Slashdot Mirror


NBC Aims For Stability Through Redundancy In Athens

Darren writes "With the Athens Olympics just 27 days away NBC is gearing up for a massive 1210 hours of coverage (that's enough to watch TV over 50 days of Olympics 24/7). The infrastructure needed to provide such coverage is huge, and the potential for problems is significant. As a result NBC are taking all precautions possible and over the 17 days of competition they will utilize three satellite network linkups and three land-based connections to ensure they always have a connection. The mind boggles at what it is all going to cost - but I'm sure their advertising revenue will make it worth their while."

163 comments

  1. Hang on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The infrastructure needed to provide such coverage is huge and the potential for problems is significant.

    Unlike the facilities for the Olympics themselves, the place is still a building site isn't it?

    1. Re:Hang on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope they're bringing their own source of power...

    2. Re:Hang on... by Czernobog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No it bloody isn't. Check your facts first.
      Ah I forget. You cocksuckers are called cowards for a reason.

      --
      /. Where the truth
    3. Re:Hang on... by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sad thing about this, is that I am sure they are preparing for the possibility of a terrorist attack.

      Let's say there is an attack, at some stadium. Well, the whole world would be watching, and they would have exclusive rights to access the area with cameras.

      Seriously, you know they thought about it, and probably put that into the contract. Exclusive rights to a track and field competition...good...but exclusive rights to the second largest terrorist event this century? Priceless.

      I'm not saying it because I want it to happen, or because I am calloused. I am saying it because it makes financial sense for them. This could be the biggest scoop ever, and they want to be prepared.

      It IS a sick world.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    4. Re:Hang on... by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd like to remind you that the terrorist attack at Munich 1972 made Jim McKay's career.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    5. Re:Hang on... by +apis22 · · Score: 1

      The place is ready and full of Japanese that have rented rooms and cubicles for their tv networks.

  2. Yes but... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they eb covering the math competition?

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if someone is guaranteed to get hurt. (writer's cramp does not count)

    2. Re:Yes but... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will they eb covering the math competition?

      That's about as likely as an Olympic Spelling eeB.

  3. Re:wow by mattjb0010 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just check out the Athens soccer stadium!

  4. In case of nuclear terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they have a redundant Athens standing by?

    1. Re:In case of nuclear terrorism by robogun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They don't have to actually pop one off over there - one phoned-in nuke threat could cause delays or cancellations costing hundreds of millions of dollars.

    2. Re:In case of nuclear terrorism by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why, as a matter of fact, they do! Why don't y'all come down here to have a look-see? It's as good as the real thing, Ah swear!

      Yeesh, who wants to go over to see some ruins in Greece when you can get all the culture you want down here? We just got our second Wal-Mart, it's quite a sight! I don't know why they even host the olympics in some other country, as if Greece has some olympic prestiege over good 'ol Georgia...

    3. Re:In case of nuclear terrorism by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      You know yur from Georgia when you have to tell your 13 year old doughter not to smoke at the dinner table in front of her kids.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  5. How can eunuchs participate? by Thinkit4 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well we woudn't pass the barr body test because our chromosomes are still XY. With the reduction in weight...perhaps the marathon.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
    1. Re:How can eunuchs participate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      1980 Moscow Olympics. Before the women's swimming competition, an East German swimmer and a Bulgarian swimmer are in the bathroom together. The Bulgarian swimmer is shaving her face with an electric razor. The East German swimmer looks into the mirror, touches her (own) chin and asks the Bulgarian swimmer if she can borrow the razor.

      "No," says the Bulgarian swimmer and kicks the East German swimmer in the nuts.

    2. Re:How can eunuchs participate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you said "we...our".... you've had your man lopped off? What...the...fuck.

    3. Re:How can eunuchs participate? by WarMonkey · · Score: 1

      Dude, you said "we...our".... you've had your man lopped off?

      Doubtful. I'm straight, but I have enough gay friends to know the "eunuch" thing is probably used by the poster as a gay Muslim reference.

      Some scholars have been re-evaluating old historical texts and determining that the frequent references to "eunuchs" in Arab culture back then may have been simply gays rather than mutilated people in many cases. I don't consider myself enough of an historian or language expert to offer an imformed opinion on the topic myself, but I've seen the thesis presented. Google "Queer Jihad".

      Then again, the poster may actually be ball-less and insane.

      --
      -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
    4. Re:How can eunuchs participate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh please stupid historians always trying to update history to make it politically correct...

  6. NBC has the backbone by toetagger1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NBC is owned by GE, which in turn owns GE Energy. With the resent history of power outages on July 13 in Grece, I wonder how they back up against that?

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
    1. Re:NBC has the backbone by Colymbosathon+ecplec · · Score: 5, Informative
      Same way we power stuff when off the grid or the power goes down, and what hospitals and datacenters and lots of other places use: diesel powered gensets. Plus, if they did lose feed, they have a ton of advertising and rehashed 'content' to fill the space.

      ^CE^

    2. Re:NBC has the backbone by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 1

      Is this like five degrees of Kevin Bacon, but with NBC?

      Here's mine: Me, My father works for GE Medical Systems, GEMS is a subsidary of GE, GE owns NBC Universal (NBC Universal is supposed to be said with a Wizard of the Oz or Gou'uld-like voice).

