Slashdot Mirror


OO.org Selects Its Own Sea Bird

Elektroschock writes "A new mascot of the OO.org project was announced today: A crazy sea gull. I wonder whether it will help to convince office workers of Open Office. "Andrea [Maggioni]'s contribution is not only beautiful and effective but also illustrates the potential of young people to contribute importantly to real projects under the banner of Free and Open Source Software." Andrea, "whose cheerful drawing, of a fun-looking seagull holding a fish, plays on the "OOo" shorthand of OpenOffice.org"... ehemm, it's a crazy sea gull."

413 comments

  1. Pun on by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Migration? maybe?

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Pun on by BarakMich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well.. good thing it's not an african swallow...

    2. Re:Pun on by g0_p · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think its based on the birds (gulls?) that are a part of the OOo mascot. As someone else already pointed out this is the new mascot of the OOoEdu project and not the OOo project.

    3. Re:Pun on by JackpotMonkey · · Score: 1

      I didnt see any coconuts so I think we would be safe...

      --
      ______ Eagles may fly but monkeys don't get sucked into jet engines.
    4. Re:Pun on by jest3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ok the bird looks cross-eyed bloodshot stoned out of his mind .. munchies under one arm .. with a hairdoo to match .. a scarf that looks like something from queer-eye .. add one more finger to the hand gesture and he's calling us all a$*holes ..

      hopefully they give the gull an extreme makeover before they let him loose ..

    5. Re:Pun on by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      I half expected an albatros.

      (Or should that have been linked here?)

    6. Re:Pun on by Spudley · · Score: 4, Funny

      You want puns?

      I'd say they just took a tern for the worst.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    7. Re:Pun on by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Rather an albatros than a damn "sea rat".

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:Pun on by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      If it's a play on an epic concept, they might have been inspired by Jonathan Livingston Seagull.

      Really, a neat story.

    9. Re:Pun on by kaellinn18 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a coconut...

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    10. Re:Pun on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. They should have just used the 16 year old Italian girl as a mascot.

    11. Re:Pun on by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that the bird is not an Albatross, seeing as how the OO.o developers seem to have a copy of Word 97 hanging around the neck of their interface...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    12. Re:Pun on by denise_yenko · · Score: 1

      Or she wanted to leave no tern unstoned...

      (Brrrrrrmp!) rimshot

      --
      I'm armed and I haven't changed my patch, so don't start with me -- you *know* how I get!
    13. Re:Pun on by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

      I must cry fowl! You're just egging them on.

      Watch this one fly off the shelves.

      Creating nested tables should be easier now.

  2. Mascott? by probbka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think there's only one 't' in mascot.

    --
    Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    1. Re:Mascott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >> I think there's only one 't' in mascot.

      Not if the mascott is a seagul.

    2. Re:Mascott? by Gropo · · Score: 1

      The mascot's wearing an ascott.

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    3. Re:Mascott? by cgenman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Maybe he's hiding from those ruffians who
      wish to manhandle his dickie. They've already kicked his ascot.

      (appologies to Groening)

    4. Re:Mascott? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      That's from The Critic, not the Simpsons.

    5. Re:Mascott? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Lots of appologies, then. The Critic was an excellent show that died far before it's time. I guess I got my "UN Episodes" confused.

  3. Well, mine got rejected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny


    You can tell I am pissed cause my submission got rejected on the spot. Granted, it had a few hidden messages, but it was on such a high-level, only 2-3 people in the world would've got it.

    1. Re:Well, mine got rejected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Whoever modded it as such must have a Microsoft stick up his ass.

  4. Sea gull?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They must have wanted an aquatic animal that will compete with a penguin for food! :)

    1. Re:Sea gull?? by ikewillis · · Score: 2, Funny
      They must have wanted an aquatic animal that will compete with a penguin for food!

      Speaking of which, the fish that seagull is holding looks a bit too happy for the situation he's in...

  5. See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm glad people are getting a kick out of this. I really enjoyed orchestrating the competition (I do more than troll Slash, you know), and Andrea and the other candidates did a bang-up job. We couldn't be more proud.

    Voting is of course closed, but if you'd like to see the other students' submissions, our voting page is still displayed. You can click on the individual images for a larger view.

    Also, a minor point of clarification regarding Timothy and Elektroschock's write up -- this is not a mascot for OOo. This is a mascot for OooEdu, the new Schools Project of Open Office.org. Please, read the attached article to learn about what the OOoEdu aims to do, and how you can help. We're an active and devoted community, and there are things you can do to further OOo's acceptance in schools, even if you can't contribute a line of code!

    1. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez... No wonder this one won, it beats all the others by orders of magnitude...

    2. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      wow. you're really an asshole.

      These came from kids as young as 7 years old. Younger than Linux. You'd think you could appreciate the interest and effort a bit more.

    3. Re:See the Other Submissions by Syriloth · · Score: 1, Funny

      Indeed. It reminds me of one of those damn science fairs where the kid who wins first place has a project that has obviously benefitted from a lot of assistance from one of his parents. Did the OOo people do a bit of dressing up on this logo? I mean, at the very least it's obvious that the coloring was done with a computer.

    4. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord, I thought that was a joke page.

    5. Re:See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1, Funny
      Did the OOo people do a bit of dressing up on this logo? I mean, at the very least it's obvious that the coloring was done with a computer.
      Yes. The shading was reworked with Adobe Photoshop running under WINE because we wanted to show that professional quality could be accomplished using 100% free software.
    6. Re:See the Other Submissions by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The shading was reworked with Adobe Photoshop running under WINE because we wanted to show that professional quality could be accomplished using 100% free software.

      1) While it's true that the winner looks pretty solid compared to the competition (which mostly look like they were drawn by a demented seagull) "professional quality" may be overstating it a bit.

      2) Getting your copy of Photoshop off Kazaa doesn't make it "100% free software".

    7. Re:See the Other Submissions by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, the kids were of various ages. A ten-year-old that had spent some time with Illustrator could have done that. I don't think it's clear that a parent assised (aside from teaching the kid Illustrator, which IMO is fair game).

      I agree that this is head and shoulders over the others, partially because the use of a computer made it more easily integratable into electronic media. The kid clearly had a very good sense of what it takes to make a good logo (the image creates a relationship with the viewer, with the bird looking straight in the viewer's eye).

      Very nice, too, is how both the bird and the fish are smiling, which makes the image very cheerful and "childlike" (in the way adults define it).

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    8. Re:See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Getting your copy of Photoshop off Kazaa doesn't make it "100% free software"
      The winning entry was touched up with Photoshop LE, which is included free with many tablets and digital cameras, and WINE was used instead of Windows.

      We do not copy software illegally as this would defeat our whole movement, and we definitely don7t use any non-free software.

    9. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    10. Re:See the Other Submissions by zackeller · · Score: 0

      Photoshop LE isn't free. You're forced to pay for it alone with the cost of the tablet, camera, scanner.

    11. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Mascot. Ever.

    12. Re:See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Photoshop LE isn't free. You're forced to pay for it alone with the cost of the tablet, camera, scanner.
      Please don't feed the trolls.
    13. Re:See the Other Submissions by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, so I sinned and did RTFA. Here's a quote from the last paragraph, which is ROTFLMAO, IMHO.

      Context: case study of OOo being burned to CD in a school project.

      One of the students has suggested we try to get individuals and local organisations to sponsor individual disks and this is something we'll definitely be considering - Chris is already working on a draft letter to Bill Gates!

      It'll be a cold day in hell when Bill Gates will sponsor OOo for schools! That would go straight against his business strategy in so many ways...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    14. Re:See the Other Submissions by killjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes but what's with the fish? Why is the seagul holding a fish and why is the fish smiling?

      Is the fish happy that he is about to become dinner? Does the fish symbolize something?

      Cute bird, the fish has to go.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    15. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's a +1, Obvious when you need it.

    16. Re:See the Other Submissions by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > Please don't feed the trolls.

      The only trolling I see here is yours -- claiming a bundled copy of PhotoshopLE is free software.

    17. Re:See the Other Submissions by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0
      The only trolling I see here is yours -- claiming a bundled copy of PhotoshopLE is free software.

      ... and that user name! At first I thought that he forgot that he still was logged in with his trolling account when posting a serious message... But then other posts with that same username followed... Weird...

    18. Re:See the Other Submissions by JET+666 · · Score: 1

      feeding Tux?

      --
      De sig boss de sig
    19. Re:See the Other Submissions by LDoggg_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cool, I get to plug my new project and be on-topic.

      k12wincd is a CD image that includes open office as well as others. Similar to gnuwinCD.
      I should be burning 250-300 of these this summer to be handed out in the fall.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    20. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the fish happy that he is about to become dinner? Does the fish symbolize something?

      Obviously a reference to the Godless nature of Free Software, with the fish symbolising Christianity.

      (Posted anonymously because of the large number of humourless zealots on both sides of that equation.)

    21. Re:See the Other Submissions by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Photoshop isn't Free. Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Why not use the GIMP?

      You're currently modded funny, but I don't get it!!:.(

    22. Re:See the Other Submissions by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It'll be a cold day in hell when Bill Gates will sponsor OOo for schools!

      I think that back in the day, when MSIE 4 had already been released, Gates Foundation gave money to some big Finnish library or whatever. In the news clip, almost all of the library computers had Netscape Navigator 4 on the screen. Well, they did run that on Windows though, but still... And it also made me wonder for how long NN stayed there... =)

    23. Re:See the Other Submissions by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You can't expose children to the terror of death. Most parents don't think it's appropriate.

      That's why even fruits and vegetables smile in some cartoons, just sitting in a bown or on a platterr, waiting to be eaten.

    24. Re:See the Other Submissions by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      My one problem with the mascot is the hair. Fine lines don't always scale well. It may end up looking like a fuzzy helmet when scaled to be a polo shirt logo, for example. Also, how will it look when printed in monotone?

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    25. Re:See the Other Submissions by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, that's Nemo. In fact, the bird is stolen from Finding Nemo too. WTF?

      I think some little Mac kid just embraced and extended OpenOffice.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    26. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why not use the GIMP?

      Because it's not usable?

    27. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike your momma.

    28. Re:See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 0, Troll

      He's a little slow, ladies and gentlemen. Give him a little more time. He'll get it eventually...

  6. Only for OOoEdu by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think I should point that that I believe this mascott is just for the OOoEdu project, not for the OpenOffice.org project as a whole.

    1. Re:Only for OOoEdu by shiftless · · Score: 4, Funny

      OOo, I see!

    2. Re:Only for OOoEdu by gilrain · · Score: 1

      This is really the key point. I know a LOT of school projects that have silly and/or unprofessional looking mascots. Not just software projects, but just about anything associated with lower education. It's an extreme pity that this somehow slipped by the submitter and editor -- this violent first reaction will be hard to take back, even now that the facts are known.

    3. Re:Only for OOoEdu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, then why does http://www.openoffice.org/ have it right on the front page?

    4. Re:Only for OOoEdu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Sketch (111112)

      Aha, sneaking in half of Office 97's serial number, are we? (the other half is 111111111 -- gotta love Microsoft's pre-DRM anti piracy efforts).

    5. Re:Only for OOoEdu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they have an article about the same school project on the front page, and because the logo also links to that school project?

    6. Re:Only for OOoEdu by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      No matter what I thik that fish looks a bit too happy. What's he smoking??

      --
      Martin
  7. Please note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please note that this is not a new general OpenOffice.org mascot, but one for "The recently established Schools Project of OpenOffice.org (OOoEdu)"

    1. Re:Please note by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      thats good to hear, because while it is a nice picture and all. I dont think this is the logo that will get them international respect as an alternative to microsoft office.

      However i do applaud them for involving school aged children into this project and their efforts to bring open office to schools. This will not only save schools hundreds of dollars (more like thousands) but also will having children involved with the development of such a product has countless educational value.

      I tip my hat to them

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    2. Re:Please note by JackpotMonkey · · Score: 1

      Might I ad it will point students in the right direction about OSS and also allow for more students to have experience with office software, and since they can get it for free they will be more likely to get it on their home computer as well so they are using the same working environment at home and school.

      --
      ______ Eagles may fly but monkeys don't get sucked into jet engines.
    3. Re:Please note by bob65 · · Score: 1

      Note that even if it were for OpenOffice in general, it is not even a logo. It is a mascot - like the MSN butterfly guy.

