Slashdot Mirror


Germany Preparing Law for Backdoors in Any Type of Modern Device (bleepingcomputer.com)

Catalin Cimpanu, writing for BleepingComputer: German authorities are preparing a law that will force device manufacturers to include backdoors within their products that law enforcement agencies could use at their discretion for legal investigations. The law would target all modern devices, such as cars, phones, computers, IoT products, and more. Officials are expected to submit their proposed law for debate this week, according to local news outlet RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland (RND). The man supporting this proposal is Thomas de Maiziere, Germany's Interior Minister, who cites the difficulty law enforcement agents have had in past months investigating the recent surge of terrorist attacks and other crimes.

251 comments

  1. Define by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2

    "Legal"
    Good luck on that, it's a slippery idea that is resistant to being pigeonholed.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we lose all personal privacy, then the terrorists have won.

    2. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope the terrorists lose too. Only the all out uber police statists win.

    3. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Incorrect. The only people that lose are people who are not terrorists. Terrorists will simply use methods which are 100% immune to this law - which are plentiful. The end result, as with gun control, is that the only people who lose are good, lawful people. In the end, the only winners are tyrants and terrorists - and the stupid who believe the easily invalidated propaganda.

      Not to mention it means that these devices become engineered to facilitate hacking. Which now means everyone is now vulnerable to blackmail, extortion, kidnapping, or simply exploitation, and any number of other crimes. Again, bringing us full circle that the only winners are tyrants and terrorists.

      Only the very ignorant, very stupid, or very evil, support this type of move. As for Merkel, it's because she's very evil. She openly advocates the murder and displacement (even complete replacement) of the German people. Just as Obama and Hillary advocate for America - and all the other evil, globalist leaders in the Western world are currently doing.

    4. Re: Define by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      NOBODY in security EVER thinks a backdoor is a good thing!
      They are a MASSIVE vulnerability just waiting to get cracked, and if they are mandatory, all it takes is a single slip and that entire group is totally unprotected!
      It's not a question of IF it will be used and abused, but simply WHEN

      Sorry for the caps, but I really wanted to highlight those specific words to get across the point to some of the readers.

    5. Re: Define by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Terrorists will simply use methods which are 100% immune to this law - which are plentiful.

      So will plenty of other people. They can simply drive across the nearest border to buy their phone in Denmark, Poland, Netherlands, etc. That isn't far since Germany is tiny, smaller than California. It would fit into Texas twice. So this will hurt the German economy, but otherwise have little effect on anyone with anything to hide.

    6. Re:Define by Mikkeles · · Score: 2

      East Germany has won over West Germany!

      News at 1100!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    7. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually Merkel who is the main terrorist in Germany.

    8. Re: Define by asylumx · · Score: 4, Funny

      bold and italics do work here, just FYI.

    9. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we have someone to blame for the problems. Then the ability to monitor citizens (which won't be abused). Are they going to start forcing muslims to wear a star and crescent next ?

    10. Re: Define by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      EU.

      How much you willing to bet that if Germany succeeds here, they'll push for an EU-wide version?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re: Define by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      You are just an idiot.
      What evil has Merkel done? She stole your cookies?
      And what has Merkel to do with it? The article itslef clearly points out it is 'Thomas de Maiziere' idea.
      He made a Trumpish blurb in front of a camera ... and nothing will happen as such 'backdoors' or laws regarding them would be unconstitunional.

      And uour gun control reference is the smost stupid thing I hear, but I hear it all the time. Lickily I live in a country with strong gun control laws.

      I don't have to fear that an idiot after a car accident jumps out of his car and shoots me, or random people around me.

      Do youu have any idea how low gun crime is in Europe? Or gun accidents? Your idea that every criminal has a gun is just absurd: from where would he get it?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re: Define by Teun · · Score: 0, Troll

      Which is already (since the Hitler years) illegal.
      The Nazi's wrote in law the use of radio waves has to be approved, not only on the transmitter side but also on the receiving end.
      Like in Germany you can only buy short wave radios with approved frequencies, on the other side of the border these same radios can receive anything.

      The recent banning of child toys with WIFI capabilities was based on this Nazi law, not because of the frequencies used but based on what the radio waves were used for.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    13. Re: Define by Teun · · Score: 1

      Technically you are correct, politically you are so far out it's getting funny.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    14. Re: Define by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      How many brain cells do you have?

      What are you going to bet? Is it against the EU constitution and basically every national constition? Yes or No?

      How dumb the /. crowd has become is unbelievable.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an UE member, it's already illegal for her to push it. What does that tell you?

    16. Re: Define by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      First if all that are not Nazi laws.

      Like in Germany you can only buy short wave radios with approved frequencies, on the other side of the border these same radios can receive anything.
      That is nonsense, radio licenses are regulated very similar all over Europe. In some countries you dont need a license, but the radios are just the same.

      The recent banning of child toys with WIFI capabilities was based on this Nazi law, not because of the frequencies used but based on what the radio waves were used for.
      That is nonse. Double nonsense, as there is no ban.
      The concerns and investigations are about illegal survilence, and that has noothing to do with the frequeencies. Survilence is always illegal, unless authorized by a court. And that included putting survilence devices into your kids rooms.
      Same law for everyone, you stupid idiot. Parents are not extemot from the law. Wow, that is Nazi country, yeah yeah ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was stated in the post. The fact you ask what has already been answered means you're mentally retarded or evil yourself.

      You're a terrible, selfish, evil, person.

      Look up the UN's definition on genocide. Under the UN's definition of genocide Merkel is literally guilty of genocide. As are many other western world leaders.

      Merkel is also a communist. She is associated with an ideology which has murdered 120 million people. If you believe Merkel is not evil then you also support that Hilter was awesome. You can't have it both ways. Objectively, Merkel is evil. As of evil people like you who support them.

    18. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly expect it; They can only regulate devices sold in the country. The obvious way around this is for consumers is to travel to a neighbouring country and purchase there. If they launch it is Germany and show improved crime statistics (manipulated for the narrative or not), then they will push for such a law to go EU-wide in order to close the glaring loophole.

    19. Re: Define by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny

      NOBODY in security EVER thinks a backdoor is a good thing! They are a MASSIVE vulnerability just waiting to get cracked, and if they are mandatory, all it takes is a single slip and that entire group is totally unprotected! It's not a question of IF it will be used and abused, but simply WHEN

      Fixed it for you.

    20. Re: Define by Megol · · Score: 1

      How nice of you to post bullshit that is so obviously crap that not even a insane conspiracy theorist would believe them. Idiot.

    21. Re: Define by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Which is already (since the Hitler years) illegal.

      Bullcrap. There is currently no German law against using cell phones purchased in foreign countries, and millions of people do it everyday.

    22. Re: Define by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      How much you willing to bet that if Germany succeeds here, they'll push for an EU-wide version?

      If only there was some historical evidence that Germans are more willing than other people to resort to authoritarianism ...

    23. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, too likely the photos would be distributed to the press by SJW extremists. It's more efficient just to quietly gas the Muslims while giving them their "shower" at the border entrypoint. Nazis gotta be Nazis.

    24. Re: Define by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Well, there are some historical evidence that germans like to push their laws on other countries.

    25. Re: Define by quenda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as with gun control, is that the only people who lose are good, lawful people.

      Germany is not the US. Sure organised criminals can obtain guns, but you have very little chance of being shot when stumbling across a burglar in places like Germany. I call that a win.

    26. Re: Define by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Why bother, just MIP and leave the phones behind and see how they try to Gestapo treat that security (meet in person). Need to spread a message, simply go back to school and pass hand written notes. The German crap is about mind control, infesting the mind of ordinary citizens they are being watching 24/7 on a prison planet ( https://www.prisonplanet.com/ , heh heh, sometimes these people are right and sometimes when they have no stories for their kind of reporting, tabloid, they make stuff up, just like the tabloids https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...). It is evil shit and the reality is prior to this all citizens should have a back door into their government and it's departments first. The right to look any where at any time into any action by their government or it's agencies, secrecy in government is primarily there to serve corruption and nothing else.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re: Define by Teun · · Score: 1

      You got it, it has nothing to do with frequencies and that's what I said, in this particular case it is the way they are used yet that particular law was (ab)used.

      I know these days there are hardly any short wave radios sold anywhere but yes, in Germany they have limited frequencies.
      Hell, even simple FM receivers are not allowed to be sold with Japanese frequencies (below 87 MHz).

      Just to cool you down, France and Saudi Arabia have similar laws.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    28. Re: Define by Teun · · Score: 1

      That's not what I claimed.
      The moment you would start using a phone not complying with local law they can based on it's IMEI lock it out of the network.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    29. Re: Define by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked Math was the same in Germany and America and as a matter of fact everywhere else. How would a backdoor any safer in Germany?

    30. Re: Define by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The laws are basically about: "who is allowed to listen to what".

      The obvious laws, and that is basically a "we tell you, don't do it and you are fine" is to listen into private conversations _AND_ forward/report them to someone else. (And that basically covers all communication, regardless via wire, internet or radio).

      But: on a ship you can listen to everything the radio allows, so: you could listen (at least to one party) who has a radio call to a coastal station that is routed to phone network. You are supposed to leave the channel and come back in a few minutes, and leave again if there is obviously a private conversation going on.

      In Germany we have laws that force you to acquire a license to operate such radios. Which basically only assures that during acquiring that license you learned about those laws (and obviously radio protocols, like MAYDAY).

