Slashdot Mirror


Building the Enterprise D Out of LEGOs.

CleverNickName writes "A self-proclaimed "dork" has built one of the best models of Enterprise D I have ever seen (and I think I speak with some authority)...entirely out of LEGOs. I can see my house from here!"

293 comments

  1. Poor Bastard by skroz · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wow. Thanks to Fark.com, I've gone from 15 page views (mostly mine) to almost 5,000 in about 24 hours. Very nice to have so many compliments - it'll be the first and last fan mail I ever get, probably. :) Check for some additional notes and answers at the bottom of the page.
    He has no idea what a slashdotting is, apparently.
    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    1. Re:Poor Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's too late to have Bill Shatner comment on this.

    2. Re:Poor Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      farking is the same thing as slashdotting. fark has almost as many viewers as slashdot, and is certainly a lot quicked than slashdot with most storys :P

    3. Re:Poor Bastard by wdr1 · · Score: 2

      Out of curosity, I wonder if any of the many sites who have stood up to a slashdotting would be interested in sharing their page view stats. In particular, roughly how many page views/sec is a slashdot'ing comprised of, and how does it vary over time?

      That would be pretty interesting to know.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    4. Re:Poor Bastard by c0ol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      whats fark.com LOL

    5. Re:Poor Bastard by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Please don't ever come to fark.com, we don't want you.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    6. Re:Poor Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot vs fark

      fight to the death!

    7. Re:Poor Bastard by slipgun · · Score: 1

      farking is the same thing as slashdotting.

      So I 'slashdot' my girlfriend, or is that just my British accent playing tricks on me?

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    8. Re:Poor Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, guys, lets slashdot em. That'll teach 'em.

    9. Re:Poor Bastard by bdesham · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but do they have the same high-quality repeat articles as we do here on Slashdot? :P

      --
      Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
  2. Slick by altaic · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many hours did this guy put in? Scope out those diagrams! Most archetects don't use that much detail when designing a building. Just goes to say that dorks have too much time on their hands.

    1. Re:Slick by skroz · · Score: 5, Funny
      Most archetects don't use that much detail when designing a building
      Please tell me you're not an architect.
      --
      -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    2. Re:Slick by altaic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have friends who are, which probably explains how my perspective is skewed. ;) But seriously, speaking from experience, geeks have too much time on their hands.

    3. Re:Slick by SolarInfinity · · Score: 1

      He mentioned about 100 man hours to do it.

    4. Re:Slick by altaic · · Score: 1

      I guess that's expected since he did all those 3d models/renderings of it. Do you think those are just progress shots with the background whited out, or results of autocad fun?

    5. Re:Slick by Desert+Raven · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most archetects don't use that much detail when designing a building
      Please tell me you're not an architect.

      Eh, I've worked with architects. Any details they add aren't usually worth the graphite they were drawn with. Architects don't actually know how to build things, and thus rarely have any concept of appropriate materials/dimensions/cost, etc. All they care about is how it looks.

      It's the engineers/builders who have to transform the architect's crack-pipe hallucination into something that obeys the laws of physics, human ergonomics, and modern economics.

      The guy who built this was not an architect, he's an engineer.
    6. Re:Slick by daeley · · Score: 2

      Most archetects don't use that much detail when designing a building

      Please tell me you're not an architect.


      No, no, he must have been talking about archetects, which could be construed as 'model builders', if one takes arche- as in archetype and -tect, as in, well, architect.

      Of course, I just might be overestimating his cleverness. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    7. Re:Slick by mtec · · Score: 2

      Of course, I just might be overestimating his cleverness. ;)

      Ya'think?

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    8. Re:Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WARNING: Politically Incorrect joke ahead (hence the AC)

      **

      Well, I've been told that an architect is someone who wasn't man enough to become an engineer nor gay enough to become an interiors designer.

      *ducks!*

    9. Re:Slick by altaic · · Score: 1

      Be nice, now. That's not clever, anyway ;)

    10. Re:Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I worked in construction for about 20 years, and in every building I've worked on, the drawings had multiple major problems. Even the drawings for a Jack in the Box had major problems. You'd think that after building that many of them in the same style, that would eventually get fixed. None of the architects I've worked with have been detail oriented. They're like anti-engineers. Of course, they do a great job helping us engineers make things look better.

    11. Re:Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that explains why you're still posting here then, doesn't it? If your architect "friends" spend less time and detail designing a building than this guy and his Lego ship, tell your architect "friends" that they're fucking morons. Assuming they actually exist, of course.

    12. Re:Slick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are lame.

    13. Re:Slick by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > he must have been talking about archetects

      Err, what does model building have to do with the beginning of
      anything? (Or what did you _think_ arche in archetype meant?
      The other possible meaning (ruler) makes even less sense.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  3. Why bother starting from scratch by Anon0mous · · Score: 2, Informative


    when there are lots of kits and plans to choose from http://www.starshipmodeler.com/trek/trekship.htm

    1. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Yebyen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only possible answer is that if you have to ask, you couldn't possibly understand.

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    2. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "when there are lots of kits and plans to choose from http://www.starshipmodeler.com/trek/trekship.htm [starshipmodeler.com]"

      Yeah I don't understand Lego people either. Why they build anything besides what's already planned out for them is beyond me.

    3. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 1

      which would you rather be? a copycat or a nerd? what nerd builds a starship from a kit when he can come up with his own from legos? building from a kit....thats like bill gates making an operating system off someone elses work.....wait a minnute...your right might as well use a kit

    4. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by pranalukas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why bother building a Linux distro from scratch?

    5. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Inferno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do it?

      First off, a little background: I built (played?) with legos well into my teen years. When I moved on to computers I passed all my Legos on to my little brother, who added them to his already large collection. He continues to build today (at age 22), but they are much more complex models involving the Mindstorms robot system. He's really delved into the programming on those, and has 2 mindstorm "brains" that he uses. This last fall, he got an award at the Oregon State Fair for his "Dinner Plate Transporter".

      Anyway, the reason that I built was because I wanted to create my own toys. My brother and I would setup environments consisting of Legos, pillows, blankets, chairs, tables, etc etc, then build vehicles and buildings to populate those environments. Then we would play. :) The beauty of it was the flexibility of the Lego blocks. If something wasn't working out or didn't look right, we could tear it down and rebuild it.

      Those were the days. :)

    6. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2

      "Yeah I don't understand Lego people either. Why they build anything besides what's already planned out for them is beyond me."

      It's the same mentality of the X-Box Linux Project.

    7. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by stwrtpj · · Score: 2

      Why bother writing an OS from scratch when there are so many other fine ones out there?

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    8. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by stwrtpj · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The beauty of it was the flexibility of the Lego blocks. If something wasn't working out or didn't look right, we could tear it down and rebuild it.

      Here's an interesting thought: Replace "LEGO blocks" with "open source software" and read the sentence again.

      Might be interesting to do a statistical analysis on how many avid LEGO builders/collectors became code hackers and programmers later in life (put me down as one of those)

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    9. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by corian · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't understand Lego people either. Wh/y they build anything besides what's already planned out for them is beyond me.


      While that is sarcasm, there is a valid point -- he's still only building a replica of an (already-designed) starship he saw on TV rather than coming up with a pure, unique design of his own. So, while it's impressive to build from scratch, it still is a derivative model in the same way any other one you can buy is.

    10. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "So, while it's impressive to build from scratch, it still is a derivative model in the same way any other one you can buy is."

      Nothing wrong with that. Part of making good art is enjoying what you do. If recreating the Enterprise suits your fancy, by all means go do it. It's really not an issue until you try to sell it.

    11. Re:Why bother starting from scratch by Inferno · · Score: 1

      Funny you should wonder how many avid LEGO builders/collectors become code hackers/programmers.

      hacking code is what I do in my spare time (LEGOs used to be my hobby, now hacking code is my hobby). :)

  4. Sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm a classically trained geek-boy who has only enjoyed the company of women by the sheer grace of God.
    ... birth does not count.
    1. Re:Sorry, but... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Jesus? Is that you?

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  5. Features by Bimkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The model features accidental saucer-separation capability, as I've found out more than once."

    Translation: I dropped it. It broke.

    --



    If you smoke after sex, you're doing it too fast.
    1. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no kidding?

