They do not need to circumvent any security measures. All they need to do is access data that was not intended for them. At least thats how current court cases are going. Still waiting on that issue to be resolved eventually in the supreme court if it ever gets there.
Remember, honey pots are OPEN WiFi units, not locked ones.
Anyway, I doubt if student records are copywrighted material and I do not think that is the law in question here. Of course if there were a few tests on their or answers from certain software test programs etc..
I have always liked the iterative approach. It feels better to me. In the long run it is definitely much slower. But it does not *appear* to be slower because every week when they come and ask what have you done, you can show them some new bells and whistles.
The planned approach, every week you can show them a new slide show. People just don't get the value of organization. To most people, you have not done any work. They will be calling your product vaporware in 2 months.
no patience.
Re:Creation of a blue collar computing segment
on
More Cheap Linux PCs
·
· Score: 1
Thats why they are pushing certifications as opposed to degrees. This allows them to flood the market with "qualified" people to reduce the overall wage. So you hire 1 degreed person, and 4 certificates to work for him/her.
a 100w power supply is like buying a celeron 533. Prices are only going to get so cheap. I would expect a 250w psu to be the lowest available on the market for cheap.
I any event, labor will at least match piece cost.
Look how much press it got. Putting misleading things in the 'small print' only to show why (some of them) don't really matter anyway.
Still I have to disagree with him. He claimed to use gcc to 'normalize out' differences in software. Yet they use a specialized malloc which is software!
Its better than it looked, but its still not clean. If its faster they should have just tested everything RAW as shipped/received. Then they would be clean.
As suggested already, the G5 is not a piece of hardware, but a complete computer.
Its better to say he interpreted the report for the layman. The report is definitely misleading if they disabled things. Its like testing CPU A with 1GB of RAM and testing CPU B with 128MB of RAM, then putting that in the small print while a huge graph in the center shows CPU A to be so much faster.
Yes, I know, the GPL is based on copyright, so I misspoke there.
I am not on a quest against Microsoft, I use their products gladly where appropriate.
I am not suggesting GPL is the only way, I am suggesting that the GPL is 'a' way. I think governments should only deal with GPLed software when using the publics money. Othercompanies can do as they please.
If thats what the text said it was a typo. hyjacking the DHCP servers would be quite useless. It has to be the DNS servers, thats where the web addresses are passed out.
I have never written a java application on the desktop that wasn't smooth. I have been writing them for about 5 years now.
Slow GUIs are the fault of their programmers, not Sun.
Admittidly Sun made a huge blunder in using DirectDraw. For some reason on NT oses you need to disable that to get good performance. Many application developers deploy their apps without doing that. (this underneath it all is the fault of Sun, they need to fix that)
Note that for the Java classes the source is available and this is one of the major reasons so many bugs get fixed and the Sun Java libraries are so high quality. I suppose you want the same thing for the JVM. I don't think its Java you want GPLed but the sun JVM. Their are other JVMs out their you can work on if you have a strong desire. Nevertheless, I can not disagree that opening the JVM would make it instantly much better than it is, and its quite good now.
To the A.C. Good God from zion. Did you suggest that MFC was better architected than Swing??? You are a troll. The Swing classes are absolutely beautiful. Period. If you want a lesson in object oriented programming, dive into the *source* sometime which is freely available.
Note, Swing is slow because its build on top of AWT which is build on top of the native toolkit. Its not slow because its bad code! Today its quite respectable. But it could use some improvement. The biggest problem with Swing is the difficulty in handling multiple resolutions and multiple fonts, on multiple platforms. The Swing layout manager implementations could use some serious work!
If you can come up with a superior layout manager, you will probably be rich.
Your point about IBM is well taken. I thought it not mildly funny, and indeed propaganda that this "conference" had some feer about IBMs plans w.r.t. Java.
To me its obvious. IBM always thought software would be free, and the value is in the hardware. They paid for that thinking with M$ capatilazing. They have held out and are beginning to realize their dream.
