In Mexico, to prevent the drug cartel from penetrating law enforcement headquarters, some cops have been implanted with RFID tags. Although, knowing the cartel, I imagine they'll eventually gain access 'single-handedly', if ya get my drift.
Don't you dare terraform Mars. My family lives there. We'd hate you all. if it weren't for these all-natural body suits we wear here on Earth, we'd be unable to stand your awful hot moist planet. Unfortunately, the suits degrade after a few years and we have to change them for new fresh ones.
However, at the bottom of where the lake was, is a huge crop circle in the shape of an X-Box. Additionally, a message from space was found engraved on a titanium plate. Translators think it said "All your lake are belong to us".
Since you continually refuse to cite specific pages and lines as proof, I classify you as a liar. Yes, I'm calling you a liar now, and certainly a lazy ignorant boor.
And your chemistry lesson is completely jumbled, showing you're as poor a chemist as you are a sociopolitical analyst. For your information, the Anarchist Cookbook was bogus, thrown together full of incorrect formulas by a writer hired by Lyle Stuart. It is known, by people far smarter than you, as a great way to accidently blow oneself up following incorrect data. If you did your homework, a little reading, you'd know this. But god, you're dumb, just another appallingly ignorant rightwinger dummy, disgusting stupid. You take the easy and incorrect paths of reasoning, skipping the hard parts you can't understand, and coming to abysmally wrong conclusions. You read into the UN reports what you want to believe, not what they say. That's why you're afraid to quote specifics.
"Your just not right in the head, that all." Thank you, Doctor Grammar, I'll take that as a complement coming from a rocket scientist like you.
Your last few posts are a splendid mess of increasingly incoherent ravings defending Bush. About what I'd expect of a senile rightwinger ruled by fear. You note "The information in the article I linked to was accurate, so it doesn't matter who wrote it or who cites it, it is still true nonetheless." Actually, no, it was partly bogus and you're too stupid to know this, or care. For you only the easy slipshod way. Not knowing who Santorum was, shows how shallow your understanding of your own political party is. In the article he was quoted as waving 'proof' in form of paper, which no one got to see. Well, like Joe McCarthy waving a 'list' of known Communists in government that only he ever got to see, and which ultimately came to be known never existed, the esteemed Mr. Santorum was a BS artist too. Your article thus fails as proof, as bogus as all your other frothing raving claims.
You are a superb moron, a perfect specimen. Now don't darken my doorway again with your drunken ramblings or I'll have the sheriff put you on the next train. And put on some Depends, you've been urinating all over the debate floor. Eeeuuu. Jeeves, show this boor out and spray the air, he's stunk it up something fierce.
Grandpa, you're not ever going to win any debates. You had several chances to rebut, citing specific pages and lines to prove your contentions but still refuse. This means you can't; you've lost all credibility for your fantasies. I grant you no more chances; you've lost. And as for fantasizing about beating sense into me, dream on. Flinging NeoCon talking points over and over don't fly, homie. You claim a UN find of a very small handful of useless degraded shells proves Saddam didn't disarm, and rocket ranges 'could' have been extended, etc. Nowhere - NOWHERE - a hard 'we found many usable weapons ready to go, the world is not safe!'. Hussein did not attack us. He did not do 9/11. It was Bush who made war on Iraq, it was Bush did the first war strike and invaded Iraq. This is illegal. Anything else is your NeoCon fantasy. Saddam was not about to cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade Disneyland, Grandpa, that may be too simple a concept for you to understand. Bush is a war criminal as well as a treasonous cretin trying to destroy the US Constitution. And if you support his illegal activities, that just makes you another Nazi-like camp follower. I'm real tired of lying mentally-ill criminal NeoCons, and will not stop until we're rid of these traitors.
"This is key because we knew the stuff was there, we didn't know however, that it was useless until we found it after the war started." Baloney. There were no vast caches of working WMD. Your own alluded-to UN reports show the UN went in plenty of times and found no hard evidence of big numbers of tangible weapons for the world to see or to justify all-out war. But profit-drooling Cheney need to get the oil secured, and the alcoholic Bush needed to go to war to keep Israel safe. Those inspection reports do not justify a full-out war upon Iraq. You had your chance to cite me specific pages and lines but didn't and have lost. Keep repeating your NeoCon fantasy wishes, but you'll always be just a blowhard with no credibility. I could order you to show me photos, windbag, but all you'd come up with are rusted out '56 Chevys.
