So how the hell can you be sure what they looked like? They could have been totem poles or something.. just happened to be arranged in a similar round pattern, which is most likely common for that era of man ( think sun/moon god worship ).
Chicago lost because they offered a less attractive *package* then the others. They couldn't compete at several levels, which is good as the midwest really doesn't have the cash to spend on this with the economy the way it is.
Im all for freedom of information, but are they planning on publishing floor plans of private buildings too? That could be a severe security risk in some cases.
I'm all for promoting homegrown electronic countermeasures, as I've long fantasized about building a directional, subsonic-targeting HERF weapon to discourage noise pollution on my residential street.
So those evil customers dont want to overpay.. go figure.
The licensing doesn't have to be so complex... Really it doesn't. its all designed to screw you out of as much as they can.
I have been reading books on the computer since home computers first got video output... and yes, E-paper is wonderful.
Copyright wont stand in the way, but the attorneys will.
But in the end, they will lose, unless we lose ALL control of our digital device and basic freedoms first. ( which is always possible ).
Should be free, and will be free.
If you don't offer 'added value' to the information you produce, then you are doomed.
I hope he's kidding. Reading devices are not the issue. The trouble of converting is, and that is becoming less of a issue by the day.
Only the good guys can be trusted. ( yes, this is sarcasm.. before anyone flames me )
Skill is a bit harder to come by.. You have to go buy/threaten an ex soviet scientist for that.
So how the hell can you be sure what they looked like? They could have been totem poles or something.. just happened to be arranged in a similar round pattern, which is most likely common for that era of man ( think sun/moon god worship ).
If a cars firmware breaks an engine accessory, id say there are larger issues at stake and its time to sell the car.
Should there be is the correct question.
Should Palm ( or anybody else ) be able to interface with consumer items like itunes without getting its hands slapped?
Chicago lost because they offered a less attractive *package* then the others. They couldn't compete at several levels, which is good as the midwest really doesn't have the cash to spend on this with the economy the way it is.
Sure, but its not science related like the channel should be.. Or monster related ( which is what the channel was degenerating towards )
"There can be only one"
But in this case, no sword battles and cool lighting effects will be involved.
18% said those companies should be put out of business
Cool, and i thought i was standing alone in that attitude. Nuke the damned companies.
There are some buildings which are quasi public, that they might actually be able to publish.
True security clearance buildings would of course be off limits.
Im all for freedom of information, but are they planning on publishing floor plans of private buildings too? That could be a severe security risk in some cases.
No used sales, no 'use until you are done'... Its like a markers wetdream.
The problem with restricting access to public funded computers is that the public funds them, including the person using it.
Just like we did when people still used maps. Far safer.
Doesn't the kernel code in 8RC1 still have debugging stuff enabled? I know that is a speed killer and would at the least skew the numbers.
Stability and predictability are also rather important factors ( in the favor of *bsd )
Depends, are you making meth out of the trunk? if so it might come in handy.
This is how things used to be...
I'm all for promoting homegrown electronic countermeasures, as I've long fantasized about building a directional, subsonic-targeting HERF weapon to discourage noise pollution on my residential street.
I have found a shotgun works well.
So what happened to this Slava dude?