Slashdot Mirror


User: lubricated

lubricated's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
944
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 944

  1. Re:bloggers throw hissy fit, film at 11 on Bloggers Test New MS China Filter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Your house belongs to the government now.

    After you get paid for it.

  2. Re:Whatever - not Kozmo at all on Online Takeout Delivery is Back · · Score: 1

    the best was when kozmo started delivering beer and wine. Ahh the college years. Though I think things could have been better had I graduated before the bubble burst.

  3. Re:Interesting "landing" on Helicopter Lands top Mount Everest · · Score: 1

    yeah, I'd be on that helicopter I would laugh at you. Then I'd tell you it's called summit.

  4. Re:Strange on Konqueror Passes the Acid2 Test Too · · Score: 1

    http://www.edmunds.com/new/index.html?tid=edmunds. n.zipentry.new..2.*

    Most of the links on this page don't work in konq. 3.40

  5. Re:How long until it's usable? on Single Molecule Transistor A Reality · · Score: 1

    The old one was

    There are no good guys or bad guys it's just a whole bunch of guys

    but I've grown more cynical. I think I've heard it before, but it just fits really good right now.

  6. Re:How long until it's usable? on Single Molecule Transistor A Reality · · Score: 1

    I like it, it's will be sigged. Haven't changed my sig in 5 years or so

  7. Re:How long until it's usable? on Single Molecule Transistor A Reality · · Score: 1

    Only the Sith deal in absolutes

    Has anyone caught the obvious irony of this statement?

  8. Re:Evolution is rubbish on Outlook, Evolution and Kontact Side-by-Side · · Score: 1

    > And people wonder why the supposedly messy and hard to use KDE is still popular. A system that lets you do it your way is by definition not hard to use.

    It's funny. I used kde before 1.0 came out. Then I used gnome since before gnome 1.0 came out(.95 or somethng). This statement in the early days would have been reversed. Recently I switched to kde because it's faster, and unlike gnome the file manager is good and always has been. Nautilus sucked when it first came out and it continues to stink. It's a slow turd.

  9. Re:Evolution is rubbish on Outlook, Evolution and Kontact Side-by-Side · · Score: 1

    thankyou that is sooooo much better.

    Now if only junk mail worked like it does in mozilla-thunderbird. Where you could get it to just mark a message as junk, and not do anything else.

  10. Re:Evolution is rubbish on Outlook, Evolution and Kontact Side-by-Side · · Score: 1

    what a bunch of lame excuses. Kmail too has it's problems but at least the functionality is there.
    Here's a list of kmail's problems.

    It's go that completly unessesary "html message" bar on the side of every message.

    By default it doesn't automatically check your mail. You have to enable "interval mail checking", It should be called "check mail every x minutes" where x is an adjustible box.

    It's got that stupid box at the bottom of every message showing stuff noone cares about.

    You can't rearrange your folders. Local folders are always at the top of the list. These folders are pointless for an IMAP user.

    One more gripe about evolution.

    It doesn't let you use an imap folder as an address book or calendar.

    None of these graphical applications allow you to store the preferences on an imap server. Pine has this feature.

  11. stop complaining on Voice Actors Protest at E3 · · Score: 1

    I would tell them to find a real job. I think video games focus way too much on the story as it is and not enough on game play(e.g. metal gear solid). If I want a story, I'll rent a dvd.

  12. Re:You are Totally off there on Revamping Freenet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > go ahead and complain,

    Now there's a pot calling a kettle black.
    "Waaaa, your review sucks"

    > no one really cares as your 'review' has no relevance.

    then why did you bother replying?
    Usually before I try something out I like to see what other people have to say about it myself, so it will matter to others like me, and if it pisses on fanboys like you I really don't mind.

    > Strange how others don't seem to have those problems.

    See all the other posts here. Your perception is skewed fanboy.

  13. Re:How many revamps on Revamping Freenet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > Its only in "outlying" cases . . . ie. with firewall issues

    more and more people are getting routers this is hardly an outlying case.

  14. Re:You are Totally off there on Revamping Freenet · · Score: 1

    > Java bloat? No worse then other languages that try to be *universal*.

    When you have a single program that is supposed to be in the background eating all your ram and half your cpu you kill the process.

    > Besides, don't like java? Then recode it in something else and quit bitching.

