Be an adult and try to reason with them. Failing that, go to the courts and try your case there, write letters, editorial and to your government agencies. Get others with your same issues and band together to get more people writing letters and making complaints. It's a business after all. With enough negative publicity they will eventually find it too costly to do business. I have no problem with people that go through the proper channels, just the ones who whine and don;t do anything except expect everyone else to do it for them.
Such a perfectly American comment here. "I got mine, so fuck you!"
How so? It's a valid argument. It not only applies to gun ranges but any other "nuisance" you care to name. If you knew before hand it was there and you move in anyway then you have no grounds to complain. If it came in after the fact and you didn't let your wishes be known it on you at that point. People have got to start being responsible for their own actions or inaction as well. But where did you get a "I got mine" idea from my original comment. It was more of a "suck it up" comment.
Who was there first you or them? If it's the latter, stop your complaining and move. It was your choice to move there. If it was the former that sucks for you, too bad you didn't go and complain when they had the zoning hearings for just such a reason.
I haven't flown for over a decade now simply because they, the government, have taken enough of my rights. Why should I freely give them any more. I even missed my dads funeral to some extent because of my refusal to fly. Family things being the other main contributor.
If a company cuts corners on security, then in the same way that if I leave my door unlocked and get burgled, I can't make a claim.
I agree with the second portion of your comment. It's an entirely different matter when it's personal property verses protected information. There is or should be a certain level of security afforded to one's private property regardless of the level of security maintained. Meaning I don't care if the door is wide open it's still wrong to have someone come in and take what isn't theirs. I know that my home-owner's and auto policies have zero stipulations on eh security levels that must be maintained. Where as there is a documented level of security that needs to be in place for the protected information. Look at HIPPA, PCI, SOX, etc. requirements. I think if you don't meet those standards it should be a criminal as well as a civil offence to allow the non-compliance. From a an admin's perspective you better have documented proof of your recommendations and when/why they were shot down or you are just as guilty as the PHB.
Must have abeen a boy. My 14 year old daughter is in a stage that I can't understand. I guess it could be best described as "I'm an adult and do everything and know everything, but still need to be taken care of" stage. But my 7.5 and 9 year old boys in the "messy guns are everything" stage.
Citation please. Why? Let's see.
I'm at work posting on/. so I've already spent too much time on the internet.
I'm not sure I know the correct search terms.
It's just too cool to know that I can use the links to gross out my 13 year old who thinks they are just the cutest little things.
TIA
Why would they not want to build it? With the troubles Boeing is having, it may their best chance at making their name as THE provider of fully functional aircraft.
That's still helping with development. You have to have testers or else they will never get the bugs squashed. One hey this doesn't look right is whining, that can be dismissed. Several people having the same issue means hey there's a bug here that needs to be looked at. Since when has not being a developer excluded you from being a beta tester?
My clients that have this issue are all XP w/IE8. Various manufacturers and patch levels. When I say my client, I do their switch/route stuff not servers/workstations.
I'm not discounting your points, but it seems he hit a nerve. He did mention that it was an ISP that he works for. Why is it OK for an ISP to allow everything through their network when it comes to other questionable traffic both from and thru their infrastructure but when it comes to spam it's off with their heads. Shouldn't it be all or nothing? If you want ISPs to not be filtering/blocking other information/data that we want, spam should be allowed as well right? I mean it's just data.
Not to be a jerk toward the people in Conn., but yeah you pretty much target the same areas with a gun that you would with a knife, Head, neck/torso. If you don't you are likely just going to mame them and not kill. firearms are also known as ranged weapons. They simply let you be farther away from your target.
My HOA has/had a guy that was like that. He turned me in every other week because my Bermuda grass was too tall. I actually sat on the board because of him. I was put in charge of the architectural control and violations committees. I was able to get the rules that allowed him to be that way changed. We have some very good commonsense rules now. Such as no more than two live chickens can be kept on your property for more than 60 days. No parking in your yard for more than a week without giving the HOA a heads up. Mostly so if there is an actual problem we have a legal leg to stand on. Oh yeah "that Guy", he's now known throughout the sub-division as the angry fat man.
But if the human built device is programmed for and relies on the three laws exclusively and is incapable of rational thought, it is not sentient is it?
Slashdot Mirror
How is that different from others bashing Christians?
Not a who a what. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Be an adult and try to reason with them. Failing that, go to the courts and try your case there, write letters, editorial and to your government agencies. Get others with your same issues and band together to get more people writing letters and making complaints. It's a business after all. With enough negative publicity they will eventually find it too costly to do business. I have no problem with people that go through the proper channels, just the ones who whine and don;t do anything except expect everyone else to do it for them.
