I Like Chinese Lyrics Artist: Monty Python (Buy Monty Python CDs) Album: Monty Python's Contractual Obligation Album
The world today seems absolutely crackers, With nuclear bombs to blow us all sky high. There's fools and idiots sitting on the trigger. It's depressing and it's senseless, and that's why... I like Chinese. I like Chinese. They only come up to your knees, Yet they're always friendly, and they're ready to please.
I like Chinese. I like Chinese. There's nine hundred million of them in the world today. You'd better learn to like them; that's what I say.
I like Chinese. I like Chinese. They come from a long way overseas, But they're cute and they're cuddly, and they're ready to please.
I like Chinese food. The waiters never are rude. Think of the many things they've done to impress. There's Maoism, Taoism, I Ching, and Chess.
So I like Chinese. I like Chinese. I like their tiny little trees, Their Zen, their ping-pong, their yin, and yang-ese.
I like Chinese thought, The wisdom that Confucious taught. If Darwin is anything to shout about, The Chinese will survive us all without any doubt.
So, I like Chinese. I like Chinese. They only come up to your knees, Yet they're wise and they're witty, and they're ready to please.
All together.
[verse in Chinese] Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.) Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.) Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.) Ni hao ma; ni hao ma; ni hao ma; zaijien! (How are you; how are you; how are you; goodbye!)
I like Chinese. I like Chinese. Their food is guaranteed to please, A fourteen, a seven, a nine, and lychees.
I like Chinese. I like Chinese. I like their tiny little trees, Their Zen, their ping-pong, their yin, and yang-ese.
I like Chinese. I like Chinese. They only come up to your knees...
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.Here.
1. I had to move my sound card to a different PCI slot because it was causing problems with sharing an IRQ with my video card. Because of different card sizes, I had to rearrange other cards, too.
a. New sound card found, do you have the drivers? Ah, yes, but... Great, give it the drivers again. Reboot. b. New TV card (multimedia device found) do you have the drivers? Why, yes, but they were already instaLled. No matter... Reboot.
Two driver reinstallations and two Reboots.
2. Put my gamepad in a different USB port: Windows has found new hardware but you need to be an admin to install it. WHAT??? At least Windows didn't require me to reboot.
Linux. No driver reinstallations, no reboots, no need to be admin to use my fricking gamepad in a different port.
THIS IS RETARTED, BILLY BOY!!!! ze software is not so f888ing great!
I think the USPTO won't care and Congress won't either unless the letters you speak of are accompanied by lots of $$. But I'd think you knew that already.
Ok, here's how I think it happened: Big guy got all the chicks because he could provide and defend them. Little guy invented "the Almighty" (and the idea of priests) so he could instill fear in the big guy and be able to get some chicks, too.
Do you know if the boisterous dumb fucks were from your town (Madtown USA?)? Just wondering because I wouldn't put it past our gov't (I was going to say Dubya, but...) to have the CIA or some other paid informants come in and start a riot so that stoners could be made look bad, violent, etc.
One of the best ways to meet those lower needs it to be sucessful in relation to a ledger line.
I don't understand what you mean by "in relation to a ledger line" in this specific case because every example I can think of someone achieving "self-actualization" they didn't have a checkbook but their immense wealth came from being content with what they had.
Microsoft would be well advised, if they haven't already, to have a strict regimen for ensuring that all code they release is really theirs.
They don't have to do such thing when they can do the following:
1. Steal from other companies/Break Laws. 2. Sell products that break laws or include properties of others for A LOT of money. 3. Pay off gov't or company suing them. 4. Profit. 5. GOTO 1.
Someone has to come up with a formula for success that doesn't equate directly to a ledger line.
How about this one: Success = the extent to which a person overcomes their own selfish, egoistic, habitual tendencies and approaches what Abraham Maslow called "self-actualization."
The problem, of course, is that people now have to abide by this view and I don't see that happening any day soon.
It's almost scary that we know more about what binds subatomic particles together than what keeps the moon orbiting the earth.
If you find that almost scary then do you almost cream your pants considering that we know more about what binds subatomic particles together than the nature of our own mind? I mean we do "know" that there is a certain relationship between physical phenomena and psychical events, but yet we don't know what thoughts are and how it is even possible that the "I" can create them.
