Unskilled "engineers" pumped through bad schools to cobble together some barely functional shit to make money for venture capitalists and industrialists in a huge economic bubble made insecure apps.
Another factor is engineered vulnerabilities to assist mass surveillance.
Basically our entire society has become a bubble that is going to pop within 50 years.
It doesn't matter if women are "sexually harassed" or not. It does not matter to anything important at all. If they can't stand up for themselves and function in their job against adversity, they need to stay in the house and exist in their traditional role. We don't need them to work. Men can do everything woman can do in the economy.
Our society is becoming completely and totally unhinged because of all the double standards. Everyone is going insane. We do not need to adapt the workplace to women. Women need to adapt to the workplace. The weak must adapt to nature. Nature must not adapt to the weak.
This is all a symptom of the rampant interventionism of the government in every aspect of life. The plutocrats are simply destabilizing every aspect of society they can access with government, education, and media so they can manipulate us into giving up our humanity and becoming worker drones.
We need to destroy this system and start over or we are all going to be turned into insane brainless slaves who exist for purpose other than work. Humanity is being destroyed and you are letting it happen because "the poor women and minorities can't exist on their own strength in the 'white patriarchy'"
FUCK the women and FUCK the minorities. If they can't play with the big boys then they can go back to the kitchen and the sandbox. We have no obligation to interrupt our productivity to let them participate. In fact we have an obligation to stop them from participating if they can't roll with the punches. We can't breed weakness into our society because some complete losers have hurt feelings. They should feel LUCKY to have nothing more than hurt feelings, because if nature has it's say they would be DEAD.
The deck is stacked against us. Publicly traded companies and the federal government are the same entity. They are conspiring to throw us down into the deepest possible slavery and probably to kill/sterilize us once they have the machines to replace us.
The possibility to resolve this problem without utter chaos lasting indefinitely is closing. Those of us who realize the threat need to band together NOW and bleed this system dry with sabotage and seek to rebuild our republic.
Okay, and what does this have to do with the claim that Donald Trump declared his entitlement to commit sexual assault?
Four women, out of how many in the room? How can you establish that he was uninvited? "Something along the lines of"? This is tabloid "journalism".
Neat, but the context isn't established, you're cutting due process short due to your motivations and bias, you know, like they did in the witch hunts. You don't care about the other side of the story, therefore you do not care about justice, therefore you are a liability to civilization, besides being an insufferable annoyance to anyone with a sense of rationality.
Seriously, these people cannot function in society, we have to form enclaves and keep these crazy bastards out and let them rot in their world of their own choosing and making.
How typical, you declare yourself a winner based on the actions of those who you commend but have nothing to do with, and refuse to provide an argument or do any work yourself. Yep, that's leftism.
About what story, you mental defective? Notice how you think and speak in negatives and don't provide an alternative positive? What WAS he talking about? Establish the context.
But oh wait, you don't care about fact, because instead of acting like a human being, you act as a conduit for virtue signalling.
You found a way to mention Donald Trump, very good!
But the thing is: how are you asserting that their failures outweigh their successes? I don't disagree, but I think it's important to understand the mechanisms and to keep things straight as to when a given thing is a failure or a success and to not cast judgement were it is not due.
>Only because many of those very wealthy are shielded from the consequences of failure. Take a good look at Donald Trump's series of bankruptcies. He, and investors like him, are sheltered from having to pay for the losses of their risk taking. Unless of course those bankruptcies were just cannibalization of investments that were projected to outlive their purpose soon. What if they served a purpose and were a net gain and were just scuttled before they became a net loss?
You are trying to make a blanket statement to characterize every claim of sexual harassment and are implicitly placing guilt on men for every objection that the fundamentally and increasingly irrational feminist social justice warriors bring up.
The problem with the honest (but misguided) sexual harassment accusers is that the "gray zone" is that it is constantly being expanded with double standards. The concept creep is rampant.
The real problem is the dishonest or externally misguided accusers who take advantage of the fact that there is absolutely no check or balance against claims of abuse. These matters are being judged emotionally and not objectively. The only "evidence" submitted in almost every case is the testimony of the accuser herself, with no corroboration for that specific alleged event. Multiple accusers are not necessarily credible either as almost all of the time they still have no corroboration for the specific alleged event they are purporting.
