You won't see it either or it will be damn easy to disturb or detect by using the same methods. My signal theory is rusty, and i may be wrong, and I know there are a few schemes with component analysis which allows to detect signal lower than the noise floor on specific bandwidth, but then so can the other detector do. After all you do not need to know the signal is meaningful, you only need to detects that at that bandwidth there is a higher power than expected.
"There might be perfectly rational reasons for the voters to impose forced cooperation or gridlock" only a partisan politician and probably a reps at that would think that. In a healthy democracy with a healthy government , people elect those they want at the power, but once the election is done, expect the government to WORK in their interest and the interest of the country. Note the emphasis. As soon as it comes to partisan politic and obstructionism AND the voters supporting (which is NOT a given seeing how congress has the lowest approval rate ever) then you have a very sick democracy and a sick country not being properly governed. This is arguably by the way on reason of being bipartisan. If you scratch the surface as soon as a 3rd or more party comes in, they usually tend to cooperate more between each other than fight each other. They go into compromises and alliances (temporary). With 2 party going toward extreme , this is the death of compromise and the death of governance. Case in point : refusal to do their duty by pretending they are not forced to if they wish and wait for the next election in the HOPE their party get it. And if you think THIS is better than a functioning government entering compromise or DUTYFULLY looking at a nomination in the interest of the American and NOT in the interest of Party, then you are as big a fool.
And here is a nice chart backing me up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
UK should shut the hell up if they pretend they get too many migrant. FFS even CH has by head more than UK.
"they're the ones that have to take the fall for Europes refugees " care to back that up with statistic ? Because all source I have got cite europe refugee highest number as germany, hungary, greece, heck even Sweden is mentionned, UK is not even mentioned. How the heck would they arrive in UK anyway ?
"Democracy must pander to the majority, which happens to be women."
No pandering is what bad politician do and what dysfunctional governments do. Good government and politician might have a pandering platform to differentiate each other, but in the very end do what is good for the whole and not only for the part of the population they get vote from. What you describe is the former, a dictate of the mob. Should for one reason or another the lever reverse, say for example if you get a non gender equal massive immigration like in Germany and a generation down the line more men than women voting ? Would you expect then to throw out all progress and go to a patriarchal society ? get real please. Thankfully that's why most modern good democracy have constitutional counsel, like the supreme court, which to varying degree ensure that such pandering and perversion of democracy and dictate of the mob does not happen.
In many basement gas cumulate. Mostly due to lack of circulating air. While it is not a problem in most region, if your region has granitic grounds (rather than say clay or calcifer) then chance are that minutes quantity of radon infiltrate your basement and cumulate to the point that you have to check them for radon and clean it up if radon cumulate. Example : limoge in france has a radon problem and you can read story there of people basement being so full of radon as to endanger greatly people with lung cancer. Even school were evacuated.
So don't trust that because it is your mom's basement it is safer. It might actually be a death trap;).
why would I trust a crypto currency for which the one with the more computer power "wins", and the first adopter "wins", over the current fiat based currency ? That makes no sense to me as a user of currencies. The current system while having its default is far superior.
The age of enlightenment lie by excellence. Since they were so "enlighted" then the previous age must have been dumb idiot. Thus the myth cropped up that people thought the earth was flat. Actually among the scholar and sailor (those who count with respect to this myth) they knew and were taught the earth was a sphere, and had pretty good estimate back in the ancient greek world. As for the paysant/serf who know what they taught beyond "will I have bread tomorrow".
Refuse to comply to the court repeatedly, and sooner or later you will face court contempt and arrest. In some case indefinite arrest : there was the case of this guy int he US which was found in contempt of the court and spent what, 14 years there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ? He was only released recently because the court found he would never comply and it was not in the society interest to keep him longer. And that was only money evasion NOT drug trafficking which is arguably a stronger offense.