I myself have a BS in Physics but I lost interest around the time that I read this story:
A man was walking home late one night when he saw the Mulla Nasrudin searching under a street light on hands and knees for something on the ground.
"Mulla, what have you lost?" he asked.
"The key to my house," Nasrudin said.
"I'll help you look," the man said.
Soon, both men were down on their knees, looking for the key.
After a number of minutes, the man asked, "Where exactly did you drop it?"
Nasrudin waved his arm back toward the darkness. "Over there, in my house."
The first man jumped up. "Then why are you looking for it here?"
"Because there is more light here than inside my house."
( best version I could find)
My point? Well, I think that if we are seriously, honestly interested in finding a ToE, we should consider Eastern thinking a little and Buddhist philosophy a bunch. Like here:
a Google search
... if the patent holder was forced to pay court costs...
Let's also be "fair" and force them to pay an amount proportional to their worth, thus MS pays more than me; otherwise, it's just hurting non-megacorporations. Yes?
Come to think of it... shouldn't all laws be that way!
What I meant by "new" is something different than what they are doing at the time.
To the problem: We want to make a new ___ (browser, firewall, etc.) the answer seems to be: Let's buy company X.
While I agree with you (right or wrong) that "it's often easier to buy a company that has a functioning product..." Microsoft's history of buying companies for their products provides no evidence to me of "the folks at MS Research are so extremely bright "
The folks as MS Research are actually extremely bright...
If the folks at MS Research are so extremely bright then why does MS still have to buy or copy a company's products whenever they want to do anything new?
Slashdot Mirror
Apex of enclosure technology to date?
Not bad but I think this Antec is more so: Antec P180
this is about a company, thier product, and in the end the money. Right?
Some people amaze me, too. Lie, cheat and steal to make a buck. That's pathetic.
the only way microsoft knows how to innovate is to copy, clone, or outright steal other people's innovations.
I disagree. Sometimes they buy someone else's hard work, too, like they bought IE from Spyglass (who also f***ed over by MS, by the way).
(Monty Python):
I Like Chinese Lyrics
Artist: Monty Python (Buy Monty Python CDs)
Album: Monty Python's Contractual Obligation Album
The world today seems absolutely crackers,
With nuclear bombs to blow us all sky high.
There's fools and idiots sitting on the trigger.
It's depressing and it's senseless, and that's why...
I like Chinese. I like Chinese.
They only come up to your knees,
Yet they're always friendly, and they're ready to please.
I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
There's nine hundred million of them in the world today.
You'd better learn to like them; that's what I say.
I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
They come from a long way overseas,
But they're cute and they're cuddly, and they're ready to please.
I like Chinese food.
The waiters never are rude.
Think of the many things they've done to impress.
There's Maoism, Taoism, I Ching, and Chess.
So I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
I like their tiny little trees,
Their Zen, their ping-pong, their yin, and yang-ese.
I like Chinese thought,
The wisdom that Confucious taught.
If Darwin is anything to shout about,
The Chinese will survive us all without any doubt.
So, I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
They only come up to your knees,
Yet they're wise and they're witty, and they're ready to please.
All together.
[verse in Chinese]
Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.)
Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.)
Wo ai zhongguo ren. (I like Chinese.)
Ni hao ma; ni hao ma; ni hao ma; zaijien! (How are you; how are you; how are you; goodbye!)
I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
Their food is guaranteed to please,
A fourteen, a seven, a nine, and lychees.
I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
I like their tiny little trees,
Their Zen, their ping-pong, their yin, and yang-ese.
I like Chinese.
I like Chinese.
They only come up to your knees...
... copy-cat product, it's sudo R&D practices, and how they have smited compnaies and denounced innovation from competitors.
that what you state is True Innovation!
I'm Buddhist, you insensitive clod!
... we were merely expressing other views on origins of life.
How many? Two?
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism. Here.
Or Google it.
This is too funny to me right now:
evolution vs creation
Democrat vs Republican.
1. I had to move my sound card to a different PCI slot because it was causing problems with sharing an IRQ with my video card. Because of different card sizes, I had to rearrange other cards, too.
a. New sound card found, do you have the drivers? Ah, yes, but... Great, give it the drivers again. Reboot.
b. New TV card (multimedia device found) do you have the drivers? Why, yes, but they were already instaLled. No matter... Reboot.
Two driver reinstallations and two Reboots.