    4. Re:Please note by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      I dont think this is the logo that will get them international respect as an alternative to microsoft office.

      Compared to a bunch of office workers falling all over each other?

  8. Around here, seagulls are called "shithawks". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gully says:

    "It looks like you're trying to run Microsoft Office via WINE. Would you like me to poop on it for you?"

    1. Re:Around here, seagulls are called "shithawks". by Rassendyll · · Score: 1

      Nah, we'll just send in a squadron of GU-11s to divebomb it...

      --
      An eye for an eye... leaves the whole world blind.
  9. That's just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No offense. But how do you expect to be taken seriously when that's your logo? People laughed at MS's attempts to have things like paperclips, and you go and find something worse?

    1. Re:That's just stupid by clandestine_nova · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you probably don't need a reply, but if you had read, it's for the Educational project that OOo is running, and is therefore child targeted. Obviously, it isn't meant to be used in a corporate setting. Let me summarize: RTFA.

      --
      Discworld.
    2. Re:That's just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Educational Advertising??

      OH like the MPAA.

    3. Re:That's just stupid by Bricklets · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People laughed at MS's attempts to have things like paperclips, and you go and find something worse?

      I don't think they hated the paperclip because it was too cute. It could have been a hot chick for all they care and they probably would have hated just as much.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    4. Re:That's just stupid by axis_omega · · Score: 1

      Eventhought it wasn't though for the OO. Don't think they would had put blindly a semi confuse drunk mascot to show the world.

      We're talking about a software that wants to compete in the big league here.(thinking MSOffice anyone?)

      And think again, the first time the penguin was sketched for linux, did anyone though it would become so widespread ?

      Surely he looks kinda dumb, and look at the hair :) But with little modification Im sure it can look has good as any other mascot.

      --
      It's funny how I make sense to others and not myself...
  10. Why am I reminded of that scene... by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...from "Finding Nemo", where that seagull picks up our fishy hero.

    Oh and there's only one 't' in 'mascot'.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine

      (Watch finding nemo and you'll understand :) )

      It's a nice mascot, however as people have pointed out it's for the ooEDU project. I'm all in for sea-gulls. ;)

    2. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I boycott Disney, so I didn't see Finding Nemo. You'll have to do better than that to effect me.

    3. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators: Please give a score of +5 to this post. Its free-spirited thinking embodies what I like to call the "Spirit of Slashdot."

    4. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by chgros · · Score: 1

      mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine

      So maybe it should be a Microsoft mascot after all...

    5. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Perfectly fine for Disney as well.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:Why am I reminded of that scene... by rekle · · Score: 1

      I agree. It looks like the kid who drew this was just drawing the seagull and Marlin the fish from "Finding Nemo"... Might be a TAD of a copyright problem with this logo!

  11. Not the OO.org mascot by the-banker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The article specifically states the mascot is for the OO.org schools project, not a general mascot for the OO.org project.

    I have enough trouble trying to convince coworkers to adopt F/OS Software without having to deal with "cutesy" mascots. Not that Clippy was any better.

    1. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have enough trouble trying to convince coworkers to adopt F/OS Software without having to deal with "cutesy" mascots

      Amen brother. What the hell is the deal with so much of the visual symbology for OSS being ... well ... retarded? We're trying to draw folks in here, not push them away, right?

      Proceed mods, I'll let the karma burn on this one.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    2. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you (and could someone please explain to me why the parent was moderated redundant when three different people all wrote that this isn't the mascot for all of OOo and were all modded interesting?)!

      I don't see the need for mascots at all, and they are all so cutesy I could hurl. Tux, the BSD mascot, now this seagull which is the worst all all. Maybe the reason MS still owns the desktop and we don't is that they don't have a mascot, and the repulsive clippy is easily kept out of sight (in Japan, clippy is replaced by a Dolphin, which is less annoying but just as needless).

      No doubt we'll both be modded down for daring to criticize open-source maskets as the disgusting, cutesy things they are, but I not only have karma to burn, I have a well-grounded grasp of the real-world value of /. karma: nothing.

      OK, I know /. userids have been auctioned on eBay, but that doesn't prove karma has value, only that a low /. userid does. And that some people have way too much money and way too little clue.

    3. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Clippy is easily hidden? Right, ok. All we need to know now is how to hide that damn Tux mascot...could someone please give me instructions because I cannot seem to do it by myself. It takes up my entire monitor with its stupid yellow beak.

      In case you couldn't tell, I was being sarcastic.

      When I open up Open Office, even for the first time, I'm not eye-raped by a cutesy mascot asking me if it can help. That practice is patented by Microsoft I believe. Moreover, the images of Tux that I do have on my machine are all in directories about 5 levels deep.

      I don't see the problem with having a mascot, least of all for an educational program. KIDS LOVE THAT CUTESY CRAP!

      There are myriad reasons why GNU/Linux isn't successful on the desktop, blindly attributing it to cutesy mascots is at best short-sighted, and at worst, extremely fucking stupid.

      This was brought to you, not by blind open source advocacy, but by logical thought.

    4. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, I didn't realize I was addressing someone whose sense of humor was surgically removed, along with his sense of logical thought (trust me on this; no one engaging in logical thought writes the way you do).

      I don't know what kind of people you interact with, but here in the corporate world, I do not find that having a penguin mascot increases the credibility of Linux. It would be an easier sell without Tux, I really think so.

      However, Tux is way ahead of that horrid seagull. Yeesh. All I can say is "What were they thinking?" Not only because it's ugly, looks drug-crazed, and has hair (an odd attribute for a seagull), but because as someone mentioned in another post, the seagull is making what is considered an obscene gesture in some cultures (and a crude one, but with a non-sexual meaning, in a country where I lived for some years). They really ought to reconsider it. Or at least re-draw it.

    5. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Having had some (little) experience with people in the corporate world, I can honestly say that I wouldn't try and sell them on the idea of a product using, or even mentioning, the product's mascot. When IBM pushes GNU/Linux, I'm pretty sure *they* don't use Tux as a major selling point, and I'm willing to bet that they don't mention it at all.

      There is no reason to include images of Tux or the BSD daemon when advocating the use of GNU/Linux or *BSD to others.If *I*, and I should think most technical people, were writing an executive summary, assessing the appropriateness of a product in a business context I wouldn't even consider the mascot, I'd dismiss it as the irrelevance that it is. In *my* opinion, it neither adds nor detracts from a project's credibility.

      There are many more pertinent reasons why GNU/Linux is not ready to beat Windows on the desktop, valid technical reasons with basis in fact.

      The seagull was drawn by a child, and it's meant to appeal to children. Not only that, but if the OO.org Edu program has a friendly mascot that appeals to children, teachers may be more likely to see it as more appropriate for children than MS Office.

      I mentioned elsewhere, it matters not that we think the seagull looks "drug-crazed", I don't know many children who know what a drug-crazed person looks like. Do you think the girl who drew it was thinking about drug-crazed seagulls? :o)

      However, I'm beginning to see that the children won't ever get to make their own innocent assumptions about the seagull because teachers and parents will be projecting their own interpretations onto a child's drawing. That is a valid point, and I think that maybe a non "drug-crazed" seagull might be more appropriate after all. I was wrong.

      I apologise if I came over a little strong before but I still maintain that there's no reason why a project, again, least of all an educational project, should not have a "cutesy" mascot.

      P.S.
      I agree wholeheartedly on the gesture it's making, as others have mentioned. If it's obscene in some cultures, maybe it should be changed...

  12. Damn. by Zebra_X · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That seagull was drawn by a 4th grader. While I don't think that they need to go "mainstream" with a mascot. It certainly can't hurt their cause any to have a mascot that is a little more serious.

    1. Re:Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see the OOo people working on important things like picking a mascot ... instead of wasting their time improving the code base so it won't lock up every other time I use it.

  13. We all know the crazy gull is what PHBs want by dancingmad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought April Fool's was over? Spelling mistakes aside (mascot?), I think this is a really bad move for OO. Isn't the goal of OO to replace Microsoft Office? From a corporate standpoint, as cute as it is, a crazy gull is not what people want. There was reluctance to even use Tux back in the day, if I remember correctly, who is several shades less...crazy than the gull.

    What message does this send? Use OO and you'll go nuts (or have a fish purse?). I don't think this was well thought out.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:We all know the crazy gull is what PHBs want by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      And a seagul is worse than... an annoying pushy paperclip?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:We all know the crazy gull is what PHBs want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This mascot is for schools. Not the workplace.

  14. A few mistakes in the summary... by oldosadmin · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) This is just the mascot for OOOEdu, not OOo.

    2) It was a childs drawing, who won a competition.

    I think it's quite cute.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
    1. Re:A few mistakes in the summary... by williamstephens007 · · Score: 0
      --
      William Stephens
      MCSE,MCDST,Well Respected VBScripting Guru
      williams007@yahoo.com,(212)275-4831
    2. Re:A few mistakes in the summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's posts like this that make me long for the good old days on slashdot... when trolls were clever and entertaining.

    3. Re:A few mistakes in the summary... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

      3) Children are usually not hired in place of graphic artists for a reason.

      4) The "OK" logo (which I haven't seen anyone use in about 7 years) is obscene in many countries.

      I think it's a mistake. In fact, I think logo competitions in general are just asking for trouble.

      --
      True story.
  15. So just how will this "mascott.." by gambit3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    so just how will this mascott promote OO?
    It just doesn't seem to inspire lots of confidence, but maybe that's just me...

  16. Something wrong with the picture by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Funny

    That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull. Doesn't it know that the seagull is going to eat him?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Something wrong with the picture by stienman · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it know that the seagull is going to eat him?

      "If you destroy me, I will only become more powerful!"

      -Adam

    2. Re:Something wrong with the picture by alexborges · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously you know nothing about non-verbal language.

      The bird is qualitatively meassuring an oriffice...

      --
      NO SIG
    3. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull. Doesn't it know that the seagull is going to eat him?
      They did say the seagull was crazy, you never know.
    4. Re:Something wrong with the picture by incom · · Score: 5, Funny

      True. Does the fish really recongnize it's own mortality, does a fish try to squirm away out of discomfort, instinct, or actual fear of death. Thanks for bringing up the quality of metaphysical discussion here at slashdot, although valid sometimes the paradoxi of soviet russia get a little worn out.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    5. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull.

      I don't know. The first thing that I thought was that that seagull looks totally stoned. It's got bloodshot eyes, messed up hair, a zoned out expression, and its fingers look just like they're holding a joint. It's pretty easy to mentally add an enormous smoldering doobie to the image.

      The fish has a huge smile on his face and is staring directly at the seagull's virtual joint. He may be anticipating that the seagull is going to be kind enough to give him a puff or two.

      Hopefully the seagull doesn't have the munchies.

    6. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Tuqui · · Score: 1

      Is better be eaten by a OO seagull than by MSOffice dolphin.

    7. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Have+Blue · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I bet that fish is thinking "In SOVIET RUSSIA, seagull eat- OH, CRAP!"

    8. Re:Something wrong with the picture by yotto · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, paradoxi wear out YOU!

  17. Misleading post by dbarclay10 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This Slashdot post is misleading (not very unusual, I understand). From the article:

    The recently established Schools Project of OpenOffice.org (OOoEdu) has a new mascot.

    It's the mascot for their school-targetted marketing. And pretty bloody appropriate for young kids, I think.

    --

    Barclay family motto:
    Aut agere aut mori.
    (Either action or death.)
    1. Re:Misleading post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot editors consistently write misleading headlines in order to get more hits. Same as any other mainstream media. "Oh, but they're geeks" (say the stupid suckers who flock to the site...)

    2. Re:Misleading post by dbarclay10 · · Score: 1
      Slashdot editors consistently write misleading headlines in order to get more hits. Same as any other mainstream media. "Oh, but they're geeks" (say the stupid suckers who flock to the site...)

      I know. I'm not going to let it slide without saying anything, though.

      --

      Barclay family motto:
      Aut agere aut mori.
      (Either action or death.)
  18. PETA by Yoda2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bet the PETA people will make a bunch of noise over this. Remember when they portrayed that fish out of water at the end of that Faith No More video?

