Exactly how would the EU accomplish that? The EU has no military of it's own, it has no nukes (we have thousands) it has no force projection capability (we have multiple carrier groups). It has no way to attack the US. We have combat troops and equipment stationed all throughout the EU. The EU wasn't even able to stop the genocide in Bosnia until the US decided to step in and help.
Sure, and that is how they achieve pre-order delivery. Set the product to ship during the next lightning storm, land drone on steeple, lightning strikes charging capacitors with 1.21 gigawatts, drone then achieves 88 mph speed and presto deliver the package an hour before it is ordered.
Bingo. For example two years ago I drove for UPS during the Christmas rush. At the peak the Delivery center (one of three servicing the Salt Lake City Metro center) was pushing 80,000 packages a day. Two of those three centers were at the same location a third at another, that's about 240,000 a day at peak using roughly 300 package cars. A large volume of the volume was Amazon. Call it 100k, 300 trucks versus 100,000 drone flights a day leaving from the central sort and distro facility. And those package cars go out in all weather. What happens when a thundercell rolls through an area, will those perches hold a drone in place through 70 mph wind gusts, or how do they keep their delivery schedule going during a three day blizzard?
The average person can do jack shit to head off global tyranny (whatever that is) or the apocalypse. What they can do is play a game that gets them out walking around rather than sitting in front of a PC or a TV screen, or just sitting. It's a new concept and some people have neglected common sense. But how many people keel over dead from heart attacks while sitting and watching TV shows every year. If they were out walking around regularly they might have avoided it.
Get off your high horse. And you don't own the lawn of your retirement home gramps.
Actually such a law was just repealed, making it legal for the first time for significant amounts of US petroleum to be exported. The Keystone pipeline is to take Canadian oil to be refined and then loaded onto ships to China and elsewhere. It is Not for US oil.
No it is actually a real case, and it was a legitimate complaint. As McDonalds kept their coffee at exceedingly high temperatures causing the lady to receive near instant 3rd degree burns from the 180 degree beverage.
As to the Windows 10 users (assuming you mean those upgraded against their will): I imagine Microsoft will point out the benefits of moving as many users as possible to an up to date single OS structure versus trying to maintain and patch multiple versions. Promises to maintain older versions are fulfilled by moving users to current version. The maintenance and support is to move them to a more modern OS. They'll be able to point to how Apple has done with with both OSX (not always forced) and iOS (forced until the hardware can no longer handle the upgrades. As well as how that is the model most apps in the mobile environment use as well as most major browsers.
Thus they are only following industry norms, nothing to punish them for. Just because so many of us are used to the need to hold off on upgrading to a new windows version until at least SP1 does not mean they can't change the paradigm and push all users really, really hard to update and achieve a more secure OS environment not having so many varieties of Windows out there to patch.
They did not foresee a future where we would be under constant threat of non-state actors wishing to do us harm. So all those Native tribes that frequently raided outlying villages and farms didn't exist. They didn't face down the Barbary pirates just years after the Nation was established. Technology has changed, the world has not.
They do not open and read the contents. Scanning for chemical or biological contaminants is not the same as opening and looking over the contents. They don't even x-ray all packages as that could result in damage to some items sent via mail (film).
Actually they do have a point. The data is being changed, from the encrypted form to the cleartext form. The FBI then has to be able to prove that the decryption process did not change the actual content of everything decrypted. We can't just print out and read the encrypted data and see that the email in question actually said "I laundered $3 million dollars worth of hotel towels" rather than "I laundered $3 million dollars for the Russian Mafia". Granted it wouldn't exactly be easy to create a decryption process that would convert random but properly placed bits of text from innocent data to incriminating data without glaring errors.
The key to computer forensics is you have to prove you didn't change the data when you pulled it from the source hardware.
And it's the same degenerate undesirables who fight back on their convictions who establish what protections we do have. Miranda for example was a real scumbag, but his appeal on being interrogated without knowing his rights established the Miranda warnings we can all quote from TV. And incidentally shortly after winning his landmark case that upstanding citizen was stabbed to death in a bar fight.
Niantic has long held that restricted access does not mean invalid. As long as some people can legally access the site and play without violating any security rules and it's not private residential property. This rule came about so that they could keep their portals on the Google Campus which are off limits to the general public. Thus many stops and gyms may appear in places that are going to be off limits to most people. They just have to recognize that they are off limits and that they will most likely not be able to get to those locations. Hopefully the game will soon have a way to request that such ingress portals not be used as stops or gyms. Keeping such locations viable makes sense with the game play of Ingress where hard to get to portals is just part of the strategy in some aspects of the game. But they do not really make as much sense with Pokémon Go. Though some such locations do make sense to keep valid (i.e. the Google Campus, non secure sections of military bases etc...)
Get a few dozen Ingress players to report it as an invalid portal. Since it is no longer a church a brief explanation of this fact and that it is now a private residential property (a very key phrase in portal location criteria) and it should be removed within a few months. (The portal que is heavily backlogged due to very poor decisions by Niantic.)