" WTF are you talking about. I am not sure who Rick Santorum is or why it is important. " LOL. You threw out a quote on an article citing Rick Santorum waving a piece of paper claiming we found weapons, and nobody got to see the contents, and you don't even know who Santorum is? How stupid can you be? Didn't even read and understand your own cited article, you just threw it out there in panic. Wow, that's pathetic. Hope your retirement home gives you vitamins to stave off Alzheimers, Ronnie.
And thanks for the chemistry laugh, Forrest Gump. "But you can use alcohol as an ingredient in rocket fuel. and no, you don't need a 100% solution either. 40% will work, just not as well." LOL. You are a complete idiot. When alcohol is used in rockets, it's used in conjunction with potent oxidizers far beyond, for example, drugstore 3% hydrogen peroxide. Especially if it's watery. You might be able to make a Molotov out of JD, but I don't think you're going to blow up any bank vaults with it. And converting cotton into guncotton as you maybe imply? LOL. You can't exactly convert it onboard with carry-on shampoo. Gee, let's pack a chem lab in the carry-on luggage, Mustapha! Pack a Bunsen burner in your jockstrap! Put the nitric acid in the your sippy cup. Oooh, why don't you convert your burqua into guncotton, too? Do you spend a lot of time fantasizing about this?
You've only shown in all these windy handwaving posts that all you are is a blowhard defender of a lying president. Maybe senile too. You have earned utter disgust. But against Astroturfing morons like you whose goal is is to waste the time of anyone disputing the Reich's policies, I could keep this up forever, and be happy to. But I'd only have to until your Nixonian god, the criminal Bush, is replaced by someone in the next election. Not long off. and I'm patient, and will live longer than you anyway.
Seems pretty easy to use low-tech against these. Dogs for one. And then application of effective peasant technology such as POR weapons (Plain Old Rocks) or SMD (Shovel of Mass Destruction) or the more sophisticated FBCB airborne weapon, also known as Frikkin Big Concrete Block deployed off roof.
Also they may be susceptive to simple home-brew weapons. Robo-tasers, gadgets rigged from auto ignition coils, etc.
Interestingly, the flip side of the 78 rpm vinyl was a recording by Snoop Doggy Dog's grandfather, "I Gots Yo Bling Bling, Now Ride Wit Me in Mah Model T. Uhuh Uhuh."
I have to laugh at some sorry excuse for an idiot citing "it specifically says that 'they think' the chemical weapons used in modern terrorist attacks came from Saddam's arsenal of forbidden weapons". They 'think'. Well, thank you, Galileo. We 'think' the world is flat. But we're struggling to prove it. Show me the photos, the news reports. hey. WMDs clear as day. Right here! Oh. Can't find any to show you.
We all know how truthful you John Bolton buttkissers are. The UN reports discuss pre-1991 weaponry and a few overlooked - small quantity - of things like degraded CW shells. Don't play the game of pointing to 29 UN quarterly reports and others and demanding *I* dig through them to prove your contentions. Maybe you can quote a specific page and line in a specific report that supports your frothmouthed ravings, Grandpa. Perhaps now that you're retired, Gramps, and have nothing better to do, you can scurry off and do that in between the episodes of pedophilia with the nieces? All the UN reports say is, they found evidence that Saddam had weapons prior to 1991, and the vast majority were now destroyed or degraded into unusability by time. All you say is "could be or maybe or think." Well, that's scary. Ooooh. Let's bomb a country into the Stone Age on that basis, hey! And the article you quote is about a report waved about by Rick Santorum but not readable. So you use third-hand 'evidence' from Santorum! Hahahaha! Stop, you're killing me. LOL. You haven't proven anything but that you're a loudmouthed rabid chickenhawk. Say hello to Rush, Michael, and Bill O'Reilly for me. That makes four morons, enough for a rightwinger game of Bridge.
"I would hate to have two people take separate parts of a bomb onto a plane and sail through security because it isn't working at the time just to have them reassemble it at will and do whatever they wanted to it. Do you realize how stupid that sounds?"
Yes, I do know how stupid it sounds. And you're absolutely right. You did sound stupid, Gramps. Now empty out your sippy cup, because a $14/hr TSA guard can't tell the difference between Jack Daniels and rocket fuel.
