It's amazing to see liberal "logic" "work". If you keep shoving words in people's mouth, you're going to have something more solid shoved down your THROAT.
Universal basic income isn't a universal basic way of life. Unless you call consumerism a way of life, in which case you're wrong. A fire consumes but we don't say that fire is alive, do we?
You can't just give people money and no motivation to work toward anything. Then they just stagnate in their present circumstances. Grow or die. That is the natural law.
And that is the real purpose behind a guaranteed annual income. To placate the masses in such a way that they stop trying to live their lives and eventually die out.
I'll just try to point out that since that phrase "triggered" you, you decided to suspend your process of rational analysis. You pick and choose what you decide to analyze rationally based on your personal politics. It's a switch you turn and off at a whim. That is the definition of self righteousness and irrationality. This precludes you from having a valid world view. This precludes you from mental health.
This is not a matter of emotion. This is philosophical in nature. There is no excuse to turn off your rational mind. It's completely inexcusable. Recuse yourself.
Ok, nice trying to talk to you, enjoy the war you're going to lose. Enjoy your life being taken from you as you mire yourself in a self righteous subjective mindset.
You don't get to say "the fatalists are right" when YOU ARE A FATALIST. Do you refer to yourself in the third person usually?
You are literally blaming Trump for turning society upside down singlehandedly. You are blaming the one spark for the forest fire, as if hundreds of sparks weren't coming within days of the start of the fire.
But where is the evidence of the fire? Your subjective interpretations that are really just reflections from a media narrative?
You are severely, severely mentally ill. You have been drinking out of the media toilet far too long. You have left your humanity behind you. Bad dog!
They are being up front about what has already been done clandestinely. Expect many legal overtures like this in the future. The establishment will bargain for your consent for the violations they have already perpetrated.
I pray that they will be stopped before they have absolute power. We will all have to sacrifice profoundly in order to restore liberty to western civilization. Stand up now or be enslaved for eternity.
This thread is actually very scary. Half of the population believes in a reality that's completely different from the reality the other half believes in. And they have absolutely no evidence, references, or rationale for believing it. They are just fatalists. It seems the nihilism instilled by our society's materialistic and superficial substance is actually causing mass mental illness.
Why exactly is Trump supposed to be evil, again? Because of a complicated tax reform that no one in the general public really understands?
We really need a new type of forum, for the sanity of humanity. We need facts and arguments laid out for all to see and discuss without a psychotic majority censoring the dissenters. Hopefully AI can give us a chance at this: objectively mapping out ideas and translating them into terms everyone can understand. Imagine a completely neutral moderator that encourages a logical discussion. Most people would piss on it for being boring. But it's exactly what we need to give birth to the leader class of the future.
Take your kids outside, they aren't in the phase of development where interaction is paramount, they're in the phase where observation is! They need to see the natural world work. They need to see the land. They need to see plants, animals, streams, and weather. They need to see life and death.
Don't coddle your children in an artificial playpen where a great proportion of their instinct and intuition has no place. Unless you WANT to sabotage them for some reason.
The word from the deep state surveillance system must have trickled down to the corporate level: persecuted groups are seriously contemplating violence against their authoritarian oppressors
Can anyone provide an argument for why or why not this man is or is not an engineer? This is crucial to understanding the story but it's not being presented clearly.
The Constitution does not protect against consumer demand.
So that means NOTHING should? That means there is no principle behind the law? These are what leftists and many moderates implicitly argue. They refuse to address the reason for the law's existence: to maintain society. But it can only do so much. Society still needs to be maintained by the will of the people. So let's look at the law, understand it, and use it as inspiration to restore the will of the people.
Leftists and most moderates have abandoned liberalism completely. They have no concept of liberty at all, only authority. They have no free will to speak of. Those of us who can see this need to schism or society, we need to distance ourselves from these slave-minded people and put up firm barriers.
Still waiting for the argument for "diversity" that isn't upended by a simple rebuttal. Western civilization has always been a meritocracy at it's core. There have always been class barriers, but where on earth has there not been? Ever? Some one is trying to change that, some one is trying to destroy western civilization and plunder it. That doesn't necessarily mean these people are coming from outside of it.
