Slashdot Mirror


Gateway Forges Partnership With SuSE

Zardus writes "According to Forbes, Gateway has named SuSE a "strategic partner" and will be offering SuSE Linux on all of their servers. I always thought SuSE would be a nice name for a cow, but I guess I'll have to settle with it being the OS of a spotted server." The article notes: "SuSE has long sought a greater presence in the United States, where rival Red Hat has taken the lead in selling Linux server software to businesses."

250 comments

  1. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good news for Linux in general, good to hear this. Wonder if the "Windows Tax" will still apply like it did with IBM, tho?

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Servers don't usually have the windows tax... I take it you have never bought one. You can buy a server from major vendors pretty easily without any OS. Microsoft tax only applies to desktops.

    2. Re:Cool by Jetson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is good news for Linux in general, good to hear this. Wonder if the "Windows Tax" will still apply like it did with IBM, tho?

      GateWay Canada used to sell machines with RedHat preinstalled. As I recall, the price was almost identical to the price with Windows installed. They also absolutely refused to sell the machine without any OS (I prefer Debian and don't want to pay for RedHat, either). All of this suggests that they are paying a Windows tax and will pass it on to you regardless of what OS you want.

    3. Re:Cool by geekoid · · Score: 1

      bar in mind, the 'Windows Tax' is about 20 bucks for system builders. When I owned a computer company, I paid MS 10 bucks for win 95.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. Finally another Linux partner by Krondor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I for one have been waiting quite awhie to see a major vendor endorse another distro besides RedHat. Variety helps everyone, as does competition, and I don't see how a choice between linux distros hurts Linux or the vendor.

    Good Show

    1. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you, for one, welcome our new SuSE overlords? :)

      Keep in mind Gateway ain't doing so hot right now, so I wouldn't read too much into this move, or expect much out of it.

    2. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Isn't just that there are so many of them.

      The great thing about standards, and having "open" systems, is that everybody is on fair ground. Why does Red Hat and Suse outsell their competition? Is it because they have some "secret extra" that locks in their customers?

      Well, no (at least not for the most part). It's because of the other things they bring to support the standard, such as service, support, upgrades, developing to add to what has been done to make the "standard" easier to use.

      So if China wants to base their software on Linux, more power to them - as long as they obey the GPL. If they make an improvement to make it easier to use Chinese characters on the command line, great - release it to everybody else. If they make a processor that works like Intel and they want to make it public, have a good time.

      So I disagree with Mr. Barrett in principle that using regional standards is a "bad" thing - as long as those standards are published, realized by everybody, and don't have any hidden "gotchas".

      What China will have to remember is the great thing about standards - there are so many of them. They (and by this I mean China's oppressive communist government) might think of some great standards, like "electrocute religious dissodents if they touch a computer". Or "file encryption systems must have a government backdoor at any time".

      Because the rest of the world might not want to use that particular standard in their stuff. And if you have 75% of the world not using your standard, you either have to a) say you don't care (and make Mr. Barrett right), b) modify your standard, or c) join the rest of the world.

      And if it turns out they're just taking the intellectual property of others - including Linux and yes, Intel - and not returning it to the group, they'll find that people will not be as interested in playing in their sandbox.

      So have fun, China, and I hope to see some interesting new standards. I actually wish you luck if you decide you want to make your own processors and software, and if you truly want to make both open for all to use, have a good time.

    3. Re:Finally another Linux partner by The+One+KEA · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes! I welcome our new SuSE overlords!

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    4. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      now all that is needed is the ibm buyout of novell and all the pieces are there:

      • an operating system: suse
      • a well-known networking interface: novell
      • a hardware vendor: gateway
      • clout and cred: ibm

        it looks like a partnership is being built to offer the "whole enchilada" in the same way that sun does. if that's the case, then red hat's days are probably numbered.

    5. Re:Finally another Linux partner by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      I don't see how a choice between linux distros hurts Linux or the vendor

      SuSE is the least free of the major distributions. The licesne for YaST doesn't meet the three major definitions of "free software" (The FSF defition, the Debian definition, or the Open Source Initiative definition).

      If they don't want to use Redhat (which is free), I'd prefer they use Debian or Slackware or Gentoo or Madrake or some other fully free Linux.

      You might not think this is a big deal, but one of the big attractions for me of Linux over Windows is that freedom.

    6. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      The licesne for YaST doesn't meet the three major definitions of "free software"

      Err, *four* definitions. You would think that somebody so concerned about FSFreedom would know this.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Krondor · · Score: 1

      IBM is already partnered with Novell. At the Novell/IBM Linux Solutions seminar they talked quite a bit about how IBM is working with Novell to provide Linux solutions from the MDF (MCC if you prefer) to the Desktop.

      Granted right now it's a 50 million dollar partnership, but I expect that to grow. Both of these companies have quite a lot to gain by seeing Microsoft take on some real competition. IBM's Linux investment is quite substantial, and I don't think they would mind Novell's involvement. After all they mesh well together, Novell makes the software IBM makes the hardware.

      All in all I guess I'm saying dont' be surprised to see a lot of IBM Novell joint projects in the future.

    8. Re:Finally another Linux partner by pyros · · Score: 1

      slashdot covered HP's announcement of a cheap desktop with Madrake 9.1 pre-installed.

    9. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe you haven't heard, but IBM has been a hardware vendor for some time now. The might even have a better reputation than Gateway.

    10. Re:Finally another Linux partner by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So...

      Let me get this straight. Suse provides you with the code to their installer. Suse allows you to modify their installer as long as you don't resell it. And this is a problem.

      Holy crap, we would be lucky if everyone else did that. So they won't let you *resell their installer*. Big friggin deal. It's a great piece of work, works really well, and I've never had a major problem with SUSE. Since I can not say the same for Redhat, guess which one I use.

    11. Re:Finally another Linux partner by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Maybe you haven't heard, but IBM has been a hardware vendor for some time now. The might even have a better reputation than Gateway.

      There's not "might" about it, sonny.

    12. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Krondor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      .. I'd prefer they use Debian or Slackware or Gentoo or Mandrake or some other fully free Linux.

      Of course! Who wouldn't prefer that? However, you have to look at it from the Vendor support level. RedHat was always first on the support level because they did extensive testing and certified hardware as being functional in Linux. This takes a huge load off of vendors, such as Gateway, because they can check off their hardware against the list then guarantee their customers when they sell them a Linux box it will be compatible with Linux.

      The problem right now is that a lot of Vendors (excluding IBM) don't generally make their components. They buy a motherboard from MSI, a sound card from Creative, etc.. How are they to know if it is Linux compatible (and what degree of compatibility as some people's definitions seem different), without extensive product testing?

      Vendors such as SuSe, RedHat, and Debian (to an extent) do heavy testing and certification of Hardware. Face it SuSe and RedHat are "Enterprise Grade" in their testing processes. Gentoo will likely never be supported as it is constantly evolving to bleeding edge updates maintained by tons of packagers who generally aren't directly employeed by Gentoo.

      Debian is different in the size of its userbase, but Debian also does not have the resources for the kind of testing corportate Linux entities can muster. It will likely never have these facilities due to the community nature of the project, but instead relies on user testimony. Ex. "I use this it works". A vendor is going to need something a little more solid then testimony.

      Mandrake might have a shot if they could ever become profitable enough to put out some rigourous testing, though you could probably use RedHat's results fairly confidently with Mandrake (or any other Linux distro).

      Perhaps what is needed is a Hardware compatibility group that can test and verify hardware compatibility with various Linux distros, Kernel versions, etc..

      So to close, I still do not see how being able to choose between RedHat or Suse hurts Linux more then just being stuck with RedHat or nothing. You could argue that Vendors should just carry different Linux distros and not certify that they work, but I'm sure Gateway's legal team would feel queasy at that notion. Keep in mind companies are paranoid of brand association (Gateway sold this so they obviously endorse it).

    13. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Err, *four* definitions.

      ...and nice red uniforms... Ahem, amongst our five definitions are such diverse factors as...

    14. Re:Finally another Linux partner by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Gateway is pretty much exiting the consumer PPC market right now as evidenced by the electronics and flat screen tvs in their shops.

      I don't know what kind of a footpring they have in corporate/enterprise server market, but I just can't image a significant one.

    15. Re:Finally another Linux partner by weave · · Score: 1
      If they don't want to use Redhat (which is free)

      Redhat is no longer free, in beer or freedom. They get around the GPL through contractual law now. I'm not free to make copies of the software and install on other systems for starters. And you have to contractually obligate your company to allow Redhat to audit for unlicensed copies.

      Did you mean Fedora in above?

    16. Re:Finally another Linux partner by lambsonic · · Score: 1
      Emphasis mine:
      The licesne for YaST doesn't meet the three major definitions of "free software"
      Err, *four* definitions. You would think that somebody so concerned about FSFreedom would know this.
      Apparently one of them is minor.
      --
      # make clean sig
    17. Re:Finally another Linux partner by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Mandrake wasn't preinstalled on it due to possible legal issues. They simply threw a Mandrake 9.1 install CD set in the box with it, and left the hard drive blank.

