I built it for a small group of friends, and I'm sure it will collapse under the weight of a slashdot effect. But searching Craigslist can be done without violating section 12.b of the terms of service.
Proxy servers tend to munge up way too much software so all but one company I have ever worked for just nat everything and do not use proxy servers.
Well, I have used transparent proxy servers at every SMB installation without fail. All the web pages see it as they would if the computers were NATed together.
If you use a proxy server, transparent or not, this vulnerability will not affect you.
I recently put together a server with power consumption in mind. It included: 1GHz VIA cpu, 512MB RAM, two network cards, and two 40G 7200 rpm drives mirrored.
The entire computer pulled a total of 47 watts. I was even able to unplug the CPU fan once I replaced the heat sink.
I have one problem with using word processors for large shared documents: Version Control. How would one accept patches from others?
I'll stay with TeX and DocBook
Re:Nice, but they've got it all wrong...
on
Linux Desktop Guide
·
· Score: 1
...there are no users who've never used a computer before who are likely to run Linux...
Well, not really. I'm encouraged to find people creating documentation/guides that assume that every user on the planet will be one day running Linux. Because I assume that that day will come.
But you can start the download the questionably hacked version now. Then tomorrow, switch to the officical torrent. Let bittorrent compare the files for you, or verify the MD5 sums from fedora tomorrow.
Without violating Craigslist terms of service. I have created a nation wide search, and state search for Craiglist. The links are.
http://atl.org/~ed/craigslist/
http://atl.org/~ed/craigslist/queryState.php
I built it for a small group of friends, and I'm sure it will collapse under the weight of a slashdot effect. But searching Craigslist can be done without violating section 12.b of the terms of service.
Yea, tell that to an ice skater.
Yea right, when Slashdot speaks in one voice is when I turn to another site for commentary.
Well, I have used transparent proxy servers at every SMB installation without fail. All the web pages see it as they would if the computers were NATed together.
If you use a proxy server, transparent or not, this vulnerability will not affect you.
You are not entitled to a second chance, you can plead for one, and hope for the best. But that is different from entitled.
I recently put together a server with power consumption in mind. It included: 1GHz VIA cpu, 512MB RAM, two network cards, and two 40G 7200 rpm drives mirrored.
The entire computer pulled a total of 47 watts. I was even able to unplug the CPU fan once I replaced the heat sink.
I'll stay with TeX and DocBook
If your project is small, one programmer, then there is no need to separate duties.
But you can start the download the questionably hacked version now. Then tomorrow, switch to the officical torrent. Let bittorrent compare the files for you, or verify the MD5 sums from fedora tomorrow.
Why should we stop imagining new solutions to the spam problem, just because all the previous attempts have seemed to fail?
I believe that the proper solution has not been thought of yet.
stop being lazy, think of another solution.
Any application that is on any merit that runs on Linux will also be available on Solaris, *BSD, and Windows.
Examples include: MySQL, PHP, Apache, StarOffice, GIMP, Mozilla, etc...
(fyi: yea, I wrote the catalog system for my friend)