"Diversity" is a literal and true conspiracy. It's a malicious lie being enforced from the top down through the schools, universities, and media. It's an orchestrated narrative being perpetuated by an extreme minority of wealthy individuals to break down society and enforce unprecedented slavery on us all. This is a simple model of displacement. This is simple physics. If a space is occupied by a body, it cannot be occupied by another body without pressure and displacement. So where is this pressure coming from exactly? We're supposed to believe that the bodies have changed properties, that they suddenly do not want to occupy the space that nourishes them. A more mentally sane point of view would be that the entering body is being forced in.
If you do the math, which isn't very complicated, it's aimed at putting down white people. When you prioritize other people for employment based on their race and gender, rather than their achievement and skill, it's a negative action, not a positive one. It's not 'affirmative' at all. And it's not "all relative". The effect of the action either way you look at it is always that white men are excluded disproportionately to their achievement and qualification. Any way you look at the equation, there's a negative attached to the "white male" unit. It's impossible to make minority employment 'affirmative' by quotas. That is not the variable you can manipulate if justice and positive affirmation is your goal. In order for the action to be positive, all aspects of it have to be VOLUNTARY and explicitly consented to. When did we have a vote in which white people decided they wanted to be discriminated against?
Notice how I said this was about putting white PEOPLE down, not just white MEN. Well when you exclude white men from the work place, who are the white women going to socialize with? The probability becomes ever greater that they will socialize with nonwhite men, therefore becoming more likely to become involved romantically with nonwhite men, therefore becoming more likely to end the identity of their genetic line as being white. And this is all happening in the middle class, in the high-paying job sectors. White people are meant to be relegated to lower classes where they are much less likely to marry and/or have children. The white identity is being systematically destroyed.
"Diversity" is not a slippery slope, it's a vertical abyss. You are being targeted, you are being attacked, fight back while you can.
A toy presents a set of rules for play by its very nature. There are only so many things you can do with a toy before the object itself becomes irrelevant, and if you place importance on the object you cut off a whole range of free play. Which, to be stingingly honest, is the intent behind the entertainment industry, including toy makers. It's a form of social conditioning. Not unlike what the 'SJWs' say about Barbies, but they are generally very lacking in their interpretation of the scope of these measures. The toys just don't enforce "gender norms", they enforce the scope of a child's very humanity by relation to their social role, regardless of gender. They enforce an extremely irrational subordination to authority, a la "these are the rules, you must follow them, enjoy, or else you can't have any stimulation, because there is nothing else."
That there is an object that play is centered around is not good. Play should be centered around the social and environmental interactions. A toy should just be any old thing that is lying around. This is in order to stimulate all parts of the mind, all the instincts, big and small, that make up the human mind. Children need free play to stimulate the various parts of their minds and bodies proportionally and to develop good mental and physical health. But when you raise children in urban/suburban 'pens', there isn't anything at all just lying around. It's a constrained, sterile environment. Unfortunately this is just something most of us just have to live with, not having the luxury of being able to move out into the country. So we have to be extremely, extremely careful about the toys we give our children and we have to go far out of our way to provide them with regular free play experiences.
To be honest, kids absolutely need a natural environment to play in. Fields, woods, etc. They need to be able to range around unsupervised. It's a desperate need, every single day, it's not negotiable except at the cost of your child's development. Your children will be hurt deeply without these experiences. Do whatever you can to provide this for them.
Just stop shoving this SJW bullshit down our throat, Slashdot. It isn't helping, and it isn't working.
But don't you understand, they are indeed SJWs. The editors are all SJWs. What do you suppose it means when a media entity is bought out, as Slashdot has been, twice now?
It isn't working? Yes it is. You keep tolerating it without taking ACTION against it. Oh yes, it's working. You just admitted that it was "being shoved down your throat", and you aren't doing anything about it. That means you're normalizing it, that means you're consenting to being attacked. Your future and your childrens' future are being shaved away without resistance.
Most people are afraid to even say a single word about it in real life. What hope is there if our freedom to speak has been so subverted by cultural marxism? (cue uneducated leftists unable to distinguish between cultural and legal freedoms implicitly arguing that cultural freedoms should only exist when they like them, for no reason, just emotive motivation, which boils down to "what the plutocrat-controlled media told me is okay")
There is a HORRIBLE civil war brewing, and putting it off will only make it worse. Stand up and speak out NOW, maybe we can prevent violence.
Slashdot Mirror
It's amazing to see liberal "logic" "work".
