Slashdot Mirror


Yelp Employee Posts Open Letter About Cost Of Living And Low Wages, Gets Fired (modernreaders.com)

whoever57 writes: Talia Jane was employed by Yelp in San Francisco but after posting in an open letter to Yelp's CEO, Jeremy Stoppelman, that her after tax income of $8.15 was insufficient to provide basic necessities like heating, food, etc., she discovered that she had been fired. How did she discover? Her work email stopped working. Even her boss did not know what had happened. Stoppelman denies having a hand in her firing, making the claim "(There are) two sides to every HR story so Twitter army please put down the pitchforks," replying to the criticism. He didn't personally turn off her email, perhaps he did not even make the decision to fire her, but as the person who ultimately sets the culture and policies of the company, his claim to not be directly responsible is unconvincing.

1,092 comments

  1. And this is...news? by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I truly hope none of us here will express amazement that someone who criticized their employer, and blamed them for what are essentially her own poor life choices, got fired.

    This is how the real world works, jr. You are not owed, or entitled, to shit.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quite to the contrary, she deserves a living wage because her parents and teachers told her that she was special. It absolutely can't have anything to do with the insane taxes or the brutal rents caused by the same people who voted themselves a raise on the taxpayer's dime. Don't like it? Leave!

    2. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So everyone who pickets their employer because they want to move work out of the country should also be fired? Everyone who publicly criticizes their employer for unsafe practices that endanger the public should get fired? Or, in this case, anyone who publicly points out that wages paid are too low to survive in San Francisco should get fired?

      Go move to Qatar - they're looking for slave-wage laborers who are ready to die in droves for a pittance, because if they complain they get thrown in jail and kicked out with no wages. Sounds like your kind of place.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:And this is...news? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 0

      Industrial action is often protected by law and is generally organised by a union. Part of the reason they don't get fired is because they have enough of a % of the workforce to make that impossible.

      Criticizing health and safety or unsafe practices is the sort of thing that should be protected under whistle blower laws.

      This. No. There is no suitable ground for protecting this person. If her salary was below the legal minimum wage, then absolutely. But it wasn't.

    4. Re:And this is...news? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Hell, I don't even bad-mouth my ex-employers in public, and there's one for which I still maintain a seething hatred. It's just unprofessional to do so; and, barring whistleblowing of illegal activities, pretty much always out-of-line and will always work out badly.

      Also, if you major in english literature, and have no better marketable skill, you're probably not going to be able to get a job good enough to support yourself unless you go all the way to PhD. and score a professorship at Cal or Stanford.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    5. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, given your definition of how the real world works, people must fight for what they want. Publicly shaming employers for low wages is one way of pushing those wages up (though the effectiveness remains to be seen, in this case).

    6. Re:And this is...news? by msauve · · Score: 0

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices. If she was qualified enough to get paid more, then options other than biting the hand which feeds her would have been available.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a faggot.

    8. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and is generally organised by a union

      Ahahahaha yeah put your faith in unions. They REALLY care about you.

      A former union rep.

    9. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right you're not owed anything. Not even your life.

      And employers best remember that fact.

    10. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's a "union"

    11. Re:And this is...news? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      No I don't. Not even slightly. But where I am industrial action is protected and you can't be fired for it if you have followed the right steps first.

    12. Re:And this is...news? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can be forgiven in thinking that your examples match what we're talking about here, as the summary didn't actually link anything. For reference: https://medium.com/@taliajane/...

      The "Open Letter" wasn't discussing offshoring, nor unsafe business practices. It was nothing more than entitled whining, and not even very inspired at that. It certainly wasn't what I'd expect from an english major, short of it's verbosity. But then, she never said she finished college, so I guess I might be expecting too much.

      I especially like how she's now begging for someone to employ her. As if a whining entitled employee is right at the top of every employer's wish list.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    13. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Contrary to THAT,

      She deserves a living wage, because if greedy imbeciles don't stop violating the social contract, they're not going to like it much when the masses turn to anarchy.

      Pay them now, or pay them later. Either way, nobody's going to get away with making the downtrodden a slave race for long.

    14. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices.

      That's a nice way of saying "Yelp doesn't pay some of its employees enough to live". Of course, we don't know enough of the story to know if the job reasonably could be expected to pay enough to live on (ie it's 40 hours), whether Yelp intentionally choose to avoid giving the person 40 hours/week to avoid certain tax requirements or other obligations for "full time" employees, etc. Nor do we know enough about whether she actually could live on $8.15/hour (after taxes) or as you argue it was actually "lifestyle choices"--hint, the ability to pay for food, heating, and shelter* don't qualify as "lifestyle choices" as a general point.

      If she was qualified enough to get paid more, then options other than biting the hand which feeds her would have been available.

      That is bullshit. Full stop. A person's only qualification to be paid enough to live is to actually show up and do the job. Anything more is a market failure.

      * I presume cost of shelter is actually a big reason for the costing of living issue. It's why affordable transportation is often necessary. And honestly, if the cost of shelter is so expensive in an area that people require substantial travel time to get to/from their place of work to a home with a viable cost, they should be being paid the equivalent in compensation for those lost hours either directly or indirectlty in a higher wage. Sure as fuck, $8.15/hour after taxes is not a sufficient compensation for said travel time to live outside the Bay area, so clearly her complaint is actually valid.

    15. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think the special snowflakes who viewed society as a function of their bank accounts and plastic surgeons ever took time out from attacking labor to defend it instead. Did something pierce your bubble?

    16. Re:And this is...news? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What she made is easily a living wage in most places. The problem is she wants to live in THE most expensive place in the US. It's not expensive because somebody decided to make it that way, it's expensive because the demand to live there is high and there aren't enough domiciles to meet that demand. So what happens? People outbid one another, hence putting upward pressure on the cost of living there.

      There's really an easy fix for this: Move somewhere else. If her employer finds that they can't attract enough talent because nobody wants to live where their workplace is, then that situation will sort itself out naturally. However in choosing the living situation that she did, she created that mess for herself.

    17. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My former union rep. was a huge fan of Rush Limbaugh and blasted his show at us.

      So you may be right. But all that says to me is that US unions are crap.

    18. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I definitely wouldn't advocate for a professorship at UC-Berkeley, Stanford, or many of the Ivies nowadays. Even a full professor in an engineering discipline doesn't make enough to pay off a decent house for twenty years or so in some of those areas.

      Oddly enough, the state schools in the Midwest have the best salary/cost of living ratio. For many engineering disciplines, the salary range will be on par with professors of equal rank at many of the top schools. The cost is living also isn't too bad. It takes about 3-6 years of saving to pretty much pay for a new 3000+ sq ft. home in full.

    19. Re:And this is...news? by Daemonik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is she wants to live in THE most expensive place in the US.

      No the problem is that her former EMPLOYER wants her to work in the most expensive city in the US, and gives no fucks about how she makes that happen on what they want to pay.

    20. Re:And this is...news? by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Re: "Publicly shaming employers for low wages is one way of pushing those wages up" screw you and your theory.

      Alternately: "Staying silent on the topic of low wages helps employers pass the profits on to employees as raises". See how daft the idea is?

    21. Re:And this is...news? by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices.

      Lifestyle choices like eating regularly, living inside shelter with running water and electricity... how dare she think she's entitled to such things from a days wage!

    22. Re:And this is...news? by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      I seem to agree with AC; EmployERS need to be reminded that they're not entitled to the advantages they've maneuvered themselves into. Employees can only be threatened into silence for so long.

    23. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're championing tyranny of the (lazy, selfish, thieving) majority?

    24. Re:And this is...news? by haruchai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She lives 30 miles outside of San Francisco.

      " If her employer finds that they can't attract enough talent because nobody wants to live where their workplace is, then that situation will sort itself out naturally."

      So explain how millions of jobs got moved out to other countries. Was that because companies couldn't "attract enough talent"?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    25. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No the problem is that her former EMPLOYER wants her to work in the most expensive city in the US

      Her employer doesn't want her to do anything, they are offering her a job and a salary. She has to decide whether she can make ends meet. If she got roommates and lived frugally, it would be easy for her to live on that salary even in the Bay Area. If she wants her own apartment and her own car, the salary isn't enough and the job isn't for her.

      and gives no fucks about how she makes that happen

      Correct. And they shouldn't give a fuck how she makes that happen because her bad financial decisions are not the employer's problem.

    26. Re:And this is...news? by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The job position likely doesn't provide enough value to justify paying the kind of wage necessary to live in San Francisco. The company should just move the customer service department to the mid-west or somewhere else where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.

    27. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 0

      That's a nice way of saying "Yelp doesn't pay some of its employees enough to live"

      She could live just fine on this salary if she got roommates or if she was part of a two income family.

    28. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >former EMPLOYER wants

      This is the key phrase. If the employer wants to pay that much, and she accepts, why is that on her employer?

      I'll go out on a limb and say it is probably because she spends her workday on reddit.

    29. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're championing tyranny of the (lazy, selfish, thieving) majority?

      No, I'm not championing it at all.

      I'm just saying it's what WILL happen. It's the natural result when people do not have a way to obtain basic needs and human dignity. It has happened again and again in history, and it's ignorant to assume we live in some kind of exception.

      Secure a basic level of living for all working people, or don't at your own peril.

    30. Re:And this is...news? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I agree, but problem is that she couldn't keep THIS particular job in most places: Yelp ain't a franchise. If she was making $8.15/hr working at Burger King, she could do that in San Francisco, or Moscow, ID or Columbus, GA and your argument would be valid.

      But Yelp only has offices in San Francisco, and so there is no way she could work at Yelp if she chose to live in, say, Ft Collins, CO. So this argument is not valid here. And if you are thinking of other places in the Bay Area, they're not much more affordable, and the places that may be would require her to have a car to get to even BART or CalTrain.

    31. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're championing tyranny of the (lazy, selfish, thieving) majority?

      No, not championing it at all.

      I'm simply saying it's what WILL happen. It has happened again and again in history, and to think we live in an exception is just ignorant. If you don't secure a basic quality of life with some human dignity for people within the system, they'll sure as hell start to wonder why they need the system at all.

      And at that point, the game is over.

      Ignore it at your own peril.

    32. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's delusional assholes like you that are bringing this country down, not the people working for slave wages.

    33. Re:And this is...news? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yelp's only solution to this sounds like to move out of San Francisco, or indeed, CA. They could move next door to Reno, and set up headquarters there. Everything would be a lot more affordable. Only thing - most of the techie crowd has a fetish for San Francisco - even places like Santa Clara or Fremont ain't good enough. And w/ that comes the strain that it puts on people who don't make 6 figures that would enable them to afford a studio in the city.

    34. Re:And this is...news? by Nemyst · · Score: 1, Troll

      We're talking about making a respectable living, not luxury. Drop the strawman, you're just looking like a complete idiot.

    35. Re:And this is...news? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      A wage is supposed to cover the above items PLUS RENT. Her wages could cover the above items w/ no issues: it's the RENT part that blows her up. Since we're talking San Francisco here, she either has to take a place that would allow her to get to work by Muni or BART. If she lives some place beyond those facilities, like say, Belmont, she'd have to afford a CAR in addition to the rent, which wouldn't be all that less, and then that throws in high commute times. So either way, she's SOL. Hopefully, she could find a similar job outside the state, and doesn't have a fetish for living in the cities like to many of the Techie crowd does.

    36. Re:And this is...news? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      She deserves a living wage, because if greedy imbeciles don't stop violating the social contract ...

      If she was making $8.15/hr in SF, she is an idiot. I live in the Bay Area, and we can't even hire no-skill warehouse clerks for less than $15/hr. The SF area is way past full employment, and nearly every company has vacancies that they are struggling to fill.

      My impression from skimming TFA is that this was a telecommuting position, which means the pay rate is disconnected from geography, and she is basically competing for wages with people in Mumbai, while living in one of the world's most expensive cities. So what does she expect? If she wants to get paid more, she has to make herself worth more.

    37. Re:And this is...news? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No the problem is that her former EMPLOYER wants her to work in the most expensive city in the US, and gives no fucks about how she makes that happen on what they want to pay.

      They offered her a job that's in that area, however they likely made no requirement that she live there. Likewise how she makes ends meet isn't their business, nor should it be. I'd personally be annoyed if my employer managed my finances.

    38. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yelp does employ some sort of ambassador or some whatever promoter title in various cities. I think it's usually kind of a part-time gig that sets up events at businesses and stuff to advertise Yelp.

    39. Re:And this is...news? by cowdung · · Score: 1

      It was $8.15/hr AFTER taxes.. not sure how much is withheld but she probably made like $15/hr

    40. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder when people will start to see that people that have a job, or those looking for a job, aren't lazy entitled people, because they aren't being paid enough to live with dignity.

      I always see the same things:
      Don't have a job? You are a lazy SOB taking the money I worked for! Get one of your own!
      Not making enough? You're stupid, and look for another job!

      Employment may be getting better, but under-employment is still a horrible problem.

    41. Re:And this is...news? by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      She got a B.A. in English. Enough said.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    42. Re:And this is...news? by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Correct. And they shouldn't give a fuck how she makes that happen because her bad financial decisions are not the employer's problem."

      I remember a time when businesses were considered SYMBIOTIC relationships between capital and labor. You are just an amoral person who doesn't understand this concept at all. Im not saying you are wrong, im saying you are an asshole, and the world would be better off if there were less people like you.

      --
      Good-bye
    43. Re:And this is...news? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Thanks for providing the link. Given how expensive it is in the Bay Area, I thought that it was a reasonable request that she was making, but after reading that, it was indeed whining.

      If she came there to be close to her dad, why doesn't she live w/ him - that would save her on the rent, and then she'd have enough for everything else she described in that letter.

    44. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you every think that perhaps they can't afford to move?

    45. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Welcome to the United States of "Fuck you I got mine" America. The most soulless country on the face of the planet.

    46. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They offered her a job that's in that area, however they likely made no requirement that she live there.

      Being able to get to work requires that she lives somewhat close. Yelp doesn't offer telecommuting positions (nobody seems to anymore, ever since Marissa fired all of Yahoo's telecommuters, but that's another rant). Lots and lots of companies want to be located in SF to be close to whatever hipster revolution they think is happening, but they aren't paying their employees enough to live nearby.

      There are a whole lot of tech workers living 5 or 6 to an apartment here. You have to live here because they won't let you work remotely, but the only way you can afford to live here is to shack up with half a dozen of your coworkers. Some American dream that is.

    47. Re:And this is...news? by mspohr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (signed by US and most countries on earth) would beg to differ.

      http://www.un.org/en/universal...

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    48. Re:And this is...news? by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Choosing to live in a high cost metropolitan area is a life choice. It is an analogy, not a straw man.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    49. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i like "yelp employee posts review of yelp and gets fired" better. next time don't work for extortionists.

    50. Re:And this is...news? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Um when was that? In 1940's faerie land?

    51. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lifestyle choices like eating regularly, living inside shelter with running water and electricity... how dare she think she's entitled to such things from a days wage!

      Quite so governor! I say, the nerve of these peasants is appalling!

    52. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. No no no no. Holy Hell NO. Is this what they're teaching in HS Economics these days? A wage covers the cost of the labor, not the employee's cost of living.

    53. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Im not saying you are wrong, im saying you are an asshole

      I'm a gay man who has wanted to live in SF for a couple of decades but never could afford it; that is, I could actually have paid for it out of my salary, but it would have cut sharply into my retirement savings, so I didn't do it. SF has been an expensive place for many decades, and you either have to be rich or foolish to live there.

      The "assholes" are people like you and her who think that someone fresh out of college, with no marketable skills, somehow deserves their own apartment in San Francisco without roommates. Screw you and your selfish greed.

    54. Re:And this is...news? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Here is a hint, don't work there then. Employers or anyone for that matter will do what they can only because people enable it. Either buy a car and commute, find a roommate or whatever, or seek employment elsewhere. Two of those options allow the low wages and the other will force higher wages, changes in how they employ people, or put them out of business. Can you guess which one?

    55. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. in reality she was fired after making sexual comments on a social media site with a visible yelp account name (pouring purple sauce on her taco being a preferred start to sexy time) and instragramming a 1L bottle of Bulleit Bourbon at work.

      But don't let that stop your outrage.

    56. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but as a company built on criticizing.. err.. reviewing other companies publicly, the dont seem to handle criticism very well. Oh the the irony.

    57. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I remember a time when businesses were considered SYMBIOTIC relationships between capital and labor.

      I won't comment on the particular employee. It sounds like from other posts that she was stupid, and defending stupid is likely not worthwhile. That being said, why can't we go back to the relationship where Employers were loyal to Employees, instead of just expecting it to be one way? It surely couldn't hurt productivity. Does anyone work at a company where the Employee Employer relationship is actually symbiotic as the previous poster alluded to?

    58. Re:And this is...news? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      No the problem is that her former EMPLOYER wants her to work in the most expensive city in the US, and gives no fucks about how she makes that happen on what they want to pay.

      Perhaps that is true, I certainly wouldn't put it past a company like Yahoo.

      On the other hand, I might ask if there was a compelling reason for her to live in the Bay Area? Staying close to aging parents or some other personal reason? Seattle, where I live is getting to be a lot like the Bay Area in terms of cost of living but it wasn't always this way, but when that day arrives, I'll move.

      And sure, Yahoo management might very well be a bunch of ass-kissing cock-sucking sycophants to the executives "up stairs", paying shit wages in one of the most expensive places to live on the planet, but to me that makes a great argument not to work for them.

      Lastly, it's never a good move to publicly bad-mouth your employer in ways that can be traced back to you. This is just a reality. In ways I sympathise, but mostly I think the outcome was extremely predictable.

      All in all, I find myself thinking that I would have been out the door by my own locomotion a long time ago .

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    59. Re:And this is...news? by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Her employer doesn't want her to do anything, they are offering her a job and a salary. She has to decide whether she can make ends meet. If she got roommates and lived frugally, it would be easy for her to live on that salary even in the Bay Area. If she wants her own apartment and her own car, the salary isn't enough and the job isn't for her.

      Right, and when that salary is not enough to live, she has two options
      1. Encourage them to offer her a higher salary
      2. Find a different job.

      She was carrying out 1, she probably had started on 2. I don't see why she should have been expected to act differently.

    60. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The job position likely doesn't provide enough value to justify paying the kind of wage necessary to live in San Francisco. The company should just move the customer service department to the mid-west or somewhere else where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.

      Name one county--any county--in America where $8.15/hr is actually considered a "living wage". I don't think you can.

    61. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      posting anon because...well, it's obvious who has all the mod points right now, and people are being voted down "flamebait: I don't agree with you but I can't form a rational rebuttal"...and I rather enjoy my karma score, thanksverymuch. But I can't help but respond to this bullshit.

      It is not the responsibility of an employer to ensure the employee is living within their means. They both entered a mutual agreement where the employee would work a certain amount of time at a certain task, and the employer would provide money in return. That is the symbiotic relationship you're looking for. It's fucking right there.

      In reality, you're ranting because you think "labor" somehow is owed more simply by virtue of...I'm not really sure, but it sounds like nothing more than simply "being labor". That's more a description of a leech than a symbiant. Talk about amoralism.

      If the employee feels they are not being paid adequately for their expenses, they have a lot of options for recourse: they can slouch off to match their effort to their perceived value; they can work harder to make themselves more valuable to the employer; they can find employment elsewhere; they can lower their expenses; they can (in California, at least, where TFA describes this situation) organize and strike; they can even post an open letter to the CEO. They just can't expect to do any of those things in a vacuum, because actions have consequences.

    62. Re:And this is...news? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      You know it used to be that most families could support themselves with only a single income. My how times have changed.

    63. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She lives 30 miles outside of San Francisco.

      " If her employer finds that they can't attract enough talent because nobody wants to live where their workplace is, then that situation will sort itself out naturally."

      So explain how millions of jobs got moved out to other countries. Was that because companies couldn't "attract enough talent"?

      No, they obviously found the talent. The talent they found was willing to do the work for less money.

    64. Re:And this is...news? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      This is the race to the bottom and as despicable as the industry is for profiting off of it, a huge amount of the blame lies with the workers for enabling it. Stop working for shitty salaries in overpriced cities and the executives running these corporations will stop expecting people to ruin themselves in order to bloat the executive bonuses. Grow a spine or brain or whatever it is that you're lacking and stop propping this shit up.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    65. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they're opening a site in Arizona to perform the work she was doing with Yelp... specifically because they can't pay 100k+ to sales associates pushing $1000 ads.

    66. Re:And this is...news? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you make $15/h in the SF area you are taking home ~$12.50 after Federal, FICA, State (no local taxes). It is possible a lot of it was taken out by creditors or the IRS for back taxes (which you could be penalized at a monthly rate up to the minimum income), but that's poor life choices, not your employers' fault. And once you have more than 2 creditors taking money out of your pay check, your employer may be able to terminate you (because it's a hell of a lot of paperwork).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    67. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) One does not pay slaves. The slave owners in your analogy are simply throwing their pittances away.
      2) Firing a slave is basically the opposite of throwing a person in jail.

    68. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now she will never be employed again.

    69. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet they have no shortage of applicants.

    70. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yet corporations want the lowest wages, the lowest taxes, and all the subsidies they can lobby out of the government, but you're OK with *that* entitlement, right?

    71. Re:And this is...news? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Somewhere close is a pretty wide area. All places have cheap locations and expensive. If you want to be able to walk to work, or downtown in ten minutes, yes you pay for it, but in most places instead you could have a 30 minute bus ride for 30% less rent. And just because their exist in-vogue restaurants where a water costs $10, does not mean that you cannot buy a 50 pound sack of rice for the same price.

      Just because their exists incredibly expensive options in your area, does not mean that their are not cheap options.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    72. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, poor people have all made horrible life choices, and the idea that a single person with no dependants is capable of earning an adequate living wage is patently absurd.

    73. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people take up unpaid internships. Just because it happens doesn't mean it should happen or is right. No more than one can use one murder to justify more. But, like was said, there's plenty of places not in San Francisco (no idea if you'd have to leave California) where $8.15/hour after taxes (or possibly even before taxes) would be a living wage. Or they could, you know, pay even the janitor more money because it's a cost of doing business.

    74. Re:And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not even close. The original article says that she made $12.25 before taxes. Remember that people at the bottom of the pay scale pay much less in taxes (proportionally) than people making in the six figures because of the progressive income tax system.

      This sounds like a number of startups in the Bay Area that prey on out-of-state people who don't know how high the cost of living is out here, hoping that they'll manage to squeeze at least a few months' work out of them before they quit and go to work somewhere that pays better... like McDonald's. $12.25 is, in fact, minimum wage in San Francisco. You can literally make that flipping burgers with no skill at all. And this is what they're paying people with college degrees, doing customer support work (which is usually at least a couple of tiers above minimum wage).

      Now to put that in perspective, the average salary for a customer service rep in the Bay Area is $22.05 per hour. That means that Yelp is paying barely over half the regional average. And when people complained, rather than fixing the sweatshop-level conditions, they are moving the jobs to Phoenix. The only problem is that the average salary for a customer service rep in Phoenix is still $16.10. So that $12.25 would still be massively underpaid, given the job category, even in Phoenix. And yet somehow they're paying that wage in San Francisco!

      I would like to make three suggestions to the CEO of Yelp:

      1. Compile a list of all the managers who approved those appallingly substandard wages.
      2. Fire all of them with cause for creating an appallingly abusive work environment and damaging Yelp's corporate image.
      3. Hire this girl to replace one of them.

      You should reward people who have the courage to speak truth to authority, not punish them. If you don't, you'll end up with a company of "yes men" who will agree your entire company right down the toilet and into the ground.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    75. Re:And this is...news? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Retaliation by an employer is a crime that is Actionable. Such a case with a paper trail would likely include significant Damages to make the complainant whole. IANAL

      I don't know the details of this case, but you are wrong.

    76. Re:And this is...news? by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to eat regularly at Maxim's, shelter at the Ritz, bathe in Veen and use all the electricity I want. Since you think I'm entitled to that, are you going to pay for it?

      OMG is that what this person was asking for?? No wonder they got fired then.

      Oh wait? That isn't what they were asking for and you are egregiously making shit up in order to sound like you actually have a reasonable argument?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    77. Re:And this is...news? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm a gay man who has wanted to live in SF

      But you repeat yourself :)

    78. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You know it used to be that most families could support themselves with only a single income. My how times have changed.

      True, and that was also a time in which women were working their fingers to the bone doing household chores, when single parenthood was socially unacceptable, and when people waited with getting married and starting a family until the husband was reasonably certain he could provide for a wife and kids. Are you saying you want to return to that?

    79. Re:And this is...news? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      But now that she has been fired, she can give Yelp bad Yelp.

    80. Re:And this is...news? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking economics here. I'm talking from Talia's POV. Whatever she earns should cover her rent: if it's not enough, she needed to either live elsewhere & commute to work, or not take the job.

    81. Re:And this is...news? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Note that some people are really attached to their employer, and would hope to change their relationship with their employer before leaving. Don't know if it is the case here, but some people will stick around if they can manage to do so.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    82. Re:And this is...news? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Yes, strange to be seeing commentary at that at the same time a lot of other debate happens around 'how do we get by with fewer people working if everything is automated'. You would have thought progress would have made less work per household needed rather than more...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    83. Re:And this is...news? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Informative

      And at that point, the game is over.

      Well before that when people find out that living in the jail / prison is better and if the GOP get's there way the doctors will be better there and cover more.

      Then the state is spending a lot more then just covering more. Now in some places we need a higher min wage and or basic income.

    84. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Please read the chapter "On The Wages of Labour", in "Wealh of Nations", by Adam Smith. It talks about why those who set wages have an inherent advantage much better than I could.

    85. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure that's entirely accurate.

      I believe we're looking at a false dichotomy. Not all labor is equal. Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store? Or should they be in a position where they have to pool their resources and live more frugally than someone who makes more than that? Does everyone "deserve" to live in San Fransisco and expect to be paid a living wage there without having to pool resources and live frugally - even if they're a fry cook? Are there no consequences for poor choices? And no, not everyone has made poor choices - just not like everyone is in their situation through no fault of their own.

      Some people have shitty jobs because they've done stupid things. They now have to pool their resources and live frugally. Should I be able to have a nice apartment and the various accessories that we use today - on a convenience store salary?

      I can see a logical argument for both - but you didn't actually present that argument. You just insisted it was so.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    86. Re:And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I agree, but problem is that she couldn't keep THIS particular job in most places: Yelp ain't a franchise. If she was making $8.15/hr working at Burger King, she could do that in San Francisco, or Moscow, ID or Columbus, GA and your argument would be valid.

      She was working at Yelp for minimum wage in the hopes that it would get her foot in the door for a real job. Unfortunately, the reality is that this technique almost never works. She might as well be working at Burger King. The job would have been easier, and because of her college degree, she probably would have been able to quickly move up to a shift lead job, which would have paid her more than she was making at Yelp....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    87. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Yelp hired her as a fresh out for a job she didn't really want and she was dismayed that Yelp actually expected her to do that job for a year before applying for a transfer. She has some bizarre expectations. She had probably been told by those around her that she was a special snowlflake -- but no one mentioned what happens to a snowflake in the spring.

    88. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        and blamed them for what are essentially her own poor life choices, got fired.

      An insane rent of $1245, combined with shitty pay of $732 every two weeks at Yelp are "her choices"?

    89. Re:And this is...news? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices.

      By "lifestyle choices", you mean her choice to have food and heat.

      The slave mentality that a lot of people like you have just amazes me. And by "people like you", I mean dickwads. They're not only unwilling to ever look sideways at the hand that feeds them (or in the case of this Yelp employee, doesn't feed them), but they're also ready to joyfully lick the master's asshole on the smallest possibility that they're fealty will be noticed.

      msuave, you are a fucking disgrace. There, I've said it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    90. Re:And this is...news? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well first it is $8.15 after taxes so the pay is actually higher. So assuming around 25% of her income goes to taxes (which i do not know the specific rates but that is close to what lower paid employees can expect to be withheld here in the mideast) she is making around $10.90/hour.

      Next, why does she have to work at yelp? Is there something making that the only option? You see, the premise that she couldn't live somewhere else is false on its face because she could find another job. It's a pain to switch jobs but I'm not aware of any barriers to doing so.

    91. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The company should just move the customer service department to the mid-west or somewhere else where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.
      Reply to This Parent Share

      I live in the Mid-West. I've got news for you. $8.15 an hour (takehome) isn't a living wage anywhere.

    92. Re:And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yelp's only solution to this sounds like to move out of San Francisco, or indeed, CA.

      They would have to move farther than that. There's nowhere in the U.S. where $12.25 per hour is an acceptable salary for a customer service rep. The national average is over $16 per hour.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    93. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Professors in an engineering discipline at Cal or Stanford are probably expected to make their real money on outside consulting jobs or, perhaps, involvement in a startup. The professor job is mostly to give them creds and is used for marketing.

    94. Re:And this is...news? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The company should just move the customer service department to the mid-west or somewhere else where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.

      There is nowhere in the United States where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    95. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was after taxes/deductions.

    96. Re:And this is...news? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      $8.15/hr after taxes? So roughly 10-12/hr before? Thats pretty much considered a living wage in Brewster County TX, ass end of the nation, and borderlands of the civilized world. Here, you can rent a shitcan 5 bedroom house for 1,200$ a month, and eat more than rice and beans for most meals at those wages. I do not recommend moving here, unless your hobbies consist of drinking and fornication, with a side of staring at a bleak and unforgiving desert.

      But yeah, most places now days, $8.15/hr after taxes is a joke.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    97. Re:And this is...news? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Many parts of northern Missouri.

      feel free to fact check.

    98. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to agree with AC; EmployERS need to be reminded that they're not entitled to the advantages they've maneuvered themselves into. Employees can only be threatened into silence for so long.

      Yes, indeed! I can only imagine what the next Yelp town hall meeting will be like.

      Jeremy Stoppelman steps up to assertively grip the podium at the front of the room.

      JS: I understand that there are some recent unfortunate accusations that we here at Yelp do not pay our employees a "living wage". Is there someone of our business associates who would like to speak to that?

      (A single hand in the audience goes up.)

      JS: You, sir! Yes, what would you like to say?

      Low Wage Slave: Well, I do think that we are not paid enough to make ends meet. I think if our wages were raised--even just a few percent--that would help us out an awful lot.

      JS: Security! Seize that man! Take him out back and have him shot!

      (Security apprehends and drags the LWS out back to do their duty.)

      JS: Is there any one else who would like to comment on their compensation here at Yelp?

      (Crickets)

      JS: Excellent! Well, I'm really glad we had this time to clear the air and hash out this problem. You're all doing a fine job! Keep up the good work! Dismissed!

    99. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember a time when businesses were considered SYMBIOTIC relationships between capital and labor.

      You don't remember it, because it never has been. Business pays low wages, because that's what they can get people to work for. Do you think for a second that Yelp would be offering $12.50 or whatever (pre-tax) per hour if people weren't taking the jobs at that rate?

      $12.50 an hour goes pretty fucking far in less-expensive areas of the country. But if you want to go live in San Francisco - one of the most expensive places on the planet - and you make the mistake of taking a $12.50 an hour job, then that's on you. You could easily go live and work someplace down south, or in the midwest, and live pretty comfortably on that.

      Of course, you don't get the warm smugness of knowing that you're living in the most right-thinking city in America, but that's the price for surrounding yourself with a warm blanket of smug self-righteousness.

      Fuck, maybe she should move North to Seattle, where she'll get a minimum $15 an hour. It's not as if it's THAT hard to get a job paying this sort of wage when you've got a fucking college degree.

    100. Re:And this is...news? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing I'd point out is that her apartment isn't in San Francisco, it's about 30 miles out.

      There are things to be said for both sides. Yes, I have no problem with Yelp firing her. The, "Gosh, I was told I'd have to work for an entire year before I could consider being an internal candidate" is pretty silly. As someone else said, she should consider getting rid of her one bedroom and finding a roommate to live with. If a one bedroom apartment is $1245 where she lives, I'm sure she can find two bedroom apartments for $1800 or so that she could share and end up paying less rent and possibly less in utilities. She should also start figuring out what things cost--if she's close to a mass-transit line, it may be worthwhile to dump her car.

      That said, Yelp might want to consider whether what they are paying people will aid them in getting the employees they want. I've seen plenty of companies who pay crap and treat employees like crap and then can't understand why they have such high employee turnover and low employee morale. "These kids today don't want to work! They're spoiled brats who think the world owes them!" It might also be smart to move a customer service call center somewhere else where you can pay people your current rates but it's cheaper for people to live and not have to worry about employees being unable to get into work because they have no money. While there's lots of technical talent in the Bay Area, you might be able to find better customer service people elsewhere.

    101. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      Would you like to live in a world where nobody did those jobs and you, therefore, did not benefit from having people to do those things for you?

      And it's not about living frugally vs having a nice apartment with all the trimmings; it's about being able to live frugally in the first place. Not earning enough to pay basic rent and utilities and keep food on the table isn't something you fix by living frugally, it's something you fix by earning more money, and the people in these jobs can't do that without abandoning those jobs, which leads to the world described above.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    102. Re:And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That is after taxes so... Franklin County, Maine.
      http://quickfacts.census.gov/q...

      It'd not be too bad. Figure it's at least $10 before taxes so it's at least $20,000/year. The median income is cited at the link. That's about $22,000/year. I think poverty is $12,000/year.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    103. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you fucking liar. Plenty of hiring in other areas besides the bay.

    104. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A wage covers the cost of the labor, not the employee's cost of living.

      In theory, due to supply and demand cost of labor is always greater or equal to cost of living because as a supplier of labor the supplier (the employee) won't take a job that won't cover their costs to provide that labor, which oddly includes that pesky detail about "living"--at least until the zombies take over. In reality, like most things suppliers will at times sell at below cost because their economic situation is better to sell at all vs to sell none. In the longer term, a failure to cover cost of living a people will either (1) die, (2) seek other employment, (3) commit crimes to supplement their financial needs, (4) take on additional employment, (5) engage in rent sharing or other means to cover their costs, (6) seek public or private charity, (7) seek support from family, (8) ask for a raise, etc.

      Basically, everything but (2), (4), (5), or (8) are possibly reasonable although if said person is full time then (4) is unreasonable. Considering she seems to have been fired for merely commenting about it, (8) clearly wasn't an option--the notion than any company would fire you for disclosing your pay or even complaining about it is absurd. You don't think companies do the same? So, it seems (2) is the way to go. Honestly, considering circumstance, the whole point is that (2) is probably a good idea for a lot of other Yelp employees.

    105. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she wanted to, she could move to Europe. She could even get a graduate degree there for free. Nothing to save up for. Obviously, she lacks even that degree of initiative.

    106. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How could someone fresh out of college have no marketable skills? College is where special snowflakes, each of whom intrinsically is gifted with special things to contribute to society, learn more about themselves and how to bring out those special talents in ways that will benefit the community. Of course someone fresh out of talent is loaded with marketable skills: you don't lose your marketable skills until you turn 30 and join the establishment.

    107. Re:And this is...news? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      In the vast majority of offshoring, it's never been about the company needing to fill job openings, but to rid themselves of domestic workers or older workers.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    108. Re:And this is...news? by unrtst · · Score: 2

      I do not recommend moving here, unless your hobbies consist of drinking and fornication, with a side of staring at a bleak and unforgiving desert.

      Hrm... 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

    109. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yelp's only solution to this sounds like to move out of San Francisco, or indeed, CA. They could move next door to Reno, and set up headquarters there. Everything would be a lot more affordable. Only thing - most of the techie crowd has a fetish for San Francisco - even places like Santa Clara or Fremont ain't good enough. And w/ that comes the strain that it puts on people who don't make 6 figures that would enable them to afford a studio in the city.

      The Bay Area has become quite a catch-22 situation these days.

    110. Re:And this is...news? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      There is nowhere in the United States where $8.15 per hour is a living wage.

      Depends, is the person living alone? If so $8.15/hr is just fine in quite a few places as a living wage.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    111. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She made over $12 an hour liar. She cited after tax pay to befuddle fucking idiots like you.

    112. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they neglected to first make her train her Indian replacement.

    113. Re:And this is...news? by geoskd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop working for shitty salaries in overpriced cities and the executives running these corporations will stop expecting people to ruin themselves in order to bloat the executive bonuses.

      When you're staring at the want ads, on line job sites, the newspaper jobs section and anything else you can think of to find a job because you graduated 5 months ago and you're still looking for something that pays more than minimum wage, you notice something very disturbing. There are literally thousands of job postings for minimum wage jobs, and almost no postings for anything that would be considered middle class or up (maybe 1 listing in 20). Just because we have low unemployment doesn't mean that underemployment isn't rampant as hell. Sure there are plenty of other places to work, but they all pay the same crap starvation wages. Starbucks still pays the same crappy wage so that those fortunate enough to have found a solid job don't have to pay too $4 for a latte (ohhhhh, never mind, they charge that much anyways). So, all of these employees on the bottom decide to collectively have themselves a strike. What would it accomplish? The powers that be just ride it out and wait 3 weeks. Those employees will be back, and willing to do absolutely anything because, as this person so ineloquently stated, no money, no eat.

      The basic trouble with the labor market, is that workers do not have the luxury of simply not engaging in the market if the terms are unfair. The employer can file chapter 11 and shut their doors, or can wait out a strike, or can simply fire the employee and get another one. In short, they have options. The employees however are stuck with the tyranny of having a stomach and an undeniable need to put food in it with shocking regularly. In short, they have no options.

      What happens at the negotiating table when one party A needs party B, but party B doesn't need party A? Party A gets hosed. The free market theory requires that all parties have the option not to take part if the deal is not in their best interest. With the labor market, that is not the case. Workers must earn money or die. Whether the employers know that when they set wages is irrelevant, as they take advantage of it to offer minimum wage jobs nonetheless.

      12.7% of American workers make less than $10 per hour. 51% of American workers make less than $14.50 per hour. That means that the average American employee will not earn more than $14.50 per hour until they are 40 years old.

      Since 1980, median individual income has risen from $20,500 per year to $27,000 per year, an annual increase of about 0.8% per year. Over that same period, inflation has averaged 3.37%. after 35 years of that, buying power is only 28% of what it used to be, and wages are only up 31%. This means that the total buying power of the median wage today is only 36% of the median buying power in 1980. In effect, wages have fallen to 1/3 of what they were in 1980. This is partly offset by a massive increase in the number of women who are working (2 income households), as well as a marked increase in the number of hours that individual employees are working.

      As if that wasn't enough, we are fast approaching a debt crisis, as our debt to GDP is quickly approaching the highest in American history. We have been giving out massive tax break to the wealthy for almost 40 years, and financing it by going into nati

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    114. Re:And this is...news? by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices.

      Lifestyle choices like eating regularly, living inside shelter with running water and electricity... how dare she think she's entitled to such things from a days wage!

      Get your head out of the clouds. This woman was living in one of the most expensive areas in the country with no roommate and a minimum wage job and expected to make ends meet. That is ludicrous. In 2005 I was making only a couple dollars over minimum wage and had 4 roommates in a five bedroom townhouse. And this was in the Midwest over an hour from the nearest major city.

      I am a liberal supporter of Bernie Sanders, but even I don't think this woman's problems are caused by her employer. Moving to San Francisco with no savings and no social safety net from friends or family and no significant job lined up is objectively stupid. Not taking advantage of the likely dozens of apps that help you find roommates is almost just as bad.

      There is no sob story here. This is a naive and entitled kid who hopefully has learned something from the experience.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    115. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame Obama and the communists. If we were libertarian like the Founders intended we'd all be rich.

    116. Re:And this is...news? by ranton · · Score: 1

      Her complaint amounted to an admission that she couldn't find a job which would support her lifestyle choices.

      By "lifestyle choices", you mean her choice to have food and heat.

      No even close. The lifestyle choices were moving to one of the most expensive places in the world with no significant job lined up, and wanting to live on her own with no roommate.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    117. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English major. When speaking of the language it's capitalised.

    118. Re:And this is...news? by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      It's basically what I said to Michael Dell, and my career didn't end until the layoffs the following year.

    119. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lived 30 miles from their workplace, and lived on a bag of rice

    120. Re:And this is...news? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      I was there, it was more or less as you told, except the final JS statement. It was like this:

      As your leader, I encourage you from time to time, and always in a respectful manner, to question my logic. If you're unconvinced that a particular plan of action I've decided is the wisest, tell me so, but allow me to convince you and I promise you right here and now, no subject will ever be taboo. Except, of course, the subject that was just under discussion. The price you pay for bringing up your wages' level as a negative is... I collect your fucking head. Just like this fucker here. Now, if any of you sons of bitches got anything else to say, now's the fucking time!
      [...]
      Gentlemen, this meeting is adjourned.

    121. Re:And this is...news? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      How has any of that connected to wages?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    122. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Until I'm affected that's the best and right solution.

    123. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There's nowhere in the U.S. where $12.25 per hour is an acceptable salary for a customer service rep.

      There are lots of places. Mostly small shops and boutique websites. Please peruse monster.com from your high horse.

      > The national average is over $16 per hour.

      Average. Not base.

    124. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      Good questions. My first question: How do you define a 'living wage'? I generally define one as sufficient for a single person to live on, with a suite-mate. I've had online discussions though, with people who seriously wanted the minimum wage to be sufficient for single full time income earner to support a family of 4. In addition, as a military member who's deployed a number of time, my 'standard of living' is a bit lower than some.

      Personally, I'd prefer to not set a minimum wage at all. I'd prefer to avoid mandating benefits either - mandating healthcare for full time workers, for example, has resulted in whole segments of employers only hiring part time workers.

      But you still have to counter the race to the bottom. As such, I support a support system - either a mandatory employment program (I tend to call it 'FedJobs'), or something like a basic guaranteed income(BIG), such that employers who offer too little simply don't find any employees. Whether because citizens find working for the feds more profitable or because they find the wages too pathetic to work for under a BIG. A hybrid system is possible.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    125. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but if you move to the Bay Area for $12 an hour you're either a moron or have been living under a rock with no access to google. Just googling cost of living in the Bay Area and you can see all the problems.

    126. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      There's a law that I like to point to in times like this. It is the Law of Diminishing Returns. At some point, there's an amount of labor, between none and little, where it's simply not enough energy spent to deserve payment at a level enough where someone could do just that job, nothing else, and have all the benefits of modern society. Unless you want to change that, and if so advocate for that but you need to present a logical argument for doing so. I'm not seeing that.

      There is that point where you're not contributing enough for people to justify giving you the product of their labor or as much of that as you might prefer. Where is that line, why is it there, and by what authority do you place it where you do?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    127. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with her employer. Stop assigning some sort of good/evil characterization. Yelp had a job opening; they were willing to pay X. It happened to be in California. She took the job. If no one took the job, they'd either cancel the job or up the pay. No one put a gun to her head and forced her into this situation. She can leave whenever she wants; California is an at-will state.

    128. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Worked at Intel for 17 years in Oregon. I was paid well over 8.15 an hour but still I could not afford to own a home in the area I lived in. So I felt I was working for the billions that the company made and the profit of the apartment I lived. I called out the company on their internal discussion forum many times. Not that it was their fault causing my troubles, but that after devoting so many years of my life to them I was not able to provide for my son. So I quit. I was also tired of pretty much everyone at the company being a liar and cheater and not being able to believe in anything that was said.
        Now I live in a much cheaper situation, I work full time, run my own business and am starting another business and trying to write a book. All things that will improve my situation.

    129. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing I'd point out is that her apartment isn't in San Francisco, it's about 30 miles out.

      Yes, but she was complaining about her long commute, suggesting that she really thought she deserved an SF apartment.

      That said, Yelp might want to consider whether ... It might also be smart to move a customer service call center somewhere else

      Indeed, I think Yelp is mismanaged and doomed, like most tech companies that choose to locate themselves in SF. But that makes her choice of thinking about a career with them even dumber.

      I wouldn't even care that much about any of this if all this bullshit wasn't likely to be eventually a burden on tax payers outside of SF.

    130. Re:And this is...news? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That's roughly $1400 a month take home. You could make it on that in most places in the midwest if you didn't try to rent a house/high end apartment or eat out all the time.

      The biggest problem is expecting to survive off a single income. Most people find roommates or a spouse. $2800 a month is definitely livable for two people. But for some reason no one wants that.

    131. Re:And this is...news? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      She was working at Yelp for minimum wage in the hopes that it would get her foot in the door for a real job.

      No David, she wasn't. She was working for $17/hour. That what the position was advertised at for the San Francisco office on Indeed.com.

      I realize that some cities have (inadvisedly) increased minimum wage to $15/hour, but San Francisco is not one of them, and even their minimum wage increase over the federal minimum proposal was scaled to kick in over the end of the next decade, not immediately. They pay well, because they are well hated.

      Unfortunately, the reality is that this technique almost never works. She might as well be working at Burger King. The job would have been easier, and because of her college degree, she probably would have been able to quickly move up to a shift lead job, which would have paid her more than she was making at Yelp....

      All this is very true; there's a lot of unreasonable expectations instilled in college graduates, especially those who believe that a degree, *any* degree, will magically get them a job in their chosen field, and "if they can only get their foot in the door..." that will happen immediately, or even quickly.

      I was really frustrated by her complaining about "a *whole* year" to move out of a support role, into a role which she would be paid to do what she admitted she was already doing on her own time for free. Why in heck would they pay her to do something that she's going to do anyway?!?

    132. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      At some point, there's an amount of labor, between none and little, where it's simply not enough energy spent to deserve payment

      I can tell you, first hand, that flipping burgers is a lot more labor-intensive that writing code. I make a lot more doing the latter than I did doing the former.

      at a level enough where someone could do just that job, nothing else, and have all the benefits of modern society

      And we're (I though I made this clear) not talking about that; we're talking about the ability to do just that job and have a roof over your head, clothes on your back, food on your table, and government-mandated health insurance (even if you can't afford to use it because you don't make enough to afford the copay). Where I made that clear was when I said the following:

      And it's not about living frugally vs having a nice apartment with all the trimmings; it's about being able to live frugally in the first place.

      I, then, further clarified with the following tautology:

      Not earning enough to pay basic rent and utilities and keep food on the table isn't something you fix by living frugally

      Please note where I said "enough to pay basic rent and utilities and keep food on the table", then explain how that is anything remotely close to "all the benefits of modern society".

      We've butted heads here a few times in the past, and we've agreed on things a number of times, as well. Usually, when we butt heads, it's because you ignore entire portions of my posts in order to counter a point I wasn't making. Can we put an end to that, please?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    133. Re:And this is...news? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Her lifestyle choice was living in San Francisco. I personally know an accountant who makes about $96,000 a year, and was offered nearly double that for a job in San Francisco, but he refused it. Why? Well, $96,000 is a lot of money here; definitely qualifies for upper middle class. Hell, I make $50,000 a year and I live in a resort style luxury apartment with two olympic sized swimming pools and concierge trash service in a 1077 square foot unit.

      However making $192,000 in San Francisco is likely to make you end up living paycheck to paycheck living in an apartment barely the size of a closet.

      That said, I don't care what her role at Yelp is, she could very easily find a similar job in another area that doesn't have such a high cost of living. That's on her, not on her employer.

    134. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not all labor is equal. Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      Yes. If you're highly paid person in San Fransisco and you expect to have a fry cook make you food or a convenience store clerk serve you a Slushee, then you also have to expect that those places are manned because it's worth the while of those providing the service to you. They're not going to drive two-hours one way to get to their reasonably-priced living accommodations.

      There is no reason, especially in the circumstances of rent inflation due to a concentration of highly paid people, why you should have to exploit people to get your low-priced burgers or Slim Jims.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    135. Re:And this is...news? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      And then the companies complain to the Government they can't get enough skilled workers and need more H1-B visas.

    136. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC the fast foot joints bumped the minimum wage to $15. So she would be making more at Burger King. Probably a better work environment too.
      And 1250/mo rent is almost certainly in Oakland at the (rent controlled) subsidized rate. Non rent controlled is about double that.

      FYI: San Francisco / Bay Area *is* a shit hole until your making over 500k.

      I like to call it 'So F*ck*ng Over'. 'Cause it peaked about 50 years ago and was still passable 30 years ago. I just takes a couple generations for public perception to shift.

    137. Re:And this is...news? by jcr · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, snowflake. You're entitled to what you create, and what you can obtain from others on a voluntary basis. Try to take my earnings by force, and you will lose.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    138. Re: And this is...news? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Versus the current system of tyranny of the (lazy, selfish, thieving) minority?

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    139. Re:And this is...news? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Slave wages" is an oxymoron. If you don't like what you're earning, then it's up to YOU to increase the value of your labor.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    140. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see people as expensive liabilities, don't you? Are you a machine? Are you even capable of human emotion?

      Why do you even bother stooping to respond to us mere peasants if you're SO much better than us?

    141. Re: And this is...news? by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      No one is saying that fry cooks should all live in McMansions. But if a fry cook is not worth enough to pay the minimum needed to maintain a single person in basic health and dignity, then it is not worth your while to have fry cooks.

      If you use a mule to do a job, you provide it with enough to sustain its life and health. If you use a machine, you keep it powered and in good repair. But if you use a man, it seems, it's perfectly OK to pay him a pittance and expect him to live on it.

      --
      Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
      Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    142. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      With the current data that I have, the reasoning that I have used, I hold the belief that the socially responsible choice would be to have a universal basic income IF you're going to have no minimum wage. I'm not exactly enamored by that but it seems to be the most logical choice if one wants prosperity and stability. I'm open to suggestions.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    143. Re: And this is...news? by Mr+Foobar · · Score: 2

      What's a "union"

      It's like an uncola, except for charged moieties...

      --
      -> I dislike sigs...
    144. Re:And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No David, she wasn't. She was working for $17/hour. That what the position was advertised at for the San Francisco office on Indeed.com.

      Based on the biweekly pay she lists in her letter, she actually made $9.17 after taxes, which is about $12.25 before taxes. So unless she is lying about her paycheck amount, she is not making $17 per hour, nor anywhere close to that.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    145. Re:And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      A small shop doesn't have a customer service rep. It has a cashier. You can dress it up in a fancy name, but it isn't really the same job. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    146. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel is JUST like this, get your ass to work even if you gotta sleep in the gutter., get your sorry butt in there and make us another 20 billion and maybe we'll toss you a slice of pizza.

    147. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That statement assumes pay always is correlated to value. It tends to be correlated to perceived value but not always.

