creating a kids' grey market of slipping allowances to other kids to wear these shoes...Or just forcing future slashdot readers to wear them via liberal applications of swirlies.
You still haven't explained what links "pay for play" to "higher threshold of publication quality." (And I think you're going to have a hard time making your argument sound convincing to a crowd of open source advocates.)
Think about what you're saying. You're saying that the US should present a unified position... which happens to be EXACTLY THE SAME as the position Bush wants to present - because he just gets rid of anyone who doesn't agree with him.
"It's about people on a standards committee." exactly. Not a REPUBLICAN standards committee, you will note. That's what "standards" means. It's about representing the people, not the president, of the US.
I had thought KJHK was the first, but I guess it started just after WXYC. (December 3rd, 1994)
Anyway, CUSeemee was clearly being used in substantial "webcasting" efforts long before the date claimed by Real.
I didn't mean to sully the good name of plastics. After all, they can't help whose corpses they end up infusing. They're just innocent giant molecules.
Why are Fox "beating the pants off" the other networks? I've got my own hypothesis: because the average-to-dumb outnumber the smart by a wide margin. This is no secret: look at IQ statistics for the general population. Got a lot of money and Want a successful TV network? Write dumb, loud, shiny content which appeals to the cross-section of the population covering "average" down to "foolish mush brain", and you are guaranteed the widest audience. And you get to perpetuate that audience by filling their heads with your mush! Bonus!
It's the same reason that PBS and NPR historically must struggle to survive, while the Dr. Phils of the world turn into megamillionaires. There just aren't enough smart people to go around, and the dumb ones multiply faster than the smart ones to boot.
So congratulations, stupids, you're extinguishing your best hope for long-term survival. Who wants their kids to get physics degrees, when everybody else's kids are becoming latte-slurping pinheads with MBAs?
At least you can take solace in the probability that when the end comes, you'll probably all be - statistically speaking - too stupid to realize it.
Nobody said anything about ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN. Nobody but you, that is.
And yes, Fox leans toward the side of evil. It's true. Evil, loud, bigoted, xenophobic, misogynistic, fat, angry, dumb, NASCAR-devouring, Wal-Mart-enjoying, backyard-wrestling, idiot-haired white people. Like those who populate most of our great nation, sucking dumbly on their Mega-Gulp cups filled to overflowing with the gray pablum squeezed out of the giant plastic assholes of the megacorporations, staring glassy-eyed at the shiny wonders that float before them on their giant-[wide]screen TVs as they sink slowly down to become one with their Barca-Loungers, and finally peel off into the piano-case-sized caskets that will house their plastic-infused corpses for all eternity, or at least until they're dug up by a backhoe to make way for the future supermall their children are going to want.
Therefore, leaning in the opposite angle should be okay. But if you think it's "most people" who feel this way, you haven't seen the same TV ratings I have.
In the 1960s, most large computers were used on a timeshare basis. In many instances, if you wanted calculations done, you bought blocks of "computer time" by the minute. Thus, twice the computing power would = half the cost. Therefore something that cost $10000 one year should only cost $5000 the next year (when the computer was twice as fast), etc.
He's not mocking black people, he's mocking people who believe the CIA/crack rumor. You're the one who's making the leap from "gullible" to "black". Therefore, you're the one showing evidence of racism, if anyone is.
...who read the article and saw this:
The CORE.. is a radically compact and efficient fuel cell, capable of powering anything from a motorboat to a small domestic property
and thought, "Why would I want to drive a house around?"
i don't think a motorcycle would make a good bomber, unless it could go fast enough to escape the blast radius in the time it takes for the bomb to fall a couple of inches to the ground.
Why should the rules be different for wireless phones? Do you pay for calls you receive on your land line in the US? I don't. Why should I pay for calls I receive on my cell?
Slashdot Mirror
*Secure connection established*
creating a kids' grey market of slipping allowances to other kids to wear these shoes ...Or just forcing future slashdot readers to wear them via liberal applications of swirlies.
You see, in France, we have a saying. Ze allowance, she is like a shoe, no? A shoe which enforce ze TV restrictions. How can you say is not so, eh?
Please forgive me for zees post: I am but a lowly stereoteep.
They have porn sites online now?
You still haven't explained what links "pay for play" to "higher threshold of publication quality." (And I think you're going to have a hard time making your argument sound convincing to a crowd of open source advocates.)
What the hell are you talking about? You don't have an argument. You're just typing, and it doesn't make any sense.... tough guy.
