Slashdot Mirror


UK Trains Take WiFi Route To Connectivity

Randy Sparks writes "The BBC is reporting that one of the UK's largest train operators, GNER, is to offer Wi-Fi net access on its trains. What's interesting is how this net connection will be achieved - by a combination of networks provided by multiple mobile phone connections or even digital TV Internet, provided from ground stations the train passes by. It'll cost UKP4.95 per hour for train goers, although First Class Travellers will get it free..."

236 comments

  1. Oblig Jokes by beacher · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quake players and their rail guns...
    Tunnelling
    Rail driving?
    Say, didn't you just hit a badger? There goes our proxy server!

    1. Re:Oblig Jokes by Zocalo · · Score: 1, Funny

      How on Earth could you have missed "Train hotspotting"? ;)

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Oblig Jokes by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Dunno how fast software like kismet works, but riding on a train could be a great way to scan long stretches for hotspots. On the other hand, the delayed-email systems like we're seeing in third-world countries could probably benefit from having "carriers" mounted on trains.

      Also, has anyone taken to wartraveling with handhelds? It's probably a heck of a lot more convenient than lugging around a laptop.

  2. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when sitting in a three hour delay you can at least do some browsing.

  3. mmorpg addicts dreams are coming true! by sh2kwave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally it seems i will be able to achieve my goals of playing my mmorpg charectors no matter where i go.

    I can see it now "sorry sir you cant take that see i need it for my 3rd laptop which has my cleric on it, plz leave me along the mobs gonna spawn soon"

  4. Cheap WiFi by prat393 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Make sure you sit next to the first class car! You just might get free access. "Warsitting", perhaps?

    1. Re:Cheap WiFi by canavan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd suspect that some sort of access credentials will be printed on the tickets, so you may have to go dumpster diving instead - or just ask someone who's not going to use it anyway.

    2. Re:Cheap WiFi by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative


      Nothing more required than a bit of knowledge and experience.

      here's the tools

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Cheap WiFi by VertigoAce · · Score: 3, Informative

      That'd be great if these systems were encrypted, but they generally aren't. I know the Dallas/Fort Worth airport has two wireless internet access services (T-Mobile and something else). You can pull out your laptop and connect to them immediately, but any requests bring you to an info page. One of the services let you find out tourist information along with airport info (flight info, services, etc) for free. To get access to the rest of the net you have to pay. It probably uses some sort of software firewall that keeps track of your IP and mac addresses. Normal WiFi hacking isn't going to do you much good in this case.

    4. Re:Cheap WiFi by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Make sure you sit next to the first class car! You just might get free access. "Warsitting", perhaps?

      If you know when you want to travel and you have at least seven days before travelling, buy a First Class Apex ticket for the journey - first class comfort, free refreshments, now - free WiFi - AND it's cheaper than a standard ticket.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    5. Re:Cheap WiFi by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      If it's plain text then that's even better

      MAC's aren't exactly unspoofable

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:Cheap WiFi by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Isn't first class seperated from standard class by the buffet coach? Or is that just on Virgin Trains?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  5. Its GBP! by Krik+Johnson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why do people keep giving us the wrong currency symbol? GBP is the international standard code for pounds, not UKP! For another thing, slashdot dosen't allow pound signs either. Stupid stuck in 1997 website deisgn that dosen't even have valid HTML 3.2!

    1. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? All I do is hit Shift+3 and I get

      Oh yeah ! How silly is that

    2. Re:Its GBP! by OC_Wanderer · · Score: 1


      Errr....

      The British Pound sign or the other one?

      (Don't hit me too hard.)

      --
      -- There is no spoon. Only fork.
    3. Re:Its GBP! by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Probably for the same reason that we use ".uk" as our ccTLD despite the "official" ISO standard being GB - because the average joe in the street uses "UK" in preference to "GB". As do the media and the government for that matter. The only common place we use the "GB" ISO code I can think of is on those stickers that go on cars travelling abroad.

      Also, bear in mind that the full name of this green and pleasant land is "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Given that the "GBP" is also the currency of Northern Ireland, "UKP" is actually more accurate.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Its GBP! by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      Um, go back and read the post again, because I didn't say (or even imply) that "UKP" was the official currency symbol. In fact I actually only referred to it directly as "GBP" with the comment that "UKP" would be more accurate since the United Kingdom includes Northern Ireland, whereas Great Britain does not.

      Please don't spout forth if not understanding the post. ;)

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    5. Re:Its GBP! by kahei · · Score: 1, Informative


      People use UKP because the country is called the UK (at least that's how the name starts... it kind of goes on and on).

      'Great Britain' is a geographical area including some (but not others) of the islands that are near the main island on which England sits.

      Why everyone (who doesn't like there) has started referring to the country as 'Great Britain' I have no idea... watching too many Mel Gibson movies, maybe...

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    6. Re:Its GBP! by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting


      My Passport is for

      "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"

      Code of Issuing State : GBR

      Nationality : British Citizen

      Please note, fingerprinting yankees, that it also says :

      Her Britanic Majesty's Secretary of State Requests and requires in the Name of Her Majesty all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary.

      You'd better watch out, we'll be sending some Royal Guards to sort you out!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:Its GBP! by rikkus-x · · Score: 5, Informative

      Official ISO standard for what? Great Britain is an island. The United Kingdom is a country. Northern Ireland is a province, England and Scotland are Kingdoms, Wales is a principality.

      People usually talk in terms of countries, so what are the ISO people using Great Britain for, I wonder?

      Rik

    8. Re:Its GBP! by NickFitz · · Score: 4, Informative
      'Great Britain' is a geographical area including some (but not others) of the islands that are near the main island on which England sits.

      Not quite.

      Great Britain is, as you say, a geographical term, but it refers to the largest island of the British Isles - the one comprising the majority of the landmass of England, Wales and Scotland. The British Isles also include Ireland, containing Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as well as all the smaller places like the Isle of Man, the Shetlands, and so forth . The name of the country (i.e. the political entity, or state) often referred to as Great Britain is actually called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

      Personally, I usually refer to my homeland as Britain, as even though it's the greatest country in the world, that isn't saying very much when you consider the competition in this hellhole of a human-vermin-infested planet. Damned by faint praise about sums it up.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    9. Re:Its GBP! by 0siris · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that just mean to pass freely over the British border though? It's a statement to say you can be let out of the country and let back in again, not to demand entrance to the US.

    10. Re:Its GBP! by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Gee, who cares?
      Why are there so many posts regarding infrastructure etc. in the UK etc.

      Stories about whats happening in France and Germany etc. are more interesting. Those countries
      seem to be more news worthy..

    11. Re:Its GBP! by nickos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "other one" is called hash - The jargon file says "The pronunciation of '#' as 'pound' is common in the U.S. but a bad idea ... The character is usually pronounced "hash" outside the US."

    12. Re:Its GBP! by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      I think it's because most /. readers seems to have at least a passing understanding of the language of the UK ;)

      I'd certainly be interested in geek news from France and Germany. These days I seem scarily familiar with the USA and Australia (I'm UK resident, so UK too) but hardly know anything about the rest of the geek world. For all I know, France has been using 802.11z for 19 years, and broadband in Germany means legally downloading DivX's in minutes. On second thoughts...maybe that's why we hear so little from the rest of the world...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    13. Re:Its GBP! by Chep · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't benefit the Brits much, you know; you can't put a ¤ nor € just EUR in slashcode anyway.

    14. Re:Its GBP! by jamesbulman · · Score: 1

      Just out of interest, do US c/c++ coders say "pound include" or "hash include"?

      As a UK/GB c/c++ coder I say "hash include".

    15. Re:Its GBP! by pubjames · · Score: 0

      even though it's the greatest country in the world

      Most people think where they live is the greatest country in the world, so you're just like everyone else in that respect!

    16. Re:Its GBP! by Pippinjack · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Great in Great Britain isn't to do with world stature, it's there to distinguish it from Britanny as in Bretagne and Grand Bretagne.

      --
      hear all, see all, say nowt; eat all, supp all, pay nowt; and if tha ever does owt for nowt - do it for thissen
    17. Re:Its GBP! by nickos · · Score: 1
      As a fellow UK/GB c/c++ coder I don't know either. Perhaps they say "sharp include"? ;)

      PS. Am I the only one who ever noticed that the # symbol looks like two "++" strings, one above the other? "C#" can be seen as
      C ++
      ++
    18. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "other one" is called hash

      Actually, the official name defined by Unicode is NUMBER SIGN. There are other names it goes by, which Unicode acknowledges, but that's the "proper" name.

    19. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given that the "GBP" is also the currency of Northern Ireland, "UKP" is actually more accurate.

      Actually, it used to be Punts, and now they use the Euro.

    20. Re:Its GBP! by davew666 · · Score: 0

      People usually talk in terms of countries, so what are the ISO people using Great Britain for, I wonder?

      Probably avoiding using UK, which is the Ukraine. I would imagine it is easier to use GB which is definately relevant, whereas finding another abbreviation for the Ukraine would be a pain.

    21. Re:Its GBP! by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      No it's not. The British Isles is a geographical area including the islands around the mainland, such as the Isle of Man and Ireland. It's not a political description of any area. Great Britain is England, Scotland and Wales. 'Great' because it is the largest of the British Isles. The UK is Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales) and the province of Northern Ireland

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    22. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The name of the '#' symbol is the OCTOTHORP.