    148. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people used to live on one salary they used to eat at home and not buy expensive junk. I know its possible to live on one salary. I work and live in Cupertino and my wife is a homemaker taking care of our 2 kids. Yes its hard but its possible. We dont eat out, buy used cars in cash,use the cheapest phone and internet, use coupons, watch our bills (with 4 people and cooking everything at home our PGE bill is 92 a month (what was this girl doing with a 120 dollar PGE bill), buy cheap gifts for bDays and other occassions. The only thing we overpay for is the rent (3000 for a crappy apartment) but it gets us Cupertino schools and the sacrifices are worth making to get good schools for our kids. If this woman could not make it as single she definitely wont be able to make it as part of a family. Its obvious from some hints in her rant that she has some psychiatric issues. Entry level jobs is probably all that she is good for. Also a fresh college graduate at 24? You should graduate at 22 from 4 year college. Obviously a few years lost to boyfriend or drug abuse. And an English degree is really only for people with money who go to college to find spouses , its not a career.

    149. Re: And this is...news? by russotto · · Score: 1

      If you use a mule to do a job, you provide it with enough to sustain its life and health. If you use a machine, you keep it powered and in good repair. But if you use a man, it seems, it's perfectly OK to pay him a pittance and expect him to live on it.

      Which would be a perfectly good reason to spend enough to keep your slaves in good health. But slavery was abolished; employers don't own their employees. If someone is willing to be a fry cook for $12.25/hour, even if this results in a standard of "basic health and dignity" for them below that which one M. Beauregard finds acceptable, there's nothing wrong with that. If no one is willing, then either the price will have to go up or we won't have any fry cooks. For fry cooks I imagine the price would go up. For Yelp customer service representatives... well, maybe we could do without.

    150. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      True, but if you only need a mule to do a week's worth of work per year - you get shoot the mule and eat it.

      Where's the line drawn? What is reasonable? Is reasonable a nice car, cell phone, data service, broadband, a tablet, a laptop or desktop, a nice stereo, not having to have roommates, or what? Where does that line get drawn to you? Platitudes are nice but actual answers are more helpful - I'm open to suggestions. We don't have enough gainful employment for everyone. Never mind, enough that they are willing to pay a great deal more for. Where do we draw the line, why, and how to we ensure we're protecting the liberties of the individual while ensuring reasonable protections for the commons?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    151. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So because you're a fucking pussy someone else should accept your decisions as their own? Bitch, please. Quit being a faggot and go suck some SF dicks. You'll be glad you did.

    152. Re:And this is...news? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to work at a company that doesn't pay much that badly?

      BTW, they will not increase H1B visas for one company who demonstrated that they won't pay the going wages. It's not as simple as that.

    153. Re:And this is...news? by sed+quid+in+infernos · · Score: 1

      There are other choices she made affecting her ability to make ends meet, such as not having a roommate. And her twitter feed exposes quite a bit conspicuous consumption that is definitely here choice, such as choice of alcohol, small appliances, and the like.

    154. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      So what does manned mean in this case? What does that mean, really? What are they worth, in real dollars and cents? (Or dollars and sense, if you prefer?) Do they get an apartment to themselves, a game console, a phone with data, broadband, a car, a computer, a couple of reasonable hobbies, a meaningful social life, and without any compromises along the way?

      So far, I've gotten platitudes and pithy sayings. I'm holding out - there's at least one more reply. What does the ideal look like to you? How do you propose we reach it? What reasonable protections are we going to maintain to ensure the liberty of the individual is upheld while ensuring the protection of the commons? (I asked another person that - your replies are rather similar.)

      I'm very open to suggestions here. Buggered if I've got the answer. If I knew, I'd be happy to tell you. I'm sure as shit on the guy who holds back from sharing his views on things.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    155. Re: And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She should have turned down the job cold. But like many new college grads, she knew what field she wanted to work in, and she took the only job she could find for a company that operated within that field, under the assumption that it would be easier to transfer internally to a job that wasn't beneath her skill level when one became available. That trick used to work well forty years ago. Nowadays, it is almost invariably a mistake. Unfortunately, schools don't teach that, because the people who teach in schools mostly haven't worked in industry for decades.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    156. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think I ignored anything. Lemme double check.

      I think I see where you're confused and I'd speculate that you're actually the guilty party BUT I'll take the blame and say it was because I was not clear enough. No, those are questions. What does a 'basic roof' over their head even mean? What does that look like? Are their roommates? Are there sacrifices?

      Those are very generic statements and ill defined. There's no basic tautology here, they're mired in complexity. What's the basic standard of living and how much work does it take to meet that standard of living *if* any?

      In my failure to articulate properly, assume (and rightfully so) that I'm on the side of things like giving serious consideration to a universal basic income at this point. If that makes it more clear, that might help. I am pretty sure you're thinking I hold a position that I do not.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    157. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Do they get an apartment to themselves, a game console, a phone with data, broadband, a car, a computer, a couple of reasonable hobbies, a meaningful social life, and without any compromises along the way?

      At least enough to cover rent, food, transportation to the job, and communications whether that be cell phone or landline or whatever. If you require an equation then it wouldn't have to be much more intricate than coming up with a number based on apartment rent in the area, transportation, food, and internet/phone and starting with that as a number.

      I know that as someone who purchases fast food a little too often I don't want prices so low that the people prepping my food are killing themselves just to keep their head above water. I actually go to a more expensive fast food place because of that.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    158. Re:And this is...news? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 0

      When you're staring at the want ads, on line job sites, the newspaper jobs section and anything else you can think of to find a job because you graduated 5 months ago and you're still looking for something that pays more than minimum wage, you notice something very disturbing. There are literally thousands of job postings for minimum wage jobs, and almost no postings for anything that would be considered middle class or up (maybe 1 listing in 20).

      There's actually a very good reason for that. If you've ever been in a position where you need to hire somebody, the want ads almost always suck. The people that apply for jobs in the want ads just go work for the first person that will actually hire them, and will leave at the drop of a hat. They aren't high quality workers at all, which is why they make minimum wage.

      If ask any professional you'll ever meet about how they find their jobs, almost none of them will tell you they use any kind of job search. By far the best way is to network with people you know. You ask around if they know somebody who knows somebody, and when you draw that connection, you're likely to find a good quality job. Likewise, employers like these networks because they find good quality employees. Alternatively, recruiters like to do some spying at other companies and poach their talent.

      People who hire out of the want ads don't necessarily want somebody intelligent, they just need an extra pair of hands, and if that extra pair of hands just disappears one day they can find another pair of hands because there are so many that they are a dime a dozen. Thus they don't value their time very much, and therefore don't pay much either.

    159. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now or then? This isn't a new story IIRC, or at least: it wasn't necessarily the case when the pissing and moaning about wage slavery first started(e.g. "Google Bus driver" 1099 scandal from 2015 comes to mind as an example from over a year ago).

      Personally, I wouldn't work in the Bay area for less than $30/hr(as an employee with benefits) or $50/hr(as a 1099) so I find these wages more sympathetic than many people from less expensive areas might.

      "you fucking liar" Also: Chill the fuck out. Who do you think you are? Ted Cruz? This isn't the goddamned GOP primary so there's no need to grand stand between 2x ACs.

    160. Re:And this is...news? by adolf · · Score: 1

      I think any person should be able to afford to make it on their own, given good work ethic, no matter their skillset.

    161. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How could someone fresh out of college have no marketable skills?

      She was an English Literature major. Could be worse; my sister was a Sociology major!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    162. Re:And this is...news? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Is English no longer a required course for all 12 years of primary eduction?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    163. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      A roof over their head means just that: any roof. Food on the table means enough food to sustain not only life, but health (so they can continue working and contributing to society in some meaningful way). You know, the necessities of life: water, food, shelter, and clothing. With shelter comes utilities, and with living in the US comes insurance, so we have to add those in, as they're really not optional (though insurance used to be).

      Now, you can get government assistance for housing, food, and insurance, but wouldn't you much rather people worked for those things? Especially when it is quite possible (common, even) that working at all can disqualify you for one or more of those programs, while not supplying enough income to replace the assistance.

      If you'd rather the government subsidize everyone who works to serve your needs, that's fine; I actually support that, since the government is taking a portion of my money anyway and giving the guy who flips my burgers a bit of that money means my burger can cost less. However, if what you're saying is that the guy who flips my burgers doesn't deserve the basic necessities, we're not going to reach a common ground here and we might as well just drop the subject.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    164. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Those sound reasonable, should they be able to live alone in a reasonable apartment? (I'll say reasonable meaning comfortable, private bathroom, at least with adequate food preparation and storage facilities.)

      Then food... What quality? There's a slew of options...

      Then, they gotta have a social life and a healthy hobby or two - that's not unreasonable, I don't think.

      Then, what about when they can't budget for shit, owe money due to past choices, and have mental problems that might include things like addiction but aren't so pressing as to require isolation and protection from themselves?

      And more...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    165. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. actually, I think I see the problem here. You see, I am not the AC you initially replied to; and I believe that AC was actually being sarcastic in his reply.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    166. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      As a contractor, I've learned one thing: If you don't like your current position, you have only one option: Find another position. The reason people are willing to work 80 hour weeks for minimum wage is they think they're going to be start-up millionaires within a few years. Been there, done that several times, and I'm still not a millionaire! But I've definitely heard the bullshit stories about how all the stock options are going to be worth millions to each employee in a couple years.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    167. Re:And this is...news? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Nope. Employers and employees are simply peers, making a deal. They both put forth their demands, and both are free to accept or decline. No extra responsibility either way, except to adhere to the deal, and to follow the law. Business aren't owners or parents, employees aren't children or slave. They're both just people.

    168. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Half hour ride in an BART, what's the problem? She didn't need a car, there's no parking downtown anyway.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    169. Re:And this is...news? by grasshoppa · · Score: 0

      Are these managers forcing people off the street to take these jobs? Are they somehow being deceitful in their hiring practices?

      Here's the thing most people don't seem to get; you aren't entitled to take any job and live off of it. There are a lot of jobs, and this sounds like one, where a better suited candidate might already have another income ( ie: spouse ), but is looking for some supplementary income plus some amazing medical ( from the sounds of it ).

      One final point, and it's a bitter truth so strap in. Some positions just aren't that important. If you are a dime a dozen employee, why *should* you be paid more than minimum wage?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    170. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You would have been out the door by your own locomotion as soon as you found another position. If you're a crap employee fresh out of college, that might take a bit longer than you hope it will. Admittedly, as software engineers we have a warped view of the world because we are constantly being offered new positions, even when we have a job we're happy with.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    171. Re:And this is...news? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      She was an English Literature major. Could be worse; my sister was a Sociology major!

      Sounds like a good candidate for Starbucks barista!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    172. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Then, what about when they can't budget for shit, owe money due to past choices, and have mental problems that might include things like addiction but aren't so pressing as to require isolation and protection from themselves?

      I think I'm misunderstanding something here, why are you concerned with this?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    173. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So be the fucking wage setter, you dumb motherfucker. Nobody but your mother gives a shit about you or your dignity.

    174. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Phoenix, where you need to pay $500/month for air conditioning alone... I'm sure people can live on minimum wage jobs there!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    175. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means lower cost of living for families because they chose to do a lot of things themselves that they now hire others to do. It also means a smaller labor supply and hence more competition for workers. And in general, people used to have a lower standard of living. Taxes were lower too. That's why one salary used to be sufficient for more families.

    176. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      No, the talent they found was more willing to lie on their resumes, and harder to catch lying because they lived in other countries. But yeah, willing to work for half as much helps too.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    177. Re:And this is...news? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Since 1980, median individual income has risen from $20,500 per year to $27,000 per year, an annual increase of about 0.8% per year. Over that same period, inflation has averaged 3.37%. after 35 years of that, buying power is only 28% of what it used to be, and wages are only up 31%. This means that the total buying power of the median wage today is only 36% of the median buying power in 1980. In effect, wages have fallen to 1/3 of what they were in 1980.

      And this crap is at +5, no wonder American politics is full of clowns.... in the header of the income figures it says (Reported in $2012), so the numbers are all inflation adjusted already. So you might have missed that but to be so out of touch with reality that you really think they're 64% down instead of 31% up... you should run for president! It looks like you got /.'s vote.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    178. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop misspelling millennial, millennia, millennium with only one n. Just knock it the fuck off, that shit is so old and rotten.

    179. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      There's also mental health and I'd think we'll need higher standards for housing - it should be comfortable (within reason), safe, and secure. Some level of each is good - and the Law of Diminishing Returns is still ever-present.

      There should be meaningful social life and recreation - it needn't be expensive but, overall, I suspect the price of "bread and circuses" (football and beer) goes a long ways, as does a significant other, and things like that.

      A hobby is also good - as is a chance (with effort, luck, and dedication) some level of upward mobility that can be striven for.

      So, how do we get there? What about those who can not give a full day's work - should they be paid a full day's wages?

      By the way, I do sort of think we might have "butt heads" over this before but I think it might be because you're used to everyone attacking and arguing. I don't find those conversations interesting and I don't usually learn anything from them. So, I do like a good debate but I hate to argue. Nobody's ever changed anyone's mind just because of a few pixels on the screen and most folks are not actually interested in holding their views up for scrutiny and changing them when new information comes to light. I think it's an ego thing but I'm not a head doctor...

      Currently, I am thinking that the Universal Basic Income might be the best in that it's potentially the least expensive, might foster growth, protects the liberties of the individual, and still ensures that the commons are given due protection. They could more than cover this lady's taxes by raising mine a mere percentage point and I'm not actually sure that I'd even notice. Again, while looking at that as an option, I'd caution one to remember the Diminishing Law of Returns. It's complicated but I think we humans making it more complicated than it has to be.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    180. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      'm not exactly enamored by that but it seems to be the most logical choice if one wants prosperity and stability. I'm open to suggestions.

      I happen to agree with you. My only alternative is, like I said, a guaranteed job program. Which tends to end up being more expensive and getting less work done than hiring people suited for the work that needs to be done and paying the rest welfare. It's complicated.

      Anyways, for a job program, step 1 is that it shouldn't displace regular employees. IE it shouldn't be for maintenance, though I'm sure it'll end up doing some. Instead, I think that they should work to create conditions such that they can find outside work, stimulated by the fedjobs work.

      As such, I'd want them to be restricted to 'infrastructure creation'. Stuff that can be put on hold if the economy heats up and starts hiring them. I define infrastructure, in this case to be anything that increases the productivity or quality of life of citizens that can be expected to last at least 20 years with routine maintenance. So education is infrastructure. A building is infrastructure. A park is infrastructure, etc... Mowing the park is maintenance, not infrastructure.

      Sometimes infrastructure can be on the part of business - say, a cable company's wires. The benefits of fedjobs should be public, not private. Fedjob workers shouldn't be helping private corporations, at least not directly. The closest I'm willing to go is the installation of utility lines and equipment for a not-for-profit, government or cooperative company.

      If the economy heats up, you'd simply slow or stop the starting of new infrastructure projects as you lose workers, then slow and stop existing projects. Hopefully you'd have enough warning to get said projects into a state where they can be slowed or stopped without breaking down/losing existing work.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    181. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I worked in Oregon at Intel and other jobs for 15 years and bought 2 houses; don't know what your problem was. Sold both houses when I was out of work for 2 months.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    182. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumb fuck. He was making a point by demonstrating how fucking stupid your position is.

      He was successful.

    183. Re:And this is...news? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      In 2005 I was making only a couple dollars over minimum wage and had 4 roommates in a five bedroom townhouse. And this was in the Midwest over an hour from the nearest major city.

      I don't doubt her need for roommates, since SF rents are insane. But how is it that you spent so much? You can live on your own with $12K a year in California's capitol city, I've done it. The midwest has got to be cheaper.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    184. Re: And this is...news? by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We don't have enough gainful employment for everyone.

      That's an interesting point. In that case, there are only a few solutions:

      1. Overpaying for labor (i.e., the "living wage")
      2. Welfare
      3. Government make-work jobs (e.g. CCC)
      4. Letting people descend into homelessness and die in the street

      Given that most of the radical conservative types have been railing against #1 and #2 and (given their support for cuts in government spending) clearly reject #3 as an option... well, it's hard to believe anybody could be so heartless as to prefer option #4, but it's the only one left...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    185. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pay is correlated to how hard you are to replace. Period. There are no other factors involved.

    186. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again, you aren't known for your ability to think.

      Fucking moron.

    187. Re: And this is...news? by adolf · · Score: 2

      This, exactly.

      There also doesn't seem to be much room for advancement these days: If you want to get ahead, it's usually quasi-laterally between companies.

      But on the other hand, if folks still can't make it on their own in SF with SF's minimum wage, then maybe there are deeper issues that can't be resolved so simply as "finding a different job."

    188. Re:And this is...news? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Hmm, you did not clarify, are you talking about the employer or the employee, with it comes to bloated sense of entitlements. Of course when talking about the employer, I can understand it, for the employee, well, "That Is Exactly What Unions Are For" and yes you have a right and are entitled to a subsistence existence. if you are denied this, you are logically entitled to kill to achieve this, one would assume you hunt bunnies to survive for food and clothing but if not available then I suppose employers will have to do ;) (although they are considered somewhat tasteless and very thin skinned).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    189. Re:And this is...news? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      For me... I'm tired of living with other people. The only person I could live with was my ex-fiance and the end of that was not me. Otherwise I can't go for more than a few months before other people drive me nuts and I need my space from them. In most apartments you can't usually get space from them. More so the more roommates you need.

      On top of this is my horribly bad experiences with roommates including nut cases who threatened to kill me in my sleep because I stopped contributing to the shared food budget (of which they were buying stupidly expensive stuff and I was barely home to eat any of it, so paying for them to eat well was stupid). To a roommate whose sister got him hooked on drugs and he moved out taking my tv with them. Or even a brief stint with my parents... Which was great fun. Yes, I'm still twelve, thanks mom I need all this advice about how my ex was a horrible person every single day just because she broke off the engagement with me.

      So yeah... I can't imagine why of why people don't want to live with others...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    190. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Actually, for company reviews it's glassdoor.com.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    191. Re:And this is...news? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      $1245 isn't an insane rent, that's about what I pay for my 3-bedroom house with a fenced yard for my dog...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    192. Re:And this is...news? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I used to make what worked out to around $13 as a network admin here in PA and it was quite enough to live on and even talk of buying a house. My dad who did building maintenance until last year used to make _less_ than that and was the primary breadwinner of my direct family. Oh and yes, customer service workers make less than $12/hour here.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    193. Re:And this is...news? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      When I read this, I immediately knew she would be fired. Every job I've worked at pretty much has a disparagement clause, and my last job also included one in my severance package. Heck, I got a call from our "Director of Marketing Relations" or such for posting a comment on a New York Times article when I mentioned a client by name since we have various contracts about things like that. I didn't get fired over it, but neither was I slamming us or them in any way. If I had done either, and gotten fired over it, I'd might have even got sued too since it was in my contract I signed that I wouldn't bad-mouth either.

      And her complaining about the food the company provided is SO over-the-top, I'd love for my workplace to provide free food like that and wouldn't ever complain about it. If your job isn't paying enough, go find another.

    194. Re:And this is...news? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 0

      Choosing to live in a high cost metropolitan area is a life choice.

      Forcibly taking people away from their families and friends and resettling them in an unfamiliar place is a violation of human rights. Personally I would never choose to live in a high cost metro, but I couldn't tell someone whose roots are in one to just move. I can't see myself moving Bolivia so that my income will stretch further, so I can't ask anyone else to leave everything and everyone behind.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    195. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Where do we draw the line with a living wage net? How much will we cover? What levels of forgiveness will we have? What methods of rehabilitation will we have?

      A subset of people are going to say, "If we're paying taxes to enable you, you need to follow these rules." (They may include things like health, lifestyle choices, etc.)

      I have no idea if those people will have much power but somewhere, at some point, there's going to be a line drawn. That point is when the output of labor is less than the company is getting in profit/benefit at what they consider an acceptable rate - right now (or at least something close to that).

      This minimum living wage, it needs to be something other than, "Just enough to eke by with no frills." That definition is too subjective. There will be unexpected things - some of which happen with an alarming frequency and thus the quoted text leans in that direction.

      Does it include enough to pay off student debts? Or, if the student undertook those debts and was unable to get a job in their particular field - what then? Does it include enough to cover the guy's $10/day beer habit? 'Cause there's more to live than just eating rice and drinking water. Surely there's more to a living wage than just a cold, empty, apartment without amenities of any type, no social life, and a few tins of cheap spice and a 40# bag of rice.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    196. Re:And this is...news? by meerling · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter if you do as there are fewer and fewer unions anymore, and more and more regulations to prevent union busting and other such actions have been eliminated, gutted, or circumvented.

    197. Re:And this is...news? by meerling · · Score: 1

      Lifestyle choice... Yes, like not starving or trying to avoid having to fight the rats for space in an unoccupied alley. As it was, she seemed to be doing poorly on the former, and barely better than that on the latter.

    198. Re: And this is...news? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      No, dumb fuck. He was making a point by demonstrating how fucking stupid your position is.

      He was successful.

      You clearly hadn't noticed that I had no position as I hadn't commented before. The exaggerated claims made by GP were absurd and a straw man.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    199. Re: And this is...news? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Moves to bay area with no job, takes a job making $8.15 an hour in the most expensive place in the country to live. Then signs a lease she can't afford, without roommates and only works one job.

      Yeah, let's blame "the man". That's definitely the problem here.

    200. Re:And this is...news? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the girl said she takes home $8.15 after taxes. part of the problem is the bay area is so stupidly expensive that I wouldn't want to be there if I made $100k, let alone $30k. Hopefully she takes this opportunity to move back whence she came, where she can find a better path to success and happiness.

      the letter was heelarious by the way. I'm sure she'll find it funny after some years.

      she also said she was spending $1200, or 80% of her take home, on rent. The sad fact of the bay area is that you end up living on somebody's couch.

    201. Re:And this is...news? by Mephistophocles · · Score: 5, Interesting

      $12.50/hr works out to about $2K/month. A quick Zillow search of apartments in the SF area turns up nothing (not one) under $1K/month. The cheapest thing I could find (in 5 minutes, I grant you, but still) was $1300 - for a 140 square feet studio apartment (that's 14ft by 10ft - smaller than the single room I'm sitting in right now). Maybe she's an idiot for living in SF. But regardless, if that's what housing costs in SF, $2K/month ain't gonna cut it.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    202. Re:And this is...news? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      it's one thing to speak truth to power. it's another to spill your dirty laundry all out in public.

    203. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I think you're over-complicating it. Right now this is about people not making enough to pay for their living expenses, meaning they end up on gov't assistance. You're going well outside of that scope.

      There is no slippery slope, here. It's a problem that is going to be solved one way or another. Either the wages do go up or these services just won't be available in those areas. It'll peeter out once it's no longer an issue of needing gov't assistance.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    204. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to know you are swallowing CEO cock.

    205. Re:And this is...news? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not if you're a sociopath masking your pathology in a thin veneer of Libertarianism it isn't.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    206. Re:And this is...news? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      My bad. When I typed "not going to be able to get a job good enough to support yourself" I meant to include "in the Bay Area". And yeah, it would be very Very hard to support support yourself on a primary school teacher's salary here. It's mostly because of housing prices which, through a combination of a booming economy plus a level of NIMBY-ism you would not believe preventing construction of adequate new housing; has sent the price to buy or rent through the roof.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    207. Re:And this is...news? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Giving CEOs suggestions on who to employ here? You must be some successful businessman with a track record of making various business decisions including who to hire and fire.

    208. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What poor life choices are you referring to? For the vast majority of the people in these positions, their only "poor life choice" was not taking thousands of dollars in student loans to go to college... And if college is now required in order to live in modern society, then it turns out that college is just a barrier that poor people can't hope to overcome without creating other, sometimes more debilitating problems for themselves.

      Not all of your convenience store clerks and grocery baggers are criminals or high school drop outs.

    209. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wish came true. Most are only interested in salary. Hardly anyone noticed that she got fired because of talking about issues. This creates fear to talk and that kills the company eventually. If you have stocks. Sell them now.

    210. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1
      It seems we're more in agreement here than either of us realized, likely as a result of how the conversation started.

      You might be interested in this post, from a different discussion. Basically, a suggestion that some form of capitalistic communism might be the ideal, and a loose comparison with what we have today. I was hoping to get a discussion started with that comment, but it seems to have gone unnoticed. Maybe we can get that going here, instead.

      Nobody's ever changed anyone's mind just because of a few pixels on the screen and most folks are not actually interested in holding their views up for scrutiny and changing them when new information comes to light. I think it's an ego thing but I'm not a head doctor...

      Indeed and I hate that about people. Absolutely hate it. Personally, if someone wants to make an argument and back it up with research and facts that show me I'm wrong, I'm open to it because it means I get to become a better, more knowledgeable, and often more capable person for it, at no cost to myself. It doesn't even cost me pride; on the contrary, I'm proud to be one of the few who can actually do that. I've seen you do it, as well, so I know we're on the same page there.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    211. Re:And this is...news? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      How many $12.25/hr jobs though offer full health insurance. I work a high tech job and we don't vision or dental and our co-pay is infinity because it's an HSA. She also gets free food every day for lunch. We used to have that policy but now it's just once a week.

      The mistake was placing the call center in San Francisco. Put it in Lincoln Nebraska. At $12.25/hr you could afford a 1 bedroom apartment, heat and a car payment.

    212. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, masses, go and turn to anarchy! Now! I'm talking to you right there, masses. Come on, you don't like us? Revolt. You know where our offices are. You outnumber our security. Why don't you make your move? It's not going to be *any* better for you. Come on. We're standing here. We're standing here. (Crickets) Yeah, I guessed so. Shut up and work, you have wasted enough time already.

    213. Re:And this is...news? by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Not owed or entitled? Where the fuck do you get owed and entitled out of this scenario?

      You want to talk real world? Let's talk business. It's a business contract you fuck. The only owed and entitled behavior is the concept that companies think they are entitled to cheap labor. E.G Normal business would be - 'I will exchange this amount of money for you to perform this task on me' and if it is too low, people go 'No, your desired amount to pay for this work is not enough, I am not interested'

      Then the company would have to go 'Okay, I'm negotiating to pay you more, in exchange to do this work' Then the other party can choose to accept it or not.

      Instead what we get it companies who don't want to pay the wages the population of the country and instead of the above happening, they go 'Not enough workers! We need to get people from OTHER countries to come perform this work', and the lobby the government, slip some money here and there, and poof, you have forced cheap labor.

      Your bullshit will only have a place to stand once we stop displacing citizens with temporary workers at cheaper wages. You want to do business in this country, to take the peoples money in this country, and the people should dictate what business practices are acceptable in the country.

      Not a bunch of stuffy old fucks getting paid way too much in a cushy job deciding for the rest of the country to keep wages suppressed.

    214. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? We're just pointing out that her expectations were unreasonable.

      As for firing, her employer should be free to fire her for any reason or no reason at all.

    215. Re:And this is...news? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. She should have made herself an anonymous Yelp account using her local Starbucks' wifi and posted a review of the company there. Of course, they'd then have deleted the review because it wasn't "trustworthy".

    216. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I am over-complicating it. It does seem like this is an eventuality we need to deal with at some point - on a greater scale than just a few people who still have choices. I'm not sure if that's a slippery slope, by definition, or if it's just a legitimate concern? I guess I see it as something bigger than one person, one company, and one area. We're fast approaching the point where we don't have enough gainful employment to keep going with our current structure.

      Yes, we can kick the can down the road or we can start to come up with ideas and ease this inevitable transition. It won't be in our lifetimes but it may not be many more generations before we're in a post-scarcity and leisure class society. There are only so many service jobs and lots of reasons why they might exist only in lower numbers.

      So, yes. I could be over-complicating it. That's certainly true. I don't place much stock in this one particular letter or this one particular person. It may sound harsh but, in the scale of things, she's of no importance to me - by herself. From the looks of things, she'll be fine. I do worry that we have some big societal changes ahead and that that sort of upheaval may be very messy, very messy indeed. If we can get it moving in the right direction now, maybe it will make that upheaval less disruptive and violent. So, you're right and I could be over-thinking and making it needlessly complicated. It's more than an individual or even one specific location.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    217. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook?

      Unequivocally, yes. Anyone working full time, or two part time jobs aught be paid enough, as a minimum, to do all of the following with reasonably wise spending choices:

      • Afford reasonable housing, which may include renting a dwelling of one's own, or owning a meager hovel of a home with a likewise fully employed spouse, or by using room-mating with a one or two people to support that mortgage.
      • Afford enough reasonable quality food that one can live healthily.
      • Afford some measure of transportation, be that a bus/metro pass or a 20 year old Toyota Corolla or other economy car of reasonable quality, that they may get to work or school.
      • Afford to seek self-improvement through schooling, for that matter. Everyone who wants to be employed should be able to afford to pay their student loans, either this or those loans should be subject to bankruptcy like other public debts.
      • Afford to pay for health, dental and eye insurance.
      • And after all of that, one aught to afford to pay taxes and put some paltry amount in a savings account.

      Now, this is all going to vary wildly according to geography and market. Someone living in or near San Fransisco will need to make substantially more than someone living in the middle of BFE.

      If people can't do this, they'll just vote for someone who will give them entitlements, and you me and everyone will be paying for the wage slave class to have these things through the taxpayer's back pocket, rather than out of their own front pocket. They won't be encouraged to better themselves to better their situation. Indeed, they'll quite oppositely be encouraged toward chronic under-employment, so they can get their free obama-fones, their EBT cards, public assistance, and NOT have to work a legitimate job with 40 work week, because they'll find they can have their cake and eat it too, if they learn to jump through the correct bureaucratic hoops.

      The reason we have become a welfare state is because we've accepted being a corporate welfare state. The negative externalizations of some of the wealthiest companies in the world who are unwilling (and certianly not unable) to pay people a reasonable wage will be the end of us all. They are the ones indirectly encouraging this cycle of culture-rot. This is the situation we have now. Like it?

    218. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Retaliation by an employer is a crime that is Actionable. Such a case with a paper trail would likely include significant Damages to make the complainant whole. IANAL

      I don't know the details of this case, but you are wrong.

      In California, claiming wrongful termination firing for at-will employer's is kindof restricted. If you want to prove it was a retaliatory firing you pretty much have to show it was against the law (e.g., discriminating against a protected class), or somehow falls under "Tameny/Turner" exception (basically it would be against public policy like exposing a crime like embezzling, or for refusing to do something illegal).

      You might argue that exposing yelp for paying minimum wages might be something retaliatory as exposing something very unflattering that the public would want to know about, but I don't think it reaches the level of exposing something illegal (given this person was apparently paid minimum wage), which probably doesn't reach the "Tameny" or "Turner" thresholds.

      Although I too am not a lawyer, but I've had quite a bit experience helping people who are testifying in various cases before EDD (California's employment development department which deals with unemployment claims) and it certainly isn't going to be a slam dunk given what I've read in the publicly known information about this case, although many folks that sit on the various preliminary evaluation board might give this person the benefit of the doubt and might force Yelp to take it to court. However, it seems like a loser case to me on both side (the employee probably won't win and Yelp is getting all the bad press over this).

      On the other hand, if the employee in question, instead of publishing an open letter to the CEO, attempted to start a union or collective bargaining by contacting *other employees* and attempting to organizing them, that employee would certainly have the support of existing laws.

      I suppose it's somewhat cliche that millennials think about themselves to the exclusion of others and spend so much time in the virtual world that they miss the obvious benefits of IRL social networks and interaction (what kind of shut-in begs for money writing on a whiteboard?). Live and learn, I guess. If you feel sorry for yourself all the time and think the *man* owns your life and you decide to be passive-aggressive instead of an activist, well maybe life will treat you the way you expect to be treated,..

    219. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, heard that one. What happens if the rich have private security and machine guns, then what? Then maybe it is the rabble huddled outside the city wall that isn't liking it much.

      If your position is, "don't leave us unhappy because we might get violent," don't be surprised when the corollary is, "Bring it on."

      And that is before even considering that when that few people have jobs, the jobs are being done by robots. They can probably build robots to kill advancing masses. This isn't the old days where there is no way to stop thousands of people with pitchforks.

      She may or may not "deserve" this or that based on your perception of the social contract, but does any reasonable interpretation of the existing social contract imply she deserves any of it from one company of her choosing? The fact is that if you've decided your employer sucks, it is time for you to go; the right thing is to quit, but if you want to abuse your employers trust and pretend to still be qualified for the job, it is up to you to keep your feelings under the radar. Because when you show contempt for your boss, they can (and really should) fire you with cause. This is well established in the courts; you have to want the job, not just the money, for it to be just and righteous to show up to work and clock in. If you don't like your boss, that is a real and legit reason for them not to trust you to do a good job.

      I do agree that if nothing is done, there will be conflict eventually. It is in the best interests of the working class to find political resolutions before their part of the economy collapses and they lose all bargaining power. Simply being angry will not continue to provide any sort of power, the way it does now.

    220. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, minimum wage in California is $10/hr.

    221. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      There is a subset of people who would agree with #4, with a straight face, and a sincere held belief, yes. Yes, yes there are people who believe that.

      I'm really in favor of a meritocracy. I'm quite fond of it. However, there's a Law of Diminishing Returns with everything, pretty much. My current thinking is that we should seriously consider a Universal Basic Wage as well as completely removing the minimum wage. We also should find a way to keep a good amount of power reserved to the individual States and even localities. Unfortunately, that too will have to be protected as it may result in concentrations of assets that end up making the system untenable. Yet reserving some powers to the State is an essential element and not to be overlooked.

      An example is, we really can't let something like San Fransisco become an enclave of wealth where those who want to actually work are forced to move. Doing so has too much potential to turn the rest into servitude. So, some rights must be reserved to the State. Well, ideally... I'm pretty sure? That's not the most articulate but, oh well.

      It's a near certainty that something has to give. At some point, and we can try to kick the can further down the road, we're going to have to figure this out. The longer the pressure builds, the greater concentration of force when the walls break.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    222. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you, first hand, that flipping burgers is a lot more labor-intensive that writing code. I make a lot more doing the latter than I did doing the former.

      I can walk into a job at McDonalds and be 95% productive and doing the job adequately and within expectations in about 20 minutes. A lot of McDonalds employees don't actually even flip burgers anymore, or fill cups or even measure and put fries in the oil and pull them out, that is automated now. There is a reason that job only pays minimum wage. Anyone willing to show up there in a uniform can do it.

      I am an IT infrastructure manager for a large international company. My actual work is simple and not what I get paid for. It is my knowledge and demonstrated ability to keep everything running, understand the business, and to move things forward to potentially save the company money or to provide us a competitive edge. It is not a job that someone with even doing what I do in another company could immediately come in and be productive in 20 minutes.

    223. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      What's stopping a little of Column A and a little of Common B? Might that be viable?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    224. Re:And this is...news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Another frightening far-leftist who is wholly willing to destroy our entire country so that her extreme political views can win. The "ruinous taxes" thing has been tried before by your kind. It didn't work. So why are you advocating it again? It's not going to work and it can't work. The only rational conclusion is that you know this, and simply wish to destroy us. This fits in quite nicely with far-left philosophy all around the world. I'm tempted to make a comparison to Hitler.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    225. Re:And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I'm in complete agreement with her being fired for embarrassing her employer and exposing their substandard wages

      And I salute here for exposing Yelps substandard wages for the area. Hopefully, they'll get the reputation they deserve and have trouble finding employment and lose some business.

      Your poor life choices was a stupid ad hominem attack and irritated me. It made me want to say angry things at you.

      But, I hope when you suffer for your particular poor life choices (which you will), that you get treated with sympathy and grace by those around you who are doing better at the time.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    226. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think any person should be able to afford to make it on their own, given good work ethic, no matter their skillset.

      That's a nice idea, but it's not true basically anywhere in the country, not universally anyway. Not even close. It's double-especially not true in cities lots of people want to live in, like San Francisco. There is only so much of it to go around, and if everyone could make it there, then they would have to live in one another's laps. That's pretty much already how it is for lots of people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    227. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Maybe she's an idiot for living in SF. But regardless, if that's what housing costs in SF, $2K/month ain't gonna cut it.

      She doesn't make enough money to live alone. I made more than twice what she made and I rented a room in someone else's house. Mind you, Paul Prince of 385 Nevada St. (he probably moved since) turned out to be a tweaker, which is excellent for the manager of a Toys R Us... but that's another story.

      I've known people in SF to live in a fucking glorified hallway for $500/mo. Like, people constantly walking through it, bed sectioned off from the room with a hanging sheet. If you have a crap job in SF that's what you do to survive. Don't like it? Don't move to SF. It's not viable if you're poor.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    228. Re: And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Flipping burgers is only more intensive in the moment.

      If you count the 4 to 8 years of training you have to prepare for writing code, the trade off is not so obvious.

      You will have to stay up 24-40 straight hours multiple times to meet deadlines for a coding degree. You will have to work nights, weekends, and holidays. When your hands hurt from typing, you will continue to type to meet deadline.

      On my last software project we had several divorces and five heart attacks out of a crew of 400. Not counting the "mystery contractor" who was hauled away unconcious from his desk and we never found out what happened to him. The young people from the contracting houses were walking around with double black eyes (not blue under the eyes-- literally purple black) from lack of sleep. Add in the constant pressure of being fired and losing everything if you fail to meet the unreasonable deadlines or.. if you just get unlucky.

      Coding can be extremely stressful work. Once you learn to flip burgers, you are set.

      Once you learn a software set, you are okay for maybe 6-10 years, then you must self-retrain and successfully get on another back breaking, hand killing project that leaves your arms in pain from tendenitus, screwed up shoulders and frozen muscles in order to jump to the new technology.

      Coding *COULD* be easy work, but it frequently isn't. Development projects are always on an unrealistic deadline. Maintenance programming isn't so bad tho.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    229. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When you're staring at the want ads, on line job sites, the newspaper jobs section and anything else you can think of to find a job because you graduated 5 months ago and you're still looking for something that pays more than minimum wage, you notice something very disturbing. There are literally thousands of job postings for minimum wage jobs, and almost no postings for anything that would be considered middle class or up (maybe 1 listing in 20).

      Yes, that's distressing. But minimum wage goes a lot farther in some places than others... It's bad everywhere, but it's horrible in expensive places like SF.

      Just because we have low unemployment doesn't mean that underemployment isn't rampant as hell.

      We don't have low unemployment. That's a lie. It's not a new lie, special to Obama; every president uses the same lie. When people are no longer eligible to receive unemployment benefits, they are no longer reported in the unemployment rate. Lots of people ran out of benefits without finding any job at all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    230. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they had dignity, they would still have it even if they were starving to death. They have shitty jobs because they have no dignity, and value money above self respect.

      And other people have the exact same job, and do have dignity, and do have self respect, and they have that job because they wanted it, not because they couldn't find where to stand for a bag of money to land on their head.

      I swear, man... I've been homeless, and if you go to a homeless shelter or soup kitchen very few of the people there have this sort of sense of entitlement. At least half the homeless are going to be fighting against this revolution if you nutters ever organize. ;)

      Read the "open letter." It is just a kid who grows up and finds out the world isn't fair and there are no free ponies, and an English degree isn't actually useful unless you want to teach English, and then she blames her employer. Guess what? Writers don't prepare to be writers by getting an English degree. Now, maybe she has a legit gripe against her HS career counselor. Somebody should have pointed it out. If you want to work in "media," you need an art degree, a computer degree, a drama degree, maybe even meteorology. If you want to be a writer... there is no degree for that, you have to "go out in the world and live" and then "find your voice." English degrees are for teachers. It is really that simple. The don't even start teaching how to write until the 4th year. An English degree doesn't even prepare you to be an editor. So she finds a crap job, and she's shocked she would have to work a year in her starting position before having any chance to transfer. A whole year, omg that is like so long because I'm still a kid! Except, a year is a really short time in a job. If you don't even want the job you're taking, they're not going to promise to move you into a better job. You need to prove yourself in the first position, not act entitled and show disdain for the actual position that they hired you for.

      And for the record, if you starve a pack of wolves and throw them a steak, the alpha pair will eat it, and everybody else will sit back crying. They teach that in a different department than English, though.

      What kind of idiot takes a full time job that would only pay 80% of their rent, without having moved as soon as they knew they were taking the job? I thought even English majors had to pass algebra, and this is just arithmetic! I'm sure there is a word problem for this. There is no irony in not having enough money for food. There is only arithmetic in it. When it gets the BART part, we find out the truth; she's still too spoiled to move to a part of the bay area that she can afford. She probably doesn't want to give up her free time to spend it commuting on a bus. Welcome to the most expensive part of the country, why did you expect to live there at the start of your career... with an English degree?

    231. Re: And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are, indeed, much deeper problems, and the problems are that the minimum wage is still less than half what it should be, given the cost of living. San Francisco's minimum wage isn't even close to being a living wage. The proposed $15/hr minimum wage is barely enough in the South Bay, much less in SF. To illustrate, let me use Tennessee for comparison purposes. I'll show both rural and urban versions of Tennessee for maximum impact.

      TN minimum wage: $7.25/hr, $290.00/wk.
      After taxes: $239.72/wk.
      Minimal apartment (rural): $300/month, $75/wk
      Average commute: 7.5 miles each way, 15 miles round trip @ 25 MPG average = 0.6 gallons * $1.49/gal = 89.4 cents per day, $4.47/week
      Remaining money: $160.25/wk

      If you go with a city location in Tennessee, the apartment jumps to about $800/month,or $200/week. Remaining money is down to $35.25/week, which is just barely enough to survive, but it is possible to survive on minimum wage in Tennessee cities without sharing an apartment.

      Now contrast that with the Bay Area:

      CA minimum wage: $12.25/hr, $490/week
      After taxes: $381.41/week
      Minimal apartment: $1600/month, $400/week (unless you get really lucky and manage to find one of the tiny number of rent-controlled apartments out there)
      Average commute: 25 miles per day @ 25 MPG average = 1 gallon * $2.09/gal = $2.09 per day, $10.45/week
      Remaining money: -$29.04/wk

      So people making minimum wage in San Francisco, even with its $12.25 minimum wage have a substantially lower quality of life than people making $7.25 in Tennessee; it is actually plausible to have your own small apartment in rural Tennessee on minimum wage. It isn't even possible to pay for a basic studio apartment on minimum wage in San Francisco (again, unless you get lucky and find something under rent control with income restrictions, and these are few and far between).

      Worse, even if you double up in that Bay Area apartment, you still have only $170.96/week after taxes, shared apartment, and commuting. In an area where everything from food to electricity costs at least 20% more than in TN (and for electricity, up to 5x as much as in TN), you're in serious trouble if you're making only 7% more than somebody in TN making minimum wage.

      To calculate the minimum living wage, which I define as the level in which a Bay Area resident has the same standard of living as someone in Tennessee making the federal living wage, we can reverse that math. Assuming the average cost of goods is 20% more in California, you would need $192.30 ($160.25 * 1.2) per week after paying for a single apartment rent plus your typical commute cost to have a similar standard of living. $192.30 + $10.45 + $400 = $602.75 per week after taxes, which is a whopping $807.88 before taxes, or $20.20 per hour! So $12.25 per hour is nowhere close to a living wage. It is abject poverty.

      Basically, we need to bite the bullet, acknowledge that rent control doesn't work, and simultaneously eliminate rent control and raise the minimum wage for the entire Bay Area to at least $25/hour, adjusted annually for inflation. Not the $15 that has been proposed. $25. This will fix a lot of problems.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    232. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree wholeheartedly! People who make stupid decisions should not be able to live well after clawing back up from nothing!

      Oops so much for that 70% of new startups that fail.

      Oh, what hubris to assume "poor life choices" should equal "poor rest of a life". Consequences are one thing. Perpetual destitution is another. Bankruptcy exists for this PRECISE reason, yet it is of no benefit to one that can't afford rent in the first place.

      I am still flabbergasted that people don't see how different things are now than they were in the 70s, when opportunity meant building wealth by working hard. Now, it's enough to work hard, you must also work in the right profession. Can you not see this will tend toward certain professions and entire industries having a shortage of labor? "Ah," you say, "this means the wages will go up as demand increases!" Nice try, but as you say, unskilled people will pool resources and live 4 to a flat in order to have work at all. Eventually, when the systems collapse, we'll all realize just how much more vital docks, grocery, shipping, construction, manufacturing, and so many other workers are than IT security and Web administrators.

    233. Re: And this is...news? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      True, but in reality no one is that hard to replace in today's world.

    234. Re:And this is...news? by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Networking, networking, networking. Probably the single most important skill to develop. When interns and young folks ask me about important things to do at work, I always stress the importance of it. I'm a naturally fairly introverted person who tends towards keeping to myself and limiting contact, but I made a point of getting around my companies and getting to know people. What this meant was when I was ready to leave a company I'd been at for 12.5 years, I had a couple good options on the table already from people who had left prior. When my next job didn't work out after a couple months (CFO issues, not mine) I went from laid off on a Friday to interviewing the next week and starting an even better job the next Monday.

      This has its ups and downs - I'm pretty sure I'll never want for a decent job anywhere in this metro area I live. But my wife and I have discussed moving a few states away to be closer to her family, and the last time I tried it was difficult to get anyone to call me back that wasn't for an entry-level call center position (which granted was smack in the middle of the recession). It really sucks for new workers, people moving to a new area, and people maybe trying to make a career transition.

      As for the subject of the article, it sounds like there's something to be said for both sides. A year in jobs before moving around seems to be standard now, and everyone coming out of school has to pay their dues to prove they're capable and dependable people at least until they have the beginnings of a network and something to put on their resumes. There are tons of people who dabble in really funny Twitter accounts and freelance writing and I'm not sure that's enough to skip a step by itself. But if the basic financial details in the article are accurate, it sounds like Yelp may not be paying enough for the area. There's a fine but important line between living lean and having to make sacrifices, and literally starving in a freezing apartment. Plenty of unanswered questions for both sides though.

    235. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They posted the job at the offered wage. If not this rube, some other rube would have taken it. Many rubes DID, in fact, take the offer.

      If an offer is too good to be true, don't take it. Duh. But preying on clueless people is a crime in any other context.

    236. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a one bedroom apartment is $1245 where she lives, I'm sure she can find two bedroom apartments for $1800 or so that she could share and end up paying less rent and possibly less in utilities.

      How do you suggest that she qualify for that? That is $21,600 a year, and on her salary no landlord would ever qualify her for that. She is also probably stuck in a 12 month lease.

    237. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahaha! Haha! Ahaha!

      Gawd that was great. Hoo!

      Half your income is already being taken and you're arguing for another destitute mouth to take yet another slice instead of being a champion for better wages for those mouths.

      You sir, are the funniest fellow of the day.

    238. Re:And this is...news? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Forcibly taking people away from their families and friends and resettling them in an unfamiliar place is a violation of human rights

      Wow I thought most of the comments on this story were retarded, but you've just set the bar my friend.

    239. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just because their exist
      Just because their exists
      does not mean that their are

      Ever wondered what the basis for polack jokes was?

    240. Re:And this is...news? by Parafilmus · · Score: 3, Informative

      anyone who publicly points out that wages paid are too low to survive in San Francisco should get fired?

      Its not what she said. Its how she said it.

      Ms Jane's blog post included a link to her bosses' home address and a picture of his house. She shared it on twitter using the pseudonym Murderface.

      I don't want to dismiss her complaints. Her complaints are serious and Yelp would be foolish to ignore them.

      But if you were in charge of HR in this scenario, would you decide to keep an employee who uses the name Murderface and posts the bosses home address on her blog?

    241. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You missed the part where I no longer flip burgers and now write code for a living... I have for the past 13 years now. I know nobody living the fresh hell you describe; perhaps you should seek greener pastures.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    242. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      Indeed. How dare those fry cooks and convenience store clerks expect to remain alive?

    243. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet these people will be voting for Hillary if they bother to vote at all when what they really need to do is feel the Bern. The only candidate with a credible plan to help the working class is Bernie Sanders. Hillary is on the Wall Street payroll and the Republicans don't care about anyone who earns less than 100K per year. If the American people fail to elect Bernie Sanders, they deserve everything that's coming to them.

    244. Re:And this is...news? by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Choosing to live in a high cost metropolitan area is a life choice.

      Forcibly taking people away from their families and friends and resettling them in an unfamiliar place is a violation of human rights. Personally I would never choose to live in a high cost metro, but I couldn't tell someone whose roots are in one to just move. I can't see myself moving Bolivia so that my income will stretch further, so I can't ask anyone else to leave everything and everyone behind.

      There is an element of choice here. If your employer makes the choice to leave his current location and move to a high cost area then that is their choice and it is your choice to follow them to the new location even though your living costs will rise enormously. You also have the choice to quit and get a new job. If Yelp made the decision to set up shop in a place where the shitty wages they pay their people do not cover their living expenses then that's Yelp's choice. Personally I'd have elected to set up in some cheaper location where low wages stretch further so that things like this do not happen and if they did happen I'd try to take a course of action to resolve the matter that is not lifted from the pages of George Orwell's 1984 but Yelp must have their reasons for doing stupid things and displaying all the finesse of a bull in a china shop in their employee relations. I can't imagine what those reasons might be, perhaps Yelp's upper management got drunk one night and overdosed on Ayn Rand? ... I don't know, but I'm sure they have their reasons. Now the CEO of Yelp has responded by pointing out that the city of San Francisco must act to lower the cost of housing... but wait a minute.... isn't that socialism?

    245. Re: And this is...news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      So, highly-skilled, creative people have to make way for the hicks and rednecks? WTF? Look, one of the main selling points of being in a creative community is being away from uncreative cretins. It's an issue of people liking people who are like themselves. If you want to go live in a trailer park, then get out there and meet your coal-hearted neighbors. The rest of us, we want to find new solutions to society's problems.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    246. Re:And this is...news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I think Yelp is mismanaged and doomed

      I hope so.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    247. Re:And this is...news? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I would like to make three suggestions to the CEO of Yelp

      How hopelessly naive are you? Remember, this is Yelp we're talking about. You know, the glorified extortion racket? I gua-ran-fucking-tee the CEO is fully satisfied with his peons getting paid appallingly substandard wages, if indeed he didn't institute the policy personally!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    248. Re:And this is...news? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      She has to work somewhere, so why not Yelp, if they are hiring and paying $2 per hour more than McKFC Bell?

      How would working somewhere else change her argument, other than get it seen by fewer people?

    249. Re:And this is...news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Pay them now, or pay them later. Either way, nobody's going to get away with making the downtrodden a slave race for long.

      People who write letters like this are not the kinds of people who start a revolution. She might even be afraid of guns.
      These are the kinds of people who start revolutions.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    250. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The SF area is way past full employment, and nearly every company has vacancies that they are struggling to fill.