IBM is certainly a friend of Java if you ask me. But yes, and enemy of *Sun*.;)
The problem with the speed of swing has nothing to do with Java. Java is as fast as or faster than C++. All tests I have ever seen, and personal experience bear this out. The problem with the GUI is the layers necessary to keep it cross platform. Swing is build on top of AWT which is on top of the local GUI toolkit. Thats 2 layers deeper than any local application. So it will always be slower, but for me its not noticeable anymore. (unless you have redraw on during drag operations)
Isin't this like renting a car? When I go on busines s trips, if I don't return it when I said I would, I can just keep it longer without any hassle. And return it when I am finished. Its not monthly though.
Or is this similar to checking into a hotel indefinitely.
Sorry, wrong answer. Expect Wal-mart to go on about its business gladly ignoring the patent. Why should they care? It's not like netflix wants to waste years of their life and tons of money trying to enforce against *Walmart*.
No, expect them to go on happily. However, expect Walmart to be the first to inform netflix of any *other* infringements that are indeed sueable.
Infact Netflix may just cut a free deal with walmart so as not to look like they are scared of the Giant. That would certainly be in walmarts interest in case Netflix gets bought out by a sue happy holdings company.
That is not true. He is not saying the tests are fake. He is saying the tests are true. He is pointing out the *small print* and letting you understand the significance of it. Note that he uses Apple's own information to explain this, he has NOT done his own comparative tests.
He contents that Apple is misleading its customers. Not lying to them, misleading them. Misrepresenting the truth. Their is a suttle difference here.
CAD does not require that much RAM. cgi can get intensive when large textures are used. Same, CAD can also get intensive if you have shaded parts with textures. other than that, the CAD system does not require googobs of RAM. Well, it requires googobs of *video* RAM.
Slashdot Mirror
They do not need to circumvent any security measures. All they need to do is access data that was not intended for them. At least thats how current court cases are going. Still waiting on that issue to be resolved eventually in the supreme court if it ever gets there.
Remember, honey pots are OPEN WiFi units, not locked ones.
Anyway, I doubt if student records are copywrighted material and I do not think that is the law in question here. Of course if there were a few tests on their or answers from certain software test programs etc..
RTFA. The world shares the allotment of IP addresses. Their can not be an Asian shortage without their being a world shortage...
I beg to differ. The market determines what "Linux" is. The market has said Linux is the whole package.
Redhat Linux AOT Redhat GNU/Linux
LinuxNewbie.org AOT Linux-GNUNewbie.org
justlinux.org AOT JustLinux-Gnu.org
It is undeniable that when people say Linux, they mean Linux + GNU tools.
I do however see that the "personality" of Linux is in GNU and not the kernel...
The Linux kernel has become the champion of GNU. He should be finding a less offensive way to express the difference.
Indeed. People are missing the main benefit or Linux today and the main reason they are being attacked.
Linux has a good public image. Linux is popular.
We can't let our shining example be tarnished. Its alot about public relations and SCO understand that.
I have always liked the iterative approach. It feels better to me. In the long run it is definitely much slower. But it does not *appear* to be slower because every week when they come and ask what have you done, you can show them some new bells and whistles.
The planned approach, every week you can show them a new slide show. People just don't get the value of organization. To most people, you have not done any work. They will be calling your product vaporware in 2 months.
no patience.
Thats why they are pushing certifications as opposed to degrees. This allows them to flood the market with "qualified" people to reduce the overall wage. So you hire 1 degreed person, and 4 certificates to work for him/her.
The irony :D
(for those asleep, relate back to Linux Router Project closing up shop last week)
a 100w power supply is like buying a celeron 533. Prices are only going to get so cheap. I would expect a 250w psu to be the lowest available on the market for cheap.
I any event, labor will at least match piece cost.
Look how much press it got. Putting misleading things in the 'small print' only to show why (some of them) don't really matter anyway.
Still I have to disagree with him. He claimed to use gcc to 'normalize out' differences in software. Yet they use a specialized malloc which is software!
Its better than it looked, but its still not clean. If its faster they should have just tested everything RAW as shipped/received. Then they would be clean.
As suggested already, the G5 is not a piece of hardware, but a complete computer.
Its better to say he interpreted the report for the layman. The report is definitely misleading if they disabled things. Its like testing CPU A with 1GB of RAM and testing CPU B with 128MB of RAM, then putting that in the small print while a huge graph in the center shows CPU A to be so much faster.
Yes, I know, the GPL is based on copyright, so I misspoke there.
I am not on a quest against Microsoft, I use their products gladly where appropriate.