    18. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gateway has never produced anything PPC based. Their machines are strictly i386.

    19. Re:Finally another Linux partner by pyros · · Score: 1

      interesting. I don't see any indication on the product page that that is the case. Can you point to any articles or reviews that talk about the legal issues? (Not asking as a challenge to back it up, just would like to know more).

    20. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      So which one is the "minor" definition?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    21. Re:Finally another Linux partner by lambsonic · · Score: 1

      I was wondering that myself, actually.

      --
      # make clean sig
    22. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the above apply only if you sign a support contract with Red Hat? Of course you can sign a contract with another company for any stupid conditions you want, but you could also get the software without restrictions and without support (which puts it in the same category as, say, Slackware). If Red Hat won't sell you support except under draconian rules, don't buy it from them.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    23. Re:Finally another Linux partner by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      So they won't let you *resell their installer*. Big friggin deal

      Yes, it is a big friggin deal, since it precludes making and distributing cheap SuSE ISOs, either separately, or as part of a larger package.

      The YaST license also is unclear about borrowing CDs. I don't see anything in the YaST license that allows installing from borrowed CDs.

      One of the big benefits of Linux at work is that it frees us of the hassles of license tracking. It sure looks like SuSE fails to do that.

    24. Re:Finally another Linux partner by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      You must not have read it that well. We read it here, and basically you're free to make as many copies and use them as you wish as long as you don't sell them.

    25. Re:Finally another Linux partner by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've used SuSE since about 6.1, and I've always thought that including non-GPL software was one of their strengths.

      SuSE used KDE long before the QT libs became free
      SuSE included several commercial packages, normaly a limited version of packages aimed at much larger instalations than home users so we could try-before-we-buy.

      YAST is the SuSE configuration/update program, and is proprietary it gives SuSE it's flavor, and actualy I don't like it, it's a bit slow and clunky for my tastes.

      The bigest thing wrong with it is it reads and write all of the config file each time it's started or stopped rather than just whats necessary. Not having Yast as GPL'ed software isn't a big loss for free software.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you clearly don't get his point.

    27. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Zemran · · Score: 1

      That is so well put that I have decided that I want to have your babies. It is nice to see an objective view here :)

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    28. Re:Finally another Linux partner by stevey · · Score: 1

      They are doing good, they have a certified platform for Oracle which is big in the enterprise/corporate world.

      My site is 50/50 Debian and SuSE - and I'm very glad I was able to resist the temptation to move to RedHat eclusively, as that would have meant having to spend lots of time upgrading from server to "advanced server edition" - and a hike in the prices.

    29. Re:Finally another Linux partner by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      You must not have read it that well. We read it here, and basically you're free to make as many copies and use them as you wish as long as you don't sell them

      Where do you find this clearly stated?

      • Section 1 of the YaST license basically says you can use it if you follow the licesne.

      • Section 2 covers modifications to YaST.

      • Section 3, first paragraph says no distribution for a charge without written consent.

      • Section 3, second paragraph, first part, covers licensing of modifications. Second part of that paragraph allows distribution by FTP or "mailboxes".

      • Section 4 is a disclaimer of warranty.

      • Section 5 says you don't have any rights other than those granted by this license.

      • Section 6 deals with patents or interface copyrights.

      I don't see anything in their that clearly says I can give a CD containing YaST-licensed software to a friend. The closest I see is that you might try to deduce that it is OK because otherwise there would have been no need to have the explicit restrictions on distribution for money.

      That is a very shakey argument, and not the kind of risk I'm going to take at work. As far as I can see, I need to track SuSE licensing just as meticulously as I need to track Microsoft and Apple licensing.

      No thanks. I'll use free Linux distributions, or *BSD, and avoid that hassle.

    30. Re:Finally another Linux partner by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't use XFree, ya know that isn't GPL'ed either.

    31. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a server? Why the fuck would you?

    32. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding.

      People don't realise how much good Redhat has done for linux. It provided a mechanism for it's growth into the corporate sector.

      ALL the improvements that Redhat makes in the support of hardware directly goes to other Distros like debian and Gentoo.

      In another 5 years or so once people figure out that Free Software means more then just cheap and reliable software people will begin to support and be more willing to give money to Open Source products. Like Mysql vs Oracle and stuff like that.

      Just one example:

      With Open Source you get the source along with the software. You can improve it and improvise it. You can hire poeple that have intimate knowledge of the software and develop stuff in-house. That is the ultimate in "support".

      Instead of paying 250 dollars a phone call to MS you have a expert already at work. It's just a "Hey Bob, come up and check out this bug. It's playing hell on this new python database front-end we've been working on for the boys in accounting. Jill says you've submitted a couple bug patches to blah blah blah and think you may be able to help us out quickly." (can you say "Bonus($)!")

    33. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Drakon · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link where I can download ISOs of RHEL (since RH 9 is no longer supported)? If it is in the same category as slackware, these should be easy to locate, IE through linuxiso.org...
      Thanks in advance

    34. Re:Finally another Linux partner by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      I hope you don't use XFree, ya know that isn't GPL'ed either

      So? XFree is under a free license. My objection to YaST is not that it isn't GPL'ed. It is that it is not under a free software license.

      Is your failure to address the question of where the YaST license even allows for sharing an admission that you can't find it, either?

    35. Re:Finally another Linux partner by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Honestly, dunno. I didn't look at the Yast license. I looked at the license that came on the root of my CD. I'm assuming you don't have a CD...

    36. Re:Finally another Linux partner by dylan_- · · Score: 1
      Where do you find this clearly stated?
      Part 3, where it says:
      All programmes derived from YaST, and all works derived thereof as a whole or parts thereof may only be disseminated with the amended sources and this licence in accordance with 2b).
      I know it says "may only" but it does say it may be done, as long as the conditions of 2b are followed.
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    37. Re:Finally another Linux partner by ameoba · · Score: 1
      Vendors such as SuSe, RedHat, and Debian (to an extent) do heavy testing and certification of Hardware. Face it SuSe and RedHat are "Enterprise Grade" in their testing processes. Gentoo will likely never be supported as it is constantly evolving to bleeding edge updates maintained by tons of packagers who generally aren't directly employeed by Gentoo.


      Here's a quote from an anonymous friend who's a Gentoo dev : "I probably should've tested this ebuild before I committed it to CVS..."
      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    38. Re:Finally another Linux partner by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't know where ISOs of RHEL are available for download. (That in itself wouldn't stop it being free - for example, the FSF does not provide ISO images of GNU software for download but they will be happy to sell you a physical CD for $5000.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  3. Good for Suse... by wankledot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Too bad that Gateway is just about the last vendor I would buy a server from. Maybe I'm just replying on some prejudices of mine, but does gateway make decent server hardware?

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:Good for Suse... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

      Dunno if they make good servers, but I bought 60 desktop boxes from them 3 years ago, and I'm still using them. I just put more memory in them and installed Win2k.

    2. Re:Good for Suse... by Quixotic137 · · Score: 1

      They were really trying to get into the server market a few years back. In fact, I seem to remember that they bought a supposedly well-respected rackmount case manufacturer, though I don't recall the name of that company and I didn't recognize it at the time. I don't think it has worked out too well for them so far. Really, none of their recent attempts to break in to new markets have worked out too well for them so far.

    3. Re:Good for Suse... by jchawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gateway bought ALR a while back. ALR made amazing multi-processor servers on x86 hardware. In fact they even had a 6-way pentium pro 200 server back in the day that was wicked-cool. :-)

    4. Re:Good for Suse... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "does Intel make decent server hardware?"

    5. Re:Good for Suse... by Bobulusman · · Score: 3, Informative

      My hometown is Sioux City, Iowa, manufacturing center for Gateway computers, so I might be a little biased, but...

      Them seem to be getting better. As I understand it, the story goes like this:

      A few years ago, Ted Waitt, founder of Gateway computers, retired. The board selected a new CEO, who proceeded to cut corners and the like until Gateway was known for crappy PCs. The board kicked him out and since Waitt's stock options were now in the toilet, he agreed to come back and fix the whole mess. Since then, Gateway seems to be improving.

      Hopefully, they can earn back a place of trust in consumer and corporate minds.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    6. Re:Good for Suse... by jsupreston · · Score: 2, Informative

      My shop (a gov't agency) is an all GW shop. I prefer Dell for my server, but the Gateways have been stable the two years I've been here. Only probs I've had were a drive failure in a raid 5 array and a tape drive transport mechanism jam DURING A CRITICAL RESTORE. Can't blame either of these problems on Gateway. So, to answer the question, seems to be decent hardware to me, except they make it too complicated to get the cover off of a tower server (keep telling the boss we need to go rack).

