I am a fan of Mozilla, but Opera had both popup blocking (I think) and tabbed browsing first. Mozilla did innovate as well, though: best support for standards, XUL, etc.
Actually, the scientific method is not built upon logic. Induction is empirical. It deals with both induction and deduction, but ultimately it is empirical. Deduction should not trump induction. That is a common mistake of religions where deduction is encouraged fanatically so long as the premise is scriptural.
This is much better. The first one recommended that I recompile the kernel, and X with no optimizations, but I tried it anyway and it didn't work as expected, but this one seems to work okay (a few bugs, but no show stoppers) even with these optimizations in make.conf on -stable:
Sure, that's why the MPAA/RIAA will be sure to release DRM protected content which allows consumers to use the content in the ways in which they want to use it.
They tried that already. It is called "non-DRM technology". Your arguments clearly show that you understand that the technology is not the issue, but rather it is what they will do with it. Can we trust them? How much do you trust them when you are buying a CD for $15 to listen to one track?
The role of the goverment is to do the expensive, ground-breaking research. Commerce should be what makes things cheaper and commercially viable. The government needs to do the type of research that commerce will not.
It seems to me then, that economy means to be more efficient at the main function. Economy cars and flights cover the same distance for less, econo-lodges cover the same amount of people for less. So therefore, an economy ink cartridge covers the same amount of paper for less.
HP is supposed to make the product more economic by removing unneeded packaging, or even using cheaper ink, but not needed contents. When you remove the whole purpose of going economy, that is wrong. Economy doesn't mean "less of the product", it means "less of not the product".
I think that we wouldn't have such diffulty if the MIDI standard were more discrete. I would like to see a new draft that defines patches by aural primitives rather than by instrument. Look at how game developers deal with video. Games use visual primitives all the time, and it seems to have worked pretty well. If OpenGL were designed like MIDI, you would have to draw all of the monsters out of trees and rocks, and the weapons would never look the same.
MOD could be used as a decent default until the standard is adopted, kinda like Quake's software rendering. You could even texture aural primitives just like in video. I don't mean like soundfonts, but more like envelopes, reverb, and other meaningful effects.
Yeah, great music is more addictive than cool graphics, although it is much more difficult to produce. Why not use musical works that are already in the public domain? I am sure that I could make a lot of good loopable MIDIs extracted from Bach's "Art of Fugue". Of course, I would love to submit my own loopable MIDIs, but I have always felt that there is already so much stuff that is perfect for gaming. Baroque music is great because it doesn't require a strict instrumentation, and is therefore very "cross-platform". Portability is an art whether it is in computers or music.
If Lockheed published all the plans to their aircraft, and they were available to unfriendly nations, do you think the American government would purchase said aircraft?
If there were hundreds of U.S. aerospace engineers designing it for fun, from the ground-up, and they could patch it, firewall it, and work around it as easily as with software then I think they could probably get away with it. The analogy ends before your point.
Slashdot Mirror
I am a fan of Mozilla, but Opera had both popup blocking (I think) and tabbed browsing first. Mozilla did innovate as well, though: best support for standards, XUL, etc.
CVS Dillo renders slashdot fine now, due to some changes to the parser.
I was wondering that myself, actually.
Actually, the scientific method is not built upon logic. Induction is empirical. It deals with both induction and deduction, but ultimately it is empirical. Deduction should not trump induction. That is a common mistake of religions where deduction is encouraged fanatically so long as the premise is scriptural.
This is much better. The first one recommended that I recompile the kernel, and X with no optimizations, but I tried it anyway and it didn't work as expected, but this one seems to work okay (a few bugs, but no show stoppers) even with these optimizations in make.conf on -stable:
The install was pretty painless, too.
The console market is dominated by Sony, not Microsoft. Microsoft has monopoly in personal computers market.
But it is evidence that they are leveraging their monopoly.
P.S. Note also that monopoly itself can't be illegal. It is abuse of the monopoly which is illegal.
Exactly
Why is Semanticweb.org using tables for non-tabular data?
I have an identical twin, and I could have told you the outcome.
BTW, I never complain about duplicate articles.
I just bought one 5 days ago. :(
Plus: You have to compile it from CVS, which prevents idiots from using the network.
Apparently, it prevents more than just idiots.
Theo thinks that things can be secure only if he can understand them ?
Well, at least he isn't putting something in the kernel that he doesn't understand. :)
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=82840 +0+current/freebsd-security
Sure, that's why the MPAA/RIAA will be sure to release DRM protected content which allows consumers to use the content in the ways in which they want to use it.
They tried that already. It is called "non-DRM technology". Your arguments clearly show that you understand that the technology is not the issue, but rather it is what they will do with it. Can we trust them? How much do you trust them when you are buying a CD for $15 to listen to one track?
The problem, obviously, is that people do not expect the protection to be "reasonable".
I also compose music and software, but apparently for different reasons than you.
I haven't tried it, but there is a Blackbox for Windows. Although it is a clone, not a port.
The role of the goverment is to do the expensive, ground-breaking research. Commerce should be what makes things cheaper and commercially viable. The government needs to do the type of research that commerce will not.
Although he did say "roughly".
I am still working on the BSD license.
It seems to me then, that economy means to be more efficient at the main function. Economy cars and flights cover the same distance for less, econo-lodges cover the same amount of people for less. So therefore, an economy ink cartridge covers the same amount of paper for less.
HP is supposed to make the product more economic by removing unneeded packaging, or even using cheaper ink, but not needed contents. When you remove the whole purpose of going economy, that is wrong. Economy doesn't mean "less of the product", it means "less of not the product".
It has "jumbo" MPG.
I think that we wouldn't have such diffulty if the MIDI standard were more discrete. I would like to see a new draft that defines patches by aural primitives rather than by instrument. Look at how game developers deal with video. Games use visual primitives all the time, and it seems to have worked pretty well. If OpenGL were designed like MIDI, you would have to draw all of the monsters out of trees and rocks, and the weapons would never look the same.
MOD could be used as a decent default until the standard is adopted, kinda like Quake's software rendering. You could even texture aural primitives just like in video. I don't mean like soundfonts, but more like envelopes, reverb, and other meaningful effects.
Yeah, great music is more addictive than cool graphics, although it is much more difficult to produce. Why not use musical works that are already in the public domain? I am sure that I could make a lot of good loopable MIDIs extracted from Bach's "Art of Fugue". Of course, I would love to submit my own loopable MIDIs, but I have always felt that there is already so much stuff that is perfect for gaming. Baroque music is great because it doesn't require a strict instrumentation, and is therefore very "cross-platform". Portability is an art whether it is in computers or music.
I am definitely going to look more into this.
If there were hundreds of U.S. aerospace engineers designing it for fun, from the ground-up, and they could patch it, firewall it, and work around it as easily as with software then I think they could probably get away with it. The analogy ends before your point.
Yes but when will they have microchips than can control the flow of beer?
You don't need any particular chip, just the right protocol.