The most tired excuse is "well the male predator only strikes when they're alone together, so how are we supposed to get them into trouble unless our mere accusations are empowered by the mob and/or the courts?" Sorry, you have no proper recourse whatsoever nor do you deserve any. You can't make a mockery of justice because you have poor judgement. Don't be alone with a man you don't want an advance from. This has been the rule for all time. In every case, even if you are alone in a room with a man for some business purpose, there are other people nearby so you could not be said to be alone with this man.
Stop blaming other people for your inability to function in the real world. If some one comes too near you, back away or otherwise use body language to repudiate. If they still come toward you, leave to go to an area with many people and tell some of them about it. There is no reason to, and you have no right to, go to a public platform and accuse this person of some wrongdoing. They have done nothing morally or ethically wrong. They have expressed their desire, and if that is wrong by social convention the scope of recourse is by right limited to the social situation in which it occurred. If you prevent an unwanted advance, you have not been attacked. You have no right to feel attacked. And you have no right to a platform to speak to the public about the event. We cannot let common social interactions become arbitrated by mob and then legislated by government. It robs our society of its strength, it props it up when it has no strength of its own.
There is no excuse not to stand up for yourself. Unless you want the social validation of all that attention on you. Which is no doubt what motivates many of these accusers.
First, he was recorded behind closed doors. Secondly, he was speaking about women who are paid for sexual service and are therefore willing.
So there is no abuse.
Yeah why don't you go down to the strip club and tell those women that they are being abused and to call the police.
It's an absolute witch hunt. There is NO EVIDENCE. Do you not get that? That's the characterizing feature. NO EVIDENCE, ONLY HEARSAY. By God you're a stupid animal.
"It's all a matter of power, Hicks pointed out -- and women have never had their share of it,"
Here is some blatant Marxist propaganda, and very false at that. Rich versus poor, Higher class versus lower class, oppressor versus oppressed, winner versus loser, fit versus unfit, selected by nature for life versus selected by nature for death....and then they project this pattern, to which I could concede to an honest Marxist that there is at least some truth, onto something to which there is absolutely no truth: left ear versus right ear, left eye versus right eye, left hand versus right hand, left brain versus right brain, man versus women. First they begin by greatly (and most often disingenuously and falsely) characterizing the tradition wealth disparity. Then when you're worked up about that they slide in a similar image trying to get you to look on something entirely different with the same eyes. There are critical differences that you're more likely to ignore in an emotional state. They build up this emotion in the culture day after day, year after year, generation after generation until there is enough of this capital of human irrationality to slice a civilization in halves like a hatchet would split a bone lengthwise, and then they consume the marrow. Men and woman are complementary forces with distinct tendencies in behavior, many of which seem opposite for a given situation. I'm not going to go on about this, but that Damore Memo doesn't go nearly far enough. This is supposed by the Marxists to be "sexist". Sorry, but by your definition nature itself is "sexist", "wrong" and "evil". When a human tribe encounters a problem, men and women (are supposed to) attend to their different domains in order to cover all the aspects of the situation.
This fool featured in the article goes on to attribute the necessities of economic forces to the ill will of "the patriarchy" with absolutely no logical argument. The simplest observation flips his narrative upside down to show its yellow belly: the industrialists don't care how the work gets done, they just want more work to get done. They don't see their slaves, so why would they care what they look like? They only care how to extract more labor from the population, which is why they drive wedges between us with the media, schools, and universities, which, of course, they own nearly all of. In this way they open up more shafts in their huge mine through unstable areas of the earth, getting at the gold they never could have reached before.
So really, all that is going on right now is that some rich people are telling you that certain other rich people are bad so they can take their wealth and create even more disparity all the while giving you a tiny sliver of it and using technology to distract you from the overall astronomical growth of wealth of humanity.
Conspiracy theory you say? This easy rejection of anything you don't want to hear is a canker, so I'll give a brief rebuttal. In short, look at the stock market. Everyone is invested in everyone else's business. So a collective interest forms. When you have a great deal of wealth you can afford to invest in everyone who shows promise, and so you profit greatly from the vast majority of successes and so gain influence over every success, many to a great degree. If you don't end up controlling a given success, odds are you know some one who does and has a significant stake in one of your own investments. And so the birthing grounds for conspiracy take form.
