That's also true for words like "healthy", "calm", or many others. Why does it disturb you so much specifically when it comes to gender? Are you a sensitive snowflake?
It's official, I can no longer differentiate between alt-righters and SJWs, both just say "we're the victim and everybody else are raping/genociding/whatever us"
What's wrong with tits and weather report? And as for fear and hate, I believe that libertarians, christians, muslims, jews, vegans, feminists, preached them before modern media existed.
Considering the fact that rightwingers have been sending men to die in wars for years while women are safe back home, I would say that this hardly only the left's worldview.
I think that throughout history, life were always mostly shitty for people, as most of them were used as slaves of some powerful man. Note how most societies try to prevent suicide no matter what, even in so called capitalism where a man owns his property, destroying your body is still outlawed. I suspect that this is because life inherently sucks. In the past, people who felt like that thought they were the exception and not the rule. Nowadays, with social media we finally understand that life are actually shitty for many people, which helps convince more of us that it is ok to get rid of them.
Too bad that instead of trying to make a happier, balanced society, this will only lead to stronger suicide prevention. After all, slaves must work.
Rust is not trying to invent anything, it just combines features from existing languages. Hell, as a C++ programmer I can tell you that to me, C++ looks like a complicated, buggy, and faster version of rust, and yes, that includes their fancy memory safety and type system. If you want complicated languages that try to invent new ways to make secure code, I recommend taking a look at something like Idris.
Scheme yes, Lisp no. Lisp is a very complicated language, but Scheme always felt pretty easy to me. The trick with scheme is that not only it has a simple syntax, but also a very simple semantics.
There is a freely available rust book, nobody is going to check your politics before you try reading it. I don't understand, that's how many people learned C or other languages, why is Rust different? Are you saying that whenever someone asks about Rust in stackoverflow he must first show confirmation that he is not a republican?
If the only way to learn a language is by depending on a small group, then that language is either way too complicated or not enough common. You don't depend on ISO to learn C++, you don't depend on Guido to learn Python.
Too bad it is impossible to actually do this kind of policing, just like how Iran can't prevent you from writing an anti-islam text in Farsi. The whole "policing users" accusation doesn't make any sense. At most, Rust could be policing the developers of the compiler, which is stupid but commonly practiced.
Slashdot Mirror
That's also true for words like "healthy", "calm", or many others. Why does it disturb you so much specifically when it comes to gender? Are you a sensitive snowflake?
In that case, according to your definition, no culture is fit for survival.
The internet was nice before everything became mobile. You already fucked desktop interfaces, why do you want fuck the internet too?
https://foldingcoin.net/
Wait, who is who?
It's official, I can no longer differentiate between alt-righters and SJWs, both just say "we're the victim and everybody else are raping/genociding/whatever us"
Why do you romanticize child slavery? Btw, I know someone who 10 years ago faked her id to get into a tech job (she was 17 and lied she is 20)
I suspect it can also be the opposite, depression causes people to spend more time in social networks.
If this guy gets caught, the punishment he gets will make him wish he was "just" a rapist.
Rich people working to restore feudalism.
Education for what? Which information? Who decides?
What's wrong with tits and weather report? And as for fear and hate, I believe that libertarians, christians, muslims, jews, vegans, feminists, preached them before modern media existed.
Considering the fact that rightwingers have been sending men to die in wars for years while women are safe back home, I would say that this hardly only the left's worldview.
Yes, the truth must be hidden from the slaves, so that they'll think they have hope, so that they'll keep chruning at the factories.
Can't we just illegalize monero?
I think that throughout history, life were always mostly shitty for people, as most of them were used as slaves of some powerful man. Note how most societies try to prevent suicide no matter what, even in so called capitalism where a man owns his property, destroying your body is still outlawed. I suspect that this is because life inherently sucks. In the past, people who felt like that thought they were the exception and not the rule. Nowadays, with social media we finally understand that life are actually shitty for many people, which helps convince more of us that it is ok to get rid of them.
Too bad that instead of trying to make a happier, balanced society, this will only lead to stronger suicide prevention. After all, slaves must work.
Someone in Blizzard needed to show he is working.
Rust is not trying to invent anything, it just combines features from existing languages. Hell, as a C++ programmer I can tell you that to me, C++ looks like a complicated, buggy, and faster version of rust, and yes, that includes their fancy memory safety and type system. If you want complicated languages that try to invent new ways to make secure code, I recommend taking a look at something like Idris.
Scheme yes, Lisp no. Lisp is a very complicated language, but Scheme always felt pretty easy to me. The trick with scheme is that not only it has a simple syntax, but also a very simple semantics.
What about AWS/gcloud?
There is a freely available rust book, nobody is going to check your politics before you try reading it. I don't understand, that's how many people learned C or other languages, why is Rust different? Are you saying that whenever someone asks about Rust in stackoverflow he must first show confirmation that he is not a republican?
Python is pretty easy for beginners, Scheme as well.
If the only way to learn a language is by depending on a small group, then that language is either way too complicated or not enough common. You don't depend on ISO to learn C++, you don't depend on Guido to learn Python.
Too bad it is impossible to actually do this kind of policing, just like how Iran can't prevent you from writing an anti-islam text in Farsi. The whole "policing users" accusation doesn't make any sense. At most, Rust could be policing the developers of the compiler, which is stupid but commonly practiced.
Something that I find disturbing is that I actually saw this exact comment before. Why are you copy-pasting this over and over again?