Slashdot Mirror


Cloning In The Animal Kingdom

tanveer1979 writes "The New Scientist is carrying an interesting article on cloning in nature." From the article: "The ant Wasmannia Auropunctata, which is native to Central and South America but has spread into the US and beyond, has opted for a unique stand-off in the battle of the sexes. Both queens and males reproduce by making genetically identical copies of themselves - so males and females seem to have entirely separate gene pools. Conventional reproduction happens only to produce workers. This is the first instance in the animal kingdom where males reproduce exclusively by cloning, though male honeybees do it occasionally." National Geographic is also carrying the story.

123 comments

  1. Attack of the Clones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our new ant-cloning Wasmannia Auropunctata overlords!

  2. Well then by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Does this mean that Bush will have to declare war on this "Wasmannia Auropunctata" too? Or is that just for oil?

    1. Re: Well then by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Troll


      > Does this mean that Bush will have to declare war on this "Wasmannia Auropunctata" too?

      Surely he would applaud cloning workers, since it would increase consumption and drive down wages. Though he'd probably want them exempted from minimum wage laws.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Well then by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      Ant oil! Get your ant oil!

    3. Re:Well then by mbius · · Score: 1

      *groan*
      These ants have suffered under the regime of an oppressive dictator. We've given them Freedom. Some people say ants aren't capable of Democracy, but I believe they are.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
  3. cloning uncommon? by evenprime · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Conventional reproduction happens only to produce workers.

    But aren't most of the ants in a colony workers?

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
    1. Re:cloning uncommon? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But aren't most of the ants in a colony workers?

      One would think so, perhaps these ants aren't like the other ants in this respect too?

    2. Re:cloning uncommon? by ZosX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is correct. They are also sterile too AFAIK. I believe that the workers are by definition female, but incapable of reproducing. The male ants really only exist to mate with the queen to create more female workers. I'm sure they have some other small functions, but not much else. In the event of a queen dying in a bee's nest, I believe that the male bees have a way of producing another female queen, but I forget how it works. (Its been years since I read about bees)

      Bees and ants are some of the most fascinating creatures on the planet in a lot of ways. They almost seem to posess a collective conscious and part of that is the ability for them to communicate with each other in a rapid efficient manner.

      Basically the queen in a nest of either species exists mostly to reproduce. Everything else exists to support that. The workers take care of and feed their larvae young. Ever see ants carrying little white things that look like rice? That is them moving their larvae about. The nests they build are amazingly well developed. Ditto for bees.

      If you ever get a chance you should search google for bits of info on the supercolony of ants that has pretty much migrated across huge swaths of europe. It seems that the colony is completely interconnected as the ants all cooperate. In a lot of ways, it is the Borg of ant colonies.

      Bugs are weird. Lets hope they never start hating humans. We'd lose really quick.

    3. Re:cloning uncommon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But aren't most of the ants in a colony workers?

      Yes, but the workers themselves don't reproduce at all, so combinations arrived at through sexual reproduction aren't passed on to later generations.

      Of course, the cloning system itself is bound to be imperfect; mutations should still occur and consequently evolution will take place.

    4. Re:cloning uncommon? by syukton · · Score: 1
      Bugs are weird. Lets hope they never start hating humans. We'd lose really quick.


      I've got some napalm here that would suggest otherwise.
      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    5. Re:cloning uncommon? by Troed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you'd be interested in Coalescent: Homo Superior if you haven't already read it of course.

      Human hives possible?

    6. Re:cloning uncommon? by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 1

      Most of the ants in a colony are workers. But workers are a dead end for genes. Only the males and queens pass their genetic material to future colonies. The remarkable part about this finding is that for this one species (or is it two?), new males have only the father's genes and new females (queens) have only the mother's genes. Workers have a mix. This is different from the typical case for other ants and other animals, where the parent genes are mixed to produce both male and female offspring.

    7. Re:cloning uncommon? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Informative


      I googled for it as you suggested. And now I'm going to have nightmares for a month.

      The link is here. It also contains a link to an article on the Fire Ants that attacked Australia.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    8. Re:cloning uncommon? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Great. So you're going to have nightmares, and then you share the link? At least you warned us, I'll give you that much.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:cloning uncommon? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Its the new Goatse

    10. Re:cloning uncommon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you just go and try your napalm on those African locusts and come back to tell us how it went.