      No, they're not struggling to fill the places. They're struggling to fill them *cheaply*. Try doubling the wages. I bet you'll have no trouble filling them very fast.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    251. Re:And this is...news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      someone fresh out of college, with no marketable skills,

      If you get out of college with no marketable skills, you did it wrong.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    252. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an anarchist -- a socialist libertarian -- and I am amused at your own totally class-unconscious sense of entitlement, Bernie Sanders supporter. Want to make a few tweaks to capitalism with Bernie? That won't cut it. We need real change. If the lady has "learned something from the experience", hopefully it is to do with the immorality of a system that distributes wealth to a tightly chosen few and creates a hierarchy in which a few people control the lives of everyone downstream of them. Jam your Bernie Sanders 'liberalism' up your ass.

    253. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why doesn't she live w/ him

      Because she's a special snowflake, angry and bitter that she can't have the life that she wasn't promised and no prior generation led handed to her on a silver fucking platter.

    254. Re: And this is...news? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Look, one of the main selling points of being in a creative community is being away from uncreative cretins.

      Bullshit. If you find a 'creative community' that doesn't need or want services provided by low paid labour then feel free to give it as an example, but if the best you can manage is SF then you're talking about a bunch of very highly paid people who are absolutely fine being surrounded by people paid a fraction of their income to do things for them. There's a difference between choosing to associate with people like yourself and being sufficiently selfish that you feel entitled to 1%er income while getting dirt cheap services from people who can't afford healthcare or a decent place to live.

    255. Re:And this is...news? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Agreed. One of my former employers actually threatened to have me blacklisted. I'd *never* talk about them publicly (well, I'm doing it now, but not many people know who I am in real life). It's not worth it. I still have a great relationship with my last employer (much nicer, this last one) - essentially a standing offer to come back to work for them if I ever decide to pack up my current self-employment project. It's most definitely possible to remain on good terms with former employers, and it's just savvy in today's world, as you never know - things might change, and you may want to give them a second look. Or, you might find yourself working at a new place with former colleagues, as has happened to me on several occasions.

      Young people today have grown up sharing anything and everything about themselves online, and many of them are shocked when they learn there can be real-world repercussions for doing so when you have actual employers who care about their public image, and how you as an employee may reflect on that image. Yes, it's cathartic to be able to vent online, but doing so may have a cost. I'm not saying it's right or wrong - it's the way of the world today.

      I don't know the whole story, and I don't want to defend Yelp, but it certainly sounds like this young women hasn't made the wisest choices in her life recently either. I hope another employer gives her a chance, and I hope she takes the opportunity to reflect on her own actions and what she might have done differently as well.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    256. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I truly hope none of us here will express amazement that someone who criticized their employer, and blamed them for what are essentially her own poor life choices, got fired.

      This is how the real world works, jr. You are not owed, or entitled, to shit.

      It's not news in the US. American employment law allows employers to pretty much hire and fire at will.

      It would be big news in Europe though where employees have some rights. If this happened over here, she could be expecting to see a pretty hefty settlement check in the near future.

      I honestly don't know how Americans continue to put up with it. Sure, there are good reasons not to go too far in the opposite direction (companies do have a need to be able to drop underperforming staff or reduce their head count), but examples like this should be an open-and-shut case of abuse and should be penalised as such.

    257. Re: And this is...news? by mbone · · Score: 1

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook? Should it be a living wage to work in a convenience store?

      Do you want to eat in diners? Do you want to go to convenience stores? If so, the answer needs to be yes.

      I don't really know just what you mean by "pool their resources," but I suspect it means "get others to provide them with support so they can continue to live while doing their jobs." If so, that's what you, the customer of the diners and the convenience stores, should be doing.

    258. Re:And this is...news? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand how much effort and resources are spent on creating and maintaining the society in which you create and obtain from others. It's almost as if you don't comprehend the world in which you live, and assume it's all because you are so awesome. You are not an island, and taxes buy civilization.

    259. Re: And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I did. i'm retired now.

      I also flipped burgers at a Dairy Queen for 3 years. It was easy, fun work with a zero learning curve.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    260. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredibly, it seems that everyone is missing the point here.

      The point isn't about whether she's whining, or "entitled", or whether she should have said anything in public at all. It's also no about whether her wage was actuall sufficient, nor whether she should have been living somewhere cheaper.

      The actual point of this store is that she was fired without any notice, without even a discussion with her manager or with HR. As a business practice, that stinks. What it says to me is that their HR staff are incompetent and her boss is a coward. I'm sure they can make a great case for dismissal if they want to, but if they're not prepared to explain it to her face-to-face, then they should expect to see the pickforks on twitter.

      As the boss says, there are indeed always two sides to these stories; we don't know if she had a previously poor record or was on a final warning already, or anything like that. But the fact remains: If you're going to fire someone, you tell them about it in person.

    261. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      There's actually a very good reason for that. If you've ever been in a position where you need to hire somebody, the want ads almost always suck. The people that apply for jobs in the want ads just go work for the first person that will actually hire them, and will leave at the drop of a hat. They aren't high quality workers at all, which is why they make minimum wage.

      You have it backwards, the workers are crap BECAUSE they're making the minimum wage. If you offered them better wages and better working conditions, then they'd stay longer. You instead treat them like crap and sound almost aggreived that they repay the treatment in kind.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    262. Re:And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Oh come on man, every place I ever worked at said, you have to show you can do the job before you can get promoted to the job.

      You work as a lead before you are a lead. While a lead, you start doing the work of a manager before you can be a manager. And a lot of the time, you do the work without ever getting the promotion.

      I guess you never worked at a place like that. Maybe that behavior is regional.

      Your math is WAY off. There is no way $17/hr ends up being $8.15 per hour after state and local taxes.

      Perhaps she has a gender discrimination suit without realizing it.

      The take away is that Yelp may be a shitty work place with terrible communication skills that takes advantage of their employees. Welcome to 60% of businesses for the last two decades.

      A major problem is wealth inequality which allows those in the top 20% to "bid up" nice places like san francisco to the point that the bottom 40% really can't afford to live there any more.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    263. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I never said it was difficult, not fun, or that there as much to learn. I said it was labor-intensive. I guess Dairy Queen isn't known for burgers, though, so I see how you might not have experienced that part of the job.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    264. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Hell, I don't even bad-mouth my ex-employers in public, and there's one for which I still maintain a seething hatred.

      My former employer is a large university. They pull some nasty tricks on unsuspecting post-docs to save money at the expense of really, really screwing over early career researchers. I personally feel I have a duty to warn anyone in a similar position to the one I was in so that they don't get fucked over in the same way I was.

      It's just unprofessional to do so

      I'm not willing to sacrafice other people's careers on the alter of "professionalism" for a place that screwed me over.

      pretty much always out-of-line

      And this is why these places can get away with it: they've convinced people like you that somehow the onus is on you, the victim, to cover up their unethical behaviour.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    265. Re:And this is...news? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      A wage is supposed to cover the above items PLUS RENT.

      The above items did include "living inside shelter..."

      place that would allow her to get to work by Muni or BART

      I'm not sure about the SF area, but in lots of other places in the world, prices tend to go up once there is easy access to public transportation (and also if there's easy access to a freeway).

      So the only alternative would indeed be a rather time-consuming commute... Meaning that it's work-commute-bed. Without any time for any kind of leisure. But is that a life she'd like to live? We work to live, not the other way round.

      fetish for living in the cities

      Urm, maybe she lived in a big city, because that's where the F*ING job is... And it's entirely Yelp's choice to chose to establish itself in SF...

    266. Re:And this is...news? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You might enjoy reading this "open letter response".

      https://medium.com/@StefWillia...

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    267. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Err... where did the 'hicks and rednecks' come from? I really don't understand your post.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    268. Re: And this is...news? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      On another hand, that raises a question about how Yelp decided to open offices in an expensive area for employees they believe do not worth enough to be able to live there? Aren't they just some kind of assholes? I mean, it is perfectly understandable you want to pay low wages for some kind of work, however, in this case, shouldn't you pick a cheaper area in the country to build your office?

      The employer is not without responsability here.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    269. Re:And this is...news? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      In the true spirit of Yelp, they should give her money in order to make her comments more favorable.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    270. Re:And this is...news? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      But now that she has been fired, she can give Yelp bad Yelp.

      She can start a site reviewing different companies, become a millionaire from it, then pay her own customer services crap all and the cycle is complete.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    271. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is no lazy selfish thieving majority. There is a majority of people being screwed out of just compensation for their work because of conditions created by greedy selfish employers who think the world owes them cheap labor.

      There's a reason the middle class is gone in this country. Better yet, there's a reason why it existed in the first place. That reason was that the people demanded it exist through fair wages and good benefits. They did this through laws and through organizing, because organizing labor is every bit as important as organizing capital. Of course the capitalists don't like that part because they still believe labor should be free or very cheap.

      So now we have a population of what seems by election results to be about 50 percent brainwashed idiots who vote against their own interests, which perpetuates this race to the bottom.

      It's not people voting for minimum wage increases that increase rents in these metro areas btw, for the very simple reason that the insane rents preceded that. Also, back when wages and productivity had an actual correlation, you really didn't have this problem even though you had more money in the hands of more people.

      What causes this is the redistribution of wealth from the workers to the rich and the resulting speculative behavior as people seek return on piles of cash and landowners seek a way to get at those piles of cash. The internet doesn't help of course as in years past you didn't have national and international companies buying up property to lease out. It wasn't practical. Now it is, so Americans with their pitiful wages relative to the pre-Reagan years are also competing with foreign speculators for housing in their own neighborhoods.

      To blame this on workers who want a fraction of what their parents had in terms of wage to shelter price ratio is just stupid, but I imagine it's what keeps non-rich people who believe these myths from killing themselves.

    272. Re:And this is...news? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This woman was living in one of the most expensive areas in the country with no roommate and a minimum wage job and expected to make ends meet.

      Or look at it the other way around. Yelp is expecting people to live in one of the most expensive areas in the country on minimum wage and make ends meet.

      Perhaps Yelp should set up an office somewhere cheaper, if it wants to pay low wages. The real issue here is that there is always someone more desperate than you for that low pay job, willing to stretch a bit further, so it becomes a race to the bottom where companies pay just enough for a human being to sustain themselves. People do it for a while when they are healthy, become unhealthy due to the lifestyle and move on.

      The employer has too much power, there needs to be a rebalancing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    273. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a full-time job (or combination of multiple part-time jobs) fails to provide at least a reasonable standard of living, the employer is a leech on society.

    274. Re: And this is...news? by gcalvin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this recommendation. The text is available here.

    275. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a gay man, do you also pick your nose? Tell us that is soooo relevant in this discussion...

    276. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbshit, wont they move elsewhere?
      Why do you think there are suburbs and small towns?
      How did those people get there?

      How about South Africa? notice how the poor overthrew? you didn't? Oh that's right, that's not how it works in real life.

    277. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this communist Russia? Is she forced to work at that employer? does she have no choice in the matter?
      Can she not find another shit job somewhere else in the entire whole goddamn country?
      Are we going to complain that she cant afford to rent a place in the Hamptons on her shitty job wage?

      If you make less money you live in a less expensive place, Is she the only person of her wage in the company that cant make the numbers add up but are still there?
      What a bunch of retards!

      Are you a fucking myopic nit wit?

    278. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US anyway, think "medieval trade guild".

    279. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If they had dignity, they would still have it even if they were starving to death.

      It's hilarious to see a well fed person talking about dignity while starving to death.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    280. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Last sentence of my original post was "A hybrid system is possible". So yeah.

      A BIG of around $500/month per adult*, fedjob starting at somewhere around $5-10/hour. Yes, I'd increase pay for more skilled work. Sit on your bum - $500/month. Kinda doable if you get several roommates. Not intended to be generous. Still, when I was younger it would have been quite the safety net - "Screw, you, my biggest expense, rent, is covered if I can't stand this place anymore."

      Work full time for $5/hour, that's ~$833/month** in wages. Add in the BIG and it's 1,333, or $16k/year. Right on the federal poverty line for an individual. Very survivable in most areas of the USA with a roommate or two.

      Capable of more than sweeping floors(badly)? Get $10/hour, $26k/year. Not a bad living for helping out your fellow man. Plus, if a $10/hour fedjob is 'easy' to get, that puts a floor on what the businesses can offer. Also gives the feds incentive to keep minimum wage reasonable - they have to hire everybody UNDER it, after all.

      I'll note that I haven't addressed healthcare - I figure that if you're paying a BIG, you can cover basic healthcare as well.

      *Defining how you handle children is an extremely complex nut.
      **($5*40*50)/12. 52 gives $867, but meh.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    281. Re:And this is...news? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Every place I have ever known that employs a significant number of customer service reps was always looking for employees. If she was making that much less than the average wage for a customer service rep in the area, why didn't she get another job?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    282. Re: And this is...news? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Wait until the minimum wage is tied to inflation as a percentage. The circular logic will instantly set into motion hyper inflation.

      Buy metal. Start stacking.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    283. Re:And this is...news? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone live in a city that's reached critical mass? Supply and demand dictate these minimum wage earners would move out to areas where the COL is more friendly to them. I know that if I was making minimum wage, I sure as fuck wouldn't be living in SF. But then again, perhaps being smart enough to realize that is precisely why I don't earn minimum wage. Ok, granted, that was a dick-ish comment. Seriously though, if enough of these people start leaving SF, that city will have no choice but to increase wage levels, or they can fester in their own garbage, do their own cooking, and all-around any other job on their own that would normally cost the minimum wage.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    284. Re: And this is...news? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The majority of adults should be able to earn enough to support a family (partner + 2 children). The minimum wage should be somewhere below that, but not too far below.

      Note that "support" means "live in a reasonable size home for four people, with reasonable local facilities, basic car ownership, and comprehensive health insurance". That's the goal we should aim for.

      It doesn't all have to come from wages. Benefits for in-work people are acceptable too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    285. Re:And this is...news? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I moved a few years ago to an area with tons of start ups. I'm at my second one now, and I don't work for peanuts and options. I make a good wage and the options are icing on the cake.

    286. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, roman, not everyone can be the slave owner that you aspire to be. some people have to do business in the real world.

    287. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US violates half of that... why would they give a shit now

    288. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think you are going to be earning MORE money under anarchy?? lol. the masses have no choice, pick: bad or worse. being violent and stupid gains nothing.

    289. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay is correlated to how hard you are to replace.

      How hard they think you are to replace. "They" are typically too stupid or proud to realize how hard some people are to replace.

    290. Re: And this is...news? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2

      While I don't disagree with anything you're saying, you don't have to live in SF to work in SF. I used to live in Concord, in what is now a $1630 two bedroom single bath apartment. Not the most pleasant commute in the world, but certainly a lot closer to living wages if you can handle the BART ride. Even more so if you're doing telework most of the time and only go into the office a few days a week.

      This is a combination of bad wages and bad choices . Both should be fixed.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    291. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you going to do, bring in... democracy?? lol

    292. Re: And this is...news? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      " If you use a machine, you keep it powered and in good repair."

      You need to spend a few years as an IT consultant. Maybe the mule gets fed, but your story ends there.

    293. Re: And this is...news? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook?

      Yes, unless you don't mind eating at a place with dead people leaning on the grill. We expect businesses to pay the full cost of maintaining their equipment, why do you think they should pay less when that equipment is organic in nature?

    294. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What kind of idiot takes a full time job that would only pay 80% of their rent, without having moved as soon as they knew they were taking the job?"

      Amen.

      About 5 years ago (in my early 30s) I was in a similar situation, so I downsized to sharing a shithole apartment with a few friends, myself paying about $350/mo in a major US city. I had a spot on the floor for my sleeping bag and a box for my clothes, that was literally it.

      I never did think about writing a blog post bitching out my employer and calling out my bosses by name. I guess times have changed?

      Times were tough and I did what I had to do.

      (And btw girls didn't care I only had a sleeping bag, they thought it was funny)

    295. Re: And this is...news? by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      My current thinking is that we should seriously consider a Universal Basic Wage as well as completely removing the minimum wage.

      This has been tried before, and it failed miserably. It was known as the Speenhamland system, and provided the price of bread to anyone with a job. Employers rapidly realized they could pay people literally starvation wages and have the government make up the difference (much like Walmart and food stamps). Workers were desperate for any job, in order to qualify for assistance. The result was people working their asses off under deplorable conditions because, hey, you have to eat. "Basic income" is an extreme distortion of the labor market and just not a workable policy within a capitalist system.

      You can't let people starve in the street. You can't let the powerful abuse the powerless. The powerless - those masses of naive 20-somethings - will happily take jobs away from each other by accepting just a little lower wage. Unpaid internships are a real thing. If we're going to prevent employees from uniting into collective bargaining, then the next option for the individually powerless is to unite as an electorate and legislate a minimum wage.

    296. Re:And this is...news? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Her own damn blog or whatever that thing is has this as her tag line (emphasis mine):
      "talia jane

      comedy writing better at thinking about things than actually doing them"

      Was she actually good at her job? She certainly penned a nice letter but I would have fired her too, most likely, and I agree that she should be making more money. She admits to living off of the food they provide for their workers as snacks, amongst other questionable things she says. How long did she spend writing that? What about all the problems she caused herself by "I put a bunch of debt on a shiny new credit card to afford the move" after she admitted "I also desperately needed to leave where I was living".

      I'm all for taking risks in life. I constantly tell people to change one thing to make their lives better. In my experience that works out most of the time. When it doesn't, though, don't blame other people for your bad choices. I think, had this letter been more detail about the conditions of her work, and less about the bad choices she made (including accepting a job she was "desperate" for) she might have actually made headway. As it is, she sounds like someone with potential mental health issues (no employer wants to deal with that if they can avoid it) who also makes bad decisions and publicly announces those bad decisions because she thinks she's a writer.

      And she has the gall to plead for money too! I agree, she's not a revolutionary. At least not yet.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    297. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that adds up to the millenials being the first generation in US history to live a lower standard of living than their parents.

      Because they've been told that studying 6th century Hebrew poetry is a completely viable educational pursuit. I'm sorry, but this is not the fault of industry, it's the fault of the fucking parents.

      "Go ahead, little Timmy - you can be anything you want to be, and you'll just magically DESERVE a comfortable middle class lifestyle!" is not life guidance - it's a recipe for ensuring you're kid is an entitled, self-absorbed little shit who whines about how hard it is to make a living with an English degree while doing nothing to:
      a) Re-train yourself for a new job;
      b) Take a second job;
      c) Live somewhere more affordable;

      All of these are options, but instead, we get snarky posts on Medium and Reddit about how everybody "deserves" a comfortable life doing nothing but what they want, always.

      To quote Steven Crane:
      A man said to the universe:
      “Sir, I exist!”
      “However,” replied the universe,
      “The fact has not created in me
      A sense of obligation.”

      Do you think that the massive growth in the middle class back after WW2 happened because people wasted their time in college getting high and studying things that had no useful application in the outside world? Because I'm pretty sure that's what's happening now. Do you think my grandfather wanted to bust his ass working in a typesetting shop, which he eventually worked his way up to owning? I bet he would've had a lot more FUN drinking every night and chasing tail, but he didn't, because he understood that being a fucking adult involved a little bit of self-discipline and hard work.

      Fuck you and your whiny, narcisstic peers.

    298. Re:And this is...news? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what an overly entitled whiner, expecting to eat and be warm.

    299. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      If you get out of college with no marketable skills, you did it wrong.

      Yes, that's the point: she is doing a lot of things wrong, yet she still expects a better lifestyle than people who are making far better choices than her.

    300. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite to the contrary, she deserves a living wage because her parents and teachers told her that she was special.

      Don't forget that she's a woman, which means she is oppressed by the white male patriarchy. That patriarchy oppressed her so much that she decided to not go to college and major in something that would get her a better job.

      Maybe Silicon Valley companies should give her a special outreach program for her and put her ahead of some evil white males who actually went to college and earned their jobs.

    301. Re:And this is...news? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      I would like to make three suggestions to the CEO of Yelp:

              Compile a list of all the managers who approved those appallingly substandard wages.
              Fire all of them with cause for creating an appallingly abusive work environment and damaging Yelp's corporate image.
              Hire this girl to replace one of them.

      You seem to be under some sort of impression that CEOs in general, and specifically the CEO of Yelp, are good people who care about their employees.

      What in the world would have given you such an impression?

      CEOs get where they are because they are sociopaths who are able to fuck over the people who work for them as much as possible in the search for 'shareholder value'.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    302. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro, when I got out of college, I lived 60 miles from my workplace, and lived on ramen fucking noodles.

      My commute, into downtown Boston, was 60 minutes each way - assuming absolutely no traffic, and that I drove myself, and spent approximately $40 per day - about $5 in tolls each way, plus $20-30 to park, depending on the lot. If I took the commuter rail, I'd leave the house about 6:30 am, be into the office about 8:30 am - drive to train station, park, wait for train, take train, arrive at South Station, walk or subway up to my office building. I'd do the same thing starting at 5 pm, to arrive home around 7. At that job, I made ~ $22 / hr, when I sat down and calculated it out.

      On that salary, I had a nice apartment, a nice car, and money to pay off all my college loans. It meant I couldn't go out and spend hundreds of dollars every weekend in the city "having fun," but I had a solid, comfortable life, in a pretty expensive area of the world. I adjusted my expectations and my spending to match my means - I didn't demand that the world somehow adjust my means to match my expectations.

      I could have taken a job making about the same in San Francisco, or San Diego, or New York City - I had the job offers. I turned them down, because they didn't make sense. The problem is, nobody understands the notion of self-discipline and delayed gratification anymore.

      "Of course I should be able to afford to live in SF at the age of 25, with no marketable skills. I WANT TO."

    303. Re:And this is...news? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You did read the part where she said she "ran up debt on a credit card", and lives alone, right? She's "stuck" in an apartment because she won't make a decision to leave said apartment and get a roommate or two. Those are not her employer's decisions, they are hers.

      I've made bad choices in my life. I've broken leases and lost 2 months of rent doing so but, in the end, I was better off. She would be too.

      Does she (and all the coworkers she mentioned) deserve a better wage? Probably. Is she going to get that by complaining about her own bad choices? Not a chance in hell.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    304. Re:And this is...news? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      When you're staring at the want ads, on line job sites, the newspaper jobs section and anything else you can think of to find a job because you graduated 5 months ago and you're still looking for something that pays more than minimum wage, you notice something very disturbing. There are literally thousands of job postings for minimum wage jobs, and almost no postings for anything that would be considered middle class or up (maybe 1 listing in 20).

      Yet those jobs do exist. Find out where and how they're filled.

      I know my employer attends job fairs, visits colleges and universities and recruits a lot of people into entry-level professional jobs. So do many other employers.

      They just don't use online job sites, newspaper jobs sections or the local job centre because by the time someone's looking there, the job's already been taken by someone that was more alert.

      Online job sites and recruitment agencies help fill the middle ranked positions, but not those for which we'd happily take on an inexperienced graduate.

    305. Re:And this is...news? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If ask any professional you'll ever meet about how they find their jobs, almost none of them will tell you they use any kind of job search. By far the best way is to network with people you know. You ask around if they know somebody who knows somebody, and when you draw that connection, you're likely to find a good quality job. Likewise, employers like these networks because they find good quality employees.

      That's total bollocks, especially in IT.

      A lot people get work that way, and as you progress up the ladder increasingly so, but far more people do not.

      Alternatively, recruiters like to do some spying at other companies and poach their talent.

      That's true, but doesn't address the entry level jobs for graduates. It's also less 'poach' and more 'harass in the vague hopes they might be stupid enough to apply for an entirely inappropriate job so that I can pick up some commission', but that's the recruitment industry for you.

    306. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1
      She lives in SF in her own apartment at a low paying job. This isn't a story about a living wage. This is about one naive girl who had a hissy fit online when she found out you have to work hard to get what you want.

      And before you respond with the being able to pay rent argument, you should add this caveat:

      At least enough to cover rent w/roommates, food, transportation to the job...

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    307. Re:And this is...news? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The daft thing is that if she was good at the job, she'd shine and get the chance to do more interesting things before changing role, and that would open a number of opportunities by the end of the year.

      If she just kept her head down and did the job, she'd get to learn about the company, the work available, the ways people apply for and get promotions or new roles.

      If she planned ahead she'd have realistic expectations on initial quality of life, compromises and trade-offs around disposable income, commute and house sharing.

      I'm not going to be judgemental though; my career planning at that age was 'ooh, a job. money! hmm, I have to share a house with three girls from the local dance college? This is awesome!'

      I could have done with a lot of guidance, insight and support when taking my job; looks like that's still a gap for current graduates too.

    308. Re:And this is...news? by phorm · · Score: 1

      As is basing the operations of your business in a high-cost metropolitan area. If it's good for the goose...

    309. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      A contract requires both people to agree

      Ive never agreed to any contract...... so stop... just stop

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    310. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      There is a faulty assumption in your argument, that a basic standard of living involves not having roommates. This woman in particular was living way above her means. If she lived in a shared apartment, she would have enough to get by on. Her standard of living would not be great, but what do you expect making minimum wage.

      As a side note, even at my first job at 15 at a fast food restaurant, I have never made minimum wage. They offered the minimum. I countered with a bit more and we met nicely in the middle. If you settle for minimum wage, you are settling for the kind of life it provides.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    311. Re: And this is...news? by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to hire a competent developer?

      --
      --fatboy
    312. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal basic wage... So, you are for increased taxes in exchange for the likely result that fewer people even attempt to work. This then begets another round of increased taxes to compensate for the unfactored increase in people not working. Then, those that can will either become a citizen of another country or otherwise give up US citizenship. (Note, the latter can be done without becoming a citizen of a foreign country. You simply lose certain rights & privileges like voting and, if I recall correctly, driving.)

    313. Re:And this is...news? by ranton · · Score: 1

      Or look at it the other way around. Yelp is expecting people to live in one of the most expensive areas in the country on minimum wage and make ends meet. Perhaps Yelp should set up an office somewhere cheaper, if it wants to pay low wages.

      Why shouldn't Yelp have entry level jobs in expensive areas so employees can build the skills and experience necessary for higher paid positions? It isn't like you can't live in the Bay area with $1600 per month in after tax income. You just can't live like this woman was trying to do, in the privacy of your own apartment. I don't even know anyone living in Chicago with under $80k salary trying to do the same.

      I'm not sure how hard it was to find roommates 20 years ago, but today its not much different than the effort it takes to find an apartment in the first place.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    314. Re: And this is...news? by cameronallanowens · · Score: 1

      Although I do agree with those that point out minimum wage is not a living wage in certain areas, she is blaming someone else for her poor life choices. Unfortunately she doesn't understand how the real world works. An undergraduate degree in English lit is barely more than a GED in the rest of the world so to think that she'd get paid to make "memes" about food is outrageous if not comical. Next to move to one of the most expensive cities in the USA without a relocation package, or on your own dime is insane and should have stopped her dead in her tracks of taking the job. Next she should have run the numbers and realized no way could she live off minimum wage in SAN FRANCISCO! So to blame yelp for her being a fool is just sad.

    315. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to ask for clarity. Do you mean that minimum wage should be set where only 1 working adult is needed to provide for the family of four, or is set at the level where 2 working adults are needed?

    316. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      complaining about not getting paid enough...when YOU AGREED TO THE PAY is different than complaining about unsafe working conditions. Please try and see that. we have enough stupid in this world

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    317. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      herkimeer county NY

      any more easy questions???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    318. Re:And this is...news? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're very clearly not a lawyer. Then again, neither am I, but I do know that publicly embarrassing your employer tends to be against the terms of employment at most companies, grounds for disciplinary action and frequently a cause for someone to cease employment.

      The only real question is whether they're sacked, resign or get paid off.

    319. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      its also true that families used to stick together and be one unit, not a group of individuals

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    320. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      she was an english major in school... she isnt restricted to SF

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    321. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      yeah... i am.... the lower their rate, the more I can keep (as an employee and a consumer)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    322. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no, choosing to live in the most expensive place in the country is a lifestyle choice, she could choose to live somewhere else (which is why I living in NY and moving to NC this year)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    323. Re:And this is...news? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      did anyone hold a gun to her head and say she had to live there or work there?

      If the answer is no (and it is) than yes, they were her choices

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    324. Re:And this is...news? by jcr · · Score: 1

      taxes buy civilization.

      Oh will you just fuck off with that stupid canard already? Taxes buy violence and destruction. Look at the 20th century, for fuck's sake.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    325. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how people are quick to defend the poor from being stereotyped (good behavior), but are usually the same people who stereotype the rich as selfish assholes who aren't "paying their fair share".

    326. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that is great, but Yelp wouldn't be paying that fucking terrible wage if people wouldn't agree to be hired for it. When I got my job 18 months ago, they wanted to pay me less than I was making at the time, and I told them that it wasn't worth it to me to give up 10 years of service and job security that was tight enough to keep me employed unless I set fire to the building, and they met my ask for salary because they wanted to hire me.

      If Yelp is paying the shittiest wage in the area for the type of work this woman is (was) doing, then she should be looking for another employer. Clearly Yelp isn't willing to listen to their employees when they give feedback, so those employees should move on to an organization that values their contributions. When Yelp suffers from the revolving door in their customer service department, and can't hire anyone for the position who has a clue, they'll either outsource and take a massive publicity and quality hit, or raise their wages (which they can pull a Wal-Mart and trumpet to the press about how they are being socially responsible, etc.)

      Yelp is a shitty company anyway with no moral fiber whatsoever, and I can't believe anyone is surprised by this.

    327. Re:And this is...news? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why most companies don't put call centers in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, etc. Why pay someone $25/hr to answer a phone and email in those places when you can pay half that for someone to do the same job at the same quality in Indianapolis, Phoenix, Atlanta, or Salt Lake?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    328. Re:And this is...news? by ranton · · Score: 1

      I think any person should be able to afford to make it on their own, given good work ethic, no matter their skillset.

      Making it on your own is a fantasy. No one makes it on their own. Society is necessary for anyone to live a modern lifestyle. Depending on where you lie on the socio-economic ladder, you may need to rely on society a little more or less than others. I have lived "on my own" working temp jobs for minimum wage and with a six figure salary at different times in my life, but one universal truth is I have relied on society for my quality of life my entire life. And so has everyone else.

      When you live on a minimum wage salary, part of relying on society is banding together with other people for acceptable living conditions.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    329. Re:And this is...news? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The problem is that that is impossible and/or illegal on the part of Yelp. The minimum wage in SF is $12.50 - you take home $10.25 after taxes. Where is she losing another $2? Is she calculating in her rent or transportation? At that rate she wouldn't even have to pay for medical insurance and any other insurances would be optional. Even if she was having a judgment against her wages, it would be fairly hard to have a judge agree to allow these to go below the areas minimum wage. I just don't understand how she got to that number.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    330. Re:And this is...news? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      She should consider (3), with said crimes not just to support her financial needs, but specifically politically directed at those who refuse to pay her a living wage, and those who rely on their product.

      If enough people did this, perhaps someone would wake up.

    331. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      I remember early in my career that having a roommate and driving a shitty car that had an electrical fire in it while I was driving it was a necessity, because I was early in my career and needed to do these things in order to not stack up debt and overdue notices. Does that mean that every employer I worked for were populated with assholes because they didn't offer a guy fresh out of college with practically no experience $40k/year?

      You do what you need to in order to get by. I worked my ass off to eventually afford to buy a new car, and then move to a better apartment, still with a roommate. Then when the roommate moved out, I was still working my ass off and was able to afford the place by myself. And eventually I was able to save up enough to buy a house. And on it goes.

      I had a girlfriend that was making decent money and owned her own home. She then had a confluence of legal expenses, her car engine throwing parts where they shouldn't be, ongoing medical expense from a chronic condition, and she just started her Ph D. program. She didn't bitch and whine about not making enough money - she did the math and considered renting a room in her house in order to make the math work. It's what people do.

      It's clear that Yelp is actually managed by assholes from this particular story. But this story doesn't cover the whole story - we have no insight whatsoever into if the woman who wrote the letter is making bad decisions and shifting blame to her employer.

    332. Re:And this is...news? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      You're spending almost double what she takes home after tax in an entire year on your rent. Kindly fuck off.

    333. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it was centrally planned economies in the Eastern Bloc from the 1920s to ~1991. What he's speaking of was known as a collective farm, or a kolkhoz, and it didn't work nearly as well as he says. People worked just hard enough to meet the centrally planned quota, and the regional administrators (whom the farmers hate and fear) set the quotas just right so that the farms could meet them without working that hard, because if your region falls short of it's quota, you are not a good administrator and you get a ticket to eastern Siberia to die working on the Road of Bones.

      It only takes several decades of that, and you get shortages and food lines. And revolution.

    334. Re: And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's fairly obvious that everyone should get paid a living wage somehow if you want the system to not collapse in on itself. If that means MGI/COLA, then that's what it means. (That's what I suspect, but I don't know everything.) It definitely means single-payer health care, because medical bills are still bankrupting Americans, and that's clearly not sustainable. But people obviously have to get enough money to live on, and if we're not going to get serious about public transportation that works for people then they also have to be able to live close to work. I for one would prefer better public transportation (as I keep saying, some kind of elevated PRT is my pick) but whatever society chooses is fine as long as it takes reality into account: three meals down, people start to pick up torches and pitchforks

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    335. Re: And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I happen to agree with you. My only alternative is, like I said, a guaranteed job program. Which tends to end up being more expensive and getting less work done than hiring people suited for the work that needs to be done and paying the rest welfare. It's complicated.

      No, it's not complicated, the decision is simple. Do what makes sense, and it's not that. Give people enough to live on, and if they want to have fancy stuff or do fancy things, then they can work. Most of us, I think, will choose to work most of the time, so that we can have more than the basics. And if not, at this rate, it won't be a problem anyway because the number of jobs is plummeting.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    336. Re:And this is...news? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
      3. Find a way to reduce expense.

      We don't know the whole story. Did she find it necessary to get a $4 coffee every morning that could have been avoided? Does she smoke, which is the closest thing you can get to literally burning your money ($7/pack in San Francisco)? Did she have roommate(s)? Etc.

      That being said, it's well known that Yelp is managed by asshats, so really neither the appalling salary, nor the reprehensible silent firing should shock anybody.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    337. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Right, and when that salary is not enough to live, she has two options
      1. Encourage them to offer her a higher salary
      2. Find a different job.

      She was carrying out 1

      Badmouthing your employer to the word does not encourage them to offer you a higher salary. It encourages them to show you the door.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    338. Re:And this is...news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    339. Re: And this is...news? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to find competent proprietary software?? ??

    340. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      someone fresh out of college, with no marketable skills,

      If you get out of college with no marketable skills, you did it wrong.

      To be fair, this is strongly encouraged by guidance counselors who are trying to fill classes. It's happened to me. You have to make fucking friends with them to get useful advice, which should be their job.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    341. Re:And this is...news? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      The more I see the less I care about her predicament.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    342. Re: And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And she was pointing out that the employer's expectations were unreasonable. What's good for the goose ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    343. Re: And this is...news? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Basically, we need to bite the bullet, acknowledge that rent control doesn't work, and simultaneously eliminate rent control and raise the minimum wage for the entire Bay Area to at least $25/hour, adjusted annually for inflation. Not the $15 that has been proposed. $25. This will fix a lot of problems.

      Better idea, just remove all the regulations. I'm not normally one of those liberal no-government types, but a series of expectations have lead to this situation:
      1. The expectation that you can live where you work.
      2. The expectation that employers can find labour where they are located.
      3. The expectation that it's all unfair so someone will take care of me.

      If you unravel it all it may lead to:
      1. Wages so low that people leave. -> Lower cost of housing.
      2. Companies struggling to get people because they're not around. -> Maintaining existing wages (it's unlikely they'll raise them) + the decentralisation of the Bay Area which caused the problem in the first place.

      These are tech companies for god's sake, not some mining company created employee village 500km from civilisation.

    344. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That sounds reasonable. We might allow some, minimal - it should be minimal (I think), local control over the basic wage. If they have a tax-base and a population that support the idea (again, Law of Diminishing Returns, the individual, the Commons, and all that) then they should be able to increase (probably not decrease) their basic income dollar amount.

      At the same time, we might need to ensure that the people with the power and money do not actually just raise the cost of living by an equal amount.

      It kind of negates the point if one could live on $500/mo and the new cost to maintain that same level is $1000/mo.

      It's an interesting thought exercise and thanks for making me ponder and hold my views up to scrutiny and refine them. I'm pretty sure it's a good idea to figure these things out before they reach the point where they're forced. I haven't been talking about it much but I'm running for office in my home state. It's a small position (State Senate) and I won't have any real power but I might be able to at least get people talking and thinking about it. It's going to come to a head, at some point, and there are many ways it can go - history suggests it may not be peaceful or go in the most ideal direction.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    345. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Then is the problem the employer for not upholding their end of the social contract or is it because minimal wage is too low?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    346. Re:And this is...news? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      30 Articles in that declaration of human rights and not one of them about being entitled to have someone pay you money to live in the most expensive part of the country? Did you link to the right article? We're talking about entitled little shits here, not some war refugee.

      Nothing in the Declaration of rights says that someone is entitled to claim money from an employer who doesn't want them.

    347. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What is the big deal have about posting their address on the Internet? It's already available through plenty of public records, and we even used to have these things called telephone books that gave not just your address, but your phone number too. Do you like living in a world of wimps who want to keep the illusion of their pretend-privacy rather than seeing how things really are?

      Posting the boss's home address is really, seriously, a non-issue in today's world. Anyone who wanted it could get it. Ditto with a picture of the house, thanks to google street view.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    348. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      We have enough stupid libtards who think that it's just fine to have a race to the bottom, and if you're on the bottom, too bad, you agreed to the pay and conditions, so shut your mouth because there's many others who are equally desperate.

      The hollowing out of huge sectors of many counties economies because of so-called "free trade agreements" is finally coming home to roost.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    349. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I suspect there's plenty of blame to go around. As I just mentioned in a reply to another poster, is the problem that they're not upholding their end of the social contract or is minimum wage too low? Sure, she has some culpability and some further reading indicates she might not be all that frugal and there might be some misinformation/biases being posted. That doesn't mean that this isn't a problem. I'm betting I can find people in her area that are working for less, probably quite a bit less.

      She was making (if the math is right about taxes in that area) about $10/hour as a customer support/sales rep, working the phones. That's not reasonable. No, seriously, that's not reasonable. Yes, yes I (the Libertarian) just said that's not reasonable. (Don't read more into that than what I said.)

      How do I base that? Someone in that position, in Maine, will make $9 to $14/hour. The median income in my home county is about $22,000. I think the poverty line is about $12,000. That's shit compared to a city, San Fran in particular, and probably should be higher. Yelp shares some of the culpability and needs to uphold their end of the social bargain if they want to be good citizens.

      I should probably explain something...

      Err... I'm not really an extremist or anything. I'm actually acutely aware that it's quite likely that a story has multiple sides and that society is a complex thing. I'm actually an old-school Libertarian who thinks Rand was an idiot and that anarchy or unregulated capitalism is borderline retarded. Believe it or not, most Libertarians hold similar views - we're just not the noisy ones. In fact, I'm not comfortable with the title but I'm a Socialist Libertarian. In Europe, I'd be a "Social Democrat." Unlike socialist, I used reason and logic to support and find my beliefs.

      I want a strong social safety net, reasonable health care, and education because that enables you to be able to use your liberties and appreciate your freedoms more. But, on a pragmatic level, society is a big thing and we're paying for those things already. If we pay for them in bulk, all the evidence shows that they're actually less expensive in the long-run. It's cheaper to feed you and give you a meaningful life than it is to warehouse you in a prison. It's cheaper to feed you than it is to hire goons to stop you from stealing my stuff. It's cheaper to educate you, give you gainful employment, and provide upward mobility avenues than it is to clean up after the mess you leave behind.

      Those are a royal you, not you in particular.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    350. Re:And this is...news? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Don't like it? Don't move to SF. It's not viable if you're poor.

      And yet people need to work in the service industry in SF.... but they shouldn't live there?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    351. Re:And this is...news? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What kind of idiot takes a full time job that would only pay 80% of their rent, without having moved as soon as they knew they were taking the job?

      An "idiot" that has been trying for months to find work and has realized that I even 80% is better than zero when their unemployment benefits run out, and has not been able to find anything better

    352. Re:And this is...news? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I hate to disparage a low-income employee's ability to do math, but I'm sure she just calculated that from take-home pay and ignore the fact she was probably getting hundreds of it back in a refund. Perhaps thousands, plus a huge credit, if she has children.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    353. Re: And this is...news? by wiggles · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. There are lots of options that don't involve any of those things --

      How about making it cheaper for employers to hire people by cutting the payroll tax?
      How about creating a climate of entrepreneurship which creates jobs?
      How about reducing the cost of living by eliminating expensive regulation?
      How about making it attractive to the private sector to start projects such as construction or the like that result in more and more jobs being created?

      There are lots of ways to get people out of poverty that don't involve giving people money.

      "In the only cases in which the masses have escaped from the kind of grinding poverty you’re talking about, the only cases in recorded history, are where they have had capitalism and largely free trade." --Milton Friedman

    354. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And yet people need to work in the service industry in SF.... but they shouldn't live there?

      If people go somewhere else to work then they will have to pay more. The price of a burger will go up, but it provably should.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    355. Re:And this is...news? by ranton · · Score: 1

      I am an anarchist -- a socialist libertarian -- and I am amused at your own totally class-unconscious sense of entitlement, Bernie Sanders supporter.

      Pray tell what my sense of entitlement is? To the best of my knowledge I am grateful for benefits I have had in my life, and do not feel I am entitled to anything. I have been poor enough to lose teeth because I couldn't afford a dentist and work in fast food so I could take expired food home to feed myself. I have also gotten my act together and worked hard to give my daughters an easier life. I was able to do this because society significantly helped me through minimum wage laws, unemployment payments, my parents who valued education (even when I wasn't listening), public schooling, and government backed college loans. It also required a lot of hard work on my part. I still have six figures worth of student loan debt to pay off, but thankfully have a six figure income to pay it off with.

      I also think society should do even more to help people out, but don't think anyone should just complain while they wait for more assistance. You still have to live in the real world while you are fighting for a better one. I would have preferred paid paternity leave so I didn't need to use over a year's worth of vacation time in a couple months, but I didn't childishly lambaste my employer because they don't offer it. I did what I had to do, while letting my employer know it is a perk I feel should be offered and making campaign donations to politicians who agree with me. Now it's my turn to be on the side of society helping people less fortunate than myself (not that I'm done receiving the benefits of our society).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    356. Re: And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      People in low-paying jobs don't pay anywhere near 1/3 of their pay in taxes. It's called progressive taxation because the more you earn, the higher the tax rate. Get a clue.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    357. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity: Are you under the impression that SF, for example, doesn't have fast food or other predominantly low-wage services within their high-rent area?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    358. Re:And this is...news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      To be fair, this is strongly encouraged by guidance counselors who are trying to fill classes.

      Yes. Never trust guidance counselors. If you're not paying them, they're not there to help you.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    359. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Never said that the examples I gave were all about her story. There are too many libtards out there who think that the minimum wage is a ripoff, living wages are only for those who somehow "deserve" it, and that anyone who tries to change things for the better is a whiner.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    360. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      English majors don't take algebra. Seriously, they take remedial math and are lucky to be able to do arithmetic when they graduate.

      But they (the non algebra taking people) are the 'well rounded' ones. Just ask them.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    361. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I've always backed labor. I'm Canadian, not American :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    362. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DNS-and-BIND is practicing a subtle bit of sarcasm, to assert that the people in San Francisco are snobs who would never deign to be around people working hard.

      After all, trailer park trash are just that, trash. Refined professionals don't need to associate with that ilk.

      It's actually a dig at San Franciscans.

    363. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking we're fast approaching the point where something has got to give. I'm loathe to add regulation but I'm not adverse to reasonable taxation and considering the options.

      Also, I'm not sure it's obvious? What if they *don't* work, will not work, or won't work hard enough to warrant paying a living wage? How do we account for them? They do exist - they are not a unicorn. I know some... They are not the majority, I don't think and my experiences suggest anything but that. But, they exist... Should you be able to work 20 hours at the game shop and making a living wage? Should the company be forced to pay you a living wage? How about if they only need someone for 20 hours a week? How about if they only need them for 10?

      So, I'm not sure it's obvious.

      I'm not against taxes or anything. I mentioned elsewhere, they can bump my taxes up a percentage point and I'd not only pay her overall tax burden (I did the math) but a single percentage point would cover a bunch of that same burden. Of course, if they took that extra percentage point then they'd probably spend it on a down-payment for a bomber but that's another problem for another day.

      But, do we make the convenience store pay a higher wage? What if, instead of employing someone for fewer hours or just minimum wage they decide that they can go a few more years before they close up and just retire? Those situations do exist, they *are* the "main street" that we talk about when comparing/contrasting with Wall Street. Is it really 'worth" a living wage to put in 20 hours at the game shop? (I'd suggest that such would be nice.)

      I keep going back to the UBI (Universal Basic Income). I really can't think of a better way to go about this but it has its own problems. I've listed some, as well as some precautions, and I'm really not able to think of a better solution at this time. Try as I might, I can't...

      Yes, yes I know that means my taxes go up. I don't have a problem with taxes. I have a problem with how they're spent. I'm out of posts again. :( So, I'll post as an AC. I'll leave this open in case you wanted to reply. No guarantees that I'll see it but I'll try to keep the tab open. 'Tis obviously KGIII. Nobody else types this much gibberish or quite like I.

    364. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So, people aren't allowed to post during breaks or lunch? Come on. And nowadays, pouring purple sauce on her taco being a preferred way to get in the mood for sex is pretty tame. As for the bourbon, was she drinking it on the job? If not, so what? (Though I imagine a job like that is enough to drive people to drink).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    365. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. "Not enough" doesn't turn into enough because you waited "months." BTW, months are very short time units. You'll understand when you're old enough.

      If she took the job for 2 weeks and quit to use the 1 paycheck for a bus ticket somewhere that isn't super-high-demand to live, that would make sense. Agreeing to do a job that literally can't support you, and then trying to actually do that job on that pay? No. That is straight idiotic. "Should not have received HS diploma because she didn't finish math" type stuff here.

    366. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utopian much? Deserves? Why is that exactly? What exactly is "the social contract"? If you are referring to Rousseau's work then I am unclear how a private company fits into that model. I get that it's cool these days to rage against those have more that you and scream about why you deserve more without doing anything to earn it - but that's not how it works kid.

      Instead of ranting about about how they deserve it, Jobs, Gates, Zuck and countless others I can name all decided to make something of themselves instead of feeling entitled.

    367. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Really nice places (or at least places where a lot of people want to live) pay less than equal cost of living shit holes (not saying Maine is).

      Because the place is a benefit and the employer knows it. It's why vacation destinations pay like shit.

      So for SF, coders get paid really well, because as a group they could give a shit about the location. But hipsters? They are luck to be paid at all in SF.

      Socialist libertarian doesn't really work. Socialist implies the government takes such a cut of the GDP that libertarian is practically impossible. Money corrupts and the rest is already written.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    368. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You should not start a family until you have skills. We don't want people to spend their lives flipping burgers. If they do, they fucked up.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    369. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww poor little millennial doesn't want to live in poverty.

      This is America bitch. We love having a huge class of poor starving people, working for the richest companies on the planet.

    370. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You've got a point - she'd be better off in jail than working for Yelp. No worries about how to get to and from work, or ending up homeless, or having to watch what she says about "da man", 3 meals a day ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    371. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's the 'creative' types.

      I've got an example of one. Tech writer waltzes into a project meeting, first week on the team. Announces that 'things will be better now that you have a creative person on the team'.

      What? He wrote bad instruction manuals for a product created by the rest of the people in the room (he was always too confused to understand). But he was the creative one because of how much acid he'd eaten. Truth be known, he had eaten less than some already there, just more recently (like that morning).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    372. Re:And this is...news? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      She made a lot of bad choices. She wanted to live in SF. Well guess what folks it is expensive to live in SF. She has a degree in English literature. Not exactly a high paying field. She did not want to be a teacher so she went to work at Yelp in customer support hoping to transfer to a different department and she is shocked that it would take at least a year.
      The fact that she thought that she could move out of customer support in less than a year shows she is clueless. She got the job and then rented an apartment that she could not afford betting on getting a different job at the same company that pays more?
      Really?
      Sorry but this in no way violates any social contract. She was not tricked or manipulated into taking that job. She did not have to move to the most expensive city in the US to live. She did not have to get a degree that does not pay all that well. She could have tired to get a job that paid better but she did not want it. She does not seem to have a roommate again that is her choice.
      Over all my advice to her is move to someplace cheaper and get a job that uses your degree that pays better than customer support.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    373. Re: And this is...news? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That works fine so long as there is a balance of power between employers and employees so that fair negotiation is possible. Unfortunately, out here in the real world there's a dramatic power imbalance in the employers favor - without a robust social safety net, which we do NOT currently have in the US*, employees need to take whatever job they can get to try to say alive, and employers seeking low-skill labor have no incentive not to exploit that mercilessly.

      *consider - if you're unemployed you can't even get food stamps unless you're actively looking for work, and risk losing your benefits if you turn down an offered job, no matter how unfair the wages.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    374. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we be setting FRY COOK as a minimal skill for living? That work is generally reserved for pimply faced youths while they live in moms basement.. Is SF going through a gen y-bother drought like other cities? Are there NOT enough HS students to fill those positions who DONT need it to live? What ever happened to growing up and being a productive member of society? No, fry cook isnt helping society in any way and is probably doing more harm than anything else than what ever good they can say they are doing.

    375. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that was a great read.

    376. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wan't encouragement, that was whining. Big difference.

    377. Re:And this is...news? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It's possible to move without hiring a moving company. I had a friend that was long-term unemployed, got a lead on a job in Florida, put the stuff he wanted into a shitbox 1980s Toyota Corolla and drove.

      He now lives where he wants, because he makes more than $150k a year, because he made a good decision, worked his ass off, and had a little bit of luck go his way after a long streak of not.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    378. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      SF is already there. 20+ years gone.

      Many of the complains about 'gentrification' are from trust fund kids who grew up there but who's trust fund no longer covers the cost of living in SF.

      To live in SF you need to be fairly rich or dirt poor 'living on the streets'. Their shit jobs have been filled by BART riders for decades. Working people could live in South SF, Oakland or as far as Benecia.

      For the east coast people: SF proper is Manhattan, Oakland is the Bronx, South SF is Queens, Marin county is the Hamptons.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    379. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You weren't alive in the 70s were you?

      Do you want to know how I can tell?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    380. Re:And this is...news? by Megol · · Score: 1

      It must be nice living in ones fantasy. Here in the real world it is much more complicated.

    381. Re:And this is...news? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Do you know what real despair is? I'm betting that you've never experienced it.... count yourself lucky.

      Of course not enough never turns into enough.... but even not enough is still better than being homeless.

      Obviously, a person with any sense will continue to look for additional (or better paying) work while they are working at a place where they aren't making enough to really meet their needs, but looking does not mean that one will necessarily find anytime soon... particularly when one is already employed and has their hours restricted by what their current employer is expecting.