Nice try, Sparky. The UNMOVIC report does not say anywhere that they found WMD from pre-invasion times, but affirms that after Saddam was beaten badly in 90s, he was forced to destroy weapons and the results monitored. Nowhere does they say they actually found working military weapons of mass destruction. Likewise, the inspectors did comprehensive investigation and failed to find working weapons. Just one quote out of many: "No evidence was found that Iraq had developed these systems for the delivery of biological warfare agents." I hope you're not John Bolton's retarded younger brother.
I thank you for doing an excellent Zell Miller impression. Your hot button seems to be when someone identifies what is really going on, and you launch into denying reality, while frothing at the mouth. Regardless of whether you're a fool or a paid tool, either way, I don't waste time on that. But thanks for the laughs. "Was it the WDMs that aren't a lie?" Oh, we found WMD? LOL, I don't remember reading that anywhere. Maybe you saw it in the National Enquirer? Along with the UFOs in your alternate reality? Maybe Nixon piloted one, ya think? While Liddy and the Abominable Snowman broke into Watergate. Those FOX viewers, always the life of the party.
It's hard to believe anyone in their right mind defends Nixon and Liddy, denies problems with Bush, and at this stage refuses to accept that the Bush admin lies its head off. Perhaps a paid Bush Astroturfer might though. That said, I do nto easte my time with fools, liars, and professional propagandists. Raving lunatic, lol. You're a hoot. But transparent. Now go back and lecture to your fellow Limbaugh and Savage listeners.
This reply nicely whitewashes over reality and misses additional factors negating its easy comfort with what's going on. We have a president who is demonstrably the most dishonest one in history, whose administration tries to grab power at every opportunity, whose Attorney General lies to Congress, and you naively say "People are making way too much out of this. Every president in recent history has had plans just like this." But recent presidents did not have the morality and ethics of a Richard Nixon. Recent presidents did not have secret courts, secret prisons, and perform torture. Recent presidents did not arrogantly demand warrantless wiretaps.
Also not noted in the discussion is the fact that Bush previously took upon himself the power to replace Congress in the event of a disabling emergency. Yes - I'm not making this up. By his Executive Order already in place separate from NSPD-51, "should Congress not be able to convene" he can replace Congress with his own handpicked representatives. So should some 'terrorist' event such as false-flag bombing take place that kills some members of Congress, Bush has assumed for himself the ability to replace them. Under those conditions, a resolution ending the emergency might never be allowed.
Is this impossible? Well. Did Bush lie about WMD? Did Bush lie about yellow-cake uranium? Did Bush chose to go to war against a country that did not attack us? Would Bush hesitate to bomb Iran if puppetmaster Cheney sets up an excuse for it? Could a false-flag attack take place? Easily. The USS Liberty, the USS Cole attacks demonstrate that a certain pragmatic small country has no scruples about the end justifying the means.
Could we do anything to stop a power grab? No. Bush has given himself the authority to Federalize the National Guard and deploy them outside their home states to 'keep order'. Use of Blackwater mercenaries in New Orleans, who took guns away from people needing them to defend themselves, shows the attitude of this administration. Halliburton has been building detention camps in the US. If it were only one or two small things relating to a police state, that would be of less concern. But the unending barrage of arrogance, lies, and abuse clearly presage an ominous future path.
"People are making way too much out of this." Who's being the blind one here and who is being an apologist for the worst president in US history?
I truncated the correct full directive title, sorry. it's National Security Presidential Directive 51, and in it Bush assumes total power for himself in the event of his declaring a national emergency.
or any of the other discussions about it. There are many. Only a fool would call this directive harmless. In the event of ANYTHING Bush chooses to call an emergency, he by self-proclamation assumes power over all government functions:
"When the president determines a catastrophic emergency has occurred, the president can take over all government functions and direct all private sector activities to ensure we will emerge from the emergency with an "enduring constitutional government."
Translated into layman's terms, when the president determines a national emergency has occurred, the president can declare to the office of the presidency powers usually assumed by dictators to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over."
The problem with this directive is, it is also up to Bush to declare when the emergency is over. Nice, huh?
No surprise. It will take three generations to recover from the damage done by Bush. One generation to improve education, one generation to create new educators from the 1st generation, and then teaching the next generation. By that time, the US will be hurting massively. Or be a police state. If Bush nukes Iran next spring and invokes dictator powers to stop the next election, under NSD51. Hey, who needs science in a service economy, eh?
Actually, that is pretty relevant to brain operation where neural networks both store data and compute.
