Slashdot Mirror


Cats Can Recognize Their Own Names, Study Suggests (gizmodo.com)

AmiMoJo shares a report from Gizmodo: Plenty of cat owners will happily tell you their felines are capable of responding to their own names, but the scientific jury remains ambivalent on the matter. A fascinating new experiment suggests this might actually be true for some cats, and it's a capacity very much tied to the social environment in which the cat lives. The new research, published today in Scientific Advances, doesn't mean cats understand the human conception of a name, but it does show that at least some cats can distinguish their names from other words. Prior research has shown that cats can recognize human gestures, facial expressions, and vocal cues. Slashdot reader sciencehabit adds: Give this a shot at home: Say four random words to your cat -- separated by about 15 seconds -- with the same length and intonation as its name. Then say its actual name. If it swivels its ears or perks up its head, chances are it knows what you call it. That's essentially what researchers did in a new study. The scientists saw similar responses when the cat's name came after the names of other felines he lived with, or when a stranger spoke the words. The findings are the first to experimentally show that cats have some understanding of what we are saying to them, the team concludes.

228 comments

  1. No surprise by redback · · Score: 5, Informative

    This should come as no surprise to anyone who owns a cat.

    My cats will come when they are called, if they feel like it. Sometimes they will run to the door then refuse to actually come in.

    So yeah, they understand. They just probably dont give a shit about what you want.

    1. Re:No surprise by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did wonder if my cats were just responding to my voice. Ignoring everything I say, merely taking note of the fact that the help had returned from wherever the fresh chicken comes from.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know. My girlfriend breeds them (Russian Blues)
      We also have various other cats "boarded" at our place for periods of time due to her CFA connections.
      I'm literally exposed to 10-11 cats a year, though never 3 or so at a time, for varying lengths of time. I.e., I have a *lot* of experience cohabitating with cats. A diverse selection of cats.

      While cats certainly recognize words, I have seen little evidence that they're aware of their name.
      If I call a cat by the treats, every cat that wants a treat comes running.
      If I call a cat while on the couch, every cat that wants pets will come running.
      If I call a cat while I'm in the bathroom, our one cat that fucking loves the shower will come running.

      You could argue that as "they know I'm calling someone, but they don't give a fuck that it's not them"
      But I read the article too, and they didn't discount for the possibility that they are simply recognizing that you're calling attention to yourself, which they may or may not be interested in, depending on the context, as opposed to making random noises.

      In short, I think learn to interpret "names" as some cat meowing loudly because he wants something, which also depending on context, will send various other cats running toward it.

    3. Re:No surprise by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Animal smarts only ever surprises people who don't own animals.

      My two cats definitely know their own names and they're not even the smartest cats I've ever owned.

      More: They know the other cat's name, too. I once asked one of them where the other cat was (she was stuck in a cupboard - somebody closed the door) and he took me there pawed at the door, like saying, "She's in there!".

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This should come as no surprise to anyone who owns a cat.

      My cats will come when they are called, if they feel like it. Sometimes they will run to the door then refuse to actually come in.

      So yeah, they understand. They just probably dont give a shit about what you want.

      Must have taken a lot of effort on your cat's part to train you that well.

    5. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have two, they both look directly at me and meow at me when I say their individual names and don't meow at me when I say the others name or just make noises in general.

      They do recognize their names, it's just a lot of cats don't give a shit what we want.

    6. Re:No surprise by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I noticed that they react to the can opener way better than my voice.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat definitely knows his name. Using the same tone of voice if I call out a different name from another room, nothing. If I call his name, he'll usually emerge from his sleeping and/or hiding spot and walk over to me. He also understand the word "treats", which is always enough to get him to come over.

    8. Re:No surprise by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know. My girlfriend breeds them (Russian Blues)

      While cats certainly recognize words, I have seen little evidence that they're aware of their name.

      Totally different experience; cats whose owners have no emotional connection to the owners and live with many other cats and hearing the names of other cats continuously as the kitten mill churns along; and a cat that is kept as a pet and develops a long emotional bond with the owner and gets lots of one on one time.

      A cat that is kept as a pet and has an emotional bond with their human is going to develop deeper understanding of their human than one that is a commodity to a human and doesn't have the emotional bond.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:No surprise by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You can "trick" them with similar-sounding words, but not with different-sounding words. They clearly hear some kind of pattern even if they don't hear their "name".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:No surprise by Gaxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes - we had two cats and one was smart and one was about as dumb as a rock (in cat terms, at least). Both were well aware of their own names, though.

      --
      -- Gaxx
    11. Re:No surprise by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Animal smarts only ever surprises people who don't own animals.

      My two cats definitely know their own names and they're not even the smartest cats I've ever owned.

      More: They know the other cat's name, too. I once asked one of them where the other cat was (she was stuck in a cupboard - somebody closed the door) and he took me there pawed at the door, like saying, "She's in there!".

      Yeah, cats have a wide variance in intelligence. Some are really smart and some are really dumb- just like dogs have different levels of intelligence. Some of mine have shown a wide variety of vocab and understanding.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    12. Re:No surprise by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      This should come as no surprise to anyone who owns a cat.

      My cats will come when they are called, if they feel like it. Sometimes they will run to the door then refuse to actually come in.

      So yeah, they understand. They just probably dont give a shit about what you want.

      Not only do they know their name, they understand intonation as well. Also, we have one cat that each member of the family calls a different name- she responds to all five names; but knows for example, when we call out one of her siblings names, that we're not talking to her.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    13. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they feel like it? That's super subjective then.

    14. Re:No surprise by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

      My 12 cats periodically check if I am steel breathing. I suspect they are just waiting to eat my carcass.

    15. Re:No surprise by gtall · · Score: 1

      I used to have two Siamese sisters before they went to the Great Food Bowl in the Sky. Once, I was busy and pushed Ariel away from me letting her know I was busy. She walked down the hall, turned and gave me (what I interpreted as) a reproachful look, and walked into the bedroom out of sight. She was miffed. When I called about 5 minutes later, she came running.

    16. Re: No surprise by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      You clearly didnâ(TM)t rtfa

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    17. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this is nothing new to pet owners.

      Many of my ferrets have learned to drop what they're doing and pay attention to me when I saw their names.

      My parents rabbits didn't seem to respond to their names but they heard the fridge door open from all the way upstairs and would bound all the way down to the kitchen and start begging for a treat before you even closed the door.

    18. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah no shit, Sherlock. Cats understand *tones* not words.

    19. Re:No surprise by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Say four random words to your cat -- separated by about 15 seconds -- with the same length and intonation as its name.

      They also pick up subtle inflections in your voice. Even if you try to say the name with the same intonation as the other words, you won't. When I had a cat he would respond to his name when I called him, but if I said "Come here stupid" in the same voice he would respond the same way.

      All they hear is sounds (like we hear their meows), so how you say it means at least as much as what you say.

    20. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Name" is just a sound people make in your direction to get your attention. Personally I answer to nearly anything people shout at me and I only listen for my "name" when i am in a crowd of more than two people. In that case I cannot determine that "you", "that guy", or "him" means me.

      Can a cat sit in a group of four other cats and be the only one that comes when it is called by name?

      I didn't think so.

    21. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Iâ(TM)ve never owned a cat that didnâ(TM)t respond to itâ(TM)s own name. And Iâ(TM)ve owned several throughout my 68 years. What I find noteworthy...actually disturbing about this article is that something so obvious merits a study to confirm it. Apparently not a one of these researchers has ever owned a cat. What a waste of time, money and bandwidth.

    22. Re:No surprise by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Yep, my cats definitely know who I'm talking to and respond. Now when food is involved, my greedy cat will try to get in the way if he suspects I'm feeding our non-greedy cat. But outdoors with no food on the mind, you can get a good feel for what they understand in general.

      I'll add to this:
      "Then say its actual name. If it swivels its ears or perks up its head, " OR if you see the tail go from no movement to a twitch very precisely and succinctly, but they otherwise ignore you unless you call them 3+ times, then they'll possibly look at you like, "Well damn it, I don't want to move over to you right now. Be quiet, when you say my name it makes me antsy."

    23. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carcass? If you're identifying as a cat, they have already won!

    24. Re:No surprise by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Same here, our cat will prick her ears up and look at you every single time you say her name, but mostly ignore anything else, including words that sound quite similar. She definitely knows her name.

    25. Re:No surprise by Zorro · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have YOU well trained by now.

    26. Re:No surprise by bradley13 · · Score: 1

      People tend to read too much into the concept of a name. As far as we know, animals don't have a sense of identity, in the same way that people do. A person may be able to step outside themselves and think: "that's me, and my name is XYZ". Animals can't, and don't.

      So: what is a name to an animal? I submit that it is a very simple, functional sound: the sound made by a human who wants to get the animal's attention. And the animal gives its attention, because interesting things tend to follow.

      If your girlfriends cats all come running to every name-sound, that is easily explained: you and your girlfriend are not consistent in rewarding them if-and-only-if the correct cat reacts to the name. If any cat gets treats/pets/whatever, whenever any cat is called, then they all effectively share all of the names. How are they supposed to differentiate, if you don't?

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    27. Re:No surprise by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Be honest. Do you react better to your parent or SO telling you to take out the trash, or the sound of the oven timer saying dinner's ready?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    28. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As more evidence of knowing their own names, I have 3 cats each of which is addressed by a unique "baby-talk" vocalization.

      The cats will compete for my attention, but only when I address them with their unique "baby-talk" label. They don't compete for attention when I call for treats, to go outside, food's ready in the kitchen, or other mundane activities. But they sure do get upset when I uniquely address one and not the other.

    29. Re:No surprise by Grand+Facade · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes but she went in to the bedroom to pee on your clothes!

      --
      Rick B.
    30. Re:No surprise by lgw · · Score: 1

      As far as we know, animals don't have a sense of identity, in the same way that people do. A person may be able to step outside themselves and think: "that's me, and my name is XYZ". Animals can't, and don't.

      We don't know either way. Humans assume humans are special, but there's almost no science behind that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same kind experience with my cats recognizing their own name and showing me where the other cat was.

      I think my fondest memory of a cat was the time I had a friend over. I said, "watch this. Jackal, sit. Lay down". The cat did. He nearly fell out of his chair. They are trainable, with a lot of patience. Mostly we don't bother as long as they use the litterbox.

    32. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Roomate is a Cat Is basically a story about me... introvert, working from home; Adopted stray triggers the change in his life. But the anime is super cute because the second part of the show re-tells the story from the cat's perspective, what she's thinking, and why she acts so weird.