      GBP is the official ISO/SWIFT currency code, but so are CAD and CHF but people commonly instead write CDN and SFr. It's just a difference of whether you want to be understood by machines or humans.

      The ISO currency codes usually begin with the 2-letter ISO country codes, for which both Ukraine (UA) and United Kingdom (GB) WANTED "UK", so the dispute was settled by giving NEITHER of them what they wanted.

    23. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nearly made the same mistake you did. He's refering to Northern Ireland, a province of the UK but not part of Great Britain (which is the big island to Ireland's East) which is attached, boil like, to the North of the island of Ireland. You are correct that Eire (or The Republic of Ireland) has an independent currency and does not use GBP. Eire is to the south of Northern Ireland.

    24. Re:Its GBP! by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, pound include, although oddly, it's usually only called pound in reference to the telephone. Otherwise it gets the disgraceful "number sign".

    25. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain is the greatest country in the world, though. More specifically, England is.

    26. Re:Its GBP! by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Wales isn't a Principality. Everyone assumes it is, because there is a Prince of Wales.

      *But* the head of state in Wales is still the Queen. Wales is not a country. Wales is "just" a part of Great Britain.

      (When I say "just", I mean it ironically.)

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    27. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, you are right. I've just come back from Dublin, and for some reason thought it was in Northern Ireland. Trust me to not even know what country I am in!

    28. Re:Its GBP! by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      Wales is a country! So is Scotland and England.. They make up Great Britain, which is NOT a country, but part of a Kingdom (which includes Northern Ireland, a province). Have no doubt, wales is a country. these are not "states". Wales is not in England, not is Scotland. Note World Cup countries, England, Wales and Scotland all have their own teams..

    29. Re:Its GBP! by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      England has existed as a unified entity since the 10th century; the union between England and Wales, begun in 1284 with the Statute of Rhuddlan, was not formalized until 1536 with an Act of Union; in another Act of Union in 1707, England and Scotland agreed to permanently join as Great Britain; the legislative union of Great Britain and Ireland was implemented in 1801, with the adoption of the name the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; the Anglo-Irish treaty of 1921 formalized a partition of Ireland; six northern Irish counties remained part of the United Kingdom as Northern Ireland and the current name of the country, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, was adopted in 1927


      Source: = CIA world factbook
      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    30. Re:Its GBP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "the northern part of Ireland"

      there is only one Ireland.

    31. Re:Its GBP! by gilrain · · Score: 1

      Not so much of a pain that they didn't do just that! The ISO code for Ukraine is UA, not UK.

    32. Re:Its GBP! by arwel · · Score: 1

      Except for part of Co. Donegal which goes further north than any part of Northern Ireland...

  6. a train?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a soul train??

    choo choo

  7. Through the rails or over the power lines? by Snover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Excuse me for being so grossly ignorant of the workings of such things, but why don't they either use broadband-over-power and then have wifi routers within the compartments or send the traffic through the rails, rather then try to aim satellites at things? Seems silly to create a new infrastructure when the existing one can be used.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
    1. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by samael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seen the huge sparks that fly about whenever a train goes over even slightly mismatched power rails?

      I suspect that there would be altogether too much interference.

    2. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by tarunthegreat · · Score: 0

      Well not grossly ignorant. But why use wires, when you can be totally wireless? I'm sure it's a cost saving, IMHO.

    3. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Snover · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's a good point. +5 Insightful. However, no, I've never seen those sparks, because the only time I've been in England is when I had a layover when I was really young going from here (the US) to Italy. Like most Americans I enjoy commenting on things I really have very little place commenting on. :)

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    4. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The track is already used for train position detecttion and interlocking. I suspect that whilst it may be possible to additionally use the track for internet traffic, it is against regulations for the train protection systems.

    5. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by weave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's also the minor fact that not too much of the rail lines are electrified to consider!

    6. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Both the East coast main line that GNER use and the west coast mainline that Virgin use are electrified - overhead power lines though, not the rails themselves.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    7. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by linuxci · · Score: 2, Informative

      But not all of the line is electrified, GNER services from Edinburgh to Aberdeen and Inverness are still run using diesel trains as there's no power lines north of Edinburgh. I suspect this is because the main Scottish rail operatior, ScotRail, doesn't have any plans to introduce electric trains so GNER need to make do as well for this part of the route

    8. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      The actual tracks the trains run on are obviously not electrified, but quite a lot of the rail network is electrified, and quite often twice when you are near a mainline station. Some local train services and the London Underground use a third rail to carry power while the Intercity system and some other local train services use overhead cables, as do most (all?) of the tram type systems. Many mainline stations therefore have to support both power arrangements on the same sections of track - ain't standards great!

      It's all irrelevent for the large number of diesel and the few steam trains plying the tourist trade that are still in service of course. ;)

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    9. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Don't talk to me about GNER!!! Last year on March 20th they removed my bike by breaking the lock on it at York station as an "anti-terrorist" measure. They then wanted a lost property fee for it back, sent it to Newark, back to York - despite saying it's not their "policy" to send bikes by trains...

      All this and they didn't remove any of the hundred or so bikes for hire on platform 1..... oh well I suppose that was the paranoia of the days of the Iraq conflict (happened four days before Iraq invasion) - and I suppose the JIC assement probably lent to an overly paranoid communique from GCHQ....

      rant over...

      internet on trains good - but story very outdated....

    10. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Timo_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

      So they took the bike from in front of the station (because it might contain a bomb) and put it on a train instead? Very clever ;-))

      --
      Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
    11. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      removed my bike by breaking the lock on it at York station as an "anti-terrorist" measure.

      That actually makes sense. A bike frame stuffed with explosives would make a very nice pipebomb and, unlike a suitcase or a bag left outside a station, a parked bike would be very inconspicuous.

    12. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Orlando · · Score: 2, Funny

      or send the traffic through the rails

      You obviously don't live in England. The rail infrastructure is so bad they have enough problems getting the trains to run on the rails let alone network traffic.

      --
      -= This is a self-referential sig =-
    13. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      On numerous occasions, the only way I've been able to get anything approximating a seat on our wonderful trains is to lean on somebody's bike saddle in the luggage area. Maybe they were just trying to meet their government targets for available seating?

      (If you're wondering how I got into the bike storage area, a tip: be nice to the staff, and they'll be nice to you. This is particularly the case with local services, where the same few crews usually work the same services in rotation. I even used to get called on my mobile by a member of the train crew telling me how late they were running: "We're just leaving New Street, so you'll have time for another pint.")

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    14. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by SW6 · · Score: 1
      Don't talk to me about GNER!!! Last year on March 20th they removed my bike by breaking the lock on it at York station as an "anti-terrorist" measure. They then wanted a lost property fee for it back, sent it to Newark, back to York - despite saying it's not their "policy" to send bikes by trains...

      So you immediately went to the police about the criminal damage (to your lock) and extortion (the "lost property fee")?

    15. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The East Coast Mainline technically terminates at Edinburgh or Glasgow.

      http://www.gner.co.uk/images/route_map_map.gif

    16. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Late · · Score: 2, Informative

      If we ignore the fact that only part of the tracks are electrified, broadband over power does not work over high voltage. It is only designed to work on relatively low power wires from the closest switching station to a house. Even in these conditions the power has to be cleaned of interference as much as possible. Overhead train power is (in this case) 25 000 V AC. It is not particularily clean and the connection from the wire to the pantograph is the absolute opposite of clean. Although the rails are not powered, they are grounded as they are the ground point for the electrification so they are very much a part of the same mess.

      There isn't much chance of moving anything along the rails. Train tracking and control uses either a balise (an antenna between the rails) and an antenna under the train or a radio network. The future European Train Control System is designed to use a special version of GSM called GSM-R for communication. It would probably be possible to run an antenna along the side of the rails. This is how they make GSM work in metro systems at least in Helsinki. But this gets as back to the original point of using existing infrastructure.

    17. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you paste in a few more acronyms, people will you are even smarter!

      1124 comments, 56ker. Quite frightening for someone with 5xxxxx UID.

    18. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..but quite a lot of the rail network is electrified, and quite often twice when you are near a mainline station.

      East of London, between Cornwall and Birmningham, is not electrified either overhead or third-rail (Aside from a few NSE lines which terminate at Redding and are third-rail) There are apparently plans to electrify the WCML but I'll believe it when I see it..

    19. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by BeerCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some local train services and the London Underground use a third rail to carry power while the Intercity system and some other local train services use overhead cables, as do most (all?) of the tram type systems.

      Just to clarify:
      South of the River Thames (and near Liverpool), 750v (or sometimes 630v) DC is used from a third rail. Elsewhere, rail electrification is 25kv AC overhead lines. The London Underground is 660v DC using a third rail for current and a fourth rail for return. Light rail systems typically use 1500v DC on the overhead, except for the Docklands Light Railway, which is 750v DC from an upside down 3rd rail (the collector is underneath, rather than on top)

      All clear?
      I thought not.
      Still, at Stratford, east London, there is 2-rail (25kv), 2 lots of 3-rail (750v and DLR), 2 lots of 4 rail (Central and Jubilee lines), so you can see for yourself. If you want. Maybe. Possibly.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    20. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by akadruid · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, the combination of anti-terrorist 'get-out-of-jail-free' rules and the signs saying 'we can do what we want' means they literally can steal the thing.

