What I'm using is Evernote plus a Livescribe Sky pen. You write your notes in a notebook (yes, it has to be one of their notebooks) but a copy of the page (searchable if you use Evernote Premium and write halfway legible) is stored as a note. Plus audio can be recorded at the same time and is associated with the text being written at the same time. I've tried the Echo version of the pen and it requires Adobe reader to take hear the audio. Don't like it as Adobe reader is nothing but a big self contained advertisement that does some other stuff.
There is also a newer version of their pen called the Livescribe 3 but it doesn't work with Android devices (the Sky does) and requires a device to playback audio.
Plus, if you lose your notes in Evernote you always have your backup paper notebook with your handwritten text. So you haven't lost it all.
You come across as very arrogant. Have you ever managed a group of low level employees who spent more time chatting, visiting facebook or conducting online personal shopping than they did actual work? How do I explain to the guy/gal across the hall that everyone is losing their jobs because the company is folding due to the other half just plain not doing their jobs.
I'm sorry but if I'm paying you, then you do what I pay you to do. If you're so valuable that you think you call the shots then I've got news for you: If you're not the capital behind the company, if you're not the one that is taking the risk of losing it all, then please do your job as requested. And if that means no personal business than so be it. Feel free to move on to all the other suitors in your professional life if you don't like it.
A company should work as a team, as if everyone's job depended on the success of the company. Because it does.
I was addressing the thought that children like to build things. I have a 5 year old son so I certainly know how things can disappear. Nonetheless, I don't nail everything down. The implementation of something similar to what I proposed would be a discussion for another day. The point was: broaden one's definition of "library". It's kind of hard to foster technical innovation without something to work with. Hell, it could be software based and that's not likely to walk away, so to speak.
If you think it can't be done, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I rarely say "I can't do this", I simply say I don't know how at this time.
Granted, I'm of the "get off my lawn" group so it's been a long time since I've been in a school library. If you want to foster technical knowledge and give these kids a chance to explore areas that are not otherwise available to them then put something in there besides books and computers for research. Like a maker space kind of set-up where kids have access to tools and supplies to actually create things. Look at the appeal of Legos, now make it a bit more technical. Might even foster the actual reading of books and on-line information in order for students to achieve their goals (which they probably don't even have at this point.)
As for parent, I recall my boss telling me something about retail: It would be better to pay roughly 20% of the people who buy from you to walk away rather than deal with them, because the problems they'll have will ultimately cost you more.
Somehow, as a favor to someone, I ended up managing the operations of a service based company for a short period of time. We would have customers that constantly were saying: "Do you know who I am?" Usually the past, past, past president of some condo association. Or customers who thought we'd starve without their business and make all kinds of unreasonable demands that would result in a loss to us. We'd let that happen maybe two or three times and when it became apparent that the customer's behavior was chronic I would simply tell them that our goal was to satisfy our customers in every way and obviously we were unable to meet their needs. We valued their satisfaction and felt they would be better served by another company. I'd then suggest a competitor for them to call. The reactions were priceless! They couldn't believe they were being "fired". It helped us two ways. First, it freed up our resources to service the customers who appreciated being treated fairly (and we really were service oriented, money back guarantee on everything.) Second, by the time our competitor figured out what kind of customer they just took on they had suffered the loss.
This was a service industry where there was more work to do than we had people to do it so there really was no loss to us in culling the bad ones. Offtopic I know but maybe someone will benefit from our experience.
One of the things I used was a bug board. Basically a white board with all the programmers names on it. At the beginning of the month it was a clean slate. As I reviewed code and found bugs myself, or if others found them, they were brought up at the weekly programmers meeting. If it was indeed a bug, and not something else like lack of information to make the code work correctly or a bug in the IDE we were using, etc, a mark went up on the board for that programmer. The programmer with the fewest bugs at the end of the month received cash, maybe a cool tech item or perhaps something everyone would want. The real incentive though was to have the fewest bugs. Bragging rights and all.