I have to deal with asshole driver on the road, so after a few accidents, a truck pushing on the side, a car barreling from my left burning my right of way, 1 with a stop, 2 incidents of cars burning a red light because, "who cares it is night and what are the odds of somebody else on the intersection-----woooops". That's over 30 years. I have 2 sets of scars one on my hand one on my head, the rest I only got bruises. And that's pretty much enough to tell all driver to fuck off I would feel much better in an autonomous car, or if the other driver were forced into one. I am betting the 75% think they are "good" driver, you know the type, the one which decide which speed they can go and think speed limitation are speed trap (they are not if you respect the speed no matter how you feel DUH), or the one which think at night they can go much quicker even in city, despite the lower visibility and distance sight. The one which should be FORCED to get an autonomous car because in reality they are crappy drivers.
It is always depends on which point of view you look at this (not even touching the point of contention of free speech). You can see prison as mostly punishment or as rehabilitation. If you see it as rehabilitation, then having the punishment become a matter of public record, hinder the rehabilitation, make the people become paria, unemployable (even for job without children) social outcast - such I am not defending the crime , only the right to rehabilitation once the crime was paid especially socially.
I am for the right to be forgotten anyway : we enjoyed that right until google came up. before that, everybody could simply be forgotten by moving to the next village (exaggerating a bit but without a way to search for news archive this came down to this)...
But i can imagine that some people buying into "information wants to be free" and never lived in the time period pre-google where forgetting was the norm... Can't grasp at the issue. Or don't care.
Summarizing : calling to violence against a volk in general e.g. "I hate all jew and they should be killed" is hate speech. Google Volksverhetzung for example. Another example is to "libel", if it is the correct term, a volk and/or spreading falsehood. E.g. gas chamber never existed, e.g. jew are drinking blood of christian babies. Now you may not like such laws, but I would like to remind that they were imposed by allies after WW2, and never removed. But yes hate speech is pretty much defined. See parapgraph 130 federal german law.
I don't have the numbers at hand for the region of new york, but in the region I was (with underground mostly chalky and silimars) it takes a hundred year and more to percolate as rain water down to the aquifer and back to the pumps, even more if the soil is dense and more water proof with high clay content. It is not an instant process and there is no underground river or such like it is all percolation into a gigantic sponge. So for one the possible tritium would be diluted in the process, and since its half life is 12 years about by the time it comes up there has been so many half life it is probably mostly gone. But that is assuming it is going to the aquifer first before being pumped back. If it drains into a river and then is pumped and purified from there, that's another story, but that would still most probably be highly diluted to the point it disappear in the backgroudn radiation.
That is not to say it is a non story, it does not sound like a catstrophal story, but it sounds like the plant director is trying to downplay a leak, and in the current climate it is probably worst to downplay it than to admit the reality and dfemonstrate there is no impact.
However, this claim been disputed by observations of a conservative bias in the content it displays
So possibly conservative outfit leaning give GOP a lead, whereas possibly democrate leaning outfit give democrate a lead. I can't help but grin at that.
"In 2009, a group of Italian scientists affiliated with the watchdog group New Weapons Research Committee (NWRC) pronounced DIME wounds "untreatable" because the powdered tungsten cannot be removed surgically"
I have to wonder if it is not against some UN convention to have a weapon which makes wound intentionally non healable or inoperable. If it isn't it should be.
Like Simoncini's claim that cancer are all caused by fungus (the reason he thinks that are trivially laughable). Fact is, that we know that some type of cancer are caused by virus others are documented to be by carcinogene substance. Exposing a mice to benzene or formaldehyde does not suddenly make a virus spontaneously appear and be missed by generation of scientist which think carcinogene exists. So claima s such you cited seem to belong to the crank category. And yes we have the ability to detect even very small virus and we did & do routinely search for them in research case - if only to eliminate that explanation.
Nearly half of American disbelieve evolution and think the world was created 6000+ years ago. So, when you have so many people even disbelieving the most successful predictive theory in biology, I don't expect that many either to udenrstand complex themes like encryption, walled garden, and civil right to privacy.
"If ask any professional you'll ever meet about how they find their jobs, almost none of them will tell you they use any kind of job search. By far the best way is to network with people you know."
For very high wage post like CFO, CIO, or C level manager you are right, for the rest of us ? Bullshit. The crushing majority of "middle" class or white collar job are found through want ads or similar.