How so? It's a valid argument. It not only applies to gun ranges but any other "nuisance" you care to name. If you knew before hand it was there and you move in anyway then you have no grounds to complain. If it came in after the fact and you didn't let your wishes be known it on you at that point. People have got to start being responsible for their own actions or inaction as well. But where did you get a "I got mine" idea from my original comment. It was more of a "suck it up" comment.
Who was there first you or them? If it's the latter, stop your complaining and move. It was your choice to move there. If it was the former that sucks for you, too bad you didn't go and complain when they had the zoning hearings for just such a reason.
I haven't flown for over a decade now simply because they, the government, have taken enough of my rights. Why should I freely give them any more. I even missed my dads funeral to some extent because of my refusal to fly. Family things being the other main contributor.
Thanks for the refresher.
I thought Broadcast tv was 24 frames/sec back in the bad old days.
I agree with the second portion of your comment. It's an entirely different matter when it's personal property verses protected information. There is or should be a certain level of security afforded to one's private property regardless of the level of security maintained. Meaning I don't care if the door is wide open it's still wrong to have someone come in and take what isn't theirs. I know that my home-owner's and auto policies have zero stipulations on eh security levels that must be maintained. Where as there is a documented level of security that needs to be in place for the protected information. Look at HIPPA, PCI, SOX, etc. requirements. I think if you don't meet those standards it should be a criminal as well as a civil offence to allow the non-compliance. From a an admin's perspective you better have documented proof of your recommendations and when/why they were shot down or you are just as guilty as the PHB.
Sadly it can, and is being done. We are the test subjects. Unfortunately it probably won't be us who gets to parse the final data.
Must have abeen a boy. My 14 year old daughter is in a stage that I can't understand. I guess it could be best described as "I'm an adult and do everything and know everything, but still need to be taken care of" stage. But my 7.5 and 9 year old boys in the "messy guns are everything" stage.
Citation please. Why? Let's see. I'm at work posting on /. so I've already spent too much time on the internet.
I'm not sure I know the correct search terms.
It's just too cool to know that I can use the links to gross out my 13 year old who thinks they are just the cutest little things.
TIA
Heh, maybe he should have sued his wife, not Apple. It would have been cheaper, and either way he's not getting any. There fixed that for you.
Why would they not want to build it? With the troubles Boeing is having, it may their best chance at making their name as THE provider of fully functional aircraft.
Oh get off my lawn you young whipper snappers. :P
here http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tdp
That's still helping with development. You have to have testers or else they will never get the bugs squashed. One hey this doesn't look right is whining, that can be dismissed. Several people having the same issue means hey there's a bug here that needs to be looked at. Since when has not being a developer excluded you from being a beta tester?
My clients that have this issue are all XP w/IE8. Various manufacturers and patch levels. When I say my client, I do their switch/route stuff not servers/workstations.
I'm not discounting your points, but it seems he hit a nerve. He did mention that it was an ISP that he works for. Why is it OK for an ISP to allow everything through their network when it comes to other questionable traffic both from and thru their infrastructure but when it comes to spam it's off with their heads. Shouldn't it be all or nothing? If you want ISPs to not be filtering/blocking other information/data that we want, spam should be allowed as well right? I mean it's just data.
Not to be a jerk toward the people in Conn., but yeah you pretty much target the same areas with a gun that you would with a knife, Head, neck/torso. If you don't you are likely just going to mame them and not kill. firearms are also known as ranged weapons. They simply let you be farther away from your target.
My HOA has/had a guy that was like that. He turned me in every other week because my Bermuda grass was too tall. I actually sat on the board because of him. I was put in charge of the architectural control and violations committees. I was able to get the rules that allowed him to be that way changed. We have some very good commonsense rules now. Such as no more than two live chickens can be kept on your property for more than 60 days. No parking in your yard for more than a week without giving the HOA a heads up. Mostly so if there is an actual problem we have a legal leg to stand on. Oh yeah "that Guy", he's now known throughout the sub-division as the angry fat man.
No I haven't. I was thinking philosophically.
Link please. I would like to know where that place is so I can stay away from there.
But if the human built device is programmed for and relies on the three laws exclusively and is incapable of rational thought, it is not sentient is it?
They can turn into almost any other cell so why not. All a tumor is is a bunch of otherwise normal cells gone wacko.