Slashdot Mirror


Energy Efficient and Cheap Servers for Home Use?

CapnRob asks: "I just got married, and my wife and I are putting together a home network in the (small) apartment we're now living in. We'd like to set up a firewall/mail server/small-file-server, but all the machines we own right now are pretty big machines that pull a fair amount of power, and that we don't want to keep running 24/7. Since our mail and file server needs are pretty low, our ideal box would be something like a Linksys WRT45G with one of the open source firmwares ... if only you could add a small hard drive to it. We're both long-time FreeBSD users, so installing a *nix system is no big deal, but what I've found so far in this line needs more l337 soldering iron skillz than I've got. Any suggestions for tiny little cheap boxes that won't send our power bills into orbit?"

594 comments

  1. SparcStation IPX by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    SparcStation IPX (or even IPC) I ran one of these clever little buggers for a few years, very low on power, quiet as a churchmouse and houses one harddrive (but at todays disk sizes that's plenty) the architecture is pretty fast and 64MB of RAM was more than adequate. You can pick these little beasties up on eBay for next to nothing so spare parts shouldn't be a problem, either (I actually bought a second for spares.) I was running RedHat 6.1 for months at a time without a hiccup.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:SparcStation IPX by nocomment · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OpenBSD runs very nicely on a soekris box.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either this one or this one

    3. Re:SparcStation IPX by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's some problems with the IPX that should make you think twice before considering it.

      1) CPU speed: The CPU in a Sparc IPX is slow. We're talking a MicroSPARC at 40MHz. Even running basic applications in a shell, it feels like slogging through mud. I have a SparcStation classic, which uses a MicroSPARC at 50MHz (slightly faster) and it's pure torture, especially when you fire up gcc to compile something.

      2) Bus speed: The 20MHz SBUS can barely support 10Mbps ethernet at full speed. I put an hme 100Mbps adapter in my SparcClassic and couldn't push more than about 12Mbps through it with large packets. It absolutely choked with smaller ones. The system also adds about 4ms of latency to any packet going through it, in my experience. Again, this is the slightly faster SparcClassic, not even an IPX! If you have a really fast (3Mbps or greater) DSL connection, you may lose out on performance because of this.

      Don't get me wrong, it's a fun as hell box to play with, and you can get them to network boot and run off a serial console, but they're just plain torture for doing real work. Even a PCI-bus 486 is loads faster.

      -Z

    4. Re:SparcStation IPX by gnomepro · · Score: 1

      Try a Toshiba Magnia SG20 or SG30. They are just a little pc in a neat box. Has a 20-30GB laptop HD, 128mb ram, and runs stock redhat 7.3 with some stuff added (web interface, display stuffs). That can change at your will. Check Ebay.

    5. Re:SparcStation IPX by ericdano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its going to be a mail/file server. I think you don't need a ton of horsepower.......I used to run a fileserver/email server on a dual pentium 166.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    6. Re:SparcStation IPX by Karzz1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its going to be a mail/file server. I think you don't need a ton of horsepower.......

      It depends on whether you are planning on doing any mail filtering. I have a bunch of experience with MailScanner and ClamAV -- a sendmail server that normally eats 4-5% CPU will quickly start hitting 75% and more. SpamAssassin will add a bunch more to the load. As far as file sharing goes though, you are probably safe.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    7. Re:SparcStation IPX by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its going to be a mail/file server. I think you don't need a ton of horsepower.......

      Until you try run Spamassassin and Clamav to filter spam and windows-virus-cruddage and wonder why email takes days to arrive...

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    8. Re:SparcStation IPX by capilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good gawd. I was on the development team of that box back in the day. It was the finest workstation of its era in terms of price/capability.

      Should I be proud they're still in service, or heartbroken they're selling for $14?

    9. Re:SparcStation IPX by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If he means a mailserver for home use, even with a lot of spam for a few users, CPU usage should be OK.

      I'd be a lot more worried about RAM though if the boxes max out at 64mb... the perl version of SpamAssassin uses about 20MB, and if you do AV also, that's another 5-10MB RAM per concurrent connection.

      I've had problems with my home server (P5/140MB RAM) freaking when I use fetchmail to d/l my POP3 acct with 10-20 emails; fetchmail hands the messages to sendmail and sendmail tries to process them all at once, launching 20 Amavis+McAfee threads, and the server runs out of RAM and the evil OOM killer kicks in and kills something important like apache or bind! :(
      I haven't tried it lately (new 2.4.x kernel without OOM killer).

      Tuning sendmail to do less threads at once would help of course.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    10. Re:SparcStation IPX by pyg · · Score: 1

      Right on brotha'. If you don't believe him, I have three for sale.

    11. Re:SparcStation IPX by krenshala · · Score: 1

      i still run a dual P166 (256Mb RAM) as my mail/web/router/firewall for my home network. ;) at one point i had x windows on it, but it was too sluggish there. works just fine in console, however. and hte only problems i've had with the Tyan mb were fixed with a bios update.

      --

      krenshala

    12. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a 'P5'?

    13. Re:SparcStation IPX by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Informative
      What's a 'P5'?

      The original Pentium is often referred to as a P5.
      PPro/PII/PIII is P6, Pentium4 is P7...
      I don't know what they'll call the Pentium 5 if/when it comes out :P

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    14. Re:SparcStation IPX by eclectechie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Its going to be a mail/file server. I think you don't need a ton of horsepower...

      Don't forget SSL. If you want to run webmail over HTTPS, you need a fair bit of CPU.

      My P200/Linux server goes to 100% CPU usage when I hit Refresh on my inbox, and it feels slow as molasses. Otherwise, the machine is adequate; all non-encrypted stuff feels quite snappy.

      --
      "The empty vessel makes the greatest sound." -- William Shakespeare; Henry V, 4. 4
    15. Re:SparcStation IPX by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      That doesnt sound right.. what distro and did you compile openSSL from scratch?

      I had a P2 266 serving SSL pages and it was fine on a minimal RH8 install with hand compiled apache/php/ssl..

      Give Gentoo a shot also.. I was amazed at the difference..

    16. Re:SparcStation IPX by iamacat · · Score: 1
    17. Re:SparcStation IPX by eclectechie · · Score: 1
      It's an ancient govt-surplus Dell Optiplex P200 running the original Engarde Secure Linux community edition, with i386 binaries. Source is a hassle, because the distro comes without development tools (you have to install them separately).

      I was surprised myself; it's a reasonably busy web server, and the usage is usually so low I wonder about the accuracy of the numbers. But serving Squirrelmail pages over HTTPS pegs CPU usage at 100%, and it's slow.

      --
      "The empty vessel makes the greatest sound." -- William Shakespeare; Henry V, 4. 4
    18. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IPX doesn't use a MicroSPARC CPU. Not only that, but the MicroSPARC 50MHz is slightly slower than the "plain-jane" 40MHz SPARC CPU used in the IPX, mostly due to an abysmal cache size.

      Still, I agree.. It's really not that fast, and interactive use is almost out of the question. I had a SparcStation 2 for a long time; this is basically the same thing as the IPX, minus the built-in framebuffer, and in a "pizza-box" style case. The only way it was usable in X was with a light WM like fvwm or blackbox, and in 8-bit color, don't expect to do anything graphical. Web browsing? Don't bother. Even console input was somewhat slow, though there is a fix for the slow console output on sun4c cg6 machines (look at the netbsd. sparc faq)

      I've used 100mbps "BigMac" cards on sun4c machines with slow Sbus, and they don't seem to have a problem saturating the card. What operating system were you using?

    19. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSL is not THAT slow on a 40MHz SPARC, believe it or not. When SSH generates keys though, don't bother coming back for an hour.

    20. Re:SparcStation IPX by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      25

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    21. Re:SparcStation IPX by stripyd · · Score: 1

      OS would be the tricky part: connected to the internet and on 24/7, rapid security patching would be a priority. I think SuSE was the last of the big commercial distros to support SPARC, but that's long out of support. sun4c kernel architecture hasn't been supported by Sun since Solaris 7.

      I would have thought this might detract from the utility of the IPX/IPC for the task in hand...

    22. Re:SparcStation IPX by rpilkey · · Score: 1

      You said "quiet as a churchmouse". My IPX is the noisiest machine in the room. Did you remove/replace the case fan in the back?

      --
      Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off then on again?
    23. Re:SparcStation IPX by justins · · Score: 1
      1) CPU speed: The CPU in a Sparc IPX is slow. We're talking a MicroSPARC at 40MHz. Even running basic applications in a shell, it feels like slogging through mud.

      Then there's something wrong. Either you're running a poorly supported framebuffer, or you're running Linux. Neither one is going to give you very good results on that hardware.

      That's my experience, anyway. Solaris 9 runs much faster than Linux, and a bit faster than OpenBSD, on my 70MHz Sparc 5. But adding a wacky framebuffer will hose shell responsiveness more than anything.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    24. Re:SparcStation IPX by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

      I had the regretful experince of using a SparcStation a few years ago in a Unix class I took. It is the slowest computer I think I have ever used. In fact the school dumped them the next year for while box Intel clones with Solaris x86. These boxes were lighting in comparison.

      As for the orignal post check out: http://www.logicsupply.com/default.php/cPath/21

      They specialize in SFF computers and DIY parts. You can build I nice little box to handle you needs.

    25. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to buy extra computing power to run Spamassassin and Clamav? Surely not!. Spammers are saying all the time how it never costs anybody anything to receive their messages, and how pressing delete is instant, painless and costless.

      Perhaps you could claim the bounty on Alan Ralsky and use that to upgrade your mailserver...

    26. Re:SparcStation IPX by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting, squirrelmail itself isnt that heavy, so it must be SSL.. I think the issue might be with Engarde itself. They do a lot of their own mucking about with their distro, rather proprietary OS.

      Give Gentoo a shot, although I would go with a stage3 install as it may take you 3 days to compile from scratch on a P200 ;-)

    27. Re:SparcStation IPX by eclectechie · · Score: 1
      ...Engarde... rather proprietary OS.

      I know; too bad. I went to Engarde as a replacement for Red Hat, after flirting with OpenBSD. When Engarde Community 2 was released I got nervous about availability of updates, so I moved to OpenBSD.

      Give Gentoo a shot,...

      Someday I will, but on the desktop.

      ...it may take you 3 days to compile from scratch on a P200 ;-)

      That P200 server is overdue for replacement. When it does get replaced, it will get OpenBSD.

      Heh; so how do *I* fit the slashdot profile?

      • *BSD is NOT dead around here, all my other servers (except my AS/400) run OpenBSD
      • Linux is for the desktop, rather than the servers =)
      • ...and I'm posting this from a Windows machine.
      --
      "The empty vessel makes the greatest sound." -- William Shakespeare; Henry V, 4. 4
    28. Re:SparcStation IPX by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      LOL! I rather fit the profile, linux cluster for production servers, linux for desktop, *BSD, Solaris, and W2K for dev and experimintation.

      I have toyed with the idea of FreeBSD for servers but I went with an OpenMOSIX linux cluster instead as I decided to go contrary to the standard n-tiering of systems. It could be my lack of knowledge but most of the clustering software out there that fits my architectural needs either doesn't exist for *BSD or is not ready for prime-time.

      BTW, wouldn't NetBSD or a slimmed FreeBSD work on that P200?

    29. Re:SparcStation IPX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I still use 100MHz Pentuim I form mail/firewall/web ;))

    30. Re:SparcStation IPX by matyas47 · · Score: 1

      Don't mean to break your heart further, but I bought my IPX for $5 at a Thrift Shop back in 2000. I think some CS student got it from Carnegie Mellon University's surplus, and then needed to get rid of it....

  2. Soekris is what you want. by Nugget · · Score: 4, Informative

    Soekris boxes are exactly what you're looking for. They're cheap, stable, low power, interface-rich and run FreeBSD like a dream. They're super boxes.

    1. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1

      I don't see "boxes" (well, a T1 box) on their website, just mobos.

    2. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      OMG. . . I've been googling for weeks and never came across these. Thanks so much, exactly what I was looking for, and priced to buy.

    3. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Nugget · · Score: 1

      They sell the boards bare or in little cases.

    4. Re:Soekris is what you want. by douglips · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can easily run the Pebble Linux distro on these. The easy way is to mount a CF card on a Linux box and build a bootable filesystem there. The Pebble docs walk you through it, piece of cake.

      Since you can get 1 GB flash cards for pretty cheap, and Pebble even with added bells & whistles fits handily in 256 MB, you can run dead silent. No fans, no water cooling. Power consumption is somewhere south of 10 watts according to the soekris docs.

      Of course, if you are running a mail server and/or web server, you might want an actual hard disk to be able to have many read/write cycles without destroying your CF card - you can use a microdrive CF form factor disk with no problem.

      My understanding is that Soekris' support for *BSD is better than for Linux, but I've had no problem running Pebble on mine.

    5. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might I suggest this as well http://www.nmedia.net/~chris/soekris/

    6. Re:Soekris is what you want. by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, thanks! I've been looking for something similar too, and their net4801 seems really nice and compact - and $250 isn't all that too much, either.

      Do you know of anything similar for a webserver, something like a compact off the shelf thing running either *BSD/Linux? I guess I could always solder in a hard-drive onto the 4801 (since the website says that they do have both CompactFlash Type I/II socket and UltraDMA 33 int.) - but one that comes built in with something like that would be cool.

      Most of the solutions out there kinda seem really complex and expensive, I just need something to serve a few static pages, and something I can just ssh into remotely to do stuff.

      Any suggestions?

    7. Re:Soekris is what you want. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      That site appears to have nothing to do with Soekris, and is in German no less.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    8. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Raleel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can concur on the soekris box. Might I suggest the 4801. 3 ethernet ports, laptop sized harddrive connector on board, compact flash slot, pci slot, and a mini-pci slot. they even sell them with WAN interfaces cards

      we use these for wireless/bluetooth sniffers

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    9. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Notebook HD with an adapter if needed.
      They are a lot cheaper than CF and they consume less power and are not as noisy as normal HDs.

    10. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Shao+Ke · · Score: 1

      I have a 4801 with a 40g laptop hard drive in it. No problem.

    11. Re:Soekris is what you want. by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. If I can set up OpenBSD on one of these as my second BSD box ever, I'm sure someone with some actual BSD experience can do it easily.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    12. Re:Soekris is what you want. by vincecate · · Score: 1

      That board does look nice. There is a new 366 Mhz Geode as seen on this 5 watt board.

    13. Re:Soekris is what you want. by blixel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Soekris boxes are exactly what you're looking for.

      I'll second that. I bought one of these about 6 months ago and it has been amazing. I plan on getting at least one more so I can have a highly customizable WAP.

      Check my little tutorial for more info. (Several pictures included.)

    14. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microdrives make horrible hard drives. They are not meant for any real duty cycles. From what I have heard, if they are used as a real hard disk, they never last more than 2 months. Use a laptop hard drive, a nice 1.8" hard drive if you want to spend top dollar.

    15. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Sayan · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can try out VIA C3 or Eden based solutions such as this one: http://www.computergate.com/products/item.cfm?prod cd=B7VEPIACL6
      VIA http://www.via.com.tw/ makes excellent fanless CPUs and motherboards from 400Mhz upto 1+Ghz

      --
      resurrect my .sig
    16. Re:Soekris is what you want. by epine · · Score: 2, Informative

      New item today on
      The Wedgie that the VIA Esther C5J has now been branded as the C7. This core has accelerated instructions for AES, RSA, hardware entropy, and various SHA standards. It should run fanless at around 1GHz and outperform a P4 as a cypto NAT firewall.

      http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0402/ ms g00112.html

      Once upon a time Theo de Raadt wrote:

      >Got a couple figures on AES performance... the cool one at the bottom.
      >
      >type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
      >aes-128-cbc 15985.10k 16924.93k 17238.12k 17319.74k 17339.74k
      > 1.6GHz amd64 in 32bit mode
      >
      >aes-128-cbc 13323.36k 14403.55k 13225.65k 14529.80k 14654.16k
      > P3/1GHz
      >
      >aes-128-cbc 13090.59k 51065.12k 174593.45k 426600.92k 735548.02k
      > VIA C3 with the xcrypt-* instructions. This is using a new diff
      > I have written which makes OpenSSL directly use the cpu instructions
      > if they are available, right in userland, without having to call to
      > /dev/crypto
      >
      >Two things are apparent. First, this CPU feature is really cool.
      >Second, the OpenSSL glue above crypto operation has pathetically high
      >overhead...


      I vaguely recall a claim on the VIA site which I can't find right now that the Montgomery multiplier will perform one hundred 1024 bit RSA setups per second.


      AND this chip supports NX.


      I'm waiting until spring to replace my aging P200 firewalls. If those benchmarks prove out, I'll have the better part of a decade to seek out the next replacement.

    17. Re:Soekris is what you want. by doc+modulo · · Score: 1, Informative

      But does it have ECC RAM?
      The site says it's soldered onto the board so you can't replace it if it isn't.

      A PC that needs to keep running/doesn't reboot, absolutely needs ECC (Error Correcting Code) memory.
      In PC RAM, bits will flip unintentionally because of cosmic radiation (I'm not kidding) and other reasons. With ECC RAM, your PC will detect those flipped bits and, correct them.

      If you don't have ECC memory, those flipped bits will add up after your PC has run a while and if you save any of the info in your RAM, the flipped bits will be stored permanently as corruption of your files. I've read that any ram will quickly flip bits this way. Even while running, bugs might occur. Who knows what will happen with random bit flips, a FreeBSD might spontaneously turn into WindowsXP :)

      For this reason, I will not build a server without ECC RAM. Trouble is, it's hard to find motherboards/chipsets that support it. There are 1 or 2 nice Pentium M chipset motherboards that give you BOTH a low power solution and ECC memory but those solutions are expensive.

      I'm hoping, that in the future, more manufacturers will create Pentium M motherboards, there's definitely a need for that, especially since Intel is going to switch from Pentium 4 type, to Pentium M type processors for their main consumer range.

      The best board I found for a Pentium M server is this a new one: Aopen i855GMEm-LFS
      It's not out in Europe (nor US I think), but as I said, not cheap. Ultra low voltage Pentium M's can be cooled without a fan using a good heatsink. Maybe the Low voltage Pentium M 1.6 GHz can be as well. You can also underclock them to make certain, they'll still have plenty of computing power.

      --
      - -- Truth addict for life.
    18. Re:Soekris is what you want. by PuceBaboon · · Score: 1

      Soekris have a $15 dollar drive adapter kit which allows you to mount a laptop drive in the standard case (no soldering involved). I have two of the 4801s, one using a flash card and the other using a 15GB laptop drive.
      The USB port also works reliably with plug-in keyholder style flash and OpenBSD runs beautifully on these boxes. My other recommendation for the guy who was looking for a web server... try thttpd.
      It's pretty much a custom fit for a small web server running out of flash on a machine like this.

    19. Re:Soekris is what you want. by nielsenj · · Score: 0

      If you get the 4801 it even has a 2.5" HD connector.

      I have my 4801 running FreeBSD 5.2.1 (installed from official FreeBSD cd via nfs) with a 20GB 2.5" disk and and DLink DWL-640 for wireless.
      Only one problem though. Net throughput seems very low, and as far as i've been able to tell it's caused by interrupt flooding from the net driver :(

    20. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      You are correct, a 'Doppelkarte' is an insurance document you need to register a car in Germany. That website has to do with Car Insurance.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    21. Re:Soekris is what you want. by cpghost · · Score: 1

      net4801 with FreeBSD 5.3-BETA1 is absolutely great. I've beeing using one as ADSL router, Postfix + Cyrus/IMAP server and thttpd webserver for many months now without any problems. I can highly recommend them!

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    22. Re:Soekris is what you want. by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any server board will take ECC RAM. Just have to get one made for 24/7 operation...

    23. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just by looking at the picture of the board I can see that this would be a good choice. A comment for anyone who says it is too slow:

      Each of the eithernet ports is most likely serviced by a single network processor (can you see the symmetry on the card?) so the 'speed' of the system for use as a network processor is only loosely coupled with clock speed.
      PS: do your office and gui work on a separate box which is why the original poster wants a firewall!

      With the news that MS's new service pack II slows machines down do you all see the need for a firewall now? My guess is that the firewall part of the Win SPII is the part that slows things down.

      The Soekris device looks very good.

      Do they have a similar thing for audio?

      I would like 16 inputs and 20 or so outputs and would use the board as sound recording/mixing console.

      I would use 24bit 94K sampling.

      Just for kicks I would like 8 to 16 video in's and a bunch of video outs.

      But now I am off topic-*

    24. Re:Soekris is what you want. by mark_osmd · · Score: 1

      If these bit flips are happening, why doesn't the parity test detect them? I've used computers for years and haven't seen parity errors. Mark

    25. Re:Soekris is what you want. by brentcastle · · Score: 1

      Definitely don't do this. IIRC the CF manual says somewhere in the range of 100k write/read cycles. While this is fine for pictures/music, its horrible for an o.s. In fact, I believe it specifically says to not put os's on CF's.

      --
      http://www.brentcastle.com
    26. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also try the TS-7200 from Technologic Systems, http://www.embeddedarm.com. $150 for a 166 Mhz ARM based board that runs Linux right out of the shoot from onboard flash. Power spec is like 2 watts. Here at work, we put a 1Gb compact flash card on and are using one board to run our entire public website. No moving parts, low thermal stresses (due to low power of ARM), and low system complexity yields a very reliable server platform perfect for small networks.

      I must confess though, I actually work there, some I'm partial :-)

    27. Re:Soekris is what you want. by MatrixXForm · · Score: 1

      Nugget's comment is right on. I have bought about 10 soekris boxes and they are perfect for this purpose. You can stick m0n0wall on them (see http://www.m0n0.ch/) or its cousin m0n0bsd. or just roll your own. I've done all three and can't fault it.

    28. Re:Soekris is what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My openbsd server has been running for almost 900 days without a reboot. No ECC memory or any special hardware.

    29. Re:Soekris is what you want. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ahh... that board. FWIW, it's one of the cheapest P-M boards I've seen. I THINK it's meant to be a desktop board. Also, you notice the heatsink mount? It takes a P4 heatsink. Can you say "my Pentium M 755 is running fanless, and cooler than your vapor-phase cooled P4 3.6GHz"?

    30. Re:Soekris is what you want. by douglips · · Score: 1

      You can mount the CF read-only, and upon boot copy the system to a ramdisk. The pebble setup docs step you through this.

      Then, your CF disk is used only for reading, and will last for a good long time.

      There is also a Journalling Flash Filesystem which is supposed to optimize writes so that CF life is not compromised.

    31. Re:Soekris is what you want. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      A PC that needs to keep running/doesn't reboot, absolutely needs ECC (Error Correcting Code) memory.
      Bullshit x 1

      It's simply not worth the cost, expecially since the probability is pretty/extremely high that, on the rare occasion that there IS an error, it will be in non-critical data (like a pixel in a jpeg) sitting in ram rather than executable code.

      bits will flip unintentionally because of cosmic radiation (I'm not kidding)
      Bullshit x 2

      You might not be kidding, but experience says otherwise. Cosmic radiation doesn't really have much effect on dram at ground level. Again, most soft errors are in non-critical data, and most of these get corrected, evin with non-ECC ram. For example, you download a chunk with bittorrent, the checksum is no good, you download that chunk again. You read some datga from your hard disk - the controller notices that the checksum for that track is wrong, it re-reads the track.

      Unless you live in Denver or Chernobyl, buy the cheaper non-ECC ram for samll and mid-size office servers.

  3. whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You found a BSD chick? roxxor!

    1. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      You found a BSD chick? roxxor!

      I happen to know there are some BSD chix out there. They like Star Trek, Star Wars, computer games, Dungeons and Dragons, and love wild sex. Unfortunately 90% of them are five foot two and weigh in at 250 pounds.

    2. Re:whoa! by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 4, Funny

      geeky, smart, hot. Choose any two.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    3. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't geeky imply smart?

    4. Re:whoa! by cephyn · · Score: 1

      smart+hot is plenty good for me. geekiness can be learned, especially if you're smart. ;)

      --
      Moo.
    5. Re:whoa! by couldntthinkupagoodn · · Score: 1
      I happen to know there are some BSD chix out there. [...] Unfortunately 90% of them are five foot two and weigh in at 250 pounds.

      You know, a girl who is five foot two and weighs in at 250 pounds wouldn't exactly be placed in the "chix" category.

    6. Re:whoa! by kevman42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hilarious...the parent is modded as "Informative"...like some person with mod points was reading through the posts, saw that one, and thought "Hm, I didn't know the BSD chix weighed in at 250. Next time I see h0tti3BSDbab3 online, I'll know not to flirt with her anymore, because I like my women thin".

    7. Re:whoa! by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1

      My ex-wife is geeky hot and smart but menatly ill but so am I so I guess we where a good match

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    8. Re:whoa! by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a BBW lover, so that sounds perfect to me. Don't go knocking big girls -- for some, that is ideal.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    9. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD is procreating!

    10. Re:whoa! by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Not really, "I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart." Milhouse. Someone can have geeky interests witout being that smart. And by smart I mean like 130+ IQ.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    11. Re:whoa! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "five foot two and weigh in at 250 pounds"

      You say that like its a bad thing.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    12. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went that route with my girlfriend, and I'm afraid it's going to be an uphill battle for you!

      Her sister is geeky and smart, and the guy that married her lucked out when she freaked out and started counting calories, and jogging 4 miles a day. Dropped a hundred pounds plus in 9 months. Now she looks like mine.

      It's OK though, if my girlfriend was geeky, she'd start finding things on my computers...

    13. Re:whoa! by uberdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they're hot+smart, they're clever enough not to get entagled with any of us.

    14. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have a problem with looks, size, weight ... etc.

      I DON'T ... give me a clue to where these geek angels live, a suburb, city ... state even ...

      Now that I know they exist, I will spend my life searching!

    15. Re:whoa! by shut_up_man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but the correct reference is:
      Smart, hot, sane. Choose any two.

    16. Re:whoa! by thoennes · · Score: 1

      Beg to differ. Mine is young, tall, thin, hot, funny, technical (computer security no less) and pulls down big bucks.

