Slashdot Mirror


RFID, Sign of the (End) Times?

andy753421 writes "Wired is running an article featuring Katherine Albrecht who, with her new book 'The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance', is warning that RFID tags may in fact be the "mark of the beast". Among her arguments are that in a futuristic world anyone who wishes to buy and sell goods would be compelled "to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads," as is foretold in the book Revelation. Others are skeptical saying that many new technologies, such as the printing press, bar-codes, and several others, have also created fears about the beginning of the end."

843 comments

  1. Last post by saltydogdesign · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get it? Huh? Huh?

    --
    // This is not a sig.
    1. Re:Last post by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      So what the hell does that make this post? Post-armageddon?

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:Last post by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      They're never right. Why should I be?

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    3. Re:Last post by ookabooka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps your post was merely the end of the first of the beginning of the last posts.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    4. Re:Last post by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Ouch.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    5. Re:Last post by really? · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "Amen!"

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    6. Re:Last post by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Too funny! I have frequently wondered what the origen of the word 'Amen' is. In The Aeneid of Virgil, the old English translation ends many a prayer to the Gods with 'bidden ah me!' meaning something like 'so ask I'. This made me wonder whether the mystical 'amen' of the Christians is simply 'bidden ah men!' - 'so ask us'.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    7. Re:Last post by secolactico · · Score: 2, Informative

      From Wikipedia (so take it as you will): "So be it; truly"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:Last post by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Its Hebrew. Jews end prayers with ah-mayn (pronounces with a long a in the second paragraph) spelled alef-mem-nun, the exact same if you add the vowels.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:Last post by atsabig10fo · · Score: 1

      even if some evil government sets up a system to require this and it is made law people can take comfort in the fact that only must follow a law unless not doing so makes you a better christian.

    10. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      post apocalyptic.

    11. Re:Last post by HermanAB · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I lived in Israel for a few years and cannot remember ever hearing a Jew use the word - though I didn't go anywhere anybody would be praying to the Gods either, since those are generally good places to stay away from...

      I have heard 'Alah akbar' shouted from minarets in many places all over the world, but no Arabic sounding like 'Amen' either.

      Does any real Jew care to comment on 'Amen'?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    12. Re:Last post by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am a real jew, born into it. Many of our prayers end in amen. For example, the prayer over wine- baruch atah adonai elloheynu melech haolam boreh pre hagofen amen (fogive the rough phonetic spelling there). It doesn't end every prayer, and its not said reqularly outside of prayer as some christians do. But its definitely used. Go to a friday night kiddush and you'll hear it.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    13. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This made me wonder whether the mystical 'amen' of the Christians is simply 'bidden ah men!' - 'so ask us'.

      How about using a dictionary? Dictionaries have this thing called word etymology.
      For example, Merriam-Webster show that the etymology of the word "Amen" as:

      Etymology: Middle English, from Old English, from Late Latin, from Greek amEn, from Hebrew AmEn

    14. Re:Last post by Almonday · · Score: 2, Informative

      "But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first." -- Matthew 19:30

      Jesus would probably read Slashdot at -1, that masochist.

      --
      Posterity, my posterior.
    15. Re:Last post by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, cool, one mystery cleared up, but no, I rather won't go to any Shabat thing - since people may be offended by my ignorance of the customs. I was actually confirmed in a Christian church, but it was against my will. I was pretending due to enormous peer pressure in an overwhelmingly Christian setting. This is why I feel I earned the right to speak my mind about religion, since it was forced down my throat as a child... :)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    16. Re:Last post by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Don't blame you, I wouldn't want to go listen to people babble in a forein language either :) Just suggesting a way you could verify the information.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    17. Re:Last post by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

      interesting. 'Bidden' is also current (and old) dutch for praying. Amen is also used in the dutch language.

      --
      -- No Sig is a Good Sig
    18. Re:Last post by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Which "old English" translation? I can't think of a translation into Anglo-Saxon. I can think of Douglas (Scots) -that's what it sounds like to me. It doesn't sound like Surrey, Stanyhurst, or Phaer (early modern English) or Dryden (18th century).

    19. Re:Last post by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      The Aeneid - Publius Virgilius Maro, translated by J.W. Mackail, CRW Publishing Limited. I can't find a date for the translation, but it is wacky old English - hard to read - almost as bad as Elisabethan English.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    20. Re:Last post by Namronorman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read at -1, it is real hell sometimes.

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    21. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that they've never *been* right, *yet*. There can only be one time.

    22. Re:Last post by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      Elizabethan English is modern English. Middle English is from about 800AD to about 1400AD (roughly, post-Beowulf to Chaucer). Old English is before that.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    23. Re:Last post by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Ugh - My goodly sire, I hast beg thine sincerest pardon, but no-one speaketh in Elizabethan tongue on purpose in these holly modern times... :)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    24. Re:Last post by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      it's a word that is used to refer to one who speaks with the authority of God, that is, a prophet, though not necessarily a prophet as moderns know it. An amen didn't always fortell the future. My source for this is J. Pelikan, Jesus Through the Centuries 1999 paperback edition, p. 14. He doesn't give a source for this translation/understanding of the Aramaic, and I don't speak Aramaic so YMMV.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    25. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some in the Freemasons say that "Amen" at the end of a prayer is an invocation of the Egyptian sun god Amen Ra. That is where it came from whether Christians and Jews realize it or not. If you are praying to Jehovah or Yahweh (however you pronounce the name you aren't supposed to say anyway), you should not be invoking the name of Amen Ra. Curious that the Wikipedia article mentioned the masons, but not this possibility for the origin of "amen".

    26. Re:Last post by secolactico · · Score: 1
      Some in the Freemasons say that "Amen" at the end of a prayer is an invocation of the Egyptian sun god Amen Ra.

      Interesting. I did some digging on the web and there are several (web) sources that confirm this. Muslims also use "Amen" altho it's not in the Quran.

      From http://www.seiyaku.com/customs/amen.html:
      People still talk about Moses, Jesus, Mohammed and Buddha, and often use those names completely out of context as expletives. Amen was seen as a powerful god and the name continued, out of context, as an exclamation or salutation; a classic example language evolution. From the Jews, the word was adopted by Christians, Muslims and others.


      Sounds legit to me, tho I'm a layman when it comes to languages, their origins and nuances.
      --
      No sig
    27. Re:Last post by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      Like the ridiculousness and hypocracy of yelling FUCK when you drop a hammer on your foot? Using a word to express your feelings, regardless of it's actual definition, is still effective if those around you understand the context of the sentiment.

    28. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jebus died almost two thousand years ago and a majority of white christians still think jesus was a white man with straight light brown hair.

      The best part about religion is that when I told the judge that the baby was actually gods and not mine, he allowed me to stop paying child support. They took DNA but when I explained that we share the same image, he let me slide. Thank God!

    29. Re:Last post by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      Where is the beginning of the end the beginning ends with?

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    30. Re:Last post by dajak · · Score: 0

      To bid is also an English verb, in some senses still synonymous with pray and beg. To pray is from old French. I don't believe in a relation with amen.

    31. Re:Last post by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Naw, post-apocalyptic, like most sci-fi manga.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    32. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (R)equest (F)or (I)mmediate (D)estruction. Do I get it???

    33. Re:Last post by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, "So say us all"?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    34. Re:Last post by woah · · Score: 1
      YOU FAIL IT.

      geddit? :-)

    35. Re:Last post by computer_redneck · · Score: 1

      Some in the Freemasons say that "Amen" at the end of a prayer is an invocation of the Egyptian sun god Amen Ra

      Not sure who you are talking to in the Lodge but I have never in 15+ years of being a Freemason heard anyone refer to an Egyptian God. Most of the time in Lodge when there is a prayer we do not say Amen but 'So Mote it be'

      There are a couple NON-Masonic organizations that took from Masonic Ritual and used other things as part of their so called Masonary. Order of the Orient or something like that started by Alister Crowley comes to mind but that is not an official or even recognized Masonic Body.

      Careful what you hear and pass on. Hearsay is not always accurate or true.


      Too Lazy to put this in my sig

      Support our Troops Impeach Bush

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BF
    36. Re:Last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, cool, one mystery cleared up, but no, I rather won't go to any Shabat thing - since people may be offended by my ignorance of the customs. I was actually confirmed in a Christian church, but it was against my will. I was pretending due to enormous peer pressure in an overwhelmingly Christian setting. This is why I feel I earned the right to speak my mind about religion, since it was forced down my throat as a child... :)

      Is there a contradiction in that post? You won't go to one religious service where people might be offended by your ignorance, but you're good with "speaking your mind" about another religion, even though you were an outsider ("pretending")? That doesn't sound right somehow.

    37. Re:Last post by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Mackail is ~1885, so he must be using deliberate archaisms.

    38. Re:Last post by McFadden · · Score: 1

      And exactly how many Christians utter the word with the sentiment it deserves? Not that many I would suggest. In my experience it's just used as a handy way to sign off at the end of a prayer. Most people don't give it a second thought, let alone sincerity or sentiment.

  2. Fallacy by XanC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because those other inventions weren't the mark doesn't mean this one isn't.

    1. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because some old book tells a pointless fairy tale doesn't mean it has any connection to reality either. ( -1, Flamebait, I know.)

    2. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I never did understand the Christian aversion to the Beast. The Beast must come as part of Christ's second coming, prophecy says so. Why would they resist this? If I were a Christian, I would be doing anything I can to hasten the return my my God.

    3. Re:Fallacy by microarray · · Score: 1

      Fallacy: You have assumed that there -is- an invention corresponding to a "mark". :)

    4. Re:Fallacy by XanC · · Score: 1

      I don't think I did... I stated a reason why we can't conclude that this ISN'T it. Never said anything about concluding that it (or anything) IS.

    5. Re:Fallacy by mce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agnostic as I am, I do not believe this apocalypse nonsense at all. But it has to be said that there's another logical error here as well: maybe the invention of (for instance) the printing press really was "the beginning of the end". Maybe the whole process just takes 600 years to complete...

    6. Re:Fallacy by microarray · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that by stating that X is not an A, you assume that there exists an A to compare to. You could state that you're just talking about possible A items, and not actual A items, but that just serves to diminish the value of the argument. :)

    7. Re:Fallacy by sedyn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Exactly...

      Hell, when England made the Domesday Book in 1086 Christians probably went ape-shit over it for the same reason.

      I've learned something about Christians, when something like this comes, many don't say "this is the mark of the beast" instead they say something along the line of "the end is near"... So, they're learning.

      I think that the stance against RFIDs needs all the help it can get... So, let the Christians rant and rave next to the EFF... Just as long as the reasonable people raise that point that tracking technologies COULD be used for bad reasons, and encourage people to weigh the good against the bad... Or does that involve thinking?

      --
      Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    8. Re:Fallacy by Gyga · · Score: 1

      We know that many people will suffer, and we don't want so many people to suffer. Few people actually want others to suffer in the ways the bible foretells, that is why people preach.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    9. Re:Fallacy by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      And, (dramatic pause,)

      this "begs the question" of whether there's an A.

      Hah. Finally got to use it correctly. Go me.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    10. Re:Fallacy by grub · · Score: 1, Troll


      And why the sobbing at funerals? Aren't they happy their loved ones went to be with Jesus? Or deep down do they know it's all make-believe?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    11. Re:Fallacy by wrf3 · · Score: 1

      Have you never had two conflicting emotions at the same time? Sorrow at a deep loss and joy for new life?

      And It isn't make believe, btw.

    12. Re:Fallacy by bigpicture · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should read Revelation again. The "mark of the beast" is actually the "mark of the beast". "BIOMETRICS". When they have this technology perfected and in common use, you will have your "mark of the beast". Not silicon chips which are the "mark of sand".

    13. Re:Fallacy by grub · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      haha, that's precious.

      Do you believe in leprechans, elves, and unicorns, too?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    14. Re:Fallacy by wrf3 · · Score: 1

      Right -- it isn't the particular technology used, but rather that buying and selling is no longer free from government control. If the government doesn't want you buying something, you won't. Government is not our friend; why we keep giving it more and more control over our lives is, IMO, a byproduct of an increasingly secular society. We will have something take the place of God, even if it is something of our own invention. YMMV.

    15. Re:Fallacy by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And why the sobbing at funerals? Aren't they happy their loved ones went to be with Jesus?

      The (original, non-commercialized) New Orleans Jazz Funeral recognizes this fact.

      The band plays dirges while the casket travels from the Church to the cemetary. Then, from the cemetary to the deceased's house, the music is lively and happy, celebrating the fact that the deceased is now in Heaven.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    16. Re:Fallacy by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I learned a long time ago to find groups that share an agenda you'd like to promote and then use their power to get what you want done. A simple letter of appreciation to the right group for "taking a stance against this new threat" with some motivational languaging will work wonders. In short, "I read your church's newsletter about this RFID technology being the mark of THE BEAST and I pray that Jesus(tm) will give me strength to resist their evil armies. I have attached a donation. It's not much but it's all that my social security check will allow after rent, food and tithing. Blessed be His name."

      So yeah, call in when you get the chance and get them fired up about this. Write them letters, get them to get Pat Robertson and all his idiots involved and you'll see some changes made. You'll be surprised how easily it'll work, and how quickly all these people will be forgotten once the message makes it to the right person much in the same way each church will be forgotten once the message makes it to someone like Pat.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    17. Re:Fallacy by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why do parents cry when their child graduates high school or college? Aren't they happy their loved one will finally become a useful, productive member of society?

      Of course they are, but they're also sad that the child is moving away from them. Most people crying at funerals aren't nearly as sad for the person as they are for themselves, having lost the person.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    18. Re:Fallacy by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Okay... Lets say I make a guess about something five times in a row. I'm wrong all five times. How highly would you rate my chance of being right the sixth time?

    19. Re:Fallacy by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe the whole process just takes 600 years to complete

      Surely you mean 666 years to complete :)

      Let's see anyway - printing press invented in 1440. Add 666 years. That's 2106. Plenty of time for RFID to become required, and just about the time this asteroid will hit Earth!

      Ha! I win the thread!

    20. Re:Fallacy by croddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter whether you are religious or not -- an identification system that can be read remotely and surreptitiously is a friend to no one but evil.

    21. Re:Fallacy by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shh, don't rock his worldview too hard. We have to respect ignorance, it's a point of view now.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    22. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the end isn't necessarily near, just nearer...

    23. Re:Fallacy by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are pretty close.
      Actually I was talking about being able to identify a unique person via DNA when I wrote that business about 'mark of the beast' in Revelations.
      Once 'they' get that ability in near-real-time (ie, on the spot) - you guys are screwed.

      It is always funny to watch how you young people misinterpret what I wrote in that book.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    24. Re:Fallacy by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      I guess the diff is that this one is a *trade* mark... ;-)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    25. Re:Fallacy by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...maybe the invention of (for instance) the printing press really was "the beginning of the end".

      Well, it did mark the beginning of IP law, so you could be right.

      --
      What?
    26. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When did religious conviction become ignorance?

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    27. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fairy tale that the "towel heads" believe in is not that different from the Chistian crazies ( who can afford bigger bombs to blow up women and children )

      It is the strong blind belief in these fairy tails that cause Bush type fundies to hear god voices and want to aid Israel and go to war, helping their interpretation of Revelations come true, even if it destabilizes the world, and causes large security threats to the US.
      And the strong belief in fairy tales that causes the Osamas in the world to want fight evil by blowing things and people up.

    28. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many choices are there again?

      As n approaches infinity, you will have a higher change of being wrong.

      Guessing, in this case, is pointless unless you have a finite set of n elements. As it stands, the number of elements keeps increasing.

      At any rate, Christians will bring the end upon themselves when their religion dies. It's the same for everyone else too.

    29. Re:Fallacy by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are actually a lot or Christians who are looking forward to the end times. Some of them are actually public servants in the United States.

      Environmental Armageddon

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    30. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Belief in anything without a shred of proof is ignorance.

    31. Re:Fallacy by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to say all that. Just say the things that you do agree on.

      "I read your church's newsletter about this RFID technology being the mark of THE BEAST. I don't agree that it is the beast, but I do think that it is a bad thing for all people. I have attached a donation in support of your work."

      Honestly, who could reject a letter like that? I'm sure that some people will, but for the most part, most people do appreciate being able to work with opponents & common enemies. The next time you open your mouth to them, they'll be more attentive and open-minded. They'll probably say, "Oh, here's the guy who approached us to support us with his money. I wonder what he's going to say.".

    32. Re:Fallacy by jbrader · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not really sure. How long has there been religious conviction?

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    33. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. We already know it's not whether the other inventions were or not. How? Because the Bible says that NO ONE knows when it'll happen.
      Plus, the Book of Revelation was written as a consolation to the early Christians who were being prosecuted.

      And wasn't the War in Iraq also supposed to be the beginning of the Apocalypse? I don't believe that one bit, but I'd certainly believe that more than I'd believe RFID is the beginning of the Apocalypse.

    34. Re:Fallacy by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      No one can predict the future. Many pundits fail to predict the popularity or lack of popularity of many electronic devices but would you call that a fallacy? People who believe in the Bible are no different than you believing in whatever you believe in (religious or non-religious) but non-believers have a good time making fun of the believers because of their faith and I'm not quite sure what is funny about that but I'm sure you have to laugh about something since you are going to hell, right? If you don't believe in that then you won't mind that statement because it is irrelevant to you. Anyway, the people who believe in the Bible are waiting to see the prophecies come true and since they don't know when or how they will they can only guess what will make them come true. Barcodes could have been the mark of the beast but I don't think there was any plan to use them on people. There is however many plans to use RFID tags on people (and some people already have them) and many pets have them. It could only be a matter of time before a gov't makes them mandatory for citizens and then it wouldn't be too far-fetched for a national leader (or the UN) to sign into law the requirement of the RFID tag before goods can be bought. I'm reminded of the movie Paycheck where the premise is that we try so hard not to do what our future predicts and yet we end up doing exactly what the future says we will even though we try to avoid it so the predictions ultimately still come true.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    35. Re:Fallacy by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I never figured out why they don't all kill themselves. I mean, don't they want to go see Jesus?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    36. Re:Fallacy by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Funny
      I never did understand the Christian aversion to the Beast. The Beast must come as part of Christ's second coming, prophecy says so. Why would they resist this?

      It would have a negative effect on property values.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    37. Re:Fallacy by tor528 · · Score: 0

      We have to respect ignorance, it's a point of view now. I'm making that my myspace headline now.

      --
      If I think something is funny, I will probably mod it +1 Insightful. "It's funny because it's true."
    38. Re:Fallacy by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Government isn't something that Christians should worship, and it isn't our friend, but it ultimately serves a positive purpose and Christians are directed to submit to it. (A large part of Romans 13 deals with this.)

      You're right that our governments are increasingly taking the place of God, but just because that's true doesn't mean that the institution of government is in and of itself a bad thing. Romans was written when the government was Rome.

    39. Re:Fallacy by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funerals (New Orleans Jazz or otherwise) are just rituals designed for the living, not the dead.

      There are asshat relegious types who'll hold a relegious funeral, even against the express wishes of the dead. But like I said, the funeral isn't really for the deceased.

      Funeral Directors get this, which is how they've managed to turn it into a business.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    40. Re:Fallacy by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      When the first man saw some natural phenomenon and said, "I do not know how or why, so there must be a god who did it and had good reasons beyond my comprehension".

    41. Re:Fallacy by tminton · · Score: 1

      As is stupidity.

    42. Re:Fallacy by hazem · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I were a Christian, I would be doing anything I can to hasten the return my my God.

      And that explains so much of the Bush foreign policy. Starting civil wars, giving out nukes, it all makes sense in this context.

    43. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We were a lot better off sitting around a fire drinking mead or eating peyote. At least then we had an excuse for hearing voices.

    44. Re:Fallacy by teknomage1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More importantly when did willful ignorance become revered as religious conviction?

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    45. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the ignorant, unenlightened atheist, who can't have faith in anything he can't see.

    46. Re:Fallacy by TubeSteak · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No offense, but maybe it's because women can't control their hormones?

      At least that seems to be the major reason women cry 90% of the time. The other 10% is part injuries and part child birth.

      Okay, just kidding. Please don't mod me flamebait. I'm sure guys would cry more often too if they weren't socialized against it.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    47. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you mean 616 years.

    48. Re:Fallacy by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are actually congressmen who support Israel for this very reason, scary as that is.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    49. Re:Fallacy by wrf3 · · Score: 1

      A Christian's submission to government isn't absolute and there are several instances of civil disobedience (e.g. Daniel and the Apostles Peter and John). The trick, of course, is knowing where the line is.

      Of course government isn't in and of itself a bad thing. "And the government shall be upon His shoulders..." [Isa 9:6]. Nevertheless, given that man is fallen and that fallen man cannot help but abuse power, government should be limited in scope.

    50. Re:Fallacy by AusIV · · Score: 1
      Let me start by stating I'm not thrilled about the idea of having such an identification system, but I think it might not be as bad as you think. There are a number of things that such an identfication system would be useful for:

      Preventing identity theft. Provided it's difficult to falsify RFID tags (and I think that's the idea), you don't have to worry about losing credit cards.

      Security Clearance. Whether it's to allow someone to drive your car, enter your house, turn on your computer, or enter a highly classified government facility, it would be a useful means of accurately identifying someone.

      Alibi. In the case that you're accused of a crime (and innocent), records of your RFID tag could be used to verify your location at the time of the crime.

      I could come up with a huge list of other novelties that would make life easier if we could be identified by a wave of our hands.

      That said, I think such an identification system needs to be introduced at a time when citizens are weary of their government. Under the right circumstances, I can see citizens demanding that petty, victimless crimes be done away with, or sentences reduced. If the government is capable of catching every crime that is committed, and politicians still have to be concerned of what citizens want, citizens will not accept enforcement of the minor crimes that are committed without malice by all of us. I certainly would not want such an identification system implemented by a government that has no need to listen to its citizens.

      Lastly, I remember reading some time back about a man who had an RFID tag in his hand, and used it to conrol everything in his house, from the security system to the light switches. He argued that an RFID tagging system kept Big Brother at bay. An RFID tag can be removed with a knife and some determination. Other identification systems that may be developed, such as eye scans (a la Minority Report) or DNA comparisons (GATTACA comes to mind), would be harder to circumvent.

    51. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alas, I have no mod points today, so I will have to reward your sig line with a "fan" setting. Good taste, sir, good taste.

    52. Re:Fallacy by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... like you should talk. Your guy (Joseph Smith: founder of the Church of Latter Day Saints AKA The Mormons) saw an angel named MORONi who told him that he needed to tell his wife that he must have more than one wife to follow the wishes of God. Think about it. Smith was a JACKASS. He just wanted to dip his wick in a bunch of women (many of the "wives" of mormons have been historically underaged and blood relations as well) and have it "sanctioned by god". At least the Flying Spaghetti Monster (my current deity of choice next to my wife ["The Goddess L"]) leaves teenaged relatives and non-relatives alone. (Don't mean to offend, but people here can check out what I've said, it's the truth.)

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    53. Re:Fallacy by supabeast! · · Score: 0, Troll

      "When did religious conviction become ignorance?"

      When was religious conviction ever anything else?

    54. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to site an Everything2 article.

      "Don't say 'Religion' when you mean 'a particular religion I hate'"

      Save the stereotypes for the Evangelists that wrote the article. Most of us "crazy" chistians believe in Evolution just as much as you.

      I'm sure there are a few Scientists out there who preach wild beliefs about the end too. Some environmentalists for instance. "The global warming will kill us all! Forget the evidence against it, We Know! Repent, I mean, Save the trees now!"

      I just know this things gonna get rated down, but if you do, at the very least don't because you hate christians. Or if you're an environmentalist...

    55. Re:Fallacy by farrellj · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Of course, don't forget that Prez Bush & Co are fundies, and are expecting the
      End Times any day now...why preserve ANWR, or oil, or the Rain Forests, etc...

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    56. Re:Fallacy by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1
      Man, are you crazy? In a perfect world, RFID chips would never be abused and only used for the good of society.


      In *our* world however.....


      RFID chips are not difficult to clone. Take a copy of someone else's chip, and boom you have access to everything that person does. Identity theft - well, if all you have to do is copy someone's chip you're saved all the hassle of trying to get them to follow your phishing link. Want an alibi? Commit a crime while in possesion of an ID chip you've nicked/cloned off someone else. If the system were foolproof, all these nice ideas you postulate might work. Stick in the human factor, and you have instant corruption, advantage-taking, and the same old criminal activity we (humans) have been at for millenia.


      RFID chips that switch lights on for you on the other hand are quite cool.

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    57. Re:Fallacy by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      I never figured out why they don't all kill themselves. I mean, don't they want to go see Jesus?

      Religion is about how live your life. Living properly is supposedly a way of guaranteeing you get a good reward when you die, but nobody actually wants to die.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    58. Re:Fallacy by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Please don't mod me flamebait.

      Hm, doesn't look like that worked.

      One of my clearest memories of my grandmother's death is my grandfather sitting next to me at the funeral, sobbing so hard that his whole body was shaking.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    59. Re:Fallacy by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Also, on a practical level, even a religion that believes in an afterlife more enjoyable than the natural life would do well to discourage suicide, since there's not much way to spread the message and keep momentum going among the living if the church's members make the (admittedly forward) move to suicide.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    60. Re:Fallacy by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, it's politically incorrect to say anything that disagrees with anyone's religion.

      Oh, wait, he's a christian? Ok, go ahead. That's an accepted hypocracy.

      *end sarcasm*

      Seriously, though, if a christian tried to "force their beliefs" on people, when though "truth is relative", the christian would be labeled intolerant and reprimanded. But people can randomly take potshots at christianity, and it's all ok because "christians are idiots". So either don't try to rock our worldview, or don't complain about our attempts to rock your worldview.

      At least on slashdot, the atheocracy is legitimately formed by democracy. Unlike the United States, where judicial atheocracy oppresses religion in lower courts, and society doesen't even realize that many of the restrictions placed on religion have been repeadedly struck down by the Supreme Court.

    61. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I critisize organized religion, I would do it in general. I would talk specifically as it relates to specific harm that religions pose to society (cause of current war and terrorism).

      For you, I would challenge you to look at the core of your beliefs.

      If this ultimate purpose of this "god" is to be worshipped, is that really a good purpose.
      Is the reason to worship this master, simply because the legend says that it is the only master?
      Compare yourself to the natives on giligans island that worshipped the big rock statue. That's pretty silly, right.

    62. Re:Fallacy by trawg · · Score: 1

      Except, if any laws get changed as a result of their pressure, then you're in the situation where religious groups are getting laws changed on theological grounds (which some, like me, find shaky at best) instead of the because of the real issues involved.

      I don't want to stand up next to a religious group claiming a particular technology is the tool of the devil, even if I don't like it.

    63. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since always, you idiot troglodyte

    64. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was Jesus who said that no one knows when he will return; that relates to the end times, but exactly how it relates is under (constant) debate (IINM).

    65. Re:Fallacy by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      You're tying together two different biblical ideas.
      1) The Mark of the Beast is a precursor to the End of the World
      2) No one knows when the End of the World will be, it will come "as a thief in the night"

      The conclusion that no one will recognize something as the Mark does not follow for a few reasons.
      1) The Mark itself is not the end of the world, it is a precursor. So a recognition of the Mark does not mean that we know when the end will come; we just know we're getting close.
      2) Christians must not take the Mark. How can one avoid taking the Mark if one doesn't recognize it as such? I guess this is supposed to be handled through Divine Revelation or something, but the fact is that Christians must recognize the Mark in order to avoid it.

      Additionally, just because someone predicts the end of the world and happens to be correct does not mean that they Know it in the sense of Biblical foreknowledge. The correct interpretation is that God will not give said foreknowledge to anyone. Otherwise, all we need to do to keep the world from ending is to constantly predict "The world shall end tomorrow."

    66. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you don't get to see Jesus if you kill yourself, cuz suicide is a sin and you burn.

      Which is funny since God is supposed to be all loving and all forgiving, so why does anyone go to hell if god is such a great guy?

    67. Re:Fallacy by abigor · · Score: 1

      When hasn't it been? Face it, you've got the short end of the logic stick here.

    68. Re:Fallacy by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Just because those other inventions weren't the mark doesn't mean this one isn't.

      No, but it does point out the short-sightedness of these doomsayers.

      The real beginning to the end started when Cain fucked Eve.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    69. Re:Fallacy by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Depending on your branch of Christianity, suicide is considered "Murder of self." Thus, a sin, and since you're dead you have no chance to repent. Instant damnation.

    70. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 0.5

    71. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Added to that, there are 21 virgins awaiting.

    72. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some consider suicide to be an unforgivable sin (esp. when there's no time to repent for the sin of suicide).

    73. Re:Fallacy by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      Ah, but just because its a fairy tale doesnt mean that some space aliens wont read it and decide to act it out as some sort of violent play.

    74. Re:Fallacy by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      What judicial atheocracy? The kind that supports seperation of church and state? The kind that says "Do what you will in your own mind, but don't expect the government to support you"? What? Sure, there may be a few whackjobs who manage to go too far, but I've yet to see any case that actually oppresses Christians. Why is there some desire to prove that Christians are somehow "oppressed" in America? We live in a country where Christians control the House, the Senate, the Presidency, the Supreme Court, and all governorships (except maybe Nebraska's governor, who hasn't stated a religion). How could you get any more friendly to the Christian faith without being overtly preferential?

    75. Re:Fallacy by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > an identification system that can be read remotely and surreptitiously is a friend to no one but evil.

      I'd better burn off my face, lest someone recognize me during my commute!

      --
      My other car is first.
    76. Re:Fallacy by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some consider suicide to be an unforgivable sin (esp. when there's no time to repent for the sin of suicide).

      Assuming we're talking Christianity here, there's no biblical reason to believe that suicide is an automatic hell penalty. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

      Of course, some feel they've got to threaten those who would like to shortcut life, but there's no biblical way to justify it.

      I could get into the theology of this, but hey, this is /. and I'm already an ignorant blowhole for daring to say I'm a Christian.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    77. Re:Fallacy by Emor+dNilapasi · · Score: 1

      No, the reason we keep giving it more and more control over our lives has nothing to do with "an increasingly secular society", and is not a desire for "something to take the place of God". It's because an apparent majority of voters in this country are so woefully ignorant of history and so blindly hysterical with panic over the possibility of an attack that they have surrendered their liberty and thus their future for a cynical illusion of security.

      As for the the complaint of "an increasingly secular society": we are seeing a resurgence of religion, or at least assertive dogma, over much of the world. In light of this development, this complaint starts to sound more like a self-indulgent assumption of victimhood, a straw-man argument in much the same mold as the Republican Senate, Republican House of Representatives, and Republican President of the US whining (unconvincingly) that their Great Plans (tm) are somehow being stymied by some mysterious hidden force of the Democrats. In short, I don't buy it - and I believe that I am not alone.

      But I will give you one thing - you are absolutely right that government, especially this one, is not our friend.

    78. Re:Fallacy by wrf3 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that "they have surrendered their liberty and thus their future for a cynical illusion of security". But I submit that there is a spiritual basis for this. It is because they haven't found their liberty in Christ or security in God that they turn to government.

      we are seeing a resurgence of religion, or at least assertive dogma, over much of the world I understand that. Christianity, for example, is exploding in China and it's going to make for some interesting times to come. I was limiting my comments to the US, where some of the more visible groups are pushing for the privatization of religion so that it is silent in the public square. They won't succeed, but it is happening.

      My statement, BTW, has nothing to do with victimhood, since I refuse to be a victim.

      Thanks for the interesting comments.

    79. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's certainly not a "pointless fairy tale" to millions of people. In fact, the Bible is the most literarily validated books in history--and that's no fairy tale.

    80. Re:Fallacy by Thangodin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The funny thing is that the whole book of Revelations is far more likely to be about events in the first century, with either Jerusalem or Rome being the Whore of Babylon and the Beast being the Emperor or the Roman Army. The Mark of the Beast probably refers to the tatoos that were given to slaves to mark them as such, usually in an easily visible place like the face or the hand. Early Christians also wore tattoos as a sign of their faith. Facial tattoos were sometimes worn by Roman Soldiers, although the Romans regarded tattoos as barbaric.

      In fact, the Book of Revelations was a controversial addition to the early Bible, and several Bishops argued against including it in the canon due to the difficulty of interpreting it, and hence, its potential for abuse--particularly the type of abuse so typical of fundamentalists, who keep claiming that the end times are upon us. Other portions of the Bible specifically warn against doing this, because only God knows the time when the world will end. To this day the Eastern Orthodox Church does not consider it part of the Canon.

      If you're a non-believer, like I am, all of this is moot--the whole thing is either about the world John lived in, or he got dosed with some grain ergot while in prison. If you are a Christian, however, steer clear of belief that these are the end times. It's a definite no-no in the religion. And if you believe in the Rapture, rest assured that the people who compiled the Bible would have denounced you as a heretic, and you probably would have ended up being used for sword practice by a Roman Legionnaire. This is a spin from the lunatic fringe on a single line of a book that almost ended up in the fireplace of history. It is also a morally corrosive doctrine because it undercuts personal responsibility, encouraging people to believe that God is going to solve all of their problems for them, kill all their enemies, and build them a whole new world.

    81. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belief != proof.

    82. Re:Fallacy by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I can't deny an assertion that Christians work as public servants in the US, but I'd like to qualify the statement. Christians will look forward to the end times (some in anticipation, some in uncertainty), but the underlying principle is that you can't change God's time. At different points in time, the 12 disciples wanted Jesus to bring deliverance to their people, but he did not come 2000 years ago to conquer.

      How does this really relate to RFID? Barcodes could certainly be a mechanism for giving everyone a number, but it's obvious. Really, with all the people who are somewhat tolerant of Christian beliefs, it would be difficult to get someone to take a barcode on their forhead. On the other hand, an RFID tag could be placed inside nearly anything (barring lead, and copper suspensions), and still operate. Excuses for placing an RFID tag (considering the many ways to do so) could be endless, and as the scripture says "right hand or forhead", it may not matter so much where, as what. Either way, do not be afraid; Those who are sealed by God will not be vulnerable to the mark of the beast.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    83. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine it's tears 24/7 from you then, sonny.

    84. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +3 Interesting?

      Congratulations, Glonoinha. At least some religious wackos on /. believe you are God or one of his prophets.

      They say every cult starts with its first mentally disturbed follower - you're well on your way to your very own Jonestown!

    85. Re:Fallacy by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Says the Anonymous Coward, who can't back his words up with a name.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    86. Re:Fallacy by uncoveror · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years ago when RFID was still too expensive, the paranoid were sure "The Mark" would be a tattoo. Now, it doesn't have to be visible. All the "crazy" things the paranoid used to fear and reasonable people used to laugh at are becoming real. It makes poking fun at conspiracy theory a lot less enjoyable.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    87. Re:Fallacy by AusIV · · Score: 1

      To quote myself: Provided it's difficult to falsify RFID tags (and I think that's the idea). If the system is falable, then any security uses go out the window. Current RFID may not be difficult to clone, but I doubt we'd see it used for wide spread security and penpointing criminals if it were easy to trick.

    88. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      there has even been many studies done by people who study writting styles and they dont belive that it is the same john or ot is a person using his name to get his story heard.There is a big difrance in the writting styles the words used and how many times they are used and there placement(like for say tammy went the store with sam == sam and tammy travled to the market) just take a look

    89. Re:Fallacy by Emor+dNilapasi · · Score: 1

      Interesting. While your perception seems to be that "the more visible groups are pushing for the privatization of religion so that it is silent in the public square", mine is more of that the religious right (for want of a better term) has been emboldened by their recent political successes and has been actively pushing to have their particular brand of religion enforced as common law. While you may mourn the silencing of public displays of religion, I welcome it, for the simple reason that I am NOT a member of any majority religion, and have no desire to be bombarded with messages that I don't belong, that I am somehow flawed and alien, even in the land of my birth.

      The problem arises because most religions is that they are exclusionary; if you do not belong, you are an outsider, an alien, someone not necessarily to be included or trusted. With prostletyzing religions the situation gets worse; failure to accept the particular creed being offered, the very Word of God (tm), can be interpreted that you are considered an active enemy of God himself and your situation can get very ugly very fast. Now, I'm not saying that America has become a hotbed of fanatic "convert or die!" activity. But I do distinctly remember the former President Bush saying that atheists really couldn't be considered American because America is a nation under God. Talk like that, especially from a President, gives me and everyone else who isn't of the mainstream religion the willies. I ask you to try to remember that the next time you consider whether public displays of a particular faith are in the best interest of the nation and ALL of its citizens.

    90. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How is the End of the World going to come "as a thief in the night" if you recognize the mark? Will it be a surprise to anyone if they predicted it? Or do you think that no one will recognize the mark and we're all damned to Hell?

      There's a lot of confusion here in general, and this whole thing is stupid. The Book of Revelation doesn't predict ANYTHING. It was written as a coded message to the early Christians - it was written so that only they could understand it, which is why there's so much confusion about it.

      Let me help things out a bit:

      1) In ancient times, the Jews and Christians had a special system for translating names and words into numbers. "666" could be the translated form of "emperor" or whoever the emperor was at that time (maybe Nero? I'm not sure).
      2) Certain numbers in the Bible represent different things - the number 3 represents God, 6 represents man, 7 represents perfection. Therefore, a 3-headed beast with the number "666" meant a man pretending to be a god - and the Romans believed that their emperor was a god. So it would've represented the emperor, whoever that was.

      What did the Mark of the Beast represent? I don't know. Maybe the Romans dressed differently than the Christians. Maybe it was the Romans' brutality which only the Christians saw as a problem. Maybe it was their inability to be non-conformist (the Christians were seen as "unpatriotic" because they were pacifists and refused to become warriors - certainly there must've been others in Rome who didn't want to fight but did so simply to avoid prosecution?)

    91. Re:Fallacy by nanojath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you've delivered a very sane, rational analysis for the true-believin' rapture preachin' hardcore eschatological hysterics. That should settle 'em. Why didn't anyone ever think to just explain it to them?

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    92. Re:Fallacy by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most think evil wears a black hat and can be seen from miles away too. Many will not be convinced that they already HAVE the mark when they do. In other words, if people are raped slow enough, they won't know they are being raped.

    93. Re:Fallacy by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Flood the system with false information, swap chips, create bogus chips, carry a collection of thousands of chips they're small so it's easy. Chip tagging will be the fun new pratical joke (sneak chips onto other peoples person with out their knowing, watch them get arrested for shop lifting, for trying to sneak people onto the subway in their back pocket and being arrested for being you). Just like any other computerised system garbage in is the easy thing in the world to achieve. Just think of thousands of computer geeks being in thousands of different places at the same time, temporal penguinistas.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    94. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are a few Scientists out there who preach wild beliefs about the end too. Some environmentalists for instance. "The global warming will kill us all! Forget the evidence against it, We Know! Repent, I mean, Save the trees n

      let's hope you don't find yourself in the situation where you say "whoops, i was wrong about that", because i'm going to have to suffer it same as you while *I* on the other hand think it's coming.

      crazy christians, seeing the "end times" coming in every damn thing but refusing to see environmental disaster as its happening....

    95. Re:Fallacy by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Is it? I always consider Christianity a religion of death- its obsessed by the subject. 90% of everything its followers talk about boils down to hell or how to avoid it. Compare to Judaism, where the afterlife isn't even mentioned in the Torah.

      Of course, to me religion as a whole seems ridiculous- its a bunch of adults who not only believe in imaginary friends, but argue and kill each other over who's imaginary friend is better.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    96. Re:Fallacy by Reverend528 · · Score: 1
      celebrating the fact that the deceased is now in Heaven.

      However, if the person was an asshole. they play upbeat music to celebrate the fact that the decesed is now in hell.

    97. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those who are sealed by God will not be vulnerable to the mark of the beast.


      Tinfoil hat, anyone?
    98. Re:Fallacy by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Tonight I heard a bunch of kids sing a Christian song called "Come, Sweet Death." It freaked me out, to be honest. Imagine a bunch of little kids going up on stage and lifting their voices in song -- asking to die.

    99. Re:Fallacy by killjoe · · Score: 1

      the following is 100% true. I swear.

      I used to live in a town which held a small apocoplypic cult. I knew some of the people in this cult, they were otherwise smart and nice people. Every once in a while the leader of the cult would announce that the world was going to end on some date. He would be very specific, for example he would say the world is going to end may 10 this year. The whole cult would then prepare for the end times. They would do things like empty their shelves so theings won't break in the earthquakes and put mattresses over them to protect from tornadoes and such.

      Needless to say the world never ended. The cult leader always had a great expalation though. Haven't been in the services I don't know what they all were but I was told that one of them was "we prevented it by praying and performing other rituals".

      I never understood why otherwise smart people would fall for this but then again there are lots of smart people who believe strange stuff.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    100. Re:Fallacy by empvirus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Did this lady just pull all this stuff about avoiding RFID because "it'll end the world" out her ass, or what? I'm a christian too, but wow, that is a VERY extreme point of view there. And as such, it isn't too likely she'll have alot of followers. She should probably point more toward the facts if she really wants to be heard Go ahead and troll/flame me.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    101. Re:Fallacy by empvirus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, one cannot know whether he/she will go to heaven, according to the Bible (Judge not). Apparently all the judgement will happen on judgement day/apocalypse/whatever. At least if I'm reading the Bible right. Please pipe up if you think I read wrong.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    102. Re:Fallacy by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why didn't anyone ever think to just explain it to them?

      Because for much of history since then, they killed anyone who tried.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    103. Re:Fallacy by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, one cannot know whether he/she will go to heaven, according to the Bible (Judge not)

      I don't think that's what "Judge Not" means. As far as which Christian gets into heaven, that's a whoooole different, and very long, topic that's definitely not suitable for Slashdot.

      Apparently all the judgement will happen on judgement day/apocalypse/whatever.

      That's what The Revelation Of John seems to say. IMO, the reason people think Uncle Bob, or Aunt Jane go straight to Heaven/Hell is that that's what they've always been taught.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    104. Re:Fallacy by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      When you signed up for Slashdot.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    105. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the epitome of make believe. The fact that the stories have been passed as fact through generations and eons doesn't make it any more real.

    106. Re:Fallacy by m00j · · Score: 1

      personally I am more worried about this Apophis asteroid:

      "Apophis, measuring 300 metres across and with a mass of less than 100 million tonnes, will fly by at a distance of 36,350 kilometres from the Earth's surface on 13 April 2029."

      Thats friday the 13th!

      dooomed I tell you!

    107. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest she yell louder and send lots of spittle. That will help.

    108. Re:Fallacy by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think you know as well as I do that we've all been _trying_ to explain it to them for a long time, but they're TOO FUCKING STUPID to understand.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    109. Re:Fallacy by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Funerals are for the survivors, not the guest of honour.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    110. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Jesus tried and failed, so everyone else figured "if he couldn't do it what makes me think I can?".

    111. Re:Fallacy by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      If you're a non-believer, like I am, all of this is moot--the whole thing is either about the world John lived in, or he got dosed with some grain ergot while in prison.

      I thought the guy was infamous for his appreciation of mushrooms? I'm surprised the Revelation doesn't involve jumping on turtles and hitting qustionmark blocks with your head (I'm sure the Revolution does, however).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    112. Re:Fallacy by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the more interesting interpretations of these "signs of the end times" is that they are meant to be useless for actual forcasting. There have always been "wars and rumors of wars", natural disasters, false prophets and leaders, etc. which means that we've been living on borrowed time all along and should always live as if these were our last days.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    113. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they're TOO FUCKING STUPID to understand.

      Now that's fucking stupid. Most blanket generalizations like this are. It will undoubtedly surprise you to learn that Christians range in intelligence from "drooling retard" to "insightful supergenius". Explaining things to the retards in the pews may be pointless, but for the ones who are capable of evaluating new information and reaching conclusions for themselves, it's not only productive... it's an ethical imperative.

