nah, you cant use it for coms, you have to transport the information about the first entangled particle to the second entangled particle using normal communication mechanisms.
hmm. let's think about this. Copyright imports, exports and infringements add up to less than a fraction of a percent of our GDP. Sugar, wheat and wool on the other hand makes up 90% of our GDP. So yeah, I kinda think that from a free trade perspective it's worth it.
Who says his formulation for general relativity is correct? In fact there's a number of people who claim otherwise and it's because of this attitude of "Einstein must be right" that we have concepts like dark matter.
I hate to tell you this, but Post-It notes are patented. So are the little bits of plastic on the end of your shoelaces. It's common and normal practice to patent things that are obvious because everything is obvious after someone else has done it.
ummm no. Microsoft likes money and as much as people whine and complain about worms and viruses, there really aint too many people who blame Microsoft for these things so much so as to not buy their product. Trueth be told, Microsoft hasn't put up a reward because they hate worms and viruses, they've put up a reward because it's a cheap way to show that they're doing something about the security of their products. But the worm writers don't see it that way. They honestly think they've gotten under Bill Gates' skin.
Isn't it freakin' obvious that computer viruses are written by rebellious and outcast youth who (like most youths) consider themselves invincible? Anyone with the slightest incling of the rebellious mind will recognise that arresting someone for an act will encourage others to commit the same act. German kids used to consider it "kinda wrong" to write and release worms, now the government has gone ahead re-enforced the wrongness of that act. The fact that Microsoft ponied up a cash reward just broadcasts the message that writing and distributing worms really pisses them off (whereas before worm writers had nothing but an assumption). That message is now clear. Hate Microsoft? Wanna rebel against society? Write a worm!
Can you supply us with links to this discussion (and in particular, the math). That's what shocked me most about their site, there's no whitepapers with graphs and figures, not even a primer on airships.
So if I don't want a family I can't be in a relationship. It would appear that the reach of Hugh Hefner did not extend to you. BTW - try not to get all your life experience from movies (especially ones with Woody Harelson in them).
You, too, can be a sleazy pornographer like Hugh Hefner, who in this game's vision is about 30 years younger and resembles Superman more than the dirty old man he is.
Damn, nice unbiased article there. If Mr Bozell wasn't such an ignorant jerk he'd know that Hugh Hefner is anything but a sleazy pornographer. He not only affected the way people perceived nudity, but he also popularized a way of life that was hardly known in the fifties. Hefner showed society that it was ok to shun marriage, kids and the picket fence. That both men and women could be sexual creatures without the shackles of moral expectations such as the presumption of family. The equility of the working couple would never have been possible without Hefner.
Yeah, I too disagree with the "if we all work together we can make space travel happen". It's like saying that if we all work together we can eliminate hunger, yeah, we can, but it aint gunna happen. More likely some physics student will have a stroke of genius and the entrepreneurial spirit to turn it into something more than yet another theory of reality. Or a commercial entity will find something in space remotely valuable and lay down the ground work to get to it. The era of government commitment to long term space projects is dead. NASA is all about bang-for-buck small missions now. Consider a mission to the solar foci. This is not beyond our current technological means. If we all worked together we could up and build one of these and in about 25 years we'd have the best telescope ever (radio and optical). So where's the international committee with significant funding to get this happening? There isn't one, because there is no business case and there's a significant chance of failure. So even with the most stable GDP and the most peaceful and enlightened of people, why would there be international co-operation to get this done? Maybe if space technology was so damn cheap that you could build it yourself (like software for example) then maybe we could expect our species to become a space-faring one. But even then, we're making some assumptions about the kind of production available to individuals or even international groups. Yes, we may one day have nanotechnology that could conceivably make production of space technology as feasible as production of software but who is to say how available that technology will be.
maybe he ment essentially but how are we to know? Attempting to measure 't' may have actually resulted in a measurement of 'c' but had we left well alone the letter would have remained 't'. I think this is just more evidente of the transatcional interpretacion of quantum physics.
If I wanna get together with my friends and beat the shit out of a bunch of other consenting adults why is that a police matter? If two teams were hanging out on #football, finally got sick of hearing the other team slag them and demanded a game, no-one would even blink an eyelid. Just because life and death brawling is not your thing doesn't mean others shouldn't be free to do it. If it's ok to arrest these "gangs" for fighting then please arrest every amature football player too.
we know it, we get over it. There's no unix version so I guess I won't even try this tool. Seems pretty sad that we can write a compiler but not a simple refactoring tool, but hey, no-one ever said parsing C++ was easy.
Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an.it.com.net or.org domain name.
Uhhh.. she's 15. I guess we know why her sister's boyfriend talked her into contributing.
Maybe I'm just an old fart and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Star Wars faster-than-light travel called Hyperspace? Where'd this light speed shit come from?
Copyright infringment is arguably more accurate (since you're infringing on exclusivity granted to someone else), but violation or illegal is certainly nice and accurate.
Maybe where you live but copyright infringement is not a crime in my country (yet), it's a civil matter. Therefore "illegal" is not accurate, it's flat out wrong and it serves the purpose of making people fear sharing with their neighbour because they think they could go to jail. The correct term is "unlawful". For example, slander can be unlawful but it cannot be illegal. You can be sued for slander but you can't go to jail (how obsurd would that be?) Copyright infringement is the same.
This just shows that Microsoft Windows and Linux.* are as unusable as each other. Put a Mac into the mix and you'll see a dramatic different in usability.
Slashdot Mirror
nah, you cant use it for coms, you have to transport the information about the first entangled particle to the second entangled particle using normal communication mechanisms.
That's just because StarForce is a piece of crap.