      --
      "It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear."- Norm (from Cheers)
    7. Re:Good for Suse... by whittrash · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend a Gateway either...we have an old server with NT on it. Why upgrade that box, put it in a closet, then throw it away! It runs OK, but wacky stuff always breaks, always has been a rough ride. I don't like Gateway products, my last 2 work PC's were Gateway...bad. Gateway was doomed the day they moved operations to San Diego from South Dakota. Also their commercials suck, and the cow is a horrible idea for a computer. Cows are stupid grass eaters with very little personality. I much prefer steak to an actual cow. You ever see a cow puke while it is chewing its cud? It is green and stinks like shit. They rechew that crap 4 times...disgusting. I don't like cows. They should have picked something fast and nimble, like a rabbit, gazelle or a cheetah. Or maybe something with fangs to protect your data like a leapard that eats cows. They had to pick a cow... Basically, they suck, and suck hard. Let me repeat that...they SUCK! SUCK!

      In the future computers should fix themselves.

    8. Re:Good for Suse... by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      that doesnt answer the question
      do they make good servers?

    9. Re:Good for Suse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I bought one of those when I worked for the US Government - an ALR Revolution 6x6. They had come up with a scheme to rotate four CPU IDs among six Pentium Pros. I remember that Government Computer News praised the price/performance point they'd hit with that hardware.

      Downside: It needed a new system board as soon as we got it, and the field support was a multilayered mess. Also, I had a tape drive supplied, but it never worked right. It was that experience where I began to see a crack in the wall of closed-source tied-in drivers and hardware.

      I wish I had one of those at the house.

    10. Re:Good for Suse... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Dell went for the opposite route and look where they are now?

      For x86 systems they are the most reliable ( desktops ) with ok entry level servers. They only use Asus motherboards for example. They refused the althon because of bugs in the early VIA chipsets. They were flammed by slashdot but they were right. The early boards were crap if you installed a geforce card. HP and IBM still own the high end servers of course but my parents gateway is a piece of crap!

      No offense to you, but I had replaced 3 video cards within 8 months of owning due to cheap ass fans failing! It kept making grinding noises. I finally gave up and put in my old Vodoo3 3dfx card and stuck it in myself. Problem solved.

      The included modem is CRAP! They sent my 2 of them and both had trouble... Oh I ordered the hardware modem too and not software. Turns out it had a software wort. I bought my parents a $120 external US Robotics modem and then the problem was solved.

      Would I buy a gateway? Hell no. Dell? Yes.

      I will still wait and see if they are more reliable.

    11. Re:Good for Suse... by Bluefire · · Score: 1

      You said: "They refused the althon because of bugs in the early VIA chipsets."

      Umm, dell is an "Intel exclusive" shop, they didn't refuse Athlon because of bugs, they refused (and continue to refuse) Athlons and Opterons because they're non-intel

      --
      My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right
    12. Re:Good for Suse... by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      The servers aren't that bad. I have used them for running small domains off of. I have used both 1u and 5u units and have never had a problem. Like I said though, these are small domains (approx. 500 - 1000 users) and the work load is very easy. 1 PDC a few BDC's, and a couple of exchange servers. If it does matter though...my company just went to Dell's recently.

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
    13. Re:Good for Suse... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I could tell you horror stories about Dell...

      Like the time I spent 4 hours on hold, telling them that the drivers they shipped with the machine (and still had on their webzit) were causing HDD corruption. I mean, when you get a system from somebody 'reliable' like Dell, you don't expect the box to have wonky drivers that eat the HDD...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    14. Re:Good for Suse... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Oh, thank outsourcing to India for that.

      India does all the tech support.

      They all do today.

  4. Gateway by Pingular · · Score: 2, Informative

    has been dying for a long time now, their hayday was '96, '97, they needed a partner like this to help them going. This is definetly a good business move on the part of Gateway.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Gateway by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      too true. they are in the process of totally revamping their product line and market position. they are sorta trying to be an online best buy, without the floor space overhead. but i personally won't buy electronics from anyplace i can't walk into, not because i'm into the local economy thing (though that helps), but invariably, we've all had somehting not work right, and it sure as hell helps to talk to a person, in person, withthe item in hand (or on cart). they can't compete at 3-4% share like apple can, because apple sells 1) a much higher margin product, and 2) apple's and "PC's" aren't really in direct competition. they are differentiated products.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    2. Re:Gateway by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 1

      Before you ping on Gateway for turning into Kmart, you should know that Dell has started selling plasma (ok, LCD) TVs

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    3. Re:Gateway by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      "without the floor space overhead. but i personally won't buy electronics from anyplace i can't walk into"

      Gateway has brick and mortar stores. I think they're called Gateway Country Stores. There is one here in Jacksonville, FL.

      --
      -- Jason
    4. Re:Gateway by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there are Gateway Country stores (interestingly, they're only in MAJOR commercial zones... the ones that have flattened 5 zillion acres of farmland each... there's one 30 minutes from me, though) So, Gateway DOES have floorspace in some areas. Apple also has stores, in case you didn't know.

    5. Re:Gateway by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I know this. But Dell is also successfully selling computers, and this is their core business. Gateway on the other hand is attempting to change their core business, due to their losing $417 million last year alone.

      Michael Dell is smarter than Ted Waitt and has better hair too.

    6. Re:Gateway by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      we had a gateway store near where i live (north of L.A.). it closed down. i understand that they are closing lots of stores. and yes, apple has stores. i bought my ibook there last month. but, they are opening stores, not closing them. AND, they are still selling apple computers, not plasma tv's.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    7. Re:Gateway by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Same seems to be here in Europe, (at least the Netherlands) I used to see gateway adds, now I see Dell, Hpaq mainly.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    8. Re:Gateway by geekoid · · Score: 1

      But at least they sent there tech support overseas, that will save the company.

      The only thing that can save Gateway, is to do something really innovative with the computers. Like up the quality.

      I would start selling Linux Boxes, and come out with a marketing campaign that slam MS. It's risky, but they need to take a big risk right now, or they'll be gon in a few years. Of course, I won't miss them one bit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Gateway by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I won't miss them either. Their slimey ex-CEO and COO are now under indictment too, for fraud. Personally, I don't think SuSe should align themselves with such a dishonest company.

    10. Re:Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proof. Pingular is the mutant child that sprang from Sir Haxalot's corpse.

  5. Huh? by rmohr02 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gateway sells servers?

    1. Re:Huh? by donnyspi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah they are trying to expand their business and get away from just selling desktops. You can get gateway printers, digital cameras, etc. I wonder how many of these products are really made by someone else with the name "Gateway" stamped on them.

    2. Re:Huh? by Geccoman · · Score: 1

      They even sell Gateway Plasma TVs

      My wife wants one =/

      --
      I'm on a chair.
    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean those ones that people buy thinking they are High def capable when they really aren't?

    4. Re:Huh? by Geccoman · · Score: 1

      BINGO! Craptacular, ain't it?

      --
      I'm on a chair.
    5. Re:Huh? by generic-man · · Score: 3, Informative

      All of them are. When you buy a laptop, you're usually buying a design from a Taiwanese ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) that Dell, Gateway, etc. decided to stamp their name on. ODMs design a lot of concepts; American companies round out the specs and provide sales and "support" for them. The co-branded printers, cameras, etc. all work on this model. Dell and Gateway have been introducing a lot of new products because PC margins are razor-thin and most families who have a PC are not very inclined to replace it.

      Incidentally, Gateway's plasma TV was so successful that more companies are jumping onto the bandwagon.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Huh? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      You mean those ones that people buy thinking they are High def capable when they really aren't?

      True, but they also think DVD's are High def. End result: their DVDs look fine and they don't notice. In fact, they're not likely to notice until the most mainstream programming is sent in HD. Perhaps not even then.

      --
      bp
    7. Re:Huh? by icewalker · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, they definitely sell servers. These are not the older servers you may have noticed a few years ago. These have been redesigned. I'm the proud owner of a Gateway 975. It will be a very good competitor to the Dell 2650. Not to mention it is cheaper and I have better I/O (like 4x) from hdparm on my 975 than a brand new Dell 2600! Both have hardware raid. Go figure!

      --
      The truth is usually just an excuse for lack of imagination.
    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gateway sells servers?
      Well they do now!
  6. Gateway Makes Servers? by supersmike · · Score: 1

    One thing's for sure - I've never seen a Gateway in a server room at any place I've worked. Dell, sure- but Gateway?

  7. Gateway + SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, SuSE-Moo.....
    Oh, SuSE-MOO !
    Oh, SuSE-Moo, baby I love you.
    SuSE-Moo.

    1. Re:Gateway + SuSE by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Buddy Holly would have been proud

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    2. Re:Gateway + SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And John Fogerty would be more proud, as the one who penned the tune!

    3. Re:Gateway + SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, thats Credence Clearwater Revival. Not Buddy Holly.

    4. Re:Gateway + SuSE by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Peggy Sue? Buddy.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    5. Re:Gateway + SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original post was referencing "Susie-Q" from CCR, not Holly's "Peggy Sue".

    6. Re:Gateway + SuSE by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Ah. That would explain that odd person talking about CCR, then.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  8. What about Novell? by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As Novell agreed to acquire Suse how will this affect that agreement? Doesn't this mean that Gateway will be offering Novell Suse Linux on their servers?