      France has no law to acquire such a license (for ship based SRC radios. Right now, but it is in the process of changing), but has the same laws about protecting the privacy of the people exchanging messages.

      But then again come american idiots (I hope you are neither american nor an idiot) who says: hey, if you exchange messages over an "public channel" everyone has the "right" to listen and to do what ever he wants with what he hears. The laws and the licenses make pretty clear: no! No one has the right to listen, not even law enforcement, without a warrant!

      Radio waves, despite the fact that you easily can eves drop in, are treated the same as wires, as good as you can. It is a law that demands the curtesy of radio operators _not to listen to private chat_

      Regarding the frequencies: below 87MHz in Germany there is Police radio, emergency radio of fire forces, emergency medic care and "technisches hilfswerk" (a private rescue non profit non government organization with heavy gear).

      Those frequencies are by the definitions above of no business for a citizen. And as you can not assume that the laws sketched out above are adhered, there are laws that forbid sales of radios that can tune in into such frequencies.

      I would feel slightly disguised if a funeral parlour would call me at home because they heard an hour ago that my father has died in a car crash on police radio. Probably before I knew.

      Anyway, people can have different stances on that, but the laws are to protect privacy, not to have a totalitarian grip over citizens.

      If you know how a radio works, which is necessary e.g. for an amateur radio license, you can circumvent the frequency limitations, or simply build your own radio from scratch.

      When I was between 16 to roughly 21 I had a half battery (battery was build in and rechargeable) half grid powered radio from Siemens. The frequency blocks where just screws and nuts on the cord that was connected to the tuning knob. If you turned the nob to far you could not turn further as the screw prevented it. Remove the screw and you can turn down to something like 70MHz and up to something like 120MHz (don't know the actual numbers).

      Of course: when I tried to listen on police radio, I lived in a small country village. I doubt there ever was a police car in that village. So: I never heard anything ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re: Define by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      The frightening thin is that there really isn't such evidence. People all over like authoritarianism.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re: Define by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      thats right, this is basically giving handouts to the ransomware blackhats, ... nobody seems to think it odd that poland (of all places after what the nazis did there) is like the centre of the ultra-right in europe ... that zee germans, despite the nazis losing the war, are the number one house of europe, most power, most money, most clout, and NOW, they try to re-instate a surveillance state, the likes of which they say they try to fight (but thats hatespeech) dont get me wrong, im not a nazi, im certainly not a pro or antifa, at best im a freespeech extremist
      but nobody seems to really see the irony of it all here
      GET ME OUT OF HERE
      before i make like half of Antwerp and join IS (a shame i couldnt lie about my opinions on monotheism, i always wanted a harem of young ladies who do whatever i say ... call it lollicon, sounds better, right?)

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Round up the Russians and send them to concentration camps. That way, once all the paid Russian trolls are being starved in concentration camps, we can safely have elections without fear of meddling.

    1. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried that before, hopefully it works this time.

    2. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like how people don't understand that "meddling" is part and parcel of great power politics. The people screeching "Russia! Russia! Russia!" are also the ones who were silent when O did exactly this to Netanyahu.

    3. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, no. You need to work a bit on your "people skills" and switch off your reality-distortion filter.

    4. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly did the Russians get the DNC to cheat Bernie anyhow?

    5. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Uhm, no" to which part? Great powers are always meddling in the politics of other countries. To claim otherwise is to admit that your history teachers failed you.

    6. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, the problem here is that the meddling was done TO US. Trump won, at least in part, due to foreign meddling. That should not be allowed nor tolerated. And no other country would be okay with a foreign government meddling in their elections or politics.

      Why should America bow to Russia? Why are the Republicans happy to be subservient to Russian interests? Why are they supporting the wholesale rape of our country? These are treasonous acts that, in earlier times, be met with mass investigations, trials, and very possibly executions.

    7. Re:Germany has better things to do by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Trump won, at least in part, due to foreign meddling.

      Keep telling yourself that nonsense and you will continue losing elections. Sooner or later you have to assume some personal responsibility for your failures.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Kennedy wrote to the Soviets asking for Andropov's help in ousting Reagan. Why are the Democrats happy to be subservient to Russian interests?

    9. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "O Sweet Saint Andreas, hear our prayer"

    10. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you were the same kind of guy that pointed out how much money Hillary Clinton got from Saudi Arabia. But when its your guy under the thumb of a foreign power, that is just smart politics.

    11. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, where do you you get your information from? Lush Rimjob?

    12. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was written by the London Times back in 1992. Since Kennedy was still alive at the time, the American media ignored it. A simple search will yield numerous articles including a recap by Forbes.

    13. Re:Germany has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. Attach a rider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All door locks must be able to be kicked in by emergency responders. It's in case of fire. There could be children in the building. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

    1. Re:Attach a rider by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kicked in? More like built for a skeleton key. Of course, the key and all copies will be labeled "Law Enforcement Use Only."

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Attach a rider by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The concept you're looking for is "master key."

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Attach a rider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct.

      -gnick

    4. Re:Attach a rider by meerling · · Score: 2

      Being government mandated, it'll have to be usable by the dumbest of bureaucrats, so a hairpin would probably work.

  4. liars touts & shills.. all mirror addict cowar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we've seen more than enough.. cease fire stand down,, there are moms & babys in all or our towns the world around..

  5. Ok.. by Drathos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not ban all security on devices while you're at it?

    --
    End of line..
    1. Re:Ok.. by forkfail · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, and if I could multi-mod comments, I would give -1 for redundant and +1 for underrated... ;-)

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:Ok.. by rajafarian · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Idiots not understanding technology making rules about it... /sigh

      I'm in awe of your low number user ID.

    3. Re:Ok.. by fazig · · Score: 1

      They do try to do that every couple of years. Fortunately the strong consumer protection lobbies in German are quick to sue over something like that. And because the German justice system still seems to work independently from the government, the courts have ruled virtually all of these technologies to be unconstitutional. But who knows how long that will last.

  6. if I were GeegawCo, I'd pull out by swschrad · · Score: 2

    deliver notice to the regulators proposing this that GeegawCo would cease operating in Germany, including any network/remote/cloud operations, if this were enacted. ship the money back home and dump 'em.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:if I were GeegawCo, I'd pull out by Mr307 · · Score: 2

      Seems like the responsible thing to do, could even couch it in a "we respect and value our customers and dont want them to be at risk" type message.

      If it were a large enough entity it could cause a kerfuffle or if there were enough of them willing to leave, could be even more interesting. No doubt some competitor with less principles will fill the market, its easily big enough for most manufacturing scales depending on the gadget.

      Almost want them to follow through with this kind of crazy, could be a fantastic litmus test, instantly see which companies dont have the general publics actual interests in mind.

    2. Re:if I were GeegawCo, I'd pull out by meerling · · Score: 1

      Companies rarely if ever care about public interest. On the other hand knowing that if they were making gimped "security" in their devices, they should know their worldwide sales would plummet like a lead brick! No company with any brains would do this, even if it means cutting off all sales in Germany. The losses would just be too big otherwise.

    3. Re:if I were GeegawCo, I'd pull out by Mr307 · · Score: 1

      I get your point but in general I still disagree, self interest will tend to follow public interest, probably till some point on the scale is passed so it would mean that most companies of smaller size will be more actually interested in public interest as compared to larger ones.

  7. Repetition by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Nice to see Germany returning to its totalitarian roots.

    1. Re:Repetition by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Nice to see Germany taking one for the team... I read this and immediately thought: Thank God some other nation besides the US is stupid enough to try this first, thus giving other nations the proof we need to kill such notions before they take root... wait... that's how this works, right?

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    2. Re:Repetition by meerling · · Score: 1

      Bet trump will tweet about how he loves this idea, assuming he didn't already do so

    3. Re:Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Germany lays a turd so.... let's hate on Trump!

    4. Re:Repetition by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that is exactly what is happening. Totalitarian tendencies are strong in Germany, despite its bad history in this regards. Many people want the state to control everything. And now that the resistance had gone way weaker, the proto-fascist in government and administration try hard to become the real thing again.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends entirely on how long it takes the criminal underbelly to discover what the master key is. If a month goes by and no one has cracked the system yet, our politicians will likely see this as "proof" that it was all scare-mongering on our part and ram through their own versions.

    6. Re:Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is they will see germany pass it and think "that looks like a good idea lets do it too!"

      even if germany passes it it will take a couple years to go into effect, and then some time after that for the new insecure devices to start replacing the old devices before some script kiddie or malware can take advantage of it to show everyone else it was a bad idea. by that time everyone else would have have already passed their own laws..

    7. Re:Repetition by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually we are not doing this.
      It is just another minister who forgot to read the constitution befrore he took his office.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Repetition by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Totalitarian tendencies are strong in Germany,
      That is nonsense. Hint: I'm German, and mainly live in Germany.

      Many people want the state to control everything
      That is even more nonsense,

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turds of a feather, flock together...

    10. Re:Repetition by Megol · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Germany have very protection against just this for obvious reasons: the verfassungsschutz or translated protection of the constitution.
      It is an unique system to make any system that goes against the German constitution very hard to implement. It is a system that (yes!) infringes on personal freedom if that is the way to stop totalitarian groups to increase in power. It doesn't as such protect the current system but the idea of a free state without totalitarian tendencies.

