Slashdot Mirror


Tuberculosis May Become A Global Threat Again

Iphtashu Fitz writes "The journal Nature Medicine is due to release a report today on how highly drug-resistant strains of tuberculosis are on the verge of becoming a global epidimic. Strains of TB that are highly resistant to antibiotics are becoming increasingly prevalent in places like Russia, eastern Europe, and China, and only small changes are required to make these strains start spreading quickly. Treatment for multiple-drug-resistant strains of TB requires a carefully monitored cocktail of drugs taken for months on end, a regimin that many, especially in poorer countries are unlikely to follow to completion. The strategy used by the World Health Organization to combat TB, the "directly observed treatment, short course" or DOTS, involves using trained health workers to watch patients take their long courses of drugs, since even a little carelessness could result in TB mutating into a more drug resistant form within the patient." Oh, Alexander Fleming ? where art thou now?

480 comments

  1. Been there, Done that by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    All my life I've tested negative. A few years after moving to California, the great gateway to the developing nations of Asia, things changed. Where I worked they provided free TB tests, I thought "Cool, I'll save on going to my doctor and have my folder updated for the next few years", so I took the test. A pink spot appears on my left arm, while in the midst of a critical project I'm managing and -pfft- I'm sent home until I can prove I don't have the disease. After a week of cooling my heels at home, having a chest x-ray and hand-written letter from my doctor I return to work. His assessment is I don't have tuberculosis (formerly called Consumption in the olden days), but I've been exposed to it so my immune system is on red alert. I can no long have the little poke under the skin, but from now on must do the full doctor visit thing, whatever that will entail, including deductables and co-pays. Yay.

    So someone probably coughed in an elevator, in a kitchen or whatever and myself and anyone else in the vicinity were exposed.

    I was put on Isoniazid with vitamin B6 (because Isoniazid knocks the sh!t out of your liver) for 9 grueling months. The first month I felt like I was dying. It really played havoc with mountain biking and meant no beer for 9 months, it was glorius to be off it.

    Even two years ago it was recognized that there was an epidemic of TB in the asian sub continent and many of the H1B workers to came in may not have had it full blown, but had it and were bringing it into the USA. Could very well have been one of the fine people I worked with shortly after moving to California, but by no means would the state be unique. On weekends and holidays I'm a cyclist and put in long miles with considerable effort, which means I'm pretty well in tune with how my lungs are doing. Any little change, a day more phlegmy the others makes me take notice and track whatever seems be be going on. For that I thank all the brilliant people and lobbyists who made it so much easier during the tech boom to let people into the country on a rush to fill positions in businesses (which lobbied like hell for increases in H1B and more lax health screening.)

    A little background on TB, the bug is not killed by the immune system, but isolated. If it's under control that means a little cyst-like structure is built around it which hopefully contains it the rest of the hosts life. A severe respiratory infection can weakend the immune system to the point that the bug gets out and wreaks havoc, more likely at advanced age.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Been there, Done that by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, you didn't have TB but were put on a liver-destroying and probably resistance-breeding drug? Also, I would assume a bug in cyst-like structure eventually dies. Can it really survive forever without food in a warm human body?

    2. Re:Been there, Done that by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Wait a second, you didn't have TB but were put on a liver-destroying and probably resistance-breeding drug?

      As the medical establisment goes in the USA, if there's a chance you have TB, they treat you as if you did have it. This was effectively: take the treatment and you can go back to work, don't take it and take your chances unemployed. See the light?

      Also, I would assume a bug in cyst-like structure eventually dies. Can it really survive forever without food in a warm human body?

      Various organisms are capable of surviving extended periods without activity, food, warmth, etc. Some bacteria, so I've heard, can survive hundreds of years waiting for conditions to be right to shed some little shell they get by in.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Been there, Done that by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having the largest prison population in the world is a much bigger threat to America than H1B workers ever will be. Prisons are a breeding ground for communicable disease.

    4. Re:Been there, Done that by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Having the largest prison population in the world is a much bigger threat to America than H1B workers ever will be. Prisons are a breeding ground for communicable disease.

      Not really.

      Having a large prison population creates, in effect, a large quarantine.

      It's also easier to make prisoners take their medications properly.

    5. Re:Been there, Done that by terrymr · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I moved here from the UK, where everybody gets vaccinated against TB, I had to have a chest x-ray done to prove i didn't have TB because immunity from vaccination gives the same result on the skin test.

    6. Re:Been there, Done that by zungu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, developing countries do have TB. And I am sorry to know that you contacted. However, your direct attack on H1B workers for this is just bizzare and xenophobic. How about the 8 million Mexican illegal immigrants giving you a little TB infection? Why do only H1's figure in your post? BTW, TB is a "white-man's disease" we in India were introduced to TB due some assholes coming over from the "developed" world in the 16th century.

    7. Re:Been there, Done that by AaronGTurner · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Having a large prison population creates, in effect, a large quarantine.

      Not really, since eventually most prisoners are released. Also prison warders come into contact with the prisoners, and then frequent other places outside the prison. If you want to lock up all prisoners forever, for even minor crimes, and also never let the warders mix with the general population again then you have quarantine.

    8. Re:Been there, Done that by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Informative

      Alright, I'm a practicing lung doctor so I've got to say a little bit.

      Change in the skin TB status (or PPD) suggests a recent infection with TB. Placing someone of INH for 6 to 9 months greatly decreases the risk of someone developing active TB in the future.

      The amount of exposure and the potential risks for reactivation of the TB are all evaluated before INH is prescribed.

      INH can cause liver problems... and avoiding alcohol is a must.

      To answer the parent's other question--
      Using INH for a long enough duration will not cause resistence. Dead bugs can't develop resistence.

      Yes, it can survive forever.

      We see people that were exposed 20-30 years ago and have reactivation when placed on steroids or chemotherapy.

      In the grand scheme of things, TB may be getting worse worldwide, but here in the states it seems well controlled. We have a huge immigrant population, and I have seen on a couple cases of active TB over the last 5 years.

      I come to read slashdot in between patients to get away from medicine... please quit running these medical stories. They remind me that I'm not a real geek. :)

      AC

    9. Re:Been there, Done that by dtolman · · Score: 1

      Thats a load of crap... Prisons let people out eventually - so its no an effective quarantine. Prisons don't have world class medical facilities. Heck some barely have any facilities - I wouldn't count on prisoners getting the proper drugs, let alone a monitored regimine.

    10. Re:Been there, Done that by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mostly false...

      Prisions are a huge breeding ground for TB. One of my partners just saw somebody that had baseball-sized masses growing from several sites on his body. He wasn't referred to a doctor for several months. Biopsy of these lesions showed tons of TB.

      Medical care in the prisions is very sub-standard.

      It is true that if you do not take your TB drugs as prescribed, you will be put into prision. Yes, America will force you to take your TB drugs... to keep you from infecting others.

      However, most prisioners are in and out of jail too often to really get adequate screening for infectious diseases.

      AC

    11. Re:Been there, Done that by blindbat · · Score: 1

      Having just had the tests myself, I was told that some people can test positive for the skin test just from the kind of immunizations they had as a kid.

    12. Re:Been there, Done that by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for clarification! My final hope is that the risks are really evaluated professionally rather than "screw your liver or lose your job" as the original poster suggests.

    13. Re:Been there, Done that by BoldAC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, this is true...

      and it's a pain in the ass for us physicians. The vaccine only works for 10-20 years... so how do we test you guys over here in the states to see if you still have immunity?

      We can't test your arm everytime and watch you have a horrible reaction. Plus, we don't routinely immunize people here so we can use the PPD for screening. (Plus, we screwed up the immunizations over here a long time ago and actually GAVE a bunch of people TB.... so there is a natural reaction in this country not to do immunizations. Even though the immunizations are now really, really safe.)

      So you guys screw it up for the rest of us! :)

    14. Re:Been there, Done that by BoldAC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too.

      High risk people such as health care professionals, people with HIV, or people on immunosuppression are almost always treated.

      Young people and people who have recently converted their PPD are also usually treated.

    15. Re:Been there, Done that by danheskett · · Score: 4, Informative

      As the medical establisment goes in the USA, if there's a chance you have TB, they treat you as if you did have it. This was effectively: take the treatment and you can go back to work, don't take it and take your chances unemployed. See the light?
      That's not right, and its probably untrue. If you were threatened with your job - even if you really did have TB - then your employer comitted an actionable offense. If they really, really, really did that you own them. Especially if it was in writing.

      An employer cannot legally terminate you because you have TB. Just as they cannot legally fire you if you are pregnant, have a broken leg, have HIV/AIDS, etc.

    16. Re:Been there, Done that by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry they brought it to you, but TB absolutely thrives in the living conditions of India, Bangladesh and China. Dense populations, overworked and weakened bodies, poor water quality and effluent in water (even when used for agriculture) contribute greatly to ideal conditions. Once there were strict medical requirements to get a work permit to enter the USA, which according to my doctor, have lapsed considerably and often are forged.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    17. Re:Been there, Done that by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting.

      In the late 80s, I had to take a TB test as a result of possibly having been in contact with the dissease.

      Yeah, I did get the little 'poke under the skin', but only after they had confirmed that I never had had that test before, and they told me afterwards that the test would no longer be reliable when repeated in the future, and that in relevant cases I should mention that to medical personal.

      Maybe the test we got back then was different from what you got now? The explanation we got is that the test would trigger the immune system either way (nfected or not) but the direct effect of triggerign it woudl be different (that is how the test shows if you are infected or not)

    18. Re:Been there, Done that by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Easy solution: Make drugs legal, start enforcing the death penalty on murder cases. Prison populations will drop pretty rapidly.

      On one end we're locking people up for a long long time for stupid non-violent crimes that shouldn't even be illegal anyway--someone wants to kill themselves (albeit, slowly) on crank, let them... That's why our prison population is so big.

      On the other end, we've got people in prison for life or rotting on death row. Do like Texas did, install an "Express Lane" for convicted murderers and get them out of the system so they stop leeching tax dollars...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    19. Re:Been there, Done that by terrymr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Recent studies suggest that effectiveness is much better than 10 - 20 years.

      Check the Journal of the AMA May 05 2004.

    20. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So someone probably coughed in an elevator, in a kitchen or whatever and myself
      > and anyone else in the vicinity were exposed.

      In the UK blame is being put on foreigners, especially those who spit all the time. People from Eastern Europe and parts of Asia and Africa are the most likely, apparantly. No idea if this is racist nonsense-mongering or truth. I have noticed that spitting is quite popular amongst young non-Britons.

    21. Re:Been there, Done that by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About 10 years ago, 60 Minutes ran a story on the upswing of TB in the US, focusing on some studies done by -- NIH?? (don't recall specifically, but one of the major gov't health outfits). One of their case studies involved the shipyards at Long Beach (which for the geographically-challenged, is just south of Los Angeles proper). Turns out EVERYONE who worked there had been exposed, and many had active infections!! (These were American workers, not immigrants.) The thought was that because it's a relatively closed work environment, there was no chance NOT to be exposed if even one infected person entered the facility. (Much akin to the prison environments discussed down this chain a ways.)

      Another study involved airliners -- and the conclusion was, if you're flying, you're going to be breathing recirculated air that has a strong risk of someone's wandering TB germs floating in it -- and that if you saw anyone coughing, you should consider yourself exposed. They (the NIH or whoever it was) went so far as to recommend wearing surgical-quality masks during long flights, especially to/from countries that are a TB hotbed. (Think of it as a condom for your lungs :)

      While this may sound alarmist, remember when AIDS was something that only happened to other people?? Better paranoid than epidemic.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    22. Re:Been there, Done that by Deagol · · Score: 4, Informative
      Check out the online entry for TB in the Merck Manual, Second Home Edition (I have this book at home). It's an interesting read.

      You may understand why doctors may default to such harsh treatment when in doubt. It's a damned tough bug. It can infect nearly any system in the body (even the brain, in rare cases), though it's most commonly found in the lungs. It'll sit dormant for an entire lifetime, popping up when the immune system is weak and/or when damage to the infected system released the cysts, activating the infection.

      There are 3 primary kinds of TB: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the kind people mostly get), M. bovis (cattle variant), and M. avis (bird variant).

      I've read up on TB a bit (I also own the Merck Vet. Manual), because we own a cow. Cattle, a common vector for TB, are simply culled when bovine TB is detected. I assume that if effective treatment were possible, it would be similar to the long, expensive kind used on people and it's simply not profitable to cure a cow.

      What these sources really don't address (or address clearly to the layman) is whether or not the bovine and avian variants are a threat to people, and if they're treated the same way. Maybe an M.D. can clarify for me. :)

    23. Re:Been there, Done that by thbigr · · Score: 1

      And use their organs for transplants

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    24. Re:Been there, Done that by igny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the difference between TB and HIV/pregnancy/broken bones, is that TB is airborne disease. You can not go spread TB/plague around.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    25. Re:Been there, Done that by VP · · Score: 1

      We can't test your arm everytime and watch you have a horrible reaction.

      Horrible reaction? In my experience, it has been just about 1 cm... Also, the rest of the world takes immunization quite seriously, and I had to be re-immunized because I didn't have a positive skin test. It was standard practice to do this in high schools in my country.

      The vaccine only works for 10-20 years...

      I don't know if it works for only 10-20 years, but I still test positive after close to 30 years... Of course, in the US I directly go for a chest X-ray when I have to be tested, since I know the test will be positive :-)

    26. Re:Been there, Done that by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      While this may sound alarmist, remember when AIDS was something that only happened to other people??

      Hmmm....AIDS is still something that only happens to other people. For me at least. Still, I see your point...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    27. Re:Been there, Done that by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      I believe TB is a virus, and as such is not alive perse, but I could be wrong...

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    28. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >we're locking people up for a long long time for stupid non-violent crimes that shouldn't even be illegal anyway--someone wants to kill themselves (albeit, slowly) on crank, let them

      What a great idea! Yeah, because the crank addicts never commit any other crimes to support their habbit -- they are otherwise fully functional, productive members of society that don't harm anyone but themselves.

      What a great solution -- let's make it free for everyone as long as we're making it legal. Hey, why not make it manditory for school children as well, as long as we're at it!?

    29. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screen the Wogs and seal the borders.
      A $100/head bounty for turning in illegals would work fine.

    30. Re:Been there, Done that by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      now this: "Dead bugs can't develop resistence." would make for a cool sig.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    31. Re:Been there, Done that by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      Thanks Doc.
      I too had to go through the months (12 I think) of drug treatment for the same thing. Made me the default designated driver my junior year of college.
      When it showed up on my skin test I assumed it was because I was vaccinated against TB in the 8th grade, but apparently the vaccine isn't very good. The TB vaccine is not a fun one to get either as it often develops in to a bruised wound full of pus, and makes an appealing punching target for the lucky ones who diddn't have to get the shot.

    32. Re:Been there, Done that by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Case in point, an inmate at a privately run prison in Canada died recently after a small cut on his finger got infected.

    33. Re:Been there, Done that by igny · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Prisons are a breeding ground for communicable disease. While it is true that prisons allow diseases spread faster, the main reason why TB in prisons is so rampant is that TB mainly affects people with weaker immune system. People in prisons are under constant stress, probably lacking vitamins/minerals. Consequently their immune system weakens, and an exposure to TB is automatically followed by infection.

      I have a friend, who is a pulmonologist in Russia. He told me that in the past doctors rarely became infected even if exposed to TB constantly. Nowadays, doctors themselves lack vitamins and put under stress in Russia. This pulmonologist was infected once, and other doctors fall ill regularly.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    34. Re:Been there, Done that by scheme · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sorry they brought it to you, but TB absolutely thrives in the living conditions of India, Bangladesh and China. Dense populations, overworked and weakened bodies, poor water quality and effluent in water (even when used for agriculture) contribute greatly to ideal conditions. Once there were strict medical requirements to get a work permit to enter the USA, which according to my doctor, have lapsed considerably and often are forged.

      You're forgetting that the other component in drug resistant TB is availability of antibiotics. In the US, I'm fairly sure that prisons are a fairly nice source of drug resistant TB. Especially since prisoners may get on a course of drugs and stop partway through the 6-9 month course. Add in the infections in the native population and the availability of the latest antibiotics and you have a great way of incubating a drug resistant population and spreading it.

      It also doesn't help that immunosupressed people (AIDS, organ transplants, etc.) can easily get infected by multiple strains increasing the possibility that different strains swap resistances.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    35. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a great idea! Yeah, because the crank addicts never commit any other crimes to support their habbit -- they are otherwise fully functional, productive members of society that don't harm anyone but themselves.

      If drugs were legal, they would be much cheaper (cocaine costs $1-2/kg to make, for example) so addicts wouldn't need to commit crimes to get them. Drug dealers would lose their black market funding at the same time. You don't see nicotine or alcohol addicts committing crimes on a regular basis to support their habits, do you? Yet they're both more addictive than many illegal substances.

    36. Re:Been there, Done that by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      What if you kill the wrongfully convicted?

      Take the Baltovich case for example... it's about to be re-examined in court due to new evidence pointing the finger at Paul Bernardo.

      I'm not saying he's innocent, but if it's demonstrated that he is, then the guy's been in jail 14 years too many.

      And if there had been a death penalty, and he had been "processed" quickly, then there would be no way to bring him back from the dead and give him a life back.

    37. Re:Been there, Done that by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      If my lung doctor told me he was practicing, I think I'd try to find a more experienced lung doctor.

      Bet you never heard that one before.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    38. Re:Been there, Done that by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same here :)

      Still, AIDS is disadvantaged by comparison; airborne infections don't require that the individual do something stupid to become infected. You need merely take the wrong breath at the wrong time.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    39. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Useless solutions. The prison population has to be maintained to prevent our unemployment from increasing dramatically. Even if we let out the drug offenders, the resulting rampant unemployment and poverty due to oversupply of the labor market will lead to an increase in crime, so the prison population will not ultimately shrink.

      Our prison population is so big because our productivity is high enough that there is not useful work for the entire labor class. The only ways to solve this are to increase demand in some way or to reduce the work accomplished per person (perhaps by reducing the work week to 35 hours).

      The fake-drug scandals showed that the justice system in Texas is quite broken, and it's easy to convict the innocent. Thus, our "fast-track" execution model is probably a moral disaster, and I'd hesitate to recommend it to others.

    40. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I just realized? I'm a major university here in the midwest. There are a lot of Chinese. There are a lot of Chinese walking around who are coughing all the time, and I mean the same people, during the summer, fall, spring, winter, all the time. I work with some of these fuckers. I'm going to get a TB test now.

    41. Re:Been there, Done that by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      The "Express Lane" only applies when three credible eyewitnesses name you as the guilty party.

    42. Re:Been there, Done that by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      So what we really need to be doing, when the human varient is detected, is to cull the herd?

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    43. Re:Been there, Done that by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Scary.

      I would have thought the requirements for evidence would have been higher, ie DNA, fingerprints, fibers, etc.

    44. Re:Been there, Done that by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's even worse than that. Off the top of my head these are the people that are in the prison system that aren't prisons.

      Guards
      Cooks
      Councelors
      Doctors (most prisons have an internal medical ward)

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    45. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister steals from my mom to buy smokes and booze.

    46. Re:Been there, Done that by megarich · · Score: 0

      that's why you should never drop the soap in prison....

    47. Re:Been there, Done that by bear_phillips · · Score: 1
      and it's a pain in the ass for us physicians

      So, are you a real doctor or do you just play one on slashdot?

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    48. Re:Been there, Done that by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Informative

      The primary problem with resistant strains of TB arise from the mismanagement of the treatments and or from its innate ability to remain latient for long periods of time. (I am an RN who has delt with many cases of TB probably more than most US Doctors individually ever see in a lifetime)

      The State of Alabama saw the resurgence of TB about 1990 as a result of the AIDS epidemic and the mismanagement of it by New York City. The NYC people had turned people loose with drugs and did not monitor their behavior or results. TB tends to ride on HIV due to the immunity failure. It was clamped down on in Alabama and eventually the NYC people saw fit to correct their ways.

      Essentially the whole problem arises from the modern unwillingness to quarrentine or enforce health rules. HIV has presented due to its politically insane management a gaping hole in the management of all too many diseases and TB is just one. It was for example said that Quarrantine of HIV was not reasonable. It is actually essential for several reasons not usually found in many diseases.

      HIV Should be Quarrantined for these reasons.

      Brain infections cause many HIV People to suffer Dementia and insanity (self protection and community protection) This is about 50% or more in the epidemic.

      Immunity failures make it dangerous for HIV infected persons to be about in the community as they catch easily diseases the rest of us do not suffer from but have on our bodies.(Patient safety)

      HIV is very difficult to spread (Extremely) and by suppressing access to spread it by a modest quarrantine it would be stopped from spreading.

      The Secondary infection risk of HIV makes the HIV infected persons a danger to the community generally such as TB infections

      This cannot be over stated in importance that HIV is a basic problem that a simple Home bound monitored Quarrantine would save millions of lives world wide. Cuba proved this and cold cocked HIV in their country. The cost of this would be less than the drugs we are handing out now!

      TB does have a latiency that it will appear to be successfully treated in people and will reemerge as they get old and weak. This is similar to the HIV lowered immunity issue. It is doubtful that any person is ever successfully treated for TB rather they are simply put into a temporary remission. This means many people as they get old have it reappear from treatments as old as the 1930's. HIV lowered immunity increases the problems with other diseases like TB.

      The good news is that there is a simple measure that everyone can do that vastly reduces all of these problems and it really should be considered as a national security level important thing. WASH YOUR HANDS! It is the only known effective method for handling very nearly all infectious agents. IT WORKS!

      For the Nerd types, REPLACE YOUR KEYBOARDS about every 6 months and clean them often.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    49. Re:Been there, Done that by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to find three eyewitnesses who are willing to testify in most capital trials.

    50. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're after easy solutions, why not go all the way there? Let's kill all the inmates.
      I mean, who cares about them anyway, it's not like I lived in a fascist country where you can get jailed for smoking friggin weed.

    51. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they know it's someone else and are trying to protect him/her.

    52. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's make it free for everyone as long as we're making it legal. Hey, why not make it manditory for school children as well, as long as we're at it!?

      Your sarcasm is misplaced. These two ideas don't follow the same logic. Try again.

    53. Re:Been there, Done that by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      Yup. Had that done too. My friends tell me that the antibiotics actually altered my personality during that period. I have no clue if that was accurate that was only their assessment. I was "immunized" against TB as a child in my country of origin. In the US my allergies were causing me coughing spasms that went on for months. My old doctor put me on those drugs for months since I reacted positively to the skin test. I changed doctors, the new one prescribed Claritin and my coughing spasms went away.

    54. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can no long have the little poke under the skin,

      You could just have a horse allergy, and now should tell the people who do the test "give me the chicken derived test".

      Cuz that is what I get to do.

    55. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was reading up on the UK vaccination programme earlier this year.

      We've not had a proper vaccination programme in the UK for about 10 years - indeed there was nothing at all in large parts of the UK for a lot of that time. Where the vaccine has been available it has been given in doses generally regarded as being too small to be properly effective.

      The rate of TB infection is rising fast in the UK - particularly in population centres like London.

      Currently we're fooling ourselves that it's only a problem for immigrants however our lack of adequate immunisation has already led to several outbreaks in areas where there are no immigrants and no prisons.

    56. Re:Been there, Done that by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's even worse than that. Off the top of my head these are the people that are in the prison system that aren't prisons.

      Yay - go to prison, get TB.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    57. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really extremely scary since most of the population can't afford proper legal representation, and especially in Texas the court-appointed attorneys are useless. A real attorney would challenge the credibility of those three witnesses, but the defense attorneys who usually work these cases can't be bothered. Texas is NOT to be used as the shining example of proper judicial practice.

    58. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the companies that made money off the H-1b craze aren't going to pay your medical bills are they? (Let alone the costs if you get really messed up)

    59. Re:Been there, Done that by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      An employer cannot legally terminate you because you have TB.
      Sure, but they'd be within their rights to fire you if you had TB and then you insisted on not having it treated and spreading it around. Otherwise they'd be guilty of not creating a safe environment for their other employees, or some damned thing.
      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    60. Re:Been there, Done that by Kwantus · · Score: 1
      >Texas is NOT to be used as the shining example

      No shit. In the Odell Barnes case even prosecutors began to admit likely innocence but they just couldn't be bothered with a new trial. Then there's Jessy Carlos San Miguel, whose race was a sentencing factor.

      And guess who the goober was.

    61. Re:Been there, Done that by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      For the Nerd types, REPLACE YOUR KEYBOARDS about every 6 months and clean them often

      That's some stupid advice there. Just have people wash their hands before touching the keyboard *and* have their own keyboard. For "nerd types", like me, we already have more than one keyboard :)

      Creating more garbage is not the answer.

    62. Re:Been there, Done that by aswang · · Score: 1
      Yeah, there was an article in the Chicago Reader a few months back, talking about how Hepatitis C is running rampant in the prison system. Hep C is like Hep B and HIV, in that it requires blood-borne transmission, but it is a lot hardier than HIV is, and can live on razor blades and kitchen utensils and such. So imagine that someone from prison gets paroled and is allowed to work at a fast food restaurant or something. Fun times.

      Even better is the fact that there is no decent cure for Hep C right now. Sure, there's PEG-interferon and various other permutations, but the treatment takes a long time and is probably just as horrible if not worse than the disease itself--people on interferon look like they're dying. It might save their life and keep them from getting liver cancer, but it's not an easy thing to do.

    63. Re:Been there, Done that by aswang · · Score: 1

      The CDC recommends that a positive PPD despite BCG should be treated as a positive if BCG was administered more than five years ago. How valid that is, I don't know, but chances are you are going to have to go through isoniazid prophylaxis and get screening chest X-rays. Yay. Radiation. That said, I've seen some horrible reactions to PPD in people who had previous positives. I saw one woman with an arm that had swelled to a size as big as her head, and it was completely ulcerated and necrotic. But chances are she actually had TB, though, so it probably won't be that bad if you get a repeat PPD

    64. Re:Been there, Done that by aswang · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Shoot, I just graduated from medical school and I've seen more than a couple of cases of active TB in the past year. I've even seen miliary TB and TB osteomyelitis. And this was in Chicago, not anywhere near the Mexican border.

      Of course it may have more to do with socioeconomics. Asking about TB was routine at Cook County, but when I asked about it at an affluent community hospital, everyone looked at me like I was crazy. "You mean people still get TB?"

    65. Re:Been there, Done that by Xybot · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?

      I assume you are a Physician who is against TB vaccination because it makes your job more difficult?!?.

      And we're wondering why TB is becoming a problem again.

      Anyone who refuses to get vaccinated for these diseases should not be allowed to live in the same community as me and my children. As far as I'm concerned they are guilty of the equivalent of criminal negligence.

      --
      God was my co-pilot, but then we crashed and I was forced to eat him.
    66. Re:Been there, Done that by really? · · Score: 1

      or, even better, do nothing. Let nature take its course.

      What would Darwin do?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    67. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did Darwin do to deserve that! He did not invent natural selection - he merely proposed that it is a fact of life.

    68. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, more like fine their employers(current fine is $10K/illegal which is way to low)-given them the money if they stay home.

      Were _Are_ talking 15 Million people here. The employers are the _real_ criminals here. The Illegal aliens should be kicked out-the business owners should do hard time.

    69. Re:Been there, Done that by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Another study involved airliners -- and the conclusion was, if you're flying, you're going to be breathing recirculated air that has a strong risk of someone's wandering TB germs floating in it -- and that if you saw anyone coughing, you should consider yourself exposed.

      Yep, there was a case like that near here in the Midwest. Some idiot Maharishi cultist flew back from India through O'Hare, she landed in the US and keeled over from TB. The hospital asked the airline to track down every single person on each leg of her flight, IIRC a dozen of them tested positive for TB. IMHO the airline did a good job helping with the containment.
    70. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So imagine that someone from prison gets paroled and is allowed to work at a fast food restaurant or something. Fun times.