      Took a lot of years to find her.

    17. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Beg to differ. Mine is young, tall, thin, hot, funny, technical (computer security no less) and pulls down big bucks.
      Has she noticed you following her yet?
    18. Re:whoa! by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Damn,I'm lucky...

      My s/o is 4'10", 105, petite, red head with green eyes.

      She's handy with HTML and scripting. I take care of the hardware, she handles the software.

      Of course, with her in the room, my software isn't. Not for too long, anyway

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    19. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, sounds good to me any day.

    20. Re:whoa! by amide_one · · Score: 3, Funny

      > pulls down big bucks.

      Bare-handed? or does she hunt the deer with dogs? :)

    21. Re:whoa! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      If they're hot+smart, they're clever enough not to get entagled with any of us.

      Because proper spelling is important to smart hot chicks?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    22. Re:whoa! by uberdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry. My N key is fiicky.

    23. Re:whoa! by Linux+is+shit · · Score: 0

      Compared to Linux-using girls, that's pretty slim.

      --
      Linux will succeed on the desktop the day you don't need the CLI to install a driver.
    24. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't apologize to grammar nazi's. Give 'em the finger and tell dem two feck awf!

    25. Re:whoa! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the correct reference is:
      Smart, hot, sane. Choose any two.


      Yeah, but this is slashdot.

      And I've already made my choice. Smart, geeky, and kinky. My three of a kind beats your pair. ;)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    26. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have GOT to be kidding. I suggest visiting Slashdot to kill that unfounded notion.

    27. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Bee-utiful burn.

    28. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent was using a colloquialism to refer to a different type of hunting -- one that concerns gentlemen of African heritage.

      But hey, each to their own.

    29. Re:whoa! by babyrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      ummmm no - we were talking about women - sane doesn't apply. :)

    30. Re:whoa! by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 1

      Hey, we all know why BSD is better :)

      --
      I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    31. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that would be

      Smart, hot, sane. Choose no more than two.

    32. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And was born a man?

    33. Re:whoa! by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been going out with two geeky, linux groking, smart and hot chicks (unfortunately not at once). But they were both almost criminally insane ;)

      So I married smart, hot arts major ;)

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    34. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all the equipment is in the right places, would you care?

    35. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4'10"? That's dwarfism: http://www.lpaonline.org/resources_faq.html

      105 lbs is pretty solid for someone that short. My smart, hot, chemistry geek wife's a full foot taller, and only weights another 30 lbs or so (most of which is on her 34DD chest :)).

      (posting anoymously for a reason)

    36. Re:whoa! by Fished · · Score: 1

      I got all 3. :)

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    37. Re:whoa! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      What? Is that supposed to be difficult or unappealing?

      I'll take "hot", and "hot"... err, I mean "hot" and "smart" :-)

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    38. Re:whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If Ceren weighs 250, she must be made out of Gold or something.

  4. Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Move into an apartment with utilities included.

    AC 24/7, free electricity... It's like a server farm in here.

    1. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, except the other half of my apartment is filled with grow lights.

    2. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as tenets from Hell ;-) As a landlord I'd be asking you to move. Lucky for you not all landlords will notice what your up to.

    3. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell, they don't have an easy way to monitor individual electricity usage.

    4. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Our electricity isn't included, but water is... so we hooked a generator to the tap and let the water flow freely.

    5. Re:Just do what I do by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Our electricity isn't included, but water is... so we hooked a generator to the tap and let the water flow freely.

      Then you should be able to have free watercooling too!

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    6. Re:Just do what I do by curea · · Score: 1

      Who made the generator? I'm curious about this now:)

    7. Re:Just do what I do by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      I don't know, You'd need to ask the G.P (Mr. Anonymous Coward. :P )

      I think it's a joke, but I'm sure you could get some power. It'd be a HUGE waste of water though.

      Googled, found this.

      Seems like only about 75watts assuming 30psi.
      I've seen 90psi around here though.

      Doesn't sound worth the trouble... 75watts is about $0.20/day in California.
      And everytime someone flushes the toilet, you'll have a brownout!

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    8. Re:Just do what I do by tooth · · Score: 0, Troll

      What a waste of water, i do hope that you're joking!

    9. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be more worried that they got the wrong impression of what you were up to, considering all that electricity being used...

    10. Re:Just do what I do by RubberJohnny · · Score: 1

      But really there should be a distribution specifically for tiny apartments with inadequate spotty electricity...Fallujah Linux.

    11. Re:Just do what I do by cpmte · · Score: 1

      -1: No sense of humor

    12. Re:Just do what I do by PopeFelix · · Score: 1

      You know, I've always wanted to try doing that when I lived in a place where water was included.

      --

      Pope Felix the Scurrilous.
      Computer Geek by day, religious Icon by night.

    13. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free, but the environment still pays.

      Perhaps the original posters want to have the luxury of a file server, but also wish to have their luxury tread a little less heavily on the planet than some servers might.

    14. Re:Just do what I do by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      And everytime someone flushes the toilet, you'll have a brownout!

      Were you trying for a pun, or did it just happen?

    15. Re:Just do what I do by ddent · · Score: 1

      I know of someone who had a little data centre in their basement - a few T1s, a good number of servers. They had friendly visits (friendly being an extremely relative term in this case) from the local police no less than 3 times - you would have thought the police might have gotten it a little bit sooner (i.e. the first time).

    16. Re:Just do what I do by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      It just happened. I did notice it before I submitted, but didn't want to go there.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    17. Re:Just do what I do by tooth · · Score: 1

      no, just living in a very water poor part of the world where people don't seem to care about how much water they use as long as the lawn is green.

  5. Mini ITX and CF by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Saw a story at a home recording enthusiast site (sorry that I don't recall which) about using a Mini ITX mobo and a flash memory card instead of a HDD (I think they put knoppix on a 1gb CF) for a low-power, low-heat, nearly no noise solution for a recording studio.

    I guess the same solution would work for a low power home firewall & mail server, and have the added advantage of being really nice and quiet too.

    You could possibly sub a low power laptop HDD if you needed more storage space.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Mini ITX and CF by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Flash memory isn't a good storage solution for a mail server. If you've got any sort of traffic volume, you'll wear out the memory in a year or so.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Mini ITX and CF by kwiqsilver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second the mini itx idea (not sure about the CF). I have a Via Epia 533MHz box that works great for that kind of stuff.
      It's only 20 or 30 watts, and the only moving parts are a small, quiet fan and the hard drive (get an old 5400rpm drive for even less noise/power).

    3. Re:Mini ITX and CF by schwep · · Score: 2, Informative

      I added a current meter to my 12 volt line & my Mini ITX (800 Mhz with 512M ram, 80 Gig Samsung drive) only uses ~20 - 30 Watts under a normal load. Burning DVDs while watching MPEG video only uses ~ 40 Watts. The only time the system spikes above that is on start up.

      I have been very happy with my little box. You can even do stepping to reduce the CPU clockspeed if desired - though I'm happy with 30 Watts.

      I wouldn't mess with the CF personally.

    4. Re:Mini ITX and CF by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bollocks. Just do what I did - build a nice little Mini-ITX system, put in a gig of RAM and load up Linux with a custom initrd that extracts the system to a ramdisk and pivot_roots to it. Mount the drive for storage, then use hdparm to tell it to power down when idle.

      Then write a daemon to watch when the drive is spun up, and copy the mailboxes off to a storage area on the drive. Use rc.local to copy them back when the system reboots.

      Voila - low power (max 40 watts, usually less because the drive isn't spinning) and fast.

      You could do this with flash as well, you just won't have the storage space of a drive. And it obviously doesn't have to spin down. Just use a cron job.

    5. Re:Mini ITX and CF by slothjammin · · Score: 1

      Was this it?
      http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8275095591.html /
      Sounds like an excellent idea.

      --
      Squidward: "Spongebob, If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have 1 dollar."
    6. Re:Mini ITX and CF by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "Flash memory isn't a good storage solution for a mail server ... you'll wear out the memory in a year or so."

      True at first blush. However: make sure your spool and mailhomes are on a RAMDrive, and you should have no problem. Hope you have plenty of RAM though.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    7. Re:Mini ITX and CF by sPaKr · · Score: 5, Informative

      memory, daemon, spin up disk, cronjob ? jebus your cool. It only took you about 10 seconds to revinvent a shitty vfs layer in userspace. Shouldnt we just be able to tune the VFS for aggressive cacheing and let that spin up and down the disk as needed. I dont want to get into the softupdates Vs. journel issue, but really thats what you want.

    8. Re:Mini ITX and CF by jht · · Score: 1

      Love the Mini ITX - ixnay on the CF hard drive. I'd say go with a 2.5" laptop drive, they're cheap, and many Mini-ITX cases have the brackets to take them already. If not, it's easy to adapt it in. Lower power draw than the standard 3.5" drive, and it's not a major performance hit. You'll wear out a CF drive as a server with any kind of real activity.

      Or just use a laptop in the first place. Any old midrange Pentium will do (use one with a real mobile processor, though - not one with a desktop chip). Or an old PowerBook G4 would be real slick, either running Linux or MacOS X Server.

      My own home box is a Mini-ITX running E-Smith. It's based on an older RedHat version, with nice wizards and web-based management.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    9. Re:Mini ITX and CF by Enucite · · Score: 1

      Actually a new 5400rpm drive would have much less noise/power than an old one... but I'm sure you know that and just worded the statement poorly.

      I was building a new firewall and was going to use an old 1gig drive since I didn't need more storage than that. After getting it set up, the drive was so loud during read/writes I ended up putting in an old 20GB drive just so I wouldn't hear it at my desk.

    10. Re:Mini ITX and CF by cybergremlin · · Score: 1

      Below is a link to a small web server design, compleate with CF to IDE example
      http://www.ant-computing.com/index.html?o ldurl=/

      An old laptop may be your best bet, even if the screen, keyboard and battery are all crap.

      Moving parts are of the devil, so I would avoid a fan and HDD if possible. Unfortunatly NAND flash is not the best medium for lots of write/erase cycles (over 10k) so you may need a hard drive for storage. Also NEVER use flash for a swap partition unless you want to find out how fast you can reach the wear out limit of your CF card.

      My opinions are no those of my employer, more's the pity.

    11. Re:Mini ITX and CF by bobbozzo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linux 2.6.6 and above kernels have a "Laptop Mode" which will only spin up the disk when necessary (read needed, or write buffers full).

      It's a sysctl variable...
      echo "1" > /proc/sys/vm/laptop_mode

      There's apparently also a userspace version if you don't want to upgrade your kernel.
      Google has info on using both.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    12. Re:Mini ITX and CF by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      perfect, its like I think it and they have already written support for it. Personally I would have rathered it be more tuneable via the VFS layer. In stead of the boolean aggressive caching, on off (laptop mode on|off) I would want to setup this on a per volume granlarity. So HDs can be setup with normal behavior, while flash disks can have agressive caching decressing total writes and keeping them alive longer. Also I would like to be able to tune the VFS layer so that the fs cache for the normal drives get flushed for space first. Really all of these ops need to be per device settings. Also it would be cool if these settings were tied to the device like in the superblock or somethng, but I doubt that will happen anytime soon.

    13. Re:Mini ITX and CF by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      If you have a HD, why would you want a CF?

      Or, why not just put /boot on CF, and everything else on HD?

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    14. Re:Mini ITX and CF by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      I was just using it as an example while laptop_mode seems like a good step, the granularty sucks. The VFS should not have one big nob, but rather a nob on each device.

    15. Re:Mini ITX and CF by virtig01 · · Score: 1

      was it this?

    16. Re:Mini ITX and CF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MicroDrive

    17. Re:Mini ITX and CF by cgreuter · · Score: 1

      Shouldnt we just be able to tune the VFS for aggressive cacheing and let that spin up and down the disk as needed.

      The problem with that is that the OS is still going to spin up the disk too often. If you're using a ramdisk and leave the disk unmounted when not in use, the drive stays off until you tell it to come on again.

      I think I'd do what the previous poster suggested, only I'd run the hard drive for maybe one minute per day, just long enough to backup my email. I'd also look into underclocking the system and getting rid of the fans so that it'd be completely silent most of the time.

      The way to do it is to use something like fetchnews but get it to leave your mail on the ISPs POP3 server. Only after the mail has been copied to disk do you delete it from the server. This way, you won't lose your mail to a power failure.

      (What I actually do is use an old PC and leave it in the basement where nobody can hear it. But that's not what the asker wanted.)

    18. Re:Mini ITX and CF by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      If you can keep the disk spun down without loosing changes there is now reason that you can do this in user space but not kernel space. Infact its the same ammount of work, but kernel space is already setup to fix the huge problem of concurrency, that userspace almost always fails at. Also managing the disk with a properly tuned vfs layer will happen seemlessly each application would reap the benefits. Not to mention protecting the flash for those few lock files that always forget about.

    19. Re:Mini ITX and CF by justins · · Score: 1
      Flash memory isn't a good storage solution for a mail server. If you've got any sort of traffic volume, you'll wear out the memory in a year or so.

      It's a fine solution for storing the OS and getting the thing booted. You can use network-mounted storage for the rest, and still meet the goal of having a small, low-power server with no moving parts. You've got to have a server someplace with an actual disk, but I'm guessing the original poster owns a PC...
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    20. Re:Mini ITX and CF by Nikker · · Score: 1

      With the price of RAM these days you could boot the system off the flash and hold static web pages and configs.

      Then load evreything to a ram disk with 1GB of most flavours of ram run at about $200 you should be able to run faster and more efficient.

      Also if you were considering just using the wireless router and flashing a new *nix OS why not just get your hack on and get an external 2.5" case that will hold around 60-80GB and a usb to eternet adapter and solve all your problems even cheaper!!

      Just my $0.02

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  6. Is this what you're looking for? by fatjesus · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.mini-itx.com/

    1. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by Bombcar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm drawing less than 35 watts with one of those. The harddrive takes most of the power. You won't get less than that, and 35 watts is basically less than a normal lightbulb.

      Try to get a setup that requires no fans.

    2. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's what I was going to say. But that only covers the CPU, on top of that, if they really want to spend money to save power. Get a laptop style hard drive. They are very low power and adaptors are cheap. Of course make sure use set up power management in software, so the drive can be stopped and the CPU idled. You wont be using much power at all.

      Still, you'd save a lot more power buying efficient appliances (dishwasher, refrigerator, washer/dryer).

    3. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by sglow · · Score: 1

      I agree that the mini-itx is a very nice little computer. I've got one under my television running myth-tv.

      These things run Linux great. They should have plenty of power for a mail/file server application.

    4. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      Well, we *did* buy efficient appliances. We've got a Swedish washer/dryer setup that has the magic number "189" on its EnergyStar use sticker, f'rinstance.

      The fridge came with the apartment, though, and we'd really, really like to bury it at sea to form an artificial reef, 'cos it's probably using more power than the rest of the apartment combined.

      Actually, a big part of this is we also want a machine to serve that costs little enough that, when it gets nuked by lightning, we won't cry too hard. The build-your-own boxes look cool, but the idea of running a broken laptop as throwaway file server is actually pretty intriguing.

    5. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      I'm drawing less than 35 watts with one of those. The harddrive takes most of the power.

      Modern 3.5" drives are supposed to idle at 3-5watts, and spinup is 10-20w.

      2.5" drives use even less.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    6. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      I know a couple of people that use old powerbooks for this kind of job - with a pcmia ethernet card plus the built-in one and running BSD they can be used as true firewalls as well. The G3 based ones draw hardly any power.

      I was in a similar situation - after seeing these I went and got an old G3 iMac. It's great - it runs really cheaply, quite fast, and has NO FANS!

      I simply switched on apache, postfix, and installed mySql and a few other bits, hooked it up to the stereo and the plasma screen, and now I have a file/music/web/mail/photo/ftp server. Very cheap and super easy.

      The only problem was that it got me hooked on Mac's ;)

      As an alternative you could try this from the Yellowdog Linux crowd. Very small (fits in a 5 1/4" drive bay) and the G3 ones would be very quiet and easy on the power.

    7. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      I'm drawing less than 35 watts with one of those. The harddrive takes most of the power. You won't get less than that, and 35 watts is basically less than a normal lightbulb.

      Geez, Intel has really screwed everyone's perspective on power. I get 4 hours minimum on my iBook with a 40 watt-hour battery, so yes, you will get much lower than that. Turn the screen off, wireless off, and cycle the processor and minimize drive spin up/down and you should be able to get a G3 iBook down into the 4-6 watt range on average for something like what the poster describes.

      Personally, I wouldn't keep a 35 watt bulb on 24/7. That's 840 watt-hours which is the equivalent of the entire lighting usage of my house in the summer - family of 4, mind you.

      They aren't exceptionally cheap, but a used dual USB iBook can be had for a few hundred bucks - monitor, keyboard, and UPS included. Runs BSD, linux, or OS X. Includes firewire and usb in case you want to hang anything off of that server like a printer.

    8. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I measured by reading the wattage of the little powerpack - it was around 60 so I assumed that I'm probably using half.

      But I've never actually measured it.

    9. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      So is that less than a basic 100 watt light bulb or less than a basic 25 watt lightbulb?

      Good idea on the no fans...

    10. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by rew · · Score: 1

      See http://www.openbrick.com when it works again. If I remember correctly, they draw about 1 to 2A, or about 5-10W. This was measured without a harddisk.

    11. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by pesc · · Score: 1
      These are great low-power machines.
      Get one that

      has low MHz rating - needs less power

      has no fan - is silent

      takes a flash memory - no need for hard disk (yet more silent and low power)

      There are also models with more than 1 NIC - great for firewalls

      Also see here. Or here.

      --

      )9TSS
    12. Re:Is this what you're looking for? by screwdriver · · Score: 1

      840 watt-hours for the whole summer? So you can leave 8 100W bulbs on for ~1 hour (or 4 for 2 hours, 2 for 4 hours, etc) to fill your entire summer lighting quota? You must have some short summers!

  7. Old computers by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm using an old P233 box as a server. It's not exactly a small box, but it doesn't draw much power. If you want a small form factor as well, look into VIA C3-based computers.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    1. Re:Old computers by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      I'm using an old P233 box as a server.

      I have an old Compaq laptop -- 266Mhz PII w/64 Mb RAM that I have been thinking about using in place of my current Linux router. The big reason I was thinking about it was cuz it has a built-in UPS -- I can save the battery in my other UPS for the machines that need it!

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
  8. old Pentium 166 by Fouquet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm using an old Pentium 166Mhz for my network server and find that it works great. In fact, it's probably overkill. I've got 128mb ram, some old small (~10GB disks), and a couple of network cards. The machine is running an internal dhcp server, a samba server, an lpd server, and a firewall under RH 7.3. The power consumption is quite low - I think the power supply is 200W.

    1. Re:old Pentium 166 by darkith · · Score: 1

      Perhaps take an older system, and underclock it. You'd consume less power on the CPU (although I'm sure it's a case of diminishing returns), and you could get away with fewer fans (side benefit of less noise).

      Monitors draw lots of power...they even draw a decent amount in standby. Consider turning it off (or run headless).

      An older Pentium/PentiumII probably doesn't draw anymore than 75-125 W, which isn't much more than leaving a few light bulbs on part of the time...

      D.

    2. Re:old Pentium 166 by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You'd be hard-pressed to find a Pentium that draws 75 watts. IIRC, the CPU itself won't draw more than 12 watts fully-loaded, the CPU heatsink doesn't need a fan, memory doesn't take much, non-3D video cards don't either, and a hard drive is around 15-20 watts.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:old Pentium 166 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I run a pentium mmx as underclocked to 166 from 200mhz on my nat/fw box- allows it to have just a passive big sink safely.

      anywhow.. modern computers really don't consumpt that much power when you're not doing anything.. also it's TOO common mistake that people think that their psu will suck whatever it's rated for 100% of the time when it's on(this is especially stupid when the higher rated are usually of higher quality and waste less electricity).

      or one could buy something like the ebox from http://www.gadgetcomputer.com/ . the dual lan configuration really fitting the bill.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:old Pentium 166 by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      I certainly didn't mean to imply that my machine actually used 200W, that's just the size of the PSU. I'm sure the actual consumption is much less than that. Also, my view on what is a small amount of power consumption is probably skewed. My primary desktop uses one of the original Athlon XP CPUs (read: space heater).

    5. Re:old Pentium 166 by sigaar · · Score: 1

      And once everything is installed and configured you can take the display card out and run it headless.

      --
      sigaar
    6. Re:old Pentium 166 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and i wasn't trying to say that you were under such false impressions :)

      i was just saying that too many people are.

      personally I got 3 computers running at 24/7... most of the the year the apartment needs heating anyways - might just as well come from excess heat.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:old Pentium 166 by afidel · · Score: 1

      I actually ran a Pentium 133 underclocked to 120 without a heat sink (just bare package) because I couldn't remove the fan from the heatsink it came with and I was building a firewall for a friend when we both had zero cash. The only real power draw was the Bigfoot HDD.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  9. Slashdot by couldntthinkupagoodn · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're planning on making the file server accessable from online, whatever you do, don't post the link. I've never heard of a slashdotted house before, but I can't imagine how hard it would be.

  10. This guy is a fraud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geek guys never find a geek girl that has actually used FreeBSD or any open source OS. The only geek girls that exist are those hot cam girls that take their clothes off.

    1. Re:This guy is a fraud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest I found was a girl who used the FreeBSD mascot for her AIM icon thinking it was cute.

    2. Re:This guy is a fraud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he bought enough items on her Amazon wishlist to convince her to move in with him.

    3. Re:This guy is a fraud! by Staos · · Score: 1

      You must read Maddox.

      --
      In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
    4. Re:This guy is a fraud! by jesst · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, I wasn't a figment of CapnRob's imagination. I am indeed a FreeBSD girl these days. But really, I use what I have to to get my job done - as a scientist, I have used a lot of different setups and I learn what I need to when I need to.

  11. Crappy notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe you could get an old used notebook, even with a broken display? That should be pretty silent and need low power.

    1. Re:Crappy notebook? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      That's what we use at our business. We have an old notebook running W2K that does everything for us. It's out gateway, firewall, file server (frequently backed up), etc.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Crappy notebook? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      And hey, you get a built-in UPS. A couple of words of advice if you go this route, though.

      1: Route the video to the external display most of the time with the Fn-F8 key on most laptops, so you're not burning watts on the power display.

      2: If you're not using wireless, remove or physically turn off the device. They draw roughly 200 mA when active that you don't need to waste.

    3. Re:Crappy notebook? by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did something like this with an old AST notebook.

      133MHZ, 800Meg hdd running Slackware 9.1, Apache. No GUI, just SSH from a 'real' comp as required. Worked fine.

    4. Re:Crappy notebook? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too. An old cheap laptop with 2 PCMCIA ethernet cards if you want to do firewalling. Just watch for a few things.

      -Laptop hardware is built lighter than desktops and most have had a hard life being banged around. Give the hardware a thorough burn in before you trust your data, network, etc. to it. Most important of all the hard drive. It's better to get a brand new drive in most cases.

      -Many of those PCMCIA cards with the dongles have cheap connectors that work loose easily. Better to tape them down.

    5. Re:Crappy notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A laptop if the battery works also provides a built-in UPS

    6. Re:Crappy notebook? by Tassach · · Score: 1
      An old laptop has nice geek appeal as a mini server, and having a built-in keyboard and monitor saves you from having to run headless or getting a KVM. However, I would worry about the reliability... if it's a file server, you want redundancy, reliability, and an easy way of making backups. Also, even a used laptop is going to have a pretty crummy price/performance ratio. Pesonally, be more likely to build a basic server out of new components and go for reliability over absolute minimum price or geek chic. I'd build it around a name-brand micro-atx motherboard with on-board RAID-1, video, and ethernet. I'd go for a Socket A because that gives us the best price/performance ratio. Add 256M of memory, the cheapest processor you can find, a pair of hard drives, and a case with a good powersupply and decent airflow, and you are set. Looking on NewEgg:
      • Motherboard: (1) MSI KM4M-V. $58 w/ shipping
      • CPU: (1) Athlon XP 2000+ Retail Pack w/ Heat Sink. $64 w/ shipping.
      • Memory: (1) 256MB Kingston PC-3200. $46 w/ shipping.
      • Hard Drives: (2) Hitachi 80M 7200RPM SATA. $134 w/ shipping.
      • Case: (1) Powmax Mini-ATX MATX3304-S. $42 w/ Shipping
      • Fans: (3) 60MM Vantec temperature-controlled case fans. $33 w/ Shipping
      That's a $377 investment, but you've got all new components with manufacturer's warranty (3 years on all the key pieces). It's a little more than a used laptop on EBay, but it's going to be a LOT more reliable in the long run, especially with the hardware RAID.

      [I left off a floppy and/or CD-ROM intentionally -- any self-respecting geek should be able to scrounge one up for free -- especially when you consider that you'll only be using it to install the OS anyway.]

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    7. Re:Crappy notebook? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      1. when the laptop lid is closed, AFAIK all laptops turn off the screen. (but this is like one of those 'does the light in the fridge go off when you close the door' scenarios.. can we ever be sure???)

    8. Re:Crappy notebook? by sbryant · · Score: 1

      Not all laptops! Mine doesn't, unless configured to do so.

      Actually, some laptops (and some fridges for that matter) are easy to test: there is a button that is pushed when the lid/door is closed. Under Windows, I can configure it to blank the screen, put the laptop in standby and so on. Under Linux, I haven't yet found where this is configured, but then again, I haven't looked for it!

      As far as it goes with saving power: an external monitor will probably suck a lot more power than the laptop screen, and it'll definitely take much more space. I know you can turn the monitor off with the switch, but X can use DPMS to turn off the laptop screen, which saves exactly the same amount of power as when you switch from the built-in display to an external one. You can tell if it's really off because the screen isn't just blanked - the whole backlight goes off too.

      Another trick: mount your partitions with atime disabled, and have the disks spin down automatically on no activity for a couple of minutes. Laptop drives have better ratings for the expected number of times you can spin up/down.