    11. Re:cloning uncommon? by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 0

      The supercolony itself also has a rival - a second, smaller supergroup of Argentine ants holds sway in the Catalan region of Spain. These creatures are more than happy to make war.

      Franco's been dead for thirty years, you silly ants! Can't our supercolonies all just get along?
      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles.
    12. Re:cloning uncommon? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fire ants eat napalm. OK, they don't but there isn't enough napalm to get all the ants, though it would destroy the rest of the environment we need to live. The sick fact about bugs is that we need them more than they need us.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:cloning uncommon? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      "Basically the queen in a nest of either species exists mostly to reproduce. Everything else exists to support that."

      That's the same for all species. vis a vis Dave Chappelle's comments re: hot cars and tittyflashes.

      Everything exists to propagate the message in DNA.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    14. Re:cloning uncommon? by Seenhere · · Score: 1
      It's not just Europe. Those "Argentinian ants" (Linepithema humile) are taking over the planet! Or so it seems. Have a look at the Global Invasive Species database: http://www.issg.org/database/species/distribution. asp?si=127&fr=1&sts=


      Around where I live (coastal California) I don't think there are any other kinds of ants anymore.

      --Seen

      --
      "I used to be a dilettante. Then I thought I'd try something else for a while."
    15. Re:cloning uncommon? by syukton · · Score: 1

      We don't need one another (humans and ants). Technology can and will replace everything in our lives which comes with annoying side effects.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    16. Re:cloning uncommon? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Like too many geeks?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:cloning uncommon? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Good heavens, fire ants are terrible! I'm from Texas, and there is no greater pestilence than fire ants there.

      Incidentally, you remember the Super Conducting Super Collider project that congress cut funding from in the 90s? Well, it was to be in Texas, and they had already built a lot of the tunnels for the collider. Then, when congress pulled funding, one of the reasons listed in their official report (or so I've heard) was that fire ants are attracted to electricity (which they are, I have an anecdote about that if you like) and had already moved into the tunnels.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    18. Re:cloning uncommon? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      fire ants are attracted to electricity (which they are, I have an anecdote about that if you like)

      Spill it. :)

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    19. Re:cloning uncommon? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Ok, you got it.

      When I was four, we moved to house just North of Dalls. On the other side of the alley behind our house was a big green box. It could be opened, if you had a key. We (me and my neighboorhood friends) used to use it as a stage, a castle, a mountain, a thing-to-be-defended-from-everyone-else-in-today's -game, etc. Our parents always told us not to play around it, but we ignored them, as the only reason we could see for this was the continual prescence of a small fire-ant nest at one corner of the base of the thing.

      Several years later, we (my family and I) were eating breakfast together (yes, we really did that), when all of a sudden there was a loud "BOOM!" that shook the whole house, and instantly, the lights went out, all over the neighboorhood. Well, an hour later, a truck from the electric company shows up, and goes to unlock this big green box. It was the power transformer for our whole neighboorhood, which was why our parents told us to stay off it. Well, the power repair guys opened it, looked at for a minute, and then closed it back up. They drove off.

      An hour later, we still have no power, but the truck comes back. This time they have shovels. They open the transformer back up, and begin shoveling a large portion of the transformer's volume worth of dirt and dead fire ants...

      Eventually, they got the whole nest cleaned out of there, and fixed the transformer (turns out that the ants had somehow chewed through the insulation or something and managed to short the thing). Then, finally, that pesky ant nest at the corner was gone. Too bad we had all outgrown playing on it anyway. However, a few weeks or months later, there was another nest starting up in about the same place...

      Yeah. That's my story. And I'm stickin' to it.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    20. Re:cloning uncommon? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Cool. Thx.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  4. God forbid . . . by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You'd think if the animal's can do it, we'd be allowed too. I say this is lovely fuel for the fire.

    --
    A B A C A B B
    1. Re:God forbid . . . by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Animals also eat each other. Shall we start with you?

      Poached or broiled?

    2. Re:God forbid . . . by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:God forbid . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many animals care for their young. Should we as humans do the same?

    4. Re:God forbid . . . by taskforce · · Score: 1

      I eat animals as well ^_____^ Am I going to hell?