      Of course, you have the train companies' general incompetance on your side. A decent lock should keep em out.

      Mind you, at any London station a piece of paper with PTO on both sides is probably good enough.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    21. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by arwel · · Score: 1

      East of London? Hmm, I wonder how the trains to Ipswich and Norwich get their power then...

    22. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      As the police were the ones who authorised (over the telephone) the bike being removed it wouldn't be wise. I agree with you over the criminal damage thing - I should file a letter of claim and if they don't pay use the Small Claims Court. I agree with you that it seems in breach of article 17 part 2 of the declaration of human rights:-

      (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

      as they didn't remove all the bikes.

      They did (finally) drop the insistence on a lost luggage/ property charge. I did report it initially to the police - but a branch that was local to me and about 200 miles from where it happened. The local bye laws in this country allow the train companies to do what they like regarding property (unfortunately). Telling me if it had been a car they would've blown it up - is not consoling.

    23. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      a) no signs because of b) local bye-laws

      Next time yes - it's alarmed with ferocious attack dogs unleashed if they try to remove it. ;) This wasn't London. *grins* In London they'd have had the bomb squad out. *grins*

    24. Re:Through the rails or over the power lines? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      As the police were the ones who authorised (over the telephone) the bike being removed it wouldn't be wise. I agree with you over the criminal damage thing - I should file a letter of claim and if they don't pay use the Small Claims Court. I agree with you that it seems in breach of article 17 part 2 of the declaration of human rights:-

      (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

      as they didn't remove all the bikes.

      They did (finally) drop the insistence on a lost luggage/ property charge. I did report it initially to the police - but a branch that was local to me and about 200 miles from where it happened. The local bye laws in this country allow the train companies to do what they like regarding property (unfortunately). Telling me if it had been a car they would've blown it up - is not consoling.

  8. Dupe by Inda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I call dupe.

    November 30th, 2003.

    First UK On-Train WiFi Service Launches Monday

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Dupe by linuxci · · Score: 4, Informative

      I posted that original article, that was when the GNER service was a trial, now it appears the trial was successful and will be rolled out in the entire fleet.

      GNER is the only decent train company in the UK, it's the only one that still offers a smoking carriage, it gives regular travellers a loyalty card like many airlines do, in has a proper restaurant service and I've not had too many problems with their timekeeping.

      The only thing I can say bad about them is that they used to sell bottled real ales in the buffet car, but they stopped doing those October last year, now you've got only canned mainstream beers which ain't the same. GNER are usually good at listening to feedback so if you're a regular traveller and miss the guest ales then email them and let them know. Vist www.gner.co.uk and click on the 'contact us' link, then select customer relations.

    2. Re:Dupe by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Nope, that was the announcement that they were trialling it...

      This is the anouncement that it is live across the whole GNER route.

      (For anyone interested, GNER operate mainly on the East Coast Main Line from Aberdeen down to London)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    3. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go with your +2 Insightful, you Whore

    4. Re:Dupe by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      it's the only one that still offers a smoking carriage

      Not true. Anglia Railways (now rebranded as "One") have smoking carriages on their mainline services between Norwich and London.

      Bob

    5. Re:Dupe by MattBurke · · Score: 1

      I was mortified when Virgin stopped their smoking carriage. On the way to a festival it was like being in a very friendly pub, and even on more mundane trips it was a godsend when the inevitable "this train is going to be running 4 hours late" announcement came along :)

    6. Re:Dupe by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Ahh I was given wrong info then, when Midland Mainline abolished smoking I read on some news site that GNER was the only one that did this.

      Virgin scrapped it a long time ago, GNER can easily offer smoking because all their trains are at least 9 carriages long (they increased the length of their 8 carriage 125's last year), whereas Virgin indruced new trains that were actually shorter than their old ones on the cross country route (5 carriages max)

    7. Re:Dupe by linuxci · · Score: 1

      They cite customer demand for the removal of smoking on Virgin, so write to them and show them it's not so.

    8. Re:Dupe by bbtom · · Score: 1

      You think that's good? Midland Mainline have a quiet carriage. Which means a "Shut the fuck up and stop using your mobile" carriage. It's bliss on those St. Pancras to Leicester journeys, especially when the chavs get on at Market Harborough.

      Now if only they could give out free wi-fi, I'd use the train far, far more.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    9. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's the only one that still offers a smoking carriage

      <insert obligatory bad taste joke about a train tragedy here>

  9. This seems better than GPRS by karikasper · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Estonia we have GPRS-based connection in trains. Haven't tried it myself, but I've been told it's quite slow and sluggish.

    1. Re:This seems better than GPRS by tarunthegreat · · Score: 1, Informative

      Considering GPRS is a 2.5G mobile-phone standard, and wi-fi is a Broadband standard, ya, GPRS will be a lot more sluggish, than wi-fi. The real comparison to be made is WCDMA/3GSM vs Wi-Fi. GPRS is just some kind of midpoint between 2G digital mobile phone service and 3G 'fat-pipe' wireless data transfer

    2. Re:This seems better than GPRS by Random38406090308 · · Score: 1

      Well this is 4KB/sec and two channels. If there are more users than 2 then this bandwith will be shared. And it is not wifi on the train but you have to connect your computer using a cable, that you can borrow from the train. It is for the first class only and for free.

    3. Re:This seems better than GPRS by s7uar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rather like our UK trains then.

  10. Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thats about 8USD to you! No suprises that the pricing is expensive, rail travel is more expensive than air travel in the UK sometimes!

    1. Re:Expensive by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      IIRC, isn't that because air travel is heavily subsidised by the government?

    2. Re:Expensive by alnapp · · Score: 1

      YDRC

      (you don't recall correctly)

    3. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, isn't that because air travel is heavily subsidised by the government?

      Some of the airlines flying into and out of the UK probably are subsidised by their governments but I'm sure that HMG doesn't subsidise any airlines.

    4. Re:Expensive by pklong · · Score: 1

      It certainly is if you travel first class.

      A quick search on National Rail shows the standard first class fare is 267.00 GBP (~ 491.55 USD)

      FYI Other fares:

      Saver Return (But has some travel restrictions) 87.10 UKP (~ 160.35 USD)

      Standard Open Return 186.00 UKP (~342.43 USD)

      Cheaper fares are available but are a pain in the ar^H^H^H^H^H^H to get.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  11. Excellent by vedli · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is really great news. When I go and visit my girlfriend in Edinburgh I have to do without an Internet connection for up to 3 hours; clearly far too long for anyone :-) With regards wireless networks in general, I know that when wi-fi network cards are in ad hoc mode you can stumble across other cards in ad hoc mode but is there any way to communicate with them? For example, not only being able to tell another card is present, but ask the owner of the card if they want a game of Quake?

    --
    (http://www.e-consort.co.uk)
    1. Re:Excellent by jemnery · · Score: 1

      When I go and visit my girlfriend in Edinburgh I have to do without an Internet connection for up to 3 hour Then fly, dude, it's a lot quicker and cheaper if you're close to an EasyJet airport like Luton.

    2. Re:Excellent by GlynDavies · · Score: 1

      So when you go visit your girlfriend in Edinburgh, after 3 hours on the train, the first thing you do is jump on-line?
      You must be a regular here. ;-)

    3. Re:Excellent by drunkahol · · Score: 1

      And when you're NOT in Edinburgh . . . your "girlfriend" turns tricks down in Leith! Seriously - she's pretty well known down there.

      As for flying vs train between Edinburgh & London, the train beats the airports every time. Total travel time for each method is going to be around 4 hours. But trains don't have check-in, security scanning, boarding, sitting around on tarmac, fat bastard sitting next to you sweating all over you, disembark, collect baggage, get taxi to city centre etc.

      Dunk

    4. Re:Excellent by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Because flying on the cheap airlines is not a pleasant experience, I know people who've flown on a cheap airline and have not being allowed to board because they have the wrong type of ID (e.g. they have the old style driving licence that has no photocard) and not even given a refund. Customer service is terrible and the fact is you should not need ID just for a domestic flight.

      Also trains run more frequently than planes, so by the time you add the getting from the town centre to the airport, having to check in early, etc it's often quicker overall to just get the train.

      Also if you prefer to travel flexibly (not be tied down to travelling on certain services) it's a lot easier to get a flexible ticket for train travel.

    5. Re:Excellent by vedli · · Score: 1

      I don't think she'd let me go straight on-line :-) Which is food for thought guys, think of all the /. ing I'm missing on the train!

      --
      (http://www.e-consort.co.uk)
    6. Re:Excellent by vedli · · Score: 1

      Um, not sure about the first bit but as for the second I do agree. People have suggested I use low-cost airlines but the whole process just seems like a pain in the ass. And I haven't heard about EasyJet offering wi-fi yet! Speaking of which, if I'm planning on travelling by air should I remove my wi-fi network card?

