No, censorship happens in either location. In the purest form censorship is when information is deliberately obscured, preferably without you ever knowing it existed.
If your ISP blocks you from seeing it, from your perspective it is as if the information does not exist. It is no different than using a sharpie in a textbook to cover over text. Certainly the information is still on those pages, you didn't unprint the books, but it is still blocked to you.
This is certainly Google self centering what they wish to show you. They, of course, have every right not to provide links to anything they don't want it, especially if they are acting in good faith that the material they are linking to is violation of copywrite. The real problem is that Google claims not to do it at all in their Terms of Service
Exactly, that's the argument nudists have been using. Showing the skin celebrates beauty.
Personally, I thought people wear faux fur because they think fur is pretty, they think fur is soft, and they think fur is warm, and above the other three, they think faux fur is cheaper than real fur.
From NC DOTFor an additional annual fee of $30.00, most plates issued by the Division may be personalized. The plate may bear up to 8 spaces made up of letters, numbers and/or special characters. INBOXSTR works here. Don't know if those rules are nationalized or state by state though.
Even your sarcastic response demonstrates why the lid isn't generic. Strategic placement of the holes, including their shape and the molding of the plastic make it a more pleasant drinking experience. It's not the same as taking peices of lots of different players and saying they are new because you put them all together.
Look again, lots of free CPU's mean the free ones are superfluous, not the original. Alternatively, if the software is more efficient, the CPU contains redundant power, the CPU itself is still required. No matter how efficient your software is, it still requires at least one CPU to run it.
[quote]just because you see a word lots of times on/. doesn't mean you know how to use it.[/quote]
Ironically, your examples do not give particularly convincing evidence you do either. Your second example is much more convincing for "obsolete". The first one is marginal. Perhaps you meant: redundant? why, is your processor going to reproduce? Will you suddenly have TWO or possibly THREE processors?
Along the same lines, is a set of common responses to common stimuli technically a language anyway? Rather, is communication the result or the cause of abstract thought?
Yeah cause THAT'S the unbiased way to decide. His points weren't entirely wrong, but then neither was the post to which he responded. That's the problem with the whole thing, what it's FOR and what it makes possible aren't the same thing.
Perhaps, but on the same note consumers do expect the things they are told to be comparable. AMD felt the same way and began to rename their chip lines to be comparable for performance. Intel clearly doesn't, as they have no problem with labelling a Celeron and a Pentium with the same numbers. Sure, it's the consumers job to educate themselves, but it's not unreasonable for them to expect to believe the numbers they are told.
It has alot to do with luck and expectations. The real beef with Gateway is that they play a numbers game, as do most of the mass marketed computers. They use the confusing nature of PC marketing to sell overpriced computers that have higher fail rates for each part and run slower than they seem like they should.
They sell a 2.4 Celeron with PC2100 RAM and their consumers are happy only because it's faster than that 866 they upgraded from, if only just barely. They have no idea they could get a MUCH faster machine by using an AMD 2.4 Barton with PC2700 RAM for roughly the same price, because they do nothing to educated their users.
As someone else said about emachines, when chosing between quality and cheap, they always always always chose cheap. You just got lucky and got one without a flaw.
Don't bother. He's misunderstanding anyway. That verse reads equivalently as Leviticus 19:12, Deuteronomy 6:13, and Deuteronomy 10:20 all of which are referring to taking oaths on the name of the Lord. In otherwords, God is telling the Israelites if you claim to be doing something in the name of the Lord, God will hold you to it and punish you for failure. Verse Links
It's a sobering promise, and it's why we used to swear on the Bible in courts, even if it's a practise being done away with now.
However, you are going to want to duck because there are large numbers of fish RAINING down from ABOVE the lake. We, personally, believe they are not dead until the SPLAT AGAINST the land AROUND the lake.
Slashdot Mirror
No, censorship happens in either location. In the purest form censorship is when information is deliberately obscured, preferably without you ever knowing it existed.
If your ISP blocks you from seeing it, from your perspective it is as if the information does not exist. It is no different than using a sharpie in a textbook to cover over text. Certainly the information is still on those pages, you didn't unprint the books, but it is still blocked to you.
This is certainly Google self centering what they wish to show you. They, of course, have every right not to provide links to anything they don't want it, especially if they are acting in good faith that the material they are linking to is violation of copywrite. The real problem is that Google claims not to do it at all in their Terms of Service
Prove it.
Maybe they went to his grave and said, "If you don't want us to show this video, please say so".