Now, my name was on that list as well as I developed the base code and did a fair amount of other coding as well. I wasn't eligible for an incentive, but any bugs of mine were noted. I wasn't above my staff, I was part of the team.
One of the most important parts of this process was that in order for something to be considered a bug it was voted on by the team. I didn't vote. The team couldn't be too harsh or too lenient as they were playing by the same rules and what goes around comes around and everyone wanted to win. But judge too harshly and it would come back to you. Too lenient and one might lose their ranking.
We also covered why it was a bug and how to prevent similiar issues in the future. Amazing how many things were boundary issues. It was a learning experience for all involved including myself.
All in all it made for a lot of fun, was good education for my staff and everyone enjoyed it. Those were good times and anyone on my staff would have told you so. I had their respect, and they had mine.
I think the problem is the same most IT professionals find about their own job. When you have a good manager, they are almost invisible and you don't realize what is going on behind the scenes. When they are a problem, then you notice and complain. It's how most of the other departments in a company see IT. Completely ignore them unless something is wrong, and then complain about them.
Before retiring I was an IT manager. I can tell you my presence was a great benefit to my employees. In addition to isolating them from all the politics and idiotic suggestions from other department heads, I also was a mentor. My staff had varying skill levels and I worked with each one to help them improve their skill set. I also prevented those less qualified from being assigned tasks better handled by someone else.
In addition, I fought the rest of upper management to make my staff's working environment enjoyable. No overtime when I was there. I knew enough to know that overtime is, generally speaking, non-productive when forced, and forced often.
I also instituted incentive plans for those of my staff that tried hard. They didn't have to be superstars, they just had to try to improve themselves. And my staff loved me. All our software was developed in house and we did a major conversion on one of the pieces, probably the most important piece in the chain. We did it on time, minimal roll out issues and no overtime. And everyone had fun along the way.
Problem was, the owners couldn't see the benefit I was bringing to them. Most projects like that are late, over budget and don't work right out of the gate. They fired me:)
When the shit hits the fan you distance yourself from the scapegoat anyway you can. Temporarily side with those organizations who have a good name. I don't think these companies really cared until it became a PR issue for them. They'll all point fingers at the bad guy (feds) until such a time when it has all blown over. Then, back to business. (still looking at you, same as parent, telcos).
One of many societal problems we face is the short attention span we have for this kind of stuff (and not just government, corporations are often on the shit list.) How many of our younger members know of Bhopal, for example. How many who do know just had their memory jogged? We will rail at the injustice, for a bit. After that, we will lose more and more until the next big leak outrages us again, until the next shiny thing comes along. And so it goes......
If the GP is referring to Straight Talk, you get unlimited everything (USA only) for 45.00/mo. Calls, texts, data etc. I've been using them for over a year and it's been fine for me. Plus, they use Verizon's towers so the coverage is excellent.
Not in any way associated with them. I just use their service. I've got friends paying 60.00 plus a month for something like 700 minutes and that's on a dumb phone, very limited data. Why? The options are worth checking out......
Android 4.0 comes with a bunch of API advances but you can't effectively use them while you're supporting 2.3. Not without greatly increased overhead.
As a developer there are all kinds of choices, most hopefully to be made to maximize return. BUT, you're not forced to support 2.3.x, or 4.x. Or even Android at all.
If it makes sense, it will happen. Those that guess wrong will not thrive.
Please note, this post is in no way an endorsement of either product...
YES, it is. Subcontracting doesn't absolve you of shit.
This ^. Apply this to many other topics here on/. We may offload our work, but we don't offload our responsibilities. Not and be considered "responsible". Think about it.....
you know, I'm really upset and concerned about spying on me because I feel it violates my 4th amendment rights and is a slippery slope, but I'm relatively indifferent to spying on foreigners. Isn't that the point of the CIA/NSA anyway? so, while I could believe Snowden's claim that he revealed the domestic stuff because of concern over our citizenry, there's no reason for the other stuff other than to be a d!ck / counter spy himself. and now he's harboring with the chinese, hmm? we'll see how that extradition process goes.