Newtonian mechanic still hold, because at those level it is an excellent approximation and virtually indistinguishable if GR did not exists. Sure we could find an alternative to GR, but as pointed out GR has many prediction/evidence. Therefore the new theory could only be like Newtonian theory : is all those predicted situation, GR should still stay an excellent approximation and virtually the result indistinguishable to result obtained if that new theory was not present barring new complex situation where GR break down. That is possible but far more likely the model for ring blackhole sucks and something is wrong with them or even them existing.
This would run smack into discoverability and the FBI would never be able to guarantee that the result of their research is valid. Furthermore a judge could simply require the source code to be shown under NDA, as is done with breathanalyzer, and if the company refuse, toss the evidence, potentially tossing the case.
A dirty bomb is only fearful as much as the population fears it. In effects a dirty bomb is pretty much useless as far as effects goes. It ain't a nuke folks. At worst it contaminate a wide area of a few hundreds feet with a bit of radioactive materials which you have to clean off. Basically to have a health effect you have to have people ingest it , or to have it in huge quantity enough that exposure become dangerous. Spread it/dilute it enough to have a wide area and it loses its effects, OR have it effects, and the area/volume become so small as to not eb a concern. the only concern is the PANIC folk would have because dumb politician and media have used for year RDD as a kind of scarecrow. The PANIC would be what would massively kill people.
Firstly not radioactivity is equal. Alpha unless ingested is not a problem. Beta or gamma is another matter. But even then highly radioactive one are not a "problem" (e.g. half life of 100 years, by 1000 years you get less than 1/1024 of the radioactivity and the very short half lived one are even mostly gone during temporary storage). Weakly radioactive material with extremely long life are not a problem either (they don't emit much per second because long half life). The problem at worst is the one with medium half life, radioactive enough to be dangerous, beta or gamma emitter, but also around the half life you cite , and in sizeable quantity. IMHO this is anyway not a big problem, because the quantity involved are minuscule. 300000 cubic meter is barely a cube of 66 meter side. For the whole country over 15 years nearly. Let us not hide the fac that this is a problem but let us be realist and not make a mountain out of it. Basically the 100K years is not a scam. It is just a little bit exaggerated as problem & consequence. Compare to CO2 emission and radioactive emission of coal for example.
Slashdot Mirror
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl...
You won't see it either or it will be damn easy to disturb or detect by using the same methods. My signal theory is rusty, and i may be wrong, and I know there are a few schemes with component analysis which allows to detect signal lower than the noise floor on specific bandwidth, but then so can the other detector do. After all you do not need to know the signal is meaningful, you only need to detects that at that bandwidth there is a higher power than expected.
"There might be perfectly rational reasons for the voters to impose forced cooperation or gridlock" only a partisan politician and probably a reps at that would think that. In a healthy democracy with a healthy government , people elect those they want at the power, but once the election is done, expect the government to WORK in their interest and the interest of the country. Note the emphasis. As soon as it comes to partisan politic and obstructionism AND the voters supporting (which is NOT a given seeing how congress has the lowest approval rate ever) then you have a very sick democracy and a sick country not being properly governed. This is arguably by the way on reason of being bipartisan. If you scratch the surface as soon as a 3rd or more party comes in, they usually tend to cooperate more between each other than fight each other. They go into compromises and alliances (temporary). With 2 party going toward extreme , this is the death of compromise and the death of governance. Case in point : refusal to do their duty by pretending they are not forced to if they wish and wait for the next election in the HOPE their party get it. And if you think THIS is better than a functioning government entering compromise or DUTYFULLY looking at a nomination in the interest of the American and NOT in the interest of Party, then you are as big a fool.
And here is a nice chart backing me up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... UK should shut the hell up if they pretend they get too many migrant. FFS even CH has by head more than UK.
"they're the ones that have to take the fall for Europes refugees " care to back that up with statistic ? Because all source I have got cite europe refugee highest number as germany, hungary, greece, heck even Sweden is mentionned, UK is not even mentioned. How the heck would they arrive in UK anyway ?
No pandering is what bad politician do and what dysfunctional governments do. Good government and politician might have a pandering platform to differentiate each other, but in the very end do what is good for the whole and not only for the part of the population they get vote from. What you describe is the former, a dictate of the mob. Should for one reason or another the lever reverse, say for example if you get a non gender equal massive immigration like in Germany and a generation down the line more men than women voting ? Would you expect then to throw out all progress and go to a patriarchal society ? get real please. Thankfully that's why most modern good democracy have constitutional counsel, like the supreme court, which to varying degree ensure that such pandering and perversion of democracy and dictate of the mob does not happen.