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
  7. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many days until its over :)

    the olympics used to mean something

    i just dont care anymore and a lot of people feel the same

  8. aaaahhh, redundancy.. by peculiarmethod · · Score: 0, Redundant

    redundancy; something slashdot knows a LOT about. They should come to us to get the low down on how to report each event multiple times as if it were the firs.. wha? Equipment? Oh.. nebermind.. *mumbles walking away*

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  9. Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by poulbailey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story just seems to be posted to drive traffic to a blog. Why do the Slashdot editors allow this?

    The proper stories are posted at sportsillustrated.cnn.com (printer friendly) and computerworld.com (printer friendly) respectively. Click those links instead.

    1. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe the editors wanted to encourage redundancy :-)

    2. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      This story just seems to be posted to drive traffic to a blog. Why do the Slashdot editors allow this?

      I take it you didn't win the hourly prize then?

    3. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Wish I had mod points today.

    4. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That takes too much work. They are above having to read articles or think critically. Heaven forfend that an editor actually RTFA!

    5. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story just seems to be posted to drive traffic to a blog. Why do the Slashdot editors allow this?

      Because in essence, that is exactly what slashdot is.

      It's a listing of user submitted links, that in turn get selected by moderators (slashdot calls them editors, but as you can tell from their spelling errors, they don't edit.)

    6. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

      You didn't get the latest interweb memo? Blogs are the New Media, baby.

      Get with the program. We don't need stodgy, fact-checked, well-written stories anymore. All we need are quick-witted, off-the-cuff pieces based on the news.

      It's a new century and news is changing, yea! Get on board the train or be left at the station, man.

      --
      sig not found
    7. Re:Why the indirect linkage via a blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's alright, Darren. You've rightfully earned your ad impressions.

  10. Redundancy isn't the only point of success. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Funny

    NBC's idea of redundancy might sound like a good one at first, but according to the Department of Redundancy Department, redundancy has its risks as well. First and foremost is the risk of a false sense of security. For example, if the satellite gets shot down, then their three links to the satellite won't be worth the paper they're printed on.

    1. Re:Redundancy isn't the only point of success. by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Must Must See See TTVV!

    2. Re:Redundancy isn't the only point of success. by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a customer of mine that wanted to order a second ADSL for redundancy - not only was all the DSL hardware in australia provided by Telstra, but they were going to use the same ISP! :(

      More recently, some providers have started installing their own DSLAMs to create their own DSL network, so at least Australia won't be left in the dark when some idiot takes out telstra's DSL gear.

  11. Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by crashnbur · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...because everyone will be watching hoping to be glued to their TV when/if a blackout or terrorist attack hits. There's no news like bad news, and nothing can replace the ego of an American who can say he/she "saw it as it happened".

    (I don't think I will intentionally watch any of the Olympics, because I'll be out looking for a job and preparing for grad school.)

    1. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      ...nothing can replace the ego of an American who can say he/she "saw it as it happened".
      Americans moreso than anybody else?
    2. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      ...nothing can replace the ego of an American who can say he/she "saw it as it happened".
      Americans moreso than anybody else?
      We Americans have a bigger ego than anyone else -- and we're proud of it!
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Nah, they will tune if if something happens but that will not help. The nets don't show ads during terror attack coverage.

    4. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      and nothing can replace the ego of an American who can say he/she "saw it as it happened".

      I was on Slashdot the morning of September 11, 2001, and read an off-topic comment about the crash, then turned on my TV set to see the live images of the burning tower (before the second plane).

      Sad or what?

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by iantri · · Score: 1

      Yes.. a la stories of where one was when JFK was shot.

    6. Re:Advertising revenue will skyrocket... by vt0asta · · Score: 1, Troll

      There's no news like bad news, and nothing can replace the ego of an American who can say he/she "saw it as it happened". ...especially when we "see it happen" on European soil. I know I for one, can't wait to get to say "I told you so" and "It was no doubt a result of European's foriegn policy during the cold war." At last, it's not to be, everyone knows terrorists have Europeans in their back pocket. ;)

      --
      No.
  12. solve all problems using the Slashdot method by Jrod5000+at+RPI · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's easy! afraid of losing a broadcast? simply submit a duplicate broadcast! if both get through, blame Taco!

    I mean what the hell, it works for slashdot!

  13. And after? by Trailwalker · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's get this into perspective - if you were to watch those 1210 hours end on end you'd be watching 50.4 days worth of television around the clock!


    Death would be a mercy after that.
    1. Re:And after? by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      Especially with Bob Costas.

      *Shudder*

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  14. Olympics not profitable for television by Jayfar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The mind boggles at what it is all going to cost - but I'm sure their advertising revenue will make it worth their while.

    The networks generally lose millions on the olympic broadcasts - it's a prestige thing for them. Maybe they gain some small advantage in viewership for subsequent sports programming.

    1. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by snkline · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I seem to remember one of the networks (I think it was NBC) coming out with 3 Olypmpics dedicated cable channels in the early 90's. They were a HORRIBLE economic venture, losing so much money I think it made the news.

    2. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by DocScience4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's what is known as a "loss leader" in the broadcasting industry. Not only is it (though marginally) for getting people to watch other sports, and overall "prestige", but mainly it delivers a sizeable audience to which they can promote their new and incumbent shows.

