Slashdot Mirror


Getting Law Enforcement Action for a Large-Scale Hack?

HeelToe asks: "Two nights ago, I sat down to do a few chores with finance websites and check my mail. To check my mail, I use an ssh connection and read it via mutt. I had already hit Slashdot for my semi-hourly dose of content, but then noticed my ssh client complaining about a difference between its cached copy of the server key and the server key presented, so I started investigation. After figuring out what was going on, I contacted the tech support line for my service provider (Charter Communications) to no avail, as well as the FBI and NIPC, again, both to no avail. There are all these laws and all this hype about enforcing these computer crime laws - what must an end user do to get some enforcement done? Read on for more, much more..." Update: 06/21 19:13 GMT by C :As it turns out, the issue wasn't a hack at Charter but a particularly nasty form of Spyware. Stll, the question is valid, and some of the suggestions already given, have been real informative. Keep 'em coming!

"So I determined that I was connecting to xxx.p5115.tdko.com instead of xxx. I started looking at dns settings. Of course, under Windows, the default is to accept the default dns domain specified by a DHCP server for the PC's ethernet connection. There are settings to disable this, but I hadn't thought about it until now. It turns out, Charter Communications' DHCP servers were infiltrated and were providing p5115.tdko.com as the 'Connection-specific DNS suffix', causing all non-hardened Windows (whatever that means in a Windows context) machines to get lookups from a hijacked subdomain DNS server which simply responded to every query with a set of 3 addresses (66.220.17.45, 66.220.17.46, 66.220.17.47).

On these IPs were some phantom services. There were proxying web servers (presumably collecting cookies and username/password combos), as well as an ssh server where the perpetrators were most likely hoping people would simply say 'yes' to the key differences and enter in their username/password.

Has anyone else seen this type of attack before? Pretty sneaky. I bet it would slip by most people that don't use anything but a web browser. This makes me want to step up my plans to put an OpenBSD firewall in place and allow it as little trust of the outside world as possible, providing more trusted DNS/DHCP services to the hosts on my network. It would be nicer to be able to boot the thing self-contained-and-configured off read-only media and have no writable access to anything from the operating system to totally prevent break-in/tampering.

With respect to the law enforcement issues. I first called Charter, and after 10 minutes on hold was told to submit a report to their abuse account. I asked the tech support rep if they really wanted me submitting the incident report through a hijacked proxying web server. I hadn't yet reconfigured my Windows systems because I wanted to collect as much information as possible while the attack was still live. The long and short from the tech support rep was they'd look at it, but couldn't do anything with respect to responding to me about it unless I submitted that report.

I moved on to calling the FBI. The after hours person had no idea what evidence collection procedures I should follow, nor if their office would even be interested in investigation. I was told to call back during business hours. I did a little searching and found the National Infrastructure Protection Center. I gave them a ring and was asked to fill out an incident report. I was told it would be reviewed in the NOC quickly and a decision made about further investigation. The rep answering the phone said to collect any and all information I could think of regarding the attack. I got a response later this morning that their NOC personnel had evaluated the report and decided not to investigate further.

I called the FBI back this morning, only to be told they generally didn't investigate these types of crimes for individuals, but usually only for companies that had lost at least a couple thousand dollars. To inflate my ego a bit, I asked if I could count my time cleaning up/investigating as a loss of this magnitude and was told no, that it would have to be a financial loss like is associated with internet credit card fraud. Given how Kevin Mitnick was convicted and sentenced on 'evidence' that included employee time for investigation and cleanup, why is this any different for me?

With respect to getting some action on any future attacks - what should I do? Who should I call? I'm not a h/\x0r, and I have reasonable investigation skills, but aren't there professionals doing this to uphold the law? What's the point of all those federal laws anyway? Monitoring of third party communications, without the consent of either party; unauthorized access to Charter's systems - the list can go on a lot further depending on the activity happening at those proxying servers. Are these laws just tools to oppress unpopular computer criminals but just plain not enforced most of the time?

I found this situation and particular method of attack interesting... hopefully this was fun to read. If you have suggestions for what I should do in the future to handle attacks, I'd love to hear about it!"

721 comments

  1. Call tech support, but by aridhol · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you can't get the tech support to help, try escalating and turboing the problem. Eventually, you'll talk to someone at the ISP who can or will do something. If not, it's time to get a new provider.

    It sucks that the law-enforcement agencies won't help private individuals; however, since it's a company that's being hacked, they should be able to put their resources on it.

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    1. Re:Call tech support, but by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      (Wow, 32 comments and no one has told him it's his fault for using Windows?!?)

      It sucks that the law-enforcement agencies won't help private individuals; however, since it's a company that's being hacked, they should be able to put their resources on it.

      The problem here seems to be this: the company has been hacked and it's the customer researching the problem and trying to get help. The FBI isn't particularly interested in hearing some guy talk about a compromise of someone else's server -- hopefully Charter is dealing with them and the agents shouldn't be keeping you informed of the status of an investigation to which you're basically a bystander.

      Sorry, HeelToe, you're being a good guy and did the best you could. Now, it's between you and the ISP.

    2. Re:Call tech support, but by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Eventually, you'll talk to someone at the ISP who can or will do something. If not, it's time to get a new provider.

      Or use my old trick: BE the Internet Service Provider. Cable modems and the local phone company's DSL service provide way too much low hanging fruit for hackers.

      For what these places charge for bandwidth you are better off getting a fractional T1 and splitting it with your nieghbors, or having a few doting small businesses pay you to host their websites.

      Of course I haven't used windows in almost a year, and I convert old laptops to wireless dumb terminals. I got so sick of email games I have my own domain, hosted on my own (okay, temporarily work's) machine, hosted (until recently) in my living room.

      I just bought a new house, and they haven't hooked up the DSL service yet. The good old fashioned kind with static IP's and a "we don't care what you do with it" usage agreement from a small player in the market.

      Hmm. Does this post count as a rant or an ego stroking?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Call tech support, but by keepr · · Score: 1

      If I were subject to an attack like this I would gather all information possible and Force my isp's hand by posting any and everything on Sites like Slahsdot, security focus, dtnn.net, dslreports.com..

      Once you ISP finds out about this you can bet they will take care of it and try to prevent it from tarnishing their reputation in the future by actually fixing the problem..

      But how would your ISP find out about this? SIMPLE! call up the tech support desk and tell them you saw this post about their service on all mentioned websites and are worried about the security of your own personal computer..

      --
      Slashdot taught me how to use the preview button!
    4. Re:Call tech support, but by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
      It sucks that the law-enforcement agencies won't help private individuals;

      Unfortunately, equal protection under the law (Amendment XIV Section 1) applies only to the states, not the federal government:
      No state shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
      Accordingly, you may have more success petitioning a state law enforcement body to investigate, even if the crime is interstate in nature.

      IANAL
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Call tech support, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Call Homeland Security. Tell them you want to report a terrorist attack.

    6. Re:Call tech support, but by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Securityfocus mailing lists is definitely one place to go. You'd probably want to post on the Incidents list. They also have a Focus on Incident Handling list which is more about discussing incident handling procedures.

      In any case, once it's posted in a big enough public forum, it becomes a problem for their Public Affairs/Public Relations dept and not just tech support. Don't know if Slashdot qualifies as big enough, but you might as well try Cnet/Wired since they've reported these kinds of large scale hacks before.

    7. Re:Call tech support, but by dszd0g · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But he isn't a bystander. The attacker is attempting to steal his passwords (and credit card numbers for those who don't notice and sending it unencrypted). I would consider myself under attack in such a situation.

      That said I am not surprised by Charter's response. I had @Home for almost two years with out technical issue (one double billing, which they resolved quickly), until they went under and I was switched to Charter's service. I spent over 40 hours on tech support with them trying to get them to finally find the missing entry in their database that was causing my service to be interrupted (I was down for 18 days). From my experience, I doubt one could find a more incompetent ISP.

      --
      This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    8. Re:Call tech support, but by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1
      IAAL - you incorrect. Although the 14th amendment (from which you quote) only applies to the states, the due process clause of the fifth amendment offers similar protections from the federal government. From law.cornell.edu:

      The 14th amendment is not by its terms applicable to the federal government. Actions by the federal government, however, that classify individuals in a discriminatory manner will, under similar circumstances, violate the due process [clause] of the fifth amendment.
      .
      Full article here. It probably doesn't violate equal protection for the FBI or whomever to blow you off, so long as they have a rational reason (read: any reason at all) for doing it.

      This post not intended to constitute legal advice: if you need such advice, see an attorney, not slashdot.
      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
    9. Re:Call tech support, but by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      If you cancel your service, then the ISP could cite your lifetime loss of business as a loss of tens of thousands of dollars, and hopefully finally get the FBI off their asses to arrest this dude.

      So if you cancel, you will be doing your ISP and soceity in general a favour :-)

    10. Re:Call tech support, but by thx2001r · · Score: 1

      That was a great article on dealing with non-responsive technical support!

      I've forwarded it on to some of my friends!!!

      --

      -Joe
      If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

    11. Re:Call tech support, but by Greedo · · Score: 2, Funny

      This post not intended to constitute legal advice: if you need such advice, see an attorney, not slashdot.

      Ah ... so that's what I've doing wrong all these years.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    12. Re:Call tech support, but by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But he isn't a bystander. The attacker is attempting to steal his passwords (and credit card numbers for those who don't notice and sending it unencrypted).

      Sure, I understand that. But that doesn't translate into the FBI's dealing with him as though he were the party under attack. They're going to want to deal with the ISP. His case is against the ISP, not the hacker.

      It may be unfair, but it's the way it is.

    13. Re:Call tech support, but by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      If you can't get the tech support to help, try escalating and turboing the problem

      This is important. It's surprising how many people will get a moronic brick wall from 1st level tech support and then go "Nuts, what now?" Turboing is as simple as calling up the CEO and saying "Can you please tell me who in your organization can help me with this problem?" The CEO then hands off the problem directly to a capable person within the company. This way, it's like the CEO's problem that needs fixing, and so it gets done pronto.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    14. Re:Call tech support, but by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm seeing your comment I am inspired...

      Play hardball... if the ISP is refusing to admit that their machines are hacked, then they must be doing this on purpose.

      I would report to the FBI that the ISP is redirecting all traffic and running man in the middle attacks on you and their other customers and you have discovered it...

      If it works, then that at least gets the ball rolling on the investigation and when they find out that the ISP is a hapless victem, then they will have the full attention of the ISP directly in dealing with the issue.

      Oh yea... and get a better ISP.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    15. Re:Call tech support, but by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well..that and it didn't involve any P2P copyrighted song sharing....

      I'm sure they would have been on it in a minute if this were the case....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:Call tech support, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of a handful of people on the product engineering team for a popular computer product... a couple of weeks ago we got a guy who must have followed this plan because he somehow was able to call into our vice president of sales who (reportedly after an hour on the phone with him) was able to plunk it on my desk.

      I called the guy at the number he left and went through his problem... he was basically a home user (I heard his loud pet bird in the background) who didn't feel like calling the product re-seller's tech support (rhymes w/ hell)...

      Long story short he absorbed two hours of my time and needed to re-install his drivers.

    17. Re:Call tech support, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say "KISS IT OFF" unless you have a powerful attorney.... the magic number is $10,000. IF you can prove $10,000 loss by collecting payment stubs to your staff, reciepts, etc. Take them down to the US Attorneys office and file a formal complaint.

      BUT... here's the catch... Unless you are a company with at least 20 employees and can prove these hack attacks are causing you to loose business, then there is NO HOPE unless you know someone in the Justice Dept to pull some strings to get them to take on your case.

      In MY case, our servers are being attacked by spammers (Major DDOS attacks), and we have YET to be able to get someone to take on our case.

    18. Re:Call tech support, but by MaGGuN · · Score: 1

      With respect to the compromise of the server, he is still a bystander. What he is not a bystander of wich you pointed out, is theft of personal information like passwords etc. And in this situation he should only expect to get feedback on this, and nothing more. How, why, when and the progress of any investigation if any, is not of his concern. Regarding the integrity of network, the affected costumers should expect to receive information from their ISP, not FBI, if you ask me.

    19. Re:Call tech support, but by insanechemist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Charter is a big bag of p**p. We used them for two buildings that couldn't get DSL and the modem was up and down for the better part of the first 6 months on one building. Finally they acknowledged it may be a hardware issue and came out - it was. They had done a crappy cable install and one of the connections was breaking randomly. After that we had OK service for a short while - except when they finally admitted the network was unstable and had to do a full scale modem swap out. I called to find out what the new problem was (our modems at that point were no longer working more than one hour per day on average) and NEVER gat a call back from the corp. sales cheeze whiz. Dumped them and moved to DSL - no unplanned disconnects yet! We have a VPN so any down time is quickly noticed when the big whig can't get his email.

    20. Re:Call tech support, but by gooberguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Charter is a big bag of p**p.

      When did "poop" become a swear word?

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    21. Re:Call tech support, but by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      I read the "escalating and turboing" website linked to by your post. Being someone who works in this industry I must agree with the methods outlined in how to talk to a bigwig however descriptions of Level 1/2/3 CSRs and how to handle them is completely wrong. Interesting reading nonetheless.

      -- iCEBaLM

    22. Re:Call tech support, but by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      No, tell them you know where the Texas legislators are - that's what Homeland Security has been spending its time on, according to some reports at the time...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    23. Re:Call tech support, but by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Charter is going out of business. Their market value is now slightly above nothing, 1/20th of what it was 2 years ago. So maintaining good customer relations is no longer their primary concern.

      I also experienced an hour a day outage like you described. It turned out that my ip address was no longer as static as it was the 6 months before. In addition, all versions of the drivers for the cable modem they rented to me crash xp a couple times a week.

      The ISP of the company I work for seems to have an unwritten policy of providing free same day on site support whenever there's a problem with our internet connection.

    24. Re:Call tech support, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. Charter is awful. My service goes out at the most inconvenient times and it's capped at an obscenely low level...

      I pine for @Home/Optimum Online.

    25. Re:Call tech support, but by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Oh yea... and get a better ISP.

      --I echo that sentiment. If I were you I'd grab an Earthlink CD and use dialup rather than connect thru a hacked server even one more time!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    26. Re:Call tech support, but by LX.onesizebigger · · Score: 1

      You may have a very serious point here. IACertainlyNAL, but I think the ISP seems to have shown a level of negligence that should warrant litigation. Given their refusal to accept notification by telephone, they cannot, IMHO, claim ignorance. One complication is the difficulty to prove that financial damages have been incurred by customers, though, given the scale and nature of the attack, this seems very likely. Even so, it sounds like the ISP has acted with negligence with respect to their users' integrity, effectively facilitating unwarranted access to users' data.

      --
      I for one welcome our new SCOviet Russian overlords to whom all our base are belong.
    27. Re:Call tech support, but by nbvb · · Score: 1

      OOL is _VERY_ different from @Home....

      Optimum Online is a division of Cablevision Systems, who, as much as I can't stand their CATV service, have a business plan and have been able to execute on the broadband side of the house.

      My understanding is that the guys who run the OOL side are just _great_ guys who understand a) what broadband is good for; and b) how to provide real, honest-to-goodness customer service.

      I have NO complaints whatsoever about OOL. I'm still a (very very happy!) DirecTV (with TiVo) customer, and I don't think that's changing anytime soon, but I have to say, the Optimum Online experience is truly fantastic ....

      Fast, and most of all, RELIABLE! Of course, I hear people whine about the mail & news servers, of which I use neither, but the actual connection is rock-solid.

      All I want from an ISP is a reliable connection. I'll supply my own email server, thanks. :)

      OOL is, hands down, the best ISP I've ever used!

      --NBVB

    28. Re:Call tech support, but by joenbama · · Score: 1

      It is fine to dislike a company, but posting slanderous lies is another thing. You should research what you say before you post it. It is obvious by your quote, âoeCharter is going out of businessâ that you did not do any research. Your entire post is an attempt to slander Charter. In addition, your statement that Charter is 1/20th of what it was two years ago is misleading. I am an investor with CHTR as one of my major holdings. I HAVE done extensive research on the company, and I would like to clear a couple of things with you. The first quarter 2003 revenues for Charter were 1.178 BILLION dollars. Fiscal year 2002 earnings were 4.566 BILLION. Charter has 14 Billion Dollars in debt. This is VERY manageable. Charterâ(TM)s stock dropped from a high in the lower twenties to 80 cents due to a grand jury investigation and a call on this debt. Charter has spent the last few months reorganizing the company and restating their earnings. In doing this, the stock has been stabilized. Charter stock is now up 450% from its lows, and rumor is that the grand jury investigation will be concluded in the next few weeks or months. All of the information that I have submitted in this post is available on any website that post information on publicly traded companies. I would like to see a link to the website that informed you that Charter was going out of business. I invested in the company when it reached $1.20 and my investment has gained 298.33% in two months. Charterâ(TM)s stock is one of the best performers in the market. As any investor will tell you, the performance of a stock is a direct reflection of a companyâ(TM)s health. The grand jury investigation drove down the stock with fear of bankruptcy. Now that there is no fear of that, the stock is going back up. As you can see, your post was just an attempt to bash Charter because of a personal bad experience. I know people that have had bad experiences with them. I know people (myself included) that have had good experiences with them. With a company the size of Charter (third largest cable company), there will be good and bad experiences. I have had Charter cable and high speed Internet for years without a problem. The problem is that you never hear from people that are happy. If you want to complain or bash a company that is fine, but please do not post lies.

    29. Re:Call tech support, but by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I had no intent to post false or misleading information. I was going by a stock graph I saw a couple months ago, and with regards to the cable modem problem, I've confirmed that many other charter customers experience the same crashes caused by every available version of the XP drivers for the modems they loaned to us, but Charter's tech support claimed to have never heard of the problem, leading me to believe that they were uninformed about the problems faced by many of their customers. In their defense, they suggested I buy a dedicated router rather than plugging the modem into my USB port.

      My mention of the hour long outages was meant to show that not all problems connecting through charter are necessarily their fault, though I did show a hint of dissatisfaction because my ip address used to be static and they've started changing it. I apologize for that. It was my fault for assuming that they gave me a static address and I shouldn't blame them.

      Please disregard major portions of my post. It came entirely out of frustrating experiences and research I had done months before. Good luck with your stock.

  2. nothing at all by intermodal · · Score: 1

    My friend was a victim of identity theft last year, and the FBI wouldn't touch it unless he'd been screwed for at least $20,000. Good luck, man! Hope it goes better for you than it did for him.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:nothing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have always been surprised by how uninterested cops are in investigating some crimes. I once had a $500 camcorder stolen while I was packing my bags into a cab right outside a hotel. The guy who took it and ran was caught on the hotel security camera, but the cops didn't even bother to come and take a look at it. They were like, "well, unless they have a full name tag on the video, it's not worth our time." I kind of understand that $500 is not worth doing facial recognition checking against some database, but you would think they would at least want a snapshot of the guys face to store in some file cabinet in case he commits a more serious crime to retrace his steps.

      Kind of reminds me of Guillian's (NYC mayor) statement that letting people get away with small crimes usually leads to them committing major ones. Also reminds me of the Washington snipper case-- had the cops cared more about documenting and investigating their convenience store robbery, they would have probably been caught a lot sooner.

      Do we really have so much crime in this country that the city cops do not have the resources to care about $10000 crime?

    2. Re:nothing at all by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the Secret Service that investigates credit card fraud, but still, I'd bet they wouldn't do more than take a report for anything under $20,000.

    3. Re:nothing at all by realdpk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ha, no doubt. The police are definitely not there to serve the people. They're there, apparently, to direct traffic from parking lots (drive around Seattle at 4-5PM some time and count 'em - I've seen at least 6, in Seattle Police uniforms, indicating they're working for the city).

      It sounds to me like we need to cut back on police spending if they're not going to help the taxpayerfolk.

    4. Re:nothing at all by intermodal · · Score: 1

      ah yes. thanks for the correction...it was the secret service, now that I think about it. And thats exactly what happened.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:nothing at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was involved in a computer crime case, the FBI wouldn't touch it unless it involved a loss of more than $50,000. My company claimed $300,000 in losses. They later (much, much later) revised this figure downward to $9,000 or so. By then it was too late, the FBI was involved and now a man is in prison because of it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:nothing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You got it all wrong. The cops are there to make sure that the world is not flooded with donuts...

    7. Re:nothing at all by HBI · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A quick story, if you don't mind.

      In 1994 or 1995 I was late with my income taxes. I had never been late before. I was really freaking out - it was after midnight on April 15 and I was just getting done with the forms. I called my dad, woke him up, said "hey, can I use your postal meter to backdate this to April 15?" (he had a Pitney Bowes machine for his business). His reply was: ", how many people file income tax returns? 150 million? How many of them are on time? Obviously not all of them. Do you think the IRS has the resources to track down every person who ever mailed their taxes in on April 16? I can't believe that in 25 years of raising you, you haven't learned that yet". He hung up with a loud click. Suitably abashed, I put a stamp on it and sent it the next morning.

      Nothing further heard about it, obviously. The government is so laxidasical about enforcement of regulations and laws that in most cases you can get away with just about anything, unless you generate the wrong kind of attention and they choose to make an example out of you. The trick is to live a quiet life and not draw attention, as the Mafia well knows. The common person believes in law enforcement because of those big cases that they see in the news, and that the district attorneys announce. It isn't because of any reality of assured punishment.

      My dad wiped the naivete out of me that day. Maybe his words can help someone else too.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    8. Re:nothing at all by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no. SPD are allowed to wear their uniforms while they are off-duty, providing security or directing traffic for private companies. Have you ever seen a cop standing around in a grocery store late at night? They're paid by the store, not the city.

    9. Re:nothing at all by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      Officers who do that type of work are usually off-duty. They are allowed to work private gigs in uniform to earn extra money. If you're really curious, just go up to one and ask if he's on duty. He/she'll tell you. It's the same for officers you see working night clubs/convenience stores/store security. They're working extra hours either before/after their shift or on their off day.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    10. Re:nothing at all by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      There is usually a fiscal threshold which has to be exceeded in order to justify the time/expense of the investigation. However, one of the few exceptions is Kiddie Pr0n. One of my colleagues is a sysadmin and found some of it on his inbound mail server. Called the FBI about it, and they had 2 agents to him within hours to collect evidence, FWIW.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    11. Re:nothing at all by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Damn. That sure is bogus. Sure fooled me, too.

      I still think we need some reform here, though. As far as I can tell we have more cops than ever (they come out of the woodwork for protests) but "not enough" to investigate home burglaries.

    12. Re:nothing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About '96 or '97, some guy emailed me wanting me to web-publish his vast collection of naughty photos of very underage females. I notified the fibbies and never heard a peep out of them. Lends credence to paranoia. Nowadays crap like that just goes in the junk folder.

      --rgb

    13. Re:nothing at all by operagost · · Score: 1

      Your dad is one tough SOB.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:nothing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote Jack Burton - "cops got better things to do than get killed".

      Guiliani worked off the "broken windows" theory - small crimes that are allowed make a situation that allows bigger ones. So that bum pissing on the wall or littering, leads to purse snatchers, leads to hookers walking around times square, leading to NYC being a hellhole.

      As for the 10k stuff - that has been true for some time. Talk to any small business person - it is not worth their time to sue anyone that owes them less than 10k because the costs of the courts and the lawyers will be more than that, and they will probably still never get the police to enforce it if they win. Thus the quasi legal system that has built up - repo men and the like.

    15. Re:nothing at all by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the IRS but I did work for Revenue Canada (now called CCRA or whatever) for a few years, menial student-type work such as opening returns, and sorting/ordering them for the auditors upstairs. Tons of cute college girls and $9/hour, it was close to heaven for a student!

      Anyway, I got into a whole heap of trouble once because I "accidentally" mixed up some one-day-late tax returns in with the on-time returns. They didn't use the postmark date but tracked it by when the returns were physically received, and I put them in the wrong bin.

