Microsoft Project + Sharepoint server for the collaboration. Oh, you want an open source (read: free) solution? Looks like you're shit out of luck, not even SourceForge is free.
Step 1: Create Sourceforge account. Step 2: Place project into "Planning" phase. Step 3: Wait 3 months. Step 4: Purchase 3D Studio Max using the money you've been saving for 3 months.
Why don't you go suck on an inherently huge cock? No wonder you're on my foes list, god damn you're an asshole. Someone tries to inject the first bit of rational thought that I've seen into this totally redundant useless thread, and you try and bring it down. Why don't you pull your unixish head out of your ass and get a clue?
Sorry, Mozilla developers are busy working on skinning and other worthless features (read: ChatZilla). They might want to work on an integrated spell checker first. I'll stick with Outlook XP, thanks.
I don't see a regular user editing the registry. Unless you edit a key in the registry, you are not allowed to view executable (exe, bat, com, vbs, shs, etc) attachments. Period. It doesn't allow you access, unless you edit the registry. Want to send an executable? Tell the sender to ZIP it.
Really? Then how come when the argument is "Linux is utter shit" the response is almost unanimously "You have the source, fix it yourself"? Seems like a double standard to me.
Considering installing a server configuration of either OS is intended for capable server admins, perhaps MS figured warnings were unjustified. However it's nice that Mandrake went that extra mile to allow at least SOME hardening of the OS with a click of a button at install time and warnings of the consequences--and wise too considering their OS is free and accessible to a wide audience.
Could that be because Linux ships desktop and server versions on the same CD, and with Windows, there is a distince difference?
That's not good thinking. Joe User installing Linux would most likely install Apache, wu-ftpd (which is swiss cheese), sendmail (good for spammers) and all sorts of other goodies.
OTOH, Win2k Professional does NOT install IIS by default. In fact, you don't really get many choices during setup... you have to go in after the fact and install it additionally off the CD.
My school used to do this (not anymore, but its bound to be back). The packetshaping was done by user IP address -- when you surpassed a 24-hour limit, you started to have packet loss to the Internet (not campus servers).
The statistic about 10% of the users using 90% of the bandwidth is correct. It's not fair to everyone else.
Slashdot Mirror
LOL!
Strangely, Microsoft gets their software taken down from illegal eBay auctions. Maybe you need to find yourself a good lawyer.
You have his address -- solve this the old-fashioned way: go kick his fucking ass and cut off his balls.
Maybe that's a little overkill.
Terrorists!
That carpet... it really tied the room together, man.
</ lebowski quote>
Microsoft Project + Sharepoint server for the collaboration. Oh, you want an open source (read: free) solution? Looks like you're shit out of luck, not even SourceForge is free.
Doesn't Emacs already have this functionality built-in?
Step 1: Create Sourceforge account.
Step 2: Place project into "Planning" phase.
Step 3: Wait 3 months.
Step 4: Purchase 3D Studio Max using the money you've been saving for 3 months.
If you really must know, the sole purpose of my sig is to elicit responses such as yours. Apparently my little social experiment has worked. :D
Why don't you go suck on an inherently huge cock? No wonder you're on my foes list, god damn you're an asshole. Someone tries to inject the first bit of rational thought that I've seen into this totally redundant useless thread, and you try and bring it down. Why don't you pull your unixish head out of your ass and get a clue?
Sorry, Mozilla developers are busy working on skinning and other worthless features (read: ChatZilla). They might want to work on an integrated spell checker first. I'll stick with Outlook XP, thanks.
I don't see a regular user editing the registry. Unless you edit a key in the registry, you are not allowed to view executable (exe, bat, com, vbs, shs, etc) attachments. Period. It doesn't allow you access, unless you edit the registry. Want to send an executable? Tell the sender to ZIP it.
You've never spoken to a woman without giving her your credit-card number, have you?
Well according to this-here ad on Slashdot, we should be running Microsoft Small Business Server!
And you're the one for this article!
Because "we are ripping off Micro$haft!!!! LOLOL!!!"
The hilarious part about all that is that the XBox is now in profitability, and Microsoft isn't taking a cut anymore.
Really? Then how come when the argument is "Linux is utter shit" the response is almost unanimously "You have the source, fix it yourself"? Seems like a double standard to me.
Yes, you could have done a much better job by yourself. Thanks for your insight and wit.
Considering installing a server configuration of either OS is intended for capable server admins, perhaps MS figured warnings were unjustified. However it's nice that Mandrake went that extra mile to allow at least SOME hardening of the OS with a click of a button at install time and warnings of the consequences--and wise too considering their OS is free and accessible to a wide audience.
Could that be because Linux ships desktop and server versions on the same CD, and with Windows, there is a distince difference?
Just patent patenting.
I suppose we should ban Linux and Unixes as well as it _is_ possible (albeit difficult) to set a null root password.
That's not good thinking. Joe User installing Linux would most likely install Apache, wu-ftpd (which is swiss cheese), sendmail (good for spammers) and all sorts of other goodies.
OTOH, Win2k Professional does NOT install IIS by default. In fact, you don't really get many choices during setup... you have to go in after the fact and install it additionally off the CD.
My school used to do this (not anymore, but its bound to be back). The packetshaping was done by user IP address -- when you surpassed a 24-hour limit, you started to have packet loss to the Internet (not campus servers).
The statistic about 10% of the users using 90% of the bandwidth is correct. It's not fair to everyone else.
We're talking about Pine, not Ximian Evolution... please understand the context of the conversation before going off like a lit match.
Perhaps. But I don't expect them to give as much information to make GCC >= icc. That would be self-defeating from Intel's viewpoint.