      Is it perfect? Nothing ever is. And as I noted above it can reduce personal freedom when it is used to promote a subset of totalitarian views.
      You may find that distasteful, that's okay. I don't really like those aspects and sometimes find its use heavy handed (but still free from any notable political bias).

      But it directly goes against you bullshit claims. The state of Germany have a strong protection for their democracy.

    11. Re:Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, just because the Constitution says you can't doesn't mean much. For instance, USA Constitution is rather firm in the second amendment but we manage to ignore it anyway.

      It's all about interpretation.

    12. Re:Repetition by gweihir · · Score: 1

      No, it is not. And I happen to have about the same opportunity for observation as you do.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:Repetition by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Then why is somebody like "Lothar die Misere" still in office? You are blind to what is going on.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Repetition by muecksteiner · · Score: 1

      As a german speaker from a neighbouring country, I can only express my amazement at the attitude of you guys, over and over again. You Germans are probably the most smug bunch on the planet: one can bend horseshoes around your egos. Right now, you are so extremely convinced that you are right, and that everyone else is just making mistakes. And that the only danger is from the "rise of right wing tendencies".

      Oh boy.

      The thing is, your precious "democratic" "leaders" you have right now are travesties of what true statesmen should be. And have been for two decades at least. Helmut Schmidt and the like still had character, but how long is it since he was in office?

      Point in case: that chap de Maiziere. Or, even worse, Mr. Maas. These people are utter scum: totally unsuited for public office, both intellectually, and with regard to their character. And they both show strong totalitarian tendencies - sorry about that.

      And if you don't see that, you deserve everything you get. Unfortunately.

    15. Re:Repetition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has a Federal Constitutional Court that has frequently struck down legislation that violated the constitution, though. It's not as easy for German politicians to violate their constitution as it is for American politicians to violate theirs.

    16. Re:Repetition by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never have seen anyone who wants a "totalitarian" government in Germany.

      With what kind of people do you hang out that you have a different impression?

      We all want basically a Switzerland system were we can vote over important things instead of letting parliaments run stuff.

      If you have other experiences you must live on an island or something.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:Repetition by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, in Germany, despite the relatively sound running politics, we still believe people with character don't go into politics.

      On the other hand I'm tired about the Merkel trashing. She is from the wrong party, never voted for her. But as you mention Helmut Schmidt, besides him she is the best Chancellor we ever had.

      Point in case: that chap de Maiziere. Or, even worse, Mr. Maas. These people are utter scum: totally unsuited for public office, both intellectually, and with regard to their character.
      I completely agree.

      And they both show strong totalitarian tendencies - sorry about that.
      And if you don't see that, you deserve everything you get. Unfortunately.

      That is not what the parent claimed.
      Gweir is of the opinion the population supports totalitarian movements or changes, which it does not.

      Perhaps no one saw the G20 riots in Hamburg ...
      If totalitarian changes get boxed through in Germany, Germany will burn. There is no question about that, and people who like to support the burning will come from all over Europe.

      The idea that Germany is - like Trumps America - changing into an totalitarian system again: is completely absurd

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  8. Obligatory Stasi remark by dyfet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And I had thought east germany had joined west germany, not the other way around...

    1. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And I had thought east germany had joined west germany, not the other way around...

      All states are at war with their respective publics, see this comment by former national security advisor. It's the rich vs the rest.

      Citizens called a "global menace" here by former national security advisor of the US:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZyJw_cHJY

      Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. See the manufacturing consent videos when you get the time. Science on reasoning:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

      Crisis of democracy

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYFxtNgOeiI

      Book:

      http://trilateral.org/download/doc/crisis_of_democracy.pdf

      Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

      Wikileaks

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABDiHspTJww&feature=youtu.be

      Manufacturing consent:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwU56Rv0OXM

      https://vimeo.com/39566117

    2. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by admin7087 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Call me old-fashioned but I can't help considering someone ridiculous who apparently gets all his knowledge from Youtube videos. No matter what message you've got, I didn't even check it and don't care, try reading some books first. You can find them in the library.

    3. Re: Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information is not validated based on its media. I can write a book full of lies just like I can make a YouTube video that's full of lies. If I made a YouTube video of me reading your "old fashioned books" from the library would you disregard it? Your statement is completely irrational so do us all a favor and read a book about reason and logic.

    4. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Call me old-fashioned but I can't help considering someone ridiculous who apparently gets all his knowledge from Youtube videos. No matter what message you've got, I didn't even check it and don't care, try reading some books first. You can find them in the library.

      Uhh you do know the first video is former national security advisor of the united states? AKA someone with serious foreign policy credibility, he's been giving speeches everywhere and talking about his concern for the political awakening of the publics of the world. The reality is the rich are exploiting everyone else and that has elites concerned because it's starting to become obvious the elites have always been robbing the world and the rule of law is a myth. That's the reality, otherwise he wouldn't call the political awakening of the masses a "menace", aka a menace to their profits.

      In his 1970 book Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, Brzezinski wrote the following.

      "The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."

      Between two ages

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski

      From war is a racket:

      "I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil intersts in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested."[p. 10]

      "War is a racket. ...It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives." [p. 23]

      "The general public shoulders the bill [for war]. This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations." [p. 24]

      General Butler is especially trenchant when he looks at post-war casualties. He writes with great emotion about the thousands of traumatised soldiers, many of who lose their minds and are penned like animals until they die, and he notes that in his time, returning veterans are three times more likely to die prematurely than those who stayed home.

      War is a racket

      He wrote this on american empire, aka the rich (big business) vs the rest of mankind.

      The grand chessboard

      The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives

      Grand chessboard user review

    5. Re: Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I can't take anything seriously from someone who gets most his information from books. Call me old fashioned but I prefer to get my knowledge from hieroglyphics. You can find them in museums.

    6. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another link everyone should check out when they get the time.

      https://theintercept.com/a-con...

    7. Re: Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i am sorry i can't take anything seriously who gets their information from hieroglyphics. call me old fashioned but i get my knowledge from cave paintings. you can find them in caves.

      now get off my lawn!

    8. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess being Nazi's is just in Germany's nature.

    9. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I guess those things are the reason one bright mind invented 'Butlers Jihad'.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

      I certainly understand your point of view. Historically, published articles and books were proofed, edited, perhaps even peer reviewed and therefore considered to have sane and accurate information. Anybody can publish any random nonsense on the Internet. However, I would put forward that with the conglomeration of major media outlets and consolidating of information sources, only "approved" information is getting in any of those primary, and once trusted, media sources. The onus is now on each individual to fact check, validate, and use critical thinking on any information source. But Internet-based sources are more likely to be freer of interference. Although even that is ceasing to be true as Facebook, Google, and other major online repositories of information start their own purging and blocking of contrary ideas. Honestly, it may be only a few years before well documented and thought out articles from completely anonymous sources found on obscure sites will be the closest to honest information we can find.

    11. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by bidule · · Score: 1

      I guess those things are the reason one bright mind invented 'Butlers Jihad'.

      Erm...
      The Butlerian Jihad, as in "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind." ?

      You mean the killer robot conspiracy started by Edison and fought by Tesla?

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    12. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All states are at war with their respective publics, see this comment by former national security advisor. It's the rich vs the rest.

      Right on point

    13. Re:Obligatory Stasi remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I had thought east germany had joined west germany, not the other way around...

      Er... No you just swallowed all the propaganda they spread to believe that they are the good guys that care for your security- Yeah! keeping backdoors on all your devices for your own safety of course. This just in case you happens to turn into a terrorist (according to their definition, terrorist is anyone that does not accept their total dominance).

  9. Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first people to get the backdoors will be cops.

    The second people will the in organized crime. It'll only take one bad law enforcement employee on their payroll to leak it... and THAT is just if there's some kind of key involved. The system itself will be public before the first device is even sold, since the standards will have to be given to the manufactures and they're going to leak like sieves.

    Then you'll have a nation of devices that are completely untrustworthy. In theory... because in practice this is so obviously too stupid to work that they can't possibly go forward with it.

    1. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " In theory... because in practice this is so obviously too stupid to work that they can't possibly go forward with it."

      And people pacifying themselves with sentiments like these are how these theories are put into practice.

    2. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Living in a similar country, next to Germany, I can assure yo that criminals will have this whole system fully operational long before any part of the government gets there half-assed proof-of-concept working reliable enough to not be totally unusable.

    3. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Here I thought Germany had it's collective head screwed on straight. Boy was I ever wrong, I guess.
      The most dangerous and troubling thing about this: If it gets passed in Germany, it'll be considered precedent in other countries (like the U.S.). In a world where all data security is compromised, there won't be any security for anyone (except the cops, maybe the military, and definitely THE RICH). At that point there won't be any reason to own a cellphone beyond the cheapest clamshell dumbphone, a computer of any kind, or have Internet access, because EVERYTHING will be Open Season. Also if your car can be remotely controlled, you'll be taking your life in your hands every time you get in it; may as well start riding a bike.

      I still have a hard time believing how fucktarded people in general are getting, that it's all come to this. :-(

    4. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by meerling · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the influence and reach of stupid people in power

    5. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Here I thought Germany had it's collective head screwed on straight. Boy was I ever wrong, I guess.

      See elsewhere in this thread; it's Trump's corrupting influence, dontchaknow. Read some of those and your worldview will be back on the rails in no time.

      Never mind that Germany has been competing with the UK for years to see who can create the most chilling thought-police state in Western Europe to deal with mass immigration opponents. Nah. You're only just now noticing how bad it's gotten.