      --
      (http://www.e-consort.co.uk)
    7. Re:Excellent by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      This is probably true for the East Coast (Edinburgh - London), but the West Coast (Glasgow - Birmingham - Bristol) is a different story. Virgin at their worst, 6 hour journey times, that fat bastard travels on Virgin Trains when he's not flying with you. In contrast, EasyJet to Bristol is cheaper, includes car-parking at Glasgow Airport, Bristol Airport is fairly accessible, etc.

      In summary: not all airports like Embra and Lundin.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    8. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know people who've flown on a cheap airline and have not being allowed to board because they have the wrong type of ID (e.g. they have the old style driving licence that has no photocard) and not even given a refund

      Maybe they should have, you know, read the damn terms and conditions?

    9. Re:Excellent by timbos · · Score: 1
      Speaking of which, if I'm planning on travelling by air should I remove my wi-fi network card?

      I wouldn't think so. I know of at least one airline (Lufthansa) who offer WLAN access on long haul flights.

  12. Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not buy up a whole carriages worth of space and set up your office on a train going between say, Bristol and london, or Manchester? Sure beats sitting in an office all day. If you worked the shifts out correctly, your staff would have a choice between living in two citys (or any stop in between).

    Of course that bring up the obvious joke:
    In Soviet Russia, the office commutes to YOU!

    I think the view from a moving train would be much nicer then a static office window anyday!

    1. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      GNER don't operate in Bristol, or Manchester... Bristol is on the West Coast line which is Virgin Trains territory.

      GNER operate the East coast mainline (Aberdeen, Edinburough, Newcastle, Durham, York, Leeds, Doncaster, Peterborough, Stevenage, London Kings Cross) - I've probably missed a couple but thats the main stopping places.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    2. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 3, Informative
      GNER don't operate in Bristol, or Manchester... Bristol is on the West Coast line which is Virgin Trains territory.

      Ya, I know, I live in London.

      But the BBC commented on the fact that other Operators were going to interduce the same survice soon. If Branson fails to get the same thing added to Virgin's trains with-in six months of GNER doing it, I'll send my e-mail address to the top five spammers :)

      I was not intending for my comment to be Moded funny anyway, I was hoping that the idea of moblie offices would actualy spark some interest, but it looks like most people took it as mobile SPAM offices, and i only ment that to be a humerious title.

    3. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by curlyk · · Score: 1

      I think the view from a moving train would be much nicer then a static office window anyday!

      Unless you work here, which shares buildings with this.

    4. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by o_truk_d · · Score: 1
      I believe Branson has already done so. There are adverts in my local station that are advertising Wi-Fi in their fancy new trains. Executive toy number 24, I think.

      Hmm. It's distressing that I recall that...

    5. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      their fancy new trains suck. i was on one yesterday. too few seats with too little luggage space (they assume that almost everyone uses handbags)

    6. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bristol is on the West Coast line which is Virgin Trains territory.

      Bristol (Actually, Swansea) to London is First Great Western if you leave from Wales, or from Bristol Temple Meads. If you go from Bristol Parkway to London then you can get a Virgin service, if you're masochistic enough for it.

    7. Re:Cool, Spammers now have rolling hide outs :) by AcerKev · · Score: 1

      and the metel in the windows kills the FM reception, and GSM/GPRS reception :(

  13. A whole new spectrum of excuses by JosKarith · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We're sorry this train is late, but there are the wrong type of interleaves on the pipe..."
    (For the benefit of those who don't have the pleasure of living in the wettest place on earth British Railways used 'Wrong leaves on the track' as an excuse for late/cancelled trains for years...)

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by Fernando+Pessoa · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, this is an amalgam of 2 different excuses:

      "Leaves on the line"

      and

      "The wrong kind of snow".

    2. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Until they discovered that spraying orange juice on the track fixed the problem with the leaves. You couldn't make this stuff up.

    3. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by AGMW · · Score: 3, Funny
      ... and shortly after the "leaves on the track" incident, there was a case down in Kent somewhere where some guys had robbed a sub-post office and been chased onto the tracks by the police. The announcement came of the tannoy ...

      "We apologies for the late running of the 07:25 service to London Bridge. This is due to thieves on the line."

      Laugh! I nearly got to work on time.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    4. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by drunkahol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acutally that excuse was only used a handfull of times. It's become folklore now - so people bring it up all the time.

      The problem came about when they switched the brakes to using disk brakes rather than clamping the outer edge of the wheel. The clamping action would help scrape the leaf mulch off the wheels so the wheels were clean to grip the track. The leaf mulch couldn't be cleaned off when the disk brakes were used.

      As for the wrong kind of snow, it's more that the de-icer was sprayed on the tracks - then the temperature rose and it started raining and washed off the de-icer - then the temperature dropped and the rain froze on the tracks. Odd circumstances, but you can easily understand how it happens!

      Dunk

    5. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by kraut · · Score: 1

      The one that really gets me is "the wrong kind of rain". You'd think of all things they'd be used to rain in this country...

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    6. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by AlecC · · Score: 1

      The problem came about when they switched the brakes to using disk brakes rather than clamping the outer edge of the wheel. The clamping action would help scrape the leaf mulch off the wheels so the wheels were clean to grip the track. The leaf mulch couldn't be cleaned off when the disk brakes were used.

      That disagrees with the pamphlet the railway company put out, saying the problem was that the pressure of the train pounded the leaves into graphite on the line. So the problem had to be solved by cleaning the line not the wheels. And it arose because in the "old days", they cut back any trees to about 5 yards away from the line, so relatively fewl leaves get onto the line. Since privatisation, they only cut back the trees enough to let the trains through, so the leaves fall on the line.

      As for the wrong kind of snow, it's more that the de-icer was sprayed on the tracks - then the temperature rose and it started raining and washed off the de-icer - then the temperature dropped and the rain froze on the tracks. Odd circumstances, but you can easily understand how it happens!

      Wrong again, as I heard. The snow was too fine and powdery and got into the air circulation slots on the side of the electric motors on some trains. They had assumed that water would run off, and bigh snow would stay on the outside and get shaken off. Fine, powdery snow (not common in lowland UK) caked inside the cooling vents not outside, so didn't fall off and could not be knocked off.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    7. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by stridebird · · Score: 1
      The wettest place on earth?

      You need to get out some more.

      1) Buenaventura, Colombia 265.5"
      2) Monrovia, Liberia 202"
      3) Pago Pago, American Somoa 196.5"
      4) Moulmein, Myanmar, Burma 191"
      5) Lae, Papua New Guinea 183"
      6) Baguio, Luzon Island, Philippines 180"
      7) Sylhet, Bangladesh 175.5"
      8) Conakry, Guinea 171"
      9) Bogor, Java, Indonesia 166.3"
      10) Padang, Sumatra Island 166.3"
      source

      Also - Vancouver? Santander? Bergen?( > 300days with rain per year!) Just a few that spring to my mind.

    8. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by NickFitz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some years ago, I was on a train whose conductor explained in great detail why we were going to sit at Nuneaton for an hour, finishing with:

      "Once again, we apologise for this delay, which is due solely to the incompetence of the driver."

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    9. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by Stone+Pony · · Score: 1
      The contemporary railway press certainly mentioned the switch from clasp brakes (where the brake shoes bear directly on the tyre treads) to disc brakes as being a factor in the leaves on the line debacle. That said, I do recall hearing the change in policy on lineside vegetation control being a factor, too, so you may well be right.

      Snow messing with electrical equipment is by no means confined to UK railways. In 1958 the Pennsylvania Railroad had it's passenger service between New York, Philadelphia and Washington wiped out in a similar incident.

      As unsexy as the rail industry is these days (in the UK, at least), the people working in it aren't stupid and there are almost always sound engineering explanations for this sort of screw-up. The problem is that these incidents are presented to the public through news media which is (a) chronically ignorant about the technical issues; and (b) wouldn't let those issues get in the way of a good headline even if they did understand them. Next thing you know, they're interviewing passengers at Euston or Paddington about ticket pricing, or something, and there's some gurning dipshit saying: "well, it's leaves on the line, innit? Wrong type of snow! Pathetic really!" because those are the only rail factoids that he can call to mind.

    10. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by AcerKev · · Score: 1

      Not to forget that if the temprature gets too hot the network descendes into (even more) chaos.

    11. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I was just visiting the UK for the first time over Spring Break and when I was just ready to start going home from London back to where I was staying in Brighton, the Picadilly line, which I was on, stopped, and an announcement came on saying:

      "We're sorry this train is late, but there is a person under the train further up."

      I kind of looked around at everybody expecting some sort of reaction.........looking...........still looking........nope! Not a damn blink from anybody, except for someone asking another which line they should switch to to get somewhere. I love Britain.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:A whole new spectrum of excuses by arwel · · Score: 1

      it arose because in the "old days", they cut back any trees to about 5 yards away from the line, so relatively few leaves get onto the line. Since privatisation, they only cut back the trees enough to let the trains through, so the leaves fall on the line.

      Trees have been growing near the track a lot longer than since privatisation. It was after the end of steam locomotives in 1968 that they stopped cutting back the vegetation so much, as of course diesel locos don't tend to set light to nearby vegetation during droughts the way that steam locos do.