      Presuming that anyone who would complain about being underemployed as somehow only brought upon themselves the fruit of their own labors is nothing less than veiled snobbery, and shows a distinct lack of compassion and awareness of the world around them.

    382. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      People aren't equipment. They have employers not owners.

      There is someone in charge of maintaining every person, it isn't there employer.

      If I'm in charge of maintaining something, then I'm in charge of it. Employees don't want that. Freedom is preferred. Even if that's the freedom to be dumb as a rock.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    383. Re:And this is...news? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Probably around the same time people accept that sometimes people do contribute to their own problems.

    384. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You keep saying that the system will collapse because the bottom feeders don't get benes, it's not true.

      There are kids just learning work skills, who aren't worth a living wage. If you demand they be paid that, they will never be hired at all.

      Any society can afford a % of losers. They are needed to motivate the others to strive. People too dim to get decent work skills aren't going to pull off a revolution.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    385. Re:And this is...news? by Megol · · Score: 1

      Im not saying you are wrong, im saying you are an asshole

      I'm a gay man who has wanted to live in SF for a couple of decades but never could afford it; that is, I could actually have paid for it out of my salary, but it would have cut sharply into my retirement savings, so I didn't do it. SF has been an expensive place for many decades, and you either have to be rich or foolish to live there.

      Here is a nice example of what I complained about yesterday: people that like to push irrelevant facts like their gender, sexuality, skin color, political leaning etc. into things where it ISN*T BLOODY RELEVANT!
      For that: FOAD shithead.

      The "assholes" are people like you and her who think that someone fresh out of college, with no marketable skills, somehow deserves their own apartment in San Francisco without roommates. Screw you and your selfish greed.

      I think your brain doesn't work very well - perhaps that why you can't afford to live in SF.

      See I can insult people too! The difference is that my insult actually may be relevant...

    386. Re:And this is...news? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It used to be that the minimum wage was $4.25 an hour (when I started working). Making $12.50 /hr before taxes was pretty good when I was fresh out of school.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    387. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You should really visit the Bay area once. Otherwise you will keep writing stupid shit like this.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    388. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its* verbosity

    389. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The shit job takers haven't lived in SF for decades. With the exception of young hipsters who learn like this bitch.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    390. Re:And this is...news? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It's not the only region. There's plenty of customer service jobs in Ohio, Indiana, etc. If she's restricting herself to the second most expensive city in the US, then she's going to have problems making ends meet, and that's just a fact.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    391. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I agree. It is hilarious to see somebody who has always been well fed, just presume that their dignity came from the extra meat on their bones. Those of us who have experienced hunger, those of us who grew up in poverty, those of us who know the value of a package of ramen noodles with dandelion leaves, those of us who have lived the experience know exactly what it means. People who presume that being hungry means you have no dignity, have no idea about either. People who presume that anybody who is hungry instantly disclaims any dignity and behaves in any random way like begging on corporate white boards with time that could have been spent applying for crap jobs that aren't at a startup, well they shouldn't even bring up dignity.

      People whose self-respect is associated with access to money or how they are seen by others have no self-respect, they have their personal illusion of other-respect, an entirely different consideration. But dignity has nothing to do with external factors; dignity is entirely internal. Dignity is your own sense that you have value, your own self respect. The person who is starving because they won't do something "beneath them" is proud of their choice, because that is the nature of dignity. Some people grow up with a lot of money and presume that dignity is just the absence of shame, but that's because they never needed it. Dignity isn't something you can whine about being denied to you. It is rather by not whining and taking personal responsibility that a person reaffirms their dignity.

      And, she's not even being starved. She's actually rather wealthy compared to people who are starving, and could feed herself and another person too just by moving to a rental she can afford, like one with a bunch of roommates. Well, she could have, because she imploded and lost her job. Will she understand the value of a dollar after the experience? One can hope. Will she figure out what dignity is? Very little chance of that happening for many years yet, it appears.

      Those of us who have experienced hunger know what dignity is the first time we're confronted with the question, "Do I care what I do to put food in my face?" People with dignity, the feeling of being worthy of respect, do care how they feed themselves. In the context of a starving man, it might simply be the difference between digging in a dumpster for food nobody is using compared to just standing around begging. If you go to a homeless shelter and get to know a few people, you'll find many of them are too dignified to beg, and find the practice abhorrent. Others don't mind begging because it is consentual, but consider doing an immoral job like telephone sales to be beneath contempt. And of course, many humans don't care what they do if somebody hands them a dollar. That is the value of dignity; most people don't have any.

      Dignity doesn't pay in dollars or donuts.

    392. Re:And this is...news? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      She knew what the job would pay when she took it.
      She knew what the rent was.
      Really?
      Sorry but she may need to get a roommate or more. Instead of her own apartment she may need to rent a room.
      The lifestyle choice is wanting to live in SF. Guess what? It is stupid expensive to live in SF. I really hope some of the tech scene decided that it is just to expensive and hard to stay in SF am start moving to other cities. You are already seeing it happen in Austin and Portland.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    393. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Clues are earned. Some are expensive.

      The clueless are a resource to be exploited. In the long run, it's for their own good. Someday it will click 'So that's what my dad was saying...'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    394. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      So here I am, 25-years old, balancing all sorts of debt and trying to pave a life for myself that doesn’t involve crying in the bathtub every week.

      I truly hope none of us here will express amazement that someone who criticized their employer, [...]

      You're not wrong, but its a pretty shitty attitude that you take towards someone who is barely an adult. I dislike millennials just as much as the next old guy, but you don't grasp that our schools, society, nor parents do not do shit towards raising their kids to be functioning adults. Sadly, all of our kids have been brainwashed to be consumer materialists, and only the bright ones come to realize that owning a car, under the thumb of a mortgage, or going into permanent debt slavery to pay for a college degree is not all its cracked up to be. What a shock, young adults don't care about buying cars and owning houses anymore. So yes, its not unusual for a 25 year old to be "clueless" enough to dare criticize her employment situation.

      If my job only payed me a net $8.15/hour, I would value whining at my boss over a shit sub-minimum wage job. (I don't value whining that much; just value a sub-minimum wage job less.) At that rate, her dreams of being an economically self-sufficient adult are pretty much a joke at that point. (On the other hand, she's actually working a better than minimum wage job, because I'm sure it would be less after FICA).

      Re:And this is...news?

      Society (and employers) have an ethical obligation to enable a "hard-working" employee to "make a living". Not fire them because you don't "like" what they're saying about their earning conditions. As much as I despise "the whining" and her spending/investment choices, I value that she descriptively made public her situation, because there are many people in her boat. Yes, this is a form of news. I haven't been in that situation for decades, and I'm sure I had an "easier" time of it, even after suffering the 1990's recession.

      In other words, you're a shithead for expressing contempt her situation, rather than showing a smidgen of compassion for what many young adults are experiencing right now.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    395. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      As long as you set aside money for heat during the summer.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    396. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At best they are Danegeld.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    397. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try living in San Francisco on a minimum wage salary for a year and then comment. I understand your point, but a small percentage of San Francisco's population controls a majority of the wealth and treats the management of that wealth like a game. A residual to one person is the difference between eating and starving to another.

    398. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Depends. Does she have nice tits?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    399. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Here is a nice example of what I complained about yesterday: people that like to push irrelevant facts like their gender, sexuality, skin color, political leaning etc. into things where it ISN*T BLOODY RELEVANT!

      It is quite relevant, in that it explains my strong desire for living there, in the same way that Tania Jane explained that she wanted to live in the Bay Area because of her father.

      I think your brain doesn't work very well - perhaps that why you can't afford to live in SF.

      Actually, I was simply responding in the tone of the poster I was responding to, hence the quotes around "asshole".

      See I can insult people too! The difference is that my insult actually may be relevant...

      I'm afraid your insults are merely spurious and irrelevant, based on your inability to follow a simple conversation.

    400. Re:And this is...news? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being modded into oblivion, if you increase the supply of something and demand remains relatively constant, the price falls through the floor. The reality is that we've doubled the labor supply by having women enter the workforce. I agree that people who work should be able to make a living wage. But wouldn't be sold based on these arguments. Whether I'm sold or not, of course, doesn't matter. But I'm at least somewhat representative and the only heuristic that I have readily available. We've doubled the number of people in the workforce without increasing consumption. Our educational outcomes in the US are horrible partly because our culture doesn't value it.

    401. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      And? Is your point that these low-wage workers in high income areas should have the same standard of living as someone doing work that requires a degree or any level of thought or a skill?

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    402. Re:And this is...news? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Harrison County, OH it would be more than enough.

    403. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Guidance counselors are selling seats. Duh.

      Learning that basic lesson is very valuable. Everybody has an angle, until you know what their angle is, assume it's ripping you off somehow. (What is Sanders angle?)

      Would you buy a car based on a car salesman's advice? What if he was your 'friend'?

      I think kids need protection from scammers, not old folks.

      Anybody out there who didn't overpay for their very first car? OK first bought without the help of parents/older siblings etc.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    404. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I guess things are a bit different up here in my backwater... here even a 2 year degree will require passing algebra. That means English majors take 2 full years of math, because there a number of remedial classes between "HS minimum" and "the 1 college math class you have to work your way up to and pass."

      Maybe they do things differently in California. That said, the Californians that move here seem to all know how to count money just fine.

      When you say "well rounded" I think of the young woman who sat next to me in my college algebra class... she was studying manufacturing and had an "I like to party" keychain. Most people claiming to have had a "well rounded" education are setting it up for a "I partied a lot" joke, IME.

    405. Re:And this is...news? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      She is spending more than her total income on shelter. If you live in a place like SF, you have to accept that you rent a 2 bedroom / 1.5 bath and have four people living in it. That's why I don't live in SF. If you are a married couple with two kids this may not seem onerous. If you're single, you may not want to have three roommates for economic reasons. But that part is a choice.

    406. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you offered better wages, you would hire different people though.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    407. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      That being said, why can't we go back to the relationship where Employers were loyal to Employees,

      Because society rewards employers who aren't loyal to employees. That's why there are more psychopaths in CEO positions; they don't give a rat's ass about employee's living, and generate more profit margin by sucking away money from their wage slaves. Shareholders then proceed to reward them with continued employment, usually with an increase in earnings.

      The only way you're going to encourage employers to be more "loyal" to employees is for society to impose laws on how businesses operate. There is a lot I don't like about how gov't does this in France, but some of it works well in Germany. Japanese society is probably close to an ideal model for what you are talking about. Employers are showing loyalty towards their employees to the point its resulting in the financial destruction of their huge corporations.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    408. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The interesting number is: labor force participation rate * (1 - unemployment rate). That's the real % of people with jobs.

      It's a trickier number than unemployment though. Demographic shifts are seen and need to be thought about or it will lead to misunderstanding. Also the usual under-employed issues.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    409. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I haven't made a point yet, still trying to understand yours. Couldja answer my question?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    410. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If the Ds nominate the red, they will have only themselves to blame for president Trump/Rubio/Cruz.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    411. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intent of posting someone's personal information in such a manner is to loosely attempt to incite violence towards that person. Using a name such as "murderface" only adds to situation negatively, even if done in jest since tone, satire, and irony are hard to extract from short text, let alone an online handle.

      It's one thing to find a picture of Barbara Hudson's home on Google Maps on your own, but another entirely different thing to broadcast to a potentially unhinged audience that Barbara Hudson deserves retribution for X reason and provide information in the manner of "oh, they live at this location in case you are so inclined to physically act upon any of your feelings." That becomes an attempt to direct mob justice at someone while feigning innocence.

    412. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      High School students are in class while these restraunts are open. So... no, there aren't enough.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    413. Re:And this is...news? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      What skills? She's an English major. She's doing customer support and wants to "make memes and twitter jokes about food". Do you really think the Bay Area is the only place you can do customer support or write things?

    414. Re: And this is...news? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Right, nobody in their right mind would deprive the equipment of oil, power, and shelter, it costs money when machines die.

    415. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone WILL ALWAYS BE FLIPPING BURGERS. Good god. The basic low level jobs will always be there. Are we going to start requiring multiple Master's degrees for an entry level office job?

    416. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's precisely the opposite. Real deprivation, oppression and hardship motivate people to walk across hot deserts or make boats out of anything they can find to get the hell out of where they are in search of something better.

    417. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      "fewer people", not "less people". You use fewer when it's a countable number, and less when it's not. "less milk in that cup" versus "fewer milliliters of milk in that cup".

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    418. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you are on /. and you're not in the top 20%, you are just a tourist looking in on the geeks.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    419. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Some employers trade on their 'cool' factor to sucker in young stupid kids to work for cheep.

      McKFC Bell pays more than that in SF. They have to or they couldn't stay staffed.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    420. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      The most soulless country on the face of the planet.

      Ha, good one. I mean, maybe that's true if you ignore most of Africa, most of the Middle East, large parts of SE Asia, some of Eastern Europe, and about half of South America.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    421. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's a nice place to visit. It's also a nice place to leave ASAP.

      Exactly like NYC.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    422. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't know what despair is, it is some sort of crap that pessimists go through when things predictably don't work out for them and their psychology doesn't provide a useful frame of mind. If you ever experience hunger and homelessness, maybe you'll feel despair, maybe you won't. Go live in a homeless shelter and I guarantee you, from experience, that most of the people there are not feeling despair. And an American who is not insane would have to be a reasoned idiot to go hungry; between food stamps and soup kitchens, nobody is going to starve to death, nobody is going to be in a situation worthy of despair. If they were stuck in an arid place with no food and little chance of help, knowing they were going to starve to death, OK, it is reasonable to despair. "Oh no, I don't have anything to eat because I'm not hungry enough yet to be at the soup kitchen when they serve dinner" is not cause for despair. It is just simple hunger. It is easily solved with or without a job, with or without being productive at anything. Find me a starving person and I'll find you a person who sold their food stamps for drugs. Their despair is not related to food access.

      When I was 14 and hadn't eaten anything but blackberries for over a month (!) I certainly didn't experience despair. The runs, yeah, that's the thing about fruit; it isn't a viable staple food.

      Not enough is not "better than being homeless," that is just whiny crap from people who don't understand what homelessness is. Not enough is not enough, so is homelessness. Having shelter over your head but not having nutrition is not complete; it is not better than having no shelter but having food. They are both incomplete. The short-term relative need for shelter varies by climate, but food is required to live, and a healthy diet is required to be healthy. If a job isn't going to meet your needs, it isn't going to meet your needs. Are your needs real needs, or inflated wants? In the essay, they are just inflated wants, not actual needs. Her inflated wants prevent her from meeting her financial needs on her own, so she spends a lot of time begging.

      Looking doesn't mean you'll find something, no. But being on a good path is the best way to get to a good place. Going down a path you expect to be a dead end is not reasonable, nor is it a temporary solution to anything. And she wasn't underemployed, she was over-spending. Underemployed are people working part time who need full time jobs, not people living alone (!) in the most expensive, highest-demand-to-live region in the country. There are probably supervisors among the people she complains about who live with roommates because money...

    423. Re: And this is...news? by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

      Take your lips off Ayn Rand's dead, but still thoroughly delusional ass. If, as an employer, your employees are not making a living wage, then you are stealing their time and my tax/charity money as we must make up the difference to prevent them fom starving or thieving.

      If, by and large, your employees are bordering on homelessness and starvation, your business is a burden on society.

    424. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here Here! Three cheers for reality. Yep I ate beans & rice for years after college, and lived in a place I could afford (read that as crappy). Then guess what? I saved for the life I wanted to live and then did. Not faking it while still in the budding years of my career, and crying because I remained broke.

      The one allowance I have for this person (and others like her), is that the constant push to consume, buy, accessorize, and prove your 'worth' by being in a lifestyle 'as seen on tv' is very seductive and hard to get away from. I wonder if she has learned anything to ward against that & preserve her future?

    425. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me give you a hypothetical - I'm sure I can find a real-world instance but let's just pretend, even if just for a minute...

      Let's say you own a diner and you and your spouse work there along with a couple of your kids. Now, you can expand, a little, and hire someone for 20 hours a week. You can't afford to pay them for 40 hours per week, they only give enough of an ROI to be worth 20 hours a week and no amount of expansion is going to help.

      Should you have to pay them enough to live on?

      I'm low on posts, there's a 50 post/day limit right now but they're going to change that. So, I'm going to post this as an AC. I'll check back to see if you replied. However, the world is not as black and white as you might think. Nor are your moral absolutes substantiated by facts. Prior to making assumptions, however, you should probably be aware that I actually support the idea of a universal basic income. I've made a whole bunch of posts in this thread - if you want to actually know my views instead of assuming them.

      So, should you get a living wage because the comic book shop needs help but can only afford help for 20 hours a week?

    426. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      Oh come on. You're not entitled to own a car at near minimum wage. You're not entitled to singly rent your apartment at a near minimum wage. Why the fuck is she subscribed to T-Mobile, when she could be operating out of tracfone/MNVO company? I probably only have a miniscule amount of phone usage compared to her, but I'm pretty much paying the equivalent of $7/month for my cellphone service. She just needs to find a better cellphone plan for her usage. Hell, she may even still be able to get a google phone number; operate off the wifi, the phone service part is free. Yes, the NSA and advertisers are all into the information she reveals over the phone, but she works for a social media company and probably does not want to keep available the future terrorist option. Guess what, if you're only making minimum wage, you're not entitled to spend on your credit card as if you earn more than minimum wage. She probably pays for cable TV along with her internet service. (Man, that pissed me off back in the mid-1990's. Living in the city, I cut cable TV at $45/month and learned that somehow people on welfare in NYC were able to retain it.)

      While I totally believe that our society is screwed up when people can't afford regular food, shelter, water and electricity on a "living" wage, she definitely comports herself as if she's "entitled" to more, even though she's basically a struggling, broke ass poor person who doesn't make optimal budgeting choices. You're not "entitled" to anything beyond not starving to death (and some form of shelter) in this American society. We probably tolerate a lot more economic injustice than we should. But we're not obliged to support a more comfortable lifestyle for working poor people who don't make practical spending decisions.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    427. Re:And this is...news? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Thank you for reading the Declaration.
      From you attitude, I can sense that I am wasting my time but someone else may find this useful.
      You are right. It doesn't say that entitled little shits have the right to claim money from an employer who doesn't want them.
      However, it does say:
      4. Servitude is prohibited and working for inadequate wages is servitude.
      5. No cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment... like not being able to earn enough money for food or shelter.
      22. This is very pertinent: "Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality." Here, also not being able to earn enough money for food and shelter is a violation.
      23. "(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
      (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
      (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
      (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
      25. (Probably most relevant) "(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
      (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

      I think that Yelp's (and many other companies) substandard wages are in violation of these rights.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    428. Re:And this is...news? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Except that your comment to which I first replied didn't address her situation specifically,,, your comment seemed to presume that nearly *anyone* who would find themselves in a position of being underemployed would somehow be guilty of the same level of self-entitlement as this partcular person.... you asked a question "what kind of idiot takes....?", which I took to be an open questioon. I answered that question... someone who has become desperate will take it because even not enough *IS* still better than nothing at all.... that not enough at least leaves the option open that one may be able to more easily find additional work that will eventually make up the difference more readily than they will find any single job that pays all of their expenses. I'm not suggesting that this was her case... there's sufficient evidence at hand in this matter to suggest that she wanted not just a life, but also a particular life *STYLE*, and I honestly don't have much sympathy for her in that respect.

      But just because she was a whiner, doesn't mean that anyone who says they aren't making enough to live off of is.... yet this seems to be the position you are taking. It is just not as often generally heard from the people that are sincerely trying to improve their own situation because they are too busy working their asses off to have any significant time to stop and complain about it. Speaking as one who has been there, that doesn't mean they don't, however.

    429. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bringing your sexuality into this because...?

      This ain't Tumblr / Twitter friend, you don't get Pokemon Opression Points for speaking "as a gay man."

      Or maybe you do. Whatever.

    430. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      They're teaching basic economic theory in high school? They didn't when I was there (a long time ago), and my district was at one point in the top 25 public schools in the nation. (Not that I agree with the Anonymous Coward's Libertarian contention...)

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    431. Re:And this is...news? by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder: how long until the Bay Area implodes due to the near-impossibility of service workers affording a life here? I'm living in Milpitas, which is supposedly a cheaper part of the bay, and a 2 bedroom apartment is still nearly $3k per month here. More cities are implementing rent control policies (to keep rent from jumping $500 or more per year, which is what has been happening), but it feels like it's too late for that to be effective. Once rent is $1k too much per month, it had might as well be $10k too much.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    432. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Usually, socialized countries accepting emigrants expect some level of financial assets before giving them a residency visa, and usually block out non-STEM emigrants by denying them a work visa.

      Even Canada is a little sketchy. You need $50K in liquid assets, but they're not aggressive about denying a work visa, particularly in the crappy, barren provinces. Makes me wonder what are the chances for an illegal immigrant to persevere there, as opposed to the US.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    433. Re:And this is...news? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Well, not a business as small as Yelp, anyway.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    434. Re:And this is...news? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I got curious and checked. Its only $12K, with a college degree. (Why was I thinking $50K...?)

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    435. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      Buy metal. Start stacking.

      This is where people make mistakes. You buy gold and get it in person, between paying retail and asseyment fees for selling it, you're never going to get your money back.

      Me, I buy lead, copper, and brass in prepackaged units, though I do some assembly myself as well.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    436. Re:And this is...news? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...Either way, nobody's going to get away with making the downtrodden a slave race for long.

      Not for long, eh?

      After the US managed to get themselves organized enough to draft a Constitution, it only took another fucking century to outlaw actual slavery, so yeah, this shouldn't take long...

    437. Re:And this is...news? by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying its a crime or something... but doesn't it kinda feel like a bridge-burning move?

      Taking it to the dude's home makes it personal. Makes it clear her grievance is with HIM rather than with the company.

      I'm not saying that's a bad thing. It sounds like the guy needs a wake-up call. I'd like to congratulate her for having the guts to give it to him.

      I can imagine the company firing her for publishing her story even if she hadn't gone there. Which would have been shitty of them.

      But the way it went down? Calling the boss out personally like that? It was awesome, but it feels more like quitting than being fired.

    438. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Googling "homonyms for polacks" but struck out.

      You might start here.

    439. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting how Obama supports jailing folks indefinitely with no charges...enshrined in the NDAA he signed.

      Stop being a useful idiot.

    440. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If you offered better wages, you would hire different people though.

      To some extent, but not completely. If people are treated like crap (crap pay, bad conditions), then they aren't going to bother doing a good job, they'll coast by on minimum effort at best. If you treat them like low worth, replacable workers, they'll treat the job like a low quality replacable job.

      I say at best because there's also an intresting psychological effect (can't remember the link, but I've also observed it personally) in that when people feel like they're being screwed by someone they're likely to feel justified in screwing over that person. So if the employees feel screwed over, they will act worse than merely not caring.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    441. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are pretty accurate comparisons. (I've spent time in both areas.) Though, I spent most of my time there a long time ago - and I've only been back for shorter visits a few times since. I also spent some time up in Torrence and over in Grass Valley.

      I'm not sure what we've gotta do but we've gotta do something - and the time is fast approaching that we need to seriously consider what we need to do lest natural forces decide for us. It's going to be a major societal issue and the only questions are when and what are we doing to prepare. It seems to be human nature to wait until it's a problem before giving it enough attention. Funny how that works. It also seems to make things more complicated, needlessly. But, I'm used to it... Nobody listens to KGIII. *nods*

      I'm gonna post this as an AC. I'm low on posts - I was up late and babbling. Err... As you can likely see when you read the thread. If you do reply, thread it under something else if you wanna be sure I see it. It doesn't give notices for AC replies.

    442. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1
      Your question really wasn't deserving of an answer. You asked the following:

      Are you under the impression that SF, for example, doesn't have fast food or other predominantly low-wage services within their high-rent area?

      And being a sensible person, I don't think that.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    443. Re: And this is...news? by TetsuwanPenguin · · Score: 1

      Any job that requires full time labor MUST pay a 'living' wage. That wage will vary according to the local cost of living. If McDonalds can't afford to pay a living wage in an expensive area such as San Fransisco, then maybe they shouldn't open any franchises there, or should only hire part time labor (such as college students).

    444. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      People who presume that being hungry means you have no dignity,

      Wheeeeeeeee! It's a massive game of moooooove the goalposts!

      You said "starving to death". You've now gone and written a very long post about money, poverty and being hungry, not starving to death.

      So I say to that: whatever dude, I challenged your point and you've written a very long post defending a different point entirely.

      There is no dignity in starving to death.

      But dignity has nothing to do with external factors

      Except that external factors affect internal ones. Sufficient external factors will break almost anyone.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    445. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Local control(somewhat) is fine. The main problem is that our poorest areas can't afford something like this. Our richest areas need idiots who can't afford to live there to move out.

      At the same time, we might need to ensure that the people with the power and money do not actually just raise the cost of living by an equal amount.

      You can't charge what people don't have. Though yes, you'd have to continually 'tune' the benefit levels and ratios - my $500 month/$5/hour is just an estimate.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    446. Re: And this is...news? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The majority of adults should be able to earn enough to support a family (partner + 2 children). The minimum wage should be somewhere below that, but not too far below.

      Minimum wage is for those just entering the work force. It should be enough to support 1 person. Other than that, the government should engage in policies that tend to restrict the labor force somewhat. For example, don't subsidize child care. More parents chose to stay home, that's fewer people in the work force, households with a stay at home parent tend to be financially more efficient - they generally don't need as many vehicles, can shop more efficiently, cook more food and eat out less. Fewer people in the work force = more negotiating power for those that remain = more pay.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    447. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Milpitas is cheaper, not cheap. You're just over the coast range from half moon bay for fucks sake.

      Try East PaloAlto or Benicia. IIRC they just extended BART out almost to the Sacramento river delta. If you can't find cheap rent a short drive from there you aren't trying.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    448. Re:And this is...news? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think that Yelp's (and many other companies) substandard wages are in violation of these rights.

      I know right. I live in a penthouse apartment and I can't make ends meet on my $100k. My rights are violated.

      Sorry but your view is absolute utter garbage. All of the above are only related (even if ever so slightly) to this case because of the lifestyle choice that is living in one of the most expensive places in America. Quite frankly a lot of people have no problem living on less than this person was earning. This entitled twat was complaining about standard of living in San Fran-Fucking-Cisco.

      But I guess not affording my Ferrari is cruel and inhuman and deprives me from my dignity!

    449. Re:And this is...news? by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      Most people her age will have *around* %20 deducted in taxes, that is the same percentage I used for doing some quick math to estimate my paycheck within a few dollars of what it actually was back when I was her age. Using that method it is pretty clear she was making right around $10/hr, if not that dollar amount specifically. That was pretty typical for the starting wage of a shitty customer service job back in 2000/2001, looks like things have not improved. That said, a single person living on their own would have to be absolutely insane to accept a job like that in San Francisco or anywhere else in Silicon Valley. The only people that should be taking those jobs or illegal immigrants, high school students, and seniors looking to pad their social security income.

      Her real mistake was getting a degree in English Literature.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    450. Re: And this is...news? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There is a faulty assumption in your argument, that a basic standard of living involves not having roommates.

      That's not the assumption at all. The assumption is that a basic standard of living requires it to be possible to survive without having paying roommates. If you have a shared apartment, there's always the possibility of one person losing his/her job, and when that happens, the person making minimum wage should be making enough money to at least avoid becoming homeless.

      And there's always the possibility of being unable to find a roommate, as this girl found out.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    451. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      How much does glassdoor charge to hide the bad reviews?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    452. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Only a moron would try. That's the point. She is a moron and isn't worth what she was making.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    453. Re:And this is...news? by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      East Palo Alto seems to have gotten more expensive due to its proximity to Facebook. BART's also only useful if you work in SF or the North Bay. I work in Redwood, and from my research there's really nothing cheap short of a 2 hour commute from there. But I'm not the problem demographic; I'm an engineer, so my salary is heavily based on the cost of living. I'm more concerned about the people who aren't working cushy tech jobs.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    454. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Okay, so we've established that, for example, McDonalds and Wendys restaurants exist in San Fransisco. If they're undeserving of wages that cover things like rent, how do you propose they be manned?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    455. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1
      First of all, I'm not sure you read your own response

      That's not the assumption at all. The assumption is that a basic standard of living requires it to be possible...

      That's literally what I said the assumption was.

      Secondly, to think that every burger flipper in SF should have the ability to rent their own place is idiotic unto itself. There are too many people in too little a space. Something has to give. This could be solved by building taller buildings, but that's not likely to happen there, so they are stuck with finding roommates.

      Lastly, I lived with two other roommates while working on my first career. Two of us were pretty stable, but we swapped out the third room a few times. We never had a problem finding another person and we could float another month if we had to, because we were living within our means. That last bit is a key part of being an adult. If you don't believe me, take a look at Kanye West.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    456. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      They are undeserving of wages that cover things like their own apartment in SF. They need to understand what a budget is and live within their means, which includes finding people to live with.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    457. Re: And this is...news? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      So don't work for those greedy corporations. Clearly it's easy to become a millionaire and build a giant corporation. Then you can hire the entire world and pay a living wage and put those horrible greedy companies out of business.

    458. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Depends on if the equipment is 'done' anyhow. Then it can make sense to run it till it drops.

      Are you taking a pro-slavery stance?

      Because otherwise I don't get your point. Employers are not owners and should not be expected to act like they were. It is every individuals job to own themselves.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    459. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are always new kids to work the starter jobs.

      Absent being a 'tard, nobody should flip burgers their whole life. We sure shouldn't be setting social policy to serve the worst losers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    460. Re:And this is...news? by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Certainly where I am (Australia), graduates are finding it rather difficult to find a job in their field because currently industry has little interest in training and internally promoting staff. A lot of companies have a hire and fire mentality, and my perception of this is that they just want to get someone who has all the skills when they hire. I've seen plenty of job ads for junior positions with 5 years experience. Many of my colleagues have had to experience the senior staff being sacked, and the workload dumped on them, whilst still working in a junior capacity, obviously no promotion, no pay increase.

      A university education may give you skills, but the employers now have basically shifted the goalposts where the university degree is a formality, and they largely look at different criteria. So the degree, while necessary, isn't really important as it won't differentiate you from the other candidates. I don't know how different it is in other countries, but it seems that things aren't going real well here. Graduate employment is at its worst ever, and from what I read, things aren't looking to great for many graduates in the USA either.

    461. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They call it 'Algebra'. But if you look at the books it's a review of all the math they didn't learn in middle school. Culminating the the quadratic equation. Which they are expected to memorize, regurgitate and not understand.

      This was already the case 30 years ago when I graduated from a mid-western school. It certainly hasn't gotten better.

      2 full years of math for English? Perhaps, but that's 0 years of college level math, 2 years of middle school level math.

      We referred to the 'College Algebra' for liberal arts majors as Math 2+2 (it was Math 4).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    462. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > Socialist libertarian doesn't really work. Socialist implies the government takes such a cut of the GDP that libertarian is practically impossible. Money corrupts and the rest is already written.

      I have to politely disagree. The ideology that is Libertarianism is not tied to, for instance, a specific economic model. That and, I'm a bit loathe to use the term but it's the shortest way to explain it. There are things that could be interpreted as Socialist that I support. However, I used logic and reason to reach those conclusions and not some sort of emotional response.

      I'd also further the point by mentioning that Libertarianism is about the liberties of an individual as well as the obligations therein. It's right there in the title. If you're curious, there's actually a fine Wikipedia article on it. Read just the first four (or is it six?) paragraphs. They're short. They're pretty good. They're well worth a few minutes to read them.

      You'll have to present a better argument than that. ;-) You can't just say they don't work without providing some sort of argument - considering that I manage to hold these views simultaneously, have subjected them to critique and scrutiny, as well as having defended them successfully. We can have that conversation, if you want. I'd really stress a quick read of the opening part of the Wikipedia article prior to doing so. The whole article is pretty good, or was the last time I looked.

      Lots of people have some strange beliefs about what Libertarianism is. Ayn Rand was not a Libertarian (and she was an idiot). Rand Paul is not a Libertarian. In fact, trying to shoehorn those into the ideology is crazy and yet they seem to have managed to convince people that it is so - thus the definitions have been added to but nothing has been subtracted. I'm still very much a Libertarian - even though the moniker has been co-opted by people who really don't seem to understand the "liberty" aspect. You can often tell when they confuse the definitions of liberty and freedom.

      At any rate, I'd absolutely love to have this conversation with you - if you want to have it. We might have to agree on a few definitions first but once that's done, we should be good to go.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    463. Re:And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It becomes a vicious circle.

      They are paid shit because they are perceived as more or less useless unless watched every second. Of course they ARE 'useless unless watched every second'.

      Arguing which came first is 'chicken or the egg', end result is the same: Jobs nobody should want and employees nobody should want getting together.

      Your mistake is assuming they would be good workers in another environment. True in some cases, but mostly their attitude is what gets them fired from better jobs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    464. Re: And this is...news? by sjames · · Score: 1

      My point is that they treat human beings with less care and more disposable than mere machines.

      You act as if the want ads are packed with good jobs that pay living wages. They are not. The problem is that a market can only work when either side can freely walk away under unfavorable conditions. That was once true for labor, but starting with the enclosure it has steadily become a non-viable option.

    465. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misreading that. It was never said she didn't get enough to live. It was said she didn't get enough to live in the comfortable way she felt she deserved. Those are very different points.

      I would also say she wasn't carrying out an encouragement to offer a higher salary. She was ranting about how her entire situation was purely yelp's fault (no really, read the article, find a point in there where she's taking responsibility for any aspect of her situation as a result of her choices and not immediately foisting those on Yelp).

      There are real issues to be discussed, but Talia is a poor poster child for any of those issues.

    466. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      One is an owned asset, the other is an employee.

      They are not the same. The employee is responsible for him/her self. Employers can't control employees. You wouldn't like it if they tried.

      Every employee is free to walk away. You're just mad many don't have any good options. Life is like that, no effort, no options. Decisions have consequences. Don't major in English lit and bitch about not getting a good job.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    467. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Ah. So what happens when that's impractical because the rent is too high even when having a room mate? That's happening in my not-SF area of town.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    468. Re: And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The intent of posting someone's personal information in such a manner is to loosely attempt to incite violence towards that person.

      Ridiculous. Maybe it's about publicly shaming this guy - now his neighbors will know it's him and maybe give him an earful.

      Only an idiot takes phony user names seriously. (well, except in the case of anonymous cowards, who are aptly named).

      BTW, the last few times that SJWs complained about having their addresses posted on the internet, I posted mine. NOTHING has happened since. Don't be such a coward.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    469. Re: And this is...news? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Well, she did the degree thing, I don't imagine she sent a check for a dollar and got a diploma. It was even applicable to what she wants to do in life. It seems that once she got out there her employer moved the goalposts and that is part of her problem.

      You seem to have forgotten that the purpose of the economy is to serve the people, not the other way around. Personally, I'd like to see some of that general welfare promoting. It would probably ultimately benefit you as well, I can't imagine why you are so adamant to speak against your own interests.

    470. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Isn't firing someone already making it personal? And not paying your employees a living wage, isn't that kind of making it personal? Yelp already has a crappy image - it's not like she did them any real harm.

      And yes - it was awesome :-)

      All the libtards who go on about how she should just move somewhere else if she can't live on that wage fail to note that businesses DO move to cheaper places, then tell employees that if they want to take the transfer, they'll be paid less "because it costs less there." Look at IBM moving jobs to India as an example.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    471. Re: And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are kids just learning work skills, who aren't worth a living wage.

      That's nice. They are by far the minority of minimum wage earners. The majority of them are adults. This is not news, so why are you prevaricating by bringing up irrelevant shit?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    472. Re: And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I keep going back to the UBI (Universal Basic Income). I really can't think of a better way to go about this but it has its own problems. I've listed some, as well as some precautions, and I'm really not able to think of a better solution at this time. Try as I might, I can't...

      Yes, me neither. That in itself is not a complete argument for its implementation, nor is the need to address the issue somehow. Doing nothing, however, is clearly not an option, and nobody really has a better idea.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    473. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Learning that basic lesson is very valuable. Everybody has an angle, until you know what their angle is, assume it's ripping you off somehow. (What is Sanders angle?)

      His voting record suggests that he's trying to make the world a better place. Shocking and hard to believe, I know, but I prefer things like voting records over empty promises.

      I think kids need protection from scammers, not old folks.

      I agree. It's still sad that the college employs salespeople and is permitted to call them guidance counselors. I consider that to be fraud.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    474. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      She got a worthless degree, so what? If she had asked anyone outside the English lit department they would have told her. Horrible ROI.

      The economy serves people just fine. Witness all those people voting with their feet, leaving countries with everything you want to come to the USA without it.

      What would you have the employer do with this stupid bitch? Seriously? She's just firing material.

      Moved the goalposts? Where did she hear she would be able to afford bay area costs with a worthless degree? She should kick whoever told her that right in the balls/cunt.

      Her unreasonable expectations are not the employers problem (at least not anymore).

      Don't pretend to know my interests and I won't pretend to know yours.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    475. Re: And this is...news? by russotto · · Score: 1

      For the east coast people: SF proper is Manhattan, Oakland is the Bronx, South SF is Queens, Marin county is the Hamptons.

      I see the problem. No New Jersey for the real untouchables,

    476. Re:And this is...news? by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some entitled privileged girl "schooling" someone with no concept of their circumstances. She made assumptions that Talia was being helped by her family, which is a false assumption. Just because she could suckle from mom's teat until age 25 doesn't mean everyone can.

    477. Re:And this is...news? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      You're very clearly not a lawyer. Then again, neither am I, but I do know that publicly embarrassing your employer tends to be against the terms of employment at most companies, grounds for disciplinary action and frequently a cause for someone to cease employment.

      The only real question is whether they're sacked, resign or get paid off.

      You've very clearly never heard of Federal Whistleblower Protections.

    478. Re:And this is...news? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Usually, you have two people sign the lease. Heck, maybe her Dad can cosign for her--she moved here to be closer to him, after all.

    479. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like it? Don't move to SF. It's not viable if you're poor.

      And yet people need to work in the service industry in SF.... but they shouldn't live there?

      Funny you should say that. A lot of the people who worked in Aspen used to live in Aspen, but since skiing took off, [ro[erty taxes went through the roof, and none of them could afford to live there anymore. I doubt today ANYONE who works in Aspen lives there - they can't afford to.

    480. Re: And this is...news? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      While 33% is an overestimate, she still would be paying about 18-20% of her income in taxes at her salary level. The math about works out there. Though I didn't care enough to read her letter to determine if she was also including California's ridiculous sales tax in her calculation somehow.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    481. Re:And this is...news? by EricTheO · · Score: 0

      You are wrong! $8.50 an hour will not pay your bills in even the outlying, cheaper parts of the San Francisco Bay area. Companies should be held accountable for offering untenable wages in the market they expect their employee's to live and work. There have been titans of industry that actually had a social conscience and offered pay and perks above and beyond the normal compensation of the day. That compensation was not reserved just for those with college degrees.

      --
      -Eric
    482. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We don't have enough gainful employment for everyone."

      That's an interesting point. In that case, there are only a few solutions:

      Wages are - ultimately - tied to a fraction of your productivity. Sometimes that could be 1% and huge (for a big corporation and lots of automation) or 100% and paltry (imagine raising your own ... chickens!).

      Regardless, you need to question the PREMISE, not just accept it. Work is - generally - ILLEGAL. There are only a small subset of activies which you are legally permitted to perform. It is not a lack of GAINFUL employment (after all, if you're starving, you'd farm/hunt/gather and eat your output - after trading/bartering to round out your diet) at issue but a lack of NON-CRIMINAL employment.

      Most employment is outlawed because it competes with

      - the church (prostitution - and others)
      - big pharma (drugs)
      - big med (doctors)
      - unionize(coercive variety) labor (minimum wage)
      - lawyers (anyone who like to argue ... even for FREE)

      Yeah lots of reason why you don't want a homeless person performing surgery on you after giving you a toothless BJ. That's besides the point.

    483. Re:And this is...news? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Regardless, the point stands that it's really really hard to make minimum-wage in San Francisco, a place where most households make over 200 K. I hope she finds happiness elsewhere.

    484. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The working class has already lost all bargaining power. Globalization of the economy and the inevitable automation of the vast majority of jobs have made this inevitable and absolutely irreversible. The elite now holds all the cards. Since you need to work in order to live, you can either accept their terms or starve. End of discussion. Rebellion would be futile: what are you going to do when the elite can wield disproportionally greater forces? You would be wiped out in seconds. They don't need you anymore. You couldn't even coordinate without being detected in the modern Panopticon World.

      Now try to imagine for a moment you succeed (you cannot, ever) and overthrow the ruling class. Now what? You still live in a globalized world and there is still the Ruling Elite in all of those other countries still calling the shots and you don't have the skills or the power to run things. The downtrodded masses will keep being downtrodden, accept it. The class struggle is over and the One Percenters have won. We've had a window of opportunity between 1960 and 1990 to put a stop to this on our terms but we let it pass without acting in a coordinated manner all through the industrial world and now it's over.

    485. Re:And this is...news? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      She didn't badmouth them though. She announced what amount of money she was making. If the amount of money that they were paying her was embarrassing to them, then maybe they weren't paying her enough, even for their own peace of mind.

    486. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drinking and fornication with desert view sounds quite good... no reason you cant pick up other hobbies too

    487. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What kind of idiot takes a full time job that would only pay 80% of their rent, without having moved as soon as they knew they were taking the job?"

      And what kind of idiot complains to her CEO on Medium rather than contacting him privately or speaking to her direct boss?

    488. Re:And this is...news? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, I had heard of them, but clearly the federal protections are far more broad than I'd realised. It hadn't occurred to me that "your pay sucks and you leave out snacks on the wrong day" might fall under whistleblower protection laws.

      Here in the UK a tribunal wouldn't laugh in your face for an equivalent claim but only because we're far too polite.

    489. Re:And this is...news? by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      Turning your argument around - Yelp and other corps are not 'entitled' to cheap labor either. She should have had another job well lined up before she posted her rant, as it's obvious they barely cared about their employees to begin with, and I'm confident she signed a CA at some point. Hopefully, for her sake, the unemployment office doesn't care much about justified termination based on an breaking CA's. TLDR; Corporations are dicks, vote with your feet and GTFO. Then rant.

    490. Re:And this is...news? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      She didn't badmouth them though.

      That is quite frankly complete bullshit, and if you've read the letter and still think that, you are an idiot. She even addresses her boss by name... and address. There is no planet on which that is acceptable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    491. Re: And this is...news? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's option #4, and they rationalize it as not a failing of society to provide enough jobs, but as a failing of the individual to claw their way out of poverty.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    492. Re:And this is...news? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      OK, so assume that higher paid jobs have higher expectations (not unreasonable).

      I think it's a mix. Three are some people who are just a bit crap and will never do a great job regardless, need constant supervision and etc. They're always going to be on minimum wage jobs because they will not meet the expectations of higher paying jobs.

      However, I'd bet a substantial number of people in crappy jobs aren't like that. However they'll act like it in a minimum wage job.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    493. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Two common things that happen in this scenario are more housing gets built and people commute further.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    494. Re: And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      For someone who called out a false dichotomy, you then jumped right back into one. There's a huge gradation between "no consequences" and "unable to have an apartment of your own."

      And while you pay lip service to the idea that "not everyone made poor decisions", everything else in your post screams that's how you are judging her. How do you know she made poor decisions?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    495. Re:And this is...news? by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

      You should meet the homeless in montreal...

    496. Re:And this is...news? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it's insulting to the actual slaves in the world.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    497. Re:And this is...news? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of skilled jobs out there waiting to be filled at 20+/hour. I know plenty of highly paid welders that don't even have a GED. The problem is people going to college for 4 years and not just accumulating debt, but losing out on wages to gain no skills in demand at all. Then they expect to be able to get a job that requires no physical labor in a climate controlled environment with a regular schedule and no travel and be able to afford their own apartment in a major city. That is absurd. If you went to college for 4 years and you can only get a minimum wage job, that is your fault, not an employer's.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    498. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      What happens when that distance gets so far it's impractical?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    499. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why most companies don't put call centers in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, etc. Why pay someone $25/hr to answer a phone and email in those places when you can pay half that for someone to do the same job at the same quality in Indianapolis, Phoenix, Atlanta, or Salt Lake?

      Or in the case of Chicago that Chicago office is really about 30 miles away out in the suburbs.

    500. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think you're dreadfully confused. By my reading of my post, it's painfully clear there's a gradation and I'd like to know what, specifically, is in my post that is judging her? No, really... What's it that you're seeing because I just disassembled my post and not one part of your reply seems to be in response to anything I wrote.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    501. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      That is called a labor shortage, at which point the businesses have to raise base pay to ind people and then in turn increase the cost to the consumer (not really an issue in high income areas if you raise the price of a big mac from $5 to $6).

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    502. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Okie doke, with you so far. So what happens when the desperation to have any income at all, even if insufficient, means those jobs get filled and the prices never end up rising?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    503. Re: And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You offered two choices. People who make a shitty decision in life (work as a fry cook or convenience store clerk) can live in a shitty shared apartment in San Fransisco (or GTFO) or (and mocked) we can live in a totally equal (subtextually communist) state.

      Maybe I'm misreading what you wrote, but I read all those questions as not establishing gradation, but rhetorical devices used to draw a stark contrast between them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    504. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Libertarianism is, at it's core, about the government only doing the things that only government can do efficiently. Not anarchism, but minimum government required for a functional society. Courts, cops, military. Not much else at the federal level anyhow.

      I just don't think the government is the only entity that can do 50% (a fairly typical socialist tax rate) of the economic activity in a nation efficiently.

      The key problem with socialism is excessive concentration of power. Money is power. No entity can be trusted with 50% of a nations economy.

      I could support basic income. If it wasn't implemented until after we fired all the current government 'workers' it is supposed to replace. Otherwise I suspect the cost cutting part will never happen.

      I certainly don't trust Wikipedia about any political subjects. The article was likely written by a socialist.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    505. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > And no, not everyone has made poor choices - just not like everyone is in their situation through no fault of their own.

      And I didn't offer just two choices... I did *mention* one choice, pooling of resources and living frugally. There are many, many other choices - read on.

      Nor did I say anything about total equality, communism, or any specific living arraignments for everyone - though I did indicate that some people with particular circumstances might have to make those choices if they want to have a reasonably living standard.

      So, basically you didn't read my post, inserted any ol' thing you thought I might think - without any substantiation, and responded to that. Okay then... You might read the article, based on your username, but you might want to expand that to read the comments you're replying to. I'll try, really hard, to help you out.

      Expand the thread. Go ahead, you might have to load all comments now. CTRL + F > type "kgiii" and press Enter and then F3 a few times, taking care to read the posts.

      Why you'd read into my post things I did not say is kind of strange. What really baffles me is how you'd reach those conclusions.

      Err... I'm the guy who's recommending we consider something like Universal Basic Income. I'm sorry your ego is frail, I'm sorry you're injecting beliefs and views into things I did not say. I'm sorry you're into that conclusion jumping to thing. However, I can do nothing about those things. I can, on the other hand, point out the logical fallacies and point out that there are logical arguments to be made.

      Maybe, just maybe, that will help you out in the future but it appears your ego is too frail for that. Had I known, I'd have not bothered conversing with you. Duly noted.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    506. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Everything is good! They were wrong about what they thought was 'sufficient' and have learned to live cheaper.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    507. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Stockton to Bakersfield is New Jersey.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    508. Re:And this is...news? by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      not paying your employees a living wage, isn't that kind of making it personal?

      No. It really isn't. I'm sure it feels personal, but like ten percent of the city is earning minimum wage.

      That's what Ms Jane doesn't seem to realize: her experience is not unusual, its ordinary. Like super-ordinary. And both problem and solution are in the realm of public policy. San Franciscans raised the minimum wage a recently. Maybe they should raise it further.

      I think if she had focused her letter more specifically on the wage issue and made it a bit less personal, it would have been better received.

    509. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most kids are legal adults. This is not news...90% of statistics are lies.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    510. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL No, that's not Libertarianism. Libertarianism is about ensuring that the individual is most able to use their liberties to maximize their appreciation of their freedoms. It's right there in the title.

      Now, there are many ways to do this. One is minarchy, that's one proposal but one that tends to ignore the commons. The commons need to be protected because *everyone* (or at least ideally) should be able to best use their freedoms.

      Let's establish a few definitions - if they don't work for you then let me know. Freedom, liberty, and rights... You are free to kill me. You are not at liberty to kill me. If I'm trying to harm you, you have a right to kill me.

      A good example, "Give me liberty or give me death!" Note, he's not saying "give me freedom!" Freedom is taken by force. If you are in jail, you are not free. If you are in jail, you are not at liberty to go free. If you are released from jail, you have a right to go free.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    511. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So it's good that those that are, for example, working at Walmart and having to get gov't assistance... because they learned to live cheaper?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    512. Re: And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Okay, strange ad homenim with "frail ego." I freely admit I may have misread what you said. And certainly, I didn't recall that you advocated UBI in the past. That lack of memory is kinda expected with the number of people posting.

      I'm reading one reply you made to someone who suggested someone with no dependents should be able to support themselves on a single income. Only a single post. If you misspoke, that's fine. Or if I misread. That happens in a text only medium.

      But, you kinda have to clarify. You did "see a logical argument for both" which implies two choices. You did spend the rest of your post saying that not all work is equal, and shouldn't people have to face consequences for their poor choices (which you state is not everyone in the group of frycooks/clerks, but imply is the vast majority of it) You did say people in those jobs should pool resources and live frugally. And you did not offer a middle ground I would recognize.

      If you think I misread, I'd appreciate identifying which phrase you think i missed in the actual post we're talking about.

      NB, I'll grant you never said "communism". You said "Not all labor is equal. Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook [or] a convenience store? [Maybe instead] they have to pool their resources and live more frugally than someone who makes more than that? "

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    513. Re:And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Taxes buy violence and destruction. Look at the 20th century, for fuck's sake.

      Fucking highways, causing all those accidents. Stupid clean air and clean water, making all those criminals healthy. Damn anti-lead paint laws, keeping children from being retarded (better criminals). Stupid CHIP, keeping those criminals from dying when they're young (except the future white collar ones). Damn FDA, making it so I cannot even get a ground-up finger in my burger. Fucking FCC, making it so I can only hear one station when I tune my dial as opposed to 8 fighting. Stupid Tennessee Valley Authority, causing the South to have electricity (who needs it) or the Stupid Hoover Damn creating Vegas out of desert.

      And that stupid support of ARPAnet made all this cybercrime possible.