      Too fucking late.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    6. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it will probably leak before any device with the system even hits the market. It only takes one annoyed employee of a device manufacturer to dump the specs and keys on Wikileaks.

      In fact, it would be hilarious if this inevitable person released a file right now that simply said "if this law passes, this fill will contain the specs and keys. see if you can find out where it came from."

    7. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first people to get the backdoors will be cops.

      The second people will the in organized crime. It'll only take one bad law enforcement employee on their payroll to leak it... and THAT is just if there's some kind of key involved. The system itself will be public before the first device is even sold, since the standards will have to be given to the manufactures and they're going to leak like sieves.

      Then you'll have a nation of devices that are completely untrustworthy. In theory... because in practice this is so obviously too stupid to work that they can't possibly go forward with it.

      Nothing to fault here but I'd like to observe that the German Government and their law enforcement personnel constitute a criminal organisation. They satisfy every meaningful criterion. Of course, if you prefer the blatantly self-serving definition of "criminal", "disobeying of Government", then you'd find me wrong.

      Hopefully we can at least agree that both cops and participants of what you consider "organized crime" engage in a great deal of wrongdoing and that either party having such a master key would represent an immediate decline in the well-being of every German citizen (or "resident of Germany" for those of you that consider the EU a country to which all constituent regions have surrendered sovereignty).

    8. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You mix that up a little bit.
      The first people will either be organized crime or foreign intelligence agencies.
      The second people are those who failed to be the first.
      Then law enforcement would come ...

      However as such laws/backdoors never will exist ... it is just playing mind games.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I was basing my opinion on Angela Merkel doing and saying some things that sounded smart and fair. Guess she's the outlier. Sad for Germans, now. Maybe it won't pass into law and they'll be spared this nonsense.

    10. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >See elsewhere in this thread; it's Trump's corrupting influence, dontchaknow.

      People often mix up cause and effect; Trump is an effect, not a cause.

      Trump is what happens when you ignore the fact that humans are fundamentally emotional, tribal animals and you allow a significant group of disgruntled people to form a tribal identity and blame their problems on another 'tribe'... that's sad but it happens.

      The people you really need to string up and beat like pinatas are the opportunists who feed the flames of such situations for personal gain. Those are the same people who could be calming the situation down, but they're too lacking in empathy and too greedy to do so. They need to be identified and eliminated from the gene pool.

    11. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      opportunists who feed the flames

      BLM, antifa... got it.

    12. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Blymie · · Score: 1

      In general?

      The majority of people are extremely emotional. They allow themselves to be entirely controlled by fear, have no idea of statistics, and aren't able to properly manage risk.

      And it isn't "getting". No, people have always, always been like this.

      What happened after 9/11? The largest removal of rights in US history! Most of those rights are STILL gone.

      And to make this a 'German thing', just how do you think Hitler got into power? His government was elected in power, because FEAR FEAR! Fear the foreigner! Fear this and that!

      FEAR. It's been used forever, and it's being used now. The terrorist. The foreigner. The stolen election. The Internet that will screw up children, unless controlled. The list goes on, and on, and on.

      It was The Bomb/The USSR the last half, of last century. It was the French to the British, and the British to the French, centuries before.

      It's always *something* that allows a few, to control many.

      The only difference now, is that the few have powers of control much more subtle, and precise than ever before. Thanks to modern tech.

    13. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but how about we use different language here: Trump is the manifestation of the symptoms of the real problems. If things weren't fucked up in fundamental ways, no way in hell he'd have been elected, or even nominated. Am I right?

    14. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      Here I thought Germany had it's collective head screwed on straight. Boy was I ever wrong, I guess.

      Yeah, at first glance I thought "Germany is gonna wave the BAN stick around and be rid of this backdoor nonsense."

      Sad how wrong we were. Unless it is some sort of reverse psychology sort of thing where they want support to ban backdoors, and this is just to wind people up to help get the support to ban it.

    15. Re:Has anybody told them they're idiots? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      you allow a significant group of disgruntled people to form a tribal identity and blame their problems on another 'tribe'..

      What's this "allow" business? I didn't know I had veto power over idiots banding into groups. If I'd known this years ago....

      Alternately, people are authoritarian, racist, and sexist on their own moral authority.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. NN's Ultimate Purpose by BlueStrat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From TFS/TFA

    German authorities are preparing a law that will force device manufacturers to include backdoors within their products that law enforcement agencies could use at their discretion for legal investigations.

    This is the ultimate purpose behind placing ISPs under Title II in order to place them under CALEA requirements which could easily be interpreted to require exactly the same kind of 'back doors' on devices.

    The propaganda has worked so well we have people violently protesting to have their own privacy taken away.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about misunderstanding though. Title 2 for ISP's does not do anything with the endpoint devices. Law enforcement has had and always should have the ability to listen in the middle just like they do with phone lines. Participants at the ends have every capability to use equipment to mask or encrypt communications over that medium.

    2. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Law enforcement has had and always should have the ability to listen in the middle just like they do with phone lines.

      First, there is no reason wiretapping should always be an option.
      Second, and much more important. WITH A WARRANT! Not this insane "at their discretion" logic, only when investigation of a crime suggests that such forms of espionage would provide useful evidence in a less intrusive or destructive manner than alternatives.

    3. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by thaylin · · Score: 2

      That is a pretty big conspiracy . Title 2 has both good and bad aspects, letting the ISPs fark us over is just 100% bad. Claiming the purpose behind it is differnt then all the stated purposes is just for that one is pretty silly..

      In fact the FCC did not even need title 2 to do so, they did it in 2005 and the courts agreed that even though they were not title 2 carriers they could still fall under CALEA, so moving them to title 2 is not an issue with that.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    4. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      That is a pretty big conspiracy . Title 2 has both good and bad aspects, letting the ISPs fark us over is just 100% bad. Claiming the purpose behind it is differnt then all the stated purposes is just for that one is pretty silly..

      In fact the FCC did not even need title 2 to do so, they did it in 2005 and the courts agreed that even though they were not title 2 carriers they could still fall under CALEA, so moving them to title 2 is not an issue with that.

      But another court can overturn the previous decision/precedent. Placing them under Title II assures they are required to comply.

      From the CALEA Wiki:

      The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) is a United States wiretapping law passed in 1994, during the presidency of Bill Clinton (Pub. L. No. 103-414, 108 Stat. 4279, codified at 47 USC 1001-1010).

      CALEA's purpose is to enhance the ability of law enforcement agencies to conduct lawful interception of communication by requiring that telecommunications carriers and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment to modify and design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure that they have built-in capabilities for targeted surveillance, allowing federal agencies to selectively wiretap any telephone traffic; it has since been extended to cover broadband Internet and VoIP traffic. Some government agencies argue that it covers mass surveillance of communications rather than just tapping specific lines and that not all CALEA-based access requires a warrant.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    5. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Oops, forgot the Wiki linky.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    6. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a full on retarded argument against NN. Everything is being moved over to https anyway so this doesn't matter at all. Even this garbage site we are on right now is fully encrypted.

    7. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by meerling · · Score: 1

      There's what should be and is written in law, and then there is what they actually do because who's going to arrest the cops...

    8. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is the ultimate purpose behind placing ISPs under Title II in order to place them under CALEA requirements which could easily be interpreted to require exactly the same kind of 'back doors' on devices.

      And of course any such interpretation would be factually incorrect.

      CALEA was applied to ISPs in 2005. Title II classification would not arrive for another decade.

      CALEA applies to telecommunications service providers only. It does not apply to software and hardware vendors. It does not compel service providers to hand over keys they don't have or restrict the activities of users. It does not mandate the installation of back doors into anything except the infrastructure of telecommunications service providers.

      The propaganda has worked so well we have people violently protesting to have their own privacy taken away.

      At least get your facts straight before posting provably false information. There are plenty of valid reasons to disapprove of CALEA and criticize U.S. government for it.

    9. Re: NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strat is full-on retarded. It makes sense.

    10. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, a NN troll sowing confusion and FUD.

    11. Re:NN's Ultimate Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... require exactly the same kind of 'back doors' on devices.

      The Intel management engine is a back-door that has existed for years on Wintel desktops. Direct access to the hardware means zero protection against key-loggers and screen-grabbers.

      For other computing devices, one can disconnect the network, or block the antenna. Also, one can install a VPN or encryption service on the device, defeating everything except a screen-grabber.

      All these phone-home applications, system services and built-in spyware make it nearly impossible to detect whether a back-door exists on a computing device. If people really value privacy, they'll have to stop installing the latest ad-supported, cloud-computing-enhanced software. Not that one has many choices: The latest update for my Samsung phone forces email synchronization to 'always on', ensuring my contact list and message contents are available to every application demanding local access.

      One can't build an ISP for one's phone, ever. That's why net neutrality is more important than device privacy.

  11. Stop the brown flood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and all their problems disappear.

  12. the Nazi's had laws like this! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    the Nazi's had laws like this!

  13. look at US looking down on everything that moves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an unclever disguise at best.... living the lie is fatal to every one everywhere... the 'dream' is just another nightmare now...

  14. Good! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SOMETHING has to slow down the German economy before they own us all. Chasing out all technology would do it.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Premature emptying of German banks accounts by criminals would also do the trick.

      I'm apparently still thinking of the premature air-conditioned supermarkets from the opera "Einstein on the Beach."