      So where's the bad in that scenario? You seem to imply giving Hep to the customers or something, which is, frankly, nigh impossible. How often you see fast food restaurant workers having blood contact with their customers? I've yet to see one who first stabs himself with a razor blade and then proceeds to slash me with it...

    71. Re:Been there, Done that by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      And yet, smokes and booze are already legal, so your logic is inconsistent. By the "addicts will steal if it's legal argument", cigarettes and booze (and caffeine, really) should also be illegal.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    72. Re:Been there, Done that by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Those disease vectors we don't even think about may be the scariest ones, eh? Yeah, I'll bet the airline was happy to help with containment -- they don't need any more bad press. (Of course, it was also the right thing to do, and some airlines HAVE been known to do such things...!!)

      Speaking of vectors we don't think about til it happens... Remember back before AIDS frightened the dental industry into sterilizing not only their hand tools but also the drill heads? turns out the drill head's gearing mechanism collects tissue bits from every mouth it's ever in. When I found out about this, it became flamingly obvious why EVERY time I'd had any drilling done, I'd come down with the flu within a week: the drill head was collecting and spewing germs from every mouth it passed. -- Since I found a dentist who anally sterilizes everything, I've not once come down sick after he's been in my mouth.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    73. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the person being tried (guilty or not) is very strongly disliked (perhaps for racial or religious reasons) and not very powerful (no mob connections).

    74. Re:Been there, Done that by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      This is the most modest of advice here. Actually a good measure would be to cover the keyboard with a disposable cover and replace it often but that would as you say make more trash etc.

      Have you seen the waste stream from a medical facility. Shall we say that creating more waste to burn is a well proved solution!! Actually in Africa it appears that a lot of HIV transmission is the product of their thriftiness and they reuse syringes etc. But throwing it away isn't a solution is it.

      The ignorance of the dirtiest of places in the world is killing people like germ warfare. In approximate order the dirtiest items we encounter in daily life are:

      Sponges used in cleaning

      Money

      Telephones

      Computer keyboards But of course you can hardly expect people to dispense with (Gasp Money!) some of these things so Washing hands will have to do for some level of control. Air handling units are another really NASTY thing.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    75. Re:Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

    76. Re:Been there, Done that by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      Actually in Africa it appears that a lot of HIV transmission is the product of their thriftiness and they reuse syringes etc. But throwing it away isn't a solution is it.

      You can recycle these since you can make these out of two materials - plastic and steel. Since these are used once, you don't need to make these durable, just recyclable.

      No bacteria/virus survives molten steel. The ignorance of the dirtiest of places in the world is killing people like germ warfare

      Ok germophobe. Go back into your bubble.

      Honestly, you cannot tell me a sponge full of shit kills people as a cross between E-bola and smallpox!!

    77. Re:Been there, Done that by pianophile · · Score: 1

      I found a dentist who anally sterilizes everything, I've not once come down sick after he's been in my mouth.

      Maybe not, but I think I might be after reading that.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    78. Re:Been there, Done that by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
      Yes, this is true... and it's a pain in the ass for us physicians. The vaccine only works for 10-20 years... so how do we test you guys over here in the states to see if you still have immunity?

      Thus speaks the voice of the US medical profession. Having moved from the UK to the US I encountered exactly this sort of ignorance about TB. I was even told by one that the vaccine didn't work although he was at a loss to explain how the TB epidemic was controlled before the advent of anti-biotics!

      Of course this is the same medical profession that assured me that having the chicken pox vaccine to pass the green card medical, despite already having had the disease as a child, was completely safe. I later found out that this is a bad thing to do since your body can spend time fighting the vaccine and let loose the real virus (that also remains with you for life) causing shingles!

      So, despite the obscene amount of money that US doctors seem to make compared to other countries, I think you'll understand if I tend to trust non-US doctors more. They tend to be more interested in actually treating you than covering their backsides from being sued.

    79. Re:Been there, Done that by Reziac · · Score: 1

      LOL!! So would my dentist :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    80. Re:Been there, Done that by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Sure, but they'd be within their rights to fire you if you had TB and then you insisted on not having it treated and spreading it around.
      Not necessarily true. They cant expose your co-workers to infectious disease of that nature, but they cant just terminate you because you refuse optional medical treatment.

      They'd have to make reasonable accomodations for you - namely assigning you to work outside of contact if possible.

  2. Where art thou. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, Alexander Fleming where art thou now?

    Dead.

    1. Re:Where art thou. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I were dead

    2. Re:Where art thou. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Alexander Fleming.
      Millions of people cured thanks antibiotics, we should be grateful with him and his successors.

      Besides that, I was yesterday reading an old article (1982) about antibiotics resistence, and it said Fleming himself was aware about the risk of resistent bacteria.

    3. Re:Where art thou. by Cutterman · · Score: 1

      Dunno what 'ol Fleming has to do with it. TB chemo started when Selman A. Waksman at the University of California in 1939 was able to isolate an effective anti-TB antibiotic, actinomycin; however, this was too toxic for use in humans or animals Success came in 1943. In test animals, streptomycin, purified from Streptomyces griseus, combined maximal inhibition of M. tuberculosis with relatively low toxicity. On November 20, 1944, the antibiotic was administered for the first time to a critically ill TB patient. The effect was almost immediately impressive. His advanced disease was visibly arrested, the bacteria disappeared from his sputum, and he made a rapid recovery. The new drug had side effects - especially on the inner ear - but the fact remained, M. tuberculosis was no longer a bacteriological exception, it could be assailed and beaten into retreat within the human body.

  3. Here... by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    Oh, Alexander Fleming? where art thou now?

    He's right here, silly.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Here... by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      He's probably not there, cos he was cremated, so who knows where his ashes are now

    2. Re:Here... by Politicus · · Score: 1
      Oh, Alexander Fleming? where art thou now?
      The next Fleming could be working on phage therapy right now.

      Also, on a personal note, I tested positive for the Mantoux TB skin test as part of my college health requirements in the US because I grew up in an Eastern European country where I had a TB vaccine administered as a child. As the referenced article states:

      Today is the most fortuitous time ever realized to develop effective TB vaccines.
      --
      Politicus
  4. America by miracle69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    America has the lowest rate of TB infection because we manage the disease differently than the rest of the world.

    The rest of the world gives the ineffective TB vaccine, while the US doesn't. The TB vaccine is known not to work, and it ruins the best test we have to screen for infection - the ppd (TB skin test).

    In America, we treat everyone that converts their skin test and we don't administer the TB vaccine. Our public health officials deserve a big pat on the back for this decision.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    1. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i dont know where you get such crap, less the mods who mod such ignorance up

      In June 1998, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first new drug for pulmonary tuberculosis in 25 years. The drug, rifapentine (Priftin), is approved for use with other drugs to fight TB. One potential advantage of rifapentine is that it can be taken less often in the final four months of treatment -- once a week compared with twice a week for the standard regimen.

      more here

    2. Re:America by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative
      America has the lowest rate of TB infection because we manage the disease differently than the rest of the world.

      By and large the living conditions, even the worst, are vastly superiour to the conditions many infected people come from. We've got water standards, human waste disposal, heated housing, good food, proper nutrition and for many good heathcare, though that's in decline and has been noted as potential threat which may increase frequency and spread of disease.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woot woot. america is so great . woot

    4. Re:America by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er...yes, but what does that have to do with the decision to not vaccinate against TB, which is what the parent was talking about?

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    5. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got water standards, human waste disposal, heated housing, good food, proper nutrition and for many good heathcare

      The Libertarian Party would like to see all these standards by the government abolished. They would like private corporations to step up and take these tasks over and be able to police themselves. Give the LP their way and we will be joining the onter countries in high TB cases. So like the posts say"With a twist, of course", If you vote libertarian, you will ask for this in the U.S.

    6. Re:America by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 1
      Clue gift! Vaccine != drug.

      Have a nice day!

      --
      Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
    7. Re:America by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Really ?

      Check this :

      http://www.healthylivingeating.com/Health5_News0 6_ 04/Health9.htm

    8. Re:America by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Who needs a vaccine? I've always heard that laughter is the best medicine...

      =Smidge=

    9. Re:America by AaronGTurner · · Score: 3, Informative
      America has the lowest rate of TB infection

      The USA has a surpsingly high rate of infection for a Western nation, higher than most of North West Europe. This may be a result of higher rates of prescription of antibiotics in the USA, and slo the use of antibiotics in animal feed as a growth promoter. In any case in all Western nations there is a problem with TB becoming drug resistant which is likely to be a result of strains becoming resistant in those Western nations, not the importation of strains from Asia.

      Bacteria can become resistant by the exchange of plasmoids with other bacteria of a different species that has developed immunity. In addition the plasmoids that may convey resistance may give resistance to a wide spectrum of antibiotics. Thus being prescribed antibiotics for a cold (which will not help the cold) may convey immunity to a class of antibiotics on bacteria in your gut. It is possible for these to exchange plasmoids with TB bacteria. This can also occur in animal husbandry if antibiotics are used as growth promoters or as a prophylactic.

      In Europe use of antibiotics has been lower than in the USA, so bacteria are a little less resistant here, but we are catching up. TB is on the rise in Europe too.

    10. Re:America by BoldAC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Who modded this up?

      If we have a higher new infection rate... it would be because we don't vaccinate. Doesn't have anything to do with antibotics or growth feeds, or hormones.

      The drug resistant strains are mainly coming out of countries where the burden of disease is very high or the level of care is very low...

      America is not even quoted in the article:

      Strains of TB that are highly resistant to antibiotics are becoming increasingly prevalent in places like Russia, eastern Europe, and China, and only small changes are required to make these strains start spreading quickly.

      I am against antibotic overuse as well... but antibotic overuse is not the cause here. The cause of TB multi-drug resistance is people not taking their medications correctly! This is the reason we do direct observed therapy... to prevent this.

    11. Re:America by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1

      If the increase is due to immigrants from Eastern Europe then the numbers who are infected must be small as the incidence in white males and females in the USA is falling. It is, however, rising amongst black males and hispanic males. It could be that data pooling of all whites into one ethnic group in these figures disguises things. Certainly failing to complete courses of antibiotics is a big factor in breeding resistance.

    12. Re:America by charyou-tree · · Score: 1

      [Higher TB infection rates in the US compared to NW Europe] may be a result of higher rates of prescription of antibiotics in the USA

      ...

      Thus being prescribed antibiotics for a cold (which will not help the cold) may convey immunity to a class of antibiotics on bacteria in your gut. It is possible for these to exchange plasmoids with TB bacteria.


      With respect, this is nonsense.

      Nobody uses INH, rifampin, ethambutol, or any other anti-TB drug to treat common infections. TB isn't becoming more resistant to INH because someone took a Z-Pak for a viral upper respiratory infection. INH & rifampin are rarely used. (Practically the only time I ever prescribe rifampin is to treat documented cases of methicillin resistant staph aureus. And I've neve prescribed INH for anything other than latent or active TB.)

      TB is becoming resistant to the antibiotics we use to treat it because many people don't take the drugs for the prescribed duration. Period. This is most often because the drugs aren't available, because they can't afford them, or because they're irresponsible and noncompliant with treatment.

      Another reason TB is making a comeback is because of the HIV epidemic. We've got a lot more immunocompromised people running around these days than we used to, and TB that might have remained latent in a healthy person will blossom in someone with AIDs. In developing nations, where HIV is underdiagnosed and mostly untreated, it's an even bigger problem. Remember, HIV doesn't kill people - opportunistic infections kill people with AIDS.

      HIV, and drug resistance caused by inadequate treatment (not overuse of common antibiotics), are the two factors most responsible for the resurgence of TB.

    13. Re:America by HidingMyName · · Score: 3, Insightful
      America has the lowest rate of TB infection because we manage the disease differently than the rest of the world.

      The rest of the world gives the ineffective TB vaccine, while the US doesn't. The TB vaccine is known not to work, and it ruins the best test we have to screen for infection - the ppd (TB skin test).

      In America, we treat everyone that converts their skin test and we don't administer the TB vaccine. Our public health officials deserve a big pat on the back for this decision.

      You make some interesting claims, but supply no references. I'm not an expert in T.B. but google is my friend :-). Let's examine these claims and some of the Google results.
      1. The CDC (U.S. center for disease control) inTrends in Tuberculosis --- United States, 1998--2003 states

        "During 2003, a total of 14,871 tuberculosis (TB) cases (5.1 cases per 100,000 population) were reported in the United States."

        While Eurosurveillance in 2002 reports on data (which may have been gathered in 2000) at Tuberculosis control in Europe needs expanded DOTS, linked HIV/TB control, and improved surveillance reports:

        "In most countries of western Europe, reported TB incidence is below 15 per 100 000 and continues to decrease slowly. In central Europe, reported TB incidence ranges from 20 to 40 per 100 000 and is decreasing in most countries. TB incidence is much higher in Bosnia-Herzegovina (65/100 000) and Romania (124/100 000), where it has increased significantly in recent years. In eastern Europe, a further increase in reported incidence was observed in 2000 to an overall 89/100 000, a 56% increase since 1995. In countries providing representative data, the overall levels of drug resistance at the beginning of treatment remained low both in Western and Central Europe (less than 1% of patients never previously treated had primary multidrug resistance) and remained extremely high in the Baltic states (9-12%)."

        So the U.S. may have a lower rate of TB than western europe, and definitely has a lower rate than central or eastern Europe. However, I was not able to find a supporting reference for the U.S. having the lowest Rate of infection.

      2. Khaled Mohammed Abu Khadra's thesis abstract (Ph.D. thesis?) (the thesis itself was not directly linked), but the abstract gave hard numbers of preventive vaccination (vaccination prior to exposure) for the BCG vaccine in Jordan. The last paragraph of the abstract reads:

        "The overall vaccine effectiveness was 88% ; 85% for pulmonary TB and 95% for Extra-pulmonary TB. The vaccine was more effective (92%) when given shortly after birth, compared to 62% when given at school age."

      3. However, vaccines appear to become less effective after widespread usage (try googling on Ineffective TB vaccine), so they may be ineffective after all (a BBC Article gives 70% effectiveness ratings).
      4. Potential Public Health Impact of New Tuberculosis Vaccines by Ziv E, Daley CL and Blower, S. describes the outcome of a mathematical epidemiological model of Tuberculosis, which appears to indicate that vaccination AFTER exposure (post exposure) is likely to be more effective than pre-exposure vaccination at preventing disease (the authors make an interesting point that disease prevention is more important than preventing infection).
      I wasn't able to directly refute the claims, and I suspect some of them may be true given the information turned up.
    14. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing a bit more research I now think I was wrong about TB. What made me doubt the immigration source was two fold.

      Firstly there has been an influx of refugees into Europe without the same corresponding rise in TB rates.

      Secondly the rise in TB in the USA is concentrated in the black and hispanic ethnic groups, and not amongst the ethnic groups of Eastern Europe or Asia.

      But perhaps the continuing drop in rates in whites and asians is an effect of data pooling, i.e. there may be rises based on economic status with blacks and hispanics more likely to be in groups that live in physical and medical conditions that allow TB to spread?

      AaronGTurner

    15. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are right and I was off track.

      AaronGTurner

    16. Re:America by IBX · · Score: 1

      Being born in Central Europe, I was vaccinated against TB as infant - I have an quarter-sized scar on my shoulder. That's where the bug remains alive and produces my immunity. (Aquired immunity against TB is short-lived, so persisting live pathogen is needed for keeping the immune response. Weakened pathogen is injected into skin for the vaccination and the idea is that it would not spread but remain alive there).

      In US, there is no vaccination so my imunity became a problem when I took the TB skin test to get my medical for the green card. Even after a negative chest X-ray, the doctors insisted I must take 6-month combination therapy of two tuberculostatics. I was trying to explain to them that all it would do to me (apart from a 5% chance of getting cirrhosis) would be "curing" my inoculation, killing the helpful bugs in my shoulder. I ended up refusing to pay the medical bill until they gave me negative X-ray result for INS.

      Btw: until very recently TB was practicaly eradicated in central Europe - because of the culling of infected cattle and mandatory vaccination + forced treatment of TB pacients since 50s. By early 90s, it was rare even to get a single TB pacient in a lung clinic to be shown to medical students. Now it has changed because of immigrants from former USSR.

      Even if the efficiency of vaccination is only 90%, it is useful thing to do.

    17. Re:America by aswang · · Score: 1

      You do realize that BCG is given to prevent disseminated disease, right? While it does nothing to prevent you from getting pulmonary TB, it does keep you from getting miliary TB or TB meningitis. If our four-drug regimen ever loses its effectiveness, I'm pretty sure we'll start giving BCG too.

    18. Re:America by si618 · · Score: 1

      -=> and it ruins the best test we have to screen for infection - the ppd (TB skin test)

      Bzzzt...WRONG!

      Thanks to a new Australian company, there is an improved test now being marketed globally:

      http://www.cellestis.com/

      I believe their focus in the US is on your prisons and military forces.

      --
      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
    19. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived in the United States my whole life. I'm pretty sure that I was exposed to TB when I was working at a department store - one time a woman rather violently coughed on me. I expected to have a horrible cold not long after, but "nothing" happened.

      The first time I had a PPD done since I was about 8 years old was about two years after that - positive.

      Because of my regular medication cocktail (Lamictal, Wellbutrin, and birth control regularly, with Xanax and Ativan as needed) my doctor decided not to put me on the standard nine month INH bit. There were concerns about the mild MAOI effects and (most importantly) my liver's ability to handle so much in medication.

      So far, it hasn't affected my ability to work in any position whatsoever (including volunteering with children and at hospitals), as I have a negative x-ray on file and am regularly monitored by multiple doctors. *shrug*

      I'm so confused now - is it illegal for my doctor not to have prescribed the isoniazid? (GP is handling it.) Should I press her about it? Or should I fork over money I don't have to see a pulmonologist?

      Maybe after this article I will talk to her about it again.

      But my real point - I converted my skin test, have never had the TB vaccine, have had my case reported to the California Department of Public Health, and have never been treated with antibiotics. While I hope to take INH at a later point, right now it would not be a particularly safe option.

      (Upsetting my medication balance is not a very good idea. I can do easily without the benzodiazepines, since I only take one once every two months or so anyway, but nixing the Wellbutrin could be a very bad idea. Lamictal is not advised in people with decreased liver function, which would probably include people taking INH. Bahhhhhh.)

  5. Shouldn't be that surprising by wiredog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MDR TB has been on the rise for years, as have worries about its transmissibility. Read "And the Band Played On" (mostly about AIDS in the 80's) or "The Coming Plague" (about emergent diseases) for good overviews.

  6. It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Funny

    First it was going to be AIDS, then it was SARS, cancer is slowly being beaten...

    Maybe a nice new healthy TB strain will be the new plague to rid ourselves of some of the population.

    How long has it been, at least 400-600 years since a nice big population dwindling event has occurred...

    My daily commute isn't getting any shorter, oil seems to be running out... air is getting more and more polluted... time for the G-O-D to clean the house out a little...

    (and if it's my time to go, I'm fine with that)

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:It's about time... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 5, Informative

      How long has it been, at least 400-600 years since a nice big population dwindling event has occurred...

      The 1918 Flu Pandemic probably killed more people worldwide than The Black Death. The Black Death killed a larger percentage, though.

    2. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIDS will probably clean out Africa like nothing has before (for at least thousands of years anyway). SARS is contained, but it hasn't totally gone away. From everything I've heard, SARS will probably be a re-occuring problem.

      TB isn't the only thing that is growing stronger. Pretty much all viruses are getting a boost - mainly because of idiots who don't take their medication to completion. It's a race we're probably going to lose. Uber resistant viruses, and costs of healthcare spiraling out of control: that spells trouble for the future.

    3. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Influenza(sp?) in 1919 killed more people worldwide than WWI. But, feel free to off yourself just be sure to leave all your world possessions to BeyondGoodandEvil at /.

    4. Re:It's about time... by lostnihilist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't find that particularly amusing. Several million people are dying in Africa each year from complications from AIDS/HIV-1, on the order of a holocaust about every 18 months with expectations of increased death rates for at least the next few years. Life expectancy rose from about 40 to 60 years of age from the 60s to early 90s and is now as low as 35. People are dying, not to mention that the susceptibility of AIDS patients to TB makes them a good vector to be infected and to mutate and be passed on to others to infect many of us.

    5. Re:It's about time... by grape+jelly · · Score: 1

      How long has it been, at least 400-600 years since a nice big population dwindling event has occurred...

      My daily commute isn't getting any shorter, oil seems to be running out... air is getting more and more polluted... time for the G-O-D to clean the house out a little...


      Just wait until it's your family that gets sick, or better yet, yourself . I'm sure you'll be changing your tune in a hurry!

    6. Re:It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, over a period of centuries (6th, 14th, and 17th), The Black Death killed about 137 million people... The 1918 flu did kill about 25 million in one year, which is pretty significant.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    7. Re:It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 0

      Here's some advice:

      Don't go to Africa.
      Don't eat monkey brains.

      I feel bad for people with AIDS, but I also feed bad when I stub my toe walking to the bathroom in the dark. Both of these events are preventable. I can choose to turn on the light when I pee in the dark, and people with AIDS (at least those not born with the affliction) can choose to not have unprotected sex, don't use needles, and to not eat monkey brains.

      Fnord.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    8. Re:It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 0

      I love how you can quote my message nearly completely, except for the one line that totally makes your message moot:

      (and if it's my time to go, I'm fine with that)

      Yes, death sucks. But it's part of life. Get used to it. You're not getting out of this (life) alive.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    9. Re:It's about time... by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 5, Interesting

      More Importantly, it is coming, just not how you beleive.

      While the Black Death did indeed kill less numbers, it did kill 25 million people(over 5 years), where the 1918 flu killed upwards of 40 million in about a year.

      The thing is the Black Death killed 1/3 of europe's population, fueling the greatest economic boom this planet has ever known (at least the one that didn't fall like the internet bubble).

      Upcomming in the next quarter century is the death of the Baby Boomers. When they start to pass on, they will leave behind more money and jobs than you can possibly imagine. This will fuel a new era of real money the likes of which the modern world has never experienced. Unfortunatly, the government that is in power when this begins to happen is going to get credited with the economic boom that will happen, without actually doing anything.

      Now, while the boomers don't represent 1/3 of the population, they nearly represent 1/3 of the weath, possibly causing the same sort of wealth redistribution that occured at the end of the Black Plauge. Trouble is, that the goods that North Americans will buy, will often be manufactured offshore, thereby moving the money off to other countries. Trouble with that? The governments of the last 40 years have been sucking the North American people dry, and the money that should rightly end up in the pockets of local producers, will move to their offshore competitors.

      So, When you get your inheritance, Buy North American! ... wow, neat rant ...

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    10. Re:It's about time... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As dark as his humor tries to be, he does have a point. What happens if something like this reaches India or Pakistan, or perhaps one or more of several nations in South America, in which shantytowns with no sanitation and crushing population density? It's entirely possible that we could see millions die before it could be brought under control. But what of the political upheaval? TB can kill in weeks to months once it takes hold, and spreads via airborne particles. Most of those nations aren't that stable to begin with, and those that are (like India and Brazil) have significant undercurrents of tension that could erupt into even bigger problems.

      While the world's resources could use the strain of a few hundred million fewer people, this is probably not the best way to achieve that.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    11. Re:It's about time... by throbber · · Score: 1

      The last 'great popuatiion dwindling event' that I'm aware of (not counting all the wars) was the 'flu pandemic of 1918. (http://www.stanford.edu/group/virus/uda/) . Not quite400-600 hundred years.

    12. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But monkey brains are so good, YUM!!

    13. Re:It's about time... by jatencio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although technically true, there are a lot of people in Africa who don't know that unprotected sex is the cause of their illness despite the education campaigns. There is cultural difference that I cannot claim to understand that prevents the natives from believing our educators that were sent over there that claim that this is why they are dying.

    14. Re:It's about time... by funwithBSD · · Score: 0

      While the world's resources could use the strain of a few hundred million fewer people
      Yeah. Except that a few hundred million corpses have a significant impact on the environment itself.
      Yes it's true, we are such pests that even killing ourselves off is likely to destroy the environment.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    15. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I wouldn't trust anything that the YANKEE IMPERIALIST BASTARDS say so why should the Africans.

    16. Re:It's about time... by khallow · · Score: 1
      The 1918 Flu Pandemic probably killed more people worldwide than The Black Death. The Black Death killed a larger percentage, though.

      Not so. From estimates I've seen, the Black Death killed more in Europe alone (during the 1347-1350 pandemic it was on the order of 25 million) than the 1918 Flu Pandemic did globally (roughly 22 million).

    17. Re:It's about time... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. But what we REALLY need is a moderate case of Anthrax Leprosy Delta Mu...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    18. Re:It's about time... by khallow · · Score: 1
      First it was going to be AIDS, then it was SARS, cancer is slowly being beaten...

      AIDS most definitely is a "population dwindling event". In fact, we "need" no other disease. TB is a opportunistic infection piggybacking on HIV's success. Cancer doesn't control a population since the vast majority die well after childbearing age. SARS turned out to be a dud in large part because of the aggressive quarantine of the disease.

      (and if it's my time to go, I'm fine with that)

      Why do you think someone or something else should decide your "time to go"?

    19. Re:It's about time... by BerntB · · Score: 1
      (and if it's my time to go, I'm fine with that)
      Considering your attitude to others' suffering, we're also ok with if you're going away.

      What I'm not ok with is that lots of our loved ones and good friends go away. And other people's loved ones.

      The way the research is going now, a young person might get time enough to live a good life. Not just a few decades.

      (An old student friend with back problems told me a joke: "How do you know you're dead if you've over 40? You wake up and don't hurt anywhere.")

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    20. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more of a question of the superTB coming FROM India.

      They've already given the world antibiotic-resistant E.Coli bacteria, possibly including 157.

      That's what you get with 1 billion people living in extreme insanitation (as compared to western countries), ineffective or non-existent health care and free availability of antibiotics.

    21. Re:It's about time... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Possibly, the reason is that it is US government policy that abstinence is the only preventative measure, even going so far as to de-fund humanitarian organizations that go so far as to suggest that a condom might be an alternative (and more practical) solution.

      The US government bullshits so much, it do you blame anyone for not believing a word they say?

    22. Re:It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      I just don't see why humans are infatuated with saving everyone. Some people have to die. It's just fact. If we ever get the entire population to live for 100+ years, just think of how bad it's going to get. There will be fuel shortages. There will be food shortages. (some say there already are). Air and Water will be dirtier and dirtier.

      Eventually, we will get to a point where the seas are over-fished, the ground is over-farmed, and then we're ALL screwed. You know why there is a deer hunting season? So they don't all starve to death during the winter. It's more humane to have some of them killed off.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    23. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wahoo! My parents are baby boomers! I'm gonna be $rich$!

    24. Re:It's about time... by barawn · · Score: 1

      When they start to pass on, they will leave behind more money and jobs than you can possibly imagine.

      The cohort replacing the Baby Boomers is larger than the baby boomers were. It's only when you get to the most recent generations (i.e. - probably *now*) that the cohorts (age groups) are the same size (adjusted for death rates).

      That is, they will not leave behind more jobs than we can imagine. The incoming work force is much larger than the Baby Boomers were.

    25. Re:It's about time... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 3, Funny

      What happens if something like this reaches India or Pakistan, or perhaps one or more of several nations in South America, in which shantytowns with no sanitation and crushing population density?

      M-O-O-N, that spells "we're all fucked!"

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    26. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry, but the economics of this are terrible. Open jobs don't create wealth, production creates wealth - meaning that filled jobs create wealth. The US saw an economic boom in the 80s and 90s as the boomers have been part of the workforce. Of course, as they retire and stop being productive, that will be bad for the economy; thus the complaints about the increasing burden of social security, medicare, lower benefits.

    27. Re:It's about time... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      and if it's my time to go, I'm fine with that

      May it be sooner rather than later...and hopefully before you breed.