Those, IMO, that feel some humans, regardless of borders, are not worthy of the rights we assume to be ours, need to live on the other side of the fence. Sure govt's will be trying to get the upper leg all the time. All the time missing that we are all humans on this planet, and need to treat each other so.
".....Rest assured, we remain committed to bringing our customers the latest mobile experiences, and we will continue to build on our strong relationship with Facebook so as to offer customers new opportunities in the future"
Really now, offering us new opportunities, or Mark and HTC? I'd vote for the latter......
How is the US any different. Take something simple like a traffic ticket. You were going 53 in a 55 and get pulled over and a ticket for 65 in a 55. The cop goes to court and claims that you were going 65 in a 55. You will be convicted. Short of video proof demonstrating your innocence, you will be convicted on nothing but the word of a cop. Sure, murder is harder to prove on the word of a single cop, but 10 cops could get a conviction if the accused didn't have proof they didn't do it (O.J. Simpson excluded).
Not necessarily. My son, a notorious speeder in his early twenties, racked up so many tickets he was very likely to lose his license, if not go to jail (the last was for drag racing.) He must have had 8 or more tickets, all way over the speed limit, in a relatively short period of time. What did he do? Go to court for each one, made whatever argument made sense to him at the time, and ended up with only 1 ticket sticking. A few times the police didn't bother showing up in court and that's an automatic off the hook kind of thing. This wasn't but a few years ago either so you can fight city hall if you want to. And some do succeed.
Could be, and I applaud any company that actually cares to change things to make a difference. This needn't be an either/or thing, both Amazons can co-exist. And I I said in my earlier post, I understand why Amazon (the company) would want to protect their brand. That's fine by me. But should the.amazon gTLD be dedicated to the rainforest and not abused, but rather used to increase public awareness and raise funds, change local practices that are detrimental, protect the indigenous population of all forms of life that live there, etc. then Amazon (the company) needn't be concerned.
More often than you think, actually. ".me" is having a lot of use, along with some dot coms adopting weird URL's to shorten their default ones for share links.....
This ^ is actually the problem. The whole "me" attitude. A corporate identity wants a domain because they think it will further their business. Some countries want to focus domains on what is important to them. Frankly the Amazon rainforest is of much more importance to the health of our world than the company could ever be. And anyone who wants to promote that domain in the interest of protecting this world we live on has my blessing.
What we really should focus on is what is best for.us. But, the US has that domain. Still, the sentiment remains.
Amazon, and other business entities can continue raking in their fortunes without these gTLDs. They're already doing it, they're (in my opinion) only being protective so someone else doesn't grab something that would lead to confusion between their brand and another.
One day, people will just not care about such things. They'll be too busy just trying to survive. Might be sooner, might be much, much later (way later!) My bet is on sooner, we do a good job of screwing things up in the name of profit and then move on once we go bankrupt, another company picks up the assets and not the liabilities, and continues onward. Bhopal anyone!
Yeah a bit rambling, but all important things to think about.
http://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf.php [evergreen-ils.org] I do not know much about it.
I was reading that as OpenSerf.php. What a great idea! All the help you need for a pittance, if anything at all. I believe serfdom is highly underrated and I'm glad to see people bringing it back!
Seems like the submitter wouldn't take kindly to an open environment lest he lose all his yet to be found new found riches so let's get the BSD types on board with UnlimitedHordes! Just be sure no one knows what anyone else is doing lest they put it all together and GIVE it away, no license needed!
Games are actually doing a better job of scaling, too, meaning it's less necessary to upgrade ever 2 years unless you simply must play every game on maximum settings.
I think a large part of that is that we're seeing a lot more porting of games -from- consoles rather than the other way around. They've already been written to be frugal with resources. Sure, they might juice up the graphics a bit when ported to the PC but they don't require the constant upgrade of video cards and other components that we used to go through year after year just to keep up with new games.
Of course we still have a few games that are PC first and foremost and if you want to play them on max settings you need high end equipment.
Oh and the numbers I gave are based on the U.S. Dollar, inside the United States.
I've been in remission for over 3 years thanks to Gleevec, but it still sucks that they (Novartis) push for profiteering over saving lives.