    2. Re:Features by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he's just reenacting the even-numbered movies.

    3. Re:Features by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 3, Insightful

      other funny things from the faq Okay, I didn't mean to make my geekness such an issue, though it is kind of funny. Don't worry, I do leave the house, and I do many, many things besides Lego. like watch star trek, go to star trek conventions, play with my star trek action figure...you get my point No I don't need help finding a date. Yes, cute girls may still e-mail me, though I will surely question your attraction to a 24-year-old who plays with Legos. the real question here won't be why are you atracted to me but are you really a woman :) but hey I'm a geek too and to be hounest it's a pretty cool ship I'd never do anything like it but thats just becuase it would mean I'd have to leave my monitor

    4. Re:Features by Amtiskaw · · Score: 1

      Thanky ou Captain Obvious

    5. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for parsing that for me! It is most humorous, indeed. Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Now then, may I ask a favor well-suited to your particular skills? I never quite "got" the oft-told yet inexplicable anecdote about chickens and roads and miscellaneous other things; could you explain what it means and why some humans find it humorous?

      Appreciated,
      Data

  6. Quote from site by Doomrat · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Wow. Thanks to Fark.com, I've gone from 15 page views (mostly mine) to almost 5,000 in about 24 hours."

    I get the feeling that that will soon change to "Wow. Thanks to slashdot.org, I've done from having a working server to an overloaded-to-buggery one in about 5 minutes.".

    Nice brickin', though.

    1. Re:Quote from site by Doomrat · · Score: 2

      OK, so I wasn't the 3rd person to make that joke at the time of submitting.. guess I took too long.

    2. Re:Quote from site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so I wasn't the 3rd person to make that joke at the time of submitting.. guess I took too long.

      Never mind, happened to me recently... the idiot moderators don't check the date before marking redundant, they just look at how far down the page it is.

  7. Sheep. by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 0, Informative


    Sheep -> Sheep

    Bonsai -> Bonsai

    Species -> Species

    Lego -> Lego

  8. I deserve a beating for saying this, but... by Nefrayu · · Score: 5, Funny

    To bold lego where no one has gone before!

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    1. Re:I deserve a beating for saying this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d'oh @ missing y :(

    2. Re:I deserve a beating for saying this, but... by dagg · · Score: 2
      No. This deserves a beating. A very very bad beating: "BOTANY BAY! WE HAVE TO GET OUT OF HERE! OW!! LEGO OF ME! KAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN!". That was lame.
      --
      Your sex with lego's on Star Trek.
      --
      Sex - Find It
    3. Re:I deserve a beating for saying this, but... by fishexe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would just like to point out that that only says (Score: 5, Funny) because it can't say (Score: 5, Painful)

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  9. pfft by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was admiring it until I saw at the bottom of the page: "created using a mac"

    Now I just sit back and wonder: Wow...Macs are good! I'm gonna get myself a duallie G4 and see if it can make me a Borg Cube!

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get yourself an old Next cube and you're all done.

    2. Re:pfft by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      Of course its a mac, you think a PC would ever have the sexy ships computer voice?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't give him any more ideas. He needs to get outside some before he starts another project.

  10. NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by Tsar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before any rabid Trekkers reading this story decide to email him, let me point out that he's already been informed of this: "Within hours of posting, someone named Medic e-mailed me with the dimensions: 'Enterprise-D is a Galaxy Class Starship, which are supposed to be 2,103 feet long by 1,542 wide by 476 tall.' Which means, ratio-wise, my model is a little taller than it should be. I think I can live with that."

    Bet it's the tallest one in four counties, though!

  11. Grr... Internet Explorer... by alue · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Argh, the gallery slide show does not work in Mozilla.

    It's ok; it's not a big deal, but in case anybody is taking a count of the number of things that are non-standard and IE-specific, feel free add this to your list.

    1. Re:Grr... Internet Explorer... by alue · · Score: 1

      Whoops, nevermind. It does work; I think something was broken on my computer. =P

    2. Re:Grr... Internet Explorer... by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 1

      Works for me - Mozilla build 2002053012 on XP.

      Why would Apple make something IE specific anyway?

    3. Re:Grr... Internet Explorer... by wfaulk · · Score: 2

      Not that they did make something IE-specific (at least in this case), but IE is the browser that ships with MacOS.

      --

      Fuck 'im up, Tim! His views are invalid! -Pirate Corp$

    4. Re:Grr... Internet Explorer... by immybaby · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find it does. Using Mozilla 1.0 here ...

  12. Re:wheaton by plasm4 · · Score: 0

    and here is the quote from his page Fun with LEGOs I submitted this story, which I first saw on Fark, to Slashdot, but since none of my stories ever make it, ..

  13. Lifeboats? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    He has every life pod on the thing, but i do beleive he missed the damn captains yacht! Thats the ovoid thing in the center of the underside of every saucer. More than a shuttle, not quite a runabout. I dont think its ever been used in an episode though.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Lifeboats? by saskboy · · Score: 2

      I'm sure as soon as Lego creates the "Captain's Yacht" peice, he'll attach it. For now you'll just have to wait in anticipation ;-)

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Lifeboats? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      that's because they didn't make it up until after the episodes were over. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Lifeboats? by rosewood · · Score: 2

      It was mentioned in a few episodes and it is in the tech manual and the inside was shown in Insurection

      I know this for Star Trek was my life in 4th grade.

    4. Re:Lifeboats? by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe the captain's yacht was in an episode. The one where the Enterprise is funneling engery to a Romulan warbird and somehow space time shatters. The one where Picard goes for a owl of fruit, screams and his hand has like 4 months of fingernail growth.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    5. Re:Lifeboats? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      heh, I'll bet if you point out the episodes I"ll say something like "But that's after Gene Roddenberry died! I quit watching then." Of course, I was graduating from high school then, kid. :)

      But I"ll have to take your word for it, because it's been years since I've seen many TNG episodes. And I only recently got caught up with movies again, and they're about to release another one.

      Kirk could kick Picard's ass on any planet. Just thought I'd mention that.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    6. Re:Lifeboats? by saskboy · · Score: 2

      That was most definately a runabout. I remember because they brought the runabout into the energy stream and it exploded. Hope I didn't spoil the ending, but if you haven't seen that one before, you are a little behind.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    7. Re:Lifeboats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That episode kicked ass. Although I remember a similar plot device in "The Long ARM of Gil Hamilton" or whatever (by Niven)

    8. Re:Lifeboats? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      That was the sovreign class vessel. They never showed the galaxy class captain's yacht. The episode in the season with out Beverly (season 3 I think) when Picard was going to go get a new heart (his mechanical one was failing and he needed a new one), he and Wesley shared a shuttle ride. It was discussed about building and using the Yacht, but because of money contraints they decided to use a already built shuttle. This was from the tech manual I think.

      --

      Gorkman

  14. I must be a bigger geek to nitpick but... by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Interesting

    dont get me wrong, thats quite the project there.

    However, he has a picture labeled 'the troublesome deflector dish' which he just used some brown and white blocks instead of the gray. Its been a while since I played with legos, but weren't there some parabolic dish type things that would have made a reasonable deflector shield?

    1. Re:I must be a bigger geek to nitpick but... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and if memory serves, the deflector dish is mostly blue and red.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  15. Big deal... by kakos · · Score: 1, Funny

    I once built the Borg Cube out of Legos.

    1. Re:Big deal... by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 4, Interesting


      It's actually impossible to make a perfect cube out of Lego. The ratios of lengths of the sides of the pieces are such that there is no integer multiples which are identical.

      I've never found out whether this was deliberate on the part of Lego, or an accident.

    2. Re:Big deal... by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      You could probably get pretty darn close, unless the ratio of sides is something irrational like pi/e^sqrt(2) or some insane thing like that.

      You might have to use a whole lot of bricks to find a common integer multiple. Out of curiosity, what is the ratio of width to height of a 1x1x1 stud?

    3. Re:Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, 97/127, 67623/88538 or 3473740/4548127 get pretty darn close to pi/e^sqrt(2). The worst number to approximate is the golden ratio, (1+sqrt(5))/2. Insane things usually get pretty good approximations.

    4. Re:Big deal... by kscguru · · Score: 2
      Fibonacci (sp?) Sequence.

      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 etc.

      The ratio between each pair of terms is a progressively better approximation of the golden mean. Really.

      If you have way too much time on your hands (as my Linear Algebra teacher once did), you can construct a non-iterative formula for the sequence out of this. Requires diagonalization, messy enough you actually have to do it by hand... but it actually works.

      So, the golden ratio is pretty easy to approximate. Nature's done it for millions of years. You just haven't tried hard enough... :)

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    5. Re:Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to a crude measurement:

      6 studs long = 4.8 cm = 0.8 cm per stud

      that cares for the sides seen from top (build a rectangle XxX studs long).

      Now for the height. 4 bricks heigh = 3.8 cm. Makes 1.05 cm per brick.

      Since you can get 1/3 heigh plates, that means 0.35 cm per plate.