      I don't care how cavalier you are concerning your own well-being, but a nut-house view like this applied to my family will get you a bullet in the brain. And no doubt the approval of many of my neighbors, who also don't like the idea of some douchebag going on about 'God cleaning house' with some nasty little plague.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    28. Re:It's about time... by megarich · · Score: 0

      "How long has it been, at least 400-600 years since a nice big population dwindling event has occurred"

      actually try back to the 30's and 40's with wwII. granted it wasnt a diseased epidemic but wiped out alot of people off the face of this planet never-the less.

      i know also i think in the 20's there was a big flu epidemic but now sure how many that killed....

    29. Re:It's about time... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Awww. How quaint, a knee-jerk American response! A Bush man! Probably lives near Texas!

      You mention murder while attempting to make a post about saving lives. How rhetorical!

      If we would just get a little more murder on these days (on a massive scale) we wouldn't need big plagues, new diseases, etc, etc, to control our population. But everyone has to be SOOO P.C. nowadays... can't start major world wars, perform ethnic cleansing, stage a bloody coup, use nuclear weapons... so we get more and more populated, more disease grows and spread, and kills off 1/3 of us. YAY! More oxygen for the rest of us! Less Hummer H2's on the road while we try to go to work! Think of how much shorter the lines will be at the supermarket!

      Humans die. It's what we do. It's what you will do. It's what your family will do. It's what your neighbors will do. Just accept that fact, and live your life to the fullest.

      Just don't start bitching and moaning about "I didn't have enough time, I didn't get to do this or that, I never told so-and-so I loved them" because you're a procrastinating a-hole that thinks you're God and are going to live forever...

      You get fed this line about how, like, you're gonna live forever or whatever. You're gonna die. Someone'll kill ya. Someone'll kill ya with a knife. You make sure your abs are, uh, friggin' ripped; you got some good guns! You wanna look good for when you get stabbed with a knife. Sorry, that's how it works...

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    30. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the government that is in power when this begins to happen is going to get credited with the economic boom that will happen, without actually doing anything.

      This is how governments work. A good politician is not a politician that changes things, it is someone who is in the right place when thing naturally change. But then this defines just about anyone who is successful. Remember the only true constant in this universe is that things change.

    31. Re:It's about time... by BerntB · · Score: 1
      If we ever get the entire population to live for 100+ years, just think of how bad it's going to get. There will be fuel shortages. There will be food shortages. (some say there already are). Air and Water will be dirtier and dirtier.
      The rate of getting children might have to go down a bit.

      But the Earth has enough resources. Assume fusion or really good solar cells and energy isn't a problem. One of those (or something totally different) will almost certainly happen.

      If we do it right, we could have most people in the world living well, getting education and safety. People living well don't get as many children -- the ones getting large families are the poor.

      Eventually, we will get to a point where the seas are over-fished, the ground is over-farmed, and then we're ALL screwed.
      The western world's civilisations have always had problems. We always will have them. We have solved them through technology for centuries. To insist that the only solution is to waste billions of people when you know that you haven't understood the problem, is some sort of caricature of a troll.
      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    32. Re:It's about time... by flink · · Score: 1

      I would say WWII killed a fair number of people...

    33. Re:It's about time... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Jesus H., lay off the coke Mr. Maladjusted. That's just about one of the most off-topic posts I've ever read.

      It'll be interesting to see what your argument will be when medical technology advances to the point to provide us with real immortality. My guess is that you'll either be one of the loons screaming about how it goes 'against Gods laws', or one of the whiners demanding it as a 'right'.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    34. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha. No, the income requirements for the Social Security system for when the Baby Boomers will kill the Federal Govt, so there will be a great Boom, just not an economic one.

    35. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about as fertilizer? Or as incinerator fuel?

      Just some ideas...

    36. Re:It's about time... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      1918 was the last big epidemic. The Spanish Flu. The funny thing was that it mainly affected young people, and caused more havoc on the Battlefields of WW1 than the war itself. Probably the Spanish Flu was one of the main reasons why, the WW1 had to be stopped by the germans. That and the losses on the battlefields caused a premature running out of people to a point where the war was obviously not winnable anymore on the german side and a breakthrough in the frontiers by the allieds was only a matter of time.

      Speaking about the hands of god, the Spanish Flu probably was one of those occasions.

    37. Re:It's about time... by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a little population reducing event between 1936 and 1945 that seemed to do a pretty good job. It wasn't microbial, but it was more than adequate.

    38. Re:It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully you'll be the first to go...

  7. Oh Hans Castorp, where art thou now? by perdu · · Score: 1
    If it does hit, can I go stay on The Magic Mountain?

    --
    You only use 2% of your DNA
  8. That's what happens... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    when we let big pharmaceutical companies take control of R&D.

    Most antibiotics today are BASED on peniciline. Truth is, these resistant TB strains are resistant against PENICILINE-based antibiotics.

    As I saw on Discovery once... There are thousands of natural antibiotics which are extremely complex. Some can be taken from cactae in South America, some can be taken from certain species of ants.

    But natural antibiotics just can't be patented (think of it as the OSS medicine), and companies don't give a sh*t about them.

    Hmph.

    1. Re:That's what happens... by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But natural antibiotics just can't be patented (think of it as the OSS medicine), and companies don't give a sh*t about them.
      "System and method of extracting natural antibiotics from an ant." What's the problem?
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a doctor, but I did see a program on Discovery channel last night. Thanks for that little ill informed diatribe, btw you do know where pencillin comes from? Nature!

    3. Re:That's what happens... by miracle69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      TB has never been and never will be resistant to Penicillin. Your grasp of antibiotics is slightly less than your grasp of spelling.

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    4. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As always, it's a real shame that science isn't in the hands of people who once saw something on the Discovery Channel...

      Uh, yeah, that's what it is -- there are efficaceous antibiotics against TB that can be directly taken from ants or cactuses. And no one will attempt to market these miracle compounds, and no one can figure out how to make a patentable derivative of them.

    5. Re:That's what happens... by mc6809e · · Score: 0

      when we let big pharmaceutical companies take control of R&D.

      Most antibiotics today are BASED on peniciline. Truth is, these resistant TB strains are resistant against PENICILINE-based antibiotics.

      As I saw on Discovery once... There are thousands of natural antibiotics which are extremely complex. Some can be taken from cactae in South America, some can be taken from certain species of ants.

      But natural antibiotics just can't be patented (think of it as the OSS medicine), and companies don't give a sh*t about them.


      All you've shown is that intellectual property rights encourage vigorous research, while the lack of those rights means that people "don't give a sh*t".

    6. Re:That's what happens... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ever heard of Tamoxifen for treatment of breast cancer? That drug was isolated from the Pacific Yew tree. Drug companies have a HUGE interest in "natural" drugs, but that does not mean they will find the cure for all diseases. It takes years to isolate and test the chemicals then more years to figure out how to make the drugs they did find in the tests. Then they have to scale the process to make tons of the drugs. Even with "fast-tracking", Parallel computing, folding algrithms,etc. you can expect 5-7 yrs from R&D to drugs you can buy.

    7. Re:That's what happens... by perdu · · Score: 5, Informative
      But natural antibiotics just can't be patented (think of it as the OSS medicine), and companies don't give a sh*t about them.
      Not so, not so. Drug and biotech companies and public research institutes still grow exotic fungi and plants to look for new classes of active compounds. In the past 10 years, about 25% of all new drugs came from natural compounds or derivatives.

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    8. Re:That's what happens... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, this is what happens when people get viral infections and demand antibiotics from their doctors, which are 100% useless against viruses. Those carrying TB and overdoing antibiotics can give the virus an opportunity to evolve defenses against penicillin.

      Tip to help the world avoid this: Ask your doctor what his professional opinion is about the source of your illness. If he/she believes that it's viral, ask what kind of OTC medications (NyQuil, Benadryl, whatever) will work best to deal with the symptoms. It may not slow things much, but at least you'll know that you weren't the cause for the strain that kills us all.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    9. Re:That's what happens... by danudwary · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Where does that statistic come from? I work in natural products biosynthesis I always thought it was much, much greater. What's the other 75%? And don't say combinatorial chemistry.

    10. Re:That's what happens... by WhiplashII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know that the pharmaceutical companies are "THE MAN", and therefore evil, but let's think about what that means for a little bit. You are saying that there exists a better, non-patentable method of producing a drug. And it is not being used because the pharmaceutical companies cannot patent it and thereby ensure profitability. No one else is making drugs from those sources either - even though it is known to be non-patented. So this is virtual proof that if we weaken the patent system, we will have LESS drugs available, not more. In fact, pure logic dictates that we should allow someone to patent the unpatentable natural antibiotics - at least then they would be available!

      Like you, I don't really like the way this works. But my question is what can replace the "market force" of patent law to make pharmaceutical companies make these (and other similar) drugs? This is actually a pretty common dilemma. As a society we really need to figure out a way to make people rich for doing things that are obvious, but necessary - otherwise noone smart and experienced enough to build a company will bother.

      This is one (of many, in my opinion) of the problems with patents as they are today. Anybody have any ideas?

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    11. Re:That's what happens... by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Informative

      But natural antibiotics just can't be patented (think of it as the OSS medicine), and companies don't give a sh*t about them.

      What utter bollocks. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) was derived from a compound present in the bark of the willow tree (Salyx). It was patented on March 6, 1889.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    12. Re:That's what happens... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Addendum: yes, I know that aspirin is not an antibiotic, but the same patent rules would apply to it as to antibiotics.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    13. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why only replace market forces, that seems to be only half the problem? Why not work on replacing the institution of pharmaceutical companies (which are driven by profits) with other kinds of institutions, which might be driven by different goals?

      I also think that the greater the risk, the greater the reward. On the other hand, if you subsidize the risk (as we already do with government funded research), then you should be able to reduce the reward.

      One idea that I've gotten into for how to organize an economy better is Participatory Economicss, or ParEcon for short. You can read more about it here... www.parecon.org It's an economic vision created by Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel. Albert just received the highest award that you can receive in Italy for his work on this vision, which has been going on for about 20 years, and has been written about in numerous books. He also received a glowing letter from Gorbachev. It's been discssed and reviewed widely in Europe. Step to the other side of the pond, in the US, the land of the free, and you won't hear a peep, not even a book review, despite the fact that Albert and Hahnel are both Americans. This gives us insight into how our media works.

    14. Re:That's what happens... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      The last I checked, TB is a disease caused by a bacteria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis to be exact.

      The likely reason why this bacteria has grown resistance to antibiotics is from people not finishing their prescription when they are suppose to. Doctor gives a patient a 2 week dose of antibiotics; the patient feels fine by the 9th day, and stops drug treatment. The last remaining population of bacteria who have been slowly losing the war against the drug now have a chance recuperate. But by now, the population is so low that the body in its recovered state will kill them off, but not before the bacteria gets expelled out of the lungs through a cough, or simple breathing. The next person cultivates the strain, and presto, we get antibiotic resistant bugs.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    15. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 0

      Just a pedantic correction..

      "All you've shown is that intellectual property rights encourage vigorous research, while the lack of those rights means that people "don't give a sh*t"."

      Actually, PEOPLE do give a shit, which is why we're spending all this time talking about this.

      Corporations, on the other hand, only give a shit when they are fed enough profits. This difference is not trivial. Let's not confuse the interests of a few selfish, greedy, arrogant corporations with the interests of everyday people.

      We can fix this problem in one of two ways, one way to get corporations interested is to hand over all plant life and allow them to patent and own every organism on the planet so that they can profit from them. That's the method that you seem to be advocating. The other solution is to create institutions that respond to the needs of people without being handed gargantuan profits. This second method, is the method that I would advocate.

    16. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm ... who should control R&D? The state? Yeah, state control/public funding worked great in socialist states. There was just a stream of medical advances coming out of the Soviet Union. Oh, and China is on the cutting edge of drug research.
      Private owership/control is the most efficient system. Capitalism doesn't just make people wealthy, it _vastly_ improves the quality of life for everyone in the system.
      You're a freaking, uneducated idiot if you believe turning over drug R&D to the public sector will do anything other than make the drug companies operate like the DMV or the Post Office.
      Idiot.
      Socialist Idiot.

    17. Re:That's what happens... by Inthewire · · Score: 2, Informative
      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    18. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That entire comment is untrue for so many reasons.

      Big pharmaceutical companies do not have a monopoly on R&D. There are many university and government labs work on pharma therapies.

      Most antibiotics are not based on penicillin. See this list:
      http://www.courses.ahc.umn.edu/medical-school/IDis /Antibiotic/list.html

      Many pharmaceuticals are based on natural products - drug companies take millions of compounds and screen them for activity on particular enzymes/bacteria/whatever. There has to be a source for these compounds. Conveniently, we have a source of a massive variety of organic compounds (some extremely complex and would require years of research to produce a full synthetic route) which likely have at least some biological activity - other living organisms. 'Natural' products. These compounds certainly can be patented but they might not have to be - the lead candidates found in the screening are then taken and modified to produce thousands of derivatives which are then also screened. The lead candidates from this may differ significantly from the starting compunds and can again be patented.

      In any case, extremely complex antibiotics have a good chance of either being unstable or toxic or both.

    19. Re:That's what happens... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Typo on my part. The sentence should have read:

      Those carrying TB and overdoing antibiotics can give the bacteria an opportunity to evolve defenses against penicillin.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    20. Re:That's what happens... by perdu · · Score: 1
      I heard it cited where I work (a pharma) but can't find the reference. Sorry! Now that you mention it, I think it was 50% natural products, 25% biologicals and 25% synthetics. It will be a few years yet till combinatorial chemistry makes that much impact! :>)

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    21. Re:That's what happens... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Some people care.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    22. Re:That's what happens... by vallette · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're confusing your numbers here. The numbers you quote for flu are US only, the numbers for the other diseases are world wide. So in 1918 500,000 people died in the US alone. World wide estimates vary widely, anywhere from 25-100 million. 20,000 people die in the US from flu every year making it the #1 killer for infectious diseases. The interesting thing about the 1918 pandemic was that young, healthy people died from it at greater rates then older people. In the US you were 3 times as likely to die from it if you were between 20 and 35 then if you were over 60. Today, with the ease of world travel, a similar strain could have equally devastating results.

    23. Re:That's what happens... by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      from what i can tell there is no patent on asprin http://www.uspto.gov/

    24. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My grandma had to take that for the remainder of her life after she had breast cancer. She eventually (a few years ago) had to choose between that or some other drug (I forget which exactly) because she also had to take that other drug, which conflicted with Tamoxifen (as in, deadly to take them both at the same time). She chose to keep taking the other drug, but had to stop taking the Tamoxifen, and the cancer returned, soon killing her.

      Just reminded me of her when you mentioned that. heh

    25. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      First off, its the Doctors that shouldn't be prescribing antibiotics for viruses. The problem patients are the ones that dont take all of their prescriptions, and self prescribe the next time they get sick.

      This is what is creating the resistant strains. There is a reason that you need a prescription to get antibiotics, Doctors aren't supposed to hand them out like candy to whoever asks.

    26. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First off, its the Doctors that shouldn't be prescribing antibiotics for viruses.

      That's true here in the United States. In many (mostly third-world) countries, antibiotics are available over-the-counter. And their problems become our problems.

      The problem patients are the ones that dont take all of their prescriptions, and self prescribe the next time they get sick.

      Yes, also a huge problem.

    27. Re:That's what happens... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Ummm ... who should control R&D? The state?

      For example.

      > Yeah, state control/public funding worked great in socialist states.

      They had an entirely different kind of state with a different kind of government, so comparing apples and oranges.

      > There was just a stream of medical advances coming out of the Soviet Union.

      Actually, in the areas of eye and nerve treatment, they have made quite some contributions.

      > Private owership/control is the most efficient system. Capitalism doesn't just make people wealthy, it _vastly_ improves the quality of life for everyone in the system.

      No, it is the system which worked better then the available alternatives, that doesn't make it the best system possible.

      And with the USA havign approx 12% of its population livign on or below the poverty line, something that is unheard of and would be utterly unacceptable in western Europe with its slightly more 'socialist' type of governments, rather suggests that an almost pure form of capitalism does not probvide the best possible living conditions for everyone in the system.

      Then, you are confusing a few things. Soviet RUssia and China may in name be communist countries (maybe this is news for you, but communism and socialism are not entirely the same thing) but the Soviet Union was a Leninist/Stalinist state, whiel CHina is mostly Maoist. Those are indeed in part based on the ideas of communism, but Nazism was also based on the principes of private ownership and capitalism, which doesn't make it anywhere similar to the utopia you seem to be thinking about when talking about private ownership and capitalism.

    28. Re:That's what happens... by aelbric · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight. Because Gorbachev sent him a glowing letter, I'm supposed to be impressed? He was the guy in charge when the Soviet Union collapsed in on itself right?

      One other thing, from the webpage:

      Socialism as it was Always Meant to Be
      by Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel
      A popular, descriptive account of parecon.


      Uh, no thank you.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    29. Re:That's what happens... by danudwary · · Score: 1


      OK. Just curious. I'd have guessed about 80% of drugs are natural products or derivitives. Wouldn't have thought there were so many biologicals on the market, but I guess that makes sense. Cheers.

    30. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those carrying TB and overdoing antibiotics can give the virus an opportunity to evolve

      What Virus? Are you claiming TB is a virus?

      Your rant is unclear.

    31. Re:That's what happens... by Pius+II. · · Score: 1

      The patent on aspirin was taken from Bayer as part of the reparations for WW2. unproductive google search

    32. Re:That's what happens... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Mods on acid here. Parent is utterly wrong.

    33. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, secondary bacterial infections are common. Hence the need for antibiotics. Especially with respiratory viruses in people with asthma and related issues.

      Doctors in this State don't even check what virus people have. It happened during SARS when people were being hospitalized for a week with pneumonia and other complications, and it is happening now with West Nile Fever. Hence the statistical impossibility of Minnesota having 9 cases of WNF with one fatality. Only 20% of WN infected people are symptomatic, only 1% have serious complications, and the fatality rate is lower still. But when Major Research Hospitals(tm) don't do antigen tests to provide valid statistics for the CDC, you get this absurd results, and epidemology is crippled.

    34. Re:That's what happens... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The method you advocate doesn't work well when you consider government funded institutions are unable to attract the best and brightest on a consistent basis because they can't match private sector salaries.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    35. Re:That's what happens... by jafiwam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy cow.

      It's rare that I see a post of blatant fear mongering lies such as this one.

      Tell me, is your tin foil hat working today? Good, because TIN has been off the market in foil form for YEARS in trade for aluminum. You better check what metal it really is! It might not be protecting you the way you think!

      Ack the panic!

      I only have time to punch a few holes in your nonsensical arguments, so I'll focus on big ones.

      Some 6600 people have contracted SARS worldwide, and that _is_ an epidemic

      Yes, however SARS takes down otherwise healthy adults, does not seem to have a normal low frequency background infection rate, and is fairly new to modern medicine. It's an epidemic for that reason.

      For the paragraph below, I leave it as is with the lies in bold;

      AIDS is the best. Its an untreatable/uncurable disease that is supposedly spread by contact with fluids such as blood or sex goo. We've all been told that "AIDS does not discriminate", but it does! In the US, its mostly black gay men (and some IV drug users) that get it, whereas in Africa its black heterosexual women that get it. After 20 years and I'm guessing millions if not billions of dollars in research have not even provided any kind of explanation of AIDS nor has the virus even been isolated.

      "untreatable" There are many drugs and treatments available on the market. Ask your doctor! Remember AZT? Maybe interferon boosters? Try going to Google and searching on "aids treatment" for once eh?

      "supposedly" AIDS is spread by and present in many fluids; blood, plasma, tears, saliva, seminal fluids, vaginal fluids, feces. All forms of transfer require fluid or moist environments very similar to transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. AIDS is caused by the HIV virus, the HIV virus is spread through close contact. There's no "supposedly" about it, it's a medical fact.

      "AIDS does not discriminate" is absolutely true. Once exposed every human has a more or less equal chance once the exposure type and frequency has been accounted for. YES there are various types of populations that one can define that have different infection rates. YES gay men got it more frequently because they were a) trading semen b) doing so anally (causing bleeding during/after sex). The hertrosexual women in Africa are getting it because they have OTHER STDs (many are prostitutes full time or engage in prostitution) that cause open sores in their sexual organs... so when exposed to a male that has it they are much more likely to get an AIDS infection. Same for the IV drug users, trading needles is trading blood. By your reasoning, there would be no relation to your mom walking down the street licking DOG FECES to her getting stomach and intestinal bacterial infections all the time.

      "explanation of AIDS". All I have to say is this, there are TENS OF THOUSANDS medical studies that closely or directly link the HIV virus with the collection if symptoms collectively known as "AIDS".

      Furthermore, AIDS (so far) is one of the few diseases that could potentially be completely stopped with the combination of not taking stupid risks (inprotected sex, IV needle sharing, turning tricks, etc.) and relatively easy upgrades in the health care processes that would make tissue sharing done only on known AIDS free blood/organs.

      If you are worried about the number of black people getting the disease (which your post implies) maybe the black people should wise the fuck up and start heeding the warnings.

      You sir, are a paranoid, FUD spreading cunt. What is the address of your "earth is flat" web site? Or are you this guy? Also, whomever modded you as insightful is a MORON.

    36. Re:That's what happens... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      natural antibiotics just can't be patented
      This is a recurring urban theme, and is wrong or misleading on several levels.
      While it may not be possible to patent an obscure wonder drug from cactus juice,
      1.a process to extract the drug is,
      2. adding a chemical to it to alter its' solvebility such as biological half-life is defenitly patentable
      3. adding chemicals to alter its' excretion route is
      4. a method to grow the catus to maximized drug content is patentable
      5. splicing the gene that produces the drug into yeast for factory production is patentable.

      there are very few drugs used today that aren't derived from a natual source.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:That's what happens... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      from what i can tell there is no patent on asprin http://www.uspto.gov/

      Patents expire. That's the whole point of them!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    38. Re:That's what happens... by perdu · · Score: 1
      PPS, what I saw was on new drug applications and not the current market. But here's a reference on the subject: http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/jcen?jnprdf/66/i07/htm l/np030096l.html

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    39. Re:That's what happens... by Basje · · Score: 1

      Application of said substance for treating microbe based diseases.

      If it's an invention, it can be patented. The pharmaceutical is not the invention. Processing and application are the inventions.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    40. Re:That's what happens... by hackstraw · · Score: 1
      It's rare that I see a post of blatant fear mongering lies such as this one.

      I don't see myself as spreading fear. When I first became sexually active, I was in fear from the media and whatnot about AIDS. Its interesting in that I know plenty of people that have sex, heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual, yet none of them have AIDS, nor have I heard of anyone getting AIDS from any of the 4 universities that I have worked for or attended, nor from any of the businesses I have worked for. Not a friend of a friend. Not anyone besides a few (very few) celebrities. To me, it would seem that AIDS would be much more prevalent since it has an incubation period of up to 10 years or so.

      "untreatable" There are many drugs and treatments available on the market. Ask your doctor! Remember AZT? Maybe interferon boosters? Try going to Google and searching on "aids treatment" for once eh?

      I didn't know that this was controversial in any way shape or form. I guess my word choice was not the best, I guess a better word would be "uncurable". From what I've seen and read, people that undergo AIDS treatment are still pretty sick people. Regarding AZT (from wikopedia):
      AZT does not destroy the HIV infection, but only delays the progression of the disease and the replication of virus, even at very high doses. During prolonged AZT treatment the HI-virus has the ability to gain an increased resistance to AZT by mutation of the reverse transcriptase. A study showed that AZT could not impede the resumption of virus production, and eventually cells treated with AZT produced viruses as much as the untreated cells.

      In 1991, Public Citizen filed a lawsuit claiming that the AZT/Zidovudine patent was invalid. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in 1994 in favour of Glaxo Smith Kline. In 2002, another lawsuit was filed over the patent (which is due to expire in 2005) by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.

      AZT is also the source of another controversy; there are some who claim that AZT in fact causes AIDS, not HIV. This sort of claim found itself easy to gain currency in the late 1980s and early 1990s before it became widely known that AIDS was actually considerably more widespread in Africa, where most of its victims have never seen penicillin, let alone AZT.
      Yeah, I remember AZT.

      By your reasoning, there would be no relation to your mom walking down the street licking DOG FECES to her getting stomach and intestinal bacterial infections all the time.

      I've told my mom about that. She just won't listen.

      Also, by your same reasoning. People would get AIDS all the time. I'm not gay, but I at least try real hard to get every girl up the poop shoot. I will refuse sex if I have to use a condom, and I will change my behavior as soon as there is any tangible credible reason for me to do so.

      Next, I guess you are going to say you still support the cold war, because there are still crazy commies out there, right?

    41. Re:That's what happens... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Most antibiotics today are BASED on peniciline. Truth is, these resistant TB strains are resistant against PENICILINE-based antibiotics.

      Oh lucky me. I was allergic to Penicillin anyway.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    42. Re:That's what happens... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by bacteria

      Tip: TB + mild antibiotic environment = TB that eats antibiotics.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    43. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Can you back that up with data? I've experienced an extreme amount of disconnect with performance and pay out in the corporate world.

      Most universities do quite well with government funding. I've never known corporations to be especially good about paying their best scientists large salaries. It would be nice if it were true, but that's not what I've seen. That's one reason I dropped the chemistry degree and switched to programming. Chemists, and most other research scientists don't get rewarded much for performance. High end sales is about the only area where people seem to get rewarded based on performance, and I suppose that's because:
      1. It's easy to measure the profits you make from a good salesman.
      2. People in sales tend to move into management, researchers usually don't.

      Even in my own field, which is programming, engineers that are ten times as productive are likely to not even get noticed (unless they know how to sell themselves), much less paid a lot more.

      Anyway, I wasn't necessarily advocating government institutions. I think we should work on creating a new economy, but you can read some of my other posts to find out what I mean by that.

    44. Re:That's what happens... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop a lot of them from doing so, if only to get patients to stop complaining that the doctor isn't taking care of them. Personally, I'd explain the situation, and then explain that prescribing an ineffective remedy for their ailment would be against my Hippocratic oath. They're welcome to go elsewhere, though their insurance company may not be too happy about paying for another doctor visit so soon.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    45. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Look, if you're too impatient to read through a very well-thought out vision, don't claim to have anything of substance to say. At least you admit to skimming the titles. If you're so smart, then please take the author's (and my) challenge, and tell us what's wrong with it. I would hate to think that I'm wasting my time promoting something that is a load of crap, but as far as I can see, this vision has been quite extensively thought out, much more so than either capitalism or socialism ever were.

      I think what was supposed to make an impression on you, was that people outside the US know what it is, all the way up to the leader of the former USSR, Italian intellectuals, who bestowed upon him the President's medal, and other European intellectuals, and you have no idea what it is. I think that Michael was quite astute, when he said that the reason he thinks people like Gorbachev promote it is because they don't understand what it is (i.e. they don't realize that their positions would not exist in a Participatory Economy).

      I agree that they should change that title ("Socialism as it was always meant to be"). I've actually brought that up before. Michael is promoting something that is quite different than socialism, but since his main audience, in the beginning, were left wing radicals (many of whom were socialists), that's the title that he used for one of his first works. So, he was saying, "This isn't socialism, but this is what it should have been."

      Obviously, here in America, where socialism has been confused with communism (they're not the same things), and where communism is associated with the former USSR, it's a bad idea to use the word socialism. Frankly, I'm not a socialist, or a communist, and I was happy when the USSR collapsed, to say the least.

      Anyway, you should evaluate something based on the merits of the ideas, not based on the title, not on who likes it, or who promotes it. But that's just my opinion.

      P.S. If you want a technical description of the model, you can find something approaching that here. http://www.zmag.org/books/poltoc.htm

    46. Re:That's what happens... by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      this is not correct.

      nearly every known antibiotic has been derived from natural sources. nearly all of them mimic these natural organic compounds in that they inhibit protein synthesis by binding to some part of the prokaryotic ribosome.

      the rest work by inhibiting specific enzymes that eukaryotes do not possess, or interfere with the formation of the cell wall (which again, eukaryotic cells do not possess).

      these techniques, and more often than not the compounds themselves, have been isolated from plant, fungi and animal sources.