I made it up obviously! Still, what's the percentage of IP exports? Less than a 1%. Still a good trade.
hmm. let's think about this. Copyright imports, exports and infringements add up to less than a fraction of a percent of our GDP. Sugar, wheat and wool on the other hand makes up 90% of our GDP. So yeah, I kinda think that from a free trade perspective it's worth it.
Who says his formulation for general relativity is correct? In fact there's a number of people who claim otherwise and it's because of this attitude of "Einstein must be right" that we have concepts like dark matter.
I hate to tell you this, but Post-It notes are patented. So are the little bits of plastic on the end of your shoelaces. It's common and normal practice to patent things that are obvious because everything is obvious after someone else has done it.
ummm no. Microsoft likes money and as much as people whine and complain about worms and viruses, there really aint too many people who blame Microsoft for these things so much so as to not buy their product. Trueth be told, Microsoft hasn't put up a reward because they hate worms and viruses, they've put up a reward because it's a cheap way to show that they're doing something about the security of their products. But the worm writers don't see it that way. They honestly think they've gotten under Bill Gates' skin.
begging to be hacked
She was asking for it.
if you leave your door open the thieves will come
Thieves have something to gain, worm writers have nothing to gain except how their rebellious act makes them feel.
Isn't it freakin' obvious that computer viruses are written by rebellious and outcast youth who (like most youths) consider themselves invincible? Anyone with the slightest incling of the rebellious mind will recognise that arresting someone for an act will encourage others to commit the same act. German kids used to consider it "kinda wrong" to write and release worms, now the government has gone ahead re-enforced the wrongness of that act. The fact that Microsoft ponied up a cash reward just broadcasts the message that writing and distributing worms really pisses them off (whereas before worm writers had nothing but an assumption). That message is now clear. Hate Microsoft? Wanna rebel against society? Write a worm!
Jesus, did ya ever think that the poster might be a responsible cycler who rides in the suburbs instead of clogging up the streets in the city.
Can you supply us with links to this discussion (and in particular, the math). That's what shocked me most about their site, there's no whitepapers with graphs and figures, not even a primer on airships.
So if I don't want a family I can't be in a relationship. It would appear that the reach of Hugh Hefner did not extend to you. BTW - try not to get all your life experience from movies (especially ones with Woody Harelson in them).
Damn, nice unbiased article there. If Mr Bozell wasn't such an ignorant jerk he'd know that Hugh Hefner is anything but a sleazy pornographer. He not only affected the way people perceived nudity, but he also popularized a way of life that was hardly known in the fifties. Hefner showed society that it was ok to shun marriage, kids and the picket fence. That both men and women could be sexual creatures without the shackles of moral expectations such as the presumption of family. The equility of the working couple would never have been possible without Hefner.
Yeah, I too disagree with the "if we all work together we can make space travel happen". It's like saying that if we all work together we can eliminate hunger, yeah, we can, but it aint gunna happen. More likely some physics student will have a stroke of genius and the entrepreneurial spirit to turn it into something more than yet another theory of reality. Or a commercial entity will find something in space remotely valuable and lay down the ground work to get to it. The era of government commitment to long term space projects is dead. NASA is all about bang-for-buck small missions now. Consider a mission to the solar foci. This is not beyond our current technological means. If we all worked together we could up and build one of these and in about 25 years we'd have the best telescope ever (radio and optical). So where's the international committee with significant funding to get this happening? There isn't one, because there is no business case and there's a significant chance of failure. So even with the most stable GDP and the most peaceful and enlightened of people, why would there be international co-operation to get this done? Maybe if space technology was so damn cheap that you could build it yourself (like software for example) then maybe we could expect our species to become a space-faring one. But even then, we're making some assumptions about the kind of production available to individuals or even international groups. Yes, we may one day have nanotechnology that could conceivably make production of space technology as feasible as production of software but who is to say how available that technology will be.
maybe he ment essentially but how are we to know? Attempting to measure 't' may have actually resulted in a measurement of 'c' but had we left well alone the letter would have remained 't'. I think this is just more evidente of the transatcional interpretacion of quantum physics.
If I wanna get together with my friends and beat the shit out of a bunch of other consenting adults why is that a police matter? If two teams were hanging out on #football, finally got sick of hearing the other team slag them and demanded a game, no-one would even blink an eyelid. Just because life and death brawling is not your thing doesn't mean others shouldn't be free to do it. If it's ok to arrest these "gangs" for fighting then please arrest every amature football player too.
we know it, we get over it. There's no unix version so I guess I won't even try this tool. Seems pretty sad that we can write a compiler but not a simple refactoring tool, but hey, no-one ever said parsing C++ was easy.
God this is crap.
It was a caption in the first 2 seconds of the movie. Also they talk about it a little when he finds the snake.
Uhhh.. she's 15. I guess we know why her sister's boyfriend talked her into contributing.
Maybe I'm just an old fart and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Star Wars faster-than-light travel called Hyperspace? Where'd this light speed shit come from?
Maybe where you live but copyright infringement is not a crime in my country (yet), it's a civil matter. Therefore "illegal" is not accurate, it's flat out wrong and it serves the purpose of making people fear sharing with their neighbour because they think they could go to jail. The correct term is "unlawful". For example, slander can be unlawful but it cannot be illegal. You can be sued for slander but you can't go to jail (how obsurd would that be?) Copyright infringement is the same.
Windows users pull their hair out. Many of them say "damn it, this is just too hard" and go buy a Mac. Many Windows users say "good riddance".
This just shows that Microsoft Windows and Linux .* are as unusable as each other. Put a Mac into the mix and you'll see a dramatic different in usability.
Article has next to nothing to do with the blurb.. maybe the Slashdot "editors" should RTFA before posting.