Slashdot Mirror


Bones Could Become Conduits For Data Swaps

Billosaur writes "New Scientist Tech has an intriguing article about researchers at Rice University in Houston, TX who are looking at ways to use the human skeleton to transmit data. The idea is to use bones to conduct sound waves, with 0's and 1's being represented by different frequencies. Preliminary results, shared with a conference on body networks in Florence, Italy, this week, show that bones can conduct even low-power vibrations with few errors. The idea is that the conduction of sound along bone would be more secure than that via radio waves, leading to the possibility of swapping data with someone by shaking their hand."

134 comments

  1. That makes sense. by hkgroove · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew they got it wrong. Tinfoil does not stop the transmissions to my teeth!

    1. Re:That makes sense. by Enoxice · · Score: 1

      Well what are you waiting for, then, let me see ya grillz!


      Oh, God, did I actually just say that?

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    2. Re:That makes sense. by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      they should have asked drummers; they have been passing sound through "dem bones" for generations...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:That makes sense. by monk.e.boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      My bone already has the ability to pass enough data to make a baby.

      But not through a hand shake.

      Insert joke about hand shandy.

      :-P

      monk.e.boy

    4. Re:That makes sense. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hehehe..I was thinking along the same lines.

      If they could figure out how to do this communication via the "extra" bone a man has.....every handshake message transfer with a woman would lead to a 'happy ending'.

      Not to mention how many men would go into the profession of 'messenger'.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:That makes sense. by pwainwright · · Score: 1

      "People could even swap information between devices via a firm handshake, Zhong suggests."

      I'm told the Masons do this already: - albeit only one bit: I am/am not.

  2. How long before the first virus? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    And passing spam -- o eeewwww yuck!

    1. Re:How long before the first virus? by epistemiclife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would rather suck if we became weary of handshaking for fear of filling our interfaced electronic devices with spam or (computer) viruses. I suppose that, in a bizarre way, it's a way for computer viruses to become human viruses.

    2. Re:How long before the first virus? by Cornflake917 · · Score: 2, Funny

      leading to the possibility of swapping data with someone by shaking their hand. A new, disgusting way of obtaining porn.

      "Here's Shaving Ryan's Privates: Midget Edition."

      "Sweet thanks!"

      *Squish*

      "...ummm, what the hell. Did you wash your hands?"

      "Oops!"
    3. Re:How long before the first virus? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Here's Shaving Ryan's Privates: Midget Edition."

      Link please?

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:How long before the first virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should expect to pass Spam 3 to 6 hours after eating it.

    5. Re:How long before the first virus? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      You can find it on his member page at the GNAA. Go to http://www.gnaa.us/, click "Members", and click "CornFlake917".

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  3. Interesting by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

    Should this ever be implemented, I await with much interest the inevitable methods developed for eavesdropping.

    1. Re:Interesting by torxic · · Score: 0

      Well envision this - I am eating breakfast at the table, and while i eat, my chair vibrates gently and now my MP3 player starts playing the latest news. I get out of the house, and boarded the train. I held on the handgrip and when my station arrived, my handphone gave me a nudge, telling me to get down. In the office, I spotted this really hot chick outside the pantry. I hurried towards her, and as i pass her I "accidentally" bumped into her. I muttered a sorry and left. In the toilet, i whipped out my phone and checked out her myspace.

      and so on and so forth... The possibilities are endless!

  4. when it breaks by qw0ntum · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lends new meaning to the term "broken pipe."

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:when it breaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, rather, it will revert to the old and busted meaning.

    2. Re:when it breaks by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1

      And when it works, a whole new meaning to "handshaking protocol"

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    3. Re:when it breaks by BooleanLobster · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about how they might solve the "last mile" problem.

      --
      In hell, you will find a mountain of broken, feces-covered typewriters and a stack of copies of the First Folio.
  5. I can see this really taking off by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An implanted vibrator that would allow me to securely send data from my phone to someone elses phone. Really, how often does bluetooth actually fail to beam a business card?

    Also I'd expect that the vibrations would exit through your feet and allow for snooping from ground based devices.

    I can see the potential in the medical device field.

    1. Re:I can see this really taking off by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're thinking too small. Think "Data Centers in graveyards".

      Think of the possibilities: Even after death, you could live on as an Ethernet cable for an AOL mail server!

    2. Re:I can see this really taking off by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cross talk would be a killer if you tried to put a DC in a graveyard using low frequency FSK signalling.

