I'm running Office 2003 in linux right now (via Crossover Office) and it works perfectly. (Perfectly meaning "the same as it works in Windows", of course)
I'd like to believe that, but the story sort of advocates having less Intel hardware around. Also CNET does not really have a reputation for being any sort of Intel mouthpiece.
That's not what's going on here. The post (before it was 'edited for accuracy') claimed that google was launching krugle, not just that krugle was like google.
I did read TFA. The article that I linked states directly that it *has* to be a T-Mobile hotspot. So if you're paying for hotspot access through a provider other than T-Mobile, you won't be able to connect. If you are out in public and the only hot spot available is *not* a T-Mobile hot spot, even if it's a hotspot from your provider, you're screwed. According to that article.
That said, I read the product manual and it doesn't mention T-Mobile anywhere, so I don't know what to believe.
According to this and other articles I've read about the camera, it's restricted to T-Mobile (subscription-based) hotspots: "subscribers to other Wi-Fi services will not be able to connect an EasyShare-One to those wireless accounts." The T-Mobile subscription price is $4.99/month. The article linked in the original post does not get this point across very well.
Don't listen to me. Read the Bible
But if I read the Bible, then I'd be listening to you, which you just told me not to do. I've become confused. I'll stay here and await further instruction.
Well, then, the agency could just say "nay", even if they were using it, and the case could go no further because nobody's allowed to divulge the details. So what would be the point?
if i go out and make written copies of a book written by someone else, and give myself author credit on the covers of my new copies, and distribute it on the street, and then i find out that another person is making copies of my copies, would i have grounds for a copyright infringement suit against that person? no.
a clone is not a derivative work, at least not in the eyes of US law. it's nothing but a port to flash.
do you think if i started, say, porting current nintendo games to cellphone OSes, keeping the original game titles but putting my name on them, that i would not be subject to a lawsuit by nintendo?
he didn't change the name of the game, or the gameplay. he didn't change the character of the game. maybe he updated the graphics a little. that doesn't give him the right to call it "Burgertime" without asking the authors, and especially not to scream "copyright infringement!" when someone does something similar to him.
You seem to be missing the point that he didn't "create" anything. Burgertime is a 23-year-old game. He took someone else's work and put his URL and email address on it.
No, it's not his choice at all. He didn't invent Burgertime. He cloned it. It was made by Bally Midway/Data East back in the 80s and was still being produced as of 2000. The copyright has not even expired. He has not the right nor the option to license it commercially. In fact, if the Burgertime copyright holders found about his clone, they'd probably take action against him. He stole someone else's game, didn't even bother to change the name, and then got pissed at Fuddruckers for stealing his stolen game.
You're missing what is meant by "gzip". The above posters are referring to on-the-fly gzip compression of the http stream by the web server as the pages are requested. They're not talking about gzipping the individual files and offering them for download that way.
Anyone running Apache can install mod_gzip, which compresses the served content and sends it to the browser, which decompresses and renders it. for further info, see this rather old article.
Is there a way, with monitor setups like this, to run 3d games such that one part of the display runs on each monitor? Like a flight simulator with front and side windows, for example?
Slashdot Mirror
I'm running Office 2003 in linux right now (via Crossover Office) and it works perfectly. (Perfectly meaning "the same as it works in Windows", of course)
I'd like to believe that, but the story sort of advocates having less Intel hardware around. Also CNET does not really have a reputation for being any sort of Intel mouthpiece.
You must be new around here.
Oh, I don't know, maybe the point lies in the historical significance of the encoded documents?
http://www.tokyoflash.com
Always has interesting stuff.
That's not what's going on here. The post (before it was 'edited for accuracy') claimed that google was launching krugle, not just that krugle was like google.
Offtopic?? Did you even read the post, let alone the article?
According to Wired, Google is going to launch Krugle next month.
No. Wired does not say that. Krugle does not say that. I read the krugle site, I searched the krugle blog. It's just not true.
To be fair, it's clear that the poster didn't read the article either.
I'm sorry, i can't find anything on Krugle.com or in the Wired article that states that Google has anything to do with this.
Grandparent: Am I the only person left [that objects to increasing safety]?
Parent: No. [You are not the only person left that objects to increasing safety.]
You: Why do you want to increase safety?!?!?!1
hey, thanks, kaleidojewel-20^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HAnonymous Coward! what a generous, and completely selfless, act of hotlinking.
Somebody should break this news to Hani.
(It's not going to be me.)
I did read TFA. The article that I linked states directly that it *has* to be a T-Mobile hotspot. So if you're paying for hotspot access through a provider other than T-Mobile, you won't be able to connect. If you are out in public and the only hot spot available is *not* a T-Mobile hot spot, even if it's a hotspot from your provider, you're screwed. According to that article.
That said, I read the product manual and it doesn't mention T-Mobile anywhere, so I don't know what to believe.
According to this and other articles I've read about the camera, it's restricted to T-Mobile (subscription-based) hotspots: "subscribers to other Wi-Fi services will not be able to connect an EasyShare-One to those wireless accounts." The T-Mobile subscription price is $4.99/month. The article linked in the original post does not get this point across very well.
Don't listen to me. Read the Bible But if I read the Bible, then I'd be listening to you, which you just told me not to do. I've become confused. I'll stay here and await further instruction.
Well, then, the agency could just say "nay", even if they were using it, and the case could go no further because nobody's allowed to divulge the details. So what would be the point?
if i go out and make written copies of a book written by someone else, and give myself author credit on the covers of my new copies, and distribute it on the street, and then i find out that another person is making copies of my copies, would i have grounds for a copyright infringement suit against that person? no.
a clone is not a derivative work, at least not in the eyes of US law. it's nothing but a port to flash.
do you think if i started, say, porting current nintendo games to cellphone OSes, keeping the original game titles but putting my name on them, that i would not be subject to a lawsuit by nintendo?
he didn't change the name of the game, or the gameplay. he didn't change the character of the game. maybe he updated the graphics a little. that doesn't give him the right to call it "Burgertime" without asking the authors, and especially not to scream "copyright infringement!" when someone does something similar to him.
You seem to be missing the point that he didn't "create" anything. Burgertime is a 23-year-old game. He took someone else's work and put his URL and email address on it.
No, it's not his choice at all. He didn't invent Burgertime. He cloned it. It was made by Bally Midway/Data East back in the 80s and was still being produced as of 2000. The copyright has not even expired. He has not the right nor the option to license it commercially. In fact, if the Burgertime copyright holders found about his clone, they'd probably take action against him. He stole someone else's game, didn't even bother to change the name, and then got pissed at Fuddruckers for stealing his stolen game.
Benny Hill was gay?
You're missing what is meant by "gzip". The above posters are referring to on-the-fly gzip compression of the http stream by the web server as the pages are requested. They're not talking about gzipping the individual files and offering them for download that way.
Anyone running Apache can install mod_gzip, which compresses the served content and sends it to the browser, which decompresses and renders it. for further info, see this rather old article.
Please mod parent up!
I don't think Christians believe that animals have souls whether or not they're clones.
(But if you live in southern California, it soon may be...)
Is there a way, with monitor setups like this, to run 3d games such that one part of the display runs on each monitor? Like a flight simulator with front and side windows, for example?