      I just pleaded ignorance and nothing really bad came of it (I guess my old lady boss thought I was cute or something, thank god for 40 year olds and their glaucoma lol) and it just seemed retarded to worry about what usually amounted to a few cents worth of interest. I realize that would add up tho, but with the amount of money the government spends, big fucking deal! As an example, the Revenue Canada building where I live (one of three major centers in the country) is a HUGE building with some amazing architecture and very expensive large art displays, which can only be there for employees since access controls are pretty tight. Wow great use of tax money.

    16. Re:nothing at all by Cidtek · · Score: 1
      Do we really have so much crime in this country that the city cops do not have the resources to care about $10000 crime?

      Yep, it's called the War On Drugs.

    17. Re:nothing at all by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0

      Probably the two agents who shelved the report they were working on about the Al Qaeda pilot training when they got the kiddie porn call...

      I remember back in the '60's when I was working in the Adjutant General's office at Fort Rucker, Alabama handling personnel files of soldiers who had gone AWOL or deserted. After a certain amount of time gone, the Dothan, Alabama, FBI office would send out one or two agents to take the files and sit in the office writing out a report on the soldier which would then be sent to his home town police department. On one occasion, two FBI agents showed up at the same time. I overheard them asking each other what their case load was. One said something like 40, the other said something like 50 or 60...

      Which is why nothing gets done...They're too busy investigating bullshit and harassing the American Indian Movement, or Waco religious cultists, or whoever...

      Another example is my arrest for bank robbery. I was arrested by San Francisco police on a Friday shortly after the robbery, spent the weekend in the County Jail, and was turned over to two FBI agents on Monday for transport to the US Marshal's holding cell in the Federal Building. So here were two FBI agents basically doing nothing useful for an hour except moving one guy between buildings...

      As an amusing aside, one FBI agent, noting that I had carried a Glock 19 on the robbery, told me that was his second choice for a handgun, and showed me his handgun, stating that was his first choice. I couldn't see well because my contacts were out, so I asked him what make it was. He said Sig (i.e., Sig-Sauer). I didn't say it, but I should have told him, "Yeah, you're a Federal agent, you can afford an $800 handgun, I had to rob a bank to afford to buy a $500 handgun..."

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    18. Re:nothing at all by berzerke · · Score: 1

      ...The police are definitely not there to serve the people.



      True. In fact, it might surprise some people, but there have been actual court cases where the courts said police have absolutely no legal obligaiton to respond to calls for help. The following is taken from http://www.thisistrue.com/guns.html



      ...Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers." The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen..."



      Face facts, you're on your own.

    19. Re:nothing at all by Flack405 · · Score: 1

      I recently had not one, but both of my personal vehicles broken into in my own driveway. From one car, they stole approximately $2000 in stereo equipment. From the other, they stole my laptop bag, which besides my laptop, had my cell phone, palm pilot, and a whole pile of goodies crammed in there.

      I couldn't even get the police to come out to my house for the police report. They took the list of items over the phone, and mailed me a copy of the report a week later. So much for crime scene investigation.

      Three months ago, my sister's house was broken into by my cousin. We gave the police his name and they wouldn't even pick him up for questioning. When he was later arrested (parole violation), they asked him if he did it; he said no, and they dropped the issue.

      Those two incidents have shattered any notions I had about how law enforcement works. I think the laws are there to keep the good and semi-good people honest, and to punish the "bad" people when they turn themselves in or fall into their lap.

    20. Re:nothing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do me a favor. Next time there is a debate with your mayor and the wanabe mayor. ASK them in front of everyone. That belive it or not is one of THEIR jobs. Make sure the police is up to snuf.

      Just as other people said you need to go up the ladder to the CEO in these threads. The mayor IS the CEO. Do not forget your local district congressman. You can get something done if you squeek. Write your mayor. Hes the one ultimatly responsible for the police officers lack of motivation. It will come down from on HIGH fix the problem before the media catch wind of it. I think the words someone else used was 'acting on bad faith'.

      It is not up to the police to keep this nation straight. It is up to YOU. You learned the wrong lesson. You need to keep the police honest. Making sure that they KNOW, and the media knows, they are screwing up big time is the best way. They work for you. That is what your taxs go for. Make sure they remember it from their boss the mayor. Also something else you can do is talk to the mayor. Some actually let their citizens call them at home. Call em up. Say hi ask em hows the reelection going. Make nice with them. Ask them to help you with a problem your having with the local police. Do not be angry or mad at him. He is more than likely just finding out about it. His lakeys probably have smoothed it over and everything is hunky doory.

      If you find other people like you in your neigborhood encourage them to do the same. After the 5th or so call he will get the point and start asking his police chiefs some HARD questions. Like 'why am I being called at home for small petty crimes? Why didnt an officer at least go out? Do I need new commanders?'

    21. Re:nothing at all by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      I'm actually pretty surprised to hear that. My car had its license plates removed, and there were cops at my door the next day. While thats not immediate, it was fast enough for the crime committed. One of my family members is also a cop, and I can't really say he does nothing either. I think there probably is too much crime, and the cops just can't handle it all. That, and incompetent phone operators.

  3. Post it to Slashdot by ites · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which will do two things:

    1. you will get realtime help. OK, there are better ways but this is a _big_ audience you have here.

    2. post a link to the offending server, and the /. effect will wipe it out.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Post it to Slashdot by tuanjim_2001 · · Score: 1
      Ok that shouldn't be modded as funny. Once you have collected a large chunk of data then post the link to the offending server to /. and let the magic of the /. effect happen.

      --
      "If a quarter is two bits, then a dollar's a byte." -R Deric Miller
    2. Re:Post it to Slashdot by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      True enough.. then the DNS admin at the ISP will have to get off his lazy butt and do something about it do cause all of a sudden No-one can get DNS res cause the fake servers are being ./ed :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    3. Re:Post it to Slashdot by Punchinello · · Score: 1

      Are you suggtesting purposely trying to take down the offending site? Who do you think you are, Orrin Hatch?

      --

      Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  4. Busted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Stoopid P2P Terrorist. It was probably the FBI watching you and you were dumb enough to blab to them that you had spotted their tap. Get ready to drop the soap in the near future.

  5. Money == attention by Whammy666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has been my experience that unless there is some large monetary losses involved, then you're going to have a hard time getting law enforcement to do much of anything. Generally, for simple break-ins, they expect you to handle it yourself (typically contacting the ISP of the hacker).

    --
    When all else fails, run.
    1. Re:Money == attention by wetshoe · · Score: 1

      This really depends on the ISP. We recently had a small DOS attack which wsa being run by a script on a couple of different machines. Our office was closed, but I happened to be in the office doing some work, and I noticed it. I contacted our ISP, which was during non business hours, and they were very helpful. Some ISPs are better then others. I don't think Charter has ever been known for it's outstanding customer service.

  6. Are you a large multinational corporation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because if not, you're out of luck. These laws were bought to protect monied interests, not the likes of you.

  7. This is giving me the cold sweats by Glyndwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bet an attack of this nature turns up an absolute shedload of valuable, confidential information, and I bet there are plenty of pissant ISPs in the world with poorly configured DNS servers too. How often has this kind of attack been found? I'm suddenly real glad I run my own DNS server behind my firewall.

    "No financial losses" my ass. Lets see what Visa's customers have to say about that when the logins for half a million credit card e-banking systems get compromised. Hmm, almost makes me wish I could detect a similar attack so we could see what the UK police would do. "Intarweb, sir? Nah, not on our patch, you seee...."

    --
    You win again, gravity!
    1. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Credit card companies never cared, currently don't care, and never will care until their major customers actually stop doing business that is based on e-commerce security snake oil.

    2. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Off topic and stuff, but how does one go about protecting one from things like this?

      If you can't trust your ISP DNS, then how can you even trust your own?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by platypus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't. But fortunately, exactly that (and more) is what server keys and challenge auth is for. So never, never! ignore when your client for a secured connection complains about non-matching keys.

    4. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I bet there are plenty of pissant ISPs in the world with poorly configured DNS servers too

      I think I've protected myself from this kind of thing. I've hard-coded the numeric IP addresses for DNS servers. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong and should be worried.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Run your own caching DNS which gets its info straight from the root servers. Still not perfect, but much better. Also useful against primitive DNS censorship techniques which are used in some countries. In a home environment, I recommend an OpenBSD router, which will do this and much more. Tutorial here.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    6. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about this too but wouldn't a hijacker hijack the DNS refresh/renew request I make to a root server?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    7. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It gets better than that. There's a Canadian ISP that has a DNS server which is used by most of their customers. Let's say it's 10.123.0.0 for the sake of the example. I have a netblock that includes 10.223.0.0, again a example to show the numeric difference.

      It took me a long time to figure out why all these Canadian systems were poking me with DNS requests. One day I got lucky and started trying variants and sure enough, the PTR was something obvious like ns1.foobar.ca.

      I don't have that much space - a /19 and a /20. Yet, I get enough misdirected DNS queries that I could have some serious fun if I wanted. How about a name server that's authoritative for . and answers nearly everything with an A record that I control? It's easily done, and would net plenty of passwords, outgoing mail, account numbers, or anything else I wanted to do. All because some twit fat-fingered a setting on their machine.

      My take on this is that I'm running a server that's purposely configured to hand out certain addresses for testing. If you want to ask it questions too, that's your problem. Nobody forced you to take my bandwidth and resources by pointing a resolver at me.

    8. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Paracelcus · · Score: 0

      How about using your own caching DNS server behind your firewall?

      Rule of thumb, don't trust anybody!

      Maybe why the gummermint wasn't interested is because they're behind it?

      Was that me talking? I'll shut up!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    9. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Yea, the DNS servers themselves were hijacked. So that you can connect to the hijacked servers is not protecting you.

      Not to worry though, this is *exactly* what SSL is there to protect you from.

    10. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Yea, the DNS servers themselves were hijacked.

      According to the text, it was the DHCP servers that were hijacked, so I think my technique would still protect me. However, your point is still valid. If they hijack the DNS server, I'm still in the same boat -- except that I end up locally caching most of my DNS lookups and I tend to hit the same web sites time and time again. In most cases, my provider would find and fix the problem before it nailed me. On the other hand, my local cache could still work against me after the intruder is ejected....

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    11. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      SSL only tells you if the pipe to the server is "secure". If they are running a proxy SSL server, you SSL to them, they copy your login/password, then forward the connection to the end destination (still SSL'd). Granted, you'd need lots of storage and bandwidth, but it is possible.

    12. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 0
      No. Read the blurb. They hacked the ISP's DHCP servers to provide a different domain name suffix, which caused the DHCP clients to access a hacked nameserver, which in turn returned IPs of a sniffing proxy. If the OP had configured his computers to use a local DNS, there would have been no compromise.

      As an aside, my post provided a direct solution for the OP's problem, I fail to see how it can be offtopic. (Insert rant about crack smoking moderators here.)

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    13. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they forge a trusted certificate for the site you're trying to connect to?

    14. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by cscx · · Score: 1

      This seems hard to prevent unless you do get your DNS from the root servers. I, for example run an OpenBSD firewall on my cable modem. It gets its external interface address from DHCP. But that would be moot if AT&T's DHCP server was hacked, as it would simply would be polluted with bad DNS server information... unless I had that set statically. Where is that in /etc anyway? :)

    15. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by cscx · · Score: 1

      It all comes down to the concept of trust. Do you trust a supposedly "experienced" ISP admin to make sure his DNS server is secured, or do you trust yourself enough to make sure your local copy of BIND isn't hacked instead?

    16. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      In my experience as merely a user, sshd appears to create a new key every time it is started. Your advice is like encouraging people to "never, never ignore those dire-sounding warnings that SnakeOil SoftFirewall pops up!"

      Better advice is to accept the new key, but do an uptime and compare it to the date/time of your last login.

    17. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by tinguru · · Score: 1
      Humm, that sounds broken, or, at least it is not consistent with my user experience.

      Also, what if they had a reverse proxy on the ssh that went to your real host... they could have passed along your password to the real server (keeping a copy).

      Better Advise is "never, never! ignore when your client for a secured connection complains about non-matching keys." Investigate first!!!

    18. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Do you trust a supposedly "experienced" ISP admin to make sure his DNS server is secured, or do you trust yourself enough to make sure your local copy of BIND isn't hacked instead?

      Probably neither. I certainly don't see what I've got in place as infallible. I guess the only good thing is that if I find my local copy of BIND has been hacked, I can fix it myself without relying on the folx at the ISP. I do keep BIND behind a firewall, but that pretty much just keeps out the viruses. Any serious hacking could probably breach both the firewall and my server. Maybe I'll install an alarm system....

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    19. Re:This is giving me the cold sweats by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      If thats what the text said it was a typo. hyjacking the DHCP servers would be quite useless. It has to be the DNS servers, thats where the web addresses are passed out.

  8. No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    There is spyware which changes your default domain ( overrides DHCP). It's by a company from the UK I can't remember their name. It's your own fault for using IE.

    1. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's your own fault for using IE.

      Shut up, ass.

    2. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.infotech.siu.edu/csc/howto/windows/spyw are.html

    3. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now Now who doesn't love arbitrary code being run on their computer w/o their permission?

    4. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lop - adaware or spybot can remove it.

      hahah a ask slashdot post which basically shows how dumb the asker is pretty kick ass.

    5. Re:No you were running spyware! by bsiggers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sssh! No good advice here!

    6. Re:No you were running spyware! by cruelworld · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only a terrorist would suggest something like that! You're in on it aren't you!!! Goddamnit, I knew I shouldn't have sent my tinfoil hat out to be drycleaned.

    7. Re:No you were running spyware! by HeelToe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it was not spyware.

      I queried the dhcp server from a unix-alike box and got the same response back from it for the connection's dns domain as I did under windows. The DHCP server was handing it out for sure.

    8. Re:No you were running spyware! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      "It's your own fault for using IE."

      I'm sure that people who are kidnapped and people who are robbed and people who are raped are all at fault.

      This thinking is what falsely give hackers some sense that they are not doing wrong.

      Oh, lets just go into that persons house and steal there money and burn their furntature.. Its there own fault for not having titanium steel reenforced doors and windows..

    9. Re:No you were running spyware! by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Think you might be barking up the wrong tree. By default, the Windows "DNS Suffix" only applies when
      1) You type a short hostname without a "."
      2) WINS lookup fails
      3) NetBIOS broadcast fails

      Then Windows sends the request for "HostName+DNS Suffix" to the DNS server for resolution. This set of circumstances would apply very rarely at best for home internet users and would seem to be useless for stealing website passwords.

      More serious would be if incorrect DNS server address were being handed out by the DHCP server. You probably lost the techs at the "DNS Suffix" part. Get the DNS IPs returned by DHCP (IPCONFIG /RENEW ; IPCONFIG /ALL) and ask support if that's correct.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    10. Re:No you were running spyware! by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      1) right... connections to xxx. went to where they were supposed to.

      2) no WINS servers on my network

      3) NetBIOS disabled.

      The question I have is why my dns suffix was as it was, and how come that came from the dhcp server.

      I did an ifconfig /release; ifconfig /renew and the domain suffix still showed up. I corroborated the DNS server addresses with the tech support personnel.

      Could this be spyware/adware that neither spycop or adaware is detecting?

      Could my hardware firewall/router be infected somehow?

    11. Re:No you were running spyware! by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Well, I think I figured out why they set the DNS Suffix -- many providers set up the mail servers to be just "mail", and rely on DHCP to get the suffix. This would allow them to steal passwords for spamming purposes, read mail, etc.

      If you think web traffic is being rerouted, you might want to check your IE Proxy settings. Or try to determine if your machine's been hacked.

      It's also possible this is a virus, not spyware.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    12. Re:No you were running spyware! by Ricin · · Score: 1

      So you're just going to ignore the whole lop.com thing? Wonderful sysadmin. I mean, obviously that should be your starting point. It was there outright and I (as AC) and others have pointed it out. Heck perhaps your ISP uses Win2k or XP for DNS? Also check what dns name is on your 127.0.0.1.

      There could have been a much better response from you had you taken the blatently clear observations about C2 Media critterware seriously.

    13. Re:No you were running spyware! by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      I definitely took them seriously. Not seriously enough to go out and buy software for it, but I did update and run spycop once my machines were no longer using that dns suffix to lookup addresses. It found some cookies, but that's it.

      Just for future reference, what could I have done differently in identifying the cause? I did use a non-Windows system to verify the data returned from the DHCP server.

      In retrospect, that data may not have been from their DHCP server, but from my broadband firewall/router. Is there a not-low possibility that was affected somehow and was the source of the poisoning?

    14. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops: negate that part about the virus. Are you getting DHCP from the ISP or the router?

    15. Re:No you were running spyware! by plover · · Score: 5, Informative
      I run Spybot S & D, from http://security.kolla.de. It does a pretty good job of cleaning up these infections. It got rid of Xupiter, which was my first personal infection by spyware (or any virus for that matter.) I then asked my kid to stop running Morpheus and switch to Gnucleus. (I've since asked him not to participate in any file sharing at all because of all the legal crap flying about.)

      Of the bad ones, Lop (which you have) is far and away the most difficult to get rid of. It has many separate components, a Browser Helper Object, an executable launched at startup via an entry that's in your registry's HKLM/Software/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Run key, (and possibly in RunOnce and/or RunServices, plus in the same path under each user as well), and others. I think it may even replace your WSOCK32.DLL but I don't remember if Lop is that one. If it is, it certainly would explain why your DNS went haywire. The deal with Lop is that all these components watch over each other. If you delete or disable one component, the others silently patch the hole next chance they get.

      To answer your question, I've never heard of it affecting a firewall/router. (I kind of assume you're running a Linksys, but regardless of the make & model make sure you don't still have the default password on it.) If Lop patched your winsock layer, the Windows box would be completely unable to tell you the truth about DHCP or DNS.

      It's not quite as bad as kudzu, but it's definitely not something you want.

      Anyway, I've found Spybot S&D to be a most excellent tool with frequent and current updates. It's the first thing I run every time I visit friends or family and they want me to look at their computers. It's also free, (but donations are welcome.) I switched from the paid version of AdAware+ after they failed to release V 6.0 on time. I do wish that the anti-virus vendors would block some of this crap.

      Other things I run to defend my Microsoft equipment from this stuff?

      • I run BHOCop occasionally, which lets me manage "Browser Helper Objects". The only BHO I allow is Acrobat.
      • I use StartupMonitor which watches all the startup registry keys, the "Startup" folders, the system services, and the Autoexec and Config files for changes and it pops up a confirmation message box before allowing any changes that would allow a new program to run on startup. If something wants to run at startup, I think I should know about it. It used to be freeware, but I think the magazine that sponsored it now wants $20.00 for it. I suppose I'll just have to get off my butt and write one (it's about a dozen Win32 API calls.) And while I'm at it, I think I'll have it watching for BHOs at the same time, and try to kill two birds with one stone. I don't like how it doesn't play nice with multiple users under XP anyway.
      • I run Mozilla as my primary browser. None of the spyware fiends seem to have targetted it. And it doesn't run stupid objects. But, I still have IE as the default browser because on Windows, there are some things that just have to have IE.
      • I run the Proxomitron as an ad-filtering proxy, so I added certain anti-spyware checks into it.
      • My son likes running Zone Alarm to keep an eye on what's leaving his box, but I found it kind of annoying so I removed it from mine. It doesn't really prevent much, per se, but it does let you know you're infected.
      • I tried creating directories for the default paths of Xupiter, Kontiki and others, and used CACLS to have NTFS remove all access. That was kind of a mistake, because even I couldn't get rid of them after that.
      • Finally, I had entries in my hosts file for the sites of the known worst offenders (lop, xupiter, bonzi buddy, gator, kontiki) so that even if something slipped thru, I wouldn't be accidentally talking to them. But I ended up with over 1600 lines in my hosts file, though, and name resolution started taking way too
      --
      John
    16. Re:No you were running spyware! by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Wow. Thanks for the effort in documenting that. Definitely a post I will bookmark. I'd post "MOD PARENT UP" but I think the moderators have moved on to more recent stories in typical /. fashion.

      Thanks again.

    17. Re:No you were running spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incredibly DUMB. Everyone knows what happened you ran Lop.com spyware and it messed with your domain and you're too much of a pussy to admit you made an idiot out of yourself on ask slashdot.

    18. Re:No you were running spyware! by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      If you take a peek at Kazaa Lite (under Supertrick) they have a host file with lots of spyware hosts. The host seems a bit slow at the moment, but just retry a few times.

    19. Re:No you were running spyware! by Imonline · · Score: 1

      First, either way this is nasty. Don't listen to the criticism.

      Some questions: was it really spyware? If so which one? Can you elaborate on how the second lookup was trashed, ie at one point you did not think it was spyware b/c you had done a lookup on a different machine? At one point you stated that about an hour after you reported it to Charter the problem cleared up. Was that in response to something you did or what they did?

      With regard to ssh, I wonder if you had picked YES if you would have gotten your host, ie were they really relaying and playing MITM. Do you have any evidence that they really were doing MITM or were you just getting their sshd?

      THANKS!

    20. Re:No you were running spyware! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Excellent research! I need to go through and patch the holes that my pre-teen kids, spouse, in-laws, and mom have probably left with their game downloads.

      Meanwhile, I just ran over to the SpybotSD site to check them out, and got a reminder of how easy it is to get focused on one technical aspect, only to get wallopped by another. In this case, it's the domain name game.

      According to this news item, the Spybot folks failed to check to see if spybot.com was available. It wasn't -- looks like it's been registered since '98. I haven't gone to the spybot.com site (don't want to give them the hits), but a company called InBox Inc. is going to try to trademark "Spybot" -- or at least, get "our" Spybot company to cough up some dough.

      Similar problem with another project -- they didn't grab safer-networking.com or safernetworking.com, either. This time, it's a matter of not checking your back: both domains were just registered on April 1 (appropriately enough).

      That's the problem with being a one-man show (as this appears to be)... there's only so much one person can do, especially when you're already juggling 10 balls while pedaling your unicycle across the tightrope.

      Of course, I've added all three domains to my whois.sc watch list! Don't worry... I'm a white hat domain squatter.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  9. If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by Master+Bait · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...called the FBI back this morning, only to be told they generally didn't investigate these types of crimes for individuals, but usually only for companies that had lost at least a couple thousand dollars.

    I really don't know what to say, except what I put in the subject line. The subject was lifted from the famous line in Blade Runner, "If you're not cop, you're little people." These days, money incurrs rights and protection granted by the government. Odd how things have turned out, eh?

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
    1. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by realdpk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, sure, but it's not like the FBI has unlimited resources either. I don't think it's necessarily right to expect them to investigate every little SSH key popup you get, or SSL cert change, etc.

      If someone really did hijack Comcast's DNS servers, Comcast ought to be the ones calling, in any case. If you're worried that someone else's DNS servers will be compromised, host your own locally.

    2. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by realdpk · · Score: 1

      er, I meant Charter, not Comcast..

    3. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      These days, money incurrs rights and protection granted by the government. Odd how things have turned out, eh?

      Its always been this way.

      The cops know who pays the bills. "Oh thank you, thank you, officer" doesn't put bread on the table.

    4. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by bourne · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really don't know what to say, except what I put in the subject line.

      You're overreaching a bit.

      The end-user isn't an official representative of the victim. Obviously, law enforcement isn't going to deal with him. Firstly, for (the feds) to get involved, they need at least $5000 damage, which he couldn't speak to. They're not going to waste their time unless there is a willingness to prosecute, which - guess what - also requires an offical representative to commit to. Finally, if they do get involved, their next step is to ask for logs and other evidence - which, at best, the end-user only has symptoms of. Again, they need to deal with the duly authorized representative of the ISP to get anywhere.

      From the sound of it, they actually went out of their way to try and help him reach the minimums to be considered a valid case himself. That's actually pretty amazing by itself.

    5. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by InsaneGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      In general the reason being: it's not a federal issue until it hits >$5,000 in damages. Until then you are supposed to deal with your local organizations (there is a reason for your local government, you know. Does one go directly to the CEA to get more toiletpaper in the batchroom?).

