Facebook isn't fact checking, they're narrative checking to make sure it's leftist-approved.
Like Twitter's Ministry of Truth and Safety, its job will only consist of protecting leftism - as they have failed to pick anyone that is anything but a hard leftist.
To see the fallibility of Watson. Just as it was nice for Patterson to observe the original Watson seeing his own desk on fire, it is similarly nice to see Watson fail.
Since it is an expert system, it probably already has an error rate.
Yet we have not seen it in any final results. On the other hand, we've seen Watson's PR-friendly "successes".
More directly to the heart of American fast-food cuisine, Momentum Machines, a restaurant concept with a robot that can supposedly flip hundreds of burgers an hour, applied for a building permit in San Francisco and started listing job openings this January, reported Eater. Then there's Eatsa, the automat restaurant where no human interaction is necessary, which has locations popping up across California.
In other words, a robot that makes lower quality food and some place that hates humans.
Twitter has gladly helped criminals, abusers, and racists - as long as they were leftists. Some of them even have the ear of Twitter's Ministry of Truth & Safety department.
When we start hearing of people on the left get removed from Twitter (permanently), then they might have some shred of legitimacy.
Price alone isn't a justification for such conditions. If anything, price-related justifications show a callous disregard for those that do work (or seek it).
If anything, this is a reason why permatemping (what Amazon is doing), classification abuse (hiding behind a third party), and zero-hour work (the ultimate in precarious work when combined w/ UK-style workfare) needs to DIAF and the remains be shoveled into the nearest black hole.
While proof has shown otherwise. Look at those who use favored positions on platforms like Twitter(where a leftist will never be banned or disciplined, but conservatives will) or Reddit (e.g. the edits made from the Fuck Spez incident) to harass others.
Oh, and your sig needs to be revised to say "This is fascism, Clinton fits."
By condoning and defending "hate speech" of their own while defining it as anything that breaks leftist narratives, they're becoming the ones that aren't civil.
You might be frustrated that the most popular platforms don't allow your particular speech (although Twitter will tolerate pretty much anything other than harassment and child pornography)
For leftist-favoring definitions of harassment and child abuse.
but you are not being silenced.
Only if you're leftist. If you're conservative, the policy will be used at a moment's notice to purge.
Given Twitter's support of protecting criminals of similar leanings, this isn't surprising. I wonder how long this will go until they have to actually defend someone significant they hate (or purge someone significant they favor), if only to be consistent with policy.
Slashdot Mirror
Which would explain, why Hillary Clinton got 4 million votes more in California, than Trump...
No, more like more than half of their US user base.
Facebook isn't fact checking, they're narrative checking to make sure it's leftist-approved.
Like Twitter's Ministry of Truth and Safety, its job will only consist of protecting leftism - as they have failed to pick anyone that is anything but a hard leftist.
Given that contract classification abuse (if not outright fraud) is something well known across the world, Uber can't PR themselves out of this one.
Congratulations, the "journalist" will be seized along with their camera and storage.
You just made it that much worse for the individuals out there.
The moment they see encryption or something "not right" with that camera, it's not going to go well for the camera's presumed owner.
A rubber hose and a few other things will make short work of whatever is done.
At least they did the easy work of identifying who is against the US.
Humans don't get practice sessions, neither should Watson.
Why? Why would it be nice?
To see the fallibility of Watson. Just as it was nice for Patterson to observe the original Watson seeing his own desk on fire, it is similarly nice to see Watson fail.
Since it is an expert system, it probably already has an error rate.
Yet we have not seen it in any final results. On the other hand, we've seen Watson's PR-friendly "successes".
If their reason for choosing Uber is that they had no other options that were significantly different/better, it's still force.
More directly to the heart of American fast-food cuisine, Momentum Machines, a restaurant concept with a robot that can supposedly flip hundreds of burgers an hour, applied for a building permit in San Francisco and started listing job openings this January, reported Eater. Then there's Eatsa, the automat restaurant where no human interaction is necessary, which has locations popping up across California.
In other words, a robot that makes lower quality food and some place that hates humans.
Twitter loves and protects those people.
The only violation that matters is not being a proper leftist according to Twitter.
N/T
Twitter has gladly helped criminals, abusers, and racists - as long as they were leftists. Some of them even have the ear of Twitter's Ministry of Truth & Safety department.
When we start hearing of people on the left get removed from Twitter (permanently), then they might have some shred of legitimacy.
Enough to see all these thinly-veiled ads, but it'd be nice to see Watson be proved wrong.
Price alone isn't a justification for such conditions. If anything, price-related justifications show a callous disregard for those that do work (or seek it).
If anything, this is a reason why permatemping (what Amazon is doing), classification abuse (hiding behind a third party), and zero-hour work (the ultimate in precarious work when combined w/ UK-style workfare) needs to DIAF and the remains be shoveled into the nearest black hole.
That's complete tosh.
While proof has shown otherwise. Look at those who use favored positions on platforms like Twitter(where a leftist will never be banned or disciplined, but conservatives will) or Reddit (e.g. the edits made from the Fuck Spez incident) to harass others.
Oh, and your sig needs to be revised to say "This is fascism, Clinton fits."
By condoning and defending "hate speech" of their own while defining it as anything that breaks leftist narratives, they're becoming the ones that aren't civil.
Easy, it's only enforced when Uber wants to purge a conservative from their platform.
Just because it's not your preferred term of force doesn't mean that it isn't force.
You can also block people you don't want to see your tweets, and make them only available to logged in users, or users you whitelist.
If there was sanity at Twitter, they'd purge those features after purging the "Trust and Safety" team.
You might be frustrated that the most popular platforms don't allow your particular speech (although Twitter will tolerate pretty much anything other than harassment and child pornography)
For leftist-favoring definitions of harassment and child abuse.
but you are not being silenced.
Only if you're leftist. If you're conservative, the policy will be used at a moment's notice to purge.
Given Twitter's support of protecting criminals of similar leanings, this isn't surprising. I wonder how long this will go until they have to actually defend someone significant they hate (or purge someone significant they favor), if only to be consistent with policy.
There's always Lockheed Wisdom.