Better to let schools determine their own standards and not be shackled into serving something that won't be eaten.
That way, public schools are free to make the balance between nutrition and what will be eaten - versus forcing something on people that the prior regime's family would never eat themselves.
Solar and wind kill the planet with their manufacture, and nobody cares. In addition, the favored sources don't provide the reliability and ease of hydrocarbons.
Coal/Oil? All you need is a spark. Solar/Wind? You have to consume energy and materials before you even get to having a chance at energy production.
It's one thing to just poach staff, but Infosys would have to do (better) for citizens what it did for H1-b's - train and place displaced individuals with employers.
Chin said although technology has allowed Credit Suisse to cut back and middle office staff, headcount has remained flat because the bank has hired a large number of programmers.
No word on if the same staff were retrained/retained or just replaced.
In sane countries like the US, coal is not a 4-letter expletive but a source of energy; the workers are given greater respect in the US versus being written off completely in coal-phobic countries.
Imagine if the FAA and the DOT hold back drone and self-driving vehicle deployment by not providing appropriate regulation for 10 years. The tech matures, heavily. Everyone is ready to go on it. It would provide immense cost savings at little risk. Then: they set requirements, and open the flood gates. People transition to a sector that has been prepared and made ready for all, including the displaced. Unemployment goes down and participation goes up as long-termers are picked up by companies - for long-term jobs.
FTFY for reality. Oh, and it is the situation I would prefer.
It only takes weeks in the best case for prices to respond: the delivery fee and driver tips for pizza vanish, and that $16 order becomes an $11 order. That's $5 that can be spent elsewhere for each pizza; and it's an extra pizza ordered wherever someone was willing to pay for a pizza but not willing to drive or pay for delivery. Between these, you're going to need more pizza makers, more retailers, and more shipping for whatever other stuff you're buying with that $5 (although the pizza makers will shift in part from whatever that $11 was previously spent on instead).
And quality goes to shit from the product to the employees making it.
Over the years, taxis give way to something Uber-like, because the regulations for a driverless taxi don't include background checks on the driver. Quality goes off the deep end, resulting in less work and shittier conditions for the displaced. But you got your "progress".
FTFY.
Again, quality goes off the deep end, resulting in lower-quality jobs that aren't worth anything, especially for the displaced.
That doesn't take long in small bites, or in growing markets. Once you've started the economy shifting, it can move faster and pour workers from one class of jobs to another smoothly. If displacement accelerates over years, it overcomes replacement rates until an external force slaps the entitlement mentality off employers.
Reality interrupts your low-friction fantasy, yet again.
In the end, about 3.8 shipping and taxi jobs vanish, plus millions of delivery jobs. More retail jobs and service jobs do not appear; business management jobs for logistics do not open up to the displaced; if we buy new IT services (e.g. Spotify, Netflix, high-speed Internet), the support staff for those get fueled by guest workers brought in under fraud by overly entitled employers. Jobs do not proliferate for the displaced until employers are compelled to hire them.
Apparently you don't know what really happens.
That's what welfare is for.
Or you could make it a royal PITA not to hire these displaced individuals. By doing so, these individuals have more income to help support other jobs - versus relying on subsistence. Try living it sometime and you'll get to know just how bad it is to be on SSI/SSDI.
Forcing it will only make people resent the change that much more. That's how you lose your gains - all at once, fast, and for a very long time.
Managing progress to be at an human-acceptable speed isn't painful. That's how you keep your gains - at a pace that doesn't assume the worker is at fault.
you're that much of a coward to not suffer the consequences of your actions, what else are you trying to hide?
Then the media can be as open as well. Given their campaign to destroy anyone and anything in the way of their narrative, it can be safe to say that they can no longer be assumed to be good or impartial.
The excuses from the con artist administration are just that, excuses.
The Obama administration left office on January 21st, 2017. On the other hand, they seem to want to keep a Soviet-like iron grip on power through the rioters, media, and DNC faithful.