You need the discipline to stop paying for services that do not serve you. You need the social skills to organize boycotts and to generally represent your own interest through unionization.
You can't run to your mommy to make a rule to fix your every problem. You have to get your hands dirty and solve your own problems by a refined set of principles - not bloat and mutilate your principles so that everything you don't like has to be made illegal.
Western civilization is way too 'liberalized'. We are doomed. Us who see it coming better band together quick so we have something in place to pick up the pieces.
What about what I said implies I don't want white women intermarrying? The fact that I remarked on the probabilities of certain social interactions? Even if I do care, how does that imply an attitude of supremacy? What if I believe all races should stick to marrying their own race? That makes me a white supremacist, a black supremacist, an asian supremacist, etc., all simultaneously?
Your side is not rational at all as far as I can tell. You ignore data that shows the trends in races for difference in intelligence that controls for socioeconomic standing. Off the top of my head, try the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. You generally refuse the concept of race entirely, see Lewontin's Fallacy, or human history since the beginning of time. Race is a social construct, in that society provides SOME of the selection mechanisms for genes, and instinct provides for the rest (though instinct in turn can be modified by societal selection). But race is primarily constructed genetically. In every human action there is a seed of instinct, and every instinct is directly encoded in genetic material.
The simple fact is that white people have undergone selection to live in western society for a hell of a lot longer than other people. Making things "equal" for other races artificially, by making RACE QUOTAS for education and employment, is pure and simple, with malicious intent, the destruction of both western society and the various tribes and admixtures thereof of "white" people. The simple fact is that the Aryan way of doing things (this includes/has included Hindus, Persians, and many others, who are NOT "white") has always been the best (and most consistently dominant) in the world (see: worldwide imperial domination since the beginning of recorded history), and moreover in recent times the Western European way of doing things has proved to dominate the entire world. "White" people will always trend for more success in their own habitat. The aristocracy is not just for fun, it's an extremely rigorous genetic selection mechanism. Society itself is quite rigorous, so even the peasants are deeply effected. It's not even about IQ alone, it's about all the genetic traits that interface with society.
Sorry, but some people are just born better, and there is a correlation with race and class. The highest class people of the most dominant civilizations are generally genetically better than most peasants of anywhere on earth. This doesn't mean white people alone. It could be from any civilization. Everyone has a unique intelligence and mastery of their own domain. They don't even have to be from a great civilization. Australian aboriginals communicate spatial information verbally and can pinpoint waterholes in vast wastes. No one else does that. Trying to say that everyone is born equal is a deliberate attempt to erase the specialized knowledge humanity has accumulated over the generations.
The only interest it serves is the interest of the plutocracy who are narrow minded to an astronomical extreme and want only slaves and eternal power and life they can never attain. And you help them because you refuse to confront your fears of inferiority. You refuse to confront reality.
That is a lie. There is no solution to the problem of power. Because there is no problem - other than the people themselves. They are disingenuous lazy scum who will inevitably be selected against by nature. Power always exists. Because some who hold it become corrupt does not mean there is a problem with power. That is power fulfilling its natural role. A bad ruler cannot live for long, he will run his system to failure, probably at the cost of many lives. He takes down all of his followers. And as the world shrinks, it finally comes to the point where the rotten have no where to run.
The "solution" is to have many powers of similar magnitude to compete. As humans we can realize this and apply our will to this end. Or we can wait and have nature establish this the hard way - at the cost of huge proportions, no doubt the vast majority, of the populations' lives. The current consolidation of power will be a divine gift to those who survive its downfall.
Everything we do electronically or with a connected device attached to our persons is being monitored and recorded by the corporate/government system in order to create a psychological model of the population with individual resolution for the purpose of predicting and controlling our thoughts and actions.
Seems to be working well to divide us. When will people get a grip on this horrible truth and stop being so easily redirected to attack each other rather than the perpetrators? This seems to be the end of the long-established civilizations.
Okay why don't you apply your lens of mass hysteria to everything else new. Why don't you apply it to the sentiment around Trump, global warming, the North Korea crisis, Bitcoin, diversity....