      In this case specifically a resonable analogy would be, a technically competent end-user in a corporate environment doesn't contact the FBI their IT dept does. The user here doesn't have control over the DHCP/DNS servers, doesn't manage them in anyway. What do you expect from a federal organization in this situation... 20 feds flown down to look at an end-users system that hadn't receive any monetary losses yet?

      A more defined notification authority would be nice, but you can't expect every single end user to call the FBI. As an end-user contact you local officials you are paying taxes for them, if you are the owners of the compromised systems and you incurred financial loss then you can bump it up to a federal level (remember local/state organizations can sometimes even provide better service than the FBI, and then there are some that are stupid)

    6. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So incorporate already! All Americans should set up a corporation in order to reduce their tax burden as well as protect themselves against various liabilities.

    7. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by gandy909 · · Score: 1

      Correction, you deal with the feds when FEDERAL law is being broken, and the local boys when state/local law is being broken. Or, you should, anyway...

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    8. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called the federal government. But, it's a bit too much like a real corporation.

    9. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      I think there is a deeper issue here other than Field Proceedures of the FBI. The fact is that a crime was being committed. They knew it and with a phone call to the ISP caused the ISP to take some action. The victim's are all the users that get their passwords and information stolen.

      The analogy would be that they have hijacked a store front to steal from people coming into the store front. The miss-directed traffic is not the real crime. The ISP only has some liability if the people who have had thier information and eventually money stolen, sue.

      All the end users are the victims.

    10. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by aws910 · · Score: 1

      I am the net admin at a company that owns/manages well over $200 million in assets. They don't care!

      We used to be an open relay but I secured us.... relayers* still try to hijack our smtp, so I report them to their ISP*. I've kept track of who I threaten and it NEVER makes any difference - it's the same guys* all the time. I've called the FBI/NIPC when they're trying so much that they cause a DoS on my server, but still, they ALWAYS say "The attack must cause a verifiable dollar amount of loss before we will do anything".

      I've seriously considered taking matters into my own hands. This is the way I see it: If someone shoots at you in front of a cop(who doesn't do anything about it) wouldn't you shoot back?

      Alas, all I know about hacking is how to do a port scan... lame. I don't even know where to start when trying to learn how to hack.

      *="In the United States". I realize that most offshore ISPs either don't care or don't "speaka english"

    11. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      Firstly, for (the feds) to get involved, they need at least $5000 damage, which he couldn't speak to.

      That was really my point. First, hijacking dns services is illegal regardless of damages, right? Second, no local law inforcement has jurisdiction over something as national or international as was the dns hijacking.

      The analogy I want to draw is that somebody is pointing a gun at somebody else's head. Now, should law enforcement get involved, even if the potential victim doesn't have a large financial portfolio?

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    12. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the guy is a fucking moron to alert fbi because his 20$ server was hacked by a 2 cents script kiddie. Its like calling the fire dept because your neighbor is having a barbecue.

    13. Re:If You're Not Corporate, You're Little People by bourne · · Score: 1

      First, hijacking dns services is illegal regardless of damages, right?

      Probably... if it had been done, which it wasn't (read the later posts) and if he had been the ISP calling, which he wasn't.

      The analogy I want to draw is that somebody is pointing a gun at somebody else's head. Now, should law enforcement get involved, even if the potential victim doesn't have a large financial portfolio?

      Nice analogy. The analogy I'd like to draw is someone drawing a pot of tea. Clearly there's no requirement for law enforcement there, and my analogy has as much likeness to the case at hand as yours does.

      This is simple: he downloaded spyware, it screwed up his system, he misdiagnosed and ran around like chicken little telling his ISP the sky is falling. When that didn't work, he ran to the federal government, who rightly said that they'd prefer to hear from the people actually responsible for the machines allegedly compromised, thank you very much.

      Had he realized it was spyware, and called the feds, they'd have ignored him then, too. And rightly so. They aren't tech support.

  10. use of SSL/SSH by stonebeat.org · · Score: 0

    I use SSH/SSL for only non-sensitive communications. for everthing, i go in person. and that is the most sensibl things to do, after hearing all these stories about identity theft.
    we are just NOT there yet! :)

    1. Re:use of SSL/SSH by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And we never will be. :-)
      As the defences get better, so do the weapons.

    2. Re:use of SSL/SSH by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      It'd be a lot easier for a bank teller to steal your information than for a hacker to do it.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    3. Re:use of SSL/SSH by etcshadow · · Score: 1

      No, as the user mentioned, SSL (including HTTPS) and SSH aren't going to be spoofed (at least not transparently) because of the server key fingerprint, or certificate. These methods make "man in the middle" attacks detectable, and by default won't allow man-in-the-middled connections.

      --
      :Wq
      Not an editor command: Wq
    4. Re:use of SSL/SSH by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed. When I need to check my confidential email, I fly from NJ to the hosting center in Texas where my domain is hosted. From there, I plug my laptop into the serial port on the server and run minicom to get in. You just can't be too careful nowadays!

    5. Re:use of SSL/SSH by insomnic · · Score: 1

      Are you serious or are you joking??

    6. Re:use of SSL/SSH by Amer · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's serious, of course. He also goes to his bank datacenter and connects his laptop straight to the database every time he wants to check his checking account. The guys at the bank get a bit pissy, though...

      --
      -- To gain that which is worth having, it may be necessary to lose everything else. Bernadette Devlin McAliskey
  11. Who did you talk to? by arcsine · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure if you came off the right way. You may have wanted to ask to talk to a manager at an ISP and explain to them that it wasn't *your* problem, but *their* problem.

    Most of the tech support people are used to handling stupid people with simple problems, and probably didn't believe, or realize how bad the actual problem was.

    1. Re:Who did you talk to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > You may have wanted to ask to talk to a manager
      > at an ISP and explain to them that it wasn't
      > *your* problem, but *their* problem

      I did that once, in a different context. The company was losing sales because, somehow, their traffic was being directed to me. (Error in published contact info or some such, never did find out.)

      When I told them about their problem, they raged at me for causing the problem and demanded that I stop!

      No, this doesn't make any sense. It's true, but doesn't make any sense.

    2. Re:Who did you talk to? by Wansu · · Score: 1

      When I told them about their problem, they raged at me for causing the problem and demanded that I stop!

      Shoot the messenger ;-)

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    3. Re:Who did you talk to? by bkocik · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my own cable provider, Adelphia. I once had to call them and tell them one of their DNS servers was off in the weeds. I could not convince the 2nd tier person that the problem was not on my end (she scheduled a tech to come look at my modem), so I hung up, called back, and turned the tables on the 1st tier person that answered. Instead of them having me run commands (which usually doesn't get very far before I tell them, "Wait...I have a firewall and other things here, you're not going to be able to get the information you need from my Windows PC. Tell me what you need to know and I'll find out for you"), I had her run a command that did a DNS query against the dead server. When she got no response, I got her to cancel the tech that was coming my way and get someone to fix the server.

  12. good luck by burninginside · · Score: 1

    but it's not real surprising that law enforcement won't do anything...hell i had my car stolen by a tow company did all the research presented it to the cops & they wouldn't do crap
    also as far as law enforcement is concerned cars are still worth more than money

    hopefully you'll be able to get something done but honestly i wouldn't hold your breath

    1. Re:good luck by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      That's called repossession. It's what happens when you don't pay a lien holder ;)

    2. Re:good luck by burninginside · · Score: 1

      nope the car was payed off for 3 years...it's quite a problem here in dallas....a class action lawsuit was just settled about theft of cars by tow companies a year or 2 ago....

    3. Re:good luck by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      a class action lawsuit was just settled about theft of cars by tow companies a year or 2 ago...

      Time to start a new one...

      If it's the same company, check on the old class-action suit to see if there's a standing injunction as a result of the settlement. It's far easier to file for violating an injunction than to start your own lawsuit.
      (IANAL)

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:good luck by burninginside · · Score: 1

      i checked into it & they violated several of texas's laws & guild lines on towing, which i reported them for but just as the case of the guy who got hacked nothing happened & was given the run around

    5. Re:good luck by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      I've been robbed twice, and attempted at least 2 more times from the same people. All the cops do is send one out to scratch their balls and a few notes down. The most they did was tell me they'd put me in jail if I actually caught the suckers in the act and touched them. That's assult.

      Oh, the FBI only cares if someone: pisses off something or someone rich, traffics a significant amount of drugs, or has kiddie porn. Otherwise, you can officially go to hell. Unless they think you are doing one of the formetioned. In which case you can go to jail.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    6. Re:good luck by burninginside · · Score: 1

      thats more than they did for me...they didn't bother to send anyone out for the report...

  13. Domain suffix fun.. by wfberg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The domain suffix on windows is fun. It uses the domain name in your hostname as a domain suffix to search as well. One day, I'd set up my windows box as mybox.mydomain.com. Then my ISPs DNS servers stopped working. So when I went to cnn.com, it went to cnn.com.mydomain.com - and I got my very own homepage, even though the address bar in the browser said cnn.com (since *.mydomain.com resolves to mydomain's webserver's IP address..)

    I also have my webserver set up so that if you surf to a hostname that doesn't exist, it serves up the google I'm Feeling Lucky page for the hostname.. "Collecting ancient art? Why, I happen to have a website on that, just go to collecting.ancient.art.mydomain.com."

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:Domain suffix fun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an option in the TCP/IP Advanced properties to remove the suffix. Try that.

    2. Re:Domain suffix fun.. by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Funny

      The address doesn't work.

      I just get a bunch of stuff about buying domains.

    3. Re:Domain suffix fun.. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      The address doesn't work.

      I just get a bunch of stuff about buying domains.


      Darn. Slashdotted AND hijacked already..
      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    4. Re:Domain suffix fun.. by akeru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ahh yes, DNS domains . . .
      well, it's not just Windows that does that it is, in fact, part of address resolution that the first thing that gets checked is .. and then . You can get around it by manually adding the '.' to the end of the domain. Try http://www.cnn.com./ and watch it go to the correct place. (Assuming cnn.com. doesn't redirect you to to cnn.com, which would be looked up according to the usual rules)

      --

      Let's hope that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space 'Cause there's bugger-all down here on Earth.

  14. Ratchet the wench some more. by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Looks like you are on your own.

    There is always DNS-SEC that you (or you brain-dead ISP) can implement

    And don't forget the following: POP3S, IMAPS, HTTPS, SSH with AES-512, SMTP/SSL and last but not finally, FreeNet (and definitely not KaZaA).

    1. Re:Ratchet the wench some more. by mattsucks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ratchet the wench

      I've never heard it called _that_ before.

  15. There's your problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You called Chater tech support?

    It's a wonder they didn't tell you to reboot your modem, reboot your PC and verify that the network card is listed in Device Manager.

    That's about all I've ever gotten out of them.

    1. Re:There's your problem... by notque · · Score: 1

      Did you check your phone lines? ...

      You use a cable modem? ...

      Have you rebooted it?

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:There's your problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd be surprised about how many people call 10 or 11 times a week with a problem that is resolved by powercycling and rebooting.

      It's sad.

    3. Re:There's your problem... by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      It's a wonder they didn't tell you to reboot your modem, reboot your PC and verify that the network card is listed in Device Manager.

      You know, that puzzles me. I have Charter and I have called them maybe 10 or 12 times over the two years I've had their cable modem service. Now, I pay for the top package, so that might be why I get better treatment, but I have always had a very positive experience with them. And they don't care a whit that I have assloads of computers on my home network -- they've even helped me troubleshoot home networking problems.

      I know this is one of those "It works for me!" posts, but, well...I sometimes wonder if you're all cranky on the phone or something.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    4. Re:There's your problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The customer experience definitely varies by region. Level 1, from my area (well, actually 200 miles away at best), won't even begin to bother with me unless I'm running one system with Windows directly connected to the cable modem with no software firewall. This includes situations where the problem rather obviously has nothing to do with my configuration, which was the case both times I needed to call them. Each time I had to fight to get them to pass the results of my diagnostics on up the pipe to somebody who gave a damn, who was then almost immediately able to fix the problem.

      Our 2nd (top?) tier sounds to me a lot more like what you're describing -- cool, relaxed, and recognizant that there are a lot of neat things people want to do with this technology now that we've finally got it.

  16. They've got to have some guidelines... by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To inflate my ego a bit, I asked if I could count my time cleaning up/investigating as a loss of this magnitude and was told no, that it would have to be a financial loss like is associated with internet credit card fraud. Given how Kevin Mitnick was convicted and sentenced on 'evidence' that included employee time for investigation and cleanup, why is this any different for me?

    So many reasons, it's hard to count! But here's a couple for starters:

    1) Your Mitnick example was how evidence was used in court to determine guilt and sentencing. That is a different animal than investigatory guidelines as to which cases should be pursued.
    2) The Mitnick thing was years ago, and activity is so much higher now that they might have set the bar higher in terms of what cases to pursue.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  17. Show me the money by jimmcq · · Score: 1

    Unless you can prove that there was over $5,000 in damages, I doubt that you're going to get law enforcement agencies interested in this.

  18. Escalation? by kjs3 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did you try to get escalated to a higher support tier or to a supervisor? I've found that generally works as long as you are persistent.

    Level 1 support at most ISPs don't have any technical skills. They walk through a series of scripted interactions and weed out the 99% of calls that are simple to solve. Good for the ISP, but bad for the 1% highly technical callers.

    It's also possible that there is a specific security group that you could contact. You might have to be persistent to find them, however.

    1. Re:Escalation? by sirdude · · Score: 1

      I would suggest logging EVERYTHING. Give your ISP a chance to rectify matters. Follow their advice to the letter. Push them a bit-urge them a bit.

      If you still aren't satisfied, inform them that you will be contacting the press, and ask them cordialy to prepare tehmselves for some negative publicity.

      Then call up 10 newspapers, and computeresque magazines and ask tehm if they would be interested in hearing your story. Get some cheap webspace and put everything up there.

      *shrug* Most ISPs don't move their arses unless their arses are at risk :P

      laterz....

    2. Re:Escalation? by taverngeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you needed to do was ask for the ISP's security dept saying that their systems had been compromised and that their systems were now being used to attempt to compromise your and presumably other customers data.

    3. Re:Escalation? by nsayer · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that most tech support outfits are wise to the "ask for a supervisor" gambit. Guess what: now they're all "supervisors." Feh.

    4. Re:Escalation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is that most tech support outfits are wise to the "ask for a supervisor" gambit. Guess what: now they're all "supervisors." Feh.

      When I used to work tech support, there were times when there wasn't a supervisor around, i.e. around lunchtime, etc. and every now and then, someone would want to talk to a supervisor during that time. Solution: Your friend is now your supervisor :).

    5. Re:Escalation? by pirodude · · Score: 1

      If I notice a serious problem with an ISP I first try their support number. If they're clueless idiots who keep reading from a script I'll jump right to their NOC contact. I called the noc of this company after I noticed their machines were attacking ours. The noc had them offline within minutes and called me back several times to keep me updated. Now don't go calling for every stupid thing that happens because they'll stop publishing the numbers. But if it's big, go ahead and do it.

  19. The laws are tools.... by raehl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    To protect corporations from having to spend money on real security.

  20. semi-hourly dose of content ? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I had already hit Slashdot for my semi-hourly dose of content

    It takes your half an hour to find the content in Slashdot ?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:semi-hourly dose of content ? by aridhol · · Score: 4, Funny

      How did he go through the chaff so quickly?

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    2. Re:semi-hourly dose of content ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had already hit Slashdot for my semi-hourly dose of content
      It takes your half an hour to find the content in Slashdot ?


      Since when is there content at Slashdot?
  21. Well, you have done some good here already. by OwnerOfWhinyCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every admin who has been reflexively typing 'yes' to the

    The RSA host key for yoursite.com has changed, use new key?

    prompt is now shuddering to think how many passwords s/he might have handed the "Man in the Middle."

    Good Job.

    1. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by aridhol · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course, that only affects those who use passwords for SSH. I generally prefer RSA user authentication. One of the reasons is laziness - I only have to enter my key's password once, and it authenticates to SSH servers for me. And, of course, there's security. Because I don't enter my password over the wire, there's no way for it to be intercepted.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    2. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by pompousjerk · · Score: 1

      I actually did that once. Luckily, no damage appeared to have been done; instead, I was spoofed on IRC with the message "ur account" followed by the standard shell account message. Quite a shake-up. Changed the password, bought every freaking Hacking Exposed book.

    3. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      Your RSA password may not be at risk, but being MITM makes it easier for them to watch your session itself. (I don't remember that the RSA key exchange mechanism frustrates MITM attacks on the actual session.)

      If you SSH back out and they're watching your session, then they'll catch the password that you use then.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by DraconPern · · Score: 1

      I suggest always creating a RSA key for login and use that instead of a password. Even better, also disable passphrase login in sshd after creating the key so that passwords can't be used/guessed in the future remotely.

    5. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by aridhol · · Score: 1
      If you SSH back out and they're watching your session, then they'll catch the password that you use then.
      Not necessarily. I run ssh-agent, which stores my RSA key. If I have "forward-agent yes" in my .ssh/config file, then when I ssh to another machine, my local machine is consulted for RSA authentication.
      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    6. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by pediddle · · Score: 1

      I've luckily never had it give me that prompt except when I know that I've re-installed SSH from scratch on some computer. That could be an interesting attack, though -- set up a box to ping your target SSH server, and wait to implement the man-in-the-middle until it detects a change in the server's key. Once it does, the users will be expecting a change!

    7. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by CorwinOfAmber · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course, that only affects those who use passwords for SSH.

      No, a successful man-in-the-middle attack will affect anyone using SSH, whether they use passwords, RSA keys, or anything else.

      Because I don't enter my password over the wire, there's no way for it to be intercepted.

      Not your login password, no. But anything else you enter or view can be. Su to root? Now they know your root password. Read your mail? They did too.

      --
      My future's determined by Thieves, thugs, and vermin -- The Offspring
    8. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my ssh client (IIRC) aborts without prompting if the key changes. Also, there's only three hosts I routinely ssh to - two I know everything that happens to, and the third I don't really care about :)

    9. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Go read the docs for SSH some more and while you are at it, learn the basics of public key crypto. A man in the middle attack is damn nigh imposible with a well designed system, and SSH2 is well designed. Mind you that SSH1 was a textbook example of why those who don't know the details of WHY crypto works should not design a cryptosystem, even from off the shelf parts.

      Since a man in the middle won't happen if you pay attention to changes in the host key you only have to worry about one of the ends being compromised and giving up your keystrokes.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    10. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by CorwinOfAmber · · Score: 1
      Wrong. Go read the docs for SSH some more and while you are at it, learn the basics of public key crypto.

      Thanks for the advice, but I'm already pretty familiar with public key crypto and SSH.

      Since a man in the middle won't happen if you pay attention to changes in the host key

      Right. How about you go and read the original post before you put your foot in your mouth.

      --
      My future's determined by Thieves, thugs, and vermin -- The Offspring
    11. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by MattBurke · · Score: 1

      Where you get this idea from?

      The fundamental thing about public key crypto is your private key and passphrase will never be compromised unless your local box has been owned and something's logging keystrokes.

      A man-in-the-middle attack will be unable to retrieve a key because it's only public keys sent over the wire. A man-in-the-middle attack will be unable to retrieve the passphrase since it never leaves the local box in any form. A man-in-the-middle attack will not be able to intercept any of the ssh data either as long as you're using a sound cypher mechanism (read as SSH2). All a man-in-the-middle can do is proxy the session.

      If you're still using SSH1 OTOH, you deserve everything you get.

    12. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by David+Jao · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the advice, but I'm already pretty familiar with public key crypto and SSH.

      jmorris does have a valid point here: the design of the ssh2 protocol makes it impossible to forward RSA/DSA user credentials to any party other than the party you have connected to. That means an attacker in the middle cannot intercept credentials from you and then use those credentials to complete a legitimate link to the real server.

      ssh1, on the other hand, is a flawed protocol that allows credentials to be replayed to a third party, and therefore is far more vulnerable to man in the middle attacks than ssh2.

    13. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Right. How about you go and read the original post before you put your
      > foot in your mouth.

      Yes, but the post I was replying to was ranting about man in the middle attacks that would affect affect "anyone using SSH" and I contend that anyone who gets nailed after their ssh client throws up a big scary "Someone may be attempting a man in the middle attack...." warning kinda deserves to get screwed into the ground. And people, LOOK at the damned URL on those ecommerce sites before you plug in that CC#.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    14. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by CorwinOfAmber · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the post I was replying to was ranting about man in the middle attacks that would affect affect "anyone using SSH"

      I wasn't ranting. What I said was "a successful man-in-the-middle attack will affect anyone using SSH, whether they use passwords, RSA keys, or anything else". Maybe I could have been a little more careful with my wording, but the post I was replying to was claiming that only people who use passwords for SSH would be affected by a MITM attack. To which I pointed out that a successful MITM attack would affect any user.

      and I contend that anyone who gets nailed after their ssh client throws up a big scary "Someone may be attempting a man in the middle attack...." warning kinda deserves to get screwed into the ground.

      Well, yes, that was the whole point of my post. Again, maybe I should have been a little clearer in my wording, instead of assuming that people on Slashdot actually read the whole thread before spouting off a condescending reply. The post I replied to claimed "that only affects those who use passwords for SSH", in reply to this post, which was about people who reflexively type "yes" to the "big scary" warning. This claim is not correct; even if you use RSA or DSA authentication, you are still vulnerable to a MITM attack if you blindly type "yes" to the big scary warning about the host key changing.

      --
      My future's determined by Thieves, thugs, and vermin -- The Offspring
    15. Re:Well, you have done some good here already. by CorwinOfAmber · · Score: 1
      jmorris does have a valid point here: the design of the ssh2 protocol makes it impossible to forward RSA/DSA user credentials to any party other than the party you have connected to.

      I never said otherwise. I said a successful MITM attack could still get valuable or sensitive information, even if you use RSA authentication.

      Even if you use SSH2, you are still vulnerable to MITM attacks if you blindly type "yes" whenever you get the big scary warning about the host key changing.

      --
      My future's determined by Thieves, thugs, and vermin -- The Offspring
  22. Contact the police local to the offenders by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lookup the IP registrations, find the owners' locale, and then contact that local police department. Tell them a federal crime (felony) is being perpetrated on a grand scale, and that you need to speak with someone with extensive computer/internet/technical knowledge to report all the details.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Contact the police local to the offenders by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "...then contact that local police department. Tell them .... you need to speak with someone with extensive computer/internet/technical knowledge"

      Someone in the police dept. with extensive computer knowledge? +1 Funny

      Not knocking the police. I'm sure they do the best they can with the resources/funding they have.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Contact the police local to the offenders by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I whois'd the first IP in the list. It belongs to a Hurricane Electric (he.net). My guess is that *they* have been hacked and are being used, without their knowledge, to launch further attacks. So it might behoove one to contact those people and ask them to investigate for doings on their end that they might not yet be aware of.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. F*ck the police by LS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The computer police too. I've been mugged, robbed, and assulted multiple times in my life, and the police were never interested in helping. My car was just broken into, and I had $4000 in computer equipment stolen out of it. I called to file a report and have them come down and dust for prints, and they said that they can't send anyone down.

    Of course, I've been stopped and harrassed by cops on a number of occasions. My brother gave me a small cut in a fight that required stitches, and they investigated my parents for child abuse. I've been accused of possessing marijuana for having a tomato stem in the cup holder of my car. I have to drive through a police checkpoint every day on the way back from work on highway 15 in San Diego. After I hit a spare tire that flew off the back of a car in front of me, the police officer wanted to write me a ticket because he was upset that he had to drive out a take a report.

    I'm a law abiding citizen without a mark on my record, and I can still say: fuck the police

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:F*ck the police by BuddhaMonkey · · Score: 1

      Most of your problems with the police are due a California/San Diego thing. The police there tend to be a bit on the "law does not apply to me" side of things. My $0.02.