      They can also charge a premium rate for certain events on NBC (akin to the Super Bowl), and can provide more limited-appeal sports to narrowly-focused audiences in non-prime-time, as well as on their ancillary (e.g. USA) networks.

    3. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true that in the past the networks lost money on the Olympics coverage, as is the case with the NFL and and NBA (especially the NBA). But because NBC scored a huge coup in securing the Olympics rights for 10 years at a rock bottom price (through shrewd politics and secret discussions with the IOC), the past several Olympics have eked out profits, with the 2002 Winter games scoring large profits.

      NBC paid around $3.5 billion for the rights to all Olympics from 2000-2008. In cotrast, NBC's ad sales for the 2000 Olympics were around $900 million, and the 2002 Winter Olympics brought in a whopping $750 million (really good for a Winter olympics and a sagging ad industry). Estimates are that NBC made around $75-$80 million on the 2002 Winter Olympics, and made a small $30-$40 million profit on the 2000 Olympics.

      (NBC Sports President) Dick Ebersol is still claiming NBC will make a larger profit on the 2004 Olympics then they made in 2002. It'll be tough, given the time difference and scandals recently. I last heard NBC still had some ad stock left for the 2004 Olympics. Compared to this time in 2002, all but the crappiest packages were sold out.

      (Look on Google for the sources, I'm lazy...I just happen to know the figures from work experience.)

    4. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure about that. The advertising revenue for 50.4 days of programming is potentially very lucrative and major networks such as NBC are very good at providing efficient coverage of major live events. They are most definitely making money on the games.

      and why is Slashdot scanning my ports right now?

      Your computer's TCP ports:
      80, 1080, 3128, 8000 and 8080 have been scanned from 66.35.250.150

    5. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happens whenever I post to /., don't know why a web page needs those obscure ports. Nothing about it in the FAQ, and I don't think its important enough for an email.

    6. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by grumling · · Score: 1
      Another reason for the major investment in the latest and greatest gear is because Sony and Panasonic usually fight to outfit the network. They then make a big deal about the fact in the trade mags. The other thing is that they sell off the trucks after the event for just about what they paid for them (after all, the equipment is almost new and is unlikely to be beat up).

      Due to Hollywood accounting, the olympics and just about everything else on television looses money. But, for some unknown reason, the networks fight for every sports event out there. Maybe in a few years, when the business press starts to investiagte accounting practices of Hollywood, and the real P&L of programs is exposed, we'll break the cycle of constantly escalating sports programming costs (and poorer quality -at least from an excitement level).

      The other reason they like sports is because it gives them plenty of chances to promote other programs.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    7. Re:Olympics not profitable for television by grumling · · Score: 1
      The Olympics tripple cast was not designed to make a dime. It was a reason to get PPV eqipment installed in (at the time) TCI cable systems and be able to write off the investment as a loss. NOBODY thought it would be successful on a revenue basis.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  15. Re:wow by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

    I guess you're not real big into sports then. Dosen't everybody know the olympics happen every 4 years? Winter olympics get 02, 06, summer gets 96, 00, 04, etc. (Que reply stating "You must be new here, slashdotters aren't into sports...")

  16. Of course they're gonna cover eveything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would it look if the inevitable terrorist attack happened at an event they weren't covering? And with all the coverage and the redundant communications connections they might just pull off a nice little ratings coup with all the fun carnage the newsies like to show off, we might even get to watch it happen live. ....Not that I'm expecting anything to go wrong or anything....

  17. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you're not real big into sports then.

    I guess you didn't get the joke then, about all the Athens delays?

  18. Why does NBC bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Despite spending so much time & effort covering the games, they don't actually broadcast the vast majority of it!

    NBC will have a couple hours of wrapup every day, and that will be it.

    1. Re:Why does NBC bother? by NickV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's actually not true. It seems like NBC is planning on prempting ALL of their coverage on all of their networks (I wonder what they're going to do with CNBC during business hours... olympics + stock ticker?)

      They'll be broadcasting it ALL across all 7 of their channels (bravo, cnbc, msnbc, telemundo, nbc, USA, nbcHD [local HD affiliates]. The HD broadcasts will be in 5.1 1080i too, which is pretty damn slick.

      Of course, aside from a prestige thing, this looks like network programming suicide.

    2. Re:Why does NBC bother? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sometimes i wish nbc could be banned from showing sports at all.
      Even the stuff they do cover (which, in my slightly biased opinion, consists of way too much gymnastics) shows up far too late. The sydney olympics were the worst. They showed events that had literally taken place over 30 hours earlier. And all, i suspect, because they have to do a big mock up story about every frickin event. Talk about it a half hour before they show it. Talk about if for half an hour after. Instead of just showing more events which would be faster and cheaper.

      That and their half hour stories of the atheletes whole lives makes me glad i have access to sports channels from other countries.

    3. Re:Why does NBC bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like watching a Nascar race and hearing nothing but Jeff Gordon crap or those stupid video montages that show 2 minutes of sports and the rest is some band or music. Maybe its only slightly then some of Fox Sports coverage.

    4. Re:Why does NBC bother? by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      No, they'll have an hour and a half of biographical drivel, then a half hour of gymnastics.