      So, we need to find a solution to the relation:

      Width/Length = Height
      X * 0.8 = Y * 0.35

      Let's assume U = Y / 2 (building in two-plates heights), so:

      X * 0.8 = U * 0.7

      One solution:

      7 * 0.8 = 8 * 0.7
      5.6 = 5.6

      Or in other words 7 by 7 studs, and 16 plates (5 bricks + one plate) heigh gives a good approximation.

      The measurements are probably not accurate enough, but in reality you would come *quite* close.

      Hm, funnily, it is 5 bricks and two plates (aka 17 plates height) that matches 7 studs long - and 1 mm is still missing. Somewhere my formula was wrong :)

      Tels

    6. Re:Big deal... by tsangc · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's actually impossible to make a perfect cube out of Lego. The ratios of lengths of the sides of the pieces are such that there is no integer multiples which are identical.


      Sure you can. This design is pretty damned close to being near perfect.

    7. Re:Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      97/127 - pi/e^sqrt(2) = 0.000005781

      Take a Fibonacci approximation of the golden ratio with a comparable denominator:

      233/144 - (1+sqrt(5))/2 = 0.000021567

      it's a much bigger error.

  16. I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by smoondog · · Score: 0, Troll

    There's an Enterprise "D"?

    -Sean

    1. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Enterprise NX-1 - Earth's first ship capable of (relatively) high warp speed.

      Enterprise 1701- Main TOS ship.

      Enterprise 1701 - Upgrade, refitted Enterprise. New class named: Enterprise class. Seen in ST:TMP

      Enterprise 1701- A - Recommisioned Enterprise Class after Kirk destroyed the upgraded original in Star Trek 3 (Originally USS Atlantis before recommisioning)

      Enterprise 1701-B - Excelsior II-class, seen in Star Trek: Generations

      Enterprise 1701-C - Ambassador-Class, seen in TNG episode 'Yesterday's Enterprise'

      Enterprise 1701-D - Galaxy-Class, main TNG ship

      Enterprise 1701-E - Sovereign-class, newest ship, seen in every movie past Generations where 1701-D was destroyed.

      God I'm sad.

    2. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The original Enterprise was "a Constitution-class starship", at least according to the original series...

    3. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 1

      you forgot two

      Enterprise 1701-F-which will happen once the enterprise E gets destroyed in nemisis (saw that on the "spoiler-free comercial" /sarcasm
      hollywood gives away too many things on previews now days, saw that and a thing with data getting jettisoned
      into space)

      Enterprise 1701-PROFIT

      *ducks*

    4. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yup. It's packed with lots more people and destructive goodies than the Enterprise C. And there's and Enterprise E that's going to be ever more larger and deadly than the D class.

      Enterprises are like bra sizes; when you go up a letter they get bigger and more impressive.

      --
      Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    5. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by parkanoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Galaxy class is the largest enterprise in terms of tonnage and volume.

    6. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by stux · · Score: 2

      damnit.

      keep the spoilers to yourself.

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
    7. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by I_Machine · · Score: 1

      Not to mention "Riker's Hot Rod," with the extra nacelle, NOS, altezzas, a Sparco Captain's chair and indiglo behind the LCARS panels. And, since the Captain's gig was never used, he might've put a BMW roundel in its place, along with other product stickers everywhere...hear they're worth an extra .01 warp each...

    8. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      You neglected to mention that the original 1701 from TOS was Constitution class. Also, the upgraded 1701-D with the third warp nacelle from the future that never happened in "All Good Things".

      I heard a rumor that Gene Roddenberry had insisted that warp nacelles should always be in pairs, so you could have two or four of them but never three. He had recently passed away, so a third nacelle was used in that episode just because they knew it would have pissed him off - they also did as many other things in that episode as they could for the same reason. Can anyone comment?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:I may be a geek, but I'm out of touch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Spoiler. :P

  17. The submitter.... by cuyler · · Score: 2

    One would think that CleverNickName has seen enough Star Trek items like this. Kind of surprising he'd be out looking for this stuff.

    On a related note, the orginal models - are there any still around (that haven't been blown up). IIRC the models used for TNG were 6 feet long (I could be way off).

    1. Re:The submitter.... by devmike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting sidebar: After the production of Generations, the 6' model of the Enterprise D was lost.

      Archivists all over paramount were running screaming when they couldn't find it anywhere.

      more than a year later, it shows up in some back office reception area in horrible condition...all dinged up, holes drilled into it for display hanging, nacelles busted, and several years worth of grease layers.

      explanation: 'someone' loaned it out to a local restaurant for display and it never really got returned. It is now safely sequestered in the giant room of boxes you see at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    2. Re:The submitter.... by Pauley_24 · · Score: 1
      IIRC the models used for TNG were 6 feet long (I could be way off).

      The original models, built for the begining of the series, were 6 feet and 2 feet in length. The 6-footer was the only model built for the series that featured the separating saucer, so it was also used for Generations. Due to time constraints, the models did not get the fine details the model builders wanted.

      Sometime during the third season, a smaller, more managable 4-foot model was built, and the hull was much more finely detailed. Take a look at the later episodes, at least the parts that didn't use stock footage -- you'll see things such as the lifeboats a lot more clearly.

      (Source: STTNG Technical Manual, STTNG Blueprints)

      -- Pauley
    3. Re:The submitter.... by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      One of the original models from the original ST series is hanging in the Smithsonian Aerospace Museum in Washington DC. You get to walk under it.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  18. Re:el dork-o by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny

    A self-proclaimed "dork"...

    I also proclaim that you're a dork..


    And that makes all the difference in the world. Dorkle, the popular dork engine, is not affected by self-references of dorkdom. Only dorklinks from other dorks count toward a higher DorkRank, and the more the better.

    Your post was hilarious, by the way. I laughed so hard that my pocket-protector fell out. I tried to come up with a joke about the existence of "dork matter" or maybe going over to the "dork side," but I'll have to leave that to cleverer dorks than me.

  19. Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    However, he has a picture labeled 'the troublesome deflector dish' which he just used some brown and white blocks instead of the gray. Its been a while since I played with legos, but weren't there some parabolic dish type things that would have made a reasonable deflector shield?

    See, the thing is, if you made it out of those parabolic dish-thingies, it'd be really, really tough to modify the deflector dish to interface with the sensor array, and emit a neutrino pulse into the heart of the anomaly.

    1. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by lhbtubajon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean a tachyon pulse, but we'll let that slide since, you know, at the time you were off with the Traveler and all.

    2. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      See, the thing is, if you made it out of those parabolic dish-thingies, it'd be really, really tough to modify the deflector dish to interface with the sensor array, and emit a neutrino pulse into the heart of the anomaly.

      IIRC, whenever the brave crew of the Enterprise modifies the deflector dish to interface with the sensor array and emits a neutrino pulse into the heart the anomaly, it never works as intended.

      Name one episode where using the deflector dish actually helped the crisis. I can't recall any.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    3. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The episode with the little ghost girl who is the "immaginary" friend of one of the children on the ship.

      Although not exactly resolving the crisis (it had already been resolved), at the end they use the deflector dish to emit a stream of energy into the cloud of spirit-entities. It makes them happy.

      I was never one for exhaustive details, but I do watch the show more than a healthy amount.

    4. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Tsar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Name one episode where using the deflector dish actually helped the crisis. I can't recall any.

      You've obviously forgotten the episode "Protocols." Data modified the deflector dish to support Subspace TCP/IP (RFC #31,415,926) and ran an IRC server through it until Picard booted him off and changed the root password.

      The best moment was during the final court martial scene, when Riker uttered the immortal words, "Data wants to be free."

    5. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Tsar · · Score: 5, Funny

      See, the thing is, if you made it out of those parabolic dish-thingies, it'd be really, really tough to modify the deflector dish to interface with the sensor array, and emit a neutrino pulse into the heart of the anomaly.

      This is only a short-term benefit--the new Enterprise version (NCC-1701F) will be DRM-enabled, and such modifications will be prohibited under the DMCA. Resistance is futile, so do what you can with impedance.

      In another vein, I seem to recall that Marina Sirtis wore a reproduction of the Heart of the Anomaly (Le Coeur de l'Anomalie) to last year's Oscars, and it looked quite tachyon her.

    6. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by ptbrown · · Score: 1
      Subspace TCP/IP (RFC #31,415,926) and ran an IRC server through it until Picard booted him off...

      To be fair, he was operating an FServ. (with complete series of Chobits, Maharomatic, NukuNuku, etc.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    7. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

      You can use the parabolic dishes, but you have to compensate for a weakened structural integrity forcefield.

      If you just stayed in Starfleet Academy another year they would have taught you about the virtues of model airplace glue.

      --
      Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    8. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Sacarino · · Score: 5, Funny

      See, the thing is, if you made it out of those parabolic dish-thingies, it'd be really, really tough to modify the deflector dish to interface with the sensor array, and emit a neutrino pulse into the heart of the anomaly.