    47. Re:That's what happens... by aelbric · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I admit that what you said was true, I took a cursory look at the site, noticed some of the references and immediately formed an opinion without giving it due diligence. Since you responded with a well thought out reply, I will give you the courtesy of reading through the material and giving an objective opinion. Apologies for the knee-jerk reaction.

      I have an economics paper due anyway, this may make an interesting subject.

      More to come......

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    48. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I appreciate it. Again, take a look at the link at the bottom of my last post. That's probably the most technical, although they are all worthwhile reading. Some start from a more philosophical approach, others a more mathematical approach.

      I'm sorry if I came off as a bit caustic. Part of the problem with ParEcon, may in fact be the people promoting it. Clearly, a lot of what ParEcon promotes isn't exactly "left", or socialist. For example, Albert flat out rejects one of socialism's core values, which is giving to people according to need. Instead, he says that if people are capable, but unwilling to work, then they should get nothing. He also rejects the idea of central planning, and promotes heavily the idea of self-management. Unfortunately, he only promotes his vision to socialists. The reality is, that this vision could appeal to a lot of people that exist outside "left" circles, if it was promoted correctly. That is likely part of the reason it hasn't succeeded in the US, where individual freedom is more appealing than "left" ideals. However, in my opinion, ParEcon, if done right, would promote individual freedom. By that I mean true freedom, to manage one's own affairs, and not the freedom to "negotiate or go elsewhere" as Rand puts it.

      Keep in mind that Albert isn't a hack. He has a degree from MIT, and Hahnel is a professor at the American institute of economics. There are quite a few good ideas there and it's pretty evident from his writing that he has a clear understanding of how to think about these issues. Hopefully this will be an interesting topic for your paper. I wish that more universities looked at alternative economic models as possible research topics.

    49. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TB has never been and never will be resistant to Penicillin.

      Sure it has. TB did you mean to say that has _always_ been resistant to Penicillin, in a sense it doesn't work on it at all?

      It may not be resistance gained by our usage of it, but it's a resistance nevertheless.

    50. Re:That's what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I at least try real hard to get every girl up the poop shoot. I will refuse sex if I have to use a condom, and I will change my behavior as soon as there is any tangible credible reason for me to do so.

      For someone as stupid as you, we can only hope that you'll take your upcoming herpes infested, wart riddled, HIV+ status as "tangible credible reason" to practice safer sex, lest you you start infecting all those girls you're so eager to bang in the ass.

      Out of curiosity, with habits like that, why do you think you don't have HIV?

    51. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 1

      I'll be keeping an eye on this thread for a couple of weeks. Let me know what you think when you get a chance. It's a lot to swallow in a day, and might not be the best topic for a paper unless you have a lot of time to explore the writing. If you need any more resources, there are quite a few books on the topic that Albert has put online, as well as audio, etc., plenty for a term paper.

      If you want, I could post a temporary email address, and we could exchange email that way. I don't put my email on slashdot, for obvious reasons. Or, you can just reply here, whichever works best for you.

    52. Re:That's what happens... by composer777 · · Score: 1

      You might also get a kick out of Albert's reply to some student's reviews of his work. You can see some common arguments that the students made against Albert's vision. Apparently, a professor had his class read Albert's, "Parecon: Life After Capitalism". Since it sounds like you'll be doing roughly the same thing, but perhaps reading different stuff that he's written, it might be amusing for you to read Albert's response to some of the student's critiques.

      http://blog.zmag.org/bloggers/?blogger=albert

      Skip down to the blog posts titled "Soc 292: Parecon Comments" and read his replies.

      You could also send in your paper, he'll probably reply to that, if you're interested. Just make sure that whatever you write is well written, he's pretty good at spotting logical fallacies and flaws in arguments.

  9. Not all that surprising... by solive1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bacteria (not computer, although I suppose it could apply too) evolve regularly. Some strains of staph are now resistant to most antibiotics. I had a case of MRSA (Mesocillin Resistant Staph Aureus) two summers ago after having surgery. It was most unpleasant and only an IV-induced superdrug called Vancomycin could destroy it. So, to me it's not all that surprising that TB is making a comeback. It finally figured out how to immunize itself.

    1. Re:Not all that surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gee, a friend of mine nearly died from MRSA. Ended up with signicant brain damage instead.

      You'll no doubt be thrilled to hear that cases of VRSA (Vancomycin resistant Staph A) are starting to appear. No replacement for Vancomycin has been found, so if you catch VRSA they basically just isolate you and wait for you to die (or pull through).

      Scary stuff.

    2. Re:Not all that surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI for general immunity, anti-mold, fungus, some anticeptic properties, "oil of oregano" is a good thing to have, used by the ancient greeks, it's different than the pizza sauce oregano used in cooking, the variety I'm referring to grows in the wild in the mediterrainian mountains. Copious amounts of garlic in the diet is good too. Helps to kill and keep at bay, many nasties that invade your body. Will help you be healthier and have a stronger immune system. Of course people should also consider trying not to poison themselves with a lot of the toxic waste that's pawned off on an unsuspecting population as food. Good luck in your journey. Research now, stay healthy...

  10. Antibiotic resistances by MattW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why:

    (1) If you're proscribed antibiotics, you should take them exactly as instructed; take them for the whole course, do not stop in the last couple days or when the symptoms go away;

    (2) Do not attempt to "chase off" what you think might be an oncoming infection by taking a "leftover" pill or two from a previous subscription

    (3) Realize that many infections are viral; do not expect or demand to be proscribed antibiotics contrary to your doctor's wishes

    Doctors are now becoming very aware of bad behaviors which cause bacteria to become antibiotic-resistant, but convincing people to follow good practice is apparently harder.

    1. Re:Antibiotic resistances by khallow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The solution is to come up with drugs and distribution methods that don't rely on patients' ability to follow difficult regimes. Eg, why not implant all the doses at once with some sort of metering device that insures that the course is followed? Otherwise, you eventually will have to enforce treatment by withholding treatment from those who can't follow the schedule.

    2. Re:Antibiotic resistances by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend is a fairly intelligent individual and yet I cannot seem to convince her to take a full run of antibiotics. She always ends up with leftover pills, and of all the thing she could do that really cheeses me off, especially since A> it's just a pill once or twice a day and B> it's not like she's getting the real gut-bombing antibiotics that give you the runs for the full course.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Antibiotic resistances by tsg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it makes it that much harder to stop taking them when the patient has serious side effects to the medication.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
    4. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Antibiotic resistances by kbahey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Excellent advice.

      However, it does not work this way in every part of the world. In third world countries, antibiotics are not as regulated as they are in G8 countries.

      Pharmacists there dispense antibiotics freely without prescription, since many poor people go to the pharmacist for a cure, without having to pay the doctor's fee. This may not be purely legal, but everyone does it.

      This causes more and more strains to be resistant to antibiotics, and many of the new ones become ineffective quickly.

      This is why we see some almost eradicated diseases (e.g. TB in this case) revitalize and become more virulent.

    6. Re:Antibiotic resistances by bahwi · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not to mention our bodies are floating with antibiotics at pretty much anytime(ever eat meat, or especially fast food?). Teaching good habits won't change everything, we've still got to eat healthier and encourage industry to raise food-animals without the use of antibiotics except when necessary.

      Taking the pills like you're supposed to won't help, when you've had many different kinds of antibiotics in your system when you first got sick. And with other antibiotics just starting being used in food-animal industries, we've got a bigger problem on our hands.

      It's like in Texas, they want to cut back on emissions, but they keep trying to reduce the pollution standards on large companies. The pollution increases, the consumer has to pay more and jump through more hoops, and everybody loses.

      I'm not anti-corporate at all, there are lots of good ones out there, but look at some of the specific ones and see.

    7. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice fearmongering.

      1 - having a cache of Antibiotics, the hard powder pill form, AND knowing how to use it is very important.

      I saved myself from a trip to the ER/Doc and spending money when I did not have any back in college when I diagnosed correctly a Sore-throat/ear infection. Taking a correct general use antibiotic that was over 10 years old for a correct treatment length as perscribed in most medical journals. solved the problem. I was lucky enough to get my hands on a bottle of 500 of these 500mg gems. they saved me many trips when I had no money at all.

      The solution is to not be a idiot. learning basinc helath and how to diagnose and TREAT an illness should be required. Doctors are not uber-smart nor any more special than you or I, they just had lots more money to go to medical school, and an interest in medicine.

      I know of many friends that like to hike in absolute wilderness that buy "illegal" medications from mexico so that they are prepared when over 200 miles from civilization and that come down with pnumonia. Having a 7 day pack of zynthromax in that situation is a life saver (and overkill but you dont want to hike with 60 pounds of pharmacuticals.)

      I strongly suggest that people learn about how to self diagnose correctly and self TREAT basic infections that can be life threatning.

      Knowlege is power, dont trust the world to take car of you.

    8. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Getting the runs from antibiotics is because they also kill off big chunks of the bacteria that actually digest your food for you. A simple way to avoid (or at least reduce) the runs while taking antibiotics, is to consume a small amount of yoghurt every day, to repopulate the intestinal flora. If you can't tolerate yoghurt, cheese will do almost as well.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't "proscribed" mean "forbidden"? Being proscribed antibiotics would probably prevent you from being cured...

    10. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      The solution is to come up with drugs and distribution methods that don't rely on patients' ability to follow difficult regimes. Eg, why not implant all the doses at once with some sort of metering device that insures that the course is followed? Otherwise, you eventually will have to enforce treatment by withholding treatment from those who can't follow the schedule.

      The problem is that "take one pill every twelve hours for the next ten days" is not a difficult regime. Antibiotics are not generally taken on complicated schedules. Antibiotic 'abuse' generally is a problem for people taking short courses of antibiotics as their only medication. For example, someone is prescribed antibiotics to deal with an infected bee sting, or a sinus infection, or to clear up a case of strep throat.

      These people don't need the hassle, expense, and risk(!) of an implanted medical device. They need to follow the instructions on the bottle and take the damn pills when they're supposed to. What might be useful would be to provide people with a little timer that beeps at eight, twelve, or twenty-four hour intervals to remind them to take their medications.

      Most people that have to follow a complicated, multidrug dosing schedule are in a doctor's care in a hospital, hooked up to a carefully metered IV. Either that, or they have a chronic illness, and most such individuals actually tend to manage their condition and meds quite well. (There are studies to suggest that adherence to the complicated regimens for AIDS treatment is actually quite good, even in the Third World.)

      The big problem with antibiotic misuse is not people who can't follow a dosing schedule--the mentally ill, the developmentally challenged, those with senile dementia--the problem is the people who won't. The people who say, "can't you just implant something so I don't have to take responsibility for my own health care twice a day?" or "I'm feeling better so I'll save the rest of these pills for the next time I'm under the weather" or "Gimme some pills doc, this cold is driving me nuts!"

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:Antibiotic resistances by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Unpasturized yogurt.

      You need the little buggies in there.

      Also good for keeping yeast infections to a minimum because the biological niche is then filled with bugs that DONT cause itching and burning.

    12. Re:Antibiotic resistances by garyok · · Score: 1
      Fine. Give them a couple of doses and, if it doesn't kill them or turn them purple with green spots, then slam in the implant. Or you could just slam in the implant and hope for the best. If it kills them... well, it probably saved a quarter of the Earth's population from an agonising protracted death from whatever mutie bug they were incubating. And it's not as if homo sapiens is an endangered species or anything.

      No, we're just not.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    13. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word proscribed is synonymous with prohibited. You're looking for the word prescribed. Anonymous Grammar Acolyte

    14. Re:Antibiotic resistances by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually I haven't found that it makes a whole lot of difference, so long as it's one of the "natural" style yoghurts, not the crap that's full of gelatin and stiff as jello. Regular Yoplait works pretty well for the purpose. -- I think the diff might be that too much gelatin encapsulates the living stuff, plus there's simply not enough milk in it compared to soft or "natural" yoghurt.

      However, you may be confusing bacteria and yeast, the latter being what usually gets the blame for "itching and burning" (tho in my experience, the latter IS probably due to surface staph infections, not yeast at all anyway!) Gut bacteria is what the yoghurt is meant to repopulate.

      *Traditional* pastuerizing doesn't sterilize a milk product, only kills off the stuff that sours it *fast*. Modern sterilization (which involves irradiating the milk as well as heat) kills off everything, so the milk rots rather than souring. Ick!!

      While we're totally off-topic, the reason butter no longer tastes very good is because since ~1980 it's been made with stale-dated sterilized cream (pulled from grocery shelves), giving the butter that borderline rotted taste. The only dairy that apparently still uses *fresh* cream is Land O'Lakes, and you can sure tell the difference.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Antibiotic resistances by tsg · · Score: 1

      If it kills them... well, it probably saved a quarter of the Earth's population from an agonising protracted death from whatever mutie bug they were incubating.

      Okay. You go first.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
  11. What's interesting by prisoner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know much about TB but I was having a discussion with a doctor the other day and he passed along this tidbit: Humans have never devised a way to kill viruses once inside the body. The common cold? Virus. What can you do? Wait it out. Sure we can treat symptoms and, in some cases, endrun the virus to head off some of its bad affects but meet it head to head and win? Hasn't happened yet. This discussion was in the context of the "every patient who has a cold wants an antibiotic" discussion. He has a tough time explaining to people that anitbiotics don't treat colds. Sure, they can contain a secondary infection but it won't help the cold at all...I don't know how much he was talking out of his ass but it was interesting.

    1. Re:What's interesting by nacilmeiel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tuberculosis is caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis, and like its name, it is indeed a bacteria. However, we have not found any antibiotics succesfully in treating or killing completely the mtb. Infections of tb lie latent forever within your body. As per regard to perscribing antibiotics to viral infections (like the cold), they are nothing more than a placebo. Secondary symptoms can be placed under control by medicines (cold medicine, aspirin) that suppress immune responses, something that antibiotics do not perform. This is really a case of people thinking they know more than they do coupled with a severe confusion with reality.

    2. Re:What's interesting by lightknight · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm. There is a way to kill (or otherwise slow down) viral threats: Interferon.

      The protein interferon, produced by animal cells when they are invaded by viruses, is released into the bloodstream or intercellular fluid to induce healthy cells to manufacture an enzyme that counters the infection. Interferon is therefore considered a potential medical resource as a BIOPHARMACEUTICAL.
      For many years the supply of human interferon for research was limited by costly extraction techniques. In 1980, however, the protein became available in greater quantities through GENETIC ENGINEERING.
      Scientists also determined that the body makes three distinct types of interferon, each perhaps with several members. These classes were first called leukocyte, fibroplast, and immune interferon after their supposed production sites, but it is now known that each particular class is not, after all, made by a single cell type.
      The classes are therefore now called, respectively, alpha, beta, and gamma interferon. Interferons were also first thought to be extremely species-specific, but it is now known that individual interferons may have different ranges of activity in other species.Alpha interferon has been approved for therapeutic use against hairy-cell LEUKEMIA and Hepatitis C. It has also been found effective against chronic hepatitis B, a major cause of liver cancer and cirrhosis, as well as for treatment of genital warts and some rarer cancers of blood and bone marrow. Nasal sprays containing alpha interferon provide some protection against colds caused by rhinoviruses.

      (http://hepatitis-c.de/whatinf.htm)

      Antibiotics do jack against viral threats. They are designed (for the most part) to disrupt the bacteria's cell walls (bleed them to death). Since human cells (animal type) do not have cell walls, your body is fine. Viruses do not have cell walls, hence they are ineffective.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:What's interesting by zungu · · Score: 1

      This is very true. You can have a viral vaccine but not anti-viral drung. Viruses exist on the boundary of living and non-living matter and hence are very difficult to attack.

    4. Re:What's interesting by zx75 · · Score: 1

      If that was the content of the discussion, then yes your doctor is in fact, correct.

      Viruses, we can help alleviate the symptoms, but to date are unable to combat the cause. The common cold for example, is caused most often by one variation or another of the Rhinovirus or the Coronavirus. Such viruses, an antibiotic cannot affect. The only way we have to combat such viruses at the present time is through prevention, most commonly via a vaccine.

      Vaccines are often composed of small doses of weakened, dead, or undamaging versions of the disease. Your body then produces anti-bodies to combat this invasion which then linger in your blood to combat future infections of the same virus.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    5. Re:What's interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      This discussion was in the context of the "every patient who has a cold wants an antibiotic" discussion.

      And sometimes its worse than that. If my kids get a runny nose, various relatives start crying "OMG! Give him some cold medicine!", even if the cold isn't even really bothering the kid. Infected noses get runny for a reason, and millions of years of evolution have worked out the optimal behavior for minor colds. Trying to dry it up with artificial chemicals just isn't going to help, and might create a blockage of sticky infected debris.

      It's the same with fevers "OMFG! He's got a fever of 101 degF!!! We've got to bring it down!!!". Fevers also serve a purpose for the immune system. Why try to bring it down unless it's getting dangerously high?

      Too many people assume that anything at all has to be done to treat a minor illness that the body is perfectly able to deal with on its own.

    6. Re:What's interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people were taught in their high school biology classes that antibiotics don't work on viral infections. This is only true if you don't consider antiviral treatments (e.g. those used to treat HIV or influenza) to be antibiotics.

    7. Re:What's interesting by dTb · · Score: 1

      ... and then there's the whole other world of prions.

    8. Re:What's interesting by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actually there are antiviral drugs. e.g. Acyclovir. While that doesn't exactly kill off a virus, it's actually hard to say when a virus is "alive" anyway.

      And if you think viruses and bacteria are tough, some multicellular parasites are scary too.

      --
    9. Re:What's interesting by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Humans have never devised a way to kill viruses once inside the body.
      Not true, there are anti-viral drugs. There's one used to treat Shingles as well as other diseases caused by the same virus called Famvir. In that case it can't get rid of all of them but if taken within 76 hours of an outbreak of Shingles it can help greatly is reducing the length of the outbreak and subsequent pain. I'm sure there are others as well.

      What you're thinking is that we can't create a drug that is broad-spectrum in attacking multiple viruses like many antibiotics are. The odds are against that happening due to the huge variances in viruses. At least most bacteria have some common grounds to attack, like their protective shells.

    10. Re:What's interesting by prisoner · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I don't know a hell of alot about it but your 76 hour timeline makes me suspicious. Does it kill the virus or not?

    11. Re:What's interesting by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, it doesn't - it is a "fake" nucleoside which is activated in cells containing a viral enzyme and screws up viral replication since it can't be added to, terminating the DNA chain.

      Viruses are basically just coated bits of DNA or RNA, so it's hard to call them alive in the first place. I don't think it is possible for a chemical to actually destroy them all by itself without killing the host body. Binding them with antigen is more feasible, especially if it's made by your own cells in response to a vaccine.

    12. Re:What's interesting by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Like I said, I don't know a hell of alot about it but your 76 hour timeline makes me suspicious. Does it kill the virus or not?
      I don't know how it works, I just know it's classified as an anti-viral drug and works on the virus that causes Shingles. I also have no idea why that 76 hour deadline is important. There's a huge amount of info here on the drug including the clinical pharmacology. I can't say as I understand it all well enough to try and summarize it.
  12. So, what is someone supposed to think? by CodeWanker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My kids are gonna never believe that "when I was your age, my parents could take me to the doctor and get me a jab with a needle and it would cure any bacterial infection you got."

    And when they ask what went wrong do I get to tell them about free clinics giving unsupervised drugs to junkies in the US and Europe, and charity doctors giving unsupervised drugs to people in Africa and Asia who believe more in witch doctors and temple sacrifices than the germ theory of disease?

    Is it wrong to think we shoulda withheld medical technology from people incapable of using it properly so it would still work for us?

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    1. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by tesmako · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Is it wrong to think we shoulda withheld medical technology from people incapable of using it properly so it would still work for us?

      Yes. By most standards it probably is.

    2. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that you're wrong - in fact, these are subtle issues. However, you might want to recall the Bayer-funded post 9-11 Cipro scare and also consider the massive amounts of antibiotics poured into animal feed to increase efficiency of protein production. (yes, I realize that these are not directly human diseases, but one can still imagine some potentially disastrous side effects, no?)

      While I would agree that the miserable savages do produce some problems for us, I am of the opinion that the superiority of our "wisdom" is not proportional to the superiority of our engineering.

    3. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear you loud and clear. I sympathise with your opinion. I too relish a 'prime directive' of non-intervention where it might impact our ability to deliver medical care to our own countries in the 1st world...

      BUT...

      Once you start making decisions on 'who is worthy of medecine' it gets really ugly really fast. Of all the areas of society and science and fields of study, I suspect 'the slippery slope' is most evident in the world of medecine. Today, its "don't give out TB anti-biotics to those who won't finish it"...then its "don't bother treating AIDS patients against opportunistic infections...they'll die anyways." Then its "some cancers of the lympatic system deplete immune systems like AIDS, lets not treat these people either...".

      Who gets to make that decision? That's a tough one, and whatever mechanisms are in place will be prone to abuse and misuse and cultural/societal/scientic bias of the day.

      Aggressive screening of visitors from infected regions is probably the best bet. Also, blanket policies like "if you've done time in an asian or russian prison, you're not allowed in." are probaby more effective, and perversely more humane.

    4. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it wrong to think we shoulda withheld medical technology from people incapable of using it properly so it would still work for us?

      No. It would be wrong to refuse to TREAT those people, and wrong of us not to teach them the proper way to use the tech, but not wrong to think "man, we shouldn't give that kid a gun without teaching him how to shoot."

    5. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by aprentic · · Score: 1

      blanket policies like "if you've done time in an asian or russian prison, you're not allowed in." are probaby more effective


      But to stay consistent you should also ban everyone who's done time in a US prison. Infection rates are so bad that if you've spent more than 72 hours in a federal prison the Red Cross won't take your blood.
    6. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by shario · · Score: 1
      Is it wrong to think we shoulda withheld medical technology from people incapable of using it properly so it would still work for us?

      By your reasoning, should we withhold it from middle-class American men, who stop taking their antibiotics in the middle when they start getting better?

      Of course not. Healthcare is a basic human right. And while you would never admit it, you sound very much of a racist to me...

    7. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By your reasoning, should we withhold it from middle-class American men, who stop taking their antibiotics in the middle when they start getting better?


      Actually, yes.
    8. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      Dearest shario:

      All the middle-class American men I know do what their health-care providers tell them. We're way too scared by all the news footage from drug-ravaged locales (foreign and domestic) to do otherwise

      And I'm not a racist; I don't care what a person's DNA looks like compared to mine. I'm a culturist. When the prime minister of South Africa openly questions whether HIV causes AIDS, and uses that as a pretext to recommend witchcraft as a treatment for AIDS and suppress access to retroviral drugs in his country, I consider my culture superior to South Africa's. And I'm correct in that consideration.

      Health care is a basic human right? So, who do we take from to provide it? How much of my life do I have to give up to provide retrovirals for truck drivers sub-Saharan Africa who engage in promiscuous aberrant sex practices? To Russian IV drug abusers who are too lazy to clean their needles with bleach between drug fixes? To Americans who have knowingly and willingly engaged in some kind of risky behavior and then come up infected with something?

      Since health care is a basic human right, can we force medical practioners to treat people they don't want to treat? To work longer hours than they want to? To travel to dangerous areas when they don't want to? To work for less money than they require?

      These aren't rhetorical questions; they need to be answered. How much are you willing to enslave some people to provide a so-called "basic human right" to some other people?

      sincerely,

      Clay Sills

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    9. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by shario · · Score: 1
      Racism is not hating someones genes, it's more about generalizing people based on nonrepresenting assumptions. Not all South Africans think like SA President Thabo Mbeki. If you, based on his views, think American culture as superior and thus their culture as inferior, yes, that is indeed racist.

      Back to the point: If healthcare as a universal right isn't for you, I'd see your answer in the external effects of healthcare. By vaccinations, treatments and provisioning of healthcare in the faraway lands of Overseas, the epidemics and new discovered illnesses are treated locally, and do not get a chance to get closer to you.

      And don't be blind in your belief in one's own choices guiding his life. One can be infected with HIV from spouse (and please don't say it's just bad selection of life partner), drug abuse is seldom a choice, and so on.

    10. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      But you didn't answer the question: if health care is a basic human right, to what lengths can you go to coerce providers to provide it, and third parties to pay for it?

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    11. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by shario · · Score: 1

      And I will not. It is not an easy question to answer, and I will not even try. I'd still say that your answer, to not treat anyone who has himself caused or made worse any of his condition is not the correct one.

    12. Re: So, what is someone supposed to think? by aswang · · Score: 1

      FYI, most medical missions to developing countries go for the purpose of vaccination. There's very little money to go around for medications, and sometimes they don't even bother, because a half-assed dose might be worse than no dose at all, given the resistance problem. It's the man with fishing pole thing. You give them antibiotics, they might get better for a few days, but likely they'll get reinfected once you leave. You give an immunization, it keeps them well for a good part of their life.

    13. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      And you're not reading what I wrote. I said:

      1) should we have withheld treatment from people who we could be pretty sure would have used it incorrectly and created drug resistant disease pathogens (a question, not a statement) and

      2) it's not right to force some people to pay for other peoples' willfull recklessness. I didn't say withhold treatment from the willfully reckless. Anyone who wants to form or contribute to a charity that provides treatment for the willfully reckless should do so.

      And, furthermore, you lack any kind of intellectual rigor. You accuse me of being a racist when you don't even know what the definition of the word is: to wit, a racist is someone who holds that one group of people is genetically superior to another. Adolph Hitler was a racist. Many Arab Muslims are racist, because they think that non-Arab Muslims are little better than infidels (see the way non-Arab Muslim guest workers in Saudi Arabia are treated, or the way Arab Muslims are now slaughtering non-Arab Muslims in Sudan.) And many Muslims of all stripes hold that Jews are the children of dogs and monkeys. That's the definition of racist, my fine, morally advanced acquaintenance.

      Even if your mushy definition of racism were correct (which it isn't) Thabo Mbeki has staked out an erroneous and culturally inferior position (the denial of the pathogenic origins of AIDS.) People aware of his position choose to democratically re-elect him to the highest public office in South Africa. So how is his view not representative of South African culture as it stands today?

      And, worst of all, you are displaying the infantile demands of a typical socialist: you demand that the sweat of my brow and blood in my veins be sacrificed to pay for other people's health care, then refuse to tell me how much sacrifice is enough. You are declaring that de facto slavery of healthy people - not voluntary assistance from caring, enlightened people - is the proper way to handle health care (the only way can it be a "basic human right" is if you plunder some people sufficiently to guarantee some level of health care to others.) And after you've established this, you haven't even got the courage or mental clarity to tell me how much confiscation is sufficient. You don't care about the injustice that would heap on on the virtuous; all you care about is coddling the vicious, and it's wrong. Shame on you.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    14. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All you care about is coddling the vicious, and it's wrong.

      All the vicious care about is coddling themselves, and the vicious are everyone of us. In a democracy, they are the most numerous, in any other form of government, they are the lucky few in power. Only the weak are 'innocent' because they have no opportunity to show their true colors.

      Power corrupts,and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Witness the myriad extinctions caused by the species by the 'dominant' human species.

      If you throw a french fry at a flock of waiting sea gulls, all the rest of the sea gulls will attack the sea gull that caught the fry and try to steal it from them before they can swallow it. If a different bird catches the next fry, then the original fry catching bird will be in the subsequent attack party. The catcher-of-the-fry has no special right to it. Only the bird that successfully swallows it gets to keep it.

      There is nothing moral or immoral going on here. Every one of the birds is acting as they must to survive and to thrive.

      Who is actually successful at swallowing the most frys in the given environment of stealing and chasing and pecking is the 'best' seagull - not the one that catches the most frys.