  14. Thames Trains Reading to Paddington has this by mccalli · · Score: 3, Funny
    Can confirm that I've noticed testing going on for this. On my morning commute from Maidenhead station into Paddington (on the Reading route) my Powerbook has been picking up a wireless network called 'TEST' for a few months now.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Thames Trains Reading to Paddington has this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ian,

      Very informative. Very informative indeed. We now need you to travel to the Darkest Peru to find us a pint of the finest orange marmalade.

      Thanks
      Mr. Brown

    2. Re:Thames Trains Reading to Paddington has this by linuxci · · Score: 1

      That's a coincidence, Thames Trains have nothing to do with GNER which is the company introducing WiFI.

    3. Re:Thames Trains Reading to Paddington has this by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      Thames Trains have lost their franchise and GNER is taking over, so it could have something to do with that?

    4. Re:Thames Trains Reading to Paddington has this by drunkahol · · Score: 1

      Nope - GNER is running it on their GNER services. Not any other services.

      Although Virgin Trains is also trialling a service too.

  15. Expensive. VERY. by superhoe · · Score: 5, Interesting
    5 GBP PER HOUR?! Here we go again..

    Rapidly increasing network access on-the-go is a really cool thing. I was excited and waiting for it when it was first announced.

    Now I've already got over my disappointment - f.ex. GPRS service is charged based on traffic here, and it's damn expensive. 100 megabytes and if you exceed that, it's 2 euros/megabyte. So, what's 100 mb/month good for? Definitely not for using graphical WWW on Opera's mobile version. Well, I then check my emails with GPRS. Same thing I could do with GSM data previously, phh.. Dunno, people all around seems to be generally richer than me because they are eagerly waiting for this new EDGE thing to come and increase transfer speeds to 200k or so.

    I'm not waiting for it eagerly - correct me if I'm wrong - at least in Europe, it's most likely going to feature similar stupid pricing which renders it useless to most non-corporate users. I'll join the hype about wireless access on-the-go at the very day when I can afford to use it effectively.

    --

    -el

    1. Re:Expensive. VERY. by jamesangel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I suspect that paying services like this will dry up quickly, due to competition from other ways of access/forms of transport and the growing expectation that WiFi should be provided like light or bathrooms - free.

      Here in Paris, about three months ago I noticed that lots of cafes were offering WiFi at a similar rate to this. A couple of months later, and the same places have given up and offer it for free. It started out as a premium service, then became a nice perk to have, and soon it will be an expectation everywhere.

    2. Re:Expensive. VERY. by S3D · · Score: 1

      They already have flat GPRS rates in the Italy. Then it spread to the rest of the world the WiFi access should became dirt cheap. (Or everyone will use cell phone as a modem). The question is , how fast flat rate practice spread. IIRC it took seceral years until flat ISP rates became common...

    3. Re:Expensive. VERY. by sir_cello · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I think you need a lecture on economics 101.

      It's not that expensive: you've obviously never left home and backpacked: I've been to cybercafe's all around Europe, and although the prices are better now, about 4-5 years ago, 5GBP per hour would have at the upper limit, but not considered expensive.

      You should also read up on economics while you're at it: of course GPRS and related services are expensive: have you seen how much it costs to develop, rollout and manage the technology? It's a lot more than simply providing dialup 56K access. Companies have to return a profit so they can pay their workers and provide for their shareholders, and therefore keep all us in houses and with future pensions.

      Same in this case: installing and managing the wifi service actually costs money, so it's generally a good business model that you try and reclaim some of that back: the train company isn't a charity for rolling out new technologies.

      I appreciate your concerns, we all do: everyone wants to see future technologies come into use at good prices, but reality is a little different: it takes a while for it to all roll in and the prices to reduce.

      I'm waiting for someone to introduce standard response templates to /.: we can all say time educating people like yourself and just throw you an intro to "economics and how the world goes around".

    4. Re:Expensive. VERY. by Gossy · · Score: 2, Informative

      100 megabytes and if you exceed that, it's 2 euros/megabyte. So, what's 100 mb/month good for? Definitely not for using graphical WWW on Opera's mobile version.

      You think that's bad?

      I pay GBP25/mo on O2's online offpeak 500 tariff.

      I get ... 0.5MB of GPRS included! GBP2.35 / MB if I go over that.

      How do they expect such technologies to seriously take off at such extortionate prices? I could probably download my email once with that amount of inclusive transfer..

    5. Re:Expensive. VERY. by superhoe · · Score: 1
      You talk a lot of sense.

      Thought, one shot cybercafe hour million miles away from home is a different thing. I'd pay 5 pounds for it just to get my email. But it's a bit of different to being able to do some work on a domestic train trip to visit a friend. 5 pounds is lot of cash for it.

      I also thank you for the mini lecture to economics. But GPRS has been around for a good while and _nothing_ has happened to the prices at all. And EDGE is already coming - we're starting to move towards new technology. But the old model's price (GPRS) ain't dropping. That doesn't make sense at all.

      Am I just exceptionally impatient?

      --

      -el

    6. Re:Expensive. VERY. by steve_bryan · · Score: 0

      I don't want to be too nasty but your tone seems more than slightly smug without showing an impressive command of the relevant facts. There seem to be two situations being considered: costs for wifi implementation on British rail and costs for wifi implementation at places like coffee shops.

      For the second case we have businesses trying various strategies from free access to metered per minute or megabyte. In the US it currently appears that free access is gaining the upper hand with wifi being treated as a differentiating amenity that businesses factor in to their costs like rent or taxes. I'm sure there are several reasons for this trend but one is certainly the phone company syndrome. That syndrome is that more than half of what you pay is actually incurred by the monitoring and accounting needed to present you with a bill. So to a large extent you are paying for them to produce a bill for you to pay. Eliminate all that added burden by making access "free", build the remaining cost into the costs for the main business (coffee shop, hotel, etc) and use it as a competitive advantage.

      The first case is illuminated by the concepts taught in Economics 101. In particular the question of monopoly pricing since no one is allowed to compete with the wifi provision from the railroad. As anyone who has taken Economics 101 could tell you this will tend to cause prices to be higher than the socially optimum rate. I believe that might be what the original poster was complaining about.

      As a matter of fact there are competitve pressures but they involve the person using a competing form of transportation such as an airline, bus transportation, or private car. So a proponent of passenger rail might look askance at a policy that prices wifi access high enough to erode use of his preferred mode of transportation.

  16. nice idea but... by kefa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I currently use GPRS extensively on trains (admittedly in the London area where reception is relatively good) with no real speed issues. I'd be hard pushed to spend 4.95 GBP on GPRS connection charges during a typical journey.

    1. Re:nice idea but... by SlimDaim · · Score: 1

      I use GNER trains and can easily stay connected to GPRS from Kings Cross all the way to Grantham. 4.95GBP for an hour's worth of broadband access just doesn't seem worth it.

      --
      Daim daim@daim.co.uk www.daim.co.uk
    2. Re:nice idea but... by sir_cello · · Score: 1

      It depends on your usage doesn't it. Here's the cost comparison (it could be more comprehensive) between UK GPRS and this WIFI service, assuming a usage of 1MB of traffic (quite a reasonable figure if you're interactively web surfing). If you're smart about understanding your needs, it could be a good thing, otherwise possibly a waste of money (but hey, I'm assuming that more than half the people that read slashdot buy new technologies for the neat-o-factor rather than doing the economics, and therefore pay more than they really need to).

      GPRS = _theoretical_ maximum of 0.17mbps, say from 7.30/MB (no monthly rental), down to 3.50p/MB (17.50 monthly rental). not to mention the slow access rate.

      WIFI (probably 802.11b at least) = 11mbps [not including contention ratio in the link between the train and the access point], better access rate, and 4.95

    3. Re:nice idea but... by caluml · · Score: 1

      Get the Agile messenger smart phone IM client - and a Symbian OS phone, and GPRS, and you can message away all you like. It's great. I use about 50k of data on Jabber a day.

  17. Already have this for free in Scandinavia by Zo0ok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the train service from Copanhagen to Gothenburg (Oslo) we already have WiFi - free of charge (-:

    1. Re:Already have this for free in Scandinavia by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1
      On the train service from Copanhagen to Gothenburg (Oslo) we already have WiFi - free of charge (-:

      You are forgetting that the UK, at least in terms of public transport and service thereon, is a Third World country. I have to use public transport here every day and across the channel in France & Spain every 6 months and even after N trips the difference in quality and price between the UK and Europe mainland never ceases to amaze me.

    2. Re:Already have this for free in Scandinavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the train service from Copanhagen to Gothenburg (Oslo) we already have WiFi - free of charge (-:

      Gothenburg (Oslo), what do you mean by that? Do you mean a train service that starts in Copanhagen, stops in Gothenburg and has a final destination in Oslo? I guess you must do, otherwise I don't get your post.

    3. Re:Already have this for free in Scandinavia by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

      Yes. There are like 7 daily trains from Copenhagen to Gothenburg. One of them continues to Oslo.

      Also there are other trains from Copenhagen to Gothenburg, that do not have WiFi.

    4. Re:Already have this for free in Scandinavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure where 'Gothenburg (Oslo)' is, but I know that the line Oslo - Gothenburg has WiFi. There's also a WiFi service on the Oslo - Stockholm line, but you need to pay apx GBP 7 to use it.