I'm happy to hear you're in remission, even though I don't know you personally.
You know, we have no problems taking peoples property under eminent domain for the "good of the people". There was a business owner where I used to live who was forced to sell his property to the local gov't because they needed to turn it into a parking lot to support the major retail center across the street. The reason put forth: the additional tax revenue would benefit the public. Of course the builder of this retail/hotel/restaurant center stood to profit the most and I am confident was the one who persuaded the city to take the property with the thought of increased revenue. Bastard.
I'd like to see eminent domain apply to drugs that would help save, or greatly prolong the lives of many people. That makes sense to me. But it's not the big companies who get screwed.....
Except that the Indian Supreme Court disallowed the original patent on a technicality.
Which means, being the cynic that I am, that our pharma companies lobbyists are to blame, er...... thank. They didn't get what they wanted soon enough.
Slashdot Mirror
What I'm using is Evernote plus a Livescribe Sky pen. You write your notes in a notebook (yes, it has to be one of their notebooks) but a copy of the page (searchable if you use Evernote Premium and write halfway legible) is stored as a note. Plus audio can be recorded at the same time and is associated with the text being written at the same time. I've tried the Echo version of the pen and it requires Adobe reader to take hear the audio. Don't like it as Adobe reader is nothing but a big self contained advertisement that does some other stuff.
There is also a newer version of their pen called the Livescribe 3 but it doesn't work with Android devices (the Sky does) and requires a device to playback audio.
Plus, if you lose your notes in Evernote you always have your backup paper notebook with your handwritten text. So you haven't lost it all.
There was also was the joint Russian-European Mars500 project in 2010/2011 that lasted 520 days.
http://news.discovery.com/space/mars500-crew-experiment-insomnia-health-effects-130116.htm/
You come across as very arrogant. Have you ever managed a group of low level employees who spent more time chatting, visiting facebook or conducting online personal shopping than they did actual work? How do I explain to the guy/gal across the hall that everyone is losing their jobs because the company is folding due to the other half just plain not doing their jobs.
I'm sorry but if I'm paying you, then you do what I pay you to do. If you're so valuable that you think you call the shots then I've got news for you: If you're not the capital behind the company, if you're not the one that is taking the risk of losing it all, then please do your job as requested. And if that means no personal business than so be it. Feel free to move on to all the other suitors in your professional life if you don't like it.
A company should work as a team, as if everyone's job depended on the success of the company. Because it does.
I was addressing the thought that children like to build things. I have a 5 year old son so I certainly know how things can disappear. Nonetheless, I don't nail everything down. The implementation of something similar to what I proposed would be a discussion for another day. The point was: broaden one's definition of "library". It's kind of hard to foster technical innovation without something to work with. Hell, it could be software based and that's not likely to walk away, so to speak.
If you think it can't be done, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I rarely say "I can't do this", I simply say I don't know how at this time.
Granted, I'm of the "get off my lawn" group so it's been a long time since I've been in a school library. If you want to foster technical knowledge and give these kids a chance to explore areas that are not otherwise available to them then put something in there besides books and computers for research. Like a maker space kind of set-up where kids have access to tools and supplies to actually create things. Look at the appeal of Legos, now make it a bit more technical. Might even foster the actual reading of books and on-line information in order for students to achieve their goals (which they probably don't even have at this point.)
Somehow, as a favor to someone, I ended up managing the operations of a service based company for a short period of time. We would have customers that constantly were saying: "Do you know who I am?" Usually the past, past, past president of some condo association. Or customers who thought we'd starve without their business and make all kinds of unreasonable demands that would result in a loss to us. We'd let that happen maybe two or three times and when it became apparent that the customer's behavior was chronic I would simply tell them that our goal was to satisfy our customers in every way and obviously we were unable to meet their needs. We valued their satisfaction and felt they would be better served by another company. I'd then suggest a competitor for them to call. The reactions were priceless! They couldn't believe they were being "fired". It helped us two ways. First, it freed up our resources to service the customers who appreciated being treated fairly (and we really were service oriented, money back guarantee on everything.) Second, by the time our competitor figured out what kind of customer they just took on they had suffered the loss.