The swamp keeps filling
You might want to wake up and check the date. Also note that the media have turned back from the Presidential Guard to the Fifth Column.
oil companies dictate our energy policy
Well, they're more competent than Greenpeace or Sierra Club on energy.
That is, have an order that legally prohibits the use of AI/AI-derived treatments in nearly all cases. For the rest, a statement accurately documenting how no medical personnel were reassigned or terminated due to AI implementation - whether by direct or indirect means.
If you're that much of a coward to not suffer the consequences of your actions, what else are you trying to hide?
Then the media can be as open as well. Given their campaign to destroy anyone and anything in the way of their narrative, it can be safe to say that they can no longer be assumed to be good or impartial.
The excuses from the con artist administration are just that, excuses.
The Obama administration left office on January 21st, 2017. On the other hand, they seem to want to keep a Soviet-like iron grip on power through the rioters, media, and DNC faithful.
The swamp keeps filling
You might want to wake up and check the date. Also note that the media have turned back from the Presidential Guard to the Fifth Column.
oil companies dictate our energy policy
Well, they're more competent than Greenpeace or Sierra Club on energy.
Slashdot Mirror
If it's just going to more Silicon Valley types, that means next to nothing.
If it's going to the Rest of Us, then that would be news.
Better to let schools determine their own standards and not be shackled into serving something that won't be eaten.
That way, public schools are free to make the balance between nutrition and what will be eaten - versus forcing something on people that the prior regime's family would never eat themselves.
Solar and wind kill the planet with their manufacture, and nobody cares. In addition, the favored sources don't provide the reliability and ease of hydrocarbons.
Coal/Oil? All you need is a spark.
Solar/Wind? You have to consume energy and materials before you even get to having a chance at energy production.
It's one thing to just poach staff, but Infosys would have to do (better) for citizens what it did for H1-b's - train and place displaced individuals with employers.
Chin said although technology has allowed Credit Suisse to cut back and middle office staff, headcount has remained flat because the bank has hired a large number of programmers.
No word on if the same staff were retrained/retained or just replaced.
In sane countries like the US, coal is not a 4-letter expletive but a source of energy; the workers are given greater respect in the US versus being written off completely in coal-phobic countries.
Obama fit that perfectly.
Except that SJW is accurate at describing the people defined by it. Same with those that virtue signal.
Claims of overuse or "idiocy" affirm it while identifying the speakers ideological leanings.
While environmental activists would gladly make you think otherwise, coal is alive and well.
Nothing stops them from setting standards as a private sector entity.
Imagine if the FAA and the DOT hold back drone and self-driving vehicle deployment by not providing appropriate regulation for 10 years. The tech matures, heavily. Everyone is ready to go on it. It would provide immense cost savings at little risk. Then: they set requirements, and open the flood gates. People transition to a sector that has been prepared and made ready for all, including the displaced. Unemployment goes down and participation goes up as long-termers are picked up by companies - for long-term jobs.
FTFY for reality. Oh, and it is the situation I would prefer.
It only takes weeks in the best case for prices to respond: the delivery fee and driver tips for pizza vanish, and that $16 order becomes an $11 order. That's $5 that can be spent elsewhere for each pizza; and it's an extra pizza ordered wherever someone was willing to pay for a pizza but not willing to drive or pay for delivery. Between these, you're going to need more pizza makers, more retailers, and more shipping for whatever other stuff you're buying with that $5 (although the pizza makers will shift in part from whatever that $11 was previously spent on instead).
And quality goes to shit from the product to the employees making it.
Over the years, taxis give way to something Uber-like, because the regulations for a driverless taxi don't include background checks on the driver. Quality goes off the deep end, resulting in less work and shittier conditions for the displaced. But you got your "progress".
FTFY.
Again, quality goes off the deep end, resulting in lower-quality jobs that aren't worth anything, especially for the displaced.