    2. Re:Good! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      > SOMETHING has to slow down the German economy before they own us all. Chasing out all technology would do it.

      Calm yourself there Mr. Little.

      The "German work ethic" already makes the world safe for the rest of us.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Good! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      SOMETHING has to slow down the German economy before they own us all.

      The trick to success is NOT to drag everyone around you down, it's to life yourself up. Weakening Germany won't really improve things for others.

      Notice that even bombing them into ruin 75 years ago didn't work all that well....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  15. Sure...It will cost you by RocketChild · · Score: 1

    I like the idea that VW and BMW should tell the government they can do it in their native language. But for future upgrades that will need to be free for anyone that owns their vehicles for the next 50 years, they'll need to be compensated annually 100mil Euros to hire proper security engineers and testers. So, if France wants it, that is another 100mil Euros so they can hire French staff and if the USA, another 100mil for English speaking security professionals and engineers. Put back the cost burden on the governments for future maintenance upgrades. Security and safety isn't free, while government contracts are very lucrative.

  16. Unlikely this will pass by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Unlike the USA, Germany has a strong pro-privacy movement -- this will probably get shot down hard at either the Federal or EU level (since it's likely at odds with EU rules).

    1. Re:Unlikely this will pass by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You are hilarious!

    2. Re:Unlikely this will pass by gweihir · · Score: 2

      It will. But it is highly alarming that the fascistoid politicians pushing for this will not stop, but try again and again. It will likely not even get passed in the first place, and if it does, it will very likely get killed by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, i.e. on federal level. It has no chance at all on EU level, should it come to that.

      In the end, this law would sabotage society and far worse so than any amount of terrorism ever could. It is essentially Zersetzung, as it undermines trust and that is the critical thing that keeps a society together and working.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Unlikely this will pass by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Changes to the law after ww2 in West Germany gave a lot of powers to protect "democracy" from any group wanting to change democracy.
      Germany now has the same investigative powers to protect "democracy.".

      Why would a strong pro-privacy movement be able to block the police and security forces in Germany from protecting democracy?
      Would the police protecting Germany democracy allow a pro-privacy movement to start blocking the police from protecting Germany democracy?
      Anyone in a German pro-privacy movement would be identified and their involvement in stopping police work would be investigated.
      If such groups keep trying to stop the lawful work of the German police and security services all such groups can be banned and all members investigated.
      The laws after ww2 did not allow Germany law enforcement to just sit back and let groups question the workings of democracy.

      "Surveillance: German police ready to hack WhatsApp messages" (25.07.2017)
      http://www.dw.com/en/surveilla...
      Note the part about "at source" on users' screens.
      "The leaked document shows that Germany's security services have bought the surveillance software... "
      Will the EU save privacy?
      "French candidate Macron targets encryption in fight against terrorism" (2017-04-13)
      http://www.france24.com/en/201...
      "Europe to push new laws to access encrypted apps data" (30 Mar 2017)
      https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Unlikely this will pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty funny yerself there, chuckles. You actually go out dressed like that?

  17. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German authorities are preparing a law that will force device manufacturers to include backdoors within their products that any attacker could use at their discretion.

    Note to self: Don't buy German IT products.

    1. Re:FTFY by networkBoy · · Score: 2

      or cars...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:FTFY by meerling · · Score: 1

      ... or even toasters, especially talking ones ...

  18. Just set one up? by Toxiz · · Score: 1

    What's to stop these criminals from throwing up their own encrypted Matrix server, with no backdoor? This only really makes them stop using big commercial services. Countries will spend millions trying to get back doors into public chat rooms, only to have millions of private ones pop up. -T

    1. Re:Just set one up? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nothing. This is not about fighting crime. This is about making the whole population feel watched to prevent wrongthink.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  19. I have a better idea by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just deport all of the Muslim immigrants back to their homelands instead of taking away more freedom in the name of tolerance?

    Because that is what this is all about?

    Sorry buddy, Abdul just cannot bring himself to become a good German. He insists on acting like he's still back in the Middle East and resents that the kafir has a higher standard of living than he does, so you understand that in the name of Tolerance and Inclusion, we must impose highly onerous surveillance policies on you. I mean you're not a bigot right? You wouldn't want us to just say "wouldn't the path of least resistance and harm to German society and culture be to send Abdul back" now would you?

    1. Re:I have a better idea by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just deport all of the Muslim immigrants back to their homelands instead of taking away more freedom in the name of tolerance?

      Because that is what this is all about?

      Sorry buddy, Abdul just cannot bring himself to become a good German. He insists on acting like he's still back in the Middle East and resents that the kafir has a higher standard of living than he does, so you understand that in the name of Tolerance and Inclusion, we must impose highly onerous surveillance policies on you. I mean you're not a bigot right? You wouldn't want us to just say "wouldn't the path of least resistance and harm to German society and culture be to send Abdul back" now would you?

      Abdul? I though Jacob was the evil one in Germany

    2. Re:I have a better idea by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      But good sir, are you honestly implying that diversity isn't the panacea we've been led to believe? Diversity!

  20. sponsored by conservatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    conservatives ruin everything.

  21. Intel Management Engine (ME) by zaax · · Score: 2

    Intel Management Engine (ME), also known as the Manageability Engine. Intel have been putting a back door on their chips for the last 10 years at least. So what are law enforement worrying about?

    1. Re:Intel Management Engine (ME) by gweihir · · Score: 1

      They cannot use that one for law enforcement. As sources need to be protected, they can use this rarely and very carefully for intelligence purposes. A source you do not protect is one you lose. Incidentally, if the attack code for this ever leaks, we have a global catastrophe. And since not even the NSA can protect their attack code against having it stolen...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. That will be easy by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    After all, Munich is switching back to Windows.

    1. Re:That will be easy by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, the governments still get to keep secrets. Its just you plebs that do not have the right to privacy.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  23. Good Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it was so hard to find all the Jews without backdoor always on devices. This will make it easier to get the bad guys. This is great news if you easily forget the fact that who the bad guy is can change in less than 10 years.

  24. Global Economy by darkain · · Score: 1

    We live in a global economy today. Does this mean all digital devices imported into the country need to have these same backdoors? Probably so. Are manufacturers lazy, and want to build one-size-fits-all devices? You damn right they are. Meaning if this passes, device models sold to Germany will ALSO have these same backdoors sold elsewhere in the world.

    1. Re:Global Economy by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      One production line for all nations. Software just sets privacy to nations laws.
      With the key, security services can change the settings.
      In the past that got seen with collection like in :
      Greek wiretapping case 2004–05 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...–05
      SISMI-Telecom scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Germany will just go for software that can read "messages "at source" on users' screens." "remotely record all calls" "turn on its microphone and camera"
      "Surveillance: German police ready to hack WhatsApp messages" (25.07.2017)
      http://www.dw.com/en/surveilla...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  25. Classic delimma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, same old classic delimma argued on the cypherpunks list when the Clipper chip was being pushed on us. Now Germany is going to try to learn this lesson:

    1: Backdoors get compromised. Does Germany want its secrets guzzled out by countries who don't like them with no way for people to protect themselves? They definitely will care the next time someone knows where a VIP is attacked, with the attackers mysteriously knowing every detail of where the VIP was.

    2: Backdoors don't always work. The bad guys hear about something and do something different.

    All what will happen is that German citizens will use other country products.

  26. Preparing a law? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    I doubt it. They don't even have a government yet.
    Nobody knows what and if a coalition will be formed.
    There might be new elections.
    This is nothing else but bullshit.

    1. Re:Preparing a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't even have a government yet.

      I know I risk a Godwin with this, however you should read about Hitlers rise to power if you think the lack of "government" will stop them. There are laws to keep things running as is and there is no reason for the old government to repeat the election or form a coallition until Merkel is sure that she will get the result she wants and vacating her position isn't an option. The big german parties are known to bend the democratic process in their favour when needed, wouldn't be surprised if they tried to axe the small parties again once this is over, proof enough that you can't have a functioning government with only a five percent hurdle for participation after all.

    2. Re:Preparing a law? by houghi · · Score: 1

      They probably confused the colors of their flag and thought they where Belgium or are going for the Belgian record of froming a governement.

      Doesn't matter, both Belgium and Germany have more than one governement (just like the US).

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  27. Papers Bitte! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the German thing to say. And it ain't about rolling no joint, which they don't have in Germany anyway.

  28. Is it a good idea to let Germans do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are not people who value freedom and democracy.

  29. The recent surge of terrorist attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recent surge of terrorist attacks and other crimes... could have something to do with the millions of unvetted and literally unwashed cavemen they've brought in.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re: The recent surge of terrorist attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah fuck those Syrians for being victims!

      Jeebus isnt letting you into Heaven bubba.

    2. Re: The recent surge of terrorist attacks by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The fact that they are "victims" is entirely irrelevant. These people won't even use a public toilet properly. They have zero interest in assimilating, fitting in, or just being nice guests.

      Even the Turks don't want them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  30. Yay Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Europe soooo much better than the US!

  31. What's old is new again by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    It smells like Bubba's Clipper chip.
    You know, I know and even they know it will be compromised, not if but when.
    Who does one sue when the damn thing is used by other than appropriate authorities?

    "What will you do, where will you hide, when the man ib black is on the inside" - Drs. 4 Bob

  32. Extra door for your BMW or Mercedes? by sinij · · Score: 1

    How would you like that extra door for your BMW or Mercedes?