If you keep shoving words in people's mouth, you're going to have something more solid shoved down your THROAT.
Universal basic income isn't a universal basic way of life.
Unless you call consumerism a way of life, in which case you're wrong. A fire consumes but we don't say that fire is alive, do we?
You can't just give people money and no motivation to work toward anything. Then they just stagnate in their present circumstances. Grow or die. That is the natural law.
And that is the real purpose behind a guaranteed annual income. To placate the masses in such a way that they stop trying to live their lives and eventually die out.
I'll just try to point out that since that phrase "triggered" you, you decided to suspend your process of rational analysis.
You pick and choose what you decide to analyze rationally based on your personal politics. It's a switch you turn and off at a whim. That is the definition of self righteousness and irrationality.
This precludes you from having a valid world view. This precludes you from mental health.
This is not a matter of emotion. This is philosophical in nature. There is no excuse to turn off your rational mind. It's completely inexcusable. Recuse yourself.
Ok, nice trying to talk to you, enjoy the war you're going to lose.
Enjoy your life being taken from you as you mire yourself in a self righteous subjective mindset.
You don't get to say "the fatalists are right" when YOU ARE A FATALIST. Do you refer to yourself in the third person usually?
You are literally blaming Trump for turning society upside down singlehandedly.
You are blaming the one spark for the forest fire, as if hundreds of sparks weren't coming within days of the start of the fire.
But where is the evidence of the fire? Your subjective interpretations that are really just reflections from a media narrative?
You are severely, severely mentally ill. You have been drinking out of the media toilet far too long. You have left your humanity behind you. Bad dog!
They are being up front about what has already been done clandestinely.
Expect many legal overtures like this in the future.
The establishment will bargain for your consent for the violations they have already perpetrated.
I pray that they will be stopped before they have absolute power.
We will all have to sacrifice profoundly in order to restore liberty to western civilization. Stand up now or be enslaved for eternity.
This thread is actually very scary. Half of the population believes in a reality that's completely different from the reality the other half believes in. And they have absolutely no evidence, references, or rationale for believing it. They are just fatalists. It seems the nihilism instilled by our society's materialistic and superficial substance is actually causing mass mental illness.
Why exactly is Trump supposed to be evil, again? Because of a complicated tax reform that no one in the general public really understands?
We really need a new type of forum, for the sanity of humanity. We need facts and arguments laid out for all to see and discuss without a psychotic majority censoring the dissenters. Hopefully AI can give us a chance at this: objectively mapping out ideas and translating them into terms everyone can understand. Imagine a completely neutral moderator that encourages a logical discussion.
Most people would piss on it for being boring. But it's exactly what we need to give birth to the leader class of the future.
Yes, actually, you can force people to do anything. It's called power.
Take your kids outside, they aren't in the phase of development where interaction is paramount, they're in the phase where observation is! They need to see the natural world work. They need to see the land. They need to see plants, animals, streams, and weather. They need to see life and death.
Don't coddle your children in an artificial playpen where a great proportion of their instinct and intuition has no place.
Unless you WANT to sabotage them for some reason.
The word from the deep state surveillance system must have trickled down to the corporate level: persecuted groups are seriously contemplating violence against their authoritarian oppressors
Can anyone provide an argument for why or why not this man is or is not an engineer? This is crucial to understanding the story but it's not being presented clearly.
The Constitution does not protect against consumer demand.
So that means NOTHING should?
That means there is no principle behind the law?
These are what leftists and many moderates implicitly argue. They refuse to address the reason for the law's existence: to maintain society. But it can only do so much. Society still needs to be maintained by the will of the people. So let's look at the law, understand it, and use it as inspiration to restore the will of the people.
Leftists and most moderates have abandoned liberalism completely. They have no concept of liberty at all, only authority. They have no free will to speak of. Those of us who can see this need to schism or society, we need to distance ourselves from these slave-minded people and put up firm barriers.
Still waiting for the argument for "diversity" that isn't upended by a simple rebuttal. Western civilization has always been a meritocracy at it's core. There have always been class barriers, but where on earth has there not been? Ever?
Some one is trying to change that, some one is trying to destroy western civilization and plunder it. That doesn't necessarily mean these people are coming from outside of it.
"Diversity" is a literal and true conspiracy. It's a malicious lie being enforced from the top down through the schools, universities, and media. It's an orchestrated narrative being perpetuated by an extreme minority of wealthy individuals to break down society and enforce unprecedented slavery on us all.