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    5. Re:God forbid . . . by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 1

      Aww, it was a joke. Come on.

      --
      A B A C A B B
  5. Re: Ants in the Pants by ViX44 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it interesting that they speak as though the male ants had an intelligence that decided to modify its genes as described. I tried changing my genes and it didn't help me run faster, jump higher, or gain the ability to remember where I put my keys. Usually, I don't find those bad boys until I change my jeans.

  6. Does Cloning Help...? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whether they clone or not doesn't concern me. They are all equal in my eyes when I'm holding the Raid can.

    1. Re:Does Cloning Help...? by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 1
      Whether they clone or not doesn't concern me. They are all equal in my eyes when I'm holding the Raid can.
      But, being clones, would it not be easier to manufacture something more effective than your can of Raid?
      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    2. Re:Does Cloning Help...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, being clones, would it not be easier to manufacture something more effective than your can of Raid?

      No

  7. Reproduction through cloning by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the first instance in the animal kingdom where males reproduce exclusively by cloning

    Are you kidding? How do you think Slashdotters reproduce?

    1. Re:Reproduction through cloning by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 1

      If Slashdotters reproduced, at some period of time they'd reach a critical mass where first Slashdot, and then the World, would not be able to handle them. In essense, they would first slashdot Slashdot, and then slashdot the earth!!

    2. Re:Reproduction through cloning by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      assimilation?

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:Reproduction through cloning by MPHellwig · · Score: 3, Funny

      "How do you think Slashdotters reproduce?"

      There is no way you can have the words: "think", "slashdotters" and "reproduce" in 1 sentence without having at least 1 impossibility.

    4. Re:Reproduction through cloning by dmatos · · Score: 1

      I do not think that slashdotters will ever reproduce.

      Slashdotters think that the only purpose of mould is to reproduce.

      Slashdotters think "reproduce" is when you walk through the vegetable section in the grocery store again.

      If parents think that when they reproduce, they will end up with slashdotters, they usually elect to use birth control.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
  8. Yes, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe I speak for most Slashdot drones when I say, yes, there may be hope for us to spread our genes after all.

  9. Obvious first though from certain "parties" by sabernet · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are an afront to Jesus and the holy book and thy sinning, cloning, ants that dare copulate in an unnatural way must be cast down to the lair of Satan.

    1. Re:Obvious first though from certain "parties" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      is that how they become fire ants?

    2. Re:Obvious first though from certain "parties" by sabernet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      figures, people cracking religious jokes all over the place, but I submit one first and get modded offtopic:/

  10. Honneybees are queer? by TeleoMan · · Score: 0

    WTF?

    --
    $6.21 is the number of the beast before sales tax. Meh.
    1. Re:Honneybees are queer? by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't say that. It said that the males can, under certain circumstances clone themselves (which is news to me, but seems to be true enough).

      --
      Me (Blog)
  11. To answer your question further.... by ZosX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The queen also can produce both males and potentially other queens. In bees, when another queen is hatched and matured it will likely challenge the existing queen and the winner will continue the hive. Survival of the fittest indeed. I'd imagine it works similarily with ants. The queen is usually the key because she makes all the other ants. What is different here is that the queen is cloning herself and so are the males, that is, if they can prove this theory. Perhaps the fireants are evolving into a super colony themselves.

  12. nomenclature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of my pet peeves is how the media in general consistently screws up binomial nomenclature...it's not Wasmannia Auropunctata - the correct form is Wasmannia auropunctata...the genus name is capitalized, the species name is not...ever! Petty? Maybe...but only if you feel that being correct is not important...non-scientists just don't take the time to understand & then blame scientists for not telling them...so consider yourself told. :)

    1. Re:nomenclature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it would help if the people editing articles were different than the people posting them. For instance, a certain number of subscribers could volunteer (read: not paid) to be secondary editors - and have a wiki sort of editing, changing "its" and "it's" and certain errors such as the nomenclature, where the editors may not even know it's an error.

    2. Re:nomenclature by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Still though... "Wasman's gold-spotted bug". What a wondefully evocative name.

    3. Re:nomenclature by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "... where the editors may not even know it's an error."

      That is the job of an editor.

  13. Is that anything like... by ectotherm · · Score: 0

    ...go FSCK yourself??

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
    1. Re:Is that anything like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah...geek humour..very droll.