    2. Re:F*ck the police by druxton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been mugged, robbed, and assulted multiple times in my life

      Ever thought of moving?

    3. Re:F*ck the police by caluml · · Score: 1
      I had $4000 in computer equipment stolen out of it.

      The fact that you had $4000 on computer equipment in there in the first place and you left it alone surprises me. Hell, in some parts of cities, that's more than enough to warrant getting stabbed for.

    4. Re:F*ck the police by Dr_LHA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed entirely. You're story is one I've heard a thousand times, and one I've experienced myself. I was once when I was 16 years old knocked of my bicycle by a guy in van. The police got involved as I was pretty seriously injured (an almost ran over by a bus as part of the incident). Turns out the guy has no driving license, insurance and has not paid his car tax. He shouldn't have been driving the van in the first place.

      I was told in no uncertain terms that the guy would not be procescuted in any way.

      Just like you I've also been hassled by te police on many occasions for no good reason, been forced to show ID for such crimes as "walking home after 3am" etc. I know that police have a hard job to do, but really they need to remember that their motto is "To Protect and Serve" not "To Hassle and Intimidate".

    5. Re:F*ck the police by Phishcast · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, are one unlucky bastard. Damn.

    6. Re:F*ck the police by interiot · · Score: 1

      Laptops are easily $3000 including the software installed. So do you go home first, drop the laptop off, and THEN go back out and shop for groceries, or do you just run in and make it quick? It's really not that unreasonable to have $4k in equipment in your car.

    7. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Including software? Do you carry the installer CDs around with you when you go out with your laptop? No? Then how can you possibly count that in the value?

    8. Re:F*ck the police by Boltronics · · Score: 0

      "walking home after 3am"?

      Down under, I've had to show ID at only 12:30am. Beat that.

      --
      It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    9. Re:F*ck the police by hswerdfe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Word...Fuck the Pigs man.

      I got attacked in front of a police station, and the fucking pigs watched the guy run away. Then refuesed to take a statment or file a report or do anything.

      Fuck the Pigs.

      --
      --meh--
    10. Re:F*ck the police by caluml · · Score: 1

      Me personally? I carry the laptop around with me. Yep, in the supermarket. $3k is a lot of money for some crack-head to ignore. What's a smash and grab to them anyway?

    11. Re:F*ck the police by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      Turns out the guy has no driving license, insurance and has not paid his car tax. He shouldn't have been driving the van in the first place.
      I was told in no uncertain terms that the guy would not be procescuted in any way.

      Some newspaper reporters love stories like this. You just have to find the right reporter, and frame the story in a way that gets his/her interest.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    12. Re:F*ck the police by ChadN · · Score: 1

      What is that checkpoint for anyway? Immigration? Drunk driving? (it has been there too long for "homeland security")

      Policae are like anything else? It is the rotten 98% that spoil it for the other few good ones.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    13. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a cop shot his wife while he was in uniform with multiple witnesses outside my apartment building. She died, it was on the news once, and that was that. It traumatized my girlfriend at the time, who was sleeping while it happened.

      FSCK the police. FSCK, FSCK, FSCK the police.

      What we need are vigilantes. Someone to fsck up criminals so bad they don't want to live.

    14. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an incident 8 years ago when I was 20. I was hauling butt on my Mtn bike through the streets of Atlanta. Most of the time this is how you ride to avoid all the wreckless drivers. When I was traveling though an intersection my chain popped off the chain ring.. no biggie.. at the time I was able to fix this without getting off the bike. so I went onto the side walk and was costing slowly. right after I fixing it, I looked to my left and an A&P deliver van smacked right into me, knocking me about 5 feet, crushing the bike.

      When the cops arrived they gave me a ticket for riding on the sidewalk! I was like WHAT! the bike cops in this city only ride on the sidewalk! what kind of double standard is that!

      So the cop insisted that I take an ambulance to the hospital.. at the time I didn't have medical insurance.. The entire incident cost me over $1000.. and my bike was destroyed.. When I made it to court the Judge threw out the ticket.. but again.. I was just insanely retarded..

    15. Re:F*ck the police by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Cops don't care about auto breakins because they're so incredibly common and they're usually covered by insurance. There's also generally no chance of catching the thief, and 90% of the time they're juveniles anyway (someone broke into my car and stole my stereo, I caught them, and it turned out to be a group of 13 and 14 year olds.)

      There's no chance of getting restitution, no real chance for jailtime (most they'd get is a month or two in juvie) and no real chance of catching them anyway, so the cops don't bother. In my case I just made them give me back what they stole, which they were still very reluctant to do even after being caught red handed, and I told their parents, who didn't really care. One of them even threatened to press charges for threating her hoodlum child because I chased the kids down with a baseball bat. I threatened to call INS on her ass and she shut the fuck up real quick.

      Moral of the story here, there's really no point in wasting manpower on certain crimes where there's no real chance of catching the perpetrators. And even if you do, more than likely nothing will come of it. The cops don't care because they've tried in the past and it's gotten them nowhere. Just get theft insurance on your car and be happy they didn't steal the whole damn thing.

    16. Re:F*ck the police by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      I say we hire the Double Dragons.

    17. Re:F*ck the police by borgasm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know, you don't need to present your ID to a police officer...They can't even prevent you from walking away from them if you aren't being charged with a crime...

      Read up on some ACLU stuff...their site is pretty interesting. I think they have a little card you can carry in your wallet which lists your Civil Rights. I find it very informative.

    18. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. A few years ago I made eye contact with some teens smoking crack in the car beside me, and had the rear window of my van shot out for it. I got the plate number and grabbed the next city cop I saw. His response was "It happened getting onto the freeway, so it's the State cops problem"

      A few years before that I watched a pack of guys drag a screaming woman into a car and start beating the crap out of her. They pulled off, still womping on her and I jogged behind by about a block till they passed the local donut shop. I ran in, told the cop sitting there what I'd just watched. His response was to finish his coffee. Eventually he went out to his van, never took my name, didn't write down the plate number I gave him. Nothing.

      My point is - You are on your own. Carry a gun.

      Fsck the police.

    19. Re:F*ck the police by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Then go to the media - they're the ones who "guard the guards" nowadays

    20. Re:F*ck the police by zdislaw · · Score: 1
      How long do you plan on being gone? It only takes about 5 seconds to smash a window and grab a laptop. I can't understand how anyone would leave something like a laptop in the car alone for even a minute.

      I'm not saying they deserve to get their shit stolen, but the "I was only gone for a minute" excuse has achieved cliche status for a reason.

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    21. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in defense of the police, watch a few episodes of cops and you will see that the police are lied to more than you can imagine. So don't wonder why they have a suspicious nature. Can you imagine having to go to a fight, auto wreck or domestic disturbance and having to decide who is telling the truth, just based on thier statements? Daily? Hourly? That is an extremely tough job, that will affect the futures of the people in question. One thing for sure is that many people will lie thier asses off if they think it will keep them from getting in trouble.

    22. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I'm a law abiding citizen without a mark on my record, and I can still say: fuck the police.

      Depends where you live, and if you fit their profiles (e.g., driving while black).

      Me? I had a similar experience to yours during my grad school years in Boston.

      Now I live in $SMALL_UNIVERSITY_TOWN where the citizenry are contented cows, every crime is a newsworthy event, and the tax base supporting the local police is huge.

      A few years ago I was shocked when my place was broken into and some jerk carted off everything he could cram into a couple of my suitcases. The shocking part wasn't the break in, but the police response.

      It was a Friday night, I called the non-emergency phone number for the police. In less than five minutes my place was swarming with 3 police officers collecting finger prints and a german shepherd trying to pick up a scent. About a week later, I was called back by a detective (!) who apologized (!!) that they had been unable to close the case.

      Fuck the police? Not in my town.

    23. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... You don't leave an expensive laptop in the car no matter the circumstances.

    24. Re:F*ck the police by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      It's all part of the shift away from 'public servants'. One look at the MP5's, black kevlar, full face shields and battering-ram vehicles becoming popular with law enforcement is the first clue. Recall the famous picture of the police 'rescuing' Eliane Gonzales under Reno's command to better grasp the direction goverment's pushing them towards.

    25. Re:F*ck the police by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My point is - You are on your own. Carry a gun.

      Darn right. Several court cases have determined that the police cannot be sued for failure to protect. That means that yes, despite the "To protect and to serve" motto, it is still your own responsibility to defend yourself. Government does not take responsibility for this, though it likes to try to take away the right.

      Sort of ironic thing is, though, that some cops in CCW states (where carrying a weapon is obviously legal, as if the 2nd Amendment didn't make it obvious enough) were asked what they would do if, during a routine traffic stop with a completely ordinary driver, they happened to notice a gun in plain sight. There were responses like, "Call for backup, you never know if the guy is a nut," and, "Get him out of the car to cuff him and then hold on to the weapon." You'd think the police would have a better understanding of what it means for citizens to act legally and within their rights. Unfortunately, many (not all, and I wouldn't even say most) cops have an "us vs. them" attitude.

    26. Re:F*ck the police by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      That's very cool. Fortunately I've never had to call the police for anything more than minor vandalism and traffic accidents. In every case I've felt the police acted professionally, though I was a bit disappointed they didn't dust for prints on the cue ball that was thrown through my windshield. The odds of catching someone from that would have been pretty low, though.

    27. Re:F*ck the police by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'll give you some facts...

      #1 - police are very Lazy.. real work unless it's "exciting or glamourous" is not of interest to them... Witness the masses flying by officer-doughnut at 85-90 in the 55 zone..

      #2- Police dont give a rats ass... A local idiot kid was happiny driving like a lunatic in my residential area. the cops didnt care. so I took matters in my own hands to stop it and keep a kid from getting killed by publically embarassing the local police dept on cable access and in the council meetings.

      #3- your local officer is usually an arsehole/lawbreaker himself.. hmm out of a police department of 40 cops 10 were found to be selling drugs out of the evidence locker.... 2 of which were pimping 15-16 year old girls..

      cops = scumbags that are worse than your local gang because corrupt unions wont let them get fired, and the management of the department dont care.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    28. Re:F*ck the police by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what a trunk is designed for.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    29. Re:F*ck the police by Teflonatron · · Score: 1

      Back when I used to live in Georgia, I came home to find the apartment next to mine had it's door kicked in. Not knowing what was going on, I called 911 (I didn't have the non-emergency number, and was unaware if the perp was still lurking about.)

      One police officer showed up 5 minutes later, waited 2-3 more minutes until a second officer arrived. They entered my neighbors apartment with guns drawn.

      The place turned out to be empty, and apparently one of the tenents friends had stolen a bunch of cash ($500-$1000).

      They never accused me of anything, and were nothing but curteous and helpfull.

      I think the difference here is, big city vs. little city. Small town police are generally on top of things, while big city police have so much crime to deal with, they can't handle the 'little' stuff.

    30. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You, my friend, are one unlucky bastard. Damn."

      The M.O. of most nerds and geeks.

    31. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if you could sue the government for taxes, paid for police service, back when they don't investigate a crime that happened to you. Honestly, if the government isn't going to do the damned job, you shouldn't have to pay them to not do their job.

      I think all the problems are caused by petty political struggles though. The "war on drugs" has somehow become more important than people being mugged, shot, gang violence, etc. As long as people are still being hurt by others, I think these crimes of self-infliction should at least be put on the back burner if not off the whole damned stove altogether.

      The people in charge seem to be getting dumber every passing year. Back in the 20's, it didn't take long for people to realize that making a substance that poses no threat to anyone but the user (alcohol) was a silly idea that was never going to work. Now that we have had two presidents, sequentially, known to have done one drug or another in their youth, you would think there would be some kind of activity to treat and educate addiction to drugs instead of throwing them in jail.

      The worst crime in America is speeding, if you think that crimes are considered worse when they are more heavily enforced. It's hard to find a single person that has never had a ticket, and practically impossible to find a person that isn't guilty that has driven more than a year.

      By far, the worst place and time to be harassed by a cop, I have found, is on a school campus about 1AM. Everyone else was in bed, the public intoxication our was over, and two cops collaborated a fabricated story, probably out of bordem, that I throw a bottle out of a car. The bottle in question was plastic, so it wouldn't have been a danger even if I had thrown it out of the car. I was dumbfounded when they did this, made me pick it up, then wrote a ticket too. What can you do though? I think they just like to screw with college students because they can, and no matter how many complaints they get, the school isn't going to do jack. A friend of mine filed a report for a stolen bike, and they just ignored it. He went out and found it the next day just by looking at bike racks around campus (all of about 30 minutes). Every rape charge filed from someone on campus gets magically reported as being off campus, and they claim they were brought on campus after the act. In the filings of the reports at the end of the year that they show next years potential student's parents, they always show 0 rape, and about 3 thefts (my friend had his bike stolen two times that year... so aparently he accounted for 2/3 the thefts that year).

      I think a more general question is brought up by the whole issue. What do you do about apathetic/abusive law enforcement officials? When the enforcers of the law just don't care about their job, who is going to enforce the law on them? I had an uncle that tried to bring up these issues before. He spent many nights in jail, and was usually thrown onto the pavement in front of the jail the next morning. Hell, in some of these small towns around here, I'm MUCH more afraid of the police than the criminals, because you can actually leave and get rid of the criminals. Police can cause you problems getting jobs, credit report, they can give you bogus DV/drug raps and you'll get pulled over every time your plates are ran, all because some hick in a small town will get overlooked by any of the bigger fish.

    32. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In FLorida, which has one of the most liberal CCW laws, if you are stopped by a cop and "they happened to notice a gun in plain sight" you would be arrested, it's called Concealed Carry for a reason! A gun in plain sight is NOT concealed and you can be charged with brandishing a weapon. At least that is what is taught in the CCW course in this state.

    33. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, police are lazy and stupid.

      Several years ago when I was living with my folks in Montgomery AL, we went out of town over Labor Day weekend. We'd installed an alarm system several months prior because of increased crime in the neighborhood. First night we were gone, the alarm went off. The alarm company called our secondary contact person, found out we were out of town, and phoned the police. The police responded, claimed to have investigated the area and found nothing amiss, including with the rear bedroom window which the alarm company had informed them was the sensor that had been activated. Next night, alarm goes off again, this time for the back door. Police come out again, call our secondary to come by and re-secure the back door, they report nothing else wrong.

      We get home, and we all pretty quickly notice the fucking 50 gallon barrel stood on end outside the rear bedroom window, the crushed/broken bushes in the path of said drum, and the 3 fucking panes and crosspieces missing from the window. Twice they "checked out" the location and didn't see this shit. Fucking pathetic.

      Nowadays I work for a company that does a lot of work with police departments. There's some good officers out there, but they're few and far between. And far too many of them are simply bullies who didn't quite have the balls to lead a life of crime.

    34. Re:F*ck the police by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      Judging from attitudes apparent in some of the remarks in this thread, have any of you paused to consider that perhaps you "invite harassment" from cops simply by way of your attitude towards them? I've never met a cop I didn't like. Never. And oddly enough I've got "friends" who have never met one they did like. The difference? These friends are beligerent a-holes who can't keep their mouths shut or just accept that a cop is just trying to do his job without throwing a hissy fit and screaming about their rights being violated.. because.. why? A cop stopped you to talk to you, make sure you know where you're going and not just scoping out the neighbourhood? It's called keeping the peace. It's called maintaining a community presence. It's called proactive crime-prevention. Sure you can refuse to give them your Id and just walk away. Sure there's no law requiring you to be decent civil human being who treats everyone with respect, even law-enforcement officers. But wouldn't it just be a better place if you did anyway. I have never met anyone who complained about bad treatment from the police who didn't in some way invite suspician through their own negative attitudes. And in case you're wondering, I myself have been the subject of legitimate police investigation while living in crummy crime-ridden neighbourhoods. I'm reminded of one cop in particualt who I met beating on my doors and screaming in my face. While he vented his anger I should "quietly" and "politely" listened and answered his question without getting all upset and defensive. Eventually the guy calmed down. He apologised and we ended up talking for a little while. He revealed to me the stresses that cops face every day: they get called names like "pig" all day long and just generally are treated with very little respect by the people they put their lives on the line to protect. Obviously, they're used to dealing with a certain unsavoury segment of the population and sometimes natural defense mechanism and stresses come though when they find themselves dealing with just ordinary law-abiding folk. They can't do their jobs without people bi8ching that they're either not doing enough or they're violating someone's rights because they looked at them the wrong way. It's a very stressful job. But in the end, they really appreciate just being treated with the same basic respect that everyone else takes for granted. You might want to try it one day and see if you get treated just a little bit better from then on.

    35. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      viddy the horrorshow career development me droogies.

    36. Re:F*ck the police by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Look, I've never treated the Police with anything other than utmost respect, especially when they're dealing with me. Is it to much to ask for the same treatment in return? Your blanket characterisation of people who have issues with the police being "beligerent a-holes" is simply not true. If you think its OK for police to stop you randomly, demand your ID and hassle you for no good reason, then what else will you accept? Your phone tapped to "keep you safe"?

      I realise that being a cop is a difficult job and dealing with criminals all day must make one somewhat jaded with humanity. But the cops I've had the most problems with are in a city that has almost zero real crime, with 99.9% of the action the cops see is arresting drunk college kids.

      I've met both good and bad cops. Strangely my best experiences with them was when I was actually in the wrong (getting a fixer ticket). In that case the two officers I dealt with were polite, calm and friendly.

      It just doesn't get over the fact that my experience and alot of people who I know of when you actually **need** police help, they often aren't much use.

    37. Re:F*ck the police by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%, I worked at a company who was doing onling gambling, animal porn, and kiddy porn sites. I reported it to the FBI, and was ignored as a "employee causing trouble". They dropped it, and moved on....

      --
      oogly boogly!
    38. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops is nothing but fucking propaganda - plain and simple. Same goes for "Wildist police videos/demolition derby 324"

    39. Re:F*ck the police by Sassinak · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, its the %99.99999999 that spoil it for the 0.000000001 that are ok (not good, just ok)..

      I've been assulted, ignored, and in general mis-treated by every freaking offiicer in this bloody country.. (I travel quite a bit, so I get around). I've only met one that was decent, and I say decent, because at least when I was shot (by two bums who were doing a B&E at a bank 30 yards away).. he say, PLEASE get on the ground.. (not GET ON THE GROUND YOU @$@%@%@%@%@).

      And people wonder why no one really likes the US. Umm.. I'm not sure.

      --
      God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
    40. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause thats what you fucking were you stupid POS- who the fuck cares? You don't like your companies clients - quit.

      Fucktard

    41. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in many states you can carry a weapon in plain sight (hip holster) without a ccw permit

    42. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd agree if the "criminals" you're refering to are the ones in political office and uniforms...

      t

    43. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What company was this... i could use a little...uhh... gambling......

    44. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can relate to that. A number of years ago, while riding my bicycle, I was subsequently hit by some idiot in a car not paying attention to the light. There was no injury or anything of that sort, but there were cops there who did a quick write-up on what happened anyways. Weeks later, I find out that the guy who hit me was suing me for damages due to the fact that my bike dented his car. There was a court date set and everything, and we also tried to get the police to give a summary of their write-up, though none of that was apparently a priority, and nothing ever happened. Thankfully the whole thing was thrown out, though it was still a bit disencouraging from a 13 year old's point of view.

    45. Re:F*ck the police by Badanov · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, they can't prevent you from walking away but once the officer issues an instruction for you to stay and talk to him, or any other order as a part of his duties, you are obliged to obey it

      Failure to do so makes you subject to arrest for failing to obey an officer. Once you are under arrest, the game is over. You can be searched and the offier may then proceed with his 'investigation.'

      I think reading and believing what the ACLU says about anything is a lot more likely to get you arrested and jailed than simply obeying and cooperating with that officer ACLU or not, until that police officer dismisses you in the course of the lawful discharge of his duties, you are obliged to obey his lawful orders.

      --
      Dawn of the Dead
    46. Re:F*ck the police by LS · · Score: 1

      I just recalled a time when two friends and I were walking around at 3AM in downtown Culver City, California, which is a wealthy movie studio enclave. A couple of police drove up and rolled down their window. They interrogated us for a while, asking what we were doing around, if we had any weapons, could they see our ID, etc... They finally asked what we do: software engineer, electrical engineer, neurobiologist. He replied with "Oh hahahahh, that explains it - you guys must have been eating pizza and drinking Jolt cola all night! Be on your way" and drove off.

      assholes...

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    47. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FSCK the police. FSCK, FSCK, FSCK the police.

      Seriously. They really should be using a better file system.

    48. Re:F*ck the police by thynk · · Score: 1

      These friends are beligerent a-holes who can't keep their mouths shut

      Man, if that's the way you talk about your friends, I'd hate to see what you call the ones you don't like :)

      I've met cops I liked and respected, I've met cops I didn't. But when you get right down to it, that person is doing something for me and my family. Every day they have the potential to die to keep me and mine safe from harm.

      Simple logic dictates my behavior when I deal with a cop. He doesn't know me from Adam, he has a gun and I do not. It is in my best interest to keep my hands where he can see them, make no sudden moves and to be polite and cooperate with him/her as best I can. I've NEVER had this go wrong. YMMV

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    49. Re:F*ck the police by bluGill · · Score: 3, Informative

      True, if a police office orders you to do stay and talk, you must stay. However there is no requirement to talk. If the officer demands identification and doesn't need it (He must charge you for a crime unless you are in a car, or other situation where you must present id, not all of which I know), you should not give it. You should however demand his badge id, which he is required to give you. If the officer needs identification, which will be most of the time they ask, provide it.

      Anytime you think a cop is doing something wrong, or even questionable, get his badge id. Write it down. If the cop has a pen and refuses to lend it to you to write his id number down, that is his right, but be sure your complaint includes how unhelpful he is. The badge id is the best way to ensure that the cop causing you trouble gets into trouble. Trouble that appears on his record. It may or may not result in action, but it normally stays on the record. If this is an isiolated incidence we can all forgive it, if this is not, eventially someone will make a big stink about it, and then all the other incidences will come to light.

      BTW, make sure you save those badge ids yourself, along with a note on exactly what happened. If you hear about some officer doing "bad things" (which normally means bad enough that it gets attention, may or may not be really bad), contact a reporter, and suggest that they examiningg that officers files to make sure your report is there. They might not be able to, but it makes a really good follow up story to be able to say that the officer did "bad things, of other nature" before and nothing was done about it. Makes a local story into headline news all over the state, and reporters love that.

    50. Re:F*ck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not called proactive crime prevention, it's called racial profiling. It's exactly the opposite of innocent until proven guilty. And if you think this is ok, I'm sure Senator Hatch has an intern spot available.


      Let's just say the people are different in different places and let it at that eh?


      I have never sounded off to a cop, but that doesn't mean they haven't sounded off to me.


      I have never given a reason to be harrassed, but does that stop them? (Hell no.) "Hey nice rims, can you take the keys out of the ignition and can you pop the hood please?"


      Por ejemplo: I used to date this go-go dancer and one night I got home later than she did. She had popped a bunch of pain killers and was wasted on Jack Daniels and was about as easy to reason with as a rabid pit bull. She sprayed my in the eyes with Lysol (quite effective imho) and proceeded to beat my ass with a bat. (not fun.) Then she ran out the door, down the block calling me a cheater, liar, etc. (You shoulda seen this girl, i'd have to be fscking retarded to cheat on her, except for her obvious insanity.)


      The cops come, the neighbors had called them on a domestic disturbance complaint. When the cops showed up, they just bashed my front door in. No knock, no warrant, nothing. There I was in my boxers wiping blood off of my head and they immediately cuffed me and threw me face first on the ground. Then they screamed at me to tell them where I had put her body. (I am not making this up.) They made me strip down to my skivs, and took pictures of the whole thing. Found some herbs of mine, took em without saying a word. (No complaint here.) My girl came back then too, they cuffed her and booked her. Threw me in the back of the car and let me spend the night in jail in my boxer shorts with a bunch of huge guys that were a lot like jail scenes in the movies. (Thank god I was covered in blood, its the only thing that saved my anal virginity I am sure.)