    114. Re:Fallacy by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      particularly the type of abuse so typical of fundamentalists, who keep claiming that the end times are upon us.

      As with any cult, how could the Christian church recruit new members if the End of Times was more than a lifetime away?

    115. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be discussed whether becoming a useful, productive member of society should give reason either to crying or laughing.

    116. Re:Fallacy by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. I'm talking about the mouth-breathers, the ones who don't get the point despite countless patient explanations.

      I dispute your claim that even bright christians are capable of evaluating new information that goes against their preconceptions, btw - purely anecdotal, but there you go.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    117. Re:Fallacy by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      These days the church has refrained from telling people they will go to hell just as fortune tellers stopped telling people "you will have a horrible disease and your best friend will die" even when that's what their method of choice would predict. They're sellouts.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    118. Re:Fallacy by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Of course, some feel they've got to threaten those who would like to shortcut life, but there's no biblical way to justify it. I could get into the theology of this, but hey, this is /. and I'm already an ignorant blowhole for daring to say I'm a Christian.

      So why haven't you taken the shortcut?

    119. Re:Fallacy by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

      I don't think people have to think, as long as there's idiots on both sides too balance it out.

    120. Re:Fallacy by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      How do you validate the parts that contradict the other parts?

    121. Re:Fallacy by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      I suggest we plant an RFID tag into her head just to see if she bursts into flames as she thinks she will.

      It she doesn't then she can shut the hell up. If she does burst into flame, well same thing. Either way everybody wins.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    122. Re:Fallacy by ROOK*CA · · Score: 1

      Fallacy: You have assumed that there -is- an invention corresponding to a "mark".

      Apparently there is, I hear SCO is claiming Intellectual Property rights on it and has threatened to sue "The Beast" as soon as he/she can be located and properly served. =)

    123. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do parents cry when their child graduates high school or college? Aren't they happy their loved one will finally become a useful, productive member of society?

      Graduating college or High school does NOT make you a "useful, productive member of society"

      for every success you can mention I can find a scourge on society that was an advanced college degree holder.

      Want to start? Unibomber - held 2 masters degrees. I can go on from there.

      Being someone rich enough to be able to afford highschool and college means only one thing. your parents were rich compared to the rest of the world. American and european poor that have a home and children in school are insanely rich compared to the rest of the planet's poor.

      So get off your high horse. College and highschool means you are one of the priviliged few and does not make you any more of a "useful, productive member of society".

    124. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thank you, the poll of anti-religion slashdot readers is now complete. It was also fairly good practice for me. I have this overwhelming tendency to reply to each and every reply individually and I get bogged down in counltess threads with - how else can I put it - scientific bigots. This time, however, I managed to hold off.

      Religion is one of those topics - like abortion or evolution or homosexuality - that causes slashdot readership breaks into a frenzy whenever we have an article that allows us to vent (again) our particular poition on this issue. The tiresome part of this is not only that almost everyone is just talking to hear themselves talkk, but also that most people are also quite content to argue with phantom straw men rather than respond to real-world positions.

      In this case the straw-man for the anti-religion crowd is a very specific definition of religion; more particularly its theological definition of faith as "blind belief". This type of faith is nothing more than willful assertion of some rote dogma or other. As such it necessitates an anti-science position as it is anti-thought. Rational thought involves questioning and doubting. These activities threaten the very nature of (blind beleif) faith itself. In short - I can see why people who value science, knowledge, fairness, and information highly would find this form of religion utterly repugnant. I share that sentiment.

      There are two problems, however. The first problem is that not all religion is anti-intellectual. Not all religion has this "blind belief" view of faith. Some, like the existentialist thinker Kierkegaard, have blind belief but situated within a compelling rational framework. Others, like C.S. Lewis, focus on the aspects of their faith systems that are logically and rationally appealing to thinking, questioning and questing individuals and marginalize the blind-belief aspects as inconsequential. To throw out all religion as the base "blind faith" variety is just to show one's utter and complete ignorance for the vast spectrum of religious thought that does exist. Most people who are so convinced that religion is anti-intellectual have never bothered to read the writings of a single religious intellectual (note: this means someone other than Falwell or Robertson). When you dismiss all of religious heritage with witty one-liners you may think you look cool. +5 mod points for "informative" or "funny" may give you the credibility you apparently desire. But the fact is that you are no more informed than some Bible fundamentalist who's never taken a real sciene class in his or her life would be in assuming that evolution was just some crocked up scheme by satanist communists to lead the world from the path of God. Not only are they wrong (everyone is wrong from time to time) but they are publicly demonstrating their own prejudice and arrogance. The saddest part is that they, like you, would never even comprehend their own humiliation.

      The second problem is quite simple: it's impossible to get away from some definitions of faith. What if faith isn't believing in gnomes, faeries, Gods or Goddeses just because it's the dogma - what if faith is actually the rational extrapolation from insufficient evidence to guide necesary action? In other words - faith is what guides our actions when we don't have knowledge but need to make a choice. Well, if you realize that certainty about the real world is impossible you quickly realize that all of the things we know or do are - in a sense - dependent on faith. Even science is, in some sense, dependent on faith. Faith in the law of causality logically (if not temporally) preceeds all experimentation. It may be subsequently reinforced by experience but it can neither be directly proved by experimentation or any other known means and yet is the pre-requisite for rational experimentation.

      In the end it's a simple case of hatred for one thing spilling irrationally over into hatred for related or similar things. You guys really hate dogmatic and anti-i

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    125. Re:Fallacy by Zspdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A great many Biblical prophecies referred to events that took place in past history... But they also refer to future events as well. They do both.

      Take for example prophecy in the Old Testament - most of the OT prophets were quite clearly speaking to the people of their day, warning them of events that were about to happen (and, well, actually did happen - that's because they were prophets ;) ). But they also held significance of a greater scope. The key word here is *also*.

      Even if all the events of the Book of Revelation were realized in the 1st century, it doesn't mean they don't have another meaning to us today. Especially if you believe that the Bible is divinely inspired.

      --
      What's in a Sig?
    126. Re:Fallacy by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Either way, do not be afraid; Those who are sealed by God will not be vulnerable to the mark of the beast.

      Those of us who do not place faith in Christian myths aren't really worried about the end times. We're worried about the government.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    127. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the poster above encapsulated, the probability is precisely 1/2 because we must assume your predictions are independent events. For instance, take the classic coin toss. If you tossed it 5 times before, the outcome of the next toss is completely independent of what you tossed before, ergo the probability that this 6th toss is heads will be 1/2. Now, to get the probability of say, tossing 6 tails in a row we merely multiply the probabilities of getting a tail at each toss, so that probability is (1/2)^6 which is 1/64.

    128. Re:Fallacy by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The funny thing is, when I was in high school, there were constantly reports on oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Fact or Fiction?".

      Now that the evidence of global warming is becoming irrefutable (recall the polar bears drowning because the ice at the poles is receding?), there are new, oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Are Humans Causing It?"

      I predict that within a decade, there will be further oil-company funded studies, with headlines like, "Global Warming: Is It Too Late To Do Anything About It?"

      Presumably, in the far future, we will see, "Global Warming:

    129. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I probably should have based this in the scientific method rather than probability.

      But you see, the thing is, after a certain number of coin tosses and incorrect guesses, it starts to become more likely that the person is always wrong about that particular coin than the coin is totally random. The odds of getting it wrong 20 times in a row are a million to one. It can happen, but in the real world, it's simply more likely that the person tossing the coin is playing a trick.

    130. Re:Fallacy by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Interesting that RFID usually seems to be part of the evil things Slashdot hates (Microsoft, SCO, patents, privacy violations with RFID, etc.), but as soon as it's brought up in a religious context, suddenly RFID is not evil... religion is evil and RFID is defended.

    131. Re:Fallacy by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I think the interesting part, the part that should be inspiring a whole new perspective on the topic - is the bit about DNA and the government working hard at developing the ability to identify someone realtime simply by being in their vicinity (ie. close enough to get a sample of spit or hair.) They don't need to embed you with RFID or some other 'unique' identifier - you already have one, but it takes a few days to run the look-up. As soon as this is a real-time identification (which is what RFID gives them, in theory) - bingo! Mark of the Beast.

      There was a story a few days ago about a guy that was a potential suspect of some crime he didn't commit, so he voluntarily gave a DNA sample, proving his innocence. He went on his merry way, a free man. This was several years ago
      A few years later someone in his neighborhood got raped. He was identified a potential perp so he was brought downtown, where he refused to give a sample for DNA analysis against the evidence from the rape. Government looked it up and used his old sample / DNA, decided it was a match and now he is in jail. Which is good, because a bad guy went to jail, but when you start thinking about the long term potential for that technology and what it means in the context of the 'Mark of the Beast' discussion.

      The other part was just me joking around, getting my point across in an 'in-context' kind of manner.
      (Well that, or my followers are very upset with you right now.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    132. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what if faith is actually the rational extrapolation from insufficient evidence to guide necesary action?"

      If that was the case, then you could explain your logic, and expect and desire people to give feedback on your estimation, to help refine your theory. That would be similar to Science.

      But religion is not science. In religion people often believe without question. If there is question, people bend the facts to fit their mind, rather than bending their mind to fit the facts.

      The premise of the one-god religion is what I question. Why does the one-god need to be worshipped. Is worshipping something just because it seeams to be the best/only thing to be worshipped really a worthwhile cause?

    133. Re:Fallacy by mclaincausey · · Score: 0, Troll
      If you're a non-believer, like I am, all of this is moot--the whole thing is either about the world John lived in, or he got dosed with some grain ergot while in prison
      ...or he could have had a hallucinatory psychotic episode.

      Think of the lack of perspective people have with regard to their faith. Most Christians today would want a mother who murdered her child because she claimed God told her to locked up if not killed (since the death penalty is yet another example where two wrongs make a right, and yet another exception to "Thou Shalt Not Kill"). Yet when Abraham almost murders Isaac (before God supposedly stays his hand), it is accepted uncritically.

      Today if someone told us a burning bush was talking to him, we would put him in a straightjacket--few Christians would accept the testimony. Yet when they read of a similar testimony from a faraway time, somehow it has more credibility.

      Christians are perfectly willing to seek medical treatment, and seem to accept the findings of medical science. Yet the defer to the disproved biological knowledge of the ancient Jews with regard to questions on the origin of life and diversity. Creationists shouldn't go to the doctor. You cannot accept a fairy tale on the origin of life on the one hand, and then seek treatment using techniques and understanding derived in part from evolutionary biology on the other. Yet Creationists do so and experience no cognitive dissonance in the process. Catholics are against birth control on the mistaken Biblical premise that semen is the seed of life--they didn't understand, certainly in Old Testament times at least, that women host an egg that is fertilized. So ejaculating anywhere but a womb was considered to be abortion in those times--and Catholics still uncritically accept teachings based on this false premise, while accepting other scientific findings, such as evolution. Similarly, the pro-life movement seems to have some confusion about where life begins. Some pro-lifers assume life begins the moment a seed is fertilized-again citing documents that were written in a time when there was very little understanding of biology. But these documents were divinely inspired, right? And so were the ones saying men should not spill his seed, even though the premise for it is now widely accepted by all, Christian and otherwise, as false.

      They point to prophecies in Isaiah that Jesus fulfills in the Gospels, and they point to similarities between the gospels as validating their truth. I'm not going to debate the truthfulness of the Gospels, but since the authors of the Gospels were learned in the Old Testament, and since they were written so many years after Jesus' death, one wonders why more Christians don't consider how easy it would have been to construct and refine narratives that fulfill those prophecies post hoc. But since the narratives are accepted uncritically as absolute truth, this possibility never arises, and the weakness of the apologetic argument is never exposed.

      "If the real Jesus Christ were to stand up today, He'd be gunned down cold by the CIA."
      --The The, "Armageddon Days Are Here Again"

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    134. Re:Fallacy by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > suddenly RFID is not evil... religion is evil and RFID is defended.

      Actually, I don't see people defending RFID. I see people saying this lady is crazf for thinking it's bad in this way, not just for thinking it's bad.

    135. Re:Fallacy by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      He never said RFID wasn't evil. But falsely demonizing something is stupid, and it's why evolution and science in general are under assault by the religious. We all know that RFID is evil... her explanation just isn't why it is.

    136. Re:Fallacy by wrf3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... has been actively pushing to have their particular brand of religion enforced as common law

      That's true regardless of the group and is the nature of the beast. If you want to take the time, I would be interested in what you see to be some specifics in this area. I can guess, but I'd rather know...

      The problem arises because most religions is that they are exclusionary...

      But that isn't the problem of religion, that's the problem of truth. Truth, by it's very nature, is exclusionary. Those who think that 2+2=5 will be in conflict with those who disagree. For you to take the position of inclusion for all is, at least to me, a denial that truth exists (which is a self-refuting argument, but that doesn't stop a lot of people).

      As for the "willy" factor, I happen to agree with President Bush about atheists. As an American, I hold that atheism is a pernicious worldview that unchecked must -- by definition -- result in anarchy or tyranny and is therefore anathema to freedom. Having grown up in Virginia, I'm quite fond of their state motto "Sic Semper Tyrannis".

      As a Christian, the bad news is that, yes, you are an enemy of God. (Don't feel too bad -- everyone starts off that way). What you should find temporarily comforting is not that we are exclusive but that:
      a) You're welcome to join us,
      b) Forced conversion to Christianity is no conversion at all, and
      c) Even if you don't join us, we are commanded to love our enemies. Furthermore, love does not consist in blowing them up or chopping off their heads. The parable of the "Wheat and the Tares" is instructive:

      He put before them another parable: "The kingdom of heaven may be compared to someone who sowed good seed in his field; but while everybody was asleep, an enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and then went away. So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared as well. And the slaves of the householder came and said to him, 'Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? Where, then, did these weeds come from?' He answered, 'An enemy has done this.' The slaves said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and gather them?' But he replied, 'No; for in gathering the weeds you would uproot the wheat along with them.
      Let both of them grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Collect the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.'"

    137. Re:Fallacy by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I believe there is a difference between "RFID is the mark of the beast, and a sign that the end of time is here" and "RFID is evil", don't you?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    138. Re:Fallacy by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Ever since the first human donned ceremonial garb and shouted to a enthralled congregation: "I speak for god! And god says..." It's been downhill ever since.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    139. Re:Fallacy by Rational · · Score: 1

      Like, say, a face?

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    140. Re:Fallacy by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      How about:

      Religion > RFID/SCO/Microsoft/patents > Open source

      in a decreasing order of evil? That would be perfectly logical. When you're discussing two items, it's OK to label one of them as 'the evil one', but in a grander scheme you can have different levels of evil, so to speak.

      I think the reasoning is that, while RFID is perceived as mainly having 'evil' applications, it is still a relatively interesting technology, while religion is perceived as pure nonsense.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    141. Re:Fallacy by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the US but this is my take from the European perspective.

      We have the same complaints in Europe. Despite the fact that Christianity is the state religion of many countries with churches receiving financial assistance from the state, this claim of persecution keeps coming up.

      The howls of persecution tend to be loudest when one of these conditions is met.

      1) The state prevents a religion from doing something it wants to do. i.e. the state says that religious types aren't allowed to prosletyse in schools.

      2) The state enacts a law that contradicts the beliefs of a religious group. For example, legalising abortion or providing equal rights to minority groups like gays.

      I wouldn't call Christians idiots. Some Christians though where I live seem to like to keep reminding me that I am dreary, have no respect for humanity and unhappy since I choose to not believe in any gods.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    142. Re:Fallacy by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      That is freaky. On a forum I visit frequently, there is one Christian who seems to follow this line of thinking. He keeps saying this he is indifferent towards this life as he has eternity ahead of him. The most worrying thing is that if doesn't consider his own life to be important, how does he feel about the lives of others. I asked him if he would save someone from a life-threatening situation or simply let them die in the knowledge that they would go to heaven. He never answered this question.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    143. Re:Fallacy by XMorbius · · Score: 1

      As a Christian, thanks =)

    144. Re:Fallacy by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Look for something really special to take place on the 6th day - of the 6th month - of the 6th year of the new millenium. That would be June 6, 2006 to people who are arithmetically-challenged.

      OK, I made this whole thing up, but it sounds pretty good, 666, huh????

    145. Re:Fallacy by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Says who?

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    146. Re:Fallacy by RichardX · · Score: 1

      What if faith isn't believing in gnomes, faeries, Gods or Goddeses just because it's the dogma - what if faith is actually the rational extrapolation from insufficient evidence to guide necesary action? In other words - faith is what guides our actions when we don't have knowledge but need to make a choice.

      A good post, but I'm going to have to disagree strongly with your definition of faith.
      I've often had those of a religious nature say to me that I use faith all the time in my life - for example, when I flick a light switch I have faith that the light is going to come on. This - like your definition - is incorrect.
      I expect that the light when come on when I flick the switch because that's what has happened in the past each time I've flicked the switch. I also know how the light works, and because of that, I also expect it to come on when I flick the switch. Furthermore I know about power cuts, and that sometims switches wear out, or bulbs blow, so in fact it might not come on. I also know roughly how often those things happen, so not only do I know that it might not come on, but I can very loosely guess the chances that it will, or will not come on.

      Faith, on the other hand, is what you invoke in cases where you do not have the evidence to rely on. In cases where I have only a little evidence, I simply use what little I have to make the best judgement possible, and in cases where I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever I say "Well, I don't know what will happen, but let's find out." I don't need faith in the case of the light switch, because I have the facts.
      Faith would be expecting that when I flick the switch, the universe will end, or the sun will suddenly change colour, or anything else equally unconnected, with no good reasons to suggest that would actually be the case. That is, expecting something to happen for no good reason other than pure faith that it will happen. Faith is only ever invoked where there is a lack of logical connection and/or evidence. In effect then, it is precisely the belief in gnomes and fairies and gods and goddesses.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    147. Re:Fallacy by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      That is another good point. I tend to like to promote their fears but that's for my sadistic pleasure..heh.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    148. Re:Fallacy by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      That's when I use the ACLU, or whoever to take care of THAT agenda of mine. You don't have to be loyal to every agenda these groups want to promote and you can even use one to fight another's agendas that you happen to disagree with. Sure it's twisted and expensive but nobody said that freedom was cheap.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    149. Re:Fallacy by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Excellent statement. I particularly like the part: Faith in the law of causality logically (if not temporally) preceeds all experimentation. It may be subsequently reinforced by experience but it can neither be directly proved by experimentation or any other known means and yet is the pre-requisite for rational experimentation.

      I don't personally believe in a higher power, but I don't fault those who do, and only the truely closed-minded dismiss the possibility, usually out of some sense of intellectual superiority.

      I gave up worrying about it because I fail to see any relevance. Either God exists, or does not. Absent an independent means of discovering His existance outside the realm of word-of-mouth, I can only assume that, if God exists, He isn't particularly worried about whether or not we believe in Him, or any particular version of divine law. Some may interpret such a view as hubris. Who am I to expect anything of God? Believers expect God to watch over them which is, in my opinion, no less arrogant. Additionally, I think that such a position conveniently avoids the lack of evidence, and moreover it contradicts the view that God cares significantly about humanity.

      I tend to think belief is popular because it provides answers to questions which are otherwise unanswerable. (Note: I'm not saying it's wrong or right because it's popular, I'm just making an observation). I think it's much more difficult for most people to accept that we might have no purpose, that there is no afterlife, and that no one is looking out for us. That we do not, and may never know where we came from, or where we are going. Many people find such a concept depressing, and feel that such a life would not be worth living. But I think we're pretty good at developing our own purposes, and whether or not we attribute them to divine inspiration makes little difference.

    150. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sixth year of the new millenium would be 2007. http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~schittek/millenni .htm

    151. Re:Fallacy by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

      I'm going to need someone to back me up on this, but I thought they just discovered that the devil's number was in fact 696, not 666. Apparently there was a translation error at some point. I am almost positive about this, but I have no facts to support it. Anyone?

      --
      "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
    152. Re:Fallacy by dcam · · Score: 1

      I think a person without a face is more memorable and recognisable...

      --
      meh
    153. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 0

      Like I said earlier, "666" DOES NOT AND WAS NEVER MEANT TO represent the Devil. It refers to the Roman Emperor of that time period.

    154. Re:Fallacy by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      Is it? I always consider Christianity a religion of death

      It is. That's why I said "religion" rather than specifically christianity. Christianity does indeed have a bit of a death fetish, but it still has as its core basis the same "rules to live by" theme as all other religions.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    155. Re:Fallacy by tutori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dispute your claim that even bright christians are capable of evaluating new information that goes against their preconceptions, btw - purely anecdotal, but there you go.

      Unfortunately, I believe this to be pretty much par for the course for the majority of humanity.

    156. Re:Fallacy by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Faces require a lot more work to recognize, as I am sure you are aware. They also cannot be simply detected, they have to be sensed by an optical device first.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    157. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. I want to do something more than just respond with "no, my definition of faith is right afterall". There are two things I want to bring up. First an argument for my definition of faith using your light switch example. And then a further critique on your preferred definition of faith.

      1. Regarding the Light Switch

      You claim that it is not faith because the question "will the light turn on when I hit the switch" is answered by such facts as "how electricity works", etc. You're not depending on the unknown - you're depending on the known. Thus there's no need for faith. I would point out, however, that sometimes the light has blown and you don't know it until you hit the switch. What this points out is that your "knowledge" is actually imperfect.

      The real implication of this is that faith and knowledge work in tandem. The more knowledge you have the less faith is required. The amount of faith required to believe the light will come on, for example, is minimal precisely because you know a lot of relevent facts. Certainty in the real world is non-existent, however, and for that reason all actions and beliefs about the real world will rely at least in part on faith. So I would say that when you flip the switch you ARE relying on faith - but only to a small degree.

      2.
      Faith, on the other hand, is what you invoke in cases where you do not have the evidence to rely on.


      I want to point out that the word "faith" has a broader definition thatn just "faith in God". You can have faith in your friends, for example, or faith in democracy, faith in people or faith in yourself. So I think if we want to get an idea of what faith should really mean we need to start with the common sense definition before we jump straigh to "faith means believing in things like God - about which we can have no evidence".

      In all of these cases faith is what you get when you take the knowledge that you have - how well you know your friend, how well you know democracy, what you know about people in general or what you know about yourself - and you use it in a context where that knowledge is insufficient for certainty. If you're relying on your friend to back you up in a fight, say, then you have faith in your friend BECAUSE he's your friend. You know him and you expect him to act in certain ways and you rely on him. You have reason to believe but, when it comes down to it, you can not be quite certain. You can't directly see his thought proces, you can't influene his decision making, you can just take all your knowledge and then extrapolate.

      Since that's what faith means in general, I think it's a better model for religious faith. Yes - there are those who say we need to believe certain things about God just because the Bible says so. This is the dogmatic version of faith and it's stupid. But there are many believers who have much more complex - and much more rational - reasons for their faith in God. Like the light switch it's not a case of absolute ignorance. If you just baselessly assert "God lives!" for absolutely no reason that's not faith. That's wishful thinking (whether it's true or not).

      I believe in God in the same way I believe the light wil come on when I hit the switch. There are some differences. Belief in the light switch is simpler to express, easier to verify, and the operating features are open to my study. I understand the basic phyics and therefore when I hit the switch it's (just for an example) 95% reason and 5% faith (that the light hasn't blown, that the power's not out, that my wife hasn't taken the light bulb out, that a fuse hasn't blown, etc.) When I pray, on the other hand, it may be something more like 5% reason and 95% faith.

      The point I'm making is that you have to have reason to believe or it's just wishful thinking. Some people say wishful thinking is faith. But that's now what the word means in any other context - why should it be different here? I say faith is the extension of the best experience we have into the unknown. It's relying on something that is at least in part an unknown quantity. That's what the word means in every other context and it makes the most sense in religion as well.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    158. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I tend to think belief is popular because it provides answers to questions which are otherwise unanswerable.

      Wow - talk about nail on the head. I think that's exactly dead on. But here's what I think is really interesting. I think that for thousands of years religion has allowed people to avoid confronting unpleasent thoughts like their own mortality or the problem of human suffering in the world. It has fulfilled core human psychological needs and because of that conveniense it has been corrupted. Serious religion is not nearly that comforting. Serious religion has to adress questions like "If God exists and cares about us - then why the Hell is this planet so screwed up?". Serious religion can be demanding, frightening and intimidating. Dogmatic religion, on the other hand, allows a priest to be the designated guy to deal with tough questions while the rest of us can just go about our lives assuming these issues are delt with. We don't need to think - just engage in wishful thinking and we'll all be saved.

      The real irony here is that I think that science is starting to fulfill the same role in human society. If you were sick in the middle ages you turned to God not only for a possible solution (getting better) but more importantly to discover meaning - why were you sick? What was the reason for the pain? Now when you're sick you turn to science both for relief but also for framework of answers. Science - via evolution for example - explains what sickness is and why we feel it. To that extent I think you are starting to see science corrupted in the same way religion was to server human psychological needs by acting as a buffer between us and hard questions. Just read any of Michael Crichton's essays on the way in which science is politicized by environmentalist, health advocates, etc.

      Thousands of years ago religion began to be hijacked for those who realized that anyone who came along with robes, incense, a few scriptures and a pleasing philosophy could make a pretty good living. The trouble came when different camps decided to fight over religious dominance. None of this had anything to do with real religion. Real religion means asking honest questions and being courageous enough to look for the answers to matter what they are. It has nothing to do with robes or hierarchies.

      Now the same thing is starting to happen with science as organizations that were once founded for the unbiased pursuit of natural knowledge are hijacked by those who want money. Take the pharmaceutical companies who are out to get another drug FDA approved. For them science becomes a mean to an end instead of an end in itself.

      That's why the two sides arguing loudest about stuff like ID and evolution aren't really opposites at all. The fundamentalists hijacked religion for political power, money, or just sheer egoism. Any "scientist" that dismisses all religion out of hand betrays the fact that he or she is merely using science the same way the fundamentalist uses religion - as a tool for self-aggrandizement.

      Meanwhile true religion and true science have no conflict whatsoever. Science continues to enlarge the sphere of knowledge about the natural world - religion continues to grapple with serious questions that fall outside the realm of quantifiable data and neither threatens the other in any way.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    159. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      If that was the case, then you could explain your logic, and expect and desire people to give feedback on your estimation, to help refine your theory. That would be similar to Science.

      I do this on a regular basis with my friends and family. And it is rather like science - that's my point.

      The chief difference between religion and science is that scientific queries can be addresed with quantifiable data via reproducible experimentation. That's pretty much what defines science. Religion (and philosophy) are what you get when you're dealing with questions that can't be directly addressed through quantifiable data. You still use logic and reason, but you can't really test the hypothesese.

      That's why philosophy (and theology) are still discussing the free-will debate after several thousand years of recorded history will science manages to progress substantially from early Greek conceptions of matter to the current model of the atomic and subatomic universe.

      My only point is that logic is necessary to both.

      And yes some people view faith as raw assertion of dogma. In my view - they're simply wrong. I could interview three people on the street at random about physics and call it science but that wouldn't make it so.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    160. Re:Fallacy by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      I've often had those of a religious nature say to me that I use faith all the time in my life - for example, when I flick a light switch I have faith that the light is going to come on. This - like your definition - is incorrect.

      It's poorly worded, but they have a point. Your belief that the light will come on is a form of inductive reasoning. You've accumulated what counts in your mind as enough instances (probably one or two!) of flipping the switch to believe that the next time will give the same result. But if someone pressed you to prove logically that you would get the same result by flipping the same switch, you'd be SOL. In fact, with light switches, there are simple cases where the future isn't like the past -- such as multi-switch setups, switches that are at the end of their useful life (I just replaced one of those!), etc.

      In short, inductive reasoning is not deductive; it isn't logical but rather is based on a confidence that the future will look like the past. It is this confidence that is being labeled as "faith" by your religious acquaintances.

      Their confidence, meanwhile, is that God will continue to take care of them and be faithful to his promises, just as he has in the past. It is a different form of inductive reasoning. It is most emphatically *not* expecting the future to look exactly opposite from the past, which is your definition. I don't know a single religious person who would accept your examples a genuine faith.

      Still and all, I would agree with you that your confidence is not the same as biblical faith. For one thing, you have many more opportunities for testing; for another, you can (probably reasonably) limit the scope of your testing to local causes rather than global; religious faith can't carry out the same local causation testing because God is, well, omnipresent in most models.

      Religious people aren't irrational; they're just out of fashion these days. Consider the large number of religious people who have (and some who continue) to contribute to the scientific endeavor, and then ask whether it is reasonable to project irrationality as the definition of faith.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    161. Re:Fallacy by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      God, 6 represents man, 7 represents perfection. Therefore, a 3-headed beast with the number "666" meant a man pretending to be a god

      Aside from the point made by the reply that it might have been 696, also consider that the number systems in use in the day lacked the very idea of place value. In Roman numerals 666 would have been DCLXVI, not three of anything that corresponded to the number 6. A similar problem exists with the Hebrew and Greek systems of representing numbers.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    162. Re:Fallacy by Alsee · · Score: 0, Troll

      How do you validate the parts that contradict the other parts?

      There are two options.

      The lesser option, the pathetic fallback position of those who Have Not Truely Been Reborn, is to first select one to interpret figuratively and invent some figurative meaning for it and to validate that.

      Option 2: You study the text until you see five fingers.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    163. Re:Fallacy by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >This is a spin from the lunatic fringe on a single line of a book
      >that almost ended up in the fireplace of history.

      Yet I don't mind hearing the word "Christian" used in a positive context, as in, "Let's all be good Christians and resist being tagged by machines." It's a refreshing change from, "Let's pump Iraqi oil into our Hummers," or "Let's outbreed the Pope."

    164. Re:Fallacy by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Because for much of history since then, they killed anyone who tried.

      In these modern Enlightened times, doing that is a minority position.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    165. Re:Fallacy by Barabbas86 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Is that so? I was under the impression historians still haven't even verified the existence of many of the sites of biblical events (such as the infamous sodom and gomorrah) - conjecture aside. Of course, you can take any vague allegory or metaphor and find a real-life counterpart and claim its that which it represents. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy much like when you read a horoscope and miraculously everything it said comes true. Although, there are instances that the bible supposedly records, such as the great flood, which if my sources are correct, are now generally agreed as an exaggeration (i.e. the world did not entirely flood, most likely a river, whose name escape me, was what the writers were referring to, but not everyone who reads it knows that). To me, it seems a rather useless way to dictate strict behavior and beliefs through hyperbole and metaphor.

      But, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and we'll say there are parts in the bible that are verified and valid. That does nothing to validate the rest of it, despite that it may suggest more credibility. In which case, you can't just pick and choose which truths you want to argue based on some historical accuracies in separate parts. Only the things which are verified can be treated as truths. Do any proponents of the bible follow this philosophy?

      A problem arises when people start by assuming it is entirely true. Then they'll have license to deny the most likely truth for an extremely improbable possibility just because it conforms with their ideal.

      Really though, the bible is a work of genius, throw in some historical truths that were kept alive by oral tradition, make up a background and moral to the story, and make vague predictions of the future while making demands of the behavior and beliefs of all those who follow its teachings. Just because all of the predictions haven't come true yet doesn't mean they won't all. And it contains some truth, so it must all be true, note the sarcasm. Surely those who could see into the future would have known that it would not be necessary to rely on oral tradition and that the printing press would allow for widespread reproducability without copying errors and biases (which plague the bible). In that case, the use of allegory would serve only an aesthetic function while detracting from the true purpose. If the language were explicit, the ability to abuse the messages in the bible would be all but nullified (and many of the rituals demanded explicitly by the bible are ignored by practitioners these days). Ironically, that's what made it such a useful tool and so powerful, for those who wished to abuse it (and please do not try to tell me that nobody could or did benefit by being the authority on the bible).

      But, what about other statements in the bible that we have demonstrated as false. That the earth has four corners, or edges. The apologetic defense I've read refuting the four corners argument was that the word translated into 'corners' was similar to the word 'quarters' as in a sphere with 4 hemispheres, although from a more certain geometric point of view it would make more sense to divide a sphere into 8 equal sections, which provides the symmetry which the passage suggests. In any case, even if there are refutations that relate to the way in which the passage was translated, it would make one wonder what other truths have been obfuscated by human error in a supposedly infallible book.

      To me, it's quite ridiculous that we learn lessons of easter bunnies and santa as children, and how the church believed the sun orbited the earth and oppressed science until the truth was undeniable (truth only reached by the scientific method), but in adulthood, many still believe in some figure whose qualities nobody can agree upon, but many assume, whose existence cannot be proven one way or another, but its existence is assumed, whose motives and authority cannot be verified, but goodness and supreme morality is assumed. All the while, in our pride, in our natural desires to be unique, an

    166. Re:Fallacy by Alsee · · Score: 0, Troll

      Waaa Waaa! I'm being persecuted! Christians are being persecuted! Religion is being attacked! Religion is being called evil by those nasty opressing persecuting Slashdot atheists....

      Oh wait... the poster you replied to was a Christian.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    167. Re:Fallacy by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your reply, however, I'm not really convinced you've addressed the points I raised - perhaps my fault for not putting them as clearly as I might have.

      Perhaps the most pertinent question I could ask here, is how would you define the difference between "faith" and "uncertainty"?

      In your post you make the point, as I did, that faith is only required when there is not knowledge. For instance, if I cool water to zero degrees I know it will freeze. No faith required there.

      If I roll a die I know that I have a 1 in 6 chance of getting any specific number. No faith there, either.

      If - to borrow your example - I'm with a friend, and get into a fight, well, there are a LOT of factors involved there. Who started the fight? is it occurring for a reason my friend is likely to by sympathetic about? how well do I know this guy? how long have I known him? has he been trustworthy in the past? how does he feel about violence? how capable of fighting is he? how many opponents are we up against? what are the consequences of this event likely to be? How much does each of those factors affect his liklihood to fight?

      The more those factors point in the direction of "Yes, this guy would fight", the more certain I can be that he would - which seems to correspond perfectly to your description of having faith that your friend would join you in the fight.

      You can be pretty sure Andre The Giant lookalike ex-marine buddy would wade in and crack some skulls when needed, or that your lightweight pacifist haemophiliac friend wouldn't.

      Of course, these are the straightforward cases, it's easy to say those guys probably (but not certainly) would, or wouldn't fight. But most people are somewhere in the middle, and are therefore even harder to estimate.

      Dictionary.com defines faith as follows:

      1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
      2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.
      3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
      4. often Faith Christianity. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.
      5. The body of dogma of a religion: the Muslim faith.
      6. A set of principles or beliefs.

      The relevant definitions are #1 and #2. Let's take a look at these.
      #1 is "confident belief". That is to say, believing with a high degree of confidence that the light will come on when the switch is flicked, or that your friend will back you up in a tight spot.
      The important thing here is exactly why this belief is held. As I hope I have already shown, you hold these beliefs due to experience, reason, and logic. In these cases the word "faith" can be replaced with words such as "expectation", "probability" and so on - and indeed, I generally choose such wording so as not to confuse it with the second major definition...

      #2 is where faith collides head on with reason. When you have no logical proof or material evidence, yet choose to believe something anyway you are literally believing in it for "no sound rational reason."
      Now, by all means you have the right to believe anything you desire. If it makes you happy to believe there is a giant diamond buried in your back yard, despite having no evidence for that claim, then knock yourself out. However, know that you don't have a leg to stand on if you start trying to repeat that claim as though it has some kind of factual basis.

      Also, I'll very briefly drop in a word about #3 ("loyalty"), as it does relate to your example of the friend. However, this is really just a special case of #1. You can estimate how loyal this friend is likely to be based on previous experience and knowledge of the relevant factors. So again, that simply comes down to probabilities and uncertainties.

      So, to sum up this rather long winded post, I hope I've shown here that of the relevant definitions of "faith" the only one which cann

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    168. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for those of us that are left after all the religious folk go off to see their God.

      I got dibs on Gate's mansion!

    169. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please name *one* "Contradiction".

      I know people that have been studying the bible for more the 40 years, and they have yet to find one contradiction.

      Perhaps you think something might look like a contradiction, but that maybe because you don't know the actual meaning of the text.

      So i'm wondering what kind of "Contradiction" you come up with ;-)

    170. Re:Fallacy by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      That's when they are releasing the remake of The Omen. If it is as bad as the remake of The Fog then it will be a really BAD Omen!

    171. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it is a fairy tale but its NOT pointless, its designed to deceive people into thinking that they are not just animals and shouldn't do whatever they wish, like murder each other.. etc

    172. Re:Fallacy by Vexar · · Score: 1

      I found the fake shoplifting idea very funny. Here's an approach: make RFID tags sticky and neutral in color, scatter them on the floors of Wal-Mart. Whoo-hoo! That would definitely be a mess. Oh wait, they have cameras everywhere at Wal-Mart. You can't win. they have taken control.

    173. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell we both believe that there are two distinct versions of the word "faith". In one case faith is operative whenever a truth-claim is asserted in the absense of total knowledge or certainty. This is the "confident belief" aspect of faith which you prefer to describe as "expectation", "probability", etc.

      The other definition of faith is belief in thing without ANY material or logical evidence. This is the "blind belief" variant of faith.

      So we agree in the definition of the terms, the only question is how we choose to apply them. You seem to be saying that all faith of a religious nature is type 2: blind belief. Stop me if I got that wrong. I'm simply saying that some religious faith is type 2 and that some is type 1. Some religious beliefs are held not out of wishful thinking but with material and/or logical support.

      I can provide you with several examples of these type 1 claims. One example would be historical belief in certain events of the Bible. The Bible is material evidence for events taking place. It's not proof by any means - but it is evidence. People with type 2 faith in the Bible just go straight to "the Bible is the word of God" and never question it, doubt it, or try to verify it. People with type 1 faith in the Bible go out and dig in the desert (metaphorically or literally) precisely because they want to prove or disprove (or at least strengthen or weaken) their faith in the Bible. Now I don't think that the Bible can be proved or disproved - it's too complex and fragmentary. But through research you can come to realize things like: 1. the story of Job was probably never intended to be literal and therefore Job probably didn't exist or 2. although previously thought to be a mere legend, ancient evidence has been found to support the existence of King David.

      As another example you can evaluate the moral claims of a given religion philosophically. Is it just, in other words, for one to believe in a God that condemns people who did not hear about Christ to eternal damnation? You're never going to find material evidence that's relevant to this discussion but you have an entire body of philosophical ethics from which to start building logical arguments.

      I'm not trying to say that you can prove or disprove religion or that faith in God is the same as faith in the law of gravity. Science is defined by those things that we can make quantifiable observations about. So it's by definition restricted to material claims. Some elements of religion rely on material claims: usually archealogy and history. But for the most part religious belief and conviction will never be based on material evidence. As a result the level of certainty in religion in general will always be substantially lower than the level of certainty in things like turning a light on or off.

      My sole point is that just because a religious conviction is not AS grounded in material evidence or logic doesn't mean it has NO grounding in material logic or evidence. Furthermore I'd like to point out that a lot of the things we believe in and have faith in on a day-to-day basis are also not based on scientific knowledge. Faith in friends is a good example of this. We know our friends better than we know God so it's not as much faith (there's more evidence) but the evidence is of a decidedly non-scientific nature. And that doesn't stop us from espousing it every day of our lives.

      Most people have numerous assumptions and prejudices that they live by without question. Sometimes belief in God is just another one of those. But sometimes belief in God is something that is rigorously and earnestly critiqued. When that happens it stops being wishful thinking and starts to become the same type of faith as expectation.

      As an example - read the first chapter of C.S. Lewis's "Mere Christianity". He doesn't prove God exists (nor does he try) but he does present a rational, logical and somewhat compelling argument for Christianity. No one can honestly say his book is nothi

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    174. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      All in all I agreed with your post. I would beg to differ that inductive reasoning is not logical. It's not certain, but the rules of logic still apply. It assumes a premise (the future will be like the past) but there's nothing illogical about assuming a premise as long as you realize it's assumed and consider all the following results to be contingent on the assumed premise.

      Eg I could say "let's believe faeries are real" and then procede to make an argument. As long as at the end of the day I realized that anything I'd proved was contingent on that one assumed premise there's nothing illogical about what I've done.

      I don't know a single religious person who would accept your examples a[s] genuine faith.

      Well, I'll be the one religious person you (kind of know) who accepts the light switch example as a perfect example of faith. I understand your arguments about the differences between the light switch and "religious" faith, but I think those are differences of quantity - not quality. The fundamental definition of faith, in my opinion, is simple extrapolation of evidence/experience using logic beyond the realm of certainty. As such I consider every action, belief, thought made by humans about or with respect to the real world to be at least in part a matter of faith. The only difference is how much of our motivation is faith and how much is knowledge. In physics it may be very little in prayer it may be very much but the fundamental operations are the same.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    175. Re:Fallacy by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Because for much of history since then, they killed anyone who tried.

      Am I the only one concerned that those who believe in the Rapture are currently in the position to make it happen? Bush and Blair have now both admitted to "seeking the advice of God" when choosing to invade another country. They also believe that when the end comes, the rightous will accend to heaven and all will be good. All this can be theirs if they just push the world into WW3. Personally, I don't think anyone who believes in the afterlife should be allowed to send soldiers to their death. People who believe in eternal life just don't value real life enough.

      By the way, the same applies to all religions that exhibit violent behaviour. The three big religious brands are just as bad as each other. They all teach that their sect is superiour to others, and that the godless ones must be converted at all costs. Some even specifically mention other religions and place their believers as being worth less than cattle.

      Religion is evolutionary. The peaceful ones were gobbled up years ago by the monopolists that now control the market. Does the vatican issue shares? I want a piece of that action...

    176. Re:Fallacy by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Or do you think that no one will recognize the mark and we're all damned to Hell?

      The problem with the mark of the beast isn't so much the actual mark as it is oath you'll have to take to receive it. To receive the mark, you'll be given a last chance to choose between God and Satan, and make the wrong choice.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    177. Re:Fallacy by kalirion · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're absolutely right, it's not a fairy tale. It's a collection of myths with maybe the same historical accuracy as The Illiad (which I guess isn't really a myth, but you know what I mean.)

    178. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember that historically, the "church", around 300-400 AD, became the "state" church, and eventually became horrible corrept and doctrinally twisted into what are today's Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodix churches. They have doctrinally strayed from original "New Testament" church teachings (for example, infant baptisms, sprinkling baptisms, baptism for salvation, transsubstantiation(sp?) at communion, etc.) Throughout this history, there have remained churches that have strived to remain faithful to New Testament teaching, and many exist today in the form of many non-denominational churches.

      I'm certainly not trying to pull the "my denonimation is better than yours" card, but if you examine historical church record and compare it to New Testament teaching, you will find that many "non-denominational" churches really "get it right" when it comes to Biblical doctrine--something on which (I believe) most denominations fall horribly short. Obviously, this is not to say that ALL non-denominational churches are Biblically or doctrinally "correct", but it dies mean that Christians really need to understand just what the Bible states about the church and its doctrine, instead of blindly following denominations that are rooted in corruption and false doctrine.

    179. Re:Fallacy by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense to question a government. Of course there are many other reasons to protect your own privacy, apart from things eternal. I wasn't trying to sound like privacy doesn't matter, because it does. Dispelling some of the 666 fear is probably a good idea to rationally discuss the implications of RFID.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    180. Re:Fallacy by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Or you could recognize that that is a figure of speech in use today that can clearly be identified as meaning to the 4 compass points or even in every direction.

      I won't go into the various passages that identify the earth as round or spherical, I will leave that as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    181. Re:Fallacy by stanmann · · Score: 1

      The Goddess L???

      You mean SWMBO.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    182. Re:Fallacy by technomom · · Score: 1

      The lady obviously hasn't much of a clue about RFID.