      But I grant you that US taxes in the 20th century made Europe democratic (WWI), defeated Hitler (WWII), kept S. Korea (our current #4 trading partner) free (Korean), and kept Saddam Hussien from taking over Kuwait (Gulf War). Yeah, I mean, 'Nam sucked, but other than that, it worked pretty well in the 20th century.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    514. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Then you have a homeless person. You keep asking what if questions and stretching and stretching, so how about one for you. What if we give everyone a hundred thousand dollars a year as the living wage?

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    515. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "She deserves a living wage, because if greedy imbeciles don't stop violating the social contract, they're not going to like it much when the masses turn to anarchy."

      Nobody DESERVES anything. You get what you work for. You decide to live in SF, you better bring a skill-set that pays with you.

      "Pay them now, or pay them later. Either way, nobody's going to get away with making the downtrodden a slave race for long."

      Ah yes, the proletariat will throw of the yoke of their masters. Or something like that. If we need work done, the wage will increase until the work is filled, and no higher. Minimum wages just result in unemployment and much extra work for those who remain employed. Or the company merely going out of business which also results in longer-term unemployment.

      Tinkering with the formulas of capitalism results in paradises like Cuba, the USSR, North Korea and more recently Venezuela.

      You can scream until you are blue in the mouth and you can no more change this can you can jump off a bridge and yell at gravity for being unforgiving.
       

    516. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I don't have an answer to that question, mainly because I've never proposed it. I can attempt to answer your question by saying I do believe a fair minimum wage needs to be set, but it doesn't work when taken to an extreme like you've described.

      As for my 'stretching', the question I've asked is not an extreme, it's really happening. So, in reeling you back to earth here, I want to ask: Were you aware that the step between unemployable and homeless is gov't assistance?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    517. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if they had paid attention in school, so they would be worth more.

      But given that we have a population of 'no skill' people, Walmart is about as good as they can expect.

      BTW the government is subsidizing the low skilled workers, not Walmart. If there was a supply of better workers business could make that work as well.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    518. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that, neither is Yelp owed anything. So people can get pissed off and Yelp's brand gets destroyed. Yelp is not owed silence. And if a bunch of people want to get together to cause a raucous because Yelp can't figure out that someone is only willing to give you his or her time if compensated fairly, then too bad.Yelp isn't a charity.

      That's how the real world works. There's a tipping point, and a bunch of executives in this world are really intent on driving off a cliff thinking because they don't think there is one.
       

    519. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What dark orifice did the Wikipedia author pull that one out of?

      'use their freedoms to maximize their appreciation of their freedoms'? WTF, that sounds like it was written by someone on acid.

      Seriously who did they get that from? Chomsky?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    520. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if they had paid attention in school, so they would be worth more.

      McDonalds won't pay you more if you have a Computer Science degree.

      BTW the government is subsidizing the low skilled workers, not Walmart.

      More like the gov't is subsidizing Wal Mart. Heh. You're in the position where you're exploiting workers and paying for it!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    521. Re: And this is...news? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Who decides whats 'fair'?

      Having been part of that system, its riddled with abuse. It caters to those that can file paperwork and just propagates communities to seek assistance instead of working. Those who still find themselves homeless are the ones who really need the benefits from this system because they tend to be the ones with mental deficiencies preventing them from being employed and even filing the paperwork to get government assistance. These programs (food stamps, section 8 housing, etc) are prime examples of the Cobra Effect.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    522. Re:And this is...news? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      1) I'd hardly call 25 "hardly an adult" ( although I would classify this particular 25 year old as "hardly an adult" given her sense of entitlement ).
      2) I am an asshole, yes. Your point? Here's the thing: Society cares even less than I do.
      3) Employers have absolutely NO obligation to do anything to/for their hard working employees. They have a whole HELL of a lot of encouragement, as good workers are worth their weight in gold, but they should be free to run their business however they wish.

      Likewise, employees have absolutely NO obligation to work for crappy employers.

      Freedom means consequence, suggesting we eliminate the consequence from the equation means getting rid of freedom ( for both employer AND employees ).

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    523. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Who decides whats 'fair'?

      I think that's a perfectly reasonable question, btw. I don't have the answer, either. I think it's addressed in many places, more than I can even count. There's minimum wage, there's benefits, there's rent control, etc, and plenty more I am unaware of. The one constant, though, is that these businesses aren't introducing part of the solution even though they require these people be successful to thrive. The only ones that have stepped up have done so for PR reasons.

      And I think the rest of your post is a fair point. But the reason I've been asking you these questions is I don't understand why you feel that scenario is preferable. Why place the whole burden on the workforce (and indirectly yourself personally)? Why are they expected to bleed yet not expect responsible behavior from these businesses?

      I'm not trying to annoy you, I'm just having trouble making it all line up in my head.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    524. Re:And this is...news? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Fucking highways

      Read and learn

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    525. Re: And this is...news? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Nobody's ever changed anyone's mind just because of a few pixels on the screen and most folks are not actually interested in holding their views up for scrutiny and changing them when new information comes to light.

      *raises hand* I have actually had my mind changed by something I read on the web; whether an article or poster on a site like slashdot. ;-)

        / see sig

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    526. Re: And this is...news? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Like most things, there are exceptions. ;-) Me? I've refined lots and lots of things, including my political views, based on conversations had online. It just doesn't seem like we're in the majority. It's like we're all afraid of being wrong or our egos are too big to admit it. No, I have no idea why humans are like that. The majority seem to fit that profile. It is unfortunate.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    527. Re:And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      So you're comparing reality to an idealized alternate history? And reality came out poorly? Shocking.

      Point of fact, there was a time without a highway system. Point of fact, it got built by the government. Point of fact, road transportation in the US improved when that happened.

      But, yeah, the free market could have done a better job, it just hadn't gotten around to it yet.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    528. Re: And this is...news? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Should it be a living wage to work as a fry cook?

      This is where we are going to argue.
      Everyone deserves a living wage. If you are able to work then you should have to work for it, but that does not mean that you should have to work three different jobs just to put a roof over your family's heads while still living in poverty. If you think otherwise then you are a truly fucked up person. Where the hell do you think the people working in those jobs are supposed to live anyway? Do you think they are going to live 50-100 miles away where they could possibly afford a tiny house in the middle of a slum and still afford enough decent food to be healthy? Well, they can't. They have to live in the same damn city they work in. Most of them couldn't afford a car even if they lived in that slum 100 miles away, much less the gas to get to the job. If you want there to be people flipping the burgers and manning the checkout then you have to fucking pay them enough to survive in the same damn city you want the damn burgers in.

    529. Re:And this is...news? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If she hadn't made it personal it wouldn't have been better received - it would have been ignored. Now we're talking about it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    530. Re:And this is...news? by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      She got a B.A. in English. Enough said.

      You think people with a BA in English are lower class? What an asshole you are mschuyler. Enough said, what's that supposed to mean? This person is a human being. Thousands of kids graduate with BA in English every year, yours could be next.

    531. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you think the rhetorical phrase, "what kind of idiot" is an attempt to " presume that nearly *anyone* blah blah" then you simply don't read English.

      You're welcome to ask about specific words if you want to ask in a constructive manner, but I'm not going to read past the part that intentionally and explicitly takes my comments out of the context and extends them to "*anyone*." That is just daft. You didn't try to understand what was said, so how can your comments possibly be a response to it?

    532. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, that isn't "moving the goalposts." I'll leave it up to you to do the counter-analysis. Just presume that my defense consists of only low-hanging fruit. It may be that people don't always repeat themselves word for word, but instead say additional words and that you're intended to take all of them as things that were said. ;)

      I meant all the things I said; I moved no goalposts by making additional comments. No comment I made was intended to refute, replace, or supersede my prior comments on the matter, nor did I make any statement that offered to scale back or revise prior comments.

    533. Re:And this is...news? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Okay, I read about 25 pages of what you suggested. I saw nothing other than repeated assertions that competition = magic fix-it force. Oh, and factual errors about how the current system works (even going so far as to not keep which government (federal/state/local) pays for what straight.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    534. Re:And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They don't just call it "algebra," they call it "college algebra," it refers to a very specific class. There are also a whole bunch of classes called "algebra" at these schools, but the term "college algebra" in American English refers to what our Universities call Math 111, and it is the (only and highest) algebra class that math majors would take, though obviously higher level classes delve into specific topics that are within the category "algebra." There is no general algebra above it that would be called "algebra."

      Maybe you went to a school without a strong math or engineering department, or you were in a time and State that didn't require "college algebra" for those degrees. Many 2 year degrees don't require anything above Math 064, which technically is "college prep."

      Typically, students who already took a Math 111-equivalent in HS will actually still need to take Math 094 (algebra refresher) before taking Math 111, because passing the test and remembering it a couple years later are different things.

      When people say "college algebra" they are not just saying the two words next to each other, it is a very specific class. If you're wondering about the material, here is a random quiz example that covers all the material they teach: http://www.pnc.edu/wp-content/...

      Math 004 is indeed where many students who took "regular HS math" will have to start; it is a remedial class that prepares students for remedial algebra prep. I don't know if that is the same as your "Math 4" but it certainly carries forwards the same "2+2" jokes. And yes, it is a full 2 years of math from there to Math 094, at which point they'll be ready to attempt Math 111. That's if they take 5 credits of math every term and pass every class. It will use up all their electives and probably guarantee 5 years to get their bachelors.

    535. Re:And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple shill and libertardianin. Makes sense.

    536. Re:And this is...news? by Megol · · Score: 1

      You don't get it do you? If someone think they should mention that they are heterosexual in a case where it doesn't matter I would react the same. Your sexuality isn't relevant, nor is your age, shoe sizes, color of your eyes (or skin for that matter). If it _was_ relevant to the topic if wouldn't complain nor care (or care more if it _really_ was relevant like discussing discrimination etc.).

      Just replace "I'm a gay man ..." with "I'm a black man ...", "I'm a girl ...", "I'm a fan of snakeskin boots ...", "I'm 1'6" and ...", "I'm a monster truck fan ...", "I wear only striped pants " etc.

      Getting it? Guess not. Marked you as a friend in the hope that irritates you. :P

    537. Re: And this is...news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong with anybody who has a CS degree and ends up working any McJob.

      Seriously wrong.

      I shouldn't have to explain that well educated people don't have to work Mcjobs. That is for liberal arts majors.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    538. Re: And this is...news? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have to explain that well educated people don't have to work Mcjobs.

      It happens, way more often than you'd realize. The term you're looking for is 'under-employed'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    539. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You don't get it do you? If someone think they should mention that they are heterosexual in a case where it doesn't matter I would react the same.

      I wasn't saying "I deserve to live in San Francisco because I am gay". I was saying "You say you deserve to live in San Francisco because (personal reason). Geez, other people have personal reasons too, for example (my personal reason), yet we don't demand that society/employers/whatever deliver us what we want on a silver platter." In different words, I agree that sexuality is irrelevant to whether an employer should accommodate my choice of domicile.

      Getting it? Guess not. Marked you as a friend in the hope that irritates you. :P

      I just use the red dot to mark fools. I don't care what fools think of me.

    540. Re: And this is...news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, you have a horrible job. Coding so much your fingers hurt? I think you should be the one writing an open letter to your boss. ( and I think you are confusing coding with data entry )

    541. Re: And this is...news? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Holy Crap, Dude, where on earth do you work? If I abused my development staff in this way they would all quit. You need to find another employer.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    542. Re: And this is...news? by Ororo · · Score: 1

      In the article she also talks about how her co-workers are having the same problems, though. Working additional jobs, barely able to eat a decent meal. Companies that can well afford to pay people enough to live on choose not to. I think a person should be able to work 40 hours a week and be able to have food, shelter and build up some savings.

    543. Re:And this is...news? by cubicleguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, the race to the bottom would have us all living with as many roommates as it takes that we can legally (or, maybe not) squeeze into a residence somewhere so as to be able to divide up the living expenses. The days of being able to afford life on one's own seem to be gone for good. The "two-income trap" (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003PJ6UKC/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?ie=UTF8&btkr=1) has us all by the throat.

    544. Re:And this is...news? by cubicleguy · · Score: 1

      She just wants to live the American Dream that she's been trained to believe in. For that matter, so does the rest of the world. http://www.fastcoexist.com/168...

    545. Re:And this is...news? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Yes, the race to the bottom would have us all living with as many roommates as it takes that we can legally (or, maybe not) squeeze into a residence somewhere so as to be able to divide up the living expenses. The days of being able to afford life on one's own seem to be gone for good.

      Ah, yes, the good old days, when anybody with a high school degree could just move into a 1000 sq ft condo in San Francisco or Manhattan on their union-negotiated salary, when there was no racism, and when women could enjoy complete equality yet live in single income households with their husbands, while taking care of the kids! If only the evil Republicans hadn't destroyed that idyllic 1950's worker's paradise! That's what you evidently believe.

      I have news for you: people entering the workforce have always had a tough time making ends meet, and they have always had to choose cheap living arrangements and often live with roommates.

    546. Re: And this is...news? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      So what? The most interesting part of your comment is that you don't seem to notice that it is just a logical fallacy. Or are you seriously arguing that a decision cannot be a poor one if other people also make the same decision? You make no point, and so what if you think "companies" "can afford" to hand you money? That has nothing to do with what their employment offer to you is. They could have more money, or less money, and their offer to you is the exact same offer, and the analysis of if it is an offer that would meet your needs is unchanged.

      That's nice that you think whatever you think. You probably don't even realize that I agree that people should be able to work 40 hours a week and have food. Actually, you should really re-read what you responded to because you missed the point by 180 degrees. You think it would be nice of they got those things as a handout; I say they should absolutely demand it, and if it isn't part of an offer, they should reject the offer. How are you going to hand out a living wage without requiring anything in return from the worker, even ethics? If they're not demanding fair pay, their ethics are too weak for them to even be able to claim that they'll do fair work. It is symmetrical; a good work ethic offers quality work for quality pay, it doesn't simply demand pay because the other party makes more or less profit.

    547. Re: And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the two buses of football players after the game who all ordered custom burgers.

      Even there it was just a matter of stepping up the pace for 20 minutes.

      At burger king, it's simply a matter of loading the burgers on a machine.

      At Fuddruckers, they are not exactly killing themselves. You put the meat on the burger and start the bread in the machine. If you are selling a large volume someone else is going to dress the bun and you simply put the cooked meat on the prepared burger. if you are selling a low volume, you'll dress the burger yourself while the burgers cook.

      I've worked at much harder manual labor jobs. making sepia blue prints was very intensive continuous work.

      The aspect of programming is you typically do not get a break if you are a developer (as opposed to a maintenance programmer or analyst).
      You just type and type and type and type. Debug. submit for testing and start typing on the next project.

      I do massage therapy on people disabled from typing these days. Some can't lift their arm above shoulder height due to pain (infra spinatus) and some can't put their hands in a keyboard position (extensors, flexors, and interosseous but sometimes opponens pollicus).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    548. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I never said it was the most labor intensove job, or even that it was particularly labor intensive to begin with, only that it is more labor intensive than programming, which is what I currently do for a living. Since it is what i currently do for a living, I don't need you to tell me what it's like, as I know first hand. If it's as bad for you as you describe, you're being abused, nobody I know in the field lives that life.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    549. Re:And this is...news? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      I live in "High Tax" Canada, and $8.15/hr after taxes (Federal Income Tax + Provincial Income Tax + Payroll Taxes) would be less than minimum wage ($10.50/Hr).

    550. Re: And this is...news? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well, realize that you are lucky because there are many programming jobs out there.

      Don't get me wrong- it pays well. You can retire early (I retired at 51) because the pay is high.

      It sounds like your work never has tight deadlines. That's very nice. In my experience, that's not typical.

      Programmers at the major contracting houses put in long hours. Programmers at consumer businesses put in long (and holiday) hours.
      Programming at new development companies is insane. I had a friend who had a bed in his office, which also had showers, and food was provided.
      On our big project, food was provided two meal a day and 7am to 9pm hours were typical. Around releases, hours were longer.

      I don't know about the defense industry. I always got the impression Nasa was a pretty cushy programming job. I'm sure there are easy programming jobs out there.

      Fast food was 2-3 hours of busy and 5 hours of mostly standing around doing light work. It's not really work to push 3 burgers around the grill unless you are counting standing up as hard work.

      OTH, at exxon, they have a lot of standing desks. Because people's backs are too messed up to sit any more.

      I'm sure some burger jobs are harder than others tho.

      Look, I agree your point has some validity. But I think you have a false impression of how hard IT work is for many in the field.

      http://www.geekwire.com/2012/f...
      "Facebook employees gripe about the long hours"

      https://www.glassdoor.com.au/R...
      "long hours, high stress"
      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      "For instance, a decade ago, during the Internet bubble, a book called "Death March" became a best seller. It documented how insane hours for programmers led to health issues. It concluded that poor project management was to blame.

      In 2004, coders actually sued Electronic Arts regarding overtime and won a $15 million settlement.

      Years later, in 2010, a story went viral from a woman married to a programmer who worked for Rockstar Games. It told how the company expected programmers to work 12-hour days/six days a week for months or years on end, damaging some programmers' health as a result of the strain."

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    551. Re: And this is...news? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are easy programming jobs out there.

      Ahh, there's the problem... You seem to be conflating labor-intensity with difficulty. I suspected as much and even tried to correct for that, but there it is.

      I do, in fact, have deadlines; however, I'm also the one who sets those deadlines, unless a business need for a specific feature dictates otherwise. I do realize that puts me in a unique position, but I'm not just speaking for myself here; of the hundreds of developers I communicate with on a regular basis, I know only a handful who work long hours on a regular basis. Interesting that you mention the nightmarish hell that is working for a contracting firm, as that's what those few actually do.

      As for flipping burgers, again, never said any of it was hard (though you underestimate the labor involved in flipping burgers for BK with your "just stick it in the machine" comment, the line workers actually assemble the sandwiches and nobody stops moving during their shift, except maybe the manager when they have to do their paperwork); it's easy work, but you're always moving. I'll remind you that the term labor does refer to physical activity; programming is definitely more mentally taxing than flipping burgers, but that was never what we were discussing.

      It may just be that the people I know work for companies that value quality over quantity (except for that handful who work for contract firms) and understand that letting their developers take the time to think about what they're doing before they write the code, they can get twice as much good, productive, code written in half the time. sure, overall 1/4-1/8 as much code gets written, but when you consider that 1/2-3/4 of the code not being written is code that would have been rewritten or discarded in the first place, well... it just makes sense to give developers the ability to control their stress levels and think through the problems you're asking them to solve. Maybe it's just that most of the developers I work with on a regular basis work for startups who seem to understand that fact.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    552. Re:And this is...news? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      doing customer support work (which is usually at least a couple of tiers above minimum wage).

      Customer support work is normally Indians getting 3 dollars an hours. Support work is absolute bottom of the barrel, not requiring any skills or even a physical presence.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    553. Re: And this is...news? by vakuona · · Score: 1

      There is a fifth way - the citizen's income.

      Every citizen gets an amount of money which, if they pool together with others, they can survive on. They can then go and find any gainful work that augments their income and they pay tax at the marginal rate. Calibrated correctly, this should get rid of most "welfare" while also having the benefit of removing the means tested mess that is most countries' benefit systems.

    554. Re: And this is...news? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, that's still option #2. Welfare for everybody without criteria to meet is still welfare (not that there's anything wrong with that).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    555. Re: And this is...news? by joppeknol · · Score: 1

      We don't have enough gainful employment for everyone.

      Last time I checked there are serious problems in the care of the elder. We need to make a transition from fossile-fuel based economy to more sustainable forms of energy. There is a climate problem. There are all kind of problems with immigrants and crime, There is an ISIS threatening the western world. More environmental problems. Then, I'm not talking about humanity needing to get off earth and find our way in to space. Science is also a thing that needs more work.

      What do you mean: 'We don't have enough employment for everyone?'

  2. She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Her code of conduct infractions were making sexual jokes comments online (I forget if they were in Yelp or not), posting about internal company stuff, etc. combined with complaining about her wages while Instagraming photos of drinking, comments about drug use, and complaining that she couldn't take he provided snacks home, complaining about wages while simultaneously talking about making eggs Benedict.

    Yeah, I'd love to see her get in front of a jury and talk about how she was fired for retaliation. She literally provided photographic evidence against her case.
    "So ma'am, you said in your oct 13th post that you were too poor to afford a loaf of bread, correct? And that it was unfair that you were not allowed to take a company provided break room loaf of bread home, correct? Can you read the text of your post dated xyz? How much does a bottle of that whiskey run these days? And can you read the post from xyz date? How much does a joint run these days? How much did you spend on the ingredients for eggs Benedict? Okay, so your rent was $1300, and your biweekly checks were $730, correct. So that leaves you $150:month for food and entertainment. In this one month you blew your entire budget on making yourself a brunch while high, correct? Now can you identify the signature on the Yelp code of conduct here? That's yours, correct? Can you read section whatever about drug use? Social media stuff? Would any of those things be consistent with those codes?

    1. Re:She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, you're going to post this stuff and not post any links? Come on, man!

    2. Re:She deserved it by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a crock. Sure you don't work for Yelp's HR department?

      Here's the post in question.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re: She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about transportation. $5+ each way to/from via public transportation, or $6 + gas each way, daily. Comes out to another $200 at least, which blows away that $150 "food and entertainment" budget doesn't it? And a joint is about $5. How dare she have one decent meal and relax with a joint occasionally! She should just survive off that bag of rice...

    4. Re:She deserved it by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      You need to cite sources or GTFO. Sock puppet!

    5. Re:She deserved it by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I see nothing of this. It's libellous.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post says she pays over $11/day for commute by train, and her last month's gas and electric bill was $120.

      I found it funny how the CEO says they're creating jobs in Arizona where they'll be paid the same rate as those in S.F. I don't think people in Arizona will have an issue with the rate discussed. Or maybe they'll squeak by. I don't know. I don't live in AZ to comment. If the CEO acknowledges cost of living is high in SF why don't he raise rates?

    7. Re:She deserved it by unixisc · · Score: 1

      One thing I'm not getting - what Technical Resource does Yelp need that they are more likely to find in the Bay Area than anywhere else, such as AZ?

    8. Re: She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links. Now.

    9. Re: She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on her twitter history you fucking idiot. What he said is true. You...do understand her online presence extends beyond a single Medium post right?

    10. Re:She deserved it by geoskd · · Score: 2

      Bunch of bullshit removed

      I have been doing a bunch of looking, since reading your post to see if I could find references to what you are speaking of.

      Based on my searches, I have several things to say to you. First, by posting what you did, in the manner that you did, without providing one shred of evidence, you have effectively engaged in libel. That kind of behavior has opened you up to a potential lawsuit. Given the daily readership of this site, coupled with the nature of your claims, I would say that if you have any assets to protect that you pray she does not become aware of your posts, or, if she does, that she doesn't subsequently contact an attorney.

      The second thing I have to say is: Fuck you asshole. That kind of shit being posted anonymously, is exactly the reason that our freedoms get eroded daily. Your apparent willingness to defame someone, and to try to protect yourself by doing it anonymously reflects badly on everyone here, and is just one more piece of ammunition in the hands of those that wish to strip us of our rights. If you can't control yourself enough to take part in an adult conversation about the larger issues without the need to spew bullshit into the conversation just to make yourself feel more important, then kindly leave, as you have nothing of value to contribute.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    11. Re:She deserved it by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      With many companies like Yelp? Venture capitol.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:She deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her code of conduct infractions were making sexual jokes comments online (I forget if they were in Yelp or not), posting about internal company stuff, etc. combined with complaining about her wages while Instagraming photos of drinking, comments about drug use, and complaining that she couldn't take he provided snacks home, complaining about wages while simultaneously talking about making eggs Benedict.

      Yeah, I'd love to see her get in front of a jury and talk about how she was fired for retaliation. She literally provided photographic evidence against her case.
      "So ma'am, you said in your oct 13th post that you were too poor to afford a loaf of bread, correct? And that it was unfair that you were not allowed to take a company provided break room loaf of bread home, correct? Can you read the text of your post dated xyz? How much does a bottle of that whiskey run these days? And can you read the post from xyz date? How much does a joint run these days? How much did you spend on the ingredients for eggs Benedict? Okay, so your rent was $1300, and your biweekly checks were $730, correct. So that leaves you $150:month for food and entertainment. In this one month you blew your entire budget on making yourself a brunch while high, correct? Now can you identify the signature on the Yelp code of conduct here? That's yours, correct? Can you read section whatever about drug use? Social media stuff? Would any of those things be consistent with those codes?

      This is not a troll post.

    13. Re:She deserved it by mark-t · · Score: 1

      There are also posts of her bragging about how she has booze on company property.

      Nothing like that in the article... where did you see this?

    14. Re:She deserved it by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Not parent but these were posted elsewhere in the thread:
      https://archive.is/AR4XX/image
      http://imgur.com/5WJFUAF

    15. Re:She deserved it by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. How does this prove that Talia was greedy, deceitful, and unworthy of a living wage? How does justify disparaging Talia for complaining/warning about her working conditions?

    16. Re: She deserved it by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The photo was NOT showing anyone drinking. It was an unopened bottle. Get the facts before making accusations. Do you know it wasn't a gift?
      The "sexual commentary" was both lame and tame by today's standards, and certainly not offensive unless you hate tacos.
      Eggs Benedict is NOT luxury. And english muffin topped with bacon and a poached egg, with some sauce on top, is hardly any fancier than an Egg McMuffin.
      Drug use off the company dime is not the company's business. This being San Francisco, I doubt all of Yelp's management would pass a pee test.
      She complained about not being able to take company food home because, like many of her co-workers, she's finding it impossible to make ends meet. Everyone hits the snacks, because nobody can afford to eat properly on their pay.

      So stop being such a suck-up to Yelp, a company that probably deserves to die sooner than later because of their shake-down business model.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  3. Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, are the yelpers going to rate yelp one star now?

  4. paging whiplash to yellow journalism aisle 3 by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has been covered elsewhere, and never with so much horseshit bias. No editorialization should be needed for news, which is why no one likes Bennet Hasslehoff either.

    Didn't we reject this nonsense about the time Glenn Beck refused to deny raping and murdering that girl?

    1. Re:paging whiplash to yellow journalism aisle 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly no. Based on the reporting bias things have always been editorialized in all forms of media for at least as long as "media" has existed.

      Here are a few of my favorite examples

      Whistleblower Snowden exposes government privacy violations / Traitor leaks classified information that jeopardizes US security capabilities
      Wikileaks exposes potential US human rights issues / war crimes / Wikileaks releases details putting US military troops in greater peril
      Clinton molesting an intern and lying about it to a grand jury / Clinton having a small fling as part of his personal life.
      Drunken Ted Kennedy kills girl and dumps car in river / Secret inquest determines Kennedy was driving negligently.

      Feel free to make up your own, here are some topics:
      Nixon
      Iran-Contra
      IRAQ / Revolutionary / Vietnam / Civil / pretty much any war
      Planned parenthood
      Boston Massacre
      Star Wars (empire vs rebels)

  5. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's the right way and the wrong way to do things. Did she have a beef with her employer? or with the cost of housing in the Bay Area? or with the level of minimum wage? or with a minimum wage that is not tied to regionally tied to housing costs?

    The wrong way to handle any of the above is to write an "open letter" to your CURRENT EMPLOYER and call them out.

    I feel for her and for all like her in the same situation, but this wasn't the way to handle it.

    1. Re:Well.... by pepsikid · · Score: 2

      The economics of this is something the employer should take seriously; if you're paying your employees so poorly that they literally have nothing to lose by calling you out, then it's gonna happen.

    2. Re:Well.... by Shoten · · Score: 1

      The economics of this is something the employer should take seriously; if you're paying your employees so poorly that they literally have nothing to lose by calling you out, then it's gonna happen.

      If she had nothing to lose, then why is she complaining that she lost it?

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    3. Re:Well.... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Why are you implying that she mustn't complain? What's wrong with complaining? It doesn't serve corporate purposes?

    4. Re:Well.... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Do you complain when you didn't lose something? "Damn it, I didn't get mugged or lose my car keys today!"

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A business will pay what people will accept, if there is no one who apply at the wage offered, the wage will increase to find workers. The first problem is that she is working in a highly taxed state, living alone in an apartment. An easy solution would be to share an apartment with a friend, or get married. Just get a gay marriage until you find a guy, that why you get more tax breaks.

      Just sharing an apartment would fix all the issues. So her rant is about now being able to live how she likes. An open letter like this will make it tough for her to find a new job, so yea, she has something to lose by doing this. A quick search by an employer will bring this open letter up, and they will not want to deal with someone like that.

    6. Re:Well.... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      What you're describing is ways Talia could have sacrificed further, and helped Yelp put off raising wages. Things she isn't obligated to endure. If she wants to live comfortably alone in a little apartment, there's no call for criticizing her. She was ready to break free, and so she did. Enough with all the pish-posh about Talia's style and the sympathy for Yelp. A little more pressure is on Yelp to raise wages now, and it's not unfair that this is so!

    7. Re:Well.... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      No one has said it's unfair except the girl who wrote the letter. She wrote a whining letter and is no continuing to whine about the consequences.

      Would a better salary have been reasonable given the national average for the same work. Absolutely. Did she deserve a better salary? Possibly, I don't know. From what I can tell she was trying to make up the difference in other ways but was unwilling to actually change her lifestyle to suit her income. To me that's just poor decision making and not worth all the hype here or anywhere else, no matter how much money she was making.

      People all over the world deal with their poor choices every day. She's just never had to actually deal with the consequences before, it seems. She'll learn a lesson (hopefully) and won't make the same decisions in the future. Just like we all do in our 20s.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    8. Re:Well.... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Let me get my head around this... you live in an alternate universe where you and every other human being except for Talia agree that her pay was not unfair? And here I thought it was me and millions of other sympathizers who you were bellowing on and on against. Well, since you consider the argument already won, I expect we won't hear from you again about this.

    9. Re:Well.... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you're talking about with this comment. I said no one has said Yelp shouldn't see this as pressure to up their wages. Whatever else you're referring to makes no sense whatsoever.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  6. Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And I am sure it had nothing to do with her getting alcohol delivered to her while at work or bragging about making sexual jokes to the companies twitter account. It's either quite a coincidence or she knew she was in trouble and wrote the letter to try and make the company look worse.

    1. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the only time the company cares about those infractions... well, its always a coincidence.

    2. Re:Might be other reasons... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Ya know what would get me to follow some corporation's boring twitter feed? Delightful little gems like Lady Murderface, that's what!

    3. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she was in trouble and wrote the letter to try and make the company look worse

      All that really matters is whether her open letter is true.

    4. Re:Might be other reasons... by aralin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most companies can make up this type of bullshit reasons for most of their employees. If I search your work laptop and browsing history, I am guaranteed to find worse than that...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    5. Re:Might be other reasons... by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I am sure it had nothing to do with her getting alcohol delivered to her while at work or bragging about making sexual jokes to the companies twitter account. It's either quite a coincidence or she knew she was in trouble and wrote the letter to try and make the company look worse.

      Wow...Bulleit bourbon, delivered to her at work. And she was supposedly poor?

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    6. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies can make up this type of bullshit reasons for most of their employees. If I search your work laptop and browsing history, I am guaranteed to find worse than that...

      Not unless you lie and plant it there, you twit. Don't assume everyone fucks around and does things they shouldn't on company time.

    7. Re:Might be other reasons... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Huh. Makes enough to have booze delivered to her at work, but not enough for food, heating or electricity.

      What a poor oppressed individual.

    8. Re:Might be other reasons... by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bulleit is pretty pedestrian. If she was getting fucking Pappy Van Winkle delivered to her at work, her claims of poverty would be harder to take.

      And did she actually drink it at work, or just have it delivered there? After all, it's bourbon, a legal product. It's not like she was getting an eightball of coke or a bunch of smack stamps form Silk Road delivered to the office.

    9. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulleit's not even good. Anyone from Kentucky would've had some Woodford Reserve delivered.

    10. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not hire anyone younger than 25, no young people today are willing to get their hands dirty. Lil' Princesses!

    11. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has gross troll hands

    12. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more surprising, you believe that obvious bullshit.

    13. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even when I was so poor that internet and a cellphone became unaffordable, I found a way to buy a similarly priced bottle every so often.

    14. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Because ordering the delivery of alcohol to a work office is a common thing, and posting sexist jokes on company assets have never being a reason to terminate somebody's employment.

      You have NEVER worked anywhere, haven't you?

    15. Re:Might be other reasons... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      At work we have weekly drinks (limit 2) provided by management. Getting alcohol delivered at work wouldn't be an issue. And the jokes keep the twitter interesting. I know places that would love to have such wit on their twitter feed.

    16. Re:Might be other reasons... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And I am sure it had nothing to do with her getting alcohol delivered to her while at work

      Is this some US cultural thing? Where I work they *give* us alcohol at random intervals. It actually kinda sucks because I'm allergic.

      bragging about making sexual jokes to the companies twitter account

      "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alcohol at work sounds worse than it is(assuming she wasn't drinking it). I get everything shipped to my work because fuck multihour shipping windows.

    18. Re:Might be other reasons... by martyros · · Score: 1

      Doesn't your company allow you to have packages received at work, rather than have you work from home all day and hope the carrier actually finds your house and doesn't get lost? (Or worse, doesn't bother to knock and just shoves the "pick it up from the post office" slip through your door? Or puts it in your garbage can and you don't notice before trash day?) If they don't your company stinks. The month before Christmas in my office the place is practically a post office. I haven't bought alcohol over the internet yet, but I probably will here in a little bit, and if I do I'll have it delivered to my office, just like everything else.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    19. Re:Might be other reasons... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2

      So basically you're saying you would plant fake evidence along these lines while searching.

      Because I sure as hell haven't done anything like that at work, and i'm willing to bet most other people haven't either.

    20. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot. THey'd have to lie and plant it and that's very hard to do in a way that couldn't be detected. If they planted it she could sue, the company would be investigated, and any planted evidence would come to light. You're crazy for even suggesting that, and there are 5 people just as stupid and crazy as you to call that insightful.

    21. Re:Might be other reasons... by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Wow...Bulleit bourbon, delivered to her at work. And she was supposedly poor?

      I didn't see any indication that she was the one who payed for it. Assuming for the moment that she did, it could easily have been intended as a gift. A $25 bottle of whiskey is not an unreasonable thing to buy as a gift for someone, even if you don't have a lot of money.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    22. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is getting alcohol delivered to you at work a problem?

      I'm not an American - I don't understand these rules or norms. I get wine and spirits shipped to my workplace - it's never a problem.

      *Drinking* them at work is different - but getting them delivered? What's the issue.

    23. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was not complaining about being poor, but that she was payed under the cost of living.

      And I don't see, where to problem is getting alcohol getting delivered at work. Drinking it during working hours is another matter.

    24. Re:Might be other reasons... by houghi · · Score: 1

      First I though that it would have been the company that leaked it. I am still trying to get used to the idea that people are stupid enough to post anyting online. To me this shows thqt she is a person that you do not want in your company.

      Now how would this go in Socialist Belgium with tons of Unions (More than 50 employees and your company has a Union Rep by law)

      1) Oral warning that you are not the spokes person of the company and are not allowed to give info about the company.
      2) Second oral warning with somebody from HR present.
      3) Written official warning
      4) Second written offical warning
      5) Getting fired.

      That said, even if this was the first thing she ever did; sending an open letter to the CEO will get you fired, no matter how well organized the Union is.
      It is clear that there is a trust issue and employment is no longer an option.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    25. Re:Might be other reasons... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Hey the company I work for has in some of their offices beer vending machines and in a number of those offices they also have beer on tap in the company cafeteria.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    26. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it differs based on the company. We currently have champagne and wine bottles in our lunchroom refrigerator. Not vodka or bourbon, but I imagine one or two VPs have a bottle in their drawer.

      Another place I worked, we did shots while doing an all-nighter, which in retrospect wasn't a great thing for remaining awake, but hey it was on the company. And, it was surreal to be at work at 3am, buzzed, and watching some poor guy get busted for a DUI right in front of our office window. Nothing like walking the line and having a group of drunk coders and admins watching you do it.

      So, yeah, there are probably some places that it may not fit the corporate culture to even have hard alcohol delivered, but it doesn't mean she was drunk on the job. We were, of course, but she didn't have to be.

      The jokes to the Twitter account might not have been such a good idea, though.

    27. Re:Might be other reasons... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Bulleit is pretty pedestrian. If she was getting fucking Pappy Van Winkle delivered to her at work, her claims of poverty would be harder to take.

      And did she actually drink it at work, or just have it delivered there? After all, it's bourbon, a legal product. It's not like she was getting an eightball of coke or a bunch of smack stamps form Silk Road delivered to the office.

      It does kinda put into question her claims of poverty. Because when you are as poor as she claimed to be, you cannot afford this, let alone brag about it.

      Source? Me (because I used to be poor, and I know how that shit is/was.)

    28. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said she drank it while at work? Who said it was her money that paid for it? Who said it was even for her at all? Perhaps it was for an executive and just past through her hands while on the way to the exec? Point is, there are any number of reasons that this could have happened.

    29. Re:Might be other reasons... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That said, even if this was the first thing she ever did; sending an open letter to the CEO will get you fired, no matter how well organized the Union is.
      It is clear that there is a trust issue and employment is no longer an option.

      Trust has nothing to do with it, it's just a matter of making an example of someone who's complaining openly in hopes of intimidating everyone else into silence. Just another day in paradise.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And did she actually drink it at work, or just have it delivered there? After all, it's bourbon, a legal product

      Most places have a policy which forbids you from using the company resources for personal reasons, and generally that includes sending or receiving shipments. It's also not uncommon for alcohol to be specifically banned from the workplace.

    31. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I am sure it had nothing to do with her getting alcohol delivered to her while at work

      So what? Was she actually drunk at work? I used to get all sorts of shit delivered to me at places I worked at because I didn't want the packages to be sitting on my doorstep all day long for someone to steal.

      bragging about making sexual jokes to the companies twitter account

      What are you, a kid? That joke was so tame that it could have been on US broadcast TV.

      It seems more likely that the little punk they have in charge of the company felt threatened that a young girl could have the balls and articulation that he lacks.

    32. Re:Might be other reasons... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I find the alcohol thing interesting primarily because it runs counter to her poverty sob story, rather than being a terrible crime in its own right.

      That does though depend on the organisation. I've had a colleague buy me a 'thank you' bottle of vodka for work I've done, I just didn't feel the need to broadcast this traceably on the internet.

    33. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't your company allow you to have packages received at work

      Nope.

      The month before Christmas in my office the place is practically a post office.

      Yeah, that's one reason why it's not allowed. The company also doesn't want to assume liability for your personal shipments, which is what happens if they accept the delivery.

      I haven't bought alcohol over the internet yet, but I probably will here in a little bit, and if I do I'll have it delivered to my office, just like everything else.

      We also have a policy which forbids bringing booze to work.

      your company stinks.

      No, our company employs professionals.

    34. Re:Might be other reasons... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most places have a policy which forbids you from using the company resources for personal reasons, and generally that includes sending or receiving shipments.

      Everywhere that I have worked above the level of french-fry flipper has encouraged me to receive my personal shipments in the workplace when convenient.

      It's also not uncommon for alcohol to be specifically banned from the workplace.

      That much is true, although I've certainly also worked for businesses which had alcohol in the workplace.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25 whole dollars. That's an egregiously luxurious purchase!!

    36. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has stated it was bought for her. Try not to jump to unfounded conclusions.

    37. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a top software company and get alcohol delivered to me at work. I also drink it at work. When I'm not drinking it, I leave it in plain view on my desk. For large events the company buys beer and wine, and on rare occasions mixed drinks. I've organized such events and put beer on the corporate credit card and expensed it. good whisky is generally up to us, but seems like that's just our norms and not something fundamental: if it's work-related alcohol then work can pay for it.

    38. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably is thinking in the way the most European employment laws are formulated.
      If an employee makes it impossible for the employer to trust them (stealing, defaming the company, potentially publicly speaking negatively about the company - at least for things that do not fall under any whistleblower protections) they can be fired. The other term is that an employee has an obligation of loyalty to the employer.

    39. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you get cocaine delivered to you at work?

    40. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's lot of legal shit you don't want delivered to your business by your employees. Guns, booze, giant dildos, and pornography to name one more than a few.

    41. Re:Might be other reasons... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Maybe but don't cry that you can not afford food when you get booze delivered to your office.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    42. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies can make up this type of bullshit reasons for most of their employees. If I search your work laptop and browsing history, I am guaranteed to find worse than that...

      I doubt it...

    43. Re:Might be other reasons... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It looks like $28, not exactly cheap, but by no means expensive.

      http://www.b-21.com/Bulleit-Bo...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    44. Re:Might be other reasons... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'obligation of loyalty'?

      Nonsense. They pay me for my time, I work that time. If it stops working (for me or them), we part.

      This is how free people work deals. Loyalty is for dogs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:Might be other reasons... by swb · · Score: 1

      Every place I've ever worked has allowed shipments for any employee. I had two cases of handgun ammunition shipped to me at my last job at a downtown, 7 floors of the high rise kind of place -- the mail guy told me "Your ammo is here. It's too heavy, you have to get it in the mailroom yourself."

      As for booze, every place I've ever worked has served booze on company time. The only place it didn't happen that often was when I worked at a university office. Our suite was in the administration building with the President and Regents' office so we had to jump through the bureaucratic hoops to serve alcohol and it was a pain, but I still think we drank as much or more as a department than any other department I've worked at.

      I wouldn't work in an office that didn't have a relaxed attitude about drinking. And not because I would drink much in the office anyway, but because a place that's restrictive about it usually has stick up its ass about everything. Fuck that.

    46. Re:Might be other reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your company is a shithole. Go try working at a real company.

    47. Re:Might be other reasons... by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      It was a gift. She explained it on her Medium blog. Also the gourmet cupcakes were a company sponsored baking competition for charity. It is a little pathetic that so many people took the time to troll her social media to find "evidence" that she is lying and then create a collage with no explanation and taken completely out of context.

  7. Wahhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like your employer-employee relationship and want the world to know? There, fixed that for ya.

    Plenty of people want your job if you don't.

  8. I would have fired her. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    She publicly tried to bring her employer to ill repute. I suspect that that is specifically outlined in her employment contract as it has been in every single employment contract I have ever had.

    There is no case for whistle blower protection here.

    1. Re:I would have fired her. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if it's not in the employment agreement, California is an at-will state. You can be fired for not sounding cheerful enough when you greet your CEO in the elevator, if he so desires and is that petty.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    2. Re:I would have fired her. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can be fired for not sounding cheerful enough when you greet your CEO in the elevator, if he so desires and is that petty.

      *cough* Steve Jobs *cough*

    3. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can be fired for not sounding cheerful enough

      Don't confuse morality with legality.

    4. Re:I would have fired her. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      You can be fired for not sounding cheerful enough when you greet your CEO in the elevator, if he so desires and is that petty.

      *cough* Steve Jobs *cough*

      I'm going to say that's apocryphal unless you have a citation.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:I would have fired her. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to say that's apocryphal unless you have a citation.

      There are many elevator stories but I like this one the best.

      http://vanshardware.com/2010/07/the-legend-of-apples-steve-jobs/

    6. Re:I would have fired her. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You say petty, I say "corporate culture". Are you telling me you don't fit in? That's what I'm hearing. You can pick up your things from security.

      Ok I joke but only partially. I had to once work with a quite capable grouch who's mere presence in the room made every feel sad. The place became a much nicer place to work once he left. It wasn't an "at-will" state so it took a good 9 months for someone higher up to find an excuse to get rid of him, and to be honest he was given written warnings for some pretty petty and average things. But quite frankly having had to work with someone with whom I don't get along, I don't support people who claim there's a "right to work".

      This is why a big part of our employment practices have nothing to do with your work and everything to do with your social life.

    7. Re:I would have fired her. by fireball74 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps so, but most states who have such laws also have pretty hefty unemployment tax hikes should the company be found to have fired said employee for a bullsh*t reason.

    8. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens more than you think. *cough*

    9. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why we might need unions.

    10. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is an at-will state. You can be fired for not sounding cheerful enough when you greet your CEO in the elevator

      100% wrong. At-will means they can fire you without "cause", not that they can fire you for ANY reason. In states which are not 'at-will' you can only be fired for violating a company policy which is specifically stated as a 'fireable offense'.

      But in your example it doesn't even matter, because in ANY state the CEO can fire anybody they want, any time they want.

    11. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're painting the rose red, we're painting the roses red...

      OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!

    12. Re:I would have fired her. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I'm going to say that's apocryphal unless you have a citation.

      There are many elevator stories but I like this one the best.

      http://vanshardware.com/2010/07/the-legend-of-apples-steve-jobs/

      Right, so apocryphal. This same story has been repeated differently for many other companies and CEOs in the 70s. Note the lack of names, and the general mischaracterization of Jobs' attitude. It seems cut/paste.

      Got any others?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    13. Re:I would have fired her. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Note the lack of names, and the general mischaracterization of Jobs' attitude.

      If you were fired by Steve Jobs, would you want to the whole world to know that you were a douchebag at Apple? Or, worse, a marketing douchebag?

    14. Re:I would have fired her. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Note the lack of names, and the general mischaracterization of Jobs' attitude.

      If you were fired by Steve Jobs, would you want to the whole world to know that you were a douchebag at Apple? Or, worse, a marketing douchebag?

      Did you even read the article you linked?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    15. Re:I would have fired her. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the article you linked?

      Yes. And your point?

    16. Re:I would have fired her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At-will isn't a blank check to fire anyone for any reason, despite what companies like to put into employment contracts. There are a number of federal and state laws which will prohibit employers from firing people, even in at-will states, for specific reasons. For example, your boss cannot walk up to you and say, "Get out of here you ! I don't want any of your kind smelling up the place!" That would be discrimination based on race, prohibited under federal law and applies in all 50 states at-will or otherwise.

      At-will means that you can be fired for any reason not prohibited by state or federal law, not that you can be fired for any reason or no reason.

  9. San Fran is expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't afford to live there, don't. Leave and have a better quality of life elsewhere.

  10. Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by pepsikid · · Score: 0

    I read Talia's essay and thought it was very well written. Yelp's CEO sounded like a real air-breather trying to transform the conversation into one about his sympathy for the high cost of living in the Bay area. There are still stupid people in this world, but Yelp seems to drastically over-estimate their ability to weave a tale.

    1. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't matter if it is well written. She brought her employer into ill repute.

      She could have written exactly the same letter, but removed the identifiers and replaced it with "Major IT company" and sent to to the newspapers and she would have been fine.

    2. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by pepsikid · · Score: 2

      It's interesting then, that we AGREE she would have gotten fired over her essay embarrassing her employer, but the CEO smerts that it's not the case at all, and goes off on a tangent about how swell and sensitive he and Yelp are...

    3. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by tlambert · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read Talia's essay and thought it was very well written.

      You, sir or madam, clearly do not have an English degree.

      Her essay used sentence fragments, run on sentences, split infinitive, improper grammar, and a host of other follies which one would not expect of someone with a degree in English Literature.

      I would post a link to her actual essay (in reality, nothing more than a blog posting on a rather unsurpassing blog platform company), but to do so would drive traffic to the site, and I cannot force myself to do that in good conscience.

    4. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I think the CEO would have got further by saying it was unacceptable behaviour and that he does not expect to have conversation like that via newspapers.

    5. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sympathy for the high cost of living in the Bay area.

      What kind of "sympathy" do you expect? She is an English lit major who just graduated from college, and she whines and complains that the world doesn't magically deliver her an SF apartment, a car, and a high salary. Guess what: people who, unlike her, have actual skills and careers still have roommates.

      There are still stupid people in this world

      Yeah, and Talia Jane is obviously one of them. You probably are too.

    6. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apparently this is an entire thread of people with corporate peen in their mouth.

    7. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by orlanz · · Score: 1

      It was horrible written. Calling it an essay is an insult. I am pretty bad at writing essays and even I could tell that was not the way to go about it. What was the point and purpose? Who was her target audience? How did she want the message to approach the reader? How was she expecting the reader to respond? What was the tone she was going for? (what I did here with the questions, is basically her text).

      All I got was a bombardment of asking someone to feel bad for her about the various problems she and her coworkers have to deal with. This was a conversation piece with a friend. This essay is how 15-35 year olds unload stress to a good friend on the phone. That is not how you talk to people you do not know (ie: The CEO, HR, Slashdot, random people on the internet, etc).

      I had quite a lot of trouble getting to the end of that essay. Responding to your post was a more driving force to finish it, than her post itself. The whole thing is made worse by the fact that she majored in English!

      Now to address the actual topic. The best thing she could have done is found another job and written (an actual letter) something coherent addressed to the CEO upon finding one. She could have told him why and others like her have left, and the company would have been more receptive. Maybe even offered her a job to come back (which I don't think she should take). The alternative would have been to find more roommates (ie: with coworkers), ride share, do a budget analysis, and make some hard choices (maybe go bankrupt). But I think those are just compromises with a situation that she clearly doesn't like. She disliked her job a lot, move on.

    8. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Her essay used sentence fragments, run on sentences, split infinitive, improper grammar, and a host of other follies which one would not expect of someone with a degree in English Literature...

      Sometimes, committing those 'follies', (and others), actually leads to more effective writing. Rules may be re-written in their breaking, and often it's for the better. That's how a language grows - not to mention science, technology, other arts, etc. Emerson said "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." Which of these are you little sir, perched atop your high horse?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    9. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed the essay quit a bit. And it was pretty clever how it starts out mild and grows darker as it goes along. You have no appreciation for literature, sir.

    10. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, committing those 'follies', (and others), actually leads to more effective writing.

      Unless you have evidence that she is, in fact, a master wordsmith, I present the following for your edification:

      “Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.” -- Pablo Picasso

      “Learn the rules before you break them.” -- Steven Taylor Goldsberry, The Writer's Book of Wisdom: 101 Rules for Mastering Your Craft

      "It is known that, when we learn or train in something, we pass through the stages of shu, ha, and ri. These stages are explained as follows. In shu, we repeat the forms and discipline ourselves so that our bodies absorb the forms that our forebearers created. We remain faithful to the forms with no deviation. Next, in the stage of ha, once we have disciplined ourselves to acquire the forms and movements, we make innovations. In this process the forms may be broken and discarded. Finally, in ri, we completely depart from the forms, open the door to creative technique, and arrive in a place where we act in accordance with what our heart/mind desires, unhindered while not overstepping laws." -- Principles of Shu-ha-ri

      "there are no right or wrong answers...'Good English' is whatever educated people talk;.." -- C.S. Lewis

      “Every English poet should master the rules of grammar before he attempts to bend or break them.” —Robert Graves

      "Photographers must study and know the rules of good visual composition like writers study and learn the rules of good writing composition. Once you understand the rules, your ability to break them helps you have better impact with your photos." -- Stanley Leary

      George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language": http://www.orwell.ru/library/e...