    1. Re:PETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no-one remembers because that was 12 years ago. Half the readership of slashdot aren't that age yet.

  19. Well..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Nobody said geeks knew anything about advertising...

    And no, this isn't flamebait, this is an observation made by someone who is in the advertising industry.

    If OO wants to have a shot at gaining more credibility in the business world, this logo is not the way to do it.

    While I most certainly respect the creativity and thoughtfulness that went into this...corporations won't "buy" into the cute, loveable image. They want something that looks a tad more professional. Even the Linux penguin looks much more cleancut in this. So, perhaps the concept for the logo has some potential, but this current crude implementation does not.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Well..... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with this guy. I mean the penguin's one thing, but what is this? The people they're trying to attract over are the suits, not the geeks with a sense of humor. I like the logo and I think it's funny, but I think it's going to make it harder for the guy in IT who's trying to convince his bosses to switch to OO when the brochure he gives them has a crazy bird on it.

      Then again, that damn butterfly is starting to piss me off.

    2. Re:Well..... by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      I think it's the Smucker's theory of marketing:

      With a logo like this, it MUST be good.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    3. Re:Well..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, retards. You have to learn to ignore the misleading article summaries and at least scan the actual articles around here. This mascot is for the OOoEdu project, so having it designed by a kid is a great marketing tactic. It's not for the whole damn project. The abstract looking seagulls are still where they always were.

    4. Re:Well..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1, Interesting
      You are correct in that I did not RTFA, just looked at the image and read the summary. However, as you pointed out, the summary was wrong.

      You are correct that given its educational slant, this might be more acceptable. However, if they were to read the same summary I did, I'm sure they wouldn't have picked up on that simple message either, as it was not in the summary.

      First off, I'm in advertising, which is different than marketing, I suggest you look up the difference some time. As I stated, I didn't catch the subtlety that the mascot is for a subproject of OO because it was not in the summary and I did not RTFA.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Well..... by sholden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would the mascot of the Schools Project of OOo have any effect on credibility in the business world?

      Having logo designed by school children for a school project is just so silly isn't it. The competition wouldn't raise awareness in the target market or anything, would it? And schools hate competitions.

      And school children love boring corporate logos.

      Surely you have to be able to read to be "in advertising", but obviously not...

    6. Re:Well..... by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Many other people have pointed out that this is for schools only, so it should appeal to children and young adults, not business people.

      But aside from that, can you honestly claim the seagull is any less professional than Clippy or the stupid Windows XP puppy?

    7. Re:Well..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to say that this seems to be yet another case of style over substance...

    8. Re:Well..... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Please explain how advertising is used for anything other than marketing.

      And what's the point of making such judgemental comments without reading the first sentence of a press release?

    9. Re:Well..... by m4rcL · · Score: 1

      I don't think the 'business world' make their decisions based on Slashdot news articles either... although that could be a mistake. Maybe SCO would've made some better choices if they did.

    10. Re:Well..... by BJH · · Score: 1

      You are correct in that I did not RTFA, just looked at the image and read the summary.

      Typical marketroid...

    11. Re:Well..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I never said advertising was used for something other than marketing purposes. If you had read my post, you would see my point was that I am in advertising, not marketing, and that there is indeed a difference between the two.

      This is slashdot, since when WASN'T it acceptable to not RTFA? My comment was based on the image itself, not the article.

      And whats the point of making such judgemental comments about my post without first reading it correctly?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:Well..... by sholden · · Score: 1

      If advertising is only used for marketing, and you are in advertising, then obviously enough you are in marketing.

      Just as the School of Information Technologies is in the Faculty of Science, and I am in the School of Information Technologies, then obviously enough I am in the Faculty of Science.

      And I did read your post correctly, you are in advertising, advertising is part of merketing, hence you are in marketing.

    13. Re:Well..... by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      Yes, the children may love the mascot and they appear to find them easily recognizeable. That isn't the hard part.

      What is, is to convince the school bureaucrats, who are the ones making decisions and hold the purse strings, that this is a worthwhile product for their schools. Whatever schoolchildren actually like or don't like, only becomes known to them indirectly via teachers and superintendents, as one of several decision criteria. More important than the logo is if anyone can support it and how much retraining costs.

      Does a slightly dishevelled-looking seagull mascot help or hinder the chances for that project? That really depend on the audience. To the extent the seagull character appeals to students, as well as having been drawn by one, it is likely OK for school.

      Consider, that as sea birds go, gulls certainly are more controversial than penguins.

      This particular seagull character would have been a harder sell to some company even where a seagull might otherwise would appeal, such as subcontractors to the offshore oil industry and fish processing industry. But if the potential customer would be running a city dump or maintain boat canopies, that would not sell, as in these jobs, seagulls tend to be slightly less than welcome.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    14. Re:Well..... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the market, and/or inspect some of the numerous product mascots for school stuff. This mascot looks like it could easily pass as a school mascot itself! Come on, man. Lighten up.

      Schools aren't generally run by suits. They're run either by underpaid and overworked well-meaning people who've decided to give their careers to the next few generations of kids, or they're run by politicians who know damn well that almost any press is good press. This mascot will be a hit in schools, and it will appeal to school administrators from primary school all the way up through High School.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:Well..... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      The difference between advertisers and marketers is that advertisers have to constantly insist on who they are, it's not self-evident. If he was in marketing, not only would you have known, but you would've woken up, foregone coffee and breakfast and even skipped your first cigarette to hurry up and reply to his post to say "Thank you!".

      Nope, advertisers are a completely different group that have to constantly insist and demand respect, because they don't otherwise earn it, and they're not very good at communicating.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:Well..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Aight troll, I'll bite, but only to clear up this misunderstanding of what the difference between advertisers and marketers is, since you obviously have no clue, and only seek to attempt to spread your stupidity.

      It's very simple actually, people in advertising (not advertisers, those are people who pay for the services of ad agencies) work on their agency's side. People in marketing work on the client (advertiser's) side.

      That's the only real difference. It's a simple matter of agency vs client side.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    17. Re:Well..... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention that people in advertising also show a stark lack of anything resembling a sense of humor and are prone to lashing out in anger whenever someone else shows one.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:Well..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      You also forgot to mention how tone of voice does not carry through text so I could not pick up on your poorly worded joke.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    19. Re:Well..... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Everyone else managed to pick it up...

  20. Is that a cross between.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is that a seagull or a pelican?

    At least Sesame Street gets a mascott like Big Bird....and what do we get???

    A bald eagle, peregrine or a hawk would be a bit better. Fix up the hair too please!

    1. Re:Is that a cross between.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is that a seagull or a pelican? At least Sesame Street gets a mascott like Big Bird....and what do we get??? A bald eagle, peregrine or a hawk would be a bit better. Fix up the hair too please!

      Hi there! It looks like you're trying to mock a child's drawing!

      Would you like to:

      Take the time to do something better

      Earn a sense of self worth

      Quit belittling everything you see in an attempt to raise your own self confidence?

      Use a pre-formatting taunt such as 'way to color in the lines fart-breath!'

  21. Should've asked Bill by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

    Oh come on. Why would people crossover to OOo when they have a perfectly good paperclip to shoot? Nice work Andrea.

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.

  22. Oh well. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's products all use formless colored figures as mascots. How come we don't get to use boring mascots like they do? All we get to use are high quality creative characters. That's not fair. I think all free/open source programs should adopt boring businesslike formless colored figures, so we can appear as boring as that crowd.

    1. Re:Oh well. by telstar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Microsoft's products all use formless colored figures as mascots. How come we don't get to use boring mascots like they do? "
      • For some reason when somebody thinks about using a word-processor, an icon with a pen on it comes to mind before a seagull grasping a fish. I know ... I know ... It doesn't make sense to me either.


    2. Re:Oh well. by GTownBeast · · Score: 1
      Microsoft uses cute mascots too...

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2001-04 -04&res=l

      --
      Rumor has it... that Catholic School Girls Rule
    3. Re:Oh well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a fat middle aged butterfly for example?

    4. Re:Oh well. by smellystudent · · Score: 1

      How does a big blue W with a square around it convey "writing letters and underlining things"?

      --
      Predictive text is shiv!
  23. Not a good mascot for a project aimed at schools by syslog · · Score: 5, Funny
    I really hope that they limit this mascot to the EDU subproject.

    Quite frankly, the gull looks slightly... challenged. Not a good image for either open office or for a subprject aimed at schools :)

    -naeem

  24. The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by GringoGoiano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Brazil the mascot will look like a perverted psychopath with a thing for fish.

    1. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, you mean the seagull eats them?

      ... Oh... Ew....

      And they say it tastes like fish...

    2. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brazil the mascot will look like a perverted psychopath with a thing for fish.

      This wasn't what they were going for?

    3. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Brazil the mascot will look like a perverted psychopath with a thing for fish.

      Looks like it'll fit in in Brazil. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Why should it look any more like a perverted psychopath in Brazil than it would anywhere else? Do you have special filters on your monitors or something?

      Honest question.

    5. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Should think before I post, I didn't get what you meant when you said "OK" gesture...but still, what does that mean in Brazil?

    6. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, it means that the seagull is going to have the fish for dinner. Not in the "I'm going to eat you" sense, however. After dinner they'll put on some music, light a few candles, and...

      *ahem*

      Yeah, that's what he meant by "obscene".

      Frankly, it sorta creeps me out just thinking about it. I kinda liked it better before I knew what other countries percieved the "OK" sign as...

    7. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by loconet · · Score: 1

      That is correct. In Peru it means you are telling someone he is a homsexual in a rude way (ie; you are a fag).

      --
      [alk]
  25. Re:Word by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

    The article's submitter really dosed off on this one...

    If you ask me, I think it's the damn bird that's dosed.

    (tig)
    --
    Ignorance and prejudice and fear
    Walk hand in hand
  26. Oh, brother. by waynelorentz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Glad to see that OO finally figured out what is wrong with their office suite. It's not the fact that it can't open all MS Office documents. It's not the fact that it doesn't have an OS X-native version that works. It's not the fact that it sucks up so many resources on some WinXP boxes that people go back to the comparitively-perky MS equivalent. It's the mascot. Yeah, that will make everything better and people will "flock" to the product.

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again: "Not ready for prime time." I really wish it were so I could be 100% Microsoft free.

    1. Re:Oh, brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ill flock your sister though... :)

  27. If everyone refers to it as OO.org all the time... by Beek · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should consider registering oo.org?

  28. i hate 'clippy' and all by chimericalburst · · Score: 0

    but i think i'm gonna have to go back to using office now. i'd say send this one back to the drawing board, but apparently it never left. -enjoy yourself bitches, its a celebration!

  29. Look at the other submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, when I look at the other submissions, do I think of this?

    1. Re:Look at the other submissions by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      OMG... I was crying laughing... I sure hope none of the children who drew those things see that page. OMG...

  30. Any Open Source Marketing People? by telstar · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Seriously ... All of these open source projects seem to take a wrong turn when it comes time to market their creation. A crazy seagull with irrecreatable vectors as the hair-doo? People need to market this shit! Stop creating goofy mascots to go with your product. This isn't a Sega game. It's something you want to sell to a CEO, and he doesn't want a goofy shitting bird on his desktop every time he goes to open up a document.

    1. Re:Any Open Source Marketing People? by Gropo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well then it's a good thing the CEO isn't still in school.

      quote:

      The OpenOffice.org Schools Project has a new mascot, drawn by sixteen-year old Andrea Maggioni of Italy. Playing on our logo's seagulls and the shorthand of OpenOffice.org, OOo, the picture shows a happy seagull holding a fish.
      Yes, the blurb was misleading.
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  31. The Fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Why does the fish look so damn happy?

  32. This is the office suite for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're in the business of making meth.

  33. The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "OK" sign is another way of referring to the female genetalia in some countries, and is considered obscene, which could be a bit of an impediment to OO use in some countries.

    Maybe they should have researched this a bit more...

  34. Oh well by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

    It's better than Clippy. *shrug*

    1. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEWSFLASH! Clippy is not and has never been MS's MASCOTT! DUMBASS!

  35. OOo means dead in UO by rexguo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the MMORPG Ultima Online, everytime someone mutters something like "OOo", it means they are dead... In fact, whatever the ghost says will get translated into strings of "OooOOOOoo" unless you have the Spirit Speak skill...