      Point of order, Mr Weaton.

      You are officially cheating, using your knowledge of technobabble to gain karma.

      That's dirty pool in my book, insider.

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    9. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Pingsmoth · · Score: 1

      The worst example of this *ever* was the season finale episode "Best of Both Worlds Part 1." They had rigged it to somehow eimit a huge blast of energy to destroy the Borg ship. The episode ended with Riker giving the order to fire.

      Three months later in the concluding episode, nothing happened at all. The deflector dish did nothing--absolutely nothing. They even zoomed in on it and it sat there emitting not even the slightest blast of energy. It was like the special effects budget suddenly ran out...

      --
      http://www.walkingtaco.com
    10. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid you're mistaken. In The Best of Both Worlds Part II the deflector dish fires exactly as it was supposed to. But because Picard had already been assimilated, the Borg were aware of the plan and had prepared, so it caused no damage. There is a long FX sequence where we clearly see the deflector shooting its pretty blue energy beam at the Borg ship.

    11. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish the "Animal Things" from ST:TNG had won in that one episode of ST:TNG.

    12. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know its off topic but, that final line made me remember the EFF so im off to make my christmas donation. Mabey we all should.

    13. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      And in the words of the immortal James T. Kirk:
      "Get... a... LIFE!...".

      (Plus, the episode was called "Protocol", in singular, the RFC was #31,415,296 and Picard didn't actually change the root password, because someone seriously goofed up; if you watch really carefully, his screen wasn't showing any Federation interfase, but a half-completed game of Solitaire. I sure hope someone got fired fot that).

      Yeah, OK? Get a life. Dork.

    14. Re:Modifying the Troublesome Deflector Dish by Locke+'Nova'+Cole · · Score: 1
      Name one episode where using the deflector dish actually helped the crisis. I can't recall any.
      Every time they had to run like hell from the Borg? :)
      --
      "Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun." -Ash (AoD)
  20. Easy lego models... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Inspired by this i just created a lego Borg Cube. Even simpler than these.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  21. A testatment to civilization by marcsiry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As recently as 50 years ago, most humans on this planet were mainly concerned with finding enough food on a daily basis to stay alive.

    In today's society, it's only slightly unusual to report on an individual who apparently has enough free time to obsessivbely recreate a fictional spacecraft in exacting detail with intentionally poor tools.

    The screwed up thing is, the majority of people in the world are STILL mainly concerned with finding enough food on a daily basis to stay alive.

    I'm not trying to pull a guilt/ego/trippy trip on anyone; it's just odd to think that some of us are lucky enough to have to go out of our way to waste time.

    --
    Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    1. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're posting to Slashdot instead of shipping food to the needy, bringing about world peace, curing cancer, and a million other things that need to be done in this world.

      We all have to take a break once in a while. You and I post to inane websites. He builds lego models. Big fucking deal.

    2. Re:A testatment to civilization by Konster · · Score: 2

      So what?

      Why should we feel guilty because we are simply better than most everyone else at making a living for ourselves?

      I feel sorry for the children in places where they don't have the benefit of making a good life for themselves, but beyond that, sorry. I don't care.

      The adage that states, "Give a man a fish, and he will eat for a day, but teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime." holds true.

      We earn our daily bread and more. That we have spare time to do things other than looking for food is the result of many generations working harder than the one before so the one following will have a better standard of life.

    3. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we are simply better than most everyone else at making a living for ourselves

      Given circumstances such as ending up with 1/3 of the world's gold supply after WW2, I'd argue your country couldn't possibly be anything other than wealthy. Which means you can get a job and buy food rather than hunt it or starve. Don't be so damn arrogant.

      many generations working harder than the one before

      This is rubbish - your 8 hour day plugging computer parts into a motherboard how the hell is this working harder than the 12-14 hour day in the coal mine your ancestors would have done a couple of hundred years ago?

    4. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not concur with your analysis of past civilization. The great wealth of art they left as a legacy suggests that at least some people had time and money to spend on things that were not required for their very survival.

    5. Re:A testatment to civilization by slipgun · · Score: 1

      The screwed up thing is, the majority of people in the world are STILL mainly concerned with finding enough food on a daily basis to stay alive.

      Not quite true, I'm afraid. The number of people who are fed to a decent level has increased dramatically over the past 50 years - one of the great achievements of the 20th Century. . It seems that the reason some people still can't get enough food is because of their own corrupt governments and the fact that they're embroiled in pointless wars.

      Not that I'm saying we shouldn't help.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    6. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The number of people who are fed to a decent level has increased dramatically over the past 50 years -one of the great achievements of the 20th Century..

      Certainly! But I'm having serious doubts about whether it can be called an "achievement" to enable our species to multiply exponentially until we cover most of the habitable land area of the globe.

      Feeding one generation without controlling the birth rate only moves us that much closer to a future crash and mass starvation.

      Reading Ishmael was a moving experience-- both enlightening and depressing at the same time.

    7. Re:A testatment to civilization by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Boll, and further, ocks.

      The majority of humans on earth can find enough food quite easily. The exceptions are visible and pitiful, but they are exceptions.

      The problem (depending on your point of view) is that for many of them there's little point in doing more work than is necessary to eat, because they don't have access to markets that provide the juicy consumer goods or expensive treat-the-symptoms pharmaceticals that we're lucky enough to have access to.

      In other words, if you take a Yanomami and her 4 hour work / 20 hour leisure day in the rainforest, and transplant her to the city then she has to work 10 or 12 hours a day to pay for her apartment and refridgerator and save up for a TV. I'm not saying that's inherently bad, just that you shouldn't confuse lack of possessions with being on the verge of starvation.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its his time to waste. I have been reading these post wondering.. why in the hell does anyone care what this guy does with his time.

      Its a HOBBY... no different than watching TV, playing video games, working on your car or doing some woodworking.

      Over a 8 months he spent approx. 100 man hours. that is about 40 minutes a day. Hell it takes me that long to read my email.

      People need to spend less time worrying about what other people do in their own freetime.

    9. Re:A testatment to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The number of people who are fed to a decent level has increased dramatically over the past 50 years - one of the great achievements of the 20th Century."

      Sorry.. wrong.

      Don't believe the hype.

  22. Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    The 'Slashdot' has fired a plasma charge at the port nacelle! The feedback pulse has overloaded the antimatter injectors! We've got to jettison the core!

    (Data, On the Bridge)
    Captain, I believe if we fire a controlled burst of tachyon radiation at the bridge of the 'Slashdot', Cmdr Taco will forget that he has attacked us. That should give us enough time to reroute the power from the impulse engines to the warp core containment field. If I can run a holodeck carrier beam with the tachyon radiation, I believe I can create a 'virtual wormhole', and give us an hour before Cmdr Taco will repost this story. I mean, uh, attack us again.

    (Captain)
    Make it so. (To engineering) Jordi, you have an hour. Number One, in my ready room.

    (Number One)
    Someone turn off that damn alarm!

    1. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by lvdrproject · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's GEORDI, you uncultured swine!

    2. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by Nefrayu · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Number One, in my ready room."

      I guess that's better than Number Two in my ready room...

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    3. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
      (Hemos at the Helm)
      It appears that Enterprise D is trying to flood us with tachyon radiation using their holodeck.

      (CmdrTaco)
      Take us out of reposting the story, and prepare to fire Trolls and Flamers, full spread, maximum yield. Take aim at the technical writers quarters.

      (Timothy)
      But that will disable their ability to speak technobabble

      (CmdrTaco)
      Precisely. And when their technical writers are destroyed, their ability to do technobabble will be disabled, and they'll be left defenseless.

      (CleverNickName)
      I won't let you do this. If you destroy them, they won't let me be cameo on Enterprise.

      (CmdrTaco)
      Shut up Wheaton! And get off my bridge!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    4. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Number One, in my ready room."

      I guess that's better than Number Two in my ready room...


      However, neither would be as good as Counselor Troi in my ready room. ;-)

    5. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by SoLoatWork · · Score: 1

      Jordi? JORDI? It's Geordi *I think*
      *Gets mad over misspelling.

    6. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      (Data on Bridge)
      Captain, perhaps we can use a beowolf cluster to destroy them.

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    7. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      Who... does... number... two... work... for?

      That's right buddy, you show that turd who's boss.

    8. Re:Captain, we have a breach in the Warp Core! by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2
      That reminds me of an episode of Beavis and Butt-Head in which Beavis was dreaming about being Captain Picard. Sitting on the bridge (with a bald head), he turns to Butt-Head (who is dressed up like Riker) and says:
      "Number One, I order you to take a number two! heh heh hmm hmm heh..."
      It's not much now, but it was hillarious when I was 13.

