually be sort of OK if they got the advertisers to pay for the ink rather than the people that get spammed. Only sort of though, it's a seriously flawed idea.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  54. As long as HP prints money... by cpghost · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't care about the ads, as long as those new HP printers can also print USD or EUR bills to pay for the ink cartidges (and for other things that each BOFH needs).

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  55. Darn! I'm going to miss out on this opportunity by Whuffo · · Score: 1

    Since I quit buying anything from HP after that laptop fiasco - I guess I'll just have to miss out on having my printer spam me. They keep on Inventing so many interesting products that show how much they care about their customers that it's hard to sit back and just watch it go by without me.

    But it's OK; this is just the price I'm going to have to pay for making the choice to say NO to any HP products.

  56. Disappointed. by dandart · · Score: 1

    I'll write an angry letter and sue! Shame the ads will be all over my letters too.

  57. Can't Firewall it by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone keeps saying "Firewall it!", but that defeats the purpose of the printer, which is to allow email-printing from HP's servers. If it can't get sent stuff from HP's servers, you can't email to it, but if it can be sent stuff from HP's servers, HP can send SPAM. Unless you've got a computer in between that does image recognition of any postscript attachments coming across the pipe, and edits out HP SPAM, you might as well just buy a model without the email feature.

  58. The more things change... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

    Thias seems to harken back to the days of "Toner phoners" and ads being sent to random fax machines.

    --
    I want to shoot the messenger!
  59. RE: by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    If this is how HP is going to help revenue then I am very disappointed in this. I have to say the idea of the printer is great but this whole idea of targeted advertisement to the printer is just bad business. I hope they build in some type of spam filter because a lot of other companies will starting doing this and you can just burn threw ink, paper and all the ware and tare on the printer.

  60. Honestly by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    I have no problem with this, but wait until they see what I charge for the paper and the ink...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  61. Here's how it will work. by Yaos · · Score: 1

    As you install the 10 GB drivers and software set, you will be given page after page of checkboxes, all of them checked. You'll click past them and it will turn out those were all the ads. The drivers will take 5 hours to install, and once installed the printer will refuse to print until you replace all of the ink cartridges and reinstall the drivers again. There is also a 2 hour configuration time, that uses 100 pages, each time the printer is powered off and then on.

  62. The US fax law is USCC section 18, paragraph 2701. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check it out. Since HP already has a relationship with you as the vendor of your printer, it will be difficult to block them, especially with the combination fax/copier/printer devices.

    It's been a good law, and withstood constitutional challenges. Attempts to expand it to include email spam have failed because of lobbying by the Direct Marketing Association, which fears blocking ads from their members.

  63. hp printer issues by wkk2 · · Score: 1

    I'm happy with my HP printer with one exception: The web interface won't allow me to lock the printer keypad and the cat won't stop printing test pages.

  64. I'll just add this to my list... by dannydawg5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I'll just add this to my list of why I hate HP...

    -300 MB printer drivers
    -$30 for a ketchup packet of ink
    -hardware\software designed to actually lie about ink levels
    -scanner and other bundled software that simply does not work
    -software takes over your computer as bad as QuickTime and AOL
    -And now, advertisements directly sent to your printer!

    At what point do we just start referring to HP as malware vendor?

    I think of HP as one of the companies that people go to solve a simple problem, printing, and these people have learned to accept the terrible deal as a necessary evil, because they need to print, and HP = printing. It is like all the poor folks paying for the $100 Adobe Acrobat + 1 GB install process when there are other PDF creation tools that are free and better.

    HP is making tons of money off of by being a synonym for printing. Everybody that knows better has already left, and the people still around buying will just accept this new thing, ads on their printer, as just another necessary evil. I think it will hurt them though. Even my less tech-savvy friends are pleased with how their new Brother printer or other brands are treating them. Brands not normally found at Wal-Mart because the all-in-ones cost a more reasonable $150 instead of the ludicrous $40.

  65. Come on slashdotters! by ascari · · Score: 1

    Which part of "opt in" is so fucking hard for you to understand? Don't want ads, wasted paper, wasted ink etc? Well, just don't... Yes, you got it! See, that wasn't so hard was it now?

    1. Re:Come on slashdotters! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Which part of "opt in" is so fucking hard for you to understand?

      It's "read the fucking article" that slashdotters don't understand (I expect that someone will eventually attempt what most of them are misreading this as doing, though).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  66. Wait... by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wait, people still print?

    Honestly, I only print stuff when someone insists these days. I haven't owned a printer at home in years; everything I need to reference is sent to a PDF which is then sync'ed to my iPhone. Signatures... digital. I think the last thing I printed was a gift affidavit that I had to get notarized in order to give a car to my ex wife in my divorce :)

    On topic though; when are we going to see the printer now with the optional automatic shredder attachment (spam filter)? :)

  67. HP Monitors are next... by tekrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see it now. Your new LCD monitor is sold to you as a 22 inch, but 1/4 of the screen is actually an ad server, so your actual display area is smaller than 22 inches.

    This is the new way.

    I see it happening on TV. Between the logos, the market ticker, the oil gusher cam, and the pop-up ads promoting upcoming shows, all we're left with on TV is a talking head and all you can see of him/her is an eye or nose jiggling about the screen.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:HP Monitors are next... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Your new LCD monitor is sold to you as a 22 inch, but 1/4 of the screen is actually an ad server

      Mike Judge beat you too it...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  68. Stop the Flaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While all the flaming going on is really fun... if we actually RTFA you'd see it's not what you think.