      A laptop may not be ideal though. They often have much slower memory and disks than normal desktop systems. While this is plenty for a router which does a bit of NAT, http proxy and maybe some mail serving/relaying, it's not so good if you want a decent file server for your internal network.

      -- Steve

  12. Via Motherboard by bluewee · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am using a Syntax Via 1200+ Motherboard with CPU From TigerDirect when they were having a sale(I came to 10$USD, I grabbed a small MicroATX case from NewEgg and it works beautifully, and is small and quiet. It kinda takes a while to emerge everything, yeah Gentoo user here :D. but it works great and does not use much power.

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    1. Re:Via Motherboard by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      If you're using Gentoo on both the server and a high-powered computer, set up DistCC to offload most of the compiling effort to the faster computer.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Via Motherboard by bluewee · · Score: 1
      The funny thing about this, is that I have tried, tried and tried again. and each and every time it fails, I hang around #gentoo, and no one has been able to help me with it.

      Right now it is not too bad, I just re-emerged world and it took 26 odd hours, but for most of it I was asleep and at work, so it didnt bother me, but it would be nice to offload most of the work to my 3200+ AMD64 dual booting windows and gentoo, but meh, the server works well by its self.

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    3. Re:Via Motherboard by cachorro · · Score: 1
      I, too, would recommend a Via system. My gateway/router is a Via 866 MHz based mini-tower with 80G Seagate Barracuda. Idling, the system uses something under 20 Watts(less than a couple of night-lights).

      I disconnected power to the CPU fan and power supply fan, and was able to run the system under full-load without any problems. Aside from a faint whir from the hard drive, it is completely silent.

      The mini-tower is mostly empty, and the thermally-driven air flow seems to be enough to cool the system. Cost was around $200.

    4. Re:Via Motherboard by Computerguy5 · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why people use such high powered systems for a personal router. A Pentium 200 with a 2GB HDD and 128MB RAM will generally be more than adequate and, if set up properly, still use very little power. Now if you're doing routing for many many computers, then I can understand such a setup (except for the hard disk. I don't understand why a router would need such a huge hard disk.)

    5. Re:Via Motherboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A typical pentium at 200 Mhz will consume a max of 15-20 watts (for the cpu itself). A 486 will be maxed at 3-4 watts.

      Also, there is no way you need 128 MB for a router.

    6. Re:Via Motherboard by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      There are a number of things that could be affecting this:
      1) Some things, like GCC, don't support parallel compiling, so they don't benefit from distcc.
      2) Things that need extensive preprocessing don't benefit much, since the preprocessor must be run on the local machine.
      3) Compiling steps that don't use GCC can't be run remotely. For example, my server is currently approaching 36 hours to compile glibc, since setting up the locale information takes far more physical memory than the computer has.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  13. Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Perhaps give up the wife and then a big massive AMD-64 system would fit in nicely.

  14. The obvious? by archen · · Score: 1

    I was thinking a Shuttle PC would be fine, but I don't have much experience with them. Have you thought about just buying a used laptop? Power usage is pretty low, the profile is small, and people seem to junk perfectly good machines. Probably the only problem there would be support for the network card and if FreeBSD supports it. I've actually turned some busted up Laptops into Kiosks and it works pretty well.

    1. Re:The obvious? by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A possible problem with a laptop is fitting two ethernet ports in -- you need two if you're going to use it as a firewall. Older laptops usually don't have built-in ethernet, so you'd need to connect two PCMCIA cards, which might present space difficulties.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:The obvious? by FluffyWhiteBunny · · Score: 1

      This is a really good idea, as even a full power laptop draws a fraction of the power of all but the wimpiest of desktop systems. I have laptop running on a 1.4 Pentium M (Centrino) and even when running full out (Doom 3, for instance) it never draws more than 70 watts. Look for some old pcmcia NIC's, most have *nix support, and you are gtg.

    3. Re:The obvious? by Listen+Up · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's not true at all. I have an old P233 laptop that I am using as a server and two PCMCIA ethernet cards present no space problems whatsoever. How much space do two external ethernet dongles take up once the PCMCIA cards are in the laptop? Hmmm....let me measure....1" before you bend the cables back along the side of the laptop.

    4. Re:The obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need two if you're going to use it as a firewall.
      No, you don't!

      The 2 most common scenarios are: (1) DSL w/PPPOE and (2) Cable w/ethernet [no pppoe]. In both cases plug the modems directly into your switch/hub. In case 1 your pppoe connection will connect & you'll get a ppp0 interface to firewall. In the second instance you configure eth0 for your LAN and dhcp/firewall eth0:1 for inet.

      rho
    5. Re:The obvious? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      The big problem with Shuttle XPCs is noise. I have a SB65G2, and its fan in incredibly loud -- much louder than the fans in my bigger tower systems.

    6. Re:The obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usb ethernet adapter?

    7. Re:The obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a non-hostile situation, this is OK, but the instant you don't trust the internet or your local users, this plan goes to hell (well, with PPPoE its still OK unless a local user hijacks the PPP connection from your firewall and runs with it).

      With just ethernet you're just waiting for someone to send you packets around your firewall from the outside, or for someone on the inside to reset their network properties and just go straight out (especially with DHCP, then they'll just cut off your other users when they steal the IP.)

    8. Re:The obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just criminal.
      (they really suck)

  15. Mini-ITX variety by captnitro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mini-box make some neato little ITX boxes which you could hook up to any number of storage solutions. Past that, I've had good success with Mini-ITX boards. I get the cases from Web-tronics, as the MITX ones are very, very expensive -- they're meant to make your MITX look like a CD player, pretty much, and I can do more without having to worry about cosmetics. MiniBox (above) sells snap-in MITX power supplies ranging from 60w to 200w. For the extra cool factor, use a Xenarc display or use something 'headless', e.g., LCDProc and Crystalfontz. (As I remember, the MiniBoxes come with their own little displays.)

    1. Re:Mini-ITX variety by V.+Mole · · Score: 1

      The Minibox appears to have only one ethernet port, and no way to expand, which makes it pretty useless as a firewall. Cute as hell, though.

  16. How about a used laptop? by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 5, Informative
    A used laptop might do what you want. You don't need an awful lot of power. If a laptop HDD is large enough for your storage needs, then look for a cheap used laptop on e-bay.

    Laptops are generally very efficient on power. And they come with their own screen too. In fact, I heard of one company that replaced all of it's desktops with Thinkpads and used power as the single justification (the computer takes less, the monitor takes less, and less heat generated requires less AC).

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    1. Re:How about a used laptop? by Patrick · · Score: 1
      I heard of one company that replaced all of it's desktops with Thinkpads and used power as the single justification

      Boy, that seems like a tough sell. Let's be generous and say that laptops draw 10W (in fact, probably more) and desktops draw 200W (probably actually less than that). You save 137kWh per month, or about $11. Assuming the computer has a useful life of 3 years and is on constantly, you save $396 over the system's entire life. That's not enough to make up the difference in purchase price, let alone the more expensive maintenance a laptop requires or the fact that it will probably die (or be obsolete) sooner than the desktop.

      A/C seems like a red herring, too. Half of the year (in most places), you're running heat instead, so no savings there. But even if you were running A/C year-round, spending 1W to dissipate 1W of waste heat, that only doubles the savings, and they're still not enough.

      OTOH, laptops have plenty of very real advantages. Power just isn't enough of one to matter.

      Lest you mod this off-topic, the same argument applies. A 100W difference is barely $5/month, so don't spend much more than $200 extra to save that 100W.

      My answer (for server/MythTV duty): Shuttle SK41G with an Athlon 2400 and a Samsung 7200-RPM hard drive. 50W at idle, 75W under load, and it runs cool and quiet all the time. The barebones case is $150 new, $75 used.

    2. Re:How about a used laptop? by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not a bad idea, but laptops don't like to be left on 24 hours a day. I would know. I have a dell inspiron 8200 and I keep this thing running all the time. I'm also on my third hard drive. I just keep the operating systems and programs on the laptop drive and all other data is on the external firewire drive. If you could get a USB drive that was powered by the laptop, that might be a safer solution.

      This is a good power saving alternative to a huge desktop, but I wouldn't trust my data to a laptop hard drive.

    3. Re:How about a used laptop? by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      as posted by someone else, laptops are also going to take up even less, because users are more likely to put them to sleep, or power down on the off hours.

      My thinkpad X31 uses 11.2watts when running with LCD on lower power, and 13.3watts with LCD on highest power. if I were actualy doing a minor ammount of work on it, i bet it would average 15watts.

      a desktop quality laptop would run around $1500.. after LCD pannel, and corperate desktop prices.. I bet the desktop is going to cost about the same.

      sure you can build a home box for $500 in savings.. but most places that buy lots and lots of desktops are probably paying about the same as a laptop.

      having laptops also give workers an excuse to work from home, and that reduces A/C costs by the ammount of one human heat output, and also desk lights.. (those popular 150w halogen things are so wastefull)

    4. Re:How about a used laptop? by akorvemaker · · Score: 1
      laptops don't like to be left on 24 hours a day

      Agreed. I have an IBM Thinkpad 380D. One time I wanted to see how long I could leave it running before it became unstable (running Win95). Because the processor was not doing much, it did not generate enough heat to turn on the fan. Without the processor fan, it had no active cooling. The next morning it was already powered off. I'm guessing something overheated. It's just not designed for that sort of use.

    5. Re:How about a used laptop? by QuakeBurger · · Score: 1

      Used IBM 600E or 600X's are perfect for this. Not ripping fast but fine for a pf box on a cable modem or a mini web server.

      I've run openbsd, freebsd, and linux on them. Under $400 on ebay + $45 for a replacement battery (built-in UPS for those pesky power outages!)

      They're very common models so there's a ton of supply on ebay for spare parts etc.

      I think I have about 5 of them...

      --
      -- It is my strong belief that it is a mistake to hold strong beliefs.
    6. Re:How about a used laptop? by darket · · Score: 1
      There are apparently 2,5" hard drives rated for 24/7 operation. You have to search them, but they exist. Those are mainly built and validated for bladeservers, where heat and size is also a concern.

      Normal off the shelf HDDs are only rated for about 33% uptime.

    7. Re:How about a used laptop? by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      I have a Toshiba Satellite 4030CDT (celeron 300), which has been on and runnig for the last 8 months solid. However I moved away from the hard drive a few months ago and I now use knoppix on it. YMMV

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    8. Re:How about a used laptop? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea, but laptops don't like to be left on 24 hours a day. I would know. I have a dell inspiron 8200 and I keep this thing running all the time.

      Eh? What are you doing to that poor thing?

      My laptop is in use 12-16 hours per day and I reboot about every 2-3 weeks. Never powered off, just have it set to blank the screen after a few minutes of inactivity. This is with WindowsXP Pro (on a Toshiba Tecra 9100 with 1GB RAM).

      If you're killing hard drives, I wonder whether you don't have enough memory. (Excessive swapping will surely kill drives.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  17. Use old(er) hardware? by Cosmos_7 · · Score: 0

    I was concerned about electricity use as well (seeing as I live here in California with our triple rate overuse fees), but when I actually hooked a multi-meter up to my little PII-450 gateway/fileserver, I found consumption to be much less that I expected... about $7/month, even at our super high rates.

  18. Old laptops... by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have several old laptops that I current run as servers. It seems that it is quite common for old laptop batteries to die and refuse to hold a charge. Suddenly, they become pretty decent servers if you set them up to remain running with the top closed.

    I suspect that you will find a few of these 'battery-less' laptop on ebay for a good price as the lack of mobility will really effect the asking price for a laptop. Snap them up and get all the cheap servers you will ever need.

    1. Re:Old laptops... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      I second this - before I went ADSL, I was using an old p150 Dell laptop and Freesco as my internet gateway/print server. It still does duty as print server, and I will probably get around to setting it up as a web and dns proxy sometime.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    2. Re:Old laptops... by darkith · · Score: 1

      Yeah...laptops can be nice for that...basically DIY blade servers ;)
      Two things tho, some laptops don't disappate heat well when closed, and even older batteries can hold enough charge to act as a mini-UPS for brown-outs!

      D.

    3. Re:Old laptops... by david.given · · Score: 1
      I have several old laptops that I current run as servers. It seems that it is quite common for old laptop batteries to die and refuse to hold a charge. Suddenly, they become pretty decent servers if you set them up to remain running with the top closed.

      Yup, same here. My main house server, tiar, is a P166 laptop with 48MB of RAM (which is the maximum it can support, worst luck). It runs Debian and does SMTP (via exim), NNTP (via sn), mailing lists (via minimalist), web serves (via thttpd), is my wireless access point (only ad-hoc, though), firewalls (using netfilter), plus serves files (slowly) to my intranet... it's great. Compiling a kernel on it does take a while, though.

      The great thing about laptops is that they're (a) small, (b) quiet, (c) have built in keyboard and monitor, and (d) have a built-in UPS. Yup, even a crapped out battery that won't hold a charge for more than ten minutes will give you ten minutes of shutdown time if the power goes out. I haven't yet found any UPS software that will treat the APM battery as a UPS device, but even doing it all manually it works fine...

    4. Re:Old laptops... by K8Fan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Laptops with broken displays are even better. I have an old P3 laptop I use as a server, and I got it free. Sony charges $600 for ANY display repair, so it's literally not worth fixing. But the VGA output works fine, and I have it set up through a KVM switch. Viola! A 75 watt server. Tiny hard drive, but if it becomes a problem, I can just do externals.

      I'm thinking of taking the whole display off, thus making sure the lamps never come on, thereby reducing power drain even more.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    5. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the same in college.

      You can get P133 Thinkpads with no batteries for around $50. One with a cracked screen for next to nothing. Mine had a 600MB drive, more than enough for slack and all the apps I wanted to run.

      If you go this route, make sure you get something new enough to have CardBus (32 bit) expansion, otherwise you'll probably feel that those 100Mbit ethernet cards don't feel like 100's. :)

    6. Re:Old laptops... by mmurphy000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This brings up an interesting point -- anybody know of a site that lists laptop models that can run with the lid closed? For example, I have an HP Pavilion zt1125 that I suspect won't run closed.

      Also, anybody have suggestions for heat dissipation? I've heard horror stories (some posted here at /.) about laptops overheating with the lid closed.

    7. Re:Old laptops... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buy laptops with broken screens and just rip off the top. You can hook the back VGA port up to any external monitor you have around whenever you actually need a head on the machine.

    8. Re:Old laptops... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Nearly all off them have only a little hole which contains a lid triggered by closing the top.
      Just heat a screwdriver with a candle, melt the lid away and you wont have to worry about closing the laptop anymore. Plus you dont need to open you notebook that way.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    9. Re:Old laptops... by joelanders · · Score: 1

      On my thinkpad laptop i find that leaving it on for extended periods of time makes it get really, really, hot...

    10. Re:Old laptops... by kzinti · · Score: 2, Informative

      This brings up an interesting point -- anybody know of a site that lists laptop models that can run with the lid closed?

      Are there really any that won't? I've used linux on four different laptops - an ancient Toshiba, a slightly newer Compaq, a Dell Inspiron made five years ago, and a Sony Vaio I bought this year. All of them would run with the lid closed, given the right BIOS setting. Getting into the BIOS is not always obvious, but that's another story...

    11. Re:Old laptops... by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      I haven't yet found any UPS software that will treat the APM battery as a UPS device

      If you use KDE, there is a KLaptop program which does power-management and can shutdown if battery is low.

      I think there's one for Gnome also, but I don't remember the name.

      You could also have a perl script watch
      /proc/apm/battery/charge
      or wherever it is, and shutdown below a certain level.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    12. Re:Old laptops... by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

      The older iBooks can (pre airport extreme). They were a fav for war-chalking not long ago for this very reason. A couple of Mac war-driving utilities even built in the utility to over-ride sleep mode when the lid is closed.

    13. Re:Old laptops... by esanbock · · Score: 1

      You would have to be on crack to use KDE on a P166. I tried it on my P II 200 Mhz Toshiba Portege and it's very painful. Right now I run it as my DNS and DHCP server. Best laptop I've ever seen. The new porteges only got fatter and slower (relative to the current standards)

    14. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do what I do.
      put it in the mini fridge, no condensation

    15. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find the +1 Destructive modifier!?

    16. Re:Old laptops... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Go down to the store, pick up a few feet of sheet metal and some superglue, fold the sheet metal and glue it onto the system. Alternativally, if you've got lots of smaller heatsinks left over from older applications you can make a really neat looking laptop.

    17. Re:Old laptops... by THEbwana · · Score: 1

      yup - metoo. Additionally, I've done the same with an A21P Thinkpad aswell..

      Laptops also make excellent servers for the developing world since it comes with a really good UPS built in :-)

    18. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that you would want to tell this to any prospective seller, but if the laptop is reasonably new it will still have relatively good resale value on ebay. The reason is that you can always buy two or three broken laptops of the same model, and build a working one. You just need to check out which parts are broken.

    19. Re:Old laptops... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      anybody know of a site that lists laptop models that can run with the lid closed?

      This is a non-issue. I have never seen a laptop that will power down via the lid switch set that way by default. With APM, you can usually set it to suspend or hibernate on a lid-close event, but it's not the default. The default is to simply power down the LCD panel, which is desirable in this configuration.

      APM is easy to set up on Windows, but I've no idea on the *nix support for such things, having never ran *nix on my laptops in anger. There are APM packages available though for most distos.

    20. Re:Old laptops... by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 1

      I have been using an old crappy Micron ClientPro ZX (300 mhz) laptop as a FTP/Samba server for a year or so. It is running Debian testing and I keep the lid closed all the time and SSH into it to do configurations and whatnot. It doesn't have a battery, so it is plugged in all the time. I have never had a problem with it, and so far, it has never crashed or required a reboot except when I upgraded the kernel.
      It's great. It takes up almost no space, uses very little power, it is quiet and easily accessible. And it runs Debian far better than Windows 98 that it came with.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    21. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops are great for servers as long as you don't want to use RAID. Otherwise they have a backup power system built in, use very little power (especially the G3 chip, low power usage, low heat).

    22. Re:Old laptops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find a laptop with a broken monitor? I've asked around at a variety of repair/outlet shops, checked eBay, and asked some corporations. No dice. Where did you look?

    23. Re:Old laptops... by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Old, slow servers. Nearly any laptop HDD turns at 4200 RPM. I suppose that's okay for low bandwidth home use, though.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    24. Re:Old laptops... by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Viola! A 75 watt server."

      That was deliberate, wasn't it?

  19. Same Situation by eluusive · · Score: 1

    I'm was in the same situation. However, while this isn't the "green" environtment-friendly solution. I decided just to leave on my server. The extra expense saved on my power bill would take years to pay for any kind of low-watt server I would be able to build.

  20. No hard disk for WRT54G by Commander+Spock · · Score: 0

    There is no disk controller in the LinkSys router, but you might be able to hack the firmware to use a network attached disk (it DOES have a few network connections 8^), but then the cost of the NAS is such that the whole solution would probably be impractical. A Soekris box (as mentioned elsewhere) or similar would be a better solution, perhpas.

  21. None of us believe you by mark*workfire · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got married, and my wife and I are putting together a home network in the (small) apartment we're now living in. We'd like to set up a firewall/mail server/small-file-server ....

    Dude, honestly, none of us believe you. You should have included a link to your marriage certificate and a picture of yourselves. People posting articles on Slashdot aren't married.

    Besides, you just got married, and your interested in the network ?????

    1. Re:None of us believe you by ndogg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If that's insightful, then so is this.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    2. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... you gotta have *something* to do between... "sessions" -- otherwise things tend to get a bit raw. Hell, even the most single, porn-laden slashdotter would know that. Let me guess -- you still live with your parents, and they monitor your surfing habits?

    3. Re:None of us believe you by Wizworm · · Score: 1

      Insightful give you a +1 mod point.
      Funny give you +0 mod point.

      Some mods try to be generous to a funny poster

      --
      I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
    4. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have included a link to your marriage certificate and a picture of yourselves.

      Dude, I saw the marriage certificate, and i know it's not fake because they use lowercase L's for all the 1's

    5. Re:None of us believe you by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Insightful??? Funny I get, but insightful?

      I am married and have a son, and I post frequently on Slashdot. I have over 0x800 posts. I would post my marriage license online but I don't think you could read it :-)

      I am not the one who contributed this article though.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    6. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma whore! ;)

    7. Re:None of us believe you by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Well, when you've just moved into a new residence, getting your LAN working is right up there with plugging in the TV and the phone.

    8. Re:None of us believe you by big+tex · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have over 0x800 posts.

      Dude, 0 times anything is still zero.

      You're not impressing anybody.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    9. Re:None of us believe you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      actually, it was hex. He really posted over 2048.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:None of us believe you by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's 0x10 kinds of people in the world: those who know hex, and 15 other kinds..

    11. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You still have a phone that needs plugging in? And TV? Doesn't that just go into the PVR350 of your Mythtv box?

    12. Re:None of us believe you by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Besides, you just got married, and your interested in the network ?????

      Hell yeah! When I first married, I didn't think about anything other than sockets for months. Now I mostly yearn for the days with a fat pipe in promiscuous mode. At least I'm hooked up with thin-net, unlike some of my old peers.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:None of us believe you by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      I can live without the TV or phone. Internet access is a _LOT_ more important.

    14. Re:None of us believe you by euxneks · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that he claims to be married to a woman who is familiar with BSD..!! Preposterous!

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    15. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have over 0x800 posts.
      well I have millions of posts, and nobody listens to me.

    16. Re:None of us believe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is hexadecimal. Any half decent human beeing posting on slashdot should know that. And it equals 2048.

      So go crawl under your bed and never post here again.

    17. Re:None of us believe you by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Dude, honestly, none of us believe you. You should have included a link to your marriage certificate and a picture of yourselves. People posting articles on Slashdot aren't married.

      Besides, you just got married, and your interested in the network ?????


      What else is there to do, his wife would isn't interested in sex now.

      Especially since she is sleeping with my brother.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    18. Re:None of us believe you by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      J. f-ng C. he was joking I hope you get that

    19. Re:None of us believe you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you did not get mine.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    20. Re:None of us believe you by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Actually as of this posting, I have posted 0x97E posts.... Two more to 0x980 ;-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  22. No where to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dude, your wife has complete access to the network? Where do you keep your pr0n?

    1. Re:No where to hide by jesst · · Score: 1

      I don't really care where he keeps his pr0n. He knows where I keep mine.

  23. Too cool for words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.gumstix.com + a usb drive + a little hacking

  24. Epia C3-based Mini-Itx by dws · · Score: 1

    Epia-based systems are on the small side, and draw minimal power. Some people have gone a little overboard customizing theirs. If you're putting the system in an enclosed space where noise might be an issue, I recommend going with a power-brick over a case with a standard power supply. Mine sits quietly in the corner serving up Samba goodness off of RH9.

  25. Big power drain? by Cow007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a matter of fact computers don't use as much power as you think. The monitor can sometimes use more power than that computer itself. Run BSD on a G5 or Sparc and use flash memory, (a little expensive) but the fastest and least power using alternative and you should be good to go!

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  26. Netwinder by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't think you can buy them new (at least cheaply) but look for an old Netwinder. I got one on eBay a couple of years ago for abougt $150. Low power, two ethernet ports, easy to manage and small. Not a barn burner by any means, but for a firewall / file server / print server it works perfect.

  27. Old Laptop, two pcmcia net cards by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Brother in law gave me an old gateway Pentium MMX 133, 32 mb ram, 4 gb HD. Put two pcmcia net cards in it, and put OpenBSD running PF. Perfect.

    1. Re:Old Laptop, two pcmcia net cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You only need 1 PCMCIA NIC.

      The 2 most common scenarios are: (1) DSL w/PPPOE and (2) Cable w/ethernet [no pppoe]. In both cases plug the modems directly into your switch/hub. In case 1 your pppoe connection will connect & you'll get a ppp0 interface to firewall. In the second instance you configure eth0 for your LAN and dhcp/firewall eth0:1 for inet.

      I'm running both of these situations right now, both w/old Micron Trek2 laptops (pII 233, 128MB, 3GB HD). DSL at my parents, Cable for me! [i needed the 3Mb connection :-) ]

      rho

    2. Re:Old Laptop, two pcmcia net cards by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I think a better choice would be an old Apple G3 blue'n'white tower. The CPU in them runs at a powerful (for the clock) 300-450MHz, it takes standard components, it has no fans besides the main system fan, has 100Mbit ethernet, and can be had with an OEM SCSI card and drive.

      I've been using one as a file/print/DNS/DHCP/wireless/NAT server for about five years now. Only had to replace a drive once, it runs cool and quiet, and I'm sure the wattage is VERY low (considering the heat output).

      It will run Linux, OpenBSD, NetBSD, or OS X Server quite well, and the CPU can be underclocked to 300MHz (to save power) with no performance decrease after you set it up.

      Another advantage is that running the PowerPC might protect you from some exploits, since it's not very common to run non-x86 code in the wild these days.

      I've got money saved up for the first company to produce an open PowerPC 750 GX system at the right price. All I want is mini-ATX form, reputable GigE onboard, SATA or SCSI, and serial console support built in. Don't say Pegasos, because it's way behind and still expensive.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:Old Laptop, two pcmcia net cards by ddent · · Score: 1

      This does however give a slightly crafty person access to your internal network...

  28. Since you like Linksys by kbahey · · Score: 5, Informative

    How about the NSLU2?

    It has been covered before on Slashdot and is hackable just like the router you mentioned.

  29. Linksys NSLU2 by StarDrifter · · Score: 1

    The WRT54G isn't the only thing from Linksys that runs Linux. The NSLU2 is a designed to be a NAS solution. But you can hack the firmware to run practically whatever you want. Supports up to two hard drives (connected via USB) and has an Intel XScale (ARM) processor. It has no fans, so the only noise comes from the drive(s) you attach to it. You can pick one up for about $80.

    1. Re:Linksys NSLU2 by hopews · · Score: 1

      You're a freaking genius. I was going to write the same thing, but thought I'd check to see if someone else had written it.

      Running both a WRT54G and a NSLU2 would do all they want for $160 and a few watts.