    1. Re:What about Novell? by pheared · · Score: 1

      No one said the brand would change.

    2. Re:What about Novell? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      It probably does. You don't hear very much about Gateway anymore in the mainstream; a deal like this will not only raise their profile and possibly bring them business again, but it's also an explicit endorsement of SuSE, within or without the context of Novell itself. Either way, all three companies have a good chance of winning.

      Is Gateway the first large computer manufacturer to license SuSE after Novell announced their acquisition?

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    3. Re:What about Novell? by deuce868 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, considering this annoucement came after the Novell one I am going to bet they know something about it.

      Anyone think that SuSE could be the next RH? I mean which would you buy from right now if you were going to choose? Personally I use Debian on the servers here, but if you needed something with support I really think I would choose SuSE over RH.

    4. Re:What about Novell? by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Not one bit :). This is exactly one thing that Novell/SUSE want to have happen.

    5. Re:What about Novell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      It will be Novell SuSe SCO/GNU/Linux of course. ;-)

    6. Re:What about Novell? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Definitely SuSE for the end user. It's a hell of a lot easier to install and configure than Redhat, and it's considerably better at detecting and properly configuring onboard hardware. SuSE is leaps and bounds ahead of Redhat when it comes to accommodating the average Joe; and while this may spur the "I'm a geek and proud of it" crowd to condemn them for that very reason, where a real IT professional is concerned this is a very good thing.

      When it comes to other things like server installs, it doesn't really matter which one you choose. Either will do just fine. I go with SuSE just to make things consistent (i.e., I'd rather not have to deal with two separate sorts of linux installs when there's no discernable difference between the two in this area).

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:What about Novell? by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The big IT-related companies decide who will be big or not, and SuSE is definitely in the running.

      Sun has partnerships with RH, SuSE, and Debian; but are currently offering their enterprise Java desktop on SuSE and RH. Most of the Geophysicial apps out there are moving (or at least expanding) from Sun to Linux, and the distro of choice there seems to be RH. On the other hand, SuSE has a much bigger market (and mind) share in Europe, and that should help them.

      All I know is that I'd rather run Debian or SuSE over RH any day.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    8. Re:What about Novell? by *Avant* · · Score: 1

      Anyone think that SuSE could be the next RH?
      You bet!!! :)

      --

      braindumps.info - well, braindumps in
    9. Re:What about Novell? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      All I know is that I'd rather run Debian or SuSE over RH any day.

      Well, obviously it's a matter of taste, as having tried all three in recent incarnations, I'd pick RedHat over SuSE any day... as long as they fixed SMP threading or I could use the 2.6 kernel.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  9. Gateway by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you that aren't familiar with the U.S. market, Gateway is practically dead in the computer space. Dell has taken over anything they once had. Gateway is now focusing on selling plasma televisions and home entertainment in a last bid to survive.

  10. Gateway actually sells servers? by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought gateway had been relegated to cheap PCs and consumer electronics. Had no idea they were even still in the server space, which begs the question. In this day and age - who is buying business servers from Gateway? If Gateway had ANY sense (and I've recommended this to Sun as well), they would sell personal home servers. Today's 'connected' home is full of a lot of devices that people want to share data and yet most people are heating their homes trying to use full PCs for the task. Gateway should at the very least look up the old Qube design and turn that into a home server design. Something small, relatively quiet, and light on power consumption that can stream video, audio, etc to all of the 'connected' devices that Gateway makes. But alas I'm sure they'll try to jump on the Linux bandwagon with everyone else, after-the-fact and sell servers to the few companies who would still buy a business server from Gateway (unless I'm just not seeing their servers when I visit companies or something).

    1. Re:Gateway actually sells servers? by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I have never seen their "servers" but I guess it must be bought by the same people who buy Dell "servers".
      I mean, take a look into fx. a IBM Intel server(not the lowend, the real stuff), if you haven't seen that(or possible HP), you have not seen a real server.

    2. Re:Gateway actually sells servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which begs the question.

      The term "begs the question" does NOT mean "demands the following question be asked". It actually means something like "avoids or circumvents the question".

    3. Re:Gateway actually sells servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you actually suggest Sun leaves the enterprize business to be in a doomed market like "Home servers". Sun will be the only true Unix vendor in a few years and when the US economy is in full up swing they will be a market leader.

    4. Re:Gateway actually sells servers? by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Nope, I suggested that the look at some of the segments in which they're losing ground with their RISC chips and put together something based on the Qube form-factor that can be used in the home. Retreating from the enterprise space would be stupid for Sun as they are still a player in it - whereas Gateway has not been and is unlikely to ever be, yet they do have a reasonably strong consumer brand.

  11. Gateway has serious business problems by zymano · · Score: 4, Informative

    While Dell is making the big bucks Gateway has been laying off people. This is why they are interested in expanding into electronic products like Flatpanel displays(gateway displays are inexpensive but not hdtv) and into cameras and mp3 players. This company is in serious decline. Although their laptops get good props from Cnet and pcworld. Getting into servers only makes sense since they HAVE to diversify.

  12. Awesome! by JThundley · · Score: 1

    Wooohoooo! I'm happy to see Linux taking a stronger foothold. It's too bad that they aren't putting Linux on desktops though.
    If Linux is preloaded on a computer, people might actually prefer it to Windows. Asians do.

  13. promotional offer by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy a Gateway server, and get your choice of:

    1) Epson America Stylus(R) color Inkjet

    OR

    2) Gateway Brand 1.2 megapixel digital camera

    *Plus*

    Free UPS ground

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:promotional offer by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Funny
      Free UPS ground

      My UPS has a three-prong plug already. Why would I need a free ground?

    2. Re:promotional offer by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      I think it should have read "floating ground" anyway, which I don't recommend.

  14. Too bad their website says by donnyspi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Gateway recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP" right at the top of the screen.

    1. Re:Too bad their website says by questionlp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Almost all OEM vendors that get some kickback from Microsoft has that snippet on their site. HP/Compaq, Dell, Gateway, etc.

    2. Re:Too bad their website says by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, for their desktops.

      I don't know many people recommending XP for servers.

      The SuSE deal is for servers.

      --
      -- Jason
    3. Re:Too bad their website says by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder if those execs at SuSE know how to read.

    4. Re:Too bad their website says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can. They also know that no one's running XP on servers.

  15. How's about pointing us to Reuters Instead? by !Squalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since the original came from Reuters anyway, why no link to Reuters instead of For-bees, eh?

    Follow the source to its destination.

    --
    All Ad hominem replies happily ignored as the sender shall be deemed to lack the faculties to comprehend the equation.
    1. Re:How's about pointing us to Reuters Instead? by Damek · · Score: 1

      But Neo's connected to the Source, and I'd prefer to avoid him, thanks.

    2. Re:How's about pointing us to Reuters Instead? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      What, you mean Yahoo! News doesn't have a team of international correspondents that write all those wire stories?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  16. Re:Linux needs this like Tux needs aftershave by pheared · · Score: 1

    You don't even need to RTFA on this one to see that they are offering SuSE on all of their servers.

  17. Dude: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell did you type all that in 6 minutes? Your words/min would be over 90. If you took 3 minutes to read the story, you'd have to being doing over 180.

    1. Re:Dude: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=86166&cid=7495 173

      Basically says he subscribes on another account, so he saw it 15 minutes early, wrote the troll, then posted it when it hit the front page.

  18. Gateway Servers... by j0keralpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are among the most atrocius pieces of hardware I have ever encountered. Frequent hardware failures, performance issues that stagger the mind... I stay away from them at all costs. Oh incidentally, their enterprise support sucks as well. You would do better to get your hardware from the mom and pop store down the street, let alone Dell, HP/CPQ, or IBM.

    1. Re:Gateway Servers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyotas are the biggest pile of crap cars that ever existed! Frequent break downs, being stranded on the side of the road, not to mention performance issues... I stay away from them at all cost. You would do better to get your car from the mom and pop store down the street, let alone Ford, Chevy, Nissan, or Honda.

    2. Re:Gateway Servers... by Kyrthira · · Score: 1

      The computer I got from a friend is actually a server configuration-- dual processors, etc. It's worked fairly well so far. Then again, I'm only just now installing Linux, so I'll really be able to tell how everything runs.

      --
      ~Kyrthira Phelan~
    3. Re:Gateway Servers... by quasimodal · · Score: 1

      I dunno what planet you're on, but D(a company from H)ell hardware quality just sucks lately. And the f----- company doesn't back their warranty either. I just fionished a contract where a Dell with a 2.6 GHz puntium and 512mb of memory ran slower than a Compaq with a 1.7 GHz and 256 mb of memory. F----- Dell kept telling them to try different things on the machine and refused to come out to look at it.

      --
      Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! == http://www.cauce.org/
  19. 64 bit? by boristdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does Gateway square it's no AMD policy with SuSe's 64-bit x86 Linux versions? Will Gateway once again be forced to supply a decent processor?