    5. Re:Why does NBC bother? by CrazyFool · · Score: 1

      And then only show 1/4'th of the Gymnastic events so they can have indepth coverages of the 'sob story of the day'.....

  19. Maybe I don't get out enough, by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

    but what is Olympics?

  20. Re:wow by billygr · · Score: 2, Funny

    You forget that we are the Greeks.... Everything will be ready 5 minutes before the start of the olympics

  21. Wonder why they chose the same service provider... by syrinje · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...AT&T for all the six links. I would have thought it made sense to go with multiple service providers if I was spreading out my options for 99.9% availability.

    I just loved this gem from the link in the article "NBC will be able to send live feeds from Greece to the U.S. over all six links at once or use them for separate transmissions." Hmmm...six identical high-speed digital transmissions of Marion Jones tumbling in ignominy - yeeesh, wot a waste of bandwidth!

    Now here is an article about the design of the media center and its redundant systems that is more in tune with my ./er persona

    --
    See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
  22. No idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work for a major UK broadcaster's engineering department (shortly to be sold to Siemens :( ) and, believe me, 6 connections is not in the big league of broadcast redundancy. For The Scottish open last week we had 12 feeds (six main feeds, and reserve circuits for each) - distributed over a variety of paths and technologies (for risk-reduction.) (Good) Broadcasters take multiple redundancy very seriously.

    1. Re:No idea by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      Broadcasters take multiple redundancy very seriously.

      They'd have to if they're going to be working for Siemens.

    2. Re:No idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      believe me, 6 connections is not in the big league of broadcast redundancy. For The Scottish open last week we had 12 feeds

      Yes but Greece isn't the UK, it's one of the 4 third-world countries (sorry, 14 now) that are part of the EC pretending to be part of the Union for more than just leeching off of Brussel's subventions.

      6 feeds is probably half of Greek's total infrastructure, whereas you could pull 50 out of the butt of wee Jock "poo-pong" McPlop, public toilet cleaner in Aberdeen.

    3. Re:No idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is there's no chance of beeb sportcasts getting screwed up and us getting the rudely rescheduled Simpsons episodes back. Damn, damn, damn.

    4. Re:No idea by ncaHammer · · Score: 1

      McPlop,

      leeching off of Brussel's subventions
      consider this more than an Aristotelian-Tax than a subvention

      whereas you could pull 50 out of the butt of wee Jock "poo-pong" McPlop
      probably been there since EURO-2004

  23. In the spirit! by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In the spirit of NBC's 'get the news out through redundancy' campaign, Slashdot will dupe every article they post about the Olympics!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:In the spirit! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "In the spirit of NBC's 'get the news out through redundancy' campaign, Slashdot will dupe every article they post about the Olympics!"

      In the spirit of NBC's 'get the news out through redundancy' campaign, Slashdot will dupe every article they post about the Olympics!

      (I'm gonna earn that redundant mod, dammit!)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:In the spirit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would you hurry up and kill yourself?
      1. Or go read
      2. goatse instead of slashdot?
      k thx bye kekeke
    3. Re:In the spirit! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Would you hurry up and kill yourself?"

      Still persisting, eh? Guess being proven wrong is really damaging to some people.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  24. My How We Forget So Quickly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Doesn't anyone remember the huge problems facing the Olympics this year due to extremely poor ticket sales (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=spo rtsNews&storyID=5657784)?

    How will all of that coverage put a positive spin on the massive number of empty seats at each event?

    1. Re:My How We Forget So Quickly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      By not scanning the cameras across those empty stadium seats. What you don't see, doesn't exist.

    2. Re:My How We Forget So Quickly.. by kumachan · · Score: 1

      The will use the same technology they used in Gladiator to put cheering crowds in the empty seats. Look out for the stadium to be full of romans.

    3. Re:My How We Forget So Quickly.. by slidester · · Score: 1

      They do it like Hollywood. Digital tech would cost a lot of money so they just put cardboard cutouts and a few human sit-ins - no zoom ins in that crowd.

  25. Congratulations, Darren. by croddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    you got your personal olympics blog linked on the front page of slashdot.
    now go upstairs, your mom needs some help in the kitchen.

    1. Re:Congratulations, Darren. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Upstairs? I thought he lived in the little closet compartment 'under the stairs' leading to the second floor.

      Well, he can pretend, anyway.

      --
      resigned
  26. All that redundancy means absolutely nothing... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...if the power keeps going out every other day in Athens.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:All that redundancy means absolutely nothing... by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      Helloooooo! That's what the frickin' TORCH is for...

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  27. Yes, but will they have electricity? by ^DA · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Linking to multible sattelite networks is all well and good, but what about electricity? Just last week Athens had a blackout due to overload in the electric grid. This situation will not improve during the games!

    Guess they will have their own generators too.

    1. Re:Yes, but will they have electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess they will have their own generators too.

      I'd imagine that almost all network trucks/trailers have generators. (Heck, even the little 2-3 crew vans have generators so they can do out-and-about reporting.)

      The bigger gear might require external power (at least, it wouldn't surprise me) and they probably don't like using the generators full-time due to noise/pollution.

      But hey, I'm just an A/C, and know nothing!

  28. Answer by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Resale

  29. cover everything I say by v1x · · Score: 1

    My gripe with Olympics coverage in the US is that you never get to see any event which does not involve some US team/athlete. So I'm assuming that this would likely be 1200 something hours of US athletes-only fest. Entirely goes against the spirit of the Olympics itself.