  30. Axentra Series Servers by dso · · Score: 1

    Try the Axentra Home Series servers http://www.axentra.com/

    They H-50 uses a VIA C3 800 MHz processor which is low power. I actually like the setup and configuration options. Also, the e-mail system is great.

    Snake Oil :: A story about blowing the whistle and all the things that can go wrong.
    (http://www.snakeoil.ca/)

  31. Linked appliances by crankyspice · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it would work, haven't tried it, but something like:

    http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=283, http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=352, or http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=3 5&scid=43&prid=640 coupled with the Linux-running Linksys? (Does it have the ability to mount remote drives? I'm assuming it does...)

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  32. Old laptop by jake_eck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use an old Pentium 100 laptop for this. It's nice having a battery in the server as well.

  33. USR8200 by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    I just installed a US Robotics "USR8200" unit here and can give it a firm recommendation. It looks like your typical router with firewall, with 2 USB 2.0 ports and a firewire port, it can be a pretty good file server too. Install the new just released official firmware and it adds adds print serving and the ability to have it do "family friendly" content screening is available with a small monthly fee subscription if you really want to do that.

  34. VIA EPIA Boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slim, cheap, low power, even have fanless models. I use this for my email server.

    http://www.idotpc.com/TheStore/minibook/default_ sl im.asp?Cate.id=19

  35. RISC by leandrod · · Score: 1

    In principle, coeteris paribus - that is, assuming the same fabrication process - RISC platforms are more energy-efficient than x86 for the same performance levels.

    This is true in particular of the ARM platform, but also of the PowerPC and, perhaps in minor degrees, others like MIPS or SPARC.

    So if you could get yourself an ARM box (like the NetWinder, or even something more recent - ask at debian-arm@lists.debian.org for example) you're set. The Pegasos PPC boxes are also worthy a look, fanless too.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  36. Soekris and Axentra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Two types of solutions, I don't know your budget/storage expectations

    1) A soekris net4801 with some CF disk: very efficient. Use a USB drive if you need more storage (or cheaper). A bit slow, though.
    http://www.soekris.com. Probably not your better option, but good to know

    2) An Axentra appliance such as the H50
    http://www.axentra.com/products/multifunc_ser ver_a ppliances/home_series_net-box/
    A more powerful option, at a reasonable price.
    Running Linux with full shell access, the software included seems very convenient: I would think twice before putting my favorite distro on it.

  37. Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by nweaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get an older laptop, put a PCMCIA or USB ethernet to give you a second ethernet (connect that to the DSL/Cablemodem uplink).

    Low power: Obviously, laptops have to be low power.

    Low space: Laptops are small. Disable the "I've closed the lid" switch or get the *nix install to ignore it, fold it up, and slide it away.

    Low cost: I said OLD laptop.

    Built in UPS: Why do you think its called a "California Server"?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      : Why do you think its called a "California Server"?

      because only in california is the cost of living so high that even an old laptop is considered low cost.

    2. Re:Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Right, this is what I did. I got a not so old laptop where the screen connection was starting to break so while it works well enough, it has almost zero resale value.

      I have found the built in 3GB disk a bit small (running webserver and mail server). I could fit everything but I found I needed to do too much maintainence deleting old files. So I added a USB drive -- the laptop only supports 1.1 so it is painfully slow (500kB/s), but that's fine for what is essentially backups.

      Were I richer, I'd go for an ITX solution instead.

    3. Re:Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by c64k · · Score: 1

      A quick search of ebay shows a dozen or so pentium and pentium II laptops for less that $50.

      I'd say that qualifies as cheap.

      --
      CIA Industries - Running the world for fun and profit
    4. Re:Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Why not replace the hard drive in the laptop with a more modern one? I have a tiny Toshiba Libretto that does this job, and despite comming with a 810MB hard disk, it now has a 10GB drive in. The only thing to watch is that most laptop hard drives are not rated for 24/7 operation, so will only last a couple of years before they die. However there is a Hitachi 7200RPM drive at 60GB that comes in a version rated for 24/7 operation.

    5. Re:Old Laptop (aka a "california server") by lakeland · · Score: 1

      I considered that -- and cursed not doing it when a power cut meant it didn't just keep ticking along -- but with the screen already thretening to fall off and the CD only working if I apply pressure on the base of the case, I was worried I'd break it.

  38. Obligatory: Get a cheap dedicated server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dedicated servers are cheap these days, especially the resellers and mass hosts.

    Save the power, bandwidth, and headaches, and just go buy a dedicated somewhere that's meant to house servers. Let them worry about the networking, let them worry about the power usage, and let them buy the hardware for you.

  39. Boxes too... by douglips · · Score: 4, Informative

    This PDF is the manual for the bare-bones Soekris 4501 - the first page has pictures of the bare board and the "box" version. It is a router/hub form factor.

  40. Obsolyte! by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    As the owner of http://www.obsolyte.com, which is running on one of these little boxes, I'd like to thank you for slashdotting my poor little server into the ground... However, I guess it's good test for the server to see if it can withstand it -- if it can, than I guess that's the box they are looking for in the "ask slashdot"....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Obsolyte! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lookin good so far! This is the way to go!

    2. Re:Obsolyte! by Spad · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a concerned Slashdot reader - here's a Coral cache link for the page in question:

      SparcStation IPX

    3. Re:Obsolyte! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing is, its holding up better and returning faster than most sites under normal load!

      I'm definately impressed.

      Think I'll go hunting.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Obsolyte! by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      What modern OS's can these things run?
      e.g. Solaris 9 or 10 or any newer Linux?
      (RH6 seems a little out of date and I'd be worried about security if using it for an internet server)

      Thanks

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    5. Re:Obsolyte! by RFC959 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, they can run the latest version of OpenBSD at the very least, which should be fine for anything you are likely to do with an IPX. As for Solaris, I would forget about anything past 2.6. It might run, but... I've got one serving as my firewall, running OpenBSD. It's a fine box for what it does; they're built like little tanks. But powerful they are not. Just ssh'ing in raises the load to 0.5.

    6. Re:Obsolyte! by condition-label-red · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can run any version of SunOS 4 and up to Solaris 2.6 on these machines. I believe you can also run Solaris7, but definitly not Solaris8 or newer. I used to have an IPC running as NIS master to a bunch of U60's and SF3800's; then I lost a power supply in it and upgraded to a pair of Netra's. Quite a performance upgrade! Say what you will about Sun's and Slowaris, but PC hardware has a hard time competing with true workstations.

      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
    7. Re:Obsolyte! by starrsoft · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately the Coral cache times out too. Here is the Google cache:

      SparcStation IPX

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    8. Re:Obsolyte! by sirReal.83. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, what fools wrote Coral's software? It caches the 503 error page. Talk about defeating the purpose... they totally fail it.

  41. Xbox Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Try Xbox Linux--- http://www.xbox-linux.org/

    1. Re:Xbox Linux by asso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i did it and im very satisfied, i am running debian woody, and using the xbox as a mailserver, webserver, ftp, firewall and proxy

  42. Hello! PowerPC!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about securing an old Macintosh fitted with a 603e processor, replace the original low capacity hard drive with a larger SCSI disk, and install a PowerPC variant of Linux? The 603e was well known for it's low power requirements... Heck, so was the G3, for that matter. The 603e can also get by with passive cooling, thus needing no additional power to run a processor cooling fan.

    If power efficiency is what you're *really* after, no same time frame Intel product ever beat the early PowerPCs. In fact, why the hell are we even talking about Pentiums, here!? Geeze.

  43. Stunned, Shocked, REALLY F***ING JEALOUS by Donoho · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just got married, and my wife and I are putting together a home network...

    No really, I'm verklempt.

  44. I did that once by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Funny

    The maintenance people said that they were afraid I was a fire hazard!

    Damn, I should have kept that apartment. Heh.

  45. Openbrick by Scottaroo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Greetings:
    http://openbrick.org/ is a community of folks doing this kind of stuff. I have purchased a couple of boxes from a US distributor (http://www.hacom.net/ and have been really happy. They have 3 ethernet ports, so they make great firewalls. We use CF cards for storage because we don't need the storage, but you can put little laptop harddrives in them, so you could make a file/print box if you wanted to. They'll boot off of a USB CD, so installation is a breeze. I run Debian, but have installed openbsd for kicks, also. They're cool enough that they don't need an internal fan, so they're quiet too.
    I have nothing but nice things to say about them. The US distributor only takes paypal, but he has always delivered without problems. He even called back to see if I liked it.

    --
    ----------
    If your answer is Microsoft, you obviously didn't understand the question.
    1. Re:Openbrick by fiddlesticks · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I run Debian, but have installed openbsd for kicks, also.

      I really love /. sometimes.

      my friends and colleagues *dread* (re)installing OSs ('upgrading windows' or 'moving to OSX'), preparing for months, canvasing advice, backing *everything* up (the OS they are getting rid of, for example), *taking the afternoon off* to do so, ringing me as they do it, etc etc etc

      here, people install openbsd 'for kicks' on weird 'old' computers

      that's why i love slash

      ps, i want an openbrick :)

    2. Re:Openbrick by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      This seems expensive (300-400 euros).

      How is the performance of the Geode CPU?

      I've seen some VIA C3 boards with 3-4 Nics here.

      They have a US Distributor here.
      I talked to them in June; with case, motherboard w 4 RealTek nics and the fastest CPU it was $370.

      Here is another one with 4 nics.

      I'd be using it to run Astaro firewall, which is kind of a pig for CPU and RAM.

      If you only need 1 NIC, LOTS of Mini-ITX VIA systems are available for under $200 with case, mb, CPU.
      Their power consumption is supposed to be around 13watts + HD.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    3. Re:Openbrick by Scottaroo · · Score: 1
      Greetings:
      This seems expensive (300-400 euros)
      We gave about $400 for boxes with 512MB and no disk. We supplied the CF aftermarket.
      How is the performance of the Geode CPU?
      Well, performance typically depends on load. We use them as endpoints for remote users, so they vpn back to the office and run X with rdesktop so the users can access the terminal server. We also set them up to do firewall/NAT so that the folks who have other computers at home can share the broadband access with other machines. I haven't had any complaints. We run 512MB of RAM in them, and mount /tmp & /var as ramdrives. There are a lot of good articles about how to set them up. The http://www.hacom.net/ site had some good stuff, but seems to be down now.
      I'd be using it to run Astaro firewall, which is kind of a pig for CPU and RAM
      I'm not familiar with this, so I couldn't say. We're not typically processor bound with what we do, and these work OK. We went for the versatility, and these things really have it.
      --
      ----------
      If your answer is Microsoft, you obviously didn't understand the question.
    4. Re:Openbrick by Scottaroo · · Score: 1

      Greetings:

      We are a nutty lot.

      Life's a lot easier when you can buy them for work. Spend other people's money and get paid to play around with the stuff.

      The great thing is that with CF cards so cheap, you can get a couple and giving the thing an "OS transplant" is as easy as switching out the cards.

      --
      ----------
      If your answer is Microsoft, you obviously didn't understand the question.
    5. Re:Openbrick by IOOOOOI · · Score: 1
      only takes paypal? only one thing to do:

      **RING**
      "Hello?"
      "Do you take checks or cards?"
      "No, sorry."
      **CLICK**

    6. Re:Openbrick by nzhavok · · Score: 2, Informative

      I gotta say, I'm not particularly impressed by these. I went to the mandrake store and it was 590 euros which seems pretty expensive for what it is. I've been looking at building a mini-itx system for my girlfriend for a while now (actually I'm waiting for the nano-itx) and I think much better value for money can be found using the EPIA stuff rather than the geode.

      On the other hand it would be a cool thing to have in a company, but as an individual I wouldn't even consider it (for half that price mabye).

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    7. Re:Openbrick by egghat · · Score: 1

      The site looks as if the project is somewhat dead.

      Or are there other, more up-to-date installation images available somewhere else?

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    8. Re:Openbrick by Scottaroo · · Score: 1

      Greetings:

      It's been some months since we bought these. I got mine from http://www.hacom.net/. I did a little research on this, and what the guy really sold to us was a Light CV860A with the 533MHz fanless CPU. These units seem to be a little more common now. The hacom site has links to debian CF install with a 2.6 kernel.

      But, there's nothing really odd about them. They are just small computers. They'll boot from a USB CD, and you can install an OS. I bought a 512 MB flash card to start and just did a plain Debian install. It worked just fine. You'll want to make sure that you mount heavily written folders to RAM drives (like /tmp, /var, etc.) because CF is limited in the number of write cycles that it can withstand, but beyond that, it's no different that installing on any other machine. It's basically just a standard install, plus a RAM disk, a few /etc/fstab entries, and maybe a custom script or two if you want to save/restore the contents of your logs from /var between reboots.

      --
      ----------
      If your answer is Microsoft, you obviously didn't understand the question.
  46. Old notebook by sigaar · · Score: 1

    Why don't you just use an old notebook. Pentium II vintage with built in network should be ideal. Replace the hard drive with the sort of size you want. Use the built in network for your external interface (pppoe adsl or leased line or whatever) and add a 100mbit pcmcia card for your internal interface.

    Not only will it be super light on juice, but it should be relatively quiet, take little space (you can close the lid) and it has a built in UPS!

    --
    sigaar
    1. Re:Old notebook by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious why you recommended using the pcmcia card for the internal interface, and the on-board ethernet for the WAN interface.

      Several months ago my area was struck by lightning. I lost my cable modem (adelphia replaced it free after much haggling), the network card it was attached to, a SCSI hardware raid card (AMI Megaraid 428, not very expensive and I had a backup), a shitty little 10mbit hub. Also damaged, but still usable, was a dual P2 motherboard (it boots and runs fine, but any network cards plugged into the system do not work. other cards do. strange).

      Also, that NIC that is broken was a nice card from an alpha box, it has dual scsi ports on it as well. The scsi part of the card still works, just the NIC part doesn't work anymore.

      Ideally, I would say put the PCMCIA ethernet to your WAN interface (cable, DSL, etc), because that is cheaper and easier to replace should your wan interface die and try to take something with it.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    2. Re:Old notebook by sigaar · · Score: 1

      "I'm curious why you recommended using the pcmcia card for the internal interface, and the on-board ethernet for the WAN interface."

      Simply because on a Pentium or Pentium II class notebook, a built int controller is likely to be 10-base, while you can stick anything you like into the PCMCIA slot, gigabit if you like (assuming such a beast exist).

      The reason I recommended it that way around is because OP mentioned using it for a file server too, in which case, if you're dealing with two network cards of different speeds, you would want the faster one to be internal. Unless your WAN interface is more than 10mbit, of course:-)

      Your points about lightning is valid though. I didn't consider that. ADSL users absolutely have to have a lightning protector on their ADSL.

      Strangely, though. Our office got hit by lightning - as in the building itself. The strike hit the incoming line directly and burned it off. It blew just about every network card in the office, all the switches, and damaged the firewall's motherboard (ASUS P-II board). Amazingly the ADSL modem survived! We're still using it!

      --
      sigaar
    3. Re:Old notebook by sigaar · · Score: 1

      Damn, hit submit instead of preview...

      The ideal of course, if you use a notebook with a slow onboard NIC, would be two PCMCIA cards (if it can take that) or a dual card, again assuming such a beast exist.

      --
      sigaar
  47. Two Things by Listen+Up · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Do a search for the power requirements of a modern computer (any time after the invention of APM). There are plenty of studies to be found, many of them at university websites. The average computer, when it is in standby mode, uses 35W or less. When an EPA Green monitor (almost every modern monitor on Earth) is in sleep mode they use less than 1W. So, you are trying to figure out how to use less electricity than the equivalent of a small nightlight? The first time you leave your electric oven on 350 degrees for about one minute longer than your buzzer went off (assuming it is heating at the time), you most likely just spent more electrical energy than an entire month of computer server usage on full power.

    2) Why are you trying to jack around buying proprietary solutions or exotic mini-computers for your needs? That's dumb as hell. My personal server at home is an old Dell P233 laptop I bought for $50. It sports 80MB of RAM, 100Mbit ethernet, and a 4GB HDD. It currently runs my Apache HTTP, SAMBA, SSHD, VNC, Postfix, and CUPS server and it is tucked away neatly on a shelf under my desk. It has been especially useful as my print server (since I have a wireless network) and MP3 SAMBA server. Power consumption? Please, this is a laptop and the power features have worked perfectly as they were intended to. Also, there has been no additional configuration with this system since its original installation outside of Linux OS security/bug/OS upgrades.

    1. Re:Two Things by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      One more thing:

      3) Make sure to set the laptop's BIOS to keep the computer fully running once you shut the laptop's screen.

    2. Re:Two Things by MrNally · · Score: 1

      Why are you trying to jack around buying proprietary solutions or exotic mini-computers for your needs?

      Um... Two Things:

      1) This is slashdot, a.k.a. exotic-hacks-r-us.

      2) The poster gives away what kind of marriage this is. The simple technical solution is not necessarily the best.

    3. Re:Two Things by Tim+C · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The average computer, when it is in standby mode, uses 35W or less.

      That's good to know, but what use is a server if it's in standby mode?

      The guy said he wants something on 24/7 - that to me implies accessible, especially as he mentions using it as a mail server.

    4. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      ummmm....your idea of a night light is just under 40 watts?!?!

      The nightlights my mother puts all around her house use 4 watt bulbs...

      Are you afraid of the dark or something?

      rho

    5. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's good to know, but what use is a server if it's in standby mode?

      The guy said he wants something on 24/7 - that to me implies accessible, especially as he mentions using it as a mail server.


      Wake on LAN maybe?

    6. Re:Two Things by moonbender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, a night light rated at 40W would be brighter than my normal bedside lamp. And of course, it'd draw about 2 to 3 times the power any decent power saving light bulb (as opposed to an incandescent one) would.

      Actually, that reminds me: If you're looking for power savings like the guy who requested this Ask Slashdot, have a look at replacing your lighting solutions. Incandescent lights not only have a really terrible efficiency, but also have to be replaced than good power saving light bulbs. Night lights - if you really need them (why?) - would be very well suited for LEDs, which are reasonably efficient (WAY more so than incandescents), work forever, with their main downside being that they can't really be made bright enough for normal lighting applications, which isn't an issue for a night light.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think maybe you need to do a web search on the power usage of electric ovens. A month of computer use at 35 watts is equivalent to about 12 hours of electric oven use.

    8. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake on LAN maybe?

      Aahh! Magic Auto-Wake-On-LAN by assuming IP-Pakets which are just in transit? Thats cool and you should apply for a patent ;-)

    9. Re:Two Things by Listen+Up · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a good point, but how much power does a laptop use when on 24/7? My laptop can go for 3 hours a single battery. I would assume that even having a laptop on 24/7 would use very little energy. Plus, the most power is being consumed by your monitor and your hard drive. When the monitor is off (or closed and off for a laptop) and the hard drive is in spin-down/suspend, how much energy is really being used? That wattage was in the 10-15W range and a lot of the times is was just residual energy usage. Also, the ethernet controller is still active on my laptop in this mode, so I never have network connectivity problems when in this specific sleep mode (which is VERY easy and common on all computers to set).

    10. Re:Two Things by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      I think maybe you need to educate yourself on how electrical tariffs work. Most residential rates work against large watt hour spikes such as oven, dryer, air conditioning, etc. usage especially during on-peak hours. Electrical rates do vary across the country, so the resulting electrical billings will vary from area to area.

      And as an aside, you are correct, I should have been more careful in my wording. I was making a point during that sentence more than making a direct factual statement.

    11. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going all out (250W, that my server's PS max), mine will cost $21 a month, at peak rates, in CA. Electricity is fairly cheap, I didn't notice a change in the bill when I plugged it in. Once you add in the off-peak hours, it goes down to $15.6, note that thats THE MOST that is possible, running the power supply at max 24x7. Since it's no where near that, my guess is less than 10% of that soda I buy every day.

    12. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) Yes, please do a research. I have very nice Philips Brilliance 107D monitor (which is of very high quality) and a Samsung SynchMaster 757DFX (again expensive and very good), both of them saying that they consume 10W or less in standby. Where do you get the 1W value?

      2) I would like to see what you P233 does when you try to use dynamic webpages (PHP, Perl, MySQL)? Anything below 1GHz will simply die under something like it with a medium amount of users.

    13. Re:Two Things by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      2) I would like to see what you P233 does when you try to use dynamic webpages (PHP, Perl, MySQL)? Anything below 1GHz will simply die under something like it with a medium amount of users.

      That's a load of crap. A P/233 is fine for a web server, even with dynamic pages. Remember that a "medium amount of users" will not all be hitting the server simultaneously. My home page has some pretty damn complex back-end code (over 2700 lines of object-oriented perl) which takes about 0.6 seconds to execute normally (about half of which is just compiling) on a dual PII/300. You could assume it might take two full seconds to execute on a P/233. Those two seconds aren't that significant when you consider the big picture - remember that network latency is a bottleneck for most people. And simpler scripts would be MUCH faster than two seconds. Remember that he's talking about home use; that suggests that a second or two of delay isn't going to hurt anything.

      As for a "medium amount of users", I get over 2,000 unique visitors per month, which only counts dynamic page views (not graphics or other static content), doesn't count known robots (they're excluded by user_agent), uses cookies to ensure each visitor is only counted once per browser session regardless of how many pages they view, and also checks IP addresses to avoid over-counting users with cookies disabled. From the perspective of a web server, 2,000 unique visitors a month is practically nothing.

      Counting all hits, via "wc -l" on Apache's access_log, I get around 200,000 hits per month, give or take, mostly due to people running BannerFilter's update script from cron jobs. Again, from the web server's perspective, this is also practically nothing.

      Don't underestimate the usefulness of an old, slow box.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    14. Re:Two Things by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd love to replace all my light bulbs with high-efficiency ones - but all my lights are on dimmer switches. The day I can get a reasonably priced energy efficient lamp that works with a dimmer I will though.

    15. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you running a bakery or something? I reckon my oven takes about 2.5 kW, i.e. about 70 times more than a 35 W PC. So leaving it on for one minute too long - assuming as you say that it was heating at the time - is equivalent to leaving your PC on for 70 minutes. Your "entire month" is 44640 minutes, i.e. equivalent to leaving your oven on for 10 hours. You're nearly THREE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE OUT!

      Also, you're not the first to make a lightbulb comparison here, but I don't get it. You say that 35 W is "less than ... a small nightlight". But practically all of the bulbs in my house are about 12 W and they are certainly not "nightlights"; they are probably about as bright as 100 W of those old incandescent bulbs people used until about 40 years ago.

    16. Re:Two Things by wizrd_nml · · Score: 1

      This is just a guess from what I've seen, but aren't some (most?) cars using LED's for the red stop lights on the back? They seem pretty bright.

    17. Re:Two Things by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      --

      "There are four lights!!!"


      If you want to save energy, you should start with your sig.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    18. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd love to replace all my light bulbs with high-efficiency ones - but all my lights are on dimmer switches. The day I can get a reasonably priced energy efficient lamp that works with a dimmer I will though.

      Why not replace the dimmer switches? Binary switches are very "reasonably priced" and available at your local hardware store.

    19. Re:Two Things by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Some do, yeah, I guess the more recent ones. Stop lights don't have to be all that bright, though, since they don't have to light up anything so that you can see it (like head lights do), but just have to be bright enough that others can. That said, I don't know how bright stop lights actually are, maybe they are bright enough to light up a room.
      Regardless, those stop lights are all realised with an array of multiple LEDs, which is the only way to get good brightness out of them. I think you can actually see the individual dots if you look at them. That's not to say this isn't a viable solution; in fact most of the brighter LED flashlights come equipped with two or more high-end LEDs to get a level of brightness similar to incandescent flashlights (while at the same time running a lot longer).
      Some traffic lights are also LED-driven, I heard more so in the USA than in Europe, since here many traffic lights were equipped with other, non-incandescent lights some years ago which are equally good. The main reason to use LEDs there, apart from the greater efficiency, is that they're maintenance free, once in place there's a good chance you won't have to replace them for 10 years.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    20. Re:Two Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2,000 unique visitors is nothing. That only translates to about 67 users a day, or a little less than 3 an hour. Now, of course, it's not going to be spread out uniformly like that, but 3-10 people diddling around on a Web site at once is hardly going to be noticeable, even if there are a couple of seconds of lag between pages. People are used to waiting longer for dial-up.

      Now, what I'd like to know is why you'd want to be running a fancy Web server with lots of dynamic pages on this box in the first place. Just because it's a server doesn't mean it needs to be hosting Yahoo!. A few static Web pages with the family photos on it, or ditch the Web server altogether and stick with just mail and network file systems. Even a P133 will scream on a workload like this. (OK, maybe not scream, but you'll probably spend most of your time waiting on something else.)

    21. Re:Two Things by green1 · · Score: 1

      the local home depot here has dimmable flourescents easilly and cheaply available... the problem is they are HUGE they don't FIT in any of my fixtures, in fact I can't immagine a fixture they WOULD fit in... so once again... when they come up with a useable solution... let me know...

    22. Re:Two Things by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 1

      At Home Depot I found a Philips compact flourescent that works with dimmers. I even have it on an X10 lamp module for over a year now (used daily for about 4-5 hours under computer control). Seek and ye shall find. I think it was about $2-3 more than the regular CFL bulbs, which isn't a big difference when you're comparing CFL bulb prices.

      --
      All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
    23. Re:Two Things by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      As a small matter of fact jack9.org (back when it was still my domain) ran off a custom LAMP setup on a 200 mhz machine to the tune of 2-8k visitors a month and literally parsed 5 news sites every minute to produce my frontpage (pre-RSS and I still think RSS is primitive crap). I figure about 2500 lines of PHP and hundreds of SQL queries a minute. It worked just perfect for 3 years on cable. Sidenote: my IPX could not handle the same setup.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  48. Mini ITX, Cyrix fanless processor by dougTheRug · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are Mini-ITX motherboards at Fry's (a US West Coast electronics chain) that have a fanless Cyrix 600Mhz processor soldered on.

    I've got mine in a simple little case that looks about like a 1990 cable TV terminal adaptor: Casetronic 2699R that has a few teensy (2"?) cooling fans and an external low-wattage power supply.

