Slashdot Mirror


No-Solder Modchip For The Xbox

toothfish writes "There's a review of the latest generation of Xbox modchip over at xbox hacker- no solder, flashable BIOS, 15 min. install, etc. Stuff like this should make it easier for the average Xbox user to run emulators, Linux, and such. No word if it does or does not work in the latest iteration of Xbox though. Anyone from australia order one of these guys yet?"

183 comments

  1. People in trouble by forged · · Score: 1

    Scene Credits goto:

    bunnie, for his work on the Xbox Project with his MIT paper
    visor, for his work on the LPC Bus
    numbnut, for his great work on milksop, cheaplpc and filtror.

    I can picture all these think, "oh shit, what sort of trouble am I in now...."

  2. I would bet... by Mikelikus · · Score: 0

    ...it won't work. Anyway I think it won't be long until there is one modchip that actually works with xbox. It can't be THAT different as if it was surely there would be compatibility problems.

    --
    -- Would it be acceptable to just put my name on my sig?
    1. Re:I would bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [obviously I was referring to the NEW xbox]

    2. Re:I would bet... by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Sure it could be different.. Example.. if you tell two programmers to write a piece of code that takes in X and does Y, you could get two very different pieces of code that end up doing the exact same thing. However, a hack that worked on one might not easily work on the other.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
  3. Why not get a real PC? by g4dget · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For $200 you can get a PC with Linux pre-installed: 800MHz, CD-ROM, 10G disk, 128M. If you want to run Xbox games, get an Xbox, but for everything else, a real PC is probably cheaper and better.

    1. Re:Why not get a real PC? by cscx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because "we are ripping off Micro$haft!!!! LOLOL!!!"

      The hilarious part about all that is that the XBox is now in profitability, and Microsoft isn't taking a cut anymore.

    2. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Troed · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Xbox is absolutely not profitable, where have you gotten such a lie from?


      (Microsoft doesn't have control over the costs in the Xbox in the same way as Sony has on the PS2 or Nintendo on the Gamecube. Intel and NVidia, together with Philips/Thomson and Seagate/Quantum has their words in this too .. )

    3. Re:Why not get a real PC? by g4dget · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right: Microsoft shouldn't be losing money on it, since the WalMart PC already offers better specs for the same amount of money. Even if they were losing money on it, there is little point in giving Microsoft good marketing numbers. Given their cash reserves, they could easily give the Xbox away to millions of people if it didn't erode trust in the platform--what they want is actual purchases.

    4. Re:Why not get a real PC? by arbitrary+nickname · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The XBox will turn out to be very profitable, in the much longer term, when MS deploy future DRM systems based upon lessons learned from it

      The XBox is being used as an experiment in locking-down PCs. It's like a honeynet for hardware hackers - people *will* try to hack it - either to pirate games, play MP3s, or run Linux. MS will learn from each hack, to build a more secure system, before releasing a system that really matters... in future generations of Windows and PC hardware

    5. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because that $200 Wal-mart computer basically HAS NO VIDEO CARD (only integrated POS shared memory video).

      Xbox got nVidia...

      You suck.

    6. Re:Why not get a real PC? by pomac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Xbox is avail in europe, Walmart isn't.

    7. Re:Why not get a real PC? by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

      they want us to think that they are losing money on it so that we buy it to "undermine their economic situation".

      It's proof yet of ANOTHER honey-pot for hackers!

    8. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Lonesmurf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jesus, I never thought of that.

    9. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The assumption here of course is that there will be something so irresistable in future generations of Windows and PC hardware that will force people to upgrade even though all their rights are taken away.

      Time will prove they are wrong. As soon as my right to do whatever I want with my own hardware declines, I'll stop buying new hardware (until it can be hacked to recover those rights).

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hmmm... time to find out who's that Anonymous donor?

    11. Re:Why not get a real PC? by qurob · · Score: 1


      It doesn't have a GeForce graphics system, or a controller, or a DVD. Also, I'd bet that an XBOX stays in one piece alot longer than that.

      Try again.

    12. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, each succession of Windows will progressively become more and more secure. So far, it doesn't seem like it.

    13. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey asshole, nobody here cares about your support of the Palestinians. Take your political rhetoric elsewhere.

    14. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox is a real PC. Its just that it is underpowered and sucks.

    15. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, just like software/hardware manufacturers have learned from the fact that every previous attempt at stopping the copying of software, and cloning of hardware, and production of unlicenced hardware for consoles.

      Any day now and they`ll stop it all.

    16. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey asshole, nobody here cares about your support of the Palestinians . Take your political rhetoric elsewhere. "

      Yeah, and you 9/11 whining too.

      Back Israeli murder of civilians. Have moral high ground from which to condemn terrorists. Pick one.

    17. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care what message it is, be it pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian, or whatever. If it has nothing to do with "news for nerds" it has no business being part of a Slashdot post.

    18. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoaaaa... that's the most logical and scariest possibility of all the things I've read regarding the Xbox. It makes perfect sense too - they let the hackers figure out how to bypass things, then they use that info to lock them down tighter. Once they get an "unbreakable" box, then they can put together their own PC hardware, flood the market with them at ridiculously cheap prices (subsidised by their software monopoly), and take a large portion of the hardware market!

      Hopefully, though, hackers will be ingenious enough to continue to break any DRM crap that MS throws at them.

    19. Re:Why not get a real PC? by cortana · · Score: 1

      ASDA?

    20. Re:Why not get a real PC? by pomac · · Score: 1

      What?

    21. Re:Why not get a real PC? by bogado · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This $200 box does not have a NVidia GeForce4 bundled. I guess this is a very compealing reason to hack a XBox. :-)

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    22. Re:Why not get a real PC? by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      But it has PCI slots which makes it usable for years to come.

    23. Re:Why not get a real PC? by cortana · · Score: 1

      ASDA in Europe was bought by Wal-Mart awhile back.

    24. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Observer · · Score: 2
      The XBox is being used as an experiment in locking-down PCs.
      Perhaps, but I think that's more a serendipitous side-effect than anything that was consciously planned - though doubtless it was intended to be hard enough to crack the box that most potential customers wouldn't bother and would just buy or rent the games and utilities of interest. Given his 'druthers, I suspect that Bill G would much prefer to keep the PC platform general-purpose rather than building in kit that allows Hollywood and Tim Pan Ally a veto over what can be done in future with his brainchild. However, he wouldn't be where he is today without a shrewd idea of what battles are winnable at any particular time.
    25. Re:Why not get a real PC? by pomac · · Score: 1

      Not avail in sweden afair.

      What countries is it avail in?

    26. Re:Why not get a real PC? by qurob · · Score: 1


      2 PCI slots
      1 ISA slot


      After replacing the video card, it has ONE PCI slot.

      Although you do bring up a good point about expansion.

    27. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASDA doesn't sell PCs AFAIK.

      They do a nice line in cheap garden furniture and barbecues though.

    28. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's much better fun having a barbie with lots of beer (even if you have sit on nasty plastic garden chairs from ASDA) than hacking a stupid X-Box anyway.

    29. Re:Why not get a real PC? by arestivo · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... when MS deploy future DRM systems based upon lessons learned from it.

      Something just doesn't make sense in this sentence. Since when does MS learn anything from their mistakes?

    30. Re:Why not get a real PC? by cybrthng · · Score: 2

      Microsoft is already expecting that the "xbox will see green" this christmas.

      Considering a 1 billion dollar investment, with another 1 billion investment for the online division is already looking at profits within 1 year is simply amazing.