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
  36. How long will it be... by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

    Until Microsoft announces that they are changing Clippy to a bird.

  37. Oh great by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an .it .com .net or .org domain name. The prize is donated by E4A, a Free Software based ISP that supports the OpenOffice.org community.

    That's a nice price, sure. But for a girl who's prolly still in high school or maybe even elementary school?

    1. Re:Oh great by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 4, Funny
      But for a girl who's prolly still in high school or maybe even elementary school?
      Why do you think we included PHP?
    2. Re:Oh great by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      I don't think a kid in elementry school/middle school would have a CV.
      and what the heak is a CV? I didn't find out till i got to college.

      There are many highschoolers out there who knwo some html and could use some hosting.
      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    3. Re:Oh great by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      OHHHH SNAP!!! Take that PHP!

      --
      True story.
    4. Re:Oh great by della · · Score: 1

      Only a thing: in Italy, Andrea is a male name, so he's a boy and not a girl.

      Matteo

      --
      -- Matteo
    5. Re:Oh great by hermooz · · Score: 1

      But for a girl who's prolly still in high school

      Hey!
      In Italy "Andrea" is a MALE name. He's not a girl, and I don't think he would like to be called that way...

    6. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Andrea" is a boy's name in Italy.

  38. Take a cue from towlie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously.

    That gull looks like it's itching to ask you:

    "So.... do you wanna get high?"

    1. Re:Take a cue from towlie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmao! Beautiful.

  39. No, that was a pelican by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    It was a pelican that helped Marlin (Nemo's father) and Dory.

  40. correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    replace "business of making" with "habit of taking" and you'll be spot on.

  41. ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Pardon my ignorance, but I fail to see how this is a play on 'OO.o' like the article says (I actually read it! Yay!)

  42. What the hell is she going to do with that? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an .it .com .net or .org domain name.

    Uhhh.. she's 15. I guess we know why her sister's boyfriend talked her into contributing.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, i ussually try to talk my girlfriends 15 year old sister into something else...

    2. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, i ussually try to talk my girlfriends 15 year old sister into something else...

      Like wearing a strap on?

    3. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Good for you! Now, go tell someone who really gives a shit.

    4. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2, Informative

      She? Andrea is a masculine name in Italy.

    5. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:What the hell is she going to do with that?

    6. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it to him where he deserves?

  43. good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is pretty much the same reason that Microsoft did away with their upraised middle finger logo.

    1. Re:good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      they did?

  44. No, that was a pelican and not a seagull by Pizaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It was actually a pelican that helped Marlin (Nemo's father) and his forgetful sidekick Dory.

    1. Re:No, that was a pelican and not a seagull by ozbird · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ironically, while Nigel had an Australian accent, he certainly wasn't an Australian Pelican.
      Apart from the orange bill, he's almost certainly an American Brown Pelican.

  45. Cuter... by megabyte405 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://ryand.net/oss/abi/abiantgnomepencil.png
    AbiWord Word Processor


    (leave off the file name for more images of Abi the Ant)

    --
    I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  46. Funny, stupid looking mascot. by alexborges · · Score: 0

    I guess there will allways be room for professionalization of image and branding in the opensource world.

    I mean. Oo.O is the most competitive office suite in the world period, and its branded as the sea gull equivalent of Dr. Strangelove.

    On the other hand, i think an FOSS mascot that is not chubby (like Tux), is really a pun on us BOFHs who know that youre either anorexic, a really lame luser, a pretty bad programmer or plain FAT (ask cowboy neal).

    --
    NO SIG
  47. Re:If everyone refers to it as OO.org all the time by ValourX · · Score: 1

    The .ORG extension doesn't allow two-letter domain names. I think the minimum is three letters for .ORG. In fact there are only very few international domain extensions that allow two-letter registrations.

    -Jem
  48. branding by taj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that open source is becomming more popular, this branding is inevitable. A sign of success. But I hope these efforts stay focused on their target audience.

    Maybe its just me. But I'm really getting tired of open source branding efforts. Go ahead and do this stuff but have developer.*.org with none of this. I dont care about branding. I'm interested in the code, the bugs and the developer discussion.

    At developer.*.org place the following one click away with no product branding:

    source tars
    cvs information
    bug reporting
    developer mail lists and archives.

    Fairly simple request. Nobody will go to developer.*.org for binaries.

    Consider developers a seperate 'branding' effort.
    Its my impression the branding efforts how their understand users but not developers. Keep them away.

    Cute bird. have fun.

    1. Re:branding by Curly-Locks · · Score: 0

      Good for you! There is space for many different types of people within OpenSource. There is nothing wrong with that, in fact it is very healthy.

    2. Re:branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no really cares now do they, fuck em all

  49. I like the puns by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    This mascot is aimed at the effort to attract greater use of OpenOffice in the schools. I like the use of the bird and fish together to give a sense of "flocking" to "schools" :-)

  50. Is it... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lesbian seagul?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fly High, Lesbian Seagull.

  51. Additional Photos by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks to Google, I was able to dig up one more photo of the OO.org mascot.

    image1,

    1. Re:Additional Photos by c0dedude · · Score: 0, Funny

      Hell, I've got Karma to burn: Fuck You. Not Funny.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    2. Re:Additional Photos by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Isn't that one of the guys from this band?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  52. What? by levin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate to be critical, it's a great drawing, but why is the fish smiling?

    his ass is about to get eaten!

    --

    `which fortune`
    1. Re:What? by Bricklets · · Score: 2, Funny

      why is the fish smiling? his ass is about to get eaten!

      Tossing a seafood salad?

      --
      Little Bricklets
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that sounds good right about now. "Honey! Come here!"

    3. Re:What? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1


      Maybe he doesn't want his donkey anymore.

      (Note to some of the American readers who don't know of the difference between 'ass' and 'arse': it's a joke. I don't care if you laugh.)

  53. Clippy vs. Crazy Seagull by Wheaty18 · · Score: 0

    Grudge match!

  54. Seagulls by cinderful · · Score: 1

    . . . otherwise known as flying rats. and inspirators of hats: http://www.loosetrucks.com/ProductImages/hat_ah_da mnseagulls.gif

  55. O'Reilly hasn't spoken yet... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Tim O'Reilly and friends have yet to publish a book about OpenOffice.org, so the indullable assignment of an animal from that method remains yet to be determined.

  56. Shhhhhh!!! by kajoob · · Score: 1

    don't tell all the fortune 500 companies about clippy!

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  57. This just in... by brian728s · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in... Pixar sues OO.org for tracing a screenshot from "Finding Nemo".

  58. Re:Not a good mascot for a project aimed at school by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly, the gull looks slightly... challenged. Not a good image for either open office or for a subprject aimed at schools

    Yes, but how about an open office subproject aimed at schools for the "challenged"... :)

  59. This is a play on words? by thelenm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Maybe I'm just going to come across as stupid because it's obvious to everyone but me... but why is a crazy seagull holding a fish "a play on the 'OOo' shorthand of OpenOffice.org"? Is this supposed to be the world's most incomprehensible pun, or what?

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    1. Re:This is a play on words? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Simple, fish are a metaphor for documents in general, and by using a seagull, we're one step removed from the process of finding the fi....ok, so I have no idea either.

  60. First the seagull mascot... by PrintError · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...then the new company motto:
    Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!

    ignore the sig

    1. Re:First the seagull mascot... by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      Mushroom! Mushroom!

  61. In my well paid opinion by aghorne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a lecturer and tutor in Graphic Design at Monash University. Perhaps I can add some comments on why this winning entry does not communicate well: - Its complex. As a rule of thumb a logo or mascot should be legible when printed out at about 10mm square and run through a fax machine. - Its not cheerful. This bird looks dazed and confused like it has been drinking all weekend. - It devalues the OO.org brand by making it look amateurish not accessible. The quicker open source projects take a leaf out of Firefox's approach to branding and identity the better. If open-source projects are going to have any kind of influence on mainstream software usage (which OpenOffice indeed has the potential to) it really needs to get serious with the way it comes across. Please do judge books by their covers and applications by their icons and mascots. No mascot is better than a bad mascot.

    --
    *.02c
    1. Re:In my well paid opinion by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right as to the qualities one might want in a general-purpose OOo mascott, though perhaps there's a misunderstanding about what this image is for.

      Still, even for a kid's education program, the image suggests a goofy, amaturish feeling that implies OOo may be merely qualified as a children's application, i.e., not suitable for professional work

      It's worth noting, too, that despite what the article says, people are refering to this as *the* OOo mascott. An unfortunate bit of misinformation that may be hard to squash.

      (I also think that the doofy Tux penquin does not help the Linux image one bit, though apparently it hasn't hurt it much either.)

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    2. Re:In my well paid opinion by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Yeah I have to agree... I've designed a lot of logos in my day, and this one is pretty darned terrible. Maybe it's a good idea for a mascot, and somebody who knows what they're doing can redesign it to work, but this makes the software look like it's written in qbasic by jeffk.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:In my well paid opinion by starling · · Score: 4, Funny

      As somebody with eyes in my head, perhaps I can add some comments on why this winning entry does not communicate well - it's crap.

    4. Re:In my well paid opinion by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good point. I'd like to add that this should be applied to program names as well. I have found through personal experience that it's extremely difficult to convince people to use The Gimp due to the name. It has a negative connotation associated with it and many people find it offensive. They look at me as if I said it was called The Retard or something to that effect. There are other folks who just see it as good free software and don't care about the name. But in my experience they are definitely in the minority. I've reached the point now where I always apologize before I tell them the name.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    5. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a professional designer, I also agree. The mascot is simply amateurish.

    6. Re:In my well paid opinion by bob65 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it's just a mascot - not like they have to use it everywhere. I assume the OO.org brand will still be identified by their logo. Goofy mascots? What about Tux, or the Greek olympic mascots, or the MSN butterfly guy?

    7. Re:In my well paid opinion by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've reached the point now where I always apologize before I tell them the name.

      Wimp.

      Take pride in the software you use.

      "I use The GIMP. Yeah, you heard me right, The GIMP! Don't like it? Run back to mama PhotoShop, ya pussy! In the meantime, I'll do laps around your pathetic filters and layers, and pay a few hundred less for the honor!"

      All in presentation. A "bad" name can seem like a liability, but if you make it "in your face" enough, it can help. Don't apologize - Confront! It takes quite a lot these days to snap the sheep out of their stupor, every little bit helps. With The GIMP, you have an advantage right away, if you don't get squeamish and throw it away as a liability.

    8. Re:In my well paid opinion by roj3 · · Score: 1

      Heartily agree.

      I'm a senior marketing and PR professional.. and man, if I were Microsoft, I'd be showing the OOoEdu mascot to principals & school IT managers far and wide.

      I'm really sorry because you obviously made a significant time investment in the mascot selection.

      This mascot reflects poorly on the OO.org brand. Please reconsider.

    9. Re:In my well paid opinion by FattMattP · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Take pride in the software you use.
      Oh, don't get me wrong. I do. And I see where you are coming from. I think Gimp is kick ass and I say that as a user of PhotoShop since the 2.0 days. But out here in bizarro world (San Francisco bay area) you can't fart without offending someone. So many people out here are hyper-sensitive and focused on being politically correct. These are the same people who say waitperson instead of waitress. Sure there are a lot of people here who don't care. But when I deal with businesses, which I most often do, when I say "The Gimp" they look at me like I'm an alien.

      Although I'd love to help correct the politically correct problem out here, I don't feel this situation is the right place for me to do it. Getting people to use free software is a higher priority for me. Therefore, I apologize up front about the name and then do my best to convince people to try the software.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    10. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a great looking mascot and the kid did a bang-up job. However, I don't think it's appropriate for an office application. I don't want all of my applications to be cold and sterile and institutional like, say, Microsoft Office - but it shouldn't look like the cover of a children's coloring book, either. I think something that looks TOO playful and silly will make it difficult for management and marketing types and other decision makers in an organization take it as seriously as they should.

    11. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree. I hate to generalize, but this is very indicative of the problem in the open source community. stuff just doesn't look pretty and it isn't designed well. this mascot is terrible. cmon- although you are free, OO is still competing with Microsoft, Corel, Apple and others. Those companies would never use a cross-eyed bird that looks drunk as a mascot. Don't you want to be taken seriously?