    ...and just an ordinary hard disk drive that's pretty quiet.
    Actually, I kind of like to hear the disk say "chachunk" when an email come^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H spam gets filtered.

  49. Linksys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their NSLU2 runs Linux also.

  50. Just add solar power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a light antenna:

    http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/09/17/l ig ht.antenna.reut/

  51. asus by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    asus offers (or offered?) a router/wireless AP (something like that; not quite sure which. they've got several different models, but I believe it could function as both a ethernet and wireless router) that runs linux.

    It has at least one (don't remember if it was two) USB ports, through which you could connect it to an external USB drive, or even something like a dongle for CF or SD.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:asus by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1
      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  52. routerboard by Feyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.routerboard.com

    (no i won't make a goddaned link)

    while designed to act as a router, this thing has a 233 mhz, intel compatible cpu, can eat up to 512 megs of ram, and works off a flash disk.

    it has 2 ethernet ports (100mbits), and a USB one. i'm using one as my core router (for an ISP) and it's just a charm :) add an usb external hard drive (not sure if it has usb2, i dont use it) and you're good to go

    1. Re:routerboard by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Intersting stuff there, both the boards seem to offer IDE on board, so go and get a big hard drive directly to the board (would need some 44pin 2.5" IDE latptop -> normal IDE plug though because they got the 44 on board). Neat also the PC Cards and PCI slot, could have lots of fun with that. (I'm looking at the specs for the 230).

  53. WRT54GS by chopkins1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have seen at least one of the SVEASOFT (experimental) distributions that has a way for the WRT54G(S) to NFS mount a hard drive. Hope this helps.

    1. Re:WRT54GS by chopkins1 · · Score: 1



      The distribution for the WRT54GS (ONLY) that I saw with NFS mount capabilities was the

      sveasoft-5.2.3-ultra2.zip

      http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/dlman.php?f unc=file_info&file_id=84
      This is a special version for WRT54GS units only (8MB flash required) created by Nikki Chumakov.

      Use it at your own risk. It works for me, but I cannot guarantee it will work for you and don't damage your router.

      This version is intended for developers. No new WWW interface items were added, no user friendly features. All new features
      have to be configured from the CLI or rc_startup nvram variable.

      Stock 5.2.3 bugs were not fixed except for a minor bug with ash prompt.


      ******************* WARNING*******************

      1. DONT try to flash this firmware on non-GS units even if you think it has 8MB flash. It won't work and make damage your router.

      2. Flash stock 5.2.3 first. DONT FLASH THIS FIRMWARE UNTIL YOU FLASH SVEASOFT 5.2.3-pre FIRST AND MAKE IT WORK. 5.2.2, 5.2.4 and so on won't work.

  54. An old Mac by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously. An old iMac of the DV series is perfect for this, except maybe for the footprint, it's bigger than a mini-ITX BSD box. Fanless so it's very silent, low power requirement, runs MacOS X or Linux or BSD. Just set it to disable the screen after one minute of inactivity for even lower power needs.

    Plus it doubles as an MP3 jukebox (the Harman Kardon speakers are better than their looks would lead one to think), and with a eyeTV plugged on the FireWire, it can also replace a Tivo. You can get one cheap on Ebay or through LowEndMac.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:An old Mac by gozar · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unfortunately, these iMac's never turn off the screen. They cool by convection, with the heat of the monitor tube causing the air in the iMac to rise bringing in cool air underneath. You can set it to turn off the screen, but this will only blank it, not shut it down.

      You'll either want an older iMac (tray loading, not slot loading) or a G4 cube.

      --
      What, me worry?
    2. Re:An old Mac by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, technically, the screen goes in sleep mode instead of shutting down. It consumes a LOT less energy this way (somewhere along 1 W I'm told). That's why this setting is under the Energy Savings preferences ;)

      The major sources of heat in my iMac DV are the hard drive, the processor and the power supply (these last two having passive heat radiators), I don't really know about the monitor tube running hot or not.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  55. Separate your firewall from your servers by Bun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We'd like to set up a firewall/mail server/small-file-server..."

    IMHO, putting all your servers on your firewall is just asking for trouble. For better security, you'd do best to have one of those Linksys firewall/routers separate from your mail/file/blah-blah server.

    --
    "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
    1. Re:Separate your firewall from your servers by Voivod · · Score: 1

      The phrases "better security" and "Linksys" should never be conjoined.

    2. Re:Separate your firewall from your servers by pyg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't but that. We are talking about a home network here. Server isolation
      is not really an option. Besides which if your firewall is lossy than so is your
      server. I'd trust <a href="http://openbsd.org/">OpenBSD</a> to do both of
      those any day... way more than Linksys anyway.

    3. Re:Separate your firewall from your servers by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      We are talking about a home network here. Server isolation is not really an option.

      Depends how much time you want to put into it.
      I'm running an old PC with Astaro's firewall sw, and it has 3 nics for EXT, INT, & DMZ, plus a Wireless nic in a PCMCIA-PCI bridge.
      On the DMZ is my webserver.
      Also, the wireless network is isolated.

      Astaro is free for personal use, and there are other free firewalls, or you can build your own with PF or IPTables.

      If you're worried about power, you can use a VIA C3 or Eden, but with multiple nics, they are expensive ($350+).

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    4. Re:Separate your firewall from your servers by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      I have separate firewall and server, but I hate having all the boxen around.

      Is there a consumer device (WRT54G or whatever) that can run linux and do high enough speed prioritized queuing to keep a Vonage connection happy despite anything else going on with the connection? I've managed to achieve this with OpenBSD's pf, and it's nice - the phone works regardless of any upload or download activity. It would sure be nice to do it for the power cost of a little wall-wart.

    5. Re:Separate your firewall from your servers by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bull. Regurgitating general aphorisms blocks true understanding.

      This aphorism came about because it is undesirable to have one service hacked leading to access to all the other services and firewall configuration. Okay, this is an understandable situation and goal. Taken to its logical end, it clearly leads to one service per box, which is a good design model for a corporate enterprise with uptime and security as primary design goals.

      However, in a home network where service consolidation and low power utilization are the primary design goals, this additional layer of safety bears too high of a cost. Even if the servers are $50 laptops, six or seven of them stacked up are going to be noisy, heat-generating, continually failing little problems. That's probably okay if the goal is to learn how to manage a corporate enterprise, but now we're changing design goals midstream, never a good idea.

      With tools like chroot and automatically-handled patch management (urpmi, apt-get, &c), the risk of getting the whole server compromised by one service is reduced, down to what is an acceptable level for many. Once that's understood, we can evaluate the choice of firewall/router packages, and once we're doing that the power and flexibility of netfilter or pf blow any SOHO appliance out of the water. Proper logging, a good set of utilities... appliances are fine for use in networks where no one cares, I suppose, but I don't see why you would want one when a Linux or BSD box could be used instead.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  56. Dreamcast! by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

    You can pick up a Dreamcast for about $15 USD at your local EB, and you can get it to run BSD or Linux. The only issue is you'll need the Boardband Adapter, and that will set you back a pretty penny. They go for about a hundred on Ebay, but if you can find a friend who is willing to donate one, you're all set for a small, low power server. :) You'll also need a DC keyboard, or a PS/2 -> DC adapter, which run about $15.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  57. new wife a freebsd user? by sPaKr · · Score: 1

    Bah, this story should read, 'Real, Honest to goodness Female a FBSD user, weds, reducing available femal freebsd user pool to 0". By the way, if its lower power you want check out the Via mini-itx boards. The Eden chips go up to 1Ghz are 17cm x 17cm and use passive cooling. Plus they have hardware enabled RNG and AES acceleration that should improve security and preformance with things like ipsec.

    1. Re:new wife a freebsd user? by jspoon · · Score: 1

      And the real question: does she have a sister?

  58. What about a PDA? by Eldred · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could probably pick up an older Zaurus (Linux PDA) cheap. The 5500 I have can take both compact flash and SD/MMC Cards, and runs on a fraction of a watt. With a compact flash ethernet card you could connect it to pretty much any router. Just mark it as your DMZ, and the incoming traffic will be routed to it. All you need do is set up a mail server on the Zaurus, maybe a little custom compiling, and you're all set.

  59. Spend a fraction of capital money on power bills by batdog · · Score: 1

    Why buy a new box, when the payback on power bill savings will be years away? Just use one of your ol' klunkers.

    Underclock it and buy a low-rpm quiet fan for $20 if it's noise you're worried about.

  60. BSD users are dying... I mean getting married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woohoo... congrats man.

  61. Power Usage Reference by hungryfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For reference, I've measured power consumption on my laptop and my old box that acts as a linux server. The laptop is a Dell PII 366Mhz with a 15" screen that draws about 22 watts total. The server is a Dell Optiplex PII 400Mhz and draws about 30 watts without a monitor. When the hard drive is working at the max (e.g. a sustained file transfer) it goes up to about 45 watts. Overall, I find that the server costs me about $2.50 to run 24/7. I agree with others: An old laptop is probably a great solution if you can find one cheaply.

  62. mini-itx by gyratedotorg · · Score: 2, Informative

    one obvious solution is mini-itx. im currently using one of these guys for my www/mail server, and i love it. its just a little bigger than a cdrom drive, it only uses a 60w power supply, its totally silent, and very stable. i've been running this thing 24/7 with no problems for the last 6 months or so. and yes, both linux and freebsd run fine on these.

    --
    Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
  63. 49 Watts by Cornelius42 · · Score: 1
    FYI:

    I recently put together a server with power consumption in mind. It included: 1GHz VIA cpu, 512MB RAM, two network cards, and two 40G 7200 rpm drives mirrored.

    The entire computer pulled a total of 47 watts. I was even able to unplug the CPU fan once I replaced the heat sink.

  64. Cerfcube by linuxwrangler · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have one of these:
    http://www.intrinsyc.com/products/cerfcube /

    Add a microdrive for storage. Doesn't win awards for speed, storage or ram but the ~3 inch cube takes nearly no space, looks cool, is silent and draws very little power.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  65. I believe the trick is... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    to do it use a very large RAM disk loaded from the flash, which you then either batch copy into the flash FS at intervals, or at shutdown. (The latter is more likely as DRAM is as cheap or cheaper than Compact Flash capacity-wise).

    Hence the flash is really only there to help it between power cycles, or to "back" in-flight data.

    I could probably find one... but there should be a flash/RAM fs that does mostly everything in memory with an update-to-backing-flash-at-interval feature. Or you could somehow tune the buffer cache to be _really_ lazy about when it gets around to writing, and only to write in huge sequential blocks.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  66. Cappuccino? by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

    These may be a bit more pricey than you're looking for, but they're not too expensive, and are certainly small:

    Cappuccino PC

  67. wrt54g + nslu2 by mo · · Score: 2, Informative

    since you mentioned the wrt54g you might be also interested in the Linksys NSLU2. It's got a single ethernet port, dual usb ports and can run linux. Attach a usb harddrive to it and you can use it for your file/mail server. The open source firmwares aren't as polished as, say sveasoft but it seems to me that you're the type that might enjoy getting it working.

  68. Other places you can save the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use regular light bulbs, use compact fluorescents.

  69. Low power? by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

    A Pentium-M wouldn't be a bad choice... even though you'd have to get a laptop for it, they use only 21 watts of power. They're also insanely fast--in some tests they come out ahead of A64s clock-for-clock.

    Although you probably want to go with a desktop, in which case a mobile Athlon (45 watts) would be a nice choice.

  70. xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was thinking about doing this kind of thing with an xbox.

  71. Microsoft XBox for small linux server by jamesg123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    One solution would be to run Linux on a Microsoft XBox. It's basically a PC with a few minor hardware changes. All that's required is a modchip (try SmartXX or Xenium) to allow the box to executables that have not been "signed" by Microsoft. My XBox runs Xebian which is a Debian distribution. http://www.xbox-linux.org/ They are very cheap now, and you get a box with a DVD drive and 8-10Gb hard disc, ethernet and Pentium III 733Mhz CPU. Mine runs a webserver and stays up for weeks on end. Power consumption is low - I believe it has a 100W power supply.

    1. Re:Microsoft XBox for small linux server by AlexCorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, you don't even need a modchip. Linux can be installed without ever opening the Xbox. If you do open it, the tsop write protection can be disabled allowing one to flash the BIOS. A RAM upgrade can also be done once the tsop is flashed. I have 5 Xboxes I've done this with and it makes a nice little cluster, outrunning my dual Xeons at times.

    2. Re:Microsoft XBox for small linux server by TPoise · · Score: 1

      Yea, but what if you want to play a game?

    3. Re:Microsoft XBox for small linux server by jman+sr · · Score: 1

      If you do a software only modification you can still play games. I ran an xbox modified by the MechInstaller Linux installer and was quite happy. I use it as a small server, but I also have it plugged into my telivision. It runs freevo, and I use it as a multi-media jukebox. I did, however, get tired of starting the MS dashboard and I have since flashed the TSOP with the Cromwell Linux bios. I'm even happier now, but no xbox games.

      Josh

  72. Beware of old Dells :P by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Ever leave a Dell Latitude cpx running too long with the lid closed?

    Friend that worked at Netscape did.. she opened it up and found that the keys had melted. heh.

    1. Re:Beware of old Dells :P by leerpm · · Score: 1

      I have one of those Latitude CPx's. After a few hours of heavy use, it gets so hot on the bottom you can burn if you touch the wrong spot.

  73. Regular machines don't use so much power. by eagle486 · · Score: 1
    Before you spend the money on a new machine, find out how much power your current one uses.

    My main machine at home is an Athlon 800 with 1Gig of RAM and two IDE drives. It uses 100 Watts, that translates to 876kWh per year and at $0.10 per kWh it amount to $88 per year.
    I know how much power it uses because I have it connected to a Kill-A-Watt power meter.

    Monitor is a big power hog, but your server will not need a monitor to be on all the time.

  74. Your wife? by null+etc. · · Score: 1
    Dood your wife is a geek...


    unless...


    she doesn't really care and is just nodding her head to keep you happy.

  75. Laptop. by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

    Laptops are built for low power, its a vital part of making the machines practical. In addition, they have a battery, so you don't need to put it on an UPS.

    For a light duty server, laptops are well suited and often overlooked.

  76. I built a mini-itx for around $350 by tungwaiyip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was seeking the same thing before. I did some research and found some really cool and small products. The problem of being cool is it carries a high price tag.

    I endup ordered a mini-itx box from idotpc. No hassle, super fast delivery. Cost me around $350 for a 512MB ram 80GB HD system (w/0 CDROM). It ran a small website link above. The best part, my power bill dropped by $10 a month after I turned off the AMD box!!! Now I can brat about helping out in the California energy crisis.

    Eventually something should make a webserver the size of iPod. How about $200 for a 40GB version?

  77. Wireless Hard Drives by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    See this press release from Juine 15,2004

    Maxtor and Linksys are teaming up to push a device that will enable an external USB hard drive to connect to a wireless router.

    Also, this story

    Netgear's new WGT634U Wireless Media Router has a little something extra that we expect will be standard on all of these things sooner or later: a USB 2.0 port for attaching an external hard drive that anyone on the network can access. Plus they've cut a deal with Western Digital (sort of like Linksys' arrangement with Maxtor) to hook people up with drives that can used with this thing, though almost any external drive will work (even a lot of those Flash keychain drives) and they've even prepared a list of which ones are compatible.

    plenty of these things seem to be out there, check them out.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Wireless Hard Drives by murgee · · Score: 1

      How about the Linksys NSLU2? No wireless but you can buy a WET-11 Ethernet bridge for it if you want. Also, it can run Linux, and with the addition of a regular access point and a USB Ethernet adapter it'd probably work pretty good as a router.

      --
      mrg
    2. Re:Wireless Hard Drives by Eccles · · Score: 1

      If you just want a file server, why not a Buffalo HD-H120LAN or similar? buy.com has 'em for ~$190 after rebate, claims low power consumption and print server functionality. No mail server though.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  78. That is more power than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is more power than you think. That is enough to run my house (and I mean house not an apartment) for about 2 to 3 months and that includes the fridge, dishwasher, and occasional use of PowerMac 7300 (yes I have gas water heater and heating). These little things add up more than most people realize, especially when you aren't tracking all your expenses.

  79. Check out Soekris -OR- WRAP from PC Engines by casper_bonk · · Score: 1

    These are both excellent, low power consumpsion, single board computers. They will both run FreeBSD without trouble. I know the WRAP is capable of POE; not sure about Soekris machines.

    http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
    http://www.soekris.com/

    Currently running m0n0wall on a WRAP and FreeBSD on a Mini-ITX. Both run like a dream.

    --
    -- Casper Bonk.
  80. Soekris by tail.man · · Score: 0

    These are cool.

    http://www.soekris.com/

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/globalwarmingisascam
    1. Re:Soekris by lousyd · · Score: 1
      And here's two O'Reilly HOW-TOs (of sorts):
      Article 1 and Article 2.

      Both articles describe using a Soekris box with OpenBSD.

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
  81. power bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets pretend you pull out 100 watts all day every day. (unlikely) In Washington DC, that equates to about $0.10 daily, or $36.50/year. Power consumption is only really important for portables.

  82. Fanless IPCs might be best in the long run by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    I just got married, and my wife and I are putting together a home network in the (small) apartment we're now living in. We're both long-time FreeBSD users, so installing a *nix system is no big deal
    First of all, congratulations on getting your geek girl... ;-) Since the WAF might be an issue even in this case, mini-itx.com should be a place to look for, where you'll find boards with two Ethernet ports like these. In general, fanless solutions targetted at the industrial (IPC) market come with a higher price tag, but they are advisable as you'll have no noise, failing fans or dust buildup to worry about. You might also like to look at e.g. Samsung 's SV series 5400rpm HDDs (current models 1203, 1604) which seem to be both reliable and silent.
  83. Nick Burns? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Nick Burns and Rhonda finally tied the knot.

    Congratulations!!!

    1. Re:Nick Burns? Is that you? by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. But I'm sure they appreciate the sentiments.

  84. Could be too small for what you want by Majestix · · Score: 1

    http://www.gumstix.com

    K

    --
    --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
  85. think "laptop" by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Laptops are designed with energy efficiency in mind. In my tests I found that (at least for macintoshes) laptops draw under 40 watts even when running at full tilt, and sip less than 20 watts when relatively idle. You also get a built-in UPS, so you save money and electricity there too. Laptops also don't require a CRT display, saving you another 50 watts or so, plus considerable space savings. If you need additional storage, make sure you get a model with a firewire port on it, or just get one with an 80gb HD if that's enough for you to sprawl on.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  86. Asus WL-500GX + USB Harddrive? by bobsalt · · Score: 1

    use openwrt for the OS
    http://openwrt.org/

    and one of these for the hardware
    Asus WL-500GX (Speedbooster, 2x USB 2.0)

    OpenWRT is amazing stuff. I'm sure you could get it to do everything you are wanting to do.

  87. Uh... am I way off base here by suggesting... by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...procuring a used laptop? Low power, and all the creature comforts of a full-fledged computer.

    (aside)
    But, I have to also say. I have NEVER even MET a woman who has HEARD of bsd. I had to argue with a Comcast Cable woman today who hadn't even heard of FireWire. I considered it a victory when I got my g/f to run Folding@Home. She was even game for Red Hat, but it was too difficult for her to find a wireless driver for the Thinkpad built-in 802.11... but hey, at least she tried!

    Here's to... if not geek, then geek-compatible women! love 'em.

    1. Re:Uh... am I way off base here by suggesting... by Grey_14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Laptops arent designed to run all the time, It'll die pretty quick if your leaving it on all the time,

    2. Re:Uh... am I way off base here by suggesting... by holderofthering · · Score: 1

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/ladies/5981/, told my faviorite girl im getting her one, shes exsited :P.

    3. Re:Uh... am I way off base here by suggesting... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      My fiance (we've been together for 6 years now) has heard of BSD. She also worked on it as well as on Unix and Linux stations. She also has an honors degree from University of York (Toronto) in both Com Sci and Economics. She also worked as a programmer for 9 months and now is working as a technical BA for a year while programming her Sony CLIE for fun.

      Oh, yes, she is 5'9", blond and beautiful with probably only 8Kg over her good weight, but who isn't?

  88. PPC Option by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    The BriQ is what you need. "The same form-factor as a CD-ROM drive, the briQ provides an advanced, energy efficient (just 20-40 Watts) and affordable solution for embedded solutions. Need an in-dash MP3 player? Need two computers in the space of one? Slide a briQ into the expansion bay of your x86 or Macintosh computer! " It has linux pre-installed.

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    1. Re:PPC Option by idr · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does spending $1,245 on a server to save $10 on your power bill seem insane?

  89. Re:Hello! PowerPC!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pegasos.
    OK, it's more expensive than a used Mac, but at least it's not a Mac. ;)

  90. VIA EPIA by anethema · · Score: 1

    Nothing in the top 30 or so informative/insightful comments mention this so i will:

    The VIA epia seems like it might be exactly what you're looking for. Take a look here

    They are a very tiny motherboard with a built in VIA CPU. The processing power should be ample for any small server tasks, plus its a tiny and very quiet computer which takes almost no power. Just add ram, a hard drive, a case, and a switch and you're ready to network ;)

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  91. Wanna stick of Gum by Uggy · · Score: 1

    I saw a presentation on these last week, and was blown away. We're talking basically complete system with a 400 Mhz processor (~700 bogomips) the size of a stick of gum. Shitty floating point, but who cares.

    --
    Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
  92. simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    run extension cords to your neighbors power sockets. you can run all your computers without having to worry about the electricty bill. problem solved.

  93. Extended Temp Range by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    A system that meets the low power requirements *and* can operate in extended temperature ranges would be nice. I program my home's thermostat to stop heating or cooling when I'm at work (gets to 90F during summer). Running the AC or heater just to keep my home server happy would use a *lot* more juice than the computer itself.

  94. Believe it: My wife ran the cat5 wiring by ericzundel · · Score: 1

    There is such a thing as a geek girl. In our last house, my wife is the one that ran all of the cat5 in the house. In fact, in true geek fashion, she insisted on it - I guess she thought I would mess it up like I did the 120V electrical wiring (sheesh- anyone can make a mistake!)

    She has more computers than I do, more gadgets than I do. She gets the palm upgrade first!

    And she weighs in at under 120 lbs. (pbbbbt)

    1. Re:Believe it: My wife ran the cat5 wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And she's probably hella ugly too. Congrats on the great find, yo.

    2. Re:Believe it: My wife ran the cat5 wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't care how well your wife runs network cable through your walls. The question that we are all wanting to ask you is what does your finger smell like right now?

    3. Re:Believe it: My wife ran the cat5 wiring by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Now, the real question is did you mean to write KG or LBS?
      Just kidding.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  95. Obligatory Mac plug by FredFnord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought a PowerMac G4 Cube a few months ago to do this. Low power, no noise, and everything I needed was there and mostly set up by default. The firewall needs a bit of tugging on, but, well, such is life. The Windows file sharing works wonderfully.

    Plus, I can either lock it in the closet or leave it out on my living room table as a conversation piece. ('What's that? It's cute!' 'Oh, that's my web server.')

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  96. Real computer by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Don't use a device like a LinkSys or some other device that requires a flash card for storage if you're planning on serving web pages or handling email. Proper handling of email is not simply take the incoming message and write it to disk once. Do you realize that Sendmail writes a transcript file (xf) that exists during the life of a session showing everything that happens during that session? Few people realize that. Spam and AV checking will also likely require at least part of the message to be written to disk prior to scanning. Now you can do a lot of this in memory but the memory in a WRT45G is going to be too limited to have a decent tmpfs partition to handle this.

    No offense, but what you need to use is something that's meant to handle the job: a real computer. You can build a low cost, quiet, power conservative computer for not that much money. The average computer consumes less than 100 watts of power when performing basic tasks. This review gives you lots of details. So really the power consumption won't be a problem. Keep the number of internal devices low and you won't have much heat build up. Keep the heat low and you can do all sorts of fancy things with sound panels to absorb sound, thus fixing that problem. You sound like a person that really does need a home server, like myself and my servers. You can't go wrong with a real computer. Plus when something breaks (and of course it will) you have warranties to fall back on. You can also hop on newegg or run down to the corner Crap Shack and buy replacement parts. Try doing that with your jerry-rigged WRT54G. ;-)

    1. Re:Real computer by Starji · · Score: 1

      I believe he said like a WRT54G. As in, similar size and power consumption, yadda yadda.

      The two best suggestions I've heard so far is the old laptop, and the Via mainboards. Both seem equally ideal to this situation.

    2. Re:Real computer by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      True but a more complete quote would in fact indicate that he didn't mean "like" the WRT54G but in fact the WRT54G itself.

      ...our ideal box would be something like a Linksys WRT45G with one of the open source firmwares...

      The open source firmware upgrades are what's available for the WRT54G. Nevertheless I like the idea of using the laptop. I'm not a big Via fan but hey, they're hard to get away from. Someone else mentioned a Sparc IPX or IPC. I really like that idea. I own 4 or 5 IPCs myself. Another good one would be a SparcStation/Server 20 or an Ultra 1. I can pick up any of those for under $50 at Boeing Surplus. They even had Indigo2's for $40. That's another good one. What's the SGI model that was used in that cartoon with the Russian guy, the marketing guy, the chick, the hair ball, and a few other characters I can't recall. Boeing Surplus had one of those too. It can't pull much or be too loud. That would be a sweet firewall/personal server. I think this guy is going to find that in a few months to a year, his needs will change and he'll need something like more drive space or RAM and won't be able to do it for a reasonable price with a laptop or a WRT54G. I'm still a fan of the actual computer personally. He's going to be really pissed off one of these days when his HD crashes in his laptop and he lost all his data (websites, email, etc..). He'll then wish he'd built his setup using a real computer so he could have done some simple RAID. That's how I got to the point I'm at now. I lost 4 drives in 3 machines in under a year. I wasn't a happy serial killer. :-{}

    3. Re:Real computer by Ancient+Devices+King · · Score: 1

      I agree with your argument in general, but I disagree with your last point there. The problem is that a WRT54G is really cheap. A quick froogle search found me several sites selling those things for about $50. That's less than a reasonable hard disk or even a well ventilated case. If it breaks, you just get another one! The expensive part of this solution if you had to replace something that broke would be 1) the time investment involved in fixing it and 2) the big CF card or microdrive you'd need to get if that broke.