      FUD - funny when it is on the side of MS for a change :)

    31. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill has a cracker's mentality himself. Think of the "Developers, Developers, developers" mantra. As long as it stays in the small circle of 3133t h4xors, it still works with MS strategy. With every bug and flaw, they wink and say, hey guys, you can get a job hacking and maintaining this crap!

    32. Re:Why not get a real PC? by class_A · · Score: 1

      ASDA is one of the UK's biggest supermarket chains, 3rd I think behind Tesco and Sainsbury.

      They were bought by WalMart a couple of years ago and some of their larger stores are now branded ASDA WalMart.

    33. Re:Why not get a real PC? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 2

      Ah, who to send my money to? Wal-Mart or Microsoft? How about I just write a check to The Baby Torture and Cannibalism Society, I hear they make great inexpensive PC's

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    34. Re:Why not get a real PC? by pomac · · Score: 1

      Okay, so my original statement still stands then =)

      Anyways, I still think that running linux on XBox is a good thing since it's available everywhere and most things other ppl have mentioned is somewhat localized (or, 2 countries?).

    35. Re:Why not get a real PC? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      The assumption here of course is that there will be something so irresistable in future generations of Windows and PC hardware that will force people to upgrade even though all their rights are taken away. Time will prove they are wrong. As soon as my right to do whatever I want with my own hardware declines, I'll stop buying new hardware (until it can be hacked to recover those rights).

      You're thinking that most computer buyers are smart enough to not believe hype. You're thinking that most people aren't going to CompUSA and getting told that WindowsXP and a P4 will make the "internet run faster".

      And you're assuming most computer users are like you. MOST computer users have never used or even heard of StarOffice. So, if they are told that the next version of Microsoft Oriface will run ONLY on the next version, and that they'll have to pay the same amount of money whether they upgrade or not, most computer users will scramble to their nearest CompUSA or Circuit City or Best Buy to purchase Windows Palladium, or whatever.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    36. Re:Why not get a real PC? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      So by learning from each Xbox hack someone comes up with, Microsoft will eventually be able to build an unhackable, completely secure, locked-down system...

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    37. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of all this Xbox bashing. Have you guys even seen the release list for the Xbox this year, or even in 2003? The list has some major games such as Unreal Championship, Panzer Dragoon Orta, Shenmue 2, Brute Force, Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, the list goes on and on.

      Enough with this blind bashing. For $200 you get a 733mhz processor a modified Geforce 3, an 8 gig harddrive, built in ethernet cabability, 5x dvd drive, 4 controller ports, and top notch games coming out very soon. What else could you want? Except a Sony emblem on it you damn fanboys...

      (It seems everyone who bashes the xbox gets a 5 for insightful. For shame!)

    38. Re:Why not get a real PC? by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except not everyone around here does everything based on wether it does or does not hurt MS.

      Shocking to be sure....

      --

      "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    39. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      Time will prove they are wrong. As soon as my right to do whatever I want with my own hardware declines, I'll stop buying new hardware (until it can be hacked to recover those rights).
      I think time will prove that they are right, and you just happen to not be a typical person or representative of Microsoft's market.

      Never forget: somebody is buying Britney Spears CDs. According to various polls (not accurate, I admit) over half the population believes in Demonic Possession, and can't find their own country on a world map.

      I don't know where these people are, but they're out there somewhere, and they buy a lot of shit.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    40. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not redundant if it's new to you!

      fucking knowitalls.

    41. Re:Why not get a real PC? by shepd · · Score: 1

      That's easy:

      (a) - No windows means not many games
      (b) - No decent video means crappy performance on the games you get
      (c) - No DVD
      (d) - Crappy sound
      (e) - No monitor and it doesn't hook up to my 51" TV

      That should just about cover it...

      The $200 WalMart PC is mostly for internet stuff/office stuff -- email, web, usenet, OpenOffice, etc. Not good for new 3D games at all.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    42. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I read one more story on slashdot about hacking an Xbox i will puke.

    43. Re:Why not get a real PC? by nenolod · · Score: 1

      The $200 PC has a VIA Cyrix C3 Processor that is not as good as the 733mhz Celeron processor in the Xbox. That is the motivation for most people.

    44. Re:Why not get a real PC? by User+956 · · Score: 2

      but for everything else, a real PC is probably cheaper and better.

      Not for playing MAME roms and DivX movies in your living room on the TV. The walmart PC has no video-out capability for TV display (Svideo, composite, or component).

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    45. Re:Why not get a real PC? by kableh · · Score: 2

      LOL, right. By that logic, IIS should be the most secure webserver on the face of the planet! =)

    46. Re:Why not get a real PC? by telstar · · Score: 2
      "As soon as my right to do whatever I want with my own hardware declines, I'll stop buying new hardware"
    47. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Troed · · Score: 1
      Microsoft has publically stated they're not sure they'll see profit in 10 years. Anyone claiming the Xbox will earn money soonish better have some good sources - because I can back up that they won't.


      The Xbox sells badly in Europe

      Xbox sales very low

      Microsoft takes heavy losses on the Xbox

      Profit off for Microsoft


      Yes, I could go on.

    48. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Yakko · · Score: 1

      ... hardware which I'll never buy. Ever.

      No xbox for me, because there're no games that interest me. When I say "no games," that's what I mean by that.

      Definitely no crippled hardware for me. I'll stretch the lifespan of my current machines to the hilt.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    49. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Wal-Mart's $200 PC is only available via web orders. Not available in stores.. that way they can charge you a bunch for shipping and it is no longer a $200 PC.

    50. Re:Why not get a real PC? by g4dget · · Score: 2

      I believe the Trident/Media Pro has TV out.

    51. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just buy your Xbox at Wal-Mart?

    52. Re:Why not get a real PC? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      About your .sig. You should create a yahoo.com e-mail account so people can discuss the topic with you. Unless you don't want to discuss the topic for the thousandth time and only want people to go to the linked site? Its a shame there aren't more sites devoted to offering facts and both sides of the issue. Reading a pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian site isn't good enough. The two sides offer such radically different views that its almost impossible to understand what is actually happening.

      I liken it to reading a voter pamphlet last year. About a particular ballot measure the Pro side said: This measure will not cost one cent. The Con side said: This measure will cost 50,000,000 dollars. Well one of them was definitely lying or confusing the truth, but the pamphlet didn't tell me who or how.

      The front page of electronicintifada.org is misleading. It opens saying:
      Against the Israeli Machine
      When you find yourself sending tanks into refugee camps, perhaps it's time to consider where terror begins.

      The picture shows a young Palestinian child throwing a rock at a giant tank. I find this highly interesting. I cannot see the face of the child, I cannot tell his feelings. My first thought was the caption implied the military presence in the camp was terrorizing the people there into fighting back. Then I thought perhaps since this child is fearless and stupid enough to throw a rock at a tank, he is the problem. If he didn't want to kill Israelis now because of sermons like these, perhaps he won't grow up to try and blow himself and others to bits. So its the camps where the terrorists are hiding, and thats why the miltary is there, to capture them.

    53. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this is a very compealing reason to hack a XBox.

      Compealing?

      If that was a typo, like: compelibng, or comopelling, I could forgive that..but you just come across as plain ol' stupid.

      Check your posts before you actually post.

    54. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter how much they learn, they will never create unhackable hardware or software.

    55. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, the xbox video is also shared memory, and with a lot less memory to work with. Sure it runs at a stupidly low resolution....

    56. Re:Why not get a real PC? by PastaAnta · · Score: 2
      This $200 box does not have a NVidia GeForce4 bundled. I guess this is a very compealing reason to hack a XBox. :-)

      No, but at the time they get the closed source binary NVidia drivers to play well on the modified GeForce4 chip in the XBox, the GeForce4 will be old and cheap!