      Bass frequencies tend to travel through anything dense.

    3. Re:I can see this really taking off by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Funny

      no way, dude! Zombie computers would take on a whole new, different, and frightening meaning.

      And remember, when trying to escape a level 4 zombie outbreak, a dirigible is an excellent means of escape.

      --
      blah blah blah
    4. Re:I can see this really taking off by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      An implanted vibrator that would allow me to securely send data from my phone

      We're talking about permanently implanting a vibrator and communicating with your phone is the best idea you can come up with?

      Also I'd expect that the vibrations would exit through your feet and allow for snooping from ground based devices.

      Your average shoe has a chunk of closed-cell foam rubber in it, I doubt it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I can see this really taking off by Faylone · · Score: 1

      Well, great. Now I have to make sure and say "Not even over my dead body" with AOL

    6. Re:I can see this really taking off by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      An implanted vibrator

      Sorry, you completely lost me after that. That's just so wrong. ;-)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:I can see this really taking off by instanto · · Score: 2, Funny

      A Beowulf Cluster of Zombies!

      Sign me up!

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    8. Re:I can see this really taking off by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Wait until you see how they plan on transmitting porn.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:I can see this really taking off by guywcole · · Score: 1

      "An implanted vibrator..." Oh come on, the internet is for porn, and the skele-wire is for your girlfriend. This has got to be the obvious application.

      Or, it would be if this weren't slashdot.
    10. Re:I can see this really taking off by Raptoer · · Score: 1

      This might be a bad idea actually, for one it might tickle (no idea if it will). Also I know that contractors (construction workers) who use hammers can slowly damage their arms from the vibrations caused by the striking of the hammer.
      The article does mention that bone for transferring sound has been used in hearing aids, but that is not a structural bone, and considering the use that these might get, it might cause health problems. I don't know about you guys, but I'm not implanting anything next to a bone unless I'm absolutely sure it won't backfire. (or malfunction, imagine trying to install a patch or if it glitches out and starts transmitting 1's constantly... or heaven forbid it gets a virus...)

    11. Re:I can see this really taking off by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      So when I finally bite the dirt sandwich, my [bot]master will be not God, but a skinny 14 year old with Vitamin D deficiency?

      Religion seems OK sometimes.

    12. Re:I can see this really taking off by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Here's what you might find when you get them up and running.

    13. Re:I can see this really taking off by Pooua · · Score: 1

      As it happens, I am trying to find information on the effects of vibration from high-frequency machinery on bones, muscles and other structural members of the human body. A friend and I served aboard a Navy ship, in a space that housed our ship's steam-powered electric generators. These 400 kW generators each had a steam turbine that spun around 8k rpm. Some doctors suggest this high frequency vibration might damage bones through conduction.

      Here is an article that discusses vibrations up to 100 Hz:

      FASB Journal: Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  6. He's not feeling you up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's only stealing your music, or your bank credentials

    1. Re:He's not feeling you up by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Silly AC, your music hasn't been stolen: You have been copyright violated or RIAAPEd.

    2. Re:He's not feeling you up by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      The obligatories:

      IM IN UR BONE, STEALIN UR CALCIUM.

      I, for one, salute our new skeletal data overlords

      Oh for a Bonewulf Cluster of these!

      Say, I wonder if BoneNet has been trademarked yet?

  7. I need help by svendsen · · Score: 0

    Excuse me ma'am I need you to bend over so my bone can you some information. Careful the information will come in spurts....

  8. Who funded this? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

    I need to find out who funded this research. With the chance for practical usage ever at about 0.001%, it's clear that someone just has money to piss away if this is the research they're doing. That being said, I need USD$5 million to research a rocket car.

    1. Re:Who funded this? by AnonymousCactus · · Score: 1

      That's sorta' what research is about. Studying problems that most people don't think have an immediate business case or that most businesses think aren't likely enough to succeed to warrant investment. Sometimes you find something that is practical, sometimes you find something that is interesting and a lot of the time all you take away is a little more knowledge than you had going in. In this case, they've found that it's reasonable to transfer information through bones. I can think of a million of (unlikely) alternative uses from improving bone health, to medical monitoring, to sending information along other materials that conduct sound well.
      And, the likelihood is, that none of these will actually be used either.

    2. Re:Who funded this? by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I need to find out who funded this research. With the chance for practical usage ever at about 0.001%, it's clear that someone just has money to piss away if this is the research they're doing.