      --
      -"It seems like you're trying to exploit a security hole. Would you like help?"
    4. Re:Real computer by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 1

      Yeh, but 100 watts is about 20% of a typical European home's total energy usage. That still adds up to a lot of power.

  97. Good luck by AaronW · · Score: 1

    While I know there are plenty of low power solutions out there, I have yet to find one that fits my requirements.

    I am currently running a 333MHz PII based Linux server (uptime 409 days, SuSE 8.2) in my closet. I use it for firewall, email, web, FTP, ssh, NFS, Samba, etc. and it works great. However, I would love to find something with a bit more powerful CPU and something that can run mirrored RAID. While the VIA ITX board looks nice, it only has one PCI slot and one Ethernet port. I'd love to find a mini-ATX motherboard based on the VIA or some other very low power CPU with 2 or more PCI slots or with one PCI slot and on-board RAID and/or gigabit Ethernet. I don't need a blazingly fast CPU, just something fast enough but low power is the key.

    This box has been rock solid, as long as I don't try and run Seti@Home on it (410 days ago it caused the CPU to lock up solid every time I tried).

    The current CPU can get bogged down a bit with the spam filter and I'd love to move to gigabit (everything else is ready for it) so I can use it to archive MPEG files off of my ReplayTV.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  98. What about a VIA C3 or Eden processor? by mr.big_pig · · Score: 1

    Why don't you get a board with a VIA Eden or C3 processor? They don't draw much power and they don't need much in the way of cooling. Get a small ITX case, install your favorite flavor of Linux or BSD, and your set.

  99. Another Mini-ITX vote by mercuryresearch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen other suggestions for this, I'll give you my exact configuration. I'm running a DNS, web, mail and firewall services using my setup (off of static IP on ISDN no less, 24/7!)

    I use a VIA CL6000 (this is a dual lan motherboard with a 600 MHz fanless "Eden" processor) with slackware, 256MB of memory, and a 40GB laptop hard disk (complete overkill, 8GB would be plenty). Total cost of the system was well under $400. Power consumption is about 25 watts, and the box is completely silent. I omit the optical drive since I just "borrowed" one to do the initial install, everything has been via the network since. Uptime's been great.

    I've been tempted by the Soekis stuff as well, but cost wise it looks like it'd be a near wash, maybe just a bit cheaper. The ITX stuff is a "real" PC, so you just fire it up and go, no CF config, console emulation via serial port, etc. (I had previously used a CF card on an earlier VIA server, it works if you make sure you put the right things into a RAM disk first.)

    As others have pointed out, a cheap laptop would work, however I found the fact that I wanted firewall service (two E-net ports needed) made things a bit odd, as all the used cheap LTs I had included no network adapters, so it would have been dual PCMCIA or USB ethernet, and it just felt and looked really kludgey when I played with it.

  100. I have pentium 2 by lanteau · · Score: 1

    I have a server that just a Pentium 2 333MHZ and it runs an irc server, ftp server, ssh server, and its a print server. It is also plenty of computer for a server, and it probably only draws 20 watts of power.

  101. Shattered dreams... by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1
    We're both long-time FreeBSD users

    CRAP!!! I thought that one special geeky woman was still out there, somewhere... And now I find out she's taken.

    *grumble*

  102. Get a Logic SDK by Publicus · · Score: 1

    Logic Zoom SDKs are low power development kits that support Sharp (ARM) and Renesas (SuperH) based microcontrollers.

    Because they're for developing embedded products, they're low power and solid state. There's a PCMCIA bus on the kit, so you could probably get a SCSI adapter and run a disk on that. Otherwise, you could use Compact Flash for storage. For that matter, you could use USB. There was some story about a guy who ripped a 5 Gb CF drive out of a Rio mp3 player or something the other day.

    Anyway, the site specifies which card engines run Linux (no FreeBSD port that I know of). I've always wanted to give it a try, but I'm busy working on my house all the time.

    Good luck!

    Disclaimer -- I work for this company.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  103. VIA cpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run my mail/dns/http on a machine that was intended to be a PVR system. Its ever going to play quake 3, with a 700Mhz VIA cpu, a 60 watt powersupply, and the harddrive being the only moving part (no fans) its low on the power bill and whisper quiet. I bought a single unit barebones from http://www.gctglobal.com/, threw in a particullarly low noise harddrive, and stuck a 512MB DIMM in there.

    Shortly after I bought that (about 2 years ago) I became aware of the very large set of options available using the via cpus and mini-itx motherboard form factor. See http://www.mini-itx.com/, the site is based in the UK, but I've seen many of the components they talk about at Fry's Electronics in California. Most of of these run on about 60 watts, so need no powersupply or cpu fan.

  104. DEC Multia's by Moekandu · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're tiny (13x13x3 in), you can get them dirt cheap in both Pentium and Alpha flavors (100 - 166Mhz range) and just about any *nix distro will support them.

    They're basically the predecessor to the SFF boxen. Just don't lay the Alpha Multia's flat or one of the chips on the underside of the motherboard will overheat and die. But, then again, there are detailed instructions on the NetBSD website on how to use those l33t soldering skills to fix it.

    --
    Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
    1. Re:DEC Multia's by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      /me runs over to NetBSD's site.

      Could you post a more specific link to the fix, please?

      And do they list the exact symptoms for the problem? My Multia will boot, will run the embedded firmware tests, but during the Linux install the system barfs - like it is having memory or disk corruption.

    2. Re:DEC Multia's by DeezyChee · · Score: 0, Informative
  105. beware! .. it's a trap! by rozz · · Score: 1
    "I just got married ... We're both long-time FreeBSD users"

    thou shall not promise heaven to poor nerds!

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  106. Epia / Mini-ITX by The_DOD_player · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is the only way to do this IMO....

    I have the exact same in my closet. VIA-Epia Eden 533 MHz motherboard/cpu/network/vga package, fanless, a bit of RAM, a fluid bearing harddrive, Gentoo Linux... it rocks....
    - Barely consumes power ~30W
    - It's also almost silent.
    - It's very cheap.

    1. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by Saberwind · · Score: 1

      With a laptop hard drive, my 533MHz Mini-ITX box peaks at around 18 watts.

    2. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      This sounds interesting to try to replace my servers.

      Where do you find all the parts to put one of these together?

      Thanks!

    3. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by Bostik · · Score: 1

      I agree. Epia ITX boards are just about perfect for this kind of setup.

      My home server is a 1GHz C3, clocked down to 750MHz (and hence running fanless). I would have liked a 533/600 version but those are available (at least here) only in booksize mini-pc systems and thus use laptop drives.

      So what have I got? A system that is silent, relatively cheap, and has very conservative electricity requirements. Large enough a hard drive to double up as a home network media server, although main use is as a mail server.

      Just one thing to remember: these processors are marketed as i686 compatible, but for the omission of CMOV call, you can only use i586 optimised binaries.

      --
      There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
    4. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by merlin_jim · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm also a proud Mini-ITX owner. I have the 800 MHz version with a small fan. Got a small 2.5" hard drive used (4 GB). Stick some RAM in there. I put mine in a Cubid 2766 box, which is very compact (it's far smaller in form factor than my VCR) and uses an efficient and quiet 12V DC powersupply; the AC power is rectified outside in a transformer brick that doesn't require active cooling.

      Prices (as I recall.... YMMV):

      800 Mhz EPIA... $100
      128 MB RAM... $40
      2.5" 4 GB HDD... $40
      16X DVD-ROM drive... $25 (eBay)
      mini-adapter for DVD-ROM... $10
      Case + DC-DC power supply... $60

      for a grand total of... $275. And it can double as a DVD / digital media player.

      BTW, I originally modded an acrylic cube to hold the computer. With no prior experience, I built a 7" cube to hold everything. I took it out because the power switches I used were difficult to press. I even used acrylic hinges. You can get just the power supply for $30.

      I didn't do it for e-mail though. MythTV baby, so you gotta throw in a $150 hardware capture card to be perfectly fair when quoting the price of my system as-is.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    5. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by gtoomey · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      I'd second this but I use Slackware instead of Gentoo ;)

      I'm running a 533MHz Mini-ITX mobo (£ 70 UK) with a 120 Gb Seagate Barracuda hard drive (£ 56 UK) and 512 Mb RAM (£ 50 UK and a bit O.T.T !) all held in a knackered old case which has a 150 watt P.S.U.

      Apart from the PSU fan (which is slightly noisy) it's practically silent and just well... it just works.

      But when I get some spare cash I'll be looking to get a DC wall wart to replace the current PSU after which it should become all nice 'n' silent (as usual these are very expensive in the UK)

      But all in all I'd agree that mini-itx is the way to go. At least until someone comes out with a "cheap as chips" "intelligent" hard drive which comes with a tiny embedded Linux O/S ROM on it and which is purposely designed to act as a home server.

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    7. Re:Epia / Mini-ITX by timkientzle · · Score: 1

      I have one of these in my closet as well.
      (From idotpc.com) Runs FreeBSD 5.2 quite well.

      I'm very happy with it. According to my
      wattmeter, it draws 11w (including 80G Seagate
      Barracuda hard drive) and is one of the
      quietest machines I've ever had the pleasure
      of owning.

      For reference, I went around my house with
      a wattmeter a while back and did a bit
      of measuring:
      * My one old crappy laptop draws 14w
      * My Intel-based desktops are all 35w-45w
      * My one cheap AMD-based desktop is 70w (?!)
      * LCD monitors around 20w when on
      * CRT monitors around 40w when on

      Roughly speaking, 10w will cost you $1/month
      (assuming $0.14/kWH, which is a bit on the high
      side for most of the US.) It doesn't take
      a lot of machines being on 24x7 before you've
      racked up quite an electric bill.

  107. P233 + slow fans by Derf_X · · Score: 2, Informative
    Like many here, my home server is a P233 with 64 MB of RAM and a software RAID 1 of 2x 30 GB. It is quite quiet, except for the HD, but I am looking into silencing them with rubbers mounts and stuff like that.

    It runs Slackware with SSH, FTP, Apache, squid, gShield (iptables based firewall), LineControl (pppd remote control), etc. LineControl is because I am still on 56k, highspeed internet wasn't approved by the counsel (read: gf). So I'm tweaking the hell out of it (squid with big cache, cron jobs for nightly downloads with wget - like the 266 MB XPSP2, etc)

  108. Mini-ITX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm using a couple Mini-ITX systems from Via. I have three different motherboards from them. One system has dual LAN ports and is running IPCOP. Another is an 800Mhz running FreeBSD 5.2 which is my web/file server. And another is a 1Ghz sitting under my TV as an HTPC.

  109. Cobalt Qube by old_sarge · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can pick up an old Cobalt Qube on ebay for around $100.

    There are howto's - if you dig - for porting FreeBSD to one of these.

    They are about 7.5" cubed and draw very little power. I've got 5 of them around the country and they've been going strong for over 5 years.

    1. Re:Cobalt Qube by Camarones · · Score: 1

      I'll second this one. Qubes are nice, compact server appliances. If you pick up a recent one (Qube3) then you can even run a somewhat supported OS with available (albeit slowly) security patches. Or, you can wipe it and install your own OS on it. The qube is intended to run headless but has 2 10/100 ports, an extra PCI slot and a serial port.

      But, if you want to be a do-it-your-selfer, I'd suggest a Mini-ITX solution. I've built them with flashcard storage and hard drive storage, either works fine, but if you go for flashcard get a FAST flashcard otherwise the install and general day to day operations will take forever as the OS waits for the flashcard to catch up.

  110. Lex Systems makes some nice small systems by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

    Lex Systems makes some nice Mini-ITX systems that might be right up your alley, of you can get past the horrors of their flash-based site. I bought a Light system from them a couple months ago with a fanless C3 533, threw a CF card in and installed Bering uClibc on it. Now I have a silent linux based firewall with an internal ADSL interface with enough oomph to run a few IPSEC tunnels and do some nifty firewall tricks. Best of all, since I installed that firewall and turned off the desktop system I never used the noisiest thing in my apartment is the 3 year old harddrive in my iBook, and with Laptop-mode even that isn't spinning most of the time. Silence is golden!
    I've had a fanned 800Mhz C3 Light system running as a 3 port firewall at work for over a year now and it works great. A friend of mine has several of them scattered around town as NAT/DHCP/IPSEC appliances for the different branches of the company he works for. Never had a problem with the systems, only the DSL lines their connected to.

    - RustyTaco

  111. Check out the cobalt qube3 series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They run redhat and are a breese to setup and maintain.

  112. What you want is something called a "laptop" by hqm · · Score: 1

    Low power, compact, quiet.

    Except for one thing, it needs to be able to reboot itself automatically after a power failure, something I have not seen laptops do for some reason.

  113. PC-104, d00dz. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Pick up an EE Times, Electronic Design, Circuit Cellar, or some other embedded magazine, and pick up a bunch of those PC-104 or whatever they're called. They're designed for embedded use, which means they'll draw a lot less than a full on PC, yet they come with feature sets that'll blow you away. A lot of these are designed to run Linux and the such, so you oughtn't have any problems running the Beastie on there. The coolest hack is you can install about five of these inside a single standard computer case, so it looks like one PC, but actually has a few inside. I'd like to do this someday, and set up an X desktop that hauls ass cuz the apps all run on different comps, but look like they're all in the same box. I don't understand why these things ain't more widespread already.

  114. Use old machines by myov · · Score: 1

    I'm using a P75 and a P-Pro 150 for my servers. I've even been considering clocking down the machines since the load is fairly low.

    Just don't do this with windows. That machine doubles as my electric heater, and does a lot less.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  115. No Soldering needed. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    If it's purely a firewall box, then just grab an old Pentium box, 2 NICs, and a 1GB hard drive (Even that could probably be shaved down a bit, probably.) Install FreeBSD, Rebuild the kernel to enable IPFW/natd or IPF/IPNAT and you're good to go. I've been using this setup (IPFW) for a few years now, though I'll admit my box is a bit overpowered (475 mHz K6-2), it's the lowest one I had handy.

  116. Bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  117. PFU Systems from LinuxWorld! by JThundley · · Score: 1

    I saw one of These sexy demons at Linuxworld. I played Quake3 arena in Linux on it!

  118. Shuttle Zen: quiet small-form-factor box by bfields · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I recently got a shuttle "Zen" st62k (review), put a 1.8G P4, 1G ram, and a 180G hard drive in it. So it's in a completely different class from something embedded. But it has a fancy heat sink and an external power supply, which means the whole thing needs only one variable-speed fan, which I've never actually heard go above its lowest speed except briefly on startup.

    So despite the fact that it's always on, and lives on top of a desk in my living room, I don't really hear it. Very quiet. I haven't measured the energy use, but I suspect it's not bad. My original plan was just to use it as a firewall/personal server, but since it's plenty adequate for a regular desktop, I use it for that now too--it's nice being able to just check the weather or whatever without waiting for something to boot.

    So, anyway, I'm pretty happy with it. Recommended.

    --Bruce Fields

    1. Re:Shuttle Zen: quiet small-form-factor box by lifespan · · Score: 0

      "it's nice being able to just check the weather or whatever without waiting for something to boot" I use Windows to check the weather...

      --
      -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  119. buy a old, used machine by inkedmn · · Score: 1

    retrobox.

    I used this site to replace my father-in-law's old 486 with a pentium, cost about $40. Pretty sure the power consumption will be less than a standard p4, but probably not as low as a modified appliance.

    --
    well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
  120. A XPC and router by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    First, I personally don't like the idea of using a host as both a file server and a firewall. Unless you have some strange requirements a linksys or netgear router will work quite well. Otherwise build a separate smoothwall router.

    As for the server I recently built a Biostar 200v XPC (case, mobo, PS and heat sink for $160USD). There's room two 3.5" HDs and a CD drive. While it's hardly a cutting edge machine and will never play Doom 3, for under $500 you can build a nice, compact, quiet home server.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  121. Soekris by Mysteray · · Score: 2, Informative
  122. www.traverse.com.au - small yet powerful option by chathamhouse · · Score: 1

    These guys make a small machine that has a fully silent option with the

    The boxes are nice and compact, with 2 PCI slots which is useful for adding an extra ethernet or DSL card. Check it out.

    On that topic, Traverse also sells one of the few PCI DSL cards who has active Linux and *BSD driver development. It's low form factor, which is nice for this sort of work.

  123. What a Honeymoon by serutan · · Score: 1

    Dude.
    You just got married, and you are spending your time setting up a LAN??? When I was just married I had much better things to do. And I'm a geek.

  124. Via cpu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My server is based on a Via 600mhz cyrix chip in an I-810mb running with a laptop HD. The cpu has a large heatsink and no fan. It consumes about 22 watts measured at the wall socket. Yes that little surprised me too. And FreeBSD of course :) My guess is the low power is due an efficient power supply that came bundled with the mini-form factor case its in.

  125. My final solution to this problem... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Mini-ITX would be to much fuss for me and price/performance wouldn't be that good either.

    I'd actually use an iBook. There's open source software on the net that lets in run in clamshell mode (cover closed), it's unobstrusive and very small (flat), so you can put it behind a panel or something and comes with it's built in emergency screen and KB ;-).

    You even can leave OS X on it, since it's a good Unix, and a BSD derivate anyway. Fink (Debian OS X) and Gentoo OS X both are in good shape all you need for your OSS needs. You'll feel right at home. For ~1000$ you won't get a better bang for buck.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  126. How about a laptop? by Code+Dark · · Score: 1

    I have a home network, and wanted to get a server up but didn't have very much space. Since my server won't get slashdotted any time soon (it's not a web server; just sshd, ftpd and IMAP/SMTP), I decided to use the smallest reasonable server I could find: my IBM Thinkpad.
    Yes, it's true: I'm running Debian on my Thinkpad connected to my cable line, and I couldn't be happier. Fast connection, and the computer is definitely fast enough for a server. Talk about mobile servers, eh?

    --
    - Code Dark
  127. VIA MiniITX by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    machines draw less than 100W. Great little machines, quite fast.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  128. Ask Undeadly, the answer is Soekris. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    This was recently covered on undeadly.org.

    The comments seemed to lean towards the Soekris and similar GEODE products, and the VIA EPIA.

  129. NasLite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boot this in you old laptop http://www.serverelements.com/naslite.php

  130. Goodwill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picked up an HP Vectra running at 133 MHz (a K6 PR 166) with 64 MB RAM, 1.7 G HD, and 3com NIC for $10. I installed ClarkConnect on it and an additional NIC and stuck it behind a dresser with the cable modem. That ran great for about 6 months, then I put an 80 GB drive in. I now run it in just about exactly the same config as you describe. I store all my pics and SHN's on it, run Samba and Apache and it is my home share, webserver, etc. I have nery had any issues with it, and power consumption was not a particular problem.

    I also like the Vectra's because the case is somewhat slim (3"? about 3U?). They can be had cheap here: http://www.retrobox.com

  131. SME Server by mrbcs · · Score: 1
    I just found this thing a few days ago. I have it on the exactly wrong hardware you want. I have an IBM PC704 quad p-pro server with 12 - 9 gig drive in a raid array. Very loud and big, but the software I run on it is great.

    This server software is the coolest thing I've ever seen. All configured via web browser, does mail, ftp, webserver.. acts as a router and windows domain controller. Awesome product. Worked right out of the box (burnt cd), configured my dsl first shot, and samba works without tinkering. I think you can get it :here

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  132. soekris by buddha42 · · Score: 1

    A soekris 4801 (not the 4501 mentioned in earlier replies) has a 266mhz x86 processor and can be purchased with a case/enclosure with laptop harddrive mounting bracket inside. Its smaller than your average college textbook, runs on a "wall wart" power supply, and has 3 ethernet interfaces. Unfortunatly the morons use frames so here's a link to the front page: http://www.soekris.com/ They also don't have pictures of the case on their website* but people on the mailing list have posted a few iirc. *frames and no pictures and no online ordering.... I swear these guys are practically trying to put themselves out of business

  133. Depends on what you want... by evilviper · · Score: 1, Informative

    Everyone is just listing what they've tried, because you haven't really said what you are looking for.

    What are your concerns? Power, heat, noise, price, performance, x86 compatibility?

    If you don't need very performance, want a low power fanless system, with x86 compatibility, and are happy with a CF card or 2.5" hard drive (more expensive, less reliable than a 3.5") then Soekris is the way to go. Expect 15watts.

    If you're willing to part with x86 compatibility, you must get something Geode-based. They are amazingly low power processors, and come with multiple NICs built-in like the Soekris above. Expect < 10watts

    If you want cheap, just grab an old PC, and underclock it. I use this method myself. People think "noisy", but spending $10 to replace the cheap fans will do wonders (Great source). Expect 30watts.

    I hate hearing so many people suggesting VIA C3-based systems. They are expensive, slow, and not all that low power. I wouldn't recomend VIA at all.

    If you want a system with some real CPU power, you can have it. Buy a cheap AMD Duron CPU, with a KT133 chipset mobo. Now, this would normally use a good 80+ watts of power, but fvcool works well on this chipset. Install fvcool, and power usage will halve when idle, yet it's full processing power is there when needed. Mobo, CPU, PS, Case, RAM: under $150. Expect 40watts.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  134. Hang on to her... by binderhead126 · · Score: 1

    Beside the point, Have you any idea how hard it is to find a girl who uses FreeBSD? I know plenty of Linux chicks, but one who uses Unix, she's definately a keeper. Lucky bastard...

    1. Re:Hang on to her... by binderhead126 · · Score: 1

      Also replying to the other "Unix chick" post, I definately know some Unix five-foot-something "trolls" too. Strange.

  135. What this married guy uses by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    OK, i'm not in an apartment, I own a townhouse; but I think your power concerns aren't totally justified.

    I run two servers full time at my house. I have a single 2.4 GHz xeon 1u rackmount box, and a 1u Dell Powervault for my storage needs (P4 2.6 Ghz).

    I had them disconnected for one month while I used them on a work-site and I found my electric bill was only about $8.00 cheaper! I drink more than that in beer on a Friday night.

    The electricity cost isn't horrible, but the space, heat, and fan noise are other factors that might make my setup intolerable in your environment.

    -ted

    1. Re:What this married guy uses by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      You can't really compare electricity from one month to another if you're talking about a dollar or two. Differences in climate, usage, etc. can have a bigger effect than that. Let's do some real calculations.

      If electricity costs you 10 cents/kilowatt-hour after applicable taxes and fees, then each watt that you consume will cost you about 7.4 cents/month. At 200 watts total, that's about $14.88. And 200 watts will run a *serious* system: I measured my Athlon 3200 w/ GeForce 6800GT, and only when truly maxing out the CPU and video card would it bump a 200-watt draw from the wall.

      My P3/650 file server (4 drives) and my dual-P133 router combined only draw about 130 watts under load, for a cost of about $9.50 per month.

      Now my central air that pulls 9 amps on a 220-volt circuit all day long during the hot months, that's entirely another story...

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  136. Via Mini-ITX by dlevitan · · Score: 1

    If you don't want something like the Soekris routers (very small with little expansion), look at Via's mini-itx computers. You can (or at least could) get a fanless computer with an external DC power supply that supported a CD and hard drive. I'm using one right now as a firewall/VPN/DNS server to connect to a different computer, and it runs very well (though I don't use a hard drive, instead I use a CF card mounted as read-only). The newer ones support up to two extra PCI cards and are really nice.

    1. Re:Via Mini-ITX by owlstead · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've build one in a small wine box, together with a 250 GB 3,5 " HDD. The reason for the hard drive is that it doubles as a Media Server for multiple computers. There were some issues with USB boot devices on my board, but I suppose VIA will have those fixed by now.

      This runs fine on a 53W external power supply. If you remember that you can spin down the HDD, the power requirements will be pretty low. I can not give you an exact figure, but it booted fine with several devices attached, including a DVD-ROM drive, so it will only use a small portion of the 53W supplied.

      Even then it generates a bit of heat (I've, unfortunately, one with an active CPU fan; the fanless parts were out of stock), so make sure it has got some form of ventilation. Otherwise, buy one with fan but put it into somewhere.

      CPU speed is fine for a server running either Linux (!) or Windows. Unless you are the pirating kind, for home use a linux solution is preferable. It also comes with more features out of the box for servers.

      Other advantages:
      - MM support including audio output (digital even)
      - put in a relatively big block of memory and run internet/java/whatever servers
      - USB 2.0/firewire support (take your MP3's with you, share a printer)
      - PCI support for second or third ethernet port
      - HW temperature support (S.M.A.R.T. harddisks mostly have a temperature sensor as well!)
      - relatively large support, including different kind of cool cases if you don't wanna build your own

      http://www.viaembedded.com/indexN.jsp

  137. Taking dead display off or not? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    If you take the display off, it'll probably stay cooler, though it's more likely to have something bang into the keyboard. If that's not a problem, you're probably better taking it off. Also, if it's cooler, it's more likely not to run the fan.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Taking dead display off or not? by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      If you take the display off, it'll probably stay cooler, though it's more likely to have something bang into the keyboard. If that's not a problem, you're probably better taking it off. Also, if it's cooler, it's more likely not to run the fan.

      True. Of course, with the way I'm using it with a KVM switch, I could take the keyboard off as well. Right now I have it sitting flat on a shelf, with another shelf above it, so there's no possibility of anything hitting the keys.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Taking dead display off or not? by billstewart · · Score: 1

      I also use a KVM switch for my dead-screen laptop, but my cats like to help me with the computers, so the lid stays on...

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  138. VIA C3 Mini-ITX and notebook HDD by gweihir · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you go for the models mit no more than 667MHz, you get passive cooling. You can get these with up to 2 network interfaces, but one is cheaper and you can put a cheap additional card in the PCI-slot. Just make sure the case you get has a raiser-card. Using a notebook HDD is simpler than CF, since you do not need to worry about writes (CF has a limited number of writes before it breaks). Is also cheaper when you want storage in the GB range. I have made good experience with notebook HDDs from Fujitsu. Very quiet.

