Ditto
Every company i know having more than 20 win-users, has already the SUS installed and every user gets the windows updates when admin approves them. The article says that IBM does the same thing.Where is the news ? Perhaps after so many times that IBM had convert all their desktops to Linux that at least 20 of them are still running Windows ?
Nop,
more like "they are 1 million people blogging... in Japan" or
1 million people find blogs usefull... in Japan
and last MS finds business opportunity... in Japan
Use s-procs for maintaining the data integrity only !!
1) Centralized code
if you want to support all the RDBMS you mention then it's obvious that the code is not centralized using s-procs. You have to maintain 3 different versions of s-procs (Oracle,MSSQL,DB2)
Second you code, in some languages oriented in set logic, problems that are mainly procedural. The result is very poor IMHO in both speed and maintainability. If you use Oracle and PL/SQL the problem is not obvious, but if you plan to use MSSQL, T-SQL is the worst language i am aware (to the point i dont consider it as a language at all)
2) Compiled SQL is faster
Execution plan of Ad-hoc queries is also cached
3) Enhanced security
It must be really lazy the admin that demands to access the database using s-procs only. All RDBMS offer finer methods to secure the data than this.
and last
Since your application is "highly data-centric" using s-procs for data access is actually an SQL sterilization No matter how clever you may code your s-procs nothing beats in speed and flexibility the adhoc (dynamic) queries, so the power that SQL has, is never delivered to you or to the end-user.
You forgeting something, WordPerfect had a very large share in the market, while Linux is not the dominant OS in the desktop market.
Second MS is marching to the Longhorn release and such a move only distraction can offer inside MS and to its customers
And last i fail to see what 0ff1ce bloatware can offer to a linux user
Bill Gerstenmeier, space station director at NASA, said that if the shuttle started flying again in the spring, as planned, construction would resume in earnest on the half-built station, with the Japanese and European modules going up as early as 2007. Crews could expand from three to six members as early as 2009, he said, depending on construction at the station and positioning a second, three-person Soyuz rescue craft there.
NASA may retire but that will make
some room in the United States' Destiny science module for experiments would be used for a support system to regenerate water and air. Mr. Gerstenmeier said some displaced capacity would move to room in partners' modules where the United States has rights.
leeching off of Brussel's subventions
consider this more than an Aristotelian-Tax than a subvention
whereas you could pull 50 out of the butt of wee Jock "poo-pong" McPlop
probably been there since EURO-2004
Re:Evaluation applies to any VM language
on
Ars Technica Tours Mono
·
· Score: 3, Informative
There is nothing special in general about.NET that doesn't apply equally to Java
Except those
A. Polymorphic instruction set
In JVM most instructions have the types of their arguments hardcoded (faster
interpretation but harder to create a compiler to emit the correct one)
In CLR has polymorphic instruction set, only the result type is hardcoded
(compilers have much easier job but JITer has more work to do)
B. Extensible convention for emitted members using attributes
C. Assembly packaging vs JAR (zip file) packaging
(can also contain native code or preJITed code)
D. In JVM you are unable to encode
1) enumerations (all)
2) structures (records in Delphi, struct in C)
3) unions (C and Delphi)
4) variant records (only C)
5) overflow sensitive arithmetic on integer data types (all)
6) reference parameters (var in Delphi)
7) function pointers (all)
8) extern functions with calling convention (all)
9) variable length arguments (array of in Delphi, C...)
10) tail calls (only Scheme IIRC)
11) Unsafe code (eg C, Delphi pointer/memory manipulation)
so the compiler writer that targets JVM must emulate all the above (using Java
actually) resulting functional crippling or degraded efficiency
E. JVM has an 64K limit in branching, making compiler writing more difficult
than CLR
FYI MS is against of using the regisrty for.net apps
Use XCOPY or FTP.
Because common language runtime applications are self-describing and require no registry entries, you can use XCOPY or FTP to simply copy the application to an appropriate directory. The application can then be run from that directory.
What the author did not mention is that software implementations are always just a projection of a solution using current technologies.
As long technology advances, the most efficient implementation (in software and hardware) will be drastically different than the previous one.
If we take the time-machine and a current software (ie Linux-KDE or Eclipse-IDE) and go to 1980 and release it as a brand new OS or IDE do you think that will be succeeded ? I strongly doubt
FYI this bug is two years old (opened at 2002-09-09). IMHO Mozilla team must do a break and check/fix all security bugs in Bugzilla, before "someone" else notice them.
How is that better than JVM or even better CLI ?
It is an attempt to solve a problem already solved (in a much more elegant and portable format) using outdated techniques.
bombing macedonian villages with napalm Go to those that teach you history and tell them that napalm was discovered at 1942, so they can correct it in your books
Try to understand that, and accept it! Try to understand that besides that failing history-theft attempt we have nothing against FYROM and as you well know Greece is a great supporter of FYROM in EU
Microsoft decided to use Macedonia in the localized version of WinXP
As part of this deal ?
Alexandar's father, Filip II conquerd the greeks Where did you read this? Filip II was speaking greek, believed in the greek gods, had greek education and had conquerd Athens and Spartians, not the greeks !
FYROM has appropirated the Name and culture of Macedonia, and the rest of the world live in bliss not knowing history.