    1. Re:64 bit? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Gee, maybe Gateway will only sell the 32-bit version of SuSE. Duh.

  20. Are you channeling a troll, sir? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    None of the things you mentioned are going to be problems for John Q. Everyman for the following reasons:

    1. Gateway is installing SuSE Linux on servers, not desktops and laptops.

    2. Unless Grandma runs her own big-iron Web server or Folding@Home project, she'll never see SuSE Linux on a Gateway PC (at least not yet).

    3. Linux IS fantastic for geeks. And it's fantastic for John Q. Everyman as well. Distros like Mandrake 9.2 make it easy for Linux newbies to get into the market; a Linux newbie does not start with Gentoo!

    4. You don't need to recompile the kernel to watch DivX movies. You just need a new version of mplayer.

    All in all, sir, this is a very articulate, well-written, yet very trollish post.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      You don't need to recompile the kernel to watch DivX movies. You just need a new version of mplayer.

      Dude, Have you ever tried getting help from mplayer authors ? All you get is RTFA, even if you have read TFA and not able to find what you want. The help , faq, codec infos all are so apthetically written, they would fail both the english class and technical writing class too.

      Don't get me wrong , mplayer is one true amazing product, but compiling it, installing it with win32 dlls, realplayer dlls, quicktime support is a royal PITA.

      As compared to that recompiling the kernel is much much easier, all one needs is a basic understanding of PC architecture, and read all the help about each option. I know it can be very timeconsuming to read all that help, but afeter you have read it and follow the instructions step-by-step , you can't go too wrong.

      I don't mean to troll, but I am speaking from personal experience.

      As to grandma question, i think recompiling kernel and installing mplayer both are out of question.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Easy answer... don't install MPLayer.

      Take the 5 minutes to go out and install apt/synaptic. Point it at a repository (I use SUSE, your milage may vary). Install xine. It plays anything MPlayer plays.

    3. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      apt-get install mplayer. (or, if you're so inclined, yum install mplayer or urpmi mplayer). Betcha I can do it faster than Windows user can even get the Windows Update site to load!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a while, but don't you just throw all the codecs into a folder, add some skins and fonts to your user dir, and compile it with gui support? Granted, it's not the easist in the world, but it's not the worst either.

    5. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. considering that most solutions for windows to view divx are properiaty anyways.. loading up the windows update wouldn't help zilch and the best option would go and install ffdshow codec(which, tsuppaduppaduu, is descendant from linux, sort of.).

      -
      free software is so nice that it even helps your windows experience.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Are you channeling a troll, sir? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Don't get me wrong , mplayer is one true amazing product, but compiling it, installing it with win32 dlls, realplayer dlls, quicktime support is a royal PITA.

      Ignoring the people who are saying to use apt-get (since SuSE uses apt-rpm, and that as a secondary system), just download the SuSE RPM and install it... there are several sites that have SuSE RPMs for the latest releases.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  21. Gateway? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Interesting
    this is interesting. Gateway has seen flat sales and quarterly losses recently. They've fired most of their workforce and have their PC building outsourced. They've recently bet the farm on flat-screen TVs.


    VA Linux wasn't able to make a profit selling linux servers... I don't know why Gateway would. I think of Gateway as a PC for a first-time buyer, inexpensive, but higher quality than an HP, Compaq, or eMachines.


    I think there's more to this story than is currently being revealed.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:Gateway? by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly cheap PC's. Gateway used to be fairly widely used in the business market until their quality went downhill and tech support was outsourced to god knows where. We used to have our pc's (100+ a year) from gateway until 2 years ago when we switched to a company more focused on business clients that didn't force you to jump through the hoops that gateway does.

      Which begs the question of who the hell is going to buy these servers? I didn't even know gateway made any to be honest; I can't imagine buying any corporate type computer from gateway especially a server.

    2. Re:Gateway? by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      They've recently bet the farm on flat-screen TVs.
      I get it! Hahahahaha! If this was intentional then (mod +1 Funny).

  22. Re:Linux needs this like Tux needs aftershave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's not pre-written by much. My other account subscribes, so I saw it 15 minutes early and it took me about 5 minutes to write.

    -Fux da P

  23. And up jump the price! by JawFunk · · Score: 1
    "In other news today, SuSe's distribution of the increasingly popular Linux operating system is now selling at an all-time high of $80, how about that for free..."

    --
    [Please sign here]
    1. Re:And up jump the price! by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      Why did you pay for it? Just do an FTP install and you got free! :-)

    2. Re:And up jump the price! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If you want 8.2. 9.0 is the current version (I plan to invoke my right to a student discount - $50)

    3. Re:And up jump the price! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      $50 after discount, not $50 discount...

    4. Re:And up jump the price! by octalman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope. The price is the same it has been for a couple of years: $40. The $80 price is for the "Pro" version, which is double the price when there was no Pro version. Maybe more than double -- seems like SuSE Linux was $30 in 1999, and they even had some rebates for a couple of years.

      I couldn't get Red Hat 5 to run on my box in 1999 because it had an SiS video card. SuSE 6.2 had a patched version of X Window System that worked for me. Though I missed some great features in Red Hat, I've been very pleased with the increasing maturity of SuSE Linux.

      SuSE's download server appears to be throttled for free access users. Sometimes I can't even get a full YaST update, and it is sloooow too. I'm still living in 56K land, but the server only allows about a third of that, and it gets slower as the connection ages. SuSE offers better service for a fee -- something around $5 a month, I think, for a basic upgrade, more for business folks who need more and better.

    5. Re:And up jump the price! by rsax · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "In other news today, SuSe's distribution of the increasingly popular Linux operating system is now selling at an all-time high of $80, how about that for free..."

      This isn't today's news. SuSE 9.0 Professional was being sold for $79.95 when it got released so I don't know if you actually meant to try to tie this into today's SuSE/Gateway news or if it was a mistake on your part but again, no controversy here. And the other thing is if you're so concerned about the price why don't you buy the personal version for $39.95? The Professional box comes with 5 CDs, 1 DVD and 2 printed manuals with 90 days installation support. The personal just includes the CDs. If you don't want to do that either then do a FTP install. No one said that a Linux vendor has to ship you CDs for free. If you don't like the price then don't buy it, the OS is still free.

      I don't know about anyone else here but I would prefer is SuSE kept charging for the Personal and Professional versions. Atleast that gives them the chance to make *some* money of the "free" versions rather than ditch it all together and re-brand it a la Fedora.

    6. Re:And up jump the price! by JawFunk · · Score: 1
      My comment was an attempt to suggest that as a result of SuSE's corporate partnerships their distro may become a strictly commercial product. Considering many users that switch to Linux may be brand-conscientious and hope for SuSE to be more reliable (customer service and all), knowing the Gateway name and Novell (for businesses). When this kind of merger takes place, the question must be asked: What is the long-term goal here?

      --
      [Please sign here]
    7. Re:And up jump the price! by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I couldn't get Red Hat 5 to run on my box in 1999 because it had an SiS video card. SuSE 6.2 had a patched version of X Window System that worked for me.

      Exactly the same for me, and the load of stuff on the CD's I only had a 14k4 back then... (I know there was 33k6 and maybe 56Flex, but I had to rely on people giving me their old stuff..)

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    8. Re:And up jump the price! by Carl_LaFong · · Score: 1
      SuSE's download server appears to be throttled for free access users. Sometimes I can't even get a full YaST update, and it is sloooow too.

      When last I was running SuSE (8.2) I found I got a lot better response by using fou4s (Fast Online Update for SuSE) from fou4s.gaugusch.at, and North American content mirrors.

      Maybe I was overlooking something, but I could never keep YaST Online Update from refreshing its list of mirror sites to the ones in Germany.

      --
      Caution: Do not look into laser beam with remaining eye.
    9. Re:And up jump the price! by CMECC · · Score: 1

      I downloaded the SuSE 8.2 and 9.0 demo iso's just a couple nights ago from a North American SuSE mirror located about 60 miles from me. It was the highest average download rate I've ever seen on my cable modem -- over 3 MBps average for each 650 MB download!

  24. SuSE disappointment by morelife · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Man. What are they doing??? Gateway hasn't any server market, or products to speak of, and their other offerings are only consumer grade crap (albeit decently priced consumer grade crap).

    This is the last company SuSE should have aligned themselves with if their intent was to win any corporate clients.

    1. Re:SuSE disappointment by StarTux · · Score: 1

      SUSE align themselves with just more than Gateway :). Don't like Gateway, but want a SUSE based server (man, why not desktop other than from Wal-mart?) then get an IBM perhaps. See where this is going :).

    2. Re:SuSE disappointment by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      You really think SUSE signed into an exclusive sweetheart deal with gateway? Software companies enter into bundling agreements with hardware companies all the time.

      MSFT and gateway work together, and last I checked, Windows was available from a few other manufacturers as well.

    3. Re:SuSE disappointment by morelife · · Score: 1

      ...last I checked, Windows was available from a few other manufacturers..

      Last I checked, running around making partnership agreements, non-exclusive or otherwise, with companies widely accepted as being strategically and financially in "trouble", is a bad thing for a good company to be doing.