      It's not the scientific accuracy that's special, it's the principle that counts. Living together with greater and lesser beings... You should strive to be a God to your pets, I've taught my cat to stand on hind legs, maybe some day cats will walk upright and have more complex sentience. I feel this is an important thing to think about given that we'll have to get along with machine intelligence too. Even if a direct mind interface was made, somehow reading your entire brain, the machine gods won't be able to communicate the vast meaning in their intellect directly to you. We'll have to be very observant, maybe even take note of our dreams and subconscious impulses since those are easier to "program"... We'll make great pets!

    33. Re:No surprise by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      This should come as no surprise to anyone who owns a cat.

      We don't "own" cats, they pretty much own us. We are wait staff. Pretty much ALL cats are named "kitty kitty kitty". Don't believe me? You want pretty much any cat to come, just go "here kitty kitty kitty" [seems to take all 3 so it's like First, middle and last names.] Kinda like Zathras. That said every cat that has ever owned me has "come" to me when I called its name. Inside cats more so than outside cats which lends me to believe it's more of a condition response as indoor cats spend so much more time with their humans that they are used to be called by name then outdoor cats.

    34. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      LOL.
      Ah yes, only people who live with one cat build a bond strong enough that causes the cat to learn its name.
      That makes far more sense.
      Delusional Cat Owner Syndrome is what you have.

      People board their cats with us precisely because of the fact that *I* bond with them so well.
      A few months with me will turn the most asocial cat into a social critter.
      I love cats. There's simply no good evidence that they associate their name with any sense of personal identity. And this article didn't refute that.
      It simply showed that they respond, at some level, to hearing their name.

    35. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having had a cat I can say that they recognize their name, they just don't care

    36. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cat that is kept as a pet and has an emotional bond with their human is going to develop deeper understanding of their human

      Once a dumpster kitty always a dumpster kitty? You can take a cat out of the dumpster but not the dumpster out of a cat ;)

      On a more serious note. Sounds like we are back to nature vs nurture argument. For humans we have established it is both. Cats have enough in common with us to apply at least some of the theory.

      So some kitties are too dumb/crazy to properly interact with humans due to genetics. Some smart social kitty will show uncanny mental feats unlike its antisocial drooling idiot counterpart no matter the level of "education".

    37. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several cats. One is smarter than the others. He knows his name AND the names of the other cats. Or he thinks he has more than one name.

    38. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      If your girlfriends cats all come running to every name-sound, that is easily explained: you and your girlfriend are not consistent in rewarding them if-and-only-if the correct cat reacts to the name.

      Yes, it's also easily explained by the explanation I gave. I've spent a long time formulating that explanation, and I've never seen a single shred of evidence that it's wrong, and believe me, I've looked. Every single person I know who has claimed that cat knows its name will simply sit there and look confused and make excuses when the effect is demonstrated. I get it. We love our cats. Doesn't excuse inventing fairy tales for their behavior.

    39. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Yes, that must be it ;)

    40. Re: No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Clearly....
      Care to back up that assertion?

    41. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats actually have two names.

      The first name is the one you give them, to which they will respond, or not, as they wish.

      The second name is one to which they always respond. It is impossible to spell in English (or any other language for that matter), but
      it's pronounced in a way that sounds exactly like an electric can opener opening a can.

      I hope you appreciate my help in resolving this conundrum.

    42. Re:No surprise by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      For most people it probably depends on how good of a cook they are.

    43. Re: No surprise by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Right, because your anecdotal experience with your cats, apparently completely ungrounded in behavioral science, conclusively proves that it's the vocalization of it's name that your cats were responding to and not any of the other dozens of uncontrolled factors present. Obviously they know it's their name, as otherwise why would they respond?

      There's a big difference between "mittens comes when I call him" and "studies show that these specific species of cat are able to recognize their name and treat it as a social interaction, responding as needed". Know the difference and you'll be less likely to spout FUD.

    44. Re:No surprise by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I have three cats. If I say one of their names, the other two may move their ears or not, but the one who's name I called almost always sits up and looks at me with focus. We've had a few cats over the years and it always seems like one cat at any given time has separation anxiety.

    45. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who do NOT want a porn ad spewing .ru lonk, amazon has it too.
      https://www.amazon.com/My-Roommate-Cat-Simuldub/dp/B07NSHRCPW

    46. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      â(TM) how â(TM) about â(TM) some â(TM) â(TM) more of â(TM) â(TM) this â(TM)

    47. Re: No surprise by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Yes sure. The article address your point and explains why they believe that issue exist. Basic psychology would say that if you had read the article you would have worded your statement in relation to that part of the article and not posed it as a reason why the article is wrong. Since the article already argued why that situation is different then a couple of cats living in a normal home.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    48. Re: No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.
      The article said that cats respond, at some level (though as a group score of all recognized possible reactions, not at all) differently when exposed to their own name (but only when spoken by their owner) after dehabituation.
      It did not address my hypothesis that they simply recognize the word as a call to attention.
      In the instance of calling the cats name after a final dehabitualization step of calling another cohabitating cats name, their response was identical to the first word uttered to them- a random noun. The fact that it was higher than the final dehabitualization step does nothing to disprove my assertion.

    49. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      So yeah, they understand. They just probably dont give a shit about what you want.

      Oh, totally. Cows have actually completely solved the problem of quantum gravity. They probably just don't want us to find more advanced ways to slaughter them.

      I can sum your post up as:
      This should be obvious to anyone who shares my subjective feelings on cats, because they respond how they should respond when I interpret, subjectively, that they may want to do so. No confirmation bias in this equation.

      Excellent logic.

    50. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy.
      Do I respond better to my SO calling my name over the sound of the oven timer saying dinner's ready?
      Yes, I do.
      Don't you?

    51. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More of a dog person but our cat will come and meow at me if I say his name Everytime. Even when I'm talking on the phone to the vet and say his name in a normal voice.

    52. Re:No surprise by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't you lot give them names like breakfast, lunch, dinner?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    53. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should trademark that shit!

    54. Re:No surprise by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Problem is, my cat gets called many names. As well as the official one, "Fur balls", "Pest", "Jaws", "Claws", "Fuzz-whiskers", "Hey you!" etc are used more often. He knows when he is being addessed, you can tell by his ear movement, but mostly chooses to ignore it.

    55. Re:No surprise by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Who is "you lot"?

      I'm still trying to work out what misconception you are operating under.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister insisted that our cat Fluffy recognized her name. So Mom called "here chicken scat, here chicken scat" and Fluffy came running. I suspect that it's the tone of voice more than anything else that the little flea buses react to.

    57. Re:No surprise by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Can't hear either with my headphones on.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    58. Re:No surprise by Calydor · · Score: 1

      The problem is that any analogy will be flawed.

      Cats don't have the same desire to obey that dogs have, or the same abstract thinking to look at the bigger picture that we humans do. The cat may hear you calling, but immediately decide that you are less important or less interesting than remaining where it is in eg. a warm blanket on the couch. It may well have recognized THAT you called but sees no reason to do anything about it. Contrast that to hearing that there's food ready - that's a lot more important because it is something the cat wants.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    59. Re: No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But every cat has THREE names!

    60. Re:No surprise by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it could be fluent in 37 languages, but lack the vocal apparatus to articulate it.

      That's a silly line of reasoning, I'm sorry.

    61. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should come as no surprise to anyone who owns a cat.

      My cats will come when they are called, if they feel like it. Sometimes they will run to the door then refuse to actually come in.

      So yeah, they understand. They just probably dont give a shit about what you want.

      Big deal, I can also respond to my own name if I want to.

      But on a slightly more serious note.... Our cat's really really like to watch us humans....

  2. How to annoy a cat by mattdunelm · · Score: 2

    Keep talking to the cat four times in a minute. On the fifth time, chances are you've started to upset it and its getting ready to go someplace else.

    1. Re:How to annoy a cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just tried this and he came and laid down on my lap... wait was I supposed to baby-talk to him?

    2. Re: How to annoy a cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup

  3. My experience by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    (anecdotal evidence ahead)

    My experience is that the IQ bell curve in cats must look very interesting.

    There are some crazy intelligent cats out there but a lot of them are dumb as dirt.

    1. Re:My experience by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      There are some crazy intelligent cats out there but a lot of them are dumb as dirt.

      Just like humans then:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you not only listen to Jordan Peterson's bullshit, but linked to one of his inane videos where he misrepresents data is the perfect demonstration of the "dumb as dirt" end of the spectrum.

    3. Re: My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to show that the Army never found a correlation between low IQ and the holders of low IQ being either untrainable or an active hazard, o warrior of justice of the social kind?

    4. Re:My experience by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      When I was young, we had a cat that figured out doorknobs.

      When we had friends or family at the house, we would sometimes put him in a bedroom and close the door. The times that he got out of the bedroom, we assumed we just hadn't closed the door tight. One time, I was in the bedroom with him, and I watched him jump onto a table next to the door, reach over, and turn the doorknob.

      It also explained why, if he wanted to go outside, he went over to the outside door and reached up towards the doorknob. If he was two or three inches longer, he probably could have let himself out.

    5. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a cat who would slam the kitchen cabinets early every morning to wake me up so I would feed him. He would pull the cabinet door just enough that when he let go, it would slam shut. He would do that over and over again until I got up and gave him food. While he was around, I never needed an alarm clock.

      Oh, he also refused to drink out of anything but a glass. I think it started when I used to leave glasses of water sitting on my coffee table and he'd come over and drink from them. After some time, the water bowl wasn't good enough for him any more, and I had to start giving him water in short crystal glasses.

      I miss that chunky orange furball. He was my best friend.

  4. Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so that is quite an achievement. But they recognize the names only when you bring them food. And then they recognize any name as theirs.

    1. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Re:Cats are pretty stupid, so that is quite an achievement. But they recognize the names only when you bring them food. And then they recognize any name as theirs.

      Why do you consider cats stupid? Because you can't teach them tricks like a dog? In actual facts dogs are stupid because they will do cheap tricks for food out of greed. Cats could learn do those tricks too but because a cat is a very smart and cerebral creature it just can't be bothered with such simplistic food/reward teaching methods. You are mistaking that for stupidity.

    2. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too could build a starship in my tiny apartment for ten dollars worth of scrap metal, but my immense intellect has decided that it wasn't worth my time. That proves that I'm smart, right? That I didn't do anything?