    1. Re:cover everything I say by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      My gripe with Olympics coverage in the US is that you never get to see any event which does not involve some US team/athlete. So I'm assuming that this would likely be 1200 something hours of US athletes-only fest. Entirely goes against the spirit of the Olympics itself.

      Specifically, it will be 1210 hours of BEACH VOLLEYBALL!!!! All the other events will be ignored, even if they include U.S. athletes.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  30. Re:Wonder why they chose the same service provider by chadjg · · Score: 1

    I work in the bush leagues of broadcasting, and I can't wait until they surplus all that equipment. It's usually high end stuff that's perfectly good, but can't be sold as new. It won't go on eBay, probably, but if you like some of the small parts you see at the Olympics, start saving your pennies now.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  31. because Darren Rowse is pimping his adverts/popups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    view-source seems to turn up shitloads of Amazon refferals, fastclick popups, extreme tracking and the usual blog spammers bullshit
    just add
    67.15.16.54
    to your firewall and he has gone forever

  32. Redundancy in filming American competitors by synx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So NBC will have redundancy - so you won't miss a minute of your favourite American competitor! Most people I know joke about NBC's coverage of the Olympics - its laughable. They'll show an event, then when the American loses they'll cut to a new event.

    Contrast this with CBC and BBC which cover entire events regardless of who wins or loses.

    So those who get cable, time to watch CBC for _full_ coverage of the Olympics!

    1. Re:Redundancy in filming American competitors by neil.pearce · · Score: 1

      From the look of our British team this year, if the BBC stopped covering events after they lost I predict they'd be packing up and flying home by day 2.

    2. Re:Redundancy in filming American competitors by lakin · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the topic of BBC, NBC may have a nice redundant setup but its not like the BBC dont either: http://www.bbctechnology.com/news40.htm Paul

      --
      Paul
    3. Re:Redundancy in filming American competitors by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 1

      Funny how there aren't dozens of British competitors that had a chance in hell to win that the BBC could cover, huh?

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    4. Re:Redundancy in filming American competitors by rbbs · · Score: 1

      I have to say that the BBC coverage of sporting events this year has been absolutely outstanding.

      Being able to pick what court you want to watch at Wimbledoon via Digital, then the same tech at the Golf...it's amazing what these guys are doing. Now they're all being sold off to Siemens as 'Technology is not part of our core offering' - what a load of rubbish...anyway..compare that to ITVs low budget offerings and it really puts into perspective why the License Fee can be a good thing...

      of course it's a shame they then have to put on shows like that new Spy reality tv thing...

    5. Re:Redundancy in filming American competitors by red+floyd · · Score: 1
      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  33. Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymore? by deacon · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I mean, seriously, after all the corruption issues, does anyone take this seriously?

    Note the 48,500 links for this search!

    Seems like the Olympics has become like the UN: A good idea, which has been defiled by some of the people involved.

    Pity, really.

    I don't think i've watched since the Israeli 1972 Olympic Team was murdered in Munich

  34. Re:wow by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    i just dont care anymore and a lot of people feel the same

    I think it's about time to give the Olympics another 2000-year hiatus. What started out as a revival of an ancient track and field meet has turned into a bloated overhyped monstrosity overshadowed by never-ending doping scandals.

  35. No shooting sports coverage by chiph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now if we can get them to use all that technolgy to broadcast the shooting sports. I'm getting a little tired of watching hours of Curling or rhythmic gymnastics.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:No shooting sports coverage by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Fencing!!! We need more Fencing!!!!!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  36. Re:wow by boudie · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you're going to be there, I wouldn't sit near the Saudi javelin throwing team.

  37. Over a billion bucks ... by peatbakke · · Score: 1

    I bet advertising revenues are at least a billion bucks.

    This site says the 2002 Winter olympics took in over $700M. 2000 Summer took in over $900M.

    Yeow.

  38. So what? The coverage will suck anyway by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The major network coverage of the Olympics stinks anyway. Endless fluff pieces about athletes, almost no coverage of anyone who is not from the US, and heaven forbid they spend time on anything but track, volleyball, swimming, diving and gymnastics (again especially if no americans figure for a gold) and tape delayed coverage. Last olympics I was lucky enough to have CBC coverage since I lived near Canada but no such luck now. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the sports that do get the airtime but the coverage is usually horrible for anyone who actually knows/cares about a given sport.

    For example, the bicyling time trial last time was "The Lance Armstrong Show". I don't have anything against Lance but he didn't even win and there were lots of other good riders I would have liked to see. What little coverage was shown was poor and basically an expose about Lance's life. I wanted to see the event. If I wanted information about a rider there are plenty of ways to find out. (Yes I know why they do this but I don't have to like it)

    Anyway I seriously doubt I'll be watching much of the Olympics. The coverage will be annoying and instead of seeing a variety of sports I'll be subjected to every qualifying round of the men's volleyball team. Ugh...

  39. TRIPLECAST?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh ooh ooH!!

    Three satellite feeds... have my prayers been answered? A return of the Olympics Triplecast?!? The 1992 games were the best evar. Nothing could possibly beat Badmitton, Water Polo, and Shot Put on three different channels at the SAME TIME!!!