      Steve
  23. Re:Obviously new here... by Obliterous · · Score: 3, Funny

    Poor guy. His site withstood a farking, but now it's going to suffer through a slashdotting. Talk about double jeopardy.

  24. Does this really count? by USC-MBA · · Score: 5, Funny
    In exactly one location - the warp nacelle supports - I was bound to break some sort of unwritten moral code: I painted them gray from their original white, and glued them to their supports. ... and well, the nacelles were far too heavy to hold onto the ship's body by themselves. A liberal application of ABS plastic cement helped nicely

    Really, now, does this model truly qualify as an authentic Lego creation? Sure, his deviations seem minor, but it's a slippery slope friends.

    Where does it end. Is it acceptable to glue Lego bricks alongside one another to achieve the desired effect? Is it acceptable to airbrush cool color schemes on a model when the colored brick motif just isn't cutting it? What about incorporating non-lego pieces like balsa wood or erector set parts?

    I'm sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, this should be categorized more as just another plastic model kit of the Enterprise than a true Lego creation. Better luck next time.

    1. Re:Does this really count? by bofkentucky · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would saliva be in violation, everyone remembers that slobber encrusted legos were impossible to pull apart without hot water and a better knife or, your teeth

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    2. Re:Does this really count? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 5, Interesting

      FYI, almsot all "Grand" lego creations (homegrown and the 'pro' creations at the Legoland parks) use glue in their construction. The blocks themselves just don't provide enough support to hold a large model together.

      Painting is a different story - if there were "standards" in lego model building, painting would usually be against the rules. Though in reality, is it really much different than buying 4000 2x3 flat bricks for a project? It's not like you had them laying around.

      I'm sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, this should be categorized more as just another plastic model kit of the Enterprise than a true Lego creation.

      I'm going to have to disagree with you there - he not only built it, he designed the plans, researched the specs and size, and gathered the parts. As in depth as any boxed model is, all the work (besides putting it together) is already done for you. This Enterprise really is a neat accomplishment.

    3. Re:Does this really count? by Nefrayu · · Score: 2

      Excuse me, but does the molding of a piece of plastic and the addition of four buds of legos count against authenticity?

      Look at the X-wing lego kits or the "Quidditch Practice" kits on the Lego website... I think we've gone beyond the days of yore and the rules of lego. When shapes become difficult and are molded out of convenience, that's when the rules went out the window (MS claims to the name aside).

      I was pretty happy the day long ago when I got something other than a rectangular white, blue, red, or yellow piece. Now there's quidditch rings... I think that paint and glue are more than acceptable here. At least he didn't just mold an enterprise out of plastic with lego buds on it...

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    4. Re:Does this really count? by imadoofus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure why he used glue either. He should have just increased power to the Structural Integrity Field.

      --
      "pr0n": An anagram of "porn," possibly indicating the use of pornography. - www.microsoft.com
    5. Re:Does this really count? by Corrado · · Score: 1

      Is *that* what stuck them together!? Wow, what a time to learn that saliva was the mystery glue that cursed my childhood. I guess better late than never.

      BTW: This is a way cool LEGO structure! :)

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    6. Re:Does this really count? by stwrtpj · · Score: 3, Informative
      FYI, almsot all "Grand" lego creations (homegrown and the 'pro' creations at the Legoland parks) use glue in their construction. The blocks themselves just don't provide enough support to hold a large model together.

      In some models that's the reason (expecially large structures that are mostly shell with no interior details, such as replications of skyscapers). In other cases, the glue is used so the model will stand up to being moved from place to place, and so that it can withstand the elements or abuse by tourists, depending on where it is set up.

      Using glue to hold parts together is not considered to be "cheating" in constructing a model if you're simply gluing them together in the same positions that they would normally go together without the glue.

      As an aside, what consistently amazes me about LEGO products these days is quality. The parts are molded to a very high degree of accuracy to insure they will fit together, and the colors used in today's LEGO plastics take a very, very long time to fade. And in all the years that I have been collecting them, I have never had a set with a missing piece. I've had some with extra pieces, but never missing.

      The only problem I have with LEGO sets today is that they're damned expensive. It's quality, all right, but you definitely pay for it.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  25. Re:NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bet it's the tallest one in four counties, though!

    Almost missed the reference to Stand by Me which starred this story's submitter. Kissass.

  26. jeez by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, the Enterprise "D" was destroyed in 2372 by a Klingon Bird of Prey under the command of the Duras sisters. Don't you know anything? :) (I don't get many chances to out-geek anyone.)

    OK, if you want to be hypertechnical, according to William Shatner in that oh-so-tragic SNL episode the whole Star Trek thing is make-believe. Many of us suspect that he is still under the control of the mind-control device in Episode #37.

    1. Re:jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dumbass hit the "preview" button next time

    2. Re:jeez by alexburke · · Score: 2

      I give you a gift:

      </A>

    3. Re:jeez by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      I give you a gift: :P

      If typos translate into intelligence I'm screwed. They don't, and typing HTML by hand is idiotic anyway.

  27. Re:A testemint to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should all GET SOME PRIORITIES in Soviet Russia.

  28. I don't get it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Lego is a wonderful toy to develop spatial orientation and projection. It is perfect to develop the kind of intelligence needed to navigate in three dimensions by projecting the spatial relationships on a two dimensional plane.

    It also is a good learning tool to develop volumetric relationship (in an architectural sense).

    What I just don't understand is people trying to make it do something it's not made for: duplicating the volumetry and appearance of arbitrarly-shaped objects.

    Why don't you use clay or plaster? They are shapable to a great degree of likeness, far more than what you'll be able to achieve with legos.

    1. Re:I don't get it. by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1
      Lego is made for anything you want it to be made for! You should have seen the houses, cars, planes, space shuttles, rockets, cities, robots, etc etc etc, that I've made for as long as I can remember. Lego blocks are like real voxels, you can use them to make any shape. What do YOU want to do with Lego? Cubes? With your way of thinking, noone can even make pyramids out of Lego blocks, cause that wouldn't be an exact pyramid. Were you ever a kid, like, at all? Your subject says it all about the rest of your post: "I don't get it". That's true.

      (Yeah mod me down or whatever. Lego was a big and important part of my childhood.)

    2. Re:I don't get it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      (Yeah mod me down or whatever. Lego was a big and important part of my childhood.)
      So it was with mine.
    3. Re:I don't get it. by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1
      So it was with mine.
      In a very different way, I would guess. What did you build with your Lego? Nothing creative? Nothing of all the things I mentioned?
    4. Re:I don't get it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      In a very different way, I would guess. What did you build with your Lego? Nothing creative? Nothing of all the things I mentioned?
      House. Building. Things you could do with 4 kinds of different bricks and doors and windows. 30 years ago, there weren't any of those spaceship crap. Instead of building pre-packaged stuff, you had to think of yours.
    5. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> In a very different way, I would guess.

      Obviously! Pig Hogger was evidently very concerned about following the rules. He would never build anything that Lego bricks were not "intended" to build!

      Do you suppose he comes from a German family? ;-)

    6. Re:I don't get it. by zingbot · · Score: 1

      Some design is all about tighter parameters. Legos are more black-and-white than clay or play-doh. Achieving results takes a bit of thought, like his mapping out of the different floors.

    7. Re:I don't get it. by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

      Ok, I didn't play with Lego that long ago, but I do remember that you couldn't build anything with the parts I had, either. Sure, I had the moonbase and all, but many of the more advanced parts was to make it more real. You could still build anything from the parts that you had. But that was sometimes the fun of Lego; how do I build something with these blocks? I agree some of the Lego blocks nowadays are very much decoration (pre-made), but the thing is, you still have to use your creativity to build other things than cubes in varying sizes.

  29. A Lot of Free Time by darker_omega · · Score: 2, Funny

    From his webpage
    "One at a time, I downloaded the deck plans from the Web, resized them in Photoshop, and printed them out onto graph paper."

    With 42 decks, this is no small amount of time. Wonder what I could do if I stopped reading slash dot so much?

    1. Re:A Lot of Free Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 52 decks....

      OMG I can't believe I posted that

    2. Re:A Lot of Free Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      52 decks in your head, maybe.

      you were right the first time.

  30. LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been quietly annoyed for a long time by the word 'LEGOs', as in 'I made a scale model of Natalie Portman out of LEGOs'. You made it out of LEGO dude, much as you might make something out of string and not strings. Of course you could make a thing out of sticks and not stick. Unless you just used one. This rant is really running out of steam. Maybe what I'm trying to say is that I think the world LEGOs sounds gay and I don't mean that in the homosexual way, I mean it in the same sense that something can be shit without actually being made of shit, like for example there is probably at least one person in a small third world country right now, living in mortal fear of an oppressive govt. assisted to power by the CIA, who is thinking that U.S. foreign policy is shit and he's probably wondering wether or not he'll ever be able to afford enough LEGO to do anything about it and realises that he probably won't seeing as he has to work for a month just to earn enough to buy a can of Coke.