But on to my original reason for posting. If some kind of networks are involved in DNA operation, three ideas come to mind: 1) genetic spam 2) denial of DNA service attacks (I think viruses kind of do that in a way. Making them biological black-hat hackers), and 3) if the RIAA even THINKS of suing me for copying DNA, next time I catch the flu, I'm going to cough ALL over their lawyers. DMCA THAT, yoo hosers.
According to SEC disclosure statements: "Principal investors, John Tobor, $1,000,000 New Dollars; John Smallberries, loan backed by 400,000 shares of YoyoDyne Propulsion; and one Captain J. Kirk, who hates whales."
Oh, the museum isn't all that inaccurate. For example, the exhibit showing the RIAA offering an apple to Eve is certainly correct. And the Stone-Age diorama showing Jack Thompson and Darl McBride hitting each other over the head with clubs was not only historically accurate, but desirable as well.
I thank you, because finding out new things and new connections are some of the things that make life interesting and worth living. That, and hot sex with Scarlett Johansson. (The aforementioned items not necessarily in that order.)
The bear is actually Mark III. Their first version, the Tinky-winky, was a failure in tests, because its purse kept getting shot off. The Mark II was given the head of Hillary Clinton, but in tests the rescued soldiers chewed their own arms off in fright rather than be rescued by her.
Slashdot Mirror
In Mexico, to prevent the drug cartel from penetrating law enforcement headquarters, some cops have been implanted with RFID tags. Although, knowing the cartel, I imagine they'll eventually gain access 'single-handedly', if ya get my drift.
Robopicker: "Oooooh! Again! Again!" (robopicker LIKES it)
It was in quick-growing wild rice.
However, at the bottom of where the lake was, is a huge crop circle in the shape of an X-Box. Additionally, a message from space was found engraved on a titanium plate. Translators think it said "All your lake are belong to us".
And your chemistry lesson is completely jumbled, showing you're as poor a chemist as you are a sociopolitical analyst. For your information, the Anarchist Cookbook was bogus, thrown together full of incorrect formulas by a writer hired by Lyle Stuart. It is known, by people far smarter than you, as a great way to accidently blow oneself up following incorrect data. If you did your homework, a little reading, you'd know this. But god, you're dumb, just another appallingly ignorant rightwinger dummy, disgusting stupid. You take the easy and incorrect paths of reasoning, skipping the hard parts you can't understand, and coming to abysmally wrong conclusions. You read into the UN reports what you want to believe, not what they say. That's why you're afraid to quote specifics.
"Your just not right in the head, that all." Thank you, Doctor Grammar, I'll take that as a complement coming from a rocket scientist like you.
Your last few posts are a splendid mess of increasingly incoherent ravings defending Bush. About what I'd expect of a senile rightwinger ruled by fear. You note "The information in the article I linked to was accurate, so it doesn't matter who wrote it or who cites it, it is still true nonetheless." Actually, no, it was partly bogus and you're too stupid to know this, or care. For you only the easy slipshod way. Not knowing who Santorum was, shows how shallow your understanding of your own political party is. In the article he was quoted as waving 'proof' in form of paper, which no one got to see. Well, like Joe McCarthy waving a 'list' of known Communists in government that only he ever got to see, and which ultimately came to be known never existed, the esteemed Mr. Santorum was a BS artist too. Your article thus fails as proof, as bogus as all your other frothing raving claims.
You are a superb moron, a perfect specimen. Now don't darken my doorway again with your drunken ramblings or I'll have the sheriff put you on the next train. And put on some Depends, you've been urinating all over the debate floor. Eeeuuu. Jeeves, show this boor out and spray the air, he's stunk it up something fierce.
Call me crazy, but I think we could reduce air pollution a lot by banning coal-fueled aircraft engines and use horses instead. It just might work.
"This is key because we knew the stuff was there, we didn't know however, that it was useless until we found it after the war started." Baloney. There were no vast caches of working WMD. Your own alluded-to UN reports show the UN went in plenty of times and found no hard evidence of big numbers of tangible weapons for the world to see or to justify all-out war. But profit-drooling Cheney need to get the oil secured, and the alcoholic Bush needed to go to war to keep Israel safe. Those inspection reports do not justify a full-out war upon Iraq. You had your chance to cite me specific pages and lines but didn't and have lost. Keep repeating your NeoCon fantasy wishes, but you'll always be just a blowhard with no credibility. I could order you to show me photos, windbag, but all you'd come up with are rusted out '56 Chevys.