    2. Re:Is that anything like... by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. If your population is replenished only by cloning, its a good idea to run a quick fsck on the samples used for each generation, lest you accidently produce a generation of less than stellar genetic integrity.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  14. Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been a lot of discussion here lately about how Forbes and howstuffworks.com have been providing "articles" that are thinly vieled attempts at promoting movies like Batman and Star Wars. But this attempt at pushing cloning into the limelight on the very same day that FOX is showing Jurassic Park II: The Lost World is just too damn much. I never would have dreamed that National Geographic would sell out like this.

    STOP THE INSANITY!

  15. Re: Ants in the Pants by jcgf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember back in the '80s we used to modify our jeans with a pair of scissors. That didn't help us run faster, jump higher, or gain the ability to remember where we put our keys either. Oh well 2 down, ininitely many more to go.

  16. Anti-christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an elite member of the bush administration, and I just want to say those ants will be going to hell for this.

  17. Human hives are already here.... by ZosX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In a lot of ways I think that the above is true. However, I don't really know if the hive mentality would ever really truly fit for humans though as they tend to show many more tendancies towards the herd or the pack mentality. Once you start thinking of most humans as sheep, the world starts making more sense and starts becoming a lot more depressing. Face it. People just don't want to think about the world and what is going on in it. I know that there are exceptions, but most people do not want the responsibility that comes with knowledge of their world and are much more content sitting in the comfort of their low crime cookie-cutter suburb watching network television than worrying about all hte really terrible things that are happening to people all over the globe.

    Hell, if people would just start thinking of how much freaking garbage they produce on a weekly basis and the big fucking hole in the woods that someone dug and lined with plastic to dump it all...oh hell, what's the fucking use?

    No wonder people get depressed.

    1. Re:Human hives are already here.... by Razor+Sex · · Score: 1

      Check out Stephen Baxter's Coalescent as well.

    2. Re:Human hives are already here.... by forii · · Score: 1

      most people [...] are much more content sitting in the comfort of their low crime cookie-cutter suburb watching network television than worrying about all hte really terrible things that are happening to people all over the globe.

      People used to feel that there was a duty of the comfortable, rich societies to help those people in terrible conditions. Kipling called this The White Man's Burden. Nowadays it's more politically correct to just let people suffer under whatever situation they are in. It's called self-determination.

      In other words, if terrible things are happening to people all over the globe, then it's their own damn business. Let them sort it out. It may seem harsh, but currently it's the moral position to take. Natural Phenomena (like the Tsunami in SE Asia), of course, are considered an exception.

  18. Rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ever see ants carrying little white things that look like rice? That is them moving their larvae about.

    Oh shit! I thought they were stealing rice from my kitchen, so I stole it back and later used it to make stir fry. *gag*

  19. Here in the mechanics' garage... by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This apparently gave males both the time and the means to evolve a counterattack--converting some of the workers into males."



    Huh. Around here, we hang up posters of nekkid queen ants. Oooooh, those unarticulated segements! Kind of makes you want to pupate, doesn't it?

  20. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, all ants are going to hell.

    --
    [o]_O
  21. I works with insects too! by ratta · · Score: 1

    while(1) fork();

    --
    Wondering why i am doing so strange posts? I am trying to get a "+5,Flamebait" or "-1,Insightful" rating.
    1. Re:I works with insects too! by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain your insect joke?

      Do you mean that you continually "fork" insects, in that you stick a fork in them and eat them?

      Or is that code fragment supposed to resemble a bug in some way? Is the brackets portion of the fork() call supposed to represent the insect's head?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:I works with insects too! by b100dian · · Score: 1

      while(!fork())

      --
      gtkaml.org
  22. Raid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q: How does the PHB make the IT department's server storage redundant and bug free?

    A: He sprays it with Raid.


    Lame, I know....

    1. Re:Raid by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's assuming you have a PHB who can point the can in the right direction. Still, a Raid solution is better than none. :P

  23. Selfish Women! by jabex · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article:
    "'It's a selfish strategy initiated by females [in which] queens transmit 100 percent of their genome,' Fournier said."

    Wow, sounds like Fournier is waging his own battle of the sexes. Those selfish females, they want to clone themselves rather than have sex with me!