This was a service industry where there was more work to do than we had people to do it so there really was no loss to us in culling the bad ones. Offtopic I know but maybe someone will benefit from our experience.
One of the things I used was a bug board. Basically a white board with all the programmers names on it. At the beginning of the month it was a clean slate. As I reviewed code and found bugs myself, or if others found them, they were brought up at the weekly programmers meeting. If it was indeed a bug, and not something else like lack of information to make the code work correctly or a bug in the IDE we were using, etc, a mark went up on the board for that programmer. The programmer with the fewest bugs at the end of the month received cash, maybe a cool tech item or perhaps something everyone would want. The real incentive though was to have the fewest bugs. Bragging rights and all.
Now, my name was on that list as well as I developed the base code and did a fair amount of other coding as well. I wasn't eligible for an incentive, but any bugs of mine were noted. I wasn't above my staff, I was part of the team.
One of the most important parts of this process was that in order for something to be considered a bug it was voted on by the team. I didn't vote. The team couldn't be too harsh or too lenient as they were playing by the same rules and what goes around comes around and everyone wanted to win. But judge too harshly and it would come back to you. Too lenient and one might lose their ranking.
We also covered why it was a bug and how to prevent similiar issues in the future. Amazing how many things were boundary issues. It was a learning experience for all involved including myself.
All in all it made for a lot of fun, was good education for my staff and everyone enjoyed it. Those were good times and anyone on my staff would have told you so. I had their respect, and they had mine.
Before retiring I was an IT manager. I can tell you my presence was a great benefit to my employees. In addition to isolating them from all the politics and idiotic suggestions from other department heads, I also was a mentor. My staff had varying skill levels and I worked with each one to help them improve their skill set. I also prevented those less qualified from being assigned tasks better handled by someone else.
In addition, I fought the rest of upper management to make my staff's working environment enjoyable. No overtime when I was there. I knew enough to know that overtime is, generally speaking, non-productive when forced, and forced often.
I also instituted incentive plans for those of my staff that tried hard. They didn't have to be superstars, they just had to try to improve themselves. And my staff loved me. All our software was developed in house and we did a major conversion on one of the pieces, probably the most important piece in the chain. We did it on time, minimal roll out issues and no overtime. And everyone had fun along the way.
Problem was, the owners couldn't see the benefit I was bringing to them. Most projects like that are late, over budget and don't work right out of the gate. They fired me :)
Wonder how they like things now?
Oh man! You could have least put {SPOILER ALERT] in the subject of your post.
After all the hot water I get into maybe I can relax for a bit :)
When the shit hits the fan you distance yourself from the scapegoat anyway you can. Temporarily side with those organizations who have a good name. I don't think these companies really cared until it became a PR issue for them. They'll all point fingers at the bad guy (feds) until such a time when it has all blown over. Then, back to business. (still looking at you, same as parent, telcos).
One of many societal problems we face is the short attention span we have for this kind of stuff (and not just government, corporations are often on the shit list.) How many of our younger members know of Bhopal, for example. How many who do know just had their memory jogged? We will rail at the injustice, for a bit. After that, we will lose more and more until the next big leak outrages us again, until the next shiny thing comes along. And so it goes......
If the GP is referring to Straight Talk, you get unlimited everything (USA only) for 45.00/mo. Calls, texts, data etc. I've been using them for over a year and it's been fine for me. Plus, they use Verizon's towers so the coverage is excellent.
Not in any way associated with them. I just use their service. I've got friends paying 60.00 plus a month for something like 700 minutes and that's on a dumb phone, very limited data. Why? The options are worth checking out......
As a developer there are all kinds of choices, most hopefully to be made to maximize return. BUT, you're not forced to support 2.3.x, or 4.x. Or even Android at all.
If it makes sense, it will happen. Those that guess wrong will not thrive.
Please note, this post is in no way an endorsement of either product...