I am not suggesting GPL is the only way, I am suggesting that the GPL is 'a' way. I think governments should only deal with GPLed software when using the publics money. Othercompanies can do as they please.
Man, what the hell am I talking about??? I'm on a proxy right now and I can still do my banking without warning. You obviously are correct...
If thats what the text said it was a typo. hyjacking the DHCP servers would be quite useless. It has to be the DNS servers, thats where the web addresses are passed out.
I have never written a java application on the desktop that wasn't smooth. I have been writing them for about 5 years now.
Slow GUIs are the fault of their programmers, not Sun.
Admittidly Sun made a huge blunder in using DirectDraw. For some reason on NT oses you need to disable that to get good performance. Many application developers deploy their apps without doing that. (this underneath it all is the fault of Sun, they need to fix that)
Note that for the Java classes the source is available and this is one of the major reasons so many bugs get fixed and the Sun Java libraries are so high quality. I suppose you want the same thing for the JVM. I don't think its Java you want GPLed but the sun JVM. Their are other JVMs out their you can work on if you have a strong desire. Nevertheless, I can not disagree that opening the JVM would make it instantly much better than it is, and its quite good now.
To the A.C.
Good God from zion. Did you suggest that MFC was better architected than Swing??? You are a troll. The Swing classes are absolutely beautiful. Period. If you want a lesson in object oriented programming, dive into the *source* sometime which is freely available.
Note, Swing is slow because its build on top of AWT which is build on top of the native toolkit. Its not slow because its bad code! Today its quite respectable. But it could use some improvement. The biggest problem with Swing is the difficulty in handling multiple resolutions and multiple fonts, on multiple platforms. The Swing layout manager implementations could use some serious work!
If you can come up with a superior layout manager, you will probably be rich.
Hehe, I also thought it telling that they said .NET would be a fierce competitor to Java when in fact .NET competes with J2EE...
Your point about IBM is well taken. I thought it not mildly funny, and indeed propaganda that this "conference" had some feer about IBMs plans w.r.t. Java.
;)
To me its obvious. IBM always thought software would be free, and the value is in the hardware. They paid for that thinking with M$ capatilazing. They have held out and are beginning to realize their dream.
IBM is certainly a friend of Java if you ask me. But yes, and enemy of *Sun*.
The problem with the speed of swing has nothing to do with Java. Java is as fast as or faster than C++. All tests I have ever seen, and personal experience bear this out. The problem with the GUI is the layers necessary to keep it cross platform. Swing is build on top of AWT which is on top of the local GUI toolkit. Thats 2 layers deeper than any local application. So it will always be slower, but for me its not noticeable anymore. (unless you have redraw on during drag operations)
Isin't this like renting a car? When I go on busines s trips, if I don't return it when I said I would, I can just keep it longer without any hassle. And return it when I am finished. Its not monthly though.
Or is this similar to checking into a hotel indefinitely.
Their is NO WAY their is no prior art on this.
Either we license it for free, indefinitely, or we sue your asses in 50 states (+D.C & The Virgin Islands)
Traditional "irrefuseable deal."
Sorry, wrong answer. Expect Wal-mart to go on about its business gladly ignoring the patent. Why should they care? It's not like netflix wants to waste years of their life and tons of money trying to enforce against *Walmart*.
No, expect them to go on happily. However, expect Walmart to be the first to inform netflix of any *other* infringements that are indeed sueable.
Infact Netflix may just cut a free deal with walmart so as not to look like they are scared of the Giant. That would certainly be in walmarts interest in case Netflix gets bought out by a sue happy holdings company.
Perhaps we can mail 1-2 CDs per month to each address in the continental US!
That is not true. He is not saying the tests are fake. He is saying the tests are true. He is pointing out the *small print* and letting you understand the significance of it. Note that he uses Apple's own information to explain this, he has NOT done his own comparative tests.
He contents that Apple is misleading its customers. Not lying to them, misleading them. Misrepresenting the truth. Their is a suttle difference here.
Bizarre. All those 9s makes the number look quite large to me.
CAD does not require that much RAM. cgi can get intensive when large textures are used. Same, CAD can also get intensive if you have shaded parts with textures. other than that, the CAD system does not require googobs of RAM. Well, it requires googobs of *video* RAM.