      Anyone who has been working with RFID knows today that it just ain't ready for prime time. Just look at all the delays in getting Walmart's initiatives up and running. It takes a lot of human tinkering to adjust attenuations, set up the readers in just the right positions, and write the bazillion lines of software needed to eliminate stray reads and such. Bar code is still the king because it's cheap and for the most part, works.

      Sheesh.

      The damned stuff has got to WORK before we'll be able to take over the world with it.

      JoAnn

    183. Re:Fallacy by mistergin.net · · Score: 1

      Hey, I thought you folks were all tied up in the Google discussions!

      --
      Less Talk. More Stab.
    184. Re:Fallacy by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Nero's name gives the number 666. John was predicting another emperor as bad as Nero, the worst of the rulers that persecuted the Christians for the first century. I'm not sure if this was ever considered to be fulfilled, but my guess would have been Trajan given what I know off the top of my head, plus he came to power less than 10 years after the earliest date John is supposed to have written Revelations. While many Christians have often predicted the end times, few have done any spectacular about it. One early group (led by a bishop as I may have mistakenly remembered), around the 200th anniversary of Jesus' death, predicted the return of Christ on a certain date, and marched into the desert to meet him, where they all died. After that, the early churches developed a wait and see approach on the return of the messiah, telling their members to focus on the "be ready" as opposed to the "I will return" part of Jesus' message. This has the added benefit of getting Christians to spend their time aiding others instead of trying to make headlines by telling everyone that the last catastrophe was the fault of those stricken because of their sinfulness.

    185. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      So?
      The "666" isn't a number in the Book of Revelation, it's a name tattooed to the creature's forehead, IIRC. Meaning that it could be three of the Hebrew digits for the number 6. Or maybe "XI XI XI". Either way the idea portrayed to the ancient Christians would've been the same - that the Emperor was evil - and wouldn't have had any meaning to any Roman who happened to find and read it.

    186. Re:Fallacy by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      Although Nero was the worst persecutor of the Christians, John was NOT predicting another emperor as bad as him. Rather, he was writing to give consolation to his fellow Christians by letting them know that the power of God will triumph over Nero in the end.

    187. Re:Fallacy by tony23 · · Score: 1

      >Most people crying at funerals aren't nearly as sad for the person as they are for themselves, having >lost the person. I see - so, IOW, they're being self-centered...

    188. Re:Fallacy by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Naah....I don't think that's it....I think Cheney will actually shoot a real, live bird on that day.

    189. Re:Fallacy by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      No, I mean the kind that says school boards need to prevent religious groups from having the same rights to school facilities that non religious groups have. I mean the kind that says students can be punished for praying in school despite freedom of speech. I mean the kind of judiciating that says bibles aren't permitted in school. I mean the kind that repeatedly defies the legislative bodies and the Supreme Court of the United States by systematically ruling against any christians involved. I mean the local policy makers who implement the policies that these lower courts deal with and uphold. I mean the ACLU filing suits inconsistently to get precedents that give wiccans rights that the ACLU attempts to keep christians from getting.

      The ninth circuit court of appeals has historically been the worst, repeatedly contradicting the US Supreme Court, and ignoring prior rulings. For further reference, see HostilitytoReligiousExpression.pdf. Yes, they do classify some reasonable things as "hostility to religious expression", but there are also many examples of blatant discrimination. And "separation of church and state" is an artificial construct that is often blatantly misused. The constitution only says that "congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or abridging the free exercise thereof". There should be no distinction between the religious and the secular. And instead, the artificial 'separation of church and state' is used to justify discrimination against religious groups.

      The president, congress, the supreme court, and state governers ultimately don't matter if the constitution and federal law aren't acted upon. At lower levels, people are being descriminated against de-facto, and since they rarely know to appeal, de-jure doesen't matter.

    190. Re:Fallacy by Lord+Hasenpfeffer · · Score: 1

      The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

      --
      Windows... It's rebootylicious!
    191. Re:Fallacy by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      I would beg to differ that inductive reasoning is not logical. It's not certain, but the rules of logic still apply.

      Well, from a rigorously philosophical position, inductive reasoning is not logical. That doesn't mean that inductive arguments are false; it simply means that they can't be evaluated by logic and classed as "valid" or "invalid." They *can* be classed as "strong" or "weak" by means of statistics, however.

      Example: I flip the light switch three times. The light comes on each time. I hypothesize that the light will come on every time that I flip the switch.

      That's not logical, but it is strong.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    192. Re:Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring RFID, and the doomsdays stories, I would encourage you to examine your core beliefs.

      Before claiming that people are "going to hell", you should really think about what hell and heaven are.

      Is hell the place where those that didn't believe the story go, with painful fire, and "bad" things happening, and there are red dragon people?

      Is heaven the place where those that believed the story go, with very nice (expensive) things like gold roads, but no need for roads or money, where the purpose is to worship the one for eternity, and play with the angels?

      Is the deciding point between these two destinations really weather you believe the right story or not?

      What makes heaven a good place? Lack of pain? "Ability to worship my master forever"?

      I am not making fun of anyone here. I am just saying if you really want logical people to believe in such things, then these things need to be presented in a way that doesn't sound make believe, and instead makes logical sense, instead of picturing angel people and dragon people in space.

    193. Re:Fallacy by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I just thought of an even more amusing idea, RFID flies and let them lose to cause havoc.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    194. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed the point of my post. Your example would indeed be illogical. But here is the example of inductive reasoning that would not be illogical.

      1. I flip the switch three times and the light comes on three times.
      2. I take it as a given that in general the future will be like the past (which Hume pointed out we can never actually know and I do not dispute that).
      C. Therefore the light will come on every time I flip the switch - contingent on 2 actually holding.

      The logic is fine but the certainty is gone. All conclusions are now conditional. As long as all conclusions are given as conditional the rules of logic have simply not been broken. This isn't really debatable - we can reduce the argument to symbolic logic and procede following the strictest rules of logic that you like, and the argument above will violate none of them. It's a standard rule of logic - you can assume any old premise you want and still have a logical argument but the conclusion gets weighed down by the cumulative uncertainty of all your unproved assumptions.

      I understand what you mean by the strong/weak vs logical dichotomy. If you wish to keep your conclusions as non-conditionals than that dichotomy does indeed become necessary. But there's always the alternative of just giving up on certainty but retaining logic.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    195. Re:Fallacy by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      Well, in your example, the logic is fine but the argument is false.

      Premise 2, that "in general, the future will be like the past" is just false. Inductive arguments, in order to be strong, have to specify in what ways and to what degree of confidence the future is likely to be like the past.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    196. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      What crack are you smoking? Look, I understand that you may have a philosophy course that really emphasized this strong/weak dichotomy, but it doesn't mean that it's suddenly the one and only officially sanctioned philosophical paradigm. And short of you believing that I have no idea how you come to the conlusion that:

      Premise 2, that "in general, the future will be like the past" is just false

      For one who's so intent on using logic perhaps you could specify to me what Inductive arguments, in order to be strong has to do with an a statement being true or not. I believe you've already correctly pointed out that an argument can be true or false without regard to being strong or weak.

      I don't mean to talk down to you or anything. Maybe I'm just not seeing something. This whole strong/weak "inductive reasoning is inherently illogical" thing you've got going is very interesting. But you sound like you're just trying to tell me how it is. And that's just not going to fly.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    197. Re:Fallacy by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      Before you set DEA on me, I would ask you to read this.

      I suspect we are using language differently.

      Using at least one set of standard meanings, I read

      In general, the future will be like the past

      as "In the generalized case (i.e., always), the future will be like the past." Clearly, that's not a true statement. Hence, my comment: This is false, drawing attention to the meaning of the face-value wording.

      However, I also realized that you probably didn't mean that. You probably meant something like "as a general rule, with exceptions, the future will be like the past."

      In which case, your sample argument now raises (and begs) the question: are light switches part of the generality, or part of the exception set? Clearly, (2) in the sense in which I think you meant it doesn't imply (C) without further qualification about the likelihood of light switches following the general rule (2). In particular, one would need to know statistics about light switches. Hence my comment about strong and weak inductive arguments.

      The word "illogical" is another problematic word, because most people associate "illogical" with poor reasoning. Inductive reasoning is NOT inherently poor reasoning! It is simply not deductive, and therefore not logical by definition. That is to say, there is no principle of deductive reasoning that allows one to say "If X happens n times, X will therefore happen n+1 times." I much prefer to use the terms "not logical" and "non-logical" rather than the term "illogical" to describe inductive reasoning because of the negative connotation of the word "illogical."

      Bottom line: logical reasoning == deductive reasoning, while inductive reasoning is in a separate category. You can't cross over from one to the other.

      Footnote in case you are a math or comp sci major: inductive reasoning should not be confused with "proof by induction" in mathematics, which is (distressingly enough) a form of deductive argument based on the premise (pick one) of Zorn's Lemma, the Well-Ordering Principle, or the Axiom of Choice.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    198. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Tangentially -

      "In the generalized case (i.e., always), the future will be like the past." As a quick question - how is the general case = always? Just a tangent I'm curious about. This seems to be a specialized use of the term "general" that contradicts the colloquial usage.

      On to the point -

      You probably meant something like "as a general rule, with exceptions, the future will be like the past." Indeed I did.

      In which case, your sample argument now raises (and begs) the question: are light switches part of the generality, or part of the exception set?

      I think you're totally jumping the gun on this. It's becoming clear again and again that whereas I'm approaching this entire discussion with a generic approach you're coming from a specialized system. I'd love to know what this system is. But regardless of what it is, I think that it (like all specialized philisophical systems) is bound to get us nowhere in the end. In order for you to say that my fairly simple assertion ("as a general rule the future will be like the past") necessitates some kind of a discrete breakdown of all events into one of two (apparently non-overlapping) sets (eg: generality vs. an exception set) there's a lot of background work that has led you to accept your system but which I can neither accept nor reject because I'm not aware of it.

      In my opinion and experience you have all the halmarks of an overeager proponent of some system or other: you're so anxious to push your terminology onto the discussion that you immediately jump to levels of semantic specficity that simply do not correlate with the discussion at hand. Language is not neutral. It imposes a paradigm on the conversation. Hence I avoid specialized uses of language (at least until I've agreed with my conversational partner on the 'rules') and stick to more generic terminology. Whereas your peculiar viewpoint leads you to take as given certain premises that are in fact not clearly necessitated by our discussion. I see no reason whatsoever to drag set theory into the discussion and start applying it willy-nilly to things like generality and if you're going to insist on doing it you're going to have to explain to me how you can justify such a step. I'm not saying that you're wrong: just that your kind of failing to communicate because you don't realize I'm using generic vocabulary and you're using specialized vocabulary.

      You can either write up some generalities about your peculiar philosphical system (which I find truly interesting) or, to make the matter more concise we can get to the specific bone of contention.

      Bone of contention: Inductive reasoning is NOT inherently poor reasoning! It is simply not deductive, and therefore not logical by definition.

      It's been apparent since your first post that you equate deductive reasoning and logic, and it's also been apparent that you take this for granted. That's the problem here. I see no reason to equate the two whatsoever and would like you to explain your position on this issue. In my opinion there's a reason we have two words: these are two non-identical terms.

      Deductive reasoning:
      1. In traditional Aristotelian logic, deductive reasoning is inference in which the conclusion is of no greater generality than the premises, as opposed to abductive and inductive reasoning, where the conclusion is of greater generality than the premises.

      2. Other theories of logic define deductive reasoning as inference in which the conclusion is just as certain as the premises, as opposed to inductive reasoning, where the conclusion can have less certainty than the premises.

      It seems to me that your definition of inductive reasoning is really more like 2 than 1 (both definitions from wikipedia). I would have defaulted to 1 since it's the more generalized of them, but I'm happy to work with 2 (or some other definition) if that's what floats your boat.

      Logic:
      First of all I'd like to point out the obvious that wiki

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    199. Re:Fallacy by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      for every success you can mention I can find a scourge on society that was an advanced college degree holder.

      So you're saying that there are as many, if not more, scourges with advanced degrees as there are successes?

    200. Re:Fallacy by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      Re: "general"

      Definition supplied here. Note that my usage corresponds to adj. 1 and 3, yours to 2 and 4. I'm hardly using a specialized, technical definition.

      I'm surprised that in your studies you never ran across phrases like "the general expression", meaning "an expression true for every value of the variables involved."

      Re: logic and induction

      My major point was simply to distinguish induction from deduction. However, I should also point out that your quote from the Wiki,

      Originally, logic consisted only of deductive reasoning which concerns what follows universally from given premises. However, it is important to note that inductive reasoning--the study of deriving a reliable generalization from observations--has sometimes been included in the study of logic

      doesn't really support your claim that I'm using a specialized, abstruse meaning for the terms "inductive" and "logical"; rather, it would seem to suggest that the mainstream of philosophy agrees with me, and that your more flexible definition of logic which includes induction is only used by some.

      But no matter; that's just an issue of wordplay.

      The last word is yours.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    201. Re:Fallacy by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      The last word is yours.

      That's very gracious of you. Seriously, very classy. I don't think I'd have the self control to do such a thing.

      As far as generalized meanings go, I think that I may have overstated a few things. I certainly did come across that definition of general but only in the context of math - never in logic or philosophy so I was surprised to see it used that way.

      As for who has more philosophers on their side or whatever, I really don't feel qualified to make a guess on that. My only real objective in this whole thread - and it's a recurring objective for me - is to really promote the concept that religion and faith do not have to exclude logic and reason. I understand that your technical definition of logic may refer to only deductive reasoning, and I have no problem with that, but for most people reading they will not understand that you're referring to an academic concept.

      Anyway, it was certainly a good conversation and I look forward to encountering your viewpoint in the future.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    202. Re:Fallacy by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Hell, when England made the Domesday Book in 1086 Christians probably went ape-shit over it for the same reason.
      As someone who has studied the Domesday extensively - no, the Christians did not. (And really there wasn't anyone but Christians around anyhow.) In fact, the creation of the Domesday pretty much passed from public notice except as a seven days wonder. The reputation of the book as a source of 'dome' (doom [1]) came about somewhat later.

      The Wikipedia article is quite misleading (on a number of matters) - but the one germane here is that the book was not created as some form of unimpeachable record, but as a detailed survey of the state of England so that William knew how much taxes he could collect to repay the cost of the Conquest and to finance further adventures on the Continent. It only started being used as such a record in the first decades of the 11th century, years after William died.

      [1] 'Doom' in in more classical sense as meaning 'fate', rather than the more common usage and meaning as 'death/ disaster/ fear/ fire/ foes'

  3. There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks
    it all comes to an end, if you truly think the culture of greed, capitalism and consolidation can continue for ever then you are deluded, so when that time comes how will we know ? at what point do we give up and start again ? 20 years ? 50 ? 100 ? 500 ?

    its not IF but WHEN

    1. Re:There will be an end by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks
      it all comes to an end, if you truly think the culture of greed, capitalism and consolidation can continue for ever then you are deluded,"


      Except that looking at your examples (Mayans, Egyptians, Romans, Greeks), I'd say that greed, capitalism and consolidation have been around for a long, long time indeed.

    2. Re:There will be an end by crazyvas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because every society *until now* has had an end, that doesn't mean that every society from this point on will have an end. A culture of of greed, capitalism and consolidation may not be what is traditionally thought of as "good", but that doesn't mean that such a culture may not be the most successful one yet. "Good" and "successful" don't necessarily have to occur together.

    3. Re:There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, leaving a few struggles and revolutions aside, but China is still doing well, thanks...

    4. Re:There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because every society *until now* has had an end, that doesn't mean that every society from this point on will have an end.

      Thats true but I'd put money that every society from this point on will have an end.
      Of course, If I win, then my money might be worthless :)

    5. Re:There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason to assume that because previous societies failed that failure is an inevitable property of society. You might as well have argued that since previous societies were unable to fly to the moon, we can't either.

    6. Re:There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? There's still plenty of civilization in Egypt, Rome, Greece and South America. Do you mean they've just changed over time?

    7. Re:There will be an end by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      every society has had an end, the mayans, egyptians, romans, greeks

      Sheesh. Those societies ended because of a LACK of modern Capitalism. Note that modern Capitalism also requires a) Representative Democracy b) Stable Contract Law, and c) Stable Money Policy.

      The only way the USA will die is if the government weighs down capitalism (also known as "freedom") so much that it can't function anymore (like, say, France with their insane worker policies). Unfortunately, we've been on that road for awhile, but it seems to ebb and flow. I'm fairly confident that we'll never get full-blown socialism. As long as we stay away from that, the US will live forever.

      (And just to make the necessary disclaimer, no, I'm not a Libertarian)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:There will be an end by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      European Freedom

      Surely you mean Austrian freedom. You do know Europe is a continent with nations that have different laws, right? Some of these nations are authoritarian, some are not. Some are socialist, some are not. Not all of them have these stupid restrictions on free-speech rights.

      Or do you hail from the Fox News school of politics, where European is one big, evil, socialist nation - like China, but without the cheap labor?

    9. Re:There will be an end by woolio · · Score: 1

      at what point do we give up and start again ? 20 years ? 50 ? 100 ? 500 ?

      Wouldn't inaugurations be a more relevant unit than years?

    10. Re:There will be an end by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1, Troll
      Surely you mean Austrian freedom. You do know Europe is a continent with nations that have different laws, right? Some of these nations are authoritarian, some are not. Some are socialist, some are not. Not all of them have these stupid restrictions on free-speech rights.

      There are different nations, but there is still a common European culture. Sure, other nations don't have as strict of laws, but there is clearly a lot of sympathy for this. Why is there no outrage over this? This one incident dwarfs ANYTHING questionable the Bush administration may have done. I still can't quite wrap my head around the concept that a country in Europe has literal thought police that put someone in jail for THREE YEARS. Think about that -- THREE YEARS -- for thinking the wrong thoughts.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:There will be an end by Nomad37 · · Score: 1

      This annoys me. People do it a lot in real life too, but at least when posting on the net you have an extra few seconds to think about what you're writing. Use it.

      Your central statement may well be correct - that putting someone in jail just for taking a particular position is damaging to democracy, a morally inexcusable deprivation of rights, etc.

      But why is there then a recourse to tendentious hyperbole in order to justify your position?? "This one incident dwarfs ANYTHING questionable the Bush administration may have done." What the *hell* are you talking about?!

      Let's not even argue about the killing of tens of thousands of civilians as a direct result of an invasion based on evidence that was not only shown to be wrong in due course, but that everyone else thought was wrong from the start. (Wilful blindness anyone? At law, this gives rise to a constructive inference of knowledge).

      Let's compare oranges to oranges. You're talking about the unjustifiable imprisonment of people. Hmm... how about the hundreds of inmates at Guantanamo Bay *who haven't had a freakin trial?!?!* Innocent till proven guilty? Unless you're the wrong colour or wear a towel on your head. Right? Oh, the US constitution doesn't protect them? Hmm... well, the German Constitution doesn't protect hate speech. Guess it's okay then is it?

      I could go on, but it could be bad for my blood pressure. Grrrr.... Stick to your point, don't fsck it up by making stupid tangential claims.

      --
      Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will! - Antonio Gramsci.
    12. Re:There will be an end by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Dammit! Don't reason with him like that, I had a tiger repelling rock to sell him!

    13. Re:There will be an end by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Pulling the checklist out:

      Let's see:

      a. Nope, that went corrupt sometime in the 1800s (maybe even earlier).

      b. If by stable you mean plutocratical, then you're right.

      c. If by stable you mean spending exorbinant amounts of money we make out of thin air as well as borrow from increasingly hostile countries that we'll never pay back and our grandchildren will hate us for, I'll give you that too.

      In other words, we had all three, we don't anymore.

      P.S. You talk about democracy like it's the the cure for everything. I'm sure you know the Churchhill quote:

      "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those others that have been." - Winston Churchill

    14. Re:There will be an end by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if you ask me, and I know you didn't, I would recommend that the next generation's newest democracy fully decouple politicians and money if they expect it to work.

    15. Re:There will be an end by covertbadger · · Score: 1

      The only way the USA will die is if the government weighs down capitalism (also known as "freedom") so much that it can't function anymore (like, say, France with their insane worker policies). Unfortunately, we've been on that road for awhile, but it seems to ebb and flow. I'm fairly confident that we'll never get full-blown socialism. As long as we stay away from that, the US will live forever.

      You're being funny, right? The US has only existed for a coupla hundred years, and been a global power for less than a hundred. Compared to the empires of the past, all of which eventually fell, the US hasn't even reached adolescence. To say it will stay the course at this stage is astonishingly short-sighted, especially considering the growing influence of China.

    16. Re:There will be an end by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      ...but there is still a common European culture

      No, there isn't - that's exactly my point. The American right wants you to believe that there is a common European culture, because it makes it easier to bash.

      ...but there is clearly a lot of sympathy for this. Why is there no outrage over this?

      Huh? In my country (the UK), there's absolutely no sympathy for it. It's a disgusting violation of free speech rights. I'll certainly never visit Austria again. There's plenty of outrage.

      What you are doing is the equivalent of blaming the Japanese for China's human rights problem.

    17. Re:There will be an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also seen as THREE YEARS for preaching hate, of course. Would people complain if Abu Hamza gets a similar sentence? Probably only that it was too short.

    18. Re:There will be an end by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      I still can't quite wrap my head around the concept that a country in Europe has literal thought police that put someone in jail for THREE YEARS.

      It's not thought police, it's speech police. Irving wasn't convicted for "thinking the wrong thoughts" -- he was convicted for spreading antisemitist propaganda -- not his thoughts, not even his books but a lecture he gave (to a group of neo-nazis, as I've read) in Austria. The fact that Austria has such strict laws concerning the Nazi era obviously means they have problems with this. Not with people thinking the "wrong" thoughts (I don't think most of them are even capable of critical thought) but people actively trying to realize these thoughts.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    19. Re:There will be an end by ultranova · · Score: 1

      at what point do we give up and start again ? 20 years ? 50 ? 100 ? 500 ?

      We can't start again. All the easily used resources have been used up, the only ones left require high technology to access. High technology in turn depends on civilization to maintain. Once civilization collapses - which it will inevitably do, sooner or later, through some horrible disease or asteroid hit if nothing else, more likely from war - and that technology is lost, it will be impossible to regain, since accessing the resources neccessary to do that would require already possessing it.

      The next Dark Age will last forever, or at least until geological and biological processes will renew the metal and oil deposits, which will take at least a couple hundred million years. This is why it is so absolutely critical to expand to space - we must have self-sufficient colonies spread in a large enough area that they won't be in Earth's nations sphere of influence, and consequently won't be sucked to the abyss with the current world order when it falls.

      The next time civilization fails, the only thing that can get us up again is outside interference, so we better get to work planting sources for said interference.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re:There will be an end by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Actually, you couldn't be more wrong.

      If you actually believe this crap, explain to me how civilized people have been living in greece since the beginning of greek civilization to now?

      When did the roman empire end? If knew any history, you would know that it never really did. It kept petering on and on, until finally it became silly too keep using the name. However, there was never a day when you could say 'it's over! now everyone in the roman empire has to go back to being cavemen!'.

      The 'end of the roman empire' is really just a significant change in the empire. The people who lived there continued to live there without much change. Later they called it Italy, France, etc, but in between the change was incredibly gradual.

    21. Re:There will be an end by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Rome was invaded by barbarians. It was unable to resist them because of the softness of the people living there, possibly lead poisoning, the incredible number of barbarians, deals made with the barbarians over the previous several hundered years, etc, etc, etc.

      Capitalism didn't help or hinder it. Capitalism does not magically make your country invulnerable, as you seem to think. In fact, capitalism serves only those with capital, and no one else. It weakens countries and civil institutions, and bends governments to it's will by corruption, if doing so will give a better return on investment. It strengthens other governments or sets up strong men, if it will give a better return on investment.

      Capitalism would produce a system where YOU have to live in salt mines your entire life eating rats if that state of affairs would somehow make a few people very wealty. The fact is, this sort of thing does happen, but not to you. You are from a country with plenty of capital.

    22. Re:There will be an end by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Sheesh. Those societies ended because of a LACK of modern Capitalism.

      They all had their own Francis Fukuyamas, though, claiming that the society they lived in was the best thing ever invented by man (and approved by God himself) and would never go away.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    23. Re:There will be an end by ltbarcly · · Score: 1
      a. Nope, that went corrupt sometime in the 1800s (maybe even earlier).


      False. There has never been a government that wasn't corrupt. The founding fathers set up a government that helped their personal interests, sometimes at the expense of other americans (slaves come to mind, but also southerners who imported manufactured goods, and above all Indians. Read about good old Ben Franklin bannning all newspapers but the one he owned from being sent via the mail.)

    24. Re:There will be an end by mclaincausey · · Score: 1
      Except that looking at your examples (Mayans, Egyptians, Romans, Greeks), I'd say that greed, capitalism and consolidation have been around for a long, long time indeed.
      You completely missed the point. None of those cultures persisted. He is arguing that ours will not either due to those three factors.
      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    25. Re:There will be an end by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      I agree that assuming a culture will fail is a post hoc logical fallacy, though perhaps statistically a wise prediction. Unfortunately, however, there are signs of fissure in our civilization that look alarmingly familiar in historical context. It appears that we are undergoing the same transition from republic to empire as the Romans. I also see signs of decay that could spell the end of our civilization, eventually. But the most important signs that we are in trouble is that our civilization is environmentally unsustainable, and that, history being a precedent, disease, violence, criminality, and warfare all correlate directly to population.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
  4. Barcodes by Gyga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only reason barcodes weren't the mark is because they can't mark humans. People have ebbed RFID tags into themselves.

    --
    I don't preview or spellcheck.
    1. Re:Barcodes by fosterNutrition · · Score: 1

      Barcodes can most certainly mark humans, and have been used for that purpose extensively. The reason they can't ever be a secure way of doing things is that they provide no guarantee that they are unique - it would be too easy to get a barcode tattoo simulating someone else. RFID on the other hand (supposedly and ideally at least) would overcome this limitation through crypto and the like.

    2. Re:Barcodes by microarray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The only reason barcodes weren't the mark is because they can't mark humans"

      I can tattoo myself with a barcode, does that count?

    3. Re:Barcodes by Gyga · · Score: 1

      I thought that that was an understood reason, and didn't need spelling out.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    4. Re:Barcodes by jetcityorange · · Score: 1

      No, people CAN be barcoded. In fact, I've built a gallery of barcode tattoos.

      I'll confess that I own a barcode software company, which I guess makes me Satan's Little Helper. But I sure don't have no stinkin' barcode tat on me!

    5. Re:Barcodes by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The only reason barcodes weren't the mark is because they can't mark humans.

      Back in school. There was a guy in my dorm with a tatooed UPC barcode on the back of his neck. So you can, in fact, mark humans with the sign of the beast:)

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    6. Re:Barcodes by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I can tattoo myself with a barcode, does that count?

      Only if you've had collagen injections.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  5. This is what many Christians want by Burz · · Score: 1

    The closer we are to their "End Times", the better. No?

    1. Re:This is what many Christians want by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Some are funny that way. They want Jews to Control Israel to usher in the end-times, but turn and oppose the mark of the beast. Can't have it both ways.

  6. Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In this case, the cult is Christianity. If they were any other group, we'd be laughing at them. Unfortunately, they are large enough that their crazy belief system may cause trouble for the rest of us (yet again).

    1. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I'm not particularly religious myself, but if you look at the current state of American society, it could just as easily be said that the ongoing failure of organized religion to maintain the effective forms of social control it exerted for centuries is more of an issue than their "crazy belief system." If you are referring to the conflicts that inevitably occur when fundamentalist groups of any stripe butt heads I might agree ... but America is, by and large, becoming less religious as time goes on. Don't confuse the copious quantities of white noise being generated by the more vocal subcultures as being a reflection of more mainstream value systems.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful
      In this case, the cult is Christianity. If they were any other group, we'd be laughing at them. Unfortunately, they are large enough that their crazy belief system may cause trouble for the rest of us (yet again).

      Christianity does not believe end times are heralded by RFID tags, some Christians do. That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things. Cults need centralized leadership to tell its adherents what to do and what to believe, Christianity hasn't got a central authority and so its adherents are free to interpret the canon however they see fit and form groups where they share crucial facts of their interpretation. Most Christians believe the book of Revelation to be a non-literal message about what kind of persecution the church has faced and will face in the time between Christ's first and second coming, others believe it is an allegorical prophecy of the history of the thousand years after it was written in about 50AD and some (like the RFID nutter) believe that it is an allegorical prophesy of the thousand years before Christs second coming (whenever that may be). What almost all scholars agree on is that whoever the beast may be is irrelevant when one simply holds to the principles that the bible teaching when dealing with the beast as with dealing with anyone, thus finding the beast is pointless. Unfortunately, not all Christians are scholars and some like to draw shaky parallels and make accusations without merit.

      I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    3. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

      You didn't clarify, you were acting as an apologist for followers of christian mythology.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      so during the time of Christ, christianity was a cult.

      couldn't resist

    5. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      " That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things."

      You'd think that a website whose readership grew up on Star Trek and the various lessons about humanity would naturally understand this point.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one thinking that maybe the Christians aren't so crazy to be freaked about an RFID world?

      Maybe EVERYBODY ought to be skeered at the prospect of being permanently identified by the globab infrastructure?

    7. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by blaksaga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Christianity hasn't got a central authority

      Isn't he called the Pope?

    8. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Christianity does not believe end times are heralded by RFID tags, some Christians do. That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things.

      But Christians do believe that the end times are coming. That is 100% pure cult.

      Cults need centralized leadership to tell its adherents what to do and what to believe, Christianity hasn't got a central authority and so its adherents are free to interpret the canon however they see fit and form groups where they share crucial facts of their interpretation.

      Yes, there are many flavors of Christianity, standing as separate cults. Each has its own central authority.

      Most Christians believe the book of Revelation to be a non-literal message about what kind of persecution the church has faced and will face in the time between Christ's first and second coming, others believe it is an allegorical prophecy of the history of the thousand years after it was written in about 50AD and some (like the RFID nutter) believe that it is an allegorical prophesy of the thousand years before Christs second coming (whenever that may be).

      Nice to see you speak for "most Christinans." Too bad that you are completely wrong, as most Christians do believe it literally.

      I know I have just bitten a troll, but someone had to clarify it.

      Pull your head out of your ass. Take a look around. Study history. Come to accept that your religion is just as absurd as the myriad religions of yore that people don't take seriously today. You are nothing but a chump buying a load of crap. You are being sold down the river just as much as an ancient Greek who prayed to his gods for help. You are a dumbass.

    9. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      The Pope is the boss of the Roman Catholics. A lot of Christians would be offended if you called him their central authority. Just FYI :-)

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    10. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That is what separates Christianity from crazy cults, since it is large and diverse enough to have people make up their own minds on such things.

      HA! Remind me again how you decide right from wrong? Oh, that's right, you don't, you get told what is right and wrong by your imaginary friend. And how is it that you "made your own mind up" on the existence of heaven? Oh that's right, you didn't, you just got told it.

      The whole religion is founded on faith. That's practically the opposite of making your own mind up.

    11. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      but America is, by and large, becoming less religious as time goes on.

      Nationalism isn't a religion?

    12. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by HerrPastor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would like to think you are kidding that "the cult is Christianity." The vast, vast majority of Christians are embarrassed by this sort of nonsense. I know that I am.

    13. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by bjason82 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To begin with, you Anonymous Coward, your use of the word CULT is meant in a sarcastic and demeaning way, and you're therefore attempting to label all religions as cultic in order to negate their value and relevance. You do this because you are attempting to pronounce your own personal beliefs and marginalize religion. I find it all too common now a days for atheists to take that superiorist attitude and look down upon us all too ignorant and feeble-minded idiots who believe in a higher order, a spiritual realm.

      That said, and using Christianity as an example, I would like to point out that no Christian knows for sure when the events of the End Times will begin; not in march, not in 2012, and not in 2300. The Bible states that the rapture will come "like a thief in the night," and nobody knows the time of Christ's return. Many generations throughout history have thought the rapture will come during their lifetime, and of course, none have been correct.
      I think why you have a lot of people saying the end times are near is because there are way too many conditions being set in place that coincide with Biblical and non-Biblical Prophecy. One prophet named St. Malachy wrote down in the 11th century his papal prophecies and stopped in detail with our current pope. He only vaguely mentions one more, peter of rome, who will be a martyr and the last elected pope. At least, until now, he has been eerily accurate, it will not take much more time to find out if he was correct. Benedict is pretty old and may not last too much longer.
      The Non-Biblical prophecy of the Mayans says that the end of our current age will be around 2012, some scholars think that when you account for the inaccuracies of our calendar the Mayan 2012 might actually land on our 2006!

      Even if you look at current events it seems like things are becoming more unstable and the United States is threatened by a looming great depression (reference: look up petroeuro). The dominance of the dollar is weakening and in order to maintain its dominance the Bush administration is trying to prolong the inevitable by resorting to war and aggression. There is no way a country can exist solely on a war economy, but that is what has been happening since WWII. The collapse of the American Empire will only lead to the rise of the European Union as the world's leading power and ultimately the much prophesized one-world-government. Of course, some of what I have just said is hearsay and speculation, but it is hard to deny that there are a lot of signs pointing to that outcome.

      Now, once there is a Unified world government under the leadership of a single individual, he might prove to be malevolent and require the allegiance of all who serve him. The "Mark of the Beast" will be his way of purging those who might stand in his way and threaten his authority, we're talking about the Christians. His "Mark" will most likely be some sort of technology that can interface with computers, presumably this technology will contain the numbers "666" signifying the wearer's allegiance to this leader or even the leader's ownership over them. Those who refuse to wear the chip that, in some way, contain the number "666" will, at first, not be allowed to participate in normal commerce and functioning within mainstream society will be all but impossible. Then it will escalate and full scale persecution will commence on those who refuse the "Mark". You can almost look at it as a reverse of what happened during Nazi Germany and the Jews, the Jews were forced to wear the star of David as a way to set this minority apart from the rest of German society. The only difference is that this new designation system will be displayed in an opposite manner of the Nazi's system. Everyone has the choice to accept the mark, but those who choose not to are instead choosing martyrdom and sacrifice.

      It is difficult for even the staunchest atheist to deny the possibility of a future like this.
      I think it is way too easy for atheists to call names saying Christians are "cra

    14. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Henry+Bone · · Score: 0

      Correct, at least from a Jewish perspective. The early Christian church was referred to by Jewish leaders as the "Nazarene cult".

    15. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by Henry+Bone · · Score: 0
      Nice to see you speak for "most Christinans." Too bad that you are completely wrong, as most Christians do believe it literally.

      Objection your honour! How can the witness possibly testify as to what a million or so other people beleive?

      Dude, you probably shouldn't attack someone for making a generalisation, and then go and make the exact same generalisation.

    16. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by empvirus · · Score: 1

      I know it's easier than hell to generalize christians (especially those who are all "OMG ban gay marriage/video games" and whatever), but please, shut the hell up until you can't. My little "branch" of christianity if you wanna call it that, is a church of christ. We read the bible and do our best to understand it. And we really don't have a center, unless you want to call the Bible a center. We do meet with a few other churches of christ in the area once in awhile though.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    17. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      If you look at the reaction to his death, then Pope John Paul II certainly seems to have had quite a big an authority figure even outside the Roman Catholic countries. Pope Benedict seems to enjoy some as well.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    18. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No, because one does not (repeat not) pray to George W. Bush.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:Crazy Cult Believes End of Times Coming by blaksaga · · Score: 1

      Also notice any decree by the Pope (take abortion or capital punishment for instance) eventually trickles its way down into modern US christian belief and is sometimes used in christian arguments ("the pope says so"). So while the pope may not be a central authoritative figure to christians, he is most definitely an authoritative figure of sorts.

      And don't forget the Crusades. They were wars started by the catholic pope -- carried out by christians -- to kill muslims in the name of god and eventually even kill followers of opposing christian ideas.

      There is no doubt that christianity and catholicism have seperated and evolved to the point of basically being two separate (mostly non-violent) religions but the pope still has some influence over christian beliefs.

  7. I love Slashdot, but.. by aychamo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

    1. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by NotZed · · Score: 1

      It is sad to see such an obviously sane comment being marked as a troll.

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
    2. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by WebScud · · Score: 1

      These is getting press the same way Jack Thompson's luncay gets press -- it's pisses people off.

    3. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      You must be new around here.

    4. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't really call RFID implants progressive technology. Maybe oppressive is the word you were looking for.

      In which case I'd say their stance is completely justified.

    5. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by really? · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because they want to, in a round about way, show that it's not only the Muslims that have the nut cases. It's sort of a "case mod" pissing context ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    6. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by aeoo · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "the devil." Here, let me help you:

      teh devil

    7. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by basic0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a flaky Christian, and I've actually got a diploma in Network admin, A+ and Linux+ certs, etc..and I *KNOW* advances in technology are the devil.

      Ok, so I'm exaggerating..power, greed and money are the devil, advances in technology just facilitate an increase in power, greed and money. IBM, for example, made a lot of money from technology...by selling cataloguing systems to the Nazis. Oh, and don't get me (or anyone else on /.) started about Diebold. Or GPS tracking chips in cellphones. Or traffic cameras. Or automobile blackboxes. Or Internet phishing scams. Or...

    8. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by imrec · · Score: 0

      Easy! Because every editor knows that the occasional story that has anything to do with matters of faith (especially Christianity) is usually good for 1000+ comments. Well, it used to be anyway...

      I've always thought it kind of silly to get all excited about the development/deployment of these 'mark of the beast' technology types... As a Christian, sure, I wouldn't be surprised if the prophecy in revelation is fullfilled. If our decision to accept or not accept a tatoo, RFID, suppository or whatever the 'mark' is... is something we believe will happen, then why get all worked up about it? Why try to slow it down?

      ('aw yeah, thirst for blood... bring it')

      --
      Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
    9. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ooh, I have a non-troll answer to this one! It is a valid question.

      Slashdot seems to consist of people who are equally interested in new technology, but also smart enough to be concerned about its effects. RFID could be very beneficial. And it could be very oppressing. While most Slashdotters probably don't believe that the number 666 will literally mean anything, or that it really matters which hand it will be or who the antichrist is. But they do heed the warning that it implies. The fact that it is a Christian mythology doesn't make it any different than if it was in a modern dystopian novel like 1984. Whatever sort of fiction it is, it was forward thinking and applicable now. And so, people will be interested.

      Now, back to your regularly-scheduled trollish Christian-bashing replies.

    10. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

      The truth? Because it gets slashdot traffic.

      Before you mark me off as troll or flamebait just go out and look at the comment numbers; things related to politics, religion, games and entertainment media (including the RIAA/MPAA) are the articles getting the high comments. It makes sense that's where the traffic is at too. So, in order for slashdot to keep a flow of visitors they post articles that are normally inflamitory... If you don't believe it watch it for yourself and you'll see.

      When i fisrt came to slashdot a few years ago there was tons of pure science floating around that was good traffic and got real postings. Today it's just sensationalism. Just try to post something that's a bit more advanced than "WoW roxxorz" and some joe sixpack will mod you down as off topic because he doesn't know any better.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    11. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Just try to post something that's a bit more advanced than "WoW roxxorz" and some joe sixpack will mod you down as off topic because he doesn't know any better.

      Now wishing I had mod points so I could mod you "Offtopic" and self-fulfill your prophecy. ;-)

      However, see my sig. :-(

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah just do this and get modded as a troll because um, apple is too pure and sweet to be marketing something that couldn't play a game more complicated than a java applet as having '3-d' capabilities.

      I like apple as much as the next guy, but if people don't keep them on their toes they're going to be eaten alive by their marketing departments lies. hey man, people go into marketing for 2 reasons 1. make money 2. because they're only good at lying, and weren't good enough to be a politician/lawyer.

      claiming the intel GMA 950 series has 3-d gaming capabilities is just pure lies.

    13. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

      Technology isn't the devil. Technology is a pitchfork. People who try to use technology to oppress others are the devil, or at least work for him.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      The truth? Because it gets slashdot traffic.

      Rubbish. You're all too eager to put all the blame on the editors, but while there's certainly some truth to this, you're all but forgetting about the readers. You're forgetting that it's the Slashdot readers/users that write most of the stories. The editors can only choose from what they're being sent.

      The Slashdot readership has changed over the years. In the four years you've been a registered user, Slashdot has gained almost four hundred thousand (or maybe fewer; there's probably an awful lot of people with several accounts) new registered users. As it is, the Slashdot readerbase is quite big and it's hardly a wonder that such a great mass of people has a mass taste when it comes to what they prefer to read -- sensationalist headlines, YRO and other 'general interest' stories.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    15. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that it's the Slashdot readers/users that write most of the stories.

      And I'm all too aware of the ablity of slashdot editors to reject a story. That's their JOB. I've submitted a total of three stories in my years here at /. and not one has been accepted, nor has a "dupe" of the same story not been posted within 24 hours. If they can reject my stories because they don't like my blurbs or whatever but still appreciate the science content of them than they can smack down stories that are clearly non-scientific and that do not benifit the slashdot community.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    16. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      stories that are clearly non-scientific and that do not benifit the slashdot community.

      How can you tell what benefits the Slashdot community and what doesn't? How can you tell that scientific stories would benefit the community, but non-scientific wouldn't? In many cases, there isn't really much one can say about science stories. Typically, you'll just end up with a ton of bad jokes and childish humor. But if a story like this one here gets posted, you'll first of all get tons of comments questioning these ideas, and secondly, tons of highly modded comments (at the moment, there's about 45 +4/+5 comments in this thread, which is quite a lot) -- meaning that lots of people agree with what's said in these comments. There's also lots of comments about religion that the readers can agree or disagree with. They can feel that they're a part of a greater whole, a community.

      Of course this doesn't mean that there wouldn't be a Slashdot community if there weren't any such 'controversial' stories around. Generally, they're just good for creating lots of comments, which only 30% of registered Slashdot users read (if my memory serves me correct; in any case, it's quite a small number), while others come here for just the news on tech and science. However, defending a community from outside threat (as in this thread), whether it be real or imagined, has always been an effective method of maintaining it.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    17. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      How can you tell that scientific stories would benefit the community, but non-scientific wouldn't?

      "News for nerds. Stuff that matters"? I dunno, that's just a guess. What does that mean to you?

      also lots of comments about religion that the readers can agree or disagree with.

      So you complain about childish jokes but you think a religious bashfest is any better? Come on now, all a member need do to get some +mods is bash christianity around here. If you even try to have a reasonable debate on religion you get bashed as being a christian, a fucktard and a troll. Maybe you see it as insightful because you agree with the modders but it doesn't bring anything to the surface except for resentment and the kind of groupthink mentallity that helps the likes of the KKK and Al-Quada.

      However, defending a community from outside threat (as in this thread)...

      What threat? I don't see a threat here.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    18. Re:I love Slashdot, but.. by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      "News for nerds. Stuff that matters"? I dunno, that's just a guess. What does that mean to you?

      Well, if you look at the articles posted to this site, it turns out that there are also many things besides science that matter. So you complain about childish jokes but you think a religious bashfest is any better?

      Yeah, I do. It's a lot more interesting to read.

      Maybe you see it as insightful because you agree with the modders but it doesn't bring anything to the surface except for resentment and the kind of groupthink mentallity that helps the likes of the KKK and Al-Quada.

      The only comment in this thread that I actually found insightful was this one. I can, of course, hardly justify going through all that garbage in this thread to learn this one piece of information. I could just as well have spent this time in the library, reading a commentary to the book of Revelations. Other than that... it's not as if any of the arguments used in this thread were new. And the Religion vs. Science thing has been beaten to death so many times that I've lost count. Yes, you could say that these arguments only serve to bring the groupthink to the surface, but 'groupthink' isn't necessarily all bad. For one, it helps to keep the group together. Of course this doesn't mean that everyone thinks in exactly the same way (mind you, I don't think KKK or Al Quaeda members all think in exactly the same way, either), but they do share at least some of the traits of this mentality.