  40. It's all in HD too by NickV · · Score: 1

    The even more impressive part is all of the coverage on the normal NBC affiliates will be in HD with 5.1 (!!) sound.

    Now that's just sick! (and about time, NBC's HD coverage is the worse of the big 3)

    1. Re:It's all in HD too by zxflash · · Score: 1

      cool i wasn't aware they were doing it in hd... i'll definitely have to catch that just for the heck of it...

      --

      All the torrents you could want.
    2. Re:It's all in HD too by kf4lhp · · Score: 1
      and about time, NBC's HD coverage is the worse of the big 3


      Huh?

      NBC is the only network broadcasting late night programming in HD. All of their sitcoms and dramas during prime-time are in HD. The reality shows aren't, but they're crap anyway so it wouldn't matter.

      (disclaimer: I work for an NBC affiliate and I used to work for an ABC affiliate)
    3. Re:It's all in HD too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its tape delayed by a DAY though....

  41. balancing connections by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Balancing three Satellite connections and three landlines is not such a big deal. With equipment like Israeli company Radware's LinkProof at both ends, the loss of one line would not be noticed. You can configure that equipment to aggregate all connections to multiply the bandwidth, including spreading VPN traffic across the lines, or just use the other lines as failover. These boxes are supposed to handle 10 connections and are very configurable and are veeeery configurable.

    The same technology is available for smaller sites with their Linkproof Branch product.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  42. Got power? by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    That's what they make UPSen and generators for. But seriously, while it's a given that the Olympics data centers and IT infrastructure would be backed by a fleet of trailer-mounted gennies, I wonder if they do have enough backup power in place at each venue to fully power lighting and such. That'll be a lot of of generators.

    1. Re:Got power? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Of course, though, it'll cost them to run those generators. I've heard that Greece has the most expensive gasoline in the world.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  43. Re:wow by tzanger · · Score: 1

    Homework:
    loo?se|it'?s|the(ir|(y')?re)|you(r|'re)|a ?lot|r[ie]diculous|defin[ia]tely|(ir)?regardless

    Nice!

  44. That's nice, except... by iantri · · Score: 1
    NBC's coverage of the olympics has always sucked.

    A two or three hours a day, "plausably live".

    We're lucky, here in Canada the CBC (our national semi-public broadcaster, who must of spend their entire year's budget on it) is airing the Olympics, and their coverage has always been very good for a regular broadcast station -- the Olympics are run virtually all day. (And through a good bit of the evening, too.)

    1. Re:That's nice, except... by NickV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that's the point... NBC is planning to show people that they can do good coverage, because ALOT of people complained ALOT about Sydney.

      1200+ hours of live coverage across 7 channels all day is about as good as you can get.

    2. Re:That's nice, except... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how much of that coverage will be about non-american athletes...

      Maybe it's just me, but I like seeing competitors from other countries and seeing profiles on them as well...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:That's nice, except... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your comment. Your name has now been entered into the database of potential terrorists. We all know that there are no athletes worth caring about that are non-americans. They are terrorists, and will be assimilated.

      Love,
      Department of Homeland FUD^W Security

      --
      My other car is first.
  45. Re:Why does NBC bother? -- MOD parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Thank you.

    I'd rather be spending my time watching the actual competition.

    -cmh

  46. Re:wow by Joffrey · · Score: 1

    The olympics will, in fact, be this year, but unfortunately NBC, in their infinite [lack of] wisdom, has decided to not only show much of the games tape-delayed, but to show *ALL* HD coverage *AT LEAST* 24 hours delayed (so as not to detract from their pre-packaged schmaltzy prime-time programming).

    Blah. NBC Sports died long ago... noone told NBC, unfortunately.

    --
    No, really! I'm one of the *good* lawyers!
  47. 'puters by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    What we want to know is the computers they're using are running Linux and what is done to protect the network against h@xx0rs.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  48. Re:Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you read the history of the 1972 Israeli massacre, you start to see what should have happened, and what needs to happen in similar terrorist incidents.

    The 'martyrs' of the event were the terrorists. The true martyrs, of course, were the hostages they took.

    And what should have been the result? The 234 Arab prisoners in Israeli jails who the terrorists were demanding be freed should have been swiftly executed.

    In hostage situations, assume the hostages are already dead and take swift action. Carry through in making an example and hostage taking will quickly cease to be a viable terrorist tactic.

  49. 1210 hours of programming? Bring it on! by fprefect · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got my TiVo configured with an external RAID and terabytes of storage, I'm ready -- bring it on!

    --
    Matt Slot / Bitwise Operator / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
  50. Re:So what? The coverage will suck anyway by bugmenot · · Score: 1

    How come the Olympics isn't available on pay-per-view? NBC could broadcast the same crappy coverage as always, but make full coverage available on PPV.
    That way if you could pick and choose the sports you want to watch with full coverage.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  51. Re:Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymo by SirTalon42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "The 234 Arab prisoners in Israeli jails who the terrorists were demanding be freed should have been swiftly executed."

    Wow I can just see NBC's headlines after that:
    "Peace loving Muslims friend's slaughtered after their requested release!"
    "Those damn jews did it again! No wonder everyone hates them!"
    "Israel's jihad?"
    "Israel takes Muslim hostages then executes them then threatens they will kill NBC more civilians!"