      You can't stop drugs from getting to people who use them incorrectly. You can't keep crack out of the hands of crackheads. So why bother trying. Just sell the drugs and make the money till they don't work any more. Disease will find a way to outwit antibiotics. Then the old set of antibiotics will be ineffective. New ones will be developed or they won't. There's nothing you can do about it. All you can do is educate.

    15. Re:So, what is someone supposed to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if health care is a basic human right, to what lengths can you go to coerce providers to provide it, and third parties to pay for it?"

      I think the best answer is that you were saying we should REFUSE treatment to people. It sounds like you're saying even if the person can pay for it himself, we should be able say "you had sex with a prostitute, you dont get drugs", or "you're homeless, tought shit".

      Free speech is also an "inalienable right", but that doesn't mean the government has to publish your book for you, or buy you a computer. It's just that they can't PREVENT you from doing the same with your own resources.

  13. Sadly not new news. by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My father lost his father when he was a mere 9
    years old to TB. I don't understand why people
    treat this as "someone elses problem" - it isn't a
    SEP. It *will* bite you. You'll never have to worry about new diseases because the old ones are doing nicely...

    The irony with TB is that
    people think they are getting well, and stop taking
    the drugs (which are making them feel ill). End result: great selection pressure to make resistant bugs).

    I for one pray that we can stamp out that big disease called ignorance (hey, look at what happened in Nigeria with that dumb fuck (who cares
    what religion?) and Polio). Damn. I had a friend
    with scars from hell and calipers when I was a kid
    and I'm a mere 45 year old. I never want to see
    such things, not even in my nightmares...

    1. Re:Sadly not new news. by aswang · · Score: 1
      Unlike most bacterial illnesses, which usually succumb to antibiotics within a month (or, if not, the patient generally succumbs within a month), TB takes a long time to kill. I've seen recommendations for treatment anywhere from six to twelve to twenty-four months. You stop anywhere before then, and I can guarantee that there are still some live red snappers partying away in your lung, just waiting to get spread to your blood and your brain. And giving antibiotics is basically artificial selection--evolution in fast forward. You will inevitably select for the bug that is most resistant to the drug you are giving. The only hope is to use two, three, or four drugs, and pray that you won't get unlucky and get more than one mutation at once.

      The other problem is that TB is incredibly contagious. You can get infected by droplets that someone sneezed out hours ago still hanging in the air, bouncing around from Brownian motion, teeming with little acid-fast bacilli.

  14. Learn something new every day. by jonathan+z · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To anyone who's interested in the subject, I'd reccomend them to read Mountains Beyond Mountains by Tracy Kidder, a halfway decent book on the very interesting subject of Dr Paul Farmer, who's been desling with TB epidemics in Haiti / Siberia / Etc for quite a while now. Very informative.

  15. Thank Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not sarcastic at all - The Gates Foundation is one of the major forces fighting TB today.

    1. Re:Thank Bill Gates by digidave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What idiot modded this funny?

      I know we all hate Microsoft's business practices and Bill Gates' view of OSS, but it's impossible to deny the great things his foundation has done worldwide.

      Please, folks, separate the man from the business.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:Thank Bill Gates by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Somebody already replied that whoever moderated parent as Funny is a fucking moron.

      The problem with TB is it is poor man's disease (mostly), so there is not much money in it as patients with tuberculosis have no money for so called innovative drugs. Because of that there is not much research going on new treatments of TB. This makes Mr Gates' foundation even more valuable.

      OK, this guy is a blood thirsty businness shark but this doesn't mean everything he does is mean. It is better if he spends some of his enormous amounts of money on TB research than hoard it or build yet another billions of dollars worth house.

      Raf

      P.S. OK, as there are already more than 200 posts in this subject, probably all I've written is redundant, but what the heck...

    3. Re:Thank Bill Gates by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Please, folks, separate the man from the business.

      A person is what he does. Good deeds do not wipe out nor make up for bad ones.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:Thank Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      What a pathetic load of crap. Please try to keep your facile fortune cookie-isms to yourself.

      Bill Gates' "bad deeds" are in the minds of a few pathetic, bitter nerds who resent his success.

      His "good deeds" are in helping to stop real suffering and to generally make the world a better place.

      Grow up, nerd. Microsoft's misdeads are entirely in your mind and in the minds of their competitors, and the cheap politicans whom their competitors have bought out.

    5. Re:Thank Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thcs m.ssage wrikken fsing tje Dvorat teyboare payouk

      So the Dvorak keyboard randomly alternates between "." and "e" for QWERTY "e", and outputs "e" for both QWERTY "e" and "d"?

      Sheesh, the least you could have done was used Google to find the proper Dvorak layout. As unreadable as it may be.

      Kjg; d;; ud ,ogkkdl f;glu kjd H.so v vdtns oh p tsfke

      Of course, there should be two spaces before the first "d", but ./ eats whitespace.

    6. Re:Thank Bill Gates by Mateito · · Score: 1
      Please, folks, separate the man from the business.

      If the DOJ couldn't do it, what makes you think we could?

    7. Re:Thank Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, this guy is a blood thirsty businness shark but this doesn't mean everything he does is mean.

      No, Bill Gates is not necessarily mean. Billy Boy just runs a multinational corporation whose only motive is profit. Profit motive is neither good nor bad. A corporation is not the same as an individual person(Legally yes, but morally and physically, no). Corporations feel no pain, no remorse, no happiness, and no sadness, but they can profit. The corporation will and can do anything to profit, including things that a real person considers amoral. So the things he does while the head of the corporation can be mean.

      Now as to the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. I bet his wife thought that up. If anything, Bill would never have had time for that until Melinda showed up and thrust it upon him. Melinda Gates is probably more involved in the Gates foundation than Bill is. Just because his name is on there doesn't mean it's his. It has nothing to do with whether he's mean or not. If you saw The Corporation, you'll understand that Bill probably can't separate himself from his corporation easily. Robber Barons generally don't think of others until someone else in their life is able to separate them from their corporation.

  16. Golden Age by dmh20002 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    History will show that the baby boom and X generations, who worry and fret about every little imagined risk, actually will have lived in the golden age of human health. This will be the period when antibiotics were effective and vaccines developed in the mid 20th century kept them safe from the viral diseases. Evolution will overcome all those safeguards.

    People under 30 have a bleak future.

    1. Re:Golden Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      My silly pagan friend,

      Evolution is a fraud. God created all creatures exactly as the are now and they cannot change!!

    2. Re:Golden Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hemm sorry... Can i touch my balls? =)

    3. Re:Golden Age by wangotango · · Score: 1

      Barring some extremely rapid developments within infectious disease control. The current youth of the world are largely screwed. Previous and current generations have been poor shepards of their own medical advances. The world has never endured a panademic in recent times and I personally hope to be pushing up daisies a good while before it happens. It's no long a question of IF, the question is actually one of WHEN.

    4. Re:Golden Age by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Bullshit.

      Technology advances and will keep providing ways to fight diseases. Beyond that, there is a rapidly increasing body of knowledge on how to make your body healthy, which helps fight and prevent diseases. In short, exercise and keep trim, eat well and use supplements (especially vitamin C), sleep well every night. Don't do obvious dangerous and damaging things. Keep away from sick people.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Golden Age by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Evolution will overcome all those safeguards.

      And science will overcome evolution.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    6. Re:Golden Age by wangotango · · Score: 1

      Sure... and all the while pretend genetics ain't about 80% of the entire package.

  17. Yeah .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. suddenly, those 'oceanic arkologies' seem an even better idea ..

    of, but of course .. by the time viruses can transmute the ocean/atmosphere barrier, its time to be deep, deep in space.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Yeah .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > suddenly, those 'oceanic arkologies' seem an even better idea

      Sure, what better way to control disease than have a mass of people in a closed system. No one in office buildings ever spreads their cold to co-workers, no sir.

  18. World Travel by wangotango · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even things as simple as the commom cold are highly mobile conpared to a "few" years ago. Given air travel what it is today; a small outbreak of anything highly contagious can spell absolute disaster on a global scale. It's easy to forget people have only recently become the global travelers we now are. TB and all the others are no longer isolated to the point of initial/original concentration. Adds new meaning to "just off the jet".

  19. A bit off topic, but.. by jobber-d · · Score: 1

    It's good to see an everything2 link on the front page; I thought the editors stopped doing that

  20. Spitting by barcodez · · Score: 1

    I live in London and I have noticed over the years an increase in people spitting in the streets. Now dispite being fucking disgusting I believe this has contributed to the increase in the number of TB cases seen in the UK.

    I wish these people could get a bit of class and just stop spitting.

    --

    ----
    1. Re:Spitting by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It probably has less to do with the spitting than it does with the fact that London, amongst many is a metropolitan city with many immigrants from third world countries. These immigrants likely carriers of the TB bacteria in their lungs. While they may be immune, those around them are not. This is similar to when the Spanish crossed the Atlantic and brought germs that wiped out large populations of Mexican natives (check out the book "Guns, Germs and Steel" - Jarod Diamond).

      Also, given that in a city the population is quite dense, TB has a lot of options to spread (it is airbourne).

      The best way to avoid TB... wear a mask, it block up to 98%. Better than nothing.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    2. Re:Spitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that when some nasty phlegm/mucousy thing is in my throat, I want to get it out of me ASAP. My belief is that it probably contains toxins of some form that your body is trying to expel. Besides I think swollowing a load of mucous is disgusting. I try to be discreet, spit in a toilet or down the drain. But if it's welling inside of me, I'm not going to swollow it if I'm walking down the street.

    3. Re:Spitting by ross.w · · Score: 1

      In Shanghai, when I was there during the SARS crisis, there were some rather extreme penalties for this and I never saw it happen. After the restrictions were lifted, it was like people were hawking and spitting everywhere they went.

      It's a culture thing. Chinese people are apparently disgusted at the thought of blowing your nose in a hanky and putting it in your pocket.

      Then there were the babies with the bare ass pants and no nappy (don't wanna know where that ends up!)

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  21. Old problem ignored by grape+jelly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Antibiotic resistance was noted in hospitals in the 50's and 60's, spurring the few physicians who observed it to advise restrictions on antibiotic prescriptions. Few, however, heeded this advice and decades later, antibiotics are still prescribed readily throughout the world -- even without a doctor's prescription or supervision in a number of countries. Of course there is significant noise now about the continued development of resistant bacteria, but it still has little effect in places where such drugs are easy to come by and cheap.

    As an interesting aside, bacteria aren't the only pathogens that can develop resistance to devices we use to kill them. Early protease inhibitor use in AIDS patients resulted in strains of AIDS that were resistant to that treatment.

    1. Re:Old problem ignored by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Antibiotic resistance was noted in hospitals in the 50's and 60's, spurring the few physicians who observed it to advise restrictions on antibiotic prescriptions. Few, however, heeded this advice and decades later, antibiotics are still prescribed readily throughout the world
      I don't have the figures available, but I do know that rather massive amounts of antibiotics are mixed into animal feed for various food herds (that is, any animal raised to be eaten). This is, or was, a major contributor to MDR strains in the wild.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    2. Re:Old problem ignored by bahwi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is. A few years ago(2001) it was found that 70% of all antibiotics in the US are fed to food-animals. Not just animals to be eaten, but animals that produce milk and eggs as well(hence my use of food-animal). If 70% of antibiotics is given to animals, the diseases have a leg-up before they hit the humans. And yes, when we eat food made with antibiotics, we do absorb some of those antibiotics, helping to created MDR's (as well as the animals creating MDR's).

  22. Don't blame pharm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In China, where big pharm isn't in control (remember, this is the land of the bear gall bladder as medicine guys) today's news is reporting that over half urban dwellers are sick ! And that the hardest hit there are middle managers, whose life expectancy is down to 58 years old for well below the national average of 72. Yet the article's stll defending "traditional chinese medicine". Bears of the world, watch out!

    1. Re:Don't blame pharm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penicillin is a mold found on an ugly rotton orange. So what's your point?

  23. Iilligal Imigration by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0, Troll

    this is a direct result of Illigal Imigration and not health screening people wanting to enter the US. y.

  24. Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    RFID tag + auto dosage (below skin) of anti-biotic. You get sick, you get tagged and you are forced to take your meds. With something like TB you should not get to screw around with other people's health.

    1. Re:Forced medication by Kwantus · · Score: 1

      That exact logic killed a lot of people by AZT and vaccine.

    2. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and we should restain you, and force you to ... <something against your will> ... for the public good. Hell why not just build gas chambers and invite the TB infected to take a shower. It's for the greater good after all.

  25. Uh... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    As I saw on Discovery once... There are thousands of natural antibiotics which are extremely complex. Some can be taken from cactae in South America, some can be taken from certain species of ants.

    I thought that was a movie about finding a cure for cancer...

    As I understand Tuberculosis has never been treatable by penicilin or variants, only the other infections that happen as the result of a weakened body and immune system.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  26. Antibiotics abuse by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I hold doctors highly liable for the abuse, misuse and general over-use of antibiotics. Of course the patients are pretty damned stupid too, but I have seen cases where the doctor didn't see anything but a blood test before prescribing the antibiotics.

    There are so many natural ways to inspire your own immune system to build and strengthen itself and it seems to me that for capitalistic reasons alone medical professionals do not prescribe them.

    I'm not a doctor or medical expert either. But I'll say this much -- from the time I decided I was done taking pills and crap for every minor problem out there and let my body do its own healing, I have been a healthier, stronger person and I can't remember the last time I was sick... I remember what it was -- the flu -- but it was great than 5 years ago and basically, I just waited it out -- fever and headaches and agony and all. I recognize the fact that extreme situations call for the use of medicines and other modern medical techniques. But I think they are way over-used and in my opinion (guess) it's so they can way over-charge people.

    1. Re:Antibiotics abuse by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer to lay the greater blame on the patients. First, for not using the antibiotics as instructed by someone whom they should trust about such matters. And secondly, for rushing to a doctor over trivialties and demanding uneccesary treatment.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Antibiotics abuse by dlevitan · · Score: 1

      Not in all cases. I got strep throat a year ago, and the idiot doctor at my college's health service couldn't figure out it was strep throat although I was fairly sure it was (I suppose they screwed up the tests). I got put on some general antibiotic that made me feel better but didn't kill of the bacteria. Two days after the antibiotics were done the strep throat returned and my personal doctor was able to determine it easily and prescribe the antibiotics that I needed. And no, this was not unnecessary treatment. I had a fever of >103 and had finals in a day or two. But I do blame that idiot doctor for screwing up the prescription.

    3. Re:Antibiotics abuse by bullitB · · Score: 1

      I remember what it was -- the flu -- but it was great than 5 years ago and basically, I just waited it out -- fever and headaches and agony and all.

      It's called placebo, man. Just keep sitting there in pain, telling yourself, "my body is healing itself, my body is healing itself," and eventually you start to believe it.

      You still would have been better off getting a damn flu shot, and you probably would have had less chance of passing it on to other people, too.

    4. Re:Antibiotics abuse by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have to agree 100% with what you said. In fact, I could have written as I too had a mild case of the flu about 5 years ago. How mild? Yeah, my nose ran (no jokes please) and I was somewhat sore but I still attended my CS class that night after having gone through a full day of work. 3 days later I was pretty much back to normal.

      The only medication I take is the occasional Advil (3 times a year?)

      I regularly wash my hands when cooking and throughout the day (no, not compulsively) and use a bleach-based cleaning product to clean counter tops and such. As you geeks should know from watching Alton Brown or CSI, bleach does wonders for killing the buggies.

      When people around me complain about being sick and whatnot I just look at them and ask, "What is this sick you talk about?"

      Then again, maybe I just have a great immune system.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Antibiotics abuse by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm Wolverine's Dad, but I don't ever get sick.

      Maybe it was all those dares to eat things off of the floor in junior high, but I could eat dirt and not get sick. I eat lunchmeat that's probably beyond its prime, live on month-old refrigerated leftovers and pick the moldy bits out of shredded cheese to pour on said month-old leftovers.

      My fiancee, on the other hand, gets sick on a quarterly basis, and turns her nose up at week-old milk.

      Self-vaccination or blind luck? You decide.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    6. Re:Antibiotics abuse by cruachan · · Score: 1

      The real problem is not doctors - the amount of antibiotics they prescribe pales into insignificance compared to the volume of 'preventative' antibiotics shovelled into animal feed by farmers.

    7. Re:Antibiotics abuse by megarich · · Score: 0

      I'm with you brother. I don't take medicines unless I absolutely have to. All those side effects and what not I don't need. If i do have a fever or have a serious headache from allergies, then I'll take one tylenol. I had to take antibiotics though twice in a year for strep throat. Before that though I can't even remember the last time I was on them.

      One thing to that's underestimated is washing ones hand on a regular basis. I wash my hands before very meal and after everytime I use the bathroom. Sounds like common sense but you be amazed at the people who don't do it and all the stuff you touch in public places along the way.....

    8. Re:Antibiotics abuse by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      A simple blood test is all we need to know if you need antibiotics. In fact, sometimes we don't even need that.

      Though I am glad to hear you've taken on a healthy lifestyle, please don't be stupid. Not that you have been, or seem likely to do so in the future. Just a warning for others who read the post.

    9. Re:Antibiotics abuse by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I never get sick (maybe once every two years) but my wife only needs to be within a block of someone sick and she will get it. She also won't touch anything that is over the due date and has sat out for over an hour without proper heating/cooling.

    10. Re:Antibiotics abuse by bugg · · Score: 1

      It's funny, because while it's good you didn't misclassify a viral infection as bacterial, you've just contributed to the misclassification of colds as influenza.

      For info on telling flus from colds:

      http://chealth.canoe.ca/flu/information.asp?channe l_id=133&menu_item_id=128&which=3

      --
      -bugg
    11. Re:Antibiotics abuse by achurch · · Score: 1

      from the time I decided I was done taking pills and crap for every minor problem out there and let my body do its own healing, I have been a healthier, stronger person

      I've always held that the human body does an excellent job of keeping itself functional; after all, it's had millions of years to get that way. If you catch a cold, then the sniffles and cough aren't bad--they're the signs of your body working correctly to get the virus out. I likewise avoid medicines when I can, under the old "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle. And I likewise haven't gotten seriously ill in ages, discounting the occasional harmless cold.

      Unfortunately, here in Japan the people have this obsession with cleanliness and health, which is good for the most part but leads to doctors prescribing medicines for just about anything. There has been some recognition recently of the problem of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains, but I guess it's tough to overcome tradition . . .

  27. Definitions by SSonnentag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's "worldwide" it should be called a pandemic threat, not simply an epidemic threat.

  28. Whew! Made the cut! by PackMan97 · · Score: 2, Funny
    People under 30 have a bleak future.
    Damn! Just turned 30 this year...I didn't realize how lucky I had it! Sucks for my wife though who doesn't turn 30 until December.
    1. Re:Whew! Made the cut! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Ah but it is carousel time for you.

      --
  29. Alopathy by thewalled · · Score: 1

    or however you spell it, tries to get rid of the symptons.. have fever reduce it, have cold vanish it but does it look at fighting the root cause of the ailment??

    alternate medications like homeopathy, ayurveda etc. should be explored as well..

    btw quite obviously IANAD

    1. Re:Alopathy by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Don't forget leeches.

  30. useless alarmism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tubercolosis? LOL! This is not a problem! We live in a perfectly disinfected world... COUGH!! ... no bacteria can survive COUGHHH COUGH! we have the most advanced antibiotics and medicines... COoOoooOUGH! COUuUuuuGH!!
    COUGH... WTF!?... COUGH! COUGGGHHH! SCOUGHGCH... BLEURG...
    *STUNF*

    1. Re:useless alarmism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arse.

  31. Re:It's about time... WWI-WWII by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's only been about 60 years since the last population decrease.

    Of course that population dwindling took out lots of the genetically strong specimens and left a pile of weak ones in its place.

    So I guess it goes both ways...

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  32. mycobacteria are a pain in the ass by bodrell · · Score: 5, Informative
    Imagine a super-strain of leprosy . . .

    Just a little background info, blatantly ripped off of this website: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/mycobact erium
    Sorry for the crappy formatting.

    Mycobacterium is the only genus in the family Mycobacteriaceae of bacteria. This genus includes many pathogens known to cause serious diseases in mammals, including tuberculosis

    Tuberculosis, also called TB, phthisis, consumption, and nicknamed the white plague, is the most common infectious disease in the world today. It is caused by a bacterium, usually the Mycobacterium tuberculosis but any member of the so called Tuberculosis complex will do. If left untreated, more than 50% will die in a few years time. It causes about 2-3 million deaths per year out of 9-10 million cases and is especially prevalent in undeveloped, tropical countries.

    and leprosy

    Hansen's disease, also known as leprosy, is an infectious disease caused by infection by Mycobacterium leprae. The modern name of the disease comes from the discoverer of Mycobacterium leprae, G. A. Hansen. Sufferers from Hansen's disease have generally been called lepers, although this term is falling into disuse both from the diminishing number of leprosy patients and from pressure to avoid the demeaning connotations of the term.

    Most mycobacteria are classified into two categories, the fast-growing kind and the slow-growing kind, and most mycobacteria share some common characteristics:
    * They are widespread organisms, typically living in water (including tap water treated with chlorine) and food sources.
    * They can colonize their hosts without the hosts showing any adverse signs. For example, millions of people around the world are infected with M. tuberculosis

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the bacteria that causes most cases of tuberculosis. Its genome has been sequenced.
    It is a Gram-positive aerobic mycobacterium that divides every 16-20 hours. This is extremely slow compared to other bacteria which tend to have division times measured in minutes (for example, E. coli can divide roughly every 20 minutes). It is a small rod-like bacillus which can withstand weak disinfectants and can survive in a dry state for weeks but can only grow within a host organism.

    but will never know it because they will not develop symptoms.
    * Mycobacterial infections are notoriously difficult to treat. The organisms are hardy and can survive long exposure to antibiotics, which naturally leads to antibiotic resistance Antibiotic resistance is the ability of a microorganism to withstand the effects of an antibiotic. Antibiotic resistance develops through mutation or plasmid exchange between bacteria of the same species. If a bacterium carries several resistance genes, it is called multiresistant or, informally, a superbug.

    Most mycobacteria are susceptible to the antibiotics clarithromycin and rifamycin, but antibiotic-resistant strains are known to exist.
    * Mycobacteria tend to be fastidious (difficult to culture), sometimes taking over two years to develop in culture.
    Species * M. tuberculosis, which causes tuberculosis Tuberculosis, also called TB, phthisis, consumption, and nicknamed the white plague, is the most common infectious disease in the world today. It is caused by a bacterium, usually the Mycobacterium tuberculosis but any member of the so called Tuberculosis complex will do. If left untreated, more than 50% will die in a few years time. It causes about 2-3 million deaths per year out of 9-10 million cases and is especially prevalent in undeveloped, tropical countries.
    * M. leprae
    Mycobacterium leprae, also known as Hansen's bacillus, is the bacterium that causes leprosy (now called Hansen's disease). It is an intracellular, pleomorphic, but usually rod shaped, acid fast, gram positive, aerobic only remotel

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:mycobacteria are a pain in the ass by barawn · · Score: 1



      Just a little background info, blatantly ripped off of this website: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/mycobact erium


      Just a note that thefreedictionary.com just takes its info from Wikipedia and adds advertising. So please refer back to the original Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is the sum total of human knowledge. It rules.

    2. Re:mycobacteria are a pain in the ass by Polybius · · Score: 1

      * M. kansasii, which can cause life-threatening infections in people with compromised immune systems The immune system of a multicellular organism has several functions. It acts primarily as a defense against foreign pathogens (such as viruses, bacteria, parasites), some poisons, as well as cancer. It also functions in the return of extracellular fluid to the blood, and the formation of white blood cells. I was diagnosed with this in May 2002 and was referred to as Atypical Tuberculosis which is non-communicable but treated almost same as active TB. Isonaizid, rifadin, vitamin b6 and I think ethambutol. The doctors said I was probably a carrier of it for a long time (with no real idea where when or how or why I had it) but showed no symptoms until after I wrecked on my snowboard and got really banged up and broke some ribs. Treatment lasted 18 long months of 11 pills a day and no alcohol. Its taken a year since being off the meds to start gaining back weight I lost during the early months of it.

    3. Re:mycobacteria are a pain in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love wikipedia too, but what's wrong with a site that basically mirrors wikipedia adding ads? By going to an ad-filled site, you are taking load off from wikipedias servers?

    4. Re:mycobacteria are a pain in the ass by barawn · · Score: 1

      I love wikipedia too, but what's wrong with a site that basically mirrors wikipedia adding ads? By going to an ad-filled site, you are taking load off from wikipedias servers?

      There's nothing wrong with it (if they're *mirroring*, rather than just doing a CGI pull, which I'm not sure they're doing) but I don't think Wikipedia is so overloaded it needs the help, but it does need the attention.

      Plus the idea of Wikipedia is that it's supported by users - people add content to it. Using one of the mirrors doesn't allow you to see the fact that you can add/fix articles on Wikipedia, so it won't grow as fast.

  33. Golden Age? by dexter+riley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, I'm a Gen-X'er, and I know how glad I was to have an effective AIDS vaccine when I was growing up.

    1. Re:Golden Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a great AIDS vaccine. It is called a condom or abstinence or marry someone who hasn't had sex (great line for us slashdotters... we are guaranteed AIDS free!)

    2. Re:Golden Age? by tialaramex · · Score: 1

      And what about the people who needed human blood products in order to stay alive, who became infected and will eventually die because there is not only no vaccine, but no effective cure?

      Still, so long as there's SOME way to avoid being infected there's no need for a vaccine right? Even the common cold is vanquished by your amazing discovery, simply never breathe the same air as other people without reprocessing.

    3. Re:Golden Age? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      And that's great and wonderful and then you get an infected blood transfusion or product (unlikely at least in the "first world", I admit), or some nutter stabs you with an infected syringe and *bam* you're up shit creek. Or the condom breaks. Or one or all of those things happens to your virginal partner, adn you contract it from them.

      Avoidance is not the same thing as vaccination.

    4. Re:Golden Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Aids is 99.99% avoidable with simple precautions. The cold is very hard to avoid without unreasonable difficult precautions. Follow the logic train.

    5. Re:Golden Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the phrase "properly using a condom" is nearly equivalent to "AIDS vaccine", right?

    6. Re:Golden Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup it is nutters with syringes and broken condoms that is causing the outbreak in the developed world! Not a case of "I don't care... it is your job to protect me from me" syndrome.

    7. Re:Golden Age? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > You do realize that the phrase "properly using a condom" is nearly equivalent to "AIDS vaccine", right?

      Of course, who doesn't..

      Just tell me, how do you properly use a condom for a blood transfusion?

    8. Re:Golden Age? by abb3w · · Score: 1
      And what about the people who needed human blood products in order to stay alive

      Their life expectancies are still better than they would have been through most of history, even if they are at substantial risk of AIDS.

      Also, some of us /.ers regularly give blood (I'm picking up my two gallon pin next month). And, as noted, since we're in the celibate "safe" pool (well, the majority of us who also don't usually inject recreational drugs), there's at least hope until either a cure is found, or AIDS develops a pneumonic form to match the black death.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    9. Re:Golden Age? by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

      Quick googling seems to reveal that less than 10 people have ever caught AIDS from transfusion, yet many more people have either become ill from a vaccine or had a ineffective vaccine.

      So your argument is moot.

    10. Re:Golden Age? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Quick googling seems to reveal that less than 10 people have ever caught AIDS from transfusion, yet many more people have either become ill from a vaccine or had a ineffective vaccine.

      I am quite sure that there are more then 10 peopel in the world alive now who got infected with the HIV virus due to either blood or blood plasma.

      How many of those got to the stage of developing AIDS is another matter.

      An entirely different thing is that generally spoken, blood transfusions in for example the USA are very safe due to screening. A quick google results in a 1 in 40000 chance if it going wrong, which is a much lower chance then getting killed in a car accident for example.