    Or you can simply review the product and give it a bad review. Then suggest something else instead of acting all smug.

    > Slow? Depends on what you are doing.

    Everything is slow on freenet small websites, pictures,everything. That is if you can get it at all. freenet is one big joke right now.

  15. Re:Cell Phones over iPod? on Bill Gates: Cellphone will Beat iPod · · Score: 1

    > watches replace by cell phones,

    for alot of people(myself included) this is already the case.

  16. Re:Where does the heat go? on Aquarium Full of Oil For PC Cooling · · Score: 1

    > As well, this oil is more dense than water. It will take longer to heat up, but it will also _retain_ heat longer as well.

    You can't be more wrong on this one. He is using vegetable oil. It's lighter than water. Vegetable oil will heat up to 350 F quicker than it takes the same volume of water to boil.

  17. Re:Don't like it? Fork it! on OpenOffice 2.0 Criticized on Use of Java · · Score: 1

    yeah, but kword sucks.
    Abiword and gnumeric are cool. Most of koffice is cool. KDE could merge to gtkmm and then we could all have one happy desktop.

  18. Re:Only in Kansas... on Kansas Challenges Definition of Science · · Score: 1

    I've been to whatever that university is in Lawrence. One only considers Kansas non-flat when they themselves come from a flat place. There is a certain matter of perspective. I live in Seattle, Kansas is a pancake.

  19. Re:You know... on Kansas Challenges Definition of Science · · Score: 1

    > if they can show some sort of repeatable experiment,

    Then it would be studied by scientists untill it was explained.

  20. Re:Why? on Firefox and Thunderbird Garage · · Score: 1

    Ummm.... then why do they need a web browser??? ;)

    duh, to browse their files.

  21. Re:Fine until they take the subway on Tracking Sex Offenders via GPS for Life · · Score: 1

    I didn't think there was a subway in Florida.

  22. Re:I don't know why this is so deviceive. on The Truth About Linux and Windows · · Score: 1

    > And what do you think the typical Linux Insultant's line is going to be if a customer rings up with a corrupted filesystem or database ?

    First of all these are different products. You should be comparing something along the lines of qmail+ldap

    Under unix the equivalent would be for a mail file to get corrupted, since these are text files the worst that would usually happen is that two email messages run into each other or some go missing but it only affects one user.

    As far as filesystems and databases going corrupt usually you can fsck for a filesystem, or use whatever utilities come with a database. Most databases are far more robust than exchange, which uses jet internally. The point is that recovery usually is much more possible than with exchange. Yes backups are important but sometimes they aren't up to date enough.

  23. Re:I don't know why this is so deviceive. on The Truth About Linux and Windows · · Score: 1

    >> wtf is a business application(just about anything other than games?)
    > Ok, smartass. Show me one financial package equivalent to Quickbooks Premier that runs on Linux.

    ok dipshit, all I was doing was pointing out how pointless it was to have a category such as business software. I guess you have some preconceived notion that this means POS or acounting software. If that's what the OP meant then that's what he should have said. A broad category of business software is lame could be anything from a webserver to foxpro, after all businesses use both.

    > you are the one astroturfing
    yup, RMS pays me to sit here and type this shit.
    Do people even think about what they are typing?

  24. Re:I don't know why this is so deviceive. on The Truth About Linux and Windows · · Score: 1

    > the list could go on but you get the idea.

    That's exactly my point "business application" is such a broad category that it's a completly useless and Microsoft serving statement to say windows is better with business applications.

    > I'd rather run Enterprise servers on Windows since I know how to secure a Windows box whereas I wouldn't have a clue about securing a Linux box.

    That means that you are unqualified to judge which one is better.

    > Funny that all the TV-Out cards support Windows by default, whereas there are so few which support Linux-based operating systems.

    well if you buy yourself a mac you aren't going to be shopping for a tv card at pc store. Believe it or not some people do check for compatibility before they buy.

  25. Re:I don't know why this is so deviceive. on The Truth About Linux and Windows · · Score: 1

    > Exchange is much easier to set up than LDAP+Email,

    In a business setup is done by trained professionals. Ease of use isn't as important as reliability and integrity. If you call microsoft and tell them that your exchange data store is corrupt the first question they will ask is "how recent are your backups?"