Niantic is no longer part of Google. The spun off entirely a little over a year ago. Ingress felt the reduction in resources as well as the diversion to the development of Pokemon
And it came down to just one stubborn Union, all the others agreed that the Company couldn't meet the demanded pay increases and stay solvent, but one Union refused to play along and forced the company into bankruptcy, the product name was sold, and the new owners brutally redesigned costing far more jobs and pay than what the Union was trying to demand. Management bonuses at the time were odd, but were mostly just golden parachutes as the original Hostess was folded and sold off.
How do future employers know about how you left. I hear repeatedly that most HR depts. will confirm that you worked for the company and maybe confirm the positions and time frames but that's it. They will not report derogatory unless they can back it up with citing criminal charges.
So how does the new firm know that you were "unprofessional" in the timing of your departure?
When Hillary started as Sec State, the Dems controlled both House and Senate and did for the first two years of Obama's term. Plus a Cabinet level position gets the equipment they want. Cost is cut from peons.
Clinton chose to use her own server to hide her communications. It was not subject to periodic audits, it was not subject to FOIA requests and in deed it took a congressional subpoena to get her to release the emails that she did. After having her attorneys illegally go through it and delete many emails.
Nice try to stack up the excuses, but mobile access to classified information was quite common, maybe not on smart phones but laptops and or secure tablets were in wide use in 2008.
Already been looked at. They found a grand total of two emails that contained information currently identified as classified. But at the time the emails were sent, the information was not classified. Powell reviewed the two emails it was calendar data and he disagrees with the decision to mark it as classified after the fact, as he was Sec State at the time and thus the OCA for State if he says it shouldn't have been classified it shouldn't have been.
But regardless it wasn't classified at the time he sent those two emails. No crime if someone classifies the data after it's been sent as unclassified.
When the information was substantial enough that they can not only verify that it was classified but identify the Owning agency and get their independent verification that the information was in deed classified at the level indicated and at the time the email was sent indicates that the data was not pulled from unclassified sources. Nice try to cover-up for Hillary. The fact that there was sufficient text to identify sources tells us that it was not incidental information.
Slashdot Mirror
Wish I had mod points today, That's funny!
Exactly how would the EU accomplish that? The EU has no military of it's own, it has no nukes (we have thousands) it has no force projection capability (we have multiple carrier groups). It has no way to attack the US. We have combat troops and equipment stationed all throughout the EU. The EU wasn't even able to stop the genocide in Bosnia until the US decided to step in and help.
Thanks for the laugh.
Sure, and that is how they achieve pre-order delivery. Set the product to ship during the next lightning storm, land drone on steeple, lightning strikes charging capacitors with 1.21 gigawatts, drone then achieves 88 mph speed and presto deliver the package an hour before it is ordered.
Bingo. For example two years ago I drove for UPS during the Christmas rush. At the peak the Delivery center (one of three servicing the Salt Lake City Metro center) was pushing 80,000 packages a day. Two of those three centers were at the same location a third at another, that's about 240,000 a day at peak using roughly 300 package cars. A large volume of the volume was Amazon. Call it 100k, 300 trucks versus 100,000 drone flights a day leaving from the central sort and distro facility. And those package cars go out in all weather. What happens when a thundercell rolls through an area, will those perches hold a drone in place through 70 mph wind gusts, or how do they keep their delivery schedule going during a three day blizzard?
In other words the Doctor reviewed the file, in less than a minute. The GP didn't say read it word for word, but reviewed it.
The average person can do jack shit to head off global tyranny (whatever that is) or the apocalypse. What they can do is play a game that gets them out walking around rather than sitting in front of a PC or a TV screen, or just sitting. It's a new concept and some people have neglected common sense. But how many people keel over dead from heart attacks while sitting and watching TV shows every year. If they were out walking around regularly they might have avoided it.
Get off your high horse. And you don't own the lawn of your retirement home gramps.
Actually such a law was just repealed, making it legal for the first time for significant amounts of US petroleum to be exported. The Keystone pipeline is to take Canadian oil to be refined and then loaded onto ships to China and elsewhere. It is Not for US oil.
No it is actually a real case, and it was a legitimate complaint. As McDonalds kept their coffee at exceedingly high temperatures causing the lady to receive near instant 3rd degree burns from the 180 degree beverage.
As to the Windows 10 users (assuming you mean those upgraded against their will): I imagine Microsoft will point out the benefits of moving as many users as possible to an up to date single OS structure versus trying to maintain and patch multiple versions. Promises to maintain older versions are fulfilled by moving users to current version. The maintenance and support is to move them to a more modern OS.
They'll be able to point to how Apple has done with with both OSX (not always forced) and iOS (forced until the hardware can no longer handle the upgrades. As well as how that is the model most apps in the mobile environment use as well as most major browsers.
