Those laws where created by popular elected officials. Got a problem with the law, change the law. It is nothing but hypocrasy (sp?) to say yes it is illegal, but I don't care anyway.
In other words, we all aggreed to pay taxes, so why not simply pay them? We complain when others want to enforce the law?
The law is actually be broken buy the consumers is it not? I don't see that states are doing anything illegal. As long as they get the prope warrents for search and have probable cause.
I was talking to a dude in the Defence world in the early 90's and was talking about a compression algorythm that used fractels. This is 10+ years ago, is this the same thing? It was used for T.V. bombs I think.
I remeber when I worked in a movie theater 79'ish, the projectionist said he go two copies of a movie when they mad orders. One was shown on the screen and the other walked out the back door.
I agree with people who don't want cell phones in theaters, but something does bother me. I was always tought that when you go out in public you are required to put up with other peoples bad habits.
Things like, smoking, bad driving, bad breath, obscene language, talking in a movie theater, a couple making out, chewing their finger nails, picking thier nose, caughing, sneezing, and even farting in an elevator.
I have done them all. And I am sorry. Please forgive me, but maybe we SHOULD put up with other peoples phones, so they should put up with a good picking of a nose.
Can I asume that the blades are variable pitch and then in extream condition they could feather the blades and the blad would be as paralell to the wind as possible?
I remeber leaving middle school in the 76' time range and runing as fast as possible to the nearest Plato terminals. I needed to play Empire, I needed to read my eMail, I needed to chat, etc...
It got so bad that my father would have to hunt me and my friends down. We got to looking for more obscure terminal locations on campus (I.U. by the way).
The ultimate result occured when the usage was so high (a lot of kids like myself where doing this) at the library, that you where handed password that would give you a 30 minute time slot. When it expired you had to get back in line to get another one.
But you could still have what you want and I want. You could allocate the alectorial votes based on the populations vote in each state?
There you would have a state controled popular election. Which is what the electorial college was ment todo.
Even in the first elections nobody actually voted for an "elector", they voted for a president. Why not let the election actuall choise who you vote for?
I find all the arguments quite flat. The don't realy seem to make a good argument for the current process. The thought that we would give up the election to federal powers is realy moot. There is no difference when it comes to a federial election.
Respond to my main argument. The electorial process id designed to emulate a populare vote and it allmost always does? Why not simply make it a populare vote? It works in MANY other democracies, including the oldest, greece.
I here you and agree. I don't under stand how the strange electorial college is an example.
Its just old and strange. Why is every one afraid of change? Change is good. LEts just try it for one election. It won't effect anything realy and then we can move on.
Slashdot Mirror
*sigh* no I am not. I typeth to fast and thinketh noteth.
Oh welleth.
Luckely, I am willing to be forgiven.
Those laws where created by popular elected officials. Got a problem with the law, change the law. It is nothing but hypocrasy (sp?) to say yes it is illegal, but I don't care anyway.
In other words, we all aggreed to pay taxes, so why not simply pay them? We complain when others want to enforce the law?
Man you people are just cruel. Nope I am just another but hole sitting in the midwest.
Although I wonder if the method would improve my english.
Whats wrong with me dig? It not meant to be a complete sentance (there wasn't enough room).
Wow, what an intelegent response. You have convinced me, I change my mind.
Posting online ISN'T and english test.
The law is actually be broken buy the consumers is it not? I don't see that states are doing anything illegal. As long as they get the prope warrents for search and have probable cause.
We should pay are taxes you know.
YES What a stupid question.
thanks that was very interesting
I was talking to a dude in the Defence world in the early 90's and was talking about a compression algorythm that used fractels. This is 10+ years ago, is this the same thing? It was used for T.V. bombs I think.
Maybe the missle got scared and chickened out.
Don't worry, I am sure there would be security cameras recording every detail of your robery, beating, rape and murder.
Then again where they wairing masks?
This is the first thing that popped into my head as well.
The artical stated that the DOE reports on Yucca show it won't work. I went out and read a couple of these reports and the definatly support Yucca.
What is he talking about?
I remeber when I worked in a movie theater 79'ish, the projectionist said he go two copies of a movie when they mad orders. One was shown on the screen and the other walked out the back door.
clearly the problem is finding some of the origonal film. Thank god it has been saved. The library of congress can rest easy.
I agree with people who don't want cell phones in theaters, but something does bother me. I was always tought that when you go out in public you are required to put up with other peoples bad habits.
Things like, smoking, bad driving, bad breath, obscene language, talking in a movie theater, a couple making out, chewing their finger nails, picking thier nose, caughing, sneezing, and even farting in an elevator.
I have done them all. And I am sorry. Please forgive me, but maybe we SHOULD put up with other peoples phones, so they should put up with a good picking of a nose.
well, you can't yell "fire" in a crouded movie theater...
No wool, three broken bones, lots of cuts, asthma, bla, bla, bla.
Trueth is you can live with out cell phones, you just can. Do they make life easier, yes. But so what? Is it realy right to bother other people?
My gawd! How did I an my friends ever grow up in the 70's with out cell phones.... hmmmmm....
...Can't wait for the study proving sugar is sweet.
Or a study showing women think differently then men.
Can I asume that the blades are variable pitch and then in extream condition they could feather the blades and the blad would be as paralell to the wind as possible?
I remeber leaving middle school in the 76' time range and runing as fast as possible to the nearest Plato terminals. I needed to play Empire, I needed to read my eMail, I needed to chat, etc...
It got so bad that my father would have to hunt me and my friends down. We got to looking for more obscure terminal locations on campus (I.U. by the way).
The ultimate result occured when the usage was so high (a lot of kids like myself where doing this) at the library, that you where handed password that would give you a 30 minute time slot. When it expired you had to get back in line to get another one.
Crazy stuff.
And use their organs for transplants
But you could still have what you want and I want. You could allocate the alectorial votes based on the populations vote in each state?
There you would have a state controled popular election. Which is what the electorial college was ment todo.
Even in the first elections nobody actually voted for an "elector", they voted for a president. Why not let the election actuall choise who you vote for?
I find all the arguments quite flat. The don't realy seem to make a good argument for the current process. The thought that we would give up the election to federal powers is realy moot. There is no difference when it comes to a federial election.
Respond to my main argument. The electorial process id designed to emulate a populare vote and it allmost always does? Why not simply make it a populare vote? It works in MANY other democracies, including the oldest, greece.
I here you and agree. I don't under stand how the strange electorial college is an example.
Its just old and strange. Why is every one afraid of change? Change is good. LEts just try it for one election. It won't effect anything realy and then we can move on.
Move on? sorry...