      It just occurred to me that SuSE might just be trying to help Gateway sell some servers, perhaps they see a market niche they can fill somehow...

      But I doubt it -- SuSE should have stuck to their Enterprise level offerings, especially engineering and prof svcs, which are their strong points.

  25. Re:Linux needs this like Tux needs aftershave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nude Dax?! Where?!

  26. Too good to be true... by Vario · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Gateway was long know as the company completely focused on the mainstream with Windows/Intel, so these are very cool news for SuSE.

    Everywhere on the Gateway pages there is still written:"Gateway recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP", but maybe things change a bit. Unfortunately if you have a look at the category "Operating Systems" on their website you can still only choose between

    XP Home Upgrade

    XP Professional Upgrade

    XP Home
    and my favorite OS:

    Microsoft Plus! For Windows XP

    1. Re:Too good to be true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Gateway, not Q. Things move at the speed of business.

    2. Re:Too good to be true... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget how they bought Amiga and left it to rot.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  27. Used to work for Gateway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and I wouldn't get too excited. We've had LOTS of "strategic partnerships" that never did squat. A couple of big ones with AOL and Transmeta quickly come to mind.

  28. New target audience by JawFunk · · Score: 1

    Although most of us are used to Gateway as a home-consumer seller, I think the idea here is to get some l00t out of the many businesses that are embracing Linux for it's stability. Gateway hasn't been doing too well recently. falling stock

    --
    [Please sign here]
  29. In '96... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if they stopped selling them for a while or not, but... My first job (besides mowing lawns...) was as an assistant admin on a ~60 PC lan running 2 novell servers, the older one, a 486 was a Gateway. We had 400 days of uptime on that thing once, had to shut it down due to construction in the area...

    It is a real shame that gateway started selling crap after that... I could see the work getting shoddier and shoddier with each batch of new machines that arrived for a while... Some of them had to have their cases modded to accept a network card (the back wall of the bock was not perpendicular to the motherboard), returning defective components became a very frequent occurance... A couple of P266s got every part replaced except for the case and power suply over a 2 month period...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  30. Re:Linux needs this like Tux needs aftershave by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

    This is an absolutely no way off-topic. The mods are smoking the cheap $3 crack again. This post is highly insightful, and tastefully written, to boot.

    . . . and has nothing to do with the original news post.

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  31. This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While our competitors talk around the issue of freedom by discussing the "possible benefits" of "OpenSource techniques" and "Linux-based software", the hardware vendors should be shouting "Free Software" from the rooftops.

    With Free Software, the price restrictions drop, and computers become more useful. Hardware vendors don't have to worry if the OS will support their new video card etc. They can hack together their own support.

    So anyone can compete, and the software vendors don't hold any controlling cards. I can see why software companies don't get Free Software. They'd have to change their entrenched business models. But hardware companies should be shouting "Users should expect Free Software", and funding FSF, etc.

    some people just don't know a good thing when they see it.

    1. Re:This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by Halvard · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that's not how it works. There are lots of backend deals and payments. You pay one amount upfront and based on what you sell of a vendors OS (Microsoft) depending on your size, you get a backend payment. It's true with some other vendors and also with some hardware vendors. How do I know? We'll I previously headed up a smallish integrator and previously was the CTO/CIO of a US$40 Million per year PC distributor. At the distributor, I also set up a unit dealing just with corporations for those much larger margins.

    2. Re:This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by Enry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's already been tried. See the parent company of /.

    3. Re:This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can shout it all they want, but until the huge gap in usability, maintainability, and useful apps for most people (Joe User, not geeks!!!), it is wasted effort.

      Yeah, I know, just su as root, vi this text .conf file, kill -9 the process and restart it, right? Yeah, I know, the graphical config tools exist, and aren't complete crap, but Linux still has a long way to go - not to mention the fact that it is consistently much slower than Windows in a GUI.

    4. Re:This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly, but it seems that hardware manufacturers do not. Currently, most hardware manufacturers only support one operating system for their particular product. Presumably, this is because it costs money to hire software developers to write drivers. Since each operating system requires it's own driver for any given product, it follows that each operating system the manufacturer wants to support will require additional resources. Therefore, manufacturers will not commit to any operating system unless it feels that the cost of developing drivers for it is outweighed by the profits generated from it.

      My take is that by putting forth the effort now, hardware manufacturers can remove some of the barriers preventing wider adoption of competing operating systems, thereby increasing demand for hardware as competition in the operating systems market drives down the cost of software.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    5. Re:This confused me (hardware and Free Software) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      [devil's advocate]
      When I'm buying a computer, I don't want to be told that the vendor is giving me stuff he got for free. I want to be told that I'm getting expensive stuff at substantial markdown. If I wanted cut-rate stuff, I'd build the fscker myself.
      [/devil's advocate]

  32. Watch as the planets align.... by Rahga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There has got to be something significant with the timing of all of this... Novell gets SuSE and Ximian, Gateway starts offering SuSE... I really would not be surprised if there's something going on at Compaq/HP/Dell to turn the tables and apply serious pressure on Microsoft. Forget about pricing, I have a feeling that those guys would rather see a much larger disconnect between the OS and components like the Browser, Media Player, and *ESPECIALLY* MSN IM.

    1. Re:Watch as the planets align.... by Alexander · · Score: 1

      Nah, This is fluff from Novell and Gateway Biz Dev/PR.

      As iterated before there's nothing to Gateway's market share. This is an attempt to counter bad stock movement or continue good stock movement (haven't checked Novell or Gateway, and I'm way to lazy to do so now) with marketing fluffy bunnies ( a press release) by the parties involved. How many linux servers do you really think Gateway's going sell? How many would they have to sell for this to even make $100,000 in GROSS revenue for Novell?

      It's fluff, next we'll see Novell/SuSE announcements from Micron and Acer, and Winbook will start selling SuSE laptops.

      --
      "oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!" ..."uhhh yeah, he's the one that begins with
    2. Re:Watch as the planets align.... by heff · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking a little too far into this - gateway did this to be competitive with dell, who as you recall has been a long time partner with redhat.

      --

      --

      |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

  33. stock? by thinkninja · · Score: 1

    Slightly offtopic perhaps, but is SuSE publically traded? Symbol and exchange?

    --
    "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    1. Re:stock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, its NOVL :)

    2. Re:stock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSe is stronger than Gateway. But they are not strong on the US market.

    3. Re:stock? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      (way ot, but sig-replies are fair game)
      Geekcode is so 1996. e*

      Only because they didn't update it since then - some of the traits should be gone or changed. I mean, I suck on some of the traits simply because they were well before my time.

    4. Re:stock? by thinkninja · · Score: 1

      That's true. I used it on usenet but have always felt that it doesn't fit on a web forums.

      --
      "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    5. Re:stock? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If the web forum has a place for a bio, and you don't want to put HTTP 404 Not Found or crap like that there, it's a good place to put it (view my info for an example).

    6. Re:stock? by quasimodal · · Score: 1

      No, it wasn't, it was privately held. But, Novell's buying them, with the sale to be finalized early next year.

      --
      Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! == http://www.cauce.org/
  34. Too many cooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've seen of the desktop market, this could be a bad thing for linux midshare. I have extensive experience in delivering desktop solutions, for a major consultant, so I know what I'm talking about here, and one thing desktop users want, is security. And not in the h4x0r sense -
    they want to know what they're using, and that it's the same as everyone else's. The more different distributions there are, the more confusing it id for the end users, and the less cohesive linux's brand image becomes. We all know linux is better, but the end users don't care about that. We need to grow the dominant Linux brand (Red Hat), and encourage innovation at RH. Lots of small, competing linuxes is a waste of effort - divide and conquer anyone?

    1. Re:Too many cooks... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      Linux isn't "better". Better is a very subjective term. It depends on ones standards. For my desktop at home I want a OS that can play all of the latest games and can run all of the apps that I've spent good money on that don't yet have a good open source alternative. I've got auto updating antivirus software, a good firewall, I don't use Outlook or Outlook Express and I've got automatic updates turned on. My system is secure and it's stable. That means that for me, Windows XP is much, much better than Linux on my desktop. It's a completely differen't story when I'm at work. For servers, once they are setup I want them to "just work" without much tinkering. I don't want to always be worring about appying the latest security patches and I don't want to have to worry about viruses. I want as much uptime as possible. Linux is obviously better here. My corporate desktop is a slightly differnt matter. Security and realibilty are very important (so I can focus on work and not on patching my system or keeping up with the latest virus definitions) but appication compatibility is also an issue. We have some applicaitons that we run that work on Windows only and there isn't a good open source alternative. Linux is better on the systems that do not have to run these apps and Windows is better (with Software Update Services installed and a solid enterprise wide antivirus solution) on the systems that do. My family doesn't like to tinker with PC's and they want something that's simply, easy to use, "just works" and is hard to mess up. I bought a Mac. For them OS X is better. There is not one OS that is better than the others. Each has it place depending on the requirements of the system.