    --
    Like Teddy with an elephant gun.
    1. Re:Selfish Women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those selfish females, they want to clone themselves rather than have sex with me!

      Yah, that sounds about right- you do have low slashdot userver # count, afterall.

    2. Re:Selfish Women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really want to know is... Are you Slashdot's first ant fetishist?

    3. Re:Selfish Women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Ant fetishist.

      A genuine "needle-dicked bug f*ck*r"
      We used to accuse all sorts of people and objects of that when I was in college.

  24. small case species by xipho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its Wasmannia aropunctata not "Wasmannia Auropunctata", the species name is never in caps. No chance in hell the editors would catch that though...

    --

    only infrmatn esentil to understandn mst b tranmitd
    1. Re:small case species by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's it's not its. See you in hell.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:small case species by lav-chan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mispunctuated 'it's', you misspelt 'auropunctata', you forgot a comma before 'not', you used a comma to link two independent clauses, you forgot a comma before 'though', and you didn't end your second sentence (ellipses aren't end punctuation marks, although that's probably arguable). No chance in hell you would catch that, though.

    3. Re:small case species by xipho · · Score: 1

      Hurry is the devil.
      Haste makes waste.
      It's too bad I wasn't trolling.

      --

      only infrmatn esentil to understandn mst b tranmitd
  25. Re: Ants in the Pants by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    I remember back in the '70s when I tried to Modify my Jean with a pair of scissors. It didn't make her run faster, jump higher, or gain the ability to remember where I put my keys, either.

    In fact, all it got me was a release from jail for murder last week.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  26. Anyone seen the print edition? by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Nat. Geographic article hints at how this works, basically all the DNA from the female is eliminated from the egg by the male DNA.

    The way the submitter, and the New Scientist teaser worded it you were left wondering exactly how the male ants cloned themselves. Little ant laboratories perhaps? Being a matriarchy, I'm sure their government disapproves. :)

    --
    Where's the Kaboom?
    There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    1. Re:Anyone seen the print edition? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I was wondering that too. I thought they had a more liberal definition of "male" than I did. If a "male" could produce an egg it would not truly be a male would it? If the male is somehow capable of clearing an egg from its female DNA then that would mean the offspring is a clone of the male. The way it was worded made it sound like the male was capable of reproducing without the assistance of any female.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Anyone seen the print edition? by jmauro · · Score: 4, Informative

      A more in depth explination of the situation is provided on Pharyngula, here

  27. Here come the christians... by kd5ujz · · Score: 4, Funny

    But..but..they will not have a soul.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
    1. Re:Here come the christians... by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Christians believe that animals have souls whether or not they're clones.

    2. Re:Here come the christians... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      In related news,
      Orrin Hatch has just introduced a bill to outlaw this abominable cloning practice in the US and is calling for international pressure ...and if need be military pressure... be brought to be brought to bear against any Rouge Nation that sits idly by and allows this cloning to continue within its borders.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Here come the christians... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      ...any Rouge Nation that sits idly by...

      Didn't you hear? Communism is just a red herring...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  28. Re: Ants in the Pants by jcgf · · Score: 1

    Man I thought I stole the show with my comment but damn....

  29. Re:Bid for Dog . . . by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

    And which animals would those be?

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  30. Male? Female? by ManoMarks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are these classifications really relevant to this species? I'm always amused by the need of scientists to classify species as male and female. Like the Sea Horse, where the "male" gets pregnant. How meaningful is that?

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    1. Re:Male? Female? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, sperm and eggs are pretty distinguishable.

    2. Re:Male? Female? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      one has an X chromosone, the other a Y - this can be a pretty significant difference.

    3. Re:Male? Female? by (negative+video) · · Score: 2, Insightful
      one has an X chromosone, the other a Y - this can be a pretty significant difference.
      Sex determination in ants is by haplodiploidy: females have the full set of double chromosomes, whilst males only have one of each chromosome. The sterile workers get all their father's chromosomes, and half of their mother's chromosomes, which makes them 75% genetically related to each other, and that is what makes altruism evolutionarily favored among workers.
    4. Re:Male? Female? by sysjkb · · Score: 1
      Not all animals have equivalents of X and Y chromosomes, and even if they do, they don't necessarily follow the human pattern.