  18. Priorities by Cleggmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, it was also announced this morning that major operators have deferred the safety recommendations made following a major rail crash some years ago. An independent inquiry recommended the installation of digital radios to help prevent drivers overshooting red signals. This announcement from the operators means that the recommendations will not be actioned until 14 years after the inquiry published its findings. To rub salt into that wound, there is also involvement from OfCom (UK communications regulator) over the sharing of such frequencies, with concerns that such radios may operate on similar frequencies to public access services. And the goveernment seem surprised that its public are reticent to give up their private cars?!

  19. Why is WiFi so expensive everywhere? by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know that much about how the technology works, but it seems to me that there is almost 0 new infrastructure necessary -- but everywhere I go in London, WiFi is outrageously expensive. Can someone with more technological knowledge than I explain this? Perhaps I'm missing some cost, but it seems to me that if they charged 1GBP/hour people would use it without thinking. But, when the cost is higher than the minimum wage, second thoughts arise.


    -Colin

    1. Re:Why is WiFi so expensive everywhere? by Cleggmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is not disputed that these costs are prohibitive to the "public at large", however I would guess that the majority of users would be corporate, hence offset the costs via expenses. This, unfortunately, is indicative of the UK comms industry. Only of late are the providers packaging their products for domestic consumers as opposed to corporate users. Maybe in five years time the UK will have reached the level that most developed countries already enjoy.

    2. Re:Why is WiFi so expensive everywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The minimum wage is far higher than 1GBP/hour! Though I agree with the rest of your post.

    3. Re:Why is WiFi so expensive everywhere? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Whoops. I guess that paragraph wasn't too clear. I ment that the price charged on the trian 4.95GBP/hr is greater that the min wage, which is, I believe, 4.10GBP/hr.


      -Colin

    4. Re:Why is WiFi so expensive everywhere? by mikeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's expensivce at present because people are willing to pay it.

      I don't think it will be long before we end up with a model where enterprising pub and cafe owners figure that at about 25/month (dollars, pounds whatever) for an ADSL link they can give their customers semi-free wifi access and compete for the road warrior trade.

      They won't be able to make it unmetered, but the likely scenario is where you buy a coffee and get given a voucher for 1MB/15 minutes access ... my guess is that the hotspot market will migrate to that kind of thing with a few years and just about anywhwere public will have some kind of modest-cost wifi access.

  20. Used it last november by tomrud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tried this (or similar) on the train from Stockholm to Karlstad last november.

    I got i little box with an antenna and connected my ethernet port to the box. I got an IP-address via DHCP, but I'm sorry, I didn't check if it was a public or a NAT-address.

    Anyway, I got full Internet access as far as I could tell. I could create a SSH-tunnel to my work and use it to read my email (and to do anything I usually do through SSH. It was a little bit slow, thou. I had urgent things to do for my employer, so I didn't have the time to really explore it's limits.

    It didn't have any stupid requirements for operating system and was usable with my GNU/Linux laptop.

    You can find some (commercial) information about it here: http://www.linx.se/templates/Page.aspx?id=3108

    --
    For a nice date: Call strftime(3C)!
  21. Great for British Trains by L-s-L69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As you can post your complaint as you sit in the delay. Cant wait for Virgin to get this, I could invite the entire carridge to complain with me.

    1. Re:Great for British Trains by isorox · · Score: 1

      I never have a problem with virgin, and they have at-seat power. Wish FGW had that for my 5 hour trip to penzance tonight.

      Went on SWT last weekend though, its was ridiculous. My reserved seat's coach was missing, the train was overcrowded, but I managed to get a seat. 10 minutes into the journey (settled down watching a DS9 episode) the guy next to me lights a fag. Just about to complain and then I notice theres no non-smoking signs. South West Trains are so barbaric they actually have smoking carriages!

      Virgin are the best company I use, FGW are fine, shame theres no power sockets.

    2. Re:Great for British Trains by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Oh well, add South West Trains to the companies enlightened enough to offer their customers the choice of whether they want to smoke or not. What's wrong with giving people the option, no one's forcing you to use the smoking carriage.

      Apart from that I think South West Trains were appalling, only slighly better than the now defunct Connex and I've personally never been in a smoking carriage of a South West Train so it must only be certain services not all of them.

      BTW I'm not a smoker, but I see nothing wrong in offering choice. I do travel with smokers a lot though and would rather have them happy rather than being in a bad mood all the way.

    3. Re:Great for British Trains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SW Trains are so packed you often are forced to use the smoking carriage or not get on the train at all!!!

    4. Re:Great for British Trains by isorox · · Score: 1

      It's such an unusual thing for those of use that travel in civilised surroundings aren't expecting such archaic relics from the past and sit there without realising its the torture coach. I pity the conductor who has to work in the smoking area though, I thought there were laws against that.

      Still, in future I wont bother with SWT unless theres no choice, thank god for competition!

    5. Re:Great for British Trains by isorox · · Score: 1

      This train was so packed that at one point there was no room to *stand* except in the smoking area!

  22. Twats by tehcyder · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    If the train companies are spending even one fucking pound on this corporate toy, rather than improving safety and reliability, I hope all their directors and shareholders burn in hell.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:Twats by linuxci · · Score: 1

      They're spending money on this to increase the number of people who want to travel on the railway therefore increasing income so more money can be spent on improving services.

      Most of the safety issues are with Network Rail rather than the train companies themselves.

    2. Re:Twats by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Well, in the first place I'd say that 90% of people don't have much of a choice about using trains (I'm thinking about London/SE commuters here).

      Secondly, reliability/service issues are certainly the responsibility of the train companies.

      And finally, I appreciate that there is a certain artificial divide between train and track operators, but taking the industry as a whole, I stick by my point.

      Oh, and apologies for the tone, but I was very annoyed by people blathering on about how their precious internet access might be a bit slow, when my experience of trains consists mainly of staring at the back of someone's neck and trying to breathe.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Twats by theOtherFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shame the root post was modded Flamebait, I'm inclined to agree. Virgin are a prime example of massively inappropriate spending: when their trains were running more and more crowded and their punctuality was getting worse, what did they do? Rather than ACTUALLY spending cash on more trains, they replaced the existing stock with trains which are more cramped and have less setas and carriages. But at least they have power points and push buttons to open doors and look like planes! Nice one Virgin.

      With train fares as pricey as they are, I'd like to see my cash going into improvements in service and networks, rather than cosmetic improvements.

    4. Re:Twats by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Well GNER can't do anything about the commuter trains as they don't run any, all they do are InterCity type services which are usually OK (and they have lengthened some of their trains to ensure people can get a seat)

  23. They're not the first. by Sandman1971 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This isn't news. Via Rails here in Canada has been offering wi-fi on Via 1 trains on the Montréal-Toronto or Montréal-Québec City routes here for months on a trial basis.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
    1. Re:They're not the first. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      This isn't news.

      I disagree. This is news because its the first for the UK and it's nice to see Slashdot not be completely US-centric.

      If a railway company in another predominately English speaking country (Austrialia for example) is the first to do this, then I see no reason why it's not "stuff that matters".

      I see no reason why Slashdot has to limit itself to the US and Canada. Even more so when one of the most frequent sources they link to is based outside of those countries.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  24. The cost by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It'll cost UKP4.95 per hour for train goers

    Given that your battery will go flat after no more than two hours, it's only going to cost you about a tenner anyway :o)

    Of course i'm ignoring the fact you might have a spare battery - but also I think that Virgin Trains are the only ones at the moment to offer power points in their trains. First class only.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:The cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNER are refurbishing their electric trains and fitting them with power sockets. The new "Mallard" sets are really quite nice, and put Virgin's offerings to shame.

    2. Re:The cost by Phantom69 · · Score: 1

      No, Mains power points are available on Virgin Trains in standard accommodation too. It's on all the new trains, including their trains running to the South-West, and will be on the new Pendelino trians on the West Coast line (when they're ready - supposedly by September 2004). HTH

    3. Re:The cost by 095 · · Score: 1, Informative
      RTFA
      The new trains will also have power sockets so that passengers can plug in their laptop computers.
    4. Re:The cost by aallan · · Score: 1

      ...but also I think that Virgin Trains are the only ones at the moment to offer power points in their trains. First class only.

      Nope, with the introdcution of their new trains Virgin now have power points in cattle class as well.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    5. Re:The cost by MattBurke · · Score: 1

      the new virgin trains have plug sockets by every seat

    6. Re:The cost by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      You could use a portable that doesn't suck.

      My 2.5-year-old PowerBook still runs for three hours or more on a single charge of the original battery during light use (browsing the web on WiFi qualifies; building XFree86 while playing Civ3 doesn't).

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    7. Re:The cost by isorox · · Score: 1

      With Virgin its only the very old trains (London - Holyhead, some London - Liverpool) that dont have power sockets. There's only one socket for every two seats though.

      Of course if you're frequently on a long train journey, get a 2.5kg (5lb) 20Ah motorbike battery and charger and a 12V-16V DCDC converter.

    8. Re:The cost by bbtom · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'm currently wi-fi-ing on an iBook, with 78% charge left and a predicted 2h 54m remaining. Considering that a train journey from the suburbs to London is about 40m to an hour, I don't think that my battery would run out during the journey.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    9. Re:The cost by Lurks · · Score: 1
      Given that your battery will go flat after no more than two hours, it's only going to cost you about a tenner anyway :o)

      My Sony TR1MP which I use on the train every day, goes for a lot lot longer than that - as do a number of Centrino laptops.