" WTF are you talking about. I am not sure who Rick Santorum is or why it is important. " LOL. You threw out a quote on an article citing Rick Santorum waving a piece of paper claiming we found weapons, and nobody got to see the contents, and you don't even know who Santorum is? How stupid can you be? Didn't even read and understand your own cited article, you just threw it out there in panic. Wow, that's pathetic. Hope your retirement home gives you vitamins to stave off Alzheimers, Ronnie.
And thanks for the chemistry laugh, Forrest Gump. "But you can use alcohol as an ingredient in rocket fuel. and no, you don't need a 100% solution either. 40% will work, just not as well." LOL. You are a complete idiot. When alcohol is used in rockets, it's used in conjunction with potent oxidizers far beyond, for example, drugstore 3% hydrogen peroxide. Especially if it's watery. You might be able to make a Molotov out of JD, but I don't think you're going to blow up any bank vaults with it. And converting cotton into guncotton as you maybe imply? LOL. You can't exactly convert it onboard with carry-on shampoo. Gee, let's pack a chem lab in the carry-on luggage, Mustapha! Pack a Bunsen burner in your jockstrap! Put the nitric acid in the your sippy cup. Oooh, why don't you convert your burqua into guncotton, too? Do you spend a lot of time fantasizing about this?
You've only shown in all these windy handwaving posts that all you are is a blowhard defender of a lying president. Maybe senile too. You have earned utter disgust. But against Astroturfing morons like you whose goal is is to waste the time of anyone disputing the Reich's policies, I could keep this up forever, and be happy to. But I'd only have to until your Nixonian god, the criminal Bush, is replaced by someone in the next election. Not long off. and I'm patient, and will live longer than you anyway.
All you've been doing is deflecting away
Also they may be susceptive to simple home-brew weapons. Robo-tasers, gadgets rigged from auto ignition coils, etc.
Interestingly, the flip side of the 78 rpm vinyl was a recording by Snoop Doggy Dog's grandfather, "I Gots Yo Bling Bling, Now Ride Wit Me in Mah Model T. Uhuh Uhuh."
We all know how truthful you John Bolton buttkissers are. The UN reports discuss pre-1991 weaponry and a few overlooked - small quantity - of things like degraded CW shells. Don't play the game of pointing to 29 UN quarterly reports and others and demanding *I* dig through them to prove your contentions. Maybe you can quote a specific page and line in a specific report that supports your frothmouthed ravings, Grandpa. Perhaps now that you're retired, Gramps, and have nothing better to do, you can scurry off and do that in between the episodes of pedophilia with the nieces? All the UN reports say is, they found evidence that Saddam had weapons prior to 1991, and the vast majority were now destroyed or degraded into unusability by time. All you say is "could be or maybe or think." Well, that's scary. Ooooh. Let's bomb a country into the Stone Age on that basis, hey! And the article you quote is about a report waved about by Rick Santorum but not readable. So you use third-hand 'evidence' from Santorum! Hahahaha! Stop, you're killing me. LOL. You haven't proven anything but that you're a loudmouthed rabid chickenhawk. Say hello to Rush, Michael, and Bill O'Reilly for me. That makes four morons, enough for a rightwinger game of Bridge.
"I would hate to have two people take separate parts of a bomb onto a plane and sail through security because it isn't working at the time just to have them reassemble it at will and do whatever they wanted to it. Do you realize how stupid that sounds?"
Yes, I do know how stupid it sounds. And you're absolutely right. You did sound stupid, Gramps. Now empty out your sippy cup, because a $14/hr TSA guard can't tell the difference between Jack Daniels and rocket fuel.
Nice try, Sparky. The UNMOVIC report does not say anywhere that they found WMD from pre-invasion times, but affirms that after Saddam was beaten badly in 90s, he was forced to destroy weapons and the results monitored. Nowhere does they say they actually found working military weapons of mass destruction. Likewise, the inspectors did comprehensive investigation and failed to find working weapons. Just one quote out of many: "No evidence was found that Iraq had developed these systems for the delivery of biological warfare agents." I hope you're not John Bolton's retarded younger brother.
I thank you for doing an excellent Zell Miller impression. Your hot button seems to be when someone identifies what is really going on, and you launch into denying reality, while frothing at the mouth. Regardless of whether you're a fool or a paid tool, either way, I don't waste time on that. But thanks for the laughs. "Was it the WDMs that aren't a lie?" Oh, we found WMD? LOL, I don't remember reading that anywhere. Maybe you saw it in the National Enquirer? Along with the UFOs in your alternate reality? Maybe Nixon piloted one, ya think? While Liddy and the Abominable Snowman broke into Watergate. Those FOX viewers, always the life of the party.