      As is frequently the case here (think yesterday's story about the judge supposedly demanding that RAM be turned over), if you read a blurb here and think "If true, that person must be really stupid!", it's worth R'ingTFA.

      As usual, the submitter completely missed the point of the link.

    3. Re:Who funded this? by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

      Imaging the military use for this. Soldiers could act like a connected grid, and since it's part of the actual body little to no actual material or weight is needed.

    4. Re:Who funded this? by instanto · · Score: 1

      Seen many military charges since WW1 where soldiers walk on a long line holding hands to 'get yourself connected'?

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    5. Re:Who funded this? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Imaging the military use for this. Soldiers could act like a connected grid, and since it's part of the actual body little to no actual material or weight is needed. Yeah, they just need to hold hands and be still for a few minutes! Ideal for enemy snipers, but for us, not so good...
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  9. Great by shoptroll · · Score: 2

    Just what we need... an excuse for the MAFIAA to subpoena our bodies for network traffic analysis.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:Great by Tatisimo · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to seeing the first person who gets their skullcap confiscated as evidence.

      --
      Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
    2. Re:Great by lessthaninfinity · · Score: 1

      ...or they'll just break our kneecaps 'til we cough up the cash.

  10. Handshake by dominious · · Score: 1

    leading to the possibility of swapping data with someone by shaking their hand. Gives new meaning to the protocol's "3-way handshake"
  11. as a software pirate let me just say by thegnu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Arrrrrr! Shiver me timbers!

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:as a software pirate let me just say by backbyter · · Score: 1

      >Arrrrrr! Shiver me timbers!

      That's the old saying, new saying is:

      Arrrrrr! Shiver me femurs!

  12. Funny... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The vast majority of people I meet can barely transmit their own data through their brains.

  13. More details... by Tmack · · Score: 5, Funny
    During their extensive research and experiments, scientists discovered that sharing information between two people worked best with direct pelvis to pelvis contact, and have coined the term "PtoP" networking...

    tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:More details... by jeiler · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to "laptop interface"....

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    2. Re:More details... by Mortirer · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the male to female connectors are going to look like

      --
      Curiosity killed the cat, but cats have 9 lives.
  14. New challenge for nerds by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    People could even swap information between devices via a firm handshake, Zhong suggests.

    So, all of us slashdotters are finally going to have to develop firm handshakes. The horror! Will it also require looking people in the eye and smiling?

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:New challenge for nerds by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not me... I ain't letting someone steal my identity-related data just by shaking my hand!!

      Seriously, that could be an issue -- but I can see benefits, such as being able to carry and transmit data without a dedicated interface device; or how about using it for devices to aid the disabled?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. Tingle by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Conducting data by sending vibrations on my bones? This technology is making me tingle with anticipation.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  16. Muahahahaha by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, human bones can be used to transmit data? Now, not only does my necromantic fortress of doom's decor scare the crap out of my enemies, I can save a fortune on cat-5 and fiber cabling.

  17. Obligatory by thegnu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Incoming Squirt!
    Cancel or Allow?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      No "Sue" option?

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
  18. Crackers/Hackers? by Smight · · Score: 1

    Man, You thought airport security was intrusive before! Wait until they have to crack all your bones to find out what you're hiding.

    I think I'll walk from now on.

    --
    IOU one (1) signature
    1. Re:Crackers/Hackers? by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Just think of what this will do to chiropractors... they'll all suddenly have to become IT experts.

      Chiropractor: Here's the reason your bandwidth is so low... CRAAAAACCCKKK!!!

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  19. Interesting but... by aurgo · · Score: 1

    Like curiosity this good, but the copper is more cheap.

    --
    http://wxopencommander.com/ GPL File Explorer
    1. Re:Interesting but... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Ok, try again, but this time use a few more verbs and proper conjugations. It almost made sense there.

  20. I've got a bone right here by poity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    with endless data for all the women out there.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  21. Wonderfull! by DeathOfScythes · · Score: 1

    Now, instead of watching someone fiddle with their palm's bluetooth settings for 5 minutes to send me an E-business card, I have to hold their clammy hand until the devices sync up.

  22. virus alert by lashi · · Score: 1

    So now I can get virus and VIRUS by shaking hands with people? I think I will bow from now on.