  52. Headline: by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    NBC - 99.99% Reliabe Connection for Athens Olympics

    Gee, I'm glad spellchecking is 100% reliabe.

  53. They dont have VIDEOTAPE!? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    > You certainly cant tell a marathon runner that
    > you need to run it over [because of a network
    > issue].

    Nor could you tape it locally as you were capturing it, and retransmit it from the tape. No. That would be impossible. Or at the very least, it wouldnt cost nearly as much as having a 6-way redundant transmission link. And the goal is to spend as much of money as possible, right?

  54. Re:So what? The coverage will suck anyway by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I would pay money for NBC to stay at home and let some other network, like the BBC, cover the games. They have completely screwed up the coverage of the games for decades. The worst part is that they have bought the exclusive broadcast rights, so it's watch their drek or watch nothing.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  55. Kiraly is full of the Olympic spirit, obviously by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    "An Olympic event is a one-time event, and there are no do-overs," Bob Kiraly, director of broadcast and telecommunications operations at NBC, said in an interview from Athens this week. "Everything we plan for in our networks or our Athens operations center is really based on a failure scenario. You certainly can't tell a marathon runner that you need to run it over [because of a network issue]. "

    Aww... What is this world coming to? I remember, back in the day, we never complained about having to do the events over for little things like Roman invasions and volcanic eruptions.

  56. Wow! by sharkey · · Score: 1
    a massive 1210 hours of coverage

    Given NBC's track record, that's almost 3 WHOLE HOURS of real, actual Olympic events amidst the 1207 hours of "what they fed their kids for breakfast while they were struggling to prepare for the Olympics" mini-series.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Wow! by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      No, that's 1 WHOLE HOURS of real actual Olympic events that the USA won, 2 Hours of "what they fed their kids for breakfast", and 1207 hours of commercials.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  57. 5 9's by kingradar · · Score: 0

    Three wireless satelite links. Three underground fiber links.

    Me thinks someone will be downloading quite the porn collection in Athens.

    Of course, all that bandwidth, all that redundancy won't give you any kind of reliability if the person (people) responsible for it spill their coffee on the keyboard, or fat finger a routing table.

    You can plan for hardware failures by building in redundancy. However no amount of redundancy will prevent human error.

    1. Re:5 9's by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      However no amount of redundancy will prevent human error.
      Making the entire staff redundant (the other type of redundant ;)

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  58. TILT! by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    The 1000+ hours figure factors in the fact that NBC's HD-capable affiliates will be showing "Olympics in HD" 24/7 on their digital stations.

    However, if you can see the HD feed, you will always have at least two choices (NBC HD and at least one SD feed) on the air at all times throught the games.

  59. im involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool. My company is involved in this.

  60. In other news... by scifiber_phil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The major networks only will be airing "Highlights" of the upcoming political conventions in the US. Guess whether a 15 year old gymnast falls off the balance beam is more important. American students suck at science, but they can sure bounce a ball and throw it through a hoop. Long live the cult of Sport.

    1. Re:In other news... by XLawyer · · Score: 1

      Please explain to me why a fully scripted, three-day-long, political pep rally is newsworthy.

      At least at the Olympics, we don't know in advance every detail of what's going to happen.

    2. Re:In other news... by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1
      The major networks only will be airing "Highlights" of the upcoming political conventions in the US.
      Interestingly HDNet (Mark Cuban's network) is showing the entirety of both the Democratic National Convention and the Republican National Convention in high-definition and is making the HD feel available for free to all MSOs and satellite providors.

      So even though the networks aren't showing the whole thing, someone's stepping up to the plate. More info here.
  61. Gymnastics man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indulge your inner pedophile, you know you want to.

  62. Re:So what? The coverage will suck anyway by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

    Covering an event for pay per view costs money. Last time they tried that, with the "olympic triplecast" they lost money.

  63. Re:Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymo by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    Boxing is corrupt, we still watch that. Professional wrestling is scripted, we still watch that. Baseball players are taking enough steroids to kill a t-rex, we still watch.

    We don't care so much about authenticity, we just want to be entertained.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  64. Re:Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be neutral on the whole Israeli/Muslim thing. But after 2001-09-11 I changed. Now I'm a 110% supporter of Israel. Israel is the only civilized country in a sea of mud.

  65. Re:So what? The coverage will suck anyway by Christopher+Whitt · · Score: 1

    I remember watching some of the network coverage of Sydney in 2000, and being amazed at how bad it was. Idiotic scripted voice-overs of tape-delayed events, and stupid background pieces on the athletes (no offense intended to the athletes themselves).

    Thank goodness I live in Canada...

  66. Spelling Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resent is NOT the word you were looking for. Please use recent and please try again by using preview so you don't look like a dumb fuck next time.

    1. Re:Spelling Nazi by toetagger1 · · Score: 1

      I'm german, but not a Nazi. And maybe that explains why my english isn't up to paar. At least I don't go around assuming everyone speaks englsih as their first lanquage, and call them Nazis. I think that's rude.

      --
      who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
    2. Re:Spelling Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not calling you a Nazi, you fool. He's calling himself a "spelling nazi." If your englsih was up to paar you'd know "spelling nazis" and "grammar nazis" are people who go around correcting everyone's spelling and grammar in an unsolicited and obnoxious way, even if the errors are very minor.