In many basement gas cumulate. Mostly due to lack of circulating air. While it is not a problem in most region, if your region has granitic grounds (rather than say clay or calcifer) then chance are that minutes quantity of radon infiltrate your basement and cumulate to the point that you have to check them for radon and clean it up if radon cumulate. Example : limoge in france has a radon problem and you can read story there of people basement being so full of radon as to endanger greatly people with lung cancer. Even school were evacuated.
;).
So don't trust that because it is your mom's basement it is safer. It might actually be a death trap
why would I trust a crypto currency for which the one with the more computer power "wins", and the first adopter "wins", over the current fiat based currency ? That makes no sense to me as a user of currencies. The current system while having its default is far superior.
The age of enlightenment lie by excellence. Since they were so "enlighted" then the previous age must have been dumb idiot. Thus the myth cropped up that people thought the earth was flat. Actually among the scholar and sailor (those who count with respect to this myth) they knew and were taught the earth was a sphere, and had pretty good estimate back in the ancient greek world. As for the paysant/serf who know what they taught beyond "will I have bread tomorrow".
Refuse to comply to the court repeatedly, and sooner or later you will face court contempt and arrest. In some case indefinite arrest : there was the case of this guy int he US which was found in contempt of the court and spent what, 14 years there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ? He was only released recently because the court found he would never comply and it was not in the society interest to keep him longer. And that was only money evasion NOT drug trafficking which is arguably a stronger offense.
I have to deal with asshole driver on the road, so after a few accidents, a truck pushing on the side, a car barreling from my left burning my right of way, 1 with a stop, 2 incidents of cars burning a red light because, "who cares it is night and what are the odds of somebody else on the intersection-----woooops". That's over 30 years. I have 2 sets of scars one on my hand one on my head, the rest I only got bruises. And that's pretty much enough to tell all driver to fuck off I would feel much better in an autonomous car, or if the other driver were forced into one. I am betting the 75% think they are "good" driver, you know the type, the one which decide which speed they can go and think speed limitation are speed trap (they are not if you respect the speed no matter how you feel DUH), or the one which think at night they can go much quicker even in city, despite the lower visibility and distance sight. The one which should be FORCED to get an autonomous car because in reality they are crappy drivers.
It is always depends on which point of view you look at this (not even touching the point of contention of free speech). You can see prison as mostly punishment or as rehabilitation. If you see it as rehabilitation, then having the punishment become a matter of public record, hinder the rehabilitation, make the people become paria, unemployable (even for job without children) social outcast - such I am not defending the crime , only the right to rehabilitation once the crime was paid especially socially.
I am for the right to be forgotten anyway : we enjoyed that right until google came up. before that, everybody could simply be forgotten by moving to the next village (exaggerating a bit but without a way to search for news archive this came down to this)...
But i can imagine that some people buying into "information wants to be free" and never lived in the time period pre-google where forgetting was the norm... Can't grasp at the issue. Or don't care.
You are expecting a rich guy which profited from the system to turn coat ? What is this ? Fairyland ?
Summarizing : calling to violence against a volk in general e.g. "I hate all jew and they should be killed" is hate speech. Google Volksverhetzung for example. Another example is to "libel", if it is the correct term, a volk and/or spreading falsehood. E.g. gas chamber never existed, e.g. jew are drinking blood of christian babies. Now you may not like such laws, but I would like to remind that they were imposed by allies after WW2, and never removed. But yes hate speech is pretty much defined. See parapgraph 130 federal german law.
I don't have the numbers at hand for the region of new york, but in the region I was (with underground mostly chalky and silimars) it takes a hundred year and more to percolate as rain water down to the aquifer and back to the pumps, even more if the soil is dense and more water proof with high clay content. It is not an instant process and there is no underground river or such like it is all percolation into a gigantic sponge. So for one the possible tritium would be diluted in the process, and since its half life is 12 years about by the time it comes up there has been so many half life it is probably mostly gone. But that is assuming it is going to the aquifer first before being pumped back. If it drains into a river and then is pumped and purified from there, that's another story, but that would still most probably be highly diluted to the point it disappear in the backgroudn radiation.