      What threat? I don't see a threat here.

      Yet you're complaining about pseudo-scientific stories and sensationalism :7

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  8. Thank Allah for the distraction by RedHatLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    now maybe Christian fundies can occupy themselves railing against something harmful, rather useful things like evolution or Middle East peace talks.

    1. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly -- the biggest problem (in my non-neoconservative opinion) with American politics today is the alignment of corporatism and fundamentalism in the Republican party. If this can drive a wedge between those two ideologies (and hence through the Republican party itself) maybe we'll have a chance at getting a balanced government again.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No no, the ones who don't like middle east peace talks are the ones who WANT armageddon to happen. So they'll be in FAVOUR of us all getting RFIDs implanted in our foreheads.

    3. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The thing about those liberal 'fags' is that, historically, they're quite willing to even go as far as dying for the things they believe are right. Unlike you and your kind, who simper up to their masters and only have enough courage to make snide comments from the shadow of anonymity.

    4. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...maybe we'll have a chance at getting a balanced government again.

      Or we could simply vote for one. So far I haven't seen any laws that require you to vote republican or democrat. I don't care who the republicans(democrats) align themselves with. The problem is when 99% of the voters align with the republicans(democrats), in their vain attempts to rule over their neighbors. Every two years we are given the chance to destroy this unholy alliance. And every two years we choose to maintain the status quo. As long as that continues, you can forget about any kind of balanced gov't. In fact you can forget about it as long as 51% is allowed to decide how the other 49% is allowed to live.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by Secrity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh dear, somebody's been watching too much Fox News or Rush Limbaugh

    6. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by woolio · · Score: 1

      If this can drive a wedge between those two ideologies ... maybe we'll have a chance at getting a balanced government again.

      Perhaps.. But is that the kind of balance that we really want?

    7. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      What stupid people like you seem to call liberal, doesn't seem all that bad to me -- "broad political tradition, and current of political thought, which holds liberty as the primary political value." This doesn't seem so bad to me.

      What I think is bad, is your totalitarian and facist attions, which limit my rights (privacy), freedoms (speech), and ability to do things (fly on a plane without a butt-probe). Why do you hate freedom?

      Personally, I consider myself ultra-conservitive, meaning almost zero government, and zero interference with my life, and zero interference with my work.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    8. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      So far I haven't seen any laws that require you to vote republican or democrat.
      I have.

      There are two particular types of laws that -- practically, if not literally -- force you to vote for one of the two major parties: the first-past-the-post voting system, and ballot access laws. In fact, the former is even specified in the US Constitution (see Amendment 12).
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should talk to the soldiers and their families who continue to enlist and re-enlist to fight for your freedom--something most liberals wouldn't even consider doing.

    10. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      What we need is a 2 phase voting system. Everyone says they're afraid to cast their vote for a 3rd party because they'd be throwing it away. So, what we need is this: the summer before the election, we have a primary, where any number of candidates can run on any number of platforms. The two with the most votes can then be placed on the ballot in November.

      This assures that when someone wants to vote libertarian, but vote republican instead, their voice is heard. Or when someone wants to vote Green but votes Dem as the lesser of two evils, their vote can be heard. People will say "Oh, well candidate X really represents my views, so I'll vote for him in the summer, but if it ends up being Dem vs. Repub in November, I'll vote lesser of 2 evils".

      I mean, we have no idea how much third party support there is in this country, for exactly the clothespin voting!

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    11. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      rather useful things like evolution or Middle East peace talks.

      I can see evolution as being useful. End of comment.

    12. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by rudolfel · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should talk to the soldiers and their families who continue to enlist and re-enlist to fight for your freedom--something most liberals wouldn't even consider doing.

      petrol!=freedom
      Maybe they enlist and reenlist because they love to kill people.
      There's a saying: Join the army, see the world, meet a lot of interesting people and kill them.

      --
      -- Segmentation fault. Core dumped
    13. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by stanmann · · Score: 1

      So you're a Condorcet fan?

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Though it would require some work(oh my!), and require that you work outside the system, and not get distracted by mass media, etc., the write-in is still available. If it is made obvious that the majority voted for a non-aligned candidate, then that person will become president. Nothing you posted here can deny that. The president needs the majority of votes to win, not the majority of money. The money influences us, not them. They use it to influence us to vote for them. They don't just buy the office and then occupy it. We give it to them.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Thank Allah for the distraction by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Although I admire your idealism, you've got to realize that what you're suggesting is so hard to accomplish that it's not even worth trying. I'm all for trying to get a 3rd-party or independent candidate who is already on the ballot elected, but going for a write-in instead is completely unrealistic. Besides, any candidate with enough popular support to win as a write-in could pass the criteria imposed by ballot access laws and get on the damn thing in the first place.

      And anyway, all that's beside the point, which is that the ballot access laws and first-past-the-post voting are problems that need fixing. This workaround (even if it weren't such a poor one) wouldn't change that.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  9. Well, we all know what this means by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Apparently some Christian nut has finally caught on to what us Slashdotters have been saying for years! RFID chips are the Mark of the Beast, and the Beast himself... well let's just say he's in his sixth year of power.

    Albrecht's entry into the Christian book marketplace has not marginalized her voice in the media or with the RFID industry.
    That worries me, somewhat.

    Note: I am Jewish.

    1. Re:Well, we all know what this means by kclittle · · Score: 1
      Note: I am Jewish.

      Ah, but what is your religion?
      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    2. Re:Well, we all know what this means by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      My religion is Reform Judaism. Speculating about the Christian End Times is just plain fun, and in the case of certain political figures slightly wierd and scary.

    3. Re:Well, we all know what this means by kclittle · · Score: 1
      Speculating about the Christian End Times is just plain fun, and in the case of certain political figures slightly wierd and scary.

      Alas, certain political figures are overtly wierd and decidedly scary! Especially when carring shotguns... :)

      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  10. Save 10% at b&n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the book Revelation

    1. Re:Save 10% at b&n by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 1

      Is this an end-of-world special?

  11. Wow... by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

    some people are sceptical of claims that RFID presages the end of the world. How utterly shocking.

  12. So.. its RFID today is it? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    40 years ago, it was the 'social security card'....20 years ago people said barcodes were it.. in anoher 20 it will be something else... no need to panic.

    Now if some guy with horns and a tail, and breathes fire, comes out waving an RIFD injection machine THEN you can panic..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just Ashcroft; he forgot to put his make-up on this morning.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    2. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates' greatest feat is making you belive he dosn't exist! It's the End of the world! RFID will destroy us all!

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    3. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by boojumbadger · · Score: 2, Funny

      isn't it just a little scary that governments keep trying to fulfil the prophecy?

    4. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by croddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is a very limited and fundamentalist reading of Revelation that requires a one-to-one correspondence of symbols in the text and historical events.

      The reason the image of the "mark of the beast" is frightening is that authorities in human history have always attempted to assert their control in ways that reach into individuals' lives and compel them to function as slaves for a self-serving power.

      Social Security cards, bar codes, and RFID tags all provide valid readings of the text in Revelation. There is no reason to try to force a fundamendalist, literal prophecy onto a text that's not asking for it. Take a warning about authorities' will to dominate mankind for what it is.

    5. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      It takes 20 years or a generation for something to be accepted into mainstream.

      Think frog in the boiling pot analogy.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    6. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Now if some guy with horns and a tail, and breathes fire, comes out waving an RIFD injection machine THEN you can panic..
      That sounds like a great Halloween costume.

      And by Halloween costume, I mean every Sunday morning before Church.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by gatzke · · Score: 1


      Grandpa passed away last year, and recently Grandma pulled out his social security card.

      It was not a card, but a big piece of metal. A little bigger than a business card and too big for a wallet.

      I don't know when they handed these out or when they stopped, but it looked pretty cool.

    8. Re:So.. its RFID today is it? by gatzke · · Score: 1


      Just dug around a bit and found that metal social security cards are not issued, they are usually bought as a replacement.

      I have never seen anyone selling SS cards, but I guess they are around. I assumed they were issued by the USG back years ago...

  13. So... by 313373_bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    you may defeat the beast by wearing a tinfoil hat (or glove)?

    --
    ^[:q!
    1. Re:So... by Ezku · · Score: 1

      I knew those hats would be of use to us some day!

    2. Re:So... by dcapel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tin foil can increase the effectiveness of cooking noodles. Tinfoil can decrease the effectiveness of the Mark of The End Times. The Flying Spiggetti Monster likes noodles.

      CONVERT! Convert all ye who want to have divine protection from the end times! The End is near. Only His Noodlyness can protect us!

      --
      DYWYPI?
  14. Re:Oh Noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush = Big Brother = Christian Fundamentalists = Fear the mark = Hate RFID = Tin Foil Hat

    Now they are hex thinkers. Not only is there b&w but there are shades of grey between #000000 and #FFFFFF.

  15. Eh... Apocalyptic Stuff by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a little different. There really are passages in the Bible signifying the placement of a mark on people that is required to trade, and people are already using these things as debit cards at night clubs. I guess that people don't mind getting a chip injected after a few beers.

  16. Wow. by Chaos+Engine · · Score: 1

    I love these crackpots! Every time they start to go off on me on the mark of the beast and the new world order and the euro being the one world currency I remind them that we already have a one world currency. It's called MASTERCARD. You can buy anything anywhere with your credit card and it can be tracked by our loving one world government.

    I guess it's a bit late to bitch about being tracked and scanned. Just try to live without Visa or MC. Can't rent a car, can't get a hotel room.

    --
    And then he did that thing with that stuff and it was like, wow...
    1. Re:Wow. by bots · · Score: 1

      shhhh dont ruin the fun.

    2. Re:Wow. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You can BUY a car or a house just fine though. You can usually rent a hotel room if you're willing to put down a big enough deposit too.

    3. Re:Wow. by flooey · · Score: 1
      Just try to live without Visa or MC. Can't rent a car, can't get a hotel room.
      That's actually just what a lot of places would like you to believe, since credit cards make things a whole lot easier for them. Most of them do have a cash-only alternative (usually involving an extra deposit) that you can use if you can convince them that (a) that's the only way they're going to get your business, and (b) you're not trying to rip them off.
    4. Re:Wow. by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Just try to live without Visa or MC

      Easy.
      I use American Express.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    5. Re:Wow. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a bit late to bitch about being tracked and scanned. Just try to live without Visa or MC. Can't rent a car, can't get a hotel room.

      Its easy, go live outside the USA.

      In mst places on this planet you can get around with cash just fine. The last time I used a creditcard for the kind of things you mention was when I was living in the USA in the early 90s (yeah, I do have one still and use it at times because it is convenient, but definitely not because I wouldn't be able to do what I want or need without one).

      In fact, there are substantial parts of the world where a creditcard will buy you nothing whatsoever.

    6. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a bit late to bitch about being tracked and scanned. Just try to live without Visa or MC. Can't rent a car, can't get a hotel room.

      I don't have a MasterCard or any other kind of credit card. I always pay with cash and live just fine.

      Cold hard cash beats soft warm plastic anytime ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  17. Why does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what if it is the end of times? Does any Christian (or anyone at all) think that they can do anything to stop the end of time? Somehow I doubt God would decide not to end the world simply because people stopped using RFID.

    Maybe the person thinks that God needs RFID to identify who is a believer and who isn't? (next to the pearly gates we have the pearly RFID reader). :)

    1. Re:Why does it matter? by product+byproduct · · Score: 1

      Christians worry about the end times because they want to take the day off and *be sure* that they won't have to face their boss about it the next day.

  18. Closer to April 1st every day... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Every day Slashdot gets closer to looking like it's April fools day every day. This is not a serious story and should never have made it to slashdot. The next article I expect to read is about a lunatic who's done "scientific testing" to determine which tin foil hat arrangement is more effective "shiny side up" or "shiny side down" in blocking out the goverment mind control rays.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Closer to April 1st every day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next article I expect to read is about a lunatic who's done "scientific testing" to determine which tin foil hat arrangement is more effective

      Glad I could help

  19. ends vs means by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

    i think we can all bite our tongues here for the good of the world.

    we all know rfid in the form of identification may be cool but it is a little too big brother. if the religious right wants to use the bible as THEIR reason it is bad, i say let them do it. they have a slightly better grip on government than nerds.

    --
    -- lol pwned
    1. Re:ends vs means by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love it..

      "... it is a little too big brother" (emphasis mine)

      yup.. just an eeensy teeenny bit to much. A barcode on the forehead would be just fine. ;-)

  20. Re:Eh... Apocalyptic Stuff by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    I should note that I'm not some kind of nut. I'm just saying, if you're going to build up an argument like that, this is WAYYY easier than most of the popular conspiracy theories.

    And, hey, if TV bores you, you should listen to some of them. It's amazing how they are constructed, and it's even more amazing the assertions that people will make.

    OBVIOUSLY Aliens crashed at Area 51, bringing a message of peace (see, the aliens are always so evolved that they became pacists).

    If that'st the hallmark of a conspiracy theory, then this one stands head and shoulders above the crowd.

  21. Shiny side up by LiftOp · · Score: 1

    I did my master's thesis in Brainology on it.

  22. Re:time to heat the polish ovens again by black88 · · Score: 0

    Brave little fascist!! Posting anonymously on /.!!

    The only thing that Polish ovens should be used for is whatever kind of yummy baked treats that they make in Poland.

    I do wish that I could meet you face to face,though...........

  23. One central mistake these people make... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...relative to their believe is that the "mark of the beast" means that you have to recant your faith to recieve the mark. Unless they can make that claim and back it up, it's a meaningless claim. Bar codes supposedly have "666" encoded into them, but that is only because of ignorance of what the bars mean, and I don't remember anyone recanting their beliefs to get one assigned to their body.

    1. Re:One central mistake these people make... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      the "mark of the beast" means that you have to recant your faith to recieve the mark.

      What if your faith involves not blindly ceding total control of your life to the government, e.g. by ingesting a universal tracking device? I'm not sure that recanting one's faith need be as straightforward as saying "God is dead, now tag me!"

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:One central mistake these people make... by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1

      They don't 'supposedly' have 666, they do - almost. The three 'guard' bars, the long vertical pairs of thin lines that occur at the beginning middle and end are similar to the way 6 is represented on the right right of the two panels of the bar code - two thin vertical lines. I'm not sure how this happened, I'm inclined to think that it was a joke on the part of the inventor.

      --
      "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
    3. Re:One central mistake these people make... by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1
      That's a good point to make. It's pretty clear that the Mark of the Beast is something that is very explicitly tied to renouncing Christ, and there's not gonna be any mistake about it. Those who say "ah, whatever" will have had plenty of evidence one way or another, and deciding "not to decide" (and thus taking the mark) is in fact a decision (and a really bad one at that).

      Now, that's not to say that RFIDs may end up becoming the vehicle for this at some point in the future, just as barcodes could have and still might. The foretold regime could easily use RFIDs or whatever's the latest in the series (barcodes, RFIDs, ???s) in conjunction with the very explicit decision one way or the other. Then it's time to "choose wisely"...

      --
      GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    4. Re:One central mistake these people make... by jafac · · Score: 5, Informative

      The other thing that MOST armchair christian eschatologists seem to ignore is that there is a particular Hebrew meaning to to with "on your right hand or on your forhead" - and that is that it will affect your actions (your right hand) and your thoughts (your forhead).

      The "Mark of the Beast" is most likely not being referred to as a physical thing, but rather the acceptance of a doctrine that affects how one thinks and behaves. (Like Free Market Fundamentalism).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:One central mistake these people make... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other thing that MOST armchair christian eschatologists seem to ignore is that there is a particular Hebrew meaning to to with "on your right hand or on your forhead
      ... which is especially entertaining when they also forget that the Book of Revelation was written in Greek.
    6. Re:One central mistake these people make... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Actually free market fundamentalism advocates that greed is a virtue and that love of money should be main engine driving society.

      That pretty much makes it about anti-christian as you can get. In Christianity greed is a deadly sin and love of money is the root of all evil.

      Come to think of it usury is a sin (interest), pride is a sin, covetousness is a sin, gluttony is a sin it goes on and on. Take away all that you destroy capitalism.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:One central mistake these people make... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      The "Mark of the Beast" is most likely not being referred to as a physical thing, but rather the acceptance of a doctrine that affects how one thinks and behaves.

      Since when have religious people been renowned for their logical ability and analytical thought processes?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:One central mistake these people make... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Tefilin (Phylactories)?

      Head and right hand are tefilin, that Orthodox Jewish(tm) males and Madonna wrap every day.

      The text it's self is not "modern" so it was likely written at a time when Christians still retained most of their Jewish rituals, including tefilin. I doubt it would refer to tefilin tracks (the temporary indentations left in ones skin imediately after wearing tefilin). And in any case, I can't think of any way to make the number 666 numericaly out of tefilin or it's related procedures. (unless your perspective view of 7 forarm wraps, made you think it was 6)

      If the "mark of the beast" is suposed to cause you to revoke your faith, it may be refering to preventing you from wearing tefilin. No mark, or subcontanious could prevent you from wearing tefilin, but some sort of permenant, external binding on the right arm or the forhead might (since it would intervene between the skin and the tefillin).

      It could also refer to Karietes to may take things too litteraly.

      Religious or not, being tagged is still kinda freaky.

    9. Re:One central mistake these people make... by return_of_ffalcon · · Score: 1
      Tefilin (Phylactories)? Head and right hand are tefilin, that Orthodox Jewish(tm) males and Madonna wrap every day.
      Ummm. Left hand!?!
    10. Re:One central mistake these people make... by Proc6 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      And take away love of money, fancy cars, new gadgets, and the greed that motivates traversal through the class system and you get: The Middle East. Millions of barely literate religious zealots with no objects or cash or prospects to obtain either, just some guns and a mystical book. Working well for them isn't it?

      One of the strongest, most evolved characteristics of the human species is our desire to stay motivated. We must "obtain" and "control". In capitalism this usually equates to directing our primal desires towards that which helps ensure our personal security and enjoyment in life: cash. Take greed and money away, and that same uncontrollable desire gets directed towards each other, other races, and opposing religions. Now which is really better?

      In America, an "evil" product of pure capitalism is a CEO of an energy company that puts the screws to an elderly lady on a fixed income making it harder to pay her bills. In Iraq, an "evil" product of religion are hooded fundamentalists that decapitate infidels and barely make the news. Give me a greedy, wealthy society anyday.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    11. Re:One central mistake these people make... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "One of the strongest, most evolved characteristics of the human species is our desire to stay motivated. We must "obtain" and "control". In capitalism this usually equates to directing our primal desires towards that which helps ensure our personal security and enjoyment in life: cash. Take greed and money away, and that same uncontrollable desire gets directed towards each other, other races, and opposing religions. Now which is really better?"

      Well according to christ anyway that motivation should come from love of god and the desire to do good, not to accumulate wealth.

      "In America, an "evil" product of pure capitalism is a CEO of an energy company that puts the screws to an elderly lady on a fixed income making it harder to pay her bills. In Iraq, an "evil" product of religion are hooded fundamentalists that decapitate infidels and barely make the news. Give me a greedy, wealthy society anyday."

      To be fair, we also have tortured and killed lots of people. Sure we don't decapitate people, our prefered way of killing is to drop bombs on them. We are way more efficient though, while they have decapitated maybe a hundred or less people we have namaged to kill hundreds of thousands of humans in the last few years with our bombs.

      I honestly don't know if killing people via bombs makes us morally superior to killing them by cutting their heads off. You seem convinced of that. Maybe you can explain why you think it's morally superior to kill people with bombs then knives or swords.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:One central mistake these people make... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      only if your lefthanded. I don't know if someone who intentionaly does something to make his right hand, unusable for tefilin could switch. Ask your local rav.

  24. My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Proudrooster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like every generation comes up with a sign for the mark. Here is my brief history of the mark of the beast. Feel free to add yours.

    Social Security Numbers
    Punchcards (They used to be included with your utility bills)
    Drivers License Numbers
    Credit Card Numbers
    Bar Codes
    IP Addressess
    Bill Gates full name converted to ASCII and summed.
    CPU IDs
    and now.... RFID (Which is really just a modern bar code.)

    I think the "mark of the beast" might be figurative language in the book of Revelation, but talking about apocalytic literature can be like running the Boston marathon is quicksand. It is amazing how a 10 page book of the Bible could be expanded into a 2000+ page box set and miniseries. Maybe 666 is just a number that represents imperfection three times over.... What? I pity the fool that says the mark of the beast isn't a literal number stamped on the forehead... Ow, don't hurt me Mr. T....

    1. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe 666 is just a number that represents imperfection three times over....


      Except that 6 is a perfect number (Look it up yourself). So that makes no sense at all. Unless mathematical perfection is Satan's work.
    2. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      I don't recall any of those examples being inserted into people's hands. Revelations says nothing about people having to carry the mark in their wallets, or having it handy when they go out for a drive.

      As an aside, I read a while back that the origin of 666 is that it was the numerical equivalent (through some fancy religious conversion) of some king's name. Maybe Herod, I forget. But I guess there are many theories.

    3. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that 6 is a perfect number. OP obviosly meant that 222 is impecfection. Ba dum bum

    4. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      and now.... RFID (Which is really just a modern bar code.)

      Except that it is not. RFID has far more potential for invasions of privacy and abuse than a bar code ever could. And given the current corporate climate where everybody's information is for sale, do not think that companies will not abuse it.

      It's the attitude that "it's just another barcode" among the general population is what is so dangerous, whether you believe RFID is the mark or not.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bill Gates full name converted to ASCII and summed.

      Comes to 663. Assuming you use capitals and ignore the space.

      The extra 3 comes from him being Bill Gates the third. So you add 3. No doubt that will be fixed in MS ASCII v2.0

    6. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Maybe 666 is just a number that represents imperfection three times over...

      Actually, 6 is a very nice number - it is a product of two first primes, it describes the number of faces of a Platonic solid (cube) and it counts the number of elements of symmetric group of order 3 - the first non-commutative symmetric group.

      As for 666 this number is also interesting: it is, obviously 6 times 111, but 111 is 3 times 37 which is a prime number. So 666 can be represented as 18 times 37.

      Because of propensity of 37 to form numbers with visible patterns in decimal representation when 37 is multiplied by anything containing 3 (which is every 3rd number) it has often been assigned mystical significance.

    7. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ascii representation of the 3rd is not 3. If you add the ascii value for whatever way you want to represent billy boy being the third, his name turns out to be way more than 700 when all the ascii values are added together.

    8. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      Emperor Nero of Rome, I think. (Personaly, I belive the beast is in the future, but in the past that wiev was common) And you are correct: the mark will be in your brown or right hand. One more thing: you will worship the image of the beast when you take the mark.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    9. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by jafac · · Score: 1

      Unless mathematical perfection is Satan's work.

      That may not be too far from the truth, considering that the bible says Pi = 3.0.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Poster refers to the biblically reported dimensions of the ceremonial basin which sat in front of the first Temple (I'm way too lazy to look up the chapter and verse right now, it's in Beckmann).

      Anyways, the bible says that the basin was 10 hands across, and thirty hands around. This is a contradiction, unless you consider that the rim would have to be a certain thickness, thus, rabinnical scholars conclude that thirty hands is the circumference of the inside of the basin, while 10 hands is the width measuring from the outside rim of the basin.

      Such heroic scholarship is sometimes required to truly appreciate the bible.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    11. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      ...and the letter counts in "Ronald Wilson Reagan".

      rj

    12. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      The same effect occurs with other two-digit numbers whose individual digits add up to 10 (19, 28, 37, etc).

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    13. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Ruie · · Score: 1
      The same effect occurs with other two-digit numbers whose individual digits add up to 10 (19, 28, 37, etc).

      Hmmm... I just tried 19 but did not see anything special:

      19*1:100
      [1] 19 38 57 76 95 114 133 152 171 190 209 228 247 266 285
      [16] 304 323 342 361 380 399 418 437 456 475 494 513 532 551 570
      [31] 589 608 627 646 665 684 703 722 741 760 779 798 817 836 855
      [46] 874 893 912 931 950 969 988 1007 1026 1045 1064 1083 1102 1121 1140
      [61] 1159 1178 1197 1216 1235 1254 1273 1292 1311 1330 1349 1368 1387 1406 1425
      [76] 1444 1463 1482 1501 1520 1539 1558 1577 1596 1615 1634 1653 1672 1691 1710
      [91] 1729 1748 1767 1786 1805 1824 1843 1862 1881 1900
      What am I missing ?
    14. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till we can start giving individual cells ip addresses with IPv6

    15. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      It's also true that, since Hebrew/Arabic numerals were unknown in the Western world for another 1500 years, it is better to think of it as John would have written it:- LCDXVI

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    16. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Apparently nothing. I think I'll now shut up. :)

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    17. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's a hack. Typical microsoft:)

    18. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      Regarding the "Left Behind" series:

      I've actually read most of the books, and they're total garbage. They're at least three or four times thicker than they need to be. There's now a prequel series, too. Jerry Jenkins is probably the most successful hack writer of the past decade.

    19. Re:My Grandma thought punchcards were the mark... by Psyborgue · · Score: 1
      It's also worth noting that in some translations it is "six hundred, threescore, and six" Look on the back of a dollar bill on the bottom of the pyramid of the great seal. See the numbers.

      1000, 600 , 100, 60 , 10, 6 .

      Now consider a cataclysmic attack against the united states prompting national ID tags. An implant could be heralded as the ultimate in security and convenience. You must be a terrorist if you don't want to get an implant.

  25. Re:time to heat the polish ovens again by boobavon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Holy shit youre disrespectful, not to mention historically inaccurate. Way to go, jackass.

  26. oh cmon by lpret · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Revelations is a perfect specemin of apocalyptic literature. Here's a good definition of such literature: Hermeneutics.

    It's written to warn and to use descriptive language to explain what the future holds. The idea of head and right hand are frequently used to depict what we think (head) and what we do (hand). As such, in this particular instance, the warning is not when we have implants in our heads or hands, it's when we think and do evil things.

    Interpreting apocalyptic literature as truth verbatim is not only stupid, it's dangerous.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:oh cmon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig: "This is my digital signature. 10011011001" equates to 666 in decimal. Goes to show whose side you're on.

      Uhh, no? It has eleven digits, so the first "1" means that the number is at least 1024. I'm too lazy to do it all by hand, but kcalc says it's 1,241. Not that I have any idea what the significance of that number is.

      I'm assuming you meant it as a joke, or something.

    2. Re:oh cmon by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      10011011001

      You don't even have to work it out by hand, or trust utilitiies. The final digit is a 1, that means its an odd number.

      A mildly interesting aside, ALL normal binary palindromes are odd. (Because all binary numbers start with "one", and therefore must end with one.)

      (Sure you could be annoying and make arguments about zero padded fixed width binary fields, or argue that its not against the law to write an arbitrary number of leading zeroes... but those aren't really "normal" ... by the definition of normal I choose to use... so there. :)

      -cheers

    3. Re:oh cmon by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Interpreting apocalyptic literature as truth verbatim is not only stupid, it's dangerous.

      But it does make for some pretty wild art

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    4. Re:oh cmon by Danse · · Score: 1

      As such, in this particular instance, the warning is not when we have implants in our heads or hands, it's when we think and do evil things.

      So basically all of human history then?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:oh cmon by lpret · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case anyone starts blasting me, that was me stabbing the 0 and 1 keys several times in no specific order.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    6. Re:oh cmon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how then do you explain people not being able to buy or sell without the mark on their right hand and forehead?

  27. Not gunna happen by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone who thinks that somehow, someday, everything is going to switch over to an RFID system are insane.

    Lemme tell you why: The Black Market

    The black market is never going to dissappear. It is fueled by personal anonymity and cash (because cash money is anonymous).

    While the black market isn't necessarily something to be proud of, it shows up whenever there are market inefficiences or certain niches that aren't being fulfilled.

    Money from the black market is like money from Bush's tax cuts... it trickles down into the rest of the economey and boosts it up.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Not gunna happen by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      cash money will only be anonymous so long as embedding RFID chips in them isn't practical. :)

      i am curious about what will happen when that happens, or if it should. the implications are pretty huge. imagine a full currency system trackable like that, quite incredible.

    2. Re:Not gunna happen by big+tex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When that happens, the new 'Numbered Swiss Bank Account' will be the currency from one of the countries that refuses to tag their currency.
      You won't ever be able to stop the currency exchange.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    3. Re:Not gunna happen by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Bartering or precious metal coins.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Not gunna happen by really? · · Score: 1

      I am now in the US surrounded by people who are here semi-legally; basically they are OK to be here but not OK to work.
      Guess what, they work and make a lot of money, enough for them to help their famillies "back home"; and yet I almost never see any money changing hands. Bartering and promisory notes are just as good, as long as the web of trust exists.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:Not gunna happen by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      While the black market isn't necessarily something to be proud of, it shows up whenever there are market inefficiences or certain niches that aren't being fulfilled.

      Actually, most black markets arise from some kind of prohibition or other.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Not gunna happen by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is called a Informal Value Transfer System (IVTS) or Alternative Remittance System (ARS)

      That type of system has existed forever & like you said, it is all about trust.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:Not gunna happen by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Black markets form whenever there are barriers to a completely free market. Taxes (cigarettes, alcohol) & import tariffs are big drivers. Anytime you have to register (weapons) for something, you get a black market.

      I guess you could call laws against theft a "prohibition", but stolen goods make up a nice chunk of black market business too.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_market

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Not gunna happen by binford2k · · Score: 1

      Would that not be an inefficiency or unfullfilled niche?

  28. East of Ealing by simon_clarkstone · · Score: 1

    Actually, Robert Rankin proposed something rather similar in his (bizzare and humorus) book East of Ealing. It was written and is set before the days of RFID tags, and features barcodes instead. Like in many of his stories, the End of the World is prevented by the heros. Froogle link

    --

    C:\>spell -b slashdot_submission.txt
    Bad command or file name.
  29. The Enemy of your Enemy is your Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it doesn't speak well for the state of our nation that those who are concerned about governments and corporations extended their ability to pry into as well as control our lives are brushed aside as tin-foil hat wearing kooks or terrorist sympathisers (regardless of how moderate and rational they may be) while born-again Christians are taken seriously by the Powers-that-Be.

    But in this case, it may be a good thing for both camps. Fear of "The Mark of the Beast" is a big thing to the born again Christian. And it may end up being what keeps America from adopting such things as madatory RFID implants or national ID cards. I'm not even sure such things (at least the latter) wouldn't have been part of the Patriot Act if the fundies didn't have that fear.

    By the way, if you want to see a classic 70's "End Times" movie, check out: (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1888568003/103-8 720932-4993469?v=glance&n=404272)

    Ed Wood quality... And I guarantee you will have nightmares.

  30. Biometrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    the mark of the beast will be YOU
    why do you think there is the great rush towards a cashless society ? it wont be long before you cant buy or do anything without a biometrically enforced credit card
    and then we have arrived

    luckily most people today who call themselves "christian" will be met at the gates of hell
    go to church and listen to the preacher talk about how to improve YOUR life not your fellow neighbours

  31. If she were a REAL Christian by maynard · · Score: 1

    she'd be happy to see another sign of the End Times. I mean, teh Rapture is upon us!!!

  32. Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The traditional view of all major Christian churches and
    the reformers is that the pope is the antichrist and the
    Roman Catholic church the great whore.
    http://www.rev14.info/

    I have a list of all the major churches who had the
    pope is the antichrist in their Confessions of Faith*,
    including baptists, presberterians, luthereans, methodists,
    calvanists, and more on my website.

    If this view is correct, that the pope is the antichrist, and
    the roman catholic church is babylon the great, than obviously,
    the mark of the beast also already has (and does) exist. I
    also have this on my website - the traditional, gospel view
    and interpretation (as if the bible had something to do with
    the gospel!!)

    With the Roman Catholic church continued to be involved in
    numerous scandals, including the raping of more than
    10,000 boys by its priests, claiming that the mark of the
    beast is something other than what traditionally Christians
    have said it is probably has political consequence as well:

    It allows apostate Christians and silly idiots continue to
    fellowship wiht the Roman Catholic church instead of splitting
    with it and refusing to have anything to do with it.

    The mark of the beast == microchip implant means
    continuing to look the other way with the rapes of little
    boys.

    http://www.rev14.info/

    1. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI:

      I'm not sure idiot is the right word for making up something about microchip implants, although I believe you would be hard press to find the testimony and gospel of Jesus Christ having anything to do with the antichrist, hard pressed to find anyone two hundred years ago who didn't understand Revelation as having to do with salvation and the gospel (the pope is the antichrist), and easily explainable how to justify their fellowshiping and political support of the Roman Catholic church if they also believed it was the great whore - although it seems to me that is hard to justify based on the sheer amount of evil they've done alone, including raping all the kids And Still covering it up.

      http://www.rev14.info/ (for a real interpretation of Revelation, and a traditional one)

      Revelation 19:10 - worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.

    2. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should read:

      "I believe you would be hard press to find the testimony and gospel of Jesus Christ having anything to do with microchip implants."

      You can read "confessions of faith" on my website for a short list of traditional confessions, including luthereans, presebererians, baptists, methodists, calvinists. I could easily expand this list a hundred fold, since every major Christian church and some of the greatest Christian minds believed that the pope was the antichrist (And was just recently, that some of the most fluffy and least great Christians and apostates have made the prophecy look ridiclous, to the harming of others and for their own greed).

      "144,000 and 666 a comparision" is probably the best first article to give some insight into Revelation and the gospel of Jesus Christ.

      http://www.rev14.info/site/original_articles/666_a nd_144,000_-_a_comparison.html

    3. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 1

      Utter crap. The Pope is not the anti-christ. The anti-christ was nero. Anybody who denies Christ was God in the Flesh is called an anti-christ. The Catholic Church CANONIZED the books of the YOUR BIBLE. lol.

    4. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person who starts out using cuss words can't defend his position.

      In the past, the Roman Catholic church persecuted and murdered millions of
      Christians for saying the same thing - they can't defend their position,
      so they have to murder, censure, slander and insult instead. This isn't much different than how they treated all those kids they raped when they came forward either. What, we couldn't possible have raped all those kids, we are holy, see the mystical incense we wave in the air!

      Regardless, my website has the traditional view. If you disagree with it, take it up with all the Christians you have murdered. Its their position, and they await you at the throne of God for your argument.

      FYI: I have a pictures sections that I think makes the prophecy easy to see - in pictures, visual examples and demostration:

      http://www.rev14.info/oldsite/pictures%20and%20quo tes.htm

    5. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by umbke · · Score: 1

      it's possible

    6. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - Traditional View by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0

      The Roman Catholic Church Canonized the Bible. That is something that no one can revise historically. To say that the Church persecuted and murdered millions of people is false. Clergy never murdered anyone. Name a clergy member who murdered someone. Towns murdered heretics, sure. The clergy was called into court to testify as to the heresy. That was their job. The heretic was confirmed a heretic or not, set free or asked to repent. Mobs just burnt people at the stake at will. As for child rape. http://www.reformation.com/ has 850 protestant ministers named and shamed for child sexual abuse. Well after the Reformation Protestants murdered plenty of people. See SALEM WITCH TRIALS, how about Calvin having people executed or go ask the local US Indian population where all their people have gone. ALL THESE THINGS DID NOT HAPPEN IN THE DARK AGES EITEHR :) MIDDLE AGE MURDERS right up to the 1800s.

  33. The end is NEAR(er) by schroedogg · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We are getting closer to the end of the world every day. That is true no matter what your religious convictions.

  34. isn't this sort of silly by anyone's standards? by mrpeebles · · Score: 1

    Let's grant for a moment that the literal Rapture will come, perhaps right out of the "Left Behind" books. Even so, isn't it sort of silly to worry about RFID? Won't getting the mark of the "Beast" have to accompany some sort of decision that you know has religious weight behind it, in the sense you know you aren't just choosing to buy and sell, but to "pay" for the privilege of buying and selling by following the beast. In other words, you don't have to worry about Satan doing the equivalent of, say, hiding at the county fair, and substituting his "666" for the stamp they give you to let leave to get lunch and then come back, right? Perhaps this is supposed to be interesting as technology that would allow the Beast to, uh, do his thing, but when all you really need is tatoo technology that has been around for thousands of years to mark people with "666", how is it interesting in that way either? In any case, we should all welcome the Rapture. If believing the Bible more or less literally is all that is going to get me eternal salvation, I know I for one would rather go ahead and have the tiny demon flies come now, so that I know to change my mind, instead of after I'm dead when it's too late. All the same, my guess is this has real political implications. For example, I think a lot of conservative Christians dislike the UN in part because they think it may eventually be the tool of the Antichrist.

  35. Those nuts said the same thing wSocial Security #s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And look how the SS# has slowly crept into all areas of medicine, business, and loans, etc to become a defacto national ID number and requirement for everything from driving to buying cold medicine. Maybe they are right about RFID. I wonder how long until they'll be implanting them in our kids, for some public health/safety reason or other.

  36. As a life-long Apple Macintosh user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this brings new meaning to the phrase "Satan Inside" in the context of humans both being injected with RFID tags and Apple's switch to Borg (Intel) processors. Looks like Apple got assimilated after all. Fucking Borg! Yeah! Go ahead! Mod me down as T R O L L !

  37. The cattle have already been branded.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether you are christian, muslam, hindu, republican, democrat, etc. you have already been essentially marked.

    I like to think of myself as a 'free-range' human as I don't believe in any religion or polictical party..

    Also, did anyone else notice that the word 'lie' sits directly in the middle of the word 'believe'?

    Maybe that's why I don't BELIEVE in the bullshit most other people seem to..

  38. Cumulatively interesting by bennyp · · Score: 1

    the approaching singularity, the use of RFIDs, possibly inside human bodies, the so called end of the mayan calendar in 2012, the nearing of the 6000 year time limit of biblical prophesy... interesting times are ahead that's for sure.... other than that.. I'm withholding my statement just yet... I'd rather keep my eyes (and my mind) open to every possibility.

    --
    could it be?
    1. Re:Cumulatively interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mayan calendar ending in 2012 is the same as our calendar ending in december. The world doesn't end every year now does it?

    2. Re:Cumulatively interesting by bennyp · · Score: 1

      in a way it does... our expectations of the year are destroyed and new ones are put in... our fiscal year doesn't coincide with the civil calendar, but nonetheless, debts are put off/reinstated, etc. This is not about the world coming to an end, it's about some kind of change of state.

      --
      could it be?
  39. Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude this post was truly hilarious!

  40. Other Technology isn't readable without contact by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Others are skeptical saying that many new technologies, such as the printing press, bar-codes, and several others, have also created fears about the beginning of the end.

    Barcodes and print can be covered. Credit cards and magnetic stripes have to be practically inserted into the machine to read em.... the field strength is too weak otherwise. If you keep em in your wallet your are safe.

    All of the other technolgies that might be used to track your actions require you to willingly and deliberately use them. You don't have to use plastic to pay for purchasses is one example. Use cash.

    With RFID tags, they can be read from within metres of you so anyone just passing by you on the street can access all of the tags on you if they like. Anyone outside your house can read all of the RFID tags on your household equipment, books, porno, etc and figure out a bit about you completely without your knowledge.

    RFID is this technology that nobody really cares about except the people who would want to misuse it and the tinfoil hat brigade. Problem is that the tinfoil hat brigade will be made out to look like crackpots by the people who seek to abuse the technology.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
    1. Re:Other Technology isn't readable without contact by asuffield · · Score: 1

      Credit cards and magnetic stripes have to be practically inserted into the machine to read em.... the field strength is too weak otherwise.

      That's not strictly true, you can read a credit card stripe at a distance of several feet with the right equipment. Of course, you can't do that to the new ones with the smartcard chip on them. However, this was never a serious issue, because...

      If you keep em in your wallet your are safe.

      This part is true because your wallet contains a bunch of metal coins and other credit cards and stuff like that which is pretty effective at interfering with the very weak magnetic fields being used here.

  41. But this time it's for real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    have also created fears about the beginning of the end."

    But this time it's for real!

    616

  42. Yes, it's very unfortunate... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That one group of Church leaders under the direction of then Roman emperor (Constantine) chose to include Revelations instead of The Apocalypse of Peter (see the APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS for all the rest of the stuff left out) when they were whimsically throwing together a collection of writings that they believed were correct according to thier power induced plans of what direction Christianity should go in a full 300+ years after Jesus was dead.


    If only that had been arbitrarily put in and Revelations left out. We'd all be talking about how Jesus went to hell and that after the Apocolypse, if those who ascended to heaven asked to for clemancy for those in hell, it would be granted. Guess it just didn't have the fire and brimstone to keep the stupid peasants under controll that all the 666 bullshit and no redemption theme Revelations does.


    The worst thing about modern so called "christians" is that they don't know thier own history.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the worst thing about this poster (and SO many others) is that he only knows slightly more, then fills in the rest so it fits his beliefs according to the power contained in his tiny little fist.

    2. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhhh, not quite. Constantine did some important stuff. For example he defined the Trinity at Nicea in 325, unified the Roman churches and outlawed the Pantheon, Egiptian, Persian and other churches. The Christian Bible as we know it today however, was compiled under the auspices of King James of Britain, France and Ireland, roundabout 1611.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Uhhhh, not quite. Constantine did some important stuff. For example he defined the Trinity at Nicea in 325, unified the Roman churches and outlawed the Pantheon, Egiptian, Persian and other churches. The Christian Bible as we know it today however, was compiled under the auspices of King James of Britain, France and Ireland, roundabout 1611.

      Thats right, the Roman Catholic church has always preserved the traditional English Tridentine mass.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    4. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Huh? I'm not implying that the Roman church uses the English Bible - they use Latin schtuff. I simply said the the Bible as Christians know it today (meaning English speaking Christians), is an English compilation of rather modern origin. If you can read Latin and felt offended, well then, I appologize.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    5. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by ajwitte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OP was talking about the canonization of certain texts, which was done well before the translation of the King James Version.

      --
      chown -R us ~you/base
    6. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by rarty+bone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Okay, history lesson time. Nothing about the Christian Bible was arbitrary. Have you actually read these Apocrypha? Completely riddled with holes and just plain weird stuff that clearly does not flow with the rest of the Bible. That does not make it completely clear why they are not in your hotel night stand nowadays though. They really are just not that good of a source.

      See, you have it reversed. The best corroborating evidence suggests that the four gospels and the Pauline epistles were written between 30-80 years of Jesus' ascension, i.e during the lifetime of witnesses. That is CENTURIES before even the now famous Gospel of Thomas and the Apocalypse of Peter (which Peter couldn't have written) you mention. To put it bluntly, any scholar would laugh at the thought that the Bible was orchestrated by Constantine.

      Also, the 'Harrowing' of hell (when Jesus descends after his crucifixion) is still very much a part of the Catholic tradition. The church's reall beef with the Apocryphal gospels is that they were not written by anyone with direct connection or experience with Jesus. Those that claim to be written by famous apostles or Mary don't show up until well after they would have died, making them unreliable. The gospels that exist in the canon now are the same gospels that spread across the world 2000 years ago - very soon after Jesus left. Not to mention the fact that the writers were pretty much unknown and decidedly not famous. Matthew - a former tax collector (cheated people out of their money). Luke - a physician, but not an apostle or anything. What I am trying to convey is that serious thought and research has gone into corroborating the authenticity of the gospels and also Revelations. While Revelations was one of the last books accepted by the church, it was not an arbitrary or manipulative inclusion.

      As for widespread RFID adoption, it can be interpreted as many things. I think it is interesting about the burns when exposed to EMP. But above all right now, I think that being tracked and watched and monitored is going to become a big problem for Christians and everyone else. Well, except Wal-Mart and the Feds.