      When I got back the next day, because my door had been wide open (as it was kicked in), someone had taken just about everything I had. All I had left was my matress, a can of beans, and the box to the movie "Half Baked". Oh, and thay rectangular gray cord thingy to hook the super nintendo to the tv.


      The police would not take a police report because *I* left my door wide open.


      F*CK THE POLICE.

    51. Re:F*ck the police by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      I did you moron.... Maybe someday you can put the grown up pants on and learn some fucking respect.

      --
      oogly boogly!
    52. Re:F*ck the police by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      What is that checkpoint for anyway? Immigration?

      Yep, it's the border patrol. Don't ask me what they're doing so far from the border.

      I was coming back to LA from San Diego one night around 2:00 - 3:00am after going to a club and we were stopped there. They asked to search the car for no apparent reason and my idiot friend gave them permission (it was her car and she was driving). 45 minutes we ended up standing at the side of the road in the freezing cold while those bastards tore the car apart, dumped out bags of clothes in the trunk, etc. Then they let us leave. No apologies, nothing. Fucking assholes.

      For the record, all three of us were obviously not border jumpers. I guess they were just bored.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  24. Read the Cuckoo's Egg. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The book Cuckoo's Egg by Cliff Stoll deals with this issue specifically... Someone kept hacking the author's computers at Lawrence Berkeley National Labs (coincidentally, that makes twice in two days that I've mentioned a National Lab on slashdot), and he has to convince the authorities that it is truly worthy of investigation... The FBI points him to the CIA, the CIA points him to the FBI, so a lot of the story deals with the social engineering required to get the authorities to actually listen. It's really a great read, and you can find used copies on Amazon for a penny.

    1. Re:Read the Cuckoo's Egg. by ThrasherTT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We had to read/discuss/report on this book as part of a senior-level Computer Ethics class at VA Tech. An excellent story, but perhaps a bit out-of-date nowadays.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
  25. What can you do? by EZmagz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are all these laws and all this hype about enforcing these computer crime laws - what must an end user do to get some enforcement done?

    Honestly, unless you're a big corporation (or at least a company with some legal weight), there isn't much you can do. Sounds like you persued some of the right avenues to go through, but from what I've seen, read, and heard, individual civilian complaints don't bring a lot of action. If you were the FBI and had very limited staff resources, and you were presented with the task of either:

    helping a sole individual who had his box cracked, or

    a company like eBay, who hypothetically just had their credit card db broken into and copied,

    which would you go for?

    Maybe I just have a pessimestic attitude towards our beautiful US government. It seems that the average joe doesn't have a lot of recourse againt stuff like this though. Hopefully our fellow /.'ers will provide stores proving me wrong. That might instill a bit of faith in my weary bones.

    --

    "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for SEGA. ..."

    1. Re:What can you do? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Or you can tell them that while you were trying to trace it back, you accidently found their stash of KIDDIE PORN.

      That'll get them going (probably in more ways than one, unfortunately)

    2. Re:What can you do? by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      ... except it seems to be a case that it wasn't just a "sole individual who had his box cracked", but rather the ISP itself, such that the black-hat systems that the bogus DNS pointed to could potentially collect username/password/credit card info for every customer going to more than just one "company like E-bay". The difference to me sounds quite less than in your version (FBI resources notwithstanding).

    3. Re:What can you do? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "if you were presented with the task of either:
      # helping a sole individual who had his box cracked, or
      # a company like eBay, who hypothetically just had their credit card db broken into and copied,
      which would you go for?


      The one who doesn't already have the support of a 20-strong security team?

    4. Re:What can you do? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And this guy isn't able to open an FBI complaint on the behalf of his ISP. So, ipso facto, he was opening an FBI complaint on his own behalf, and the FBI couldn't be bothered to deal with it.

      IF the ISP opens the same complaint, the FBI might do something about it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:What can you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell kinda logic is this?

      "I'm sorry sir, I know you saw a murder, but we need the dead person to make the complaint before we can do anything."

  26. The Point of all those Tech Laws by huckamania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are there to protect businesses and the government itself.

    This is a disturbing trend in the United States of Lawyers and short of a revolution there is not much that can be done to reverse it. Just look at the article from yesterday where Oral Hatch wants to exclude copyright owners from anti-hacking laws so they can destroy a personal computer. It's sad and scary.

    What the USL needs is a new Bill of Rights that protects people from corporations.

    1. Re:The Point of all those Tech Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. ... corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."

      -- Abraham Lincoln

    2. Re:The Point of all those Tech Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That COULD be the second amendment.... if only more people would recognize what a problem this is...

    3. Re:The Point of all those Tech Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a corporate state, everything has a price, including justice, human dignity, and human life.

      You just have to have enough money. Period.

  27. The Irony.... by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... what is funny here is how the Fed spends soooo much energy collecting powers over the internet that it has no idea how to use.

    I think sometimes that the internet might be too big for them in it's present form. Better to break it and build something new! Something where Disney can get a signoff.

    1. Re:The Irony.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      .... what is funny here is how the Fed spends soooo much energy collecting powers over the internet that it has no idea how to use.


      I had no idea that Alan Greenspan and the rest of the US central bank were collecting internet powers...

    2. Re:The Irony.... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      The next time you see them going for even more pervasive laws to snoop, investigate and charge people, pass your story (with all technical details) to someone who is lobbying against it. It'll help slow things down once people realize that the police can't do anything about the crimes that are already on the books now.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  28. These laws are not made for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    These laws were enforced by lobbists with THEIR and not YOUR money. So you have no right to take advantage of these laws :)

    1. Re:These laws are not made for you! by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, I'm getting tired of these guys. They always use the same argument, "It's not stealing! When I benefit from a law, the corporation that bought it, still gets to benefit from the same law! Laws aren't divisible and you can't 'use them up!'" the idiots say.

      How stupid. These longhairs don't realize that when you use an existing law instead of purchasing a new one, you depress the legislation market. Longhairs, think about it: When you recycle legislation, your senator's next election campaign isn't getting funded. Your city councilor isn't getting his beer money. Do you expect these people to work for free? It's ludicrous. Try to imagine your communist unAmerican utopia, where founders get the laws correct one time, and then everyone lives by the same old laws. The legislators' campaign bank accounts would all be a joke, and any regular Joe off the street, would be able to afford to run against them in the TV ads.

      Foreigners might even get in on it! Do want an America run by foreigners!? Do you want your senator's re-election campaign run from an office in New Delhi, by people who have never tasted apple pie or seen a baseball game? Our legislators need protection, and it should be supplied by the government itself. We should have the government hire lobbyists to lobby itself, in order to keep the jobs safe.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  29. Sorry... by dauvis · · Score: 1

    (at the risk of sounding cynical) but those laws aren't meant to help Joe Average. They are meant to protect MegaCorp from Joe Average. It's amazing how someone can go to prision for snooping in a company's files. But on the other hand, if it was some cracker redirecting an ISP traffic to steal passwords, it isn't worth investigating.

  30. RISKS by kzinti · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't help you with getting the attention of law enforcement or the service provider, but when all is said and done, I bet Peter Neuman at the ACM RISKS Digest would love to publish your story. The RISKS readers would be interested in the original hijacking, and just as interested in the lackadaisical response by those who could do something about it. The risks posed by both problems are the forum's reason for being.

  31. I forwarded your questions by squarefish · · Score: 1

    to a concerned senator

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  32. LOP.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    look it up, it matches the IPs. they're spyware. looks like they're doing some serious assholish stuff

    1. Re:lop.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows you how much a numpty this guy is if he can't even investigate far enough to know it's spyware.

      ITS YOUR OWN FAULT BUDDY STOP BE A PRENTINOUS PUSSY. YOU PROBABLY AGREED TO INSTALL THE SPYWARE.
      Oh and everyone bitching about law enforcement not doing shit well in this case there is no likely no crime so of course they don't even need to care. It's your own goddamn fault.

    2. Re: lop.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah good.

      Finally someone actually checking out the facts.

      Maybe the reason nobody (FBI, ISP) is interested in taking a call because they get a lot of calls like this. "Terrorists have taken over my computer! Windows full of gay sex keep popping up and won't stop!"

    3. Re:lop.com by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Informative

      Definately. I don't think this was a man-in-the-middle maneuver (tho I admit I may be very wrong). LOP.com crap has turned up at my workplace repeatedly, usually 1 or 2 calls a week about "pop-up-porn", and they all get traced back to LOP. Their adware now has some tactic to hijack DNS settings I would imagine. Lovely. Can't someone send them an .mp3 so we can get Hatch to nuke them?

    4. Re: lop.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the reason nobody (FBI, ISP) is interested in taking a call because they get a lot of calls like this. "Terrorists have taken over my computer! Windows full of gay sex keep popping up and won't stop!"

      And they respond, "Stay calm President Bush, we'll have you up and running Solitaire again in no time."

    5. Re:lop.com by rayvd · · Score: 1

      Exactly... looks as if this wasn't really a hack job after all, simply some spyware on the guy's machine. Just imagine if the FBI or whoever had to investigate each and every one of the supposed-hack attempts that people call in?

      Not trolling... but there are two sides to everything..

    6. Re:lop.com by deanj · · Score: 1

      Someone investigated further, and found this:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=68266&cid=62 55 818

      So, who knows what's going on now...

      Good advice about adaware. I have a PC here that didn't have it installed, so I just did. It identified 14 registry keys, 2 registry values, 44 files and 4 folders. Doh!

    7. Re:lop.com by Xoro · · Score: 1

      That's precisely it.

      whois 66.220.17.45 shows it's owned by C2 Media, the minds behind lop, as your reference points out.

      I hope those NIPC guys are enjoying a good laugh, but it would have been nice of them to tell poor, earnest HeelToe what's going on. It seemed pretty clever of the guy to figure out that his dns had been redirected, why didn't he just look up the registration? Of course that same option didn't stop 50 posts of "Government Bad", but it wasn't their machine, either.

      Well, at least now the FBI knows HeelToe has installed pr0nsearch.exe. I feel safer already.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    8. Re:lop.com by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Exactly... looks as if this wasn't really a hack job after all, simply some spyware on the guy's machine. Just imagine if the FBI or whoever had to investigate each and every one of the supposed-hack attempts that people call in?

      Not trolling... but there are two sides to everything..

      Before writing this off and having a laugh, I'd be sure it wasn't the admin in charge of the ISP's nameserver that had run the spyware!

      I know that sounds funny to you, but there are a lot of ISPs using NT, and you should never underestimate the damage potential of a Point-and-Click sysadmin. Hell, ours used to play Quake on the fileserver.

    9. Re:lop.com by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If Charter is such a sucky/stupid ISP, could someone have downloaded lop's spyware on the DNS server?

    10. Re:lop.com by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      That poster is dead on that these guys are no good, their stuff comes in without any warning and is a real pain in the arse to get rid of, this stuff is more like virusware than ad-ware.

    11. Re:LOP.COM by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      they even offer an uninstaller on their site...the most places I have seen lop come from is bogus cracks

      there are lots of crack sites out there filled with them (possibly lop fronts that have a crack for ANYTHING but its always just a lop installer)...you can check the exe in properties, it will say something about lop.com and I know they have the uninstaller on there website and its not even that hard to find...ive had to uninstall it from many school computers.

      its not directly an IE problem as it also affects mozilla, is installed with a downloaded exe, and affects your dns settings, not browser only

      --
      Bottles.
    12. Re:LOP.COM by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Good call. I hate lop.com and assorted copycats. Like I'm really going to use their site for anything when I suddenly find myself misdirected there?

    13. Re:lop.com by HeelToe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I did think to run Spycop after this happened. It turned up nothing but a few cookies.

      I explained in another post elsewhere that I did in fact use a unix-alike box to query the dhcp server and got back that connection dns suffix from the dhcp server.

    14. Re:lop.com by Igneous · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it isn't just run-of-the-mill spyware. Did you note this comment from the original author?

      "Actually, it was not spyware.

      I queried the dhcp server from a unix-alike box and got the same response back from it for the connection's dns domain as I did under windows. The DHCP server was handing it out for sure."

      And with respect to the parent post, AdAware is only for Windows.

  33. Don't call the feds by Kagato · · Score: 1

    The problem with the FBI is they are all about making a name for themselves. They have no desire to get involved if there isn't a major loss. Even when they do, often they will go about it all half cocked.

    1. Re:Don't call the feds by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      If its not gonna make headlines then they are busy looking for Terrorists. Its pretty pathetic that the Media needs to really be involved to get Law Enforcement done.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  34. Very interesting.... by arf_barf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this an encouragement to hacking? I guess the moral of the story is that as long as the loot is below 10K, itâ(TM)s fairly safe for the hackers :-)

  35. Tell Slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We the people of slashdot clearly have the power to change these things. That's why you see fewer and fewer complaints about various issues as time goes on.

    Seriously though, cool! It's always nice to read somebody's intelligent well written account of their intelligent and clever use of a computer to do anything cool.

  36. Tell them you're with by CodeHog · · Score: 2, Funny

    the RIAA. Then maybe you'll get action.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  37. Douglas Adams gave a good answer for this... by Nemus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Apprently this problem is protected by a SEP shield(Somebody Else's Problem). Simply put, it doesn;t affect these people directly, so they could give a wingnut less.

    As much pomp and posturing as some of these organizations do, in my experience, the FBI guy you talked to was right: unless its a big company that has the cash to sue the government for not enforcing the laws, or at least raise a stink about it, these organizations will do nothing.

    The reason for this, as I see it, is that most of the legal side of this stuff is handled at a federal level. So if only say, 100 people or so are affected, they're simply not going to waste their time on it. The only solution I could see to this problem is that, once the general populace becomes better educated to whats out there and what all this "fancy internet stuff" means, there is the possibility that smaller, more municipal "cyber crime" organizations may spring up, to deal with complaints coming from people in their municipality. Until then, its a jungle out there, and its every man for himself.

    --
    Mod Points: Helping you keep your opinion to yourself.
    1. Re:Douglas Adams gave a good answer for this... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      And C-3PO gave a good solution.

      R2D2! You know better than to trust a strange computer!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Douglas Adams gave a good answer for this... by platypus · · Score: 1

      If you are really sure it's important, you could tell them you sniffed arabic usernames on the hacked servers.

    3. Re:Douglas Adams gave a good answer for this... by taverngeek · · Score: 1

      It has been my experience that the FBI wants to do as little investigative work on computer crimes as possible. It is largely upto the ISP or whoever to present to law enforcement strong evidence of the crime and strong info on the identity of the wrongdoer before law enforcement will consider further investigation.

      So no one "sue the government for not enforcing the laws" or even "raises a stink about it". If they are sufficiently upset then they spend the time doing the legwork so that the FBI agent only has to supervise the company's investigation. Heck, I was on an investigation where we collected all the info and then we had to tell the FBI what "privacy protected" records of ours to subpeona to complete his case.

      Vandalism and other mundane crimes involving property, the victim wants a police report in order to file an insurance claim. Thus, the police have a job to do on trivial crimes even if they don't plan on doing any further investigation.

  38. This is standard by alienw · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a very standard type of attack and a standard FBI response. FBI damage trigger is $5,000 IIRC. If the ISP calls the FBI, they can get the ball rolling. You can't, and frankly it's none of your business since it's the ISP server that got hacked. I wouldn't do anything beyond calling the ISP. You can't claim financial losses, because you didn't lose any money directly as a result of this hack.

    1. Re:This is standard by Spad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd argue that is damn well is my business if my ISP's servers are being compromised by a 3rd party, which could result in the interception of any information I transmit online.

      I assume it would be none of your business if you found out that someone was embezzling money from your bank too.

    2. Re:This is standard by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

      "because you didn't lose any money directly as a result of this hack"

      That is yet to be determined. And he did lose time, and his feeling of security.

      --
      Why slashdot? Why not?
    3. Re:This is standard by alienw · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that is damn well is my business if my ISP's servers are being compromised by a 3rd party, which could result in the interception of any information I transmit online.

      Sure, but it's the ISP's problem rather than yours. You might want to tell the ISP and avoid using the service (or change ISPs if they are not cooperative), but trying to get the FBI involved when you don't even control the server in question is ludicrous. If the FBI responded to every hacking complaint out there, they wouldn't be able to do anything else. I've heard of people who called the FBI after Zonealarm warned them of some random "intrusion attempt" (most likely a ping or a portscan, no hacking involved). The FBI does not want to waste time with people who don't have a clue (like the article author).

      I assume it would be none of your business if you found out that someone was embezzling money from your bank too.

      Precisely. Unless I'm somehow involved with the bank and know what is going on, I'm not going to call the FBI.

    4. Re:This is standard by ionpro · · Score: 1
      You can't, and frankly it's none of your business since it's the ISP server that got hacked.

      The hell it isn't! We're not talking about a lost service here -- we're talking about lost confidential data. What if he were to access his online banking account or credit card account while his ISP was sitting on its ass and the feds weren't working? He could lose his entire net worth in a matter of minutes. And you would tell him it's none of his business? Definitely cause for a lawsuit, but none of his business definitely is the wrong answer.
    5. Re:This is standard by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      You may be affected by the hacking of your computer but you don't have what the legal world calls 'standing' (the right to 'stand' in front of a judge and complain) on the issue of other people's losses -- including the ISP.

      Sometimes a company will refuse to press charges (not wanting the adverse publicity) in that case, the FBI's hands are pretty much tied. There's no need to investigate what's not going to court.

      BTW: if the issue is already in the public eye, then the company is going to be a bit more interested in pressing charges (methinks).

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    6. Re:This is standard by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      Send a certified mail letter to your ISP detailing the attack. If your info is compromised and you lose money, you can sue the ISP.

      You do not have standing to fix the ISP's problem, but you do have standing to expect the ISP to fix its own problems once they start to impact you.

      --
      Milo
    7. Re:This is standard by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh bullshit, being witness to a crime in process has legal ramifications. Granted, no one will know that you saw and didn't report it, but saying it "it's none of your business", especially when it's his traffic being hijacked, is just incorrect.

    8. Re:This is standard by alienw · · Score: 1

      I don't think you could sue the ISP. Most contracts have clauses that specifically exclude this type of liability.

  39. This Is The Way It Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a client that has been hit 4 times by someone using stolen credit cards to order. 3 were near each other and, of course, weren't discovered till months later when the brainless credit card holder suddenly realized their card was stolen. We shipped the products in each case, since the card was valid, passed AVS (which is a joke) and went through. Now, the same individual is ordering from us again with a stolen credit card. They are expecting delivery. They could be arrested on site. If anyone gave a damn. The LAPD only have one person that handles this type of crime and aren't permitted to go nab anyone (what use is that)? The FBI takes a submission online, but noone knows if it gets looked at. Blah blah...

    The bottom line is that you can pretty much make a living off stolen credit cards and fraud. As long as you keep each order below US$400, noone will bother you. You'll just end up screwing lots of online businesses.

  40. I think he didn't use enough sarcasm with support by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

    "I asked the tech support rep if they really wanted me submitting the incident report through a hijacked proxying web server."

    I'm sorry sir, you'll have to submit that report by email before we can do anything for you.

    But I can't send you the email, because I don't even have access to my mailbox!

    I'm sorry, thank you for calling, have a nice day. *click*

    That is totally bogus that the FBI wouldn't handle this. The NIPC is totally worthless.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  41. Something similar happened to me once by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1, Funny
    As you are probably already aware, I run one of the biggest nuclear (research) installations in the US. This means that I have to be constantly on the lookout for security issues. Well, like you, one night I noticed a hack in progress. Some guy was trying to gain access to our plutonium containment facility computer. I was on the phone to the FBI ASAP, as you can imagine. They gave me some similar runaround, so I decided to do a little investigation myself. I ran some pings, traceroutes and a couple of items I have in my toolkit (proprietary, so please don't ask) and figured out where it was coming from.

    cia.gov!!

    You can bet I shut my PC down and walked right out of there and never mentioned this little incident again until now. BTW, this was in early-to-mid September, 2001.

    1. Re:Something similar happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      DO NOT MOD PARENT UP.

      This is what we call "bullshit". PhysicsGenius is a massive troll. See this JE of his for proof.

    2. Re:Something similar happened to me once by Effugas · · Score: 1

      I call BS. Or demand further details.

      Did you at least see bidirectional traffic from the IP that resolved to cia.gov? If not, it might have been spoofed decoys.

      Did you store the IP? They may have controlled the IP range, and simply returned a relatively cruel address space.

      The CIA was funding Safeweb some time ago, so you _couldn't_ detect it was the CIA poking around. Of course, if they were coming in through an internal connection, that might be different.

      Overall, though, I call shenanigans. Down to your claim of posessing magic secret tools, and the oh-too-obvious date, ummm, yahright.

      --Dan

    3. Re:Something similar happened to me once by caluml · · Score: 1
      As you are probably already aware,

      That's quite a large ego you've got there - what are you feeding it? :)

    4. Re:Something similar happened to me once by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why..would your...plutonium containment computer...be hooked up...to a network..let alone..a public network..such as..the...Internet...?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:Something similar happened to me once by netmarcos1 · · Score: 1

      My sister was once bitten by a moose...

    6. Re:Something similar happened to me once by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Mother of Jesus... he is obviously joking. Get a sense of humor.

    7. Re:Something similar happened to me once by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      I call BS. Or demand further details.

      I call +1 Funny and demand moderation points!

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    8. Re:Something similar happened to me once by idontgno · · Score: 1
      I call +1 Funny and demand moderation points!

      I cry -1 Troll and a further -1 "You fail it, Troll!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  42. Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are these laws just tools to oppress unpopular computer criminals

    Yes.

  43. Attack by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

    Are these laws just tools to oppress unpopular computer criminals but just plain not enforced most of the time?

    My Guess based on the national focus on Terrorism is yes: unless something really sticks out, we are considered small fry. The FBI simply considers it not to be worth their while.

    I'd reccommend finding someone with a lot of clout to back you up with getting an investigation. I know time is/was most likely of the essence here with getting quicker investigations and results, but you could write a letter to the company's VP or such, explaining how this attack affects their image as a whle, future liability, etc.

    My two cents :/

    --
    uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
  44. FBI magic number by octalgirl · · Score: 1

    FBI magic number is $5,000.00. If you can't claim at least that much in damages, they won't bother. Over 5K becomes a federal crime.

    1. Re:FBI magic number by mabu · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. I had an associate claim over $100,000 in damages, with detailed logs and everything. They opened a case file, but couldn't get the D.A. to prosecute. Most of the Feds know very little about computer crime and the District Attorneys know even less, and don't seem interested in prosecuting these types of hackers... I guess they'd rather go after someone who digs a computer manual out of a dumpster or something.

  45. Call them Terrorists by Alan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say this only partially in jest, but maybe try contacting the dept of homeland defense, or GWB himself or something. Call it terrorism, they'll be shut down faster than you can say "foo".

    Seriously though, with the increase in the gov't involvment and crackdown on cyber terrorism (or they say there is) isn't this a prime candidate?

    That said, it's scary that the ISP doesn't seem to give a fark about this. If I was in charge of their security I'd be fixing this as quickly as possible, not letting my company's customers continue to use a compromised service. Wouldn't it be considered negligence to allow your customers to continue using a server you know to be compromised (ie: not changing the DHCP server back, or simply shutting down all access)? Personally I'd much rather loose my net access for a bit while this is cleaned up than my ISP knowingly let me proxy through sniffers and password grabbers.....

    1. Re:Call them Terrorists by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Hell, my ISP probably has no idea what passwords are, let alone SSH.

    2. Re:Call them Terrorists by Alan · · Score: 1

      I use them too. Luckily I've only had to call them for tech support once, and the issue was a system outage caused by a traffic accident or something. Telus was really bad though, I felt physical fear when I had to tell them I use *gasp* linux. I went so far as to plug in my windows box into the dsl modem to "prove" to them their dhcp server was down. *sigh* fucktards. Though they are paid shit and treated like shit, and I know how much it sucks to do support, so I do feel a little for them.

