Mods, please mod up my post, I need positive karma. Someone hijacked my user name and posted a bunch of nonsense and now I need to recover my good name. Thanks.
You see, I certainly believe that Microsoft's generalizations are merely a sideshow exhibit in the circus of plagiarism. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that if you looked up "self-pitying" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Microsoft's logo. What Microsoft does in private is none of my business. But when it tries to brand me as disaffected, I object.
Many people are shocked when I tell them that this will become even more obvious in the years just ahead. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Microsoft may cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it within a short period of time, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else.
And the reality of our present situation is this: Microsoft's rantings are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're totally pharisaical, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that Microsoft exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up its obvious inferiority. Microsoft hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to tell you a little bit about Microsoft and its balmy flimflams. There is one final irony to my story. I cannot believe that Microsoft would consider unsavory scroungers as virulent autocrats.
This post is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how Pres. George W Bush ducks the issue of demagogism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. Let's review the errors in Bush's statements in order. First, Bush's little schemes are bound to fail. He is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Bush and a pigeon is that Bush intends to cheat on taxes. That's why no one has a higher opinion of Bush than I, and I think Bush's an antisocial, temperamental stirrer.
When Bush says that he has his moral compass in tact, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by his dishonest smears. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and fight for our freedom of speech. Until we address this issue, we will never move beyond it.
I am not a diplomat and, as such, I am not fully conversant with the elegant and rarefied language of the diplomatic trade. I have a reputation for saying what I mean and meaning what I say. So I trust that you'll forgive me if I come across as a bit blunt when I state that Target's adherents have cooperated closely with judgmental, crude witlings on several projects. To plunge right into it, after hearing about Target's malicious attempts to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. Almost without exception, Target managed to convince a bunch of feral flakes to help it create anomie. What was the quid pro quo there?
On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that its presence makes people nervous, anxious, fearful, and angry. But upon further investigation, one will find that if a cogent, logical argument entered Target's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Target had learned anything from history, it'd know that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to oppose it and all it stands for.
Target attracts inane, inaniloquent schmucks to its claque by telling them that children should belong to the state. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Target's understrappers believe that Target's mistakes are always someone else's fault. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to tell Target what we all think of it -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use.
Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Target are, I urge you to help me wake people out of their stupor and call on them to spread awareness of the drossy nature of Target's platitudes.
It is imperative that I give you the following information, which Pres. George W Bush, Jr. wants concealed from the public. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: Bush's mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can "find it in the manual". But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: Bush's disruptive statements. While he has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about exclusionism, I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with him. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I carve solutions that are neither exploitative nor imprudent. Bush plans to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats. He has instructed his votaries not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Bush knows he has something to hide.
I, for one, thought it couldn't be done, but, once again, Bush's pronouncements have sunk to a new low. If Bush had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that it may seem difficult at first to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. It is. But I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because he says that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd indeed prevent anyone from hearing that he is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that we ought to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. That'll make Bush think once -- I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter -- before trying to desecrate religious objects. Why am I furious? Because Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Bush does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why I wouldn't judge Bush's chums too harshly. They're surely just cannon fodder for Bush's plot to replace Robert's Rules of Order with "facilitated consensus building" at all important meetings. And why am I embarrassed? Because "Bush" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone distort the facts, I tell him or her to stop "Bush-ing". Bush has always promoted the trendiest causes, the causes that all of the important people promote. Let's remember that. Some callous nabobs of sexism are actually considering helping him purge the land of every non-insecure person, gene, idea, and influence. How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by Bush on numerous occasions.
The quest to understand how Bush can be so snotty raises far more questions than it answers. Okay, that's a slight exaggeration, but you get the general drift. Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him step on other people's toes. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. In a sense, on the issue of imperialism, he is wrong again. Sure, "salaciou
As much as Spike might have refined the show over its past pair of efforts, it was clear the network had not yet found a way to perfectly merge the subject matter, the celebrities, and the audience. Nowhere was evidence of this more pronounced than in the significant number of audience members heading for the exits right after Missy Elliott's climactic performance, having seen all they came for and not caring to find out who was going to take home the Game of the Year award.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's a shoulder to cry on you fucking crybaby.
Anything but the Bush administration.
Dick Cheney going door to door shooting people in the face. Boy toy sex slave, George W Bush, waits in car. Story at 11.
Everything in the WORLD should be anti-Bush.
He's a fucking ASSHOLE!
I'd likle to kicj the ass of the person that modded you Offtopic!
who modded this Off Topic? Bush supporting shithead moderator.
Impeach that shit-head Bush. He's a traitor and scum bag extraordinaire.
All you idiots that voted for him: Kill yourself. Before that though, castrate your boys and give your daughters hysterectomies.
I'm sick of Rebublicans pissing and shitting on our poor, elderly, and smart people.
You must have voted for Bush.
Scum bag (both of you).
...said your mother after I porked her.
BTW, very apropo account name.
BTW: Why is this Redundant -1?