    7. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

      The fist may be tiny, but the middle finger stands proudly atop it;)

      --
      *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    8. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That one group of Church leaders under the direction of then Roman emperor (Constantine)... whimsically throwing together a collection of writings that they believed were correct according to thier power induced plans of what direction Christianity should go in a full 300+ years after Jesus was dead.

      Emperor Constantine had more influence over the process than you indicate. Just ask Arius or Marcius. Jesus's divinity was decided by a non-unanimous majority vote of men.

    9. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that others have corrected you about the canonization of the Bible, which did take place at the council of Nicea and not by King James.

      For example he defined the Trinity at Nicea in 325.

      As most, you fail to grasp that Constantine really had nothing to do with the council other that getting all the bishops together in one spot to hammer out some of the issues of the time. Constantine himself did not define the Trinity, in fact he was more partial to the Arian view and I think was even baptized by an Arian. So if Constantine was ever going to lay down a decree he would probably have chosen the Arian heresy... and it wouldn't have changed anything if he did.

    10. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by darqchild · · Score: 1

      That only applies to english speaking prodestants. The RC Church has it's own english translation that varies a great degree from the King James edition.

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    11. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      ?! A lot of modern English-speaking Christians will think you extremely odd for suggesting that we use the KJV. We'd rather read a translation in our mother tongue, which is not 17th century English. And we're not too surprised at the revelation that Moses and Paul didn't speak the English of any era.

      Also, FWIW, the RCC has authorised the use of languages other than Latin in the liturgy, and most Catholics don't use the Vulgate.

    12. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      The important thing is to bear in mind that there are many of these epic poetry books. The books of the various Bibles is a subset of what remained from ancient times. Lots of poetry was burned or simply not transcribed at regular intervals and got lost. The great library of Alexandria for example, first burned down, then later got submerged in an earth quake, while accross Western Europe, books were burned in great heaps by the Catholic Church over a period of centuries. Consequently, most dissenting views got erased.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    13. Re:Yes, it's very unfortunate... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Huh? I'm not implying that the Roman church uses the English Bible - they use Latin schtuff. I simply said the the Bible as Christians know it today (meaning English speaking Christians), is an English compilation of rather modern origin. If you can read Latin and felt offended, well then, I appologize.

      Most English speaking churches (inbluding the Catholics) use the New English Bible published in 1961. But the selection of texts took place between 90 AD and 250 depending on who you ask.

      The Roman church standardized on the Vulgate of 382 but this only took full effect somewhat later, after the emergence of Rome as a significant bishop.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  43. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never post here, but I have to say that this is absolutely the most retarded post I have ever read on Slashdot.

  44. Re:Eh... Apocalyptic Stuff by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, wait, I left part out of that that I thought was in the article.

    There are programs discussing the implantation of these in people. It's being piloted in the military as a way of tracking medical records, and there are already medical trials of having this inserted into people.

    Verichip is pushing for people to get implants, and bars and clubs in other countries are already using them as debit cards linked to your tab.

    So, the implants are here, and people are already using it to trade. There has been discussion of a national program to implant Americans with these, and it's being backed by a former head of the FDA (I forget the dudes name).

    That's where the idea that it's the mark of the beast comes from.

  45. sure by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    And in other news, CmdrTaco found a better mod system.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  46. Telsa Coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I finally have another use for that old Violet Ray
    device! Zip zappety zap!

  47. Condoms are the answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose we put the RFID tags into condoms. After all, if condoms can be used to interfere with God making women pregnant when he wants to, presumably then can also be used to prevent the Beast from using the RFID tags. Latex- it's God's kryptonite :-)

  48. Don't Forget Your Towel by LordVaderSithLord · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember that the answer is 42. Don't forget your towel, and above all else DON'T PANIC. Please remember too that God's final message to his creations was "Sorry for the Inconvenience." This too shall pass.

    1. Re:Don't Forget Your Towel by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was "We Apologise for the Inconvenience."
      Wording is very important in these matters of faith.

    2. Re:Don't Forget Your Towel by dodobh · · Score: 1

      It actually was "We apologise for the inconvinience".

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  49. Re:Oh Noes! by anagama · · Score: 1

    Troll? Brilliant.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  50. Take yer pick by v1 · · Score: 1

    There are dozens of ways we enumerate people today. Social Security Numbers, driver's license, telephone, voice mail box, theatre ticket numbers, just because it's not tattooed on your body doesn't mean it's not your number. If the radicals want to take a position, they have more than enough other issues to yell about, this is just the latest addition to the bottom of the list.

    Though all these things are physically separate from your body. When we get into tattoos, RFID, implants, etc., I think that's where people think a line has been crossed, because an identifying change has been made to your body, a change that may be difficult to escape or leave behind.

    DNA sampling and fingerprinting seem to blur even that line. It's something you can't escape or leave behind, but it's not something that's added to you, it's an inherent quality of you. These seem to be the current "front lines" for this issue, so I don't foresee the disconnected identifiers becomging a hot topic until dna and fingerprinting becomes completely acceptable. Then they'll move on to the more obscure and disconnected things.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:Take yer pick by ALLAHvideotron.ca · · Score: 1

      Since all beast on this planet has the DNA mark, this mean we already have the ultimate beast mark. In a few years, we will invent portable real-time DNA sampler that will remove the need to put RFID inside our body. Except for real twins... Beleving in any religious crap is accepting to be in a virtual jail. JPL

  51. But consider the efficiency! by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

    The end of the world has to come sometime, right? I think we can all look forward to the speed and efficiency that RFID will provide to this process. RFID will allow all of the scanning and sorting to be done remotely, in a fast, efficient, and automated manner. Consider the alternative: Waiting in some enormous line so that some flunky can manually verify your identity (using some old-school Mark of the Beast, e.g., SSN, driver's licence), all to find out which oven you should report to and which sort of eternal damnation is best suited to your needs. Imagine everyone going to the DMV at once, and you get a sense of the horror this would entail. I say if we need to end this thing, let's do it as quickly and efficiently as possible. RFID might not be the final solution, but it is clearly a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:But consider the efficiency! by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      You crazy!

          If im to die or suffer eternally i want it to take as long as possible to get to me so i can live a little longer without sizzling before i start to sizzle.

          Efficient hell is not a good thing... err what i mean is it's not.....

          Aww hell leave hell as it is god whats with you pencil pushers anyway your all just nuts!

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  52. Mandate the RFID chip be implanted in left hand by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    Seems like an easy way to get around the end of the world

    1. Re:Mandate the RFID chip be implanted in left hand by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      And then they mysticaly slid over to the right hand except for some which get caught and lodged in the skull opps end of the world.

          Better safe than pwn'd.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  53. nerds and fundies unite! by r00t · · Score: 1

    Love thy nerd!
    Fundies are fun!

    We CAN get along!

    1. Re:nerds and fundies unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my, my my, my momma says RFID tags are from the debil

    2. Re:nerds and fundies unite! by Bigos · · Score: 0

      Being some kind of fundie I find it very amusing. LOL

  54. missing the point about Christianity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Christian, it's troubling to me when Christians obsess over this stuff. Wouldn't it be better to focus your energy on what you can do to make your life and others' lives better. I see folks getting caught up in the book of Revelation and wondering about all the signs and conspiracies. I prefer to focus on being kind to people and doing the every day things that God wants you to do to bring Him glory.

  55. Dude... by CyanDisaster · · Score: 1

    "It's funny. Laugh."

    Hope be with ye,
    Cyan

  56. The end times? by Sathias · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the X-ists will finally come and take us away in their pleasure saucers as Bob predicted?

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  57. SSN as master primary key is still scary by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, image your SSN as a common primary key across several databases such as credit card records ,bank records, national identity card, tax, criminal records, and library. Now immagine it imbedded in your right arm or just in your driver licence in you wallet and readable at 10 or 20 feet. Now imagine it read everytime you enter a store, check out a library book, buy a hamburger, sit at a computer terminal, or drive by a stoplight.

    Stop letting the fact that religious people are leary trick you into dismissing the threat as a fantasy.

    1. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by Coming+soon! · · Score: 1

      Let me try to imagine that or a moment. I enter a store and they have what I ordered ready and waiting for me when I reach the checkout counter. I enter the library and the book I wanted at my last visit, which was already checked out by someone else, is automagically sent to the check out waiting for me to flash my library card (oh wait, I dont need a library card). I walk into McDonalds and I don't have to tell them to hold the pickles on my number 3. I sit at a computer terminal and all my defaults are preset, OSX, my inbox, my IM client etc... What a horrible existence, how can I prevent this...

    2. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You glazed over an important point: My SSN is already already ties me to every financial institution I do business with. Not to mention the fact that my employers need it for their side of taxes. My mother's SSN is tied into my health insurance.

      Identity theft isn't just about stealing someone's credit card, it's stealing the ability to sign up for credit cards in their name.

      The guys who said the social security card was a bad idea were right, in a way. With the modern digital America, it's not the card that's the threat to personal privacy and security, it's the component that gives it power, the Social Security Number. Sure, the card can get stolen, lost or destroyed, but that doesn't preclude me from giving my social security number to a financial institution, so long as I have it memorized.

      In the long run, though, the RFID implant isn't much different from a Social Security Card. If someone steals your card, they can use the number on it. If someone surrepticiously waves a reader over your hand, they can use the number.

      Sure, having a remotely readable identifying device is a personal security threat. But the root security issue that needs to be addressed is in the information layer, not the physical layer. The number is the threat, not the device that stores it. Find an alternative to a simple, copyable number, and you'll have your solution. It's just like computer security measures...if it's something that can be stolen, its effectiveness as a security measure is limited. If it's something that can be copied, it's even more limited. SSNs are part of a system where your passkey can be copied.

      The best solution, IMO, is to reduce the number of organizations that depend on the same passkey to identify the user. To start with, why don't we have every major financial institution implement its own ID system? I'm not necessarily talking about a photo ID for every bank, credit union and credit card network. A single smart card that stores any keys I choose would be sufficient.

      Oh, and now that I've pointed out that possibility...nobody can go patent it.

    3. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      And your implant is a necessity in this, since you couldn't just carry the thing on a keychain.

      Just imagine a world where my stalker can pick me out in the crowd with such convenience... where my exact movements are tracked at all times.

      It's a wonderful world indeed.

    4. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referring to RFID chips as "marks of the beast" is loony. This is not changed by the fact that there are valid concerns regarding RFID. There are plenty of sane articles to debate, no reason to resort to this crap.

    5. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > Just imagine a world where my stalker can pick me out in the crowd with such convenience... where my exact movements are tracked at all times.

      OK, just imagine a world where we can pick your stalker out in the crowd with such convenience... where their exact movements are tracked at all times. Are you even paying attention?

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:SSN as master primary key is still scary by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because my stalker told me that they were stalking me.

  58. RFID is not cost effective and is very problematic by Wayne_Knight · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's just plain silly to use religion to try to manipulate politics this way. Anybody can see why RFIDs are simply not economically viable.

    I am currently working with one of the RFID companies that is "working" with Wal-Mart on the actual implementation of RFID. Let me tell you that there is no foreseable ROI in the near future. Currently at a cost of about 25 cents a tag, it is much too expensive to be worth it for anyone. The technology is in its infancy so there are so many problems we have encountered so far.

    One of the problems is the tags. Not only do they cost so damn much, but they are also not very high quality. There's a feature called "locking" which allows you to set a number on the tag and not allow it to change, but when using this we have too high a failure rate to be effective (10-30% depending on the tag type). So we had to turn off the locking, meaning its much easier to change the unique number associated with the tags (which will be a problem when tags hit the retail sector) and now we only get around a 1-2% failure rate. But when doing high volumes, even this small percent is expensive to deal with.

    Another is the hardware. Part of the tag writing problems we have seen may be due to the tags and/or the reader/writer units. But right now, some tags get created and written to with no problems, but when they go by a reader, the reader just does not see a number on that tag, meaning as i said before its either a bad tag or some sort of incompatibility/problem with the reader unit. Currently we are trying to get the tags applied cost effectively, but unfortunately its pretty much boiling down to using people to grab tags from a RFID printer and hand-apply everything.

    We have also been having trouble verifying all the product on a pallet, and certainly cannot expect to read 100% of product 100% of time. Some product is easy to see, but depending on the density/material in the materials on the pallet, it can be very difficult to read many of the tags.

    Software is another hinderance. While the company i have been working with has had its large share of problems in the last few months, they are getting better, but still are not perfect. And unless things work perfect, it can cause so many problems. One small chink in the software can make it inoperable (essentially crashing the software a-la Windows), but the software is slowly getting more and more stable.

  59. And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have six billion people on the planet. Over the next five hundred years, hundreds of billions will live and die. Most of them will spend most of their lives suffering terribly. They will starve, kill each other, rape, drug themselves to death and more.

    If the six billion alive today suffered through the apocalypse now, it would prevent the suffering of hundreds of billions. More, really, since you can extend this for as many thousands of years as you like. It's clear that the sooner the world ends, the fewer people will suffer, and the sooner those of us who are righteous will be in heaven.

    Just one of the reasons God is clearly a son of a bitch.

    1. Re:And there's no suffering now? by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to go to New Orleans and have a nice dinner at Arnaud's Restaurant.
      If those people can endure what Katrina did to them, and come back, ready to fix something delicious for you, then there is something worth saving in the human race.
      Here's the menu. Pick something out, and give them a call and make yourself a reservation.
      That'll give you something to look forward to.

    2. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're gonna be hungry again why eat? If you're going to die why live?

    3. Re:And there's no suffering now? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      "God is clearly a son of a bitch." Quite true, since according to legend, the God of Heaven and Earth sprang forth from Gaia (Mother Earth) and she is a bitch - everybody in New Orleans will concur... :)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's easy. To kick ass and chew gum.

    5. Re:And there's no suffering now? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1


      >>Just one of the reasons "..."

      repent of blashpemy while you can. it's no joke.

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    6. Re:And there's no suffering now? by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      Just one of the reasons God is clearly a son of a bitch.
      Didn't you get the Memo?

      God IS the CEO, so son of a bitch is clearly in the job description!

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    7. Re:And there's no suffering now? by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      Using this same flawed logic, nobody should have children either! Somewhere down the line, one or more branches will suffer. Therefore YOU are the son-of-a-bitch!

    8. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, but as OP, yeah. That's why I won't be having them.

      I'm aware on some level this would guarantee the destruction of the species, but as long as I can count on other people to have kids, I can concentrate on making life better for the people I know will inevitably be born.

    9. Re:And there's no suffering now? by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      That logic is also flawed. By not having children, less people will get to experience the wonders of life or have the opportunity to help others down the road. That would also make YOU a son-of-a-bitch. :)

    10. Re:And there's no suffering now? by chickanmonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm going to put away my cynic hat and say gosh darn it the future is going to be awesome. With Mores law happening across many industries, from computers to biotech, it's just impossible to dream how far we'll go. I have high hopes that in my life time neuroscience might have it's first working theory for how the mind works. This may be the Star Trek talking, but humanities best years are still way ahead of us.

      Sure there are big problems to tackle, but I don't think the overly cynical attitudes will do anything to motivate us to make things better. Which is the problem with the book of Revelations; it leaves people with a cynical attitude towards the future.

      RFID is has it's problems and should be resisted where needs dictate. But there is no way you can stop technology from taking away more and more of your privacy, there are just too many ways to figure out what you are doing. What you need do is to fight for control of your government. If you were actually in control of your government you wouldn't have to be constantly doing these acts of civil disobedience in the first place. So fight to raise the speed limit and legalize pot or whatever else it is that you do that they could get you for if they found out.

      Never mind, the whole thing is a crock of shit and I give up.

    11. Re:And there's no suffering now? by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      Actually, you bring up some good points. People should be pushing for anonymous forms of security / paying for things. There is no reason why companies should be farming our private information. Everyone seems to be moving towards retina scans and the like. Why not a cash replacement that works like cash, or an ID technology that still allows anonymotity? Think it can't be done? Think again. People have let it happen because they are asleep to it all. They are too busy fighting to legalize pot and getting stoned. Currently, the federal government requires more of your money than God, who only requires 10%. Isn't that wrong? Even on your investments, the government takes 25-50%, inflation takes 4%, the mutual fund manager takes 1-2%. At 8-10% a year in the stock market, you will be lucky to make 1-2%. If you are in a savings account, you are actually losing money. Why is the government making more than you are on your money? Then everybody is blaming evil oil companies for the high price of oil and congress jumps on the bandwagon acting like they should raise gasoline taxes. Did you know that the government makes more on a gallon of gas through the current gas taxes than the gas station owner does? I have not heard one person even ask the question "why don't you drop the taxes on gasoline so that working families can pay less for gasoline?". Why?

    12. Re:And there's no suffering now? by RebelScum · · Score: 1

      And we're all out of gum.

    13. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the OP.

      What wonders of life are you talking about? The awakening of sexual urges at puberty that never go away and form one of the most destructive addictions known to mankind? Marriage to someone who will eventually leave you, cause you to leave them, or die? Watching your wife force a human being out of herself under tremendous pain, bleeding and general misery (or worse, doing it yourself)?

      The only wonder in life is the peace of death.

    14. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough of the religious crap already.

    15. Re:And there's no suffering now? by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

      >With Mores law happening across many industries, from computers to biotech

      um... what?

      what does the number of transistors per square inch have to do with biotech?

      Unless you're saying that technology growth in general follows the same kind of curve that moore predicted.

    16. Re:And there's no suffering now? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      I know you were marked as funny but there are actually people in real life who currently believe this.

    17. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      On a related note, can anyone explain to me why killing every fundamentalist I encounter would not be considered a good thing by every fundamentalist I encounter? They should all be looking for the quickest ride to paradise. This is the logic that suicide bombers use. I wonder what they do on the 73rd day of eternity.

    18. Re:And there's no suffering now? by mclaincausey · · Score: 1
      Don't you understand anything? Those billions of suffering people are just there so that 1/10 of 1% of the world can have the good, blessed lives they so richly deserve. Think of the unwashed billions as cattle, or a bacterial colony. That's why it's okay to rob and kill them.

      "Were a virus with shoes."
      --Bill Hicks

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    19. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "less people will get to"
      Fewer people, moron.

    20. Re:And there's no suffering now? by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I am a product of our failing socialist public school system. (I even have a Master's degree!)

    21. Re:And there's no suffering now? by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 1

      I'll play along! 1. It was once said that it is better to love and have lost than to have never loved. 2. Many people who divorce get married again, and many people never get divorced. 3. Many women still choose to have multiple children.

    22. Re:And there's no suffering now? by lbates_35476 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if God had not chosen to create this world and all his children, nobody would have suffered! But, then again, nobody would be able to be with Him in heaven for eternity because they would not have existed. I believe it helps if you start looking at our existence on earth in the context of ETERNITY. A few years of suffering for eternity with God is a small price to pay for EXISTENCE (even though it doesn't seem like it at the time). Our existence was not guaranteed until God willed it. The alternative to the suffering you observe is the lack of existence altogether. I'm completely sympathetic to the misery that some of His creation must endure, but compared to forever with Him it nothing. I'm convinced that there will come a time when the suffering many people endured while here on earth will be like the scraped elbow you had when you fell off your bike when you were 9. It hurt a lot at the time, but now it is a distant memory. People have the power to eliminate most of this misery if we would choose to, but free-will also allows us to choose not to. That's the problem with free-will, we can choose to ignore God's commandments. But without free-will, there is no true love and that is what God wants from us. He didn't want to create robots (you can't love a robot). He wanted to spend eternity with beings (both heavenly and earthly) that truely loved Him.

    23. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Mores law

      "Moore's".

      in my life time

      "lifetime".

      might have it's first

      "its".

      but humanities best years

      "humanity's".

      RFID is has it's problems

      "RFID has its problems".

      of your privacy, there are just

      "privacy; there".

      of your government you wouldn't

      "government, you".

    24. Re:And there's no suffering now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God/Allah/Jehovah/Yahweh, if he/she/it exists, is an asshole.
      Why would anyone want to spend any time at all with him/her it?
      Well, maybe other assholes would.

  60. End times, here! by sgt101 · · Score: 1

    Coz we are living after the rapture.

    Think about it.

    1. There aren't many nice people around.
    2. We all have a nagging feeling that there is someone, or several someones missing from our lives - a girlfriend? A wife? A supportive friend?
    3. All the people in the churches are evil.

    I.
    Rest.
    My.
    Case!

    --
    --------------------------------------------- "In the end, we're all just water and old stars."
  61. Lucifer is the fallen "Prince of Light" by lkcl · · Score: 1

    Lucifer - he is the fallen angel, the "Prince of Light".
    and GUESS what radiation and microwaves and electricity
    all are?

    yep - you guessed it - they're all "waves" - just like light
    is.

    so you worship your technology, do you? well LOOKEE here,
    we got a surpriiise for you :)

    oh - and to cap it all? i heard that some RFID chips
    can be made to work by utilising "heat" as a power source.
    and GUESS where the hottest parts on the human body are?

    p.s. no i'm not a christian. i might be insane, though...

  62. *Sigh* by DrXym · · Score: 1

    RFID are insidious for all kinds of reasons but the "mark of the beast"? People who think such should be be herded onto an island and forgotten about.

    1. Re:*Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      People who think such should be be herded onto an island and forgotten about.

      Just tell them that you're the angel Gabriel, have a gun-toting guy with you who calls himself Michael, and tell them it's the rapture and you should have no problem herding them - at least, until you reach 144,001.

  63. I for one encourage Religious people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to meet their God(s) as soon as possible. Wouldn't it be marvelous?

  64. Threats by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Oh, the threat of loss of all privacy is real and should be taken seriously. its tust the 'threat' of the mythical 'end of the world is near' should not be taken too serious.

    The world will go on. Just a bit more restrictive and less pleasant to live in.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  65. i knew this will come soonner. by skynare · · Score: 1

    http://www.thebeastmovie.com/ i bet that movie is about RFID mutants that will take over the world.

  66. Wrong by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

    If you take the mark of the beast and worship his image, you will go to hell. (Already now you are on that road, but you might still repent. If you take the mark and worship the image of the beast repenting will not be possible for you. We do not want you to go to hell, so we do not want you (or anyone else) to take the mark and worship the image of the beast.

    --
    Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    1. Re:Wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      However, the introduction of the mark of the beast is a necessary prelude to the end times, right? So while you might not WANT any individual to get it, you definitely want it to become available, and widespread. Just like you want there to be a giant war in the middle east. I'm sure you don't particularly want any individuals to suffer, but the war is necessary so we can get on with the destruction of the world.

      Sorry dude, but I'm staying away from any belief system that opposes attempts at peace and looks forward to the destruction of the world. If that's what it takes to get into heaven, count me out.

    2. Re:Wrong by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      The mark will come when it will come, in God's own timeing. It is not a thing we can do anything about. It is not for me to want or not. To try the evil system now if it is not the time yet will only bring suffering, and even if now is the time we should fight it, just in case it is not. (What we can do to make the Kingdom of God come faster is to send out misionarys) We are not looking forvard to the mark. We are looking forward for what is to come after. The current world is evil. It will not be so then.

      When it comes to Israel I suggest you read the profecyes yourself. (If you are thinking about Harmageddon that will he the beast vs. Israel, not the muslims vs Israel) And by the way: There is nothing you (or any other human) can do to get into heaven.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    3. Re:Wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wow. You're scary.

    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're scary.


      I'd have to say, you're the scary one. "Count me out" and so forth... Do you really mean that?

    5. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and even if now is the time we should fight it, just in case it is not.

      But if now is the time, and it is God's will, you are fighting against God's will. Look to the plagues of Egypt if you don't remember what happens to those who oppose God's will.

      I would not dare to presume to fight God. If God chooses that this come, then so be it. If God chooses it to not come, it will not. There is nothing to worry about.

    6. Re:Wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Count me out of encouraging war and looking forward to the destruction of the world we live in and the death and/or torture of everyone who lives in it? Yes, I mean that.

    7. Re:Wrong by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      But what if now not is the time? How can we be sure? And do we know that the mark is the will of God, and not just something He will allow? There is a difference between what God will allow (His allowed will) and what God wants (His expressed will).

      Example: [God] Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. (1. Timothy 2, 4) This is His expressed will. But we do know that not all will be saved. That is His allowed will.

      But yes, there is nothing to worry about for the redemed. God knows what is the best. But if now is not the time, we should fight it. I think we also should fight the real beast when he appears. (Rev 12, 11)

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    8. Re:Wrong by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      If what I say is wrong according to the Bible, pleace show me. I have been wrong before and I may be wrong again.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    9. Re:Wrong by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      Just guesing it was the last sentece that scared you, so I will try to explain it:

      You have sinned[1]. Because you have sinned, you are doomed[2]. Since you are a sinner, nothing you can do can help you. No deed can help you, as everything you do are effected by your sin. Not you own suffering or death, as it only would be what you deserve and that can not repay you sin. No sacrifice you make, as it also is affected by sin.

      Because God knew you don't have a chance, he sent His Son Jesus to die in your place. He took your punishment on the cross[3]. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3, 16 He sacrifised Himself for you.

      Still you have a problem: You can not belive. It is not possible for you. God must create the faith in you[5] for you to belive. As you are, you can not even seek God[4]! He must first make you seek Him. You are 100% depending on His grace to get into heaven. The only things you can do are things that keeps your out of heaven, like resisting Him when He calls[6] you (that could be right now) or take the mark of the beast.

      [1] "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;" Romans 3, 23
      [2] "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6, 23
      [3] "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." 2 Corinthians 5, 21
      [4] "There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God." Romans 3, 11
      [5] The faith is created like this: "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Romans 10, 17
      [6] When He gives you a chance to get in to heaven by doing in you what is impossible for you to do.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    10. Re:Wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Just guesing it was the last sentece that scared you

      Not so much. I've been told I'm going to hell by lots of people from many different faiths so that's not so scary.

      No, the scary part is the people who believe that the world is evil. I know that's just an extension of the Catholic (and others) we are all sinners thing, but I'm talking about the ones who believe the world is evil and are looking forward to something being done about it. That something, of course, being it's destruction.

      The original discussion was about people who oppose peace in the middle east because a peace accord would put us farther from the rapture.

  67. A prophecy! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Everyone knows about the Number of the Beast, but what about this part?
    And he cried with a mighty voice, saying, Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, and is become a habitation of demons, and a hold of every unclean spirit, and a hold of every unclean and hateful bird.
    WTF is this? A condemnation of Thanksgiving? A complaint that Babylon 5 was cancelled?

    That's why Revelations is so popular: you can make it say whatever you want.

  68. And the correct answer is: by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

    The "mark" of the "Beast" is our own DNA, and we had it all along. But only now are we actually marked by it.

    The End.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  69. It's about people being marked by Skapare · · Score: 1

    It's not about whether things like numbers even exist or not. Even a bar code or RFID is just a number, much the same as 666 is a number. What matters is whether than number is turned into a mark, which I believe is a reference to effectively tagging people with a number ... in some trackable form (certainly not evisioned by either the writers or original translators of the Bible). We do know this kind of tagging took place in the Nazi concentration camps.

    The mark apparently is predicted to be in the form of a number. But generally people did not fear numbers as a result of that. Numbers were used in commerce long before Revelations was written.

    What is still puzzling is that what the wording of the Bible seems to suggest is that "The Beast" itself (probably a reference to Satan or an agent of Satan) is numbered (specifically with 666 or 616 depending on which version or translation of the Bible you read, or how it is interpreted).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  70. In Your Forehead? by AdmNaismith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No Self Respecting Beast-worshipper is going through life with a chip in their FOREHEAD. It might look fairly cool passing your hand or wrist across a scanner, but it would look pretty stupid pressing your head on the checkout counter everytime you bought a flat of Ramen noodles. This is not the 'Sign of the Beast' because no one is having a scanner waved int heir face everytime they thought they were saving $2.00 at WalMart. BTW- Jesus never existed and the bible was written by a bunch of power mongers with an political axe to grind. Then when the early church decided what books to include in the 'Official Bible', they were led by a bunch of power mongers with a political axe to grind. The 'Christian Chuch' is nothing but a bunch of power mongers with a political axe to grind. that, and money grubbing whores.

  71. Why would a christian want to avoid the rapture? by soibudca · · Score: 1

    I thought the end of days meant the second coming of christ. wouldnt that be a good thing for christians? I had the impression that there were several large 'christian' groups actively engaged in various attempts to bring about 'the end of days' -- like providing worldwide 'christain radio' coverage so that 'all may hear gods word' and working to have solomons temple rebuilt in israel etc.

  72. Re:Eh... Apocalyptic Stuff by aduzik · · Score: 1

    The dude's name is Tommy Thompson and he was the former head of HHS, not the FDA. And, although he said he'd gladly get an RFID tag -- and in fact recommended that every American did -- now that he's no longer head of HHS (and, I suppose, no longer on the take from the RFID powers-that-be) he said that he's not getting tagged until he's convinced it's safe.

    --
    If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  73. How can they say that we've reached the end by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 1

    with "In God We Trust" on every dollar we spend?

  74. Are you prepared? by cortana · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Are you prepared? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Aww, c'mon. Someone mod this guy up, that movie is awesome!

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  75. Clarify this, Pilate! by copponex · · Score: 1, Informative

    Cults need centralized leadership to tell its adherents what to do and what to believe...

    Pope, anyone? Christianity is a cult, albeit one that combines the most popular Christian (meaning, Christ-believing) and pagan ideas in the early centuries after the supposed death of christ. Rome simply realized that it was going to be too hard to exterminate the Christians, so they folded them in with some Pagan stuff, got Paul (a Roman Citizen and a Jew!) to make it a little more marketable (just like they recently did away with limbo to make Catholicism more popular in Asia and Africa), and canonized the bible themselves with their own selection of Bishops in 313 AD.

    Also, Christianity is not diverse, it's divisive. Until l500 you wouldn't let commoners in on even reading the bible, and were corrupt all the way to the top until someone got sick of it, changed the bible, and started their own and new version of Christianity. Just like the Calvinists, Mormons, Evangelicals, Lutherans, Anglicans... nothing more than bunch of cults who choose to believe different parts of their own dogma derived from most of the same book.

    1. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I never said the roman catholic church wasn't a cult. If you confuse the roman catholic church with Christianity as a whole you are doing your understanding a grave disservice. As for the "Paul is a Roman spy" theory, I won't pretend that is the first time I heard it but I would like to see your evidence. For the first 50 years of Christianity almost all of its members were ethnically Jewish, many of whom were Roman citizens. And may I point out that most evidence seems to suggest that Paul was executed by the Roman authorities after spending much of his last few years in jail for illegally preaching, this doesn't seem like what the empire would do to one of their own. I would also point out that the Christian extermination policy never really started up until after Pauls death, until Paul, Christianity wasn't even on the Roman radar and if it was, it was largely tollerated by the Romans in Judea since it took people away from Judaism. By the time Christianity was first persecuted in earnest, doctrine was largely based around Pauls letters. This makes no sence whatsoever in the context of your theory.

      Limbo (together with pergatory) however was never part of the bible, it was simply part of that pagan stuff that was folded in by the Roman church to allign it with other popular beliefs of the day, it is part of what protestant churches reject. The catholic church actually did the bible a service by getting rid of that dogma. I don't think you personally know what the bible says, how different churches interpret it. I think you should learn a little about theology and church history rather than a bunch of crazy conspiracy stories if you want to talk rationally about something.

      I don't let my personal Atheism prejudice my study of faith, I don't see why you should either.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    2. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      Pope is only for Catholicism, and even a large number of Catholics don't follow the Pope perfectly. Technically, the Vatican endorses evolution... try explaining that to certain Catholics!

    3. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by night2769 · · Score: 1

      I would think you should do your own studying about Theology. You are way off on the mark about limbo and the pagans. I would state that you personaly don't know what the bible states. They are many bible and many interpretations. Can you tell me what books are referenced in the bible but are not in the bible?.

    4. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course you mourn the demise of *BSD. It's only natural. Dealing with the death of an operating system close to you can be one of the most traumatic experiences of your life, and you're bound to go through a range of emotions. While you may be able to work through those feelings on your own, it's often helpful to talk to a friend, a family member, or a counselor. You might also seek out a support group for people who are grieving.

      Grieving is a process, and it's totally normal to go through feelings of shock, sadness, anger even guilt. The healing process is different for everyone. It might take you six weeks to move on, or it might take you six years. Don't beat yourself up because you're not "over it" yet. It takes time to heal wounds.

      So what else can you do to feel better? It might sound corny, but try writing a letter, making a collage, or planting a tree in memory of the operating system you've lost. Remembering and celebrating all the good things *BSD brought to your life might help give you some closure, and having a keepsake to honor *BSD may help you get through some tough times in the future when you'll be missing it.

      It's true that life won't be the same without *BSD around. It may seem like you'll never feel better, but eventually you will. Take some comfort in the old saying, "Time heals all wounds," and remember that *BSD will always be with you in your heart.

    5. Re:Clarify this, Pilate! by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      I'd say Christianity is a series of cults, not a single cult. I think you have to treat each denomination as a cult, and perhaps each sect as a separate cult. I would include Mormonism as one of the Christian cults as well.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
  76. Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by dsanfte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Religion is really about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be. In this respect, America and the west at large is definitely losing its religion. It isn't simply becoming a-religious though; religion is being replaced in our society even more than it has before by the indirect worship of materialism.

    How do we define our lives? Work... for most people, whether they believe it or not. Kids ultimately, I suppose. Money, absolutely. The dreams the majority of us hold usually are tied to acquiring copious amounts of wealth, things, gadgets, cars, property, etc. This wasn't always so, it's actually pretty new.

    It's important that people realize this, though. The hole that religion filled/fills in the minds/hearts of the public is now being filled by other things tied to capitalism/materialism at large. We don't see it, because just as a fish submerged in water, we do not know what it feels like not to be wet.

    One thing is important: This current indirect worship (nobody goes to pray at the Sony store, but they sure spend a lot of time at the mall) of technology and materialism cannot fill any permanent voids in our lives. Our computers and cars won't sing our praises when we're gone, and if our kids are caught up in acquiring their own wealth and living for the present, neither will they. In the end we are (though I am atheist, I must use the term) spiritually bankrupting ourselves in the name of present gain. I just don't think it's worth it.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by TallMatthew · · Score: 5, Funny
      In this respect, America and the west at large is definitely losing its religion.

      Yeah, that's us in the corner.

    2. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I don't really go for religion, so without a god the storys absurd.
      havin a lot of stuff is just stuff so your material wealth cult doesn't hold up either.
      we're basically a social creature we understand a lot that we are finite we exist for a time and we die.
      The only thing which really matters is love.
      If you haven't got it your just a shell. I feel sorry for those that don't have it and especially sad for those that don't want it.

      Try to maintain positive karma be loving and responsible for your actions.

      thats a real alternative to religion which works.

    3. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by rbochan · · Score: 1

      Religion is really about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be.

      You're talking about spirituality... not religion.
      [Organized] Religion is, plain and simple, about control... nothing less, nothing more.

      religion != spirituality

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    4. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Religion is really about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be.
      >
      > You're talking about spirituality... not religion.
      > [Organized] Religion is, plain and simple, about control... nothing less, nothing more.
      >
      > religion != spirituality

      What he's referring to is neither Religion nor Spirituality.

      Spirituality is belief in the existence of Spirits.

      Can one be ethical, and yet not believe in spooks?...

      What the parent is ultimately talking about is Philosophy.

      Philosophy is (among other things) about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be.

      FWIW, Religions, as structured systems of belief, contain elements of Spirituality (of course) and Philosophy. Organized Religions, of course, are ultimately about power, and wield said power using the tools of Spirituality and Philosophy.

      When you subtract Spirituality, you're left with Philosophy.

    5. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by geekee · · Score: 1

      "Religion is really about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be."

      Actually, that's philosophy, I think

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    6. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      Well played.

    7. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >How do we define our lives? Work... for most people, whether they believe it or not. Kids ultimately, I suppose.

      All that's compatible with religion, though. Christianity has the "Protestant Work Ethic", and from Islam one of the tales of the Prophet has him praising a hard-working family over someone who spent all day praying and depended on charity ("Work and worship are belly and back"). At least one branch of Christianity elevates family life to the status of core doctrine and Islam teaches about obligations to children.

    8. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America and the west at large is definitely losing its religion

      This is not true. Religon in America today is still strong as ever. While a large portion of the role religion of is being replaced by education and science, the socially cohesive effects are as strong as ever. During the 20th century, you were right, but that may be changing, but La Revanche de Deiu is currently under way.

      Europe is more or less still atheistic, but the value system is certainly the same - which is why we see the objections to Turkey joining the EU, and Christian parties are still key members of government coalitions.

      I know of nothing other than Religion to motivate people so strongly and with such direction. While you may see Capitalism as a new value system, most don't. Until I see more people becoming martyrs because of their love for Microsoft's bottom line, I'm afraid I can't agree with you.
      (Apple fanboys who give up their productive life to use their cult's systems aren't martyrs...)

    9. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...The dreams the majority of us hold usually are tied to acquiring copious amounts of wealth, things, gadgets, cars, property, etc. This wasn't always so, it's actually pretty new."

      actually this is the way it has always been. it's called being greedy and it's been around forever. people have always wanted to be rich, to be powerful.

      "One thing is important: This current indirect worship (nobody goes to pray at the Sony store, but they sure spend a lot of time at the mall) of technology and materialism cannot fill any permanent voids in our lives."

      i agree.

      "Our computers and cars won't sing our praises when we're gone, and if our kids are caught up in acquiring their own wealth and living for the present, neither will they. In the end we are (though I am atheist, I must use the term) spiritually bankrupting ourselves in the name of present gain. I just don't think it's worth it."

      i agree again and couldn't have said it better if i tried. and i am a christian! although you are an athiest, this scenario is repeated throughout the bible, over and over again. from moses going up to recieve the ten commandments, and coming down to people worshiping the golden calf, to judas selling jesus out for money, and on, and on, and on...

      but it is also important to remember that, although, culturally, everything seems to be geared towards greed, people are individuals, and shouldn't be treated or viewed as realizations of what the group appears to be.

    10. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spirituality is belief in the existence of Spirits.

      No, that's Spiritualism. Spirituality is an expression or examination of things pertaining to, well, let's call it the Sublime. It's philosophy combined with faith and just a hint of psychology.

      In short, if spirituality is the food, religion is the grocer.

      I think that more or less sums up the grandparent post.

    11. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by The+Beezer · · Score: 1
      Good post, yet I'd like to adjust that slightly...

      religion is being replaced in our society even more than it has before by the indirect worship of materialism.

      America in the second half of the 20th century and so far in the 21st would be more accurately described as an anti-material culture. Materialism would seem to imply a value of high quality goods, craftsmanship, that sort of thing - but look at the average diet, vehicle, and home of Americans and there's precious little of that to be found. Even our wealth is just a value stored in memory at your bank - people are working their whole lives to try to change one digit in one location from 0 to 1. Meanwhile actual material is being turned into electrical and electronic impulses that make a mometary impression then are gone.

      This doesn't affect your point, which is important. My hope is that as connectivity continues to grow, building communities around shared personal values will transcend building them around property values.

    12. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's hard for some people to believe, but there are jobs which aren't merely soul-grinding money mills. In fact, some people actually enjoy their jobs enough to replace religion with them without losing anything. This is why many non-judeochristian religions have gods for the different professions; they know that God is in the details of life, and that mastery of a craft can manifest a close relationship with the sublime.

      Daoism even teaches that the master painter, the master chef, and the master swordsman have all achieved similar understanding of the sublime and that they share a common path, even though their crafts are - on the surface - immensely different.

      So for those whose passion for the truths to be had in this world are not sated by simply listening to someone tell them about faith, who have tapped into a vein of the flow of the world, dedication and devotion to their work may be, not only a genuine replacement for religion, but a better one.

      Man has struggled against working merely for personal gain for as long as he has existed, and has left behind countless cautionary tales to warn us against the temptation of greed. The idea that materialism was made popular any time recently in human history is, at best, a fairy tale.

    13. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Our computers and cars won't sing our praises when we're gone

      Hey! Speak for yourself. I plan to live long enough to leave a strong AI around that will do just that. (Probably not the car though, maybe a toaster or dishwasher that remembers me)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    14. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Ctrl-Alt-Del · · Score: 1

      The New Testament certainly encourages people to work. For instance, when Jesus is describing the rapture in Matthew 24:40-41, He says "At that time two men will be in the field; one is taken and one is left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one is taken and one is left."

      These believers aren't sitting around reading Bibles and singing hymns and wishing televangelists would just disappear. They are out living a normal life, working to bring home money. Hopefully much of that money will be given to further the Lord's work, rather than buying a brand new HDTV plasma screen, but that's between the believer's conscience and the Lord :-)

      Getting back to the original article, Revelation 18:11-13 also gives us a hint that the end times are drawing nigh : "And the merchants of the earth weep and mourn over her because no one buys their cargo anymore: ... cargo of horses and chariots and slaves and souls of men". The most valuable thing that a non-believer has is their soul. Personally, I think it's quite clear that nowadays, people will quite happily sell their soul for something of little real value. Just see how morally bankrupt our politicians and "captains of industry" are!

      Finally, I don't see what the problem should be for Christians, when it comes to avoiding the end of days. Sure, it'll be unpleasant for a while (unless they are the lucky few to get raptured during the first rapture), but that rather pales in comparison with eternity in the presence of God. So bring on the RFID tags!

      --
      "Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it" - Tom Lehrer
    15. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      Well, I tried to set it up for him. I love that song.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    16. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by Alamar3 · · Score: 1
      Religion is really about defining for us what the purpose and meaning of our lives is, or should be.

      That might be what you believe, I think that religion has no place in a rational society. So what defines "the purpose and meaning of our lives"? What always has: philosophy. Which is ultimately what 'religion' is offering you - although with the 'advantage' that it doesn't have to be rational, consistent or in any way defensible because its proponents can always play their trump card of "it came from an unknowable divine authority".

      In the end we are (though I am atheist, I must use the term) spiritually bankrupting ourselves in the name of present gain.

      Again, your belief. If you've already taken the step of rejecting the poison served up as morality by religion, you might want to consider if the philosophy you've adopted in its place (unconsciously, by the sound of it) is at all better - it's rather apparent it's not the "capitalism/materialism" you're so worried about by the way.

    17. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by syousef · · Score: 1

      The dreams the majority of us hold usually are tied to acquiring copious amounts of wealth, things, gadgets, cars, property, etc. This wasn't always so, it's actually pretty new.

      My, my we are wet behind the ears.

      What you have (or don't have) has always determined (or at least limited) what you're able to do - from saving your child's life with that much needed organ transplant, to sailing away to the bahamas for a year on a whim.

      This isn't new human behaviour at all. People have always valued propety so much they've killed each other over it.

      Go read some Shakespeare, or if that's too modern for you, ancient greek tragedies. In fact I'm sure you could find cave paintings! It's not new at all.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    18. Re:Religion is being replaced, not just displaced by mistergin.net · · Score: 1

      That's me reading Slash-Dot
      Reply-ing in a textbox
      Trying to get karma points
      And I don't know if I can do it
      Oh no I've said too much
      I just got modded down :(
      I thought your post was Funny
      I thought I heard you jest...

      Ok that's enough, I could go on forever.. (hmm, until it's the end of the world as I know it?)

      Ok, really, enough..

      --
      Less Talk. More Stab.
  77. dumb by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    maybe they think everything is the "end of times" and everything that can be traced, is " the mark of the beast".

  78. Babylon is in Iraq by NZheretic · · Score: 1

    Err, the Babylon referred to is located within modern day Iraq.
    Just ask Bush and Blair.