How much sense does that make to you? Can you see how hysteria could be the cause of either or both sides of the divide of any of those issues? "All the ingredients" are there in any case.
What does "more plausible" even mean to you? You're just trying to put a cap on the unknown so you can consider quantitatively. In reality you just don't have enough grasp to make a statement. Your reasoning is incoherent.
What ever happened to people only judging matters they are fit to judge? People have become so incredibly disingenuous and self righteous. That is the cause of the hysteria in all of the things I mentioned above. There is no hysteria about any one issue. People themselves are hysterical by default. That doesn't mean new things aren't actually happening.
If you care about liberty, if you care about freedom, you should be devoting your thought to separating from this system. There is no fixing this. It simply has to die. We need to construct a viable alternative to pick up the pieces when it does.
Bitcoin isn't anonymous you blowhard idiot. Exchanges in the US are required to verify your identity. Bitcoin can be used for anything. You have no reason to say it's only used for crime.
Actually, for those of us who aren't retarded, it's obvious that it's main use overwhelmingly is speculation. Bitcoin was a few hundred dollars for a long time. That was it being used as currency. Then the speculation extravaganza started. Now its $13k.
People are tired of blatant politicizing of everything and everything. They are tired of the hoops they have to jump through for low quality programming.
In general they are just tired of being so exploited.
According to you, it seems: Not wanting "diversity" is "white supremacy". Not wanting "affirmative action" is "hatred against nonwhites".
How do you justify affirmative action? It's racial discrimination. It takes factors other than merit into account for reward. That is wrong. That is a double standard and is dishonest. And it is hateful against white people for the reason that they are white.
But no, you can't support your views. Anyone who disagrees as a white supremacist. A nazi. A deplorable. You are pushing for a civil war that you are going to lose badly. Turn back now.
Slashdot Mirror
Is that legal?
Just what the market needs, more volatility!
Unskilled "engineers" pumped through bad schools to cobble together some barely functional shit to make money for venture capitalists and industrialists in a huge economic bubble made insecure apps.
Another factor is engineered vulnerabilities to assist mass surveillance.
Basically our entire society has become a bubble that is going to pop within 50 years.
Bad job?
Quit.
Can't find another job?
Protest.
Protest doesn't work?
Go to war.
This is how things have always worked before, why shouldn't this work now?
It doesn't matter if women are "sexually harassed" or not. It does not matter to anything important at all. If they can't stand up for themselves and function in their job against adversity, they need to stay in the house and exist in their traditional role. We don't need them to work. Men can do everything woman can do in the economy.
Our society is becoming completely and totally unhinged because of all the double standards. Everyone is going insane. We do not need to adapt the workplace to women. Women need to adapt to the workplace. The weak must adapt to nature. Nature must not adapt to the weak.
This is all a symptom of the rampant interventionism of the government in every aspect of life. The plutocrats are simply destabilizing every aspect of society they can access with government, education, and media so they can manipulate us into giving up our humanity and becoming worker drones.
We need to destroy this system and start over or we are all going to be turned into insane brainless slaves who exist for purpose other than work. Humanity is being destroyed and you are letting it happen because "the poor women and minorities can't exist on their own strength in the 'white patriarchy'"
FUCK the women and FUCK the minorities. If they can't play with the big boys then they can go back to the kitchen and the sandbox. We have no obligation to interrupt our productivity to let them participate. In fact we have an obligation to stop them from participating if they can't roll with the punches.
We can't breed weakness into our society because some complete losers have hurt feelings. They should feel LUCKY to have nothing more than hurt feelings, because if nature has it's say they would be DEAD.
Remote Code Execution Flaw
=
Engineered Vulnerability
The deck is stacked against us. Publicly traded companies and the federal government are the same entity. They are conspiring to throw us down into the deepest possible slavery and probably to kill/sterilize us once they have the machines to replace us.
The possibility to resolve this problem without utter chaos lasting indefinitely is closing. Those of us who realize the threat need to band together NOW and bleed this system dry with sabotage and seek to rebuild our republic.
Okay, and what does this have to do with the claim that Donald Trump declared his entitlement to commit sexual assault?
Four women, out of how many in the room? How can you establish that he was uninvited? "Something along the lines of"? This is tabloid "journalism".