That is not to say it is a non story, it does not sound like a catstrophal story, but it sounds like the plant director is trying to downplay a leak, and in the current climate it is probably worst to downplay it than to admit the reality and dfemonstrate there is no impact.
They also gave a lead to mccain. Just sayin'.
So possibly conservative outfit leaning give GOP a lead, whereas possibly democrate leaning outfit give democrate a lead. I can't help but grin at that.
"In 2009, a group of Italian scientists affiliated with the watchdog group New Weapons Research Committee (NWRC) pronounced DIME wounds "untreatable" because the powdered tungsten cannot be removed surgically"
I have to wonder if it is not against some UN convention to have a weapon which makes wound intentionally non healable or inoperable. If it isn't it should be.
Like Simoncini's claim that cancer are all caused by fungus (the reason he thinks that are trivially laughable). Fact is, that we know that some type of cancer are caused by virus others are documented to be by carcinogene substance. Exposing a mice to benzene or formaldehyde does not suddenly make a virus spontaneously appear and be missed by generation of scientist which think carcinogene exists. So claima s such you cited seem to belong to the crank category. And yes we have the ability to detect even very small virus and we did & do routinely search for them in research case - if only to eliminate that explanation.
Nearly half of American disbelieve evolution and think the world was created 6000+ years ago. So, when you have so many people even disbelieving the most successful predictive theory in biology, I don't expect that many either to udenrstand complex themes like encryption, walled garden, and civil right to privacy.
"If ask any professional you'll ever meet about how they find their jobs, almost none of them will tell you they use any kind of job search. By far the best way is to network with people you know."
For very high wage post like CFO, CIO, or C level manager you are right, for the rest of us ? Bullshit. The crushing majority of "middle" class or white collar job are found through want ads or similar.
Newtonian mechanic still hold, because at those level it is an excellent approximation and virtually indistinguishable if GR did not exists. Sure we could find an alternative to GR, but as pointed out GR has many prediction/evidence. Therefore the new theory could only be like Newtonian theory : is all those predicted situation, GR should still stay an excellent approximation and virtually the result indistinguishable to result obtained if that new theory was not present barring new complex situation where GR break down. That is possible but far more likely the model for ring blackhole sucks and something is wrong with them or even them existing.
This would run smack into discoverability and the FBI would never be able to guarantee that the result of their research is valid. Furthermore a judge could simply require the source code to be shown under NDA, as is done with breathanalyzer, and if the company refuse, toss the evidence, potentially tossing the case.
A dirty bomb is only fearful as much as the population fears it. In effects a dirty bomb is pretty much useless as far as effects goes. It ain't a nuke folks. At worst it contaminate a wide area of a few hundreds feet with a bit of radioactive materials which you have to clean off. Basically to have a health effect you have to have people ingest it , or to have it in huge quantity enough that exposure become dangerous. Spread it /dilute it enough to have a wide area and it loses its effects, OR have it effects, and the area/volume become so small as to not eb a concern. the only concern is the PANIC folk would have because dumb politician and media have used for year RDD as a kind of scarecrow. The PANIC would be what would massively kill people.
Firstly not radioactivity is equal. Alpha unless ingested is not a problem. Beta or gamma is another matter. But even then highly radioactive one are not a "problem" (e.g. half life of 100 years, by 1000 years you get less than 1/1024 of the radioactivity and the very short half lived one are even mostly gone during temporary storage). Weakly radioactive material with extremely long life are not a problem either (they don't emit much per second because long half life). The problem at worst is the one with medium half life, radioactive enough to be dangerous, beta or gamma emitter, but also around the half life you cite , and in sizeable quantity. IMHO this is anyway not a big problem, because the quantity involved are minuscule. 300000 cubic meter is barely a cube of 66 meter side. For the whole country over 15 years nearly. Let us not hide the fac that this is a problem but let us be realist and not make a mountain out of it. Basically the 100K years is not a scam. It is just a little bit exaggerated as problem & consequence. Compare to CO2 emission and radioactive emission of coal for example.