    1. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only retards who say "I built this out of LEGO" are the retard brits but they also say crap like "i was at university" or " i was in hospital". NO! It's "I was at THE university" and "I was in THE hospital". Dumb ass fucks don't even know how to use their own language.

      When you see a piles of legos on the ground you don't say "These are my LEGO" so why in the fuck would you say "this is made out of LEGO".

    2. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain has more than one hospital and more than one university. Therefore saying "at the university" and "in the hospital" is incorrect.

    3. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you should say "I was in A hospital" or "I was at A university" you god damn redcoat son of a bitch your lucky i don't dump your fucking tea in the harbor, yes that's harbor not fucking harbour, ok now go worship your queen and eat some crumpets or some shit.

    4. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When you see a piles of legos on the ground you don't say "These are my LEGO"
      No, but if you were speaking correctly, you'd say "This is my LEGO". LEGO is the substance, a LEGO Brick, or a Piece of LEGO is the singular thing (making LEGO Bricks or Pieces of LEGO the plural).

      To give an example of another substance that we treat in the same way, it's like rice or sand.

    5. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by tangledweb · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is one of those topics where people who are wrong are not going to change.

      Stupid is as stupid does and all that, but for what it matters, the official word from Lego is:

      1. The trademark LEGO should be written in CAPITAL letters.
      2. The LEGO trademark should not be referred to in a generic way such as "LEGOS" of "legos", or as plural or possessive words like "LEGO's".
      3. When using the LEGO trademark as a noun, please never leave it alone. Always add and extra noun, e.g. LEGO sets, LEGO products, LEGO toys, LEGO building bricks, LEGO universe, etc.

        (Quote from: http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/presskituk.pdf )

        So there you have it.

        "This is my Lego" is wrong.

        "These are my Legos" is worse.

        "These are my LEGO bricks" is correct.

    6. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by frause · · Score: 1

      yeah, and those are my Windows(R) ?

    7. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is my Lego" is wrong.

      "These are my Legos" is worse.

      "These are my LEGO bricks" is correct.


      How about "This is my LEGO waffle"?

    8. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      This is one of those topics where people who are wrong are not going to change.

      LeGoS, iNc. can go kiss my arse. They make good (very durable but expensive) blocks, their legal department, among other things, leave a lot to be desired.

      People that nitpick the finer points of grammar and spelling on a public forum are in the same sinking cruise liner, IMO.

    9. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats wrong with your kind of people, you understod what was ment. So the idea the writer had in his mind got transported to your brain. The writing did what it is suppose to do, isnt that enough? Please dont quote me with all my misstakes in this text.

    10. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by stwrtpj · · Score: 2
      This is one of those topics where people who are wrong are not going to change.

      You're absolutely right. It's horrible how brand names creep into our day-to-day lexicon. I'm with you, I'll have nothing to do with it.

      Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to run some errands. I have to go xerox a few copies of some documents and buy some more tabasco sauce at the supermarket.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    11. Re:LEGO, not LEGOs by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      So stwrtpj says:

      "Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to run some errands. I have to go xerox a few copies of some documents and buy some more tabasco sauce at the supermarket."

      Don't forget your aspirin and the cleaner for your formica countertop.

      And if you're a junkie, you should also pick up some heroin while you're at it.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  31. Nice mesh... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but I'd revise the bump mapping a bit.

  32. Dork? by Night0wl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He's a self admited Penis?
    Why would he admit that?

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
  33. Re:A testament to civilization by Tsar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, people have been wasting time since prehistory. What purpose was served by the cave paintings at Lascaux? I'd assume that those folk were generally preoccupied with the question of continued survival.

    Look at it this way--any time spent creating the spacecraft was not spent in procreation, though that may not have been entirely due to a proactive decision on his part. Consider the long-term resource savings!

  34. Slashdot earned it's tagline on this one by afidel · · Score: 2

    This is Definitly news for nerds. Not so sure on the stuff that matters bit though =)

    Of course Taco does punctuate each so I guess it can be an either/or deal.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  35. Dork? no way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who spends this much time and money on making something this expensive and totally useless just because it looks cool is an idiot.

    hmm... site is at homepage.mac.com
    That explains everything.

  36. Re:A testament to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the motherfucking paintings where part of a ritual to appease the gods asking for more animals to be delivered for hunting.

    Requesting that your god summon beasts for you to it is very different from playing with god damn fucking legos all day ok fucktard.

  37. Re: Features list is short by saskboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well I'm glad I didn't post what I was going to and be redundant and all. We picked the exact same quote out of the article.

    Except I can add:
    "..more than once."

    Translation: I'm a clutz, what do you expect from a dork anyhow? ;-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  38. To boldly build ... by ElectroBot · · Score: 1

    ... what noone has built before!

  39. The best part of the page for me... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    the lugnet.com link!

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  40. Digital vs. Analogue by czth · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's the digital-vs-analogue issue. It's a lot simpler to model something with discrete blocks when you are able to measure in discrete units, and also easier to repeat, make symmetric, transfer and encode, etc.

    But as you say, the price you pay is not being able to shape so minutely or copy precisely, i.e., you have to live with a square wave approximation of the real thing. It's all about tradeoffs. Artsies use analogue media, techies use digital :).

    czth

  41. Re:More Easy lego models... by saskboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I'd make a Romulan Warbird, or a Klingon Bird of Prey, but I just can't find enough green lego pieces lying around. I guess I'll just build the "cloaked" models of those ships.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  42. Millennium Falcon by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The coolest movie-to-Lego-model that I've seen is this Millennium Falcon (had to use Internet Wayback Machine as the original site's pictures are down).

  43. PC Legos by rosewood · · Score: 2

    I have yet to see something I have wanted for years. I want Legos on my PC. Basically, it needs to be very EASY just like Legos. Second, it has to be full rotational 3d. Third, every peice lego has ever made needs to exist and work right, including the gimick peices as I always called them (Magnets) etc. Also, all the ground peices so I could lay out a city, or base or whatever is needed. I always wanted the big train from the late 80s. If all the sets were loaded in, that would rock my world too! (ie, I could quickly load a prebuilt set model from my childhood and quickly look at it in and out and deconstruct it like I did IRL))

    I dont need things like facial animations and plot. Also, fun things to add would be stress testing. Oh, almost forgot. I have to be able to put some peices on in almost strange ways. I did that a lot and I always thought that was part of the sheer genuis that is Lego. Oh, if this has not been done and someone gets the idea to do this then consider it started and GPL'd, but lets try to get official Lego support. I dont want it to be "Supar Bloqs!" or some dumb shit.

    1. Re:PC Legos by terrabit · · Score: 1

      MlCAD maybe?

      http://www.lm-software.com/mlcad/

    2. Re:PC Legos by Luxury+P.+Yacht · · Score: 1

      You might want to take a look at LeoCAD. It has some of what you're looking for.

      --
      Bush should have died, not Reagan -- Morrissey
      Morrissey rides a cockhorse -- The Warlock Pinchers
    3. Re:PC Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something I've always wondered about the post-digital revolution. Will our children have physical building blocks and miniture AI GI Joe that they can guide with their hands/eyes, or will it all be done on a display with an input device.

  44. I hope to see a slashback in a week or two.... by mattkime · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to find out if he actually gets a date out of this!

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  45. here we go again... by fishexe · · Score: 2

    Now we get to start another debate over the proper way to say "LEGOs".

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  46. Looking at the model with a magnifying glass... by jamesjw · · Score: 4, Funny


    The small print "Model not capable of warp drive travel"

    But one things for sure, it'd probably survive a dense popcorn armada..

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  47. Good story, but... by fishexe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    you left out the part about Natalie Portman Hot Grits.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  48. Reality check by Keebler71 · · Score: 2
    You loser! Let me bring you back to reality...

    U.S.S. Enterprise

    Shuttle

    Mid-sized

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    1. Re:Reality check by daeley · · Score: 2

      Harrumph. Your reality check left out all the pre-20th Century Enterprises. :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Reality check by kscguru · · Score: 2
      According to Star Trek timelines, the U.S.S. Enterprise (aircraft carrier) was destroyed by a nuclear bomb during the Eugenics wars in 1996. (Notable because it DIDN'T happen :). Bonus points if you remember the name of the "nuclear wessel" in ST:IV (hint: don't think too hard!).

      And there was a space station called "Enterprise" somewhere between the space shuttle and the NX-1. I think it's one of the pictures in somebody's ready room, can't remember which. Yeah, there's a list of this somewhere... maybe the techical manual?