    1. Re:Extra door for your BMW or Mercedes? by aglider · · Score: 1

      My Skoda Superb already has a door on the back! Is it already compliant?

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  33. Aftermarket? Homemade? by aglider · · Score: 1

    And what if I install a so-called "after market firmware" that hinders that backdoor?

    And what if I install a home-made (read "linux based") device instead of a "commercial" one?

    Will I be considered "out of law"?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Aftermarket? Homemade? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Linux will be at the user app level of a persons phone. Type in all the message and use all the very best, strong, tested encryption that can be found on the internet.
      Once the German security services find that account to be interesting they will be "reading the messages "at source" on users' screens." on that Linux software sitting on very commercial cell phone.
      "Surveillance: German police ready to hack WhatsApp messages" (25.07.2017)
      http://www.dw.com/en/surveilla...
      Changes in software on standard hardware do not stop the security services from getting ""at source" on users' screens".

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Aftermarket? Homemade? by aglider · · Score: 1

      We are already running closed source blobs in Android phones running at root privileges. This means you can forget about privacy.
      Anyway, Linux is not at the application level. It's at the OS level. Mostly.

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    3. Re:Aftermarket? Homemade? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "This means you can forget about privacy." The gov malware will just see what the user reads. Copy every word entered. Get every spoken word. Live mic, camera, location.
      The user can swap out all the encryption and OS they want. The phone will have given away all data.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  34. Can’t work, except with small-time stupid cr by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Let’s assume the iPhone is the target of this law because, frankly, it probably is. And let’s assume Timmy & Co. cave in because they like money.

    Any good criminal network will have at least a few people bright enough to write code. Those people can implement existing strong encryption algorithms themselves. They can also teach people how to get their own free developer key and to install their own secure apps onto their own phones using Xcode. Sure, they’ll have to reinstall once a week... many jailbreakers already do this, it’s not super difficult.

    The end result is criminal networks having more secure communications, while the rest of us are told to bend over a bit further.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  35. Nazi's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have not these Nazi's been down this path before? Did they learn nothing from the Nuremburg trials?

    What a bunch of maroons.

  36. Re:Can’t work, except with small-time stupid by vux984 · · Score: 2

    The flipside, is that they don't need to access the criminals communications, they can simply prosecute them for having communications they can't access. Because THAT will be illegal now.

  37. A security backdoor simple enough for cops by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    Will be childs play for Russian and Chinese hackers.

    So Germany is mandating insecure networks.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  38. Future Hitler aproves new infrastructure ! by thygate · · Score: 1

    This from a country that in recent history, twice!, persecuted minorities. Can you imagine what would have happened if Hitler had access to the government spyware infrastructure we have today ?! And all over the world nationalism is on the rise again, how could anyone think this is a good idea ..

    1. Re:Future Hitler aproves new infrastructure ! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      A nationalist and a proto-fascist would think this is a good idea. The present young generation (gen Z for "zero", as I like to think of them) does not care. And so it begins.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Future Hitler aproves new infrastructure ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nationalist and a proto-fascist would think this is a good idea. The present young generation (gen Z for "zero", as I like to think of them) does not care. And so it begins.

      People with power wanting more power? Young people not caring about something?

      These aren't so much a beginning as they are observations of human nature and unchangeable facts of life. Let the young grow wiser, shun political/disrespectful people, and make the most of life.

  39. Its not you dummy! by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    We spy on you because of them.

    --
    If it were easy, it wouldn't be called life.

  40. Germany Uber Alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stazi wont come back you say
    Mellow out or you will pay!

    This German Reunification thing has been good for no one.

  41. It's ugly. Very ugly. by slshdtisctrldbysjws · · Score: 1

    They are being up front about what has already been done clandestinely.
    Expect many legal overtures like this in the future.
    The establishment will bargain for your consent for the violations they have already perpetrated.

    I pray that they will be stopped before they have absolute power.
    We will all have to sacrifice profoundly in order to restore liberty to western civilization. Stand up now or be enslaved for eternity.

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
  42. Not what I was expecting.... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking they were going to lay down laws to ensure security in devices... not blast them full of holes to help out hackers... So - who wants to place bets on how long it will take for the first politician to get hacked by their own backdoor?

    1. Re:Not what I was expecting.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What? Are you nuts? Slaughter the goose laying the golden eggs? If you do that, they'll immediately realize how stupid they were and backpedal.

      Hack everything else, far more lucrative and far less backlash. Jeeeesh, kids these days, can't even identify the correct hacking targets.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  43. Re: Cisco Routers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when the NSA does it its to preserve Freedumbs(tm)!

  44. *sniff* by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If only Erich Mielke could still be with us to see his dream come true...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. The perfect German argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Germany needs to do is evoke the Joseph Goebbels argument: If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

  46. Freaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freaky Germans! Always asking about backdoor stuff.

  47. And you get hacked, and you get hacked.... by Notahacker · · Score: 1

    Everyone gets hacked!

  48. Fuck Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will never comply.

  49. Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because my job. This one's free. First of all, I might eventually be affected by that bullshit if it spreads and second, it's always a pleasure belittling you and showing you just how big an idiot you really are.

    First and foremost, there is no such thing as a "government only" backdoor. A backdoor is or is not. A backdoor that MUST be in EVERY device, independent of maker and the kind of device is by definition a high profile target for every hacker on this planet. Everyone wants to have that. That includes every state actor. I.e. other nations WILL want to have that backdoor. Now, of course you might share it with friends. It's unlikely that you want to share it with states like, say, North Korea or that Daesh idiots (that's ISIS for you, in case you didn't keep up with the news). Yes, Thomas, you're about to give terrorists a tool to invade German devices.

    Way to go, aren't you supposedly at least kinda-sorta responsible for the internal security of the state?

    How they get it you ask? Are you kidding? We're talking about the universal key to EVERY computer in your country. Every private, every corporate, every government system. You think a state actor (especially a rogue state actor) would shy away from kidnapping someone's family if he as much as MIGHT have access to the relevant keys? Here's your wife, Thomas, here is your kids. Hand over the keys and don't talk about it or, well, I spare you the details.

    And even worse, you won't get what you want to get, Thomas. Because you don't think that anyone outside of Germany would as much as touch a device with a "German backdoor" installed, do you? Twice so if a state actor. No. Outside of Germany, you'll get secure devices (well, more or less... but at least not deliberately insecured ones). It is trivial, not only to me because that's what I do for a living, but to everyone with at least a minimum knowledge of IT to diff a "good" and one of your "bad" devices to see what's different between them. And what's different between them is your backdoor. It is now also trivial to patch such a security hole in a way that you'll be locked out again. And you can rest assured that every terrorist on the planet will make sure to plug that and lock you out.

    Thomas. Again. Usually, I sell good advice. This one is actually free. Stop that idiocy before it costs you your job. I kinda like your party. Even though you're a grade A moron.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by thedarb · · Score: 1

      I think you are mistaken. I suspect they could do this with key escrow. Buy a new device? To set it up, you have to get your keys issued to you by the state. Each device can have a unique key or set of keys, but they would all be owned by the state... not you. Then your phone goes through the encryption process with the key or keys it's been issued. Get arrested and they want to read your phone? No problem, send it to the single well funded government organization that has your keys on file. They don't have to share the info with anyone. They either decrypt the device themselves and provide the decrypted evidence, or they decrypt an image of the device given to them. Same net result.

      For the keys to be compromised, either the cipher needs to be broken, or the institution doing the key escrow and decryption needs to be compromised. That may or may not be possible, and no one will ever know until when and if it happens.

      And IF it happens, the state invalidates everyone's existing keys, and forces everyone to get new keys.

      This type of scenario, while terrifying, is definitely possible. But the strength of that type of design is only as strong as the agency in charge of managing it.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The whole shit flies out the window the second the device gets rooted. And you can rest assured that this is the first thing anyone with nefarious intent will do. Make it illegal? Fuck, do people planning to blow themselves to kingdom come give half a shit about a law concerning their phone? What do you want to do, arrest him? We're still talking about someone willing to blow himself up, to kill himself. You think he gives half a shit about your laws?

      What you'd have to do is make rooting a phone illegal. On what grounds? Getting something like this past their constitutional court is highly unlikely. Twice so from a party that considers private property sacrosanct, he simply won't have the backing of the rest of his government for something like this, no matter how much he stomps his foot and mutters "but terrists!". But again, even if you make it illegal, nobody would give a shit.

      I know what he wants. I also know that he cannot get it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by thedarb · · Score: 1

      Device manufacturers can complicate rooting the device, of course. They could also say all communication devices have to be leased from the Fed, too. Running compliance enforcement software. It can be done. Just very probably would need to be a totalitarian form of government to do it. Politically, yes, he'll probably never get it. But there are ways in places where people can't influence their government.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You also have to take into account that while Germany is a sizable market, it's by no means a market big enough to warrant pissing off the rest of the world and losing market shares to competitors sane enough to not build backdoored-by-design devices that no government or company would buy. So whatever backdoor they would build for Germany would be at best some tacked-on solution that is just enough to comply with whatever the law says. It would most certainly not be any hardware differences that would basically mean building some Germany-only devices but instead be a German firmware.

      This won't survive the first security researcher looking at such a device with a passing glance.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Not every device is rootable. Many devices have never been rooted, and lots of people have tried.

    6. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't need to be rooted. It just needs a third party second-encryption on the files of interest.