      With unscreened blood however the story changes entirely, it is the most direct, and depending on amount of blood, most intensive blood to blood contact possible, and provides by far the best infection vector for the AIDS virus. THat it is not the most common one is due to 2 factors: 1. alternative vectors exist and are far more common (unprotected sex) and 2. blood screening.

      ANd that my friend was exactly the point of my previous post. Safe sex alone won't solve the issue, and at least in the western world, and in quite a part of the remainign world, things like blood screening play an important role in preventing the spreading of HIV and as a result AIDS.

    11. Re:Golden Age? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > by far the best infection vector for the AIDS virus.

      WHich of course should have said HIV virus...

      Hmm, maybe that preview button is there for a reason afterall.. :)

    12. Re:Golden Age? by jackbird · · Score: 1
      less than 10 people have ever caught AIDS from transfusion

      The CDC disagrees

      Page 12 says ~5,250 hemophilia cases and ~9,000 transfusion cases in the USA 1982-2001.

  34. Whiny, demanding patients Re:Antibiotics abuse by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the doctors are at fault, it is for bowing to the demands of ignorant, demanding patients who want antibiotics for every sniffle that little Tyffany or Brett get. I have had several co-workers who just wouldn't give up the belief that they could blast the common cold by having their pediatrician shoot up Junior with penicillin.

    The Mexican practice of selling antibiotics over the counter doesn't help either. They're treated as a cure-all down there, and immigrants continue the practice.

    Like the poster said, you're better off living a clean and healthy lifestyle, putting up with minor ailments, and saving antibiotics for actual bacterial infections.

    Stefan

  35. Three year old news by obby.net · · Score: 5, Informative

    The story about the nicaraguan deaf children, and this tuberculosis story were both covered thouroughly in the PBS documentary series Evolution. Portions of the relevant segments are available online on the PBS website:

    Deaf Children Video
    Tuberculosis Video

    1. Re:Three year old news by marshac · · Score: 1

      I watched the videos... very interesting, and scary look at the Russian penal system. I did have a question though... the video opens with a view of a cell and a bunch of men coughing... and about 30 seconds later, you see a Dr and a woman, both wearing $.10 masks presumably to prevent infection of TB. Why the hell don't they issue these masks to the prisoners? If they work even moderately well to prevent infection, why not make everyone wear them?

  36. Artificial lungs? by skwirl42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We've got artificial hearts, artificial limbs and we're working on artificial eyes. What's it going to take to make artificial lungs? I'm talking from a technical standpoint here, not socially or legislatively.

    1. Re:Artificial lungs? by gwydion04 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trouble is, you'd have to somehow come up with 100m^2 of membrane that possesses the right permeability to O2 and CO2, is not thrombogenic, and prevents bacterial/fungal growth... AND can fit in your chest.

      /3rd year medical student

    2. Re:Artificial lungs? by L0neW0lf · · Score: 1

      A human's lungs, have a surface area of approximately 100m2, due to the complexities of the alveoli that transfer oxygen from the air into the bloodstream. That's somwhere between the area of a very large living room and a tennis court. Designing an artificial structure to reliably take in air multiple times per minute, transfer the oxygen from that air into the bloodstream (while removing harmful pollution and particles from it), and then expel the unused gasses and particles back into the environment, all in an object that could fit into your chest cavity, is currently far beyond human capabilities.

      --

      Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    3. Re:Artificial lungs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even when unconscious, how long can a human survive without lungs?

    4. Re:Artificial lungs? by skwirl42 · · Score: 1

      If this is in reference to the transplant of artificial ones, then you'd replace one at a time. You can survive with only one lung. In fact, one of the treatments used in the early half of this century for TB involved collapsing one lung and letting it heal, then reinflating it and collapsing the other.

      If, on the other hand, you just want to know how long the human body can go without new oxygen, I believe the brain can survive for 4 minutes without oxygen, before suffering irreparable damage.

    5. Re:Artificial lungs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why couldn't you have something with much greater permeability and smaller? Something like a carburator or fuel injector would come to mind that would create a fine mist for one way of getting 100m^2 equivalent surface area.

    6. Re:Artificial lungs? by skwirl42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks, this and the sibling post from the 3rd year med student answered my question. :)

      So this is somewhere where we'd need nanotechnology to provide us with the solution. And given the right design, an inhale/exhale wouldn't be necessary, it could just constantly filter oxygen out of the air. Then it can't sit in the chest cavity, of course, without some separate exhaust port.

      Of course, that just gave me an idea for a great sci-fi comedy sketch... :)

    7. Re:Artificial lungs? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've got artificial hearts, artificial limbs and we're working on artificial eyes. What's it going to take to make artificial lungs? I'm talking from a technical standpoint here, not socially or legislatively.

      BBC had some news a while back. Don't know the status of it now. Artificial lung breakthrough

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    8. Re:Artificial lungs? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I doubt human lungs are the standard for efficient oxygen extraction.

      Some fish seem to be quite efficient. While they're not air breathers, that's not that much oxygen in water normally right?

      Seems some species of tuna extract 50% of the oxygen from the water flowing past their gills. Tuna are amazing fishes.

      How do they do it? Can we do better?

      --
    9. Re:Artificial lungs? by skwirl42 · · Score: 1

      Short article. :) It'll be interesting to see where this goes in the next few years, with advances in materials technology.

  37. Disturbing by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I find it disturbing that you know the URL for something like this - what, looking for lunch?

    1. Re:Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it disturbing that you lack a sense of humor !

      As for the guy who posted the URL, I say more power to him.

  38. Um, Sure . . . Re:Alopathy by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    . . . but please do these explorations in some isolated area, because while you're waiting for the herbs and massages and enemas to work the patients will still be infectious.

    Um, no, allopathy doesn't simply try to "get rid of the symptoms." Antibiotics kill the bacteria that cause tuberculosis. You can't get much more direct than that.

    You could argue that people who take wholistic practices to heart and live a healthy lifestyle might be less prone to infection, but that's another story.

    Stefan

  39. Re:Been there, Done that - an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to contradict, however my bro. in law was just diagnosed with TB. He's forty three, a manager of a large trucking company and is in fairly continuous contact with native Canadian employees - whom his physician suspects of having been the "donor".

    He is starting his drug cocktail within the next week and his doctor is hopefull that he'll be off it in six-nine months as his general health is good.

    Although TB may be well controlled now in the US (and by logical extension Canada), it does appear to be a little more active than we are giving it credit for. I would consider this a timely article.

  40. Transhumanism by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1

    Was just going to take the transhumanistic angle when I saw this. Leave the politics to the lower beings--this is /. . Heart-lung machines are already available. Lungs shouldn't be important to a transhuman--only the brain is.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
    1. Re:Transhumanism by skwirl42 · · Score: 1

      But why even the brain? If you can reliably simulate the operation of a human mind, and easily transfer the contents from a brain to that simulator, you don't even need that. But in the mean time, you have to get oxygen to that brain, and not carbon monoxide or ozone, or any other noxious substances.

    2. Re:Transhumanism by amorsen · · Score: 1

      I never get that one. What use is it to you that there happens to be a copy of you in a machine? When you die, will you feel better knowing that the copy lives on?

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:Transhumanism by skwirl42 · · Score: 1

      The copy in the machine would certainly be relieved. :)

    4. Re:Transhumanism by nusuth · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm confused about that one too. However, assume that transition to machine is slow and progressive. Nanobots replace parts of your brain slowly, something like a neuron a second, with machine equivalents while you are conscious. Also assume nowhere in the process you can tell some of your brain function is no more meat-based, including the final straw. Some day, doctor tells you that your brain is now purely a machine. Would you feel you are still the same person, just with different physical processes realising your mind or just a copy, while the original is long dead? What is the qualitiative difference when the transfer happens in an instantant rather than during 40 years?

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    5. Re:Transhumanism by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      If you can reliably simulate the operation of a human mind, and easily transfer the contents from a brain to that simulator, you don't even need that.

      True, because YOU will be dead. A copy of you might live on, but you will still be dead. A copy of the original is not the original, and you can prove this quite easily with just about any piece of paper and a xerox machine.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    6. Re:Transhumanism by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      > True, because YOU will be dead. A copy of you might live on, but you will still be dead.

      Can you define "you" (yourself)? Say, you get hacked - someone replaces your mind with a computer mind and relocates your living mind into that computer in hour head. You wake up and go about your duties as if nothing happened.

      How do you know you are not you?

    7. Re:Transhumanism by jnicholson · · Score: 1

      You're only a copy of the person you were seven years ago. Does that bother the person you used to be?

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    8. Re:Transhumanism by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      ou're only a copy of the person you were seven years ago. Does that bother the person you used to be?

      You've obviously swallowed the whole 'every cell is replaced every seven years' line. Try doing a bit of research and see how this DOESN'T apply to neural tissue.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    9. Re:Transhumanism by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      relocates your living mind

      Here's where your argument falls apart. Your mind can't be 'relocated'; if you think so, please explain how your mind is mystically transported from your brain to some other receptacle.

      Perhaps you think when computers move information they actually move it? They don't; they copy the information to some other location and DELETE THE ORIGINAL COPY. You can't 'move' anything digitally, nor can you 'move' a mind. You may be able to copy it, but a copy is not the original. It never has been, isn't, and never will be, by definition.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:Transhumanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose you have a concussion from playing too much hockey or football, or you get totally hammered... Some of your brain cells would die, and your mind would relocate to the rest of your brain.

      Now, you'd add in some mechanical neurons, and your mind would expand to it's former dimensions and partially into the mechanical neurons.

      So given the existence of artificial neurons, you could move your mind into them. The effects on your mind would only be as bad as concussions or getting drunk repeatedly.

    11. Re:Transhumanism by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      The counter argument fails at the same exact point - if we assume that acutally happened (without knowing how), could you prove it happened?

      VMotion (I think that's the name) is a utility that moves VMWare virtual machine from one hardware to another - I think they even migrate processes (if not, they will soon).

      > You may be able to copy it, but a copy is not the original. It never has been, isn't, and never will be, by definition.

      Yes, that is why it's called _copy_.
      On the other hand, you do know that a copy of digital information is 100% indistinguishable from its source? So it is a copy, but a verbatim one; it's impossible to tell the original and a copy apart.

      Once it is possible to digitize brain signals, it will be possible to move mind around just like we do with virtual servers now. We will be able to tell it was copied, but it won't.

  41. part of the problem by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Alright, I'm a practicing lung doctor so I've got to say a little bit."
    [...]
    "Using INH for a long enough duration will not cause resistence. Dead bugs can't develop resistence."
    [...]
    "In the grand scheme of things, TB may be getting worse worldwide, but here in the states it seems well controlled. We have a huge immigrant population, and I have seen on a couple cases of active TB over the last 5 years."

    The article we're all discussing in this thread reports the incipient global TB epidemic caused by carpetbombing TB exposees with bacteriocides, which leaves the few mutants resistant to the drug to inherit their food supply: us. The principle of using a drug like INH "long enough" to kill all of the bacteria, even the more resistant mutants, depends on "long enough" being both less than the human lifetime, and humans nearly always following the long program. The biology of TB, or any other very large population fought with merely systematic techniques, allows at least a small population to survive, which can then reproduce. If large enough, that population can overcome the human immune response that resists the original infection (if the immune system hasn't been damaged too much, along with the liver damage, from the medication). Unless each bacterium is destroyed individually, systematic is all we've got, and we're dealing with statistics. The same reality applies to human behavior - highly variable across populations of millions, inevitably slopping across any thresholds. This attitude is solid biochemistry, but bad medicine. And it's the unchanging environmental factor within which TB has adapted. Without an alternative, the MDR epidemic seems inevitable, making inroads in the US more slowly, but just as inexorably as abroad.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:part of the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you. A difficult problem.

      This attitude is solid biochemistry, but bad medicine.

      And your suggestion is? No treatment? Suck it up and deal with it? Forced, irrevocable, interrment of those showing positive on the TB tests? You are correct in the final assement: Short of a new 100% effective (right) antibiotic and really draconian controls we have a serious problem. But short of sneering at Doctors, you offer no "alternatives" to what is being done now. I'm not sure if many of them are very palatable.

      -Otto

    2. Re:part of the problem by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not a "lung doctor", as the poster to whom I replied claims he is. I'm qualified enough to understand the story we're discussing, as the results are clear enough over the past decades to be recognizable. I'm not necessarily qualified enough to invent a new epidemiology to stop the crisis - nor do I pretend to be. But that doesn't stop me from identifying that doctor's consistency with the problems leading to the crisis, which he seems to think are no threat at all.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  42. Are you a lawyer? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    That's not right, and its probably untrue. If you were threatened with your job - even if you really did have TB - then your employer comitted an actionable offense. If they really, really, really did that you own them. Especially if it was in writing.

    A condition of employment was to not have TB. HIV/AIDS, pregnancy or a broken limb do not spread by a cough, to my knowledge. Maybe I'd be entitled to some form of workman's comp, but I couldn't perform my job at my location. (Which really was pretty silly when you come down to it, because 100 infected people could pass through the door every day, coughing their heads off, but an employee, nooooo...)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      A condition of employment was to not have TB. HIV/AIDS, pregnancy or a broken limb do not spread by a cough, to my knowledge.
      That's irrelevant. They can say it's a condition of employment, but it doesn't mean it's legal.

      I've worked in hospitals. They can certainly restrict your duties if you have an infectious diesease, but they CANNOT fire you or terminate you or force you or treat your poorly based on your disability or condition.

    2. Re:Are you a lawyer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --I've worked in hospitals. They can certainly restrict your duties if you have an infectious diesease, but they CANNOT fire you or terminate you or force you or treat your poorly based on your disability or condition.--

      But they can lay you off until you can perform your duties. In the US you can be fired any time no reason at all. Discrimination and being fired for pointing out a safety problem would be the only exceptions but then if they don't give a reason you are screwed anyhow.

    3. Re:Are you a lawyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. As a potential patient, I sure as hell do not want to be exposed to some typhoid-friggen-Mary with an agenda and an aggro lawyer.

      If someone is hired to be a nurse or some other position that requires close contact with patients, I expect that they will not be carrying a chronic, communicable and difficult to "cure" disease. If you are a carrier, pursuing such work would be highly unethical. Go into research. Or plumbing. But don't expect your potential employer to supply you with a moon suit to ensure the safety (First, do no harm...) of the patient population. Or yet another able employee to "facilitate" you. It's a business.

      Guess what, TB guy, I get infected in that hospital, I own the hospital AND your house.

      -Temporarily enabled /. reader, heh

    4. Re:Are you a lawyer? by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 1

      First, a pet peeve: One of the dumbest (and misleading) things people, specifically on this list, can do is say, "...they can't do..." You don't have to write War & Peace; i.e., "diarrhea of the keyboard", but at least specify something which sounds more than fiat.

      In this case, it's the ADA - American Disabilities Act - which comes into play as to what can be done with you when it comes to a medical situation.

      In terms of an infectious disease, I've worked in the medical profession, both as a medical professional and as a member of the staff (IT). If someone - staff, patient, etc. comes down with something such as measles, mumps, etc. they will generally (hopefully) let the staff know so those who have not had the disease can be made aware of it. If you have any interaction with patients, particularly those who are more at risk (elderly, pregnant women, infants), you are removed from those duties (and generally sent home when it's something like measles or mumps)as a form of quarantine until you are no longer contagious [and a threat to other staff and patients]. In the case of TB, there would be more stringent action taken to determine the course of action.

      As far as the issue dealing with antibiotics and efficacy, there are two parties at fault: 1) those capable of writing scripts (MD, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner) for an antibiotic either when one is not needed (e.g., for a cold. Not because they want to, but because patients bug the hell out of them until they do. Yes, this does happen!) or a new one simply because it's new(!). (telling them to be cautious, well, you fill in the blanks). 2) patients. This falls into the "That which doesn't kill you makes you stronger". People refuse to follow directions. They take meds unitl they feel better, then stop. Perhaps this might get them by with painkillers, but when it comes to antibiotics, you're creating stronger bugs. Using antibiotic soap, wipes, laundry detergent, etc. isn't helping. You don't want to implement a eugenics program; i.e., all the stronger bugs survive and there are no weaker bugs around to help you build up an immunity.

      As a result...fewer weapons to use against stronger enemies.

    5. Re:Are you a lawyer? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      But they can lay you off until you can perform your duties. In the US you can be fired any time no reason at all. Discrimination and being fired for pointing out a safety problem would be the only exceptions but then if they don't give a reason you are screwed anyhow.

      This is California - the rules are different. Exactly how, I'm not sure.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Are you a lawyer? by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using antibiotic soap, wipes, laundry detergent, etc. isn't helping. You don't want to implement a eugenics program; i.e., all the stronger bugs survive and there are no weaker bugs around to help you build up an immunity.

      Actually the antibiotic agents in soap and such are chemical antibiotics (i.e. chlorine, alcohol, etc.) and not antibiotic agents such as pennicilin. The bugs won't build up a defence against those until they figure out how to make armour.

    7. Re:Are you a lawyer? by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Actually the antibiotic agents in soap and such are chemical antibiotics (i.e. chlorine, alcohol, etc.) and not antibiotic agents such as pennicilin. The bugs won't build up a defence against those until they figure out how to make armour.

      Whew! Glad there's nothing to worry about, then.

      (Hint-go to your bathroom and look at the active ingredient in your antibacterial foo).

    8. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1
      But they can lay you off until you can perform your duties.
      No. They can send you home. You are still employed. Depending on your state you may or may not be eligible for workers compensation, continuation pay, or disability payments.

      In the US you can be fired any time no reason at all.
      You can be fired for any reason except the wrong reasons.

      be the only exceptions but then if they don't give a reason you are screwed anyhow.
      Untrue. There are myraid of reasons you cannot be fired.

      You cannot be fired for:

      Refusing sexual advances

      Complaining about sexual advances, or sexual improprietary

      Complaining about harassment, discrimination, or other similiar behaviour.

      Reporting a criminal activity to the appropriate authorities

      Reporting a criminal activity to supervisors

      Because of your race

      Because of your religious practices

      Because of your creed

      Because of your ethnicity

      Because of your sexual orientation *see note

      Because of your legitimate disability

      (* regarding sexual orientation, right now this is in flux. Some states have enacted this type of provision, and the status of the rule on a federal level is working its way all through the court system)

      Other than that this is an "At will" country. Unless you have a specific employment contract you are at the whimsy of your employer. Depending on your industry you may have additional protections in terms of termination beneifts. If you are a blue collar manufacturing type you are required to get notice if laid off for lack of work, relocation benefits, retraining benfits, and other minor benefits.

      However, if they don't give you a reason you are not categorically screwed. You have recourse if they fired for one of the above reasons. Pretending to fire you for cause when its for an above stated reason is a big, big no-no in just about every state (if not all). In my home state the fines are big, big, big on top of whatever they'll get for the underlying case. Whistleblowers get multiple times the base damages in punitive awards.

    9. Re:Are you a lawyer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Many times you ask why am I fired. The answer is we just don't need you any more. Do you think that an empoyer is going to state a reason? Proving those things you state can then be very difficult. That is the difference between theory and practice.

    10. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Proving those things you state can then be very difficult. That is the difference between theory and practice.

      No, it's really not. It's usually very straightforward.

      For example, if they refuse to answer, and you suspect they fired you for harassment, you get a lawyer. They file notice they intend to sue. You go to discovery. Your lawyer asks your manager under oath why you were fired.

      If the manager says because they didnt need you, you have something to look at. Did they fill your position? Is it advertised? Ohh, there goes the cover story. Bam. Ask the manager again, why were you fired?

      People win these types of cases every single day.

    11. Re:Are you a lawyer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --For example, if they refuse to answer, and you suspect they fired you for harassment, you get a lawyer. They file notice they intend to sue. You go to discovery. Your lawyer asks your manager under oath why you were fired.--

      Maybe so, but lawyers cost money. People out of work usually don't have it unless the case was taken pro bono. I dunno different states may be different, but try dealing with the labor board in Virginia. The law here is your employer doesn't have to give you any reason at all.

    12. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but lawyers cost money. People out of work usually don't have it unless the case was taken pro bono. I dunno different states may be different, but try dealing with the labor board in Virginia. The law here is your employer doesn't have to give you any reason at all.
      Listen, if you want excuses why this has to happen, fine. But I am telling you this: there is not a state in this country where you would have trouble finding a lawyer to take an employment discrimination case on contingency.

      The law here is your employer doesn't have to give you any reason at all.
      AS I HAVE EXPLAINED A NUMBER OF TIMES:

      You can be fired for any reason, except the wrong reason. If you suspect you were fired for the wrong reason - an illegal reason - go to the yellow pages. Go to the attornies section. Start calling offices. It will take you not mroe than 1-2 hrs to find an attorney to take your case.

      Your attorney will ask your ex-employer why they fired you. They will answer. If they do not answer, then your lawyer will file suit. In the course of the first proceedings, your lawyer can force them to say why they fired you.

      They don't have to tell you why they fired you. But in court, they must present a defense. Your attorney will say you were fired for illegal reason X. They will say no, that's not true. The judge will say "why was this employee fired?". The employer will answer, or else lose the case on the spot.

      Then you bring in your witness(s) who saw/heard/knew why you were really fired, and you win.

      If your employer fired you illegally, and you say so in court, and your employer cannot provide a reason why you were fired, you will win.

      People who just bitch and complain annoy me. If you are legitimately discriminated against by your employer it is very easy - almost too easy by some standards - to win a judgement against your employer.

    13. Re:Are you a lawyer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Not trying to get you fired up here but, I have another question?

      --They don't have to tell you why they fired you. But in court, they must present a defense. Your attorney will say you were fired for illegal reason X. They will say no, that's not true. The judge will say "why was this employee fired?". The employer will answer, or else lose the case on the spot.--

      If they say just because he was no longer needed, then what does the prosecution say?

      --Then you bring in your witness(s) who saw/heard/knew why you were really fired, and you win.--

      Where would you find those witnesses? If they still work there, they are likely to be hostile to you not sink their ship.

      You are right about the "wrong reason" part though. You wouldn't find and employer dumb enough to use that. They would use lack of experience, position eliminated, etc. How many programers let go because they we getting ready to draw retirement ever won one of these cases. Even if you win the company can wear you down by stalling/appealing for years.

      The ones with the largest bankroll have the advantage here. Very, very occasionally do you ever here of the little guy winning.

    14. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      If they say just because he was no longer needed, then what does the prosecution say?
      This is an easy one. If your job was filled by someone else, then you bust them. Lying on top of the original offense. The judge will not be impressed. If you were really fired for some illegal reason and not because they didnt need you anymore someone else will be brought in to do your old job.

      Where would you find those witnesses? If they still work there, they are likely to be hostile to you not sink their ship.
      For one thing, if there were multiple peopel witnessing an incident, someone will talk. If they are harassed after testifying they also have a good case. If people are reluctant to testify the judge can seal the court and they can be provided as a John/Jane Doe. An affadavit will often also suffice. Usually the defandants will stipulate to whatever people swear to without much of a fight. Also, if anyone has subsequently left the company to go someplace else they are a good candidate for a witness.

      How many programers let go because they we getting ready to draw retirement ever won one of these cases.
      Many, many, many. Most of these cases never even get to court. They just get settled out of court, usually with something like 1 year severance plus a few grand for damages. There are thousands of succesful employment practices cases every year.

      Even if you win the company can wear you down by stalling/appealing for years.
      This only really happens when an employee gets greedy. If you are an honest person who honestly was discriminated illegally against you wont be going for a 2 million dollar payout. You are going to be going for (a) your job back, (b) 12-18 months wages plus reasonable damages (50% of pay, maybe), (c) an apology. All of things are cheaper than even filing one appeal. Appeals are only really used in big-stakes cases - cases where attrition is the goal.

      The ones with the largest bankroll have the advantage here. Very, very occasionally do you ever here of the little guy winning.
      I disagree. I designed and implemented a tracking system used by a group of laywers to track issues like this as they go through the legal system. It's amazing. The only times you see the little guy losing is when:

      1. They fabricate all/part of their story, and then change it later.
      2. They pre-meditate a lawsuit. For example saying "I hope my boss doesnt sexually harass me, I've already made my wishes clear in writing by certified letter four times.". This is thing judges frown on. Taunting/flaunting the legal system into working for you.
      3. The get too greedy. If you are fired from your job illegally it doesnt mean you should be made rich enough to retire. Asking $1M in damages is silly. Judges don't like that.

      In my home state the success rate (winning in court, getting a settlement, or being offered the job back) was well over 50%, probably approaching 66% last I knew.

    15. Re:Are you a lawyer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --In my home state the success rate (winning in court, getting a settlement, or being offered the job back) was well over 50%, probably approaching 66% last I knew.--

      Very informative. BTW, if I'm not being too nosey, where is your home state?

    16. Re:Are you a lawyer? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Maine.

  43. Only when we believe in conspiracies... by phayes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Oh, puhlease. Does Occams razor mean anything to you? It's not ALWAYS big brother/black helicopters/aliens/Big corporations/...

    What you're calling antibiotics, most people call poisins. Organisms evolved these poisons in order to achieve an ecological advantage, but the problem is that they almost always come with side effects. Extermely rare indeed are the toxins that kill off only bacteria without killing you.

    The reason most pharmacutical companies concentrate on derivatives is because with relatively little effort they create modified versions of an effective antibiotic work with little side effects.

    So, you've found a toxic molecule. Now figure out how it works & what possible use it can be. Remember that no drug comes on the market without mass testing. Hope you've got enough money to finance all that.

    Searching through all the different poisins to find molecules is not only a massive undertaking, it also omits the production side of the equation. What good is it to find that miracle molecule if you cannot produce enough to help more than a few people because its source is some rare mushroom that cannot be cultivated. Look into Taxol for an example. It is touted as a miracle drug for cancer, but initially it could only be extacted (in very small quantities) from the bark of the english yew. Yew is not an extremely rare tree bur harvesting enough taxol to treat everyone in the USA for a year would have meant killing every tree on earth. Things have gotten better now that it is possible to create taxol from precursor molecules in the needles, but it is still a very rare and expensive drug. See here for more info.

    I'm no doctor but I'm violently allergic to penecillin & most of it's derivatives, so I've looked into why most antibiotic drugs make me sick. I wish there were more choices for me incase of a serious infection, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to go off half cocked on the basis of what a program on Discovery said...

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  44. What Inheritance? by DelawareBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an FYI, we're currently seeing a trend of the older population spending their kids inheritance.

    Traditionally, parents bequeath their homes, money, etc.. to their children, and this was a big part of the economy.

    Now, with people living longer, the parents are far more likely to spend the money on travel, dining out, etc. (assuming they are in good health) Couple this with the fact that the ones in poor health have their money given to Nursing homes / Prescriptions / etc.

    I don't know how, but this definately changes the economy.. So, I don't see the "leaving behind more money" argument.

    Rest sound ok, though.

    1. Re:What Inheritance? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      But what it does do is reduce the number of people avalibale to do a job. A shortage in labor, which will increase salaries and disposble income.

    2. Re:What Inheritance? by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Traditionally, parents bequeath their homes, money, etc.. to their children, and this was a big part of the economy.

      Traditionally, as in before the estate tax. The estate tax kicks in at $1,000,000 which isn't as much money as it used to be. If the family business isn't transferred in name before the parent dies it's likely that business will be taxed to pieces.

      A little googling found me this text:
      Under President George W. Bush's 2001 tax cut law, the federal estate tax will gradually decrease until it ends completely in 2010. But this will not be permanent. In 2011, the estate tax will return at its 2001 rates.

      Ignore the name on the law so you can properly think about it. I like the idea since it's been over 100 years since the tax has been reviewed for its effectiveness. If that plan goes through we're going to have a chance to see if more big money actually does land in the children's hands, and we'll see what exactly happens.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
  45. Homeopathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get real. Homeopathy can't cure anything. It's just a placebo effect.

    The dose that you use is so dillute (more than a part in a trillon) that you merly got more chance to win at the loto than taking a molecule of the supposed active ingredient (like snake venom, common poison, etc).