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    3. Re:Reality check by isorox · · Score: 2

      Bonus points if you remember the name of the "nuclear wessel" in ST:IV (hint: don't think too hard!).

      The USS Ranger? The enterprise wasn't available at the time of filming

      What timelines mention a nuke on the enterprise in '96? Fanfic ones, pah, they arent real

    4. Re:Reality check by isorox · · Score: 2

      And there was a space station called "Enterprise" somewhere between the space shuttle and the NX-1

      You may be thinking of the ship seen on the recdeck in TMP - looks a little like a surak class vulcan ship

    5. Re:Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      According to Star Trek timelines, the U.S.S. Enterprise (aircraft carrier) was destroyed by a nuclear bomb during the Eugenics wars in 1996. (Notable because it DIDN'T happen :).

      Oh yeah, if it didn't happen then why are you so eager to deny it? Sounds like a cover up to me...

  49. The answer is obvious by jesterzog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it acceptable to glue Lego bricks alongside one another to achieve the desired effect?

    Most lego doesn't have to stand up to the destructive forces created by extreme acceleration of a disproportionate and brittle design. Just think of this as the lego version of a conveniently available structural integrity field that redefines previously understood boundaries.

  50. curious by swyterw · · Score: 1

    I wonder if fark.com has revieved more hits because slashdot linked to a site that mentions it...

  51. Lugnet link was good but... by dbuttric · · Score: 1

    the link to bricklink was better.

    Though, they should call it brickBay...

    Who would have though that a cooperative community of storefronts selling lego bricks and sets would be a thing - but that site is huge... I went looking for light gray parts in the USA, and I got 10 pages worth...

    I have a friend who finds old lego sets, builds them and hocks them on eBay, he says he actually makeds some money doing it.

    This siet is as bad as the guy who writes C code to generate the 1x1x1 lego brick designs for mathematical curves...

    How do you pronounce lego anyway? I'm not a smart enough dork to know...

  52. Umm... by dr00g911 · · Score: 1

    That is about the most irony my brain can take after a few Bass this evening.

    At least the guy's cool with the fact that some even bigger dork has decided that it's too tall, and he can live with that.

    On a side note, I know the bigger dork is right (for the record, as we're comparing dorkiness).

    And I'm okay with that!

    --dr00gy

  53. oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know what an enterprise d was so clicked on the link anyway..
    image my horror when I saw it was fucking star trek!

    i feel dirty.

  54. Re:A testament to civilization by mors · · Score: 1

    Prehistoric cave paintings are generally believed to have been done to ensure success in the hunt. So making cave paintings was not a waste of time (from the artists perspective). It may not have worked, but it was part of an attempt at collecting food.

  55. yes..but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    jeez. a lego spaceship. Wonderful.

    things like this make me question the expense of my cable modem. There's nothing wrong with lego spaceships, I just don't need a high speed connection to look at them. After nearly a decade of the internet, wow has-it-been-that-long, I'm starting to see the internet as a vast collection of lego spaceships... ...kind of interesting but after awhile they all start looking the same. People talk about the same things, over and over again. Just in different places. Only the style varies. Different sites and people, same stuff, over and over again, like an icepick to the forehead. And the volumonous bland piles of chaff are occasionally dotted with the strikingly unique and interesting. Kind of like finding hundred dollar bills at the beach.

    I'm not saying the internet has no use. It just doesn't do 50 dollars worth for me anymore. Really, no offense to those who find lego spaceships intensely interesting. It had good allegorical presense.

  56. Re:A testament to civilization by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
    And if we hadn't Slashdotted his site to the far side of the Delta quadrant, he'd make a fortune selling ad banner space. Ergo, lego Enterprises are not a waste of time, it's a good way of providing food on the table. Provided that your warp core can handle a Slashdotting, of course.

    BTW, our Uncle Willie should be able to add another geek notch on his phaser rifle butt now - Slashdot submitter/writer/actor that he is. ;-)

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  57. Re:A testament to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australian Aboriginals painted caves to pass on information - what could be hunted in the area, dangers of the area - information to ensure survival of others. It's not art for arts sake. It's not playing with kids toys for playing with kids toys sake.

  58. Can he bump up the resolution? by Soporific · · Score: 1

    It looks pixellated to me, maybe he could dither the legos? ~S

  59. With some authority... by samrolken · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those of us who aren't following along, the submitter of this story was Wil Wheaton, yes, Wesley Crusher himself...

    see http://www.wilwheaton.net/ for details.

    See if you can find him amongst the trolls and flames.

    --
    Sam Kennedy

    --
    samrolken
  60. Brainstorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day, bored, I asked myself: "If every floor of the Enterprise were one Lego-plate high, how big would that model get?"

    I have spent many rainy days thinking about this very issue....

  61. Exists by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Google for "earthquakes and slashdot effect".

    1. Re:Exists by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      Here to save you looking for yourselves. I like the part where the paper about the /. effect gets /.ed it's self.

  62. Re:wheaton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you ought to go re-read wil's page there, slick. Or perhaps even move your mouse over the poster's nick up there, see who CleverNickName is.

    you are officially classified as a delta sierra, sir.

  63. Re:Unfair moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    not far removed from a dog licking his own nuts.

    And you know that sensation how, exactly?

  64. *If we could build a large wooden badger...* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of Legos!

  65. Perfect? by goldfndr · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's actually impossible to make a "perfect" cube out of anything.

    When modeling or building, there's an accepted 5 to 6 ratio on stud vs height. See my dimensions guide. So a 6 studs by 6 studs by 5 bricks (or 4 bricks, 2 plates, one tile) should do the trick (within accepted Lego tolerances).

    You might get a slightly different ratio if you use calipers, but wouldn't that apply to any discrete building material? Think "tolerances".

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    1. Re:Perfect? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      It's actually impossible to make a "perfect" cube out of anything.

      Really. I've made perfect cubes out of clay, glass, metal, plastecine, carved soapstone, uhh....

      the list goes on. What are you saying?

    2. Re:Perfect? by zaxus · · Score: 1

      He's saying you're not using an accurate enough measuring device.

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
  66. Hey, his logo (and site) are called 'Happy Waffle' by mtec · · Score: 2

    so his next obvious project will be to

    LEGO his Eggo...

    sorry.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  67. Hey! Right now Fark.com has pictures of girls... by mtec · · Score: 4, Funny

    with big boobs on the home page!

    All we got is Bill Gates in Borg drag....

    *I feel so small*

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  68. Kirk and Picard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucksl4shd0t said: Kirk could kick Picard's ass on any planet. Just thought I'd mention that.

    Yeah, indeed. But that's ALL he could do...
    . ;-)

    Loa

    1. Re:Kirk and Picard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he could nail more sexy green alien babes, too.

  69. ALERT by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    A self-proclaimed "dork" has built one of the best..

    ALERT TO: self-proclaimed "dork"
    FROM: The Ghost of Jon Postel

    MSG BODY:Your dorkness has gone well past the levels allowed by all RFC standards. You are now in the "nerd" category, please refer to yourself with this label from now on.

    Thank you,
    postel, watching you from afar..

    (NB: no disrespectintended in the least)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  70. /.'d yet? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    His site's hosted on .Mac. I wonder how it's holding up? I didn't notice any slowdown at 8:45am. Wonder what it would take to knock out .Mac (not malicously, just overload with geeks jazzing on Star Trek and Legos)?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  71. Re:A testament to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail the Lego god?

  72. Re:NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2

    Those dimensions are a little off. The actual dimensions are listed on Page 20 of the Technical Manual. It is 61110 cm long, 55974 cm in diameter (saucer section only), and 11707 cm from the top of the saucer to the furthermost rear of the primary hull. (I can't find dimensions for the parts lower than that...) 61110 cm is almost 2005 feet in length, not 2103 feet. (but now I'm quibbling.)

  73. Re:Yeah maybe in this universe by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    But the episode Parrells show the possiblities are endless so indeed in probably a billion gagillon trillian quadillian universes the Enterprise D still exsists, and if it was really true I'd be living on it in some universe.

  74. Re:Yeah maybe in this universe by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    Well said fellow star traveler, and with intriguing spelling. ;-)

    I am sane ... I'm as certain the Enterprise D exists as I am that Osama is currently snoozing in the Lincoln bedroom. Do they have room service?

    Note to other than the analog kid: If anyone else complains I made one stupid typo last night I'm gonna stick a phaser up their ... ah, nose. I was making typos before you could walk.