This ^. Apply this to many other topics here on /. We may offload our work, but we don't offload our responsibilities. Not and be considered "responsible". Think about it.....
Those, IMO, that feel some humans, regardless of borders, are not worthy of the rights we assume to be ours, need to live on the other side of the fence. Sure govt's will be trying to get the upper leg all the time. All the time missing that we are all humans on this planet, and need to treat each other so.
Really now, offering us new opportunities, or Mark and HTC? I'd vote for the latter......
Minecraft says differently :)
Not necessarily. My son, a notorious speeder in his early twenties, racked up so many tickets he was very likely to lose his license, if not go to jail (the last was for drag racing.) He must have had 8 or more tickets, all way over the speed limit, in a relatively short period of time. What did he do? Go to court for each one, made whatever argument made sense to him at the time, and ended up with only 1 ticket sticking. A few times the police didn't bother showing up in court and that's an automatic off the hook kind of thing. This wasn't but a few years ago either so you can fight city hall if you want to. And some do succeed.
Could be, and I applaud any company that actually cares to change things to make a difference. This needn't be an either/or thing, both Amazons can co-exist. And I I said in my earlier post, I understand why Amazon (the company) would want to protect their brand. That's fine by me. But should the .amazon gTLD be dedicated to the rainforest and not abused, but rather used to increase public awareness and raise funds, change local practices that are detrimental, protect the indigenous population of all forms of life that live there, etc. then Amazon (the company) needn't be concerned.
No he doesn't. All he needs to do is make sure there is a free snack bar! Problems tend to solve themselves when your belly's full :)
This ^ is actually the problem. The whole "me" attitude. A corporate identity wants a domain because they think it will further their business. Some countries want to focus domains on what is important to them. Frankly the Amazon rainforest is of much more importance to the health of our world than the company could ever be. And anyone who wants to promote that domain in the interest of protecting this world we live on has my blessing.
What we really should focus on is what is best for .us. But, the US has that domain. Still, the sentiment remains.
Amazon, and other business entities can continue raking in their fortunes without these gTLDs. They're already doing it, they're (in my opinion) only being protective so someone else doesn't grab something that would lead to confusion between their brand and another.
One day, people will just not care about such things. They'll be too busy just trying to survive. Might be sooner, might be much, much later (way later!) My bet is on sooner, we do a good job of screwing things up in the name of profit and then move on once we go bankrupt, another company picks up the assets and not the liabilities, and continues onward. Bhopal anyone!
Yeah a bit rambling, but all important things to think about.
I was reading that as OpenSerf.php. What a great idea! All the help you need for a pittance, if anything at all. I believe serfdom is highly underrated and I'm glad to see people bringing it back!
Seems like the submitter wouldn't take kindly to an open environment lest he lose all his yet to be found new found riches so let's get the BSD types on board with UnlimitedHordes! Just be sure no one knows what anyone else is doing lest they put it all together and GIVE it away, no license needed!
I think a large part of that is that we're seeing a lot more porting of games -from- consoles rather than the other way around. They've already been written to be frugal with resources. Sure, they might juice up the graphics a bit when ported to the PC but they don't require the constant upgrade of video cards and other components that we used to go through year after year just to keep up with new games.
Of course we still have a few games that are PC first and foremost and if you want to play them on max settings you need high end equipment.
I'm happy to hear you're in remission, even though I don't know you personally.
You know, we have no problems taking peoples property under eminent domain for the "good of the people". There was a business owner where I used to live who was forced to sell his property to the local gov't because they needed to turn it into a parking lot to support the major retail center across the street. The reason put forth: the additional tax revenue would benefit the public. Of course the builder of this retail/hotel/restaurant center stood to profit the most and I am confident was the one who persuaded the city to take the property with the thought of increased revenue. Bastard.
I'd like to see eminent domain apply to drugs that would help save, or greatly prolong the lives of many people. That makes sense to me. But it's not the big companies who get screwed.....
Which means, being the cynic that I am, that our pharma companies lobbyists are to blame, er...... thank. They didn't get what they wanted soon enough.
This news pleases me.