    3. Re:Call them Terrorists by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      We all know that calling everything terrorism is stupid and a horrible thing for civil liberties.

      So, if you go to the Dept. of Homeland Security, you are only telling them that you really believe that this is "terrorism". Don't do it.

      --
      -twb
    4. Re:Call them Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is giving tacit support to the scaremongering.

      Next time you see a post on Slashdot about someone getting 20 years for hacking, do you really want to sit back and think you had a part in it? OTOH mabye they deserve it for such a hack but I still wouldn't want to call it terrorism. You may not think it's much right now but every little bit helps the agenda of those "fighting terrorism"

  46. http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp by Hollinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Go to http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp and file a complaint. They'll follow up.

  47. Feds don't help by mabu · · Score: 1

    An associate of mine had his server broken into. He clearly documented exactly what was done and prepared a detailed report with everything cross-referenced to the FBI. The activity was clearly malicious and illegal. The FBI opened a file and sent agents to meet with him. Even though the perpetrator of the crime had been identified (down to his cell phone number, place of employment and everything), the FBI presented the case to the D.A. for prosecution and the D.A. refused to take the case. Money was a major factor. Because my associate was quick to discover the compromise, and therefore reduce the damages to his system and his clients, the monetary damage was minimal. Nonetheless, the authorities refused to take criminal action against the perpetrator even though the whole case was laid out in front of them. His experience indicated that law enforcement was more about money than law.

    1. Re:Feds don't help by dbs6183 · · Score: 1

      This is the reality of our criminal justice system, but your friend need not dispair - we have a civil justice system as well. Given the amount of data he's collected, and assuming that he collected and stored it in a proper manner, he should have no problem bringing this hacker to court on civil charges.

      -D

    2. Re:Feds don't help by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      Once again, a highly indignant reporter will sometimes results in warmed butts in action.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:Feds don't help by mabu · · Score: 1


      This is the reality of our criminal justice system, but your friend need not dispair - we have a civil justice system as well. Given the amount of data he's collected, and assuming that he collected and stored it in a proper manner, he should have no problem bringing this hacker to court on civil charges.


      This is the bullshit evolution of our system of "justice". In all likelihood this spamming loser doesn't have anything worth suing for in civil court, and if he did, he'd just do a Chapter 13 and weasel out.

      There really isn't much justice available in civil court for the common man.

  48. Are you sure they were hacked by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    I can see an ISP "Infrastructure upgrade" doing something like this.

    They want everyone to go through their proxy servers, they just hand them out as IP address. I am assuming however that these addresses were not on the local ISP control (you did a traceroute to them and found that they were located in china or something). Of course if that happened, the throughput on their machines would go to hell as everyone starts bouncing packets through the world to get to their destination.

    The intersting thing, if the company DID do this as an infrastructure upgrade, I don't see them advertising it to their custommers either, ass 99.999 percent of them would have no idea what they were talking about.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Are you sure they were hacked by JVert · · Score: 1

      I dont think its common practice to proxy ssh connections.

    2. Re:Are you sure they were hacked by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
      I have to do it here at work, of course here it is called a SOCKS proxy...

      Now it would be much easier to get little grandma or skript kiddie to just use a different destination than to actually get them configured to use SOCKS correctly

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    3. Re:Are you sure they were hacked by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      Most companies doing this on a legitimate basis would use transparent proxies not DNS shenanigans.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:Are you sure they were hacked by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      The website that he mentions as being the DNS suffix used is actually a porn website. I doubted whether this was a real attack or not at first, but assuming he's telling the truth, it may very well be.

  49. calling the FBI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed that the poster said that they called the FBI... Does someone have that number handy? On the FBI's site, all I can find is a web form to post "tips" to. Thanks!

    1. Re:calling the FBI... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Look in the phone book under "government services"... it's generally on pages with a blue border or sidebar.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:calling the FBI... by Abm0raz · · Score: 1

      I noticed that the poster said that they called the FBI... Does someone have that number handy? On the FBI's site, all I can find is a web form to post "tips" to. Thanks!/i

      1(215)418-4000

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
  50. What must an end user do to get enforcement done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be the cracker?

  51. I think it's safe to assume by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0, Redundant

    .. that it was the Feds spying on you, usually they manage not to get rumbled. Now though, you will have infiltrate their system to see what they've got on you.

  52. Goes to show ya.. by jontas · · Score: 1

    I learned a valuable lesson here. The next time I'm going to steal from someone, I'll just make sure I take less than $5,000

    I ran into similar barries when [it's a long story] I was scammed out of $1200 on the internet.

    After much talk with the FBI, local police, and FCC I learned that stealing from people is perfectly OK as long as you don't take too much..

    1. Re:Goes to show ya.. by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you have to watch out for Nigerians on here.

  53. When nobody can help... by koh · · Score: 1

    Help yourself.

    It's no wonder that the FBI won't spend time on this. People DNS-poisoned like the submitter must abound these days, and if the federal agency investigated all such cases, its activity would grind to a halt, which Administration doesn't want, unless I'm mistaken.

    Install your own DNS server. Under a good linux distro it takes no time if you know how to do it, two hours if you have to RTFM and understand it beforehand.

    Under Windows I heard it's nastier though, with requirements for Active Directory (uh ?) and admin access to the PDC.

    If you can spare a outdated box at work, consider installing a DNS on it and use it from your own box.

    Such attacks will be more difficult to perform on you then.

    --
    Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    1. Re:When nobody can help... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Under Windows I heard it's nastier though, with requirements for Active Directory (uh ?) and admin access to the PDC.
      FUD. You heard wrong. You can install standalone DNS on NT. AD needs to be integrated with DNS, but DNS doesn't need AD, except to store AD zones.

  54. When I ran a small ISP by astrashe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I ran a small ISP, our experience was the same. The law enforcement people didn't do anything for us.

    It was strange, because the FBI had actually sent a couple of agents to our office to introduce themselves, pass out business cards, and the like. But when we had trouble, we called them up and those guys basically said, "there's not much we can do."

    When the agents introduced themselves, they gave us a questionaire to fill out, and there was a question about encryption -- had we noticed anyone using it?

    The questionaire (which I didn't complete), and the lack of response when we actually needed help, sort of soured me on the beaureau. The agents were nice guys, and I had the feeling that they were sincere when they were talking to us, but the organization itself didn't seem to be too helpful.

    I don't really have a problem with them paying more attention to hacks on major e-commerce sites or banks than on my little ISP (which has long since been sold). The reality is that there's so much cracking going on, and it's so hard to track it down, that chasing small incidents isn't really practical. If a big ecommerce site gets cracked, a lot of people get hurt, the situation is really different.

    The lesson that I learned is that you're basically alone when you get attacked. No one cares, and no one will help. Your ISP won't do anything, law enforcement won't do anything, and your customers will be incredibly angry with you. The only way to deal with it is to do whatever you can to secure yourself up front.

  55. Best /. story in ages... by pVoid · · Score: 1

    HeelToe you rock.

    1. Re:Best /. story in ages... by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Thanks...

      I got some flack for running windows. So what. I was also told it was spyware, which I'm certain it was not.

      Some people seemed to misunderstand that I was attacked because my communications were in fact monitored without my or the other party's permission. Oh well... glad I pay attention to key mismatches!

    2. Re:Best /. story in ages... by Artifex · · Score: 1
      I was also told it was spyware, which I'm certain it was not.


      Have you run Ad-aware or any other spyware detector on your MS-Windows box(es), yet?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:Best /. story in ages... by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Yes, I ran Spycop the next morning with no results.

      I'll go looking for adaware and see if it says anything different.

    4. Re:Best /. story in ages... by Artifex · · Score: 1

      You can find the standard (free) edition here.

      Of course, you'll want to search and make sure I didn't send you to a trojaned fake site first, but that's the right place.

      It would be hilarious to find that it wasn't your machine that was infected, but that your provider was running its DNS services on MS-Windows boxes, and some fool with admin privileges on one installed the spyware by mistake.

      In the meantime, do you still see bad DNS redirects with your provider, or did they magically clear up soon after you Asked Slashdot?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:Best /. story in ages... by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      I googled it a bit ago and have updated it and scanned twice. Same story there, lots of cookies, no software.

      The DHCP server stopped returning that domain name about an hour after I called the support line.

    6. Re:Best /. story in ages... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Ah forget the flack.

      As Larry Wall had put it, there are a lot of cheerleaders on /.

      You proved that you can have a winbox be just as secure as any other so long as you properly use it and know how your software works.

      Cheers.

  56. Re:NIPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article. It's right there in the 1st and 6th paragraphs...

    In the first:
    "After figuring out what was going on, I contacted the tech support line for my service provider (Charter Communications) to no avail, as well as the FBI and NIPC, again, both to no avail. "

    In the sixth:
    "I did a little searching and found the National Infrastructure Protection Center. I gave them a ring and was asked to fill out an incident report. "

  57. Get yourself an attorney by FooBarney · · Score: 1

    If you want to put pressure on the government, what you need is a good attorney. The FBI and local law enforcement might be liable civilly for failing to respond to your complaint. You probably wouldn't win, but the spur of such a lawsuit would probably be enough to get a little action on your part.

    If you really care about it, I'd talk to a civil litigator or IP attorney with experience in dealing with federal law enforcement. It won't be cheap, of course (good lawyers never are), but the Powers That Be will be a lot more helpful to someone with a J.D. behind his name.

    Short of that, I think you're better off protecting your network and moving on. Good luck!

  58. ping away boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just set my office comps (all 27 of them) to ping the IPs non-stop until i turn them off... which will be monday morning.. every one, join in. /. effect to the max

    1. Re:ping away boys by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      so you want to launch an attack? funny but that seems like a stupid idea... These guys are watching there servers obviously and they are bright enough to set up the dns as they did id say dont F with them bud...

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
  59. Non enforcement by mjmalone · · Score: 1

    From my days on IRC (sorry) I can tell you that the vast majority of internet crime is not investigated or persued. Most companies just don't give a damn, and the FBI is not likely to take a case unless it is high profile (go politics). I have known people who have been caught hacking DoD and Nasa computers only to recieve a phone call form IT personnel politely requesting them to stop doing so. Your best choice is to do just what you did, inform your ISP (who will most likely try to keep it on the DL so as not to alarm costomers) and attempt to inform law enforcement if you really care/have the time. Best of luck.

  60. Excellent way to get this investigated by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 1

    Post it on Slashdot! ...err

    But really, this seems to be a large-scale scam, not a single-user hack, and since they seem to be gleaning identity information, one would think the FBI would be interested, at least a little.

    1. Re:Excellent way to get this investigated by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 1

      In addition, just say 'it could be a terrorist honeypot, drawing credit card numbers and information for them to fund attacks on americans with' and they'll be all over it ;-)

  61. FBI miss informed you by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    FBI fibbed again..

    You are repat allowed to to charge for time cleaning up an infected system as a loss counted under federal computer hakcign laws..

    Read the Mitnick Trial transcript fro proof..

    FBI inept as usual..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:FBI miss informed you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this "FBI miss?" Does she have a sister? And what is it that she informed the poster of?

  62. Step by step instructions.... by DailyGrind · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Go to something call the "fridge"
    Step 2: Open door
    Step 3: Take out something called a "beer"
    Step 4: Open can / cap
    Step 5: Drink it
    Step 6: Pat yourself on the back for posting, by far, the nerdiest post this year AND getting it past the editors.
    Step 7: Repeat Step 1: through Step 5:
    Step 8: Pat yourself on the back for killing your ISP's business.
    Step 9: Repeat Step 1: through Step 5:
    Step 10: Goto Step 9:

    Job well done! And I actually mean that!

    --
    You will have to pry my proprietary software $$$ from my cold dead hands!
  63. VISA would have been my next call. by garyrich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    *They* will certainly care about a hijacked proxy achiving account numbers and sniffing passwords. Now, when they call your ISP - I bet they would take immediate notice.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  64. don't pay any attention to this reply by tankdilla · · Score: 1

    as a person that knows how to use a computer, i find this appalling. as a person that knows a little about this kind of stuff, i find this information unsuprising and a little reaffirming. I mean really, looking for cyber-law enforcement is like lookin for the drunken sheriff. It's just not really there all the time. Law enforcement is needed when Jon. E. ComputerUser has been compromised, but it's seldom there. When Jean Pierre Corporate needs help, it's 'calling all cars, there's a hacker on the loose!' The best advice is to at least be informed of what can happen and try to take countermeasures (on your behalf, not necessarily strike back...unless u can =^D ). The Internet is really the 'Wild Wild West.' Better strap up and protect.

    --

    -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

  65. Not a hack of my PC, but... by druxton · · Score: 1

    I had an interesting spam last night - it came from Best Buy Customer Service, and warned that my credit card number may have been leaked. It asked me to go to their web-site to check. Well, surprise, the web-site wasn't from Best Buy, although it represented itself as such and most of the links on the home page did point to Best Buy pages. Another surprise was that the check for fraud page asked me to enter my credit card number and other ID so they could check to see if my account had been hacked and my card number stolen.

    That's the first one of these I've seen, and I'm sure it will catch some people (although they won't catch many in my area - no Best Buy within 500 miles). I also didn't have much success reporting it.

    Full marks for creativity, but pretty high on the scumbag scale.

    1. Re:Not a hack of my PC, but... by Eristone · · Score: 1

      Heck - I've seen two now to my Earthlink account saying there's been "problems" with my credit card billing and to please enter updated information and submit via their "secure" server. I should put up the forms they used - some folks would fall for it.

  66. Welcome to the real world of police enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the real world of crime. My grandfather had an outboard motor stolen worth a couple grand - the cops showed up, took a look, wrote up a report.

    Thats it. End of story.

    Same thing for my future parents in law - they had a break in at their cabin. The police showed up, 8 hours after the call went in, took a look around, wrote a report, and thats it.

    If its not a murder, Martha Stewart, or Pete Townsend they don't care too much.

  67. I know by soybean · · Score: 1

    Just call up Senator Orrin Hatch and ask him to stop hacking your shit.

  68. Re:NIPC by soundbyt · · Score: 1

    RTFA. The writer DID contact NIPC

  69. Counter-hack, and post links to screenshots on /. by sulli · · Score: 1

    It worked for fyodor!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  70. trully amazing or why maybe we´re doomed already by DataShark · · Score: 0, Troll

    this history comes from the country that was hit by the 9/11 events, comes from the country that loves so much copyrigth holders that some senators even think in *destroying* end-users PCs as a legitimate way of figthing copyrigths.

    This history comes from the country taht even has now a Departement of Homeland Security whose job seems to collect as much data as possible about is own citizens to protect them from *terrorism*.

    but, hey - the described events are *pure* terrorism from one side are pure negligency and irresponsabilty from another ...

    If there is still some sense of rigth or wrong in the US one thing must happen quickly ...

    get all those irresponssible people (both in the public and private sector) who simply didn Ât care fired imediately ...

    if nothing happens, well maybe this was a beta testing of some carnivore type technology that went wrong ...

    don Ât get me wrong on this : I trully love the US as a nation, but some people there should really get back to basic school just to learn a few things : the difference between black and white, the difference between rigth and wrong and above all get some common sense!

    This kind of events were supposed to be only possible on Brecht tales or Orwellian stories not in a real nation, not in a real world ...

    thankfully we still have /. ...

    Cheers from Portugal

  71. Problem with that thinking is... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    ...that this wasn't an individual being hacked, this was a block of people on Charter that got hacked. The stuff the hacker was doing would have collected a LOT of CC info, etc.

    Sad to say, this is pretty damn big and while it's not a company this time per se, they companies are going to take it up the tailpipe all the same for it.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  72. "Never Attribute to Malice ... by tabdelgawad · · Score: 1

    what can be explained by stupidity alone". Is it possible this is just some third-party advertising configuration or software upgrade gone awry rather than a 'sneak attack'? The 'hijacking' IPs seem benign enough ...

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  73. Dammit... I have charter... by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    Dammit. I have charter for my cablemodem service. Would the poster mind answering the question of just what timeframe exactly all this happened in?

    Now I have to go back and change ALL the passwords I've used in the past week. Shit.

    1. Re:Dammit... I have charter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched from Charter to a local phone company, HickoryTech, about 2 years ago due to poor customer service. I think this is an ongoing issue with Charter. Don't expect it to be resolved anytime soon.

    2. Re:Dammit... I have charter... by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Now I have to go back and change ALL the passwords I've used in the past week. Shit.


      Reading the responses, instead of just having a knee-jerk reaction to the original message, could have saved you some grief.

      The guy is an idiot, with spyware installed on his computer.
      Go ahead and change your passwords, but then install and run Ad-aware, or something similar, on any MS-Windows box you have.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:Dammit... I have charter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said the problem also existed on his Unix box...whats this cross platform spyware you speak of?

  74. what to do: by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I can see a couple of things here:
    First of all, file the report. Ask the support person if you can fax in the report because you don't want to inform the hacker that (s)he's been spotted and you are reasonably clear that you can't get a secure channel to their web server.

    If they absolutely insist that you go through their web pages, then do so. Give enough information to prove that you understand what's going on, and inform the person on their support line that you'll b expecting someone to call you with a phone number that you can call them back at.

    (This is to prevent impersonation. I'd actually check the number to make sure that it belongs to the company in question) -- remember, the hacker may be seing your on-line communications.

    Basically, the cops are right... about the only people who can force a real police investigation are at the ISP in question. If they can show that a couple hundred (or thousand) people have been affected by this hack then the cops may get involved.

    If you want to be snarky, then you can ask the name of a good local journalist that you can tell your story to.. That might also light a fire somewhere. If nothing else, people in your community need to know that their communications are being logged by someone with clearly malicious intent. Be prepared to spend some time explaining things to the reporter. Someone with the stature to get furr flying is also unlikely to have serious technical computer knowledge. Be ready with a lead-in line to get his attention fast, like:

    I've got an interesting story for you.. It appears that <X ISP's> servers have been badly hacked, and some malicious entity is now snooping on the communications of all their customers. Passwords, credit card numbers and other personal information are all at risk. I've tried contacting the ISP, the FBI and a couple of other entities with no satisfiction. Are you interested?
    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:what to do: by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      BTW: I wouldn't be too hard on your ISP on this. They really do need to get this data into their system so that they can deal with it reasonably. Although a verbal report can give them a bit of a heads-up, a written report will give them a better idea of what they're facing and provide less risk of data-loss/corruption as a verbal report goes from person to person (have you ever played the whisper game?). Given the work you've done so far, I'd say it's worthwhile to do a little bit of bending over backwards to make sure that you can get this report into their system.

      Also: they also probably get a lot of false-positives from their customers. They need enough information from you to distinguish your report from one of those. Unless your ISP is really small, the person you got on the phone is probably a low-level flunkie who's going to have to punch your report through 2-3 levels of management before it can get to someone who can properly deal with what you've noticed.

      There aren't many people who can deal powerfully with a hack attack of this kind. If you're willing, you might want to let them know what else you're willing to do on either a paid, or unpaid basis.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    2. Re:what to do: by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That and the fact that any old idiot can call up and claim a problem; if you're not willing to put it in writing, you must not care very much about it, eh?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:what to do: by scrotch · · Score: 1

      I agree with this post: use the media. Slashdot is great, and if you don't see a solution to the problem by the ISP very soon, send your write up to every news source you can find - NYTimes, CNN, TechTV, your state Press Association, your local newspaper and TV stations, Bill Moyer, Geraldo Rivera, etc.

      When Government doesn't obey a person, you get People together and you raise a stink. The media is (supposedly) the People's way of doing that. As others have said, the ISP is more likely than you to get some enforcement in this case, but a few thousand people are also more likely to get a response than just you.

    4. Re:what to do: by Thavius · · Score: 1

      Telling the media is so the way to do this. Joe Sixpack doesn't know what an ISP does, or a computer much for that matter. But, if you put it in a context they can understand, such as "malicious hackers are watching people on . They are stealing their social security numbers, credit cards, and reading their email!", You will be sure to cause a stir and have many people start calling . Even if most of it is hypothetical, the average user doesn't know it. You are bound to get the attention of Someone Important, and something will get done.

      If anything, people will cancel their accounts with the ISP, then the ISP can claim the $5k in damages and have the FBI step in.

    5. Re:what to do: by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      I've got an interesting story for you.. It appears that servers have been badly hacked, and some malicious entity is now snooping on the communications of all their customers. Passwords, credit card numbers and other personal information are all at risk. I've tried contacting the ISP, the FBI and a couple of other entities with no satisfiction. Are you interested?

      I'd think that would be pretty effective. But for maximum effect, try changing "malicious entity" to "cyber terrorist" or "evildoer". Then you'll get national coverage!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    6. Re:what to do: by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      " First of all, file the report. Ask the support person if you can fax in the report because you don't want to inform the hacker that (s)he's been spotted and you are reasonably clear that you can't get a secure channel to their web server."

      What am I missing? The problem is with DNS. Use the numerical IP address of the webserver or mail server, and communications should proceed normally.

      Right?

  75. lop.com by athakur999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you tried running Spybot or Adaware lately? If you try going to p5115.tdko.com, you'll find it's a website for lop.com. Which, incidentally, is an infamous purveyer of spyware:

    http://www.spywareinfo.com/articles/lop/

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  76. terroism == attention by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

    You should have said that your internet connection was hijacked by a member of the Axis of Evil; the FBI would have jumped right on it.

    1. Re:terroism == attention by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell them you saw documents about planes and buildings...

      Of course, once they found out that wasn't the case, they'd start investigating YOU - and they'd get you...one way or the other, for something...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  77. ALI and the FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aaaaaaaiii.

    for real. me julie.

  78. Its simple... by Silvertre · · Score: 1

    If you want the govt. to get involved, just startup a company and give them a few million dollars, they'll start arresting people even if they didn't hack anything...

  79. Looks like this happens to others as well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google
    Spyware?

  80. My experience with the feds by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our biggest problem isn't breakins, it's posting web site passwords on the net.. Hey, it's still someone using an illegal means to access materials (yada, yada, yada).

    We do our own defenses, but I always see the users or proxies attempting crap.. I tried calling a few providers, but they're completely dense when you say "someone on your network is attacking one of my servers." Somehow they manage to get the stupidest people handling their support desk, who can't even comprehend what a server is. If you do manage to get to an abuse department, they'll rarely do much.

    A few years ago, I got tired of fucking with the help-desk people to complain to, so I called the FBI. They took my information, and had an agent call me back.. It took a couple weeks to get the return call, but I did. He was actually well informed, and seemed to know at least the basics of how the Internet worked. He also said that I'd have to prove a monetary loss. The mininum amount was $5,000, if I recall correctly. It isn't enough that someone can abuse the shit out of your system, you have to prove that you were loosing money in the process.. So I have to make the decision, do I set up the system poorly enough so we do loose sales/members over fairly simple attacks, or do I just forget trying to get anyone to help.

    Recently, a friend of mine rewrote a site for selling calling cards on the net.. The company is an established real-world business, they just wanted to expand... So, she spent a few months putting together a kick-ass site, with all the bells and whistles that the owner asked for.. About a month after it went live, someone started hitting it with fraudlent transactions. Even with all her normal precautions (and a few of mine), and using a 3rd party billing company with their own precautions, they still got hammered for about $10,000 worth of fraud.. The FBI was willing to take a report on this one, but never investigated, and never did anything about it.. She (the programmer) had got the IP's of the users, found out who owned the blocks. We actually knew where they physically were and told the FBI. If they were interested, they'd only need to send one agent where we told them, and close the case. They didn't. It's still an open case with no leads. {sigh}

    There were IP's in two different /24's doing the fraud.. They were coming back about once per day and doing the same scam. Each one was a Internet cafe thing, so fairly obviously it's someone sitting on a public machine trying not to get caught. But, they were both at least 1000 miles from where we were, so it was pretty useless for us to catch them. It would have just been so easy for the FBI to send one agent out. $10,000 fraud on one site is nothing. I'd be more than willing to bet that they were hammering a whole bunch of sites with those same transactions.