This is a simple model of displacement. This is simple physics. If a space is occupied by a body, it cannot be occupied by another body without pressure and displacement. So where is this pressure coming from exactly? We're supposed to believe that the bodies have changed properties, that they suddenly do not want to occupy the space that nourishes them. A more mentally sane point of view would be that the entering body is being forced in.
If you do the math, which isn't very complicated, it's aimed at putting down white people.
When you prioritize other people for employment based on their race and gender, rather than their achievement and skill, it's a negative action, not a positive one. It's not 'affirmative' at all. And it's not "all relative". The effect of the action either way you look at it is always that white men are excluded disproportionately to their achievement and qualification.
Any way you look at the equation, there's a negative attached to the "white male" unit.
It's impossible to make minority employment 'affirmative' by quotas. That is not the variable you can manipulate if justice and positive affirmation is your goal.
In order for the action to be positive, all aspects of it have to be VOLUNTARY and explicitly consented to. When did we have a vote in which white people decided they wanted to be discriminated against?
Notice how I said this was about putting white PEOPLE down, not just white MEN. Well when you exclude white men from the work place, who are the white women going to socialize with? The probability becomes ever greater that they will socialize with nonwhite men, therefore becoming more likely to become involved romantically with nonwhite men, therefore becoming more likely to end the identity of their genetic line as being white.
And this is all happening in the middle class, in the high-paying job sectors. White people are meant to be relegated to lower classes where they are much less likely to marry and/or have children.
The white identity is being systematically destroyed.
"Diversity" is not a slippery slope, it's a vertical abyss. You are being targeted, you are being attacked, fight back while you can.
A toy presents a set of rules for play by its very nature. There are only so many things you can do with a toy before the object itself becomes irrelevant, and if you place importance on the object you cut off a whole range of free play.
Which, to be stingingly honest, is the intent behind the entertainment industry, including toy makers. It's a form of social conditioning. Not unlike what the 'SJWs' say about Barbies, but they are generally very lacking in their interpretation of the scope of these measures. The toys just don't enforce "gender norms", they enforce the scope of a child's very humanity by relation to their social role, regardless of gender. They enforce an extremely irrational subordination to authority, a la "these are the rules, you must follow them, enjoy, or else you can't have any stimulation, because there is nothing else."
That there is an object that play is centered around is not good. Play should be centered around the social and environmental interactions. A toy should just be any old thing that is lying around.
This is in order to stimulate all parts of the mind, all the instincts, big and small, that make up the human mind. Children need free play to stimulate the various parts of their minds and bodies proportionally and to develop good mental and physical health.
But when you raise children in urban/suburban 'pens', there isn't anything at all just lying around. It's a constrained, sterile environment. Unfortunately this is just something most of us just have to live with, not having the luxury of being able to move out into the country. So we have to be extremely, extremely careful about the toys we give our children and we have to go far out of our way to provide them with regular free play experiences.
To be honest, kids absolutely need a natural environment to play in. Fields, woods, etc. They need to be able to range around unsupervised. It's a desperate need, every single day, it's not negotiable except at the cost of your child's development. Your children will be hurt deeply without these experiences. Do whatever you can to provide this for them.
Check out this article, especially its references:
https://www.psychologytoday.co...
Just stop shoving this SJW bullshit down our throat, Slashdot. It isn't helping, and it isn't working.
But don't you understand, they are indeed SJWs. The editors are all SJWs. What do you suppose it means when a media entity is bought out, as Slashdot has been, twice now?
It isn't working? Yes it is. You keep tolerating it without taking ACTION against it. Oh yes, it's working. You just admitted that it was "being shoved down your throat", and you aren't doing anything about it. That means you're normalizing it, that means you're consenting to being attacked.
Your future and your childrens' future are being shaved away without resistance.
Most people are afraid to even say a single word about it in real life. What hope is there if our freedom to speak has been so subverted by cultural marxism? (cue uneducated leftists unable to distinguish between cultural and legal freedoms implicitly arguing that cultural freedoms should only exist when they like them, for no reason, just emotive motivation, which boils down to "what the plutocrat-controlled media told me is okay")
There is a HORRIBLE civil war brewing, and putting it off will only make it worse. Stand up and speak out NOW, maybe we can prevent violence.