    3. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only true if cats do absolutely nothing at all which we know isn't the case.

    4. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you Google "Moscow Cat Theatre," you will see some pretty amazing examples of the lengths to which cat training can be taken if you know how to approach the cat's personality.
      Dogs seem more trainable at firat glance since their much more rigid pack structure gives them more of an inclination toward immediate obedience of casual commands, but this has little overall bearing on their overall relative capacity to understand and follow complex instructions compared to cats. In fact the cat circus owners like to stress that all of their cats are ex street cats and that it is the training methods they use, not their ability to pick outstanding individuals, that leads to their rather stunning redults.

    5. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by DrSpock11 · · Score: 1

      Cats can be trained just as well as dogs, it's just a lot harder to do because they lack a pack instinct to follow a leader. I've seen a circus act with a dozen trained cats climbing, jumping, performing tricks.

    6. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      I too could build a starship in my tiny apartment for ten dollars worth of scrap metal, but my immense intellect has decided that it wasn't worth my time. That proves that I'm smart, right? That I didn't do anything?

      I think you misunderstood something, here's what happened:

      --=|CAT JOKE>

      -- 50.000 feet --


      .....o <-- you
      ..../|\
      ..../ \
      TTTTTTTTTT

    7. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only true if cats do absolutely nothing at all which we know isn't the case.

      Right.

      Because sleeping isn't nothing.

    8. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sleeping is the best thing in the world.

      At least cats are, on the whole, smarter, cleaner and more independent than dogs. You put a dog out in the wild, it will be dead within a week. You put a cat out there and it will survive for years.

    9. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)ve owned several cats. They arenâ(TM)t stupid believe me. One cat I owned would play fetch just like a dog. And Iâ(TM)ve yet to see any cat that canâ(TM)t be quickly trained to shit in a box. ;). Show me a dog thatâ(TM)ll do that.

    10. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Using your methodology, I think you equate to a dog, here is why: you just dumped (TM)s all over your post.

    11. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you consider cats stupid?

      Because they ain't smart. They do stuff by instinct only: they eat, they shit, they sleep and twice a year they go berserk and make more cats, and that's all they do.

    12. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "In actual facts dogs are stupid because they will do cheap tricks for food out of greed."

      No. Doing what some needs to be done to get what you want when what you want isn't otherwise related to the task isn't dumb at all. It's quite intelligent and a good bit of abstract thinking as far as animals go.

      As far as cats go though, in viewing them at family and friends houses I've never seen one do something a dog couldn't but I have seen dogs do plenty I've never seen a cat do. Of course my lack of cat ownership and the facts that cats arent anywhere near as social might have something to do with my own observations.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    13. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Cats are as trivial to train as dogs, it's not so much a pack instinct as not understanding the reward mechanism is different between the two. Then again you'll hear people say that goats, horses, sheep, pigs and so on can't be trained. They can be and easily, again it's the reward mechanism that you have to understand. And then you can get into the various sub breeds of various animals that have a natural reward instinct like with various sheep dogs or retrievers. A sheep dog is just as happy herding animals as they are herding small kids, but also can tell the difference and will absolutely put up with more abuse from a small kid yanking their ears or tail then a sheep or goat taking a nip at them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Calydor · · Score: 1, Funny

      To paraphrase, humans and dolphins long argued over who were smarter. Humans said they were the smartest because they'd invented wars, nuclear weapons and New York, while the dolphins just swam around in the ocean eating fish all day. The dolphins said they were the smartest - for the exact same reasons.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    15. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can teach cats tricks. But they need to be particularly food motivated to do so. Most cats won't care enough unless they're starving.

    16. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have trained our cat to use his scratching post instead of the furniture. Whenever I see him using the post, I give him a treat as positive reinforcement. On occasion, he'll approach the couch to scratch. When I say "no!" he leaves the couch alone and goes to the post. You can see an obvious difference in the condition of the post vs the couch as evidence that the reinforcement is effective.

      Although, perhaps he's the one that has trained me to give him a treat. I'll never know if he sees it that way, at least, not until we both master two-way communication between human and cat.

      I should set up a camera to monitor post usage when I'm not there to give a reward...

    17. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by jimbo · · Score: 1

      True but then they also think differently. My cat taught me to play fetch; while working in my office I threw a few crumbled paper balls into the next room, she charged after them and came back for more. I refused to crumble up more paper and after staring at me for a bit she went and fetched one of the previous balls and gave it to me. From then on we played fetch.

    18. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two cats who definitely know their names. Just last night I had to give one some medicine, and I called his name once from another room. That one time was all it took - he came bounding over in seconds, while the other cat did not.

      We have two dogs, and they also know the cats' names. One dog is obsessed with stalking the younger cat, and if she's laying down when I call the cat's name, she will often get up and start looking around for the cat so she can pursue him.

      The cats not only know their names, but they know other words. I've taught them to give paw, to give both paws, to give a high five, and to reach up high. I practice these with them daily, and I switch up the order in which I ask for them to perform these "tricks." It's clear they know which word is associated with which trick becuase they don't blindly perform them in the same order; they do each trick depening on which I ask for.

      Additionally, the cats will both come when I say, "kitties!" So they not only know their names and the names of tricks, but also the name I use when I want them both to come to me.

      Animals are often smarter than humans give them credit for.

    19. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      LOL.
      I assure you cats can be bothered with such simplistic behavior for treats. Mine come running en masse and all try to climb and paw at me whenever I stop near the treat cupboard.
      They're just too stupid to learn the tricks. Cats are just stupid in general. They're capable of moments of genius, but totally incapable of making even rudimentary steps to expand upon it.
      A great example from above- A cat will sometimes learn to open a door from a position where he can reach the door knob.
      But he'll never learn he can just jump and open any door.
      A cat will sit there and paw under your couch for something just out of reach until it dies of starvation. A dog will get your attention knowing it can't reach it.

      Beyond this, the intelligence of dogs vs. cats is highly settled. The encephalization quotient of dogs is higher, suggesting higher intelligence. The amount of words a dog can learn and demonstrate knowledge of is massively higher.

      And you know another thing a dog will learn? Not to stick its nose in a stove burner. Cats? Fucking never.

      I love cats. But people who assign some kind of higher intelligence to them are delusional. They're seeing what they want to see.

    20. Re:Cats are pretty stupid, by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Of course my lack of cat ownership and the facts that cats arent anywhere near as social might have something to do with my own observations.

      It also means you're free of the subjective delusions that a lot of cat owners (like my girlfriend) love to engage in.
      I do live with cats. The reason you've never seen them do something a dog can't do, is because they don't.
      Cat owners see them do it, but no one else does. For shit like this, we have science.

    21. Re: Cats are pretty stupid, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And science has, for a long time now, placed cats where they belong on the intelligence ladder: way down from where dogs are.

  5. What did hte *cats* conclude from this experiment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the cats ever reveal the results of this experiment of theirs on humans who think they're "scientists"?

  6. 1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the other by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

    I have 2 cats. Both of them respond to their own names. In fact the dumber one responds to both names - I think she's just greedy.

    The older male one is definitely smarter than the younger female one. He can understand when I point to something, to look at what I am pointing at rather than the tip of my finger - apparently this is something that about 30% of cats can do. The younger female cat seems pretty ambivalent on this gesture - sometimes she will stare intently at my finger, other times she appears to look at what I am pointing at.

    The older male is very neurotic in general and appears to remember past (negative) events exceptionally well. The female cat is much more easy going - one time when she was a very young kitten I played with her with a rabbit fur toy and happened to be holding a metal pocket multi tool (like a pocketknife) in my hand which I accidentally dropped and it hit her smack on the head, enough to hurt her and cause her to run away. The next couple of times I played with her with the rabbit fur toy she was visibly apprehensive, because she remembered being hit on the head. Now (2+ years later) I can play with her with that toy and she doesn't hesitate or worry at all, whereas the older neurotic male cat seems to recall every bad experience he has ever had and will sometimes cower when I approach him with my arms outstretched in the wrong way - he remembers past times where I applied flea medicine to the back of his neck which he hated.

  7. Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's amazing how humans still, to this day, have this pre-conceived notion of being the chosen ones in the entire universe.

    We must be the center of the solar sytem.
    We must be the master "race" (a term that does not exist in science btw).
    We are a very special species, unlike all the others in every aspect, and not animals.
    Only humans can think, animals are mere automatons who can't think or feel. (My grandma still believed that one, and she was a farmer.)
    Only humans can recognize themselves.
    Only humans can solve problems.
    Only humans can make tools.
    Only humans have names.
    Only humans know concepts like trust and deception.
    Only humans have a concept of past and future and can count
    Ony humans play and enjoy entertainment.
    Only humans have sex for pleasure.
    Only humans can be homosexual etc.
    Only humans can communicate in a language. ...

    All disproven.
    Spotting a pattern here?

    It is always nice to have some scientific certainty. And that is not what my comment is about.

    But we are NOT special. And that is OK.

    I think there ought to be a time, where the default assumption we make before having scientific evidence, should not be like those I listed above.
    And that should have happened a loong time ago, like it did for nearly all observant minds.

    1. Re:Well duh. by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      But we are NOT special. And that is OK.

      Like it or not we are special. Look around, other animals might communicate and build nests but none in any thing like the way we have and it essentially comes down to flappy lips and opposable thumbs.

      This world wasn't made for us but we have made it our own for better or worse.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that people have also applied most of those same fallacious beliefs to anyone with a different race, ethnicity or religion to justify slavery, abuse and bigotry. Rationalizing the bad things we do is probably mankind's biggest hobby after sex.

      If everyone accepted that animals were intelligent and have feelings and memories and thoughts, a lot people would have to admit that a lot of things like rodeos, catch-and-release fishing, horse racing and so forth are just ways of torturing animals for fun.

    3. Re: Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats Like to explore the great unknown, with the whispering winds, sometimes you can see their eyes in the dark. Mysterious creatures and long-lived. Unique and irreplaceable animals.

    4. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that people have also applied most of those same fallacious beliefs to anyone with a different race, ethnicity or religion ...

      And in a related story, Brunei has just imposed laws based on Islamic sharia that makes homosexuality punishable with death by stoning.

      You were saying something implying all religions are equal?

      Go ahead - compare it to Christianity FROM A FUCKING THOUSAND YEARS AGO and help make my point.

    5. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US supports Israel staunchly for one reason only - there are a few Christian US billionaires who control US policy and happen to believe that protecting the grave of their god will grant them access to the heavens. For that reason they are ready to open a full-scale war, murder hundreds of thousands and leave millions upon millions homeless and living in misery. This happened in 2003, then in 2011.