    And if you do beleive that water got memory, then with all the polution and bacterias and viruses that came in contact with the water you drink, I don't think that someone in the world would be alive to read this.

    1. Re:Homeopathy by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      The dose that you use is so dillute (more than a part in a trillon)

      If homeopathic "medicine" (ha!) contained that many active molecules, I'd at least be willing to concede that they may be a possible (if unlikely) pathway to health. However, look at a bottle sometime, and look for the "strength" indicator which will be one of "10x", "30x", and "100x". Those numbers indicate how many times the original substance has been diluted by a factor a 1:10 (source: the pro-homeopathy site at http://www.faerymagick.com/homeapat.htm).

      Now, the "10x" doses will still have a full one ten-billionth of the original substance left. Now, assume that the "medicine" has an exquisitely low atomic mass - for convenience, let's say that you want to take pure Carbon-12. Further imagine that you'll be taking a 12-gram dose of it. At "10x", you'll still be getting about 6*10^13 of the molecules you started with.

      However, remember that quacks^Whomeopathists believe that the weaker the dilution, the stronger the "medicine". At "30x", there's a 1:6*10^7 chance of getting even a single molecule of "medicine". At "100x", that drops to 1:6*10^77. Frankly, "cure by being simultaneously struck by lightning, a meteorite, and the blast from our Sun spontaneously going supernova" has much more likelihood of pharmacological benefit.

      Don't ever refer to homeopathy as "medicine". It's not. Call it "psychologically active", or "psychosomatic breakthrough", or just plain "placebo", but don't ever give it the credibility of equating it with a real cure for illness.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Homeopathy by Llewyn · · Score: 1
      i think what's missing here in this thread is this:

      allopathy (in general) treats illnesses with an opposing force, while homeopathy is a "like treats like" type of treatment. to some extent, all medicines are psychosomatic, and the people who generally believe that there is a pill for every ill fall into the allopathic line of thinking (it's easy to do this, seeing as that there's so many more MDs than there are holistic practitioners), and will tend to demand antibiotics for just about everything. at least, that's what's going on in the US.

      the beauty of holistic treatments is that a practicioner will take into account the patient's mental state as well, and other environmental factors besides the general ailment. what may work for one patient may not work for another, which is also a factor in homeopathic medicines..

      people who come into a practice and demand treatment without giving these backgrounds are potentially setting themselves up for an even greater fall if they take antibiotics, as they may set themselves up for a greater infection when their natural/healthy antibodies are killed off. but ultimately they don't want to hear "well, why don't you clean your kitchen once in a while? then maybe you wouldn't get 'X'."

      and lastly, *any* kind of treatment, if it works, should not be discredited for the person using them.. even if it's a minute doasge of a plant that may or may not actually be helping them, even if it doesn't work for everyone.. the body is an amazing thing, and the way the brain works to keep the body in line is even more astounding.

    3. Re:Homeopathy by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      to some extent, all medicines are psychosomatic

      No. It's completely misleading to say that penicillin has any mentally-induced effects on the cell wall of a pneumococcus. It very well make the patient subjectively feel better in that they know that their disease is being treated, but that has no objective effect whatsoever in the actual physiological healing mechanism.

      and lastly, *any* kind of treatment, if it works, should not be discredited for the person using them.. even if it's a minute doasge of a plant that may or may not actually be helping them, even if it doesn't work for everyone..

      Yes, it should be loudly and repeatedly discredited. Pain is a legitimate target for non-physiological "treatments", in that much of the subjective experience is due to how the patient expects to feel. A placebo may help a patient expect to feel better and therefore actually make them feel less pain, although recent studies would indicate that this effect is far less powerful than previously thought.

      However, there is no "placebo effect" that can counteract infectious agents. People who believe that there is only present a health threat to themselves and those around them. Do you honestly think that Pamela Anderson can really cure her hepatitis with "alternative medicine"? No way! It could (possibly) help her to believe that she should be experience less discomfort from her illness and therefore help her to feel less subjective pain, but that's it - she'll still have a virus chewing through her liver regardless of how spiffy her fake-doctor makes her feel.

      BTW, my post and its parent were both modded down -1: Troll until the instant you posted. Thank you for having the courage to change your mind and discuss this instead of hiding behind your previous down-mods.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Homeopathy by Llewyn · · Score: 1
      to some extent, all medicines are psychosomatic

      No. It's completely misleading....

      just as i said: to some extent. i don't argue the scientific facts, i make a casual observance that if someone is feeling afflicted, they typically feel better the instant they take a pill.. mentally... as in "whew, i just took 'X' med, it will come into affect any minute now, the worst is over." if i had said that a person's idea of wellness is directly associated with the pill they take, regardless of its content, then there may have been proper argument. but i'm not so naiive as to belive that it's all purely physical, either.

      as for the 'placebo effect'.. take this and run with it: a child complains of a stomach ache, screams about 'call a doctor!' 'give me medicine!' etc.. which (after all the screaming) could probably be a stomach ache from all the tension. the parent, knowing that the child is probably just drawing attention to themselves because another visiting family member has a child around who is younger, and this child is used to getting all the attention, could:

      a. call the doctor, schedule a visit, waste time/money on all fronts, or....

      b. give the child some type of something (tylenol, children's vitamin, whatever..) and say "here's something to make you feel better, now Dr. Mommy says go lay down for a bit."

      odds are, in either case, the child will feel better, especially when the offending younger child is out of his sight.

      what i suggest is not an either/or in this matter, as this thread seems to be suggesting, but knowledge. yes, if you have a cancer or some other ailment you can't help, go to a doctor and get a prescription or MD's treatment.. but if you have a cold, or (heaven forbid) some kind of infection because of the conditions you live in, or find that you are ultimately just vying for attention, use some common sense. try to establish the root of your problem in some other way than rushing to the next MD you can find. and if you find that some form of 'alternative' treatment helps, then do it!

      i believe that oftentimes a little common sense is what we all need...of course, if it's so common, then why do so few seem to have it?

    5. Re:Homeopathy by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Up.

      I'm a fan of "Complementary Medicine"... at least some.

      I believe that some "natural extracts" used by the native peoples of central and south America have effects just as legitimate as those produced and bottled by the drug companies (and, given their current interest, it seems that the drug companies do as well).

      My fiancee practises yoga, and her health has noticably improved. By noticably I mean her cranky week once-a-month is now down to about 2 days. Thanks be to Yoga.

      We have something like 15 varieties of herbal teas in the house, I have the odd manipulative massage to realign my "Qui", and would try acupucture if I wasn't such a wuss...

      But homeopathy is bollocks. Bullshit. Charlatan rantings. There is nothing nothing nothing to it. Man.. you are drinking water for Christssake. There is no memory effect.

      My brother was in hospital having Chemo after losing a testicle to cancer. Some of his hippy friends told him to walk out of the treatment and use homeopathic "medicines". Like the sensible bloke that he is, he told them to bugger off.

      Maybe homeopathy is just an example of Darwinism.

  46. My doctor by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    My doctor figures if it isn't gonna kill me, he's not going to prescribe anything. If it's gonna incapacitate me and cause 2 weeks off work and I ask for it, he'll give me something to help - and then he'll tell me to "take them all, don't stop just because you feel better".

    Apparently this is highly unusual.

  47. tuber-culosis? whew... by Quinn · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lucky I'm not a potato.

    --
    #19845
  48. Mod parent (-1: needs a college micro course) by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 3, Informative
    What a day to be without mod points.

    Please do a quick Google for antibiotic families and modes of action. You will find pages like this and this.

    Penicillin and derivitaves are still prescribed, but virtually every bug in the world (+ dog) is resistent to them.

    One evening of watching the Discovery channel does not a B.S. in Microbiology confer.

    The "natural" antibiotics to which you refer are still being found by the dozens. The problems are not (primarily) with patents. You have to:

    You have to find an organism that has some antibiotic activity. Not as easy as you might thing. Searches go on CONSTANTLY, and the major drug companies grab soil samples from everywhere they can to test for organisms in the soil that exhibit unknown antibiotic properties.

    You've spent several years and have found a likely candidate. Now you have to test the snot out of it. How does it do what it does? Is it a cell wall synthesis inhibitor? Does it go after 23S ribosomes? How about side effects? After all, bleach is one of the best antibiotics in the world. It's used for disinfection in BSL3 and BSL 4 microbiology labs. However, it wouldn't do you much good if you were to drink it, either. Drug interactions? If it kills someone that is taking a common drug (or worse, an uncommon drug), you're still in trouble.

    Now, you have to start the FDA certification process. Do you think the FDA reimburses you for the millions you've spent to this point if things go bad? Nope. Do you think they're even going to reimburse you for the millions you're going to spend in clinical trials? Not likely. Remember Martha Stewart and IMClone? The bottom fell out of ImClone because they'd sunk a good chunk of their cash into a drug that was not going to be approved (granted, IIRC it was a cancer drug and not an antibiotic, but the principle applies).

    Yes, pharmaceutical companies are businesses. They are for-profit. But it is not so much corporate greed that causes some of the outrageous drug prices as it is them having to pay for the research costs involved with the 99 drugs that didn't make it to market with the money made from the one drug that did.

    Please do some research before making statements like the ones you've made.

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  49. Homeless infections by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The chronically homeless are also susceptible to TB from basically nonexistent health care and occasionally living in close quarters in shelters. Add to that their bodies are frequently weakened by alcohol abuse, poor shelter and poor hygiene and you have a vector for TB frequenting public transportation, emergency rooms, shelters, police, etc.

    Requiring them to take medicine isn't even a viable option since many suffer from mental illness and they also tend to move around a lot with no way to contact them.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Homeless infections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My experience, gained from being homeless for a time and being exposed to TB in a shelter (thankfully I didn't contract it!), is that homeless people are terrified of TB (and meningitis) and will take the medication if available.

      Of course those who are mentally incapable probably wont - but that's not about being homeless, it's about mental incapacity and society's failure to care for such people.

    2. Re:Homeless infections by cfuse · · Score: 1
      The chronically homeless are also susceptible to TB from basically nonexistent health care and occasionally living in close quarters in shelters. Add to that their bodies are frequently weakened by alcohol abuse, poor shelter and poor hygiene and you have a vector for TB frequenting public transportation, emergency rooms, shelters, police, etc.

      Perhaps I'm being a bit paranoid but I really think that if you pose a risk to public safety then you shouldn't be allowed to go about freely.

      In 'Ye olden days' there were places called pest houses. All the sick people (ie. those with the black death) got moved to the pest house to either die, or survive.

      If (or rather when) antibiotics stop working, I would have no problem with the concept of a modern pest house. If there are survivors of a big epidemic we can use their immune systems to develop vaccines.

      If you cannot treat the disease, remove the vector.

  50. Good advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a great post, except...

    The solution is to not be a idiot.

    Lots of people still think pro wrestling is real, and asking them to try to self-diagnose and self-prescribe antibiotics is insane. If you're intelligent, you are probably aware of all of this already.

  51. Fantastic Book on subject by jelevy01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I highly recomend reading Mountains Beyound Mountains: Health the World: The Quest of Dr. Paul Farmer

    He essentailly discovered that DOTS doesn't work

    In this excellent work, Pulitzer Prize-winner Kidder (The Soul of a New Machine) immerses himself in and beautifully explores the rich drama that exists in the life of Dr. Paul Farmer. A Massachusetts native who has been working in Haiti since 1982, Farmer founded Zanmi Lasante (Creole for Partners in Health), a nongovernmental organization that is the only health-care provider for hundreds of thousands of peasant farmers in the Plateau Central. He did this while juggling work in Haiti and study at the Harvard Medical School. (Farmer received his M.D. and a Ph.D. in anthropology simultaneously in 1990.) During his work in Haiti, Farmer pioneered a community-based treatment method for patients with tuberculosis that, Kidder explains, has had better clinical outcomes than those in U.S. inner cities. For this work, Farmer was recognized in 1993 with a MacArthur Foundation "genius grant," all of which he donated to Zanmi Lasante. Using interviews with family members and various friends and associates, Kidder provides a sympathetic account of Farmer's early life, from his idiosyncratic family to his early days in Haiti. Kidder also recounts his time with Farmer as he travels to Moscow; Lima, Peru; Boston; and other cities where Farmer relentlessly seeks funding and educates people about the hard conditions in Haiti. Throughout, Kidder captures the almost saintly effect Farmer has on those whom he treats. Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.

    1. Re:Fantastic Book on subject by durdur · · Score: 1

      Agree with the recommendation. Farmer was a pioneer in bringing AIDS treatment to third-world patients, in Haiti and elsewhere. His organization has also been very active in treating multi-drug resistant TB, especially in Russia, where it's a big problem. I've been sending Partners in Health regular donations for several years. Hopefully the book will make them better known. They spend very little on fundraising or PR, so they haven't until now had very much visibility.

  52. Just get a TB vaccination shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But of course there is a 10% chance of infection... Death to another versus Lawsuit? Hard pick for the drug manufacturers....

    Most all pre-democratic born Eastern Europeans have all been vacinated "thanks" to the "state"...

    China and North Korea will vacinate, everyone else won't...

    1. Re:Just get a TB vaccination shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is 10% chance that you will not get immunity after the vaccination, that's different from "getting an infection". Most European countries practice vaccination, NOW, including, for exmaple England. So, no, it's not only Korea and China who do it. Could you please quit your "we're not doing it in States, so it must be bad" attitude?

  53. Shortcut by MooseByte · · Score: 1

    "Upcomming in the next quarter century is the death of the Baby Boomers. When they start to pass on, they will leave behind more money and jobs than you can possibly imagine. "

    So can we just get rid of them now and skip straight to that Golden Age?

  54. Same here by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    I am a student from Eastern Europe, and when I came here I had to do a TB test. Well since I remember I always test positive. I never had it, but I was either exposed to TB in the city transportation, or the BCG vacccine we all get in Eastern Europe cause the skin tests to show positive. So they sent me to get a TB xray test. They didn't have the machine on the University campus, I had to ask someone to me to this place in the slums and it cost me lots of money. I thought I would keep the slide and whenever they need to do the skin test again, I'll just tell them the story and show the slide that I am fine. Oh, no I went home for one month and when I came back they told me I had take the test again. Then I asked them, how would they know if I went home or not? The nurse stopped, thought about and then said, they wouldn't know unless I told them. So I said, ok, I'll go and take the test tomorrow. And they never saw me comming back. Did I do the wrong thing? Probably. Why? Because they refused to fully pay for it with the student insurance (a bill I pay which kicks my butt financialy every semester) and there is evidence I've read that blasting the chest with XRays over and over to test for TB can actually increase the chance of getting a full blown TB.

  55. Just say No to Prescription Drugs by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 0

    Over the last 30 years (and a few odd days) of my life I have been extrordinarily healthy, I do occasionally get sick, but that should be expected, I smoke, I live in a part of the continental United States that is pretty colse to the tundra, nad I really (until recently) didn't eat well, on top of that I drink a lot, and spend time in large groups of people. The secret to my incredible disease resistance seems to have been not taking antibiotics, and just fighting the damn thing off by sitting at home eating chicken (or fake chicken) soup! If you use antibiotics for every cut every time you will end up with an immune system that no longer has the ability to fight off any infection! Despite what the pharmacutical companies tell us those old family recipies that worked for our great grandparents may be best, so find out what they were, or if thier dead now try google.

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
  56. the way to treat tb by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is to hit it with a long term regimen of antibiotics

    which people abandon

    the way to create resistant microbes is to use antibiotics haphazardly and indiscriminantly

    whick every overprotective parent demands for their child whenever they get the sniffles

    so rather than berate and chastise people in to good beahvior, which will never work, why couldn't doctors hand out a patch the kid sticks on his arm that lasts for a week? the tech is already there for smokers trying to quit and women on birth control

    and for the tb victim, couldn't you implant something under the skin that gave off low doses for months?

    some problems can't be solved technologically

    it seems to me that the abandoned regimen and indiscriminate use problems however ARE inclined to be solved with technological means, no?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  57. Cannabis as a treatment?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Sterling on antibiotic-resistant bacteria: great! by jonabbey · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the very best things I've read on the topic of antibiotic-resistant bacteria:

    Bruce Sterling: Bitter Resistance

  59. Bacteriophage saga by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bacteriophage appears to be an alternative to antibiotics for fighting bacteria. An article (you have to pay to access it) in Discover Magazine by Peter Radetsky about bacteriophage was published in November, 1996. It was mentioned by a man named Caisey Harlingten in a Horizon documentary on the BBC, and seems to have been an important publication that set things into motion. What isn't mentioned in the transcript is that right at the end of the documentary, text appears that says the deal between the American company called Georgia Research, Inc. set up by Harlingten and the Eliava Institute fell apart.

    Wired wrote a follow up article on the story. One of the disputes involved another man, Alexander Sulakvelidze, opposing the seemingly pointless aim to genetically engineering phages, which Harlingten wanted to do. This possibly has something to do with the fact that genetically engineered products are protected by patents and can be regulated by intellectual property laws, whereas natural phages are not. This is what Harlingten is up to now. He is trying to apply phage therapy to multi-drug resistant Tuberculosis . And this is what Sulakvelidze is up to now, applying phage therapy to livestock.

    Evergreen State College and the Rowland Institute at Harvard have pages about bacteriophage. Phage therapy may have some side effects, however. Some types of phage carry genes that can actually make bacteria pathogenic (briefly mentioned at end of page). This has been observed in E. Coli as a response to antibiotics.

    1. Re:Bacteriophage saga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Phage therapy, unfortunately, is only truly effective in focalized, accessible colonizations and infections. For this reason, it has been explored as a potential therapeutic agent for wound infections etc. Systemic applications are a little dicey, since there are obvious concerns over the potential immunogenicity of the phage. Certainly, it may be possible to make a mycobacterium spp.-specific bacteriophage in an inhalable format, TB tends to be isolated and "walled-off" by the host, and it is likely that the phage will be unable to effectively access pockets of bacteria in the lungs.

      While bacteriophage certainly show significant promise as a novel therapeutic approach, their utility is probably limited to a specific subset of localized infections.

    2. Re:Bacteriophage saga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If no one has come up with effective phage therapies in 100 years despite all the supposed promise then I wouldn't hold your breath for some magic bullet.

  60. A word or two on the antibiotic mix by haggar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This "mix" is (or should be!) mandatory for any form of TBC, not only multi-resistive.
    These antibiotics are extremely hard on your liver and also damage your eyesight. One of them colors your urine in pink/red. One additional drawback is that, at the end of the 6-month regimen, your system defenses will be at an all-time low, and it will take several years before you can be back to what you were before the therapy.

    IF you default on this therapy, however (if you stop the start taking the medicine again, or you don't take all the pills in the mix etc.) you are going to develop a resistive or multi-resistive strain of TBC. If you develop the multi-resistive strain, you're in GREAT trouble, and are a huge hazard for the people you spend time with (which is, presumibly, the ones that are most dear to you). There are very few antibiotics which are effective with such strains, and are both expensive and hugely damaging to the liver (that's why they are not used with normal strains). Even with them, your chances of survival are not great.

    So, if you do happen to get TBC, don't fuck around wth it, be pedantic and take all the medication every day, without ever skipping a dose.

    --
    Sigged!
  61. Re:Been there, Done that - an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, your n=1 is vital evidence.

    Thanks.

  62. Re:Been there, Done that - an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fairly continuous contact with native Canadian employees

    You betcha - my wife worked with native Canadians for quite a long while, and TB was absolutely rampant on the reserves. We both were tested more than once.

  63. Bioterrorism by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    This looks like bad news in terms of bioterrorism. Terrorists could contract the disease and intentionally spread it among the populus.

    1. Re:Bioterrorism by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1

      Terrorists could contract the disease and intentionally spread it among the populus.


      If they're just giving it to trees, we have no worries; trees don't have lungs.

      --

      I bought this house and you know I'm boss
      Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  64. I think... by loqi · · Score: 1

    you should stop interferon with my good time.

    --
    If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
  65. 2,000,000 and counting. by rsklnkv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With profits up in the corrections industry I'd venture to guess that TB will only grow right along with the Prison Industrial Complex. At the current rate of growth (in the US alone) we are looking at approx. 6,000,000 prisoners by 2020. That's a very modest figure, BTW.
    From first-hand experience, TB is in love with prison. Most often, prisoners are either unable to get the medical assistance they need, especially when they are released (see: Punishment is profitable, reform is not). Others are simply uneducated regarding the risks they face when infected or the dangers they pose to others. Some simply don't give a shit, considering they're locked up in a cage year after year most likely (80% of the time) for a non-violent offense. TB is nothing new to prison. More prisoners==more TB.

    --
    _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
    1. Re:2,000,000 and counting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And US prisons aren't the worst by far. Russian prisons are probably the best breeding ground for multiresistant TB atm.

  66. Ignore it, and hope it goes away by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Sounds far fetched, but this particular attitude in governments of far eastern countries is NOT uncommon. Typically the officials involved are more afraid that "sh*t happened on his/her watch" than the potentially devastating effect of the disease on the general population. The SARS epidemic is a clear example of this mentality. The last doctor spoke out against the ostridge mentality on recurring SARS infections in China was placed under house arrest. Really doesn't inspire confidence in human being as a specie...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  67. And here's the link, for the lazy by Crag · · Score: 3, Informative
  68. Immigration as a cause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA has a surpsingly high rate of infection for a Western nation, higher than most of North West Europe.

    The US allows more legal immigrants than the rest of the world combined every year. This surely contributes to the TB rates.

  69. Hunh? by edremy · · Score: 1

    After 20 years and I'm guessing millions if not billions of dollars in research have not even provided any kind of explanation of AIDS nor has the virus even been isolated.

    Hunh? The HIV virus has been known since the 1980s. It's fully sequenced and numerous drugs have been designed based on the life cycle of the virus. I did a tiny amount of work on the protease inhibitor Crixivan back when I worked at Merck in the late 1980s. Merck had a crash program to crystallize HIV-1 protease to get the structure, followed by many attempts using computational chemistry to get an effective inhibitor. (I was a lab drone testing bioavailability of the wonder drug proposals they created.)

    Just for fun, here's a photo of the virus: http://www.avert.org/pictures/hivvirus6.htm.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Hunh? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Just for fun, here's a photo of the virus: http://www.avert.org/pictures/hivvirus6.htm

      Interesting, I wonder what the whole "virus isolation" thing is all about. I'm by no way an expert in this field, but it said something to me when noone was able to pick up the cash for the isolation of the virus. Are the requirements for isolating the virus as defined on that page BS or what?

    2. Re:Hunh? by edremy · · Score: 1
      I'm a chemist by background, not a virologist, so I can't judge which step is the real problem. I suspect it's the last step. You can't inject a (potentially) lethal virus into humans just to see if they sicken and die, and HIV won't infect anything else. (Chimps can get similar viruses, but IIRC HIV will infect them at a low level but not do much else.)

      However, take everything from that site with an oceanload of salt. Duseberg is utterly convinced that HIV doesn't cause AIDS despite a mountain of evidence that it does. (See http://www.skeptica.dk/arkiv_us/027_hemmingsen3.ht m) He's gone beyond healthy skepticism well into the realm of what I think of as evil: he's lobbying countries such as South Africa which have major AIDS problems to ignore almost everything we know about stopping the spread of the disease. (http://www.cnn.com/2000/US/04/21/aids4_21.a.tm/)

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    3. Re:Hunh? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Good read. I'm not a chemist or a virologist, but it just seems to me that its kinda wierd that AIDS was a big thing up to the early 90s (in the US), and it has since died with press coverage and infection rates. I guess it could be the paranoia and safe sex practices that have helped, but in my experience the safe sex stuff has really died out. The biggest proponents of safe sex in my experience are gay men.

  70. You make your own bed. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Jeez.

    Saw this coming from 20 years ago.

    I remember sitting in high school science class going over the details. Our Birkenstock-wearing teacher was probably breaking the rules by telling us what he'd learned. Darned socially aware hippies!

    Livestock farmers mixing non-lethal doses of antibiotics into the feed to keep bacteria at controllable levels. (Creating bacteria breeding boilers.)

    Junkies, who destroy their immune systems with their chemicals of choice, would normally die off fairly fast but for black-market/clinic-distributed, improperly used antibiotics. Concentrated junkie populations, like those I've walked among in Vancouver and Amsterdam are super-breeders for germs. Chilling and very real.

    And then of course, there's the regular citizenry and drugs like 'Contact-C' which allow people to ignore symptoms which would normally put them in bed (where one can properly recover without drugs), and thus keep them at work where they spread the virus and wear themselves down further until a simple viral infection can graduate into a full-fledged bacterial bloom. --Then it's off to the doctor for antibiotics which many don't bother finishing properly once they feel their symptoms fading. --Doesn't matter how often you explain the Hows and Whys to a drone about why they HAVE to finish their antibiotics prescription. People who have been programmed to glaze over when confronted with important knowledge are both common and dangerous.

    Humanity is getting exactly what it designed for itself.

    Fortunately, ignorance is self-punishing and awareness protects those who choose to learn and act upon what they learn. --Viruses can be avoided if one has groomed their awareness, health and energy. I've not been sick in several years now, and I certainly don't manage it by allowing some drug-salesman 'doctor' to jab me with thimerosal/mercury-laced flu shots! (Which dull the brain, and I strongly suspect, reduce the strength of one's natural immune system, thus increasing the perceived need for just such profitable pharmaceuticals).

    But you know, 'Science' is good and great and all that, precluding the need to question the intent behind the needle. Far too many people have traded their critical minds for easy, false trust and never question when they see the 'Science' label and hear an authoritative, soothing voice.

    Remember; it's okay to be wrong. You will constantly be faced with false data if you choose the road of continual learning. Just be sure to correct it accordingly as you discover it. You WILL be punished for your mistakes by those who want to stop you from learning, but that's part of the journey. --In the long run, the lemmings are the ones who get sick, and they want your (enforced) company.

    How much do you value your social acceptance?


    -FL

    1. Re:You make your own bed. . . by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Doesn't matter how often you explain the Hows and Whys to a drone about why they HAVE to finish their antibiotics prescription.

      Sorry, but I don't believe this at all... Anyone with a little bit of logic can figure out that doctors aren't perscribing exactly as much as you need...

      If they were doing so, you'd see perscriptions of, let's say, 33 pills, instead of (almost) always the nice round, multiples of 10...

      I don't advocate stoping medication when your symptoms fade, but you can hardly take blind faith that you doctor is all-knowing, and is kindly selling you EXACTLY what you need, and nothing more...

      If you don't believe that, just visit your doctor with any kind of lump at all... Tell him you've had it for over a month, and I can guarantee the results. In under 10 minutes, the doctor will have mentioned "cancer" and "surgery". It doesn't matter how the X-Rays turn out, I guarantee just about all doctors these days will want to surgically remove it, and claim that it "could have become life-threatening".

      No, I'm not a psycho who would suffer to death before going to a doctor... However, I do maintain a very healthy level of skepticism over ANYTHING they say, and every time, my suspicions turn out right.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:You make your own bed. . . by Peyna · · Score: 1

      instead of (almost) always the nice round, multiples of 10...

      Not only that, but they always come in nice round dosage increments as well.

      More than likely with antibiotics, you are getting more than you need in order to be safe.

      I've got some drugs I'm taking now where the dosage can be very flexible, all I need to do is call my doctor and tell him I feel I need more or less for the prescription.

      Pharmacy is not by any means an exact science.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:You make your own bed. . . by evilviper · · Score: 1
      More than likely with antibiotics, you are getting more than you need

      That was the exact point I was trying to make.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:You make your own bed. . . by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was concurring with you and just elaborating a little bit.

      --
      What?
  71. WARNING -- Link is a shit stained person. by robpoe · · Score: 0

    Link is a shit stained person

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  72. close the border, deport the illegal mex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the drug resistant TB in the US is coming from Mexican and other south americans. Same thing with some of the hepatitis.

  73. Other uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tamoxifen is also used to treat gynecomastia (breast development in men).