  79. Which Book? by Jennifer3000 · · Score: 0

    The name of the book of the Bible to which I believe you are trying to refer, is "The Revelation of St. John [the Divine]," or "The Book of Revelation". Note that it's not plural. It's a very common newbie error though.

  80. Re: 666 by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

    What an arbitrary number, but maybe that's the point. Maybe the number doesn't mean anything - it's just a symbol attached to an apopolyptic story.

    I spend my days working as an electronics technician, a job that will have you spend many hours in front of digital readouts with numbers fluctuating adnauseum. Some years ago my job entailed calibrating pneumatic transducers that converted voltage, current, or pulse width modulated signals to an output of specific pneumatic pressure. The process of watching a gauge quickly transition from 15.00 to 0.00 PSI and back left quite a few instances where I caught the ominous 6.66 on the readout as the value passed by. The volt meters did it. Power meters do it. If we had metric time, clocks would do it too.

    I wondered if 666 supposed devoid of any meaning. Maybe some clever writer just decided to throw out any old number realizing that when every single person, object, and action had a number or worth assigned to it that the occurrence of that "magic number" would appear more often. As the number appeared more readily, "the fear" is instilled in the populace at an increasing rate. Eventually people would be driven nuts thereby killing each other in a panicked frenzy.

    I hope that's not the case, but who knows...

  81. Boring by oc-beta · · Score: 1

    This is *old* news. I saw this my my google.com/ig about 5 days ago.

  82. Christianity vs Heaven Gate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heavens Gate followers believed that if they died at a particular moment, they would be transported onto a ship and taked to a magical place.

    Christians believe that when they die they will get transported to a magical place where the streets are paved with a very expensive material ( but roads and money have no use).

    I understand that death is really scarey, but can someone explain how "some eternal person that really needs to be worshipped forever, by angels, humans, and whatever else" is meaningful or more believable than Zeus pulling the sun accross the sky.

  83. One basic problem by Quila · · Score: 1

    "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. " -- Revelations 13

    The mark, name or number must all be the same, of course, since it is the mark, name or number of the beast.

    Internal RFIDs certainly won't leave a visible mark, or nobody would accept them, and they probably won't all look the same. Forget that one.

    RFIDs will likely be from multiple manufacturers, so the same name won't appear in all of them.

    Every RFID will have a different number (or else there's no point to them), so the "number" one that everyone fears doesn't apply.

    What scares me the most is devout people who don't even read their own religious texts, instead relying on scaremongers looking for profit or followers (or both, they are usually intertwined) for their information.

  84. VeriChip by Nutria · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised no one has mentioned VeriChip, especially after the CityWatcher.com story broke.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  85. Protestants by cartel · · Score: 1

    Protestants do not follow the Pope. Maybe some do, but at least most do not.

  86. It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But then it's easy to ignore any group warning about anything.

    Ignoring end-times psychosis, what is the reason why the "mark of the beast" is evil? Could it be something to do with the commoditisation of human beings? RFID would fit right in... I'm not saying that these groups are right, but when you look at why such things are seen as being evil or wrong by religious groups, they often have a certain consistency, and are in fact a pretty mainstream view.

    Quoting from revelations isn't going to help their cause, but it is surely entirely possible that such things as RFID could, in some sense, be symptomatic, or even causative of what people who consider themselves spiritual would perceive to be a decline of civilisation.

    Even if the delivery and mythos is nutty, this doesn't mean that the message itself is!

    1. Re:It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by smartfart · · Score: 1
      As a christian minister that believes in the end times and a literal interpretation of the bible, I can say that your answer is right on the mark (no pun intended).

      There is nothing evil with RFID as far as it being a technological tool. After all, guns kill people only when people use the gun tool with an evil intent --- the gun, after being discharged in the direction of another human being, is still just a tool. Likewise, I think that whatever technology the Antichrist bundles with the mark is innocuous in itself. Isn't RFID just a convenient means of tracking objects? God helped Joseph in Eqypt keep track of grain during the famine event, Moses kept count of the gold and other materials donated to build the tabernacle, and Jesus knew exactly how many people he fed with that fish and bread. The bible is full of examples of things being counted and tracked, and if computers (high-speed abacuses, nothing more) had existed back then, God's leaders would have made use of them where practical.

      The mark of the beast isn't about RFID specifically, but about the subjugation of men and rebellion against God. The mark is religious in nature, not technological, even though technology might be used to facilitate its use. If I thought for a minute that computers and electronics were evil, I would quit my profession immediately and be come a Luddite.

    2. Re:It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on the content of your post, I would say that you subscribe to a fairly figurative interpretation of the Bible, not a literal one.

    3. Re:It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by Ahotasu · · Score: 1
      The mark of the beast isn't about RFID specifically, but about the subjugation of men and rebellion against God.

      I like this point. Think about it this way: one of the potentials for RFID technology is a way to allow people to charge/pay for things. Instead of swiping a card, they just wave their finger/hand in front of the reader much like people wave their Exxon Mobile speedpass to pay for gas or the toll road (I think Chase and perhaps other banks are using a similar technology already in their credit cards).

      Think about it--why should I carry 8 or 9 credit cards around with me (not to mention all of these grocery store/book store "membership" cards so they don't fleece me for normal purchases) if I could have a single chip that did that for me (I could just push a button for which card to use)? Then, I don't have to worry about the things being stolen, either!

      What I find most interesting about this is that it not only puts a "mark" on people, but it also ties in nicely with one of the enemey's best weapons--materialism. Now, we rebel against God and convert to worshipping money...

      But, then again, I'm just an unthinking/ignorant religious freak, so obviously I'm completely wrong and you shouldn't even be wasting your time reading this, let alone replying to it.

      --
      --- Standard disclaimer applies.
    4. Re:It's Easy to Make Fun of the Pious by smartfart · · Score: 1
      Based on the content of your post, I would say that you subscribe to a fairly figurative interpretation of the Bible, not a literal one.

      I've never been accused of that before :-)

      I consider myself a fundamentalist, but probably not in the sense that most people use the term. I do not check my brain at the door of the church. I believe that the bible should be taken literally, except where it's obvious that a literal interpretation is out of place.

      Take for instance Psalms 91.4: He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Does this verse mean that God looks like a chicken? The intelligent way to parse this verse is to compare God to a mother hen that protects her young by sheltering them under her wings. Certainly this idea of parenting fits into the general context of the bible, whereas concluding that God has literal feathers is ridiculous.

  87. Easy Solution by Plocmstart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get one implanted in your left hand or in your neck or back of your head or something. Just avoid the right hand or forehead. Disaster averted!

  88. Hurray, more corrupt mods by dsanfte · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Truth isn't flamebait.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:Hurray, more corrupt mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very often it is.

  89. W by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have frequently wondered what the origen of the word 'Amen' is.

    Wikipedia tells all

  90. But which number is the Mark? by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    Are they aware that it's 618, not 666? Perhaps Satan's bad at Math?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  91. The only Apocalypse by Fuzzball963 · · Score: 1

    That I'm worried about is the one we will probably bring on ourselves by our stupidity and unwillingness to listen and work with those around us.

    --
    "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it, why can't you?"
  92. If I were manufacturing these things by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    I would make sure that it was implanted in the right hand and had 666 written all over it just to freak the Christians out.

  93. The Pope is not Baptist or Lutheran or... by tepples · · Score: 1

    Pope, anyone? Christianity is a cult

    You mean "Catholicism is a cult", and 1,630,000 hits can't be wrong.

    1. Re:The Pope is not Baptist or Lutheran or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "Catholicism is a cult", and 1,630,000 hits can't be wrong.

      Oh yeah?

      Catholicism is a cult -- 930,000 results

      Catholicism is not a cult -- 6,240,000 results

      (But don't try it with quotation marks!)

  94. Ah, yes, the frog in boiling water... by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Think frog in the boiling pot analogy.

    That people will believe anything patently false if it's repeated as truth often enough?

  95. RFID spelled backwards is... by i_am_the_r00t · · Score: 1

    DIFR!!! Oh My God!!! DIFR is the Hebrew word for 'Marijuana' and everyone knows Marijuana is the Devil's Weed. Tomorrow is Sunday so we should be alright. Better unplug the broadnband just to be safe.

  96. A wide white bar to the left of 6, not guard by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    The three 'guard' bars, the long vertical pairs of thin lines that occur at the beginning middle and end are similar to the way 6 is represented on the right right of the two panels of the bar code - two thin vertical lines.

    Similar, but not identical. Each guard bar has five cells (01010). The 6 of a UPC barcode has seven cells (0000101) and is easily distinguishable from guard by the white bar to its left.

  97. Re:Why would a christian want to avoid the rapture by pembleton · · Score: 1

    LOL...!!!

    You can't bring about 'the end of days' the best you can do is have "faith." When God collects the faithful and the "in-crowd" gets "left-behind" then it's time to worry about things like ID tags.

  98. *Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 1

    The 666 mark was code for NERO. Just ask the Catholic Church who canonized the Bible in the 4th century at the III Council of Carthage. When Revelation was written it was revealed to the seven churches that 666 was code for NERO. Much of Revelation has already come to pass. Any good Biblical Commentary, especially historical ones, such as the NEW JEROME BIBLICAL COMMENTARY will confirm this. The anti-christ has alread been. Also in other books of the NT we are told there are many anti-christs and that these are 'anybody' who denies Jesus was God in the flesh. It is as simple as that. Also Jesus himself tells us that we do not know when the end times will come. Only 'my father' in heaven knows. Plus the last POPE and the current POPE believe in Evolution. What we have today are modern literal interpretations (historical revisionism) of what should be a historical literal interpretation. Just as the Catholic Church who have no problem with catholics working on tech.

    1. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Hah, there were MANY "denominations" of christianity in the 4th century, besides that group which later became the Roman Catholic Church. There's plenty of christians who would reject what was done in Carthage in the 4th century just as they reject anything taught by the Roman Catholic Church in the 21st. Plenty of denominations would classify each and every pope as an antichrist, just as an example (and they would say Peter was no pope and never was in Rome, that's just myth)

    2. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0

      The Catholic Church is not demoninated from anything. Jesus started a CHURCH (singular) not CHURCHES (plural). Mat 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. The Roman Catholic Church canonized the bible. So what if "Christians" reject what was done at Carthage. Only the Church (singular) that Jesus started was given "all the truth". Joh 16:13 When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.

    3. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Various groups have done a "canonizing", and come up with different books. Some would say that the Church of which jesus spoke has nothing to do with the RCC or any other earthly organization, but of all true believers in all ages, the RCC in any case did not start to come into existence for four more centuries, and did not evolve into its present beliefs for another six hundred years after that.

    4. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0

      Jesus started a CHURCH (singular). He appointed APOSTLES to lead that church. These APOSTLES appointed their successors, BISHOPS. In the NT christian communities choose a leader who is then APPOINTED to a church position by the BISHOP. This is the CHURCH based religion JESUS started. Jesus did not start a BOOK based religion. The RCC Canonized the Bible for its own use. Jesus started 1 Church, not 2 or 3 or 30,000+ growing at a rate of 200 every week. This is simple stuff.

    5. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Strange, there's other views on that Apostolic Succession business too, that there were other "bishops" other than the ones the apostles appointed, and that the proper mode of appointing a bishop is for a congregation to elect them. This "simple stuff" of which you speak is so simple that the RCC killed tens of millions of people who had other views on the subject, not to mention snuffing out more Jews than Hitler. Somehow I don't think that's what Jesus had in mind, "my kingdom is not of this earth"

    6. Re:*Sigh* - Historical Revision at its finest. by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0

      There is absolutely no historical record of a christian congregation electing their own Bishop without the Apostles, or those that succeeded them, approving and appointing the elected person to the position of Bishop. False gospel preachers are even rebuked by Apostles and Bishops. This is all in the New Testament. History revisionists would like to think that the NT speaks to them directly, word for word, while those who have a historical understanding of the scriptures know that even though the scriptures do contain good teachings for all christians, not everything in them is aimed at everybody. Just read the Pastorial Letters, written by John, to the Bishop Timothy and Titus. The RCC never murdered anyone. Name a clergy member who did. What you will find is that villages burned those they considered heretics at the stake on a whim. The church was called in to testify if these people (who where lucky enough to actually get a trial) where heretics. These where the dark ages, not the middle ages. In the middle ages Protestant christians slaughtered lots of people for no reason. Remember John Calvin, Salem Witch Trials or how about we ask what happened to all the American Indians? Is George Bush acting Christian when he drops bombs in Iraq?... something the Pope did not believe in by the way.

  99. 666 == issuer ID by tepples · · Score: 1

    What is still puzzling is that what the wording of the Bible seems to suggest is that "The Beast" itself (probably a reference to Satan or an agent of Satan) is numbered (specifically with 666 or 616 depending on which version or translation of the Bible you read, or how it is interpreted).

    Under hypotheses that support RFID implantation == The Mark, the number 666 identifies the Beast as the issuer of the RFID tag and appears in the header of the response that the tag returns.

    1. Re:666 == issuer ID by Danse · · Score: 1

      Under hypotheses that support RFID implantation == The Mark, the number 666 identifies the Beast as the issuer of the RFID tag and appears in the header of the response that the tag returns.

      That sounds pretty retarded to me. You think that whoever is issuing the RFIDs is going to use a number like that anywhere?? They'd have to be complete and utter morons.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:666 == issuer ID by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      Mabe they will use it to make a statement. Remembet what type of goverment we are talking about here...

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    3. Re:666 == issuer ID by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That sounds pretty retarded to me. You think that whoever is issuing the RFIDs is going to use a number like that anywhere?? They'd have to be complete and utter morons.

      One would think so. But... How many people on Slashdot have included 666 in their username ? People are already taking the mark as their own, with the express purpose of showing that they don't believe in Christ, without any external compulsion; why do you think that they would refuse to do so when facing such compulsion ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:666 == issuer ID by Danse · · Score: 1

      People are already taking the mark as their own, with the express purpose of showing that they don't believe in Christ, without any external compulsion; why do you think that they would refuse to do so when facing such compulsion ?

      I didn't get to pick my own social security number. I don't see why I would get to pick my own RFID number either. The agency that implements the system would be stupid to include the 666 or 616 or any other such number in their system. I mean why would you throw fuel on the fire if you could sidestep the whole thing so easily?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:666 == issuer ID by filament · · Score: 0

      Well, they didn't with barcodes, which each have sixes at either end and in the middle - two single-width lines with a space in between. These digits, supposedly selected because they are the same in reverse, indicate where the reader should start and stop, and the halfway point at which the numbers are inverted. Such an indicator might also be used on an RFID tag, and the majority of the world would have no idea, just like they have no idea with barcodes. There was even a federal (US) smartcard security experiment with the provocative name of 'MARC' (Multi-technology Automated Reader Card).

      --
      This sig is covered under the GPL.
    6. Re:666 == issuer ID by Danse · · Score: 1

      Such an indicator might also be used on an RFID tag, and the majority of the world would have no idea

      Yes, I've heard the thing about barcodes, but that's a fundamentally different technology. RFID wouldn't need to use any particular numbers, and they could consciously avoid using any code that would cause fundies to get their collective panties in a wad.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  100. Because the Bible's prophecies are always right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. Re:RFID is not cost effective and is very problema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have also been having trouble verifying all the product on a pallet, and certainly cannot expect to read 100% of product 100% of time. Some product is easy to see, but depending on the density/material in the materials on the pallet, it can be very difficult to read many of the tags.

    And you will never know if some products don't have RFID at all.

    $DEITY help the US if RFID-tagged items come in through the ports (soon to be ) run by United Arab Emirates.

  102. Reminds me ... by steven94585 · · Score: 1

    Of that bank commercal were they rivited the barcode on to the peoples foreheads.

    ~All hail our new ant overlords!

  103. Something odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, a lot of the comments have me worried, for a simple reason. It appears that people's arguments are based around: "Yeah, loads of things have been called the mark of the beast before and it never happened".

    They read as if the bible prophecy is correct however; this is just another false alarm like the ones before. Well, let me just throw this out there: How about it's all bullshit? It's just made up crap, there is no beast or any mark because Revelations is pure fantasy along with the rest of the bible?

  104. Oh, those silly Christians at it again!! by dapho · · Score: 0

    This isn't a sign of the end times, if RFID chips are installed on your body it's just another sign of the dubious government trying to keep track of it's citizens. If it happened it wouldn't last long.

  105. not unicorns... horned devils and winged angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Christian cult believes that a god creature created winged angels worship it, leading to the accidental creation red horned devils, leading to the creation of these human creatures having free will, which caused them not to obey their owner, which caused the god creature to kill most of them and eventually create a new goodness test, where the god creature impregnated a human, and those that believe in all of this go to the magical place, with the winged angels, or else they go live in the other magical place with his other red horned creatures.

    1. Re:not unicorns... horned devils and winged angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! They were all created with free will to begin with. This is the only form of worship that he will accept. Otherwise, it would be a forced and unloving kind of worship. The birth of Jesus wasn't a goodness test, either. It was to balance the scales, so to speak. A perfect man Adam had sinned and thus brought death into the world, and it was nessecary for another perfect man to balance those sins for all mankind. People are tested all the time. Some we fail and some we withstand because of faith, the most important part is that Jesus died to balance the debt of our sins that Adam brought upon us.

    2. Re:not unicorns... horned devils and winged angels by hazah · · Score: 1

      Basically, this leaves very little room for me to be me. Why the hell can't we speak for our OWN actions? "oh.. some one else will do it" just doesn't sound like a good life phylosophy. It sounds like a very bad one.

  106. When the rapture comes... by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    ... can I have Katherine's car?

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  107. Sad, isn't it? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    The Holy Bible points out that we will truly NOT know the end times, for Jesus will come as a theif in the night and take all the believers that are not intended to stand at the end times and bear witness. That's right, folks. While you shouldn't be living like there's no God (For you'd be WRONG...), you should worry about living the full life that Jesus promises you if you walk along his path. Hellfire and brimstone, the world is coming to an end, will NOT convert those that don't believe.

    Only His truth will do that.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  108. ONLY JESUS KNOWS THE END TIMES!!! (see details) by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0

    Mar 13:32 But of that day or hour no man knoweth, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father. NO MAN KNOWETH WHEN. WE SHOULD BE GETTING ON BEING GOOD CHRISTIANS INSTEAD... 1Th 5:2 For you yourselves are fully aware that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 1Th 5:3 While people are saying, "There is peace and security," then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. 1Th 5:4 But you are not in darkness, brothers, for that day to surprise you like a thief. 1Th 5:5 For you are all children of light, children of the day. We are not of the night or of the darkness. 1Th 5:6 So then let us not sleep, as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober. 1Th 5:7 For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, are drunk at night. 1Th 5:8 But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, having put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation. 1Th 5:9 For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 1Th 5:10 who died for us so that whether we are awake or asleep we might live with him. 1Th 5:11 Therefore encourage one another and build one another up, just as you are doing. BTW - 666 is code for NERO. The anti-christ in Revelation has come and gone. According to the Catholic Church most of Revelation has already happened. ANYONE WHO DENIES JESUS IS GOD IS OF THE ANTI-CHRIST'S SPIRIT. 1Jo 4:3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. The 666 mark was code for NERO. Just ask the Catholic Church who canonized the Bible in the 4th century at the III Council of Carthage. When Revelation was written it was revealed to the seven churches that 666 was code for NERO. Much of Revelation has already come to pass. Any good Biblical Commentary, especially historical ones, such as the NEW JEROME BIBLICAL COMMENTARY will confirm this. The anti-christ has alread been. Also in other books of the NT we are told there are many anti-christs and that these are 'anybody' who denies Jesus was God in the flesh. It is as simple as that. Also Jesus himself tells us that we do not know when the end times will come. Only 'my father' in heaven knows. Plus the last POPE and the current POPE believe in Evolution. What we have today are modern literal interpretations (historical revisionism) of what should be a historical literal interpretation. Just ask the Catholic Church who have no problem with catholics working on tech. In short, Don't bother yourself about the END TIMES or the ANTI-CHRIST but get on with life and love your neighbor.

  109. Umm... by Wizardry+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I hate RFID tags as much as the next guy, but isnt calling the mark of Satan just a -little- extreme?

  110. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's the ramblings of a schizophrenic.

  111. Christians should resist it?!?!?!? by oiper · · Score: 1

    What drunk Christian is saying this? Christians believe there is an end coming, carried out by God. So....?@#?@$# are some Christians saying we should try to stop God from fulfilling the prophecy in the bible?!?!?!?! It's Christians like such that give Christians like me a bad rep. I for one welcome the nearing end.

    --
    What do I have to do to get a sig around here?! www.bearscanfly.org
  112. Or if it's true... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Then this is the most wonderful thing imaginable. If Christianity is true, then the possibility of eternal life is real, doing something good is meaningful beyond just how it makes you feel, etc.

    I realize this is flamebate with the average Slashdot crowd, but since you guys normally appreciate contrarian views on a topic.

    1. Re:Or if it's true... by MorePower · · Score: 1
      Except that if Christianity is true, then the ultimate reality is horifying.

      If Christianity is true, then the possibility of eternal life is real

      And you get the choice of burning in hell for all eternity, or eternally sucking up to big daddy so you can live in his house for ever. I'm not sure which is worse, hell sounds physically painful, and heaven sound spirtually painful (think back to living as a child in your parents house and remember how much it made you wish you were dead, and that's just for 18 years and parents aren't all-powerful).

      doing something good is meaningful beyond just how it makes you feel

      Except that good and evil go from being absolute fundimentals of life, to becoming arbitrary and changable definitions based on big daddy's whim. In the Chistian view God can make stoning gays to death or human slavery "good" by decree (and according to the OT they were, at least back then). That makes good and evil meaningless.

      The thing Christians don't understand is that I didn't reject Christianity because I felt I knew God didn't exist, I rejected it because I hope he doesn't exist. What a horrible world that would be.

  113. VeriChip vs. Actually Reading the Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The Bible says it's a mark. The VeriChip once implanted can't be seen.
    2. The VeriChip can't be put into the forehead. It's not even meant for the hand. It's usually implanted in the bicep or tricep. I doubt anyone anywhere would have anything implanted or tattooed on their forehead anyway. But that's what the Bible actually says.
    3. The current VeriChip has nothing to do with buying or selling. And all the Bible says is that the mark relates to buying or selling (not being tracked, spyed on, or what have you).

    Either believe the Bible or don't. But one should not twist what it actually says to whore a book.

    1. Re:VeriChip vs. Actually Reading the Bible by Non+Dufus · · Score: 1

      3. The current VeriChip has nothing to do with buying or selling.

      Oh YES it does. Read this:

      http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,61357, 00.html/

      Quote: "Applied Digital Solutions CEO Scott Silverman said he believes the company's VeriChip -- a subdermal microchip that uses radio frequency signals to broadcast an identification number to a scanner -- could someday replace credit cards."

  114. Actually the mark is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I believe the mark of the beast refers to the fatal wound which the beast receives to its head and also to its shrivelled hands. Revelations says that the world will wonder (be amazed) at the fact that the beast recovered from the fatal wound.

    It is a kind of resurrection for the beast, i.e. the beast is the antichrist. Revelations speaks of the beast as the one that was, now is not and yet shall come. This also mirrors Christ who was, is and always will be. I.e. the beast and the antichrist are somewhat synonymous.

    The fact that if one walks into just about any Christian church in America and asks who knows these things, only a few hands will go up, and a few minds will recall the fact, is far more indicative that any end times are upon us. It is also the cause of such pointless writings such as those the slashdot article is about.

    As someone already pointed out, in apocalyptic literature, hands and heads refer to wisdom and power (or what we think and do). The beast has been confined to the abyss, and will rise back out to everyone's amazement.

    If one realises these things, the probability that RFID is the mark of the beast approaches zero like x^(666).

    Furthermore, I won't be getting any RFID implants, because the thought disgusts me, it might hurt, and it might eventually be used for something unjust. It'll have little or nothing to do with my religious convictions and interpretation of Revelation. I don't need a religious reason for not accepting RFID.

    1. Re:Actually the mark is.... by Inconnux · · Score: 1

      Read the actual Rev. passage and it will say EXACTLY what the mark of the beast is. Rev 13:16-18 "He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: his number is 666". (NKJV) The passage refers to an actualy mark that one can't buy or sell without. Im always amazed by people who don't read the passage. How could you not buy or sell if it was 'wisdom and power'???

  115. June 6th, 2006 by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1, Interesting

    06-06-06 :O

    1. Re:June 6th, 2006 by bemis · · Score: 1

      isn't that when amd releases their new chipset?

    2. Re:June 6th, 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lets see. Opteron.. Deuron.. armeged-on? Holy Jeebus!

    3. Re:June 6th, 2006 by RichardX · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, that's when Brian Flemming's new movie The Beast comes out.
      http://www.thebeastmovie.com/about/index.html

      He also directed the very interesting (if a little amaturish) documentary The God Who Wasn't There: http://www.thegodmovie.com/

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  116. Monogamy is un-Christian by typical · · Score: 1

    it was simply part of that pagan stuff that was folded in by the Roman church to allign it with other popular beliefs of the day

    Monogamy, now so heavily endorsed by the Christian right ("a marriage is between one man and one woman") was attached to Christianity by Roman society (which was, unusually for its day, monogamous). The Bible contains plenty of references to the proper ways to have many wives.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Monogamy is un-Christian by Creedo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that Jesus guy never said anything about it.....

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  117. 0 is a valid palindrome by typical · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:0 is a valid palindrome by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So it is.

      The exception that proves the rule. :)

  118. The Mullahs might agree by FishandChips · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If Albrecht's thoughts had been aired in, say, Tehran, they would be dismissed as the ravings of a fanatical mullah, unable to come to terms with the modern world and so bent on rejecting it as the devil's work, quoting an old, crude text from the pre-modern era as evidence that he was absolutely correct. But instead they come from downhome, primetime USA. Oh, the irony!

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  119. Wait another sign of the end times.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was young back in the late 70s, there would circulate a story in the church that some old person received their social security checks mistakenly from the future. Usually the future date was the mid 80s and the check said "Not cashable without the mark of the beast" or some stupid thing.

  120. Good! by smchris · · Score: 1, Interesting


    The older and more cynical I get, the more I think this level of "discourse" is more effective than trying to reason with people about issues like rampant RFID usage.

    Conservatives push these low-level buttons all the time. It's people like Al Franken who profess that they are too good to do the same who thereby limit their available sophistic tools.

  121. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - The Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: Claiming that catholic priests put Jesus Christ
    in a piece of bread is denying that he came in the flesh.
    we did not get the bible because of the Catholic church,
    we got it despite the catholic church, who tried as
    best as possible to murder those who were distributing
    it.

    http://www.rev14.info/ [rev14.info]

    I have a list of all the major churches who had the
    pope is the antichrist in their Confessions of Faith*,
    including baptists, presberterians, luthereans, methodists,
    calvanists, and more on my website. Ever church, all the reformers,
    and some of the greatest Christian minds have called the
    pope the antichrist, and the Roman Catholic church the great
    whore, who has numerous father priests for her children.

    Also "144,000 and 666 a comparision" is probably the best first
    article apart from the picture section to give some insight into
    Revelation and the gospel of Jesus Christ.
    http://www.rev14.info/site/original_articles/666_a nd_144,000_-_a_comparison.html

    ---
    The traditional view of all major Christian churches and
    the reformers is that the pope is the antichrist and the
    Roman Catholic church the great whore.
    http://www.rev14.info/ [rev14.info]

    If this view is correct, that the pope is the antichrist, and
    the roman catholic church is the great whore, than obviously,
    the mark of the beast also already has (and does) exist. I
    also have this on my website - the traditional, gospel view
    and interpretation - as if the bible had something to do with
    the gospel!!

    With the Roman Catholic church continued to be involved in
    numerous scandals, including the raping of more than
    10,000 boys by its priests, claiming that the mark of the
    beast is a microchip inplant or some other lewd invention and
    other than what traditionally Christians have said it is
    probably has political consequence as well:

    Revelation 19:10 - worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.

  122. so as long as it's not on the right hand or fore.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't they just use the left hand?? Or maybe our ASS?

  123. Re:RFID is not cost effective and is very problema by Wylfing · · Score: 1
    Haha, very clever attempt to throw us off the trail. I see you are calling yourself "Wayne Knight" now, Mr. Beast, but you cannot fool us. We are onto your schemes.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  124. I don't get it. by AciesD · · Score: 1

    I read the article and all I got was that she wanted to stop the use of RFID. If she is a Christian wouldn't she approve of this as it is the will of God that his son return? Wouldn't it be a good idea to let the end come?

  125. What's the fuss ... by ReagansUndeadBrain · · Score: 1

    ... over tagging a few Christians? Some of them are pretty hot ...

  126. 666 years? by serutan · · Score: 1

    People who live in Australia are lucky. They have 999 years.

    1. Re:666 years? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Sixes turn upside down, down there too? Ssshhh! Don't talk, I'm busy moving my bank accounts.

      Wait wait wait! That also means 69s turn to 99s! Heaven, here I come.

  127. Christianity before 1500AD = Catholicism by copponex · · Score: 1

    It's nice to believe that there were "true" christians while the catholic church was around, but that's simply wishful thinking. Until Martin Luther's little rebellion took hold in the 1500s, if you called yourself a Christian, 99% of the time you were Catholic. I don't think anyone needs to elaborate on how far off the mark Catholicism is from anything represented by Christ.

    I don't think Paul was an agent of Rome, but I absolutely think that they made a calculated effort to popularize his views, especially regarding whether Christians should follow Jewish law. Romans wanted to de-emphasize the obvious link to Judaism so they could claim the church for themselves.

    I think you should learn a little about theology and church history rather than a bunch of crazy conspiracy stories if you want to talk rationally..

    If you're truly an atheist, then why look further than obvious political power struggles which formed Christianity? If you want to give them a pass due to some emotional attachment, that's your failure of thought, not mine.

    1. Re:Christianity before 1500AD = Catholicism by theplaidranger · · Score: 1

      It's nice to believe that there were "true" christians while the catholic church was around, but that's simply wishful thinking. Until Martin Luther's little rebellion took hold in the 1500s, if you called yourself a Christian, 99% of the time you were Catholic.
      Or Eastern Orthodox, or any of the various heretical and schismatic churches - Nestorians, Monophysites, Bogomils, Waldensians, and on and on.

      I don't think anyone needs to elaborate on how far off the mark Catholicism is from anything represented by Christ.
      Actually, I'd appreciate it; I'm curious to hear why you, as an atheist, are more qualified to interpret the various texts discussing Christ than Christians are. Yes, I'm aware of the non-canonical documents, especially the Gnostic texts, but there are reasons they are non-canonical - the primary one being that they just weren't in existence during the early years of the formation of the canon.

      I don't think Paul was an agent of Rome, but I absolutely think that they made a calculated effort to popularize his views, especially regarding whether Christians should follow Jewish law. Romans wanted to de-emphasize the obvious link to Judaism so they could claim the church for themselves.
      The major problem with this idea is chronology. Christian apologists were writing against Judaism quite early; many wrote against Judaism and against Roman persecution (see, for example, Justin Martyr's First Apology and Dialogue with Trypho the Jew. Two hundred years before Constantine, at the beginning of the persecutions, Pauline Christianity was the predominant form.

  128. Stop putting people in a box by MattParkins · · Score: 1

    Christians are people trying (but mostly failing), to be like Christ and trying, (but mostly failing) to follow him. He was the smartest guy who ever lived, and you just have to read what he said and get to know him rather than judge him by the failures that follow him - idiots like me.

    We don't write off technology judging it based on my mother's skill at a computer (she did a word processing course no less!), so don't do anything similar such as write off Jesus because of the skipful of mistakes his followers make.

    I agree - so many christians are stupid, and I'm one of them (which doesn't mean I agree with the RFID = end times stuff - I thought it was all picture language. The book of Revelation is prophecy and the bible says that God speaks to his people in riddles - I would never be as definate about the interpretation in revelation as that RFID person is).

    2p

    1. Re:Stop putting people in a box by binford2k · · Score: 1

      He was the smartest guy who ever lived

      No offense to you, but what evidence do you have that Jesus was smart at all, much less "the smartest guy who ever lived?"

    2. Re:Stop putting people in a box by MattParkins · · Score: 1

      I think he is that just because of the things he's said. You're right though if you're pointing out that I don't know how smart everyone that ever lived is! I only know a small subset of the population of earth, but he's certainly the smartest person that I've ever known or read the writings or sayings of! Its just soooo intelligent!

  129. Consider this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  130. Re:Eh... Apocalyptic Stuff by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    Eh, I was offering in what little I knew about it since nobody else did.

  131. It may not be Christian, but it's catholic by lord+sibn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many people fear the "end of times," "the mark of the beast," and all that.

    Many catholics fear it as well, but what they do not realise is that the Catholic Church (by which i do not mean merely the RCC) pray for the return of Christ at every mass offered. This implies necessity of this "mark of the beast."

    Regular people, many Christians, many Catholics hope to stave off the apocalypse by rejecting anything they construe as the mark of the beast. The first step in the sequence of all things apocalyptic. Yet the Catholic Church teaches that the the return of Christ (the apocalypse) FOLLOWS the mark of the beast. Additionally, the apocalypse is supposed to be a GOOD thing. Too many people are afraid of the wrong things.

    You believe in the apocalypse? Fine. Welcome it. There is no reason to be afraid.

    You don't believe in the apocalypse? Hey, your call.

    Either way, there is no reason to live in fear.

    1. Re:It may not be Christian, but it's catholic by Non+Dufus · · Score: 1

      Most people should be afraid:

      Is. 13:6-9 Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty. Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's heart shall melt: And they shall be afraid: pangs and sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at another; their faces shall be as flames. Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.

    2. Re:It may not be Christian, but it's catholic by mihaibu · · Score: 1

      you waste your time; they simply can't live without fear; it's just the lack of fear that affraids them most

    3. Re:It may not be Christian, but it's catholic by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok so thoughs who get saved get to sit up their in heaven watching everybody else being tortured and suffering and being killed in all sorts of unimaginable ways in incredible numbers not seen at any time every in human history. That's something to look forward to? Something to welcome? A good thing? Man your morals are seriously screwed up if you think this is something to welcome.

          I'll tell you what it really is it's Inhuman Monstrous and carried out by the worst Evil (Satan) that's what it is. Yes it's ordained by God and so has to happen but it's Evil lest you forget that is to carry it out and cause all the suffering and pain and misery and tortured deaths.

          It's also necessary inevitable and needs to happen in order for the next step but it's not something you should be wanting to happen any sooner than it has to unless your seriously sick and messed up. Nobody who calls themselves a good Christian or a good human being that cares about their fellow man should welcome it not ever.

          When it's going to happen it's going to happen and things will move on but don't sit their all pious and self righteous saying welcome it and call the event to unfold a good thing because it's not. What happens after is the good thing but not what happens on the way their.

          Besides you never know who of your friends and family members may get left behind to go through the bad half of the apocalypse and would you still feel it's a good thing to know what their going to go through while your all nice a comfy up their riding the worst of it out in comfort?

          Some things to think about the next time you feel something like this is a good thing to be welcomed or whether it's a necessary evil and hardship for man to go through and suffer in order to get to the good that comes after.

          And maybe while your up their on that cloud with God and Jesus with everybody else you could feel a bit of humanity while you watch all the souls suffering and being tortured and kill in gruesome horrible ways and at least shed a tear for them.

          Maybe after it's over you could tell me if you still think that part was a good thing and should be welcomed because I would really like to know why you could still think that about all of that.

          Sorry to be gruff and that but im a little sick of people calling themselves good Christians and then saying we should welcome it without even seeming to think about what is truly going to happen and how horrible it will be for so many (and that will almost certainly include children as well) and say it's a good thing.

          I personally just can't see it that way nor would I ever want to. I don't fear it though I do fear what will happen to the many and so I don't welcome it I rather except it as inevitable but that part isn't welcomed at least not by me.

          I just don't see how good Christians could, I couldn't see Jesus welcoming it either but that's just me I guess.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  132. When I'm selected as Pope. . . by jafac · · Score: 1

    When I'm selected as Pope, I'm going to issue a divine edict to remove that damn book of Revelation from the Bible. It's a bunch of crap, and gets all the Christians twitchy and freaky every 1000 years or so, thinking that the end of the world is coming - etc. next thing you know, they're seeing Jesus on french toast and electing any damn fool who claims to be Christian.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:When I'm selected as Pope. . . by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah leave em be it's a good thing.

          Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. But understhand this: if the owner of the house had knwon at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept wach and would not have let his house be broken into. So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. Jesus

          Jesus said he will come when we don't expect him He also said when asked by the apostles when the end of the world would come that "Noone knows not the Angles in heaven nor the son of god himself only the father knows that".

          So basicly the end of the world will come when we don't expect it or aren't predicting it which christians and doom sayers have been doing for the last 2000 years and counting. Thus ensuring the end of the world will not come for sometime to come yet as long as people keep expecting it to come.

          It was also said the end would come at a time when belief in god was at it lowest and man has turned his back from god which isn't now. The fact that roughly 90% of the world calls themselves christian or jewish or even muslim and believe in god means that belief in god is in fact at it's highest higher in fact than it has been at any other period.

          Also going by the prophecy of the popes the next standing pope (or is it the one after him) is supposed to be the last pope and will feed his flock on many tribulations. I forget who it was that made the predictions of all the popes from begining to the end but so far his discriptions of the popes in order has been right on.

            So the belief of christians about revelations and their getting twitchy and freaky every 1000 years or so should be seen as a good thing a positive thing that they are helping through their fear of the end of days to keep it from happening if it's going to happen at least it wont at thoughs times because it's expected to. It maybe crap but it keeps them occupied mostly except for the odd occation they take to elect damm fools to office, And they've seen jesus and mary on plenty of other things besides french toast like underpasses and in windows and on walls etc it doesn't take much for them to see some passed on religious figure in something somewere.

          Besides why would you want to be the last pope to preside over the end of the church anyway? It would be more of a black mark on your name and position if the prophecy did happen come to pass.

          Just some thoughts

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  133. Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by woolio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being raised a devout Catholic, I have to say this:

    For an outsider, most of the new testament looks like this to an outsider:

    1) Man and woman engage in pre-maritial sex, woman gets pregnant. Father considers finding new woman to knock up...
    2) Woman claims 'divine' miracle to escape village mockery. Villagers buy it?!?!
    3) Child has some social/behavorial problems, reading too many religious texts at a young age, believing himself to be the next coming of god.
    4) Child manages to recruit some poor uneducated fishermen into his self-made cult.
    5) Unconscious man in comma mistakenly believed to be dead wakes up, miracle cited.
    6) Drunk party-goers at a weddding ceremony mistake water for wine, miracle cited.
    7) Child walks on a coral reef/sandbar, friends think he is walking on water.
    8) Stories spread & distorted through "word of mouth", child becomes famous.
    9) More followers join cult, start preaching about the demise of those who do not follow their teachings.
    10) Government gets suspicious of this new "terrorist" group. Executes leader (child).
    11) Followers go into hiding.
    12) Many years later, they come up and spread the stories... Later write them into gospels.
    13) Some of these followers are also imprisioned, appearing to be lunatics/terrorists...
    14) **** ..) Followers unite into a "church" ..) This "church" becomes a major political party. ..) Church approves of and wages bloody wars on infidels [Inquisition] ..) Inner squabbling leads to three rulers claiming dominance [Papal Schism] ..) **** ..) Almost at world-wide domination in the 20th century!

    [The ordering of these is likely inaccurate, but the events are accurate]

    Interestingly, I learned in a Catholic high school that the 4 Gospels were written ~50 years after Jesus **died**. How well could you write about something that happened 10 years ago?? How about something that happened 50 years ago? 50 years later, how many people are going to be alive to verify/contest your story???

    This fact seems to be heavily obscured... And of course, the Testaments have undergone revisions since then. Also the 4 Gospels are basically the same in content, so three seemed to have mainly copied off the 1st, and just re-wording them for different audiences.

    If Jesus were alive today, he would be ex-communicated by most/all Christian groups, deemed as an international terrorist, and executed... And none of this would make the news in the US...

    I don't know that to think about Revelation. I do know that there are many practical guidelines for living life that people have mistakenly mis-understood to be divine regulations in the Bible.

    In that context and given that 2000 years ago, countries were still collecting taxes and taking census of their people, my guess is that Revelation is a warning about what could happen in a tightly-run society that documents, measures and meters out every little thing. What would happen in a restaurent if you only gave them 90% of the amount on the bill...? Would they let you walk away? Would the manager get involved? In India today, they would thank you smilingly and you would leave. In the US, there would likely be consequences... Which is quite ironic!

    And considering technological & political trends nowadays.... yes, we have much to be concerned about.

    1. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by ndansmith · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Interestingly, I learned in a Catholic high school that the 4 Gospels were written ~50 years after Jesus **died**. How well could you write about something that happened 10 years ago?? How about something that happened 50 years ago? 50 years later, how many people are going to be alive to verify/contest your story???

      This fact seems to be heavily obscured... And of course, the Testaments have undergone revisions since then. Also the 4 Gospels are basically the same in content, so three seemed to have mainly copied off the 1st, and just re-wording them for different audiences.

      We do not know the exact dates of composition of the gospels. They are not dated, and we do not have to autographs. Still, 50 years after Jesus' death is one estimate, with 25-30 years being a lower one. It is also true that though the gospels themselves were written (or compiled) later, their actual source materials may have been written long before that, likely when Jesus was still alive. Also, three of the gospels have very similar content, while John is fairly unique and written quite a bit later. The postulation of scriptural revision is not so sure as to be a matter "of course." We have manuscripts from the early seconds century onward, so we can establish the textual history of the new testament to a greater degree of certainty than any other historic document collection. This means that even if major revisions happened (which they didn't), we can see through them. The compositional history of the gospels is a very complicated thing, in case you were wondering ;-).

    2. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Interestingly, I learned in a Catholic high school that the 4 Gospels were written ~50 years after Jesus **died**. How well could you write about something that happened 10 years ago?? How about something that happened 50 years ago? 50 years later, how many people are going to be alive to verify/contest your story???

      This fact seems to be heavily obscured... And of course, the Testaments have undergone revisions since then. Also the 4 Gospels are basically the same in content, so three seemed to have mainly copied off the 1st, and just re-wording them for different audiences.


      We do not know the exact dates of composition of the gospels. They are not dated, and we do not have to autographs. Still, 50 years after Jesus' death is one estimate, with 25-30 years being a lower one. It is also true that though the gospels themselves were written (or compiled) later, their actual source materials may have been written long before that
      Also, remember that the culture was a very oral culture. Oral cultures tend to have far better memory in relation to this kind of thing than non-oral cultures (such as ours today) have. For example, many texts were solely known by oral tradition and could be passed on with little to no change; though parts may be embellished, etc. for different audiences by the same author, the majority of the story did not change to the point that it could be accurately transcribed years after it originally occurred - and not simply 5 or 10 year.

      Additionally, remember that the disciples of Christ (Peter, John, etc.) are thought to have been around 18 or 19 at the start of Christ's ministry; so 50 years later they would likely have been about 70 in age - quite likely they would still have been around at the time it was written, along with numerous other first hand witnesses. Now add to that that there was written works (ala Paul and others) that could also be utilized, and it is very possible. For instance - do a modern day writing on the events of the 1963 JFK assassination - there are many written works, first-hand witnesses still alive, and numerous second-hand/after-the-fact witnesses that can attest (sp?) events, etc. It would have been quite doable for the writers to compile things together even 40 or 50 years after-the-fact and still have 100% accuracy.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    3. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by mykdavies · · Score: 1

      Oral cultures tend to have far better memory in relation to this kind of thing than non-oral cultures (such as ours today) have.

      I don't think that this is a very useful argument; you could ask twenty people to tell you the story of Cinderella and they would give you stories that were fairly consistent because Cinderella is part of our tradition, and is a story that has been shaped into one that is easy to pass on. If you were to ask those same people to explain how and why we invaded Iraq, I suspect you'd get twenty different and inconsistent stories.