      Human males have one X and one Y chromosome, and human females have two X's. But the female chicken is the heterogametic sex in that species. Hens have two different sex chromosomes, Z and W. Roosters have two copies of Z.

    5. Re:Male? Female? by systemic+chaos · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the male seahorse fertilizes then carries the eggs until they are ready to hatch. Someone correct me if I'm wrong (as if that needs to be said)

    6. Re:Male? Female? by lav-chan · · Score: 2, Informative

      It isn't even always that simple in humans, either. There are females with only one X chromosome. There are also males with two X chromosomes plus a Y chromosome, and males with two Y chromosomes plus an X chromosome. There are even males and females that are completely opposite of the way they should be (males with XX and females with XY). And then there are some that are even crazier, like with three or four or maybe even five chromosomes.

      This is pretty rare (like 1% of all people, i think, and a lot of them get surgery or hormone treatment or something to 'counter-act' the obvious effects), but it still occurs.

    7. Re:Male? Female? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it really matter? it's just a convention.

      would it be any more or less meaningful to call the male seahorse the female and vice versa? would that make you more or less amused?

    8. Re:Male? Female? by Stauf · · Score: 1

      I'm always amused by the need of scientists to classify species as male and female.

      I wouldn't call it a need. Most species can be easily broken down into two distinct 'groups', usually one that fertalises the other's eggs (or analog). It is convenient to call these 'male' and 'female'.

      In the case of most ants, we have the female queen who is fertalised by a male. We also have a whole worker 'caste' which is, by convention, 'female' because they're much more similar to a queen than to a male. However, these workers don't really matter because they don't reproduce and therefore their gender is less relevant.

      (I'm not so sure about the 'by convention' bit - I'm looking at a textbook that supports it right now, but it's about 50 years old.)

  31. Re: Ants in the Pants by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's okay. Yours is good. I've just got a great deal more experience at saying outrageous and outrageously stupid things.

    I was something of an army brat, and till I was about 14 all my friends were over 60 vets, buddies of my Grandpa.

    Of course, I didn't get to polish it up until I was in the JROTC.

    Nothing like being 16 and 'talking' your 'supply sergeant' into giving you live ammo for a gun so you and your pals could go down to the shooting range.

    High Times.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  32. Hellstrom's Hive... by infonography · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hellstrom's Hive by Frank Herbert (1973) A book I read a many years back about a secret colony of humans living along Social Insect lines. Most disturbing bit as about a grinder that the 'Colonists' would walk into freely upon orders if they were found wanting. Much of the story centers around the Nature Vs Nurture theory.

    When people start Cloning Britney Spears as a marketable commodity will the clones turn out to be the same sort of strumpet? I would guess that that would be what they would want anyway.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Hellstrom's Hive... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Ask Fry about his Lucy Lu collection.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Hellstrom's Hive... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      I would, but I think I'd rather stay home with my Marylin Monrobot.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  33. Evolutionary dead end? by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    How do they manage to survive as species without the benefit of variation from sexual reproduction?

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    1. Re:Evolutionary dead end? by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      Evolution at a higher level than genotype ("culture", in a way, although that seems far-fetched for ants :), or through mutation, for example. Sexual reproduction mostly allows to recombine existing genes in a new way. What I'm wondering about is how the different colonies can make the difference between themselves and sister colonies.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    2. Re:Evolutionary dead end? by (negative+video) · · Score: 4, Informative
      How do they manage to survive as species without the benefit of variation from sexual reproduction?
      The workers, which are most exposed to the big nasty world, get half their genes from each parent. That gives some variation, and the (cloned) fertile ants have their food and water thoroughly filtered by the workers, which gives them protection that most parthenogenic species don't get. This genetic system was only recently discovered and the investigations are very preliminary, so it isn't yet known if crossing-over occurs rarely.
  34. Colony genetics by scaryfish · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ants (and bees) have some pretty interesting genetics going on. The evolutionary reason behind why they form hives and colonies is kind of counter-intuitive - why would a worker give up its reproductive potential?

    Bees are haplo-diploid. That means that females are diploid (2 copies of every chromosome) but males are haploid, forming from unfertilised eggs. So when eggs are fertilised by males, the offspring (workers) end up having 1/2 their mother's DNA but all of their fathers. This means that unlike "normal" sexual reproduction, siblings share 3/4 of their DNA on average, which is more than they could share with their own offspring. So it is in their genes best interest to help produce more siblings than to produce their own offspring.