    12. Re:In my well paid opinion by Ignatius_VI · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's a good logo either because it does not look professional.

    13. Re:In my well paid opinion by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take pride in the software you use.

      No thank you. Someday, I'd actually like to get laid.

      A "bad" name can seem like a liability, but if you make it "in your face" enough, it can help.

      "The GIMP" sounds like something that a really twisted 16-year-old kid wearing all black hacked together in his parents' basement. And most people I've mentioned it to have the same gut reaction, and they're all still addicted to Photoshop on Windows. Which is a pity, because it's an excellent program in its own right and perfectly suitable as a substitute for Photoshop for most users.

    14. Re:In my well paid opinion by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      But out here in bizarro world (San Francisco bay area) you can't fart without offending someone. So many people out here are hyper-sensitive and focused on being politically correct.

      Man, oh man, do I hate that shit. Granted, most of those people have their hearts in the right place (defeating sexism, racism, etc), but their implementation of a solution is as bad as the problem! Creating tension in order to solve tense problems? Yeah, works well, doesn't it? See, now we hate those crazy special interest groups. Good solution! ;)

      I like Anthrax alot, and they said "I won't walk on eggshells as a dance for someone else". Fuck yeah!

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:In my well paid opinion by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of The GIMP, and logos... I wonder how your prudish friends would like this sucker.

      I say that seagull needs a big reefer too.

    16. Re:In my well paid opinion by ndogg · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about it too much considering that it's for OOoEdu, and not the whole project.

      That said, if business people get uptight about using something with a "cute" logo, then they need to get a life. They need to learn to judge things based on their merit. It's not as though a "cute" logo is going to kill them.

      A book cover...

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    17. Re:In my well paid opinion by netsrek · · Score: 1

      Political Hypercorrectness is one thing, but that guy you linked to is simply a tool.

      --

      i don't read slashdot anymore.
    18. Re:In my well paid opinion by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as graphic designers and marketers go (I'm a graphic designer, too, although I find that "salary" and "talent" are hardly synonymous), I think you're missing the point. Especially on the PR front.

      This was a PR ploy, and as such, was successful. Okay, so you're saying that the unschooled efforts of a 15-year-old are a poor reflection on a competition targeted at schools? Um. Yeah. As any good designer will tell you, the right design for the project.

      Secondly: opinions are subjective. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it didn't fulfill its purpose. Bad designers forget to target the average person and instead waste their time trying to impress other designers.

      Oh, and by the way: a mascot is not a logo, by any means; that's why we have two different names for them. Do you think the MGM lion, an easily recognizable and well-known mascot, would fulfill your criteria? No. Does that nullify the hitherto-successful history of MGM? No.

      A well-paid opinion does not make it a good opinion (although possibly a pompous one with an inferiority complex who takes pot shots at teenagers.) It just means that you're good at convincing other people with no artistic sensibilities that you know what you're doing.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    19. Re:In my well paid opinion by ShinmaWa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The mascot is simply amateurish.

      Maybe because it was done by a child... I dunno.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    20. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So tell them it's "The GNU Image Manipulation Program" and let them figure the acronym out for themselves!

    21. Re:In my well paid opinion by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The what?

      Guh-new Image Manipulation program?

      Guh-what?

      Guh-new, G.N.U.

      WTF?

      Guh-new's not Unix

      What's Unix?

      An Operating system, don't worry about it, it's the Guh-new Image Manipulation Program.

      That's stupid.

      No, it's great, check out www.gimp.org

      Haha. Nice try, that's a hardcore porn site right? I don't think I want to hang around with you anymore.

      I'm serious, it's a graphic program, it's great, it's written by free software devlopers. It's licensed under the GPL.

      The GPL?

      The Guh-new public license

      You're frightening me.

      Try the GIMP, it's not very good on Windows though, you should try it on Linux.

      I think I'll stick to Photoshop. There's a new version coming out. Check out this glossy book I picked up.

      I don't have to pay for my documentation.

      Where is it?

      www.gimp.org

      Ooooh Kaaay. I've got work to do now, please leave.

    22. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine, like Tux, this mascot will be drawn in multiple different ways.
      I don't think many companies invest into software over it's Mascot, or else Clippy should have ruined Microsoft years ago!

    23. Re:In my well paid opinion by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You beat me to it on the "GIMP" comment.

      Why, OH WHY, can't nerds come up with names for their projects that don't sound like overt attempts to make the straights grimace?

      Names matter.

      Ogg Vorbis? I get where the name comes from, being a rabid Pratchett fan, but what does it have to do with a sound file format? Why not .snd or .mus or .tun or .trx? OGG? How do you market that? It sounds like someone trying to cough up mucus! You're supposed to be marketing to people who like music! The name should be as cool as the tunes it's playing.

      No one gets the joke, even if there was a joke (or a bad pun). PRATCHETT people don't get it. A combination of the torturer priest inSmall Gods and the family name of the witch Gytha Ogg of Lancre? WTF??

      The GIMP? The name of some poor bastard imprisoned in a box, zipped up in filthy leather from head to toe, tortured for months until he loses his mind and identifies with his torturers? This is a name you want to drop at the art department at Cosmo when you're trying to convince them that it's better to use open source than Photoshop? You want to put up a name meaning ultimate degradation to people who want to deal with beauty? Are you TRYING to fail?

      Now a bloody seagull. Not just a seagull, but a freaked out, stoned seagull. For kids. And the office environment.

      ARRGGGHHHHH.

      Now I can hear the snorks and wheezing laughter out there as all the geeks cut loose. It is ultimate geek humor, I know, to make up a totally inappropriate name to describe a prosaic project. If the dumbasses out there can't take a joke, fuck 'em.

      Which is why geeks don't do marketing. They don't do GUI's either. Not much into making music. They don't identify with the common herd, so there it is: they torpedo their own projects in the real world.

      I mean, what else can I say? Ogg should have been OpenSound, GIMP should have been OpenDraw, and OpenOffice should have a more mainstream symbol.

    24. Re:In my well paid opinion by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      So call it "The GNU Image Manipulation Program".

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    25. Re:In my well paid opinion by pla · · Score: 1

      The GIMP? The name of some poor bastard imprisoned in a box, zipped up in filthy leather from head to toe, tortured for months until he loses his mind and identifies with his torturers?

      Hmm, when you put it like that, I have to consider it all the more appropriate.

      I only thought of the "crippled" implication of the word, not the one you describe. Now, I could see gimp==crippled as a downer, but I don't think I could give a better description of corporate life than you did...

      "Have a minor in Color Selection, but your boss really likes fuscia? Don't worry, The GIMP feels your pain". Something like that. ;-)

    26. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's so true. The first time I tried The Gimp, I thought of the scene in Pulp Fiction where Jed tells the other redneck "Bring out the Gimp". I couldn't break that association for the life of me -- I've got a twisted sense of humor though. ;)

    27. Re:In my well paid opinion by FattMattP · · Score: 1
      The GIMP? The name of some poor bastard imprisoned in a box, zipped up in filthy leather from head to toe, tortured for months until he loses his mind and identifies with his torturers?
      Huh? That isn't what it means. Here's the definition most people think of:

      gimp
      n : disability of walking due to crippling of the legs or feet
      [syn: lameness, limping, gimpiness, gameness, claudication]

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    28. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They look at me as if I said it was called The Retard or something to that effect.

      Let's call it RetardPaint!

    29. Re:In my well paid opinion by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Scientology should switch. They obviously use a lot of Photoshop, but are having no luck with the results. (Why, they could cut off someone's head next! :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    30. Re:In my well paid opinion by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      AHHHH. I see.

      As I was told, the GIMP was named after the character I described in Pulp Fiction.

      It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program, of course, but in sadomasochistic circles it's a male sex slave, dressed head-to-toe in leather. THE Gimp is of course the poor bugger in the basement at Zed's place.

      "Bring out the GIMP" is the first thing that pops into my head whenever someone brings the name up. Since they started developing the GIMP in '95, and Pulp Fiction was out in '94, it's a short line to draw to deduce geekly humor.

      Now that I've thunk about the scenes a bit more, Zed's Gimp was probably NOT a prisoner. He may have wanted to be in the box.

      I have maligned the GIMP project's name! The sex slavery may have been voluntary. My bad.

    31. Re:In my well paid opinion by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      Why, OH WHY, can't nerds come up with names for their projects that don't sound like overt attempts to make the straights grimace?

      Names matter. ...

      Which is why geeks don't do marketing. They don't do GUI's either. Not much into making music. They don't identify with the common herd, so there it is: they torpedo their own projects...


      And the response from a long-time geek: That's your problem. The second phrase varies depending on my mood. Today it is "who cares."

      If the dumbasses out there can't take a joke, fuck 'em.

      I wouldn't use those words, but you got the sentiment correct.

      sdb

    32. Re:In my well paid opinion by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Get a group, fork these projects, and remarket them. No matter if we use exactly the same sources as the conventional version except for the logo files and the application name strings.

      Anyone want to start the project? Or shall I, over the summer?

      Ever wonder why the Harry Potter and Stuart Little movies used software called CinePaint, not by its former name of FilmGimp?

    33. Re:In my well paid opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell them that it is "Graphic Image Manipulation Program"

  62. Could these people be any cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god, was some glorified Geocities account the best they could do for a prize?

  63. Open Sour-what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it just me or does the artist not seem to really know what OO.o is nor care?

  64. Who cares about O'Reilly animals? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but who outside of O'Reilly actually associates Linux with a horse rather than a penguin?

    1. Re:Who cares about O'Reilly animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The admin guides usually have cowboys. Don't you like cowboys? How about gladiators? And who want's some gooney bird anyway?

    2. Re:Who cares about O'Reilly animals? by lewp · · Score: 1

      A penguin in a nutshell is a horse.

      --
      Game... blouses.
  65. Re:Not a good mascot for a project aimed at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but how about an open office subproject aimed at schools for the "challenged"... :)

    Like Texas University in Austin, or the University of Oklahoma?

  66. AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Interesting
    First, know that the "OK" sign in many countries is considered vulgar, and in a lot of Europe is a way to signify a pussy, vagina, female genitalia, in a vulgar regerence.

    Second, know that a fish, in the united states, is a non-direct however clear reference to the same. Pussy. Vagina. The odor of both is what has made the two a match in American vernacular.

    Now, look at the photo again, and you will see a hard-core, sex crazed bird with two big references to pussy. I am laughing so hard right now I can't breathe. Need... help... and a 15 year old girl created this?!?!? Arrg.... short of breath.... help... too... funny...

    1. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, not getting any either, huh?

    2. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the fish seems to be held by a prolapsed hemorrhoid.

    3. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Rahga · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the first point, most people who would be offended by the "OK" sign are very well aware of its popular use in America and several other countries...

      The fish, however... No, I don't think they 'match in American vernacular'. I'd say smells in either would have more to do with bacteria (death in one, treatable conditions in the other) than anything else. When I think of "Long John Silver's", my gutterthoughts don't go any lower than "Silverfish Platter".

    4. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I know that for sure brazil has that that "ok" thing to stands for 'A-Hole' .... But that's kinda' what you get without a large corporation to do all the research and leave it to a 15 year old girls to submit things to a bunch of people who work for free to pick something.

    5. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cause he is a boy :-P

      In Italy, Andrea is always a male name, not a female one.

      Also, in Italy the OK sign is used only to signify "all right", and never used referring female genitalia.

    6. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      No offense to Mr. Eric_Cartman_South_P, but by any chance are you a teenager?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  67. As if they care? by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 2, Funny
    The "OK" sign is another way of referring to the female genetalia in some countries, and is considered obscene...

    Given all the European snickering about Americans complaining when Janet Jackson showed a tit on TV, I would think they wouldn't care about hand gestures. :-)

    1. Re:As if they care? by pla · · Score: 1

      Given all the European snickering about Americans complaining when Janet Jackson showed a tit on TV, I would think they wouldn't care about hand gestures.

      And this got a "funny" mod?

      Hey, no one would call me overly nationalistic, but I consider this pretty damned insightful!

      At the same time they scold us for freaking over a nipple (hey, I'll agree to that extent), they would scold us for a stoned gull making an "obscene" gesture?