      Are you telling yourself that you're oh so different from and somehow superior to the kingdom of Brunei?

      Well, I'm sorry to give you the bad news, but you're just the same.

    6. Re: Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only humans can light and control a fire.

    7. Re:Well duh. by ImdatS · · Score: 1

      Maybe the other animals have actually experienced everything we are doing/experiencing and decided, some million years ago, that the way of civilization is not really worth going. And then, maybe, just maybe, they decided to go back, leave civilization behind as the "wrong path" and go back to nature.

      Maybe, in this sense, we are the dumbest of all species on this planet because we are way behind all of them and have to have this experience called "civilization" first...

      Just sayin'...

    8. Re:Well duh. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      This world wasn't made for us but we have made it our own for better or worse.

      How do you know it wasn't? You acknowledge that we are obviously special.

    9. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no.

    10. Re: Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that subjugation of a race or religion or another is an extremely intelligent thing to do in most cases? It also shows superiority over the subjugated. Now its not a nice thing to do, but then again other animals arnt exactly the most nice to inferiors.

  8. What's in a name? by Camarillo+Brillo · · Score: 1

    I named my kitten 'Heygetoffofthere' but she never pays me no mind. Many animals can be conditioned to respond to a stimulus if there is a reward or punishment. Animal ears andbrains are not so different from humans, so why would cats not respond. My dog on the other hand gets confused with any word that sounds like his name.

  9. Depends on the cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had many cats of the years. Seems to depend on the cat. Currently have two. One reacts directly to his name, and comes if called from another room. The other couldn't give less fucks what we call her and have never reacted to get name or any word at all.

  10. Re: 1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like they are both smarter than you, too.

  11. Re:1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the oth by willy_me · · Score: 2

    A friend got drunk and booted his cat one night. For the next several months he had to sleep with his door shut. If the cat got in it would take a shit on his chest while he was sleeping. I am told it took him several months to get back on good terms with the cat. Lesson to be learned is that cats can have a good memory and understanding of their environment. They can also often tell the difference between human accidents and on purpose. Applying flea medicine is definitely on purpose so you should expect the cat to hold a grudge for a while.

  12. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not necessarily.

    They are recognising a sound that normally precedes things of interest to them... usually food.

    For all we know, they think "Tiddles" means "I'm opening up a tin of meat for you". It only has to correlate enough for them to think it's worth getting their attention diverted to see if there's food, not every time.

    Now, I did teach my cats words. They understand what those words mean and how they differ. They don't always know their own name, for example, and will ignore you calling them upstairs by it (food isn't served upstairs, so why would I wake up and run all the way up there?.

    I teach my cats the word "down"... which discourages them off furniture, shelves, stairs, places they shouldn't be. They tend to get that.

    They don't need an explicit word for food, they tend to go by the sound of the food bag/tin being opened, but using their name does reinforce that. When you want them to approach, you can try the name but what piques their interest is chirpy sounds or holding out your fingers... both food-related enticements. They won't approach if they know you haven't got food, unless they want a stroke but that's usually a side-effect of wanting to sit on you or be fed.

    Some of them learned that me patting my lap means they are welcome to jump up but they struggle even with that.

    Let's stop anthropomorphising them... they are little wild animals that have been given a privileged environment that they will defend if necessary, accept our presence in because we are much larger and more dangerous than them, have become accustomed to us generally being amenable to them being present, sometimes scent-mark us (especially to remember who fed them, usually), act like kittens in such an environment, and respond almost entirely only to food-based enticements.

    That's not a bad thing. It's called a pet.

    Though it is said that the greatest, most natural, and most clear signal of any species in terms of offering of peace is to give food. That's why you shouldn't refuse offers of dinner in foreign countries. Giving somebody food is the biggest signal you can offer in terms of acceptance, non-threatening, friendliness, sharing of vital resources, etc.

    1. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't sound like a pet. A cat is an equal to humans and some cats more equal than others

    2. Re:Sigh. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For all we know, they think "Tiddles" means "I'm opening up a tin of meat for you".

      It actually says that right in the summary. I know not reading TFA is standard, but not reading the summary is cat levels of laziness.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are recognising a sound that normally precedes things of interest to them... usually food.

      I live in a house with several cats, but I virtually never feed them (as in, a few times a year at most for a few days usually I cat sit). Yet clearly some of the cats seem to respond to their name or at least the intonation of saying their name. I think the last part says something because cats may not comprehend the subtlety of their pronounced name but they very well may understand the overreaching vocal pattern used when saying their name. If that's the case, I'd say they understand their name: it's just the intonation, not the actual word per se.

      They don't always know their own name, for example, and will ignore you calling them upstairs by it (food isn't served upstairs, so why would I wake up and run all the way up there?

      That sounds less like proof one way or the other of knowing their name and more that they don't respond to their name unless they feel there's reason to. Of course, we don't really know which it is.

      Let's stop anthropomorphising them... they are little wild animals that have been given a privileged environment that they will defend if necessary, accept our presence in because we are much larger and more dangerous than them, have become accustomed to us generally being amenable to them being present, sometimes scent-mark us (especially to remember who fed them, usually), act like kittens in such an environment, and respond almost entirely only to food-based enticements.

      Funny how you mention all these things and ignore that cuddling and demanding being pet aren't really in the scope of anything you mention. The name "pet" even spells out that pretty substantial difference between them and wild animals, as very few wild animals would be so trusting of being held tightly. Cats actually like strong hugs.

      Though it is said that the greatest, most natural, and most clear signal of any species in terms of offering of peace is to give food. That's why you shouldn't refuse offers of dinner in foreign countries. Giving somebody food is the biggest signal you can offer in terms of acceptance, non-threatening, friendliness, sharing of vital resources, etc.

      While I wouldn't generally disagree with this, I can't imagine thinking it enough to throw a hunk of food at a bear, a wolf, etc and to be able to readily walk away nor for them to gently rub against me. There is also the rather important point that there isn't some massive social taboo about dragging someone away from eating; poisoning people also isn't remotely unheard of. Animals learn, too, to not trust food baited by humans because it may be drugged or poisoned. My point is, I think it's a bit more complicated than that.

    4. Re:Sigh. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      most clear signal of any species in terms of offering of peace is to give food. That's why you shouldn't refuse offers of dinner

      Except when they're Ferengi.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    5. Re:Sigh. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      For all we know, they think "Tiddles" means "I'm opening up a tin of meat for you".

      It actually says that right in the summary. I know not reading TFA is standard, but not reading the summary is cat levels of laziness.

      No it doesn't. I know not reading TFS is becoming standard but you can't just make up what it says.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    6. Re:Sigh. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "The new research, published today in Scientific Advances, doesn't mean cats understand the human conception of a name, but it does show that at least some cats can distinguish their names from other words."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Sigh. by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

      They don't always know their own name, for example, and will ignore you calling them upstairs by it (food isn't served upstairs, so why would I wake up and run all the way up there?.

      You just proved that teenagers don't always know their own names.

    8. Re:Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 1

      "X and Y are distinct" and "X has an interpretation that food is imminent" are two entirely separate conclusions.

    9. Re:Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 2

      They respond to the name, because that name is used when feeding them. As per the article, it doesn't matter who says it, whether you feed them or not - they know what the sound for "Dinnertime" is, whoever says it. They are associating it with food.

      That they respond does not mean they think it means "Me, particularly" which a name does, but "Come Get It!". Now if one cat responded to their name to come get food but no other cat in the house cared, then you might have something testable. That's incredibly unlikely, however.

      Why would they only selectively respond to their name? Because they think it's a word that requires their attention? Or because they think it's a word related to an activity that they can tell isn't taking place, therefore they must have misheard/misunderstand/that word only works in certain places? The intonation is also entirely different, as you say, if you're saying "Come on, Tiddles, Dinner!" than "Did you want to come round for dinner tomorrow?". They don't understand the word, they know the sound that precedes dinner, which is however you - or someone else - normally calls them to eat.

      Cats are social animals, domestic cats are kitten-like in nature, they come in for pets with humans and each other in the same way. You're a big cat to them. Wild animals do the same, they just haven't accepted humans as they own kind because they didn't grow up with them. Put a lion cub in a human house, watch it acclimatise and "play" with humans like they were other lion cubs.

      Personally most cats don't like contact unless they've been handled from birth. They see humans as "something different but we'll accept you" rather than something they will happily snuggle against. Go approaching random cats that free-roam, were taken from shelters, were part-reared without human interaction or that live in a big enough space to not attach to a small subset of humans... they won't snuggle with you. Hell, even a domestic cat that's been abandoned or a kitten pushed out of the domestic litter will likely act wild rather than domesticated.

      One of the biggest problems with cats and people who love cats is that they assume all cats will snuggle, and many won't. I work in an environment with dozens of cats are quite accustomed to roaming the site. They are all house-trained, they are all "domesticated". But they see enough humans that they don't attach to any particular one at all, so getting them to snuggle is out of the question. You might be permitted a stroke or two if they like you and think you might have food and aren't a threat. Feed them and they'll follow you home. Just stroke them and swizzle their cheek and that's all you'll ever get.

      It's about the long-term effect of their interaction with humans, words and food. Same as your bear... you can't just lob a sausage at it and think it'll be your friend. It won't. But if you reared a bear-cub in a human house and said "Honey" every time you fed it, it would grow up to a) be accustomed to humans and bond with them, seeing them as "others of the same kind", b) respond to the word Honey, c) probably be way more placid than one battling the elements, predators and other bears.

      Cats are the same. They are wild animals that quickly revert to wild behaviour in the absence of human interaction. If reared as a baby-human, in effect, they become playful and stay kitten-like with humans (miaows are an entirely kitten behaviour in the wild, domestic cats are the only ones to retain them, because.... they are treated by humans as a request for food much like kittens miaow to request food).

      They have learned to associate sounds but they don't understand deep concepts about those words (e.g. the concept of a name that is addressed only to them, rather than the word that gets used when they get fed). They are acclimated to human presence but without a deep bond from early age (pretty much never seeing anything but other bonded domestic cats and humans) they don't really offer the behaviours you described t

    10. Re:Sigh. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      "The new research, published today in Scientific Advances, doesn't mean cats understand the human conception of a name, but it does show that at least some cats can distinguish their names from other words."

