This is basically how the system is setup. Meta data about detector runs are sent from the online systems to CMSMON. CMSMON is accessible to the outside world so CMS collaborators can look at the data the detector has been collecting.
They can't get to the control system. CMSMON was a machine that collected and served meta data about the detector. The hackers couldn't reach the control system.
You're thinking of the SSC, which was supposed to be built in Texas but was canceled. The LHC is being built in France because most of it is being funded by the EU.
There wouldn't be a sizable explosion, but the beam could cause signficiant damage to the machine. If, for instance the beam poked a hole in the beam pipe it would take weeks to warm up the machine, replace the parts, get it back under vacuum and cool it down. I believe that is why they're initially only running at ~1 Tev, to minimize the chances of breaking something while they're commissioning the machine.
He complained that they turned it off for the multiprocessor test, not the single processor test. He said that turning off hyperthreading for the multiprocessor test would not impact performance.
"For both the Dell Dimension 8300 and the Dell Precision 650, Apple/Veritest performed the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks with hyperthreading DISABLED. They had hyperthreading ENABLED for the single-processor benchmarks, but DISABLED for the multi-processor benchmarks, despite the fact that hyperthreading would have improved the performance of the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks, while having little or no effect on the single-processor benchmarks"
Looking at the source to that page it seems that they have commented something out:
FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) 1. How do i get rid of my personal information from your database? 2. How does Virtumundo use my information? 3. Why does Virtumundo want my information? 4. Where can i find more information on Virtumundo's privacy policy?
Does anyone think that this will ever make it into the kernel? It seems that Linus does not like this because it cures the symptons of latency in the kernel instead of the real problems.
Does Linus put about to be released kernels through any tests in attempt to avoid bugs like these? Does anyone else remember the brown paper bag bug at the begining of the 2.2 series?
Slashdot Mirror
Isn't VNC already available on the iPhone? Atleast jail broken iPhones?
This is basically how the system is setup. Meta data about detector runs are sent from the online systems to CMSMON. CMSMON is accessible to the outside world so CMS collaborators can look at the data the detector has been collecting.
They can't get to the control system. CMSMON was a machine that collected and served meta data about the detector. The hackers couldn't reach the control system.
You're thinking of the SSC, which was supposed to be built in Texas but was canceled. The LHC is being built in France because most of it is being funded by the EU.
I thought that they were moving away from this. They're launching new satellites for the current system with this turned off.
What's the word on this?
There wouldn't be a sizable explosion, but the beam could cause signficiant damage to the machine. If, for instance the beam poked a hole in the beam pipe it would take weeks to warm up the machine, replace the parts, get it back under vacuum and cool it down. I believe that is why they're initially only running at ~1 Tev, to minimize the chances of breaking something while they're commissioning the machine.
Its well over 2000 degrees F.
He's right. The solar array on our car generates over 1000watts, and its only 8m^2. The sun does put out about 1000 watts/m^2.
He complained that they turned it off for the multiprocessor test, not the single processor test. He said that turning off hyperthreading for the multiprocessor test would not impact performance.
"For both the Dell Dimension 8300 and the Dell Precision 650, Apple/Veritest performed the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks with hyperthreading DISABLED. They had hyperthreading ENABLED for the single-processor benchmarks, but DISABLED for the multi-processor benchmarks, despite the fact that hyperthreading would have improved the performance of the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks, while having little or no effect on the single-processor benchmarks"
http://www.kare.com/images/portfolio_14.gif
In the bottom right left hand corner:
"Client: Eazel, Inc., 1999-2000"
Eazel used to be in the linux desktop market, right?
I didn't know that GIFs could have layers. Your photoshop skillz amaze me.
MlCAD maybe?
http://www.lm-software.com/mlcad/
We're back on.
MRTG Stats on Purdue I2 Connection
I thought that Komodo was an integrated development environment built on Mozilla?
Active State Komodo.
Actually, the real 1.0 tracking bug is:
7 05
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103
I've heard people complaining about this, but how exactly is the ban on soft money (which I thought this bill was about?) unconstitutional?
Looking at the source to that page it seems that they have commented something out:
FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
1. How do i get rid of my personal information from your database?
2. How does Virtumundo use my information?
3. Why does Virtumundo want my information?
4. Where can i find more information on Virtumundo's privacy policy?
You could run Netware on your file server, which allows you to do this.
What about all the people that download movies and mp3z and non-microsoft non-free software here?
I am a student at Purdue University, and see piracy everyday. I wish it would go away, and free up some frickin bandiwdth.
As seen a few hours ago on Slashdot I wonder if he will even keep his research on the web after this?
In the windows version of the game, you can use 'E' to jump and then hit 'D' to spin.
This looks like a troll that has been floating around for the past couple of months. Definatley not "interesting".
I am the only one here that has an HP graphing calculator? Does anyone know if HP discontinued them?
Does anyone think that this will ever make it into the kernel? It seems that Linus does not like this because it cures the symptons of latency in the kernel instead of the real problems.
Does Linus put about to be released kernels through any tests in attempt to avoid bugs like these? Does anyone else remember the brown paper bag bug at the begining of the 2.2 series?