    57. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone breaks into computer systems either. Honeypots catch the people that do. And "you pay less for it than it costs us to make it" is a common marketing slogan of many sellers, not just Microsoft. It works.

    58. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have considered Wally-world, and with the competitive price wars on hardware, it seems to not be a bad deal, for basic and general yet adequate hardware (HP) :) YEA HORSEPOWER ROCK!!!! (CHEAP !)

    59. Re:Why not get a real PC? by abradsn · · Score: 1

      There are some fun games you should try. Several million people think that these games are quite fun, and you might notice that some game studio's develop game for more than one platform, because they all offer different benefits.

      • halo
      • project gotham racing
      • Marrowind
      • SSX Tricky
    60. Re:Why not get a real PC? by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Who needs a bunch of no-name dot com listings to prophesize losses. Show me jupiter research, nbc, or dateline.

    61. Re:Why not get a real PC? by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Man! 51" TV.... why not buy your dvd, etc. Seems like you can afford it. Can I come to your house and play? :)

    62. Re:Why not get a real PC? by Troed · · Score: 1
      Official MS statements not enough for you?


      I think the word is .. "fanboy" .. then ;)

    63. Re:Why not get a real PC? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >51" TV.... why not buy your dvd, etc. Seems like you can afford it.

      Well... it is my parents' TV, of course (really the family TV -- without me it would never get hooked up properly). Yes, I live at home and don't waste government money by living in a dorm when college is close enough to drive. Same thing with them helping me with college payments too. :-)

      And yeah, I do have a separate DVD. Not an exorbitant one, though. Just an Apex AD-1500 /w the "improved" firmware.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    64. Re:Why not get a real PC? by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

      Damn your right. So let me get this right so I know what to get. The $200 pc, Then a new Nvidia G4 since the comp only has a 4meg card and the G3 is missing an x-chip. Then I solder a ddr chip in the Sdram slot. right? Then I install a starndered dvdrom. and so bam I have a PC I can hook up to my TV and run 2 year old Lindows??? games just like an xbox. Oh yah gotta replace the pathedic chip ???(Says = to a 800mhz Celeron) with a 700mgz P3. So basically I spend 200 for xbox , 150 for card, 80 for ddr and 70 for a dvdrom and 50 for a P3 700, and a whole lot of slodering. Damn thats only $490 What the hell am I waiting for and it don't even run xbox games!!!! Where my credit card?

    65. Re:Why not get a real PC? by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

      I dunno bout you but my parents quit buying me PC's when I turned 13. and I cant afford 2000 dollers every two years to buy a new sys. And then what am I gonna do buy a ps2? got one I use it as a place to put my xbox games when I'm not playing them. As far a quality xbox has no competion then the PC. PS2 is outdated and horible Jaggies. and I dunno bout that 3inch GC cd's. You people need to get over the whole MS being the devil thing. I think its nice to see and American Comp. Making money.And as far as xbox being a proto type PC for locking pc's down is the most insane thing I've ever heard. You don't think the MS has thousands of thingsto do. With constantly battling Pirates and other rivals? And the huge base of programmers that are just going to go unemployed? MS is not stupid The whole point of a PC is to be able to write your own progs for it. Plus they spend 500,000 on new security and 2 months later a 13year ole from China cracks it.? as far as a lockdown sys. Their just keepin up with the jones.

  4. The real question by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mod the Xbox? Why would you even want to own it to begin with?

    I mean, aside from the chance to play jet set radio future of course.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:The real question by capt.Hij · · Score: 2

      Can you really own an X-Box. I just assumed that the fee you pay at the store was to rent it from microsoft. I guess I shouldn't have gotten so excited that I didn't have to pay any monthly fees on it...

    2. Re:The real question by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I forgot, JSRF is the only game out for Xbox, you know what, you people are pathetic, you don't even have USEFULL criticism, or even anything based in reality.

      --

      "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    3. Re:The real question by User+956 · · Score: 2

      Mod the Xbox? Why would you even want to own it to begin with?

      Well, I had several square feet in my apartment free, and needed to fill them with something. The giant xbox + its enormous controllers fit the bill nicely.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:The real question by woodsma · · Score: 1

      Winning one from Taco Bell would be a good reason... :)

    5. Re:The real question by messiertom · · Score: 1

      I mean, aside from the chance to play jet set radio future of course.

      Of course - the only other thing comparable to playing JSRF is taking a time machine and going back in time:

      Awesome, whoa whoa whoa, RADICAL!!!

  5. What a waste... by monkeyheed · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a waste of talented people's resources; making linux run on an Xbox is like trying to make a silk stocking out of a sow's arse.

    1. Re:What a waste... by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know! Linux is nowhere near that elegant.. ; )

      (Just think of the security mechanisms on the X-Box as a challenging chastity belt. Ah, young love..)

  6. it _will_ run windows anyway by jukal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a scenario: Once the xboxes have populated the homes, in no time at all Microsoft will start shipping Microsoft XB to run in the device. This will happen especially if they notice that a competing open source OS has already penetrated their territory. This is just what Microsoft needs to overcome legal battles related to doing it (combining hardware and operating system) and selling it to large public and to win monopoly accusations related to doing it.

    1. Re:it _will_ run windows anyway by back_pages · · Score: 1
      It's an interesting concept, but I don't think it will open any legal barriers to putting their OS on the XBox. I'm not even sure that there are legal barriers, a la antitrust convictions or otherwise. At any rate, a third party group making a hobby out of violating the EULA is not going to give MS the legal justification for doing anything that they couldn't already do.

      But that's just my humble, non-lawyer opinion.

  7. From the documentation by CerebusUS · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the G spot is reached the LED will flash green immediately, hold firmly and tighten the screw.

    ah, you kids. Back in my day we had to find the G spot manually... and we were lucky if we got an audible alert.

    1. Re:From the documentation by RedX · · Score: 5, Funny
      When the G spot is reached the LED will flash green immediately, hold firmly and tighten the screw.

      Excellent! I've been trying to justify an XBox or PS2 to my wife for quite awhile now, I'm sure the above info will gain me immediate approval.

  8. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    !!! Click for the Installation Videos (done by a woman :P ) !!!

    Wow, even I can install it then!

  9. 15 min?? nope 15 sec!! by paz5 · · Score: 1

    I normaly dont post be cause i feel i have nothing that will be of any use to the masses (and dont like t piss people off) but this is my second post in about as many days.. the reason? yet an other error on the main page. the time is in under 15 sec not under 15 min. I personaly doubt it could be done in 15 sec, maybe with case already off and all, but thats not a very good measure of the tru time. people posting on the main page... use the preview button and reread those pages once :-D other than that keep it up... ok back to silently watching from the shadows...

  10. Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2-3 weeks ago this was news, now it's old news. Anyone interested in the XBox scene would already know all of this stuff, anyone else wouldn't but wouldn't care.

    This keeps happening with XBox scene stuff on Slashdot. Don't get me wrong I'd like to read XBox scene news here, it's just always out dated. I mean where is the far more interesting and scene important news week old news that lik-sang appears to have dissapeared along with most of the other hong kong suppliers of mod-chips. Is it just a coincidence that lik-sang had bought the open-xbox assets and was starting to ship and manufacture them just before they dissapeared?

    The other thing that always happens here on Slashdot is that people use threads about the XBox to complain about Microsoft in the rabid way that happens more and more often here.