Exactly, that's the argument nudists have been using. Showing the skin celebrates beauty. Personally, I thought people wear faux fur because they think fur is pretty, they think fur is soft, and they think fur is warm, and above the other three, they think faux fur is cheaper than real fur.
It's from your girlfriend. She says she's unsatisfied with your love life.
I'd like some to post a secret message containing a mirror of the PDF. This one seems to be so secret I can't access it.
Yes, pound include, although oddly, it's usually only called pound in reference to the telephone. Otherwise it gets the disgraceful "number sign".
See I totally thought this article would be about cattle mutilation, I hear it's up this year.
From NC DOT For an additional annual fee of $30.00, most plates issued by the Division may be personalized. The plate may bear up to 8 spaces made up of letters, numbers and/or special characters.
INBOXSTR works here. Don't know if those rules are nationalized or state by state though.
Even your sarcastic response demonstrates why the lid isn't generic. Strategic placement of the holes, including their shape and the molding of the plastic make it a more pleasant drinking experience. It's not the same as taking peices of lots of different players and saying they are new because you put them all together.
Actually in this instance avi is a reference to the file extension, which is in lowercase.
Look again, lots of free CPU's mean the free ones are superfluous, not the original. Alternatively, if the software is more efficient, the CPU contains redundant power, the CPU itself is still required. No matter how efficient your software is, it still requires at least one CPU to run it.
How we've all hungered for the elusive "Clyde Tombaugh" related bragging rights.
[quote]just because you see a word lots of times on /. doesn't mean you know how to use it.[/quote]
Ironically, your examples do not give particularly convincing evidence you do either. Your second example is much more convincing for "obsolete". The first one is marginal. Perhaps you meant: redundant? why, is your processor going to reproduce? Will you suddenly have TWO or possibly THREE processors?
What about the "use Mozilla" crowd?
Virus scanners that check by signature are not the only choice, it's just that the alternatives are relatively unknown and obscure.
Oh it's christianMANBOY.sex.
See I tried, christianFANBOY.sex and it said 404 Error Not Found
You sure?
Along the same lines, is a set of common responses to common stimuli technically a language anyway? Rather, is communication the result or the cause of abstract thought?
I tried to resist posting this, but then I read your sig and gave up.
NO ONE expects the spanish requisition
Yeah cause THAT'S the unbiased way to decide. His points weren't entirely wrong, but then neither was the post to which he responded. That's the problem with the whole thing, what it's FOR and what it makes possible aren't the same thing.
Perhaps, but on the same note consumers do expect the things they are told to be comparable. AMD felt the same way and began to rename their chip lines to be comparable for performance. Intel clearly doesn't, as they have no problem with labelling a Celeron and a Pentium with the same numbers. Sure, it's the consumers job to educate themselves, but it's not unreasonable for them to expect to believe the numbers they are told.
It has alot to do with luck and expectations. The real beef with Gateway is that they play a numbers game, as do most of the mass marketed computers. They use the confusing nature of PC marketing to sell overpriced computers that have higher fail rates for each part and run slower than they seem like they should. They sell a 2.4 Celeron with PC2100 RAM and their consumers are happy only because it's faster than that 866 they upgraded from, if only just barely. They have no idea they could get a MUCH faster machine by using an AMD 2.4 Barton with PC2700 RAM for roughly the same price, because they do nothing to educated their users. As someone else said about emachines, when chosing between quality and cheap, they always always always chose cheap. You just got lucky and got one without a flaw.
You OPENED THE BOX? Didn't you see the STICKER!!!!1!1!1! YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY VOIDED YOUR WARRENTY YOU FOOL!
Don't bother. He's misunderstanding anyway. That verse reads equivalently as Leviticus 19:12, Deuteronomy 6:13, and Deuteronomy 10:20 all of which are referring to taking oaths on the name of the Lord. In otherwords, God is telling the Israelites if you claim to be doing something in the name of the Lord, God will hold you to it and punish you for failure. Verse Links
It's a sobering promise, and it's why we used to swear on the Bible in courts, even if it's a practise being done away with now.
However, you are going to want to duck because there are large numbers of fish RAINING down from ABOVE the lake. We, personally, believe they are not dead until the SPLAT AGAINST the land AROUND the lake.
Ahem.
-- I thought hard drives in Australia had to be installed upside down.
-- I read your post backwards, you insensitive clod.
-- You must be new around here, in Australia your hard drive reads you.
-- Imagine a beaowulf cluster of Australia bits!