      There's no wifi on my train but there's a couple of hotspots accessible from a couple of stations on the way. I use Avantgo on the PC and load up all the web sites I want to use over the Wifi broadband quickly, so I can read them when I have no signal later.

    10. Re:The cost by ollyg · · Score: 1

      Virgin offer power sockets beside all seats, not just the first class ones.

      Tried an Apple Powerbook? Battery life in multiples of two hours! But that's okay, cos Mac owners are rich anyways ;-)

  25. Wardriiving, the cheaper way to go by Skevin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I started thinking about how the railway could save money...

    "Ladies and Gentlemen using our wire internet service: this is your conductor speaking, and I would like to inform you than in approximately five seconds, you will need to change your wireless settings - essid is 'linksys', channel 7, IP range is-... Oh, bugger! It appears we are entering the range of another access point, so let me consult our wardriving records... Here we are: essid is 'elizabeth', channel 11, and-... oh dear, we've just left the range of *that* access point as well. In any case, the farmhouse we are currently passing has the following settings..."

    Solomon Chang

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Wardriiving, the cheaper way to go by isorox · · Score: 1

      Not in this country. You'll get a good half hour at one WAP when waiting at a broken signal.

  26. not possible by solidox · · Score: 1

    GNER trains arn't electric.
    they don't have a means to connect to the limited amounts of overhead electric wires and the tracks arn't electric either.
    nice idea tho

    --
    1. Re:not possible by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Most GNER trains are electric, just the ones to Aberdeen and Inverness need to be diesel although they may be used occaisionally on other services

    2. Re:not possible by arwel · · Score: 1

      Huh? Most of them are electric, but since the locomotive is always at the London end of the train you might not have noticed...

  27. Pah! IP over trains protocol is the way to go by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

    You'll get much better bandwidth if you simply take the data by train. Even with the delays inherent in English rail.

  28. Upgrades... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Not sure about GNER, but on several journeys between London-Ipswich and London-Plymouth there have been announcements to the effect of "you can upgrade to first class for 5-10"
    London-Ipswich is only a couple of hours journey, but it would really be worth it to upgrade on the 5-7 hour PITA that is Plymouth-London-Plymouth...

    I imagine the same would apply to London-Newcastle, London-Scotland...

  29. All very good, however by youngerpants · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to do a lot of travelling for work, I have used WiFi hotspots almost everywhere I needed it, but whenI have used my laptop on trains before using GPRS, and I think this is a great move and a step in the right direction.

    However, the one area where this always falls over is with power. Our batteries are just don't last long enough. I have a brand new Dell D600 (finally gave up on my Thinkpad T21) and the battery will give me 1 - 1.5 hours max.

    As long as the trains also offer power outlets so I can keep the charge going I'd happily pay for the connectivity

    1. Re:All very good, however by Echnin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Whose batteries don't last lost enough? My iBook goes for about 4 hours when surfing, chatting and mailing using WiFi.

      Oh, and the trains do have power outlets anyway. :p

      --
      Lalala
  30. Brand Communications by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 4, Informative
    At the WLAN event in London on the 6-7 April, this is exactly what Brand Communications said they are going to be doing. In fact a quick look around their website turned up this press release from 1st December giving some details.

    The press release states "The latest trials were held on route between Edinburgh and London Kings Cross and achieved realistic data rates and speeds, with over 18 GigaBytes of data being sent to and from the train."

    I got the impression from the people on the stand that they will be using WiMax to get the signal to the train passengers, and then standard 802.11b inside the carriages.

    If it all works out it should make train journeys a bit more interesting, but there goes my excuse to get out of doing any work.

  31. Rail travel is often more expensive... by blorg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...than flying with the likes of Ryanair who often do free or 0.99p deals. The train however goes from city centre to city centre, rather than circa 1 hour outside each city; I'm thinking London Stansted to "Glasgow" (Prestwick) here. When you factor in taxes and the exorbitant cost of the Stansted Express it's not always so cheap any more.

    Fast rail travel (like they have on the European continent) is far more comfortable than flying. When you factor in airport distance, check-in times, etc, it's also quicker than flying on most domestic-length routes. Look at Eurostar's dominance on the London-Paris route at the expense of the airlines. It's also far more environmentally friendly than short-haul flights - in Spain you can get a discount on an AVE/Talgo ticket within 48 hours of flying into/out of the country, to persuade you to use the train rather than a connecting flight to your ultimate destination.

    Offering WiFi is definately another value-add that will increase train use - you can actually spend that 4-5 hour journey *working* (or whatever) rather than spending approx the same amount of time getting a train to the airport, check-in, hanging around, short flight, another train. Now if they can only get those leaves off the track and introduce high speed services...

  32. Fave Excuse by pklong · · Score: 2, Funny

    My favorate excuse heard on the british train system for delayed trains is "exploding pigeons".

    Apparently London Kingscross Thameslink stations overhead lines are very close to the roof and a pigeon flying between the roof and the lines can shorten the gap just enough for the electricity to arc across the gap.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Fave Excuse by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      My train into Brighton was stopped for 15 minutes at a station because of a cat on the tracks on the viaduct ahead of us. The guard went out along the edge of the track trying to scare the thing away - I think if the passengers had had their way we'd have just mown it down.

  33. Noooooo! by empaler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can actually make money by being late! The horror! Now they have incentive!

    1. Re:Noooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      They've always made money from being late, that's what the buffet car is for!

  34. Of course it would be against regulations by empaler · · Score: 1

    Think of what a few teenagers might do for kicks if they got access to the internal network for train detection and interlocking - that could be... catastrophic.

    No one say terrorists. I hate you already, if you're thinking it.

  35. GREAT Britain by empaler · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't be a real Empirical Passport if it didn't demand all-access to all it's citizens worldwide, would it?
    It's probably a remnant for back when it was a privilege to get a passport...

    1. Re:GREAT Britain by nickos · · Score: 1

      I think you meant "Imperial", not "Empirical". "Empirical" means something completely different.

      I'm not sure what an "Imperial" passport would be anyway. If there is an empire in this day and age I think you'll find it on the other side of the Atlantic.

  36. No, it's because the airlines are more efficient.. by blorg · · Score: 1
    ...than many of the woefully inefficient ex-monopoly train operators. I'm talking about the low-fare airlines here doing internal flights; the 'flag carriers' such as British Airways aren't generally competing with trains. Ryanair will ensure that it has close to 100% load at all times by varying ticket prices; while you can get a cheap ticket if you book in advance, if you are trying to book short-notice a ticket will cost a small fortune. The trains don't vary their pricing structure in such a dynamic way, and are often half-empty.

    To a small degree the airlines do have an advantage in not having to pay tax on their fuel, but actually it is generally the train companies that are getting the subsidies. I don't think this is a bad thing in itself as long as it doesn't promote inefficiency; rail travel is far more environmentally friendly than short-haul air, and a good rail infrastructure has many public benefits.

  37. Re:Euros by csteinle · · Score: 1

    "Guilty until proven innocent", eh? Yeah, Blunkett would hate that...

  38. hehe by miruku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "According to telecoms analysts BWCS, 625 million people worldwide will be travelling on wi-fi enabled trains within the next five years"

    and

    "A radio system for train drivers recommended after the Paddington rail crash has been delayed by five years. The digital radio network was to be introduced on the rail network in 2008.

    But the system, allowing signallers to speak to a number of drivers at the same time, will not be ready until 2013 - 14 years after the crash."


    so 5 years for wi-fi, 9 years for adiquite saftey? nice one

    --
    MilkMiruku
    1. Re:hehe by miruku · · Score: 1

      s/adiquite/adequate

      --
      MilkMiruku
  39. Links by linuxci · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just for more info:
    GNER press release
    GNER WiFi site
    The full rollout hasn't commenced yet but you can find out which trains are already running with WiFi


    The on board menu

  40. Regional trains and IC trains by empaler · · Score: 1

    in Denmark all have that compartment. Yet almost every time I choose to sit in one of them, I have to tell people off for talking loudly or using their cellphone - and they talk back, the bastards. If I wasn't a pacifist... (and there was a lax arms-law in DK... of course I'd use a suppressor, it being the quiet compartment and all...)

    1. Re:Regional trains and IC trains by bbtom · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to have a metal plate made up with "This is a quiet coach. Please refrain from using your mobile phones." printed on it in large letters. I would show it to them, and if they don't pipe down, smack them round the head with it...

      Don't piss off the geek in the corner (programming PHP/reading about evolutionary biology/writing a revolutionary political treatise) because they are likely to come and knock you senseless. ;D

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  41. Re:Euros by Chep · · Score: 1

    at least, we have a written constitution.

    Oh yeah, you might find interesting to read http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/html/constitution/co nst01.htm
    articles 7, 8 and especially 9 (the "english" button on the top of the page doesn't seem to work; the Fish makes a terrible mess of this text, while Google's seems decent enough).