    An interesting fact:

    Microsoft makes a loss on it's XBox hardware, so buying an XBox and a mod chip and running non-microsoft liscensed software on it costs Microsoft money. They only make money from selling oficial games that of course they make a cut on, if they developed and published the title or not.

    So those of us who choose to buy XBox and modchip combinations for developing at home are infact not supporting the all evil corporation but doing them harm. Of course I've also been buying games for my console 'cause there is some great games out there.

    1. Re:Old news? by Nuge · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've noticed, but EVERYTHING on slashdot is dated. I've seen things posted as news that happened 5 months prior. Yet people comment on it like it's fresh stuff. Don't any of you get your news from somewhere besides slashdot?

    2. Re:Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed, that almost EVERYONE on Slashdot has a short attention span? I've seen people not care about something that happened five minutes prior. Surely nothing more then five minutes old could be worth discussing. Yet people still pretend they aren't morons. Don't you have a brain?

  11. Re:15 min?? nope 15 sec!! by SScorpio · · Score: 1

    I believe the 15 seconds is refering to how long it took to attach the modchip. Previously with solder chips it could take quite a while to correctly make each connection.

  12. The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by jerryasher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd really like to find an easy to use set top box.

    My mother is basically wheel chair bound, and has visual problems. She watches a lot of TV, and has never used a computer.

    She has a WebTV and can surf the web, but her WebTV will not let her watch more than 128K of movies. And I don't believe any WebTV model will. That makes those movies of my kids that much harder to distribute to her.

    So I'd like to find a set-top box internet access solution for her. I haven't done a lot of looking, but it seems that the Xbox running Linux with a cordless USB keyboard may be a winning solution.

    She could surf the web to see the kids, download and play their movies, print their photographs out, and all from a machine designed to work well with TVs. And when her other grandchildren come over, well they can do the first person shooter thing.

    So I have high hopes for this Xbox project. I believe it can really offer a social good to a class of people that don't have a good internet solution.

    Then again, if you know of other, better, also inexpensive set top box internet solutions, do let me know.

    1. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by darrad · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I can remember the days when you had to use a TV for a PC, ie Commodore, Adam, etc... and all I wanted was to get a monitor. Now, all people want to do is run their PC on their TV.

      I wish you would make up my mind.

      Seriously, what is the purpose of modding and Xbox, other than to prove it can be done. Seems to me that all of this talent could be better put to use developing a viable alternative to MS. Sorry folks, Linux ain't it. Not enough programs, support is non-existant for the average (l)user. Don't get me wrong, I like Linux, and use it for my servers, but as a desktop or workstation it just does not cut it. Along with the things listed above, there is just not enough software out there for Linux to allow me to be productive, and that's the key. How many of the die-hard linux people on this site are dual booting so they can play the latest game on the PC?

      What is needed is something so far ahead of what we have now that it can overcome the lack of software long enough to get a hold on the market. Linux still looks like Windows. I am thinking something like a VR style OS, like the really cool one in Johnny Pnuemonic....

      Ok, mod me down to -1 flamebait, I'm spent.

    2. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by seann · · Score: 2, Informative

      lack of software is video editing
      photoshop
      flash
      and all those other big corperations that put out software that the users pirate anyways

      stop living in the 90s
      linux has everything a normal person wants

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, another solution (somewhat more expensive, of course, but with several advantages) would be to use a standard PC with a big screen (19" or above) and a TV Card for this. You can as well watch TV and do some PC work on this.

      Use low Resolution (perhaps, 800x600 pixels on a 21" CRT) or big fonts and big icons and a simple Window Manager which just has some counted Buttons for the needed apps (*nothing* else).

      Then, you can use a wireless keyboard and trackball or mouse, and of course there is a remote control for the TV card. Watching TV via soundcard and full screen Mode of some hauppauge cards is no problem - the picture quality is much better than on most TV sets. And you can of course have attached some VCR if you want - or perhaps on fast hardware record on hard disk via a good frame grabber :-).

      If the grandchildren come for a visit, they can play some nice tuxracer or boot a second Partition to do any PC game. And if there is any problem, you can login via modem, isdn or cable using ssh and correct this.

    4. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by darrad · · Score: 1

      linux has everything a normal person wants
      Really? Then why is it that M$ still has 90% market share. "normal" people want flash, photoshop, quicken, etc.... all the things that make using a PC easy for them. Show me one user who likes linux, by user I mean the average everyday user that we support. They are few and far between. A typical user would not be able to install the first piece of software on a Linux system, let alone setup a dialer to connect to the Internet. Users want all the eye candy they get with Windows, and like it or not, they are the ones that determine where the business is going.

      Face the facts, Windows is top because it is user friendly, which is also why it has the most security problems, but that's another topic. Linux is a great OS, stable, secure, until recently virus free, but it is not user friendly.

    5. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by seann · · Score: 1

      If windows is so user friendly, then why do pc repairmen exist that just come to fix when nannys computer won't open her document because the directory that normally opens is differnt, and she can't find it.

      or when the resolution is set to 600 and she wonder why everythings so big, or to small.
      or how to set up the modem so she can use the net

      or how joe-buisnessman wants to resize an image because the one he made is to big

      or how sue internet can't install her home networking because its to complicated

      or how to take digital pictures of the digital camera that you just baught your dad for fathers day, but the 10 steps to move them from the camera takes so long to remember

      or how any other small tedious thing can't be done because there are too many point and clicks away
      "right click there on that computer thing, go to the C drive go to your documents, find the file that says "my money.doc" and then open it by double clicking on the file"

      windows is far from easy to use
      just like any new thing a person learns
      thats why there will always be people to help them learn

      Linux is just like windows
      but instead of double clicking the program to install it, clicking various buttons that randomly move
      you have to either type a few words that are easily writeable on paper, or have the same person who repairs your computer install the software they would of been installing anyways

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    6. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "normal" people want flash, photoshop, quicken, etc.... all the things that make using a PC easy for them.

      Uhh.. stop me if I am wrong but Flash, Photoshop and Quicken all run under Wine in Linux now.

    7. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forget technology. why don't you invite your mother to live with you. this way she can see your kids everyday.

    8. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't she come for a visit and see your kids for real?

    9. Re:The Xbox as WebTV replacement. by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Not the same.

  13. Let's mod the XBox! by cookd · · Score: 4, Funny

    You don't need a chip at all!

    -1 Flamebait (Microsoft just knew we would all bite!)
    +1 Interesting (modding xbox is fun to do, fun to do, fun to do!)
    -1 Redundant (already got the PS2, why get an XBox?)

    Hey, moderators! Mod the XBox!

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:Let's mod the XBox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dude I can see your Karma points getting killed already!! Eventually you'll get -1 Troll, I guess.

  14. DING DING DING DING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You win! Give this man a prize!

    You're right...the X-Box IS an experiment. It is Microsoft's first tentative step towards a completely-locked-down totally Microsoft-controlled PC. The success of the X-Box guarantees this will happen.

    Forget about Compaq et al--Microsoft wants to own the hardware, as well as the software. Keep an eye out for it. The second they slap a keyboard, and mouse on the X-Box, the Microsoft PC will be born (and Windows will "suddenly" only work with the Microsoft-certified hardware). It will be completely DRM from the ground up (the X-box already IS).

    Folks, supporting the X-Box only brings us closer to the inevitable "darker ages" of home computing (we're already deep inside the dark ages right now, in my opinion).

    1. Re:DING DING DING DING! by C0LDFusion · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Forget about Compaq et al--Microsoft wants to own the hardware, as well as the software.