    1. Re:virus alert by DriveDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bow until heads touch... much more sonically conductive path than through a handshake. Substitute head lice for viruses transmitted. Thicker skulls probably work better. As usual, those with the least information share the most.

  23. Eh? Bones transmitting sound? by Kemanorel · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of that at all...

    Admittedly, I did not read TFA, so maybe they said something about this, but it should be no surprise at all that one can use bones to transmit sound, as well as other frequencies. A high school (maybe even jr. high) level biology book will tell you that the mechanisms in ears that are responsible for interpreting sound waves into what we actually hear consist largely of several bones in the inner ear. Plus, wasn't Docomo working on a phone that strapped to your wrist and let you use your thumb for a speaker, and your pinky for the mic? It's not a big jump to go from audio information to raw data.

    --
    Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
  24. Bones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dammit, Jim, I'm a doctor not a data conduit!

  25. Simpsons quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George:
    Uh, Mr. President, Sir. People are becoming a bit... confused by the way your and your opponent are, well, constantly holding hands.

    Kang:
    We are merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it.

    -- "Treehouse of Horror VII"

  26. The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you play quake?

  27. Weather Prediction. by pavon · · Score: 3, Funny

    A storm's a-coming, I can feel it in ma bones.

    Yeah yeah gramps, we all can. It's just the hourly SkyNet Subcutaneous Weather update.

    Galdarn kids these days, no respect.

  28. Uh.. by le0p · · Score: 2, Funny

    I anticipate a lot of uncomfortable conversations about "boning."

    --
    "I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability."-Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Uh.. by u-bend · · Score: 1

      Time to bone up on a little philosophy homework....
      Sticks and stones will break my bones, but only malware hurts me....
      Throw me a bone (let me steal that album)....

      --
      u-bend
  29. um.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually heard a lot of things about this professor at Rice after asking around about him in the past... and all the reports say he's a total scumbag to work with - rude, selfish and dishonest. He's never established a reputation for consistent, productive research. He's won awards for other "inventions," but according to my connections, the handheld device to test bone integrity is inconsistent and is based on handwaving rather than sound research. This work sounds the same way. His graduate students are all sixth years and older, which means no one new is coming in... He's been at Rice for a while, but he's not even become an associate professor yet... I just looked up his "scholarly interests" page, and his resume is full of poorly edited, identical citations.

    I don't really trust this guy.

  30. diamond age by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Demonstrates a much more fun way of swapping data. But this discussion probably should stay family-friendly. Yes, the last thing you want to think about there is children.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  31. Ouch... by Dmala · · Score: 1

    leading to the possibility of swapping data with someone by shaking their hand.

    Except in a handshake, there would be two layers of fat, muscle, and skin separating your bones, which I would think would interfere with data transmission. Perhaps a good hard bite could be used to make a good connection?

  32. What would the interchange be called by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're using to "beaming" ecards to one another. The zune lets you "squirt" things.

    Logically we'd have to say "Let me bone you my business card", and i'm not sure i like that.

    1. Re:What would the interchange be called by ls+-la · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Logically we'd have to say "Let me bone you my business card", and i'm not sure i like that. Just depends who the recipient is.
  33. Obligatory by PPH · · Score: 1, Funny

    Insert jokes about downloading pr0n via one's bone here:

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Wow, this is a new idea.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I guess they never heard of the 'bone phone' from DAK back in the 80's.

    Cant anyone do something original anymore? Or are we doomed to bad sequels and re-inventing the wheel for the rest of our existence on this planet?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. WOW! by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That has got to be the stupidest fucking idea I have heard since I've been her at Slashdot.

    1. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since I've been her

      How was the operation?
    2. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, somehow s/he reminds me of the song "James Bondage."

    3. Re:WOW! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That has got to be the stupidest fucking idea I have heard since I've been her at Slashdot.

      You just haven't been here long enough. Just wait.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

  36. Damnit Jim! by Lazarus_Bitmap · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm a doctor! Not a walking local area network! ~Bones

    --
    -Laz .:change is inevitable -- growth is optional:.
  37. Is that a.... by crazyvas · · Score: 1

    ....boner (get it, get it?) in your pocket or are you just wanting to swap data with me?

  38. Sound vibration through bones is old tech by problah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe it was made illegal in the 50's-60's in Canada because it was though to cause bone (cartilage) degridation, and arthritis.

    Transmitting 1's an 0's is new, as these were originally made to hear music throughout your entire body. If someone has a link, I don't, but I heard about this from my grandparents when I was younger.