    Total equipment:
    - board
    - RAM
    - HDD
    - Case

    The PSU comes with the case. Mine has an external notebook type 12V only PSU and an additional regulator board in the case. What you get is a modern PC that is a little slow (I would say C3-MHz / 2 = Athlon MHz. i.e. a 800MHz C3 feels like a 400MHz Athlon) but completely functional and with everything integrated you are likely to need. Keyboard and monitor required for installation in addition.

    I have such a setup running wit a real HDD (also backups on it) for over a year now without problems.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  139. case outlet by SlasherX · · Score: 1

    caseoutlet.com

    They have some nice mini-ITX machines.

  140. Way Overpriced at EU390 by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, they're lovely boxes. But you could get a used laptop for $100-200 with a dead screen that will work about as well with fairly low power.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  141. Been There, Done That, Put it in the rack by Hardwyred · · Score: 1

    I had a very similar issue and my fix ended up being 100% geek.

    File Server: Nokia IP330 firewall. Bought it for 50 bucks with a dead harddrive. Just a 1U box with an AMD K6-2 and 64 meg of RAM. This box sucks the most power of all my servers, but I needed the extra umph to run linux software raid.

    Firewall: WRT54G with the sveasoft firmware. Works like a charm and even supports 802.1q tagging on the wired side (with a little work)

    Mail Server: This is the fun one. NeoStation 3000 X Station. 233mhz Geode processor (30 bucks on ebay), very low power and low noise. Put the board in a case from an Intel iPivot (50 bucks on ebay) and we're good to go

    The whole thing is sitting in a rack I made out of 2x4s and powered by a Clary Onguard UPS (50 bucks on ebay). The only real power hog I have is my switch, it's an old Bay (you guessed it, 50 bucks on ebay). This can be done in a real fun, and cheap, way. Just look for used equipment and remember, darn near everything will run linux or NetBSD.

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
  142. SGI Indy! by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    Cute startup/reboot sound, put the IndyCam on for more physical security, you get IRIX. If security is a concern, get a SGI support contract or buy Trusted IRIX.

    Seriously, its a fun machine. But i'm not so sure on the power usage. For a second NIC, get yourself a Phobos G130 (i sell one btw).

    Indigo2's probably work too, but those need a Phobos G160 or 3C597. I'm not so sure on the power usage either.

    A R4x00 Indy might be a bit too slow, but a Indigo2 R4x00 or Indy R5000 most certainly suffices your needs.

    Both machines come with a 10 mbit onboard NIC. The Phobos NICs are 100 mbit though saturate usually not at full speed (EISA...). That's good for a firewall/server since you won't use more than 10 mbit whereas you can still use it for file server purposes.

    They run Linux too (e.g. Debian), NetBSD. However i'm not sure if the NICs actually will work (the Phobos ones). If you want a serious server you could even buy yourself a faster SGI. They're not that expensive 2nd hand anymore, but power usage really is a concern...

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  143. Cobalt Raq4 by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 1

    Pick one up on ebay for about $150. Easy config, quiet (I put little variable resistors on the itty-bitty fans, so its even quieter, and doesn't get too hot), low power consumption. Has two ethernet ports (could firewall/dmz) and a serial port if all goes to hell. Built in software isn't too bad either...

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.
  144. soekris + external drive by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    Looks like the 4801 has usb, too (though only usb 1.1, which at 12 mbps is a little slow as a file server). A large drive with a usb enclosure is probably a lot cheaper than an equivalent laptop drive, though it would be slower and draw more power.

    Another option might be to use one of those ethernet drive enclosures. If they don't already export smb and/or nfs (I've just seen them at Fry's, I don't really know what they do or how they work, or if multiple computers can access them concurrently) and they work with linux/bsd, you could mount one from the soekris box and re-export the file system through samba and nfs.

    -jim

  145. any old computer will do by doodleboy · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys, but I have a closet full of working older machines that I just can't seem to bring myself to throw out. My home firewall is a 486/100 ram running the ipcop firewall distro, which I've found to be very stable and powerful. It's also very quiet, since there's no fan on the cpu. I imagine a Linksys would use less power, but the 486 was free and it would take a long time in power savings to make up for the difference in cost.

    Obviously a 486 isn't going to cut it for something like a MythTV box, but there are a lot of good barebones mini-itx machines out there that can be put together for not much money.

    I've used PC-based stuff and linux for a long time and see no reason to change. It's just a matter of matching the hardware and linux version to the task at hand.

  146. Jesus... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    Buy a cheap new i-Mac. Tweak the power settings to maximum entergy savings. Max OS X will run run run... just works... ok, and it is a kick ass MAIN comp too...

  147. get a virtual server somewhere ? by guigouz · · Score: 1

    why not getting a virtual server (linode, rimuhosting) and running a dlink firewall ? wouldn't it be much more reliable than a computer plugged to a cable connection ?

  148. Single board computers, VIA EPIA by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

    I have had great success with the VIA EPIA line of single board computers. They are plenty fast enough for the vast majority of todays computing needs, even servers. Firewall, mail server, file server, you name it. For the home or small or even medium sized office these things are great. I have some from Solar PC. They are serving as cheap and simple workstations for word processing and web browsing as well as firewalls and virus/spam filter appliances.

  149. MINI-BOX M-100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this little machine is pretty cool.

    www.mini-box.com/m100.htm

    I've been tempted to buy one since my web/mail server died recently.

  150. nah, no big deal. by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    IMHO, putting all your servers on your firewall is just asking for trouble. For better security, you'd do best to have one of those Linksys firewall/routers separate from your mail/file/blah-blah server.

    You can do this reasonably. You should have all of your stuff backed up regardless of where you put it. Email and file serving are not security problems, especially if file service is done through ssh. While it may be better to port forward to other computers to share the load and risk, the low effort and low power solution is to set up one box on your internet connection and run that but nothing else 24/7. I set up a 90MHz pentium with sarge and a 200 GB hard drive as my cable box the other day and I love it. If my ISP did not block ports, that box would be a mail server too. It was very easy.

    I run about five computers 24/7 and never noticed much on my power bill. None of them are big monsters and all of them run APM or ACPI.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  151. How's 5W compare to your Sparc? by DLR · · Score: 1

    http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/0 8/18/031228&tid=222&tid=198&tid=156&ti d=1 covers a LinkSys storage server for external USB2 hard drives. Very hackable....

    --
    "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
  152. Not sure if this is overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a co worker who picked up an apple cube for cheap on ebay, it fits on top of his UPS and serves files to his apartment. He runs OS X but it ought to run netBSD and I think OpenBSD just fine. Notable lack of second ethernet interface requires a router/switch in addition to the cube but it might work for you.

  153. Build yer own Micro-ATX Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a cute little, very compact A-Open Micro-ATX desktop case with 200w power supply, a BioStar socket-370 mobo, and a new 80GB hard drive and used a Celeron 1.0GHz "Tualatin" processor, 512MB PC-133 memory and an extra network card scrounged from a parts pile for free and ended up with less than $150 in an almost totally silent machine running SuSE Linux for my home webserver, emailserver, dns server, firewall/NATbox, internal fileserver. The CPU uses a big passively-cooled aluminum heatsink I scrounged from an old machine too, so the only fan is the one inside the power supply and it pulls plenty enough air over the CPU heatsink to keep it cool for a home server. It's been running 24x7 for over a year and a half without problems. The only times it was really "down" was when I upgraded from SuSE 8.2 to 9.0 and did a complete reformat/re-install and one other time when a bad thunderstorm took down the entire neighborhood's power lines for half a day and my UPS could only run it for about 2 hours.

    Build your own box, you can do it small, cheap and quiet, and Linux will give you all the powerful server features you need... just requires an investment in learning it.

  154. another vote for openBrick by cyberrodent · · Score: 1

    I recently set up an openBrick - very happy with it - low power, quiet, small, designed to be up 24/7 -- I got this to replace a PowerBook Lombaard that was able to go about 9 months of 24/7 before it gave up the ghost in the machine -- Laptops are not really meant to be run constantly - these bricks are - I expect this guy to last for a few years at least - not really the fastest processor, but for mail/spam filtereing, its perfect. -- and mazzel tov..does she have a sister?

    --
    Talk is cheap. Supply exceeds demand.
  155. Cheap Mail and File Servers by hotbutteredhtml · · Score: 1

    How about a Cobalt Qube. You can find 'em pretty cheap on Ebay. Dead quiet too, one small fan and a hard drive. Takes all of about a minute to setup as well.

    --
    how 'bout I give you the finger....and you give me my phone call.
  156. Mappit A4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I bought this silent computer. It's so nice to have a silent family room.

    The machine has lived up to the expectations. However, here are some caveats:

    • They don't take credit cards. You have to do an international bank transfer (the distributor is in Australia), which cost me 40USD.
    • The computer arrived slightly damaged. Cooling fins in one corner were bent. The damage wasn't functional, though.
    • Because of a design flaw (which is being corrected), the computer will barely turn on after weeks of uptime (battery oxidization). You have to keep pushing the power button dozens of times. The unit has a 24-month warranty, and the customer service is prompt. However, you have to send the computer to Germany if it needs fixing.
    • To open the computer (should you want to maintain it yourself) you need a tamper-proof Torx T10 screw driver. You won't find those in the hardware store. I ordered mine over the net.
    • SuSE 9.0 hangs on the machine once a month or so. I suspect the X server, but other culprit candidates include ReiserFS and the hardware.

    Marko

  157. P2-233 no CPU fan, SilentDrive HD enclosure by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about the P2-233 is that it seems to be able to run fine with only the heat sink, I've unplugged the CPU fan. I also put the HD, 40G 5400 rpm Seagate, into a SilentDrive enclosure. I also bought a decent and quiet Antec power supply at the time. This system has been reliable and whisper quiet for about 3 years.

    1. Re:P2-233 no CPU fan, SilentDrive HD enclosure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way... the Pentium II 233 was an extreamly hot chip. I think you've got one of those second-revision 0.25micron Pentium IIs which ran much cooler.

    2. Re:P2-233 no CPU fan, SilentDrive HD enclosure by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Original slot 1 model, big-ass Intel installed heatsink/fan assembly, I actually have two systems configured as described previously. I bought these as soon as the P2-233 hit the sub US$250 mark at the local swapmeet. They were used for development for a couple of years, at that time the fans were plugged in. The fans were unplugged when these machines were retired to firewall and home server duties about three years ago. At the time I did a highly scientific test, I started some big downloads and touched the heatsink with my finger. It was always cool to the touch. After a couple of hours this got boring.

  158. Recall IBM's experience in the 80s by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Informative

    .

    IBM tried the same strategy when it introduced MicroChannel architecture (MCA) for PS/2 in 1987.

    MCA featured technical improvements that were appropriate for the times. Computers were speeding up and the bus was a bottleneck.

    The verdict of history?

    Although MCA was a huge improvement over ISA, it was limited only to IBM hardware. It was not compatible with either EISA or XT bus architecture so older cards cannot be used with it. This small market made for very high prices, and IBM didn't help matters by charging high licensing fees. MCA was largely ignored, and with the introduction of PCI, MCA swiftly disappeared.

    1. Re:Recall IBM's experience in the 80s by Forbman · · Score: 1

      NCR used it in their computers as well. And look where they are these days.

      MCA was too expensive to license, compared to free ISA/EISA/VESA Local Bus.

  159. I would imagine you can by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    M0n0wall Is BSD, albeit of the Free variety, and it was more or less designed for one of these things.

  160. Also by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    You can make a normal computer run with less heat/power by picking your CPU right and fiddling with it. A good choice from the mainstream people is the P3 Coppermine, the one on the .18 micron process. It is good at being a server per mhz and quite efficient as well as cheap. So pick up like a 700-800mhz one that runs on the 100mhz bus. Then, take the bus and drop it to 66mhz. You now have a processor in the 500mhz range, plenty for what you are talking about. However the underclocking is going to make it run REALLY cool.

    Do that, put in a conservative amount of RAM (like 256MB, not 1GB), a fluid bearing 5400rmp HD, and a low power graphics card like an ATI RAge XL and I bet you are under 50 watts.

    1. Re:Also by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. And you can always crank it back up at a later date to something faster if you need. Still though I don't think they'd really even need to slow it down. The power consumption, even with a brandnew P4 however-fast-they're-running-now doesn't consume all that much power. Even with an optical (they don't need it), a HD, floppy, and el-cheapo ATI video card they still aren't looking at anything close to 100w. Add in a couple case fans at a couple watts each and they're still sitting pretty. They could get as much onboard as they can and do alright I think. Something I've always wanted to try is putting a 120mm fan on a CPU. The RPM is much lower and the fan is much quieter but the CFM is much greater. I bought one of those ducts that sits between the CPU fan anc CPU a year or so ago. You could easily make something simliar to put a 120mm fan on a 80cm heatsink. Mold the duct slightly around the heatsink and slot the bottoms to give the air a place to go. I think it'd work slick, move more air, and be much quietr. The only downside is you'll use an extra watt or two on the bigger fan. I think it would be cool though. Use a larger rear fan as well to make the box quieter and increase airflow. I'm gonna have to try that one of these days.

  161. Linksys FYI: by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    Just an FYI on Linksys. While the WRT45G is a fabulous router (I have one myself), do not buy the linksys 802.11G cards that they tend to sell along side it. They have a broadcom chipset which does not have native drivers available for linux/bsd. While you can use ndiswrapper (in linux at least, I'm not familiar with BSD) to make it work... I'd prefer a native solution, that and I've never managed to make ndiswrapper work.

    1. Re:Linksys FYI: by tigga · · Score: 1
      While you can use ndiswrapper (in linux at least, I'm not familiar with BSD) to make it work...

      There is Project Evil AKA ndisulator in FreeBSD. I believe it does the same as ndiswrapper.

  162. Linksys Linux firewall by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1

    There are several Linux options for a WRT54G. Check out LinksysInfo.org. Some include the WonderShaper for prioritizing traffic like VOIP and game packets.

  163. Axentra Net Box by GRW · · Score: 1

    How about an Axentra Net-Box?

  164. Cost of spam and AV by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1

    Once you decide to set up a mail server, you'll probably want to add spam and virus scanning. Both are CPU- and memory-intensive. A consumer router probably won't have the horsepower for that. (I'm using MIMEDefang (a sendmail milter), SpamAssassin, and ClamAV on my box.

    1. Re:Cost of spam and AV by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      I'm running Canit Pro, the big bro to MD. Clam, SA, and friends are in use on all of my boxes. I love it. Yeah, you'll need the RAM to pull that off. I don't think they need to skimp out on the RAM. Power-wise it won't add much to the consumption. Heat-wise the increase would be negligible. I'd definitely go with a computer solution.

  165. Some real power measurements... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    My file server is a P3/650 with 4x120-gig hard drives, and it draws about 85 watts under load.

    I have a dual Pentium 133 (yes, dual-CPUs!) with 96 megs of RAM that I picked up a few years ago for $40. I've been using it as my router with Coyote Linux, and always thought it was probably sucking down the power. I measured the power draw at the wall yesterday while downloading a couple of bit torrents, it was only 47 watts.

    Of course, if you were to pick up one of those Epia/Eden/C3 systems, the entire package can consume as little as 20 watts. Maybe 25 or so with a second hard drive.

    There's always the possibility of underclocking and undervolting a processor (a mobile Athlon would make a *perfect* candidate), but those tiny Via systems still take less power, and are sexy to boot.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  166. Actual Electricity Cost by Bourdain · · Score: 1

    I don't think you really need to worry about a big spike in your electricity bill if you have a normal computer running 24/7...

    If you take a look at your electricity bill you will see the cost of electricity as kilowatt hours which is 1000 watts used for an hour. This price tends to be around 15-20 cents.

    A typical computer which could run what you are looking to run would need, at most, a 300 watt powersupply (assuming you would use this for anything outside of a server).

    More likely than not the average amount of wattage it would require would be even a lot less than that.

    Assuming it uses an average of 100 watts (a liberal estimate) it would use 2.4 kilowatt hours a day which would cost, at most 40 cents per day or $12/month in electricity costs. Please keep in mind that my assumptions were very liberal regarding the kilowatt cost and the average wattage draw.

    Good luck

    1. Re:Actual Electricity Cost by arminw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most Laptops use only 20-40 watts of power and could be used as a simple file/mail server. If the screen can be turned off the power used will be quite a bit less yet. If more storage is needed than an older cheap laptop has internally, an external USB drive should not add too much extra power drain. Some Laptops can sleep using virtually no power at all until network activity wakes it.

      --
      All theory is gray
    2. Re:Actual Electricity Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) $12 a month is actually quite a bit. I know what I could do with $144 a year!
      b) Some people care about their energy usage for reasons other than just the cost.

    3. Re:Actual Electricity Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Georga which is known to have some of the cheapest electricity, but these numbers sound high.
      My electric bill is less than $30 for 8 months of the year in a 4 bedroom 2 story house and I have 2 PCs running 24/7. These are Athlon 1800 and 2000+ boxes running XP and Linux. Also, a WiFi AP, switch, KVM, cable modem and router run 24/7.

      The rest of the house has all the normal toys (big TVs, VCRs, multiple stereos, Frig, microwaves, etc) and all my outside toys are electric (not gas) for lower maintenance.

      I stopped worrying about the power costs years ago. I've been running these since 1998, so there is enough cost data.

      Go for it!

    4. Re:Actual Electricity Cost by k12linux · · Score: 1

      While in use with limited or normal HD activity, a PC will typically use considerably less watts than the rating on it's power supply. Get rid of as many moving parts as possible (air cooled CPUS/chipsets, etc. and they can be downright miserly.)

    5. Re:Actual Electricity Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if you rig it correctly, the lithium battery in it can act as a 3-4 hour UPS in some conditions, seeing as that is basically a laptop's purpose anyway. So... A small, low-energy fileserver, with UPS.

  167. Gotta love Soekris by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a soekris net4501, it uses less than 10watts, and provides most of the services for my house.

    with a laptop drive attached, you could get a soekris net4801, and power the thing for around 15watts.

    The other great option is to use an old laptop, laptops in general use less than 50 watts when operating.. even less with the LCD turned off.

    My thinkpad T21 uses 20 watts with the lid closed, and the disk spinning.

    URL: http://www.soekris.com

  168. just use a computer by zojas · · Score: 1

    just use a regular computer. your Air conditioner, heater, clothes dryer, refrigerator will all use more power. if you want quiet, just get an apple.

  169. PlayStation 2 Linux by dillee1 · · Score: 1

    PS2 is damn cheap nowadays(~$200). Buy a official linux kit from sony(~$100) you get a 40G HDD, 10/100 network card, keyboard, mouse, vga cable and the linux discs(redhat based).

    I own one of this myself. It is small, cool and silent. You can use them for any task you can expect from a standard x86 linux.

    Btw, it can run netbsd and other exotic OSes as well.

    1. Re:PlayStation 2 Linux by mlambie · · Score: 1

      I came across a Debian-based release just the other day called Black Rhino, though I've not tried it. I have an Xbox, so Debian x86 works fine.

  170. great question by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

    Just started investigating the same thing myself. My oldest firewall machine *A 6x86-p120+ with 32mb of Ram* just gave up the ghost, Was a great machine really as both the cpu and psu fan gave up over 2 years ago and it never missed a beat. Anyways. This is an informative read to help gather info on all the products that ARE out there.

  171. Awesome little server by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    Put together some old parts...P1, P2 kinda things....around 200Mhz or so. Add a hard disk (doesn't need any real large size), couple network cards, 64MB RAM or so....and a FreeBSD firewall with WebGUI. I'm running a firewall/router with a P3 500 one a 150W power supply, and it probably needs even less than that. Also using the wonderful m0n0wall http://m0n0.ch/wall distro with an awesome webgui!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  172. Quadra 700 by tin+foil+hat+dude · · Score: 1

    Quadra cost me 25 bux. if you want a macintosh solution it's awesome. has 3 massive drives, and has been running 2+ years with only 3 restarts. I serve 7 machines in my house.

    --
    Reality is all that stuff that doesn't care if you believe in it or not.--Solomon Short
    1. Re:Quadra 700 by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      What OS do you run on it?

      I had a Quadra 660AV and the BSD and Linux drivers for the SCSI were so broken it was useless, and the 10MBit LAN was weak as well.

      For similar power draw you can run a G3 tower with about thirty times the performance.

      I do wonder what would happen if I managed to build the OS bottom-up from source for the 68040 instead of using the generic '020 you get from the ISOs online. Has anyone done this with a recent version of GCC?

      There was a thread on gentoo forums about modifying the build scripts to let you bootstrap the PowerPC distro on a debian 68k box, but it fizzled-out. I think enabling the "ppc" keyword would be somewhat safe since the PPC and 68k are endian-compatable, and that's the most common problem with new software on those systems.

      Also, the last kernel that I heard about running full-force on a 68k was 2.2. Has anyone had an ancient Mac running 2.6? Geeyrt is still contributing 68k stuff to the kernel, is it all in vain?

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  173. poor bastard by FLoWCTRL · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I just got married, and my wife and I are putting together a home network ... we're now ... We'd like ... we own ... we don't want ... our needs ... our ideal ... We're both ... our ..."

    lol!

    Translation:

    I just got married; I no longer do, like, own, want, need or imagine anything myself. Please help.

  174. M/F: Wouldn't many slashdoters fail this one? by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    Smart, hot, sane. Choose any two.
    It doesn't matter whether you are male or femaie, many people will lose out here!
  175. Lid closed by presidentbeef · · Score: 0

    This is almost always a setting somewhere, either in windows or the bios. Or, you can always remove the little button that turns it off when the lid closes. Shouldn't be too hard.

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  176. Use THIS! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1
    http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=3 5&scid=43&prid=640

    They're cheap, run on Linux and have already been hacked....

  177. used bookpc option by eagl · · Score: 1

    Try a used el-cheapo bookpc. Get one with a pci riser card so you can put a second network card in it. They're small and relatively easy to work on, and the one I had (i810 based) ran linux just fine. You should be able to find one really cheap on ebay or new/refurbished at a retailer. They take full sized hard drives and cdrom drives, but are still very small.

  178. SGI indy by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 1
    How about an old SGI indy?

    -They are cheap (they often sell for less than $15.00 each on ebay, I even bought a fully functional complete one for $1.00).

    -They have a small footprint in terms of space and power consumption.

    -They have 64-bit RISC (mips) processors and lots of slots for cheap and easily upgradable RAM.

    -Debian is easy to install if you don't wanna fool with IRIX

    -They were made to be desktop graphics workstations, so they were built to physically withstand an old large heavy monitor being placed on top of them, thus they are stackable with all kinds of crap on top of them, and no rack mounts are necessary.

    -When they were new, they cost tens of thousands of bucks each, so the physical quality and duribility exceeds that of any x86 system.

    -Its |337 to turn 15 year old technology into something powerfull enough to compete with a modern system, and do it for less money than a new machine.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  179. g4 cube by Yakasha · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest looking for a g4 cube on ebay or somewhere. There are a few on ebay right now.

    Absolute max power usage is 225 watts. A lot less most of the time. Its quiet, its small, and you can stick OSX on it. Comes with pretty much everything you need right there. And it feels a lot like FreeBSD.

  180. Pentium 100 here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run four of my websites off a 1995 Gateway P75 desktop. I've "overclocked" it to 100MHz (in quotes, because the 1995 P75s were actually rebadged P90s or P100s. Uptime is 120 days thus far, so no problems there!).

    It sports 96MB RAM, and three hard drives in a variety of RAID configurations. It sits behind a combination ADSL modem / firewall / router box. Performance is fine for serving dynamic (PHP/MySQL) web content and handling mail for over 240 users.

    I haven't measured power consumption, but the CPU runs fanless and cool, so I expect the HDs are by far the most significant. Only two of them are spun up 24/7, the other is my /usr/src filesystem.

    1. Re:Pentium 100 here! by carldot67 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I have a Pentium 200 (32M/2G) BSD box running Postfix. Been down once (for scheduled maintenance) in the last 15 months. No monitor, disk on standby. Pulls 100W or so I guess. It talks to the outside world via a little 20W Zoom ADSL modem/firewall.

      --
      I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  181. Check out the briQ by coolaider · · Score: 1

    It runs yellow dog linux, it's cheap, doesn't use much power, and really small. http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/

  182. Old laptop. by NNland · · Score: 1

    Pick up a cheap old laptop with a couple PCMCIA (aka PC-Card) slots. Grab a pair of old 3COM network adapters (with the dongles so you can run one incoming and one outgoing), and you have a low-power router. A P75 or high-end 486 would be enough to route and do mail for you.

    The hardware would set you back no more than around $100-200.

    As long as you're not compiling on the little guy, he'll do just fine - I know more than a few people who have run linux and BSDs on 486s as NAT routers for 3mbit cablemodems.

  183. HushPC ITX or iMac G5 by majid · · Score: 1

    The HushPC ITX is absolutely quiet and low-power, but rather expensive. The new iMac G5 runs a full Unix OS, very low noise, plus you can wall-mount it and use it as its own control panel or as a digital picture frame. It's not really low-power, though.

  184. Netgear mediarouter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a bog-standard 108Mbps wireless+wired home router, with NAT+firewall. It also has a USB2 port, into which you can plug any USB2 hard disk or memory stick. You can configure the router as a SMB and FTP server to access files on your disk outside the home, with multiple logins and folders. The box gets warm but is completely fanless.

  185. SparcStation IPC... as doorbell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our old house, we had an IPC rigged up as a doorbell server under the stairs.

    When the doorbell button was pressed, it would close a couple of serial port pins normally used to signify a failing UPS. This simply execute rc.powerfail (or whatever it was, can't remember now) which in turn cat'ed a sound file to /dev/audio.

    A small home-built amp provided the sound output.

    This was about all the IPC was good for as it was even slower than the IPX!

  186. Forget the hardware... by Znork · · Score: 1

    ... and consolidate your network infrastructure on VMware or something similar.

  187. Recommendation: MAPPIT by j.leidner · · Score: 1
    I fully recommend MAPPIT (I've been running the 19" version 24/7 for about a year now, which they shipped from Germany). It's silence, low energy, robust case (mine is black metal).