It's hard to believe anyone in their right mind defends Nixon and Liddy, denies problems with Bush, and at this stage refuses to accept that the Bush admin lies its head off. Perhaps a paid Bush Astroturfer might though. That said, I do nto easte my time with fools, liars, and professional propagandists. Raving lunatic, lol. You're a hoot. But transparent. Now go back and lecture to your fellow Limbaugh and Savage listeners.
Also not noted in the discussion is the fact that Bush previously took upon himself the power to replace Congress in the event of a disabling emergency. Yes - I'm not making this up. By his Executive Order already in place separate from NSPD-51, "should Congress not be able to convene" he can replace Congress with his own handpicked representatives. So should some 'terrorist' event such as false-flag bombing take place that kills some members of Congress, Bush has assumed for himself the ability to replace them. Under those conditions, a resolution ending the emergency might never be allowed.
Is this impossible? Well. Did Bush lie about WMD? Did Bush lie about yellow-cake uranium? Did Bush chose to go to war against a country that did not attack us? Would Bush hesitate to bomb Iran if puppetmaster Cheney sets up an excuse for it? Could a false-flag attack take place? Easily. The USS Liberty, the USS Cole attacks demonstrate that a certain pragmatic small country has no scruples about the end justifying the means.
Could we do anything to stop a power grab? No. Bush has given himself the authority to Federalize the National Guard and deploy them outside their home states to 'keep order'. Use of Blackwater mercenaries in New Orleans, who took guns away from people needing them to defend themselves, shows the attitude of this administration. Halliburton has been building detention camps in the US. If it were only one or two small things relating to a police state, that would be of less concern. But the unending barrage of arrogance, lies, and abuse clearly presage an ominous future path.
"People are making way too much out of this." Who's being the blind one here and who is being an apologist for the worst president in US history?
See http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTI CLE_ID=55824
or any of the other discussions about it. There are many. Only a fool would call this directive harmless. In the event of ANYTHING Bush chooses to call an emergency, he by self-proclamation assumes power over all government functions:
"When the president determines a catastrophic emergency has occurred, the president can take over all government functions and direct all private sector activities to ensure we will emerge from the emergency with an "enduring constitutional government."
Translated into layman's terms, when the president determines a national emergency has occurred, the president can declare to the office of the presidency powers usually assumed by dictators to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over."
The problem with this directive is, it is also up to Bush to declare when the emergency is over. Nice, huh?
No surprise. It will take three generations to recover from the damage done by Bush. One generation to improve education, one generation to create new educators from the 1st generation, and then teaching the next generation. By that time, the US will be hurting massively. Or be a police state. If Bush nukes Iran next spring and invokes dictator powers to stop the next election, under NSD51. Hey, who needs science in a service economy, eh?
IM IN UR BONE, STEALIN UR CALCIUM.
I, for one, salute our new skeletal data overlords
Oh for a Bonewulf Cluster of these!
Say, I wonder if BoneNet has been trademarked yet?
Frogs with modems? That's uncanny!
Gadgets? OHHH. Whew. I thought you said 'testicles'. I can survive without gadgets.
But on to my original reason for posting. If some kind of networks are involved in DNA operation, three ideas come to mind: 1) genetic spam 2) denial of DNA service attacks (I think viruses kind of do that in a way. Making them biological black-hat hackers), and 3) if the RIAA even THINKS of suing me for copying DNA, next time I catch the flu, I'm going to cough ALL over their lawyers. DMCA THAT, yoo hosers.
According to SEC disclosure statements: "Principal investors, John Tobor, $1,000,000 New Dollars; John Smallberries, loan backed by 400,000 shares of YoyoDyne Propulsion; and one Captain J. Kirk, who hates whales."
Oh, the museum isn't all that inaccurate. For example, the exhibit showing the RIAA offering an apple to Eve is certainly correct. And the Stone-Age diorama showing Jack Thompson and Darl McBride hitting each other over the head with clubs was not only historically accurate, but desirable as well.
I thank you, because finding out new things and new connections are some of the things that make life interesting and worth living. That, and hot sex with Scarlett Johansson. (The aforementioned items not necessarily in that order.)
The bear is actually Mark III. Their first version, the Tinky-winky, was a failure in tests, because its purse kept getting shot off. The Mark II was given the head of Hillary Clinton, but in tests the rescued soldiers chewed their own arms off in fright rather than be rescued by her.