      Yeah, whatever. Moral high ground? "Ring Ring", "Clue phone on line 2!"

    2. Re:As if they care? by rsidd · · Score: 4, Funny
      At the same time they scold us for freaking over a nipple (hey, I'll agree to that extent), they would scold us for a stoned gull making an "obscene" gesture?

      Janet J wasn't using her tit to promote a free software office suite for educational use.

    3. Re:As if they care? by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      I don't think the OP's comment was placed with europe in mind.... and we're still snickering about the tittygate thingy yes.. :)

    4. Re:As if they care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are clever. Not! (That's sarcasm on a level understandable even by Americans)


      One person mentioning something on Slashdot (aiming for a funny mod?) is not comparable to the extreme (!) level of moral outrage that the Jackson nipple brought about. You lose fatboy.

    5. Re:As if they care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sure! If you had an HDTV, you could see "Tux Rules!" engraved in the nipple-shield.

    6. Re:As if they care? by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      She somehow promoted Photoshopping though.

    7. Re:As if they care? by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that someone hasn't tried it yet.

  68. The image... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    ...seems to be a rather... er, provocative. I hope they will not use it to much often in PR...

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  69. I dont get it by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Why is the fish so happy?

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  70. Maybe they should use a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "flock" of seagulls. Then we'd get the music lovers on board.

  71. Pretty rude gesture to be making by wardude · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think some cultures may be offended by the sign the bird is flashing with its free wing. Ranks up there with the raised middle finger for some.

    Before you pick a logo, or mascot, it is wise to consult with experts. Just wait until the Germans get online in a few hours.

  72. Seagull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, Steven Seagal would definitely go crazy over this!

  73. Re:The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Point well taken. In my country, a picture of a seagull represents our Government, and the fish he holds tightly in his hand, a man's testicles. So, in effect, OOo is reminding me that my April 15th Tax Extension is about to expire.

  74. The fish is MSOffice by thodu · · Score: 1

    ....and is going to be OpenOffice's lunch. Only it doesn't know it yet ( and hence the smile). :-)

  75. Sends a message to all the naysayers. by 0xC0FFEE · · Score: 1

    I mean, the TCO sure _looks_ lower...

  76. Re:If everyone refers to it as OO.org all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if not two, at least one letter domain names exist: how could one forget x.org?

  77. I like it by TooLazyToLogon · · Score: 1

    After going to the voting page, I see that you had some excellent submissions. The one chosen seems perfect for the OOooEdu project. But I'm going to use [AB] [BI] and [BJ] as OpenOffice icons on my desktop.

  78. Okay with me, but not for others? by cafn8ed · · Score: 1

    I hope it doesn't come back to haunt the OO.org team, but the "okay" finger gesture in the mascot illustration may be ill-advised: The gesture is extremely rude in some cultures around the world, as a visual symbol for certain elements of the female anatomy. (no diagrams, I'll let you use your own imaginations)

    --
    Coffee is my drug of choice.
  79. Oh, lord no! by brandonY · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, let's go with Phoenix's attempt at brand identity. I mean Firebird. Whoops, I mean Firefox.

    1. Re:Oh, lord no! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't checked the site today. It's Firebat now.

      Err, hold on...

      Make that Firemoose.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  80. Logo for OOoEdu not OOorg by stateofmind · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm so tired of Slashdot not better proofing it's submissions. My first thought was, are they serious? So much for being taken serious.

    I don't read every single submission on Slashdot, but like to at least scan through the different headlines, etc. If CNN had this many errors, they would be a laughing stock.

  81. a fish, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does this crazy seagul also have morphing wings? Otherwise I don't want it.

  82. A damn SHITHAWK? by Jeff+Mahoney · · Score: 1

    Ok, using a penguin for a mascot is one thing -- but a shithawk? Probably not the best message. :)

  83. Poor slogan? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    I don't know....Is it wise to choose a bird which circles aimlessly above landfills?

    Somehow, clippy looks attractive in comparison. The bird looks half-drunk! (cute, but drunk nonetheless)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  84. I don't like it... by dfj225 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I really don't want to cut up someone's work and I think the art itself is fine, but not as the symbol for what could be a very significant piece of software. I don't think I want to trust my sensitive or important files to something that portrays itself as a retarded scavenger bird. I think something simple yet elegant would have been the best choice here.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  85. Its OOo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ahem... That's the perfect mascot for OOo, coz it is just like that bird... confusing and makes you want to drink all weekend.

  86. meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is incredibly funny for a turkish person. that gesture made by the gull means "you are gay" in turkey :-))
    for turkish speakers: "topsun!" :-))

  87. I don't know... by jellybear · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrgghh!!!!

  88. whoopidee fucking doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you want, a medal for that?

    Fucking moron.

  89. Re:The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, I learned that from a TV ad for HSBC that is running in the UK now. (It just says the gesture is rude, but one can guess how.) This factoid (among others) is supposed to demonstrate how well they understand foreign customs. Why this should make someone choose to bank with HSBC, I'm not sure. Perhaps the idea is that they will do a better job of picking investments overseas.

  90. 4th Grade? by mynameis+(mother+... · · Score: 1
    Andrea: Sure! I think this concept can be adapted to several arts fields. As far as teenagers like me are concerned, I suppose it would be an interesting activity for their school time because its really useful for other people. It's a bit more difficult to know whether they'll spend a lot of their free time in such work. You know, when you are 15/16 years old you have several things on your mind other than work... ;-)

    I'll admit that I don't know anything about the Italian education system, but maybe you meant 4th form or something?

    She's an entire 4th grader's age older than a 4th grader...

  91. *SNARRFFFFF!* by Mnemennth · · Score: 1

    OMG... I remember this guy with the crazy hair and the scarf! It's Professor Isadore Corey... one of the characters the gov'ment used on TV during the 70's to try and keep us little freaks in school during that critical "after school" time every afternoon. Interesting that he came reincarnated as a seagull... and is it my imagination, or is that a Red Herring under his arm?

    Mnem
    *Cackles and runs away from school again*

  92. With a logo like that... by psetzer · · Score: 1, Funny

    With a logo of a bird known primarily for crapping on everything in sight, I'm tempted to go with Microsoft just to spite the few people in the world who don't hate the things.

    --
    "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
  93. WRONG WRONG WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's Andres, you dolt.

    1. Re:WRONG WRONG WRONG by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1
      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  94. OSS Mascotts.... by standing_still · · Score: 0

    I would like to see a picture of an OSS Mascott (*cough* TUX *cough*) with a pretty little butterfly (*cough* Microsoft *cough*) hanging half way out of their mouth/beak.....

    Now this would be the ultimate background image

  95. It's official by KnightStalker · · Score: 4, Funny

    open source mascots MUST EAT FISH. Seriously. Besides the obvious Tux, demons, gimps and gnomes certainly eat fish. Blowfish eat other fish. (I didn't look that up. I'm just assuming, for the sake of my argument, that they do.) A few members of Monty Python were in a movie where Kevin Kline ate live goldfish. Platypuses (the Darwin project) eat fish.

    There is nothing even remotely fish-related about the wildebeest. What does this mean for the GNU project?

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    1. Re:It's official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That it's Free Software and not Open Source(TM)? gd&r

    2. Re:It's official by brandonY · · Score: 1

      You left out Vorbis Ogg. He ordered people to eat dolphins, which are practically fish.

    3. Re:It's official by avendasora · · Score: 1

      Don't you think you ruin all the fun by calling the GNU mascot a wildebeest instead of a gnu?

    4. Re:It's official by AlXtreme · · Score: 1
      There is nothing even remotely fish-related about the wildebeest. What does this mean for the GNU project?
      It means that GNU is Free Software instead! Death to the fish eaters!
      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    5. Re:It's official by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      There is nothing even remotely fish-related about the wildebeest. What does this mean for the GNU project?

      To slightly mutilate a well-known quote of which I don't know the attribution: Microsoft follow standards the same way fish follow migrating wildebeest.

      I think that explains everything.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  96. WOW by drsmack1 · · Score: 2

    That is pretty much the most un-professional image I have ever seen. I really don't think that the path to acceptance will be eased by this sort of thing. Help us out here guys - we're trying to get you in but you gotta act right!

  97. Seagulls? Penguins? by dawg+ball · · Score: 1

    There aren't gonna be any fish left for M$!

  98. Slashdotted... by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please accept this ascii art as a token of my appreciation to OO.org.

    \|||||/ This
    --| |-- is
    --{o} {o}-- not
    *bbbbbbbb*|||- an
    *bbbb*|||- offensive
    (|||) post.
    (|||)
    \/ / \ /\
    O|| / \-/|/
    | |
    \- |----/
    \-| |(o /
    \---( \
    | |----\
    | |
    / \
    -- -- Thank you, Andrea Maggioni

  99. That logo screams 'take me seriously!' by brxndxn · · Score: 1

    Not wanting to succumb to Microsoft's ability to create crappy logos (Paperclip, Bob), the Open Source community has introduced a logo that promises to trump the 'non-business like' and 'unprofessional' of all previous Microsoft logos into one logo.

    However, at least with Open Source, we may see an improvement in the next version of the logo unless of course they fork it. Personally I hope they fork it and fork it quickly.. and they should fork whoever decided on that logo.

    That logo makes the running man AOL icon look deep. Last time I saw a happy fish in a Seagall's mouth was during a bad acid trip.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  100. April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some sort of joke? ...
    You got to be kidding me!!!

  101. Eureka? by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    OOoreeka!

  102. But why a seagull? by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    I mean, there's just something about them that reminds me of Microsoft Word and what it's done to my documents.

  103. Thank you for the notice! by JC-Coynel · · Score: 0

    I had a quick look at the article, then out of curiosity, downloaded OO 1.1.1 to check it out, and then added the following note to my to-do list : "Download OO and get rid of MS office". I indeed never needed MS Office...

    My point is that this even brings attention to the OO project, and I hope many people will follow my path!

    --
    --JC
  104. We understand the qualifiers, but still... by roj3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    >>1) This is just the mascot for OOOEdu, not OOo.
    >>2) It was a childs drawing, who won a competition.
    >>I think it's quite cute.

    The problem is, it doesn't matter if it's "just" the mascot for OOOedu -- it reflects on the entire OO.org brand. Unfortunately, it communicates "sloppy, stoned bird," rather than "whimsical kid-friendly software."

    The idea of using a kid's drawing is good, but as you see, the results leave you explaining it EVERY TIME ("see.. it was drawn by a kid.. see?). What about incorporating the feedback of kids? What about working with kids to come up with various themes? or having various schools vote on a selection of professional designs?

    Cute isn't going to win us (the open source software movement) any battles.

    1. Re:We understand the qualifiers, but still... by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, it communicates "sloppy, stoned bird,"

      Hey, I knew I'd seen that face before! :-) Or maybe that was here.

      I agree with you exactly. It's not bad for a child's drawing, but the seagull makes Foghorn Leghorn look like a dignified bird in comparison. The seagull is funny, but it's funny in a bad way, i.e., not appropriate for school kids, because it could be seen as promoting illegal drug use, sexual activity (see other posts), and plain daftness. Seriously, the first thing the bird's disheveled hair and disoriented look made me think of was Saddam Hussein when he was pulled out of his spiderhole.

    2. Re:We understand the qualifiers, but still... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      It was drawn by a child(just..hey Andrea, how you doin'?;o)

      If a child draws a picture of a seagull and it looks stoned, then in all probability, you're projecting your own thoughts onto an innocent drawing. Anyone who thinks "hey that bird looks stoned" is not going to be negatively influenced by it. Go ask a room full of 8 year olds to describe that picture and I can gaurantee that they won't make any reference to drugs or sex.

    3. Re:We understand the qualifiers, but still... by superyooser · · Score: 1

      Adults are the ones making business decisions. Logos are ultimately for adults.

  105. Re:Penisbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised that it wasn't submitted.

  106. DEAR GOD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats worst that "Clippy"!

  107. What? by JesterXXV · · Score: 1

    Is this a joke? A cross-eyed seagull with crazy hair, wearing a scarf, making the OK sign, and holding a happy red fish. How can anyone take this seriously?

    --
    Yo mama so fake, she failed the Turing Test.
  108. OK by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    If the PETA people complain over this, they then will have officially become crazy.