    11. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my kingdom for mod points for this...

    12. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by niftydude · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that she is a big fat liar: http://alotofrice.pixieset.com...

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    13. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      If you're merely trying to prove that Talia hasn't always been starving, uses social media, and is the target of an organized smear campaign, you've succeeded.

    14. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by niftydude · · Score: 1

      The dates are in the screen caps, and clearly include the period where she claims to have been living off a single ten pound bag of rice. Hence my assertion that she is lying about her situation.

      There are people that suffer actual poverty in this world, and who are actually starving. This attention-seeker is neither.

      She has written a fictional sob-story, and included a link for donations. If this story goes viral, those that are fooled will donate, and she profits. Not a bad plan, especially when white knights like yourself will leap to her defence in the face of clear evidence of her falsehood.

      But you shouldn't believe everything that you read.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    15. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ::lick, lick, lick:: How's that boot leather taste?

    16. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, sirrah, write like an 8th grade school marm.

    17. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by pepsikid · · Score: 2

      Thanks for making that last point yourself. I don't trust time stamps exhibited in online media either. The year is missing from most of the time stamps. Lots of 2015, however. This wasn't even Talia's own collage. Some stranger presents what can only be assumed to be a hand-picked selection of impressions. I remain vigilant of the fact that a ginormous, experienced marketing/social networking firm likely has motive to influence. It just doesn't make sense that the general public would white knight for Yelp.

      If you've ever been homeless, you understand that the only way to get off the streets is to conceal your situation from potential employers and landlords. You can also end up homeless by being too honest about your instability. Catch-22. I wouldn't even fault Talia for creating a whole online fantasy life to stand for the one she aspired for. I see some delicious comfort food, but I don't see proof of prosperity or fraud. I've cooked up some nice things out of the contents of charity food sacks.

      There are endless explanations for the photos including photoshop, other's photos being used, photos taken months earlier being posted later, that Talia enjoyed cooking until the high heating bill wiped her out, that Talia cooks at her bf or neighbor's house, etc.

      I don't doubt Talia's essay was a simplified account of things, but again, there's NO compelling evidence that she's a fraud. No-one seems to really doubt how poor her pay was, or that she was about to encounter a whole lot of maintenance bills. Many many people are just one paycheck away from living on the street, no matter how comfortable they look in the meantime.

    18. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Luthair · · Score: 1

      How would that spur any change? She should have jst used a pen name.

    19. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO her employers actions brought the ill repute,
      she merely shined a spotlight on those actions

    20. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      She brought her employer into ill repute.

      Deservedly so, it seems.

      She could have written exactly the same letter, but removed the identifiers and replaced it with "Major IT company" and sent to to the newspapers and she would have been fine.

      Except she wasn't fine to begin with. She didn't, after all, get paid enough to live on. So she faced the choice of making a bad situation slightly worse but putting the screws on a robber baron in the process, or making a totally ineffective gesture.

      Expect more and more people to take a hard look at their lives and decide they have nothing to lose besides their chains. And expect their choises regarding this to get more and more radical as gentler alternatives - such as open letters - prove totally ineffective. Once that avalanche really gets going, there's no stopping it; we're heading for another age of revolution.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I live a very comfortable lifestyle because I've learned how to work effectively and constructively within a large corporation.

      I'm not sure that managing not to intentionally publicly embarrass my employer is a terribly onerous compromise in response.

      It's certainly much less of a personal burden than fellatio and I'm fairly sure I lack the physical attributes (and technique) to earn anywhere near as much through such acts.

    22. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are endless explanations for the photos including photoshop, other's photos being used, photos taken months earlier being posted later, that Talia enjoyed cooking until the high heating bill wiped her out, that Talia cooks at her bf or neighbor's house, etc.

      If she doesn't want to be taken as a fraud, then she should take effort not to look like one. That's how the internet works. When you expose yourself to scrutiny, it shows up. God forbid I should ever become internet famous, surely someone will come out of the woodwork with perversion-related web content from my teenage years, or the picture of me on Three Mile Beach after losing my shorts, with my Pacific-Ocean chilled pecker doing its best to hide from the public view, cursed thing.

      But that's how the world works. Until we learn to stop shitting on people for being human, it's going to continue to work that way. There are, however, advantages. We've entered a time in which more and more people are being held accountable for their actions, and that is a positive thing. Yes, the internet lets people spread memes about how wonderful the pope supposedly is for being less evil than prior popes, but it also lets us shame him for relocating child molesters. Yes, it did just let this young woman commit career suicide right out of the gate, but it may also help her begin another career.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      What's entertaining is that the author actually DOES have an English degree. Which shows exactly what that is worth.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    24. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      You and I have a very different definition of slightly worse then. She went from employed earning a salary that was less than what she wanted but still survivable with sacrifices to completely unemployable. As of now no employer would touch her with a barge pole. She has demonstrated toxic behaviour towards her employer, and it doesn't matter how justified or not you think it is, no one will want to take a risk on her.

      And those people who think they are chained and try to lose them will be in for a very very rude awakening. No one is owed a job. When you are given a job two parties take risks, the employee and the employer. It is a double sided coin, but the less skills you have and the bigger the risk your personality represents the less an employer will want to take on risk for you.

    25. Re:Obviously, no Yelp sock puppets are in here... by cubicleguy · · Score: 1

      Do we even know who actually made the decision to fire her at this point? Does she?

  11. Some perspective by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is anyone making barely above minimum wage trying to live in San Francisco, one of the most expensive cities in the U.S. without even getting a roommate to split the rent? Also, the low temperature doesn't get below freezing so there's no need to ever run a heater. Yes, that means you'll probably want an additional heavy blanket to sleep under, but you're not going to die.

    1. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, the low temperature doesn't get below freezing so there's no need to ever run a heater.

      I live in San Jose and work in Palo Alto. I have to be at the bus stop at 6AM to take the express bus and be at work at 7AM. We had a few mornings where the temperature was 30 degrees. Most of the time the early morning temperature is 40 to 50 degrees. On those nights, I'm running the heater in addition to the extra blankets.

    2. Re:Some perspective by Nemyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can die from temperatures well above freezing, you know that right?

    3. Re:Some perspective by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um, so why do you do it? You don't have to. No one needs to live in California. And wow? 30 degrees in the morning? You poor baby!

    4. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Um, so why do you do it? You don't have to.

      I have a government IT job with a nice benefit package and job security as the prime contract is fully funded for the next four years.

      No one needs to live in California.

      Born and raise here, one of the few natives left in Silicon Valley.

      And wow? 30 degrees in the morning? You poor baby!

      My coworkers in the Rockies wished it was that warm where there are too.

    5. Re:Some perspective by unimacs · · Score: 2

      She provides some details about where she lives. It's about 30 miles from where she works and it's the cheapest place she could find that had access to the train. She's quit using the heater but in general you want to keep a place no colder than 50 or 55 degrees or you'll run into problems with condensation (moisture damage).

      The larger question is what sort of minimum standard of living should working full time get you. Further she seems to contend that this job requires some level of skill and training above what your typical minimum wage job requires. There's a legal minimum that Yelp is required to pay. Then there's the going rate for similar workers. I'd also contend that there's an ethical minimum.

      Something else to consider is that in the 60's the average CEO made about 50 times what the average worker did. Today it's up to about 300 or 400 times. Now, the CEO of Yelp's compensation is $1.00 or something like that but he has an 11% stake in the company and his net worth is around $200 million.

    6. Re:Some perspective by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Why is anyone making barely above minimum wage trying to live in San Francisco, one of the most expensive cities in the U.S. without even getting a roommate to split the rent?

      If you had read the original blog post, you'd know that she did try, and she found out that all of her coworkers were living with their parents because they couldn't afford rent even when splitting it. BTW, she wasn't making above minimum wage. According to the original article, she was making $12.25, which is San Francisco's minimum wage as of 2016.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is anyone making barely above minimum wage trying to live in San Francisco, one of the most expensive cities in the U.S.

      Yes. This makes no sense. This job should be in India.

    8. Re: Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes ponce. Happens all the time in California to dudes making their way to work!

    9. Re:Some perspective by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Lol, 30 degrees outside and I'm still walking in a light sweater; If it's 40-50 degrees all day, you practically don't need to run heat.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Lol, 30 degrees outside and I'm still walking in a light sweater;

      Some of us value our health, especially when taking public transit. I wear a field jacket, sweater and stocking cap when the temperature drops below 60 degrees.

      If it's 40-50 degrees all day, you practically don't need to run heat.

      During the day, no. When the temperature drops into the 40's and 30's, yes.

    11. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously not.

    12. Re:Some perspective by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't know why people want to live there. There are so many cities nearby with more jobs, better pay, and lower cost of living. It's like they're brainwashed to think there's an invisible brick wall around the city. It *does* get freezing there, bit you don't have to go more then 10 or 20 miles to get to someplace warmer.

    13. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get an upstairs apartment; floors are so poorly insulated that the heat from the apartment below will keep your apartment in the high 60's even with the heat shut off. But that's beside the point, everybody I know that works in SF either shares an apartment of commutes from the East Bay. BART works, use it.

    14. Re:Some perspective by adolf · · Score: 2

      In a recent "cold" snap in and around Taiwan, people died.

      (I say "cold" even though, IMHO, it wasn't really very cold. But I'm from Ohio, where things don't get properly cold until -10F, and some years -20-25F isn't uncommon. Our HVAC systems, IIRC, are designed to keep the dwelling at 72F when running at 100% duty cycle at -10F outside...and -20F means the best that a well-sized system can accomplish is 62F.)

      (And yeah, I'll walk around at 30 degrees in the lightest of jackets, or a light hoodie (I don't dig on sweaters) -- probably with sandals on, because I can. But walking is different from dwelling, as moving is more energetic and warming than sitting or laying, and warm clothes and bedding aren't necessarily common in places that commonly don't need them.)

    15. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, heat is optional because not having it won't completely kill you.

      Glad you're not in my family, holy shit, wtf is wrong with you.

    16. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time the early morning temperature is 40 to 50 degrees. On those nights, I'm running the heater in addition to the extra blankets.

      Pussy.

    17. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying 80% of wage for living quarters is stupidity, but then again so is studying English literature.

      Getting a credit card is even dumber.

      But seriously, her rant is extremely informative. It shows that basic life skills like having a budget, understanding the benefits of communal living etc etc. simply are not being taught to the young. Yet pointless degrees are..

    18. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Pussy.

      That's my heater.

    19. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it could be done in India, it probably already would be. Sometimes you need to exploit poor workers who speak your own language.

    20. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... if you are immersed in water, or maybe sleeping without any clothing in a windy cold-ish weather. At home, in your bed, if you're in decent health? Not going to happen.

      Sincerely, the half of the planet too poor to have heating at home

    21. Re:Some perspective by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Nice! I hope you are enjoying my money.

      Signed, Taxpayers

      P.S. You didn't answer the question. You can get a job anywhere.

    22. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the low temperature doesn't get below freezing so there's no need to ever run a heater.

      I live in San Jose and work in Palo Alto. I have to be at the bus stop at 6AM to take the express bus and be at work at 7AM. We had a few mornings where the temperature was 30 degrees. Most of the time the early morning temperature is 40 to 50 degrees. On those nights, I'm running the heater in addition to the extra blankets.

      I live in Ottawa. It was -22F yesterday morning. Your early morning temp is T-shirt weather.

    23. Re:Some perspective by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you are an irresponsible child, which judging by her letter, she still is.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    24. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the low temperature doesn't get below freezing so there's no need to ever run a heater.

      I mean, people normally set their thermostat to 33F, right?

    25. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People get heat stroke(and die) all the time... and the temperature is well above freezing.

    26. Re:Some perspective by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      You can't die from above freezing temperatures. It takes prolonged exposure to freezing temp to use up all available energy reserves. You can starve to death from insufficient food for the temp though. (I've done winter survival training in -35 and 4 feet of snow).

    27. Re:Some perspective by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm thinking. That's $1,300/month, and I was spending under $1,000/month in Baltimore. I'm spending even less now.

      My Citizen's Dividend plan can do it in about $550/month in 2013 (it'll be ~$598 in 2016), but that relies on market force: food, clothing, personal care, all current; single-inhabitant 224sqft apartment requires modification of currently-uninhabited structures in low-income areas. It would take a few years for the landlords to shuffle enough money around to transition the 600,000 homeless into apartments, never mind the 4.8 million from HUD into income-appropriate housing (which, for a family, includes at least *two* incomes, and so can provide a profit motive for a larger unit).

      That kind of income level isn't viable for the existing market; but $1,300/month? Uh, yeah. You're just trying to live in rich-folk land on poor-folk money.

    28. Re:Some perspective by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      30? in NY we call that warm this time of year, and you can find us outside in t shirts

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    29. Re:Some perspective by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You can't die from above freezing temperatures. It takes prolonged exposure to freezing temp to use up all available energy reserves.

      Even nonlethal cold makes you uncomfortable because it puts a load on your body and prevents you from resting properly since you can't drop your metabolic rate without freezing. If you don't do something about it, it will slowly but surely grind away your health.

      (I've done winter survival training in -35 and 4 feet of snow).

      And I've stayed up all night and people have trekked across Sahara drinking their own pee but you can't live that way or you will indeed die, it'll just take a while.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:Some perspective by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nice! I hope you are enjoying my money.
      Signed, Taxpayers

      Only very, very stupid Taxpayers. California is one of the states that gets fucked the hardest on taxes; for every dollar paid into the national coffers, we get only a small piece back. States like Ohio make out like bandits and get things we can't afford, like improved Botts' Dots that don't trap a shitload of gravel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Nice! I hope you are enjoying my money.

      Signed, Taxpayers

      You're welcome! I haven't had a pay raise in two years. I could make 40% more money in the private sector. But I'm willing to do my part in protecting national security.

    32. Re:Some perspective by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      If you had read the original blog post, you'd know that she did try, and she found out that all of her coworkers were living with their parents because they couldn't afford rent even when splitting it.

      She did try with co-workers, but that does not mean she has to split the rent with only co-workers. In other words, she could split the rent with someone else if she really try harder. Also, no where in her letter mentioned about how much she earned. The only thing she mentioned was the total amount left after taxes and whatever being withheld...

      Overall condition of her from TFA, I could understand that her problems mostly came from herself. Her own decision and ambitious got her into the position she is in right now. Well, I do not expect a mid 20s person would always make the right decision and understand the reality better. There is nothing wrong with bad decision making or high ambitious. My problem is that she seems to take things for grants and expect things to be what she has been dreaming of. When the reality kicks in, she starts blaming on everyone else...

      When she made a complaint about putting debt onto her credit card, it was her decision to do so because she was dreaming that she would earn big money from working for a big corporation right after graduated from college with English major. That's already a mistake.

      I left college, having majored in English literature, with a dream to work in media. It was either that or go to law school. Or become a teacher. But I didn’t want to become a cliche or drown in student loans, see...

      Then she assumed that the position she was accepted would be in media. I am guessing that she did not question the person who interviewed her what job description or position she is going to be working in. It could be because she is new to the market. As a result, she might have assumed that she would be working in media. Another mistake...

      Then she made a complaint about health benefit she got. To me, getting health benefit with $20 co-pay is quite a good deal. No one should think about health benefit the way she does. Health benefit is NOT a grocery shopping that one would EXPECT and USE it often. It is a cushion for unexpected circumstances. Making a complaint about needing to spend $20 each visit is a bit too much in my opinion because the complaint implies that she wants to keep seeing a doctor all the time.

      One example she gave about she got stuck in the east bay because her credit card kept getting declined, I have no idea why would this be other people's problem? Another example about a situation when her manager gave her a suggestion to intentionally drive through FastTrak and get a $35 ticket in order to get to work is not anyone else fault but her manager and herself. To me, her examples are just her writing style to add irrelevant info in order to beg for sympathy from readers.

      Then she went on about her own mistake that she gave out over $600 to customers during her early work (so called training in her meaning). And then 3 months later, she could do a lot better by giving out only $15 in 3 months. Does this mean she should get a reward of $600 for doing her work? It is the company money, not hers that was given out. However, she feels that it should be hers. Not that I said the company is good in the sense of not paying customers to appeace their issues, but I am saying that she is expecting a reward for doing her work right.

      In one month, I gave out over $600 to customers for a variety of issues. Now, since getting more training, I’ve given out about $15 in the past three months because I’ve been able to de-escalate messed up situations using just my customer service skills. ... You know what I could do with $600 extra a month? For starters, I probably wouldn’t have to take money from Marcus at CVS just to get to work.

      There are a lot more issues with her letter that show her envious/je

    33. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is anyone making barely above minimum wage trying to live in San Francisco, one of the most expensive cities in the U.S. without even getting a roommate to split the rent? Also, the low temperature doesn't get below freezing so there's no need to ever run a heater. Yes, that means you'll probably want an additional heavy blanket to sleep under, but you're not going to die.

      Yea, all the fucking poor people need to GTFO out of SF. What are they thinking?

    34. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahahaha "stocking cap"

      It's a "toque" you obvious non-Canadian!

    35. Re:Some perspective by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Get back to me when you have a high temperature of 7. And poor you, with your hour-long bus ride to get to work. That's normal for public transportation in any city of size that isn't named New York, and I'll bet there are plenty of cross-borough routes that would still take an hour.

      When I lived in Portland it easily took an hour to get from home to work if I used Tri-Met, which I did about half the time. And Portland isn't anywhere close to as expensive or spread out as the Bay Area.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    36. Re:Some perspective by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Usually it involves being in a large body of water though. Or, temperatures vastly above freezing.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    37. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't die from above freezing temperatures. It takes prolonged exposure to freezing temp to use up all available energy reserves. You can starve to death from insufficient food for the temp though.

      You can certainly get hypothermia and die from it at above freezing temperatures (especially when wet or windy). Perhaps you confused it with frostbite? Frostbite can only happen at below freezing temps.

      I've done winter survival training in -35 and 4 feet of snow

      I've done similar training in Antarctica. I've taken hypothermia training many times. However, I did a Google search and everyone agrees you can get hypothermia above freezing and even die. Here's one quote.

      Most people think of hypothermic danger when temperatures are below freezing, but in reality, most cases occur when temperatures are well above freezing.

    38. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because so many tech companies insist on being located there, and insist on their people mostly be there.

    39. Re:Some perspective by HaaPoo · · Score: 1

      I live in Ottawa, Canada and at 30 degrees my igloo melts down and i wear my speedo and go for a swim.

    40. Re:Some perspective by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And poor you, with your hour-long bus ride to get to work.

      The express bus is the fastest route of I've ever taken across Silicon Valley. I used to spend to two hours each way driving on the freeway.

    41. Re:Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love when people that have clearly never been to SF spout off about it.

  12. "Unconvincing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...as the person who ultimately sets the culture and policies of the company, his claim to not be directly responsible is unconvincing."

    Whether it's unconvincing is simply a matter of your opinion; and your reason for holding this opinion is invalid. If the CEO's only action was to "set the culture and policies of the company", then no, he is not ~directly~ responsible for the firing. He is ~indirectly~ responsible. The person who is ~directly~ responsible is the one who, you know, decided to fire her.

    1. Re:"Unconvincing" by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      This AC sounds like a Yelp lawyer...

  13. No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you make waves at your employer, getting fired is certainly a foreseeable consequence.

    There are a lot of people who want a job, any job, your job, so if you have qualms about your employer then their severing that tie should not be a surprise.

  14. Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the link to this story/open letter?

    1. Re:Link? by ChoGGi · · Score: 2

      https://medium.com/@taliajane/...

      I was told Iâ(TM)d have to work in support for an entire year before I would be able to move to a different department.

      I'm just as heartbroken, that poor girl.

    2. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the little, barely visible link next to the headline? Apparently we're supposed to notice that now. That's progress for you.

  15. Medical Issue by ronaldbeal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a known medical condition :SMACSS Social Media Assisted Career Suicide Syndrome. Researchers are still searching for a cure!

    1. Re:Medical Issue by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      Well, it also shows that the open door policy at most companies is just HR bullshit.

    2. Re:Medical Issue by orlanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The open door policies of ALL companies is bullshit. It doesn't mean what people think it means. The best it gets is, "We will openly listen and TRY to address your criticism." Most people think that also means the company won't be insulted or won't fire them or won't impact their career. This is false. Somewhere in that machine, there is a cog that will feel insulted and will seek redress. The open door just slaps a name on the offender. Someone who goes through that open door is really trying to help the company at their own expense. If they want something personal, they should choose someone they trust, and have a closed door conversation.

    3. Re:Medical Issue by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      I doubt there IS one...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    4. Re:Medical Issue by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Researchers are still searching for a cure!

      Rectal-cranial inversion: it can be cured in your lifetime!
      Please, give generously to help support the search for a cure to rectal-cranial inversion!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:Medical Issue by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Fortunately her sacrifice will help others avoid Yelp and similar companies trying to gouge employees who are taken in by the thrill of working in the valley. It reminds me of Hollywood, with actors taken in by the opportunity, only to end up in on the casting couch of some crappy B movie.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Medical Issue by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Airing your grievance about your employer to the public is asking to be fired regardless of your employer's open door policy.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:Medical Issue by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I find that most/all senior managers are very responsive when you walk into their office, articulate a problem that's damaging their business and offer some options on how to address it.

      I get a lot of work that way.

      Posting a rant online with "give me more money" as a response is perhaps going to be a less effective approach. It also has absolutely fuck all to do with an open door policy.

    8. Re:Medical Issue by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Fortunately her sacrifice will help others avoid Yelp and similar companies trying to gouge employees who are taken in by the thrill of working in the valley. It reminds me of Hollywood, with actors taken in by the opportunity, only to end up in on the casting couch of some crappy B movie.

      This isn't even the valley, this is someplace actually dramatically more expensive than the valley. She tried to compete in a decathlon before she even learned to walk!

      While you are correct about what the industry is like, that's actually what capitalism is like, and it's only getting more capitalist as we give corporations more rights, by letting them continue to write legislation and hand it off to their pet congresscritters. The problem exists to some extent everywhere and will continue to worsen until we institute single-payer health care and minimum guaranteed income, because technology always makes it possible to do more with less and that means less jobs. If we can't stem birth rates to match available employment then we're going to have to find a way for people to be unemployed without picking up torches and pitchforks.

      All of which is a long-winded way of saying "I sympathize, but what do you expect?" It's fucking San Francisco, it's one of the planet's most famous and desirable cities in spite of the ongoing gentrification that I personally feel has managed to suck all the goddamned point of living there out of it, if you're not gay.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Medical Issue by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Airing your grievance about your employer to the public is asking to be fired regardless of your employer's open door policy.

      Yep. This wasn't about all Yelp's workers, this was about her. If she'd taken her name off it, then she'd probably have a job today, and we'd be having a very different argument about the ongoing failure of capitalism and growing joblessness in the world, let alone the nation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Well by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    So much for an open door policy at Yelp. If there is such a policy at Yelp, it probably pays lip service to politically correct HR.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Door policy means you don't get retaliated against for bringing up something with management at the company. This went to members of the public. "Open Letter" is pretty much the opposite of using the Open Door policy.

    2. Re:Well by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Open door policies means the door is open - you can go both and out.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Open door" does not mean "open letter". I can have an open door policy and allow employees make their comments anonymously to me, and still fire employees I catch airing our dirty laundry in public.

      The "entitled" generation may need to step back a little and think.

  17. Oh wait, this is on /. because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because of "with a computer."
    Got it.

  18. Millennial discovers ladder has been pulled up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News at 11.

    1. Re:Millennial discovers ladder has been pulled up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mid-20's English majors from third rate schools with no other skills could never afford to live in nice places. The ladder hasn't been pulled up, it was never there for them.

  19. News Flash: Employee Gets Paid Wages as Agreed by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for that scoop /. !!

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  20. My 0.02 by DaMattster · · Score: 0

    If Jeremy Stoppleman had any shred of humanity he would have prevented this and, at least, addressed the letter. But these days, any threat to the wealthy or establishment is quickly and quietly quashed.

    1. Re:My 0.02 by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with Jeremy Stoppleman. This woman is clearly irresponsible and naive. Nothing she wrote depicts any sign of real world knowledge or experience. I, honestly, would not trust her to watch a chia pet.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    2. Re:My 0.02 by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      He says it didn't come up to him. Can't prevent what you don't know is happening.

    3. Re:My 0.02 by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      what is there to address? you have a crybaby who thinks she is owed the world. If anything it is a good thing to address in the manor if

      see jane?

      dont be like jane

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  21. Take this job and... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    The person is making $10 per hour (before taxes) and working in San Francisco. That's a bad combination right there. I wouldn't work in San Francisco unless I was making $30+ per hour.

    1. Re:Take this job and... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Let's emphasize that Yelp is PAYING this insultingly low wage in such an expensive city. And keeping people in that bracket at least a full year.

    2. Re:Take this job and... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's emphasize that Yelp is PAYING this insultingly low wage in such an expensive city.

      There are plenty of technical jobs in Silicon Valley that start off at $10 per hour — and plenty of people who take those jobs. Employers aren't going to raise their pay rates until they have difficulty finding people to fill those positions. For the kind of I.T. support work that I do, recruiters are offering $35 to $40 per hour to find people to work in southern Silicon Valley — San Jose, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale — because young hipsters can't commute more than 30 minutes away from San Francisco.

    3. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't work in San Francisco unless I was making $30+ per hour.

      That's not nearly enough. I wouldn't work in San Francisco for anything less than $150 per hour, but then again I dislike both the city and the sort of people who live there, so part of that would be compensation for the sheer annoyance of having to live there.

    4. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's emphasize that wages cover the cost of labor, not the cost of living.

    5. Re:Take this job and... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Let's emphasize that wages are not calculated to cover the cost of labor. Wages are calculated to be the least which the employees will bear. Protesting against them is the first step to adjusting that error.

    6. Re:Take this job and... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Fully agree w/ you here. I'd need to live like Seinfeld's 'Bubble boy' to live in San Francisco. It's not even a good place to visit - especially by car, given the nightmare that parking is.

    7. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rub is that when they have difficulty filling those positions they will just go the immigration route around the problem.

    8. Re:Take this job and... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      No one should need to use a private car in a large city like San Francisco. Myself, I love the place, easy to get around by PT, great food, clubs, scenery.

    9. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's emphasize that wages are not calculated to cover the cost of labor. Wages are calculated to be the least which the employees will bear. Protesting against them is the first step to adjusting that error.

      Protesting against them is the first step for your employer to adjust the error in hiring you by firing you.

      TFTFY

    10. Re:Take this job and... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Fuck I wouldn't work in San Francisco or any of the surrounding are unless I was getting paid $150+ per hour. $30/hr would be about a 50% pay cut and I live in a substantially lower cost area of the country. Also I don't have to deal with people in the Bay Area which would require additional compensation.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    11. Re:Take this job and... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Let's emphasize that Yelp is PAYING this insultingly low wage in such an expensive city. And keeping people in that bracket at least a full year.

      No one is keeping anyone. I don't understand why people would stay San Francisco for such a low wage. There are a lot of other places in this country (even in California) where you will not get choked with a minimum wage. Living on a minimum wage is not pretty (I know, I did that), but some places make the situation worse than others. San Francisco is on the top of that list.

    12. Re:Take this job and... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      its not insultingly low to someone who is still living at home or with roomates. and keeping them for a year? what do you expect? im not gonna want an employee that takes 3-6 months to train to leave as soon as they finally understand the job

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re:Take this job and... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      who said its an error that needs correcting?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    14. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also San Francisco is partially to blame. The city, county, and state is preventing the construction of enough housing. This drives up rent to be 80% of someone's salary. They are also responsible for the price of the train ticket. And the taxes she was paying on driving her car.

    15. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people accept an insultingly low wage? With wages so low, you lose practically nothing by quitting and looking elsewhere for work.

    16. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally it would take $150 per hour to even get me to think about working in Silicon Valley. I too get calls to work there. I just laugh and say no thank you.

    17. Re:Take this job and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's emphasize that Yelp is PAYING this insultingly low wage in such an expensive city.

      There are plenty of technical jobs in Silicon Valley that start off at $10 per hour — and plenty of people who take those jobs. Employers aren't going to raise their pay rates until they have difficulty finding people to fill those positions...

      In other words, they'll raise their pay rates when we stop with the H-1B visa bullshit already.

      'Scuse me while I hold my breath...

    18. Re:Take this job and... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      In other words, they'll raise their pay rates when we stop with the H-1B visa bullshit already.

      I'm not talking about H-1B workers. I'm talking about American workers who take any low paying job that comes their way.

      'Scuse me while I hold my breath...

      Please do and remove yourself from the gene pool.

  22. The Bobs Just Fixed The Glitch by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Talia Jane was actually fired 4 years ago, but they forgot to stop her paychecks and email. They just "fixed the glitch".

    Her red Swingline was also confiscated.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:The Bobs Just Fixed The Glitch by slashping · · Score: 1

      They should have done it on a Friday.

    2. Re:The Bobs Just Fixed The Glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she spend the 4 years gazing out the window at the married squirrels?

    3. Re:The Bobs Just Fixed The Glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's best to do this on Friday, however.

  23. So many posts criticizing the EMPLOYEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US really is a toxic hellhole of everything bad about capitalism. I will laugh when you die starving in the streets.

    1. Re:So many posts criticizing the EMPLOYEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US really is a toxic hellhole of everything bad about capitalism. I will laugh when you die starving in the streets.

      Look who's actually starving in the streets: http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/h... 50% youth unemployment in Spain and Greece. I bet those kids would be overjoyed to have the kind of job Talia Jane is complaining about.

      Take it from someone who emigrated from Europe: Europe is the "toxic hellhole", where people have no future and the economy and society are falling apart.

  24. you have nobody but yourself to blame by ooloorie · · Score: 0
    She is fresh out of college with a worthless degree, moves to one of the most expensive areas in the country, rents an apartment by herself without roommates, buys a car, runs up debt, and she is wondering why she is running out of money?

    Talia Jane, I have news for you: even people with far more worthwhile skills than you have, or will ever have, get roommates after college, don't buy cars right away, and live frugally. And if you keep doing the kind of stupid things you're doing, you will indeed end up bankrupt and homeless. You have nobody but yourself to blame.

    1. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people (sock puppets?) seem to be making this the story of a brat who can't make good choices, but I see it as the story of how a young American worker's enthusiasm and determination got her ground into hamburger. It's a warning to other young would-be Yelp workers to steer clear lest they suffer too. That's the only way these soulless corporations will ever feel the sting and be forced to raise wages.

    2. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by ooloorie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a warning to other young would-be Yelp workers to steer clear lest they suffer too. That's the only way these soulless corporations will ever feel the sting and be forced to raise wages.

      I agree completely: people should think clearly about cost of living and desired standard of living relative to salaries when choosing where to work. Then, when corporations can't hire the workers they want at the salary they are offering, they will increase their salary offers. Talia's problem is that she obviously didn't do that.

    3. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In her letter, she mentioned that she wanted to move close to her father. If so, why couldn't she arrange to move in w/ him until she earned enough to afford a place? That would have saved her rent, and that could have been used on her flat tire, oil change and everything else she wrote about

    4. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If you want to call a decade+ old account a 'sock puppet' count me in as one.

      She was complaining that she wasn't allowed to take company food home. She posted a sexual joke in response to Yelp's official Twitter account. She posted photos of herself with alcohol on the job.

      She complained about not being able to make ends meet but didn't have a roommate and didn't live with her parents, despite them being in the area. She complained about the cost of public transportation while also having a private car.

      She got a worthless degree, it's a shock that she had a job to begin with. Based on most of her writing it's a shock that she graduated with an English degree at all.

    5. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm where is it confirmed she actually even has a degree? I see "left college" but that could mean dropped out.

    6. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've been a sock puppet for a decade then, seems likely.

    7. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 0

      I would be quite an ass if I were to demand respect based on the length of my membership. This is a meritocracy. Good day.

    8. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      You alluded to the fact that any post that disagrees with you must be a sock puppet.

      I asserted the age of my account to show that I was either not a sock puppet or a sock puppet playing the the ultra long game.

      meritocracy

      What is it with you people and that word?

    9. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      She was complaining that she wasn't allowed to take company food home.

      She was also complaining that she wasn't being paid enough to buy food. In that context, that's not an unreasonable complaint.

      She posted a sexual joke in response to Yelp's official Twitter account.

      That was clearly in poor taste. It might even have risen to the level of being actionable once it became clear that the account in question was held by a Yelp employee. It doesn't negate the message, though.

      And, to play devil's advocate here, that's precisely the sort of acting out that I'd expect from someone who was being paid minimum wage for a job that in the Bay Area should have paid considerably more than that. If you don't treat your employees with respect, why should they respect you? Where I come, respect is earned. If you're paying people McDonald's wages (and they were), you should expect no better than burger-flipper levels of decorum.

      She posted photos of herself with alcohol on the job.

      With an unopened bottle of alcohol. In every tech company I've ever worked for, they've had beer bashes where people actually drank alcohol while ostensibly on the job. The only thing potentially career-limiting about it was the caption, which could be interpreted to mean that nobody was surprised by having alcohol at work because you needed it to make it through the day. Or it could be a genuine statement of surprise from someone who moved here from an area where beer bashes aren't part of the culture, and where having alcohol at work would actually be unusual. If this had anything to do with her dismissal, then somebody has unrealistic standards.

      She complained about not being able to make ends meet but didn't have a roommate and didn't live with her parents, despite them being in the area.

      Source?

      She complained about the cost of public transportation while also having a private car.

      And then you pay for parking in San Francisco. Unless Yelp has some special deal, that's going to cost you a minimum of $15 per day, which is four bucks per day more than she was paying for round-trip BART fare, by my math. And that's before factoring in gasoline, wear and tear on the vehicle, the years of your life that you lose to stress while sitting in Bay Area traffic, etc. I wouldn't work in San Francisco for a quarter million per year, much less $12.25 an hour.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by wbr1 · · Score: 2

      They will not increase salary offers. They will beg Congress for more h1-b visas and pay immigrants less in the high cost of living areas. That or outsource.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    11. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly do NOT see enthusiasm and determination here, I see gluttony, social bragging and being lazy. None of her post are about investing her time or money into making anything better. And the plead for donations is the tops, she should be arrested for internet fraud.

    12. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the letter doesn't say that her dad actually lives within practical commuting distance, just that he is "close". That could just as easily mean Sacramento as Oakland. But yeah, she probably should have.

      Then again, she probably should have said "no" when asked to take a job at minimum wage in the first place just to "gain experience". Unfortunately, this sort of shady hiring practice is common in media-related fields, and to me, it ranks right up there with musicians being asked to play gigs "for exposure" in terms of how offensive I find this practice. It just shouldn't be done, and if everyone said "h***, no" when the recruiter gave them the dollar figure, there would be a lot less of this sort of abuse in the world today.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      The fact that your company has food, period, is more than most people have. If you're really that hard up for food you eat during the day and fast at night.

      The point wasn't that she didn't drive it. The point is that she had it. Millions of people earning 'near minimum wage' don't have the money for a personal vehicles.

      She wanted the own apartment, car, lifestyle but wasn't willing to make sacrifices that most people living in the real world have to make every day. On top of that she has a degree that is worth less than the paper it was written on. She could have gone to a trade school and be earning $20-40/hr anywhere in the US.

      Sorry if I don't feel sorry for her making terrible personal decisions.

    14. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, when corporations can't hire the workers they want at the salary they are offering, they will complain to congress that there aren't any qualified domestic workers and they should increase the H1B limit.

      Fixed that for you.

    15. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So basically you're saying that she should be forced to sell the car that she presumably already owned so that Yelp can pay their CSRs $9 per hour less than the Bay Area average for CSRs? I just want to make sure I understand you correctly....

      IMO, her biggest mistake was taking a job that was significantly below her level of education. (And no, a degree in English, even English Lit, is not "worth less than the paper it is written on". That and a tech writing credential will get you a halfway decent job around here.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      You're blind then. Girl lived on rice and power bars from work. She shut off her heat so she'd have transportation money to keep giving her all at Greed, Gluttony & Carefully Orchestrated Narratives, Inc. But I guess you feel they're too big to prosecute so you peer down at lil Talia and her perfectly legal "help me survive" fund.

    17. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      So basically you're saying that she should be forced to sell the car that she presumably already owned

      YES. Many people would love an asset like a car to sell. I'd also like to know if she had cable. Something tells me she did.

      If she was that good then why was she working for $9 less than the Bay Area average CSR?

      That and a tech writing credential will get you a halfway decent job around here.

      ... Which is why she was working for Yelp?

    18. Re: you have nobody but yourself to blame by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You say that as if it's a bad thing.

    19. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      One of the groups at Oracle Headquarters has their own Keg Fridge. In the Office. At the headquarters. While I suspect it was only used on Fridays, there is ample precedent for companies allowing drinking at work.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    20. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      That's the only way these soulless corporations will ever feel the sting and be forced to raise wages.

      I think you meant to say:
      Forced to take a $12/hr job with full medical benefits and literally a free lunch and move it India where it probably should have been to start with.

    21. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Hahah. See, $12/hr to me where I live is "must live with his parents" level wages. It must be even less impressive in the Bay Area. The benefits are contingent on not getting fired for drawing too much of one's benefits, and the shelves full of snacks is a lot cheaper than paying higher wages.

    22. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A lot of people (sock puppets?) seem to be making this the story of a brat who can't make good choices, but I see it as the story of how a young American worker's enthusiasm and determination got her ground into hamburger.

      It's too bad her parents gave her lots of determination and enthusiasm and not enough common sense, but that's not unusual in any sense. How do you propose that we allocate the available space in San Francisco, given that we live in a capitalism?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So basically you're saying that she should be forced to sell the car that she presumably already owned so that Yelp can pay their CSRs $9 per hour less than the Bay Area average for CSRs? I just want to make sure I understand you correctly....

      Have you ever lived in or near San Francisco? It is common to not be able to afford a car. I have known numerous people who lived in that situation who could not afford a car. They still managed to feed, clothe, and house themselves, and get to work. Now that parking is practically impossible anywhere in SF, people are provably better off without them. (And can you imagine what SF would be like without any cars at all, and with the streets reclaimed for green space? It would be a fucking paradise in the way that people imagine that it is and in precisely the way that it is not.)

      My car got stolen in SF, I should have sold it on the way in and got another one on the way out. I could have walked to work. There's no time of the year when the weather prohibits that, if you are willing to wear a duck suit. Heh! I wrote "fuck suit" first. Lots of people in SF wear those, but I don't think they help much with rain. You would get cold.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One of the groups at Oracle Headquarters has their own Keg Fridge. In the Office. At the headquarters. While I suspect it was only used on Fridays, there is ample precedent for companies allowing drinking at work.

      I worked for Tivoli shortly post-buyout and since their early days they had a beer Friday tradition, because Texas. (Hey, it's not all bad.) Sometimes beers would hang around in the fridge and sometimes someone would drink one, and the world failed to end. Tivoli's corporate culture did go into the toilet, but that's because of IBM, not because of beer. It was fairly usual for people to have a drink at lunch, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      1) Not sure English is really your native language. 2) I was unaware that this episode had already led to plans for revolution and wealth re-distribution on such a grand scale. 3) All Talia wants to do is her part in waking a reluctant workforce up to a) how at least one tech company exploits it's workers, and b) that the workers can't depend on someone else to improve things, so they ought to consider it themselves.

      Other thoughts: I don't think I'd like to live in a world where "common sense" meant only that you should leave an exploitative industry to it's own devices and keep quiet while it consumes the remaining sheep within it's grasp. To me, part of being a free person is standing up to exploitation and extinguishing it from the American experience.

    26. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because this story IS about a brat... but of course this site is populated by simps whose whole year would be made if any sort of woman looked in their general direction without disgust.

    27. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's that easy to just raise wages, why aren't other people out there starting up companies that pay well?

    28. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      It was her grandad's car - probably not hers to sell away but hers to use. Even if it could be sold - it was in poor condition so probably doesn't amount to much as an asset to sell.

      If she moves to other parts of the country - the car might turn out to be a great asset to possess and not have sold earlier for peanuts.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    29. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have her costs got to do with anything?

      If she felt they were not paying enough, she should have emailed the senior management. Told them that the high churn is because you are paying below market rates. Showed them that the staff are giving away way more money than needs to because they are not properly handling customer cases etc. She should have explained why she and others are worth more than was being offered, and/or even threatened to quit and suggested the negative consequences to the business.

      Instead she blabs on about her poor life decisions then blames her employer for not paying her enough to cover her lifestyle choices.

    30. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      1) Not sure English is really your native language.

      Sure you're a dumbfuck

      2) I was unaware that this episode had already led to plans for revolution and wealth re-distribution on such a grand scale.

      If you're calling for this girl to get a better deal, that's what you're calling for, whether you know it or not. It's too bad you don't know it, because you're a dumbfuck

      3) All Talia wants to do is her part in waking a reluctant workforce up to a) how at least one tech company exploits it's workers, and b) that the workers can't depend on someone else to improve things, so they ought to consider it themselves.

      No, she wants to complain, and she wants it to be someone else's fault that she has no marketable skills worth mentioning, and went to work someplace she can't afford because she wants to live there when there are jobs elsewhere in the country. Granted, bloody few of them. But she's not even aware enough to know what's going on in the country, she's just focused on herself. She's also a dumbfuck. She can't be complaining that she doesn't have enough money to eat while simultaneously posting pictures of steaks and eggs benedict. I couldn't afford to eat that shit at her age, either. She blew through her money living beyond her means and then decided to blame it on her employer, and she got fired precisely as she deserved, not least because she deliberately violated the terms of her employment.

      Other thoughts: I don't think I'd like to live in a world where "common sense" meant only that you should leave an exploitative industry to it's own devices and keep quiet

      That's not what I said, and it's just another example of how you are a dumbfuck that you would characterize it as such, you disingenuous douchebag. First, she was not in an "industry". She was a phone monkey, not a programmer. Second, she chose to go to work for a company that paid shit in a place where you need lots of money to live a "normal" lifestyle. Other people making what she is making share housing and eat ramen.

      There is a problem with wages in San Francisco, but unless you were born there, you really don't get to bitch because you knew the situation before you moved there. San Francisco is typically one of the world's most expensive cities to live in, it pretty much always is in the top ten, and any asshole can fire up their web browser and find this sort of thing out... unless they're a dumbfuck

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by tungstencoil · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you're saying, with one important caveat: it's pretty typical in soft-skill jobs (which media, frankly, is) where there is a good supply of qualified workers to take a job doing customer service to get one's foot in the door. Further, it's typical with such places to have a minimum time in service (12 or 18 months, usually) before being allowed to move to a new position... because lots of qualified people are sticking their foot in the same door.

      Before I went back to school and got my CS degree, I worked customer service at a major wireless carrier. At the time (mid/late nineties) they were expanding and growing. I had a friend who worked customer service there (because she wanted to get into sales, and they said 'you will need to get your foot in the door') and said if you can do your year, within six months afterward if you have any skill whatsoever you'd find a different job. She did; I did; it all worked out. We knew what we were getting into and, yes, a year on the phones kinda sucked. I had my eye on a larger prize and knew my own skills, so it worked for me. The woman complains about this, but knew it going into it. I don't know if Yelp *actually* promotes from within, and if they don't this is indeed a specious practice. If they do promote from within (as my previous employer did), then I don't have a problem with it if they disclose up front.

    32. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by ultranova · · Score: 1

      YES. Many people would love an asset like a car to sell.

      It would be rather foolish to sell a productive asset - a car which lets you seek work from a larger area - to help with a cashflow problem.

      I'd also like to know if she had cable. Something tells me she did.

      That something being your internalized cultural indoctrination making up shit to shield said culture's systems from criticism. It's actually quite fascinating to watch.

      Also, you're making the rather weird assumption that people are robots and don't need recreation. I presume it originates from the same ideological source, since it certainly isn't something you could conclude from observing humans or being one yourself.

      If she was that good then why was she working for $9 less than the Bay Area average CSR?

      Shouldn't you be more worried about having to effectively subsidize Yelp by letting them pay their employees such low wages that those employees end up on public support?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      G and R and E and E again, and finally D.

    34. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      First of all, you SUCK at making an argument or counterargument. Second of all, you SUCK at presentation of "evidence". Third of all, you suck as a human being for raising your voice to screaming levels in defense of an unquestionably exploitative corporation.

    35. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Have you ever lived in or near San Francisco? It is common to not be able to afford a car. I have known numerous people who lived in that situation who could not afford a car.

      Depends on what you mean by "near". I live in Sunnyvale (South Bay). I would not be able to function down here without a car. I would have to buy a grocery basket, because public transit doesn't get you significantly closer than walking. It's a question of whether you walk for half an hour or forty-five minutes while carrying all your groceries.

      If you're actually in San Francisco, public transit works well. You don't have to go very far outside the city center before it completely breaks down. By contrast, I absolutely refuse to drive in San Francisco proper because my experience has been that the roads are a living nightmare of poorly market lane changes and turns, one-way streets, cab/bus-only streets, etc. It is to the grid system what the Centre Pompidou is to architecture. If I have to go up to "the city", I drive several miles to the Caltrain station and take that up. It is possible to do it without driving, but only if I leave San Francisco no later than the 8:40 Caltrain. Otherwise, you'll get stuck at either the Mountain View station and will have to either take a cab or wait until 5:00 when the buses and trains start running again. I suppose you could pay extra to return to Sunnyvale Caltrain, assuming you realize that the light rail has already left before you step off the train....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    36. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      She complained about being so poor she had to pick up pennies and get donations from a CVS worker...

      Does these look like posts of a girl so poor she's searching for pennies on the ground?

      http://alotofrice.pixieset.com...

    37. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      From her "help me survive fund"

      http://alotofrice.pixieset.com...

    38. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      First of all, you SUCK at making an argument or counterargument.

      You're a hypocritical little bitch, and nobody is impressed by your hypocritical little bitchiness. You opened with an insult and you got back what you asked for. If you don't want to catch shit, then don't open your shit-trap.

      Second of all, you SUCK at presentation of "evidence".

      You have offered nothing even remotely like evidence. No evidence is therefore required to counter your argument.

      you suck as a human being for raising your voice to screaming levels in defense of an unquestionably exploitative corporation.

      Cry, cry again, then cry some more for me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Young women of every tax bracket have in their possession a number of ridiculously overpriced beauty aids. No telling how long ago she purchased this facial rub, who gifted it to her, or anything else. So no - not proof that she's a fraud.

    40. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yelp's CEO responded by saying "She's exactly right, which is why we're GTFO of San Fran and moving our brainless ops down to Phoenix AZ where untalented idiots like her actually enjoy a $12.50/hr paycheck for dronework."

    41. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      You miss all the other pictures? While complaining about starving on rice, she's baking up a storm, ordering alcohol, eating out... She shut off her heat but has cable tv? I'm not claiming "fraud", just showing that something is not right in her story.

      Site moved - http://thatsalotofrice.com/

    42. Re:you have nobody but yourself to blame by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you're SPENDING MONEY on a domain to smear Talia's reputation? Makes me very suspicious of your interest in all of this. And sorry, you have no evidence of Talia's supposed prosperity for the reasons I outlined above. Poor people have all kinds of things in their possession which they can't afford to buy every day, especially women and their beauty supplies.

  25. I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wish we were responding to her actual letter, rather than your portrayal of her letter, and your spin on the situation.

    I'm going to respond to her letter, rather than to you.

    ===

    Starting wages for her position at Yelp are nearly $10/hour over minimum wage. Assuming she worked a full 40 hour week, she was making a minimum of $35,360/year.

    That yields, given California and federal tax rates:

    $680.00 = Weekly Gross Pay
    $086.59 = Federal Withholding
    $042.16 = Social Security
    $009.86 = Medicare
    $017.79 = California
    $006.12 = SDI

    $517.48 = Net Pay

    $26,908.96/year gross income

    Accept her "80% goes for rent" number as fact. That yields:

    $21527.168 / year
    = $1793.93 / month

    This is a quite high rent, and implies she's living alone, with no roommates. We'll get back to that.

    $5,381.79 = non-rent disposable income/year
    $448.48 / month
    $103.49/week

    This is low, but it's livable. She does not qualify for SNAP (food stamps), even after income deductions: she is not below 200% of the federal poverty level. In other words: 30% of people live on less than that.

    Let's revisit the rent.

    A ForRent.com search (not the best site, but representative) shows 6 apartments in Emeryville -- a nice area, near Berkeley, but across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco, for less than $800/month. All of them near public transportation; 2 of them have pools.

    That's without taking a roommate. So she could have halved her monthly rent, if she was willing to live somewhere *not actually in San Francisco*.

    That's another $993.93/month in her pocket...
    = $229.36/week
    + $103.49/week
    = $332.85/week ...which covers everything she complains about in her letter, plus adds some spending money. She'd have more if she split the rent on a more expensive apartment with a roommate.

    I'm not feeling very sympathetic right now.”

    1. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd bet she has a roommate. I looked at living in SF and my rent would be in the ballpark of $3k/mo for a small piece of shit. My salary would need to increase about 28% from where I live to offset the cost of living increase, which doesn't take into account the fact that my current state has no income tax.

    2. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I'd bet she has a roommate. I looked at living in SF and my rent would be in the ballpark of $3k/mo for a small piece of shit.

      In her letter, she claims to commute from the East Bay. One of her issues is that she was stuck at a CVS pharmacy in the East Bay with not enough cash to make it into SF. If that's the case, her rent statement is completely absurd.

    3. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if she was making$200k per year. I'm sympathetic. This clearly shows a review of Yelp has backlash but the small business owners subject to the totally shitty reviews from yelp have no way to remove callous and shitty reviews. The entire concept of Yelp is flawed and yelp itself and and other sites like it should just be banned

    4. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      She states in her original post that she lives far enough out in the East bay that her daily commute via public transit is $5+ each way. $10/day * 5 days a week * 4 weeks comes to at least $200 a month for transportation alone. Your rental search may have turned up a few $800/month apartments but generally those are either reserved for low income, or get you a small walk-in-closet sized bedroom in a house with 5+ roommates. Most listings on those sites are outdated and no longer available the day after they're posted and have 20-30 people fighting over them. Typical rent in Emeryville is about $1400 for a small studio, increasing by at least $100 annually. I just moved from there, precisely because it's that insane. It's pretty much impossible to find anything unless you're an exec or engineer making six figures. Another option is Oakland, but anywhere in Oakland you're looking at drug dealers and homeless heckling you as soon as you get near public transportation, and weekly shootings near your apartment. Bay area is hell on earth unless you're among the privileged six-figure crowd. #formerengineer

    5. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't quite know how you did your search, but I just did the same and found just one apartment for less than $900/mo ($785 to be exact), and it's located in East Oakland, which is not a place I'd recommend. That apartment also has income restrictions, so she may not even be eligible (the site doesn't list restrictions for single occupancy).