      Sounds like Microsloth is turning into Apple.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    2. Re:DING DING DING DING! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Informative

      If Microsoft thinks that they can take on the hardware OEMs then they are in for a shock. Apple made the mistake of thinking that hardware was the place to be, and look what that bought them. For years their Macs were light-years ahead of the DOS based competitors (I am talking about the days before Windows), but people bought PCs because they were good enough and cheaper.

      If Microsoft tries to control the hardware companies like Dell will have no choice but to go to war, and part of that war will include getting Linux to the point where grandma could use it. And the Dells, Compaqs, and the folks down on the corner are going to be able to build computers cheaper Microsoft.

      I personally am hoping that Microsoft starts to get serious about being a hardware manufacturer, because that would very likely guarantee the success of Linux.

    3. Re:DING DING DING DING! by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      You are so right, except that I would place the Cheapness before the good enough part. People bought pcs before apples because they were cheaper. Go back in time to 1988, a couple of years after the first mac, and you will realise that Macs could do much, much more then an average PC, were much 'easier' to use (especially by todays standards) and were just better machines. The difference was that the PC was much cheaper thanks to the clones.

    4. Re:DING DING DING DING! by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      (Score:-1, Flamebait)

      Further proof that some people shouldn't get moderation points. You make an honest opinion on Microsoft trying to be the end all-be all on software AND hardware, and how it compares to Apple, and some guy comes up with "Flamebait".

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    5. Re:DING DING DING DING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another difference was that with a PC you could run what you wanted, hack DOS or BIOS, plug in a Roland synthesizer, whatever to suit your needs.

      Because of the clones, PC brought competition, variety and a sort of "standard" that worked 99% of the time (like Sound Blaster). Mac never took off because it was more restricted and monopolistic, just like DVD-burners today, but for slightly different reasons.

    6. Re:DING DING DING DING! by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Hello morons, Please note that xbox is a console. Nintendo Game Cube is run by Nintendo's software. Get a life and stop blathering nonesense.

  15. Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by haplo21112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What we really should be doing is figuring out how to use my existing PC to Play Xbox games...that woul be a much more interesting hack...

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by janda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They go hand-in-hand. It's a lot easier to hack the xbox first, so you can figure out how the encryption/lockout stuff works. Then, you write a driver, hack, or whatever in software/hardware as needed for the general PC population.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    2. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.caustik.com/cxbx/news.htm

    3. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X

      What we really should be doing is figuring out how to use my existing PC to Play Xbox games...that woul be a much more interesting hack...

      We? What exactly are you doing to hack the XBox? and Why don't you just stop hacking the XBox and start working on the PC-playing-Xbox-games hack?

      One hacks to scratch one's itch. It sounds like you want the hackers to scratch your itch. Scratch it yourself!

    4. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

      Actually I have been, trying to scratch that itch myself, but few people have also been working in that direction....I would not have said "we" unless I was part of "we"....

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    5. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      caustik.com/cxbx

      help him. he hangs out in #openxdk on EFNet a lot.

    6. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by Troed · · Score: 1

      It's coming - it's done the same way as the Odin project on OS/2. Patch the binary from xbe to exe, and wrap the kernel-calls to native. No emulation.

    7. Re:Why are we wasting time on Hacking into the X by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

      THey already do that the progs called CPX ?????. But it convers an xbox game to a PC game. Still few bugs with it I hear. But 1 prob you need a P4 2.2g with 1 gig ddr and a Nvidia 4 to run a game. So it won't be useful till tech is cheaper.

  16. Re:The real answer by Ryatt · · Score: 1
    Mod the Xbox? Why would you even want to own it to begin with?
    Because Rare was assimilated by Microsoft.
  17. not more xbox stuff... pleeeeeease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now come on. i can understand the ossasional xbox news item but if I wanted this much irrelevant xbox news I'd jump over to one of the many xbox gaming sites that are around.

    do we really need to hear about every time someone makes a new modchip or if microsoft have somehow made them unworkable. This has been going on, on other consoles for as long as I can remember now and I assume it will continue this way.

    1. Re:not more xbox stuff... pleeeeeease by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The irony -- admittedly a literary device lost on most SlashDotters -- is that in the console arena, MS is the scrappy underdog. Their presence there is a tremendous boon to game players (ardent 14-year-old PS2 fan boys not included, of course). It is the XBox which is causing $ony to drop prices, expedite online muti-player, and generally just keep in line and look over their shoulder. They have entered an industry in dire need of a competitive shake-up, and are one of the few companies with the resources to be taken seriously by the existing $ony and Nintendo monoliths.

      Microsoft Xbox -- it's a Good Thing.

      Of course, if you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that Bill Gates is the Grand Lizard of the Illuminati and that XBox is his tool to effect a plan for World Domination hatched during the Fall of the Knights Templar, a simple discussion regarding game industry economics is probably not going to sway you much...

    2. Re:not more xbox stuff... pleeeeeease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually,
      bill gates isnt the grand lizard of the illuminati. technically, he's the vice overlord of the Consortium of the Blue Mylar. The xbox itself was conceived at a meeting way back in 1949 between Gates (then residing in the body of

  18. one chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One chip to rule them, One chip to find them One chip to bring them all and in the darkness (of Microsoft) bind them.

    1. Re:one chip by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are so funny ! How did you come up with such an original joke ? You are a comedy genius, only rivaled by Robin Williams and Jim Carrey.

      What about this one ?

      1)Sell an illegal chip to run illegal Linux on XBox
      2)????
      3)profit ?

      and what about this one ?

      In A.D. 2001
      Xbox was beginning.
      Gates: What happen ?
      Ballmer: Somebody set up us the modchip.
      Allen: We get signal.
      Gates: What !
      Allen: Main TV screen turn on.
      Gates: It's You !!
      Linus: How are you gentlemen !!
      Linus: All your XBox are belong to us.
      Linus: You are on the way to destruction.
      Gates: What you say !!
      Linus: You have no chance to survive make your time.
      Linus: HA HA HA HA ....
      gates: Take off every 'DRM' !!
      Gates: You know what you doing.
      Gates: Move 'DRM'.
      Gates: For great world domination.

      LOL ! ROTFLLMAO ! You and I are so funny ! We rule Jerry Seinfeld ! We ridicule the Monty Pythons ! We terrorize Matt Stone and Trey Parker !

    2. Re:one chip by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey, I came up with yet funnier :

      Hold on, sit down, you're gonna laugh as never before :

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these modchips.

      Still alive ?

  19. Maybe I would... by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2

    Show me where I can order a Walmart PC in the Netherlands...

    1. Re:Maybe I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot walk into a Wal-mart in America either, you have to order off the website. Cannot you do the same? I assume they will ship to your door.

    2. Re:Maybe I would... by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not.
      Last time I tried to order something from walmart.com in Australia, they emailed me to let me know the order would not be shipped, and my credit card would be reimbursed. I'm not exactly sure why this is.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    3. Re:Maybe I would... by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      The reason is that people in alot of non-North American Countries are running alot of credit card scams. Some e-tailers have solved this with a scheme at mailboxes etc., but other than that, most e-tailers have stopped shipping off-continent, especially to Russia, which has been a big problem country.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  20. Re:The real answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They havent made a good game in years.

  21. Mod chips as far as the eye can see... by The+Lord+of+Chaos · · Score: 1

    This must scare the hell out of the XBox group at MS.

  22. You mean "easier to pirate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "average" XBox user doesn't care about emulators. Their PC running MAME will be more capable. They sure don't care about running Linux on the XBox - who would, except for geeks looking for a novelty who will boot it once or twice?

    The only interest the average XBox user has in this mod-chip is that it makes it easier to pirate games.