    Seagulls eat fish not vegiburgers!! Unless that seagull is vegetarian, of course.

    If we are not suppose to eat meat then why does it taste so good?

    Had to do it.

    1. Re:OK by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't you know that there's a certain substance in meat that stimulates the production of a neurotransmitter known as "Sanitonin". Without sanitonin, you generally start to lose your mind. This is particularly a problem in eastern nations that don't eat a lot of meat and are therefore particularly open to exploit by crazy political systems.

      I've heard that asparagus actually contains a neurotoxin that completely defeats the effect of sanitonin. It's called insanitonin.

      I don't eat asparagus.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  109. This is stupid too by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    how do you expect to be taken seriously when that's your logo?

    Yeah. Because a penguin is not silly at all.

    Uhmm.....

    1. Re:This is stupid too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are worse mascots, such as grown men in blue spandex dressed as rainbow-coloured butterflies.

  110. As a professional graphic designer... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a professional graphic designer, I'd have to disagree. Moreover, I image most of my colleagues would have opinions similar to the one I am about to voice.

    That seagull somewhat works as a mascot (which it is) but not a logo.

    Logos need to be simple color pallet . Moreover, logo's need to be scalable and preferably vector based. They should be recognizable at 3/4 squared as well as 4 feet squared. These factors allow one to easily apply a logo to a building, sign, letterhead, etc. Giant complicated bitmap logos are only going to give you problems.

    Moreover, simple logos are easier and faster for a human brain to retain. (psychology and sociology are fairly important subjects for graphic designers to understand) People are more likely to gain sense of familiarity and comfortability with a simple logo.

    But... anywho... I could go on and on.
    Suffice to say, I'm not a big fan of the seagull in it's current state. Mascots can get by with silly complicated forms since they are (usually) not logos. However simplifying their characterization usually increases there ability to gain acceptance.

    The seagull is a good start, but it could be cleaned up a bit.

    just my 2cents

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:As a professional graphic designer... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Logos need to be simple color pallet . Moreover, logo's need to be scalable and preferably vector based.

      See all those V shaped birds in the background? Thats the logo.

      Am I missing something?

    2. Re:As a professional graphic designer... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      professional graphic designer,

      BACK! BACK I SAY!

      We dont need your Marketroid version of creativity as a constricted mandate. You marketing types can go about remaking the world for the walmart/survivor/church crowd in a bland uniformity, but leave US the heck alone.

      No one needs your professional work (capitalist propaganda) and this forum dosnt need a lesson in Newspeak from the propaganda brigade.

    3. Re:As a professional graphic designer... by pseudochaotic · · Score: 1

      The simpler seagull shape works pretty well for that. You know, the bird in this one.

      --
      And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
  111. A lesbian Sea Gull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the hippie soung "Lesbian Sea Gull...."

    LOL

  112. Re:The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    Strange, and it said the artist was an Italian teenager too - if this symbol is offensive in most of Europe, I'd imagine an Italian would know that. I have also seen several posts referring to the artist as a teenage girl - however, the name Andrea, in my experience, is a man's name in Italy.


    Is this perhaps an intentional use of symbols that would be sexually suggestive? I know that sounds a little far out, but is this some sort of massive troll on OO.o or something? The smiling fish, the "OK" sign... both symbols for female genitalia. I dunno, the whole thing is a bit suspicious if you ask me. The post up at the top of this thread by Slashdot username "Mr. Darl McBride" about his involvement with this contest didn't exactly inspire confidence on my tinfoil-hat protected brain either.


    Perhaps high profile projects should think a little bit harder about appropriate ways to get kids involved before they let some random person set up a contest like this to pick a mascot for a very visible part of their project, even if it is "just" the OO.o Schools Project (what happened to appealing to educators and administrators and not just kids?). Maybe the whole thing was all well-intentioned and just a bad idea - the seagull is nice and all, but it looks pretty drug-addled too. Or maybe it was a big, well-planned troll.

  113. That OK gesture by godblessthenet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it's been brought up that the OK gesture is offensive in Europe, but has anyone noticed that this girl is FROM Europe? Italy, in particular: "A short interview with Andrea follows, translated from the Italian . . . ."

    "You know, when you are 15/16 years old you have several things on your mind other than work... ;-)"
    Apparently that's very true.

  114. three points to consider by scottking · · Score: 1
    okay, so there is a lot of negative feedback about the seagull. i have three points:

    1. this is a mascot for the education market and oo
    2. openoffice is good software, so hopefully we can use that to sell it to the it managers
    3. microsoft got away with clippy for a long, long time

    just my three cents

    --
    scott king
  115. I can't believe what I'm reading here by slipstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it's time to go back to proprietary software because the Free Software group has obviously lost their drive for just general fun. Sure that mascot looks a little crazy but for crying out loud this is "free" software. You want world domination go clone Napoleon or something.

    Damn people have some fun will you.

    --
    Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
    1. Re:I can't believe what I'm reading here by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Why not market their work? Openoffice is the product of thousands of man-hours of work. Why wouldn't the team want to let people know about their great product? A bigger user-base means better testing and more chance of financial support from companies that use OO.org.

    2. Re:I can't believe what I'm reading here by slipstick · · Score: 1

      And this has anything to do with my comment how?

      Let's try this again. Lighten up and have some fun that is what Free software is about NOT world domination, marketing or suits. If the suits want this application to succeed they'll do it in their own fashion. The OO leaders specifically chose this mascot for a reason. These are the same people putting in the "thousands of man-hours" so who are you or any random Slashdot reader that you should criticize their decision.

      It's one thing to say something like "well I don't particularly find it appealing" it's a total different thing to complain that it's "unprofessional".

      --
      Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
    3. Re:I can't believe what I'm reading here by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Brain in off mode this morning. Wish there was an edit option.

  116. i love it! by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

    Wow. Greatest mascot EVER. i love it!

    --

    Matt
    You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
  117. It was the best entry out of the bunch... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 1

    ..but that's not saying much. When OpenOffice tries to use this for ANYTHING, be it a black letterhead logo or a promotional bumper sticker, they're going to find out exactly why it sucks -- it's not reproducable at different sizes. That hair is just too goddamn busy (and since when do seagulls have hair anyway?). They had a good idea when they considered having kids do it, but as these entries have shown, it was at best misguided. I wish that, seriously, there was some standard open source graphic designer that projects like OO used. Because things like this emphasize the weaker points of Open Source -- sure, there are a lot of great programming minds out there, but they don't know anything about marketing or advertising, which companies like Apple and Microsoft will always beat them on because they can afford it. I'm a student who has a lot of experience with graphic design (though mostly with print and newspaper design). I would gladly intern for something like this, and help with the visual look where I could. Open source has a lot of great ideas, but deserves better advertising.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:It was the best entry out of the bunch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Christ's sake, RTFA. It's not some sort of corporate logo for OO, it's for an educational sub-project.

    2. Re:It was the best entry out of the bunch... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did. There's no reason NOT to expect quality for an educational sub-project. Just because it's for kids doesn't mean it has to look like crap. They are going to want to use it for a lot of things related to promotion of the sub-project. For all intensive purposes, YES, it is a logo. They want to identify their sub-project with it. Sounds like a logo to me. If MS were doing something similar for kids or education, it'd beat the snot out of this, hate to say it.

      Sorry, MS and Apple have the bar up HERE for marketing.










      A lot of open source stuff is down here. And they'll continue to be down here if the "aww jeez, it's good enough" crowd continues to chant their battle cry.

      --
      ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
  118. Andrea is a boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Andrea is a boy, he has 16 years old.
    In Italy Andrea is a boy name.

  119. its fine by f00duvoodu · · Score: 1

    while alot of you keep complaining that the thing is horrible because no one will know that a kid drew it i personally believe your mistaken.. the first thing i did was look at the link for the mascot pic before i read anything besides the headline for the article. and from the pic alone i used rational deduction that it was drawn by a kid.... it doesnt take much brain activity to realize a kid drew it. so there is no reason to worry

    but then again there are alot of idiots out there

  120. I'm sorry, but how is this anything but shit? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I'm sure someone is going to mark this as flamebait, but: this logo is shit.

    Number one, it looks like a kid drew it. I know that it is, well, true, but OO.o isn't exclusively for kids, and therein lies the problem. Do you think someone will want to let their corporation use software that's best efforts in creating an aesthetic logo were of a 10 year old kid? No. Heck, I don't even want to: the logo is ugly. What're they going to do with it, put it on a splash screen?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:I'm sorry, but how is this anything but shit? by radja · · Score: 1

      >Do you think someone will want to let their corporation use software that's best efforts in creating an aesthetic logo were of a 10 year old kid?

      yes, even a kid can use it.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  121. I think I see the problem now.. by Curtman · · Score: 1

    I don't think Tux was built for that. He's small and fragile. That cowboy would crush him.

  122. Re:The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in by hobbsbutcher · · Score: 1

    Perhaps that was part of the plan in their subtly marketing ploy.

    --
    Jonathan B.
  123. Re:The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in by bint · · Score: 1

    In the EU? It might be in *some* countries in the EU, but not all. Please accept that Europe or even the subset EU is not as homogenous as ...other parts of the world.

  124. Target audience? by antic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who's the target here? If kids are making the decision to roll out OO in schools, then by all means go with the demented bird, but if you're trying to sway Principals or MS-happy IT staff, then you might want to choose something that suggests professionalism, reliability, and easy for kids to use.

    The retarded bird says unprofessional, flaky, and unattractive.

    The competition was surely a great idea to get awareness up amongst kids, but I wouldn't run around with that bird as a letterhead to managers of schools and boards representing schools.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    1. Re:Target audience? by zCyl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      then you might want to choose something that suggests professionalism, reliability, and easy for kids to use.

      The retarded bird says unprofessional, flaky, and unattractive.


      You could just as well be making fun of Big Bird there. Principles are not the same as CEO's. Principles are generally aware that they're watching over children.

    2. Re:Target audience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Principles are not the same as CEO's. Principles are generally aware that they're watching over children.

      Principles are not the same as principals. Principals usually have principles, but the converse is not true.

      Also, CEO's plural is "CEOs".

      lt;/grammar_nazi>

    3. Re:Target audience? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      So, use that on a flyer to inform the kids about it, and use this for professional correspondence.

    4. Re:Target audience? by kotj.mf · · Score: 3, Funny
      Principles are not the same as CEO's.

      Got that right. Hell, you usually don't read about them in the same sentance, even.

      --
      hang brain.
    5. Re:Target audience? by antic · · Score: 1


      Is that what they're going to do?

      I wouldn't bet money that that's their plan, but it would surely be in their best interests!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    6. Re:Target audience? by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Principles are not the same as principals. ... Also, CEO's plural is "CEOs".

      I concede "principals", but according to the rules established by the US Government Printing office, a coined plural of an acronym such as CEO is formed by adding an apostrophe and an s, thus making "CEO's" correct.

  125. Well, by nametaken · · Score: 1

    Although usually I think the misinformation set forth in slashdot articles is easily resolved by reading the associated articles, in this particular case I think the editors would be doing a great service to OOo to correct the article summary.

    Some people, believe it or not, will not read the article and begin spreading the rumor that this very non-professional drawing is actually ->THE- official mascot of OOo. I think it's obvious that this could seriously damage the project's image as a serious, viable option for corporations.

  126. What an excellent lesson for the kids! by flacco · · Score: 1

    The winner learns "daddy will do everything for me" and the other kids learn "i will never be good at anything"!

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  127. The EYES are what let this down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...just flip one horizontally so they're both facing forwards, and it'll do just fine.

    As it is, the bird looks stoned to fuck.

  128. If only it was just the logo by melonman · · Score: 1

    I think the logo is maybe less important in establishing OO as an alternative to MS Office than getting OO to work properly.

    My latest discovery (after half a day of headbanging) is that the spreadsheet always splits CSV on commas, even within quotes, even if you specify tabs, with the result that it is pretty much impossible to import any data set that includes commas. That's a "first week of programming" sort of cock up. (Took me half a day to track down because I was sure the problem had to be with the CSV files I was generating, because no office package could be that bad...)

    The raw data for this project has been provided as Word documents, which OO can open, it's just that it fails to display half the data (something of a drawback with a questionnaire).

