It's overcrowded. Prisoners routinely experience rape and violence. They do not get proper medical treatment.
FWIW the prison system in France is pretty fucked up; but we don't jail people for 40 years for non-violent offenses. In fact we don't even jail people for 40 years for violent offenses.
Or would "subject" be a more appropriate term? This kind of thing would not happen in other European countries. Extraditing your own people to another country when they've not been convicted of any crime? That's ludicrous. This is also an example of Bliar's disgusting submission to Bush's corrupt administration. The extradition agreement is entirely lopsided, the US doesn't have to extradite its own citizens based on a UK judge's whim. If it was at all possible, war criminals such as Kissinger would be at risk. In conclusion, it's rather amusing to listen to the anti-Europe bullshit spewed by the Murdoch press, as if the EU was a threat to briton's freedom. The reality is the complete opposite.
Javascript lacks a clear way of enforcing interfaces. Any part of the program can extend or modify the prototype of any other object on the fly and wreak havoc by invalidating reasonable assumptions which other programmers had about that object.
There's a reason it's called "JavaScript" and not just "Java", you know...
Much of Firefox is done in JS, and it works very well. But more specifically it has managed to spawn an extension ecosystem that they'd want to reproduce.
WTF are you talking about? There's nothing convoluted about it. It's quite simple & straightforward actually. Did you know that much of the code of Firefox is already JavaScript?
That a scam be well written and manages to fool people into paying, I can understand, that's what scams are. But what's puzzled me here is that it appears very easy for a scammer to get the justice to let them collect. Additionally, what you're saying here is strange to me:
All loopholes I guess, most of this shit is done across borders
Not only is it next to impossible to collect any money in any reasonable time here for locally contracted debts (and it's admittedly a problem for business-to-business transactions), it's next to impossible for foreign-bound debts without a fully fledged court decision, not a mere automated administrative decision. No such default judgement is ever going to be declared against a person, as opposed to a corporation.
Is there no consumer protection agency / association in Germany or what? Here in Frankreich they'd get locked up faster than you can say "invoice" if they even/tried/ to collect that shit.
But your analogy's not appropriate for the case at hand.
Consider this one: if I was locked up in a ghetto, unable to get a job because the economy is devastated by a blockade, that several members of my family had been killed by the enemy, and I was borderline starving because the enemy was stopping humanitarian aid,
Deliberately targetting schools is one. Disproportionnate use of force is another.
And before says "rocket!" one more time, here's the thing: Amount of crappy explosive (gun powder) in rocket: 10kg Amount of high explosive in Israeli bomb: 1 tonne
Do you know why the government of France, Spain, and Germany were against the Iraq War?
First, the then government for Spain, that of neofascist Aznar, actively supported the invasion in spite of 80+% of the population opposing it. If your information is so wrong about commonly available facts, what can we expect from your unverifiable claims?
Second, I along with another million people demonstrated in the streets against that war. You can make up all the shit you want about Chirac's ulterior motives, but our government obeyed the vox populi. It's spelled d-e-m-o-c-r-a-c-y.
In any case, considering the amount of money tricky Dich Cheney's Halliburton's made in that war (hundreds of billions), the sums that would have resulted from the alleged Saddam connections would have been chump change. Why not fault them for that?
I thought it was supposed to be the islamists. Well they are too.
Do you realize that Israel's unfavourable opinion has reached 70% in Western Europe? Even in the US it's now around 40%. Bullshit on Youtube and Twitter won't fix it.
Not even a mechanical "I'm sorry for your loss"? You go straight to the cynical talking points?
As for what is said of Hamas, well I'm quite sure they have done their share of bad things. But I know this:
In 2006 Israel said the same thing about Hezbollah. Alright, they're double plus bad, too. Then the family of a Lebanese friend got bombed, in an area where there's never been any Hezbollah, ever. They also bombed the Beirut power station, causing one of the biggest oil spills in the mediterranean, ever. I don't suppose little Hezbollah militants were skinny dipping in the oil tanks, were they?
The only excuse for their behaviour I'm hearing from the Israeli government is that Hamas did it too. It's a very weak argument. But let's accept it. And then what? Seriously, guys? What you're saying is that... sure you're killing children, but Hamas does it too.
That's it?
You're comparing yourselves to a supposedly terrorist organization. Way to go. Moral high ground! Well there's actually a huge difference, Hamas' measly home-grown rockets have killed only a few people in those past few weeks. Israel, with its high tech equipment, has killed over 600. I'm not sure how this is a positive for the "good guys", though.
Slashdot Mirror
That would certainly not mandate a 40 year prison sentence during which you'd be raped and abused by other inmates.
Has he caused any harm to any one?
Has he stolen property?
No and no. He just took a peek at something he was not authorized to look at. Big fucking deal.
It's overcrowded. Prisoners routinely experience rape and violence. They do not get proper medical treatment.
FWIW the prison system in France is pretty fucked up; but we don't jail people for 40 years for non-violent offenses. In fact we don't even jail people for 40 years for violent offenses.
Or would "subject" be a more appropriate term?