So, on top of being a patronizing ass, you've clearly got mental problems. Sorry that you're incapable of logical thinking. Goodbye.
Think about what you're saying. You're saying that the US should present a unified position... which happens to be EXACTLY THE SAME as the position Bush wants to present - because he just gets rid of anyone who doesn't agree with him.
"It's about people on a standards committee." exactly. Not a REPUBLICAN standards committee, you will note. That's what "standards" means. It's about representing the people, not the president, of the US.
I had thought KJHK was the first, but I guess it started just after WXYC. (December 3rd, 1994) Anyway, CUSeemee was clearly being used in substantial "webcasting" efforts long before the date claimed by Real.
Let me get this straight...
...
You're saying that bigger fans... move more air than smaller ones?
It's all just too confusing. Mind you, I'm an alien from a parallel dimension. In my world, it works like this:
Step 1: Profit!
Step 2:
Step 3: Hard drive dools down.
Step 4: Detach small fan from hard drive.
No, you're totally right. Rush Limbaugh fans are geniuses. Every last one of them.
well, that was meant to sound like a joke, but it didn't come out that way. sorry.
If you're so smart, why is it so hard for you to understand what people are saying?
Thanks for the sentiment. But I fully expected the flamebait mod and I can afford the karma :)
(...until they read the other reply i posted)
I didn't mean to sully the good name of plastics. After all, they can't help whose corpses they end up infusing. They're just innocent giant molecules.
Why are Fox "beating the pants off" the other networks? I've got my own hypothesis: because the average-to-dumb outnumber the smart by a wide margin. This is no secret: look at IQ statistics for the general population. Got a lot of money and Want a successful TV network? Write dumb, loud, shiny content which appeals to the cross-section of the population covering "average" down to "foolish mush brain", and you are guaranteed the widest audience. And you get to perpetuate that audience by filling their heads with your mush! Bonus!
It's the same reason that PBS and NPR historically must struggle to survive, while the Dr. Phils of the world turn into megamillionaires. There just aren't enough smart people to go around, and the dumb ones multiply faster than the smart ones to boot.
So congratulations, stupids, you're extinguishing your best hope for long-term survival. Who wants their kids to get physics degrees, when everybody else's kids are becoming latte-slurping pinheads
with MBAs?
At least you can take solace in the probability that when the end comes, you'll probably all be - statistically speaking - too stupid to realize it.
"Oh brave new world, that has such people in it!"
can you show that the law is either correct or not?
I dunno... will I get a prize?
Nobody said anything about ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN. Nobody but you, that is.
And yes, Fox leans toward the side of evil. It's true. Evil, loud, bigoted, xenophobic, misogynistic, fat, angry, dumb, NASCAR-devouring, Wal-Mart-enjoying, backyard-wrestling, idiot-haired white people. Like those who populate most of our great nation, sucking dumbly on their Mega-Gulp cups filled to overflowing with the gray pablum squeezed out of the giant plastic assholes of the megacorporations, staring glassy-eyed at the shiny wonders that float before them on their giant-[wide]screen TVs as they sink slowly down to become one with their Barca-Loungers, and finally peel off into the piano-case-sized caskets that will house their plastic-infused corpses for all eternity, or at least until they're dug up by a backhoe to make way for the future supermall their children are going to want.
Therefore, leaning in the opposite angle should be okay. But if you think it's "most people" who feel this way, you haven't seen the same TV ratings I have.
In the 1960s, most large computers were used on a timeshare basis. In many instances, if you wanted calculations done, you bought blocks of "computer time" by the minute. Thus, twice the computing power would = half the cost. Therefore something that cost $10000 one year should only cost $5000 the next year (when the computer was twice as fast), etc.
He's not mocking black people, he's mocking people who believe the CIA/crack rumor. You're the one who's making the leap from "gullible" to "black". Therefore, you're the one showing evidence of racism, if anyone is.
If the first shuttle has a design flaw, what's to say the second one isn't afflicted by the same problem?
er... This may get you started.
Hey... I'm a consumerist.
...who read the article and saw this: The CORE.. is a radically compact and efficient fuel cell, capable of powering anything from a motorboat to a small domestic property and thought, "Why would I want to drive a house around?"
i don't think a motorcycle would make a good bomber, unless it could go fast enough to escape the blast radius in the time it takes for the bomb to fall a couple of inches to the ground.
Why should the rules be different for wireless phones? Do you pay for calls you receive on your land line in the US? I don't. Why should I pay for calls I receive on my cell?