Hes got the cash to be treated like that, so more power to him. I don't really see how this is 'news', unless its more stoking fires of the 'class war' that is going on.
Yes i saw it, and the statement was to clarify there was never any criminal intent, nullifying your comment completely, or was that too much for your pea brain to handle?
i never said it wasn't a crime to do so, only that i could. You totally missed the point i was making about 'violating orders with actions', but i am not surprised.
Since no crime is actually intended, the only evidence trail here is that you are stupid.
Its trivial to block that port except for connection to trusted remote addresses. its also trivial to see any attempt to connect to an unauthorized IP, call it a breech, and fire your sorry ass on the spot if you cant explain yourself well enough. ( oh and if you try to install any sort of client that pops up too, if you could even get it on your PC without ringing the alarm, also easy to do )
He clearly stated he cant take files off premise. Going off that fact, by accessing his PC remotely i bet he is also violating a few rules in the process.
Booth did not attack his own government. He attacked the leader of the enemy. There is a difference, and even a person as stupid as you should be able to figure that one out.
Snowden attacked his own government, which is treason, which is punishable by death.
Hes got the cash to be treated like that, so more power to him. I don't really see how this is 'news', unless its more stoking fires of the 'class war' that is going on.
It's the government's job to protect us from ourselves. Or so it thinks.
While true, this has nothing to do with that. They smell money.
Is an understatement. The feds are out of control.
That would be the FBI you are thinking of that actively blackmails congress.
The NSA doesn't need to do this as its implied by their mandate.
its not humorous for the people stuck out there.
I have seen it before. just not sure where the reference is to prove it.
Klingons do not resign. They may be forced to accept discommendation, but they never, ever give up and 'resign'.
Fuck yes i want freedom. ( and be sure to scream the obscenities )
Really, not joking here.. So you lose the ability to time-shfit for free, not the content. Just more of the 'me me me' crowd whining.
Yes i saw it, and the statement was to clarify there was never any criminal intent, nullifying your comment completely, or was that too much for your pea brain to handle?
Secession was never recognized by the US government
They didn't have to.
i never said it wasn't a crime to do so, only that i could. You totally missed the point i was making about 'violating orders with actions', but i am not surprised.
Since no crime is actually intended, the only evidence trail here is that you are stupid.
Its trivial to block that port except for connection to trusted remote addresses. its also trivial to see any attempt to connect to an unauthorized IP, call it a breech, and fire your sorry ass on the spot if you cant explain yourself well enough. ( oh and if you try to install any sort of client that pops up too, if you could even get it on your PC without ringing the alarm, also easy to do )
Want to try again, loser?
Paper money stores far better than coin. I can easily put 500$ in bills in my wallet. Lets see you do that with coin?
If you remove the 1$ bill, then you will automatically cause prices to rise.
Really isn't that much in the retail world.
Doubtful.
If his IT people are on the ball, he will run into blocked ports and get reported to management, then let go.
He clearly stated he cant take files off premise. Going off that fact, by accessing his PC remotely i bet he is also violating a few rules in the process.
Oh, yes i do get to issue demands of you. You have the option to ignore them and pay the penalty, but i can still make demands.
I can also beat you with a bat, if i find you.
It needs to move to /dev/null Worthless piece of bloated garbage. Its 2014, it has no place in the modern world.
How did you get to be such a social reprobate?
Just sick and tired of pinheads like you who cant even follow a simple directive ( read my signature again, if you are capable )
Booth did not attack his own government. He attacked the leader of the enemy. There is a difference, and even a person as stupid as you should be able to figure that one out.
Snowden attacked his own government, which is treason, which is punishable by death.
That is the appropriate response to what he did.
Contrary to your belief, most hunters are law abiding citizens and shooting the drones down would not be legal.
Now, if the state makes it legal, as they should, then yes, its open season.
As i said, get out. We don't want ( or need ) you and your family here.
Sounds like you need to be removed from the country too. Or denied access if you are one of those people coming to suck off our resources.