  23. Plain Old Living Room PC by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2

    When will someone make an ordinary PC for the living room? How about Shuttle? That way, we'd get a box that fits in the entertainment center, is far more powerful than Xbox, and with none of the restrictions.

    1. Re:Plain Old Living Room PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shuttle SV and SS boxes already work well for entertainment PCs. Check viahardware.com for the continuing saga. They are nicely built and very well equipped.

  24. Clarification about emulators on XBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    I saw some comments in this thread and previous threads about homebrew projects for the XBox (emulators specifically.) To avoid people being disappointed when they want to play games for (insert console here) system on their newly modded XBox, here is some information on the current state of emulators for the XBox.

    Firstly, there is not yet an N64 emulator that runs well. There are the preliminaries of a port of Daedalus for the XBox, including a leaked beta binary. It runs so-so because it was still early in development. This is not a comment on the author - I'm sure something will be developed soon that will make the majority of people happy, but don't get your hopes up about emulating all your favorite N64 games just yet.

    There is also no PSX emulator yet. You can find the usual hype/marketing ploys on modchip reseller webpages about modchips allowing you to emulate "great systems like SNES, N64, PSX...". Please remember when you read such things that these people want your money. Look into it yourself first. There are no PSX emulators for the XBox yet. I'm sure something will be ported over in the future ( or Linux-on-Xbox will be able to run a linux PSX emu at a decent speed soon).

    The good news, however, is that the world of emulation on the XBox is unparalleled on any other console. Here is a list of emulators ported to the XBox which work almost flawlessly:

    Stella (Atari 2600)

    Gnuboy (Gameboy/Gameboy Color)

    FCEUltra (NES)

    SMSPlus (GameGear/Sega Master System>

    HU-GO (Turbografx-16/PC-Engine)

    NeoPop (NeoGeo Pocket Color)

    DGen (Sega Genesis)

    Bochs (x86)
    Bochs emulates the PC architecture and has prebuilt packages for running DOS 6.22, Windows 3.11, and Windows 95. Windows runs too slowly in Bochs to do anything useful, but it runs old DOS games very well.

    Snes9x (SNES)

    MAME (Arcade machines)

    Daedalus (N64)

    Frodo (Commodore 64) (url?)

    Handy (Atari Lynx) (url?)

    GBA (Gameboy Advance) (url?)

    Final Burn (Arcade/CPS2 esp) (url?)

    Owning a modded XBox allows you to easily play just about all of your console classics on the TV in your living room. (No, not everyone has computers in every room of their house yet. :P ) IMHO, the most fun I've had with my XBox so far is playing games on all of the above emulators. Now that there is a solderless modchip, just about anyone can enjoy them also.

    1. Re:Clarification about emulators on XBox by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 1

      Frodo
      Handy
      GBA-X apparently does not have a web page as far as I can tell. Some screenshots are available here, though.

      And, my personal favorite...

      Final Burn

      Also, CXBX looks like a pretty interesting. It's attempting to run Xbox software on a compatible PC. From the page:

      "the process of converting an xbox executable (.xbe) to a windows "portable executable" (PE, [.exe]) has been a success. despite rumors floating around, .xbe -> .exe converstion is entirely possible, and is already being done. the problem is that a lot of work is necessary to fullfill the environmental expectations of an xbox executable. most importantly, kernel exports and certain hardware are expected, and must be emulated. the kernel emulation will be done by wrapping around existing win32 api. this is explained in the progress section."

      --

      This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    2. Re:Clarification about emulators on XBox by McBeth · · Score: 1

      I can promise you that the emu scene on the XBox is not unparalleled. Take one look at the Dreamcast and you will see a thriving emulation scene. The list below is pulled from www.dcemulation.com

      The homebrew scene is very active too. We have been making big strides in DMA lately, SDL has been ported. Take a look at the KOS project
      dcdev.allusion.net
      Disclaimer: I am a developer for KOS

      48k Spectrum
      DreamSpec
      ZX-Ishspectrum
      Arcade Emu's
      Unofficial MAME
      DCPhoenix
      DCSI
      DreamPac
      MameDC
      MamedDC
      Atari
      Stella DC
      [D]cs2600
      Atari 800/5200 Emu
      Commodore 64
      DC64
      ColecoVision
      [D]Colem
      Hand Held
      DCGNUboy
      OsWanDC
      NeoPoccottDC
      Boob!Boy
      DreamSMS
      Midway Z80 Laser Disk
      LaserDC
      MSX
      DreamMSX
      fMSX DC
      Multi System Emu's
      DarcDC
      Nintendo (NES)
      NesterDC
      FrNES
      TuxNES-DC
      Gleam
      Odyssey 2
      Odd-DC
      PC Engine
      Dream Engine
      Playstation
      PCSX-DC
      Sega Genesis
      Nginesis
      DCGenerator
      Sega Master System
      SMEG
      SMS Plus
      Sega SG-1000/3000
      Dream-O-Rama
      Sierra AGI
      SarienDC
      Super Nintendo
      DreamSNES
      Sintendo
      Ngine SNES 9x

    3. Re:Clarification about emulators on XBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have been making big strides in dma? More like I HAVE :)
      It was me who wrote the pvr dma module for kos all on info I had reversed on my own.

    4. Re:Clarification about emulators on XBox by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

      I think he means on a next gen system PS2 XB and GC.

  25. Because ... by vrai · · Score: 1

    Some of us bought all three of the new consoles (and the Dreamcast, d'oh!) so we could play all the best games regardless of what machine it came on. Not all gamers are brand obsessed fan-boys you know (unless you're talking about 8 bit games in which case its Sinclair all the way) ...

  26. Myths by wumarkus420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, first of all, the new chip doesn't work with the latest boxes that were recently manufactured (in August, I think). This has applied to EVERY OTHER chip that has been released for it (there are plenty). While, I'm sure there will be ways to circumvent this relatively soon, it is still interesting timing to see if this new chip will prompt a buying spree of X-Boxes.

    As for the cheap PC vs. X-Box argument, there are many reasons why I have found it useful: Hooks to a TV with progressive scan (there are now patches to enable the DVD and the dashboard menu in progressive mode), Media streaming - the current media player can view streamed video from a host PC or from media on the x-box HD. This works with the x-box remote, and even plays divx. MUCH more seamless than any PC-home theater-type setup. And this is coming from a guy who has had a living room computer hooked up to a home theater for a few years now. This way I don't have to keep a computer in the living room, and I don't have to keep a mouse/keyboard handy to do trivial tasks such as watching a video clip. Emulators are great, and work great with the x-box controller (controller S is actually very nice). A PC is much more tedious to setup, harder to get multi-player configured, and once again requires mouse/keyboard to even startup.

    Sorry for the rant, but after all the modding, my X-Box has actually turned into that set-top box everyone was talking about (when coupled with my UltimateTV set, of course). It provides customizability and ease of use that a living room computer simply can't compete with. If you can get over the Microsoft factor, I think anyone would be quite pleased with what has been accomplished in such a short time as compared to a stagnant PS2 development community (grass-roots, not companies trying to make PVR software) trying to play catch-up on such a limited system (even with the Linux kit).

    1. Re:Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have a tv capable of progressive scan?
      im not trying to knock you. but i always get a kick out of people who get dvd players because they have progressive scan, even though their TV isnt capable of making use of it

    2. Re:Myths by wumarkus420 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have a Sony 43" KP-43HT20, which unfortunately is 4:3, but supports HDTV anyways. Progressive scan isn't the best thing since sliced bread (I prefer 1080i), but it's definitely an improvement in image quality.