Neat, but the context isn't established, you're cutting due process short due to your motivations and bias, you know, like they did in the witch hunts.
You don't care about the other side of the story, therefore you do not care about justice, therefore you are a liability to civilization, besides being an insufferable annoyance to anyone with a sense of rationality.
Seriously, these people cannot function in society, we have to form enclaves and keep these crazy bastards out and let them rot in their world of their own choosing and making.
How typical, you declare yourself a winner based on the actions of those who you commend but have nothing to do with, and refuse to provide an argument or do any work yourself.
Yep, that's leftism.
About what story, you mental defective?
Notice how you think and speak in negatives and don't provide an alternative positive?
What WAS he talking about? Establish the context.
But oh wait, you don't care about fact, because instead of acting like a human being, you act as a conduit for virtue signalling.
You found a way to mention Donald Trump, very good!
But the thing is: how are you asserting that their failures outweigh their successes?
I don't disagree, but I think it's important to understand the mechanisms and to keep things straight as to when a given thing is a failure or a success and to not cast judgement were it is not due.
>Only because many of those very wealthy are shielded from the consequences of failure. Take a good look at Donald Trump's series of bankruptcies. He, and investors like him, are sheltered from having to pay for the losses of their risk taking.
Unless of course those bankruptcies were just cannibalization of investments that were projected to outlive their purpose soon. What if they served a purpose and were a net gain and were just scuttled before they became a net loss?
You are trying to make a blanket statement to characterize every claim of sexual harassment and are implicitly placing guilt on men for every objection that the fundamentally and increasingly irrational feminist social justice warriors bring up.
The problem with the honest (but misguided) sexual harassment accusers is that the "gray zone" is that it is constantly being expanded with double standards. The concept creep is rampant.
The real problem is the dishonest or externally misguided accusers who take advantage of the fact that there is absolutely no check or balance against claims of abuse. These matters are being judged emotionally and not objectively.
The only "evidence" submitted in almost every case is the testimony of the accuser herself, with no corroboration for that specific alleged event.
Multiple accusers are not necessarily credible either as almost all of the time they still have no corroboration for the specific alleged event they are purporting.
The most tired excuse is "well the male predator only strikes when they're alone together, so how are we supposed to get them into trouble unless our mere accusations are empowered by the mob and/or the courts?" Sorry, you have no proper recourse whatsoever nor do you deserve any. You can't make a mockery of justice because you have poor judgement. Don't be alone with a man you don't want an advance from. This has been the rule for all time. In every case, even if you are alone in a room with a man for some business purpose, there are other people nearby so you could not be said to be alone with this man.
Stop blaming other people for your inability to function in the real world. If some one comes too near you, back away or otherwise use body language to repudiate. If they still come toward you, leave to go to an area with many people and tell some of them about it. There is no reason to, and you have no right to, go to a public platform and accuse this person of some wrongdoing. They have done nothing morally or ethically wrong. They have expressed their desire, and if that is wrong by social convention the scope of recourse is by right limited to the social situation in which it occurred.
If you prevent an unwanted advance, you have not been attacked. You have no right to feel attacked. And you have no right to a platform to speak to the public about the event.
We cannot let common social interactions become arbitrated by mob and then legislated by government. It robs our society of its strength, it props it up when it has no strength of its own.
There is no excuse not to stand up for yourself. Unless you want the social validation of all that attention on you. Which is no doubt what motivates many of these accusers.
You're an insane person.
First, he was recorded behind closed doors.
Secondly, he was speaking about women who are paid for sexual service and are therefore willing.
So there is no abuse.
Yeah why don't you go down to the strip club and tell those women that they are being abused and to call the police.
It's an absolute witch hunt. There is NO EVIDENCE. Do you not get that? That's the characterizing feature. NO EVIDENCE, ONLY HEARSAY. By God you're a stupid animal.
the dotards
or, you know, anyone who sees the pattern in the witch hunt
But plenty of totally unverifiable anecdotes!
Sounds like a good basis to instigate social change!
"It's all a matter of power, Hicks pointed out -- and women have never had their share of it,"
Here is some blatant Marxist propaganda, and very false at that.
