billg: "That's the dumbest fucking idea I've heard since I've been at Microsoft."
steveb: "That's what you said when you heard about fucking Bob."
billg: "Ok, fuck it. This is the second dumbest fucking idea."
melindag: "Well, fuck you!"
billg: "FUCK!"
Problem:
* Causes a dialog to appear that says "A script on this page is causing mozilla to run slowly. If it continues to run, your computer may become unresponsive. Do you want to abort the script?"
* Leaks memory
Workaround:
Uninstall the Google Toolbar and use the unofficial Googlebar extension instead.
RoboCop: Waste makes haste. For time is fleeting. A rolling stone is worth two in the bush.
Boy: Go fuck a refrigerator, pecker neck!
RoboCop: Bad language makes for bad feelings.
"If your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of CSS data, you get a mess on your screen."
But if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of HTML data, will the rendering be ok?
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of HTTP data, will the rendering be ok?
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of TCP data, will the rendering be ok?
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of IP data, will the rendering be ok?
What? No self destruct?! What were they thinking? What if an evil genius where to steal the rocket, there would be no way for any super agent to stop him.
What you say is true for C++98 templates, but C++98 templates are not the same thing as C++0x template concepts. C++98 templates grants you to use any member (function, typedef, variable, etc) of a type, but C++0x template concepts does not allow you to use any other member than those specified in the concept of a type.
And using C++ template concepts - "Oh, in 2009, AC is going to need to use an int in a template that needs the CountDown member function, we better make int implement it".
Same thing, different taste. (Not that primitives have member functions in C++, but feel free to exchange int with something other.)
The difficulty in the design of "concept" is to maintain the flexibility of templates so that we don't require template arguments to fit into class hierarchies or require all operations to be accessed through virtual functions (as for Java and C# generics). In "generics", an argument must be of a class derived from an interface (the C++ equivalent to "interface" is "abstract class") specified in the definition of the generic. That means that all generic argument types must fit into a hierarchy. That takes foresight. For example, if you write a generic and I define a class, people can't use my class as an argument to your generic unless I knew about the interface you specified and had derived my class from it. That's rigid.
C++ template concepts are no better (or worse for that matter) than C# generics constraints, they only bind differently: C++ binds to a name, C# binds to an interface. Both are equally rigid. Both require foresight. In C++ you don't have to derive your class from a specific interface, but on the other hand you still need to implement the function knowing what name it will be accessed through (i.e. should it be named begin or Begin or GetBegin).
Funny that the caption on the windows are blurred, but he missed to blur the names of the windows in the taskbar. Nice to know that he chats with: "Ryan | Topside Porn...", "//nD2 DigitalFreedo..." and "* bjx0(TM) *".
Bought an external Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB, filled it with files, deleted the original files from my other HDDs and 3 weeks later the Maxtor drive crashed, and took down my FireWire and USB2 hub on my computer. I got a new drive of the warranty but all my pr0n was lost!
billg: "That's the dumbest fucking idea I've heard since I've been at Microsoft."
steveb: "That's what you said when you heard about fucking Bob."
billg: "Ok, fuck it. This is the second dumbest fucking idea."
melindag: "Well, fuck you!"
billg: "FUCK!"
1. Buy sex.safe
2. ???
3. Profit
I, for one, welcome our new IPv6 satellite overlords.
It's too restrictive anyway, what we need is a global tagging system, where site owners and users can tag a site/subsite.
... ... ... ...
slashdot.org - news, nerds,
politics.slashdot.org - news, nerds, politics,
wikipedia.org - encyclopedia, free, incorrect, correct,
scientology.org - scientology, religion, sect, good, bad, hoax, true-religion, pornography,
Then anyone can decide for himself/herself what to filter out... But of course this wouldn't work either.
Sharing is caring.
It all sounds like the evil flag to me.
You should read the Problematic extensions KB.
Extension:
Google Toolbar (official)
Problem:
* Causes a dialog to appear that says "A script on this page is causing mozilla to run slowly. If it continues to run, your computer may become unresponsive. Do you want to abort the script?"
* Leaks memory
Workaround:
Uninstall the Google Toolbar and use the unofficial Googlebar extension instead.
Perhaps if they will convert to Pastafarianism.
Memorable Quotes from RoboCop 2
RoboCop: Waste makes haste. For time is fleeting. A rolling stone is worth two in the bush.
Boy: Go fuck a refrigerator, pecker neck!
RoboCop: Bad language makes for bad feelings.
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of HTTP data, will the rendering be ok?
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of TCP data, will the rendering be ok?
Or if your Internet connection happens to lose a bit of IP data, will the rendering be ok?
Thats why the pilots are drunk all the time, there is nothing else to do, and it makes the time fly by.
Didn't you get the email? They are bundled.
What? No self destruct?! What were they thinking? What if an evil genius where to steal the rocket, there would be no way for any super agent to stop him.
Spore: Hot Date
Spore: Bustin' Out
Spore: Nightlife
What you say is true for C++98 templates, but C++98 templates are not the same thing as C++0x template concepts. C++98 templates grants you to use any member (function, typedef, variable, etc) of a type, but C++0x template concepts does not allow you to use any other member than those specified in the concept of a type.
And using C++ template concepts - "Oh, in 2009, AC is going to need to use an int in a template that needs the CountDown member function, we better make int implement it".
Same thing, different taste. (Not that primitives have member functions in C++, but feel free to exchange int with something other.)
C++ template concepts are no better (or worse for that matter) than C# generics constraints, they only bind differently: C++ binds to a name, C# binds to an interface. Both are equally rigid. Both require foresight. In C++ you don't have to derive your class from a specific interface, but on the other hand you still need to implement the function knowing what name it will be accessed through (i.e. should it be named begin or Begin or GetBegin).
Funny that the caption on the windows are blurred, but he missed to blur the names of the windows in the taskbar. Nice to know that he chats with: "Ryan | Topside Porn...", "//nD2 DigitalFreedo..." and "* bjx0(TM) *".
May I have your sisters' phone number?
Perhaps the web server is written in Java?
And Python (and similar languages) does not use variants (or similar constructs)?
Bought an external Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB, filled it with files, deleted the original files from my other HDDs and 3 weeks later the Maxtor drive crashed, and took down my FireWire and USB2 hub on my computer. I got a new drive of the warranty but all my pr0n was lost!
Vista Window Company or Vista Windows
They should have a good chance to win a lawsuit against Microsoft Windows Vista.
Mu
Ever tried to read the FP? ;)