  27. Re:We need video-console security. . . by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


    Bill Gates is the Grand Lizard of the Illuminati and that XBox is his tool to effect a plan for World Domination hatched during the Fall of the Knights Templar

    I don't believe any of that garbage. I do however feel that giving money to an abusive monopoly is not a good thing. Its your choice. If you bought an XBox, IMO, you did the wrong thing.

  28. Re:The real answer by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1
    Who needs Rare when you have Retro studios (Metroid Prime)?

    And Perfect Dark, one of the best games for N64 ever, has been turned into an anime in the concept shots for the next one. I like anime, but PD was supposed to be a serious game, what happened? Timesplitter 2 is coimg out for GC anyway, so that pretty much covers the bases.

    --
    I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
  29. Microsoft Office revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without any evidence whatsoever, I think maybe early in Windows history, Microsoft was counting on people stealing Office software from work. I think many people bought Win boxes specifically so they could get software at a five-finger discount. Has anyone investigated this possibility and come up with some data?

  30. Your blowing this WAY out of proportion by cybrthng · · Score: 2

    Uhm, by default the xbox allows you to rip/play "mp3's" in a way (wma's in reality).

    I think your blowing out of proportion your conspiracy theory as ALL consoles use DRM.

    Nintendo uses rare miny DVD's, and Sony is known to change things around at will as well.

    Even the Dreamcast used the "impossible to crack" GD-ROM's and that was broken.

    Just turns out the Xbox seems to have an updateable firmware that can be loaded from games or something similar in which microsoft can adopt fixes/changes necessary to protect the copyrights and value of the xbox.

    The Xbox is *NOT* a PC or a test bed to ruin your future PC experiences.

  31. Why does everyone always say that? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    The Xbox is Microsoft's stab at making lots and lots of money in the console industry.

    You don't think they're noticing the decline in the PC software sales arena? Console hardware makers get to write themselves blank cheques all the time because of the 3rd-party developers wanting to get a licence + SDK for their platform (most of the time). Look at Nintendo: they make more money than all of Hollywood put together. Look at Sony: their foray into the console industry has given them buckets of cash, so much that they could use US 20$ bills as kindlying around logs of 100$ US bills to heat their mansions, and still have lots of money left over to buy another senator!

    Maybe I'm not seeing this DRM angle, or maybe I'm just noticing the much simpler, more reasonable explanation for Microsoft wanting to get into the console industry.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  32. Not to burst anyone's bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but, out of the several million xbox owners in the world, there are probably only like 13 people who are willing to compromise xbox online to run some crappy operating system (linux).

  33. missing the point with the X-box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The X-Box has fairly good hardware for not being a PC based gaming system or beowulf Linux cluster so why not hack it and run Linux? The beauty of it all is Microsoft LOSES money each time a X-Box is sold. There can be no more beautiful thing in the world then running Linux on a box I know that Microsoft lost money building. :) :)

    Besides, I can use these little buggars as disk servers in an array for, say, an e-mail cluster to replace Microsoft's Virus Exchange. Now THAT would be truly beautiful. I'm going to run the idea by my boss now.

  34. Re:We need video-console security. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not if you mod it and escape the web that MS has laid for the average gamer.

    Can't wait to get my NES and SNES off the gaming shelf, and nicely emulated in the XBox...then I will actually have room there for my XBox.

  35. Eh, another useless endeavour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For christ's sake... its a gaming console, why the hell would anyone want to run linux on it?

    Because they want to. Another useless endeavour brought to you by the Open Source Community.

  36. Re:We need video-console security. . . by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

    I refuse to believe that it's wrong to buy a product just because the company that made it is a monopoly. If it's a good product, I'm not going to deprive myself of it in some vain effort to "stick it to the man."

    I hadn't paid for a microsoft product in about 4 years, but it wasn't because they were an abusive monopoly, it was because they weren't producing anything that I thought was worth the prices they were charging. The xbox changed that. I bought an xbox, and have been satisfied with my purchase.

    If you don't agree that the xbox is a good product then that's fine, don't buy it. But that doesn't make it wrong for other people to buy it.

  37. Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a modchip that doesn't violate the 3rd amendment!

  38. MS Laughing all the way to the bank by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Ms scared? Hardly. You see, in order to use one of those keen mpd chips, you have to buy the XBox. And contary to what a lot of puddingheads keep saying, MS loses a lot less money for each XBox sold than for each XBox not sold. Anyoine who's worked higher up the retail system than sale-floor monkey knows that is is far better to sell off your inventory at a slight loss than to have it piling up in some warehouse.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  39. Puddinghead by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you really want to hurt Microsoft, don't buy an XBox. They lose a lot more money from units not sold (ie: 100% of production cost) than from units sold. Simple economics.

    Buying an XBox to play games, listen to music and whatch DVDs is a valid reason to buy one.

    Buying an XBox to rip it open and play around with the hardware, or even get Linux to run on it, is a valid reason to buy one (a silly reason, IMHO, but valid).

    Buying an XBox to "stick it to The Man!" is lame. (Unless "The Man" is Sony Inc.)

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  40. it will, and it is... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    remember when directx was the red headed step child we all loved to bash...now it is the standard, and unfortunatly opengl is losing ground. Give M$ 10 or 15 tries and they will get it right, or at least close to it...
    Win2k is an exponential improvement to any M$ OS before. They still have MILES to go mind you but a million Bill Gates pounding on a million keyboards will eventually produce some solid code, and M$ has programmers much brighter than BG working for them.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:it will, and it is... by abradsn · · Score: 1

      I think Bill Gates is quite a bit smarter than most. He holds a ph.d. in AI and he is a chairman of the largest company in the world. Should I believe you over him? Beyond that, in case you hadn't noticed win2k is a better operating system than the current linux development. AND ... microsoft is already 2 versions past win2k. The main problem is that people get paid to write code at Microsoft. Their jobs, and livelihood depends on quality. Only a handful of linux applications and libraries can even compare. Gimp, opengl, blender, kdevelop, and kde. All of which (except opengl) have crashed several times, on me and a couple require massive amounts of setup time. Opengl, kde, and blender were all produced by people who get paid. nuf, sed.

    2. Re:it will, and it is... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      "Should I believe you over him?"...
      errr...
      what point is it we are disagreeing on here ? perhaps you should read the parent, and disregard my habit of hyperbole. I am a Win2K user and actually like it. I also use Solaris, Debian, and NCR and like them as well for the purpose they serve. I was responding to a comment that M$ software was NOT getting better and disputing that. I stand by my comment regarding programmers, Bill Gates is sharp but he's got MUCH better working for him.

      "Silly poster, comments are for literate users"

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  41. when will they learn.... by esper_child · · Score: 1

    When will companies stop dumping R&D into frivilous thinks like updating the console to kill a few modchips. Make the modders have to work for it. Update the CD-unit so that it checks the disc color by scanning some white light from the bottom to check if the disc is from correct territory and what not. If the disc doesn't pass don't spin up at all. Say for instance a narrow frequency band for US region game disc. Calibrating it would be fairly simple as you can attach a standard somewhere for it to calibrate to (though not the correct disc color for your region). I can't think of a more evil thing to do to keep modders from being able to modify the game console. To get it to work for them they have to find the right color combo (annoying as there are some fun tricks you can do with layered light refraction) or modify their disc drive to always spin up, but that would be VERY easy to defeat and expensive if you goof. Honestly what is the point of making a modification to your system setup to try to defeat a group of hackers if you don't make them have to jump through a lot of hoops in the process.