      Hmmmm, that's pushing it to say that says the same as what the other guy said. 'Here comes food' is a specific message, other words could literally be anything from 'you cuddly wuddly little bastard' to 'c'mon it's time to go to the vet'.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    11. Re:Sigh. by PPH · · Score: 1

      For all we know, they think "Tiddles" means "I'm opening up a tin of meat for you".

      Strange coincidence. When I was young, I associated that with feeding time as well.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:Sigh. by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 2

      There's no need to paint cats as complete selfish bastards... I mean the occasional cat joke is great because there is that grain of truth there, but seriously, they are awesome pets.

      "Some of them learned that me patting my lap means they are welcome to jump up but they struggle even with that."

      What?! All of my cats since I can remember learn that patting something, or patting then pointing at something, means to go there. Lap, stairs, couch, bed, etc.

      I wonder what in your environment or situation is causing some of the cats to not know what that means. It's been consistent for me and my close relatives from kid to college to adult over the course of 10+ cats.

      "respond almost entirely only to food-based enticements."

      Well, there is a grain of truth in that, but it's really not all food... my cats love to be petted. And our tomcat loves to sit on our lap or next to our feet. No food involved at all. Our youngest cat, 3 years old, was a little shy for the first 2 years, but now that she's mature she really loves to be petted. Just this morning she was hanging out near my daughter and me when we were near the bathroom sink. She kept meowing at us. I pointed at the counter, patted it, pointed, patted... she jumped right up and wanted to be petted. Yeah sure, sometimes they are begging for food, but she really just wants attention sometimes. Our tomcat always wants attention unless he is asleep.

      And what about playing with the cats? Most cats really love to chase a toy, no food there.

      Yeah cats are cool.

    13. Re:Sigh. by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Cats can understand names, but something like "down" is really abstract. They don't understand that shit at all.

      The only reason it seems like they understand it is that they understand "down" means "I'm mad at you," and they separately have figured out you get mad when they're on the counter. So if both these things are happening, they're likely to take evasive actions.

      They probably all know that when you pat your lap you want them to cuddle. It might not be a problem of them not understanding, but rather a problem of them understanding all-too-well and simply wanting something else. Some cats consider it poor form to give you emotional support on request, and you'll just to wait until they're ready. (or learn to act stand-offish enough to entice their cooperation)

      One thing that can help is to learn a little cat; turn your head so that it is about 45deg from the cat, blink once slowly, exaggerated. Look around the room. Repeat one time. (only) This means, "Hey, I'm sitting here thinking about you, you have my permission to hang out. But I'm not asking, I'm just sitting here stationary by myself, mostly doing my own thing." Cats appreciate it if you can share this type of communication with them sometimes. Unfortunately, most humans aren't really smart enough.

    14. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They respond to the name, because that name is used when feeding them.

      That's quite a leap. While most of the cats eat wet food, we also leave out dry food which some cats exclusively (or near exclusively eat). Further, when "treats" are offered, "treats" are called out. Further, I regularly call out plenty of the cat names at times well outside of food time, so there's no context for them to think it means "come get it". Finally, all the cats that eat wet food respond to the sounds of opening the cupboard with the wet food and/or a can opening. Basically, you're loading this all with presumptions that don't even apply.

      Hell, even a domestic cat that's been abandoned or a kitten pushed out of the domestic litter will likely act wild rather than domesticated.

      So will most humans.

    15. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of behaviourist explanation is invalid as an explanation for a distinction of awareness between cat and human.

      We attribute it to cats as an explanation, but not to humans because humans have a conscious mind.

      In fact, behaviourist explanations can be equally applied to humans in many circumstances as simple as the ones used for cats (and indeed were by Skinner).

      Consequently, this kind of data cannot be used to answer the question of awareness because in and of itself, does not distinguish human from animal.

      We (and you) make the distinction and draw the conclusion by assuming humans are consciously aware and animals are not, i.e., the force of your conclusion is based on assumption, not what the data show.

    16. Re:Sigh. by kbahey · · Score: 2

      I can confirm almost everything you said.

      We have a cat, regular short hair domestic tabby, almost 9 years old now. Came to us when he was 5 or so months old. He has always been odd: very scared of loud sounds, and when the door bell rings, he runs away, often watching from a perch. The possible reason is that we were told he spend some time (before he came to us) in a dog shelter and the continuous barking probably permanently traumatized him. He also does not like to be lifted up, or placed on laps at all. Like most cats, he does things on his own terms. He approaches to be petted (but not carried) and gets his dose in only 5 or 10 seconds. This is usually in the morning, or after he wakes up from naps.

      He responds to the sound of the food tin being opened, or dry food being rattled. He knows these are signs of food being served. He only comes to you when you make a scratching or grinding sound (innate genes on rodents munching). He likes to chase the laser dot.

      Unintentionally, he responds in a specific way to his name being called 3 times in quick succession. When I do it, he runs to the window, since it means there is a critter there (squirrels, chipmunks, birds). If they are close, he will pounce on them (never learned that glass is a barrier, though he rests his paws against it). But that is not recognizing his name.

      A family member often boards another cat which is half Persian, and his demeanor and behaviour is very different. He does not know to pull doors open like the tabby one. He has to go up on hind quarters and put his weight with the front paws on the door. Does not work on both sides of the door. He is not scared when the door bell rings. On the contrary, he will run to the door to see who is coming. He is more cuddly and tolerant to handling than the other one.

      I saw a documentary on 19th century agriculture in the UK. The farmer said that he called one cow a name with one syllable, and the other one a name with two syllables, since cows do not recognize the names, but will know which one has a two syllable 'call' and which is just one.

    17. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody animals with free will. Who would have thought?

  13. Simple PB ("Patience and Bribery") by resistant · · Score: 1

    Seems to me a lot depends on what sort of clear rewards are consistently associated with using the name. If your cat responds otherwise to your body language, your tone of voice, its own inner beat, and other nonverbal cues such as smelling like tuna to come when you call, always or almost always hearing the same sound -- the kitty's name -- just before getting ear rubs, small nummies, and other fun stuff will naturally become linked over time to the clearly enunciated name. Given sufficient native feline intelligence and enough repetitions, the name alone will become enough. I actually did this with my own kitty many years ago when I last owned a cat, and it worked a treat. (I was careful though not to overuse the name -- "here, kitty-kitty" was enough for ordinary occasions.) This does take some work and patience, of course, but that's the root of all effective animal training -- patience and bribery.

    I guess it's interesting in a nebbish researcher fashion to try to measure how much the overall social environment affects fuzz-butt psychology. Is a fairly noisy environment detrimental to this kind of training, such as a household with multiple kids or punk-rock musicians in development? A hammer factor with testing facilities? NASA's rocket launching facilities? An otherwise quiet campus with frat boys who love to belt out off-color songs every day at noon? What about dogs in the household -- does their constant nose-poking and butt-sniffing make learning names more difficult for cats? Just how terrible does a "terrible-twos" toddler have to be before the average kitty loses all ability to focus on anything but surviving from day to day? Just speculating on the possibilities.

    --
    A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
  14. DooDoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine named his cat "DooDoo". He got it an engraved water and food dish, cat tags, accessories.

    The cat died. He got a new cat, and since he already had the engraved accessories and already knew mentally that {"Cat" : "DooDoo"}, in a brilliant act of mental efficiency, named the new cat "DooDoo", with his thought being that onus was on the cat to figure out its name and since he bought the cat food he got to call the shots and he didn't want to have to learn a new cat name.

    When I met him, he was probably on DooDoo v4 or v5.

    1. Re:DooDoo by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine named his cat "DooDoo". He got it an engraved water and food dish, cat tags, accessories.

      The cat died. He got a new cat, and since he already had the engraved accessories and already knew mentally that {"Cat" : "DooDoo"}, in a brilliant act of mental efficiency, named the new cat "DooDoo", with his thought being that onus was on the cat to figure out its name and since he bought the cat food he got to call the shots and he didn't want to have to learn a new cat name.

      When I met him, he was probably on DooDoo v4 or v5.

      Will he go as far as doodoo twotwo?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:DooDoo by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      So as I always suspected, "NO!", "STOP!" and "GODDAMIT!" recognize their names, they're just ignoring me since they're assholes.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  15. Who ran this study? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    Plenty of cat owners will happily tell you their felines are capable of responding to their own names, but the scientific jury remains ambivalent on the matter.Â

    It sounds like the cats were the ones on this scientific jury.

  16. The sound of a can opener by burhop · · Score: 1

    This is what my cat thought his name was. He refused to answer to any other name.

  17. As any cat owner can tell you... by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    ALL cats recognize their name. Whether they give a damn about you calling them is entirely another thing.

  18. Ok, but... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...which one of their three names can they recognize ?!?

  19. Duh by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >"Cats Can Recognize Their Own Names, Study Suggests"

    Wow. I thought everyone knew this- at least anyone that has a cat (and bothers to interact with them regularly). What next? A study that says when a cat squints (slow blinks) at you or purrs it is happy? (Duh)

    Cats are quite smart, fun, affectionate, and entertaining. They are just not slaves that hinge their entire self-worth on their owners... and that is one of the best things about them.

    1. Re:Duh by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Reply to self-

      BTW, all my cats know many words- such as:

      * Special treat
      * Let's play
      * No
      * Whacha want?
      * Kitty kitty (come)
      * Where's the bird?
      * OW

      Yes, it does matter HOW the words are said... they are recognizing the sounds- pitch and intonation do matter.

    2. Re: Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adorable. People talk a lot of shit about cats but won't bother to find out how full of shit themselves are. Universal truth of the simpering coward.

    3. Re:Duh by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Here's some words my cats have taught me. They do have a lot of different vocalizations, that vary by the cat's own distinct personalities.

      1. hungry
      2. bored
      3. demanding something
      4. something's wrong
      5. I want to be petted
      6. fuck off

    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our cat doesn’t know it’s own name, hates being touched, never purrs, sheds everywhere, and only pays you any attention when hungry.

  20. Oh, they know a lot more than that by mpercy · · Score: 1

    They just don't give a crap.

  21. Another cat story! by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

    Yes, our cats know their names.

    Funny story, years ago my wife & I are in the computer room one evening (as usual) & Budapest, one of two cats comes running in meowing like crazy. It was like lassie trying to tell us that Timmy was stuck in the well. At the same time my wife & I say "Charlie fell of the balcony!". I go out & sure enough, I can hear him meowing somewhere below. We have a cat door in the screen because cats are a pain in the ass when it comes to doors.