  42. I hope not by empaler · · Score: 1

    My laptop has a built-in wi-fi card...
    Also, I can't use it for my final exams this year, because I could set up a hotspot on/near the school and secretly access the internet - and if it wasn't the wi-fi, they'd still ban me for the IRda-port. Seriously.

    1. Re:I hope not by vedli · · Score: 1

      The IR port ey? :-) Well what sort of subject allows you to use your laptop in an exam anyway? (apart from computer science) I really think they should come up with a secure system to allow people to type essay-based exams. Throughout the term at uni they make us type all our essays and then expect us to be able to handwrite as much in a fraction of the time during exams. It seems pretty stupid to me.

      --
      (http://www.e-consort.co.uk)
    2. Re:I hope not by AcerKev · · Score: 1

      At our uni they just compalin that they can't read our scrawl :( They've locked down the uni network so much you can't even open Outlook at the moment :s As for WiFi on the trains... I can't see Central Trains doing this any time soon - no that i'd risk a laptop on the Alfreton to Sheffield stretch anyway - far too many scallies, and i dare say the tunnels that make up the bulk of the trans-pennine stretch between Sheffield and Stockport would render GPRS useless for about 1 hour of my journey anyway :( [Mind you i'd much the trains to actually turn up rather than be delayed so much that the one that follows it (on paper an HOUR later) actually arives first :s]

    3. Re:I hope not by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      going to sheffield you'd probably have to surf standing up anyway.

  43. Not accurate. SWT also has stinking carriages. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    At least SWT has the good sense to explore a full banning.

    So SWT has stinkers, gives several free weekend travel vouchers anywhere in their network, have not tried restaurant, but since services are all short ( 2hours) I don't see the need for a proper one.

    The last thing I want on trains is drunken smokers, it is bad enough as things stand (have you ever taken a train after 22:00, specially on Fridays?) so I will not click that link you Mr Chimney :-P

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  44. WHAT!!! by empaler · · Score: 1

    I just moved into central Copenhagen from a station on that line A MONTH AGO. I'd been living there for two friggin' years, commuting every single morning!

    We are talking the line that goes from Helsingør/Elsinore thru Copenhagen and CPH Airport to Sweden, right?

    1. Re:WHAT!!! by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

      I think not. We are talking about the Linx service from Copenhagen to Sweden. You are probably talking about "Oresundstågen" - they are also nice, but I doubt they have WiFi.

  45. Bollocks mate. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The smoke from the stinker carriage knows no boundaries, specially in adjacent coaches in which you still have to tolerate the fumes of the future cancer patients.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  46. Cattle Class? by empaler · · Score: 1

    I've always called it 'the Monkey Cage'

  47. Sorry, I was thinking in Danish by empaler · · Score: 1

    The Brits still behave as if they had an Empire. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to get titles of the Imperial type, anymore.

    Apart from that, Danish is only my second language, and English is my third.

    I don't *use* my first language anymore, and for a time, English filled that role. Odd, really.

  48. RyanAir by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Question from a Yank: how does RyanAir charge 99p or nothing for a flight and make money? Is there a catch?

    1. Re:RyanAir by Stone+Pony · · Score: 1
      I think you'll find that the 99p tickets are very thin on the ground, and are probably either promotions or else last-minute deals to shift the last few seats on the plane. That said, the budget airline industry in general, and Ryanair in particular, are amassing quite an impressive portfolio of court defeats in cases about illegal state aid:

      Charleroi ("Brussels" - sort of)
      Pau (South of France)
      Strasbourg

      Airlines also enjoy a very favourable tax regime: there's no excise duty on aviation fuel (and it's excise duty, rather than VAT, which gives us our famously high fuel prices in the UK), fuel for international flights is VAT free, tickets are VAT free etc. Another thing is that rail ticket prices are invariably quoted inclusive of tax, whereas airlines, and particularly budget airlines, always quote the tax-exclusive price (with a small print note about the tax). Air Passenger Duty is GBP 5.00 per passenger on flights within the UK, EU, Switzerland and EU applicant states and GBP 20.00 on other flights.

  49. Ryanair's 99p/c flights by blorg · · Score: 1

    They make money because most of their fares cost more than 0.99p, and they trim their costs to the bone (quick turnarounds, one type of aircraft, 50% discount negotiated with Boeing, cheap deals with regional airports, etc.) Ryanair copied the model from Southwest, but are actually better at it even than them.

    They offer the 99p fares on flights that have a lot of space free - typically mid-week, etc. If you try to book a flight last-minute, they will absolutely screw you (expect to pay up to EUR 200-300.) Unfortunately they will also screw you if anything goes wrong - no refunds in any circumstances, unless your flight is cancelled - in which case a refund is *all* you get and good luck getting home if you're stranded. They also keep the taxes/charges for no-shows.

    The cost of the flight is basically fixed irrespective of how many people are on it, so Ryanair sell the empty seats off cheap as a marketing tool, while other airlines might just leave the seats empty. (The passenger must pay taxes and airport charges, although they did do one promotion where they paid these for the passenger.) They also make money on in-flight sales and advertising, and their CEO has in the past suggested the idea of permanently free flights financed by in-air gambling.

    The 99p fares do exist, and are not even that difficult to get if you book quickly after they announce a special offer. I've often flown on them. Their *average* fare in 2002 was GBP 30; I believe it's lower now. They are a profitable company on this average.

  50. Review of the experience by TonkaTown · · Score: 3, Informative

    Martin Little took the WiFi train and reviewed the journey for Mobitopia back in December 2003.

    Not altogether positive, GPRS may well be quicker for many people.

  51. WiFi on trains in North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are several rail providers in Canada and the US that are trialling WiFi access. VIA Rail is currently offering it for free on the Toronto to Montreal run. There are trials running down in California as well as other places. Check out PointShot Wireless for more. (No, I dont work there.)

  52. The time has already come for cheap WiFi by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    Sure things take a while for prices to come down but WiFi has already been around for a while. A large number of places are already free in the US for WiFi. Wardriving down the Pacific Coast highway (Seattle-LA) we have passed huge numbers of open wireless networks that are based in Coffee Shops, Hotels, etc. The reason they are free is that they attract customers as a value add. The same would appply to trains. To get people off planes and out of cars the UK train services need to add value to the trip without increasing the already expensive tickets. WiFi is one way to go. Keep in mind that other Wifi providers supply access for 5GBP for 24hours in the UK and you get a better idea of what the cost stucture should be.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  53. That's a relief by empaler · · Score: 1

    Aren't those the ones I kept hearing about on Copenhagen Central Station?
    "Swedish Railways are sorry to announce that the X-2000 for Stockholm has been cancelled..."?
    Happens quite often, as I recall...

  54. Yes, AC, it is by empaler · · Score: 1

    I *am* from Denmark. My mother's just from an old colony, Greenland. All my greenlandish relatives live up there, so I never maintained the use of the language.

  55. Oh yeah... by empaler · · Score: 1

    They slashed the buffet car here in Denmark years ago... Now there's a young lady with an airline-type beverage-and-nasty-food cart... Ech... As if the food they had before wasn't horrid enough...

  56. Maybe just a softball bat by empaler · · Score: 1

    On one side:
    This is a quiet compartment.
    Please respect this.

    On the other side:
    SHUT THE FUCK UP,
    YOU SMELLING PIECE OF FETID CARP!

  57. Re:Euros by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Personaly I've always liked article 10.

    Hey, Chirac, what part of: "Nul ne doit être inquiété pour ses opinions, même religieuses, pourvu que leur manifestation ne trouble pas l'ordre public établi par la Loi." don't you understand?

    Good god, Slashdot didn't zap the accents! What is the world coming to.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  58. Re:Euros by Chep · · Score: 1

    Precisely because proselytist display of religious symbols (a mere manifestation of religious opinions) in public, taxpayer-funded schools has been reckoned (rightly so IMO) to have crossed a threshold of "Trouble to public order", big time I would add.

    Law-abiding Muslims (or Jews or Catholics or Satanists) are free to practice their religion if they want to, but in their own places, and without the help from my taxes, thank you very much.

    The law does say (since 1881) that public schools are free, mandatory and laic (not in that order).

    If extremist muslim families want their daughters to wear the veil in school, they can do so in privately-funded schools if they want. Not enough money to fund those schools? Comply with the rules then. In this country, the Republic takes precedence over prophets, popes and snake-oil vendors.

    Personally, I'd vote for the return of uniforms in schools. This would get rid of this religious stoopidity problem AND the swoosh problem in a single step.

    Sweetly off-topic, isn't it? ;-)

  59. Cisco Mobile Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is an EXCELLENT application for Cisco's Mobile Router / Mobile IP technology.

    Problem: Every time the train goes into a new region (or switches to satellite etc) it will need to obtain a new IP address for the outer connected device.

    Solution: Cisco Mobile Router can keep everyone connected, maintain the same IP address, and make the transaction flawlessly so that nobody loses their open connections.

    I was looking at this technology when I worked at Lockheed Martin for use on aircrafts as they would pass from one satellite zone to another, but I think on a train like this is an excellent application.

    More info at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps2 72/

  60. Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a strong Tunisian connection to the recent bombings in Spain and other European terrorism. Tunisian terrorists (Tunisia being extremely close to Sicily) are obviously sitting off the north coast of sicily with an experimental EMP weapon.