  39. This is a good thing! by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

    Sure beats swapping spit and taking a blood oath.

  40. Bones! by f00man · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dammit! I'm a doctor, Jim, not a magician!

  41. What about other body rumblings? by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Belch at the wrong time any you one-click purchased a lot 1000 beanie babys on e-bay. Farts cause a seg fault.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  42. prime factoring? by HellFeuer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Could we then factor large numbers by having sex???? As if we needed another reason to do it!

  43. wow... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    So there really *is* a hell. Who knew?

  44. I can see it now. by Mockylock · · Score: 0, Troll

    One night stands, exchanging numbers... brushing up against a chick to send her a text message... cracking the system to get hers.

    Creepy, but endless.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  45. Health issues? by incer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about health issues? And how does it work out with diseases (or disfunctions) like Osteoporosis and Arthritis?

  46. Incorrect, misleading claim by Toffins · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There is something badly wrong with this article and it reflects very badly on the standard of journalism in New Scientist magazine. The article suggests that using bone vibrations to send messages is necessarily secure (against interception) because interception requires direct physical contact. However, that claim simply is not true. It should be obviously untrue from an understanding of elementary physics.

    Think what happens when the device is operating. The vibrations it generates will propagate as sound waves not only into the adjacent bone but also into the air surrounding the device. With the right microphones and signal processing techniques it will certainly be possible to intercept the airborne sound waves at significant distances from the device (depending on ambient noise level, sound pressure level, internal body noise as a function of motions of body parts and clothing, etc).

    Claiming that the device provides secure communication is wrong and potentially very misleading e.g. to any investors who read this article. I doubt the quote attributed to Liebschner is accurate given that this is only an article in that disappointingly woolly thinking New Scientist magazine.

    1. Re:Incorrect, misleading claim by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yeah...except the bones are insulated with flesh. Which absorb, diffue and dampen the vibration.
      So you would need to filter uot all the other noises the body makes as well. SInce that is defferent from person to person, and day to day...good luck.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Incorrect, misleading claim by FeatureBug · · Score: 1
      No, the grandparent comment is correct. You have misunderstood how the device works.

      The primary source of the vibrations is not the bones themselves. The article clearly says a vibrator is attached to various parts of the body, and a sensor is attached on the wrist to measure the vibrations. The vibrations travel through the flesh and bones, and reach the sensor (#1) on the wrist where they are measured.

      The important point made by the grandparent is that the vibrator generates vibrations not only in the body but also in the air around the vibrator. The vibrator will unavoidably emit sound directly into the air around it. Another sensor (#2) not in direct contact with the body, can measure the resulting sound waves in the air. Using bone-conducted sound waves as a secure method of communication is silly because it is not secure.

  47. PHP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personal Handshake protocol.

  48. Ok, this far, and AT&T's quote hasnt been said by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Now "Reach out and touch someone" has some actual meaning to it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  49. another verison of this from 1996 by fikx · · Score: 3, Informative

    quoted from the write-up: "... The idea is that the conduction of sound along bone would be more secure that via radio waves, leading to the possibility of swapping data with someone by shaking their hand."
    This general idea was also tackled by Thomas Zimmerman doing research for IBM. His idea did the same thing using signals carried on the skin (which didn't need the FIRM handshake to work :) Not sure how that compares to this, but both manage the same trick
    Here's a link : PAN Fact Sheet

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  50. Not to mention... by Kelson · · Score: 1

    "I can feel it in my bones"
    and "I know it in my gut."
    etc.

  51. That unbearable sound you hear ... by twitter · · Score: 1

    ... from billboards in the future could be just what you fear.

    Depending on which medical uses people have for this "new" acoustic network, the results can be more serious than funny. If I had disabilities, M$ is the last company I'd want helping me out.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  52. unique clicks and clacks. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Similarly, tooth clacks or finger clicks could be interpreted by a receiver to activate, say, functions in a phone.

    Behind the nauggahide door, the implications are sinking in, "Get that Vinnie, breaking duhr legs might really get em to pay up. Uhh, har har har." Vinnie does not get it, but laughs anyway.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  53. You might want to sleep on it. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Jolly old pirate, thegnu, says

    Arrrrrr! Shiver me timbers!

    And so the DVD shook him all night long, again and again.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  54. Bones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iam a Doctor Not a Hard Drive

  55. New RIAA tactic by frdmfghtr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now when the RIAA sues you for "an arm and a leg," they won't be kidding!