This kind of thing would not happen in other European countries. Extraditing your own people to another country when they've not been convicted of any crime? That's ludicrous.
This is also an example of Bliar's disgusting submission to Bush's corrupt administration. The extradition agreement is entirely lopsided, the US doesn't have to extradite its own citizens based on a UK judge's whim. If it was at all possible, war criminals such as Kissinger would be at risk.
In conclusion, it's rather amusing to listen to the anti-Europe bullshit spewed by the Murdoch press, as if the EU was a threat to briton's freedom. The reality is the complete opposite.
By the amazing gravitational pull of the 10^-10 g or so of that amazing tiny black hole?
That "Ag" was "microgram".
Just implement UTF-8 already!
Is it heavier than 1 Âg of lead? Or 1 Âg of feathers?
What is the gravitational pull of any of those?
Is a feather going to swallow the earth whole through its fantastic gravitational pull?
You might be in for a little surprise.
Oh wait ... they did!
Ignoramus ...
Javascript lacks a clear way of enforcing interfaces. Any part of the program can extend or modify the prototype of any other object on the fly and wreak havoc by invalidating reasonable assumptions which other programmers had about that object.
There's a reason it's called "JavaScript" and not just "Java", you know ...
Much of Firefox is done in JS, and it works very well. But more specifically it has managed to spawn an extension ecosystem that they'd want to reproduce.
IMO this is missing just one thing, XUL.
WTF are you talking about? There's nothing convoluted about it. It's quite simple & straightforward actually.
Did you know that much of the code of Firefox is already JavaScript?
then the bandwidth bill is close to 0. It's not like hard drives are expensive those days.
But my point is, here, merely having to contest it would be considered abusive.
That was mean to humorous. Whatcha gonna do, call the language Polizei?
That a scam be well written and manages to fool people into paying, I can understand, that's what scams are.
But what's puzzled me here is that it appears very easy for a scammer to get the justice to let them collect.
Additionally, what you're saying here is strange to me:
Not only is it next to impossible to collect any money in any reasonable time here for locally contracted debts (and it's admittedly a problem for business-to-business transactions), it's next to impossible for foreign-bound debts without a fully fledged court decision, not a mere automated administrative decision. No such default judgement is ever going to be declared against a person, as opposed to a corporation.
Is there no consumer protection agency / association in Germany or what? /tried/ to collect that shit.
Here in Frankreich they'd get locked up faster than you can say "invoice" if they even
Hell even 50%+ is considered a monopoly for all intents and purposes in most jurisdictions.
But your analogy's not appropriate for the case at hand.
Consider this one: if I was locked up in a ghetto, unable to get a job because the economy is devastated by a blockade, that several members of my family had been killed by the enemy, and I was borderline starving because the enemy was stopping humanitarian aid,
would I be lobbing rockets?
You bet I would. And then some more.
Deliberately targetting schools is one. Disproportionnate use of force is another.
And before says "rocket!" one more time, here's the thing:
Amount of crappy explosive (gun powder) in rocket: 10kg
Amount of high explosive in Israeli bomb: 1 tonne
Just one word.
Allows for more interesting mobile internet apps.
Do you know why the government of France, Spain, and Germany were against the Iraq War?
First, the then government for Spain, that of neofascist Aznar, actively supported the invasion in spite of 80+% of the population opposing it. If your information is so wrong about commonly available facts, what can we expect from your unverifiable claims?
Second, I along with another million people demonstrated in the streets against that war. You can make up all the shit you want about Chirac's ulterior motives, but our government obeyed the vox populi. It's spelled d-e-m-o-c-r-a-c-y.
In any case, considering the amount of money tricky Dich Cheney's Halliburton's made in that war (hundreds of billions), the sums that would have resulted from the alleged Saddam connections would have been chump change. Why not fault them for that?
I thought it was supposed to be the islamists. Well they are too.
Do you realize that Israel's unfavourable opinion has reached 70% in Western Europe? Even in the US it's now around 40%. Bullshit on Youtube and Twitter won't fix it.
Not even a mechanical "I'm sorry for your loss"? You go straight to the cynical talking points?
As for what is said of Hamas, well I'm quite sure they have done their share of bad things. But I know this:
In 2006 Israel said the same thing about Hezbollah. Alright, they're double plus bad, too. Then the family of a Lebanese friend got bombed, in an area where there's never been any Hezbollah, ever. They also bombed the Beirut power station, causing one of the biggest oil spills in the mediterranean, ever. I don't suppose little Hezbollah militants were skinny dipping in the oil tanks, were they?
The only excuse for their behaviour I'm hearing from the Israeli government is that Hamas did it too. It's a very weak argument. But let's accept it. And then what? Seriously, guys? What you're saying is that ... sure you're killing children, but Hamas does it too.
That's it?
You're comparing yourselves to a supposedly terrorist organization. Way to go. Moral high ground! Well there's actually a huge difference, Hamas' measly home-grown rockets have killed only a few people in those past few weeks. Israel, with its high tech equipment, has killed over 600. I'm not sure how this is a positive for the "good guys", though.
Those who trusted their bankers to handle what they didn't understand sure feel better now, don't they?