    Cats, dogs, even birds are smarter than many people give them credit for. Now days we have three cats & a dog. It's a lot of work but I feel our lives are much better due to the profound happiness these beasts give us.

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
    1. Re:Another cat story! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Birds can be very intelligent. My wife's parents have a cockatoo that picked a master lock to escape from her cage. She's affectionate also... until she decides not to be at which point you'd best remove your fingers from her cage. She can bite a whole walnut in two with her beak. You don't want to know what she can do to fingers.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Another cat story! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, I for one am impressed that two humans both took the time to listen to cat, and consider that the noises it makes might be communicative. Most humans aren't really that smart, they only manage to keep a pet alive because of their innate parenting instincts.

  22. Any animal can be trained to a cue by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Plenty of cat owners will happily tell you their felines are capable of responding to their own names, but the scientific jury remains ambivalent on the matter.

    No the "scientific jury" is not really in question here. You can train virtually any animal to come or do some actions on a cue. A name is just such a cue and pretty much any animal can be trained to recognize and perform an action in relation to their name. Animal handlers in zoos use this fact constantly. My wife took a graduate level training course at the Shedd Aquarium a few years ago. Some animals are easier to train than others but literally anyone who works with animals for a living will tell you that of course cats can be trained to perform an action in relation to their name and to recognize their name as a cue. The problem is that most people are very bad at training and give all sorts of confusing mixed messages about what the cue they are giving is supposed to mean. Think about how many people you see talking to their dogs or cats as if they actually speak human languages.

    So yes, cats can recognize the sounds that we give them as a name and they can associate that with some actions we might ask them to perform. But its a mistake to think it should the same thing it does to a human. We as humans have been trained to respond to our names in certain ways and cats can be trained to have responses to their names too.

    The new research, published today in Scientific Advances, doesn't mean cats understand the human conception of a name, but it does show that at least some cats can distinguish their names from other words.

    If they think this is "new" or cutting edge research they are WAY behind the curve on animal training. Read some books like https://www.amazon.com/Dont-Sh...">Don't Shoot The Dog or watch some videos by a guy like Ken Ramirez.

  23. The truth is much simpler by timholman · · Score: 1

    In the words of writer David Gerrold: "All cats have the same name. It's pronounced exactly like the sound of a can opener."

    My cats always came running when they heard it. :-)

  24. Re:1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the oth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your friend should have been arrested and put in jail. That is animal abuse and it's illegal. I would beat the shit out of anyone I ever saw harming an animal.

  25. Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also recognize when you meow in the same tone and pitch as they do. Posted as AC for obvious reasons.

    1. Re:Cats by slipped_bit · · Score: 1

      I have deeper, more meaningful Conversations with my cat than I do with any humans:

    2. Re:Cats by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They also recognize when you meow in the same tone and pitch as they do. Posted as AC for obvious reasons.

      Don't worry, your penis won't actually shrink if you stop being toxic and talk about something cute for 5 minutes.

    3. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When mine wants out, he'll say something like:

      Me out! Me out!
      Prowl now!

      No communication problem there.

  26. Domestication in cats and dogs by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1
  27. My last cat definitely knew her name by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    It took many years, but one day I was having a phone conversation with my sister and the cat's name ("cat") came up in the middle of a sentence. Like "Yeah, I once had a cat like that". The point is that I wasn't calling her in a familiar voice, looking at her, and I didn't stress that word. It was in the middle of a sentence. Right after that word she looked up and meowed at me. At that point, I knew that she actually knew the word.

    She was highly intelligent and had spent 7+ years living on her own outside after someone had apparently abandoned her. She knew how to catch food, but when I brought her inside she had no problem being inside, either, just always wanted to go back outside.

  28. IQ by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Whenever anyone tells you dogs are smarter than cats, throw something and tell them to "go fetch". When they just look at you, ask them why they are acting like a cat.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  29. Lemme Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government funded?

  30. Ellie cat knows her name and alot more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cat knows her name and comes running when I call for her. She was a rescue and in the short time she has lived with me, she has learned what her name is already. She also knows a few other phrases, like "get down" , "stop it" , "come on" , and "are you ready to go to bed", and she follows me and jumps up at the end of the bed. She also knows the sound of the drawer opening where the laser pointer is, when I slide it open, she comes running and waits for the laser chase game. For being a rescue, she is very social and sweet. We are guessing she is about 3 years old.

  31. Cool Experiment by ememisya · · Score: 1

    I call my cat Shikaka, this is going to be fun.

  32. Hey Pussy, Pussy, Pussy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks funny... Every time I call out my cat's name, I get slapped!

  33. Big deal by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    My monitor lizard (Varanus Rudicollis) knows his name, comes when called, and can count to 10 (the number of mice I feed him. If there are less, he'll hunt around for the remainder until he finds them.)

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  34. Well duh-I'm special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Except we're not the only one's with opposable thumbs so it can't be that. And African gray parrots certainly can do the talky, talky just fine so it's not that either.

    1. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Except we're not the only one's with opposable thumbs so it can't be that. And African gray parrots certainly can do the talky, talky just fine so it's not that either.

      It's a combination of those things plus being bipedal. Pretty much every other animal with four limbs uses all of them for movement (other mammals normally, if not always, walk on all four legs; birds use the two upper limbs for flight, etc.). Humans don't need to use our arms and hands for much else, so they're available for investigating and manipulating the surrounding environment.

    2. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Except we're not the only one's with opposable thumbs so it can't be that. And African gray parrots certainly can do the talky, talky just fine so it's not that either.

      It's a combination of those things plus being bipedal. Pretty much every other animal with four limbs uses all of them for movement (other mammals normally, if not always, walk on all four legs; birds use the two upper limbs for flight, etc.). Humans don't need to use our arms and hands for much else, so they're available for investigating and manipulating the surrounding environment.

      I'm not convinced you've ever even seen a video of weasel behavior while they're exploring their environment. Lots of animals walk around touching and manipulating things with their hands, that has nothing to do with being bipedal.

    3. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Except we're not the only one's with opposable thumbs so it can't be that. And African gray parrots certainly can do the talky, talky just fine so it's not that either.

      It's a combination of those things plus being bipedal.

      Our three advantages are opposable thumbs, flappy lips, bipedality and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced you've ever even seen a video of weasel behavior while they're exploring their environment. Lots of animals walk around touching and manipulating things with their hands, that has nothing to do with being bipedal.

      But other animals can't do it as much or as well as humans, because they need to use their arms/hands for movement and/or they don't have opposable thumbs. The point is that it's not any one of these attributes that separates humans from other animals, but that humans are the only animal to have all of these attributes.

    5. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      Except we're not the only one's with opposable thumbs so it can't be that. And African gray parrots certainly can do the talky, talky just fine so it's not that either.

      It's a combination of those things plus being bipedal.

      Our three advantages are opposable thumbs, flappy lips, bipedality and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.

      Hold on, I'll leave and come back in.

      Good thing we have opposable thumbs to open the door, huh?

    6. Re:Well duh-I'm special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      our five advantages are opposable thumbs, flappy lips, bipediality, fanatical devotion to the pope, and surprise

  35. This is research? by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    This is research? Seriously? I was convinced this came from some crappy write-only journal, but...it comes from a Nature publication? That's just pathetic.

    Ask any cat owner: of course cats recognize their names. Mine looks at you, to see what you want. If you say "come", then - guess what - she comes (well, most of the time, she is a cat after all). She also understands commands for simple tricks: sit, lie down, jump, etc.. And she's not any special breed, just an accident between two house cats.

    Cats aren't as good with human languages as dogs, and they're a lot less interested in cooperating, but a small vocabulary is absolutely possible. Learning their own name? Well, duh. What a stupid research topic.

    FWIW: Training cats to do tricks isn't hard, it just takes patience and perseverance. Start with hand signals, they come easier for the cat than words. But both are absolutely possible.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  36. Proves cats are even bigger assholes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They recognize their names, which makes them even bigger assholes for not paying attention to you.

  37. Cats and Chihuahuas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not that they don't, it's more like they won't.

  38. Our feline overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cats understand, they just don't care.

  39. In related news... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 2

    Cats Can Recognize Their Own Names, Study Suggests

    Cat aficionados who fancy themselves "scientists" are unable to recognize instances of operant conditioning when they see them.

    For these cats, the sequence of sounds we humans call "their names" end up being followed by feeding, treats, petting, scritch-scratching, and warm, luxurious laps in which to relax and unwind from a stressful day of napping in the sunshine and occasionally trying to catch their arch-nemesis, that stupid glowing red dot... all good and pleasant things. Naturally, being living organisms, cats tend to gravitate towards that which is pleasant, and avoid that which is not. Having the collection of sounds that they hear right before something nice happens resulting in them tending to come to expect the same or similar when it happens again is just operant conditioning.

    I propose a study to investigate the correlation between so-called scientists attributing to cats properties they may or may not have, with toxoplasmosis infection. If the parasite can make rats think cat piss smells good, it stands to reason that it might well result in "researchers" conducting "studies" concluding that cats are in various ways smarter or better than previously believed.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:In related news... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      PS: If the origin of this story turns out to be a joke tailor-made for April first, and one is inclined to exclaim, "Ha-ha, you fell for an April Fools joke!" I would point out that by "falling" for it, I have taken no action nor been changed in any way, except perhaps by having been led to believe that someone, or a group of someones is stupid. Statistically speaking...

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    2. Re:In related news... by WCMI92 · · Score: 0

      And how many of our tax dollars were spent to "discover" this thing that everyone who is not in government employ already knows?

      Yes I hate paying taxes for this reason.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    3. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how/why do you think people learn their names?

    4. Re:In related news... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yes I hate paying taxes for this reason.

      Do you mean specifically the part where you thought it was about you, or do you just mean, narcissism in general?

    5. Re:In related news... by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      Cat aficionados who fancy themselves "scientists" are unable to recognize instances of operant conditioning when they see them.

      For these cats, the sequence of sounds we humans call "their names" end up being followed by feeding, treats, petting, scritch-scratching, and warm, luxurious laps in which to relax and unwind from a stressful day of napping in the sunshine and occasionally trying to catch their arch-nemesis, that stupid glowing red dot... all good and pleasant things. Naturally, being living organisms, cats tend to gravitate towards that which is pleasant, and avoid that which is not. Having the collection of sounds that they hear right before something nice happens resulting in them tending to come to expect the same or similar when it happens again is just operant conditioning.

      Now the fun part is where you consider the process by which you learned own name to have been different.