    2. Re:Too many cooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasonable opinion.

      The one thing that Linux is better at for desktop machines (like mine at home) is that it runs nice on old machines, thus stretching the time between having dumped your old obsolete machine and then having to dump the current machine due to its obsolesence. This is a big plus for me. Granted a lot of software only runs on windows, but this is not really a function of technology, rather the market. More users on Linux, means more incentive for 3rd party vendors to write linux-compatible programs or give patches to use VMware or WineX to run their program.

  35. ......Wow...... by moogla · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    You need help.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  36. I had two Gateway PCs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they were amongst the best I've ever worked with. Unfortunately, they stopped trading in the UK a while back, or I might have had more machines from them. Don't know if they've gone downhill in terms of qualtiy since then, but if they haven't this is surely a good partnership.

  37. Gateway Forges Partnership With SuSE by surprise_audit · · Score: 4, Funny
    The title says it all:
    Gateway Forges Partnership With SuSE
    It's a forgery, folks...

    OK, it's a poor attempt at humor, but then it is Monday morning...

  38. Whose mascot (or both)? by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you cross a chameleon with a cow, do you get cow that changes it spots when it senses danger?

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:Whose mascot (or both)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you cross a chameleon with a cow, do you get cow that changes it spots when it senses danger?

      No, you get a big lizard that you can milk.

  39. Nice but... by Orien · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can't say I'm not shocked.

    I enjoyed your post even though you should have RTFA, but I was left with one burning question:

    Are you shocked or not?

    1. Re:Nice but... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I can't say I'm not shocked."

      He's shocked.
      However

      "I can't say, I'm not shocked."

      he's not shocked.

      "I, Can't, say I'm not...shocked"

      He's William Shatner.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  40. Old News by icewalker · · Score: 0

    I've known for weeks but had one of those crazy NDA's preventing from talking. I tried to get the Gateway guys to go to Debian. I even have ISO's ready to go! Oh well. Maybe next vendor! :-)

    --
    The truth is usually just an excuse for lack of imagination.
    1. Re:Old News by bamstead · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. I suggested they roll there own with Progeny. Focus on there strength the small to medium business.

  41. Why? by BigBir3d · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gateway already offers RedHat.

    Gateway has less than 1% of the US server market.

    But there have been rumblings that Gateway wants to move up in the world. A partnership with IBM should be beneficial, and might explain the Linux movement.

  42. Strike up the band? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Speaking of music, am I the only one who thought that SuSE was supposed to be pronounced like the famous march composer John Philip Sousa?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Strike up the band? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're pretty close. It's sue-ZEH. However, accepted practice in the US is to say it as sue-ZEE (this is how I say it...)

    2. Re:Strike up the band? by Oliver+Aaltonen · · Score: 0

      Close! More like ZOO-suh.

    3. Re:Strike up the band? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      However, accepted practice in the US is to say it as sue-ZEE

      I don't think so. Calling it "Susie" simply displays one's ignorance of the correct pronunciation, much like those people who go around saying "Line-ucks". For what it's worth, I used to say "Susie" myself, until I happened to call SuSE tech support and heard the correct pronunciation.

    4. Re:Strike up the band? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Ditto here. I called their Oakland office to inquire as to when 8.2 would be out and got the correct way to pronounce it. I was Soo-Sea until then, Soo-Saey from that call, and after the Novell conference I just attended, Soo-Saw seems to the most correct.

      I think.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  43. The Free World against SCO & Microsoft. by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many more companies have to embrace Linux before people realise its here to stay?

    It seems there is an emerging force behind linux now, and pretty soon there will only be a couple of large companies left behind. Those players that Microsoft has all but wiped out know that if they are going to survive, they have to put their money behind Open Source, Any new proprietary Office/Server Space software doesnt stand a chance against Open Source, or The beast of redmond. So what Microsoft kills creates a new seed planted in the beds of Open Source. Redmond are rapidly digging their own grave and in it will be planted the seeds of an open and free world :)

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  44. Kenny Loggins would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they used this as a jingle, they would owe Kenny Loggins some royalties for his old hit song.

  45. Subscribing to Slashdot:? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "I'll subscribe to Slashdot as soon as I see one month w/o dupes, typos, or stories the editors didn't read."

    February 30 Slashdot stories:

    New G5 Benchmark Results [apple]

    New G5 Results of Benchmark [apple]

    New Microsfot lawsuit apeal [under the Borg icon]

    Neal, please call home now! [Cowboy's Mother icon]

    ------------

    Nope, there will never be typos, dupes, or unread submissions.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  46. Re:64 bit? No amd Policy? BS by puto · · Score: 0

    Gatewat sold many Athlon XPs in their systems. I have had to service my fair share of them.

    And if you go to their site they even sell the opteron.

    http://accessories.gateway.com/AccessoryStore/PC +A ccessories_316441/PC+Components_316805/CPUs+_A1_+M icroprocessors_316806/2414462_ProdDetail

    Gateway said it was dropping AMD from all of its Governement and business lines. So they could a smaller number of suppliers and focus their efforts on trying to save the company. Keeping Intel was the logical choice. it makes sense not to support two chip architectures with two different types of chipsets and motherboards to deal with. There is cost in keeping enough of both chips in stock, keeping enough of both motherboards in stock, taking two types of support calls, producing two sets of documentation, and verifying and testing two types of parts.

    As for the Opteron, who knows, maybe they will offer a new box.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  47. Fine and dandy, but.... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll be impressed when they announce they are shipping systems with Linux installed as the DESKTOP enviroment, sans any M$ products.

    When I clicked on the gateway link, out of morbid curiosity, I got this at the very top of the first page I saw,

    "Gateway recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP"

    Not that I would ever buy a pre-built computer or recomend that anyone buy one, but I'm not seeing too much headway being made in the final conflict for the desktop.

    I suppose this is still better than nothing, perhaps it's a start.

  48. Re:Linux needs this like Tux needs aftershave by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way we're going to save Linux is to get it off Grandma's computer.

    Do you believe in the principles of Open Source, or not?

    • Grandma: "I clicked on the little button thingy, and it said something about needing a root."
    • RealProgrammer: "Oh, that must mean it was asking for the root password. In this system, only the user named "root" can do things that affect other users. Here's the password to type, and I'll fix it."
    • RealProgrammer leads a world-wide development effort to make a Grandma-friendly And Still Secure Enough Environment (GASSEE). Grandma is a beta tester. She soon learns that some popular, feature-rich, overbloated environments are better than others, and that she likes the ones that let her look under the hood and scratch code on the bare metal. She also likes the idea of giving back to the community, and since she has a lot of free time she takes over management of the GASSEE project, developing a lean and clean 3D X server and tools to manage XF86Config.

    Yeah, that was a little over the top, but the point is that OSS principles don't depend on the expertise of the user nor the skill level of an individual developer to work. In fact, you want users of all skill levels and backgrounds. How else can you make it better?

    Either Linux can take the scrutiny of Grandma and be improved by it, or Microsoft, SCO, and the RIAA have already won.
    --

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  49. Gateway.. shady folks.. by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    Went searching for a place to buy older computer parts for an old server I've been working on. A friend pointed me to a 'repair' shop that supposedly would buy massive containers of computer parts, find what works, and sell it cheap. This place was no where near any commercial streets or buildings, behind a fence, in someones house. We walked up, and this weird lady with freaky eyes peered at me and was like "Who are you?" I said what my friend told me and they said "We only service Gateway computers here". I looked over and saw a laptop LCD sitting on a dirty plastic table that usually would have a umbrella standing in the center of it. Past that was a rusty old garage with computer parts stacked in it. They kept questioning who I was.. We decided to leave.

    shows where your stuff goes when being repaired.

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  50. I , for one by malus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am waiting for a real partnership between Gateway & SuSE, not one of these bogus 'forged' partnerships.

  51. Gateway is Dying? by twitter · · Score: 1
    This company is in serious decline.

    Must be another Microsoft success story. That's what happens when you do M$'s monkey dance.

    Don't expect this to stay server bound. Almost ALL problems with new PCs are due to software issues, the kind of issues you have when you try to close off the source so you can screw your competition by breaking their codes. Any maker's quality would improve by simply ditching the software that breaks it.

    Welcome to the free world Gateway, I hope you are not too late to save yourself. You might do better by going further to make up for lost time.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  52. Farm Humor by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
    If you cross a chameleon with a cow, do you get cow that changes it spots when it senses danger?

    They will change from a holstein to a jersey. If the chameleon blood is particularly powerful, it may morph into an angus.

    --
    Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  53. the tables ARE turned. by twitter · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Dell has shown that you can defy M$ and still make money. What's M$ going to do to Dell for selling Red Hat, break their boxes? The bluff has been called, breaking hardware only makes M$ look bad so the threat to vendors like Gateway is no longer an issue. If you spit out enough hardware M$ can't break you without ruining themselves - and they have already ruined themselves trying. Walmart's Lindows, Gateway and others will come to the party. Hardware makers themselves will be able to come soon. Microsoft's power was illusory all along, now it's broken.