  42. Void warranty by noz · · Score: 2

    And if your XBox goes bust, you never had a warranty-voiding modification, did you?

  43. Are you all on crack? Xbox sales suck vs. PS/2 by Guywood+Threepbrush · · Score: 1

    I'm reading a large amount of comments about marketting, cost, secret plans, yadda yadda all relating to the cost of an Xbox not being worth what's in it to hack.

    Xbox and Gamecube are fighting neck and neck trying to get their marketshare out of the toilet. Together they don't come close to half the PS/2 units out there. A fact that prompted Sony to have a huge banner at the last E3 stating, "The Console Wars are over. We won."

    The marketting strategy for these devices is the same. Sell the unit as cheap as you can even below cost becuase you will make it all back because YOU OWN MANUFACTURING OF ALL SOFTWARE. It's the same reason mobile phones will gladly give the phone away for free, it's not where they make the money.

  44. Stupid Question Time! by apt142 · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't Microsoft get a clue and think for a second. People are buying the Xbox. Why? Some for games. Some for a cheap Linux box.

    But the real important issue is this: They are selling Xboxes.

    Why doesn't MS just go with the flow and allow the hack? They could bump the price up to a profitable level and sell a few more Boxes.

    It doesn't take a Genius to know 2 things.
    1)When the hardware is available, a hack is inevitable.
    2)With all the people putting time and effort into this, you know you'll have buyers!

    1. Re:Stupid Question Time! by strags · · Score: 2

      Because Microsoft currently makes a significant loss on every console sold. They count on making up that loss through the sale of games. People converting XBoxes into Linux servers do not tend to buy XBox games.

      As for raising the price - that will simply stop people buying them. If they become significantly more expensive it becomes cheaper to just buy a PC.

  45. this is sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was working on a screw-in LPC mod based on numbnuts stuff in june/july....

    I hacked one together with a bread-board in my basement... I was looking for $$ to manufacture some myself but didnt have any...

    looks like the xodus guys are cashing in on about $200,000 right now..

  46. Video-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a regular pc w/ wireless keyboard and wireless mouse, and a video card w/ a tv-out jack.

    Hook the tv-out and the sound card's output to the tv-set and voila! there's your "set-top" box.

    If she's got an old tv, you might need a $25 rf modulator to act as an RCA->Coax adapter. If that's the case, you may also need an s-video->rca adapter for the video ($20 @ Radio Shaft, less elsewhere). Either way, it's a pretty easy thing to do - I just did it yesterday.

    -Dan.

  47. Re:We need video-console security. . . by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


    Bud, you must have missed out on ethics 101. Right and wrong are a very subjective things. Its all about point of view.

    I consider it wrong for anyone to give money to an abusive mafia-like organization like Microsoft, so from my perspective so it _is_ wrong. When you discover a truly objective criteria for right and wrong that we can all agree on, get back to me and I'll check out this moral dilemma there.

  48. Re:Are you all on crack? Xbox sales suck vs. PS/2 by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't you mean PS2? I thought PS/2 was a connector for keyboards and mice.

  49. Bring it on! by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Excellent,

    The sooner Microsoft & al bring about a DRM-enabled PC, the sooner they bring about their own doom.

    People will not buy crippled hardware if they are given a choice. At least one smart manufacturer will see its niche in non-DRM generic PC hardware.

  50. emulation on PC, not on console by phorm · · Score: 2

    Agreed here. When decent Playstation emus came out, I was finally able to play some the games that I'd been itching to get at, but hadn't reached the PC market. If somebody can hack and X-box and/or a PS-2, I'll happily pay the games, but nothign sucks more than having to buy a console just to play 1-2 games.

    In another year my PC hardware should be able to dish out almost anything a console of this generation can (playstation games look better in 3d on my 2-yr-old graphics card with an emulator).

    1 big concern in PC emulation is 2d graphics. A lot of emulator designers have emus that are awesome for 3d, but crap out when it comes to 2d stuff, even such as simple as text and dialog boxes. Hopefully if an emu is made for X-box, 2d graphics won't fall to the side. As far as the actual console goes, MS could be a good fighter for games. If they're willing to dish out enough money, some seriously awesome games that might otherwise not happen may make it out on X-box.

  51. Game prices by disc0rdian · · Score: 1

    I am a bit suprised nobody else has mentioned this already, but at least over here in Australia, the games for this machine cost around $90 each, having a console capable of playing & copying games to the internal hard disk as well as the capability to do DivX ;) etc and stream from the network, spending an extra hundred on a console on top of what the cheapest DVD Player costs here ($200) one has see benefits of such a device. While a cheap PC probably would cost the same over there, the same is not true over here & it all fits in a small box which is far more ideal for a lounge room IMHO.

  52. And on the other way around? by ccollao · · Score: 1

    Ok, I suppose I have a good PC at home, with TV-out, DVD burner, etc. It wouldn't be better to make an emulator for linux to play pirated Xbox games rather than try to hack the Xbox? Something like vmware's Xbox. Or even better, a Bootable CD that turns my desktop (or notebook) PC into an Xbox to play from time to time.

    That would be more interesting since we all have rather good Pc's laying around.

    CCV.

  53. Re:Are you all on crack? Xbox sales suck vs. PS/2 by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

    Your right a little bit . Yes PS2 has one this round! But the fact remains the xbox is a superior system with grafix and game play. Ps2 is on there 4th gen. games. Xbox is just starting their 2nd gen of games. and There is a huge difference betweern PS2 allied assualt and XB Halo! Now remember PS2 won't be out till 2005- 2006. And if the basic 1st gen xbox games a killing the Newest Ps2 games who knows for the next 3-4 years. I personallt in america know 4 people who bought xbox's, 0 who bought GC's, and 6 peole who bout PS2's. But of the 6 PS2's 3 of them have gone ahead and bought xbox's. The one problem with the xbox is asia. They are very patriotic. They will buy a Subaru over a Ferrari just because it was made in Japan. Then combines with MS's rep the main argument against the xb is MS itself not the sys. But mabey Xbox will drop the asian market and just stick to the rest of the world with the xb2. Plus MS has a 20 year plan. So the battle won't be over till its the XB4 vrs the PS5. I have an XB and a PS2 and I havn't turned my ps2 in in two months and neither has the 2 other peeps I know with both. So who really knows I'm happy.

  54. Re:We need video-console security. . . by maxpower420 · · Score: 1

    Mafia-like???? Cmon what the hell are you talking about? Does MS Loanshark?, take bets?, import drugs?, do we find lots of MS employees in ditches in silocon vally? Yes corprate buisness is not for the light hearted, but looking at enron, red cross, AOL, and a ton of others I say GOOOOOOOO! MS!!!!!! Look at what sony did to the Dream cast. I think that was the best sys for the time and every one ended up waiting 2 years for a supped up Dreamcast(PS2)!

  55. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The Greatest Mathematical Error
    The Mariner I space probe was launched from Cape Canaveral on 28
    July 1962 towards Venus. After 13 minutes' flight a booster engine would
    give acceleration up to 25,820 mph; after 44 minutes 9,800 solar cells
    would unfold; after 80 days a computer would calculate the final course
    corrections and after 100 days the craft would cirlce the unknown planet,
    scanning the mysterious cloud in which it is bathed.
    However, with an efficiency that is truly heartening, Mariner I
    plunged into the Atlantic Ocean only four minutes after takeoff.
    Inquiries later revealed that a minus sign had been omitted from
    the instructions fed into the computer. "It was human error", a launch
    spokesman said.
    This minus sign cost L4,280,000.
    -- Stephen Pile, "The Book of Heroic Failures"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...