2. Put my gamepad in a different USB port: Windows has found new hardware but you need to be an admin to install it. WHAT??? At least Windows didn't require me to reboot.
Linux. No driver reinstallations, no reboots, no need to be admin to use my fricking gamepad in a different port.
THIS IS RETARTED, BILLY BOY!!!! ze software is not so f888ing great!
I think the USPTO won't care and Congress won't either unless the letters you speak of are accompanied by lots of $$. But I'd think you knew that already.
... a creation of the Almighty?
No, "the Almighty" is a creation of man.
Ok, here's how I think it happened:
Big guy got all the chicks because he could provide and defend them. Little guy invented "the Almighty" (and the idea of priests) so he could instill fear in the big guy and be able to get some chicks, too.
Do you know if the boisterous dumb fucks were from your town (Madtown USA?)? Just wondering because I wouldn't put it past our gov't (I was going to say Dubya, but...) to have the CIA or some other paid informants come in and start a riot so that stoners could be made look bad, violent, etc.
No,really, I think he got more than that: he got a really good chance of being reelected.
THAT is all
r
While I feel the same way as you, I remain hopeful that one day the average person will be able to follow a logical argument.
How about we get some reasonable laws on the books, and get rid of some unreasonable laws.
Can't argue with you there.
One of the best ways to meet those lower needs it to be sucessful in relation to a ledger line.
I don't understand what you mean by "in relation to a ledger line" in this specific case because every example I can think of someone achieving "self-actualization" they didn't have a checkbook but their immense wealth came from being content with what they had.
That is a very serious charge and you had better...
First of all, I'm not scared.
Second, "pay off gov't," you know, "pay the fine."
Microsoft would be well advised, if they haven't already, to have a strict regimen for ensuring that all code they release is really theirs.
They don't have to do such thing when they can do the following:
1. Steal from other companies/Break Laws.
2. Sell products that break laws or include properties of others for A LOT of money.
3. Pay off gov't or company suing them.
4. Profit.
5. GOTO 1.
...but I also don't want to see them bankrupted by the court system.
Well, then make them stop breaking the law!!!
Someone has to come up with a formula for success that doesn't equate directly to a ledger line.
How about this one: Success = the extent to which a person overcomes their own selfish, egoistic, habitual tendencies and approaches what Abraham Maslow called "self-actualization."
The problem, of course, is that people now have to abide by this view and I don't see that happening any day soon.
It's almost scary that we know more about what binds subatomic particles together than what keeps the moon orbiting the earth.
If you find that almost scary then do you almost cream your pants considering that we know more about what binds subatomic particles together than the nature of our own mind? I mean we do "know" that there is a certain relationship between physical phenomena and psychical events, but yet we don't know what thoughts are and how it is even possible that the "I" can create them.
I myself have a BS in Physics but I lost interest around the time that I read this story:
A man was walking home late one night when he saw the Mulla Nasrudin searching under a street light on hands and knees for something on the ground. "Mulla, what have you lost?" he asked. "The key to my house," Nasrudin said. "I'll help you look," the man said. Soon, both men were down on their knees, looking for the key. After a number of minutes, the man asked, "Where exactly did you drop it?" Nasrudin waved his arm back toward the darkness. "Over there, in my house." The first man jumped up. "Then why are you looking for it here?" "Because there is more light here than inside my house." ( best version I could find)
My point? Well, I think that if we are seriously, honestly interested in finding a ToE, we should consider Eastern thinking a little and Buddhist philosophy a bunch. Like here: a Google search
... if the patent holder was forced to pay court costs...
Let's also be "fair" and force them to pay an amount proportional to their worth, thus MS pays more than me; otherwise, it's just hurting non-megacorporations. Yes?
Come to think of it... shouldn't all laws be that way!
What I meant by "new" is something different than what they are doing at the time.
To the problem: We want to make a new ___ (browser, firewall, etc.) the answer seems to be: Let's buy company X.
While I agree with you (right or wrong) that "it's often easier to buy a company that has a functioning product..." Microsoft's history of buying companies for their products provides no evidence to me of "the folks at MS Research are so extremely bright "
The folks as MS Research are actually extremely bright...
If the folks at MS Research are so extremely bright then why does MS still have to buy or copy a company's products whenever they want to do anything new?
I say Google incorporate this into their list of services and blow M$ out of the water!