Given AI's ability to cause long-lasting harm (destruction speed > creation speed) across a multitude of professions, this might not exactly be the best thing for humanity.
It's a Code of Harassment [of "Non-Diverse" Persons], not a Code of Conduct. The design is to quickly designate and purge anything as a "harasser" that doesn't play to the social justice narrative of selective inclusion.
Reverse-discrimination against men? Rejected, per the observation that there is evidence of discrimination against women when gender is identified.
The most likely candidate of what really happens, given that this benefits the SJW crowd the least. This is especially so when developers are intimidated when they don't follow the politically correct narrative.
- Women take fewer risks, and thus are more likely to provide solutions that are accepted? The authors cite a study that claims women are, on average, more risk-averse than men. However, this is inconsistent with the observation that women change more lines of code.
- Women in open-source are more competent than men? This is the hypothesis that the authors support the most. They suggest it somes about due to survivorship bias and/or self-selection and/or higher implicit performance-standards in the female population of open-source coders.
Not as likely given that they're more in line with attempts to fit the data to the hypothesis.
The P50 & P70 support 64GB, come with better warranty options (no ownership transfer needed, Atlanta call center for everyone, 5YR onsite NBD) and don't have unsightly curves.
Slashdot Mirror
Given that he supports hate of all things that aren't politically correct, wouldn't that make Zuckerberg the bigot?
Only if you consider choice to be a problem.
Security is something that is in the control of the end users. You choose the level you want.
On the other hand, Apple only designed their security to protect celebrities and people of means.
So you're only willing to sacrifice someone else, most likely some normal person, just to stick it to the government?
At the very least, an Apple phone is now the mark of a criminal or terrorist.
Then Apple is one San Bernadino event away from being on the wrong side of things.
That won't stop the US.
The only reason they really go this far is to protect celebrities, not normal people.
(For this, I'm thankful to have an Android phone)
The first modular phone will not be the Fairphone 2, but the first one that is available in the US.
So far, it's been 0/3 including:
Jolla
Fairphone
Fairphone 2
If anything, is there a (non-Apple, non-WinMo) phone that is available in the US, wanted the world over, but only available in the US?
Unlike Apple, the Android platform doesn't have a device-killing Error 53.
Given AI's ability to cause long-lasting harm (destruction speed > creation speed) across a multitude of professions, this might not exactly be the best thing for humanity.
Those individuals are here mostly due to guest worker fraud, not due to some political persecution.
Take your racism and bigotry against white individuals elsewhere.
I'd think that they'd do a bit better academically without having to worry about narratives.
Outside of the University of Michigan, are there universities that pride themselves on *not* adopting this (or even adopting SJW-hostile admissions)?
It's a Code of Harassment [of "Non-Diverse" Persons], not a Code of Conduct. The design is to quickly designate and purge anything as a "harasser" that doesn't play to the social justice narrative of selective inclusion.
Outside of the University of Michigan, are there universities that pride themselves on *not* adopting this (or even adopting SJW-hostile admissions)?
A bad company, even worse if it's a staffing agency or other benefit-dodger entity.
Reverse-discrimination against men? Rejected, per the observation that there is evidence of discrimination against women when gender is identified.
The most likely candidate of what really happens, given that this benefits the SJW crowd the least. This is especially so when developers are intimidated when they don't follow the politically correct narrative.
- Women take fewer risks, and thus are more likely to provide solutions that are accepted? The authors cite a study that claims women are, on average, more risk-averse than men. However, this is inconsistent with the observation that women change more lines of code.
- Women in open-source are more competent than men? This is the hypothesis that the authors support the most. They suggest it somes about due to survivorship bias and/or self-selection and/or higher implicit performance-standards in the female population of open-source coders.
Not as likely given that they're more in line with attempts to fit the data to the hypothesis.
Then why are SJW's the only ones wanting to push the whole "gender 'issue'" as a "problem"?
It has not been an issue until:
They could make it an issue
They could silence all meaningful criticism
Every part of this looks like a goal-seeking or bias-confirming study with an already-presumed conclusion.
Not sure, but that's not how science is supposed to work. That might fly for global warming studies though.
The P50 & P70 support 64GB, come with better warranty options (no ownership transfer needed, Atlanta call center for everyone, 5YR onsite NBD) and don't have unsightly curves.
It's not like adblocking is illegal.
Nope, they have been infected. They are now SJWhub.
That actually is a valid redirect.
They might as well have Cortana retreat to a safe-space if done too many times.
That would be a welcome and necessary change.
He not only saved the company from itself, he also wasnt invested in being an outright spook with the company.
The last thing that Apple wants is another incident that inconveniences people of more-than-modest means.