    7. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      From every group of device that can be used for "evil", there has at least been one instance that could be modified in such a way that it benefits the one trying to abuse it. From computers to cellphones to tablets to cars.

      So if the Mercedes and the iPhone cannot be broken, terrorists are going to drive a Skoda and communicate with Samsung.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the strength of that type of design is only as strong as the agency in charge of managing it.

      This is the access back door Opportunist is talking about. Somewhere you have to have access to the database of escrowed keys. Once Daesh gets an infiltrator (actually, probably the need two) into that process then they have the same access as the German security services. They now have a security services officer who investigates chosen targets and a judge who issues warrants and permits the access.

      Foreign security services likely do this without compromising the actual people, just the devices that they use for their work. This means you can't look at the security of the device in isolation. You have to look at the entire system together.

    9. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Key escrow is a terrible idea, and you're holding it out as a solution? WTF, man?

    10. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... how can the device know the keys come from the state? Oh, I know: there is a master government key used to sign all the other keys!

    11. Re:Thomas, I usually sell good IT security advice by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Key escrow. Right. That escrow storage now gets a kilometer-high glowing sign saying "Hack me!" Keys have to travel to the escrow storage. This means that manufacturers have to store keys at least long enough to transfer them; given normal attention to security, that storage will be permanent and a high-value target.

      Right now, the key to my iPhone's storage exists and existed only in the phone's Secure Enclave. Nobody ever saw it. There was no way for it to leak. If Apple needs to know it, there's people at Apple who can leak it, and some sort of storage whose security can be breached. Right now, nobody hacks into Apple to try to find iPhone keys, because they aren't there.

      When you say it may or may not be possible to breach the security on the escrow, I hear that it's possible. (And of course it's possible. There are going to be people who can leak the information, and they will have loved ones that can be tortured to death if the people don't cooperate.) So, there will likely be a breach. Then, you say, invalidate all existing keys, which means destroying all information on everybody's phones. Hand out new keys somehow - how? By introducing a process to handle tens of millions of phones at one time without security leaks? Right.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  50. Does this apply to raspberry pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a nerd, I make my own devices. I guess I could make my own sbc too, but that is the majority of the work.

    1. Re:Does this apply to raspberry pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It almost certainly would. It's a device with a computer in it, right? Should fall under the "and more" provision in the summary. Sort of like if you 3D-print a gun, you have to apply for a serial number (in CA, in a proposed law) so it can be tracked like real factory-made ones. As if anybody would do that voluntarily.

      What they don't know...

    2. Re:Does this apply to raspberry pi? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Just smuggle it in, then. Problem solved.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  51. Ho! Hum! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just notify all my spies and assassins with One Time Pad messages created on my lap top and then copied onto my phone.

  52. Please post by shayd2 · · Score: 1
    Please post the logon details ASAP

    I need to get control of my refrigerator

  53. Requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have to install the equipment in their facilities to use on production environments. Those authorities should be subject to the same

  54. Good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like what Germany is really doing is preparing for a world where their citizens no longer have access to the latest and greats tech product from the United States, Japan, and S. Korea. Though I am sure Chinese will be more than happy to provide.

  55. Another politician lost his mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we're gonna have to cope with general insecurity in the name of security.

  56. Re:Can’t work, except with small-time stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Criminals tend to hide their communications. Do you know about Steganography? It would just ruin security for normal people while leaving the door open for criminals.

  57. they just want more government money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you like Law Enforcement to access this device? Yes/No

    Its out of our hands!....

  58. Backdoor Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHILE THE MOON IS AN ARTIFICIAL ALIEN BASE THAT SPIES ON US. Face it, theres no terrain or chemical composition in common with earth, there aint no goddamn trees there, it has a perfect size and distance to make a total solar eclipse, its massively 1/4 the size of earth, we pretend to scientifically believe that it spins on its axis, and military remote viewers have seen the soul energy of the freshly dead go into a 7-mile tall crystal with a cube on top

  59. Good luck by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    Legislating math.....

    Try repealing the law of gravity next....

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  60. Re:Can’t work, except with small-time stupid by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re "the end result is criminal networks having more secure communications"
    Criminal networks just talk at the trusted family, tribe and community level.
    The place of worship and at community events becomes their cover for meeting and talking. Police can't enter such events undercover as they have no reason to be part of that faith, community or tribe.
    The criminal networks know all the tech is fully open to German police and the security services and use it for decades of misinformation.

    Long term criminal network are doing their very best to get ready for generations and decades of productive counter surveillance on the German police and security services.
    Criminal network have a plan to win as all Germany has is a plan to hire more police, mil, investigators for the wider "community".
    Criminal networks are flooding the German security service and police with their own "clean" trusted people looking for "work".
    People who have passed German exams and have the grades to enter the German police, gov and "help" with investigations.
    Lots of second and third generation criminals who can get past any gov, police interview.
    Over decades people 100% loyal to criminal groups will rise up the ranks of the German mil, police, gov and security services reporting every policy, new investigation, undercover attempt and mission back to their criminal networks.
    Just like the Stasi attempted to get staff into West German gov, companies to rise up the ranks in West Germany over decades.
    The difference been West Germany, the CIA had actually detected most attempts by the Stasi to place its spies in West Germany.
    Such internal security has now been replaced by political correctness.
    Germany has now totally lost control of its ability to look into the backgrounds of people wanting to join the German police, gov, mil and security services.
    Its a virtue signaling free for all to get into the German police, mil and gov. No ability to find out a persons links back to a generational criminal networks.
    Criminal networks in Germany are 100% safe from been investigated in their closed communities deep in Germany.
    Criminal networks are also using very advanced long term methods to get their people into the German police to see what intelligence is been collected in real time.
    Not much the German police can do to secure its own ranks. Any attempt to remove criminals within the ranks of the police, mil, gov is blocked by a political policy to hire anyone without looking into their criminal background.
    The suggestion from the GCHQ, NSA is for the very few Germans who can still be trusted to try and use advanced electronic collection to keep investigations from all German investigators with links to criminals. To try and use top clearances that the USA has to approve to try and protect the most advance collection methods.
    The translators in the German gov or who are contracted cant be trusted. So all that collection the NSA still thinks is been kept at the most secure levels in Germany is been seen by a new generation of translators.
    German staff working for NATO, police who help with international criminal police investigations share the security product with new German staff connected to criminal groups.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  61. Other Nations' Intelligence Services Thank You by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    Setting aside organized crime for a moment, every other national intelligence service will thank you for this back door, whether you meant for them to access those devices or not. At very least, you've made it much easier for them to target their collection efforts since all they have to do is compromise a single German agency versus each and every individual device. So pick the boogeyman of choice, the Russians, the Chinese, the Americans, the French, and think of their intelligence agencies crawling through every "secure" network and device inside Germany.

  62. Germany on the March Again !? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laying the foundation for the 4th Reich, a total police state, digitally enhanced?

    I take a pass, besides, I hardly know a word of German.

  63. Chill. Headline isn't entirely correct. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    A source claims Thomas de Maizière would like to have backdoors in popular apps. That doesn't mean he'll get them or, as a matter of fact, that the Bundestag will pass a law to make those mandatory. Since the Third Reich Germany has been, shall I say, a tad sensitive on the invulnerability of privacy in mail and telecommunications. I doubt he'd get it through the Bundestag let alone past supreme court.

    It's just a German gouvernment official probing the waters machiavelli style. Just like in the US. No news here. Move along.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  64. Fuck that noise. by jcr · · Score: 1

    The STASI and the Gestapo were BAD, m'kay?

    Germany already had to overthrow two totalitarian regimes in the 20th century. They sure as hell don't need another one.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  65. Interior Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a person takes on the job of Interior Minister, they undergo a mandatory lobotomy. There is no other explanation for the streak of braindead people in that position. Listen up Thomas, you moron. German computer technology isn't particularly sought after as it is, but if it has one thing going for it, it's that it is not American or Russian or Chinese. Now you have given everybody a very good reason to shun German tech completely. The damage is done, even if that stupid law never comes to be. YOU FUCKING MORON.

  66. They have no idea of the level of extra effort.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    .... that will be required on the part of law enforcement to protect innocent people from the prying eyes of nefarious individuals that will use the exact same back doors that the government will have.

    Oh, of course these people may be breaking the law, but that's not going to help the people that will get harmed in the interim.

    I expect they will realize their folly within about 6 months to a year,

  67. What could possibly go wrong??? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a law custom made to kill the German consumer electronics industry, as everyone buys products from other countries that don't have built in insecurity.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  68. Not smart! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Germany does this, it will destroy their economy. No one will want German backdoored garbage. I wouldn't. This would be a huge mistake.

  69. Maybe Stop Importing Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..instead of ricking everyones privacy and security with back doors and government big brother...

  70. So much for security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The existence of a backdoor means a device cannot be secure. All of your data should be encrypted using a key that you "own". If anyone can access your data without your password/biometric key then you shouldn't store anything private. A backdoor that can be used by law enforcement is a backdoor that can be used by hackers. The moral of the story is don't buy anything made in Germany if this laws passes.

  71. Gun nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, you mad bro cause you can't get bumpstock? The second amendment is hardly ignored, give it up.

  72. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were a German criminal you'd hop over the border and buy a safe device, and go home. This kind of thing will keep the honest people under surveillance and that's all.