  74. Tuberculosis is not easy to cure by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    By any means. This is why they had entire sanitariums set up in the deserts of New Mexico before they figured out how to cure it. Consumption was sort of a big deal.

    While I agree, IN GENERAL, that antibiotics are over prescribed, the problem is not the treatment, but the fact that patients are too STUPID to actually finish out their course. In fact, that's what's causing the problem with TB.

    If you want to stay healthier, longer, please do feel free to avoid medications for minor infirmaries. But if you DO start taking antibiotics, take them all.

    Period.

    --
    hmmmm?
  75. Getting treatment can be very difficult by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    I was in Russia a few years ago, and got to meet a family of Chechen refugees. Their children both had TB (in remission), and thankfully, there's still a bit of the old Soviet social medicine around. The kids spent most of their time in a sanitorium (not santorum - that's something really different) getting state-provided drugs.

    But these were the lucky ones - they got out of Chechnya early, and managed to get a place in the hospital. If a Chechen tried that today, they'd probably get shot (after the recent hostage fiasco in the school). War provides an excellent breeding ground for infections diseases, and when that's coupled with shaky economies and ongoing conflicts... How can one hope to finish the treatment?

    I just hope their both cured by now!

    --LWM

  76. my mistake by bodrell · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just a note that thefreedictionary.com just takes its info from Wikipedia and adds advertising. So please refer back to the original Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is the sum total of human knowledge. It rules.
    I don't like it either when people snag their content from wikipedia. If I'd realized what I was doing, I would have found the wikipedia link. Why look at ads when you don't have to?
    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  77. U.N.: HIV/AIDS Fuels Tuberculosis Crisis by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Major media are carrying the story that the UN is blaming much of the spread of drug resistant TB on the prevalence of AIDS/HIV-infection. This is due to the susceptibility of those populations to become infected and spread the disease to others.

  78. Deadly form of tuberculosis in Eastern Europe by dumol · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would like to share a first-hand story I've heard from a Romanian doctor. I've known him while working as a social worker with homeless elderly in Bucharest (yes, we have so many homeless people around here, that it sometimes makes sense to work only with the elderly). One of the colleagues of this doctor died because of a new kind of TB, resistant to all known medicins. She was a doctor and consequently got the best treatment money can get from phase one of the disease (she was aware of the dangers she was exposing herself while working with chronic TB pacients).

    The thruth is there are places in the world where you are in danger of contacting a deadly form of TB. As noted, that's because even a little carelessness in taking antibiotics can help TB mutate into drug-resistant forms. At least, here in Romania, TB resistant to treatment has become a very serious threat. Don't understimate this, as it has the potential of changing the world as we know it.

    --

    --
    I started with nothing and still have most of it left.
  79. Copyright, Tuberculosis, and Y2K by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, I don't want to drag this off-topic into another screed about the evils of extended copyright, but it is mildly relevant.

    My grandfather was a well-respected medical researcher. The works that he developed his fortune and reputation have been superceded, but toward the "mature" part of his career in the 1930's he did a lot of work on tuberculosis especially with animal tests on cattle. The articles my grandfather wrote are still under copyright. He's been dead for decades, and tuberculosis has been a non-issue for most Americans for years. Now that a more vicious strain of TB is starting to emerge, I find it disturbing that this material is still illegal to share.

    If you can't see what I'm talking about, look at the two-digit year rollover problem framed in the media as Y2K. All of the research into the causes, identifications, and solutions to the "millenium bug" will remain under copyright for close to 90 years under current copyright law. Imagine though that copyright was extended yet again and these works weren't public domain until AFTER the next two digit rollover in 2100.

    Just as people have already started to build two-digit years into databases again, so have people given up on many practices that might minimize the spread of TB. Some people can't even identify these practices or understand why they're at issue.

    I realize that the research into Y2K and bovine tuberculosis isn't "gone" that it's still around under lease, but it seems that having only the choice of paying for out-of-date information on a tangential problem or recreating the works someone else did is a waste of resources (money or time) that could be better applied toward whatever problem is causing researchers to look back on these old issues.

    I'm thinking about digging into my grandfather's work papers (what's left anyway) and trying to digitize some of his data, notes, and private letters on the subject of bovine TB. Some of this data probably can't be collected today because of regulations on animal testing that didn't exist in the 1930's. I know full well that it would be irrelevant to the current threat of drug resistant tuberculosis strains, but it might let some researchers or problem-solvers keep their money and time focused where the real problem is rather than paying/recreating old research.

    While I'm not against people making money from their research and creative works, the length of time that this stuff remains under protection is absurd. The money made either for my family or the publishers trailed off to nothing decades ago. The potential monteary profit of his work is far outweighed by my own interests in not becoming a victim of a drug-resistant version of this affliction. The benefit of this work today is only as part of a contextual frame or foundation for research into other communicable diseases.

  80. Mycobacterium marinum by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    There is one more kind that people can get: Mycobacterium marinum . This is the mycobacterium that, as the name suggests, primarily infects aquatic critters such as fish and frogs. It seems one of the most common ways a person gets infected is through fishtanks. If your tank is contaminated and you're cleaning it out and your hands have open wounds you can get infected. The infection fortunately isn't nearly as bad as tuberculosis, as the bacteria tend to stay localized just under the skin. But the linked pagee does mention that it can hit the joints causing arthritis. Also like tuberculosis, you have a long treatment ahead of you to clear it up, on the order of two months.

    There is a tuberculosis model system utilizing M. marinum and the zebrafish (Danio rerio) and a second one using M. marinum and Xenopus laevis, a frog. M. marinum model systems, despite being "hosted" by organisms that are evolutionarily quite distant from humans are pretty good, as M. marinum is very closely related to M. tuberculosis and the infection M. marinum causes in its natural hosts manifests pathological hallmarks of tuberculosis, including granulomas.

  81. Sanitation by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, the TB problem was really solved by improved sanitation, and antibiotics were only used to treat cases that already existed. As long as we keep up sanitation standards, antibiotic resistant strains should will be a threat to the vast majority of us. I know this will come as little comfort to people living in third world countries, but most of the slashdot readership has nothing to worry about.

  82. Unequal Wealth Distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All infectious deseases work much faster, more efficiently among the weak, underfed, under or non-treated.

    Increasing unequal wealth distribution, recently even among the most developed countries, like USA is creating a huge risk. People with money tend to think that they can buy immunity, by isolating themselved into gated communities. But if they take a cab, a subway, a flight, if they eat out, their immunity is very much in question.

    Greed is a major factor in the increase of these deseases: feeding animals with antibiotics to have a bigger profit was a real stupid idea. Antibiotics production for animals is actually higher than for humans, however, when you are having that big juicy stake, you are also fed with the antibiotics that cow was eating, daily.

    Countries which could defeat wide-spread TB, are the one, which had major change in the general well-being of their entire population.

    With increasing travel, commerce deseases can spread very fast, virtually out of control. Just think of SARS and the crippling effect on the economy on even such highly developed city, as Toronto.

    The best long term solution to fight these outbrakes is to create a wealth distribution in the society, which does not leave larger and larger segment of the population underfed, with living conditions which support the spread of deseases, with no medical testing and treatment.

    You might think that who cares for example, about the criminals, dying untreated in prisons. But think again, prison stuff and everyone else, who gets in touch with prisons brings those deseases into your community. Among those might be the mail man, contractors, social workers, lawyers, nurses, doctors. You even get infected on jury duty, buy sitting in the same room with the untreated.

    1. Re:Unequal Wealth Distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh, seems the easier solution to the TB problem and the wealth distribution problem is to stop letting the problem-people through the border.

      A great backgrounder is IQ and the Wealth of Nations.

  83. Old Solviet Treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solviets had a unique treatment for TB before the advent of Penicillian. Their favorite method was a phage that targeted the terbicillium bacteria.

  84. MRSA pneumonia just killed a relative of mine... by geekotourist · · Score: 1
    Staphylococcus aureus is a nasty bug when it causes pneumonia: both the methicillin sensitive and the methicillin resistant forms kill over 40% of the people infected (with MRSA killing almost 60% of people who get it). A short-term hospital patient isn't too likely to get MRSA pneumonia, but any kind of MRSA infection requires lengthy treatments.

    In the US and some other countries the protocols for when to use Vancomycin (bad to use it for MSSA because it is less effective than methicillins) is reasonably well established. But elsewhere vancomycin isn't being as well-regulated. And now VRSA is showing up. In the US we also have quinupristin (good for people allergic to vancomycin). And there is one other antibiotic- Teicoplanin- which works as well as Vancomycin but isn't yet available in the US. And one more antibiotic in phase III trials...

    And then that's it. Do you have a relative in a nursing home? Or who goes to the hospital regularly? 60% mortality.

    As I'm still in the anger phase of grief I'll assign blame...

    • Zero percent to the scientists: in college many years ago I heard warnings about basic research on antibiotics being underfunded.
    • 20% to hospitals which didn't adopt alcohol (gel) hand cleaning (after leaving any patient) quickly enough. Now any ICU/CCU has gel dispensers outside of every room and at all entrances.
    • 30% to nursing homes which still haven't fully adopted more thorough hand washing, etc procedures.
    • 48% to the people (general public and government officials) who refuse to understand that bodies are ecosystems and antibiotics are environmental changes which cause bacterial evolution. Schools are afraid to teach evolution and so kids can graduate without any critical knowledge of why the doctor is asking them to finish the entire bottle of pills. As to government officials- if you don't believe in gravity I don't want you anywhere near building code designs or approvals. If you don't believe in evolution I don't want you anywhere near health policy funding issues.
    • and 2% to Leon Kass, because 'death is a blessing whether you know it or not' [paraphrased] from the head of bioethics for the president just doesn't give me hope for how the president approaches issues like funding basic research.
  85. Tuberculosis in India by kaalamaadan · · Score: 1

    India does account for ~1/3 of the global tuberculosis cases. [pdf] . However, the prevention scheme in India has been largely a success.

  86. Re:Sterling on antibiotic-resistant bacteria: grea by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    This must be an old article - I think this is well known in the medical community now. It has been status-quo that Vancomycin was the only anti-biotic that was guaranteed to work.

    I disagree with his 'op-ed' on the drug companies. Obviously, he has never worked for a drug company or a pharmacy. Vanco is *very* expensive. And it's dosage can run high. And drug companies aren't out looking for the next Vanco? That is categorically a FALSE statement.

  87. Me, too. Re:Been there, Done that by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Isoniazid didn't seem to do much to me. I can pound them down all night and be sober by the time the bars close, so i'm guess it didn't do much to my liver. The only thing it did do was make me want to throw up my stomach when I didn't follow directions to take it with food. (Good god this drug means it!)

    I remembered to take it every day by giving my cat his pill at the same time. Unfortunately, my cat's pill and my pill looked identical. I'm pretty sure I mixed them up at least once. And Isoniazid has a side effect opposite from the purpose of the medication my cat was on. (It kind of darkens the urine) Heh.

    Anyhow, I lived in Alaska most of my life. However bad you think TB is in California, Alaska's got it beat. My mother got it a year or so before I did. She probably got it at work. Her job involved travelling out to remote villages on occasion, where access to health care can be spotty, and education on the subject equally so. She or any of her coworkers could have brought it back. I think it's most likely I picked it up at her office, but it could have been anywhere.

    You could completely close off immigration and tourism into the US, and you'd still not get rid of TB, because rural Alaska is an intractible reservior of it. No matter how aggressive the TB programs are in Alaskan cities, it'll still be lurking in the villages. And the resources don't exist to eradicate it everywhere.

    Eventually the US is going to have to cave in (like most of the developed world) and realize that the risk posed by TB vaccines is less than the disease itself, because people in general are too goddamned ignorant and/or stupid to control it otherwise.

    I remember trying to donate blood when I was in japan, but being prevented from doing so because of my TB status. (I've heard conflicting stories about whether I can donate blood in the US) It may have just been my inadequate Japanese, but I don't think he understood how TB is handled in the US, he just assumed everyone is vaccinated.

  88. He told us so by Kwantus · · Score: 1
    I read this just last night. Fleming warned us "the greatest possibility of evil in self-medication is the use of too-small doses, so that instead of clearing up infection the microbes are educated to resist penicillin".

    My mother (born '43) can remember her rural doctor from childhood saying antibiotics would end up causing us more trouble because "the bugs" would just adapt. It's not like this is some unforeseen phenomenon.

    Yet what happened? In the US particularly, ABs were handed out just because patients asked for them, almost over-the-counter, frequently when ABs were useless for what they had or what they had was trivial. And aside from that, it screws up the bacteria we all carry in order to live, and kids get so much ABs (in their food if not prescribed) that their immune systems never bother to mature.

  89. Nobody must profit from such by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    when we let big pharmaceutical companies take control of R&D.

    The thing that concerns me most: ethics in big pharmaceutical corporations. Some googling around, taken with a grain of salt, can nonetheless scare you off. The problem isn't that some treatments or drugs reveal themselves to be ultimately dangerous for our body, I can consider it part of the process of finding new cures (if there was no negligence during the research, of course).
    The scary stuff is that they behave like any other corporation, protecting their own interests above those of the consumers. Their resistance to low priced drugs in Africa is well known, but i've seen worse things. (IANADoctor so I cannot judge this link's claims).

    Now, in case of the emergence of a global infection which can spread easily, like SARS or the new tubercolosis, the cure CANNOT be considered as a normal consumer good.
    The cure must be made and sold with no profit margins by whoever has the means to. This is the only way I can imagine that makes the spread of such diseases a bad deal for everybody, pharmaceutical corporation included. It is way better if no one has economic interest to have some things happening. Corporations can still make a living out of less menacing diseases.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  90. Re:Sterling on antibiotic-resistant bacteria: grea by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    It is an old article, yes. But it's still one of the most vivid discussions of antibiotic resistance in bacteria that I've read.

  91. Re:tuber-culosis? whew... by Mateito · · Score: 1
  92. Penicillin is so 20th century by aswang · · Score: 1
    While the antibiotic class that has the most number of drugs on the market are based on penicillin (beta-lactams such as the penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems), most of the modern drugs such as the macrolides, the fluoroquinolones, and the cell-wall-synthesis inhibitors like vancomycin and teicoplanin are based on entirely different mechanisms. (Although sadly, there is no one drug that can kill everything.)

    In any case, though, in the olden days, they used isoniazid (abbreviated as INH). With emerging resistance, they started using two drugs simultaneously. And in this day and age, the first line of treatment for TB involves three drugs, usually INH, rifampin, and pyrazinamide (abbreviated as PZA.) A lot of times, though, we're super-cautious and use four drugs--either ethambutol or streptomycin, among others. None of these drugs are really used in treating other diseases--they're pretty specific for Mycobacterium. (So these drugs would be pretty good for leprosy and non-tuberculous Mycobacterial infections, too, but those organisms usually don't have the resistance profile that M.TB does, so we can usually go with less toxic drugs)

    While misuse of antibiotics certainly is a major causative factor for why M.TB is so resistant, you've got to give the bug and evolution some credit too. TB is just so damn hard to kill. Your immune system can only really wall it off at best--without antibiotics, as soon as your immune system weakens, the bacteria just goes buck-wild, possibly causing disseminated disease like miliary TB or TB meningitis.

    It is possible to live fine infected with TB as long as you have an intact immune system, but you're sort of like a ticking time bomb. Since immunity naturally wanes with age, when your old, you'll become contagious, and TB is really easy to transmit. Just think about all those people coughing in the subway or the elevator. Probability says you're going to run into one of them eventually.

  93. Compliance to antibiotic regimen by aswang · · Score: 1
    Yeah, the solution is called admission to the hospital for IV antibiotics. Unfortunately, that's really not realistic without some sort of universal health care.

    But a lot of diseases don't require complicated dosing regimens. Pneumonia can often be treated by three days worth of azithromycin once a day. Uncomplicated urinary tract infections can also be treated in three days. Gonorrhea and syphilis pretty much only require one dose of antibiotics injected intramuscularly. It's really only in kids where the dosing regimens get crazy, sometimes requiring doses four times a day, for ten to fourteen days. That's where a lot of the drug resistance comes in, especially when insane parents demand antibiotics for their little kid's cold.

    With regards to TB, though, you can be arrested for refusing to take your medications, for endangering the public. The more uncompliant patients will get DOT as mentioned above, and if you don't comply with that, you get admitted against your will for the duration of the therapy. (It's something like six or nine months, or maybe even a year--they keep lengthening it then shortening it then lengthening it then shortening it.) Your tax dollars at work, but I guess it's better than running into them on the subway or in an elevator when they're carrying around a strain that's resistant to all four of the commonly used drugs for treatment.

  94. GI generation is dying as we speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The GI generation is a _much_ bigger concentration of wealth than the "boomers". Only the very earliest of the boomers got on the real estate "gravy train"-say those born between 1945-1953 or so.


    A lot of "boomer" icons aren't really boomers at all-Bob Dylan was born in 1941 which makes him more a "Silent Generation" type.

  95. Waksman was actually at Rutgers, NJ by spineboy · · Score: 1

    He spent nearly all of his education and adult working period at Rutgers, New Jersey, except for a small period 1-3 years, where he went to U. Cal. Nearly all of his important work was done in NJ

    http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laureates/1952/wa ks man-bio.html

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  96. You're actually looking for Selmen Waksman by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Waksman was a professor at Rutgers, New Jersey, where he discovered the mycin (streptomycin,actinomycin) class of drugs and their effectiveness against TB. Streptomycin has been listed as one of the top ten inventions that has shaped the world (itnearly erradicated TB from the world back in the 30's 40's) Waksman bio.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  97. M. bovis and M. avium by aswang · · Score: 2, Informative
    M. bovis can cause cavitary lung disease and disseminated disease just like M. TB. Clinically and microscopically, they are indistinguishable. The only difference is in method of transmission. While M. TB gets inhaled, M. bovis is usually eaten, found in unpasteurized dairy products.

    M. avium usually doesn't pose a threat to people with intact immune systems, but it is a common AIDS-defining infection. There are also other Mycobacterium that are only usually found in AIDS like M. kansasii and M. scrofalaceum, but they pretty much paint the same picture.

  98. Interferon by aswang · · Score: 1

    The only problem is that being on interferon is an ordeal. I worked with a hepatologist for a month when I was a medical student, and the people with Hep C he had on IFN looked half-dead, worse than chemo patients. And I also ran into people who had active Hep C with millions of copies per deciliter of blood floating around their body who told me they felt a lot better now that they stopped their IFN. Of course, there were people who were doing wonderfully on IFN, so there's obviously something to it, but it's not for everyone with Hep C.

    1. Re:Interferon by lightknight · · Score: 1

      True. Interferon is nasty stuff in large quantities. But the point is that large infusions are not for people suffering from the common cold; it's for the people are going to die, giving them one last chance. Sure, they probably won't make it, but if you contract something like the Ebola Zaire strain (90% fatality rate), you'd like to throw everything + the kitchen sink at it. Knowing that interferon is a drug (albeit a synthesized version of the naturally occuring kind) that can help (the only one that works against viral threats), I'd go for it.

      And you're right about Hep-C. A woman at a place I worked for was on the interferon treatment for a few years (she got Hep-C from a blood transfusion). Something about several shots a day, if I remember correctly.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  99. Public Health Funding. by BStorm · · Score: 1

    Over the last 25 years, public health funding in the west has been seriously cut back. Public health is a cost center. When it is working the way it should, nothing happens. People are healthy, there are no epidemics, the water is safe to drink, the food does not kill us, and people are informed and make rational choices concerning lifestyle.

    Elected officials over the last 25 years have seen public health as a cost center rather than a vital part of the public good. Lulled by the fact that public health when it works, it does so silently and with out fanfare. A politician who is mainly concerned with the tax payer relief will use this lack of anything as justification to cut back public health funding.

    This reflects the last twenty years the ascendancy of the individual over any sense or responsibility for a collective good. The individual is solely responsible for their own health and well being. This is to be contrasted with a quote from the dawn of the twentieth century, from Doctor Hermann Biggs, So broad is the construction of the law that everything which improperly or unnecessarily interferes with the comfort or enjoyment of life, as well as those things which are. strictly speaking, detrimental to health or dangerous to life, may become the subject of action on the part of the Board of Health."

    Twelve years ago a the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists did a survey of all fifty states and U.S. territories. What was found:

    - Only $74 million was being spent by all the states and territories for disease surveillance. Of the $74 million only $55,455 was spent on monitoring drug resistant bacteria.

    - Twelve states had nobody monitoring for monitoring disease causing micro-organisms in food and drinking water. Thirty-four states had food/water monitoring professionals at a ratio of .01 to .09 surveillance professionals per million people. Only five states had one or more water/food surveillance workers per million people.

    All this information was cribbed from the book by Laurie Garrett, Betrayal of Trust, The Collapse of Global Public Health. ISBN 0-7868-6522-9.

    There is a strain of TB called "W" that is resistant to so many drugs it is virtually untreatable. It was circulating in many jails in New York City in the early nineties. It was identified after a prison guard died of TB in 1991. In 1995 a strain of TB was identified in Tennessee that was extremely virulent. A person managed to spread it to 82 percent of all the people that he had shared air space with. Fortunately this strain responded to antibiotic treatment, so far.

    To what extent would you favor raising taxes to ensure that public health was funded?

    --
    Research is what I doing when I don't know what I am doing - Werner von Braun
  100. Vaccination?? by Xybot · · Score: 1

    I'm not really up on the subject of TB resistance but I remember everyone in my year at school receiving a TB Vaccination. Are TB Vaccinations still helpful in producing resistance to the mutated strains of TB? If so surely we should be looking at implementing wider scale vaccination programs, in order to combat the spread of these strains.

    --
    God was my co-pilot, but then we crashed and I was forced to eat him.
  101. New Gates Foundation Funding for Research? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
    • Implant subcutaneous device below the skin of the chest above the heart which the patient will be unable to remove without surgery (profit potential for doctor and hospital)
    • Make an interface port through the nipple where medicinal refills can be added on an approximately weekly basis. (profit potential for doctor and druggist).
    • Using the scheduling services of Windows CE, device infuses portions of the medicine into the blood stream on a regular basis.
    • A secure 802.11b device will allow software updates to be applied when in close proximity to your doctor and once an update fee has been paid. (profit potential for Microsoft and doctor.)
    • Make a subscription license available for the richer corporate customers.
    • Pass legislation requiring "Microsoft BreathOfLife" device to be the required treatment option for all people who may be suspected of having TB.
    • If patient exhibits symptoms of "Blue Scream of Death", remove device and implant in next patient.
  102. Russian prisons by darin3200 · · Score: 1

    I remeber seeing a documentary about this on PBS some while back. It basically covered how with the overcrowded russian prision system the disease spead like wildfire. It also said a lot of the inmates in these prisions were released before they finished their medication and this created many of the drug resistant strands of TB. But this covers more than TB, in a world where the miracle antibiotic gets rid of everything people usually don't finish all of their medication has this leaves some of the disease behind. We are then left with drug resistent diseases.

  103. I don't work for World Health but by newpath4com · · Score: 0

    I should work for World Health. Maybe then they'd read my answer to germs. Not that they should need to. I researched my information from their own websites... For those of you who haven't seen my web page http://www.newpath4.com/theanswer.html you're in for a treat. Then there's a way to get extra germ-killing oxygen permeating our insides on http://www.newpath4.com/lungs101.htm . And the system for converting one's home to gathering more oxygen from a small home-attached greenhouse is on http://www.newpath4.com/AAINDEX/paget6.htm . The National Institute of Health is aware of my Work and my results. More people will hear my answers through SlashDot than thru World Health I guess. But I want to make something really crystal clear. Fish force so much oxygen through their body that the blood PLASMA CARRIES OXYGEN, not just the red blood platelets. WE CAN DO THAT TOO. In fact, when a person is admitted into a hospital that's exactly what they do when they put you in a forced-air hyperbaric chamber! It forces so much oxygen into the wound even if the blood flow is lacking, because it's carried thru the plasma liquid, and healing moves along at a very advanced clip. My systems are about making that AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE so we can fight off disease. And a nice side effect is that our ribcage, lungs & the rest of us can get ripped in the process. BTW, wanna know why everyone is so FAT? We don't get enough Oxygen to burn it proper. All that is going to change soon, and you guys don't need to be too overly concerned about TB. Unless, of course, no one sees fit to contribute to the cause... in which case, I guess you'll just have to depend on the good ol' World Health/NIH people who ignore the information they printed on their own website. Good Luck! Ever see a fish whose sides wasn't ripped with muscle? There's a reason for that. Please, read my pages. After you do, start writing the health folks or contribute to my Paypal or we just aren't going to survive at all.

  104. You blame *creationists* for MRSA pneumonia? by WeighingForGodot · · Score: 1

    That's harsh: shouldn't you put more responsibility on the shoulders of doctors and hospitals? Plus, sorry to say, patients who choose the wrong hospitals?

  105. Patches and Implants by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    The only drugs suitable for use in patches are extremely potent drugs, given in a few milligrams daily. (The 21 mg/day nicotine patch is the highest amount of drug in a patch that I'm aware of. The Evra birth control patch lasts for a week but gives less than 0.2 mg of hormones a day.) Even the more potent antibiotics still need a couple hundred milligrams a day to be effective. It might be possible to put one in a 24 hour patch, but that's not more convenient than taking a pill or two per day. Also, the drug would require other characteristics, eg. readily absorbed through the skin.

    The drugs used for acute TB are on the order of grams per day, so an implant wouldn't work too well. But for preventative therapy (skin test but no real signs of disease) which only needs about 300 mg of isoniazid per day, it could be possible. Though for comparison, the Norplant system used six 36 mg implants over five years. Some sort of big depo shot every month might work, though.

  106. Thanks. I'm even more worried now. (grins) by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    Sigh you sound like a medic. If I had bigger balls I
    might have done that. It hurts just knowing we can't
    give easy answers for diseases like this.

    But (going technical for a mo) in the real world
    the things which produce antibiotics produce a big
    chemical cocktail of other things. Most of those *seem* to be inactive. My gut instinct spells "shotgun". What do you think? I wonder if we
    should look again at the crud that was in that
    mold to begin with (hey you know what I mean..)

    P.S: You should submit a script for this to the BBC.
    Heck with their wondrous friends at WGBH they would make an *excellent* story on Horizon. or
    the discovery channel. Personally, I'd like John Carpenter to direct it so people *REALLY* get scared. They need to. I'd hate to get this one.

    I was homeless a couple of years back, and I practiced *avoiding* anywhere with loads of
    other people. Hey, I don't want to end up like
    Doc Holiday. (If I cough it's because I smoke).

    Please scare people about this. They need to be.

  107. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by grolschie · · Score: 1

    > TB is a "white-man's disease" we in India were introduced to TB due some assholes
    > coming over from the "developed" world in the 16th century.


    "Thank you, come again" - Apu Nahasapemapetalan, Springfield Kwik-E-Mart

  108. Their right to ignorance ends at my hospital... by geekotourist · · Score: 1
    Doctors who refused to prescribe placebos instead of antibiotics for viruses... yes, they should get more blame.

    But I still blame people (ordinary or policy makers) who have no fundamental understanding of why they should only take an antibiotic to fight a susceptible bacteria. If you believe evolution then (tautologically) you believe in small changes in the gene pool over time. Small changes in environments cause small changes in the gene pool. Given enough organisms this leads to new characteristics in organisms or new species: furry elephants and naked apes and all that. And that One human with an infection equals enough organisms to have changes in the gene pool. So the person believing in evolution fundamentally understands why he/she should not mess around with antibiotics.

    Anyone else (especially policy makers) who doesn't understand evolution is likely to make mistakes. Just like someone who really doesn't understand gravity, stress strain diagrams, etc is likely to make mistakes in judging construction safety. They might make lucky guesses, but they might make horrible errors. With antibiotics they're much more likely to feel complacent about how they fund research or how they treat themselves with leftover antibiotics. And if they didn't learn evolution they probably didn't have enough microbiology to learn that bacteria exchange genes: resistance in one species can get transfered to other species. Their ignorant bliss: my pain.