    6. Re:In related news... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I propose a study to investigate the correlation between so-called scientists attributing to cats properties they may or may not have, with toxoplasmosis infection. If the parasite can make rats think cat piss smells good, it stands to reason that it might well result in "researchers" conducting "studies" concluding that cats are in various ways smarter or better than previously believed.

      How do you explain people going gaga over dogs?

      I'm starting to think that nerds love the "mind control parasite" thing just because it sounds like a Star trek plotline.

    7. Re:In related news... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      How do you explain people going gaga over dogs?

      I'm starting to think that nerds love the "mind control parasite" thing just because it sounds like a Star trek plotline.

      Dogs are actually just cool and good. That's why people like them. Cats need the parasites.

    8. Re:In related news... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      How do you explain people going gaga over dogs?

      I'm starting to think that nerds love the "mind control parasite" thing just because it sounds like a Star trek plotline.

      Dogs are actually just cool and good. That's why people like them. Cats need the parasites.

      Funny, but seriously ... humans like furry creatures with big eyes that are affectionate. Top two favorites: cats and dogs. Only one supposedly has a mind control parasite though.

      I mean, it would be a great explanation for why we like pets, except for, er, those other similar furry cute creatures without the mind control parasites ...

    9. Re:In related news... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      I propose a study to investigate the correlation between so-called scientists attributing to cats properties they may or may not have, with toxoplasmosis infection. If the parasite can make rats think cat piss smells good, it stands to reason that it might well result in "researchers" conducting "studies" concluding that cats are in various ways smarter or better than previously believed.

      How do you explain people going gaga over dogs?

      I'm starting to think that nerds love the "mind control parasite" thing just because it sounds like a Star trek plotline.

      I'm sure dogs have a spare parasite or two, between heart, lung, and liver worms. All you need to do is ask one. As long as it's not food or a chew-toy you're asking him to share, I'm sure the average dog won't mind. They are our best friends, after all.

      While yes, mind control parasites WERE featured in at least one Star Trek (Wrath of Khan, specifically*) but like antimatter and teleportation, science, (as Cosmos' Neil deGrasse Tyson pointed out,) had them first, NOT science fiction. I've heard a podcast, (can't recall whose, might have been RadioLab, ... or WAS this also Cosmos?) talking about something that could get even the most entomophobic person to feel sorry for a cockroach, called the emerald jewel wasp.

      (Brace yourself if you're squeamish, and... https://planetearthandhumanity...)

      * "Allow me to introduce you to Ceti Alpha Five's only remaining ... indigenous ... life form... "

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  40. Of course they do by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As anyone who has been owned by cats knows.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  41. Re: What did hte *cats* conclude from this experim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfekt.

  42. Re:1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the oth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would beat the shit out of anyone

    Too bad you're so fat and weak that you can only move your fingers, oh brave animal defender.

  43. Fascinating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give this a shot at home: Say four random words to your cat -- separated by about 15 seconds -- with the same length and intonation as its name. Then say its actual name. If it swivels its ears or perks up its head, chances are it knows what you call it.

    So this works on cats but not on users.

  44. Its not names, its sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From all my cats ive had, ive leant 2 main things.

    You can say anything, its the pitch and timing that convey information. Not words. Its a musical language. If you say the same word with different tones n cant, no response. If you say gibberish with the right tone n cant, response.

    Also, there is no 'cat language'. You learn and teach for each cat. There are some common elements, sure, but each cat has its own dialect. If you have a mob of them, they'll all speak similar. But you cant expect a random cat to understand your trills n meeps.
    My conclusion, a dog will try to make sense of what your saying. You have to learn to chat with your cat.
    With my current cat, we have maybe 30-50 phrases. Eg. 'hey, how ya doin?' 'Hey, where ya bin?' 'Hi, passin thru, cat business to attend to'. 'Tha fak was that?' Tha fak you doin' (my favourite, in the shower) 'tha fak your wet! Omg your wet! Your fakin WET! You ok? Your WET! Its ok, its ok ' that is a literal cat sentence.
    Chatty cats are excellent. You gotta talk back tho. Pitch n cadance. N forget a squirt bottle, if they do wrong, just hiss at em. Talk cat.

  45. Box turtles can know their name - why not cats by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    When we lived in the Ozark Mountains we knew a "turtle lady", whenever a box turtle was injured neighbours would take them to the Turtle Lady. She ended up with a collection of one eyed or three legged turtles as pets. As a demo she would line them up and ask you which one you wanted to come, she'd call it by name and it would come. Anyone who has owned two parrots will tell you they talk about the other one by name. Why not cats?

  46. Standard Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it swivels its ears or perks up its head, chances are it knows what you call it."

    And if it ignores you completely, that means.... it's a cat. They probably know their name but don't want to give you the satisfaction of responding to it.

  47. ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...] We must be the master "race" (a term that does not exist in science btw). [...]
    You are such a pillock. The term "race" used by scientists, viz. the Wikipedia article on its use in biology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

  48. Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine comes to her name, calls to "catch up" when out on walks, will nose kiss on command and yet as Triumph once said, she's still a cunt. Cats are cunts.

  49. Ironic. Crazy cat ladies knew more than science by ron_ivi · · Score: 2
    Kinda ironic that crazy cat ladies knew more than scientists.

    I knew this as 6 year old kid.

    Why is this considered worthy of a study?

    1. Re:Ironic. Crazy cat ladies knew more than science by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Yes. And Christians know that their god intervenes in the affairs of mortals to make miracles happen.
      It's not ironic that crazy cat ladies knew more than scientists. It's false. It's ironic that you think that.

    2. Re:Ironic. Crazy cat ladies knew more than science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never even had a pet, so shut the fuck up. You know less than nothing about the topic, kid.

    3. Re:Ironic. Crazy cat ladies knew more than science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because lots of "common sense" things have turned out not to be true.

      Once in a while scientists will hit something that turns out true.

      This story is only in the headlines beccause it involves cats.

  50. And yet we eat pigs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please consider that among mammals only chimpanzees are smarter than pigs. That means that pigs are smarter than dolphins. Pigs are smarter than dogs, cats, and all other mammals. You wouldn't eat a dolphin, why would you eat bacon?

    1. Re:And yet we eat pigs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's easier to buy, duh

    2. Re:And yet we eat pigs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't eat a dolphin, why would you eat bacon?

      Wild dolphins have been known to help people (thanks again Squeaky!), while wild pigs are known to attack people. Payback is a *****.

      Also, some cultures do eat dolphins (and chimpanzees).

  51. Re:1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the oth by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > I would beat the shit out of anyone I ever saw harming an animal

    Fighting violence with *more* violence and assault?!
    **Facepalm**

  52. Train the name to mean something by sjbe · · Score: 1

    While cats certainly recognize words, I have seen little evidence that they're aware of their name.

    When you say "aware of their name", what do you mean exactly by that? Have you trained each of them that their name means something special in relation to them? They don't speak English or any other human language so expecting them to just figure it out without some work on the handler's part is absurdly naive. You can train a cat to respond to its name but it requires specificity and effort on the part of the handler to communicate this information.

    A name to a cat is not anything special unless you tell them it should mean something specific. It's just a sound to them otherwise. They can recognize words (and other sounds), including their name, but they won't do anything unless a positive (or negative) association is drawn to that sound.

    1. Re:Train the name to mean something by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      A dog will eventually learn it's name. You can call your dog while it is playing with a pack of other dogs, and your dog will come.
      Cats do not replicate this behavior.
      So what do I mean? I mean I there's no evidence that they tie that name to *themselves*.
      The fact that they respond to a word that they can distinguish does not mean they consider it their identity.

    2. Re:Train the name to mean something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with that ignorant post, I can tell you have never had a cat. In fact, it doesn't sound much like you've ever had any pets.

    3. Re:Train the name to mean something by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Your theory sinks due to the fact that my cat is more obedient than my dog :-S

    4. Re:Train the name to mean something by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Not at all. That's called an outlier.
      I have definitely had some pretty damn stupid dogs, too. My current Pomeranian is dumb as bricks- but dammit, he tries.
      My Jack Russel before him would move chairs up to the counter so he could get up on it.

  53. Stop being so antrocentric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science has made an assumption : Animals are not like people. But we share 99% of our genome with large parts of the animal kingdom, and there are mammals, a group to which humans belong, which have very similar brains. The much better assumption is : Animals are a lot like us.

    That said, cats may not care. but it's obvious they have an interest in bird calls, sounds of rodents, those kind of things. They don't speak so they don't have words but they do miauw in our frequency range. Those are calls to which cats respond. Not a giant leap to have them recognize 'their name' or more likely the sound of huumans wanting something from them.

  54. My guinea pigs know their names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Biologists" once again boldly announce something people have known for thousands of years and nobody is shocked.

  55. There is definitely variation between cats by diagonti · · Score: 1

    So we have 2 cats.

    Cat A is a lean sleak hunter, who is older. She's very clever. She solves any cat toy or puzzle quickly and efficiently. When we were trying to control her food intake, she figured out how to open the door to the room where we were keeping food, went to the backside of the bag, ripped a small hole, and ate some; then left the room and closed the door after her. She did this for a week before she failed to close the door completely and we noticed. She sort of knows her name, and may just be responding to us using intonation.

    Cat B is very food motivated, but easily fooled by puzzles. However, he knows his name, the other cat's name, the words "lunch", "treat", and "bed time"; and has a remarkable sense of time and our patterns of doing things. As an example, he gets fed his favorite wet food every day at 11:30am when I get lunch (I do remote work and keep a regular schedule). Starting at about 11am he makes sure to come in and lay wherever I am. If I get up any time start at about 11:25, and say a sentence with "unch" in it, he'll run to where his wetfood cans are stored in the kitchen and point at them. If I say his name instead, he'll get up, and watch where I'm walking to. If I don't say either of those words, he'll lay there and look dejected because I'm failing in my duties to provide him food. My partner has come in to the office at 11 and mentioned something about lunch, and cat B ran to the kitchen... Similarly he understands the word "treat", and if we say that in the dining room, he'll move towards the room where his treats are kept and then keep looking back at us to follow.

  56. The naming of cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is a difficult matter,
    It isn't just one of your holiday games;
    You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter
    When I tell you, a cat must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.

    So which name are we talking about?

  57. Found the crazy cat person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guarantee anyone with that much disdain for other people and dogs has at LEAST four of them in the house.