      Your comments on the JFK assassination don't help your case -- it's a well-known fact that eye-witness accounts are notoriously unreliable.

      There are a number of scholarly works that look at the Gospels as historical documents (e.g. Robin Lane Fox's The Unauthorized Version being one). You should have a read of one, as they treat these issues in much more detail than is relevant to a Slashdt comment.

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    4. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You actually think that many people lived past 40 in those times? You sir are sorely mistaken. Hell, the average life expectancy was below 50 until around 1901our average life expectancy NOW is just 77 years. They might have lived until about 70 at the very, very most, not in the "quite likely" realm.

    5. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      It was quite likely for a person that lived past the age of 5 or so to live to the same ripe old ages we live to today. Infant and young child death was the major factor in poor life expectancy in 'those times'.

    6. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This means that even if major revisions happened (which they didn't), we can see through them. The compositional history of the gospels is a very complicated thing, in case you were wondering

      Darn it why didn't they just use CVS like everyone else!

    7. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      We do not know the exact dates of composition of the gospels.

      Yes, but we do know that they reference other events that allow us to determine the earliest point that they could have possibly been written. That's where the 50 years figure came from, though I remember reading it as 80. What's 30 years when we are talking legends and chinese whispers...

      their actual source materials may have been written long before that, likely when Jesus was still alive.

      That's just wishful thinking from someone who wants to believe, without even a shred of evidence. The four gospels were clearly copied from each other; each "expands" on the former.

      We have manuscripts from the early seconds century onward, so we can establish the textual history of the new testament to a greater degree of certainty than any other historic document collection.

      Archive.org has many pages from the earliest days of the internet. As the content is very old, it MUST be true.

      The compositional history of the gospels is a very complicated thing, in case you were wondering ;-).

      No it's not; it's just those who choose to ignore the facts and "teach the controversy". The controversy that is ALWAYS missed out is that most religions that predate Christianity consist of most of the same core "facts", such as the virgin birth, the great flood, martydom, yadda yadda yadda.

    8. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Three score and 10 has for at least several millenia been the expected lifespan of an adult. Feel free to research for yourself.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    9. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by ndansmith · · Score: 1
      You must take note that my original post in this thread does not make any claims about the truth of the content of the gospels.

      That's just wishful thinking from someone who wants to believe, without even a shred of evidence. The four gospels were clearly copied from each other; each "expands" on the former.

      No, there is evidence that there was a common source material (possibly written) for the gospels. This evidence comes from the very fact that Matthew and Luke share nearly identical material which is not found in Mark (though many argue Mark was written first). Once again, the three synoptic gospels share much in the way of source material, and as a result have many nearly identical sections. Each also has a large amount of unique information as well.

      Archive.org has many pages from the earliest days of the internet. As the content is very old, it MUST be true.

      My claim about textual criticism has nothing to do with the veracity of the content of the gospels. It simply points out that if there was a major revision after the fact, we would know. Just like you can use archive.org to find when a website's layout changed.

      No it's not; it's just those who choose to ignore the facts and "teach the controversy". The controversy that is ALWAYS missed out is that most religions that predate Christianity consist of most of the same core "facts", such as the virgin birth, the great flood, martydom, yadda yadda yadda.

      No, it is complicated. If you would like an introduction, read The Four Gospels by BH Streeter. If you examine the data, it is clearly not true that each gospel simply copied from the previous.

    10. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1
      Oral cultures tend to have far better memory in relation to this kind of thing than non-oral cultures (such as ours today) have.

      I don't think that this is a very useful argument; you could ask twenty people to tell you the story of Cinderella and they would give you stories that were fairly consistent because Cinderella is part of our tradition, and is a story that has been shaped into one that is easy to pass on. If you were to ask those same people to explain how and why we invaded Iraq, I suspect you'd get twenty different and inconsistent stories.
      That is a difference between Oral and Non-Oral culture. The memory abilities of a non-oral culture are no where near that of an oral culture.

      Your comments on the JFK assassination don't help your case -- it's a well-known fact that eye-witness accounts are notoriously unreliable.
      Per JFK - that is true. However, this was mainly to point out that eye-witnesses would have still been around. Also, remember there is a grave difference between oral and non-oral cultures, and the witnesses in the JFK assassination were/are part of a non-oral culture, so that is only to be expected per JFK.

      There are some oral cultures still left in various remote parts of the world, so this differentiation can still be found today.
      There are a number of scholarly works that look at the Gospels as historical documents (e.g. Robin Lane Fox's The Unauthorized Version being one). You should have a read of one, as they treat these issues in much more detail than is relevant to a Slashdt comment.
      While I have not read that book, I have been in contact with a number scholars on the subject, and have also studied the texts myself, and followed them. I am quite aware of what people think concerning this, and from the various scholars and others I have communicated with and listened to, those the texts have quite a high reliability. Now I also realize that a community like /. will not likely accept anything on this subject except what is in agreement with what it wants to hear.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    11. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by Auxon · · Score: 1

      Actually, Jesus's ministry started when he was 30, and lasted only 3 years; then he was crucified and rose from the dead.

    12. Re:Christianity == Crazy Cult [Read all first] by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Jesus's ministry started when he was 30, and lasted only 3 years; then he was crucified and rose from the dead.

      Yes, that is correct. However, the disciples were thought to have been about 18 or 19 at the beginning of that 3 year ministry.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  134. maybe you should have a look at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe you should have a look at this:

    http://www.wimp.com/documentary/

    1. Re:maybe you should have a look at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! These Mason guys really seem to have their shit together. Where do I sign up?

  135. I did and i got the mark of the beast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i rejected my christian upbringing...

    check out my 666 tattoo here.

    it's on my right forearm, close enough =)

    mindrape

    1. Re:I did and i got the mark of the beast! by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      That's pretty cool. :)

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  136. All /.ers should know that 2032 is the final year by ChronoFish · · Score: 1

    That's when the Unix timestamp rolls over. -CF

  137. End of world has been assumed now for 2000 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the time is at hand" was written in Revelations, as the "believers" at the time thought the apocolypse was going to happen then. Since then Christians have continued to say the same thing. Reinterpreting the same words to match current events.

    It was really talking about the fall of the Roman empire, correct?

  138. Question to a believer from a skeptic... by MsGeek · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is one more thing I would like to point out, if you are an atheist and find that the Christians you know gleefully support war and Bush's proactive foreign policy, I say to you, don't be fooled by them. Those Christians have bought into the lie that war is the only way to solve our current national problems, they have sacrificed their religion in favor of their political agenda. They have ignored Christ's message of love and peace in favor of a message of nationalism and selfishness. Those people are all-too-eager to sacrifice 100,000 of God's children in Iraq in favor of God's children in America. The only time I would ever justify war is in self-defense, the wars in the middle-east are not wars of self-preservation; they are wars of the all mighty dollar and economic-preservation.

    You seem to be able to see through a lot of Dubya's Bush-shit. Very interesting.

    However, think about this: why was it that Dubya was re-elected, mostly by "Bible-believing Christians" in the Southeastern, Midwestern and Intermountain West? Especially when you consider implantable VeriChips were approved for human use by the FDA during George W. Bush's first administration. This would mean that the Mark of the Beast, if RFID is really to be used in this way, was approved on George W. Bush's watch. And they re-elected the bastard!

    My quetion to you: is George W. Bush the "Beast From The Sea," and is Dick Cheney his "False Prophet?" Or is it the other way around, with Dubya the front-man for the real Beast, Cheney? Or do you think this is not the case?

    Another question and I'll wrap it up: what do you think of scholars who believe that the Book of Revelation is an allegory for Roman persecution of Early Christianity, both Hebrew and Greek, and the destruction of the Great Temple by Roman forces under Emperor Titus? Are you aware that Nero Caesar has a value of either 616 or 666 according to how you transliterate it in Hebrew and valuate it according to Hebrew Gematria?

    I'm just curious. I was a believer, I'm not now. As a woman, I consider Christianity to be repugnant, just like I do the Judaism I was born into and the Islam that was basically Judaism made palatable for the Arabian tribes. Most non-Abrahamic religions are quite patriarchal as well. However, I would not consent to implantation of VeriChip. I find it an unacceptable breach of my privacy, and potentially hazardous to my health. It's also...umm...spooky, if you know what I mean. No freakin' way. Hang it around my neck, put it in my employee badge. That's OK. Implant it? That's where I draw the line.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  139. Re:All /.ers should know that 2032 is the final ye by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    relax, you have more time than that, it's actually 03:14:08 UTC on January 19, 2038

  140. wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm sorry this whole thing is stupid. please wake up everyone!

  141. Leave it to the propagandists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...to frame the debate as "the end of the world." No, it's not going to be the end of the world. RFID is a great way to track inventory, but it's also a clever way to spy on everybody and track their every move. And the problem with that is the potential for the abuse of power. ABUSE OF POWER is what we have to fear with no governmental controls on this technology. Not a ridiculous "end of the world" scenario. Albrecht may be leading the charge to collectivize people who are against this technology in order to devise some way to "handle" them later. Good lord, anything but an honest public exploration of the issues. Deception seems to be the fast track to bringing change to the masses.

  142. The "mark" is the number of mankind by ant_tmwx · · Score: 1

    Might as well quote the Bible...

    Revelation 13:16 He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slave, to be given marks on their right hands, or on their foreheads;

    13:17 and that no one would be able to buy or to sell, unless he has that mark, the name of the beast or the number of his name.

    13:18 Here is wisdom. He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six.

  143. Cash? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    What if they (whoever they are, you KNOW WHO they are, don't you?) replace cash-money for RFID-card-cash? Then everyone would be obliged to use RFID in everything. Don't tell me you really think Bush (or anyone else) wouldn't do that if he could. Complete knowledge (and control) over the market, yummy.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    1. Re:Cash? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      What if they (whoever they are, you KNOW WHO they are, don't you?) replace cash-money for RFID-card-cash? Then everyone would be obliged to use RFID in everything. Don't tell me you really think Bush (or anyone else) wouldn't do that if he could. Complete knowledge (and control) over the market, yummy.

      Then I trade two of my goats for one of your cows.. and maybe some of your shiny metal things (maybe we could call them "coins", and standardise a value for them?) for some of my freshly baked bread

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  144. Cash is currently tracked. by Nymz · · Score: 1

    Cash is printed with a unique serial number on each bill. Mints track the institutions they give money to. Those institutions track the money they give you.

    Oh, and there's always http://www.wheresgeorge.com/

  145. phrase pun? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    hmm it seems that your use is of "begging the question," although correct, is ALSO incorrect. That's quite a linguistic dance you've done.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  146. 666 = Nero Caesar by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    666 was just a hebrew code for Nero Caesar. Unless someone clones Nero and he takes over the world, regulating all commerce, the "Mark of the Beast" is a false prophecy.

    Revelations should be removed from the bible. It was proven wrong when Nero died.

    For more info on Nero and 666, go to the bottom of this page: http://www.bibleandscience.com/history/roman.htm

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by Non+Dufus · · Score: 1

      Nonsense,

      Then number represents the Roman Empire which used numbers such as D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5, I=1.

      Adding them all up gives: DCLXVI = 666

      This was John's way of showing that this enumeration was of the Roman government, or rather the beast raised up implying a rebirth of the Roman empire which many believe is culminating in present form as the EU.

    2. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Revelations should be removed from the bible. It was proven wrong when Nero died.

      This is the problem with literal interpretation of the Bible. Symbols in biblical prophecies can have more than one meaning. It could be Nero AND another antichrist. I recall the book of Daniel when the angel told the prophet that (some symbol) meant various different things.

    3. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by CaptainKirkCaptainKi · · Score: 0
    4. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Well, if the bible can't be taken literally, it is worthless. If it's open for interpretation, I could interpret it to mean something good or terrible. I could do the same thing with an episode of startrek.

      In such a case, startrek is as morally useful as the bible.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by RichardX · · Score: 1

      666 was just a hebrew code for Nero Caesar. Unless someone clones Nero and he takes over the world, regulating all commerce, the "Mark of the Beast" is a false prophecy.

      Oh noes! Nero's back! (With new and improved DVD writing capability! Albeit a bit overpriced and bloated...)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Well, if the bible can't be taken literally, it is worthless. If it's open for interpretation, I could interpret it to mean something good or terrible.

      And THAT is why catholics believe in an authority to give us ONLY ONE correct interpretation of the bible.

    7. Re:666 = Nero Caesar by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Which sounds reasonable, until you realize the evil interpretations the church has made (like the topics of witches, condoms in the face of aids, purgatory, etc.).

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  147. the strange genre of 'end times' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 'End Times' genre of scaring people sure gets a lot of play.
    I don't want microchips implanted in me because they contain harmful chemicals.

    Does that mean that I am a whacko Christian?

    The only reason that people want to do this is because they want to make money selling the implaints.
    Or do they consider the common man like cattle and they want to tag us?

    Is this a form of territorial pissing that the power mafias who illusion that they rule the world want to do to us? Do they get a chubby to think that they can make us pay to have little pieces of silicon injected within us and pay them to do it?

    If we have universal health care than why do we need implaints and ID?
    The real reason for all of this is for use by bankers and financeers who want to root out banking and financial fraud and get the government to pay to do it.

    And yet one more paranoid thought to feed the flame of nonsense and conspiracy theory (I do this hoping that fools who believe in fear and loss to some evil outside force might burn down their fear and realize that they need not worry.) With the micro chip the secret societies don't need a secret handshake. They will have their implaint chips audio drive tell them who is and is not part of their rulling class elite secret society.

    And this is great fiction.

    I know that we are all part of it. And people who think they rule the world can't even rule themselves. Witness to this is that they have devolved into megalomaniacal delusions. They don't rule me or you. They get our money.

    Or maybe they don't even exist at all. They are an illusion.

  148. Fallacy^2 by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Fallacy: The Bible or any religious book predicts events in the real world.

  149. a solution for the Christian by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Don't get the Mark imprinted in your forehead or right hand, instead opt to have it implanted in your left buttocks. After all, we're admonished to turn the other cheek.

  150. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wondered if 666 supposed devoid of any meaning.

    Take a KJV bible and read the passage about the number of the beast.

    Now, read it again and think "sarcasm".

    Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (meanwhile, we'll point and laugh at the "wise men" who add up the letters in Bill Gates' name.)

    The parables of Jesus regularly challenged the lawyers and the Pharisees who thought they knew more about holiness than He, taunting them in similar ways. It could simply be a question of interpretation though. We need more Greek speaking geeks here to tell us what the bible really said way back when it was written whenever the end of the world comes up on slashdot.

  151. Re:Pope is the Antichrist - The Traditional View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Claiming that catholic priests put Jesus Christ
    in a piece of bread is denying that he came in the flesh.


    Check out John 6:51 ff. For example:

    "For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
    He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
    "

  152. Sounds like.... by sulphurlad · · Score: 1

    This lady sounds like a Seventh Day Adventist. I used to work for and with a couple of them. They are a very devout and hipocrital group. And the article is exactly the way the "end of the world" was going to happen according to them. I was alittle taken back at first, and found their ideas slightly intriging. After some research on my own, I realized two things, 1) They Believe that they are the lost tribe of Isreal, 2) They think that the Catholic Church broke the coven with God by moving the Sabbath Day from Saturday to Sunday, their lore says that the Catholic Church did this because they are controlled by the devil. They are essentially a cult of Christians, a very strange group. It's kinda sad really, to live in fear, I guess it helps to live in fear as a group.

  153. its 21 12 2012, and religeon has no part. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/3.htm#Beyond%202012

    The end times may come, or will come... but its has nothing to do with
    any religeons, much to the christians disapointment, it will be a spiritual
    awaking that will finally realise the fact that all religeons are complete
    hog-wash bull shit crap.

    Welcome to the Federation of Cosmin planets and aliens... Religeons have
    dont nothing but caused all the complete missery of millions. Our final
    lifting will be getting rid of religeons and living in peace for once, and finally
    growing up out of the pathetic dark ages.

    http://www.drboylan.com/

    Read http://www.worldaffairsjournal.com/article1.htm

    Maybe thats why American Public Christian servents have sold/given 960+ nuclear bombs to all parts of EUrope in prepartion
    for counter strikes against Iran.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  154. Tinfoil Glove??? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    You mean Michael Jackson knew way back in the 80s?

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  155. Re:A real sign of the endtimes? by Baricom · · Score: 1

    If not an "invisible man", then what? The big bang? Where did the energy for the big bang come from? There has to be an origin for it, right? You argue that it's crazy to believe in God, but I believe it's even crazier to posit that the universe came into existence on its own, purely by chance. I think one has to accept that there is some forces or materials that transcend time, that have always been there, because if you linerally follow history, you have to have something that was there, in the beginning, that doesn't have a "parent" or ancestral force. It makes much more sense to me that this uncreated force would be intelligent, than it does to assume that billions of chance interactions between quarks would randomly lead to DNA being assembled to make you and me.

    The Bible is actually very logical, and its entire focus is to defend the message that you dispute. God gave life to a perfect universe and to humanity as an expression of love. He gave us the ability to choose so that we would have the ability to worship him. Worship requires free will - if people don't have the ability to reject God, then worship is impossible, and humanity is no better than a collection of computers.

    With this free will, humanity has chosen to reject God, because we have presumed that we can make perfect decisions ourselves. The trouble is, our decisions reflect our own will, and it's usually impossible for everybody to have our own way.

    God does not force himself on people because he loves them enough to give them choice. If you choose to live your life apart from him, he will not force you to live with him after you leave this world either.

    The point of God coming to Earth as Jesus was to demonstrate the perfect way to live, but also to pay the penalty for humanity's disobedience so that we could choose to submit to God, even after the wrong choices we've made in our lives that have been rejecting God.

    Christianity is all about choice and logic. No Christian who understands and believes what he or she practices believes that people can be forced to believe. The reason they are Christians is because the message they've been told makes sense to them.

  156. Re:RFID is not cost effective and is very problema by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    It's just plain silly to use religion to try to manipulate politics this way

    Its fun. Americans are just so damn gullible. It is like taking candy from a baby. Ever wonder why there is a trade deficit? Only Americans can spend more money than they make on shit they don't need. The democrats should get in on this game.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  157. Piece of paper on my door by MegaFur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, I already know about this. Some dumb ass put a little piece of paper in my apartment door one day that read "spychips.com Rev 13:16-18". As you might guess, Revelations 13:16-18 is that oh so happy and all too oft quoted section about the number of the Beast.

    I find this crap so banally boring. I mean, lookit--Revelations itself is chock full of stuff that you could spin into whatever apocolyptic message you want to. The fact that people are so pathetically boring as to only focus on a couple or three passages is at least as depressing as the fact that they feel the need to make up apocolyptic crap in the first place.

    Oh well. By the way, if you're high or tripping sometime and you really want to freak yourself out, go read Revelations. Whole thing is whacked out on the weirdness. And you don't even have to get a bible, you can get as many translations as you want from http://www.biblegateway.com/ .

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  158. losing the religious baggage but getting the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    to put it in fully modernized terms, maybe the concern is about creeping invasion into personal autonomy by organized money and commerce.

    when those books were written, the writers had a clear idea of the two competing influences in their own culture. there was human development in the mental and spiritual sense, and then there was material life. the same binary pair exists today, except that material culture, by far, outweighs inner self-culture as a pursuit or a preoccupation.

    the writers of those old books were party to a framework of ideas that was all about the improvement of human beings. if you were a participant in that culture, then you saw your life and everything in it as material for your correction and your betterment. you didn't want to allow materialism for its own sake to take root because you understood it as a hindrance. your excess was going to weigh you down.

    all the exterior stuff...politics, secular life, accumulation of a lot of money... was a distraction or even an opponent to your improvement. however, they understood that an opposing force was also necessary. the Roman empire was effectively a symbol of all that rolled into one... the vice and the greed but also the tester and the opponent that made you strong by challenging you.

    so originally at least there was not a taboo on money or material things, only an admonition to keep things in their right order.

    fast forward to 2006. today all we have is the dominant material culture. the money, the "Roman empire" if you will, won. we call ourselves "consumers." the authorities call us "civilians."

    meanwhile the other alternative concerning correction and betterment is almost completely off the radar. what remnants there are, are often expressed in radical terms. if religious people often seem alarmist or excessive, it is because they have only tiny portions of their own philosophies in place and it all comes across as being very unbalanced and fractured.

    but if it is possible to read between the lines, maybe we can see that the technology alarmists are mirroring the excesses of the blind and total pursuit of material advantage back to us.

    i agree with the opponents of RFID but i would word my concerns differently. society needs to use wisdom and discretion with certain kinds of development, and adopt technology where there are general benefits... not merely a benefit accruing to existing centres of money. we need to be able to say no to commercial interests and lobbyists. note we don't need to mention evil or the anti-Christ. the mere mention of corporate interests and lobbyists is enough.

    at this late date however i don't know if saying "no" to runaway commerce would make room for the better life envisioned by the writers of those old books. the sad probability is we will fill the vacuum with *another* opportunistic technical solution and keep on going the way we are going.

  159. "...may in fact be the Mark of the Beast." by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    ...in fact

    Yes, scientific analysis has affirmed the theory that The Mark of the Beast and RFID tags are one and the same. The Antichrist will manifest. After a period of sustained visitation by demons and hellfire, Category 5 fire and brimstone should begin raining down on Earth, followed by 100% eradication of humanity. The sorting of human souls will then commence, and all souls with Level 4 or higher Good Quotients will be diverted to Heaven for infinite happiness, while those with Category 3 or lower Good Quotients will be diverted to Hell for infinite damnation.

    The facts all point to it.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  160. You're Forcing Me to Think! ;-) by mfh · · Score: 1

    As such, in this particular instance, the warning is not when we have implants in our heads or hands, it's when we think and do evil things.

    Thanks for reminding me of this! Years ago, I remember suspecting these symbols to being TIME. On your hand, you have a watch, and in your mind you have a watch, and it is the way of society, the big beast, that drives time. Time is also money.

    Blah blah. I used to think about this stuff to try and understand the philosophical roots of biblical study. What a trip!

    Now I have to agree with you. This is an easily misconstrued topic of discussion!

    Interpreting apocalyptic literature as truth verbatim is not only stupid, it's dangerous.

    Any kind of philosophy can be dangerous if it's applied. There is no such thing as safely applying philosophy, because then it becomes doctrine and doctrine leads to murder. Philosophy is meant to enrich our lives, not cut them short.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  161. You mean Germany? by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I still can't quite wrap my head around the concept that a country in Europe has literal thought police that put someone in jail for THREE YEARS. Think about that -- THREE YEARS -- for thinking the wrong thoughts.

    You're talking about the Holocaust Deniers, right?
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:You mean Germany? by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      and the guy wasn't even from/in the country in which he was prosecuted.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    2. Re:You mean Germany? by Skunkhead · · Score: 1

      completely off-topic, but he denied the holocaust in austria, where it is illegal to do so, where he was trialed. besides, if had went back to britain, he'd be in jail anyway.

  162. christians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sooner the world ends, the sooner we'll all be in paradise, with all the virgins...can't wait !!

    1. Re:christians by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Unless you're one of the virgins, that is.

      And remember... this is slashdot.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  163. she's a whacko anyway by irving47 · · Score: 1

    When your primary means of getting your message out there is Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, you've got to wonder how far from the pack you've strayed. OK, so now she's got a book.
    Big achievement. Her website reads just like every other paranoid schizo that proclaims the world is coming to an end because of a rock on mars that looks like a skull or they see Jesus in a pancake. In short, if they have surveillance cameras, they're evil in her book.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  164. What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by aukxsona · · Score: 1

    Ok, so RFID is baaad. Who cares what spin the Christians put on it....at least they would be doing something right for a change....so help them pamplett the world with Revelations flyers. I will and I'm pagan...why?!

    1.) Evangelicals have awesome grassroot connects and powerful political ties...if anyone can stop it they can.
    2.) Who cares, there is a saying, anyone that is an enemy of my enemy is a friend...same here.

    I hate the things and think they should be illegal because they infringe upon our privacy. I think coorprate business has gone too far. I think we need to set aside our differences and help each other over come this crap! IMO.....

    --
    Not a geek just looking for one.
  165. Put it in the left hand by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

  166. RFID overhyped by typical · · Score: 1

    RFID reminds me of XML. It does have some limited applications, but we hear way, way too much about them relative to their actual benefit.

    We already have barcodes. Barcodes are reliable, cheap, can be quickly read, and work well for most goods. If you have many boxes of something being shipped somewhere, it's much more reasonable to just slap barcodes on the boxes.

    RFID is handy for objects that are all different shapes and sizes, where a failure rate is acceptable (just pass it back through the reader until it beeps, like we do with barcodes today). The obvious application is retail checkout -- but beyond that?

    People have vastly inflated notions of the locational accuracy that can be obtained with an RFID tag, as well as the failure-to-read rate, how easy it is to avoid blocking the tag's transmission (your hand will block the read), the range at which the tag can be read, and so forth.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  167. Religion tries to hijack use of word "good" by typical · · Score: 1

    It isn't simply becoming a-religious though; religion is being replaced in our society even more than it has before by the indirect worship of materialism.

    Despite the fact that Christianity tries to hijack the use of the word "good", you can be a perfectly nice person without believing in the translated political ravings of long-dead cult leaders. The only alternative to Christianity is *not* materialism, cruelty, etc.

    You need not be greedy or obsessed with consumerism to reject Christianity.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  168. Antichrist by Theatetus · · Score: 1

    The word "antichrist" appears 0 times in the book of Revelations.

    "Antichrist" appears only in John's epistles and it's in the plural -- "antichrists" are people who deny Jesus's messianic status.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  169. Not a Christian here, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the constant trashing of christianity on Slashdot is old, repetitive, uninsightful, and everyone who does it sounds like they've read "hating christianity for dummies", because they all sound the same. Kinda like how christians pretty much all sound the same.

    WTF is wrong with you people, both religious and anti-religious, that you don't see what's wrong with your moronic attacks on each other? WTF is wrong? Did you guys eat flouride as children? Paint chips maybe? Live under powerlines?

    You guys clearly attempt to oppress each other and any time someone calls one side or the other on it, you get the 3 year olds retort "they started it, wah!"

    I seriously wish you all would choke. Just fracking remove yourselves from the gene pool already and for the sake of the gods, please don't breed. We could use people who get along and recognize their own fallacies, instead of little fallacy nazis out to point out everyone elses.

    1. Re:Not a Christian here, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are "Not a Christian", but why did you get angry when the poster just pointed out that mostly christians run the US government (and get us into religious/oil wars).

      You should give logic a chance instead of wishing violent actions against people that challenge your belief system.

  170. Again??? by Hurricane+Floyd · · Score: 1

    Ain't there always something that means that "the end times" are drawing near???? Seems like every time anything happens "its the end times"....

  171. Don't think so by danhirsch · · Score: 1

    I don't think that Christian would be even able to "accidently" and without a "deep conviction" take on the mark of the beast without having said strong convictions against it before hand...and not because somebody said it was the mark...but personal conviction. Second, I think the whatever the mark "is" would need to mean something beyond just buying and selling goods...I need to stress the word "mean"..not what it would prevent you from doing if you didn't have it..like shopping.

  172. This is expected. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Fear = Food. The Evil Overlords want you stressed out and frightened.

    What better way than to engineer a fool's religion based on twisted truths and outright lies, line it up so that to follow that religion properly you need to at some point resolve yourself to shooting at other people who follow a slightly different color of the same lies and twisted truths.

    Why not drop in a few lines of 'Prophecy' about marks of the beast and not being able to enter the kingdom of blah blah blah if you are so tattooed, or whatever.

    Yes, VISA = 666. (VI= 6, Z=6 in one Ancient language and A=6 in the neighboring country's alphabet.) Yes, money is the root of all evil. Sure.

    The lie is that the 'Kingdom of Heaven' is a place with gate-keepers and bad-deed counters rather than a state of being which can be reached by anybody if they are willing to do the soul-work required.

    Be nice to people. Be aware. Be willing to learn. Be willing to access your will power and make your own choices.

    That's it. Growth comes from within, not from without. Grow enough, and you will transcend this reality and reach the so-called kingdom. (Just a higher state of being.) All the fancy mysticism and church-going nonsense about not getting caught with the Mark of the Beast is just a misdirection designed to keep all the little Christians acting like scared food.

    For goodness sake! Credit cards are just plastic. --Sure, love of the material world can keep you bound up in this reality, and sure the banks are nasty and manipulative. But so what? Your own intent and decisions are what bind or free you in the end. You can buy a sandwich or pay your rent and it's not going to make a lick of difference to your spiritual progress if you know how to keep things in perspective. The Bible is a lark; Telling us that some people get into Heaven and some people don't? For one thing, there is no Heaven; it's just a metaphor for enlightenment and spiritual transcendence. We are all part of God already, so the only way to get 'Left Behind' is to choose not to grow; to choose not to see. --Going to church, doing and believing as you are told by governments and clergy, fearing when your fear buttons are pressed. . , these ways are not the ways to reach your higher self. Your higher self only grows strong when you use your mind to question and challenge and push and think and act. Religion is about abandoning all that stuff.

    "Do Not Follow. Not following is a Key!"

    You see. . , if God is truly infinite, then what can possibly not be God? You? Me? --How arrogant to suggest that we are beyond the infinite! We are all part of God.

    We are all free if we choose to be so. Recognize RFID for what it is and act accordingly. Do not mindlessly fear it because some 2000 piece of fear-mongering spiritual propaganda tells you to stop thinking rationally.

    Have a good night.


    -FL

    1. Re:This is expected. by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmm

          I found your pitch both inteligent and compelling and i wish to purchase your product and or service. :P

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  173. This is why PRIVACY ACTIVISM IS SO IMPORTANT!! by aquadivina · · Score: 1

    Authoritarianism is when a government believes it is God and that it has the right to determine who lives or dies. Thats where we are going and it could destroy America and the rest of the world with it. Seriously...

  174. Relevant verses: Revelation 13:16-18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If anybody's interested, the relevant verses are the last three verses of chapter 13 of Revelation.

    For context, I'd recommend reading the whole chapter.

    -cmh

  175. Re:Oblig Snopes Link by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
    Obvously the author of the article (and book) has never bothered to read Snopes.

    I mean, why are they even worried about RFID tags? The REAL mark of the beast is in bar codes.

  176. Gnostic as I am by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    We Gnostics don't buy Revelations, or 'apocalypse' as you put it, same meaning, in the Bible either and believe it is mostly a fabrication put forth by the exoteric church. In fact, we buy little of the New Testament and even less of the Old Testament and see the god of the Old Testament as the Demiurgos or 'half-maker, not the one true God. You won't find anything about 'Revelations' in Gnostic Scripture. If you would like to learn more about us, go to gnosis.org. I didn't make that a clickable link because we Gnostics don't proselytize or evangelize. We believe you have to do it all yourself.

  177. And that's fundamentalism in a nutshell: by mapmaker · · Score: 1

    Interpreting literally writings that were meant as allegory and metaphor.

  178. Mattthew 24:42-44 BIZNITCH! by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    Jesus Sez: "Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. But understhand this: if the owner of the house had knwon at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept wach and would not have let his house be broken into. So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. Jesus 1, Technophobes 0

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  179. Re:A real sign of the endtimes? by monsterzero2002 · · Score: 0
    Religious people are mentally ill, plain and simple. Religion is a virus, a meme passed from parents to their children. The world today is a mess largely because of religion. Much of religion is actually a form of hate speech, and should be banned. For example, "No one goes to the father except through me...". That is saying all Muslims and other non-christians are consigned to hell.

    There is nothing good that can come of this illogical mess. Who knows how many individuals are in therapy because of the twisted illogic of religion.

  180. all i have to say is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahaha, lol, lmao, rofl, hehe, lawl, and dr evil muahahahaha

    ahh, christians.. good times, no matter which slang you pick.. you can always laugh at crazy american christians..

  181. WWW=666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone said that www=666 in Hebrew, here's a link to it.

    http://www.av1611.org/666/www_666.html

    Now, I consider RFID's to be nothing more than barcodes 2.0.

    What I fear is accurate facial recognition. Imagine shoplifting when young and the store putting you into a shared big box database. You'd be banned for life from major stores. Walk in and the alarms for shoplifters go off. No expand this to robbers, theifs ... Kinda like a morality enforcement.

  182. A friend warned me of this over 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A born-again baptist friend (I'm atheist) warned me that when authorities tried to put some identifying device in/on my hand, to resist because this was the devil's work.

    This was long before I, and certainly she, knew of RFID.

    I always thought of it when I saw RFID tags, and thought of the eventual idea someone will advocate of tagging humans (no more wallets! no credit cards! no id! never lose track of your children!).

    I'm still an atheist, but I think the loss of privacy helps the more earthbound devils.

  183. The hero of the movie naked Mike Leigh (1993) .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. had similar thoughts regarding the mark of the beast.

    Only then he thought a barcode on the arm would be the mark. This character Johnny cited several barcode for humans studies.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107653/

  184. bring on the end by jjbarrows · · Score: 1

    if your a good christian, surely you should be actively working to bring on the end? though I do hope christian decide to oppose personal rfiding on religous grounds, then it wont mean your immediately suspect if you do refuse it. (under that silly 'only the guilty have anything to fear' idea refusal of personal rfiding constitues admission of guilt).

  185. "Rapture loans" by Animats · · Score: 5, Funny
    Back around 1997, I came up with the concept of "rapture loans". The idea was to sell balloon-payment second mortgages to fundamentalist Christians. If the Rapture came before the end of 2001, they owed nothing. They could thus enjoy "abundance" until the Rapture. At the end of 2001, interest payments started, and if they couldn't pay, foreclosure would follow.

    Marketing would be on Christian TV and radio stations, in the form of infomercials. "Quit your job now! Don't work again! Jesus is coming soon!", along with pictures of happy people with consumer goods. We considered finding some Christian figure to promote the product. Enough people were talking about the Rapture and the "Jubilee" back then that a modest market for the product clearly existed.

    (For those of you interested in financial mechanics, the money for the mortgages would be obtained by creating a derivative security that could be resold in the secondary mortgage market. The "rapture" contingency would be taken care of by obtaining an insurance policy against the "rapture" for each mortgage (probably from Lloyds or Swiss Re), using exactly the same definition of "rapture" as in the loan. The combination of the insurance policy and the loan would constitute a resellable security without a "rapture" contingency that could be packaged up and sold in the mortgage-based security market. So we wouldn't have to finance the deal, just broker it.)

    We didn't go through with it. It just seemed too evil.

    Nevertheless, when there are people running around claiming that Jesus is coming back soon, it's quite feasible to make money taking the other side of that bet.

    1. Re:"Rapture loans" by StressedEd · · Score: 2, Funny
      We didn't go through with it. It just seemed too evil.

      You presumably work in the financial sector. You opted not to do something because it was too evil.

      Hmm, maybe there is hope for humanity.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    2. Re:"Rapture loans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your rapture loans was the mark of the beast, you gave up the idea because it was too evil and humanity is saved again. Thanks for your sacrifice.

    3. Re:"Rapture loans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "rapture" contingency would be taken care of by obtaining an insurance policy against the "rapture" for each mortgage (probably from Lloyds or Swiss Re),

      "Hi, I'd like to buy an insurance policy against the rapture."

      "Um, pardon me?"

      "Yes, I'd like to give you a half-million dollars right now, and if vast numbers of Americans go miraculously flying up into the sky, to be followed shortly by the end of the world, you will pay me 500 million dollars."

      "If the US economy completely collapses, and then the world ends, you want me to pay you in dollars?"

      "Yes, that's correct."

      Dude, sign me up! Where can I get in on this deal?

    4. Re:"Rapture loans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We didn't go through with it. It just seemed too evil."

      Future slashdot trupe: Google Rapture Loan (Beta)

    5. Re:"Rapture loans" by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      I doubt that many Americans would disappear in the event of the Rapture happening.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  186. Reasonable Analysis...Re:Crazy Cult Beli.... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1
    What almost all scholars agree on is that whoever the beast may be is irrelevant when one simply holds to the principles that the bible teaching when dealing with the beast as with dealing with anyone, thus finding the beast is pointless. Unfortunately, not all Christians are scholars and some like to draw shaky parallels and make accusations without merit.

    Your "almost all scholars" are terribly missinformed. The specific scriptures regarding "finding the beast" state clearly that it is neither "pointless" nor "irrelevant". It is actually "wise" to do determine who the beast is and scripture even tells you how to determine who the beast is (calculate the number of his name), which you contradict readily without any references to back up your statement other than a vague reference to "almost all scholars", here's the scriptures your scholars would have to use as the basis of your arguement.

    ---------

    It is not a good thing to get the mark. So avoiding this is important...

    Rev 14:9-11
    9 Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand,
    10 he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
    11 "And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name."

    Being decieved by the beast and false prophet is directly related to recieving the mark.

    Rev 19:20
    And the beast was seized, and with him the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone.
    This says it's _wise_ to determine who the beast is.
    Rev. 13:18
    Here is wisdom Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.
  187. The meaning of Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen means believe in Hebrew. Written as Alef, mem, nun. (I am an Israely)

  188. the mark is not tech. dependant by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Just because RFID tech. is imbedded in the skin and can store information does not mean that the 'end times' are any closer or that RFID will be used by the antiChrist.

    The 'mark of the beast' as described in Revelations could be almost anything. Yes, I agree that RFID *could* be used in some far-flung end times scenario, but the fact is, it doesn't matter.

    The end times are a certainty (for most Christians), but the actual sequence of events is anything but. We can say for certain, however, that the mark of the beast will not be a clandestine thing that people are tricked into taking. The opposite is true, scripture is very clear that people will choose to take the mark knowing full-well the significance. Plus, wether it's RFID, a tatoo, a scarification procedure, or something else we haven't thought of, the mark will have the same consequences, so really this whole article is moot.

    My take on this article is that this woman is just another fear-monger, trying to make a buck by stirring up the multitudes of Christians who are ignorant of what the Bible really says about the end times.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  189. RFID Reusability by Black+Acid · · Score: 1
    Provided it's difficult to falsify RFID tags (and I think that's the idea)

    AFAIK, that currently isn't the idea. Most newer tags can be reprogrammed and reused very easily. Reusing tags can save a lot of money and is a major goal in RFID technology. For example, in one application, high-temperature tags are embedded in a combustion engine during testing. The calibration/QA system reads the tags and performs tests accordingly. If everything checks out, the tag is removed and can be reused for the next unit.

    Granted, when tags are cheap enough that reusing them is not worth it, reprogrammability may go out the window. But even then, it would take some serious effort to make tamper-proof RFID tags. Who knows--smart cards are already fairly secure; maybe future tags will include embedded processors with challenge/response authentication (difficult with the passive power requirements, but low-power chips and active tags are getting better). But for now, RFID tags are just a bag of bits.

    1. Re:RFID Reusability by AusIV · · Score: 1
      Yes, but current RFID tags aren't currently intended to be imbeded in people and used for identification.

      And actually, reprogrammable RFID tags might be the key to making them secure. Analogy time: my garage door opener has a remote. The remote has three buttons, so it can work with three different garage doors. I assumed that when the remote was programmed to work with the garage door opener, it simply registered the remote's ID with the opener unit, so I didn't understand what made three buttons necessary. So I asked the guy who installed the opener why I couldn't just register the same button with several garage door openers. He told me that for the sake of security, every time the remote sends its signal to the opening unit, the opener sends back a signal telling the remote what code to use next time. So the garage door remote changes keys every time it communicates with the opener. I'd think with a little effort, something like that could make RFID tags relatively secure.

  190. Verichip by DreadHarn · · Score: 0

    Are you really so blind as to believe this could not potentially lead to some malicious policy of chipping humans? This is what corporations and governments rely on--the desensitazation of society over decades. It starts small and inobtrusive and continues that course until one day you wake up and realize you have a device beeping in your hand. Don't laught, don't ignore it, the threat is real. This is human nature to want to control every aspect of the world around them, including the people around them. Our governement is no different, and neither are cold heartless corporations.

  191. Amazing, Simply Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, it's interesting how things like this get publicized. No one believes this shit, not even christians. Just because some radical muslim was a suicide bomber, does that means that all muslims are hell bent on war/murder? No... Just because some radical christian thinks that the messiah is coming because of the use of existing technology in a new and useful manner means that all christians? a majority? ok, maybe more than 15% of them... believe the same stuff... very unlikely...

    So, if so few people believe this stuff, why does it get national publicity? This is not the only example... turn on the news, it's filled with nonsense like this.

  192. I hope you're right, I really do. by salparadyse · · Score: 1

    We only get one piece of information to judge this one on. "Can you participate in the economic system without this chip/implant/tag?" If the answer is no, then maybe you need to go and check out the New Testament. If the answer is yes then move along, Damien and his creepy friends aren't here. Problem being that Revelation has evidently not happened yet. Problem also being that a fair few "prophecies" from the Old Testament came true - to the letter. God, after all, is a rather clever Chap. It would be a bit spooky, to say the least, if a world economic system came into force that required everyone being marked with a tag of some sort, without which you were homeless, foodless and helpless and it be "just co-incidence" that it was written about 2000 years ago. (In a time BEFORE the means for such a system were even imaginable).

  193. Yeah, right by Tom · · Score: 1

    Can we cut this Nostradamus-wannabe-nonsense from /.? Please?

    With a sufficiently old, vague and twice-translated generic phrase, you can interpret whatever you like.

    There's a great book, I think the title was "my paranormal bycicle" where a scientist reveals the art of finding "mystical" numbers. This is no different. The keyword is "a mark", which can (and has been) interpreted as any one of about 50 different things.

    At least Nostradamus used interesting language.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Yeah, right by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      You know, I don't care if it's nonsense or not -- if the beliefs of the religious right and the Book of Revelation can forestall the arrival of the perfect surveillance society, I'm all for it.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  194. Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a supposedly technology based publication run an article about this type of religious fundamentalist?
    The religious lunatics of this world have always tried to impede scientific progress. Such people have murdered scientists who contracticted their religous dogma, and irrationally opposed various forms of science that they don't like (eg. 'intelligent design', anti-abortionists, etc.)
    The last thing the we need to hear in any technical publication is words of a lunatic. Wired should be ashamed of publishing this religously inluenced psychobabble.
    I can't see how RFID poses any threat to us. It is short range, doesn't normally tie goods to any specific individual, and the tags can be removed and disposed of, and it is quite obvious when they are stuck to something. As far as I am concerned, RFID tags are just alternatives to bar codes.
    As for surveillence culture, I would rather be walking through a city centre at night convered by surveillence cameras.
    Clearly we don't need biometrics, and clearly we don't need identity cards (like being asked for your papers in a fascist regime). As long as the basic human rights of anonymity, and the right to personal privacy are not threatened, technology should not be seen as a problem. The problem with the arguments of these people is they can't actually explain how these technologies threaten these rights; their opposition to them is like all things religious, irrational.

  195. arabic amen by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

    Amin in arabic, I believe. It is also related to "yemin" which basicly means oath. Both are widely used, when a wish is done, all wishes done against the will of god. You are not supposed to make oaths nillywilly.

  196. calls to the prayer by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative
    Btw, those calls from the minarets are calls to the prayer, just like church bells in Christian communities - both are nuisance in my opinion, wakes you up too early, especially the dawn prayers in muslim countries - bloody hell, it's 5AM and I've just gone to sleep and some idiot starts screaming thru speakers. Same with church bells, too noisy, especially on Sundays when I'm supposed to have my beauty sleep! :)

    Basically calls to the prayers are not prayers themselves therefore they don't have to end with anything special. Allahuekber means "God is great". Bah.