Rich versus poor, Higher class versus lower class, oppressor versus oppressed, winner versus loser, fit versus unfit, selected by nature for life versus selected by nature for death....and then they project this pattern, to which I could concede to an honest Marxist that there is at least some truth, onto something to which there is absolutely no truth: left ear versus right ear, left eye versus right eye, left hand versus right hand, left brain versus right brain, man versus women.
First they begin by greatly (and most often disingenuously and falsely) characterizing the tradition wealth disparity.
Then when you're worked up about that they slide in a similar image trying to get you to look on something entirely different with the same eyes. There are critical differences that you're more likely to ignore in an emotional state. They build up this emotion in the culture day after day, year after year, generation after generation until there is enough of this capital of human irrationality to slice a civilization in halves like a hatchet would split a bone lengthwise, and then they consume the marrow.
Men and woman are complementary forces with distinct tendencies in behavior, many of which seem opposite for a given situation. I'm not going to go on about this, but that Damore Memo doesn't go nearly far enough. This is supposed by the Marxists to be "sexist". Sorry, but by your definition nature itself is "sexist", "wrong" and "evil".
When a human tribe encounters a problem, men and women (are supposed to) attend to their different domains in order to cover all the aspects of the situation.
This fool featured in the article goes on to attribute the necessities of economic forces to the ill will of "the patriarchy" with absolutely no logical argument.
The simplest observation flips his narrative upside down to show its yellow belly: the industrialists don't care how the work gets done, they just want more work to get done. They don't see their slaves, so why would they care what they look like? They only care how to extract more labor from the population, which is why they drive wedges between us with the media, schools, and universities, which, of course, they own nearly all of. In this way they open up more shafts in their huge mine through unstable areas of the earth, getting at the gold they never could have reached before.
So really, all that is going on right now is that some rich people are telling you that certain other rich people are bad so they can take their wealth and create even more disparity all the while giving you a tiny sliver of it and using technology to distract you from the overall astronomical growth of wealth of humanity.
Conspiracy theory you say?
This easy rejection of anything you don't want to hear is a canker, so I'll give a brief rebuttal. In short, look at the stock market. Everyone is invested in everyone else's business. So a collective interest forms. When you have a great deal of wealth you can afford to invest in everyone who shows promise, and so you profit greatly from the vast majority of successes and so gain influence over every success, many to a great degree. If you don't end up controlling a given success, odds are you know some one who does and has a significant stake in one of your own investments.
And so the birthing grounds for conspiracy take form.
Yes, we are under the curse of Babel.
You need the discipline to stop paying for services that do not serve you. You need the social skills to organize boycotts and to generally represent your own interest through unionization.
You can't run to your mommy to make a rule to fix your every problem. You have to get your hands dirty and solve your own problems by a refined set of principles - not bloat and mutilate your principles so that everything you don't like has to be made illegal.
Western civilization is way too 'liberalized'. We are doomed. Us who see it coming better band together quick so we have something in place to pick up the pieces.
What about what I said implies I don't want white women intermarrying? The fact that I remarked on the probabilities of certain social interactions? Even if I do care, how does that imply an attitude of supremacy? What if I believe all races should stick to marrying their own race? That makes me a white supremacist, a black supremacist, an asian supremacist, etc., all simultaneously?
Your side is not rational at all as far as I can tell.
You ignore data that shows the trends in races for difference in intelligence that controls for socioeconomic standing. Off the top of my head, try the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. You generally refuse the concept of race entirely, see Lewontin's Fallacy, or human history since the beginning of time.
Race is a social construct, in that society provides SOME of the selection mechanisms for genes, and instinct provides for the rest (though instinct in turn can be modified by societal selection). But race is primarily constructed genetically. In every human action there is a seed of instinct, and every instinct is directly encoded in genetic material.
The simple fact is that white people have undergone selection to live in western society for a hell of a lot longer than other people. Making things "equal" for other races artificially, by making RACE QUOTAS for education and employment, is pure and simple, with malicious intent, the destruction of both western society and the various tribes and admixtures thereof of "white" people. The simple fact is that the Aryan way of doing things (this includes/has included Hindus, Persians, and many others, who are NOT "white") has always been the best (and most consistently dominant) in the world (see: worldwide imperial domination since the beginning of recorded history), and moreover in recent times the Western European way of doing things has proved to dominate the entire world. "White" people will always trend for more success in their own habitat. The aristocracy is not just for fun, it's an extremely rigorous genetic selection mechanism. Society itself is quite rigorous, so even the peasants are deeply effected.