    Talked to one of the PC shops about OO. They decided to try it for their accounts. It worked fine for a while, then corrupted their files, and they ended up sending all their accounts off to someone on the other side of the world who seemed like an honest guy in a chat room. Fortunately he managed to get the data back, they migrated to MS Office and have had no problems since.

    OO is the best office suite for Linux at present, but it's still pretty bad. I'm hoping that Corel get WP10 right.

    I've met a few people who think that OO is great considering its free. I haven't met anyone who thinks it's actually easier to use or more reliable than MS Office, except for people on /. who, when pushed, only use it for typing one-page memos.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
  129. Please no! by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Kids in suits? No....NOOOO!! Bugsy Malone flashbacks!!!!

  130. Curious by InrdZQdxdqn · · Score: 1

    Does it mean something that open source developers seem to like wild animals -penguin, fox...- while big companies usually like cold boring inanimated or abstract objects?

    Psychoanalyst wanted.

  131. Virtual Joint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the stuff you only hear on slashdot...

  132. I'm the guy in IT of whom you speak by SendBot · · Score: 1

    I just started a job in a technologically impaired real estate company. Not everyone is allowed to run the version of office they desire, and a lot of people just want to be able to work with excel files they've created at home. So I try recommending OO.o feeling confident about the impression the beautiful photograph with the little smiley face will make.

    So instead I see a goofy seagull that looks like it was drawn by some bored high school student.

    Brilliant, fucking brilliant.

    Yes *that* will draw in the skeptical business minded folks in droves Seriously, make a separate page for stuff like that. Some of us are trying to promote the excellent work of OO.o in the MS dominated workplace where image counts far more than it should.

  133. is it a lesbian seagull? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over rocks and trees and sand
    Soaring over cliffs
    And gently floating down to land
    She proudly lifts her voice
    To sound her mating call
    And soon her mate responds by singing
    Caw Caw Caw
    Come with me

    Lesbian Seagull

    Settle down and rest with me

    Fly with me lesbian seagull

    To my little nest by the sea
    With me that's where you belong with me
    I know I can be strong when you're with me
    She skims the water
    At the new time to seek
    Her fish and she emerges
    With one squirming in her beak

    She plays among the waves
    And hides between the swells
    She walks the beach at twilight

    Searching for some shells
    Come with me

    Lesbian Seagull

    Settle down and rest with me

    Oh fly with me lesbian seagull

    To my little nest by the sea

    With me that's where you belong with me
    I know I can be strong when you're -- you're with me

    And in the evening
    As they watch the setting sun
    She loooks at her as if to say
    The day is done
    It's time to find their shelter

    Hidden in the dunes

    And fall asleep the
    Music of the moon
    You and me

    Lesbian seagull

    You just watch the world oh my

    Just you and me lesbian seagull

    Side by side with me 'till we die
    ('Till we die)
    You and I
    We can make it if we try
    Our love will keep us flyin' high

    Until we die...

    (Artist: Engelbert Humperdinck
    Song: Lesbian Seagull)

    Please try to keep posts on topic.# Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.# Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.# Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

  134. Works by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I like the use of depth and human-like expression to tell the story. The birds in the background represent the market share of office applications. Their dark contrasting form gives the impression of dark corporate interest, while the happy bird with a fish under his arm is portraying a friendly Open Office standing out from the crowd and 'catching a fish'. The fish here is certainly a metaphor for the user, and while it might at first appear that the user has been 'abucted' or 'fished' in a negative connotation, it becomes obvious that instead the bird has taken the user under its wing so to speak. The fish happily looks at the 'ok' gesture - a symbol of the user interface.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  135. I know if I was that fish.. by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1

    ... I wouldn't be smiling.

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
  136. So much for internationalisation by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a shame - the "OK" gesture the bird is making is not universal in its meaning. In Brazil, Germany and Russia it indicates a certain private orifice and is an insult. In France, it is also an insult. It denotes the number zero or the concept of something being worthless.
    I believe in Japan it means something like "I want my change in coins" which, although not particularly insulting, is pretty irrelevant.

    Perhaps a "thumbs-up" gesture ought to be GIMPed over the top, at least as part of an i18n package for the countries affected.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:So much for internationalisation by Rassendyll · · Score: 1

      The "thumbs-up" is not much better as I think Austrailians use it to symbolize the male genitalia in a manner similar to the western "middle-finger".

      --
      An eye for an eye... leaves the whole world blind.
  137. Cracked out gull teaches a lesson by hassassin9 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Okay, so I realize that this contest was for kids...but not only is the selection ridiculous looking, it's bordering on socially irresponsible:

    1) FIRST OF ALL, the seagull looks like it's on drugs (and loving it might i add) with his "Drugs are A OK" hand signal

    2) SECONDLY, he's holding a fish that everyone who saw it knows is gonna be devoured by this bird with a bad case of the munchies, and the fish's smile is disturbing (side note: if the fish looked more like Bill Gates, then you might be getting somewhere)

    3) THIRDLY, the gull and the fish look a hell of a lot like that little Disney movie, and the Disney Law trolls might come after you. And even if they didn't, with plagiarism running rampant in our school systems, promoting such a blatant rip-off is negligent at best.

    Okay, so let's recap...this mascot is endorsing drug usage, plagiarism...and savage consumption of your smiling prey...yep, sounds like an education program to me...OOooo...perfect.

    Visit www.DailyWireless.com for wireless industry news, research, insight, and analysis.

  138. Smiling Fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I think having a smiling face is good, I find it odd that a fish about to be eaten by the bird is still smiling.

  139. Image problem with almost all free software by capn_buzzcut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The seagull mascot sucks. I know it's for educational use, but it still sucks. Too complex, too flippant, and just plain unprofessional. This is the same general problem with a lot of free software; image. It's not just the logo or mascot either, it's even the names. Case in point, "Windows Internet Explorer" with a clean 3D looking 'e' as it's logo. Compare to "Mozilla" with it's stupid dinosaur logo. Now, any idiot can guess what IE is and what it does simply by the name, and the logo is simple and translates cleanly even in black and white. Can the same be said for Mozilla? NO!! Same goes for The Gimp and host of other really great software. And don't even get me started on the KDE "Kandalf" help screen thing.

    This is the same problem with a whole bunch of free Linux based software; compared to their Windows counterparts, their names, logos, and general lack of polish make them look like something cooked up by a bunch of social misfits, hell-bent on being obtuse and cryptic just for the sake of being 133t.

    --
    "And now, Frank N. Furter, your time has come. Say 'goodbye' to all of this, and 'hello'... to oblivion!"
  140. And the fish . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the fish suffers horribly. 8(

  141. This will help... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    ... convince corporate customers that OOo is a legitimate competitor to M$-Office... I'm sure of it... hah...

    *sigh* So much for my six-sigma project... I'll never get them to dump M$-O now...

  142. A paper clip nest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they use anything shinny to make there nests ?

    Even say paper clips :-)

  143. Rhetorical Question (Re:See the Other Submissions) by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 0, Troll
    ... which is included free with many tablets and digital cameras, ...

    My laptop came with Windows. Does that make Windows free?

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  144. OK sign considered harmfull. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    It's very offensive here in Brasil. It means "take it up your a**". Well, back to the drawing board .... :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  145. Watch the Hand there, Pilgrim... by snsparrish · · Score: 1

    The nice folks over at OOo obviously didn't do too much international research on hand gestures...

    The smug little bird's "OK" gesture of his right hand is a very vulgar sign in Brazil... basically the equivilant to flippin' someone the bird. *No pun intended*

    This is sure to speed the hundreds of comercial offices and companies in Brazil to proudly display the NEW OOo logo for all their clients to see!

  146. Animal Mascots and O'Reilly? by infochuck · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not such a good idea to choos eanimal mascots for open source projects - I'm sure we're all aware of O'Reilly's efforts to eliminate other publishers' use of animals on techinical books (arguably for would could be good reason - that's not mny point). This could put the hurtin' on other houses who want to do a book on OpenOffice, but can't use the mascot on the cover. This problems become larger the more identifiable the mascot becomes.

  147. MS Office competition by Murf_E · · Score: 1

    now all you have to do is animate it and make it ask you stupid questions while you try to work. look out clippy!!

    --
    this sig intentionally left blank
  148. Not bad Ideas, Implementation problem by pixelfreak · · Score: 1

    I agree, free software does have an image problem, except I think implementation is the problem, not necessarily the name or idea behind the logo.

    Open source projects focus more on the product, not it's packaging. I don't think it's done on purpose, but it's just not their focus.

    Take Mozilla, for example. There been several versions of the Mozilla logo. In my opinion, the green, fire-breathing character looked unprofessional. However, the red dinosaur logo is clean, and well designed. It probably took someone several days to develop at no cost to the project. Developing and maintaining the IE logo has cost Microsoft hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    In addition, Microsoft has a thick book on how the IE logo should displayed in every possible situation. They have a marketing department that monitors it's use. Since open source projects don't have the resources or time to monitor it's identity, even good design tends to degrade over time.

    How do we resolve this issue? I think this is a great opportunity for non technical people to get involved with open source software.

  149. SHithwaks descend on the office by olivercromwell · · Score: 1

    Hey, a Seagull strikes me as a BAD choice for a mascot. I do not know what they may be referred to where the people who chose the gull as their mascot live, but here in Vancouver, we call them shithawks. They are ill mannered, pesky beasts that defecate everywhere. If it were not illegal to kill coastal scavengers, you can bet there would be far fewer shithawks around here.

  150. it only reflects the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the drawing, reflect well the state of the OpenCrap community.

    bad software, poor interfaces, poor documentation, little or no chance of making it in corporate.

    no wonder all our jobs are going to india.

  151. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that Dory?

  152. Re:If everyone refers to it as OO.org all the time by ValourX · · Score: 1

    The rules changed regardng the .ORG registration requirements. Years ago you could get a 1 or 2 letter .ORG domain, but once those domains expire they cannot be renewed because of the new rules.

    Google will tell you the details.

    -Jem
  153. Dude... by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    Who stole my mascot?

  154. Seagull manager by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they've heard the radio ad where the hapless employee comments on a "seagull manager"? That's a manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, and craps all over before flying off again.

  155. Slightly OT: Italian Names by mvdwege · · Score: 1
    She's an entire 4th grader's age older than a 4th grader.../

    I think you might find after a few moments' research that Andrea is a name that can be given to a boy in Italian. I don't know if it is unisex, and the article didn't mention Andrea's gender, but it does not necessarily have to be a girl.

    Mart
    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  156. Sadly... by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

    ... I must admit that this mascot even makes Clippy look good.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  157. Uh... right. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    If you can't sell something, regardless of the name, it's either a shitty product or you are a shitty salesman.

  158. "OK" sign highly offensive in some cultures by johndeerejedi · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they know that the "OK" sign that bird is making is a pretty offensive gesture in some parts of the world. "Hey, the bird just gave me the bird!"

  159. Mine? by Rassendyll · · Score: 1

    Mine? MINE?

    --
    An eye for an eye... leaves the whole world blind.
    1. Re:Mine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate? MATE?

  160. For the millionth bloody time. by Jacques+Chester · · Score: 1

    The seagulls in Finding Nemo are not saying "Mine", they are saying "Mate". You yanks need your ears checked.

    --

    Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.

    1. Re:For the millionth bloody time. by PrintError · · Score: 1

      Hey retard. Turn on the subtitles, and you'll see "MINE!" appear every time they talk.

      The pelicans are the ones with the Aussie accents, and they only say "Mate" once or twice.

  161. And I also as a professional graphic designer... by the+web · · Score: 1

    Oh stop beating around the bush and throw your professional subjectivism in the circle. You know exacly what I'm talking about. This is no place to use the critique kid gloves of the professional designer.

    This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. It's a black mark on the OOo marketing team. If it is used on collateral of any kind you can kiss OOo goodbye. They will never be taken seriously.

    I pray this is a joke, or a token contest.

    I believe that's what my counterpart above me was trying to say.

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  162. OOo's new mascot by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 1
    But does he speak with Buddy Hackett's voice???

  163. What's he smoking? by GoClick · · Score: 1

    Ok guys am I the only one who got this mental image? Photo Shop: Perhaps the best grand I ever spent! http://gak.upnix.net/~noah/bitbucket/OOoMascot.jpg