      For apartments actually in Emeryville, you're looking at closer to $2-3k/mo, which is pretty damn close to the $1800/mo estimate, even perhaps with a roommate since two bedroom apartments are more expensive. If you have to work in SF, you're looking at over an hour commute each way, public transportation or not. On top of that, you have to be able to move around in Emeryville and, like most cities in the US, that pretty much requires a car. I've tried to do without in Emeryville: getting through your day without one is a nightmare, and I was living very close to my workplace at the time. Shops are often not on bus routes, especially grocery stores and pharmacies. There are very few places to eat out at within walking distance, assuming you even have the money to do so.

      The long and short of it is that Oakland has a lot of bad neighborhoods, Emeryville is basically SF's extended shopping district (some even just say Emeryville is SF's Ikea because the only one in the area is there) and so super car-focused, and Berkeley is expensive and even further to commute from. Your options are limited, and the commute sucks. SF is one of the worst places to be when it comes to working on low wages, and companies like Yelp (who absolutely do not need to be in SF) should take that into account.

    6. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot to include that apparently she has very good heath insurance including vision, dental, medication all with $20 copays. This is for a customer service rep.

    7. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by aralin · · Score: 1

      2br/1ba appartment 30 miles from SF goes for $3500 a month, $4000 with utilities. She definitely has a roommate. :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    8. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $680 a week.
      $153 in taxes.

      No one has YET to mention that, other than you breaking it out for everyone. 22% in taxes for someone who doesn't make enough to live on, according to them at least.

      Can we START to admit taxes are hurting/killing the working class yet? No, instead I'm supposed to "feel the Bern" and vote for an asshat that wants to at least double taxes on the working class and if I'm against it I'm not sympathetic to to the poor.

      I think this has gotten out of hand. Cut government spending and reduce taxes on the working class.

    9. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting analysis - It starts off with an assertion that YELP pays $10 above minimum wage. My I ask how you came to that assertion - Unless taxes there are stupidly high on minimum wage earners it contradicts her letter which claims she makes $8.15 per hour after tax. (I'm not saying it isn't, about the only thing I can find which might, sorta-kinda-maybe speak to this is that her ex Boss agreed that living costs in SF are to high, but said nothing of minimum wage.

    10. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by frnic · · Score: 1, Informative

      I wont bother to check all your math, since you blew it in the first line: At $10/hr she would be making $20,400 per year gross, not $35K. There are 2040 work hours in a normal year, (40x51) if per chance she worked 52 weeks with NO days off at all, it would still come out to $20,800.

      So, bzzzt, not interested in the rest of your justification.

    11. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100/week is really tight. You missed about $300/month on utilities.

    12. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Interesting analysis - It starts off with an assertion that YELP pays $10 above minimum wage. My I ask how you came to that assertion.

      Job listing, Indeed.com, for "Customer Service Representative" - $17/hour.

    13. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wont bother to check all your math, since you blew it in the first line: At $10/hr she would be making $20,400 per year gross, not $35K.

      I won't bother to read the rest of your posting, since you did not read mine.

      I said "nearly $10/hour over minimum wage". Federal minimum wage is currently $7.25/hour. That places her at *nearly* $10 + $7.25 /hour total, or *nearly * $17.25/hour. The actual amount if she took the job listed on Indeed.com would be $17/hour. Which is *nearly* $17.25/hour.

      You will notice that $17/hour * 40 hours/week * 52 week/year is precisely the figure I quoted.

    14. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      OK, I lied. I read the 40x51 par,t which is stupid, since normal wages are paid for vacation days for employees who are salaried, and may companies also pay them for people who are full time but paid hourly, based on an accrual schedule.

      So your math is off again.

    15. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      This clearly shows a review of Yelp has backlash but the small business owners subject to the totally shitty reviews from yelp have no way to remove callous and shitty reviews.

      Yelp being a fuck-stick of a company in your opinion (pardon my French) in no way justifies a higher salary for employees, unless you are suggesting that they should get "a cut of the take".

    16. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Starting wages for her position at Yelp are nearly $10/hour over minimum wage. Assuming she worked a full 40 hour week, she was making a minimum of $35,360/year.

      According to her letter, she was making $8.15 per hour after taxes, which comes to about ten bucks before taxes. Another article said that it was actually $12.25 per hour, which is the SF minimum wage, not $10 above it. Either way, unless those numbers are just outright fabrications, she was not making $10 per hour over minimum wage.

      Accept her "80% goes for rent" number as fact. That yields:

      $21527.168 / year
      = $1793.93 / month

      This is a quite high rent, and implies she's living alone, with no roommates. We'll get back to that.

      Her letter also gives her actual rent at $1245 per month. You started from a wrong assumption, and all your math from there on down is wrong proportionally.

      A ForRent.com search (not the best site, but representative) shows 6 apartments in Emeryville -- a nice area, near Berkeley, but across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco, for less than $800/month. All of them near public transportation; 2 of them have pools.

      I see nothing under $1600/month in Emeryville. I do see two in Oakland in that price range. Either way, I'm assuming she got a two-bedroom apartment with the intent to find a roommate, but then was unable to find one because everybody else on her team was living with a parent. That's certainly what the letter implied. And the problem is, once you've signed a lease, you're kind of stuck with it. And at $12.25 per hour, you can't exactly stay in a hotel until you can find a place, because even the worst rathole of a hotel in the Bay Area is likely to cost more than $330 per week.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You forgot that San Francisco requires all companies with more than 50 employees to pay for health insurance for their employees.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    18. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Which tells us that either she is lying about making $8.25 after taxes or they're paying half again more for new hires than they did six months ago when they hired her. My guess is that they didn't have many takers at minimum wage, so they had to raise their salary. And even at $17 per hour, that's still four or five bucks an hour below the Bay Area average for a customer service rep. They're pretty much looking for slave labor.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and California min wage is higher than that! It's currently $10.00/hour. so she was at >$20 an hour

    20. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all due respect, Bernie Sanders has proposed increasing taxation on workers earning $250k and up. Even in the Valley, that's not working class....that's still 5% or higher. And I'd pay it. And I don't have an issue with it, though it'd marginally affect my income. Fercryinoutloud, I put away more than that in 401k, add'l withholding (useful at years' end to avoid tax bills) and discretionary holdbacks.....if those don't hurt me, the extra taxes to help ensure that we properly educate my fellow citizens, and pay for infrastructure undermined by idiocies like Prop 13, will NOT. Yeah, it'll be a smidge less income. BFD. Taxes are the price of living in a society that isn't entirely dog-eat-dog.

    21. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking moron, Bernie Sanders will not "at least double taxes". The social programs he is proposing will come from reduced military spending. What's that? Reducing military spending will decrease security? Yeah, like USA's military spending has done any fucking good for security anywhere on the planet.

    22. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A while ago I saw a sign at Burger King on Market St, a 15 minute walk from Yelp's headquarters, offering $20/hr for burger flipping. Inflation in Norcal is way out of control. $17/hr is pretty piss-poor, and it doesn't sound like she was getting even that. Also, $17 is NOT $10 above local statutory minimum wage.

    23. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should start reading a little more to get some literary comprehension skills, as no-where was GP talking about $10/hour wages. Instead, this is what was written:

      Starting wages for her position at Yelp are nearly $10/hour over minimum wage

      So that's $10/hr ON TOP OF the minimum of $12.35 as posted elsewhere.

      By the way, doesn't the US have paid leave, like (almost) all other developed countries?

    24. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      No idea about your maths, but your reading comprehension sucks.

      He said "Starting wages for her position at Yelp are nearly $10/hour over minimum wage.".

      Thats not "$10/hr", thats "minimum wage + $~10/hr".

    25. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      30% of people live on less than that.

      You think that is an argument in your favor?

      She works for a tech startup and is making poor person money.They should at least pay her a livable wage, or do the honorable thing and offshore her job to someone someplace where that salary is not an insult.

    26. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1790 is HIGH? Do you have any idea what the rent is in SF?

    27. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      She states in her original post that she lives far enough out in the East bay that her daily commute via public transit is $5+ each way. $10/day * 5 days a week * 4 weeks comes to at least $200 a month for transportation alone. Your rental search may have turned up a few $800/month apartments but generally those are either reserved for low income, or get you a small walk-in-closet sized bedroom in a house with 5+ roommates. Most listings on those sites are outdated and no longer available the day after they're posted and have 20-30 people fighting over them. Typical rent in Emeryville is about $1400 for a small studio, increasing by at least $100 annually. I just moved from there, precisely because it's that insane. It's pretty much impossible to find anything unless you're an exec or engineer making six figures. Another option is Oakland, but anywhere in Oakland you're looking at drug dealers and homeless heckling you as soon as you get near public transportation, and weekly shootings near your apartment. Bay area is hell on earth unless you're among the privileged six-figure crowd. #formerengineer

      I have to wonder how much of the increase is due to the AirBNB effect.
      http://www.sfchronicle.com/air...

      I think this affects any major city now reducing the supply of apartments for rent / purchase and thus driving up rental and purchasing rates.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    28. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Holi · · Score: 1

      Can you please show these 6 apartments in Emeryville (home of Pixar). I searched and I could not find a single apartment in Emeryville for under $1700, In fact I found only 1 studio apartment in Oakland under $1000.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    29. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      What r-tard pays 80% of their income into housing?

    30. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      30% of people live on less than that.

      You think that is an argument in your favor?

      It's an argument against it being impossible to live on her wages.

      She works for a tech startup and is making poor person money.

      She was doing a poor person's job, too. If we want to talk about the problem here, it's a global problem regarding the available amount of work. You need a four year degree or a ton of experience to get even a shit job now. We're going to have to restructure society if we're going to expect everyone to work. We're throwing away enough food to feed all of these people just so that we can have fully-stocked shelves because consumers go to another store if your shelves aren't fully faced (it's a fact) and we have enough homes lying around to house every homeless person in the country multiple times over but we won't force the banks to sell them for what the market will bear. Hell, it's completely legal to just take the homes from the banks to house the homeless, at least in the USA, look that shit up! But that sure as shit is not happening either.

      There is a coming crisis in the USA. This girl is feeling those effects. However, she's complaining that she can't afford to live in one of the most desirable places on the planet as she begins her career. That's bullshit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude she got English Literature degree, not Math! Leave her alone!

    32. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by phlinn · · Score: 1

      Medicare for all has a 2.2% income tax applicable to everyone currently paying income tax. From his site: "The 2.2% income tax applies to taxable income as currently defined. In calculating taxable incomefor a married couple with two children, it has been assumed that they use the $12,600 standard deduction and a personal exemption of $4,050 per family member for a total of $28,800. The 2.2% tax is applied to the remainder."

      But that's not all. It's based on a ridiculously underestimated cost of the plan. Effictively, it's wishful thinking. Mega McArdle lays it out better than I could, but the basic point is that it asserts magical unexplained savings. Further, it promises to eliminate co-pays, deductibles, and refusal to cover various treaments.

      Before you claim other countries single payer plans prove we could save money and provide universal care, the plan avoids any mention of cutting the pay of healthcare professionals. Doctors here make more than twice as much as doctors elsewhere.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    33. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Why the hell do people live in San Francisco or anywhere near it? I've got relatives who live out there and all they do is complain about how expensive it is and they have nothing left over after paying the rent. I keep telling them to move back East -- there are plenty of tech jobs around here (Eng. Lit. not so much), but they're all somehow mentally wedded to the idea of living in San Francisco.

    34. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The federal minimum wage doesn't matter, only the local minimum. Also, $17.25 is not "nearly" $12.25. It's "nearly" 41% more. Dick.

    35. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by dex22 · · Score: 1

      I won't bother to read the rest of your posting, since you did not read mine.

      I said "nearly $10/hour over minimum wage". Federal minimum wage is currently $7.25/hour. That places her at *nearly* $10 + $7.25 /hour total, or *nearly * $17.25/hour. The actual amount if she took the job listed on Indeed.com would be $17/hour. Which is *nearly* $17.25/hour.

      You will notice that $17/hour * 40 hours/week * 52 week/year is precisely the figure I quoted.

      Ironic, since you apparently didn't read the original letter. The writer's take home pay is $8.15/hr. Your assumption of her getting what they are currently offering is flawed - she has outright stated she's not getting that. She's actually getting the city's minimum wage of $12.25/hr gross.

    36. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      He won't double taxes. Because he won't be elected.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    37. Re: I already posted this on another site.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Why the hell do people live in San Francisco or anywhere near it?

      One of her parents, whom she used to live with and not pay rent, lives in the Bay Area.

      Yes, I know: she could move back in, or not moved out in the first place.

    38. Re:I already posted this on another site.... by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are busted. Her salary was minimum. 12.25 an hour. Rent was 1200.
      Now rework your math and maybe you will start to see her issue.

      The problem is that yelp was paying minimum for a job that should be, in your words, $10 over minimum.

  26. One wonders why she took the job? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    Did she not do the math? Gross income, less federal and state income tax, social security, medicare, and benefits = net pay.
    If her net pay doesn't cover rent, food, utilities, and discretionary spending then this obviously isn't the right job for her.
    We can probably safely presume that since she got her degree in English Lit that math is probably not her strong suit.

    1. Re:One wonders why she took the job? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      We can probably safely presume that since she got her degree in English Lit that math is probably not her strong suit.

      Your point being what? I know plenty of people who graduated with liberal arts degrees and work in the technical fields throughout Silicon Valley. Some people don't even have a college education and taught themselves everything they need to know about technology.

    2. Re:One wonders why she took the job? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      My point is that people like you are ready to jump down just about anyone's throat for just about any reason.
      Take a chill pill. It was a joke. One you didn't get.

    3. Re:One wonders why she took the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She apparently wasn't aware at the time that should would have to work at that position for a year before being able to transfer to a different position.

    4. Re:One wonders why she took the job? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My point is that people like you are ready to jump down just about anyone's throat for just about any reason.

      This is Slashdot. You must be new around here.

    5. Re:One wonders why she took the job? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Even not having enough to pay for utilities or food is a whole lot better than being homeless. Sometimes you take what you can get... obviously if its not enough you're gonna move on when you find something better. But something better doesn't always come around that quickly.

  27. If I were her by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have found a way to supplement my income. I see people selling Yelp 'reputation management' services all the time, being an inside /(wo)?man/ on that would be profitable indeed.

    1. Re:If I were her by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I see people selling Yelp 'reputation management' services all the time, being an inside /(wo)?man/ on that would be profitable indeed.

      She probably has a non-compete clause in her contract. Yelp sells "reputation management" (extortion) services itself.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:If I were her by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      So she'd have to hide behind an s-corp.

      Having access to the Yelp internal databases would make her services unique. Yelp has limits of what it will do, she could change reviews rather than just hide them (off the first page).

      Of course eventually she'd have been found out. But it would have been smarter than just getting herself fired.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  28. Disclosing your salary by drolli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my contract it is forbidden that i discuss my salary with anybody, especially in public in connection with my employer.

    1. Re:Disclosing your salary by rekoil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Enforcing such a clause is illegal if your company is subject to the NRLA (hint: most US companies are): http://www.npr.org/2014/04/13/...

    2. Re:Disclosing your salary by drolli · · Score: 1

      I don't work in the US, but good to know, maybe i will.

    3. Re:Disclosing your salary by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In my contract it is forbidden that i discuss my salary with anybody, especially in public in connection with my employer.

      Anyone can put an unenforceable clause in a Contract.

      The clause you mention sounds quite illegal. If in the US, it certainly is (see NRLA). IANAL

      My many European friends frequently express dismay at Americans' weird urge to hide their salary. In much of Europe, everybody knows. If an American works for the State of California, everybody knows, by law; just visit the website. I myself have experienced a very similar Retaliation, which is why I am nominally familiar with the law in the area.

      So, I once noted to my managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA) that my salary was incommensurate with my experience level. The response? "That's unethical [to know someone else's salary]." My reply, "I did two hours' work on a project for a junior staff member. He reverse-calculated my salary from his monthly budget report, and then threw it in my face (rather than saying 'Thank you for charging only two hours to solve my otherwise-intractable problem'). I did not pry."

      And yet, my managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA) Retaliated against me for the complaint, rather 'having a talk' with the jerk who I had helped.

      Well, of course, within a day or two, I used my data-analysis skills to reverse-calculate everyone's salary who had worked on my own projects – which were many – because customers loved me for always delivering—I had to farm stuff out to spend my budgets out by fiscal EOY. It's called good Project Management. Or, to the managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA), it is called punishing an over-performer due to envy of that staff-members early and dramatic success in bringing in money.

      /RantOff

    4. Re:Disclosing your salary by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Enforcing the enforcement against that clause is nearly impractical. The boss basically has to be stupid enough to put it in writing or speak of it while being recorded, otherwise there's always an excuse that the person was fired for other reasons.

    5. Re:Disclosing your salary by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "My many European friends frequently express dismay at Americans' weird urge to hide their salary. In much of Europe, everybody knows." Interesting. I had the impression that it was the other way around, but maybe that's because I was in an academic surrounding. In any case, my impression is that Americans like to show off their wealth to at least give the appearance of a high income. Here in the Netherlands people rarely talk about income. I don't know it for most of my friends and as for my coworkers, even the job titles (which give the ballpark salary) are not public, although some put it in their linkedin profile.

    6. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't work in the US, but good to know, maybe i will.

      Stay in India you rapist.

    7. Re:Disclosing your salary by houghi · · Score: 1

      Being in Europe, what we know sometimes is the range that you will be paid. E.g. you will earn between 2.000 and 3.000 for job X. That means you will not earn less than 2.000 and never more than 3.000.
      It also means no matter how good you are, how many hours you work and how qualified you are, if you want more, you need to change jobs (internal or external)

      This wil be different from company to company and others will have nothing like that at all.

      I have also never discussed my saliry with anybody, except when I was changing jobs and/or companies. It might be completely different depending on country, company or reason to talk about it.

      That said, my managers will know what I earn as that is visable in their budget. If he doesn't, it means he doesn't care.

      I have know what each N-1 was earning. I was the one who decided on bonusses and increase in wage and what not, so it was my job to know.

      The several people I have know with staff I know also have knowledge of the wage of their staff. It might be a part on firering a person or not if you need to downsize (and sometimes the cheapest is the best option, sometimes it is the worst)

      But no, not everybody talks freely about their wage in Europe. Depends on the company and/or country.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sucks, what company did that happen to you at again?

    9. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My many European friends frequently express dismay at Americans' weird urge to hide their salary. In much of Europe, everybody knows."

      FWIH, in some countries tax forms are public. In others the "no discussing salary" clause is enforceable. Europe is not one market wrt labour regulations.

    10. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enforcing such a clause is illegal if your company is subject to the NRLA (hint: most US companies are): http://www.npr.org/2014/04/13/...

      but http://blogs.findlaw.com/free_enterprise/2013/12/legal-to-prohibit-employees-from-discussing-salary.html

      "For example, employers: Can legally bar employees from talking about their salaries to people outside the company, the website Ask A Manager advises. That's because the NLRA only protects employee discussions within the company."

      I think there may be an extra California law about this, though. There often is.

    11. Re:Disclosing your salary by stanjo74 · · Score: 1

      Sec. 7. [ 157.] ".... concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection." Discussing your pay with colleagues is probably ok, making it public knowledge just because is not.

    12. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case it is irrelevant that discussing the salary was forbidden in the contract.

    13. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends highly on country (though I can only name two by example for sure).
      In Sweden it is normal to ask people what they earn (if you are interested), even people you hardly know. And the tax information is public (against a fee at least) anyway.
      In Germany asking someone their salary is for most people a complete no-go, often even among friends and sometimes even family.
      It leads to some weirdness and culture shock when you move between those countries.

    14. Re:Disclosing your salary by jittles · · Score: 1

      In my contract it is forbidden that i discuss my salary with anybody, especially in public in connection with my employer.

      Anyone can put an unenforceable clause in a Contract.

      The clause you mention sounds quite illegal. If in the US, it certainly is (see NRLA). IANAL

      My many European friends frequently express dismay at Americans' weird urge to hide their salary. In much of Europe, everybody knows. If an American works for the State of California, everybody knows, by law; just visit the website. I myself have experienced a very similar Retaliation, which is why I am nominally familiar with the law in the area.

      So, I once noted to my managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA) that my salary was incommensurate with my experience level. The response? "That's unethical [to know someone else's salary]." My reply, "I did two hours' work on a project for a junior staff member. He reverse-calculated my salary from his monthly budget report, and then threw it in my face (rather than saying 'Thank you for charging only two hours to solve my otherwise-intractable problem'). I did not pry."

      And yet, my managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA) Retaliated against me for the complaint, rather 'having a talk' with the jerk who I had helped.

      Well, of course, within a day or two, I used my data-analysis skills to reverse-calculate everyone's salary who had worked on my own projects – which were many – because customers loved me for always delivering—I had to farm stuff out to spend my budgets out by fiscal EOY. It's called good Project Management. Or, to the managers at The Aerospace Corporation (in El Segundo, CA), it is called punishing an over-performer due to envy of that staff-members early and dramatic success in bringing in money.

      /RantOff

      I used to help with business development - writing technical responses to RFPs on government contracts. When the RFP was done they would give me the entire document to proof. This included the schedule estimates, cost estimates, etc. We had to submit the hourly bill rate for every employee that might look at that contract. Based on that info and the billing method used for that contract, I could calculate the rates of nearly every employee in the company from CEO all the way down to the lowest billable employee. I was just a lowly engineer with many people between myself and the CEO. Everyone knew I had access to that information. But I never used that information to complain to the company, even when I disagreed with the salary that some people were being paid. That's just playing with fire. But it does come in handy when you're negotiating your salary for another job. ;)

    15. Re:Disclosing your salary by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's good to know the real range before going in for reviews.

      Of course you have to play the game and pretend you don't know. It's like seeing the other sides hole cards. They can bluff, but you know they are already paying Shmoe $x, you just call it knowing they will cave.

      Of course you could find out that you aren't as valuable as you think. Shmoe could have serious dirt on someone, be blowing the CEO etc etc.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:Disclosing your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My many European friends frequently express dismay at Americans' weird urge to hide their salary. In much of Europe, everybody knows. If an American works for the State of California, everybody knows, by law; just visit the website. I myself have experienced a very similar Retaliation, which is why I am nominally familiar with the law in the area

      Your Europaen friends don't have to deal with the backstabbing rat that is the American worker. They'll lie, cheat or steal if they figure out you're making more than them.

  29. Yet.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    he certainly did not do anything to reverse the firing....

    This asshole absolutely told his assistant to fire them.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Yet.... by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      he certainly did not do anything to reverse the firing....

      She posted a link to the dude's home address. That's pretty deliberate bridge-burning. Would it be wise for him to re-hire her after that?

      What he should do is pay attention to her frustrations. Because its a sure bet she's not the only frustrated employee, and the company will suffer if they ignore employee morale.

    2. Re:Yet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he should do is pay attention to her frustrations. Because its a sure bet she's not the only frustrated employee, and the company will suffer if they ignore employee morale.

      My guess is that he rather cynically thinks that the company would suffer more by bringing the problem out into the light and addressing it, rather than just burying it and hoping it all goes away.

    3. Re:Yet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because the reason she was fired had nothing to do with her letter.

      She was fired for multiple violations, including having alcohol delivered to her work office and posting heavily sexual and sexist jokes in the company's Twitter site using a company account ... after being warned multiple times by management. Apparently the letter was written AFTER she was fired, not while employed.

      People should stop believing everything people claim without actually looking at the facts.

    4. Re:Yet.... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      hes an asshole for..... what exactly?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  30. A better written response, with link to the letter by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

    A better written response, with link to the letter

    Here: https://medium.com/@StefWillia...

    I refuse to link the letter in question directly. It's crap.

  31. Yes you are by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare. Otherwise wtf is the point of civilization? Why shouldn't I just sell your organs on the open market or crack your skull open and feast on the goo? Stop acting like dog eat dog is just how it should be because you got yours (fuck me). We band together as a species to make life better for all of us. You're more vulnerable than you think you are. Wake up before it's too late.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yes you are by Shoten · · Score: 1

      You're a human being.

      True.

      You're owed food, shelter and healthcare.

      So not true.

      Show me the law, ordnance, or other document of equal or greater weight (like the Constitution) that states this fact. I see no evidence that anyone is owned such things, nor do I see any means by which to defend this "right" you are talking about.

      Do I believe that it's in the best interest of society to see that all people are provided these things? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean that they're actually owed to anyone, either as defined by reality or even the intent of the foundations of our society.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    2. Re:Yes you are by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare.

      What? No, you're not. Not in any sense of the word, "entitled".

      What you are entitled to is the RIGHT to be able to have all of the above, without guarantees.

      What you are advocating is me being responsible for you WHILE AT THE SAME TIME not having to take responsibility for your actions nor allowing me to dictate to you HOW to live your life. For example, you want someone to pay your healthcare for you yet, you will not allow anyone to tell you you can't smoke, be obese, do drugs or be an alcoholic.

      That is not how life works. As Heinlein would say, TANSTAAFL. If you want food, you earn it. You want shelter, you pay for it. You want it healthcare, it's up to you to get it. You are responsible for your life, not anyone else.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Yes you are by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

      It's just the ultra Capitalist mantras speaking. A blast from the past, a Cold War era relic that was created to counter Communism. In a few decades people who don't want to live in a civilized society will be mostly gone and we'll hopefully have basic stuff like universal healthcare and close to zero percent of the population living homeless.

      --
      -SR
    4. Re:Yes you are by aralin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are not guaranteed your life or property either. You only get to keep your life, because I feel like to is to my advantage not to kill you. As you have made laws that guarantee I will starve and freeze on the street, because my skills are not useful anymore at this very moment, I have no incentive to obey any of the laws anymore. So I might just as well kill you, take your stuff and live few days longer.

      So while people are not guaranteed food, shelter and healthcare, it is in my best interest to convince them there is a reasonable chance they might survive, otherwise my own life is not very safe now, is it? It does not matter what laws there are. If the society is severely unfair for 80% of the participants, you will either have apartheid or you won't have a lawful society.

      So suck it and don't kill and starve people with your stupid attitude. Golden Rule, remember? If you want to live, that is.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    5. Re: Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill of Rights specifically says we are entitled to life.
      Damn that was easy.

    6. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not guaranteed your life or property either. You only get to keep your life, because I feel like to is to my advantage not to kill you. As you have made laws that guarantee I will starve and freeze on the street, because my skills are not useful anymore at this very moment, I have no incentive to obey any of the laws anymore. So I might just as well kill you, take your stuff and live few days longer.

      So while people are not guaranteed food, shelter and healthcare, it is in my best interest to convince them there is a reasonable chance they might survive, otherwise my own life is not very safe now, is it? It does not matter what laws there are. If the society is severely unfair for 80% of the participants, you will either have apartheid or you won't have a lawful society.

      So suck it and don't kill and starve people with your stupid attitude. Golden Rule, remember? If you want to live, that is.

      Next up is where smooth says he has a gun to fend off "looters" like you and goes into survival nutter mode. Like we "looters" wouldn't think to firebomb his home in the dead of night and pick him off when/if he exits in time. Maybe his guns and ammo burn too, but the canned beans will hold up just fine to a little accelerant fueled fire, even if the smoke gets him first.

      Lesson for smooth: If you take away any reasonable hope I may have, I have no compunction of taking yours. Maybe not me personally, I'm a coward hiding on the internet. Maybe I'll just crawl into your well and drown myself, contaminating your water and killing you that way.

      How much does prison cost? $20k, $40k, $80k/yr? How about we just let the poor people (OK, poor citizens - see we both hate illegals, we can agree!)) have ten grand a year in income subsidy to keep them from NEEDing to steal. I make enough to support a few slackers, gladly if it means an end to most petty crime/theft and the need to carry a bike lock that weighs more than my bike.

      What would it cost to give ten grand to the poorest ten percent? Let's see 30M $10k= 300Mk: $300 BILLION dollars a year! Wow, what a waste? We could have half a war (for a year) for at that price. Or Medicare part D Bush giveaway to drug companies. Or 300 1 gigawatt solar power plants. The important thing is that we cut taxes and spend big money on ill conceived wars though, right? F the poor and the environment, but they should just meekly accept it, because Vote TRUMP!

    7. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare. Otherwise wtf is the point of civilization? Why shouldn't I just sell your organs on the open market or crack your skull open and feast on the goo? Stop acting like dog eat dog is just how it should be because you got yours (fuck me). We band together as a species to make life better for all of us. You're more vulnerable than you think you are. Wake up before it's too late.

      While for the most part I agree with your assessment of the purpose of human civilization and our ability to band together to save ourselves, the American civilization is also a capitalist society which includes the labor market. If she cannot make enough to survive at her current job, she should look elsewhere or move to a cheaper place to live and find a job that increases her purchasing power. No company is obligated to pay someone a minimum salary above minimum wage, and she is making much more than minimum wage if her after tax is $8.15 (minimum wage in CA is $10 pre-tax).

      Capitalism is brutally efficient, in that resources such as your personal 40 hours per week of time should flow to whomever is willing to pay you the highest amount. If she's not happy at Yelp she should leave.

      Now that doesn't excuse Yelp for how she was fired, as there are labor laws in how you handle such a practice in California. Her story is either made up by her or Yelp broke the law and owes her money, as that is entirely illegal to terminate someone in that fashion.

      But the issue stands as well: go find work elsewhere. You're not a slave, you can go to any company who will take you and you should go to the company that will pay you the most.

    8. Re:Yes you are by chihowa · · Score: 0

      This is pretty basic stuff.

      If your best argument in favor of letting people starve in the street (while you have yours) is the lack of an appropriate ordnance (sic), then you'll find that the starving people around you don't much consent to being part of your society and will string you up to help make a society that doesn't have such a lacking. The authority of your documents is entirely based on the consent of the governed (as the documents themselves clearly state), so it's in your best interest to maintain that consent.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:Yes you are by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare/blockquote.
      Citation needed.

    10. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, Che. Can I have one of your t-shirts?

    11. Re:Yes you are by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      ... minimum wage in CA is $10 pre-tax ...

      But minimum wage in San Francisco is $12.25. She was making exactly minimum wage.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Yes you are by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So suck it and don't kill and starve people with your stupid attitude. Golden Rule, remember? If you want to live, that is.

      Even if it wasn't a moral imperative, it's basic common sense and an inevitability.

      With automation and the eternal quest for "productivity" and "efficiency" we just don't have enough work so that everybody can have a job. Nor should we expect everyone to work. Because there just isn't that much work that someone is willing to pay for anymore.

      If we're going to embrace this future, and our robotic corporate overlords, we're going to have to accept a much larger welfare state. Either that or find a way to severely reduce the population.

      Even if you think you embrace Ayn Rand and neoliberalism, and if you think you're going to be one of the successful ones because you're so clever and so talented and you work so hard, you really don't want to live in a place where you're wealthy and everyone around you is poor. You really don't. It's a shitty way to live.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re: Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you sound like a retarded high school dropout.

    14. Re: Yes you are by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      That doesn't happen often, because governments rarely lack the appropriate ordnance.

    15. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it owed to you? Who is going to pay for it? If she can't afford to make ends meet in a shit job living in an expensive area, maybe she should get s different higher paying job or move. Then if the company finds it can't find any evidence at such a low rate, maybe they'll figure out that they need to pay more. This is how real life works. Tell your food shelter and healthcare fantasy to my friends in east Africa under socialist government. It isn't working too hot for them.

    16. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare.

      Exactly. We all have the right to force others to pay for this things for us.

    17. Re:Yes you are by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "It's just the ultra Capitalist mantras speaking. A blast from the past, a Cold War era relic that was created to counter Communism. In a few decades people who don't want to live in a civilized society will be mostly gone and we'll hopefully have basic stuff like universal healthcare and close to zero percent of the population living homeless."

      That's a hope I share but, still, just a hope.

      If only by looking at past history, it may well end up that in the History books from two centuries in the future, they'll talk about the time going more or less from 1900 to Reagan's mandate as a rare epoch when it seemed that society would be able to organize itself around a bouyant and wide middle-class bourgeoisie, just to return to the standard of 0,01% amassing all power and fortune and a 99,99% just at the starving level or slightly above.

    18. Re:Yes you are by russotto · · Score: 1

      Next up is where smooth says he has a gun to fend off "looters" like you and goes into survival nutter mode. Like we "looters" wouldn't think to firebomb his home in the dead of night and pick him off when/if he exits in time.

      No, you wouldn't. Maybe YOU would if you were a person driven to looting out of pure desperation, but you aren't. The people who are wouldn't be that cunning, or they could find a safer way of making a living than homicidal looting.

    19. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck you!! FUCK YOU IN THE ASS.

      How dare you? You are owed? I get up and go to work everyday and bust my ass, and you sit here claiming that I OWE you food, shelter, and healthcare?!? Why? Because your whore of a mother couldn't keep her legs closed?

      Yes, I use the phrase "I owe you?", because you are implying that I OWE YOU. You see, you shiftless fuck, I am one of the producers.. I actually produce more than I consume. It's because of people like ME that the government actually has something to TAKE from me (against my will I might add). I don't pay all these taxes because I WANT to. I simply prefer not to rot in prison. I wouldn't mind paying SOME or even MOST if I could be sure NONE were going to self entitled little fucks like you.

      Fuck you and fuck your whore of a mother.

    20. Re: Yes you are by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You're imagining things. The bill of rights says that the government can't deprive you of life without due process, nothing more.

    21. Re:Yes you are by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Show me the law, ordnance, or other document of equal or greater weight (like the Constitution) that states this fact.

      There's the declaration of independence, which states that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are inalienable rights. Food and healthcare are required for life, you will die without them. Shelter is required for liberty (else you're always an illegal vagrant being kicked out of places).

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    22. Re:Yes you are by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're a human being. You're owed food, shelter and healthcare. Otherwise wtf is the point of civilization?

      While I agree with you completely, why are you owed shelter in San Francisco, a place so many people enjoy that it is regularly commemorated in song, film, poetry, novels... There's lots of land less people want to live on, and shock amazement, it's a lot cheaper. Some of it is even near jobs better than working for Yelp.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to embrace this future, and our robotic corporate overlords, we're going to have to accept a much larger welfare state. Either that or find a way to severely reduce the population.

      Reducing the population doesn't help, because you are also decreasing demand for stuff, which means even fewer jobs.

    24. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank. You. Well said.

    25. Re:Yes you are by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? Who owes you shelter and health care and food? The most I can imagine you answering that is probably your parents, before you are capable of getting those things on your own. I do not owe you one single thing on this entire planet, not one. You are not anybody to me, if we exchange anything it's going to be for cold hard cash. I was born in this so called 'civilization', AFAIC it's crap because of ideas like yours. I don't want anybody to be my slave and I am not your slave either.

      As to cracking skulls - that is precisely why civilization invented guns, so that if you come at me with yours I have mine and I prefer that to any government oppression of any individual.

    26. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself telling others what they want and don't want.

      What I want is freedom from the likes of you, motherfuckers.

    27. Re:Yes you are by tigersha · · Score: 1

      The US constitution give you the right to PURSUE happiness. It does not give you the right to be happy.

      This is the problem in Europe (where this girl would fit right in). Entitlement because the basic law states that you have the right to be happy.

      You don't

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    28. Re:Yes you are by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Made my comment just in the nick of time, so that I can refer to it now, when reading posts like this one.

      The society is unfair alright, but it is unfair for the exact sentiments expressed here - you believe somebody, anybody at all owes you something, anything at all. You are right, to survive people will kill. That is why individual freedom and businesses that individuals build to produce products that other individuals may find useful and would trade for is what actually economy is.

      Economy is not government planning, economy is not fake money printing by central banks, economy is not fake interest rate setting by governments.

      Economy is only individuals producing something so that they and others can use it by exchanging their productivity for it. Of-course in the absence of free markets and with central planning, theft and redistribution (which is what USA and most of the West have with their collectivist: fascist/socialist systems) what arises is oppression, government provided monopoly, resource mis-allocation, all the taxation that destroys and moves businesses elsewhere.

      Where is John Galt? John Galt moved his business out of USA anywhere else, to China, to Mexico, to wherever he feels it is a freer society. Freer as in - less intervention of government into business, less taxation (there shouldn't be any taxation or government of-course, but I digress). Where are the businesses ran by all the John Galts out there? Automating. Outsourcing. Moving assets and production elsewhere.

      What are you going to be left with? The only thing you are capable of in absence of real production capacity, in absence of somebody telling you what to do, in absence of real savings and with plenty of fake printed cash slushing around your stock markets, housing markets, bond markets, etc. You are going to have your civil unrest, your murder, your robbery. Not because John Galt is a bad person for not wanting to be your fucking slave and deciding to move but because you are part of the problem, you make your collective decisions based on idiotic notions that others owe you something just because you graced this planet with your amazing presence.

      Guess what, nobody owes you shit and people who can will move and/or make sure you cannot attack them that easily. AFAIC I think the next step in civilization is coming, the one when we realise we cannot build further based on theft, robbery, oppression, confiscation and redistribution. The next step of civilization is either to self destruct or to become free individuals, free from government. Governments were always there, ruling, destroying, stealing, murdering, kidnapping and using crowds to that effect, to justify their own behaviour. The crowds are filthy shit, but if they stop being crowds and realise they are individuals they may become something that's worth actually dealing with.

      What I say I mean very specifically, none if it is somehow opposite to my value system, so it is not a 'troll' of any kind unless you consider actual points of view to be 'trolling', but I am not holding my breath for anybody to understand that. Once again: you reap what you sow, you sow theft and entitlement ideology, you reap complete devastation of productivity and destruction of your standard of living.

    29. Re:Yes you are by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      There is a problem with your post. Mostly it's that it was written by a complete and utter smeg head.

      This is the problem in Europe (where this girl would fit right in). Entitlement because the basic law states that you have the right to be happy.

      There is no such law. But who cares? TEH EVUL EUROPS!!11111one!11, so there's not any real need to not simply make up your own facts. I mean its Europe right? I bet they have all sorts of crazy shit on the lawbooks.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re:Yes you are by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      As to cracking skulls - that is precisely why civilization invented guns, so that if you come at me with yours I have mine and I prefer that to any government oppression of any individual.

      It's why society invented police. In the UK we have very few guns and we also have a very low rate of people craking skulls for the goo inside (i.e. murder).

      In other words, the facts show that guns aren't necessary for preventing murders.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    31. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're owed food, shelter and healthcare."

      You arent 'owed' anything other than the opportunity to provide yourself with those things if you so choose..

    32. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days we've got very efficient at producing food. So most people who are very poor still have enough to eat. But there are other things, like land in a good school district, that are difficult to produce efficiently in that they aren't produced directly with labor. If you bake a cake, you can say, "This is mine because I made it." But you can't exactly bake up some more land in a good school district. If you're poor, your children are also at significant disadvantage because of lack of access to land (in desirable locations). So much for equal opportunity.

      Regardless of whether such a system is fair, though, it doesn't have to be that way. San Fransisco is doing its best to prove Ronald Reagan right: that government is the problem rather than the solution - by blocking the construction of affordable housing. But, more broadly, there are other countries in the world that have much less inequality - where ordinary people don't face such a desperate struggle to survive as they do in the USA.

      Now, granted, we already have socialism for older people (e.g. a guaranteed minimum income via social security). And there are plenty of older people who only want socialism for themselves and not for other Americans who are also struggling (e.g. young people in entry-level jobs).

      Maybe there will eventually be a revolution in the USA where the ordinary people rise up and kill all the rich people. Or maybe there won't. But looking around the world it's clear that it's possible to do a lot better than the US is doing - when it comes to providing ordinary people with secure comfortable lives. If we could do better, then why don't we? Not out of a fear of violent revolution but simply out of a basic sense of human decency.

      I look around the USA and I see a population trapped in ignorance - helpless in the belief that there couldn't possibly be a real solution to their problems. Or clinging to a simplistic solution that blames everything on the Jews^H^H^H^HMuslims.

    33. Re: Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit... It does not fucking say that, you stupid fucking moron.

      Go read it. Then come back and apologize.

    34. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, your important comment was made back on friday, when you finally were honest enough to admit your admiration for slavery. the rest of what you have written is just your religious "justification" for it .

    35. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol if you think I would sit peacefully in the street and beg if my life fell apart and those necessities were not available.

      I would specifically spend time at the public library looking for people who say shit like you just did online, and either take from you or see too it that you were dragged down to my level

    36. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As to cracking skulls - that is precisely why civilization invented guns, so that if you come at me with yours I have mine and I prefer that to any government oppression of any individual.

      What kind of drugs are you on? The gun was most definitely not invented as a personal defense tool. The gun was first for warfare, then for hunting, then much much much much later became something sold for defense. Seriously, if you lived 200 years ago when single-shot black powder was still the norm and someone pointed one at you, you would not have any way to defend yourself against it (although you could reasonably hope that they would miss entirely as many weapons at that time were still round balls down non-rifled barrels).

    37. Re: Yes you are by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Damn you are wrong. The Bill of Rights does not specifically say citizens are entitled to life. They do specify that the gov't does not have the power to take your life or property without due process of law. But that's not the same as requiring the gov't to provide you with enough sustenance to live. (Get lost, goddamned Eurotrash hippie...)

      Perhaps you meant the Preamble of the COTUS or the Declaration of Independence. Well, its fascinating, but neither the COTUS preamble nor the DoI are legally binding in the US.

      On the other hand, a large percentage of citizens are trying very hard to preserve the viability of a fetus to successful gestation. So one day, the US COTUS may actually impose a law that implies the gov't must keep a person alive.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    38. Re:Yes you are by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      We aren't owed anything. Civilization is, if you like a "development platform." We have safe water, more or less low crime, and so on. Our lives are the application we develop.

    39. Re:Yes you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Who owes you shelter and health care and food?

      The people who want to be paid for providing them, obviously.

      Don't you believe in honoring contracts?

      The most I can imagine you answering that is probably your parents, before you are capable of getting those things on your own.

      No, I'm not capable, since some people have restricted my ability to make my own shelter, grow or otherwise acquire my own food, and the means to cover my health needs are way beyond my own individual capacity.

      I do not owe you one single thing on this entire planet, not one.

      If you don't owe me anything, then you are a dangerous person, since you won't even give me the courtesy of respecting me and my right to live.

      It's better if you do have obligations towards me, lots of them.

      You are not anybody to me, if we exchange anything it's going to be for cold hard cash.

      Nope, we're not going to exchange cash, since that's not hard anyway, but you don't even think you owe me anything, which means you'd have no compunction against counterfeiting.

      I was born in this so called 'civilization', AFAIC it's crap because of ideas like yours.

      What ideas are those?

      I don't want anybody to be my slave and I am not your slave either.

      Slavery is the ownership of another as property, with no rights to itself. This is distinct from you having rights of your owns, but still having obligations and responsibilities.

      You seem to be unable to recognize this difference, but perhaps you're just lost in your words.

      So what do you want from others? How do you want them to treat you? How do you want to be treated? How do you want to treat obligation?

      As to cracking skulls - that is precisely why civilization invented guns, so that if you come at me with yours I have mine and I prefer that to any government oppression of any individual.

      I don't, living a life with a gun in your hand is a sure way to meet your end by one.

      I prefer finding another way to live.

      That said, the existence of self-defense as a right reflects on other people's obligations towards you, and society's recognition of your rights, without civilization, you would have no right to self-defense.

    40. Re:Yes you are by aralin · · Score: 1

      There is no fucking market for what 20% of people can produce at the prices that would sustain life. This number will rise to 80% very soon. I am automating away the need for dozens of people each year and I am not alone. Eventually we will not need 95% of people to work. And their work will have zero value to us. I am not ready to simply let them starve. I am not ready to let their children starve and deny their children a chance to be one of the 5% who actually would be useful. I am not ready to embrace your form of fascism.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    41. Re:Yes you are by fascismforthepeople · · Score: 1

      Indeed roman's fascism would embrace killing or enslaving a large portion of the population. He is tragically too shortsighted though to realize that in so doing he will dramatically reduce demand for his own work, and end up begging for scraps as well. His religion has told him that, beyond all reason and logic, he will some how be able to avoid this fate simply by virtue of his faith.

    42. Re:Yes you are by russotto · · Score: 1

      Eventually we will not need 95% of people to work. And their work will have zero value to us. I am not ready to simply let them starve. I am not ready to let their children starve and deny their children a chance to be one of the 5% who actually would be useful. I am not ready to embrace your form of fascism.

      Then, since you clearly believe you will be in the 5%, you will be doing all the work for yourself and providing for 19 other people who do nothing. Who is the slave in that scenario?

  32. Here's a fun game by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    After reading the posts in this thread, re-read them in either Trump or Bernie Sanders' voice.

    1. Re:Here's a fun game by oddtodd · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny

      --
      I have plenty of common sense, I just choose to ignore it. -- Calvin
  33. Jeremy Stoppelman is worth c. $100 million plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking online, I see that Jeremy Stoppelman's personal net worth is estimated at between $110 and $220 million dollars. Of course he only has to pay his workers what the market will bear, but he certainly could afford to pay them more if he wanted to.

    1. Re:Jeremy Stoppelman is worth c. $100 million plus by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      his net worth has nothing to do with company money.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  34. Think about it... by no-body · · Score: 1

    Clearly shows the callousness one ??O needs to have to fill his/her chair and how many of those acts and conditions happen remain undisclosed and found necessary to keep the wheels humming.

  35. Kinda creepy... by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

    Here's the open letter, since tfs doesn't seem to include a link: https://medium.com/@taliajane/...

    Her observations are valuable, and Yelp will be wise to pay attention. Its not in their interest to have frustrated employees.

    But the part where she posted a link to her bosses home address? That was creepy and unnecessary.

    1. Re:Kinda creepy... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Looks like the link to his house was pretty easy to google - it's labeled with his name on the webpage. Not exactly revealing secret info.

    2. Re:Kinda creepy... by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      It's not like she's spilling secrets. But posting her bosses home address in that context was definitely creepy.

      Ms. Jane has some serious complaints, but she's going to a weird place by linking the dude's home address. She's taking her letter out of the professional context, and making it easier for people to dismiss her actual complaint.

      Think about it. A disgruntled employee using the name MURDERFACE writes an angry letter, and includes your home address and a picture of your house. You can see how that's creepy, right?

    3. Re:Kinda creepy... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      There is no professional context for this kind of complaint. Even before they fired her, the company had spoken loudly with their actions: Yelp obviously does not care about the material well-being of their workers. The only viable context for this kind of complaint is the forum of public discussion.

      I don't see the "murderface" name anywhere in the article. Not sure what's up with that.

      Anyways if bossman is upset about his address being known, he might ask virtualglobetrotting.com to remove the entry for his house. Also, we don't actually know that's his house, just that someone labeled it as such.

      I think her point is that bossman lives in a rich suburb in a big house with a swimming pool, while his workers struggle to survive. It seems like a fair thing to mention. Kinda Dickensian.

    4. Re:Kinda creepy... by Parafilmus · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Lady Murderface" is the name she used to share the post on Twitter. The name probably colored my initial perception of the post, because it doesn't actually seem creepy on a second read.

      That's kinda what I meant by professional context though... I don't mean she shouldn't have taken her complaint public; the public forum is definitely the place for it. But I wish she had focused more narrowly on the professional issue.

      Instead she takes the reader through four paragraphs of autobiographical detail. We learn about her relationship with her dad and about her old living situation and how she won't get a promotion for at least a year. It all feels kinda self-indulgent, until she drops her bomb in paragraph five: Yelp employees are going hungry and some of them are homeless. Holy shit, why did she wait five paragraphs to say that???

      From peoples' comments, I suspect most readers aren't getting past her autobiographical opening. People are dismissing her as self-indulgent and unprofessional after reading a few paragraphs... by the time she reveals that Yelp has a real problem, she's already lost half her audience.

    5. Re:Kinda creepy... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The problem is that she is living beyond her means, and expects the rest of us to make up for it. Without Twitter, she would just be another failure who went to the big city for a year and then ended up back on the farm. This happened for centuries. At least she isn't pregnant by some smooth talker who would have never gotten past her male relatives back home.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Kinda creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...I suspect most readers aren't getting past her autobiographical opening ...by the time she reveals Yelp has a real problem, she's already lost half her audience.

      She explains it herself:
      "...sharing these thoughts is worth my time, even if it’s not worth yours."

      She's an aspiring writer who is venting, ranting, and carrying on. She's doing it for herself and it feels cathartic to 'tell it to the mountains', except only one thing: In this modern age of being able to reach a global audience- she decided to rant & rave to the whole world & the corporate boss directly. This guarantees the Mirror Of Shame will be presented right back to her by her lack of tact and desire to wrap other people to her personal cause. She's not a social justice warrior as she may think, she's yammering- and publicly at that. She did it for herself because it would help her feel better, as she says so.

      _

    7. Re:Kinda creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore if she has homeless co-workers she should maybe rent out her spare room... also if you google her name she isn't living on a bag of rice, she's eating much better than I am.
      So she's basically lying.

      And I'm someone who thinks american workers get mistreated, but I'm tired of young women in san fran with degrees in dickdiddle thinking that life owes them something. She's got everything she deserves and more.

  36. Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

    This article could be an interesting one to use to model different moderation models. There is a real mix of conflicting moderation so far with insightful mixed with flame bait and over rated mixed with interesting.

    Could be a good example to work with putting in a "contentious" filter.

    1. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Cow+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please be very careful when trying to "fix" moderation on Slashdot. This is one of the features that work reasonably well, compared to other sites. There's always room for improvement, but there are dozens of more rewarding fixes and changes than the moderation system.

      This site is already a technological anachronism; we stay for the comments and the discussion. If that breaks down because of half-assed fixes to the moderation system, it's good night.

      Just my 2 cents.

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    2. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      Agree you need to be careful. But I was thinking something like a different colour for the bar or something like that if there are opposite moderating. Or maybe a little picture of some scales. Something to identify that this particular post is splitting moderation rather than just being a straight troll.

    3. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments do tend to be consistently wrong here, whenever the subject is even slightly controversial.

      Every forum that relies on moderation through democracy inevitably becomes subject to majority tyranny (and every forum that relies on the honor system becomes subject to ordinary, everyday tyranny).

    4. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Oh darn it, I already commented, and thus cannot mod or meta-mod your post.

      Anyone with MOD points, please mod Cow Jones' comment up.

      Slashdot NEEDS to remain an anachronism. We ALL come here for the comments, whether it's merely reading the 'top-20' Comments, or occasionally digging through the muck of 0-Rated comments because that is where AC posts start when submitted. Many, many, many AC posts are AC because they are insider information. That is, sharing factual accounts of their observations, but anonymously because they might be fired or killed if they were found out as the source.