Thus they are only following industry norms, nothing to punish them for. Just because so many of us are used to the need to hold off on upgrading to a new windows version until at least SP1 does not mean they can't change the paradigm and push all users really, really hard to update and achieve a more secure OS environment not having so many varieties of Windows out there to patch.
The storage could be argued as a bait and switch.
They did not foresee a future where we would be under constant threat of non-state actors wishing to do us harm. So all those Native tribes that frequently raided outlying villages and farms didn't exist. They didn't face down the Barbary pirates just years after the Nation was established. Technology has changed, the world has not.
They do not open and read the contents. Scanning for chemical or biological contaminants is not the same as opening and looking over the contents. They don't even x-ray all packages as that could result in damage to some items sent via mail (film).
Actually they do have a point. The data is being changed, from the encrypted form to the cleartext form. The FBI then has to be able to prove that the decryption process did not change the actual content of everything decrypted. We can't just print out and read the encrypted data and see that the email in question actually said "I laundered $3 million dollars worth of hotel towels" rather than "I laundered $3 million dollars for the Russian Mafia". Granted it wouldn't exactly be easy to create a decryption process that would convert random but properly placed bits of text from innocent data to incriminating data without glaring errors.
The key to computer forensics is you have to prove you didn't change the data when you pulled it from the source hardware.
And it's the same degenerate undesirables who fight back on their convictions who establish what protections we do have. Miranda for example was a real scumbag, but his appeal on being interrogated without knowing his rights established the Miranda warnings we can all quote from TV. And incidentally shortly after winning his landmark case that upstanding citizen was stabbed to death in a bar fight.
Niantic has long held that restricted access does not mean invalid. As long as some people can legally access the site and play without violating any security rules and it's not private residential property. This rule came about so that they could keep their portals on the Google Campus which are off limits to the general public. Thus many stops and gyms may appear in places that are going to be off limits to most people. They just have to recognize that they are off limits and that they will most likely not be able to get to those locations. Hopefully the game will soon have a way to request that such ingress portals not be used as stops or gyms. Keeping such locations viable makes sense with the game play of Ingress where hard to get to portals is just part of the strategy in some aspects of the game. But they do not really make as much sense with Pokémon Go. Though some such locations do make sense to keep valid (i.e. the Google Campus, non secure sections of military bases etc...)
Get a few dozen Ingress players to report it as an invalid portal. Since it is no longer a church a brief explanation of this fact and that it is now a private residential property (a very key phrase in portal location criteria) and it should be removed within a few months. (The portal que is heavily backlogged due to very poor decisions by Niantic.)
It is not run by Google. They spun it entirely free from the parent. The effects were seen in the Ingress game and back story as resources were cut.
Google no longer owns Niantic.
Sounds like their second game is a bigger hit than Ingress was. Hope they get a big cut of the profits.
Niantic is no longer part of Google. The spun off entirely a little over a year ago. Ingress felt the reduction in resources as well as the diversion to the development of Pokemon
And it came down to just one stubborn Union, all the others agreed that the Company couldn't meet the demanded pay increases and stay solvent, but one Union refused to play along and forced the company into bankruptcy, the product name was sold, and the new owners brutally redesigned costing far more jobs and pay than what the Union was trying to demand.
Management bonuses at the time were odd, but were mostly just golden parachutes as the original Hostess was folded and sold off.
How do future employers know about how you left. I hear repeatedly that most HR depts. will confirm that you worked for the company and maybe confirm the positions and time frames but that's it. They will not report derogatory unless they can back it up with citing criminal charges.
So how does the new firm know that you were "unprofessional" in the timing of your departure?
When Hillary started as Sec State, the Dems controlled both House and Senate and did for the first two years of Obama's term. Plus a Cabinet level position gets the equipment they want. Cost is cut from peons.
Clinton chose to use her own server to hide her communications. It was not subject to periodic audits, it was not subject to FOIA requests and in deed it took a congressional subpoena to get her to release the emails that she did. After having her attorneys illegally go through it and delete many emails.
Nice try to stack up the excuses, but mobile access to classified information was quite common, maybe not on smart phones but laptops and or secure tablets were in wide use in 2008.
p.s. This was as per a CNN report last February. Sorry don't have the link handy.
Already been looked at. They found a grand total of two emails that contained information currently identified as classified. But at the time the emails were sent, the information was not classified. Powell reviewed the two emails it was calendar data and he disagrees with the decision to mark it as classified after the fact, as he was Sec State at the time and thus the OCA for State if he says it shouldn't have been classified it shouldn't have been.
But regardless it wasn't classified at the time he sent those two emails. No crime if someone classifies the data after it's been sent as unclassified.
When the information was substantial enough that they can not only verify that it was classified but identify the Owning agency and get their independent verification that the information was in deed classified at the level indicated and at the time the email was sent indicates that the data was not pulled from unclassified sources. Nice try to cover-up for Hillary. The fact that there was sufficient text to identify sources tells us that it was not incidental information.