That doesn't take long in small bites, or in growing markets. Once you've started the economy shifting, it can move faster and pour workers from one class of jobs to another smoothly. If displacement accelerates over years, it overcomes replacement rates until an external force slaps the entitlement mentality off employers.
Reality interrupts your low-friction fantasy, yet again.
In the end, about 3.8 shipping and taxi jobs vanish, plus millions of delivery jobs. More retail jobs and service jobs do not appear; business management jobs for logistics do not open up to the displaced; if we buy new IT services (e.g. Spotify, Netflix, high-speed Internet), the support staff for those get fueled by guest workers brought in under fraud by overly entitled employers. Jobs do not proliferate for the displaced until employers are compelled to hire them.
Apparently you don't know what really happens.
That's what welfare is for.
Or you could make it a royal PITA not to hire these displaced individuals. By doing so, these individuals have more income to help support other jobs - versus relying on subsistence. Try living it sometime and you'll get to know just how bad it is to be on SSI/SSDI.
The "fact checkers" are just narrative checkers that rubberstamp their own articles while questioning anything not fitting their narrative.
That would still lead to very few buyers, courtesy of the collapse in employment opportunities and mass write-offs of population.
Better to slow things down a bit so that humans are included and not excluded.
Forcing it will only make people resent the change that much more. That's how you lose your gains - all at once, fast, and for a very long time.
Managing progress to be at an human-acceptable speed isn't painful. That's how you keep your gains - at a pace that doesn't assume the worker is at fault.
Since Mr. Ma wants to inflict pain across the world, he (and his apparatus) can be the first to go.
Not only do they want to make parts that much harder to work with, they also want to make sure that the parts remain out of reach.
Trump will release full visitor logs five years after the current term ends.
Obama just decided to keep many records secret
Isn't Trump's mere delay instead of outright refusal much better?
Laughing at the modbombers.
you're that much of a coward to not suffer the consequences of your actions, what else are you trying to hide?
Then the media can be as open as well. Given their campaign to destroy anyone and anything in the way of their narrative, it can be safe to say that they can no longer be assumed to be good or impartial.
The excuses from the con artist administration are just that, excuses.
The Obama administration left office on January 21st, 2017. On the other hand, they seem to want to keep a Soviet-like iron grip on power through the rioters, media, and DNC faithful.
The swamp keeps filling
You might want to wake up and check the date. Also note that the media have turned back from the Presidential Guard to the Fifth Column.
oil companies dictate our energy policy
Well, they're more competent than Greenpeace or Sierra Club on energy.
Boehner isn't President.
Trump will release full visitor logs five years after the current term ends.
Obama just decided to keep many records secret
Isn't Trump's mere delay instead of outright refusal much better?
That is, have an order that legally prohibits the use of AI/AI-derived treatments in nearly all cases. For the rest, a statement accurately documenting how no medical personnel were reassigned or terminated due to AI implementation - whether by direct or indirect means.
Your use of the "we know better" marks you.
When this hits a country that doesn't have the ability to kill off opposition to such efforts, it will not be any bit pleasant.
If you're that much of a coward to not suffer the consequences of your actions, what else are you trying to hide?
Then the media can be as open as well. Given their campaign to destroy anyone and anything in the way of their narrative, it can be safe to say that they can no longer be assumed to be good or impartial.
The excuses from the con artist administration are just that, excuses.
The Obama administration left office on January 21st, 2017. On the other hand, they seem to want to keep a Soviet-like iron grip on power through the rioters, media, and DNC faithful.
The swamp keeps filling
You might want to wake up and check the date. Also note that the media have turned back from the Presidential Guard to the Fifth Column.
oil companies dictate our energy policy
Well, they're more competent than Greenpeace or Sierra Club on energy.
It's one thing to hear about AI's "wins", but it's another to see it handily (and happily) losing to humans where it should have won.