      Among those of us who aren't foreigners with sub-paar English, spelling nazis are considered rude by some, amusing by others, and useful by other spelling nazis. They don't care whether englsih is your first lanquage because that's not a valid excuse to them-they expect everyone to master the lanquage thoroughly, and accept the criticism if they have not achieved that level of mastery. You'll never see the spelling nazis posting poor German, because they won't use a lanquage incorrectly even if they don't know how to use it correctly.

      That said, "toetagger" sounds like an excellent name for a Nazi. The Nazis, being the bastards that they were, had to tag a lot of toes, if they used the toe tagging system at all. Unless you're a professional mortician, that's an odd name to post under.

  67. Question about Targeted Saturation Bombing figures by brainiac · · Score: 1

    I am confused about this "1210 hours of programming". Since the advertising carpet bombing factor currently is 0.33, does that mean we get 1210 hours of Olympics and 605 hours of commercials (50 days of Olympics with 25 days of commercials), or 806 hours of Olympics and 403 hours of commercials (33 days of Olympics and 16 days of commercials) ?

    Help, I really need to know !

  68. TiVo by telstar · · Score: 1
    "I'm sure their advertising revenue will make it worth their while."
    • Thank god for TiVo.

  69. Re:Does anyone pay attention to the olympics anymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well aren't you special, douchebag!

  70. Olympic Channel by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    Look on the brighter side. They could have brought back the PAID olympic channels red white and blue. At that point, you'd be watching people's training, interviews and everything else on top of the competition for 50hrs x 3 channels. And if you don't watch, it's kind of a waste of money.

  71. Re:So what? The coverage will suck anyway by digitaleopard · · Score: 1

    It's amazing what you miss with the way the networks cut the olympics, and what you can see if you are there, or have an uninterrupted feed.

    I worked in the NOC for the last winter games and we saw EVERYTHING - and got an appreciation for some events that on TV get totally shortchanged.

    The winter event that turned out to be the most fascinating? Get this - Curling! Yeah, the one where older people throw big rocks across the ice, like winter shuffleboard. What you don't see is all the fascinating strategy that goes into each shot - the way the teams get together and spend five or ten minutes studing the angles and figuring out the best way to make each shot - while the other team watches and tries to figure out what they are thinking. It's like go, with dexterity and accuracy added into the mix.

    Of course, on the network, what you see is: /cut from commercial to ice
    Show person picking up rock and looking down the ice
    Show shot
    Replay last moments of shot in slow-mo
    Commentators make wildly inaccurate observations (our favorite part, we all got a big laugh out of some of the truly stupid stuff they said) /cut back to commercials

    Now, the foreign networks, they get the raw feed and can do what they want with it. At least, at the last winter games. So they CAN show the full event, uncut, if they want. Doing that, with scrolling ads at the bottom, could be a winner for NBC - IF they had the guts.

  72. Re:Wonder why they chose the same service provider by digitaleopard · · Score: 1

    They didn't - the article says that AT&T set them up, not that they were running them. IE, ATT did the design work. They are probably running on one provider, though - it's a prestige thing. All of the rings at Salt Lake were Qwest's - built for the games.

    The infoworld article was interesting, though. 56 venues! Geez - SLC didn't have over fifteen, and I think the actual total was thirteen. That's scary to think about. Only using two rings means they are big and complex to serve that many sites - not great. SLC had seven primary rings for the thirteen sites, with one BIG OC-192 backup for everything.

    And if the NOC is still dark, with four weeks to go, then they are WAY behind and WAYYY screwed. The Salt Lake NOC was up and running two months before the games started. Please, no commentary about the games running on Windows NT - Anything over layer 2 (Transport) was someone else's problem, not ours.

    Good luck to them - I'm afraid they are going to need it.

  73. I won't watch a minute unless they cover ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I won't watch a minute unless they cover the shooting events.

    To watch US coverage of the olympics you'd think there WEREN'T any such events - even though the US does exceptionally well in them.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  74. Great... by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

    All the stories on EPO and Human growth hormone will get to us no matter what... I was kinda hopeing for a break from it.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  75. They're very keen to sell the need. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    An Olympic event is a one-time event, and there are no do-overs
    Yeah, but there are video recorders and delays? Most of the crap^H^H^H^H sport is going to have to be time shifted anyway. What i would do for all that bandwidth and equipment! (deathmatch on the big screen)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  76. Actually there are rumours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of an attempt to distribute poisoned Coca Cola. I don't know what to believe since these rumours were spread through anonymous emails.

  77. Re:wow by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    No, no, it's 30 minutes guaranteed delivery time, like all the Greek-owned delivery places.

  78. Re:wow by vinlud · · Score: 1

    Mmmm, somehow joking about Greece and soccer is not a good idea those days... :)

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  79. Heh by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    Contrast this with CBC and BBC which cover entire events regardless of who wins or loses.

    Easy to say when Britain sends what, a quarter of the atheletes that the US sends? Besides, a good Brit will drink to anyone - us Americans are more patriotic.

    Speaking of which - is there going to be a weapon-dropping contest this year? Or how about an "I surrender!" shouting contest? You know, we have to have SOMETHING that the French and Iraqis are good at! :P