    We called the cafe owners and told them what was happening. Their suggestion was to call the police, they weren't going to stop anything. {sigh}

    Knowing how bad they are to stop things, I wonder if I'm doing the wrong thing, staying on the legitimate side of things. If we can literally say "They guy sitting in this cafe is running tens of thousands of dollars in fraudelent transactions per day, and stole from us" with proof, and they won't touch it, how much evidence do they really need against someone to do something?

    Ya, we see the big "some hacker caught" stories occasionally, but honestly with all the crime going on (yes, there's lots), it's only rarely that you hear about someone getting caught.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:My experience with the feds by valdezjuan · · Score: 1

      I tried calling a few providers, but they're completely dense when you say "someone on your network is attacking one of my servers." Somehow they manage to get the stupidest people handling their support desk, who can't even comprehend what a server is. If you do manage to get to an abuse department, they'll rarely do much.


      The sad part is that there are some many people sending in abuse complaints that are incorrect or false that it makes sifting through them very tough. Not to mention that these people are making crap wages (although the way things are now most of them are lucky to have a job).

      For example, a user connects to a website and spends some time reading the content. Later when he clicks on a link, zone alarm or whatever other pc based firewall starts freaking out from a port scan. So he fires off a letter to abuse at every where, calls the NOC staff (often times being very hostile), who then create a trouble ticket for a security guy or some sysadmin. The Sec(sys) admin spend time to track it down, ask the person for a log since he didn't send any with his complaint and figure out that the connection timed out and he was surfing the site and not being attacked. It happens way to often, usually (and I don't mean to pick on the older generations) it is an older person who doesn't understand how things work. Which is fine but they take up time that can/should be spent solving other problems or looking into real abuse cases.

      Granted the OP seemed to have a clue and was willing to work with the ISP. There response is sad to see. Not all NOC's are filled with idiots who don't care. There is no real excuse for an abuse department to not pay attention, that is what they are paid for. I can only speak to the company (and only my tiny little slice of it) that I work for and perhaps a bit from the startup that I originally worked at. But our Security group takes all cases seriously (since our customers sites are on the line and our jobs).

    2. Re:My experience with the feds by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's funny is, we get this same occasional complaint.. Joe user will mail to us, his provider, and some authority (like the FBI or whatever) saying a very secure web server is attaching him.. By very secure, I mean that the particular web server has no CGI's on it, and the firewall rules block everything but port 80.. But, I always do check out the machine (verify all binaries, make sure there's nothing wierd going on, etc, etc), and then respond to him and all letting him know it's probably just his firewall being wierd, since it's reporting port 80 traffic as a hack attempt.

      It's understandable that they may get confused.. They'll start browsing to one server, but eventually requests go to other servers, or come from the wrong IP. Our big site has 16 IP's on just over half as many machines. Some of the machines use teql to manage their load across two ethernet cards, so they hit one IP, but the traffic comes back from another. I've let a few newbie abuse people know that port 80 is the web server (they had no clue), but most of them look at the reports and let the user know straight off that it's their firewall.

      I'm very happy with Level3's abuse department. They're careful to forward every real abuse complaint to me quickly. There was a hosted machine broken into once that was port scanning machines, which I did unplug then fix. The hosting customer wasn't very happy that I unplugged his machine, but hey, he didn't take care of security on it, dammit. Most of the time, I think I'm being wierd that I actually reply to every abuse report, no matter how they come in.. It's wierd how many abuse reports end up going to the billing department first..

      It's cool that you take care of all your abuse cases too.. We're a rare bunch out on the Internet, but we're making sure at least our chunk of the net is secure.

      I agree, it's frequently older people. The worst complaints I get are from older folks who say they've been programming on the Internet for 40+ years (ummm, the 1960 Internet?). I haven't gotten many of those lately. Most of those came in back in the .com boom, when everyone thought they were experts, and were throwing crap at us most of the time. Some of them had half a clue, but it was when they first discovered netstat, and would see ports open to our web servers, they'd completely freak out.. I'd have to talk them down, and explain to them, "if you want to see pictures from our porn site, you're going to have to have a connection open to us in some way."

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  81. Martha Stewart by bathmatt · · Score: 1

    How do you expect any law enforcement person to work on this with the likes of Martha Stewart walking the street. This is far more important than *any* crime that may have occured!!!

  82. Check out the site. by FreeLinux · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the site 66.220.17.45 which claims to be LOP.com. Pay particular attention to the title of the page. Notice the AyBrBtU in the title. All your base are belong to us. These guys are no good. Shields up! Now Slashdot the crap out of them.

    1. Re:Check out the site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no effect as of yet

    2. Re:Check out the site. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Well, if their spyware redirects people all over the world through their servers, I'd expect they'd be able to handle a slashdotting. Probably wouldn't even notice it'd happened.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  83. Things you can do.. by shoestring · · Score: 1

    Well depends on who you want to help, and how much you are willing to spend.

    (I would send this e-mail, but your address is not public) You could have contacted the holder of the redirected addresses (66.220.17.47) They are all together and all on one class C.. All owned and mapped to one entity (Hurricane Electric). You can find this by doing a search at www.arin.net. They might be more receptive to your call (if anyone is there) as either they are doing the redirect, or their boxes have been compromised.

    Personally depending on how nice you want to be, you could just make your own firewall/dns/etc (not hard with linux) and have it search the root domains for every DNS lookup.. It is more secure, though if everyone did that the root servers would probably die. Leave a report with your ISP, get off and try again tomorrow when someone who might be able to help (and/or cares) sees the note. I would also recommend that you call the next day (business hours) as your note might well get misplaced. You might also think about this response and determine.. Do you want them as your ISP (might not be an option.. but is something you might think about).

    If you want to be more vigorous I suppose you could find someone to fix the hack. It is indeed an interesting hack, took sometime to set up, and they are looking for some gain.. Your ISP should care, and frankly the others should too with this amount of effort, they don't have anything (dollars) yet, but I expect it would be really easy to use this to catch who did it. (Phony credit card numbers anyone?) But while it might not be an ideal world.. I expect most enforcement people have hotter priorities.

  84. Law enforcement staffing by burNtchicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To begin with, like many previous posts are stating, the FBI doesn't handle individual cases of home intrusion or even very small business intrusions.

    The best place to call would be local law enforcement (eg. county or state). Depending on their practices, you may or may not get a response. However, the unfortunate reality is most law enforcement agencies are too understaffed and underfunded in their computer crimes departments to be able to give an effective response to individuals. This goes for organizations from the FBI all the way down to your local PD.

    All of the money being currently allocated to cyber crime is more geared toward terrorism (Since that's the buzzword these days), or general attacks on public infrastructure, government and large businesses. Furthermore, attacks on individuals are so prolific that I don't think any PD would even know where to begin.

    As if that wasn't enough, there is such a shortage of law enforcement professionals who understand and can perform an effective incident response, that even if such PDs and agencies had the cash, they couldn't hire many more quality people. The best security professionals often tend to make their way toward the private sector (Again serving big business or big government contracts) where they'll make real money.

    Sadly, you're just not going to get much help these days from government. Someone earlier mentioned posting your problem on slashdot or somewhere else (Does anyone know of a good site to post for home incident response advice), and that's probably the best idea, because you're better off just defending yourself.

  85. The USSS? by Jonsey · · Score: 1

    I know the USSS (United States Secret Service) usually prosecutes computer crime in the States.

    Pester them? -- It's worth a shot, they have offices in all 50 state (IIRC).

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    1. Re:The USSS? by abaddon314159 · · Score: 1

      not really, they only handle it when there is a financial institution involved etc, they are still very much part of the dept. of the treasury, there were some terf wars back when they were still doing shit like busting steve jackson games etc, but they seem to have settled on solid juristicional boundries...read the orielly book on computer crime...its a bit dated, but not alltogether too bad...

    2. Re:The USSS? by Jonsey · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that. I'm gonna go look that book up, (seeing as this is ask.slashdot.org) anyone know of an updated source as well?

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  86. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    they're like that all over the good ole Corporate States of Amerikkka

    1. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you hate france. At least they are more dignified not to call it "freedom toast" and "freedom fries".

      I'm still wondering where the nukes are if you ask me.

    2. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very intelligent. You'd make a fine parrot.

  87. While he had the cops on the line by m_chan · · Score: 1

    I think HeelToe should have said that he was a contract worker for Krispy Kreme.

  88. Call the big boys.. by Trunkboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just report to the RIAA that these individuals were trying to rip the Madonna CD from your CD-ROM. That should do it. ;o)

  89. talk to your bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Document what happened and show it to your bank

    Faced with the prospect of having card numbers and PINs stolen, the bank will understand the risk. They have the clout required to get the authorities moving.

  90. Sue Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was their server that was compromised, and they are responsible for protecting their customers.

    I would suggest you contact a good class action attorney, tell him what happened and the likely number of subscribers affected, and then sit back and watch him beat the living crap out of them for negligence, etc.

    It's sad to say, but in a capitalist world it is money that forces action. Make em hurt and they'll take action in the future.

    -rt

  91. So incur some damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rent a room for a week at a cheap local motel that won't bug you about ID. Order a shitload of stuff online on your credit card and have it delivered to the motel. Take the stuff home and then call your credit card company and say you didn't make any of those transactions, and then call the FBI back and tell them they should have listened to you the first time.

  92. You left out: by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    You left out:
    • Remove, then re-install your tcp/ip stack
    • Reformat your hard drive and re-install windows.
    1. Re:You left out: by cruelworld · · Score: 1

      Ironically, since his problem appears to be Spyware that would have fixed the problem

    2. Re:You left out: by Nerull · · Score: 1

      I remember TechTV doing a survey of diffrent companies tech support.
      One of these companies (might have been Toshiba, not sure), when asked how to stop a Explorer window showing C:\ from opening every time windows started, (they had placed a link to C:\ in the 'startup' folder in the start menu), that the only way to fix the problem was to format and reinstall windows.

  93. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by tigris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm truly amazed that Charter and the FBI blew you off like this.

    You've already tried going through channels so the next step is embarrassing them into doing something about it - notifying news media outlets and posting to slashdot are probably all you can do though. If Charter has any specific usenet groups like @Home used to have, I'd post this info there as well.

    Best thing would be to get this on TV as then they can't ignore it. Charter is based in St. Louis and I'm sure one of the consumer affairs reporters at one of the TV stations in town would be interested in finding out that the major ISP in town is letting their users' passwords and other info get leeched.

  94. Translations? by mrbuckles · · Score: 1

    One of the ip addresses you mention is found on this page, which just seems odd. Can anyone translate?

    1. Re:Translations? by ciphertext · · Score: 1

      I believe it is 404 error. In anycase, the file doesn't exist....possibly in english. Although, that IP may only be serving as a relay by the original attacker.

      --
      To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  95. First, get the name of the tech support person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Then tell "Bob" if he'd like his name on the USENET postings detailing for public record how his incompetence caused his employer to be held liable for any secrets the attacker stole.

    That will get his attention...

  96. THANKS FOR THE GEAR DUDE! LOVE, THE COPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That shit was sweet. Thanks for leaving it in your car. Talk about window shoppin'!

  97. What Mr. ScriptKiddie learned... by Ifni · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now the wannabe computer criminals know that there is little to no danger in pulling off such computer crimes, because those that care enough to act are too small to be heard, and those that are large enough to be heard don't care enough to act.

    It is quite sad that the ISP took no interest in a breach of its own security, which only encourages future breaches, since the perpetrators know that they will get away with it, not because they are 1337 h4x0rz, but because nobody will look into it.

    It won't be long before such attacks become as common place as email viruses if the proper authorities don't act now, and, more importantly, the ISPs don't take heed of this danger. Lack of enforcement does indeed encourage crime.

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  98. Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    % whois 66.220.17.46
    Hurricane Electric HURRICANE-3 (NET-66-220-0-0-1)
    66.220.0.0 - 66.220.31.255
    C2 Media Ltd HURRICANE-CE1076-331 (NET-66-220-17-0-1)
    66.220.17.0 - 66.220.17.255

    This is the infamous lop.com customized ad/spyware, see lop.com and wrn.net. The thing with the domain suffix is a trick with 127.0.0.1. This type of software typically installs a search toolbar in IE and they seem to come in a multitude of different versions. It's the worst of breed.

    C2 Media claims that people click through an EULA and know what they're installing. I know all this because my Dad had a "weird extra toolbar and popups to go online gambling". He found the running binairy, I looked through a hexdump of it and there was their EULA alright. But he never saw it. This critterware can even get installed by merely mousing over a banner.

    Don't believe me? Google for "lop.com, adware, toolbar"...

    1. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are correct that the original poster is a moron. There was no hack, it is definitely C2 Media.

      However, your claim that this can be installed by merely mousing over a banner is misleading--this can only happen if you have done something stupid with your security settings (e.g., set to Low or other custom values that are similar).

    2. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears standard IE security settings on WinXP (which I don't use personally) were enough. Shutting down ActiveX would have helped I reckon.

      BTW, looks like we have the same name. Nice meeting you Anonymous ;-)

    3. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow..if standard settings allow this in, that that is very bad indeed. I've come across this before, but always with security popup.

      (Nice to meet you as well!).

    4. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      you're not paranoid... they really are out to get you... muhaha

      you would think that someone who clearly wants to be a computer geek would have asked a few friends or some such before posting this to /. maybe start with a usenet group or an irc channel. it's obvious that the guy doesn't even dual boot as most of the /. crowd does.

      amature

    5. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by papasui · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was just going to post that he's infected with spyware.

    6. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right in that he may have jumped the gun, but coming off as an arrogant and elitist wannabe just makes you look like an "amature" as well.

      Just my .02 cents.

    7. Re:Writer is an idiot. He has C2Media ad/spyware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason not to use IE. IE is the worst of the mainstream browsers anyway.

  99. Read only media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It would be nicer to be able to boot the thing self-contained-and-configured off read-only media and have no writable access to anything from the operating system to totally prevent break-in/tampering.


    I thought about that too, but it doesn't really protect against break-ins. It protects against poisoning your binaries and back doors, but the attacker can hypothetically gain access and then abuse the trust you give to that machine. He/she can't write changes but can launch attacks inward at your network or outward and make you look bad. Read only is a step in the right direction, but it does not make anything break-in proof.

  100. wow by ed.han · · Score: 1

    that turboing article is extraordinarily valuable.

    ed

  101. my ISP is Charter... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now what? How do I know when I am at risk? What does the normal schmo do in a situtation like this?

    Should I stop accessing any financial websites that I use?

    This is the one thing that's always made me paranoid, so what if I have a firewall, if my ISP is hijacked, then what do you do? It's not like I have options out here, Charter is it, unless I want to bend over for Sprint's DSL (which they charge you tons of cash to cancel your account among other nefarious things...) or satelite (ugh)

    1. Re:my ISP is Charter... by JohnA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are using a relatively standards-based browser, and connecting to HTTPS servers, you are fine.

      SSL protects against man-in-the-middle attacks through the utilization of certificate authorities. If someone intercepts your connection, they must present your browser a signed certificate. If they present the one the original site uses, they must have the corresponding private key, which is near impossible. If they present a different certificate, your browser will pop-up a warning dialog informing you of this.

      The breakdown can only occur if a CA is compromised, or there is a security breach at the company providing the service over HTTPS.

      Long story short, use a good browser, and pay attention to those warnings, and you'll be golden.

    2. Re:my ISP is Charter... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      I am using Mozilla, hehe, thanks. It's good to know one decision covers me on so many bases. (No viruses in 5 years thanks to Mozilla/Netscape...)

      I called Charter upon seeing this article and the support guy got all annoyed. "Those guys at slashdot are just tech geeks, and they probably don't even have an proof that we got hacked...blah, blah, blah" and

      "If we got hacked, _I_ would know about it..."

      uh-huh...

      I had to practically badger the guy into sending me an email when the corporate office made an "official reply" to the abuse claim...*sigh*

      Again, thanks...

    3. Re:my ISP is Charter... by papasui · · Score: 1

      I work for Charter... The dude has C2 media spyware installed.

    4. Re:my ISP is Charter... by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      hehe, good to see there's some people in the know at Charter. I don't mean to sound down on Charter, I have been extremely pleased with the service, the terms and the support, all excellent. :)

      Of coures when my connection goes down because some lunk heads at construction sites cut the fiber optics, not much Charter can do... :P

      Alright then, your reply beg's the question, "how do you know it was that particular spyware, and there isn't a problem inside of Charter?"

    5. Re:my ISP is Charter... by papasui · · Score: 1

      If you look up the domain name of the name server he mentioned it points to lop.com if you do a google on lop.com you will see that they are notorious for their spyware that hijacks web browsers.

  102. Actually if you weren't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...using at least a *BSD box with PF, or a Linux 2.4 box with iptables and a well-tested set of firewall rules in either, to protect your network in the first place, you are a stupid dimwit twit who deserved to get hacked.

    Not having a solid firewall in place first and formeost before ever allowing that first internal workstation to surf the web is the networking equivalent to being on the receiving end of unprotected anal sex with as many strangers as you can.

  103. So what we've learned today is.... by puppetman · · Score: 1

    Time to start defrauding companies of about $4999. Maybe make it $4000 to be safe.

    I've read a fair bit about investigations of eBay fraud - I wonder if the same limits apply there.

  104. what to do to get some action by prgrmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With respect to getting some action on any future attacks - what should I do? Who should I call?

    Write your state's attorney general. Include all the information you collected, a more detailed explanation of what you posted here of the incident. Let them know you've contacted the FBI but I would lead them to any conclusions about where that is going. Request that their office look into this from both a pespective on the potential harm from the hack, and the responsibilities of your ISP to respond to, and ultimately, prevent this sort of thing.

    Then, write each of your senators and your congress person. Before you do that, find out which committees they sit on and see how you can tie this in to their oversight responsibilities with regard to the various goverment offices that could be dealing with this. Point to anti-hacking legislation like the Patriot Act and anything anyone suggests, and then point out how the laws are not uniformly enforced. Point out that potential harm and not sheer magnitude of dollars expended ought to be a desiding criteria for launching an investigation, or not.

    If you haven't already, fill out an incident report for your ISP to cover yourself. Those IP addresses belong to someone, and they have a responsibility in this. Whether direct, or indirect, remains to be seen.

    Finally, contact your lawyer. If for no other reason, you will need some legal CYA in your back pocket as insurance, given the stir you've already started by contacted those people that you have. Not that you should have to worry about liability issues, but you never now.

    HTH, good luck with it.

  105. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the 'Connection-specific DNS suffix' only used if the original entered name doesn't resolve.

  106. Charter Area? by audiokat · · Score: 1

    Hey HeelToe,

    I don't have an email address for you or I'd ask there; what Charter area are you in?

    audiokat AT :remove: yahoo DOT com

    --
    Why is it that it's a penny for your thoughts, but you have to put your two cents in? Somebody's makin a penny. --Steven
  107. Simple.... by PortHaven · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you can't beat em, join'em!

    First off, do the terrifying...submit to CNN.com or ZDNEWS....

    "Entire Charter One Internet Communications Divisions Security Jeopardized....what data was collected? Why was nothing done to stop this...even after a client reported the crime in progress!"

    Than file a lawsuit or insinuate, by paying a lawyer to make a call and claim that his client is considering filing for damages....blah..blah..blah.

    But the truth of the matter, most of our recent laws are there for two reasons.... a) to protect the powerful, b) to keep the massess subdued.

    Almost none of them are designed to punish actual criminals or protect the common citizenry. Face it, our justice system in America is dying...

    1. Re:Simple.... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually, this might not be such a bad idea.

      With the over-the-top reactions reported in the media, this might be exactly what is needed to force Charter One to deal with their fucked setup.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
  108. Try calling Scottland Yard by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is the info on the addresses you provided.

    Lop.com
    Unit 12
    571 Finchley Road
    Hampstead
    London, NW3 7BN
    UK

    Domain name: LOP.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Live, Media webmaster@lop.com
    Unit 12
    571 Finchley Road
    Hampstead
    London, NW3 7BN
    UK
    + 44 7817 130 743
    Technical Contact:
    Live, Media webmaster@lop.com
    Unit 12
    571 Finchley Road
    Hampstead
    London, NW3 7BN
    UK
    + 44 7817 130 743

    Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
    Record last updated on 12-Mar-2003.
    Record expires on 06-Oct-2005.
    Record Created on 07-Oct-1998.

    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.LOP.COM 66.220.17.5
    NS2.LOP.COM 66.220.17.5

    1. Re:Try calling Scottland Yard by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      571 Finchley Road
      Â Hampstead
      Â London, NW3 7BN
      Â UK
      How odd -- I've only been to London once, for three days, and the place I stayed was located right off Finchley Road... My, how small the world is.
  109. Re:well, duh! by bucky0 · · Score: 1

    What does that have to do with anything? The FBI is probably manned with people from Clinton's first term or longer. It's not like the FBI gets rechosen every time an administration rolls around, and theyre the ones making the choices.

    Gah.

    --

    -Bucky
  110. The reason law enforcement won't investigate by djbrums · · Score: 5, Informative
    I worked as a security officer for many years, working with law enforcement on issues such as this. In reality, what you've run up against is a fundamental problem with computer law. Almost any offense they could charge the perpetrator with is a felony, thus the FBI should handle the case.

    So what does it take to get the FBI to investigate? There are about 4 different things the bad guys could do:

    • Cause $5000 worth of damages. What "damage" means is not standardized. Some district attorneys read the law as meaning $5000 worth of physical damage! In any case, most interprate this to mean $5000 in damages from the hack, but recovery time is not necessarily included. Thus, the question of whether your credit card was used.
    • Breaking into a financial instituation.
    • Cause a public health threat, such as by breaking into a hospital.
    • Attacking the interests of the US, i.e. the gov't.

    The problem is you don't fit into any of these categories for the FBI. Suppose you did come up with the required damages. Then the FBI have to choose whether to pursue your case or another. If someone else is causing more problems, they'll investigate them instead of your case. If you don't have any idea whose doing the hacking, then again they'll probably go after someone who they think is easier to catch. Last, they'll try to decide whether or not they think the case will lead to an easy conviction. If not, again your screwed.

    Basically it's a matter of priorities, and this doesn't sound like a large enough hack to be more than the blip of a Cessena at an international airport full of 747's.

    It sucks, but that's how it is. What would be good is if hacking resulted in a fine, or some other misdemener. Then convictions would be easy, and the bad guys would quickly learn crime doesn't pay in the small case, and the big cases result in the FBI actually going after them.

    1. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by mabu · · Score: 1

      There's a bigger problem with the District Attorneys. You can get the FBI to investigate, but the DAs are the ones that have to choose to prosecute. Most of them don't know squat about computer crime and are politically motivated. For this reason, it's important for slashdotters to ask questions during election time for their DAs and find out what they know about technology and whether they have a stand on tech issues.

    2. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Informative
      So what does it take to get the FBI to investigate? There are about 4 different things the bad guys could do:
      • Attacking the interests of the US, i.e. the gov't
      To add to the earlier comment, the situation with Cliff Stoll in the Cuckoo's Egg started out as a few minor hacking incidents, and was eventually traced to a group of German hackers who were stealing U.S. military documents and selling them to the KGB (and this is non-fiction!). Cliff's computers were being used as an intermediate link to other, more important computers at various U.S. National Labs and Air Force Bases. The FBI had no interest at first because from Cliff's perspective it just appeared as if somebody was breaking in and leaving an account open. The CIA had no interest at first because it didn't appear to be an international crime. Only through lots of Cliff's own investigation and persistence was he able to convince the CIA to finally listen, which uncovered the crazy ring of espionage...

      The moral of the story: Not all minor hacks are minor hacks. :^)
    3. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by Spyder · · Score: 1

      At least in my experience the FBI is hit or miss on it's ability to investigate internet crime. You have to do much of the hard evidence work yourself before they get their experts working on the attack. I've also noticed that unless you already know evidence handling, you can pretty easily screw things up for the case.