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  56. File Sharing! by railbaron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, everybody! Group Hug! :)

    1. Re:File Sharing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naked LAN party!

  57. I want to get Online, I NEED....a Computer by gargarxp · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it that bones can hold 80 gigabytes of info, 160 if you use a doubler.

  58. Bluetooth ? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Not entirely sure if this is a pisstake or not, but one possible application could be bluetooth headsets.
    The current generation are, well, crap basically. They don't stay in your ear very well and the mic is either on a long boom and ridiculous or doesn't pick up too well with background noise (driving).
    How about a device (patches) that sends and receives signals by bone and relays to the phone by bluetooth. The ear relies on sound waves already, and I'm sure there is enough bone vibration from your voice to send a usable signal.
    Voice controlled computer apps could use this tech too, and the sound levels could be kept low enough to be private (sub-vocalisation). Tempest my ass (ok no bones in there, but you know what I mean).

  59. Boner by Jackrabbitslam · · Score: 1

    I would like to know if XXX would work as well, download me a boner.

  60. sorry but by metroplex · · Score: 1

    this doesn't make any sense. If you have the ability to phisically touch the recipient of the data, why not just use a cable? Or standardize a sort of "clip" usb port where you just have to touch the other phone to transmit data if you are paranoid about someone intercepting your data transfer and don't want to use a clunky cable?

    --
    "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
  61. new simile for Stevens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Internet is like a bunch of connected bones...."

  62. Seems like an unnecessary burden for Bones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is she going to do all those autopsies while transferring data?

  63. uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft already has a patent on using skin...

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:I0J8mb7VruMJ: news.com.com/Microsoft%2Bpatents%2Bbody%2Bpower/21 00-1014_3-5244766.html+microsoft+skin+patent&hl=en &ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

    We are all gonna be in trouble in a few years since the next gen Windows "blue screen of death" is going to be a real human death!!!! YIKES!!!

  64. Already existing more or less by renoX · · Score: 1

    I remember that there were a gadget, worn like a watch which could exchange business cards communicating with current on top of the skin.

    It never went anywhere.

  65. The truly personal personal computer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... will consist of nano-manufactured circuitry that is part of your bones from shortly after birth, has an interface directly to your brain, and grows and develops as you do ...

  66. prior art by kithchung · · Score: 1

    considering that the human body transmit sound data via bone already (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ossicles), they may have problems patenting this.

  67. Borg technology by kithchung · · Score: 1

    Anyone noticed in the article the research is sponsored by TI and Microsoft? http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicms.gif Here comes Bill Gates of Borg!

  68. Re:Eh? Bones transmitting sound? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    I do remember reading about some headset microphones that actually pick up sound from the vibration of your skull instead of from the vibration of the air.

  69. Prior Art by Joebert · · Score: 1

    The skeletons on Looney Toons were doing this 20 years ago.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  70. Sounds like someone's been reading Dan Simmons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of thing appeared in the Hyperion books, at least 10 years ago. Excellent sci-fi.

  71. Six shakes. by LarsG · · Score: 1

    So the next social networking game will be 'six shakes of Kevin Bacon'?

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  72. Swap? by flackrum · · Score: 1

    "Dammit Jim, I'm a Doctor, not a conduit."

    ~ Bones

  73. Nice by polyex · · Score: 1

    Fun. I can't wait. Bone Cancer.

    1. Re:Nice by Octopus · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      You thought mobile phones caused tumors? Wait until you ARE the tower!

  74. Bones schmones. by Octopus · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the DNA research mentioned in Jeremy Narby's "The Cosmic Serpent", where they supposedly discovered that DNA strands seem to have superconductive properties, and could be used as millions of antennae or to conduct electrical information.

    I'm just sayin.

  75. Virus Vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is likely to contribute to the transmission of viri both electronic and biological.

    Is exchanging a traditional business card really that hard?

  76. Not as far fetched as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not an entirely new concept.... I believe a different variation of "data exchange by handshake" - low voltage transmitted via skin (water?) has been around for a while now. One person could exchange a business cards's worth of data at about low-end modem speeds (1200-9600baud)". Remember the PAN? (Personal Area Network). http://ecpe.ece.iastate.edu/arun/Cpre489/stuff/stu ff1.html

  77. couldn't you ... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    hack someone by working in a restaurant and implanting a transmitter in their fork?