I think you mistaken, all world believes that FYROM has nothing to do with the name Macedonia (which is a Greek territory) except FYROM itself. The site that the article links, is spreading FYROM's propaganda, but noone listens except "Vande"
Slashdot Mirror
Google sucks, none found, so you have to sell your soul to MS
Use the Pharaoh's curse or voodoo symbols at the end of e-mail.
Ditto
Every company i know having more than 20 win-users, has already the SUS installed and every user gets the windows updates when admin approves them.
The article says that IBM does the same thing.Where is the news ?
Perhaps after so many times that IBM had convert all their desktops to Linux that at least 20 of them are still running Windows ?
what if i pick good and cheap and put them in a Beowulf cluster ?
1. Manage MS-Bob project
2. Fail (big time flop)
3. ???
4. Marry BG
5. Profit!
Nop, ... in Japan ... in Japan
more like "they are 1 million people blogging... in Japan"
or
1 million people find blogs usefull
and last
MS finds business opportunity
Use s-procs for maintaining the data integrity only !!
1) Centralized code
if you want to support all the RDBMS you mention then it's obvious that the code is not centralized using s-procs. You have to maintain 3 different versions of s-procs (Oracle,MSSQL,DB2)
Second you code, in some languages oriented in set logic, problems that are mainly procedural. The result is very poor IMHO in both speed and maintainability. If you use Oracle and PL/SQL the problem is not obvious, but if you plan to use MSSQL, T-SQL is the worst language i am aware (to the point i dont consider it as a language at all)
2) Compiled SQL is faster
Execution plan of Ad-hoc queries is also cached
3) Enhanced security
It must be really lazy the admin that demands to access the database using s-procs only. All RDBMS offer finer methods to secure the data than this.
and last
Since your application is "highly data-centric" using s-procs for data access is actually an SQL sterilization
No matter how clever you may code your s-procs nothing beats in speed and flexibility the adhoc (dynamic) queries, so the power that SQL has, is never delivered to you or to the end-user.
Do you mean Lookout, that MS recently bought (available here),
Is based on the open source lucent.net
You forgeting something, WordPerfect had a very large share in the market, while Linux is not the dominant OS in the desktop market.
Second MS is marching to the Longhorn release and such a move only distraction can offer inside MS and to its customers
And last i fail to see what 0ff1ce bloatware can offer to a linux user
NASA may retire but that will make
McPlop,
leeching off of Brussel's subventions
consider this more than an Aristotelian-Tax than a subvention
whereas you could pull 50 out of the butt of wee Jock "poo-pong" McPlop
probably been there since EURO-2004
There is nothing special in general about .NET that doesn't apply equally to Java
...)
Except those
A. Polymorphic instruction set
In JVM most instructions have the types of their arguments hardcoded (faster interpretation but harder to create a compiler to emit the correct one)
In CLR has polymorphic instruction set, only the result type is hardcoded (compilers have much easier job but JITer has more work to do)
B. Extensible convention for emitted members using attributes
C. Assembly packaging vs JAR (zip file) packaging (can also contain native code or preJITed code)
D. In JVM you are unable to encode
1) enumerations (all)
2) structures (records in Delphi, struct in C)
3) unions (C and Delphi)
4) variant records (only C)
5) overflow sensitive arithmetic on integer data types (all)
6) reference parameters (var in Delphi)
7) function pointers (all)
8) extern functions with calling convention (all)
9) variable length arguments (array of in Delphi, C
10) tail calls (only Scheme IIRC)
11) Unsafe code (eg C, Delphi pointer/memory manipulation)
so the compiler writer that targets JVM must emulate all the above (using Java actually) resulting functional crippling or degraded efficiency
E. JVM has an 64K limit in branching, making compiler writing more difficult than CLR
What the author did not mention is that software implementations are always just a projection of a solution using current technologies.
As long technology advances, the most efficient implementation (in software and hardware) will be drastically different than the previous one.
If we take the time-machine and a current software (ie Linux-KDE or Eclipse-IDE) and go to 1980 and release it as a brand new OS or IDE do you think that will be succeeded ?
I strongly doubt
FYI this bug is two years old (opened at 2002-09-09).
IMHO Mozilla team must do a break and check/fix all security bugs in Bugzilla, before "someone" else notice them.
"Build done" signal makes no sound
How is that better than JVM or even better CLI ?
It is an attempt to solve a problem already solved (in a much more elegant and portable format) using outdated techniques.
Just mho
bombing macedonian villages with napalm
Go to those that teach you history and tell them that napalm was discovered at 1942, so they can correct it in your books
Try to understand that, and accept it!
Try to understand that besides that failing history-theft attempt we have nothing against FYROM and as you well know Greece is a great supporter of FYROM in EU
I dont believe that will be the case if US-Georgia and Russian-Georgia had common borders.
Microsoft decided to use Macedonia in the localized version of WinXP
As part of this deal ?
Alexandar's father, Filip II conquerd the greeks
Where did you read this?
Filip II was speaking greek, believed in the greek gods, had greek education and had conquerd Athens and Spartians, not the greeks !
Open a new bug :
Selecting Macedonia is not bringing Greek characters as expected, but Slav
FYROM has appropirated the Name and culture of Macedonia, and the rest of the world live in bliss not knowing history.
I think you mistaken, all world believes that FYROM has nothing to do with the name Macedonia (which is a Greek territory) except FYROM itself.
The site that the article links, is spreading FYROM's propaganda, but noone listens except "Vande"
I doubt that you hear different answer, since if he is living in Macedonia must be Greek !