      No, /. is not Wikileaks. It is (currently) a forum for the discussion of the intersection of technology and society – with a strong emphasis on the IT point-of-view. Recall that /. was originally us SysOps. . . Oh, sorry, later than that. . . SysAdmins.

    5. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by nolife · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the moderation of a post, just read and/or skim the comments as you have time or desire. True trolls and junk are usually modded down accurately and there may be some +5 and some -1 you feel different about but overall, the moderation here is better than any other place I've ever seen.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Agreed. /. is the only site that I know of with (mostly) working moderation. There may be room for improvement but I have no idea what could/should be improved really. No solution can ever be perfect.

      I'm often reading a Dutch newspaper (de Volkskrant) online. Their comments system - where posts are checked by the redaction before they go on the site - has no moderation and no threading. It's impossible to read. There are many more like that, no moderation, no threading even.

    7. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the moderation system is actually almost as good as it can ever be. The only think that needs some attention is mod-bombing and slightly harsher penalties for people who down-mod and metamoderation says are wrong.

      I'd suggest only allowing each user to moderate another user's posts once per day, to stop them simply going to the user's page and bulk down-modding their posts. Then adjust metamoderation so that people who mod as troll/flamebait/overrated but are subsequently rejected by a number of others have that moderation undone and take a slightly bigger karma hit.

      In other words, stop those trying to silence others with the moderation system, but leave everything else as it is. It's not perfect, but like democracy it's the best of a bad bunch.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But take the first post on this article. I've watched it bounce between 0 and +5 up and down multiple times. I was just thinking about a way to identify posts that people were conflicted about, not changing the overall scoring. If it ends up a +2 it stays a +2 but has a flag marking it as a post that got people arguing. Those are the posts I like to find!

    9. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Take this comment as an example - http://news.slashdot.org/comme...

      That comment started as +1 as a default. It got to +5 Insightful and is now 0 - troll.

      The scoring reads as
      Moderation -1
          40% Insightful
          30% Overrated
          10% Flamebait

      I was just suggesting a way that that type of comment was marked in some way that you would notice it. Yes you can always browse at 0 but most comments there are pond slime. But if a comment has caused enough mixed responses I think it is good to flag it.

    10. Re:Whiplash et. al. Interesting moderation article by Cow+Jones · · Score: 1

      I see what you mean. Marking controversial posts for easier moderation (or meta-moderation) does look like a useful improvement. I wasn't trying to suggest that every facet of the moderation system should be chiseled in stone, just that the features that make moderation in Slashcode unique and useful shouldn't be messed with without a very good reason. I should have made it clearer that I was addressing changes/fixes in general, not your specific suggestion.

      Another potential improvement is to let moderators undo an accidental moderation without having to add a nonsense post. That's a feature many people have requested, but it also opens up the potential for abuse if not implemented carefully (e.g., using time limits etc). I don't see that problem with what you described.

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  37. Universe to woman: Higher paying jobs are avail by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    If you desire to live in a desirable place then find a job where the utility you provide your employer is higher than the utility you're providing Yelp in your current position.

  38. Re: boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers. -probably not said by Socrates.

  39. yelp sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as a small business owner i can tell you all yelp is a disgusting piece of shit, worse than facebook, all they want is money for basically not removing you from any and all search results, they have no interest in helping consumers find what theyre looking for.

    1. Re:yelp sucks by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      as a small business owner i can tell you all yelp is a disgusting piece of shit, worse than facebook, all they want is money for basically not removing you from any and all search results, they have no interest in helping consumers find what theyre looking for.

      This. Yelp is a horrible business model run by horrible people. They're sucking up their funding from small businesses, creating a business model out of something totally unnecessary. They're the cigarettes of the internet.

  40. Link to original letter. She's a douchebag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://medium.com/@taliajane/an-open-letter-to-my-ceo-fb73df021e7a

    Sample

    Let’s talk about those benefits, though. They’re great. I’ve got vision, dental, the normal health insurance stuff—and as far as I can tell, I don’t have to pay for any of it! Except the copays. $20 to see a doctor or get an eye exam or see a therapist or get medication. Twenty bucks each is pretty neat, if spending twenty dollars didn’t determine whether or not you could afford to get to work the next week.

    Did I tell you about how I got stuck in the east bay because my credit card, which amazingly allows cash withdrawals, kept getting declined and I didn’t have enough money on my BART Clipper card to get to work? Did I tell you that my manager, with full concern and sympathy for my situation, suggested I just drive through FastTrak and get a $35 ticket for it that I could pay at a later time, just so I could get to work? Did I tell you that an employee at CVS overheard my phone call with my manager and then gave me, straight from his wallet, the six dollars I needed to drive into work? Do you think CVS pays more than Yelp? I worked a job similar to one at CVS. A manager spends half an hour training you on the cash register, you watch a video, maybe take a brief quiz, and you’re fully trained to do the entire job. Did you know that after getting hired back in August, I’m still being trained for the same position I’ve got? But Marcus at CVS has six dollars in his wallet, and I’m picking up coins on the street trying to figure out how I’ll be able to pay him back.

    Amazing.

  41. Be a better writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first several lines of the article are very important. It usually contain the main point. But you are talking about your dream as a child. Is it a novel?

  42. Re: boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what happens when 99.5% of jobs are paying slave wages and parents only get to see their kids 1 hour a day because they have to work 2 full time jobs each.

  43. story violates first law of journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The boss of the company whose (successful) business model is (borderline legal) extortion stomps on a lowly peon because he feels like it and is annoyed when called out on it.

    Dog bites man.

  44. Yelp sales works on commission and deletes reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did the website for a new shop and submitted it to Yelp and searchengines.
    It got some 5 star reviews and immediately after that calls started from Yelp sales persons to advertise on Yelp.
    Every time a sale was rejected one of those 5 star reviews was removed.
    The last call I confronted the sales person with this fact, he said that it is his right to flag bad reviews but promised not to do it if an advertisement was bought.

  45. Unconvincing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unconvincing, untrustworthy, unbelievable, without merit.

    Ha ha
     

  46. Re:boo hoo by Falconhell · · Score: 0

    Another probably mid forties to mid fifties asshole, who has no idea of how difficult it is for young people these days to get to the comfy position you're in.
    I would suggest she try and move to a civilised country that pays a decent minimum wage, and provides health care like a civilised country should.

  47. Re:Whiplash et. al. [OT] by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    For the most part there is nothing wrong with the moderation on Slashdot, trolls sink to the bottom reasonable comments float to the top.

    I surf at the 2 threshold, seems to avoid most bullshit.

    There is the pesky problem of "group think" and having engaging comments modded down because they don't fit with the "group think" - subjects like Assage / Snowden, RMS, Microsoft, and so on can be tricky. But there probably isn't a solution to that...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  48. How do I Review Yelp! itself? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    How do I post a review of Yelp?

    I posted one on Yelp!, but it was soon deleted.

    1. Re: How do I Review Yelp! itself? by dothasmurfysmurf · · Score: 1

      Post reviews for the app in the app store or Google play... Yelp can't touch those.

    2. Re:How do I Review Yelp! itself? by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      How do I post a review of Yelp?

      I posted one on Yelp!, but it was soon deleted.

      Sorry for the long URL but this is a page where you can file a public complaint about Yelp, or anyone with a business license really. http://www.bbb.org/search/?typ...

  49. Revolutions by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm just saying it's what WILL happen.

    Indeed, history teach us that people revolt when they do not have enough to eat. But on the other hand, I cannot think about a democratic system been thrown away this way.

    Therefore we are stuck with this alternative: either convince people to vote for someone that will fix the problem, or convince people the system is not democratic (which may be the case or not: what matters is how it is perceived) and they should revolt.

    1. Re:Revolutions by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      Modern democracy isn't very old, but there's still examples. Ever hear of the Weimar Republic?

    2. Re:Revolutions by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      The fall of Weimar Republic was not a revolution. Hitler got the power though a democratic process (with some helper tricks such as arresting communists members of parliament to turn NSDAP relative majority into an absolute majority). Unfortunately that falls into the "convince people to vote for someone that (they believe) will fix the problem";

    3. Re:Revolutions by Aighearach · · Score: 2, Informative

      either convince people to vote for someone that will fix the problem, or convince people the system is not democratic (which may be the case or not: what matters is how it is perceived) and they should revolt.

      Or install remote gun turrets at the bottom of the driveway.

      It isn't enough to present an abstract set of conditions when people might overthrow a democracy. There are millions of us who are patriotic enough to fight for our republic even if you raise however many rebels who decided it isn't freedomy enough and they're going to try a dictatorship. Nope. That just adds up to a bunch of dead rebels.

      Most of the idiots who say this shit don't even vote, and have no idea the depth of patriotism of many around them, left right and center.

      If you don't find a political solution that is reasonable and has enough votes and is legal, you just won't have your concerns addressed. Even if the concern is people starving. It is as simple as that, really.

    4. Re: Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler lost the only election he ran in and was appointed to his post, later siezing power. He was never elected.

    5. Re:Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler (PBUH), did nothing wrong. Those filthy Jew communists had it coming.

    6. Re:Revolutions by sjames · · Score: 1

      Since going with a new Hitler doesn't seem that appealing either, perhaps we should go the living wage route...

    7. Re: Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry some of us Patriots would happily toss your corpse on the bonfire of history should you choose to support the billionaires that have destroyed this country for the rest of us.

    8. Re:Revolutions by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Democracy tends to get replaced in one of two ways:

      The people continue to vote themselves entitlements and they become a communistic society
      -or-
      A dictatorship with strong military support takes over.

      There are plenty of historical examples.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    9. Re:Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin

    10. Re: Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's on?

      Have you seen who's poor in America. Your side is fucked.

    11. Re:Revolutions by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      You're presuming that the poor participating in the voting process will somehow fix the problem. Gov't is a lousy way to correct economic problems in society. More likely, you're only going to encourage a more socialist government. Honoring the social contract and implementing the "correct" infrastructural improvements is the only way to improve regional economic conditions.

      As for revolt, people don't revolt because the government they live in is not democratic or equitable. People revolt when they're close to starvation and hold the elites in power responsible. The revolt tends to do more short-term damage than long-term improvement. (Has life in south LA, or policing significantly improved since the LA riots? Is that the solution that Ferguson, MO and many other areas should take?)

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    12. Re:Revolutions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My, you talk a good fight.

      By the way, since when did patriotism mean sucking the 1%'s dicks?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Revolutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lying about the GP's position only exposed your inability to intelligently argue your own.

    14. Re:Revolutions by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      As for revolt, people don't revolt because the government they live in is not democratic or equitable. People revolt when they're close to starvation and hold the elites in power responsible.

      My point is that within a democratic system, the revolt of the starved will face other citizen that want to save the system that made them sovereign. Then you get a civil war, or tyranny of majority, instead of a revolution.

    15. Re:Revolutions by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you think you can tell which side somebody fights on purely by if they give analysis that includes the perspective of the other side, then you'll never be able to understand anybody other than the grunt following orders. You won't understand any of the results of the battles.

      Do you presume the 1% are too stupid to think of defending themselves? It seems pretty relevant when idiots are implying violence to consider if the people they would be attacking can defend themselves.

      If you've read Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut, then I'll clarify that I sympathize with the revolution in that story; they re-learn how to live before they die, and that is something more than they had left themselves with prior. Of course they could never win, or present any significant challenge to the forces that be; it is just a way for them to die feeling alive. Is that all the poor want to leave themselves with now? Pitchforks don't win against gun turrets, and gun turrets are easy to build if society breaks down to the point where the police are not able to protect the rich. The poor have some clever people, but they won't have ammunition or food supplies.

      If considering the perspective of the enemy causes somebody to appear to you as the enemy, it stands to reason that you would never know your enemy, or have any chance of knowing your enemy. You do not talk a good fight.

    16. Re: Revolutions by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Someone has clearly never taken a course on rhetoric.

    17. Re:Revolutions by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're from the USA, which isn't much of a stretch, your whole country is based on a revolution that misappropriated Good King George's property, namely you and the land you're standing on.

      Care to explain why that revolution is morally right and a subsequent one would be wrong?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    18. Re:Revolutions by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Find a map, don't just be an arse.

      Look at a map of the English colony, which was not in fact English soil and was never actually annexed by England. (That's actually part of the premise of a colony; it isn't your nation's actual soil, it is just a place you have some economic interest in)

      Now that you've found out about these "map" things that modern society has, what percent of the US population lives in a place that was ever even part of a British colony?

      If the whole premise of your question is horse shit, then don't expect me to worry about if I answered the part you asked about. I will instead attempt to correct the low hanging fruit among your fallacies.

      I'm a direct descendant of Oliver Cromwell, you might not want to engage too seriously in silly arguments about that which was owned in the past by different people, based on hereditary claims. It might turn out I own your land by that sort of theory. And why did fat King George "own" anything at all? Oh, because Richard Cromwell granted the crown control of foreign policy. Georgie certainly didn't rule anything in Britain, the Parliament already ruled that. Weak sauce in so many ways. And that is without even getting into treaties between governments that establish the British recognition of the United States and her borders.

  50. Bay Area Blues by unixisc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is very true. I understand why in the 90s, companies chose to be there - 80% of the world's VCs were there, and so that was where companies got started. Plus if you were a semiconductor or software company, usually the people you needed would be more likely found in the Santa Clara Valley than anywhere else.

    After leaving the Bay Area and returning there on a visit after 10 years, I just couldn't recognize the place. Most of the tech companies that could be seen from the Bayshore Freeway in the 90s and even early 2000s were gone. The Microcenter near the AMC Theater in Santa Clara, which could be seen from the same freeway, had been replaced by a Walmart. Unlike previously, where the big offices used to be that of various tech companies, like the Intels, the Suns and so on, now it was mainly the consulting companies - KPMG, Accenture, et al.

    I know that a whole bunch of the geek crowd w/ goatees love loitering in San Francisco to be in 'The City', but still, this fetish of basing their companies there totally escapes me. Particularly a company like Yelp, that could easily have set up shop anywhere else in the country.

    1. Re:Bay Area Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the world's VCs are on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park and it has been that way for decades, long before the Internet boom. SF attracts companies with its tax breaks, because it is an absolute shit hole otherwise.

    2. Re:Bay Area Blues by jittles · · Score: 1

      This is very true. I understand why in the 90s, companies chose to be there - 80% of the world's VCs were there, and so that was where companies got started. Plus if you were a semiconductor or software company, usually the people you needed would be more likely found in the Santa Clara Valley than anywhere else.

      After leaving the Bay Area and returning there on a visit after 10 years, I just couldn't recognize the place. Most of the tech companies that could be seen from the Bayshore Freeway in the 90s and even early 2000s were gone. The Microcenter near the AMC Theater in Santa Clara, which could be seen from the same freeway, had been replaced by a Walmart. Unlike previously, where the big offices used to be that of various tech companies, like the Intels, the Suns and so on, now it was mainly the consulting companies - KPMG, Accenture, et al.

      I know that a whole bunch of the geek crowd w/ goatees love loitering in San Francisco to be in 'The City', but still, this fetish of basing their companies there totally escapes me. Particularly a company like Yelp, that could easily have set up shop anywhere else in the country.

      The landscape there changes very frequently. I go back to the bay area several times a year and there are constant changes. The Microcenter has been gone for almost a year now, I think. But for the GP: there is an Ikea in Palo Alto so I'm not sure why anyone would want to deal with the Bay Bridge to go to Emeryville when they could go down the 101 instead. I guess it depends on where exactly you live in SF. But I avoid the Bay Bridge like the plague.

    3. Re:Bay Area Blues by unixisc · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Santa Clara/Sunnyvale, I would initially go to the Ikea in Emeryville for things we wanted. Later, when the one in East Palo Alto came up, we switched to that one instead.

      The reason I brought up the Microcenter example was telling. That's one of the leading Tech stores that comes to mind. You have it in a number of cities, but in CA, the only store that exists is in Tustin, in Orange County. There are NONE in the Bay Area, which is telling! One would think that the place that is the capital of world tech would have that.

    4. Re:Bay Area Blues by jittles · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they were not pushing enough transaction volume to satisfy the landlord. They refused to renew Microcenter's lease because they thought they could get more money from a higher volume retailer. It was not that Microcenter was unable to make a profit there. I can't cite any sources for that, and it could be entirely wrong. From Santa Clara/Sunnyvale you could just take the 237 to the 880 up to Emeryville. Not great traffic but better than the Bay Bridge, if you ask me.

  51. This is why .... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    .... I never read my company e-mail.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  52. If you're going to San Francisco by CanEHdian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're going to San Francisco
    Be sure to have some money in the bank
    If you're going to San Francisco
    You're going to meet some large expenses there

    For those who come to San Francisco
    Payin' the rent will be a worry there
    In the streets of San Francisco
    Young people, grey showing in their hair

    All across the nation
    Come see that abberation
    People in trouble
    There's a whole generation
    With really no explanation
    People in trouble
    People in trouble

    For those who come to San Francisco
    Payin' the rent will be a worry there
    In the streets of San Francisco
    Young people, grey showing in their hair

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    1. Re:If you're going to San Francisco by Alypius · · Score: 1

      I'm so sorry...meant to mod that as "funny"

  53. No one will pay more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Yelp is under paying that much maybe there is a better opportunity out there. Though I'm guessing that is not the case after reading that blog. Sometimes the problem isn't in the employer.

  54. Re: boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said every ageing generation ever. What a fucktard.

  55. Yes, I know, Yelp not Yahoo... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    Yes, I know, Yelp not Yahoo... When thinking of shitty companies, for some reason Yahoo always pops into my mind...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  56. Re:A better written response, with link to the let by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Where is your criticism of the sentence fragments to be found in the letter to which you provided a link? Is it possible that you are loath to crtitcize the grammar of someone whose views you endorse?

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  57. Re:boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She HAS health care. Full. She also has her own car, and her own place to live in one of the most expensive city in the World. She also earns over $35k a year.

  58. eloquent response from William Strunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is an old observation that the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric. When they do so, however, the reader will usually find in the sentence some compensating merit, attained at the cost of the violation. Unless he is certain of doing as well, he will probably do best to follow the rules.

    She was certainly exposed to that exact quote and chose to ignore its sage advice. Forgive us for inferring that her situation is the result of ignoring other good advice she has been offered.

  59. Yelp? by bestweasel · · Score: 3, Funny

    TIL why they're called Yelp. It's the noise they like their employees to make.

    1. Re:Yelp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yelp like a pig?

  60. Maybe its a good thing for her by kamaaina · · Score: 2

    Sometimes we don't realize we are in a bad position and it takes a kick in the butt to improve your situation.

    I do feel bad for her, but I am not surprised. If she is worth it, I truly do hope market forces work their thing and she finds something more meaningful and pays enough.

    I recall working a job for $11 an hour in college in Hawaii and thinking, I just need to make $30k a year as a manager and I will have my life set, then I graduated from college and a lot of classmates were making $80k some $100k a year.

    I tried it out took a chance and moved to the "Mainland" and financially and spiritually I am in a much better place. I miss Hawaii, but am at peace with the choice I made.

    So like I said, hope she will find something better, but she needs to be worth it.

  61. Re:A better written response, with link to the let by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Where is your criticism of the sentence fragments to be found in the letter to which you provided a link? Is it possible that you are loath to crtitcize the grammar of someone whose views you endorse?

    I stated that it was "better written", not "well written". If you want a point by point critique of either for their linguistic skills, I would, perhaps, be willing to provide you one -- provided you refrain from being accusatory and offensive.

    If you are writing an essay in a way that conceivably, or to be honest: most likely, result in your being fired, and you are claiming credits as someone with an English Literature degree, you are, in fact, providing a writing example to potential employers.

    The complaint essay had a number of themas, but the major ones were:

    - Hey, I'm unhappy
    - Hey, I think I'm not being paid enough (the position is $17/hour to start is nearly $10/hour above federal minimum wage)
    - Hey, look at me!
    - Hey, the snacks are gone for people who work weekends
    - Hey, I've complained to my bosses bosses boss about other things in the past, because I do not respect my management chain
    - Hey, working at Yelp sucks!
    - Hey, I deserve to write, tweet, and so on for Yelp in less than a year after being hired
    - Hey, even though I write, tweet, and so on for free, and Yelp wouldn't have to pay me to be sure I'd continue doing so
    - Hey, I have an English Lit degree, so I'm qualified as a writer, as evidenced by this writing sample I'm currently presenting
    - Hey, I buy into a stupid stereotype called "Millennials"; although it's really a marketing bucket, I think it's a cultural group
    - Hey, I spend way too much on my apartment, because I apparently do not know how to use Google
    - Hey, I'm starving to death, even though my social media accounts have pictures and posts of me making, eating, and drinking expensive food

    That's not a millennial, and it's not a mature adult, it's a spoiled child with a liberal arts degree. And that degree will generally never land you a job unless you are either willing to "Pay Dues", as the essay I referenced indicated its author did, or you pursue a graduate level degree. And perhaps even a graduate degree will not land you a job, in that particular subject: Geoffrey Chaucer knowledge is not high on the list of things I look for when considering job candidates.

    So yeah: she's been pissing off management for a while, violating her employment agreement, and living above her means.

    I'm surprised, nay, astonished!, that she lasted as long as she did(*)(**)(***).

    ====

    Footnotes:

    (*) The exclamation point before the comma was an intentional breakage of the rules; it works as a pun on two levels; firstly it better indicates degree of incredulity, and secondly, official branding for "Yelp!" contains an exclamation point.

    (**) I am neither claiming a literary degree, nor am I providing a writing same to a prospective employer, nor am I claiming in an essay that I should be promoted to a writing position with less than a year in a position to indicate my willingness to actually do work.

    (***) These footnotes themselves indicate that I'm aware of the rules, the fact that I broke them, the fact that she should be held to a higher stndard, and this footnote in particular is deliciously self-referential

  62. Re:A better written response, with link to the let by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I read the letter and I'm tempted to offer a rebuttal. However, I'm particularly lazy today. I have my reasons.

    At any rate... Suffice to say, there's a lot to be said about this. Like most things, it's complicated. There's even more than one way to look at it and a variety of "facts" still in debate. One of those facts includes sexual innuendo whilst representing the company on a public forum, drinking at work, and recreational drug use - on her own time. (I'm obviously not a fan of a company giving a shit what you do on your own time but, ya know, you don't have to *tell* them that in a public forum with your own username attached to it.)

    'Snot even very well written. My grasp of the English language is quite poor. I can do better than that. But, what is the message? Oh, yes... Now I remember. Heh, no - that's not even worth rebutting. There's a level of accountability missing. I suspect that would fix a few things up but she's bound to come to a realization - eventually. And, as I'm skipping all the fluff, the sooner she reaches that realization, the better. Don't blame me, I didn't set up the system. I do know that I must work within it - if I want the benefits from it.

    So, save us both the time and assume I said something witty and insightful. *nods* Insert it here and pretend it was another seven or eight paragraphs. That's my thoughts on the subject. Make sure to finish it off with a nice personal anecdote and call it good. 'Cause I'll write you a novella if I really gotta... I suspect I'd be preaching to the choir and I am lazy today.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  63. Re:boo hoo by KGIII · · Score: 1

    What makes you think it was easy for those guys to get that position? Why does she deserve that position without having put any effort into it? What does that look like in your head? 'Cause if it's anything like I envision, it's not all it's cracked up to be.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  64. Am I the only one that finds it ironic... by Outtascope · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that she got fired from Yelp for posting an unflattering review?

    1. Re:Am I the only one that finds it ironic... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironic that they couldn't afford to pay for a better review.

  65. Re:boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, America would be better off. College drop out with major in english literature screams loser.

  66. Her tagline reveals something by russotto · · Score: 1

    "talia jane
    comedy - writing - better at thinking about things than actually doing them"

    I think we may have found the issue here.

  67. nice pr stunt by superwiz · · Score: 2

    but i still don't care about yelp. sorry, better luck with your next "star turp".

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  68. The way they fired her... Isn't being fired. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    While at her income level hiring a lawyer might not be worth it, I'm going to say that 'company email stops working' isn't a proper notification of release from employment.

    As such, she should still be paid for her hours until she receives proper, formal, notification.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  69. Re:The way they fired her... Isn't being fired. by Shados · · Score: 1

    She explains this already: the company deactivate all access right away, and tell the person they've been fired when they show up the next day.

    She just called her manager right away and got an unofficial confirmation. She was still going to get an official notification the moment she stepped in the office.

  70. Work rule #3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CC'ing is usually a dumb thing to do.

  71. Re:boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea provide health care, and dental care, and free food if your too lazy to get off your duff. What the hell is going to ever motivate these people who have everything given to them to ever do anything themselves?

  72. Fuck Yelp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp was never really useful to begin with. Fuck that shit. Seriously, and fuck every idiot who insists on using it.

  73. Wait, she *DISCOVERED* she had been fired? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I get that in a lot of states there is this thing called "at will employment" that allows an employer to fire an employee for almost any reason (or no reason), as long as the reason does not violate federal rights, but is it legal to fire someone without actually communicating to them that their services are no longer required, apparently letting them somehow figure it out on their own?

    While the situation with Milton in the movie Office Space was funny, I can't imagine it is remotely legal in real life.

    1. Re:Wait, she *DISCOVERED* she had been fired? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      but is it legal to fire someone without actually communicating to them that their services are no longer required, apparently letting them somehow figure it out on their own?

      In short, yes. It's especially frustrating when you come in at 0600 to open the office and find out then, when you would rather have been sleeping in. (That company imploded shortly thereafter, and I was the newbie...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Wait, she *DISCOVERED* she had been fired? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting it doesn't happen, I'm suggesting that I can't imagine that it is genuinely legal.

      Bear in mind that I understand that an employer may not have to give any *advance* notice of things such as schedule changes or even termination... one can usually be fired for (nearly) any reason, or even no reason at all at any time... but even then, it would seem to me that if the employer did not actually tell the employee that they were fired, then the employer would still have to pay for all hours worked until such communication was made, so it is not in the employer's best financial interest to not tell the employee at all.

    3. Re:Wait, she *DISCOVERED* she had been fired? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      it would seem to me that if the employer did not actually tell the employee that they were fired, then the employer would still have to pay for all hours worked until such communication was made, so it is not in the employer's best financial interest to not tell the employee at all.

      This is correct, as far as I understand it. I believe that until you give them written notice (in California) they are still entitled to their contractually-agreed compensation. If they are hourly, then you're only actually accountable for the hours they've actually worked...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Wait, she *DISCOVERED* she had been fired? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      And that's my point.... that the employer would have had to *AT LEAST* compensate her for the time that she worked until she discovered she had been fired... Perhaps not that big a deal when it is only a matter of an hour or two, but would have been very interesting if she had not found out for several days.

  74. A new hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the bright side. She'll be force to find another job, or leave the bay area wher even tech workers have difficulties to find an appartment. May be she'll be lucky to find a rich husband.. Or just try to collect money from a gofundme page.

  75. Automated/drone weaponry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if you're rich and protected by automated weaponry from the rest of humanity.....

    There could come a day when the 1% doesn't need to keep the masses sort of happy anymore, and the 99% would have no recourse except to try to subsistence farm on whatever marginal lands the 1% allows them to occupy.

    This seems to be the future that certain parties in the USA want to bring about.

  76. Re:A better written response, with link to the let by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    A better written response, with link to the letter

    Here: https://medium.com/@StefWillia...

    I refuse to link the letter in question directly. It's crap.

    U read this one https://medium.com/@optimiseor... (I got half way through, guy just didn't know when to stop). It's a "I share your pain, but..." reply.

  77. what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no article here, it's just some moron pushing an agenda.

  78. Struggle Rice by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    To be fair, when I lived in SF I was a network admin and I made OK money, so I could afford to eat out all the time. And to be equally fair, I eat a nice big fat steak semi-regularly now and I feel grateful for the opportunity, too. But when I was starting out, I ate a lot of goddamned ramen, not steaks. And I didn't live by myself, I shared a house with five other people. And I didn't use Lush products, I used Suave, or whatever I got out of the dollar store.

    Yes, the cost of living in SF is high, but what do you expect to do about it? I sympathize with people who were born poor in SF; how do you save enough to escape? There is only so much SF to go around. This nation is founded upon the principle that might makes right, not that whoever was there first gets to stay. If you lack economic might, you don't get to run things. If one is opposed to capitalism, okay, just say so. But don't complain about cost of living, or gentrification, or scarce housing if you choose to move to someplace. There are other less exciting places to live which are considerably better deals. We have to decide who gets to live in SF somehow. Money is the arbiter of all such decisions under capitalism.

    I was reading a blog post on gentrification recently where the author was whining that tech companies had come into SF "a few years ago" and blown the economy out of proportion. Talk about a total lack of perspective; it happened decades ago, not "a few years", or at least that's when it really began to take off. The tech proliferation in SF corresponded to the dot-com boom. They had office space and proximity to an international airport, what did people expect?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  79. a job not worth having. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    the point is, that working for yelp as it is, is stupid.

    the company will have problems as result.

    and just ducking behind hr doesn't really help.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  80. Bull by aepervius · · Score: 1

    "If ask any professional you'll ever meet about how they find their jobs, almost none of them will tell you they use any kind of job search. By far the best way is to network with people you know."

    For very high wage post like CFO, CIO, or C level manager you are right, for the rest of us ? Bullshit. The crushing majority of "middle" class or white collar job are found through want ads or similar.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Bull by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You're a delusional idiot. This isn't the 1960s. No one is going to pay you a middle class wage out of college, and no one is going to hire an idiot they have no knowledge of and pay them a lot of money. You need to know people and you need to have skills. One or the other isn't enough, unless you get lucky. Most people do not get lucky.

      If you don't know anyone, talk to a head-hunter. It's their job to know people.

  81. yelp culture by Cronq · · Score: 2
  82. It's illegal to fire for discussing work condition by MarkWegman · · Score: 2

    Most of the comments here are about whether the woman in question is a whiner. That isn't the important point. The National Labor act makes it illegal to fire employees for "discussing terms and conditions of employment with fellow employees". The NLRB has ruled that social media is a way to discuss conditions with other employees. Unless she was discussing company secrets not related to things like salary she can't be fired for that. More detail can be found here: https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outr... If Yelp fired her because of this post, then they are going to owe her back wages and maybe a lot more.

  83. How did she discover? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    How did she discover? Her work email stopped working.

    I assume there was at least one more step to it than that. If I discovered my email had stopped working, I wouldn't automatically assume I'd been fired and not bother coming into work. I'd go to work as normal, ask around, and then someone would tell me I'd been fired.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  84. BOYCOTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp! is finished

  85. having majored in English literature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girl ought to be glad she has a job at all after "having majored in English literature"

  86. Re:A better written response, with link to the let by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

    A millennial using the word millennial as a derogatory term. That's kind of cute in all its awkwardness.

    --
    -SR
  87. Find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ridiculous....not happy with your pay or can't make ends meet.....find another job!

  88. Go fund me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you have a go fund me page since you were fired.......support yourself and get a job like everyone else!

  89. Violate The Terms of Employment, Get Fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the news here? If you violate the policy of the company you are working for, and you get fired, should you really be surprised?

    I don't know much about Yelp, but every company I've ever worked for has had strict rules about a) disclosing your rate of pay and b) speaking negatively about the company in public.

    The reasons for each are pretty obvious. Being an employee carries the public perception of "speaking for the company," and so it is important that employees are careful what they say in public.

  90. Yelp deletes bad reviews by anyaristow · · Score: 1

    Yelp is useless. They delete bad reviews. Amazon has a sycophant army marking bad reviews as unhelpful, but Yelp goes one further and just deletes them.

    1. Re:Yelp deletes bad reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon actually pays for good reviews of "sponsored" products with the Vine program. They give free product in exchange for good reviews.

      Also, sellers are allowed to pay buyers for good reviews. It's a total sham.

    2. Re:Yelp deletes bad reviews by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Even worse, they hold business owners hostage by leaving bad reviews up unless the owners of said business pay them to remove the reviews.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  91. careful! lots of propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not handing out tax breaks to the rich, we're handing them out to the cronies. Just ask the rich who are not cronies how much tax they're paying. You'll see them beefing at how cronies get the nice tax breaks while they are the ones paying.

    In addition, the middle class pays most of the taxes anyway. See, they're not cronies, so taxes hit them the hardest.

    When corrupt government stops being corrupt, maybe we can actually stand a chance of having a society.

  92. Internships by phorm · · Score: 1

    "And the positions I’d be offered would all be unpaid internships."

    This is something that needs to be killed, with fire.

    The rest of it is fairly solid though. Most young people expect the hard work is all in school and that a magical, high-paid job is waiting at the end of all those cram sessions and exams. Hell, my wife is going through this right now while studying for a new field, and the one thing I have to stress to her is that - while I personally make a good wage and a lot more than her current - that's based on over a decade of experienced gained and ladders climbed, including jobs with crappy pay.

    But while even a decade ago one could start at the bottom and climb, an oft-overlooked factor is that that the bottom hasn't moved much, but the water your ladder is sitting in has. The *cost* of living (and no, I don't mean bourbon, but rent, heating, food, and possibly fuel) has surged and is outstripping wages at the middle let alone the bottom.

    There are problems at both ends of the spectrum: People at the top who make obscene amounts of money and see those under as menial subservients; and people in the working pool who frankly lack either the work-ethic or take their employment seriously. Both problems also tend to feed each other, with workers feeling beaten down and thus "why try", and corporations who want to both sell us (or better yet, rent us) expensive products and pay us low wages.

    1. Re:Internships by tlambert · · Score: 1

      "And the positions I’d be offered would all be unpaid internships."

      This is something that needs to be killed, with fire.

      Let me translate that into fashion magazine editor speak for you:

      "You aren't Anne Hathaway. We wish the hell you would quit applying for internships with us, but if you promise to sit quietly, we'll let you hang out. We won't pay you, of course, but we also won't forcibly eject you from the building."

  93. not troll - Mod up by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    this should not be marked troll. this is dead on the money

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  94. Re: boo hoo by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    citations? because you are full of shit

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  95. Re:boo hoo by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    like Greece?

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  96. Re:It's illegal to fire for discussing work condit by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    The National Labor act makes it illegal to fire employees for "discussing terms and conditions of employment with fellow employees". [...] If Yelp fired her because of this post, then they are going to owe her back wages and maybe a lot more.

    \

    In a word, no. The post wasn't disseminated only to other Yelp employees. It was aired on the open internet, which is a clear violation of her employment contract. Nobody is going to pay their employees to badmouth them on the internet. That's just not how it works.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  97. Fix a lot of problems? by BuckB · · Score: 1

    Your logic presupposes two assumptions that I do not agree with, and draws a conclusion that ignores the downside. On the whole, $25 minimum wage is unsupportable.

    First, someone on minimum wage should not expect to be living in an apartment on the own - driving a car. I'm not sure when it came to pass that minimum wage was equated to a living wage, but Pres. Obama seemed to draw that conclusion with his $10.10 minimum wage - the figure he uses that would provide a worker with the funds for themself and two dependents.

    Second, life in Tennessee is different from life in San Francisco. The folks in Knoxville chose to have lower taxes, less social services, etc. to fit their life choices, just as the folks in San Francisco choose to have very high taxes. The people who own the buildings there choose to offer their apartments at high rents because people are desperate enough to pay them. Food is expensive there because the workers want exotic food.

    Your conclusion that $25/hour fixes a lot of things is short sighted. Sure, it would make some of the lowest paid workers there happy for awhile, but Yelp and other employers would do one of two things: either reduce their workforce or move it entirely somewhere else. And rents for everyone would go up. As would tolls, gas prices, etc.

    For evidence on layoffs, look what's happening in Seattle - as there minimum wage goes up (beyond what the market used to support), unemployment is going up. That's right - while the national and even regional unemployment numbers are approaching record lows, unemployment in Seattle is increasing.

    It's all supply and demand. If more workers can now afford the $1600 rent, there will be a shortage of apartments and owners will charge more. They will have to charge more because their burger prices went up so that the restaurant can pay their busboys $25/hour.

    1. Re:Fix a lot of problems? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      For evidence on layoffs, look what's happening in Seattle - as there minimum wage goes up (beyond what the market used to support), unemployment is going up. That's right - while the national and even regional unemployment numbers are approaching record lows, unemployment in Seattle is increasing.

      No, it isn't. In Dec. 2015 (the last month for which info is available), the unemployment rate was 4.2%. In Dec. 2014, it took a brief one-month dip to 3.8%, with 4.1% and 4.3% on either side of it. In Dec. 2013, it was 4.1%. The long-term average is 5.54%. Source: ycharts

      There's no plausible reason why raising the minimum wage would increase unemployment from an economics perspective. If every business's wages go up equally, then they have to raise prices to compensate, and with few exceptions (things that Amazon also sells), you basically have a captive market. People aren't going to stop eating because prices go up. And people aren't realistically going to stop eating out. The people who are likely to balk at the high prices suddenly have more income to match, and nobody making a decent living cares about the difference between a $5 combo meal in Tennessee and a $7 combo meal in California, so why would they care about the difference between $7 and $8?

      It's all supply and demand. If more workers can now afford the $1600 rent, there will be a shortage of apartments and owners will charge more.

      With the potential for more people being able to afford apartments and the elimination of the mandatory low-rent units, it will be significantly more profitable to build housing, so more housing will get built, thus counterbalancing the increased demand. And with more housing getting built, that will also mean less space for businesses, which will help fix the current ridiculous imbalance where there are more businesses in SF than can be supported by the available housing, which will further lower demand over time.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Fix a lot of problems? by BuckB · · Score: 1

      Really? You honestly look at the ychart data that you point to and say "Yep, unemployment is going down????" It was at 3.0% in April (when the increase to $11 / hour took effect) and as of December is at 4.2%. In 2 months, the new minimum will be $13, and I'm sure there will be another surge of unemployment. Compare this to any other city in the US. Let's pick San Francisco, since that's where our "victim" lives. San Francisco unemployment has actually dropped since April - from 3.4% to 3.3%.

      Now if you're truly interested in looking at data, and how the increases in minimum wage increase unemployment, you can start with the CBO study on raising the minimum wage to $10.10, or many of the other studies that show that minorities - especially those in high unemployment urban areas - are severely impacted by raises to the minimum wage

      In the case of San Francisco specifically, do you think there are large tracts of land with available space, utilities, and infrastructure to build a significant amount of housing?

      There's a lot of information out there - a lot of people have studied this issue specifically - there is a tremendous difference between $7 and $8. This is not a captive market - where do you think Yelp gets their money from?

  98. Amazed by cost of living by Dareth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I live in the southern US. I am amazed at the cost of living in big cities. I pay around $1000/month mortgage on my 3000+ square foot home on almost 4 acres of land. I can't even imagine paying that for something smaller than my laundry room.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  99. Possibly Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they did indeed fire her because of the letter she posted, it could easily be in direct violation of CA labor laws which prohibit retaliation for an employee discussing his/her salary information.

    The problem will come in that the company will claim "right to work" and most of the state agencies charged with enforcing these provisions are, giving them the full (and likely undeserved) benefit of the doubt, so overwhelmed with cases that unless you have a smoking gun, they're not going to lift a finger. Yelp's HR department would come up with some kind of BS excuse for why she was fired that had nothing to do with the letter and the state agencies will tend to accept it without even doing any kind of investigation if it means they can close out another case. That or they'll hire some employer side law firm that hires sociopaths (people who have no empathy) with law degrees to draft a character assassination file for the person.

    I was retaliated against for complaining about being harassed by my coworkers and not only did the state not even bother with any kind of investigation beyond just sending a form to my former employer, even though they had a field office about 10 miles away from my former employer, they closed my case in very direct violation of the agency's own rules. Sadly, that's likely what would happen to this young woman if she tried to file a complaint.

  100. having majored in English literature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's your problem right there

  101. She has only made $8.15?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long was she employed that she has only made $8.15? If she's been at Yelp a year, she's averaging .68 cents a month! Yeah, no wonder she's struggling.

  102. What a dope by schizrade4954 · · Score: 1

    I made it on 22k/yr in SF just 15 years ago. That paid for rent, food, utils and a DSL line. That's it. No eating out, no cell phone, few nights a month go out for a beer with friends. Gotta start somewhere, and that's where I started. This dope goes to college to get a mostly worthless degree, and immediately want to live like her middle-class parents. She believes she is entitled to it NOW. She will be that person that is 45 working a register at CVS moaning about how unfair it all is.

  103. Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a "union"

    Unions: Organized enterprises dedicated to the extortion of employers.

    Labor laws: Known framework within which a business must arrange its affairs.

    In the US, it has often been the case that, the business having complied with the latter, the former destroys the business model.

    In the cases where the business is not complying with labor laws, it is the government's job to remedy the situation.

    In cases where the public is not satisfied with the labor laws, it is the job of their vote to see to it that their representation corrects the situation.

    Unions are an end-run around the failure to utilize the political process correctly and see to it that the labor laws reflect the general population's idea of how things should work. As such, they have no legitimacy - even though it is true that at times, the end results may provide worthy benefits to valuable workers. Such benefits are akin to me being able to feed my deserving children because I stole your money.

    When you take a job, do the math first to ensure that it reflects a practical solution for your lifestyle. If you won't, or can't, do the math, the odds are hugely in favor of the fact that you are to blame. It is grade-school simple. Sum expenses in one column; income in another. Subtract expenses from income. Positive? Ok, good to go. Negative? Unacceptable job.

    "I want to live in/near San Francisco" does not magically change how those numbers come out.

    "B.A. in English" does not make her useful to a business unless they have a shortfall of required skills in English.

    "I put a bunch of debt on a brand new credit card" is a very solid indication that she failed to even try to do the math.

    TL;DR: She established a must-fail set of circumstances and now is reaping the consequences. But I am neither surprised or particularly inclined to think she has any legitimate complaint to make other than about her own decision making process.

  104. Kind of hard to have a Revolution. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . .when the same regimes that prefer low-wage labor also prefer that their near-slaves also lack the means to successfully prosecute a religion. Silicon Valley: good luck taking on the Elites with their armed Security, when all you've got is, at best, Molotov Cocktails, zip-guns, and the occasional legal weapon. Plus Walled communities, control of the telecom infrastructure, and increasingly ubiquitous surveillance. . .

    1. Re:Kind of hard to have a Revolution. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      arrgh. mis-spell. Not "religion", but "revolution". . .

  105. Rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The general rule of thumb is 30% salary for rent. She made her own poor judgement but tries to pin it on Yelp.

    1. Roommates. If her collegues are also struggling she could have roomate with them.
    2. Find a cheaper place farther away
    3. Get a second job
    4. Look for better paying job that can afford the rent
    5. Live with her dad and look for job around his neck of woods
    6. Putting yourself in debt moving isn't called affording.

    Lastly, don't write public letter to shame your own company. Welcome to the world of being an adult.

  106. Entitled whiner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a tech PhD, and worked in tech for decades. I can't afford to live in San Francisco.

    She seems to think she can major in English -- not clear what kind of school -- live and work in the most expensive place in the country, and have the same standard of living as 37 year old programming wizards. She forgot to mention what her phone bill is. How many hundreds of dollars? She thinks it outrageous that she should have to work in her current job for a WHOLE FUCKING YEAR before she can be promoted to a job that she was not hired for!?

  107. Come see my job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My job is an industrial manufacturer and makes us work 60 hours a week (10 hour shifts 6 days a week). Night shift employees such as myself never get to see our families. 3:30pm to 2am. Everyone is asleep when we get home and everyone is at work and school when we get up.

    With that said, the reason we work so much is because of the insane turn-over rate. Every week a few people quit or get fired. New guys that were trained by new guys that are training new guys. Low qaulity products are the end result. It takes a few days to push out one of are machines. When no one knows what they are doing, it's impossible to be efficient.

    Last guy that wrote a letter stating "we need a break" was fired immediately. Less than 50% of the factory has employees that have been there longer than 1 year; 20% more than 3 years employment.

    It's not Union and no one trusts anyone there... So a strike will never happen. They focus more on "Active Shooter" scenarios instead of fire alerts. We have never had a fire drill nor are there any maps to tell us we're to go. "We are working on that" is the answer i got dozens of times. I walked out on the safety committee. Work us until we fall asleep running machinery. That will be fine.

    Yelp doesn't sound like a hard job. Asking for a promotion via bitching to the CEO is something a kid would do. Not professional.

    I got fired for a 100k/yr job for telling my manager (a 21 year old kid) that I didn't like how he was talking to me. I had a question about the chemical he wanted me to put my hand in without proper safety equipment. "Now that I'm in charge, I make the fucking calls. I demand some goddamned respect. I will fire you right now goddammit. Man up and just do it." I called the EPA and OSHA but since this was on a military installation, nothing got done and I went home.

    Yelp is a desk job. Probably an at-home gig. I dunno. I just care about this story. There's plenty of people that get fired at my job and no one writes an article on them.

  108. rice only? by damnitalready · · Score: 1

    Wow that sucks... wonder what all these are about then?

    http://alotofrice.pixieset.com...

  109. Now, we're software engineers by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    We can help!


    5 EMPLOYERS = ["YELP", "UBER", ...]
    10 I = I + 1
    20 CUR_EMP = EMPLOYERS[I]
    30 PRINT CUR_EMP + " Employee Posts Open Letter About Cost Of Living And Low Wages"
    40 PRINT "Employee Gets Fired"
    50 GOTO 10

  110. He's a CEO by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    "He didn't personally turn off her email, perhaps he did not even make the decision to fire her, but as the person who ultimately sets the culture and policies of the company, his claim to not be directly responsible is unconvincing."

    As CEO, everything he says is pretty much a lie. It's how it's done in "America".

  111. Real world lesson for millenials: by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    Life is hard. Be happy you have something and some place to complain about it, there are others not as fortunate as you.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  112. Governments fault... by WorBlux · · Score: 1

    High high cost of housing if the bay area is not the fault of Yelp, but due to the policies of local government. The only way to make it more affordable it to bring down the cost by adding supply. This includes the nearby suburbs.

    1. Re:Governments fault... by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Around here $1250/mo will rent a 1000-1200 sq. foot house on a 5000 sq. foot lot.

  113. Re:Whiplash et. al. [OT] by bstag · · Score: 1

    Says the Microsoft shill :)

  114. Oh I don't know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She probably wanted to be fired. I expect it works out better financially for her than if she just quits.

    She seems relatively rational about the rest of it, and I can't really tell from here if she is paying way too much for housing. For all we know she has a spare bedroom in somebodies basement.

    I hope she has a bit of a social safety net in her net work of friends, because she won't be getting any sympathy from slashdotters. And she needs to find a better job. You need a bit of breathing room to be able to do that.

  115. Most of America, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $8.15 after taxes?

    Where I live in Arkansas you can rent a nice one bedroom apartment for under $500 a month. Lots of places around the country like that once you move away from the major cities. Plenty of 3-4 bedroom houses to be found for under $100k. If you want to live small, you can have a modular home built on a small plot of land for much less.

    So yeah, that's a "living wage" with money left over to eat out and go to the movies every now and then.

  116. Payback is a BITCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read all the sentiment about living wages. It's amazing how inhuman people are. Yes we all fight for the things we have but lets be real here for a moment. The people who own Yelp are making massive amounts of money. The reason they won't pay a living wage is nothing more than pure greed. They are building their wealth on the backs of people who can't eat because of the rent prices.

    These people over a period of time have turned customer service jobs into a commodity. The same is happening in the computer world. Eventually all of our jobs will be replaced with automation and wages will be driven to all time lows. The people who want those jobs will just have to accept the pay they get. It may eventually fall to the point of it not being a living wage.

    So to all of you psycho McNerdy Nerds out there. What are you going to do to survive when this same thought process rolls your way? I'm sure all of you have "skillz" and will survive at least in your own minds. The harsh reality might be a bit different. When that time comes and believe me it's coming sooner than you think take a moment to think about the people you talked about and said they don't deserve a living wage. All technology jobs will eventually become the digital equivalent of a fry cook on a long enough time scale. It's just a matter of time.

    I don't know the lady that wrote the letter but her story was well written and I was once in her shoes when I was first starting out in life. I donated to her. While I agree what she said was not the smartest thing in the world she at least had the courage to stand up and say it. More courage than most of you guys have accepting contract positions rather than full time for lower wages just so you can have a job. Over time the wages will go lower and lower if you don't say something. It takes courage to go against the grain and the people on the top of the food chain are counting on your fear and submission as part of their plans. As much as you don't want to pay for overpriced groceries they don't want to pay for overpriced nerds. Many of you idiots out there are writing your own pink slips with automation software and aren't even smart enough to realize it.

  117. She should have just gotten another job. by r2rknot · · Score: 1

    If everyone was willing to work for stupid low wages in a stupid high-cost area. Then they (The company) have no incentive to offer more money to attract good people. You do research on if it is beneficial to work in that location for those wages. If not, you don't accept that position. I don't blame her though. She was hoping to hit it big doing something she enjoys for a job. That is pretty commendable. But no one said doing what you love pays all your bills.

    --
    "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."
  118. Electronics by phorm · · Score: 1

    In a way that makes sense to me. I've generally had any sort of electronics stuff of any worth (say over $100) delivered to the workplace, because both the UPS and regular post persons have a tendency to randomly drop shit in plain view on my front stoop (often with labelling proclaiming it to be electronics/worth stealing). I'd imagine ammo might similarly be something that less scrupulous persons might want to steal, so the workplace is a safer place to get it dropped.

    I've never had alcohol or ammo delivered by mail though, let alone at work, so not sure how that would go over. I suppose it depends on the packaging.

    1. Re:Electronics by swb · · Score: 1

      At that job, the mail room was part of the "facilities" department that managed the physical space of the building, and I worked pretty closely with them because there was always something network related when it came to office space moves and reconfiguration. They were good people and we both kind of shared "outsider" status in the company since we weren't on the revenue side of the business.

      I'm sure if the HR people got wind of ammo being shipped to the office, they would have shit, but because I had a relationship with the people who handled all the mail it wasn't a big deal.

      But then again, other than being just heavy there was nothing that screamed ammo. It was a box-in-a-box kind of shipment with no external markings to indicate content or company of origin, so they wouldn't have known what it was to begin with. My guess is that unless the box gives away your content, you could really order anything shipped to your office provided it didn't get delivered with a cop.

      Other than a local delivery service, I don't think you can order booze through the mail due to the maze of federal and state rules on taxation and other regulation.

  119. Basic income by NewYork · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income can fix it

  120. Let Godwin Make Aliyah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I hear is the boilerplate of "poor life choices". This is nothing but Darwinism. Eleven men were hung after the Nurenberg Trials for applying Darwinism. That was evidence of a generation devoid of a conscience, imperious, relentless and cruel.