It's not even about IQ alone, it's about all the genetic traits that interface with society.
Sorry, but some people are just born better, and there is a correlation with race and class. The highest class people of the most dominant civilizations are generally genetically better than most peasants of anywhere on earth. This doesn't mean white people alone. It could be from any civilization. Everyone has a unique intelligence and mastery of their own domain. They don't even have to be from a great civilization. Australian aboriginals communicate spatial information verbally and can pinpoint waterholes in vast wastes. No one else does that.
Trying to say that everyone is born equal is a deliberate attempt to erase the specialized knowledge humanity has accumulated over the generations.
The only interest it serves is the interest of the plutocracy who are narrow minded to an astronomical extreme and want only slaves and eternal power and life they can never attain.
And you help them because you refuse to confront your fears of inferiority. You refuse to confront reality.
That is a lie. There is no solution to the problem of power. Because there is no problem - other than the people themselves. They are disingenuous lazy scum who will inevitably be selected against by nature.
Power always exists. Because some who hold it become corrupt does not mean there is a problem with power. That is power fulfilling its natural role. A bad ruler cannot live for long, he will run his system to failure, probably at the cost of many lives. He takes down all of his followers. And as the world shrinks, it finally comes to the point where the rotten have no where to run.
The "solution" is to have many powers of similar magnitude to compete.
As humans we can realize this and apply our will to this end. Or we can wait and have nature establish this the hard way - at the cost of huge proportions, no doubt the vast majority, of the populations' lives.
The current consolidation of power will be a divine gift to those who survive its downfall.
Everything we do electronically or with a connected device attached to our persons is being monitored and recorded by the corporate/government system in order to create a psychological model of the population with individual resolution for the purpose of predicting and controlling our thoughts and actions.
Seems to be working well to divide us. When will people get a grip on this horrible truth and stop being so easily redirected to attack each other rather than the perpetrators? This seems to be the end of the long-established civilizations.
Okay why don't you apply your lens of mass hysteria to everything else new. Why don't you apply it to the sentiment around Trump, global warming, the North Korea crisis, Bitcoin, diversity....
How much sense does that make to you?
Can you see how hysteria could be the cause of either or both sides of the divide of any of those issues? "All the ingredients" are there in any case.
What does "more plausible" even mean to you? You're just trying to put a cap on the unknown so you can consider quantitatively. In reality you just don't have enough grasp to make a statement. Your reasoning is incoherent.
What ever happened to people only judging matters they are fit to judge? People have become so incredibly disingenuous and self righteous. That is the cause of the hysteria in all of the things I mentioned above.
There is no hysteria about any one issue. People themselves are hysterical by default. That doesn't mean new things aren't actually happening.
If you care about liberty, if you care about freedom, you should be devoting your thought to separating from this system. There is no fixing this. It simply has to die. We need to construct a viable alternative to pick up the pieces when it does.
Bitcoin isn't anonymous you blowhard idiot.
Exchanges in the US are required to verify your identity.
Bitcoin can be used for anything. You have no reason to say it's only used for crime.
Actually, for those of us who aren't retarded, it's obvious that it's main use overwhelmingly is speculation.
Bitcoin was a few hundred dollars for a long time. That was it being used as currency.
Then the speculation extravaganza started. Now its $13k.
Seriously, you are a moron.
People are tired of blatant politicizing of everything and everything. They are tired of the hoops they have to jump through for low quality programming.
In general they are just tired of being so exploited.
According to you, it seems:
Not wanting "diversity" is "white supremacy".
Not wanting "affirmative action" is "hatred against nonwhites".
How do you justify affirmative action? It's racial discrimination. It takes factors other than merit into account for reward. That is wrong. That is a double standard and is dishonest. And it is hateful against white people for the reason that they are white.
But no, you can't support your views. Anyone who disagrees as a white supremacist. A nazi. A deplorable.
You are pushing for a civil war that you are going to lose badly. Turn back now.