    1. Re:Colony genetics by snilloc · · Score: 1
      The evolutionary reason behind why they form hives and colonies is kind of counter-intuitive - why would a worker give up its reproductive potential?

      You're approaching this the wrong way. I think Matt Ridley said it best - "the gene's eye view". The genome of the ant/bee species continues. In this view, the genes "use" the workers and the reproductive individuals in much the same way. With evolution, the question is "what best promotes the genes?" Or, more bluntly (and perhaps more accurately), "what works?"

    2. Re:Colony genetics by scaryfish · · Score: 1

      Well.. yeah. Perhaps I wasn't clear, I meant it is initially weird to think that giving up reproduction would be a successful evolutionary strategy. But when you take a look at the genetics behind it, it makes sense.

    3. Re:Colony genetics by snilloc · · Score: 1

      He writes for a popular/mass audience, but Matt Ridley's books are really insightful, and a quick read despite their length.

  35. This is weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this website:

    http://www.evergreen-foundation.com./#

    Then login under "extranet login".

    By-pass sloppy security with this id & pswd: PROPAGATE

    I can't figure out WTF is going on. I didn't think the tech was that far advanced.

  36. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our Ant Clone overlords!

  37. Ant experts discussing on my forum... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Click here to read.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. The Darwin rule of economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they do it for economic reasons? You could save a fortune on dinners and movies.

  39. Evolutionary dead-end by Max+von+H. · · Score: 1

    With such a narrow gene pool, could this be an indication that this particular species has attained an evolutionary standpoint at which the present DNA happens to be at the end of its possible evolution?

    Some genetics/evolution specialists here care to explain?

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  40. I think this is the important part: by FFFish · · Score: 1

    these ants have struck the perfect balance between diversity and population. They need one-quarter as many males as females.

    There's an appropriate gene combination for every form of significant ecological change the colony has previously encountered. When the ecology changes, the queens and males breed experimental variations of the species. Those that add a new combination that provides the form of worker ant that will keep the colony alive will join the ranks of the self-cloning.

    I always end up seeing this life "thing" as coming around back to memes in our genes. Life does what is necessary to keep DNA moving forward through time.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  41. This can't be allowed! by mbrother · · Score: 1

    If animals all reproduced by cloning, how would shy parents be able to teach their kids about sex?

    --
    Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  42. asexual reproduction not uncommon in animal kingdo by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i'm not sure why cloning in nature comes to us as a surprise at all. all single cellular organisms duplicate themselves (i.e. cloning). we've already known for a long that that many animals in the animal kingdom are known to have asexual reproduction.

    from http://biology.about.com/library/weekly/aa090700a. htm

    In asexual reproduction, one individual produces offspring that are genetically identical to itself. These offspring are produced by mitosis. There are many invertebrates, including sea stars and sea anemones for example, that produce by asexual reproduction.

  43. Link to PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PDF of the Nature article is available here.

  44. Re:asexual reproduction not uncommon in animal kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes this remarkable is that males are reproducing asexually.

  45. Re: Ants in the Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I tried changing my genes and it didn't help me run faster, jump higher, or gain the ability to remember where I put my keys."

    Perhaps you need to find looser fitting genes?
    Tighter genes would make it easier to find your keys, but rather limits movement...

  46. no, FEMALE bees clone by airuck · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but it is the female worker bees, and not the male drones, that sometimes clone themselves. AFAIK, this has only been observed in queenless colonies and has been explained as a genetic escape mechanism. Without a queen, a hive would otherwise be a reproductive dead end. When unfertilized workers lay haploid eggs in response to lack of queen pheromones, all of the eggs become male drones. Although the colony remains doomed, the drones can go out and mate with queens from other colonies and continue the genetic line. See this article for a general description of this phenomenon. So you might ask why workers don't cheat and clone themselves more often. Well, they do, but their sisters don't stand for it.

    --
    First entomology, then virology, and finally bioinformatics systems. Bugs follow me wherever I go.
  47. ANTS CLONING???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they have good lawyers to fight off the patent suits...

  48. I agree Completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baaaa :)

  49. God forbid we play with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Animals also masturbate... I'll start without you.

    Lubed or chafed?