  58. Say their true name by TotalCriminal · · Score: 1

    If you really want a reaction, say their true name...then watch out.

  59. Cats understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cats understand certain commands. When they are pawing at something or doing something annoying
    all I have to do is say in a gruff voice:

          "Hey! Knock it off!"

    And they stop. There know there "could" be consequences, such as:

    The best way to train a cat is with a plastic shopping bag. If they do something you don't like, pick up
    the bag, go slowly towards them, and then VERY abruptly crumple the bag. The noise shocks the living
    daylights out of them and they HATE it.

  60. Can toddlers recognize their own names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I have 2 cats, each one is ours, and each one always comes running from outside when either of us call their respective names. My cat has been with me for all but the first 2 weeks of his 8yrs of life. My wife's cat about 4years, so both are well accustomed to living with us.
    We also have 2 toddlers, who come running much less often than than the cats do when summoned by their respective names, but all 4 immediately come running if any food is handled anywhere on our property. Do toddlers understand their own names? I believe this merits a new study.

  61. The physiology of cat hearing by steveha · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a world-class audio expert. One time he and I were talking and he mentioned that cats hear very differently than humans do.

    Cats can hear up into the ultrasonic. They can also hear sounds in the range audible to us. But he said that while their range is much wider, this has the tradeoff that it's more difficult for cats to tell the difference between some sounds that sound different to us.

    The base set of sounds that we identify to distinguish words are called formants. He told me that cats have trouble distinguishing formants, but on the other hand they can track a mouse in 3D space by the mouse's heartbeat. (Consider how small a mouse heart is and then imagine the audio spectrum of its heartbeat.)

    A cat can't respond differently to its name if it can't tell the difference between its name and some other word. I wonder if the researchers allowed for the physiology of cat hearing at all in their tests.

    Now, this next part isn't anything the audio expert said, it's me trying to fill in the blanks with what I know.

    The sound of the letter 's' (called a sibilant) is basically white noise and thus covers a lot of the spectrum. Thus I'm pretty sure cats can at least distinguish between sibilants and non-sibilants. My wife and I have two cats right now, and one of them is named "Saga" while the other is named "Harbard". I'm pretty sure that those names will sound different even to a cat.

    But if we had third cat named "Samba", I'm not sure they would be physiologically able to distinguish that name from "Saga".

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  62. Re:What did hte *cats* conclude from this experime by BrianMarshall · · Score: 2

    The mice won't allow it.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
  63. like people, some dumb, some smart. by clovis · · Score: 1

    I never called my cat when I was putting out food.
    I asked some friends and they said they hadn't thought about it, but they didn't call their cats either. It's probably because, as you say, there's no point in calling a creature that appears within seconds of your getting the food bag out and is already trying to shove you aside from the bowl.

    My dogs were mind readers. They appeared underfoot if I even looked in the direction of the pantry. Come to think of it, the dogs were always underfoot.

    OTOH, both the cats I had (different times) were self-adopting and probably lost pet cats. We didn't feed them for the first few months, but they decided they lived at our house and acted like pets whenever we came out. Eventually the smart one moved in to be a mostly inside cat. I suspect the were applying an "I'm a pet" template to us.

    The smart one learned its name, the other did not. The one that learned its name would come when I went outside and called because it seemed to enjoy walking in the woods with me. Or sometimes I would call her, and she would call back and pretend that I needed to help her get out of the tree she was in. However, I had observed her running up and down trees like a squirrel when she didn't know I was watching. I have no idea what that was about.

    I taught her one trick. I would say "squeal like a pig: and she would reliably meow in response. I offered no treats, I just told her good girl when she responded like I wanted, and soon we had a game to play.

  64. My daughters cat must be confused by Revek · · Score: 1

    Only my daughter uses her name, everyone else calls her asshole. Din, Din ASSHOLE!

  65. Dogs have owners. Cats have staff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course some will know their human given name. One of ours can be exploring outside up the block and if called will appear and trot over to be pet. But then he is very friendly, loves people and visits all the nearby houses He made people who didn't like cats, love him. And if they call his name he walks over to them too. Unlike some humans he watches for cars before crossing the street. He and the other cat both know that OUT means go outside. Having raised a few cats I think if the names are short and often used often as they grow up they will associate that sound to their identity.

  66. How like their research subjects... . by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

    "Plenty of cat owners will happily tell you their felines are capable of responding to their own names, but the scientific jury remains ambivalent on the matter."

    I bet the dog researchers are far more enthusiastic about their research results.

  67. We share a common language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have more than one cat, keep their names different - in terms of the vowel and consonant sounds. And they also have no problem at all in recognising simple word/phrases such as "bickeybickeybickeybickey..." (when it suits them - which is mostly, if it involves food).

    IMHO - they have a vocabulary of about 20 to 30 words or clearly distinct words or phrases.

    Facial expressions, gestures and basic "grunt" sounds - they recognise plenty - we are all mammals for fuck sake - and there is a reason why humans, cats and dogs are co-species; it's kind of self-selecting and Darwinian.

  68. Re:Dogs have owners. Cats have staff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you allow your pet to go outdoors in an area with cars, then you are an irresponsible asshole and should be arrested for animal abuse.

  69. Cat owner for 40 years by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    I've had many cats over the last 40 years. It depends on their intelligence. Most recognize their name. Some don't at all. Some are REALLY intelligent enough to understand some english. I have a cat now that in addition to his name, he learned the words "food" and "hungry" to which he would respond by nudging his head against me, then lead me to his dish as I walked to the kitchen.

    The smartest cat I ever owned actually understood English - I swear he did. I had stayed with my parents for a short while due to being displaced by a flood, and was talking to my mother about where I was going to move to. I looked at my cat and when I asked him if he would like to come with me, he reached up and nudged me in the face! My parents had this one cat who was really mean and was a real p!sser. I didn't like him, and neither did my cat. When I found my bedroom slippers soiled with cat urine, I banned that p!sser from my bedroom and told my parents that if my cat got in a fight with the p!sser that I was not going to stop him. And my cat was the reigning champion in the house. Well somehow my cat intuitively understood my wishes, and he guarded my bedroom from the p!sser. I actually witnessed this when the p!sser snuck in the room, unaware that I was laying on the bed. As he was about to crouch I warned him don't even think about it. He immediately turned to leave, and found himself face to face with my cat who snuck in behind him and had a serious look of disapproval on his face. My cat had an intimidating "look" that would command respect, I've seen it at work many times (he was a "shepherd cat" he could sense attitude and was not afraid to confront it, and was happy with other cats who were behaving). P!sser was so terrified that he attempted to go around him very slowly, and every few inches he advanced my cat moved to his lead. Over and over this happened until he reached the door. My cat was smart enough to know when he didn't have to fight, he knew his "look" was all he needed.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  70. missing phrase by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1

    Part of the introduction is missing:

    After "Plenty of cat owners will happily tell you their felines are capable of responding to their own names"

    it should read "...they just choose not to."

    There, fixed that for ya.

  71. Re: 1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As an animal I'd harm the shit out of any animal that harmed another animal...." Start with yourself there busy.

  72. this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Squirrels recognise acorns

  73. Sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cats and dogs recongnise the "words" by association of the sounds to a particular action. However, they do not get the concepts of syntax, grammar, vowels and consonants, or sentences.

  74. Re: 1 of my cats is definitely smarter than the ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet beating on a disheveled homeless man who did nothing is OK with you, I'm sure.

      I hope this is not the case, because I am tired of the hypocracy routinely displayed by animal lovers.

  75. Names are just animal specific cues by sjbe · · Score: 1

    A dog will eventually learn it's name. You can call your dog while it is playing with a pack of other dogs, and your dog will come.
    Cats do not replicate this behavior.

    I think you need to be more careful with your definitions. Taking as given what you stated above as given for the sake of argument, that's does not prove they cannot learn their name. It just proves they do not respond to it in the same manner as dogs. Different species of animals learn in different ways and respond to instructions differently. You wouldn't expect a whale to learn or respond in the same manner as a sloth, so why would you expect a cat to behave like a dog? Not to mention that there can be considerable intra-species and inter-breed variation in ability. I own several border collies and they can learn FAR more commands and generally learn them faster than my whippet because they were bred for different purposes. There is similar variation within cat species and breeds.

    So what do I mean? I mean I there's no evidence that they tie that name to *themselves*. The fact that they respond to a word that they can distinguish does not mean they consider it their identity.

    A distinction without a difference. All a name is for any animal is a verbal cue that the animal has learned (including humans) which has been taught specific to that animal. Some animals can generalize this more than others but if I call my cat with its name (a unique command to that animal) and it responds in the manner taught to it, then it knows its name. Whether it can generalize that behavior is a separate question. I'm puzzled how you think a dog or any other mammal would be any different in that regard. You absolutely can teach a cat a verbal cue unique to it which to all practical purposes is a name. Maybe you are going deep into something about sentience or some other philosophical nit picking but I'm not seeing any arguments which clarify your position or invalidate mine.

    1. Re:Names are just animal specific cues by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Am I now to understand that you are comparing cetacean intelligence with sloth intelligence?
      Sure a cat responds differently. Vocalizations aren't the only place where canine intelligence has measured objectively superior to feline intelligence.
      I conceded that a cat is certainly aware of a vocalization that is often used to mean something may happen.
      But there is still little evidence to indicate that it considers that word any kind of label for itself.
      Dogs don't have names. Yet they easily learn a human name.
      A cat requires tons of training, and very careful individual training, or it will think its name is, as the adage goes, the sound of a can opening. Or any other cat's name who's around.

      Do you have a cat that likes to fetch?
      I do.
      Tell me when you can train it to go get its ball from some random location on command.
      And when you think, "it must just not want to play," go get that ball and put it in front of it.
      It's interested. It's just not that bright.
      We as human have a tendency to be... non-objective about the things we love. And we love our cats. I certainly love mine.
      But I've spent a lot of time with a lot of cats, and never seen anything out of them to indicate they're that intelligent. They do sometimes adapt some pretty cool behavior, but they lack even the most basic problem solving skills. That's not to say they're incapable of learning.

  76. SCORE==SCORE+2 (SNORT!) by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Yes I hate paying taxes for this reason.

    Do you mean specifically the part where you thought it was about you, or do you just mean, narcissism in general?

    Alas, /. won't let me mod you up though I currently have modpoints to burn, because I've posted to this thread already. Conflict of interest or avoidance of self-dealing or whatever... but that made me snort. Score + TWO just for that. Hat's off to you Aighearach.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.