  73. Why the "Things?" As if one is needed there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For cars, the backdoor already exists. Plug in a suitable dongle to the OBD port. Manufacturer would just need to document for law enforcement its proprietary APIs that go beyond the mandated ones.

    For IoT, in general, they're backdoored from the factor. Hard-coded admin passwords, etc. As somebody noted in a thread I saw recently, security is the "S" in IoT. If somebody in law enforcement truly needs to get into your refrigerator or media box, I don't think they'll have much trouble.

    Phones and computers, now, *should not* have a backdoor built into the device. That's just too dangerous - they get lost, there are privacy issues, etc. Perhaps some kind of key escrow is possible, such as the MS backup in their cloud of your settings. I'm sure Apple and the Android OEMs/Google could do the same thing if required. Yes, it can be avoided by working only with local accounts, in which case the cops are in the same position as they always were - must somehow ban encryption entirely (to the everlasting joy of the hackers and info thieves) to get around that.

    This just looks too Stasi-like for me. If it goes through how long do you think it'll be before the same things gets mandated in the US and UK?

  74. What to do after a leak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the chaos if the master database of backdoors were leaked (i.e. Snowden type disclosure)?

  75. It's time we stopped being enablers by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Just about everybody in the Free World is either keeping their mouth shut about how much they're willing to give up to be safe, or else beating their chest and proclaiming what manly men they are because "anything to fight terrorism".

    We need to start calling out both varieties of coward, ridiculing them, shaming them and generally treating them like the threats to democracy they are.

    We need to stand up and say we're willing to accept casualties to stay free. That means the government needs to be told to fuck off out of our private lives, and if that means terrorists manage to kill some of us, it's a price we'll pay. We need to let people like this know we will unelect them and their party so fast their cynical, crypto-fascist heads will spin.

    In short, we need to grow up and stop pretending we can have both freedom and perfect security. We have to choose. And as far as I'm concerned, if you choose security, you should move to China and quit wrecking things for decent people.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:It's time we stopped being enablers by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've been calling out cowards for years now, as appropriate. So far, people ignore me.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  76. Open source projects? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    Just wondering how they will insist on a backdoor in any open source project that uses encryption. Especially if it is hosted in another country. I can see a great opportunity for open source alternative firmware downloads.

  77. I feel a class action lawsuit coming. by 0ryn · · Score: 1

    When (and it will be a when not if) hackers figure out this back door. I can see a huge security nightmare ahead for German citizens.
    I think it's time to start preparing a class action lawsuit against the German government.

  78. Well written, Opportunist, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you think Thomas de Mazière understands English? He is barely able to articulate himself in his mother tongue!

    On another topic, it's sad that this guy is the son of someone who fought the East German government, with its stasi :-(

    1. Re:Well written, Opportunist, but... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually he does understand English. But even if not, he should have the personnel to translate it for him. He outsourced so many parts of his brain that it's actually a feat that he still can stumble from blunder to blunder, one should assume that they already somehow manage to keep him from moving at all.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Well written, Opportunist, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually he does understand English.

      You mean Oettinger English?

      But yes, more seriously. This guy shouldn't be where he is.

  79. "surge in terrorist attacks"... I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It couldn't possibly have anything to do with Merkel forcing the German people to allow one and a half million RANDOM YOUNG MEN to live in their country, most of them muslim, by any chance?

  80. Well, by ruddk · · Score: 1

    That can't end well.

  81. What have the Americans promised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the USA have promised to do in exchange for providing them with a free backdoor for their espionage agencies in every device. I am aware Mr de Maiziere isn't exactly known for his pro-privacy stance, but this is an exceptionally idiotic proposal even for him.

  82. Maziere is an open fascist, and so are you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heâ(TM)s a member of the Mont Perelin Society and their >500 think tanks, whose "values" are
    1. fascism (replacing power to the people by power to the corporations, whose behavior, mind you, is that of psychopaths) [newspeak: "privatization"],
    2. freeloading on state services and infrastructure that we pay [newspeak: "tax breaks"], and
    3. creating an anti-social psychopathic dog-eat-dog society, where we let our fellow citizens starve, rot in "privatized" old people's homes, and die in the dirt in front of the hospital, because basic human decency would be "socialism". [newspeak: "social state degradation"].

    And so are you.

  83. In what distorted world do Americans live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You call the Nazis fascist when they were literally national *socialists*.

    You call neocon actual-fascism, aka your country's chief export, and the Mont PÃrelin Society's agenda since '47, of which ALL German political leaders currently are members btw., "communism".

    And you call neoliberals " neocons", while calling anyone who is not a ultra/right wing etremist literally-willing-to-murder-babies-for-profit supporter a "liberal".

    Do you even realize that your reality is as distorted as that of North Koreans?
    That is not even a fucking understatement! Ask *anyone* outside the Anglophone/Hypercapitalist world, who follows these things. Every African, South American, East-Asian, Russian, Indian, Oceanian, and even most Europeans, including Brits, Canadians, and Australians know this.

  84. Exelent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let's focus again on making old-school devices that don't store all kind of random stuff and just ditch most of that so called smart crap we see nowadays...

  85. It is highly illegal im Germany too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did you ask how many brain cells he has, because you have none left, and ... "spare some brain cells"? Or just because you are so dumb that you cannot even tell how dumb you are?

    Multiple fundamental laws directly forbid it. Laws that were created as a direct result of the industrialization of murder by the Nazis.

    But the fascist Mont Perelin Society, of which ALL political leaders of Germany are members, does not give a fuck.
    Hell, they also supported TTIP, which, by German law, makes them literal traitors. A crime that gets you the maximum sentence: 20 years in prison.

    But of couurse, they made themselves a law that makes politicians exempt from prosecution.
    But make no mistake, they *will* face prison at the first instance where the power ever slips from their hands.

    Germany's active society (as opposed to the passive-thinking livestock) does not take that shit lightly.

  86. He's not trolling! He is right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that does not mean the Nazi things cannot ever be related to good things. Even he nastiest monsters have some good im them!
    E.g. they built the Autobahn!
    I can both disapprove of the Nazis and approve of the Autobahn! Why can't you Americans do such mental feat??

    Hell if a serial child rapist Dick Cheney clone would sind the most beatiful thing, I would support the fuck out of that, precisely *because* he's evil! Because that is his fucking way out, can't you see?? Stop forcing evil people to stay evil, for FUCK's sake!!

  87. ROFL. Verfassungsschutz is Newspeak for Gestapo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The level of your bullshit is truly amazing. Lying to the Americans...

    @Americans: The "Verfassingsschutz" is something between the DHS, the Gestapo and some ministry from "1984".
    They actively go against our constitution and are one of the main forces in pushing evil shit like this total surveillance!

    Totalitarian control is literally their job description!

    To say they protect the constitution is like saying the GDR was a democracy, or like saying the Nazis were social humanists.

  88. Heil Merkel! by Mrakodrap · · Score: 1

    All hails to our Dear Leaderess Frau Merkel! Sieg Heil! (Now I can go puke.)

  89. take a deep breath, step back, and look at the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you were initially wrong with the assumption of single master key design.

    The whole shit flies out the window the second the device gets rooted.

    Not really/necessarily. It can be viewed as the capability to read any device like an open book, which is a different thing from controlling what software every device runs.

    And you can rest assured that this is the first thing anyone with nefarious intent will do. Make it illegal? Fuck, do people planning to blow themselves to kingdom come give half a shit about a law concerning their phone?

    There is a pretty vast spectrum of scenarios. You seem hyperfocused on one. But even in this one, it can be seen as the authorities wanting to be sure they can read the terrorists phone *after they've blown themselves up*. But yeah, layered encryption, whuddyagonnado?

  90. Re:Can’t work, except with small-time stupid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    And let’s assume Timmy & Co. cave in because they like money.

    You seem to think that the German government can ban iPhones with impunity, and that the German public will meekly go along with it. Another possibility is that Apple stands firmly behind privacy, and the German authorities can either give in or ban the iPhone, which will (a) prove highly unpopular, and (b) ensure that Apple Stores in Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Switzerland, Austria, the Czech Republic, and Poland get a lot more business. (Did I miss any bordering countries?) It's not like Apple is going to be losing all those German sales.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  91. IntelME Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems german has the idea from IntelME for this reason.

  92. Re:Can’t work, except with small-time stupid by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Criminals tend to be pretty average people. If anything, they tend to be below average. Most criminals wouldn't be able to tell you what steganography even is.

  93. this is far away from a law by datadefender · · Score: 1

    don't panic !
    Every now and then politician make suggestions. In this case it was the (acting) interior minister.
    For it to become law it has to go thru parliament and it it would, the courts will be called.
    There is already enough resistance to this from other political parties.
    That is the great thing about democracy and independant jurisdiction: anyone can thow up ideas for debate and debate is good. In the end majority and courts decide

  94. Time for a line in the sand... by Docrobot · · Score: 0

    I imagine that more and more manufacturers will simply not ship networking and other related products to Germany, finding the cost of manufacturing special networking products with these back doors too high to be worth the trouble or the cost of lost business and other commercial backlash from outraged clients. The companies might also not like the increased costs and higher selling prices associated with low volume specialty items and simply comply to the law by not selling any items that fall into this category of hardware in Germany at all. What will Germany do if no networking companies change their hardware, because the cost of working with a Government who openly spies on it's people is too high in so many areas, including integrity? Time for a digital line in the sand, so to speak...

    --
    -------- Docrobot