    People don't need Microsoft and do better with honest specs, hardware and software.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  54. Gateway makes computers? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Informative

    From 1990 to today, every Gateway owner I've known has had to call tech support at least once. Single user home PC purchases, large institutional buys, it hasn't mattered; something was always wrong enough to require a call to Gateway.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  55. Suspicious... by todesengel · · Score: 2, Funny

    According to the article.... "Gateway, which currently offers Microsoft Corp.'s (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people) server software and Red Hat Inc.'s (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people) version of Linux..." Mmm, Redhat seems to have been acquired by Microsoft... Microsoft is taking some pretty drastic measures to compete with Novell...

  56. how you really have to market it by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    if you really want to get people to buy these gateways with suse installed, appeal to most teenagers, who are obsessed with almost everything japanese, just say "Japan uses linux"

    voila, instant user base ;P

  57. Cow? You mean Sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suse is most like "Suuuuy!", which is heard in commonly in Arkansas and will be Ark. native Britney Spears' nickname in 10 years...Oink oink.

  58. Re:Does this... by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

    Zardus wrote:
    >I always thought SuSE would be a nice name for a cow.

    Maybe it would make a better name for a cat? Remember Dr Seuss wrote "The Cat in the Hat". It's been made into a movie with Mike Myers: http://www.thecatinthehat.com/

    SuSE: A cat in a hat
    Fedora: A cat in a red hat

  59. Re:Huh? Huh? Computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local Gateway Country store has signs all over the outside about their plasma TV's and nothing else. I didn't even know they still sold computers.

  60. from their homepage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gateway recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP

  61. Losing the freedom to sell is important. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    Let me get this straight. Suse provides you with the code to their installer. Suse allows you to modify their installer as long as you don't resell it. And this is a problem.

    Yes, it is a problem for Free Software fans because they would give up the opportunity to make a profit. Some of this money they might choose to put into developing more Free Software. It would, therefore, injure the community to restrict people to non-commercial distribution.

    Holy crap, we would be lucky if everyone else did that.

    No, we would lose a valuable freedom we already have with Free Software. As I explained, commercial distribution is a valuable freedom we should not bargain away. As GNU/Linux distributions go, SuSE is the odd one out here--there are plenty of worthwhile distributions that ship nothing but Free Software. I can see why you might not value this freedom, you don't leverage it yourself. But consider that with other programs you use you are benefitting from others who do leverage this freedom: Red Hat and IBM's Linux kernal contributions, Red Hat's GNOME and KDE artwork, and Mozilla represent a little bit of the Free Software developed in part with commercial funding.

    It [SuSE's installer is] a great piece of work, works really well, and I've never had a major problem with SUSE.

    There are resellers who have just the opposite experience with SuSE's software.

    1. Re:Losing the freedom to sell is important. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1
      Yes, it is a problem for Free Software fans because they would give up the opportunity to make a profit. Some of this money they might choose to put into developing more Free Software. It would, therefore, injure the community to restrict people to non-commercial distribution.


      I call bullshit. Look, SUSE pours lots of resources into the linux community. They support KDE, XFree, Alsa, ReiserFS, and so on. They provide money and code. The only thing they don't GPL is Yast. Boo friggin hoo. They want to make some money on their installer. Fine. They're good citizens and give plenty back as well. What's the big deal?
  62. Pronunciation by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

    So is it pronounced like "Seuss" (as in "Cat in the Hat" by Dr. Seuss), or is it pronounced like "Suzy" with a soft "S" instead of a "Z"?

    1. Re:Pronunciation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'SOOZ-ah' is how they say it in Krautish.

    2. Re:Pronunciation by bill98144 · · Score: 1

      Heh. Since they're from Germany, maybe it's "Soosa". :)

  63. ALR Servers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago, we bought some ALR servers just after Gateway bought out ALR and re-badged the cases. These machines were P2-300 with AMI Megaraid array controllers and redundant power supplies. They're still going string today, although quite underpowered by todays standards. After having bought many more Gateway desktops over the years, I have come to the conclusion that modern Gateway boxes are absolute junk nowdays, and their tech support is a bunch of consescending, bubblegum-smacking teenagers who can barely read the owners manuals and their stupid tech support scripted dialog charts. Utterly useless they are to solve any problems. I will not be buying anything from them ever again.

  64. My evil laughter to you: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moo-hahaha...

  65. American pronounciation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOO'-zeh is most correct pronounciation... but you should pronounce it kinda like "Sousa" (As in John Philip Sousa's last name).
    That's close enough.

  66. not bad by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    considering I used to work for a company that was exclusively gateway and novell! Seriously, the Old-school businesses have only bought 1 upgrade from the likes of Dell...And I haven't been very impressed with trying to get support for out-of-warranty stuff [i.e. parts!] out of them. Gateway has definately got some room to manuver here...mostly, the MS/Intel/Dell triangle has destroyed the corperate PC marketplace! Fortunately there is some compteition left for selling the PC boxen...hence gateway will look for whatever edge they think they can get!

  67. Re:Calling all Trolls !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, you want to form a beowulf cluster of beowulf IRC trolls! Hahaha, I kill me.

  68. nothing shady here! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    That's normal for the PC industry. After all, somebody does actually do something with all those dell and gateways that corps toss every 2-3 years! I live near the michigan power company's headquarters, and they toss litterally dozens of fully equipt PCs a month! Many people go there to scavange an old 500-600+ for mom-n-dad or Grandpa!

    You just ran accross the "profesionals"...people like that are the ONLY places to get anything more than 3 years old from anymore...I have Dells still under [or just out of] that pricey 3 year waranty that Dell won't even get you parts for anymore! Welcome to the "real" computer world...not the nice shiny things!

  69. Re:Gateway? Laptops are pretty good though by bach37 · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a new Gateway laptop and use it on a daily basis- perhaps 50+ hours a week. It's rock solid, and have had no problems with it. The price for it was a couple hundred lower than the big bulky Dell comparative laptop with same specs, and it shipped pretty much instantly on order. It's too bad the laptops aren't catching on more to help this company out of $$$ problems.

    Scott

    (Btw- the Mandrake 9.2 install on this Gateway model 400vtx went just fine. Only problem was getting the video to 1024x768- it's that intel cheap "Extreme" graphics thing.)

  70. I hope Novell doesn't ruin SuSE, by blueberry(4*atan(1)) · · Score: 1

    but I'll be suprised if they don't. I hope Gateway's interest in SuSE keeps Novell financially interested in keeping it alive on both the server and workstation sides.

  71. Red Hat has an additional piece, too: Cygnus. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    RedHat was always first on the support level because they did extensive testing and certified hardware as being functional in Linux. This takes a huge load off of vendors, such as Gateway, because they can check off their hardware against the list then guarantee their customers when they sell them a Linux box it will be compatible with Linux.

    Not just vendor support, but customer support, too.

    Remember that Red Hat absorbed (and still runs, last I looked) Cygnus: a company that existed to provide support for GNU software - for a fee.

    Purchasers of hardware with Red Hat pre-installed can expect that, if they have complex trouble, they can always go to Red Hat and buy enough service to get the problem solved.

    This gives them a nice comfy feeling about the product. And it also unloads the tough software support problems from the hardware vendor (even if he DIDN'T include a basic support contract with the install to unload the software-related powerup questions to Red Hat's phone banks.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  72. You should get karma for that one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice.

  73. Don't over simplify. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    They [SuSE are] good citizens and give plenty back as well. What's the big deal?

    Nobody is suggesting we judge a company by just one thing they do. No matter how well it works, non-free software is not a contribution to our community. Free software is a contribution to our community. So it's sad that they don't take the step to make their installer free. But I'm glad they help the development of other free software and distribute free software as well.

  74. Re:64 bit? No amd Policy? BS by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I'd bet that an Opteron box would be in the works. Even if it's just a rebadged box desigend by someone else. I'd bet this way because they'll probably do anything to differentiate themselves from Dell - and score a few sales at the same time! Really, they don't have a whole lot to loose in the server market, what's their marketshare there? 0%?

  75. The margins are too small to support that by dbn3 · · Score: 1

    The computer vendors are working on slim enough margins while selling Windows boxes. There is very little possibility a vendor has enough cash to pring the programmers on board to "hack together thrir own support."

    The software has to be supported by the maker of the software.

    --
    open mind: teaching computers the stuff
  76. YaST Online Update by metamatic · · Score: 1

    SuSE's download server appears to be throttled for free access users. Sometimes I can't even get a full YaST update, and it is sloooow too.

    Count yourself lucky you could get that piece of crap to work at all, I couldn't.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  77. Download suse 9 with bittorrent now and try it for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suse 9 is like the crem of the crop..

    I am a debian user at heart but suse was able to go beyond. Grab a copy now with bittorrent (google bittorrent to learn why it kicks ass for speed!)

    http://www.super-serv.com/~supr/torrents/450/SuS e_ Linux_9.0_Complete_5_CDs.torrent

    Got this link from suprnova.org