  75. Enterprise made from Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow. This is so much cooler than girls.

  76. Mac User by a5cii · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I think this is a mac user, quite easily confused with a "DORK", note the page address "http://homepages.MAC.COM"

    IMHO it must have been while his mac was down LOL

    And for all you mac using scivvy boys n girls i have never had more than 10 minutes uptime on a mac, yet i have windows 2k on 25 days before it crashed and Windows XP on 37 Days (Proof) before an accidental restart.

    I would probably get a mac aswell if it were A:Cheaper and B:More Stable

    FOR all you Americans, heres a question - I hate your government, does that make me a TERRORIST?

    1. Re:Mac User by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      And for all you mac using scivvy boys n girls i have never had more than 10 minutes uptime on a mac, yet i have windows 2k on 25 days before it crashed and Windows XP on 37 Days (Proof) before an accidental restart.

      It's a poor carpenter who blames his tools. When properly set up, Macs are quite stable-- like my home automation server, up for 119 days now and still going strong. The uptime would be even greater, except I shut my systems down and unplug them when particularly strong thunderstorms roll through my area-- and one did just that 119 days ago.

      My Win2k box at work is NEVER shut down, and never crashes. It would have pretty spectacular uptime were it not for the restart required after installation of the security patch du jour. My XP Pro box at home likewise never crashes, but there's no uptime records to be had there because I shut it down at night-- it's about 5 feet from my head when I'm in bed, and the fans required to keep the beast cool are so damned noisy they'd keep me awake.

      ~Philly

  77. Mindstorms are OK by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When you create a working prototype of something it may be the first set in an important evolution. But I can't understand how so many people seem to be intent on bulding models from legos. And I can't understand this fascination with Star Trek.


    I have a collection of science fiction that started with my dad in the 1940's and has been growing ever since. But that's Science Fiction, with capital SF, not sci-fi or space opera. It's the kind of stories that make you think "hey, that had never occurred to me, what if it happens that way?". On the other hand, the only thing that comes into anyone's mind when seeing Star Trek, or any other space opera, is "wow".

  78. So who's up for doing a Star Destroyer in Legos? by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

    That way we can battle it out and really see which is more powerful!

    (sorry, just couldn't resist, and all I could think about looking at all those grey legos was, wouldn't it be cool to do a Star Wars Star Destroyer with them?)

  79. And, one more time.... by psyconaut · · Score: 2

    The plural is Lego. NOT Legos, Lego's, LEGOS...

    -psy

  80. It's been done by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    LEGO themselves sell a Star Destroyer set. It's got over 3000 pieces, is 3' long when completed, and costs damn near $300.

    ~Philly

  81. Not a true ST dork... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this is impressive, I doubt his Star Trek dork skills. Why, do you ask? One of his sub-titles calls it a "reflector dish" when it clearly is a "DEflector dish".

    That is all.

  82. A perfect cube is possible by Guppy · · Score: 1

    "It's actually impossible to make a perfect cube out of Lego. The ratios of lengths of the sides of the pieces are such that there is no integer multiples which are identical."

    There is way to make perfect cubes -- by using techniques other than just stacking square blocks. You can use angle pieces to produce a cube, or rods like the type you find in Technics sets. Might not look quite as pretty, though.

  83. Typo by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Yes I'm a geek too, and the photo page is mis-labeled, thats the primary deflector not the primary reflector :)

  84. Re:NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone really need to know the dimensions of a fictional starship, in a fictional universe..?

  85. Re:More Easy lego models... by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get the "Statue of Liberty" model, or the similarly sized Yoda. Then you're flush with light green parts.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  86. Re:A testament to civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Prehistoric cave paintings are generally believed to have been done to ensure success in the hunt.

    Interesting theory!

    Pure, unadulterated speculation... but interesting.

  87. Dude-- you're the man. by samuel4242 · · Score: 1

    Really. This is cool. I wish I had that many pieces. Maybe in the future when we can beam things from place to place, we'll be able to push a button and have a big enough pile of legos without paying a fortune for them.

  88. Re:NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

    ya know, instead of using dimensions, you could, uhm, eyeball it

  89. Fun Facts by glassware · · Score: 3, Funny
    Thank you, Wil, for mentioning the "House" phrase. Here is a history of this phrase as far as I am aware.

    1) In 1995, Blizzard released Warcraft II. The Goblin Zeppelin unit, when repeatedly clicked, had a set of silly phrases it would say. "I can see my house from here!" was born.

    2) For a long time, nothing.

    3) September, 2001. The series premiere of Star Trek: Enterprise, a few Klingons are invited to view a Holodeck for the first time. Presented with a recreation of the Klingon homeworld, one of them utters the phrase, "I can see my house from here!" in a guttural Klingon accent. Fans of the phrase are delighted.

    4) July, 2002. The incredible Mr. Krol takes over the voice of the Goblin Zeppelin for the new Warcraft III. Although the phrase "I can see my house from here!" is absent from the game, early reviews of "What what what?!?" are positive.

    5) November, 2002. Wil Wheaton uses the phrase in a Slashdot Posting, although we do not have an audio file of him saying it. Fans of the phrase are delighted and hopeful.

    1. Re:Fun Facts by matt-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A long time prior to 1995, someone came up with a joke about Jesus being nailed to the cross. Jesus calls one of the disciples over to him (which one depends on who is telling the joke) and eventually gets around to saying "I can see your house from here!"

  90. I don't know what's scarier ... by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... the fact that this guy spent all this time putting this model together from detailed designs or the fact that the first thought that entered my head when I saw it was "Hey, I think I have enough LEGO pieces in the right colors to build that"

    --
    Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  91. Re: Features list is short by jmb-d · · Score: 1

    Translation: I'm a clutz, what do you expect from a dork anyhow? ;-)

    That's klutz.

    HTH.

    --
    In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
    -- Yun-Men
  92. "Civilization" by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Actually, I'd bet that "most" (i.e. >half) of the people on this planet are STILL mainly concerned with finding enough food on a daily basis to stay alive. 3 billion live on less than $2/day, and 3 billion without proper sanitation - that's about half.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  93. *disappointed* by Alari · · Score: 0

    ... It's not life-sized.... =(

    Alari

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
  94. Dear Wil by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would like formally to apply for the role of "low level drone" in the Cult of Wheaton. I struggled against it, but to no avail. You epitomise all that is great and good in geekness. Please, let me join your Army of Dorkness, that I may contribute in a small way to your elevation to Spod Emperor. What is thy bidding, my master?

    And the scary bit is... I'm not joking. Wil is one seriously self aware guy, and I'm prepared to do a bit of chanting and genuflecting in his cause.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  95. He was in that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding? Read his website. He still thinks that he's famous for "Stand By Me" (1986)!

    (Of course, if I had his filmography, I'd be playing up "Stand By Me" too. Deleted from the Last Starfighter? What were they thinking?)

  96. Re:NewsFlash: Lego Starship NOT exact scale!!! by ErikZ · · Score: 2


    in cm!

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  97. Lego - NOT "Legos" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plural of Lego is Lego, not "Legos". It's like sheep, there's no "sheeps". :o(

  98. Re: Features list is short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man, give me credit. It was late, and I remembered the "tz" at the end.

  99. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, here's some news, be sure to stop by my site and bid on some overpriced used goods with my signature on them!

  100. With some MONKEY GLASSES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I was famous. I would put all of my junk up on eBay and tell stories about it, and shed some fake tears while I sign it, talk to it, and then laugh as I cash the checks when they arrive.

    And the fans would still love me for it.

    If only I was famous.

  101. The Traveler by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

    Someone mentioned the Traveler in one of their replies and that made me think of a question.

    For the footage of STX that you shot and was then cut, how did they tie in the fact that Wesley was a Traveler to him showing up? Did they even mention it or just let things slide by with Wes suddenly being there.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  102. Impressive, but not complete! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the little LEGO Wesley Crusher hanging by a LEGO thread out of an airlock?

  103. Of Frustrated Moderators... by BasharTeg · · Score: 2

    Here I sit with 5 moderator points, but alas your post already has a score of 5. Would that I could moderate you up further, but I cannot. So instead, I post to this thread to salute you by forfeiting my ability to moderate any other posts.

  104. Re:In Soviet Russia... by BasharTeg · · Score: 2

    Hahahah. I love this guy. I know it seems like the Soviet Russia shit isn't funny anymore, but it is.

    Too bad we haven't heard much from the Tiger Penis Soup troll in several months. I wonder where his jawa hating ass is.

    BT

  105. Your mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4 bricks heigh = 3.8 cm. Makes 1.05 cm per brick

    I checked a few maths books and something less than 4 divided by 4 is unlikely to be greater than 1...

    ie: 3.8 / 4 = 0.95 (not 1.05)

  106. Re:Hey! Right now Fark.com has pictures of girls.. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Did anybody else find it funny that Wil Wheaton Submitted this story, or is it just me...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  107. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod #4786106 down too, then!