    1. Re:calls to the prayer by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Allahuekber means "God is great".

      Actually, that is fine with me, but can't they be a little more specific - which God? Some Gods aren't very nice. My favourite God is Bachus and the Muses...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:calls to the prayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the Koran says "There is no God but God". (That is, the God of Abraham, to the Muslims "Allah")

  197. Same old barcode debate by henrytheexistentiali · · Score: 1

    Isn't this essentially just a rehash of the old barcode-as mark of the devil debate? There's an excellent scene in Naked by Mike Leigh about this...

    "What is the mark? Well the mark Brian, is the barcode. The ubitiqous barcode that you'll find on every bog roll, and every packet of johnny's and every poxie-pot pie. And every [expletive-removed] barcode is divided into two parts by three markers and those three markers are always represented by the number six. Six-six-six. Now what does it say? No one shall be able to buy or sell without that mark. And now what they're planning to do in order to eradicate all credit card fraud and in order to precipitate a totally cashless society. What they're planning to do; what they've already tested on the American troops; they're going to subcutaneously laser tattoo that mark onto your right hand or onto your forehead." (Naked, British movie, 1993, directed by Mike Leigh and starring David Thewlis)

    http://www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html

  198. In other "the world is comming to an end" news... by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    WinXP Boots on a Mac!!!1
    http://www.mathcaddy.com/windowsxpbootsonamac!!!!1 / (yes, the !!!!1 is intended)

    --
    Scott Swezey
  199. Orthodox Church & Protestantism on Revelations by jdfox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To this day the Eastern Orthodox Church does not consider it part of the Canon.

    I was baptised Orthodox, and I can assure you that that's not true. It's considered by the Orthodox Church as part of the Canon, but is not read as part of Divine Liturgy. A PBS documentary once mistakenly claimed the Orthodox Church doesn't consider it part of the canon, and this mistake has been widely repeated ever since. Walk into any Orthodox church this morning, and have a look. Most English-speaking Orthodox churches use the Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha, which includes the book of Revelation.

    There's an Orthodox monastery above the place on the Isle of Patmos in Greece where St. John the Divine received his Revelation, and the spot where St. John is said to have written it is a site of frequent Orthodox pilgrimage.

    The Orthodox Church teaches that Revelations is a divinely inspired book, but should not be taken as a literal account of future events.

    In fact, the Book of Revelations was a controversial addition to the early Bible, and several Bishops argued against including it in the canon due to the difficulty of interpreting it, and hence, its potential for abuse--particularly the type of abuse so typical of fundamentalists, who keep claiming that the end times are upon us. Other portions of the Bible specifically warn against doing this, because only God knows the time when the world will end.

    Neither did Martin Luther:

    "About this book of the Revelation of John...I miss more than one thing in this book, and it makes me consider it to be neither apostolic nor prophetic...I can in no way detect that the Holy Spirit produced it. Moreover he seems to me to be going much too far when he commends his own book so highly-indeed, more than any of the other sacred books do, though they are much more important-and threatens that if anyone takes away anything from it, God will take away from him, etc. Again, they are supposed to be blessed who keep what is written in this book; and yet no one knows what that is, to say nothing of keeping it. This is just the same as if we did not have the book at all. And there are many far better books available for us to keep...My spirit cannot accommodate itself to this book. For me this is reason enough not to think highly of it: Christ is neither taught nor known in it" (Luther, M. Preface to the Revelation of St. John, 1522).
    Luther didn't think that the Catholic Church was infallible in determining canonicity, and rejected Revelations, and the Epistles of James (he called it an "epistle of straw"), Jude and Hebrews. Yet the Protestantism that he was instrumental in founding still fiercely defends the Catholic/Orthodox Canon of the Bible, including the Book of Revelation. On the other hand, they reject the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches' teachings on it, and on much else besides.
    I haven't entirely worked my own beliefs yet, but this contradiction never made any sense to me.
  200. The same misreading over and over again... by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

    Every time this conversation comes up it drives me nuts, because it's based on a misreading of the bible. For those wondering, here's the relevant text (King James):

    Revelation 13

    16: And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    17: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    18: Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    The confusion always seems to come from the pronoun "his" in 17. People read it to mean each person will have a number associated with their name (hence SSN, RFID, etc). But the "him" referred to here is the beast, as evidenced by the next verse. Now, when congress passes the law that everyone has to have 666, or Satan, stamped on them, that's when you start worrying.

  201. sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so how do I get that 666 RFID tag?

    I like christians, I can just never eat a whole one.

  202. Kaiser Sose Said it Best by cyberbian · · Score: 1

    "The best trick the devil ever pulled was making humanity believe he didn't exist."
    - Kevin Spacey as Kaiser Sose in The Usual Suspects

    --
    if I claimed I was emperor just because some watery tart lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!
  203. The end...of righties by bostonrobot · · Score: 1

    Let's just put it in everyone's left hand then. Problem solved!

  204. Not entirely unlikely, imho. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I [Post Anonymously] for obvious reasons.

    Forehead or hand. Noone will be able to buy or sell.

    That's a personal ID micro (RFID/Angel/whatever) chip buried into your forehead or the palm (or back) of your hand and a totalitarian capitalistic system that "serves" all and chashes and bills every thing whatsoever automatically to your 'universal balance' based on that chip.

    Not unlikely to happen if you ask me. Allthough it might take another 100 - 150 years.

    Which more or less fits the schedule of most of the profecies on this "arrival of the beast" thing.

    But most of the profecies (and that's not only the confessional christian ones) don't speak of "the beast" arriving but of the incarnation of Ariman (often mistaken with the demon "Satan" in the middle ages) which - contrary to popular belief (no pun intended) - is not the same being as Luzifer. Luzifer is the one which seduces the soul, Ariman (aka 'Satan') the one which seduces the body. According to some Occultists each spiritual being has the 'right' to incarnarte one time - and Ariman is preparing his incarnation within the next few hundred years.

    I wouldn't say I "believe" that in the way bothersome bible belt christians tend to propagate but I'd suspect that such a being would incarnate itself into the appropriate human - Adolf Hitler or Ayatolla Chomeni maybe. If this should happen I'd imagine it would happen in a sort of way Frank Herbert describes it in his Dune tapestry. It is in some of those books where Muhadips daugthers mind slowly is engulfed by the spirit of Baron Harkonnen. One could maybe imagine the incarnation of Ariman taking place sort of that way.

    Churious enough we - computer geeks - notive all the bizar tendencies modern culture adn is misconception brings us. Software Patents as the basic form of "Thoughtcrime" or "Mind Patents" come to mind.

    I wouldn't mock and dissmis these 'warings' completely and find that Python Funny-Foot a little displaced. Personally, I tend to be wary of the developement of our global technocracy. The "arrival of the beast" as it is called may be inevitable and foretold, however how we de deal with it isn't. That's the part that's interesting. Use and know technology but be aware that that may be absolutely not what human life is all about. That's what I say. And I am not a confessional or baptised christian.

  205. JESUS SAVES - At First National Bank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An advertisement I have been waiting to see for some time...

  206. Already happened by KDR_11k · · Score: 1
    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  207. OH definitely by SlippyToad · · Score: 1
    If you look at the mega-church complexes that have arisen, you get an even more distinct message from Christianity: We're wealthy, we like to network, and we like to show YOU how unstoppable we are.

    One of the mall-churches near my house is referred to as "Six Flags Over Jesus" and is crammed in between a huge series of mega car dealerships and walmarts. It's clearly as much a commercial enterprise as any of the others, and there's none of the austerity or severity I normally associate with "church" surrounding it. It's all business. At one time I was told this Superdome of a church claimed a congregation of 30,000 -- that's in a city whose population is under half a million.

    The gaping insincerity of this organization is just beyond comprehension.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  208. "RFID, Sign of the (End) Times?" by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Of course, any event that vaguely resembles something in their book of children's stories is evidence to these fucking nutjobs.

  209. stepping stones by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    rfid may not be "the" mark, but it definately is a step towards it.

    have you ever wondered why the mark would be centered around trading and commerce? isn't that weird, weird that they would have guessed that a controlled, convienent, consolidated system of buying/selling was the mark?

    does that mean the mark came about because there was something that was difficult about buying/selling? does the world come to a point where it was able to conterfeit/clone anything including legal tender?

    the rfid technology of current day may not be "the" mark, but you can easily see how it can evolve a progression of technology such that something down the line will be it.

  210. No, it's definitely Austria (Includes Map) by giafly · · Score: 1
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  211. Religion and Reality conflict by Dh2000 · · Score: 1

    Destruction of that myth requires only this: Adam never existed. Even if he did, for a 'perfect' man to make a mistake is impossible. Another thing... if Adam didn't know good and evil, how could he possibly have know that he shouldn't have eaten the 'knowledge fruit'? That's right, he couldn't. It'd be like killing or beating a 2-month-old for making a mess of it's food after you've sternly warned it to not spill anything, while being well aware the baby cannot comprehend you. The 'first sin' is completely, utterly illogical and self-contradicts.

    Yay, I discredited the entire basis of Christianity... original sin.. and it was so very easy, too.

    Of course, you have to accept the physical world and logic and apply them to your religion to see these obvious truths.. sadly, very few religious people can get past their childhood indoctrination. Some Christians are even fond of the mantra 'faith like a child', encouraging adults not to think too deeply about their beliefs.

    1. Re:Religion and Reality conflict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could actually eat from every tree in the garden except that one... He was told this.

    2. Re:Religion and Reality conflict by Dh2000 · · Score: 1

      Uhmm.. let me makes this extremely clear: If he didn't know good from evil, then he couldn't know disobedience was wrong. If he didn't know disobedience was wrong, then he'd have no reason not to do it.

      I guess you could say that he had no conscience, no moral qualms, no respect for authority, etc, etc. A perfect man. ;)

      Kinda simple, isn't it? Telling someone like that not-to-do-something doesn't work, and is rather silly to expect anything other than eventual disobedience. That a god gets angry when his amoral creation disobeys him is the height of absurdity. And that the god didn't want man to be knowledgeable about ethics is just bizarre.

      What if Adam decided to kill and eat Eve because he was hungry? He'd just do it without ever feeling any remorse.. and then the human race ends :)

      Brilliant planning.

  212. Skeptics by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    "Others are skeptical saying that many new technologies, such as the printing press, bar-codes, and several others, have also created fears about the beginning of the end."

    Actually, I'm not skeptical because of that very poor argument, I tend more to being skeptical because it's all a load of made up baloney.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  213. What if... by RobinH · · Score: 1

    What if the government gave you the option of having the RFID chip implanted on your left hand? No problem?

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:What if... by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      I want the option of having it implanted in my butt. That way the info would litteraly be comming out my A$$ :D

          Otherwise i don't want it. On second thought i don't want it either way so forget it.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  214. The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame that many people so technologically advanced are so switched off spiritually.

    The beast is Satan. He wants to be god. He will be cast to earth in his supernatural presence to pretend to be Jesus. The whole world will worship him, except those without the mark of the beast in their foreheads - those that know it's Satan. Family members that don't know it's Satan will lead loved ones that do know it's Satan up to Death - death being Satan. These holdouts will be put on trial and the whole world will hate them. The Holy Spirit will speak through these people and what will be said will wake up a lot of spiritually asleep people. During the time of the locust, which is 5 months in length, there will be two witnesses that will speak against the anti (false) Christ. Satan will see to it that these 2 are killed. The whole Satan-worshipping shoulda-read-the-bible-with-understanding world population will be sooooo happy as the dead bodies of these two lie for three days, after which they will stand up. Then, as a thief in the night (it not being day spiritually when Satan is here pretending to be god), the True Christ will return... when least expected. Then those that did not wait as virgins for the true Christ and spiritually wed the false christ will pray for mountains to fall on themselves.

    Satan will pretend to be Jesus in Jerusalem. He'll be able to do miracles in the sight of men. He'll come in "peace" and "prosperity", and likely pay off all your bills - all you have to do is worship him.

    It's going to happen Real Soon Now.

  215. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by mclaincausey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I write this assuming from context that by "literary validation" you mean popularity. "Literary validation" would actually mean something like scholars of literature widely citing the book as some sort of masterpiece. The Bible is not a single piece of literature, so I don't think that would apply.

    Sorry, but an appeal to popularity is yet another logical fallacy. At one point (and perhaps still today), the majority of people in America thought Saddam Hussein was involved in 9-11. The popularity of that (deliberately implanted) falsehood does not make it true. Truth is independent of popularity. In fact, many of the greatest scientific revolutions (continental drift and heliocentrism come to mind) were initially met with contempt, disbelief, and even censorship and threats. The popularity of the Bible, and even the fact that some of the events in the Bible are historically verifiable, do not make the other events in the Bible, particularly the ones that are unprecedented, any more credible.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  216. blah by DavidGX · · Score: 1

    Religious people == morons.

  217. why does this creature need to be worshipped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all a very elaborate way of getting thing/angels/humans to worship this creature.
    What exactly is that?

    If I go buy some dogs, and tell them to be good and fetch my paper every day.
    The dogs that run away, I kill or have tortured.
    This is not really fair for the dogs that stay or run away right.

  218. Herein is truth -- there is nothing to fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well first off, the book is titled "Revelation" no "s" on the end.

    The prophecies therein speak to certain internal events which occur as one progresses spiritually and emotionally through life. Any similarity or resemblance to external world events is purely coincidental.

    Those who would use Revelation to foment FUD are indeed allied with an empire which is not so much evil as ill-informed and uncomfortable in their own skin.

    PS. Find Robt. Langdon

  219. This will be the thing that really takes off... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    As the election of GW Bush has already demonstrated, emotional and/or religious grounds work way better to get the masses to do anything than logical arguments do. Just like environmentalists cultivate the "awww, don't hurt the cute fuzzy animals!" line to get support from the public, these loonies are much more likely to garner support for their cause than we are by saying that it erodes our privacy. Privacy is already eroded to the point that we have CCTV cameras on every street corner, and cell phones that report our position on every hip, and we like it that way.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  220. the pope is the antichrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says so on his hat, "Vicarius Filii Dei" translates to 666 when converted to Roman numerals.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarius_Filii_Dei

    we're all gonna die. drink the kool-aid
    D. Koresh

  221. Because it may not be a LONE nutjob by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful
    why are you guys posting articles by some flakey Christian who thinks progressive technology is the devil?

    If this "flake" is able to convince a large enough number of other Christians to flake out over this, it will impact how RFID gets used. The RFID design or usage plans may get modified, using "avoid freaking out the evangelical nutjobs" as an added implementation criterion. The resulting design changes may make for something that the rest of us will be happier with... or make for something that we will be much unhappier with. This makes it "stuff that matters".

    Society affects technology, and vice versa. Not all of society is rational, but the irrational parts still impact technology. Of course, the Slashdot discussion won't focus on this, because (a) figuring out exactly how this will impact RFID is pretty hard and (b) making fun of fundamentalist christian whackos is more enjoyable for a lot of Slashdotters.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  222. Fallacy II (electric bugalo) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mark of the Beast probably refers to the tatoos that were given to slaves

    The bible specifically says that only people with this mark could buy stuff like food. So you're saying that it refers to slaves? You think that in anchient rome only slaves could buy food.

    Nope. Try again.

  223. What stupid story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the ignore list ScuttleMonkey.

  224. Erm... by Suichi · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys, but I'd like to see someone who's against RFID who isn't using the "it's a sign of the End Times!" as a reasoning for it. Maybe, you know, someone could be logical about it and bring up the privacy/"Big Brother" issues it could cause? I'd find it much more credible than religious texts, myself.

  225. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

    One flaw in your idea though.

        Most good god fearing christians want to bring about revelation or the rapture.

        Why?

        Because they belive that they will be raptured away from earth to heaven and be with god and jesus before all the bad stuff goes down and the end comes. So they would be happy that the end times have arrived never mind the suffering on the human scale that is to follow.

        One thing that gets me is how could good christians want to have such a thing happen any sooner than it has to given the suffering torture coruption of human souls and deaths that are to surely happen.

        Just seems inhuman to me and they call themselves good christians? The mind boggles.

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  226. Its the appochalypse alright, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought I had a hand in it with all this wireless stuff ;)

  227. Have you read the book? by miller60 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't read the "Christian" version of Albrecht's book, but I'm reading "Spychips" now. I bought it after reading the story here on Slashdot about data center engineers having RFID chips implanted in their arms for security access. The plain fact is that whatever Albrecht's religious leanings, the book is really well reported, with a ton of information from patent filings filled with surprising revelations about the ways major corporations want to integrate RFID into everything. I think it's an important book that raises awareness of the potential privacy issues surrounding RFID. It sure raised mine.

  228. Ugh... Revelation figurative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok kids, Revelation is not a literal prophecy, as if dragons and monsters were going to start coming out of the sea and actual people on colored horses were going to start trotting round the earth. At the VERY BEGINNING OF THIS BOOK, it reads:

    Revelation 1:1(American Standard Version) - (end of verse) "...and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;"

    Revelation 1:1(New World Translation) - "And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John,"

    From the start, this book says it's written in signs, or is a FIGURATIVE book, so in other words, when it says that the "beast" gives a "mark" to people that want to do business, you'd think of times past where soldiers or religous adherants would wear the mark of their leader or god upon their forehead. And the same can be said of putting it on the "right hand", thus it would be plainly seen you belonged to the "beast". So... this is a figurative "mark", like an attitude or allegiance that you give to your leader or "beast. The "beast" is representative as well, and from I can see, people are already allowing themselves or willingly accepting that mark of allegiance, and have been for around 100 years.

    I can understand why so many view religious people as idiots, because of the crazy things that they are taught. But that's NOT what the bible really teaches, these so-called "christians" don't actually read and reason on the bible. Not that ALL people who read the bible are crazy, but you have to search for those that make sense. Next time, talk to some Jehovah's Witnesses about it; to me, they are the only ones that actually sound reasonable, even if they do seem somewhat pushy.

  229. Heard this one before on EAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When EAN codes were new, christians handing out colourful leaflets with animals resting together told me that EAN codes were in fact the number of the beast. If you look at any EAN code (barcode) you will see that the number 6 seem to be represented by two equally thin lines. Well, the EAN always has two such lines at the start, in the middle and at the end, hence 666.

    These lines do in fact not represent 6 but (surprise) start, middle and end.

    How they actually got 666 to fit in RFID would be mildly entertaining to hear some friday evening in some pub.

  230. Even if RFID does happen... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    ...just as the book of Revelation says, there will still be stupid people out there who will make every excuse in the book as to why it's not the end days and another Bible prophesy fulfilled.

    They see earthquakes in diverse places, they see wars and rumours of wars and plagues and the list goes on and on and they will still REFUSE TO BELIEVE GOD EXISTS.

    It's baffling to me.

    1. Re:Even if RFID does happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's baffling to me.
      Yes. Yes, I can quite believe that.

  231. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by aukxsona · · Score: 1

    Except the Bible says the Beast will reighn for (X) years....you think they won't fight the beast and his mark before tha rapture...

    I could look it up if you'd like.

    --
    Not a geek just looking for one.
  232. Cash or check. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I found your pitch both inteligent and compelling and i wish to purchase your product and or service. :P

    I'm set up on Paypal and I take checks or money order. I have a full product line, but honestly, ideas are free. I think you may have mis-read my 'pitch'. But if you truly want to give me your money, I'd be happy to sell you a few items.


    -FL

    1. Re:Cash or check. by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes i'll get some of your

      Fear food with a side of evil Overlord and crispy fries also some fool's religion with some Prophecy to go in a bag if you could.

        Put it all on my Visa 666 card charged to the beast ok

          Oh and could you throw some twisted truths and heavens gate with gatekeepers and a few bad deed counters hold the soul work, And also could i get some access to will power as well.

          Oh almost forgot put a key in the bag as well heavens gate is no good without the key, Gotta have the key.

          Just put it all on the plastic if you could thanks. :D

          Sorry twisted humor you left that one out of your menu. :P

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    2. Re:Cash or check. by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh wait Cash or check?

          No Plastic?

      Ppftttt Forget it then ill go to Mickey D's down the street they take plastic. :D

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  233. Scripture Verses About the Mark by 4d49434841454c · · Score: 1

    Revelation 13

      14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

      15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

      16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

      17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

      18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    Revelation 14

      9And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,

      10The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

      11And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

    Revelation 16

      2And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

      11And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds.

    Revelation 19

      20And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

    Revelation 20

      4And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

  234. Where is the Kings ring? by Yodamasterjedi · · Score: 1

    Implanting a chip under your skin as a personal ID is a very naive idea. It sounds like a sales stunt from a freshman business student, adopted by a desperate-for-recognition start-up company. We have implanted a lot of technologies in our bodies.

    Just for example; crown teeth and filling, artificial joints, heart valves, remains dispensers for colon-cancer removals, plastic Corneal Implants, steel plates for broken bones, titanium replacements for bones, bypass implants, artificial skin for burns victims, in addition to silicon implants for cosmetic surgeries.

    Every time any of these new medical miracles come out, we hear most of the voices praising science and we hear the religious crowd performing ceremonial rituals for acceptance of these new medicines and surgical operations. RFID deployment inside the human body is simply an overdue addition to these medical miracles. However, the moment we begin to consider that a permanent implant in the body is a work related subject, and that it is part of the job, we instantly forget the real world.

    The real world states that you have the possibility of losing your job by the end of the surgery, or even sometimes while you are on the surgery table. In todays world of corporate America, a layoff, department change, a transfer, a promotion, a merger, an acquisition, a bankruptcy, or simply closing the shop and going out of business due to closure of the business unit is just around the corner. add the changing world of software, hardware, networks and wiring, etc, and you have an extreme possibility of one-year time life expectancy for such an implant.

    Maybe the clandestine and intelligence community, in addition to industrial espionage community would benefit from such implants, because simply they have a lot more in their life to worry about than just a chip implant under the skin.

    This makes you ask a simple question; what happened to the ancient old way of verification; Where is the kings ring that he gave you? How come you are not wearing it?

    The ironic answer might be; I do not like rings, but I love chip-implants under my skin.

    That does not mean that this is the end of times. That means you just got an answer from a freakin wierdo.

  235. Enemies. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, exactly! The enemy of my enemy, as that old saying goes, is my friend, however temporarily. And if that newfound friend happens to be a much more vocal and powerful group than yours, then milk it for all it's worth!

  236. If Zeus did not pull sun accross sky, who did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You argue:
    "it's crazy to posit that the universe came into existence on its own, purely by chance"

    but assuming one more level of creation does not make anything less crazy (it just matches sunday school). I assume if you really believe your first argument then this would also hold:

    "it's crazy to posit that the invisible-man(more complex than universe) came into existence on his own, purely by chance, then created the universe".

    Introducing the invisible man into the equation did not help.

    Why does the invisible-man want/need to be worshipped.
    Is there really no higher purpose in Christianity other than the slave humans worshipping the invisible master?

    It's all very silly if you really think about it.

  237. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chuckle. No, I'd wager that he meant that the Bible is a literal and inerrant historical document, and that the grand Canyon is absolute proof of The Flood 4000 years ago.

  238. Helios did, you fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Sol in the Roman pantheon. Apollo also sometimes appears in that role, but never Zeus.

  239. Re:Prophecy Times Two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "The funny thing is that the whole book of Revelations is far more likely to be about events in the first century, with either Jerusalem or Rome being the Whore of Babylon and the Beast being the Emperor or the Roman Army."

    - There's one thing that people who posit this sort of thing always seem to miss, and that is that many of the prophecies in the Bible come true twice.

    For instance, the coming of the Messiah was widely misunderstood by the Jews because His coming was prophesied as coming both in shame and oppression, and as a glorified conqueror. They assumed he would only come once, so the Jews 'solved' this dilemma by saying that the way He came would be determined by how faithful the Jews were to God. But, the Christian understanding is much more full. He came first as the suffering servant and will come again as the conquering King.

    It is true that there are a lot of events in the first century that seem to fulfill revelation, but that time period also lacks a lot of events from revelation. The second apocalypse will be the real and final one fulfilling all the rest of the prophecies.

    I agree that RFID and similar technologies are the Mark of the Beast, or they will be when the day comes that having it implanted it synonymous with allegiance to a one-world superpower. But, I disagree with the author being against these technologies! We as christians know they will come, must come, and we should be welcoming them, not fearing them. The Lord's coming is a blessing, certainly. Heck, buy stock in the verichip company, one day it will be supplying a few billion RFID chips.

  240. Re:Orthodox Church & Protestantism on Revelati by PrayingWolf · · Score: 1
    There is a danger of not seeing the forest for the trees. I mean getting all worked up about some chip is really not the point. Your quote from Luther can mean that we shouldn't be looking for the concrete artifacts of end-time, but it does not mean the bible doesn't predict end-times throughout its pages.

    "Christ is neither taught nor known in it" also doesn't mean this. Jesus did talk about the end-times himself, referring to the book of Daniel. He spoke of wars, and other catastrophies which are also signs of the end.

    Lets not shut our eyes from the end-times just because we don't buy this thing about RFIDs and stuff - there is much more to it.

  241. End of the world on the MS time scale by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    The End the world is getting like the Windows 95 release date.
    The end of the world is now.... okay it'll be here soon... alright were pushing it back few years....

    I beleave the end of the world is just a way of manipulating hearts and minds, after all who wants to be on the wrong side during the appocalypse?

    BTW how does this person thing RFID tags will cause the end of the world??
    "Bwahahaha I am satan behold my dark powers for I know for the RFID tag that you are low on jam, tremble as I remove all the jam from the Earth and cast it into the sun! There will be no more jam and you will have to use peanut butter for all eternity! Bwhahahahahah!"

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  242. The book of revelations by gunnarstahl · · Score: 0

    If this whole book of revelations was born in the imagination of John, than it is pointless and should be burned in the fire of history. But if this book was really the result of a vision that John had, than this book is highly relevant.

    For me I take this book as the result of a vision. Therefore I take it as very important. But it should not be used as a cheap and quick argument.

    This book is not about the mark. This book deals at first with the churches. Something like the president talking about the state of the nation. The one speaking in the book tries to bring his nation, the churches, back on the road. Many churches have lost their way, their first love, their focus on Jesus and the focus on their duties. They forgot their very reason for existance. Take a look at the first chapters of the revelations, read what "the angel has to tell to the churches".

    And the one speaking in this book shows the readers the future. As a warning and as a guiding light for what will inevitable come.

    There will come a time when one person standing at the top of a worldwide spanning ruling government will have unlimitted power. Earthly power and divine powers. He will be the clearly identified, unquestioned emperor of the whole known world.

    And he will call himself god. He will perform miracles. Healing the sick, raising the dead. He will _prove_ his godly nature by these miracles.

    And people will follow him. They will make a clear, conscious decission to follow him. To bind themselves to him. And these people will receive the mark of him. With his sign engraved.

    And the ones wearing the mark will be the only ones who have the right to participat in the society and economy. They will be the only ones who can buy and sell.

    So they clearly, willingly, knowingly sell themselve to him in exchange for living the life that he offers them.

    It is not and by no means possible to take the mark of the beast unknowingly and unwillingly. Therefore this whole question whether or not a certain technology will be the mark of the beast leads nowhere. It just distracts. Its a pointless, useless question. Which you can not answer. It is neither provable nor disprovable. It just gives you the feeling that something it is wrong. Without knowing _what_ is wrong. Like this "If you have nothing to hide" argument. It gnaws in the back of your mind.

    This question somehow implies that it is possible to take the mark of the beast unwillingly. And unknowingly. You find a certain technology like a rfid chip useful, implant a gps chip to yourself and to your children so you always know where they are just to find out a couple of weeks later that you sold yourself to the devil.

    No, this is not possible.

  243. Re: Mod fallacy funny by Marce1 · · Score: 1

    When I saw the mod score reason I laughed out loud:

    Someone give that modder a (free) beer - I was seriously considering the evils of \. until then!

    --
    [ insert meme here ]
  244. Difference between Europe and America by Jadrano · · Score: 1

    This is not true. Religon in America today is still strong as ever. While a large portion of the role religion of is being replaced by education and science, the socially cohesive effects are as strong as ever. [...]Europe is more or less still atheistic, but the value system is certainly the same - which is why we see the objections to Turkey joining the EU, and Christian parties are still key members of government coalitions.

    I think there is a significant difference between Europe and America in that respect, in most parts of Europe, religion plays a rather small role for social cohesion. The objection to Turkey has much more to do with nationalism and cultural differences and prejudices than Europeans being religious Christians - it is just one of many cases in which religion is important as an attribute of national/ethic groups, but not because of its religious content. For instance, people in Northern Ireland or countries in former Yugoslavia, where there are conflicts between groups belonging to different religions, are hardly particularly religious, religion just happens to be an attribute of groups between which there are conflicts because of reasons not related to religion.
    In many European countries, parties with 'Christian' in their name are strong, but most of them are just moderate conservative-centrist parties, and although there are sometimes discussions about the role of the 'C' in the name, in practice religion is not one of the central political issues of these parties.
    Some people talk about a revival of religion, but I don't think the evidence is convincing, as far as Europe is concerned. Of course, the Christian religion is not completely dead in Europe, only a small minority of people are really religions, and in most cases when religion comes up in public discussion (often in connection with Islam) it is not really about religion, but about questions of migration and cultural traditions.

  245. are you fucking kidding me? by ClioCJS · · Score: 0, Troll
    Just google for bible contradictions and you will find many. But since you apparantly pool the wool over your own eyes I wouldn't expect you to notice.

    If you're a troll, know that I will not respond to your response, so don't bother.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:are you fucking kidding me? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Every Generation believes they are the first to have discovered the apparent contradictions, but oddly enough, there are volumes discussing and explaining the misunderstandings that lead to the identification of these items as contradictory that are as much as 1000 years old.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    2. Re:are you fucking kidding me? by ltbarcly · · Score: 1
      Nope. There are gaping holes in the bible. There are huge gaping holes. Even the bible admits holes, and large parts of the bible carry the discaimer that those parts are merely the opinion of the (human) author, and should not be construed to be the word of god.

      Even if you ignore the parts that are clearly nonsense, you end up with widely varying stories.

      Jesus says 'turn the other cheek' and 'pick up YOUR cross, and follow me'.

      Jesus also says 'I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. '

      Of course, this is just the author of the book attributed to Matthew misquoting Micah and attributing it to Jesus.

      Then there are all the mis-prophesies of Jesus.

      "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled."
      "Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done."
      "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled."

      Matthew, Mark, and Luke respectively. Now, Jesus is talking about his return, and the Judgement, etc. Clearly that entire generation, and the next 100 or so generations have now died. Jesus has not returned.

      Christians try to say that is because that generation ISN'T really dead. They are in heaven or some such. Yet Jesus is saying in no uncertain terms that he will return before that generation has died as in heart stops beating. Jesus never refers to a soul or any other immaterial representation of the 'self', and neither do the Jews before him. To them the body was all there was, and to be buried in the common grave with criminals was the worst thing they could do to you after you died. There is no discussion of a soul or spirit (except the holy spirit, which is something entirely different, and the simmilarity in terms is just a fluke of translation) anywhere in the bible, whatsoever. And even to punish the supporters of the antichrist in a lake of fire it is necessary that they are alive.

      there are volumes discussing and explaining the misunderstandings that lead to the identification of these items as contradictory

      In fact, there are not. These so called discussions intentionally confuse the issue, quote more passages from the bible as evidence, and often claim that the bible does not mean what it clearly says. They do mental gymnastics to avoid ever admitting that the bible has contradictions, or what would be even worse, that translations of the bible do not convey the origional meaning. The purpose of these 'discussions' is to satisfy believers that there isn't a problem, and prevent the seed of doubt from being sown.

      Here's a tiny doubt for you. If god made man in his image, why did god give man a penis, or more to the point, testicles? Does god have a penis, and testicles? Did Adam need testicles, even before Eve was created? Why would god give him the urge to procreate (via testicles and testosterone) an not give him a mate? Why would god do this, and then have to actually witness Adam being lonely before he (god) realized that he should create Eve? Why does the bible claim that god created woman from the rib of Adam, when men and women have equal numbers of ribs (it was widely believed in antiquity that men had one more rib than women)?

      Here is a much bigger doubt for you. The bible makes no mention of dinosaurs, or of massive meteor impacts with the earth. Yet we know all of these things existed. We know, for example, that there were periods of several millions of years in which animals, which do not exist any longer, were the primary life on this planet. Yet the bible mentions none of these. Specifically, the bible can be rather easily shown to claim that the world is around 4000 years old. This is curious, since we now have evidence of civilizations which predate this age, and large numbers of human made tools which predate this by many years. Worse, we have fossils thousands of feet below the ground, in areas where people have continuously

    3. Re:are you fucking kidding me? by stanmann · · Score: 1
      Why does the bible define PI to be exactly three?
      My time is limited, I may follow up with more later, but the fact that you(and everyone else) still trots this out is amazing.

      And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: [it was] round all about, and his height [was] five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.
      1Ki 7:24 And under the brim of it round about [there were] knops compassing it, ten in a cubit, compassing the sea round about: the knops [were] cast in two rows, when it was cast.
      1Ki 7:25 It stood upon twelve oxen, three looking toward the north, and three looking toward the west, and three looking toward the south, and three looking toward the east: and the sea [was set] above upon them, and all their hinder parts [were] inward.
      1Ki 7:26 And it [was] an hand breadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths.
      here you can find one explanation
      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:are you fucking kidding me? by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't buy it.

      "ten cubits from the one brim to the other"

      "a line of thirty cubits did compass it round"

      They could have said 'a line of thirty cubits, and a little more, did compass it round'. Unless the brim had negative thickness, there is no way you can end up with a number lower than 3.14.. times the width.

      They didn't.

      The webpage you link to is pure speculation. All it proves is that it is possible to build a vat such that if you measure it in a way somewhat different than how it is claimed to be measured in the bible, you end up with measurements as quoted without saying that pi = 3.

      If I told you that I lived 5 miles from Walmart, and then you looked at the map showing my house to be 200 yards from walmart, I would be wrong. If I said that 'the way *I* go it's five miles, becuase I like to get on the highway and drive around randomly for a while' I would be full of horse shit. That is exactly what the webpage you link to does. It produces fictions from pure thin air to substantiate a claim, and to boot they have to modify the claim to even make their speculation fit.

      Now, it is possible that this is exactly what the bible is saying.

      What about all the rest of the inconsistancies? Why does the bible refer to multiple gods throughout the old testimate? Ahh, you say, the trinity. The entire trinity theory smacks of exactly the nonsense that I am talking about. Christians have simply changed the meaning of the text to make it consistant.

      If the bible said that 'his cloak was red' and 10 seconds later said 'his cloak was never red', christians would come up with some incredible theory about the meaning of this passage. People would read it over and over becuase, since the bible is perfectly true, any apparent contradiction must be a mistake in the reader, not the book.

      I'm content not to believe in Zarathustra, even if Zoroastrian texts have no contradictions. However, what is your reason to not worship Mohammed or Zarathustra, and instead worship Jesus? Why not Buhdda? Christianity has no more historical evidence than many other religions, and in fact has much less than many.

      Add that to the fact that the Christ story is far from original (and no, not in the prophesy sense). There are probably a dozen other 'gods' who were buried and rose on the third day, had 12 disciples, and were born on December 25th, etc, etc. The cross was a symbol of Mithraism long before Christ is even claimed to have been born.

      Like Mithraism, which predates Christ by 100 years, and is contemporary with early christinanity.
      see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithraism#Similar ities_to_Christianity

      How about the osirin sacrament? Predating Christ by 2000 years, followers of Osiris believed that taking his sacrament was literally to eat his flesh and drink his blood. Sound familiar?
      see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris#The_Osiria n_Sacrament

      Dionysus turned water into wine before Jesus. Dionysus was fathered by a god but his mother was a mortal woman.
      see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dionysus#Parallel s_with_Christianity

      In fact, the Jesus story contains no original elements, other than geography and ethnicity. Thus it very easily could just be a myth which developed over time.

      There are no historical records outside of the Gospels of the bible of Jesus's existence as a person. There is no record of his actions outside of the Gospels.

  246. Re:RFID is not cost effective and is very problema by tecnopa · · Score: 1

    As another member of the RFID research community I whole-heartedly agree with your analysis of the situation. I think the idea of someone reading tags located anywhere on your body is nearly laughable... the amount of water in the human body woud likely render most tags on worn clothing, shoes, etc. unreadable.

  247. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'm not refering to "popularity" at all. I'm refering to acceptance by literary scholars as to the "legitimacy" and "validity" of the writings. The Bible has long stood the test of scrutiny--far more than other "ancient" works like Homer's Iliad, etc. The scholar or the "science-minded" person seemingly has no issue with accepting these other works as "valid" or "legitimate". But even hint that the Bible is "legitimate" and "verifiable" as a literary work, and you get pounced on. You emphasize that "Truth is independent of popularity", and you are correct. The question is, "Are YOU willing to make the unpopular decision to accept the Truth of the Bible?"

  248. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is thinking along with the sheep "willing to make the unpopular decision to accept the Truth of the Bible?"

  249. Christian cult revision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I will revise the description. Tell me if this is correct:

    The Christian cult believes that a god creature created winged angels worship it, but they were created with free will, leading to the inevitable transformation of some into red horned devils, so another "perfect" free willed human creature was created, but inevitably messed up and ate the knowledge fruit, making us all suffer (from the earlier created horned devil/snake), leading to the obvious need to have another "perfect" man to balance, this time a man from a woman impregnated from the the god creature directly, but this "perfect" man needed to die for the first "perfect" mans (and mankinds) mistakes, and those that believe in all of this go to the magical place, with the winged angels, or else they go live in the other magical place with his other red horned creatures.

  250. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

    The point is they want the rapture.

        No beast no mark no rapture so they welcome it. Sure Jesus and his army will face the beast and his army but if you paid attention it's after he has reigned for a time and has corupted thoughs he could and killed the rest other than the ones already raptured away (they wont be their to fight they were raptured away to save them from the horror and bloodshed) except for the Jews in the holy land which he plans to wipe out last hence the gathering in the valley of megeido or armagedon. But it's after the mark has already been placed on everybody else so your point is mute.

        And no you don't need to look it up for me i have already read it several times but you might want to re-read it for yourself though.

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  251. Can this be patented? by Reiners · · Score: 1

    This sounds like not such a bad idea. Has anybody patented it yet?

  252. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by aukxsona · · Score: 1

    I take it your Christian or were at one time. Perhaps my Bible study is very rusty....I never did understand it all, but I think the evangelicals will fight this....I do. If not then they are recieving the mark of "the beast". When it comes down to it.

    At any rate thanks for the explanation....I'm not Christian...I looked it up your right. I live in a very Christian area, it's easy to get them "started" so to speak. I do listen though, because my own "world view" is tied to theirs so to speak. I pay attention to what the locals say is "evil" etc....Did you know Walmart is evil and against god according to some preachers.....

    I'm rambling. Ugh!

    --
    Not a geek just looking for one.
  253. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

    Well i guess you could say i was wance a catholic christian but now i consider myself a religious indepentednt but still christian if that makes any sense.

    I have long since abandonded my firm ties to the mainstream of chrstianity but believe in the main views or points theirin about god and jesus but believe (without turning to islam mind you) that catholismum hasn't quite got it all right.

    I now consider myself a religious independent within christianity but still christian and am willing to entertain other viewpoints to gain what i hope is a deeper understanding of god and his plans for us.

    Given all that i still look into the only bible i have (one given to me in my teen years by my mother) for guidance from time to time and to try and understand things and see if they might help or give new meaning to modern life. Though i don't look at it and try to make parts of it fit events happening around me i more look at it and try to see if things may or may not co-incied and connect or fall along the same lines, But enough about my religious slant.

    I have looked at that part of the bible more than once and something about it has always seemed kind of different to me from what others have claimed or held to and after spending much soul searching and atempts at justification i came to the only conculsion that i could given my own viewpoint (which i readily admit others may or may not see or believe) was that catholisium was promoting or reflecting however inocently or blantently (i make no judgments) the end times. That christians who were to be saved wouldn't be around to witness at least not first hand or personally what was to happen according to revelation the events of mans end on earth or at least what we have come to know as mans life on earth.

    This is what has come to disturb me most not because it is to happen but because of how many mainstream christians look apone it as something to welcome or look forrward to when given at least my outlook it is a time to morn or dread though maybe nessicary it will be for me at least a time of great personal suffering knowing what others will go through who (maybe even myself as i cannot fortell my feight (how do you spell that) let alone others) are left behind as mainstream christians put it or see it. To see it as something to look forward to as many christians seem to see it leaves me feeling ill or dirty because these are afterall humnan souls that have the same feelings and emotions though different viewpoints and events driving them as you and me and to just well you get the idea.

    I just cant personally divorce myself from this or them no matter how i have tried and how much i have thought about it ( think to much about things almost nobody wants to hear thats my trouble) and so i have come to the conclusion that this isn't something to welcome as many tend to look apone it as or play it off as but more a time to dread even though it has to happen it's a time to look on with great sorrow and outpouring of our own grief and emotions. But as ultimaly inivitable to progress to the next level or stage of being but that doesn't mean that the path is to be welcomed or pardoned or however many of the christians tend to see it as it does come at a terrible cost in life and human suffering.

    Ok ive gone just about to far with my own preaching and personal views on this. It is as i said up to you and others to truely decide for yourselves what you feel is right christianity, Islam, Jewidium, Hinduisum, Douisum, Yourisum, Myisum or someotherisum. At any event if you belive or consider an end time it is important to consider all aspects of it something which many have not or at least have not paid as much attention to as they should given it's importance or what should be it's importance to humans.

    Of course i could always just be some nut with to many screws loose so whos to say. But i can only say and

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  254. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the mistakes in my post i was a bit intoxicated ( i make no excusses for it) at the time but my oppinion still stands.

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  255. Re:What! You can't see the oppurtunity? by aukxsona · · Score: 1

    Well, my own end times tie in is this....after the rapture and all the horrid things to come some will stay. (Might be in the Bible) Any way, after the time of the sun (son) comes the daughter....the burning times will come again (end times) we must be like water to live through it, in order to see the time of the daughter. Here is an interesting note, my own world view says the end times will come because of the Christians hastening it. Through their wish for it......We are advised to start going to church and priasing God until it blows over.....hmmm. Maybe I'm too late.....

    --
    Not a geek just looking for one.
  256. Re:another fallacy (or Thinking 101) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is thinking along with the sheep "willing to make the unpopular decision to accept the Truth of the Bible?"

    By characterizing the acceptance of the Truth of the Bible as "thinking along with the sheep", you (and others) seem to infer that this is somehow a thoughtless, lemming-like process. On the contrary, many Christians come to Christ after a long, logical thought process. It is at the point where one realize that there are things in this world that are forever beyond human comprehension and understanding that we embrace, with faith, the Truth of the Bible. Other religions would characterize it as "enlightenment" or "understanding" but the importenat thing is that becoming a Christian (at least from a New Testament-centric perspective) is not something to be taken lightly or casually. It's a world view, a way of life, an understanding of one's place in the God-created universe. The comfort, joy, and security felt is unparalleled.

    Unfortunatly, mainstream denominations fail to even discuss this. Read the Bible, and you will see that mainstream denominations have strayed far from original doctrine and teaching.

  257. Wow, many Jesus freaks here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be one myself, so I understand.

    I find all of this very interesting.

    From the outside, something like Christianity sounds very made up, with angels and dragon/devil people and miracles all of which cannot be definitivly recordered on audio/video tape. And a heaven and hell, which when explained explicitly, also sound made up and represent some human desires and fears with fantasy.

    But from the inside, all of this is is unquestionably true. Every little thing can be explained. And all the expanations make sense. The human mind has made this fantastic reality true.

    Of course, things like science and logic can pose problems, as when these are given credibility, then there is a conflict between the fantastic reallity and the logical reality. And yes, even with that, some/many are able to suppress or explain away the logical one, and sometimes use parts of the logical reality to boost the fantastic reality.