    HP is trying to develop a system of content delivery, which will support ads. Imagine your grandfather waking up in the morning and the sports and local news sections of the local paper are already lying on his printer tray. Sure there's an associated, targeted, local ad.. but he's got the news paper delivered to his desk for very little cost.

    It's not a terrible idea. It's a pretty good idea. It's just communicated poorly.

  69. One more reason by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Why you couldn't give me an HP printer.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  70. An Apostrophe Does Not Mean Here Comes An "S" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a recipe's what?

  71. What would EPA say about this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would the environmental protection agency say about these fuckers at HP wasting your ink and paper on these unsolicited ads?? Hopefully they'll put a dome over Hewlett Packard like they did Springfield!

  72. Do we get a refund by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

    Do we get a refund at the end of the month from HP for ink useage to print the spam ads?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  73. Stephen Nigro by Kreeben · · Score: 1

    That last name is spectacular. I wonder if he's black.

  74. Send it in white font by ZiggyM · · Score: 1

    Better send it on WHITE font (with deep black background of course)

  75. Newspapers tried that 25 years ago by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    They wanted to be able to fax you a summary of the morning paper (for an extra fee, of course). Nobody bit.

    Why would I want to print it out anyway? How many people are going to buy a printer who don't already have a computer?

  76. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's open up the printer more, wwweeeeeee! Maybe we don't change the default admin password. Time to phish someone, load up nmap and scan the network for printers. Is it possible to forward the print jobs to a remote IP address?

    Let's hope that payroll get a printer. They should print out really big f@#*ing spreadsheets with all the companies’ staff names, addresses, and social security numbers.

    Why bother with the routing, is ftp installed? Can I access the internal hard drive of the printer across the network?

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/19/eveningnews/main6412439.shtml

  77. They need not bother with this crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont want "targeted ads" or any ads at all. So I will not by any HP crap.

  78. I'd get one if the price was right by ChrisK87 · · Score: 1

    I know many (most?) people hate this advertising on principle, but I'm willing to go along with it if it reduces the cost to me. -- On the flipside, I wouldn't allow one into my office if it didn't come at a steep total discount over normal printing (that more than offsets the printed ads). I don't see any reason to put up with creepy targeted ads--or to do more paper- and cartridge-replacing than I already do--when I could just buy one that doesn't give me junkmail.

    If they'd provide the ink/paper and reduce the pricetag on the printer, I'd probably be willing to buy one. I could put up with some creepy targeted ads if it meant the printing I actually want would be cheaper.

    As far as this "printing newspapers daily" thing goes, that doesn't remotely count as a feature. Given that I'm already at my computer anyway, I may as well just go to a news website manually, and I can print from there if I want to.

    It'd probably be pretty easy to circumvent the ads also. We'd have to see how it handles being turned off when not printing, or left out of paper except when I want something (though I assume it'll just queue up ads and not allow me to cancel them). At the least I can feed already-printed spam pages into its paper supply whenever I am not printing, and pocket the money/paper from the ink and paper allowance (which would be necessary to get me to buy one in the first place).

    It also seems easy enough to mount the printer on its side over a recycle bin, and perhaps make a paper tray I can put over the trash can when I am printing something on purpose.

  79. Trying to ignore the irony by richtaur · · Score: 1

    ... of visiting the link and the very FIRST thing on the page (very top) is a banner ad, followed by a scrolling Motorola ad, a giant LREC on the right and a popup in the corner.

    Holy crap too many ads.

  80. Re:some things you need paper for... PAPER "demo" by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1

    >> there is not a single thing that REQUIRES paper in todays age.
    > A paper aeroplane? Try that with your laptop you'll have to get a new one.

    Actually, when I got it I did :) I ran the 1996 64k intro Paper which features LOTS of digital paper aeroplanes! I can confirm that due to Statix's excellent programming skills that my laptop is still working fine but thanks for your concern! :) Note: Paper works best now days under DOSBox or you can watch it online here.

  81. Don't these fucking idiots ever let up? by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    As an old aquaintance of mine once said, "Life seems to be one never ending advertisment".

    I am surprised that the fucking genius types of the advertising world have not yet released underwear that prints flashing banner adds on your dick...

    So every time you pull it out, Whoaaaa Dude!!! "Work the tension out of your body with Henrietta's Hand Relief"..

    Next time you see an executive from HP or Yahoo - beat them up.

    Why? because they deserve it.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  82. I'm too lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can HP turn the printer into a robot so it can 'deliver' me the stuff it prints...

    Heck, I'd rather just do away with all the printing anyway.

  83. Pay TV by krischik · · Score: 1

    I see it happening on TV. Between the logos, the market ticker, the oil gusher cam, and the pop-up ads promoting upcoming shows, all we're left with on TV is a talking head and all you can see of him/her is an eye or nose jiggling about the screen.

    This is why I have Pay-TV these days. At least in Germany Pay-TV does not interrupt the feature program with advertising. I think the "new world" you are talking about is again a world divided: Those who have the funds to purchase advertising free products and those who don't.

  84. Not that far off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what? I'd actually like some variation on this... I mean, I don't want to be spammed with random ads, but I already get those savings flyers that are 90% garbage, and keep thinking I SHOULD save the few good coupons, but don't. If a list of coupons just arrived, and the ones I okay'd printed, cool. That might actually get me to browse the list.

  85. I've seen this in the wild already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do screen scraping and I was wondering what the fuck this hp and yahoo javascript code was I was seeing
    on a couple sites.