Mods, please mod up my post, I need positive karma. Someone hijacked my user name and posted a bunch of nonsense and now I need to recover my good name. Thanks.
You see, I certainly believe that Microsoft's generalizations are merely a sideshow exhibit in the circus of plagiarism. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that if you looked up "self-pitying" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Microsoft's logo. What Microsoft does in private is none of my business. But when it tries to brand me as disaffected, I object.
Many people are shocked when I tell them that this will become even more obvious in the years just ahead. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Microsoft may cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it within a short period of time, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else.
And the reality of our present situation is this: Microsoft's rantings are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're totally pharisaical, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that Microsoft exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up its obvious inferiority. Microsoft hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to tell you a little bit about Microsoft and its balmy flimflams. There is one final irony to my story. I cannot believe that Microsoft would consider unsavory scroungers as virulent autocrats.
"The Sears/Circuit City thing was just my attempt at humor. "
God damn you're fucking bad at humor. GOD DAMN!
Oh god, I thought creationists were barred from university. Isn't that why god created community 'colleges'?
This post is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how Pres. George W Bush ducks the issue of demagogism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. Let's review the errors in Bush's statements in order. First, Bush's little schemes are bound to fail. He is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Bush and a pigeon is that Bush intends to cheat on taxes. That's why no one has a higher opinion of Bush than I, and I think Bush's an antisocial, temperamental stirrer.
When Bush says that he has his moral compass in tact, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by his dishonest smears. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and fight for our freedom of speech. Until we address this issue, we will never move beyond it.
Ain't no one remember the rats of NIHM. They'll royally fuck this world up for us.
Conservatives should all be jailed. For the good of the country.
Hey!, Christians NEVER did anything bad in history.
Never. Ever.
I am not a diplomat and, as such, I am not fully conversant with the elegant and rarefied language of the diplomatic trade. I have a reputation for saying what I mean and meaning what I say. So I trust that you'll forgive me if I come across as a bit blunt when I state that Target's adherents have cooperated closely with judgmental, crude witlings on several projects. To plunge right into it, after hearing about Target's malicious attempts to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. Almost without exception, Target managed to convince a bunch of feral flakes to help it create anomie. What was the quid pro quo there?
On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that its presence makes people nervous, anxious, fearful, and angry. But upon further investigation, one will find that if a cogent, logical argument entered Target's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Target had learned anything from history, it'd know that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to oppose it and all it stands for.
Target attracts inane, inaniloquent schmucks to its claque by telling them that children should belong to the state. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Target's understrappers believe that Target's mistakes are always someone else's fault. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to tell Target what we all think of it -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use.
Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Target are, I urge you to help me wake people out of their stupor and call on them to spread awareness of the drossy nature of Target's platitudes.
It is imperative that I give you the following information, which Pres. George W Bush, Jr. wants concealed from the public. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: Bush's mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can "find it in the manual". But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: Bush's disruptive statements. While he has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about exclusionism, I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with him. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I carve solutions that are neither exploitative nor imprudent. Bush plans to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats. He has instructed his votaries not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Bush knows he has something to hide.
I, for one, thought it couldn't be done, but, once again, Bush's pronouncements have sunk to a new low. If Bush had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that it may seem difficult at first to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. It is. But I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because he says that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd indeed prevent anyone from hearing that he is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that we ought to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. That'll make Bush think once -- I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter -- before trying to desecrate religious objects. Why am I furious? Because Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Bush does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why I wouldn't judge Bush's chums too harshly. They're surely just cannon fodder for Bush's plot to replace Robert's Rules of Order with "facilitated consensus building" at all important meetings. And why am I embarrassed? Because "Bush" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone distort the facts, I tell him or her to stop "Bush-ing". Bush has always promoted the trendiest causes, the causes that all of the important people promote. Let's remember that. Some callous nabobs of sexism are actually considering helping him purge the land of every non-insecure person, gene, idea, and influence. How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by Bush on numerous occasions.
The quest to understand how Bush can be so snotty raises far more questions than it answers. Okay, that's a slight exaggeration, but you get the general drift. Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him step on other people's toes. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. In a sense, on the issue of imperialism, he is wrong again. Sure, "salaciou
i know, he only got elected twice. if the standard was higher we could have had him for 2 or 3 more terms. Damn term limits.
I think it's pretty funny that you have that sig and you replied to an AC.
Did you vote for Bush too? Like all the other hypocrites? Ta ta!
WTF does Long Tail mean anyways? Sounds like something a fucking faggot would say when barking commands to his butt buddy fucking him in the ass.
As much as Spike might have refined the show over its past pair of efforts, it was clear the network had not yet found a way to perfectly merge the subject matter, the celebrities, and the audience. Nowhere was evidence of this more pronounced than in the significant number of audience members heading for the exits right after Missy Elliott's climactic performance, having seen all they came for and not caring to find out who was going to take home the Game of the Year award.
"I'm a fat smelly dick head. So sue me. Now if you would excuse me, I have to get back to my lunch of roasted, aborted, ethnic fetuses."