    --
    Try Nuggets , the mobile search engine. We answer your questions via SMS, across the UK.

  188. Perhaps a PC/104 board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not going to give you much horsepower, but they only draw a few watts at a low voltage.
    I've done some contract work on one that was about the equivalent of a P100. Took standard SDRAM simms (or dimms?), on-board flash, most will take a CF card, and provide ethernet and ATA connectors.
    I've been thinking a bit about this kind of thing since I'm planning on moving my next house off-grid.

  189. Small x86 device by norhtec · · Score: 1

    NorhTec has just released a product called the MicroClient. It is a x86 based system small enough to fit in the palm of your hand that sells for less money than a full sized PC. It consumes 4 watts without disk and 7 watts with disk.

  190. Asus Pundit by thunderbee · · Score: 1

    Small, good looking (comes in metal grey or black), almost silent, an excellent choice.

    --
    In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  191. Re:Way Overpriced at EU390 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good way to recycle a dead laptop that would otherwise be scrap too.

  192. I'm showing my age by darkonc · · Score: 1
    Looks like the 4801 has usb, too (though only usb 1.1, which at 12 mbps is a little slow as a file server).

    If you didn't also want a file server, I'd say "go for it". There was a time when booting diskless over a 10 megabit (shared) network was condidered just peachy. If all you have on the outside of the firewall is a 1 Megabit adsl/cable link then it'd be more than enough to handle that load.

    Unfortunately, if you also want file serving, chances are (these days) that you'd find 12 megabit a bit slow.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  193. Running with lid closed by RichiH · · Score: 1

    It is actually pretty easy to let a laptop run with it's lid closed: You take a pair of pliers and rip out whatever is used to detect the closed lid. If you want, you can be a little more gentle, but if you have a laptop with dead batteries you can only use as a server any more, you might as well forget about functionality you will never need again.

  194. Just get a quiet PC!? by coofercat · · Score: 1

    Any of the Via based PCs should do the necessaries. They're mostly very quiet, with minimum fans in the case, and probably have a decent disk that doesn't make much noise. Via mobos also support CF cards and the like, so you could even make it diskless, if you want.

    http://www.hoojum.com/
    http://www.hushtechnologies.net/
    (and many more besides for you non-europeans)

  195. slashdot sucks by acrimony · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    geez.. it's so obvious how some slashdot articles from people claiming to be innocent and naive are actually from vultures attempting to use the /. for what it's worth.. its about time /. started requiring a background check.. :)

  196. Gmail... by Kmos · · Score: 1

    How about to use GMail.com, so it can do a lot of things for you ;-)

    --

    I'm a Lost Soul in this Lost World...
  197. PC Engines WRAP by Danta · · Score: 1

    A cheaper alternative to the Sokeris is the WRAP by PC Engines. The cheapest one goes for $140 with a 266MHz CPU. For an additional $15 they come with a real neat case. They only use 3 to 5 Watt and support POE. They don't come with an IDE interface though, so if you want to read and write, you will have to invest into a Microdrive. My WRAP is running OpenBSD off a 32MB CF card, working as a router and has been running like a charm.

  198. an x-box ? by Krunch · · Score: 1

    I just got a Soekris and it's a fine box but yesterday I realised that an Xbox is cheaper, more powerfull and it has a hard drive (but only one NIC). It's bigger and not as quiet as a Soekris but it's probably still better than a standard PC. I don't know about FreeBSD but it can run Linux without hardware modification.

    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  199. Industrial computers do this by GuyFawkes · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I had a project many years ago to design a computer for racing yachts, they were using laptops and breaking them on a VERY regular basis, thing is these guys are totally anal about weight, on a 40 foot boat they will chuck shit like 2 pint aluminium kettles over the side, so whatever I designed HAD to use fuck all power because they carried minimal traditional 12 volt lead acid and minimal diesel and in any case starting the motor meant a race penalty.

    Ideally they were looking for something around 500 mhz, that weighed 2 ounces, was literally bulletproof and waterproof to 1000 feet, the size of a matchbox, and generated enough power to charge the main lead acid battery.

    A smart engineer doesn't try to reinvent the wheel (especially for a *potential* customer that isn'y waving a blank cheque book at you) so I went out and bought a 3.5 inch biscuit PC from advantech (do a google) this is a single board PC, literally the size and form factor of a 3.5 inch hard drive, with onboard cyrix 233 mhz cpu, onboard sodimm slot (I used a 68 mb card), onboard gfx and sound, and pc104 expansion (I used 4 of these, one for four rs232/485 ports, one for a gps, one for pcmcia and one for ethernet) I also used a 2.5 inch laptop hard drive, and stuck the whole thing in a case that had an integrated inverter / PSU that would run off anything from 10 volts dc to about 36 volts dc. The whole thing was completely fanless.

    Build quality of all these components, being industrial, was excellent, much better than home pc standards. It was also extremely tough and had a very wide enviornmental envelope. Best of all it was cheap, they make so many of these things for point of sale electronics etc that prices are comparable to cheap domestic kit.

    For the demo unit (which was fully linux compatible) we ran winders98 to demo the nav software which was also winders based, performance was about what you'd expect from a equivalent mhz laptop, eg more than enough for 95% of uses.

    Nearly forgot, being industrial it also had in hardware an automatic reboot thing (which you could disable) which would reboot the whole thing if the OS stopped responding to an internal irq for 15 seconds...

    Power consumption of this box was typically 11 watts mean, this was measured by a pukka power meter on the supply line for several hours.

    Apart from the 2.5 inch hard disk, it was zero moving parts and therefore near as dammit totally silent too.

    My take on this is if a standard obsolete dektop box won't do it look at EPIA, and if EPIA won't do it then look at industrial biscuit PC's.

    HTH etc

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  200. IIWY I would use EPIA CL 10000 (Mini ITX) by Brane2 · · Score: 1

    Main attractions for your application:

    -It is small (17x17cm)

    -has decent horsepower at 1 GHz, considering dimensions and power consumption

    -has loads of I/O interfaces, that can be put to good use (for example, USB ports for ISDN or analog modem or for printers- good use for printer server!)

    -is very low power. IIRC it uses 20W peak, less on average. Less power means less ventilation needs, less ventilators, less hasle with oxidation and dust buildup, less noise.

    -two builtin Ethernets let you use it as a firewall. If you plug in one more into a free PCI slot, you can skip the ethernet switch, that is, if yo have up to two machines to connect to the switch. Other possibility would be to plug in a WiFi card and cover the premises with wireless also (usefull if you have notebooks etc.)

    - it has two IDE channels, which means that you can connect four disks to it (like two RAID-1 arrays). Very usefull for local noncritical data that you need to/might want to use from all your local machines.

    -without loads of troubles, energy inefficiency (UPS), or costs, it can be battery powered.

    -it has builtin AC97 soundcard and can be used for sound and video player (dvd, divx etc)

    -it fits inside standard ATX housing and connects to the standard ATX power supply

    -it is relatively abundant and not very expensive.
    Here in SLovenia I can get new CL for some $180 +VAT. Not cheap, but not that expensive, considering that everything else is built-in.
    Essentially, you need just a power supply, DDR RAM stick and disk.

    AFAIK, none of the other proposed solutions can offer all this.

    OTOH, if price seems to steep for EPIA or you would like to reuse something that you already have, that's another matter.

    You could *underclock* old Athlon or Tualatin to get it to run cooler, fit all PCI slots with Ethernet cards and/or cheap IDE cards and use it as a switch/firewall, small data storage point, WiFI acces point, printer server, fax machine etc etc etc.

  201. Meshcubes anyone? by daybyter · · Score: 1
  202. VIA EPIA by frambris · · Score: 1

    I have a slightly modified Procase with a fanless VIA EPIA board in it. It does just that. Firewall/Mail/File-server (it used to do jukeboxing too). With a 80mm Papst fan running on 7V (the harddrive generates some heat that must be sucked out of the box) it is quiet as a whisper and draws less current than an average light bulb.

    From what I've read BSDs should run just fine on that hardware too.

  203. Electricity is cheap here by nuggz · · Score: 1

    $0.047/kWh.
    So my old pentium with a ~300W power supply can draw a max of 0.3kW *24h *30.5d/mo = 219kWh.
    Which is about $10, assuming the power supply is maxed out. Which it isn't (I never use the CD/floppy drive) Spin down the hard drive etc.

    My wife and I actually keep all 3 computers up all the time (turn off the monitor).
    The few dollars a month is worth it to keep from having to wait to turn them on and get back to where we were earlier.

  204. tiny little cheap boxes by sundy58 · · Score: 1

    I use Clark Connect on a 350MHz Pentium. Does everything and sets in a closet humming away. http://www.clarkconnect.org/projects/home.php Worth looking at even if you are a guru IMHO.

  205. Apple Titanium Powerbook by Tomasset · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am surprised that no one has suggested this before, but get a Tibook from eBay, preferably with an Airport card installed.

    - It's got a BSD derivative OS
    - Works without problems (FreeBSD drivers for some laptops... good luck!)
    - The PowerPC architecture is more energy efficient than 80x86
    - The 667 Mhz/DVI model, the one I am typing this with, is silent in normal use.
    - No need for additional wireless routers/access points
    - and you can send all you unix boxes to /dev/null !! :)

    http://grotto11.com/blog/archive/1018823985.shtml

  206. Multia by argent · · Score: 1

    The Alpha-based multia is hot hot hot, but the Alpha-based on isn't the only option, DEC made an Intel-based one as well.

    The intel-based Multia is small, quiet, low power, and runs FreeBSD perfectly. I've been using them as thin servers for years. It's only a P100, but for a mail/news/file server that's ample.

  207. It's only for a firewall, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's only using it for a firewall, right?
    And the network cards themselves have their
    own on-board processors.
    40 Meg will be fine. If he is
    doing anything else he will not be using this
    low-power device.

  208. Pick and old laptop by mi · · Score: 1
    Something too heavy or too slow by modern standards, like a Pentium2 or Pentium3. If you find something with broken screen, you'll get a big discount. Look for stuff with a built-in network card and a FreeBSD-supported modem (such as IBM's ThinkPads).

    These were designed to draw little power. Even if its battery life is not great, you'll still be able to move it from one room to another without shutdown and the UPS will be built-in.

    Being an x86 machine, it will run our favorite OS smoothly too.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  209. one pc.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all vmware ;)

  210. Walmart Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart is selling $600 USD laptops that look like they'd make excellent Linux boxes. The only god damn bad thing with them is they are coming with a copy of Windows Home.

    Christ, they could sell them for the exact same price, minus the Windows License, and I'd be telling every bastard I know to buy one. I wish I didn't have to many damn computers around me right now, because I WANT ONE.

    You need to stuff a 512MB stick in there (~$90 from pricewatch), but they're still a good buy.

    ---
    AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ processor with PowerNow! technology
    128 MB RAM, upgradeable to 640 MB*
    40 GB ATA 100/66/33 hard drive
    Supports 2.5V / 1.25V 200pin DDR200 / DDR266 SO-DIMM module
    14.1" XGA TFT LCD with 1024 x 768 resolution
    16.7 million colors possible
    High performance 256-bit 3D graphic engine
    Shared memory 16/32/64 MB DDR (user adjustable in BIOS)
    DVD-ROM drive
    Two built-in stereo speakers
    Integrated WiFi-compliant Wireless 802.11b (11 Mbps) LAN
    On-board 1Gb/100M/10M Base-T LAN Ethernet, up to 1 Gbps
    56 K V.90 modem
    Synaptics touchpad w/ 4-way scrolling button
    4 USB 2.0 ports, 1 RJ-11 modem jack, 1 RJ-45 Ethernet jack
    Line-out Headphone jack
    1 microphone-in
    1 external VGA port, 1 parallel port, 1 S-Video TV - Out connector
    1 DC-in jack for AC adaptor
    Universal AC adapter with auto-sensing dual voltage support. AC 100-240V
    BIOS plug & play, ACPI and DMI
    Kensington lock and BIOS password protection
    4-cell Li-Ion battery pack
    Pre-loaded with Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
    Dimensions & Weight: 13"W x 10.75"D x 1.5"T; weighs 6 pounds

  211. How about a Mac? by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    Maybe Macs are different but I've never known anyone to lose data due to a hard drive flaking out. I've got almost 4 years on my PBG4 400 and it never gets shut down.

    1. Re:How about a Mac? by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      you just dont know enough people. exact same drives, exact same quality levels. i've lost a lot of mac drives lately in powerbooks.

  212. cheap as dirt by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    I built a NAT/Firewall box from an old pentium 2,
    66 mhz, with 64 meg of RAM. It only has that
    much RAM because I scrounged it from other boxes.
    It has no hard disk, the linux distro and software
    boot from a 3.5 inch floppy disk. I get very fast
    download speeds through it and it firewalls nicely

    http://www.freesco.org

    I took another p2 133 mhz box and put gentoo linux and samba on it. I added a cheap hard disk and
    made it into a file server box for my wife and
    I. We have our mp3's on it.

    None of these actually cost me any cash. They
    were all replaced by newer boxes or given to me.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
    1. Re:cheap as dirt by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      a p2 133MHz

      a pentium 2 66MHz

      ???

    2. Re:cheap as dirt by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

      LOL! Just goes to show how long it's
      been there and how often I have to mess with it.
      It's been so long I forgot the specs on the
      machines!

      --
      -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  213. Mini-ITX by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    You want a mini-ITX machine http://www.mini-itx.com/ Or any of the boards from here: http://www.soekris.com/ which can hold a flash card (for ultra-low power/noise/heat) which are now 256-1024MB for cheap. Otherwise, they can hold a hard drive. Also, see http://m0n0.ch/wall/ to save yourself some time in building that router.... fine product.

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  214. Buffalo linkstation running debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are stacks of small personal SAN devices on the marked in Japan that are being hacked in various ways.

    Run http://agora.spymac.net/ through babelfish.altavista.com (japanese -> english translation).

    It contains a zip file with a debian image and instruction on how to install on a buffalo linkstation.

    The kernel is a problem though. Thats in flash on the box and a bit HW specific, so not so easy to update, the rest of the OS is pretty open after that.

    There is a 200MHZ PPC in the linkstation and it uses just over 20W.

  215. How about a series 2 tivo? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

    You can hack them to allow USB 2.0 support, install your own apps cross compiled for MIPS, etc.

    And, if you are carefull about it, you could still use it as a TiVo.

  216. Suggestion by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Sure, get a Mini-ITX system in a small bookshelf enclosure. Some of those boards have dual-Ethernet connections on the back, so configuring it to be a Linux firewall should be no problem assuming you can get Ethernet drivers.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  217. SolarPC by clj2289 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This might be what you are looking for, its inexpensive, low energy and small. http://www.solarpc.com/ the least expensive one is around $200.

  218. Use a mobile x86 processor by Anderlan · · Score: 1
    There are mobile athlons that are compatible with full-size desktop sockets, I believe. You could have the best of both worlds, full standard x86 distros, and low power. You should be able to control the speed throttling with a modern kernel and motherboard.

    This makes one wonder why AMD and Intel don't offer speed throttling on *all* their CPUs. I'm sure it's just because it gives them a reason to charge a premium. Someone should shame them into offering it in all CPUs because of the environmental impact. We're not talking about a 10% decrease in power consumption. More like 300%. In addition, in colos, server rooms, and even my bedroom(!) power is not only consumed uselessly by idle CPUs, but also by the air conditioning for the room. Generate heat, then get rid of it, for no reason.

    --
    KLAATU, BORADA, NIh*ahem*
  219. mini-itx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here's what I wish I could afford on my paltry network administrator pay:

    VIA EPIA800V kit, with fanless VIA Eden processor, PW-60 DC-DC converter, 12V/5A AC power adapter. Price I found $148. If you got the extra $$ then you can do better than this kit, including dual Ethernet on board.

    PCI riser, $10.

    An IDE to CF adapter. Prices I found are around $20.

    A 128M CF Flash Drive (I probably wouldn't need that much, but I'd rather have more than less) Price around $30.

    Spare PC133 Ram. I could probably do with 32M to 64M, although I've got enough 64M sticks that are pretty much useless to me for any other purpose.

    Spare NIC. You can get plenty of RTL-8139 based cards dirt cheap $5 - $10. I've got plenty of NIC's in my little spare parts box, that I would use.

    An afordable Mini-ITX case for this kit. Unfortunately for me, I haven't found low cost cases worth using that weren't more expensive than the EPIA800V kit. I may just pick up a cheap project box, and modify it to my own needs, that is if I can ever find a way to spare a little over $200 for my little dream project. It's hard enough to just put food on the table.

    From there the choices on Free (Libra) are yours. Me I want to do sort of a LFS, but more geared to embedded systems. Use a Linux kernel configured specifically for my needs (mainly firewall), but lean and mean, uCLibc, BusyBox,...

    Here's my reasons for my choices. No moving parts to break and fail, pretty much solid state, low power, low heat. This also gives me x86 compatible architecture, and all the gear I need to build a specialized router/firewall.

    Actually, I would like to do two kits, because what I'm really interested in is High Availability (LVS-HA using VRRPv2). One box dies the next automatically takes over, this is why I want to build the system from scratch and not just use another specialized distro geared toward router/firewalls like Devil-Linux, Leaf Bearing, FloppyFW, ...

    Why do I want to do this... PHBs. My PHB wanted a training room set up, firewalled from the rest of the network. So he bought a cheapo Linksys, which is fine, but what bowled me over was when the Linksys broke. I put together a box from all the ancient pieces of junk scattered around our storage room, installed Linux, and wrote specific rulesets to do exactly what we needed (which by the way the Linksys couldn't do), spent maybe 3 hours doing this, had it ready to go.... and the PHB said "no", his stated reasons: hardware failure possiblities... What I believe the real reason was is this: My organization is soooo hooked on the Microsoft monoculture that they drool over idea of a Windows only world (they also drool over replacing their VAX, AXP, and IBM super boxes with a Windows Server Cluster!?!). You only have to look at their web apps to see the monoculture mentality at that organization,... they only work with IE. At first, I thought about remastering a Knoppix based distro for this use, or using LEAF Bearing on a floppy, or Devil Linux CD and configuration floppy, then building several spare boxen as backup, but I realized that this wouldn't impress them (the dark side of the force is strong with my PHBs...). The answer to why I want to do this is: I want to build a proof of concept, shatter their arguments with dual solid state boxen set-up with seamless fail-over, the ability to customize the rulesets, manage the firewall from a management PC (FirewallBuilder, and SSH using RSA keys and no clear text passwords), and let them stew over how much they would have to spend to get the same functionality from a commercial firewall. I would like to show this off, then take the boxen home, and replace my home Athlon based firewall, happy in the thought that I provided some education to my PHBs and fellow (Windows only) network admins.

  220. All-N-one LinuxSBSP! by rickr2004 · · Score: 1

    The box or systems your looking for is Linux SBSP (Linux Small Business Server Platform) This will do all that your looking for and more. It will also run on your older equipment, IE .. P-III , 512Megg Ram and 10-20 Gig HDD and 2 Nic Cards. Email mail me and I'll send you a free 30 day server download, if you like it and want to keep using it, just sign up for the monthly monitoring fee of $39.95 and you get Email Spam, Anti-Virus filtering, Server system Monitoring, VPN, Firewall, Web, Webmail(with shareable Calendar) Print & File Server, plus many other features. Check it out http://www.linuxsbsp.com/

  221. Re:Mini-ITX variety (weak itx power supplies) by mark_osmd · · Score: 1

    There is one thing to beware of with the mini-itx boards and cases. I bought a Checkercube case for my mini-itx Eden board (533MHz) and the included power supply was so weak that when I tried to use a modern high speed cdrom (say a 48x or 52x speed) to do the install of the os, I got unpredictable behavior. I think what happened was the cdrom was lowering the rail voltage so much at 12v that the board was crashing. I bought a antec 300W supply at ComaUSA and it's worked fine for the install and running. Unfortunately, 99.99% of the time I don't even need the cdrom or the higher power supply and this Antec PS can't even go in the checkercube case. Mark

  222. Get yourself a nice little iMac...or a Qube by amper · · Score: 1

    My main Internet server is a 400MHz iMac DV running Mac OS X 10.3.x, the Cyrus IMAP server, Sendmail (10.3 has Postfix by default, not Sendmail), SquirrelMail, etc, etc.

    The iMac DV's with their FireWire ports, are ideal little server boxes and very easy to support. The truly paranoid can run OpenBSD on them, and the Linux fanatics can join in the fun, too.

    Right now, the server is off-site, and I manage it mostly with ssh and the occasional VNC session, but soon it will be moved back to my house now that I have a 3072/768 ADSL line installed with a slash-29 subnet.

    Once the monitor goes into sleep mode, the whole machine doesn't consume a lot of power. The best part is, I got the machine for free from a client!

    I'd also look into getting a Sun/Cobalt Qube. I just rebuilt one for a client, and it's a rockin' little box--I believe Sun is committed to support for them until 2008.

  223. there is no contest, you need a VIA mini-itx by mqx · · Score: 2, Informative


    There is no contest, you need a VIA EPIA, running at 533 or 800mhz, which may not sound like a lot, but it is perfectly acceptable for a home server, and more powerful than the soekris or other kits you'll hear of. You can get higher grunt power if you want, but it'll be an overkill.

    If you buy a pre-build kit from mini-itx (www.mini-itx.com), it's all you need: comes in a DVD/VCR size box, has a CD-ROM, HD, etc with a single PCI slot that easily fits an 802.11 card, and you can just plug a USB DSL modem into the back, and a hub into the 100mb LAN port - plug a printer into the parallel or USB port, and it's also your print server. Run an entire home network kit (samba, etc) easily. How do I know? Because I did this for over a year.

    In terms of cost, power consumption is fantastic: the power supply for the mini-itx is only 70W max to start with, and typically your box will idle at low CPU and with drive inactive, it reportedly draws no more than 5-7W idle power -try doing that with a full scale PC.

    It does have a case-fan, but I've found that you can disable the case-fan without a problem -- meaning you get totally quiet operation. Did I mention that is only the size of a VCR/etc, so can in a cupboard or out-of-the way.

    Seriously, anything else is an overkill on all fronts. We previously used ours in a small apartment, serving a 2.8ghz dell desktop and a couple of wireless laptops, all at 1mbs DSL 24/7. Absolutely fantastic.

    You can either buy a pre-built kit, or a pre-build (where you need to plug everything together -- you'd have to be reasonably incompetent if you couldn't do this).

  224. Learning actual power consumption. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I didn't see it mentioned so far, but anyone who is concerned about power consumption should have a way of learning what the actual power consumption is. The Kill-a-Wall is a great device for seeing instantaneous as well as accummulated usage info for around $30. Here are some of my readings. Yes the laptop is the most economical in terms of power usage.
    • IBM ThinkPad T20 Laptop
      • 15w display off, disk on.
      • 25w all on, battery not charging.
      • 15w average (Total for 120 hours == 1.81 kw/h)
      Sony STR-DE995 Receiver
      • 0w standby
      • 48w vol @ 20, using tuner.
      Shuttle SS51 mini-pc p4-2.4ghz, 5400 rpm disk.
      • 4-5w standby (4.5?)
      • 95-105w peak
      • 65-70w idle
      Dell PowerEdge 1600sc Server with 2 10K RPM SCSI disks
      • 7w standby
      • 145w peak (115w peak w. no scsi)
      • 105w idle (both 10K scsi)
      • 96w idle (only 1 10K scsi)
      • 91w idle (no scsi drives)
    btw, anyone notice how hard it is to get actual specs. for devices these days? The datasheets for most drives have turned into just glossies - maxtor is one of the worst.
  225. I my experience... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...a typical PC being used as a web/mail/firewall box (P200MMX with 32 Megs of RAM) that is on 24/7 with no GUI will not use more than $5.00/month of electricity where I live. (NE Ohio) You can put console on the serial port to avoid needing a monitor. Unless you are getting seriously raped by your utilities (which is a distinct possibility here) you shouldn't need to worry about having a computer on 24/7. Unless $5.00 a month is a problem?

  226. Solar PC by DonGar · · Score: 1

    Another similar vendor that I've had good luck with.

    (Not that I've had bad luck with the mini-itx site).

    --
    plus-good, double-plus-good
  227. Oops-- braindead calculation error by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Should have read 0x8c9, after this posting, it will be 0x8ca. Sounds like a BSOD error message :-P

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  228. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  229. the WGT634U sucks. by No-op · · Score: 1

    I ordered one of these for testing, as it looked very intriguing. unfortunately, we have yet to get it to really work well, via wired or wireless connections- it will randomly choke on packets, and has bizarre latency issues that we are at a loss to explain.

    we upgraded the firmware (it has it's own nifty firmware update thing on it's web interface) and called netgear, to no avail. It's probably running linux inside, as it wants to reformat your disks to ext2 format (I think, don't quote me though). I was bummed, as I really wanted to hook up and mount my existing fat32 usb drives. all in all I was not particularly impressed.

    it would be cool if all the features worked, but as-is it's kind of a half-broken first generation product.

    --
    EOM
  230. Rig a big heat sink for safety/ durability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me, since the screen went flooey on my old Amity CN, I leave it on 24-7 in a friend's office where there is connectivity. It's been a godsend when I need a place to stash stuff online.

    It doesnt attract attention looking like another book on the shelf. But next to it is a big aluminum plate, just to make sure the heat is all dissipated & it doesnt become a fire hazard. I had it on the top shelf on a water-filled cushion, but my friend preferred the aluminum slab.

    The thing has no cooling fan to burn out, and is rated 27 Watts max. [P133, 32Mb, 1.2G, W98, VNC] No 75 watt laptop here!

  231. Re:whoa! from the ex... by tracydotcom · · Score: 1

    I am geeky, hot AND smart and while lennydotcom likes to recklessly throw around mental illness accusations, sadly it is he who clearly is ill. Who would cheat, lie, destroy and repeatedly leave a HOT, SMART, GEEKY successful (not to mention adoring) wife. ONLY someone who is mentally ill, I fear! So happy to be free and available for new adventures....