      --
      Spyder
    4. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this doesn't sound like a large enough hack to be more than the blip of a Cessena at an international airport full of 747's.

      I think they investigate Cessena-sized blips at ALL airports.

      I can just imagine the scene at LAX - "Ah small plane just flew into the feul depot, destroying half the Airport and grounding all the planes for the next two weeks. Air traffic controllers were overheard saying 'It was small. Really small! It's not like it was a 747!'."

      I think you might want an analogy like this doesn't sound like a large enough hack to be more than the blip of a model rocket at an international airport full of 747's.

    5. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1
      Basically it's a matter of priorities, and this doesn't sound like a large enough hack...

      Translation: law enforcement is available to the highest bidder (where bidding is measured in monetary damages to you, among other things).

      Thus, it seems that if you are willing to engage in theft and fraud of a kind which no law enforcement agencies can be bothered to deal with, you can make a pretty good tax-free income.

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    6. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by djbrums · · Score: 1
      Indeed, this is probably true right now. However, one of the points was repeatedly violating the law generally ups your chances of being targetted by law enforcement. Thus, you should change crimes often so you're not high on any one list :)

      The parallels of repeated hacking to moderation are astounding. In a way, you get moderated higher the more you contribute to the criminal underground. Get moderated high enough, and all the agencies will know your name, and you'll become targetted. If you *still* continue to commit crime, you'll be moderated up to the point of "moderator"...i.e. helping law enforcement (after completing your sentence, of course) recognize whose who in the underground.

    7. Re:The reason law enforcement won't investigate by fshalor · · Score: 1

      And all caught for a $0.75 discrepency on a phone bill. :)

      To quote Rowling
      Moody: CONSTANT VIGILANCE!!

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  111. No, they know how to use it.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    But protecting Joe user isn't high up on their list (especially, as numerous other have pointed out, since it wasn't the users computer that was hacked).

    They collect all those rights to use against terrorists, pedophiles, music traders, random computer users, emailers and political ideologists. Not to prosecute teenage scripters, at least until a corporation complains. I mean, your just a voter. ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  112. I wonder if by tarlek · · Score: 1
    This explains the following in my firewall's logs:
    Jun 19 00:29:17 /bsd: arp info overwritten for 24.196.80.1 by 00:04:9b:eb:c4:54 on xl0
    Jun 19 04:28:16 /bsd: arp info overwritten for 24.196.80.1 by 00:04:9b:eb:c4:70 on xl0
    I'm on Charter cable also, and these have been showing up in my logs since at least May 31st (which is as long as I keep logs). These two MAC addresses keep fighting over the IP address. Tarlek
    1. Re:I wonder if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:
      This explains the following in my firewall's logs:
      Jun 19 00:29:17 /bsd: arp info overwritten for 24.196.80.1 by 00:04:9b:eb:c4:54 on xl0
      Jun 19 04:28:16 /bsd: arp info overwritten for 24.196.80.1 by 00:04:9b:eb:c4:70 on xl0
      End quote.

      Has nothing to do with it. The guy has spyware. This is normal arp message, most likely load balancing on their routers.

    2. Re:I wonder if by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
      Actually, no, it doesn't. I'm on Comcast cable and I get much the same in my logs, except that it occurs much faster, like a difference of under a second. Note that the MAC address differs only by the last octet, which means the two cards were manufactured at roughly the same time and are probably physically located in the same machine or group of machines. It seems that BSD boxes detect this swapping, though Linux boxes either don't detect it or don't log it.

      Now, if you look up the IP addresses for a dozen different sites, and you keep getting back the same three addresses, then, I think, you might have a problem.

    3. Re:I wonder if by tarlek · · Score: 1

      Actually it occurs more frequently than the log shows- the change occurs in under a second. I grabbed the wrong two lines.

      Thanks for the info. I was just offfering another datapoint (before I read about the LOP connection). Occam's Razor strikes again.

  113. your comparison... by pulse2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think your comparison to the Mitnick case is a little off. In the Mitnick case, the companies he broke into/social engineered called the federales and reported a crime on their systems. It is their responsibility to report crimes on their computer systems, and I don't see why law enforcement would respond to a call from someone concerning a crime that is not specific to that person's computer system. Technically you do not have the authority to ask the police to investigate crimes on computers you do not own or otherwise have responsibility for. That's like saying my ISP can call the police if they notice someone hacking into my computer. It's my decision or responsibility to report the crime. The hacker in your dilemma hacked your ISP, not you specifically. However it is a different matter if the hacker actually used information they collected from hacking your ISP against you - such as credit card information, SS number, passwords, whatever. At that point you can report credit card fraud, stolen identity, etc.

    Compare this to a non-computer situation: If someone breaks into your house, the cops can't enter your house to investigate without your permission, even if a neighbor calls up and reports the crime.

  114. YOU'RE A TOTAL PRICK! ASSHOLE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  115. Re:trully amazing or why maybe we´re doomed alrea by easter1916 · · Score: 1
    This kind of events were supposed to be only possible on Brecht tales or Orwellian stories not in a real nation, not in a real world
    Fascinating. Someone from Portugal pontificating about Orwell, etc. Portugal has been a democratic country for MUCH longer than the US, of course. Oops! Did you forget about your not so long ago dictatorship?
  116. Charter DNS Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had Charter for over a year, and can honestly say I like their service with 2 caveats:


    1) They're a cable company, not a ISP (really) Frequently they're clueless as to what's wrong. On the bright side, they really don't care what you do with your service.


    2) Their DNS servers are always down, broken, etc. I run off private DNS servers, and I'd suggest anyone who uses their service do so as well. I went from being unable to connect to websites around 80% of the time to almost never having problems with it at all.


    In respect to the hacking incident, there's not much you're going to be able to do unless the thieves actually do something with passwords gleened from you, etc. Just change you passwords, get a private DNS server you know, and continue on with your life.

  117. coolest post today? by ed.han · · Score: 1

    someone needs to mod the parent up. it's way informative.

    ed

  118. hack them back! by xnickmx · · Score: 1

    I had a Linux machine of mine hacked a few years back and the attacker completely wiped one of my hardrives. I happened to log on during the middle of the attack though, noticed something weird was going on and pulled the ethernet cable to my box. I was able to look through my logs before the attacker had a chance to erase them. In there was his IP address, when he logged on, etc.
    Next I called the local police. They didn't think that there was anything that they could do, but said they'd call back.
    Next I called my ISP. They didn't care either.
    Next I called the FBI and they didn't care either because there weren't enough monetary damages.
    Next I called the attacker's ISP. (I had his IP address from the logs). They didn't care either.

    The local police finally called back and said that there was nothing that they could do. I finally asked the cop on the line that if there was nothing that could be done by seemingly anyone if I should just hack him back. He said that if it was him in my situation that is exactly what he would do! Not being a 1337 hacker though, I had no idea what to do and just gave up. I had already spent tons of time investigating and being pissed off. I was tired of the whole mess and I couldn't come up with anything to do.
    Thinking back on it now though, it still makes me mad.
    Maybe the only solution is to come up with an online posse to dole out a bit of online frontier justice.

  119. Re:trully amazing or why maybe we´re doomed alrea by DataShark · · Score: 1

    fact is : we 're talking about present and future not past ... if you pretend to live under the shadow of you 're country past it is fine to me ... but remember: Portugal was onced an empire bigger thanthe US ever will be ... back to the main question ... how the hell do you justify such a massive failure in the whole system ? ...

  120. I Have An Idea by defishguy · · Score: 1

    Copy the ENTIRE Pearl Jam, Jimmy Buffet, and Metallica music libraries to the bad guys machines. It should take the RIAA roughly 17 minutes to find the ip addy, sue the ISP for the names of the hackers, send cease and desist letters and finally hire a group of Sherpas to hunt the villians down like gangster hit men and beat them senseless with very hard wooden clubs.

  121. Sounds like bad luck.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    Police are (in my experience) pretty much like you and me. I've taken shit and met a lot of decent officers too. Its got to be about the hardest customer support job available. ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  122. Slashdot away!!! by phorm · · Score: 1

    You should have posted a link to the offending site and/or IP address number 1, number 2, or number 3

    There you go. All visitors, please click through the links above. We'll take them out in no-time...

    1. Re:Slashdot away!!! by mountain_penguin · · Score: 1

      hmm they are all links to lop.com This is a known spyware intrusion program that alters DNS settings to its own. see this for more details try adaware to remove it

  123. word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    comin' straight from the underground.

  124. Similar to BestBuy hoax? by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 1

    This sounds similar to the recent BestBuy hoax.

  125. tdko.com by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Informative
    I pointed my browser at tdko.com and found a porn shop/spam center. The spam center has the following offerings:
    1. Email Extraction Software
    2. Realtime IP Tracking - Buy 25,000 visitors
    3. Create freedom,wealth,...
    and so on.

    If nothing else, the attack you describe is a way to harvest current email addresses.

  126. up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to turbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    This "turbo" link gives advice better than most, but it's still not right. I have read so many times on slashdot posters' advice to work your way up the chain of command in a corporation. That is inefficient and won't get you results.

    The turbo article says, "phone the CEO's office". That's better, but a phone call is too easy to blow off and it easily gets lost in the shuffle.

    From experience within corporations at the highest levels, here is what works best. When you get blown off by lower level tech support, immediately write a letter to the highest people in the corporate food chain, its Board members or CEO. What typically happens is the letter will be passed down the line to the High Level Person who can handle it (some VP, for example) with instructions scrawled on the letter using a pen by the CEO which says something like, "Look into this, handle it, and let me know what happened."

    This is real life, people. Now you've got VPs at the highest level running around trying to solve your problem, who are required to report back quickly to a quixotic boss who has the power to fire them. This process is a model of efficiency - you quickly wrote a letter; the CEO very quickly scanned it, acknowledged the problem and quickly prescribed that a solution be found - and now the engines of the corporation are at work scrambling to solve your problem.

    Doing it in writing makes it easier for the CEO to pass the responsibility on quickly. All he has to do is take a few seconds to read your letter, and a few seconds to delegate the solving of your problem. He doesn't even have to try to re-articulate what your problem is through phone calls and garbled telephone tag -- you've done this for him already.

    So, this turbo approach gets it only half right. Yes, they're right - working your way up the ladder doesn't work, only down the ladder works. But, you've got to do it in writing, and quickly. That's the way to get fast results.

  127. FBI is busy by Capt_Troy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I spoke to an FBI agent about this once. She told me that their computer crimes division is so extreemly busy that they only concerntrate on the cases involving about 250K or more since they don't have the resources to investigate everything. Additionally, she told me that when making a case to the FBI, that including your time and expenses in the initial investigation are valid monitary losses and can be included in the net loss resulting from the hack. However, you need to have suffered serious losses to get your case looked at by the FBI.

    Sorry. But they are busy.

    Troy

  128. go after the next rung by arget · · Score: 5, Informative

    The government is worthless in this. They're reactionary, not preventative, and even then will only give you the time of day if there's hard money or data loss involved.

    Charter was woefully unconcerned, and as their customer, I'd raise hell, escalating up their corporate food chain.

    To get at the actual attacker, go the next rung, look at who owns/controls the IPs that you're being redirected to.

    http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=! %2 0NET-66-220-17-0-1

    CustName: C2 Media Ltd
    Address: P.O. Box 1113
    City: Shalimar
    StateProv: FL
    PostalCode: 32579
    Country: US

    who are in turn a customer of Hurricane Electric

    TechHandle: ZH17-ARIN
    TechName: Hurricane Electric
    TechPhone: +1-510-580-4100
    TechEmail: hostmaster@he.net

    OrgTechHandle: ZH17-ARIN
    OrgTechName: Hurricane Electric
    OrgTechPhone: +1-510-580-4100
    OrgTechEmail: hostmaster@he.net

    Go to Hurricane, and ask them why they're letting this go on. They'll be more concerned. You've indemnified Charter in your service agreement, most likely, and can't sue them. Hurricane has no such protection from you and will, ironically, be more responsive than your own ISP.

  129. Did you call your local police and/or DA? by Photo_Nut · · Score: 1

    Identity theft is a serious crime, and mass identity theft by stealing passwords, etc. Could lead to significant losses to all of the people using that computer system. The fact is that most people don't have more than one password. Who knows if they use the same password to protect their finances as they do to log into their ISP?

    I'm not saying that you didn't do the right thing by calling the people you did, but perhaps you can take action in other ways. Are there any laws to protect you from ISPs who don't care about your security? I'm not suggesting that you should sue your ISP over lost security, but if they don't follow up once they've been notified of a security problem, it's a big deal. Stealing personal information (passwords, etc) is an invasion of privacy and there should be laws against it.

    Go ask a laywer for some advice and see if that makes people care a tad bit more. If the RIAA can sue Verizon for names, so can you. The FBI is TOO HIGH a level to complain. The ISP phone people are too incompetant. A lawyer will get the ball rolling. Try the ones who are paid by the state first, AKA the DA.

  130. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by paganizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't be amazed.
    It's just the way they work; unless its internally generated, whether a charter, the FBI, or any other investigatory agency, they just don't want to see it; they have already got a job, things to do, and they don't want you adding to the load.
    If you REALLY PUSH, they will usually put you in contact with someone who at least has a clue what you are talking about, but the first thing THEY will do, if you are a private individual, is see if you are the criminal; you are guilty until proven innocent, if you actually get them to take you seriously.
    They also will have no interest whatsoever in any evidence you have gathered; they know that it won't be investigated for most likely months, so there is really no point to it.
    If you encounter any behavior other than this, you should really keep it to yourself; otherwise the competent individual you encountered will most likely get fired.
    I know of what I speak; I ran into some blatantly immoral(important) non-legal(not so important) activity in the past and determined to get it taken care of no matter what the cost in time or effort.
    and the costs were very high.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  131. Re:well, duh! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

    Their boss, John Ashcroft, is a Republican, and he's the one who decided that petty theft (less than $20,000) is not worthy of their time. They're too busy catching Osama. Or trying to. Or something -- I dunno, but it involves reading all our email and listening to all our phonecalls, so it must be important.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  132. Sorry you were'nt born rich by DogKnots · · Score: 1

    The reason they were "unable" to help you is because investigations like this are a service available only to the wealthy elite and apparently you don't have a six figure per year income. Try playing the lotto or something and then call them back.

  133. What must you do? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

    There are all these laws and all this hype about enforcing these computer crime laws - what must an end user do to get some enforcement done?

    Have you made any major contributions to any political campaigns lately?

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  134. Quit your whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a $250 bicycle locked up with a Krytonite lock stolen, and the police aren't going to find it.

  135. holy fuck - this guy IS the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charter's dhcp servers were not hacked! This guy has freaking spyware on his pc, that I assume most everyone who does windows pc tech stuff has seen. So he calls the FBI because of his incorrect assumptions.

    I would like to believe the FBI blew him off because he was NOT the affected party if in his mythical little scenerio. The other agency ignored him because he is just some nutcase who DID NOT know what was really going on.

    When one of our servers got hacked, we called the FBI, they were on site in less then 15 minutes, and they did data collection, and were on the phone having logs pulled from upstream. I don't think they ever cought anyone, but they were doing everything they could. Lets face it, when the shit *really* hits the fan, there on top of it.

  136. FBI doesn't care if you're an individual? by MTNhike · · Score: 1

    I thought the government was "by the people, for the people". Why doesn't the FBI care to investigate an issue if its an individual who has the problem? Why does only companies rate the "privilage" to have their issues looked into?

    I thought the government was present to help protect the CITIZENS!

    This reminds me of a hit and run incident I was involved with, and the Worcester, Massachusetts police didn't want to invest it because their wasn't enough monetary damage to my car (after I chased the drunk driver down the roads to get their license plate number).

  137. I'm using charter as well... by eniu!uine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately I am not as technically savvy as the poster. Is there any way I can duplicate the 'investigation' to see if I get the same results at least so I know whether or not my information is being collected? I use DHCP to get my DNS, so I'm pretty much screwed if the poster is right.

    1. Re:I'm using charter as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Ping yourself. They spoof the localhost address.

  138. Normal people getting hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI doesn't care.
    Remember What Can Illegal Hacking Do For MY Business?

  139. Re:well, duh! by penguinlust · · Score: 1

    Osama, is he still out there? Well Bush thinks it doesn't matter. By now he probably also thinks it doesn't matter if we have Sadam or not. Next stop Iran, everybody exit.

  140. Come on! by siskbc · · Score: 4, Informative
    First, it's quite possible those guys were hijacked too, as it's hard to believe someone would be blase enough to point the proxy to their OWN server. So we may be adding injury to insult to injury here.

    Second, hey guys, the site's still up. Get off your lazy asses. ;)

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Come on! by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. I did a tracert 66.200.17.45 and it had a routing loop @ the 64.8.192.33 and 64.8.192.34, which means the line is down.

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  141. Notify CATCH -- a high-tech response team by lobotomy · · Score: 1
    You need to notify the Computer And Technology Crime High-tech Response Team (CATCH) at
    http://www.catchteam.org/

    From their site:

    The Computer And Technology Crime High-tech Response Team, or "CATCH," is a multi-agency task force formed in June 2000 to apprehend and prosecute all criminals who use technology to prey on the citizens of San Diego, Imperial and Riverside Counties.

    They visited us and gave a presentation to all of the sys admins. They seem competent.

  142. Keeping honest people honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with the police is that their primary job is to keep honest people honest. Thus, they hassle those of us who are law abiding, in hopes of scaring those who are dishonest. Beyond that, they have no clue what to do. Too bad it doesn't work. It's like pirating Windows XP. Sure XP has elaborate activation schemes, but it's only effective on those who are willing to shell out the money in the first place. Real pirates will very easily find a way around it.

  143. charter abuse form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    apparently their abuse form uses some kind of broken javascript that does not work under mozilla.

    someone with a non-compliant browser let them know that they've been badly embarrassed on /.

  144. Be afraid, be very afraid by MrLint · · Score: 1

    The reason to be afraid is this: If the government stories are to be believed that we face imminent 'cyber-terrorism', this is exactly the kind of under the radar thing that will lay the ground work. Lots of stealthly data collection with future plans to deploy.

    Whats worse is that no one seemed to care. 'Oh if its not costing a company money who cares?' Well here is the rub. YOu notified the company and the FBI. The company may now be liable now as they didnt take serious actoin. as for the FBI.. well they are too busy tracking down democrats in texas. *rolls eyes*

    The upside is that this /. story will likely make it to major news outlets. Watch people fall all over themselves denying responsibility then:)

  145. Could it be spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These addresses are all registered (quite recently) to C2 Media Ltd.

    CustName: C2 Media Ltd
    Address: P.O. Box 1113
    City: Shalimar
    StateProv: FL
    PostalCode: 32579
    Country: US
    RegDate: 2003-04-28
    Updated: 2003-04-28

    I've had quite a bit of problems with C2's spyware in the past. I did consulting for a number of small businesses and individuals and have uninstalled multiple different versions of C2's spyware in the past.

    See: http://www.spywareinfo.com/articles/lop/

    for a quick description of some of their offensive crap!

  146. Local News Media? by mahlen · · Score: 1

    I would think that the local news media would be interested in a story like this, since ISP's are essentially local. Sure, they'd get the story wrong in most ways, but when the local TV station calls the FBI to ask why they are ignoring people's credit card numbers being stolen after being told about it, that would increase the likelyhood they they sit up and do something.

    Might be worth a shot.

    mahlen

    If I am to speak ten minutes, I need a week for preparation; if fifteen
    minutes, three days; if half an hour, two days; if an hour, I am ready now.
    --Woodrow Wilson

  147. Nobody cares by hafree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfotunately, nobody cares when it comes to the consumer. About a year ago a new vulnerability in AuthorizeNet's billing gateway was discovered that would allow someone to submit authorize-only transactions knowing nothing but your AuthorizeNet username, which was often found embedded within the various forms of an online store. One of my e-commerce clients fell victim to this, and had over 600 $0.01 authorize-only transactions submitted in under an hour. Basically what this meant was that someone was using my client's account to verify stolen credit card numbers.

    Going through my logs, I was able to get the IP addresses these submissions came from, the e-mail addresses the results were sent to (not sure why they bothered with that), and all information on every single card submitted. This included the card number, expiration date, and the cardholder's name and address. I contacted AuthorizeNet but they said it wasn't their problem. I called Visa and Mastercard but they just asked for a printout to be faxed to them (600 item spreadsheet 5 pages wide). I contacted the FBI and was referred to the NSA. I contacted the NSA and they said call back Monday since at this point it was about 6pm Friday evening.

    I was appalled to find out that some identifiable hacker with an arsonal of valid cards was about to be given an entire weekend to sell or use them before anyone would even consider looking into it. I couldn't even get the credit card companies to accept the spreadsheet of THEIR customers so they could at least warn them all that their cards had been compromized.

    I finally just gave up and destroyed any evidence of this fraudulent activity having ever taken place. With my luck, not only would the hacker get away, but I'd be the one in hot water for posessing that spreadsheet. It just goes to show you that nobody cares about the consumer.

  148. Re:speaking of law enforcement and other agencies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice story. You need to dr the names so it involves CmdrTaco and Kathleen Fent, and make it be gay pornography, if you want it to be ontopic.

  149. So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by phr1 · · Score: 1
    It's always seemed to me like the height of irresponsibility that SSH makes no attempt at server authentication except for displaying those hex numbers that no one has a convenient way to check and that change every so often anyway. The CA system used in web browsers isn't perfect and lends itself to a bunch of corporate rip-off certificate selling schemes (Verisign etc). but it at least makes this kind of wide-scale MITM attack (i.e. against lots of different hosts simultaneously) a lot more difficult.

    SSH should be modified to present X509 certificates and to check them against a list of known CA's just like browers do. Until that happens, its lack of authentication should be considered a gaping security hole.

    1. Re:So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by Shuasha · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you're smoking, but I've never had a key on one of my servers change unless I force it or reinstall. Also, IIRC, OpenSSH has the ability to use certificates.

    2. Re:So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by Breakerofthings · · Score: 1

      And you will be posting this fix of yours when?

      Noone claims that SSH is perfect; but it is a hell of a lot better than Telnet

      Besides; you can bitch about Microsoft; because they suck and you basically have to deal with it.
      But bitching about an Open Source product for which you paid nothing? Geez... the programmer Gave it to you; You are simply professing your ignorance. If you know of a problem, let the maintaner know; if you are coherent I am sure he/she will be happy to receive your suggestion. If you are such an expert, though, perhaps you should implement this fix yourself, and submit a patch? Isn't that the whole point of open source?

      I, for one, am thankful that I am not forced to use a) telnet or b) some proprietary "secure" tool.

    3. Re:So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by dougnaka · · Score: 1
      Do you know how to read? That bit of "hex numbers" is the FINGERPRINT of the DSA/RSA public key the server is providing your client. SSH does use keys, the server has a public/private keypair and won't work without one. They NEVER should change unless you, as the server admin, WANT them to. If they do change, then something bad really is going on.
      Was a nice try though, you may have fooled some n00bs into thinking your 1337....

      As a side note it's INCREDIBLY humurous that this comment is to a post about a security problem that was effectively caught by ssh's public/private key authentication.
      Want to see what your ssh is really doing...? Throw some -v's in the command line..
      ssh -vvv bob@somehost.flonk

      --
      My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    4. Re:So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by phr1 · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's what I mean. I'm speaking from the point of view of someone using the CLIENT. Server admins do change keys every now and then, for whatever reasons they have. It's pretty typical, if you screw around with a server configuration to end up generating new keys. At the client end I just see a bunch of hex numbers and have no idea whether they're legit or not.

      The solution is to use a certificate system with carefully maintained CA roots. For that matter, just run telnet over SSL, or stunnel if you want port forwarding. That stuff existed and worked fine long before SSH came onto the scene. I just don't understand why SSH got to be so popular.

    5. Re:So why is no one pointing out that SSH sucks? by dougnaka · · Score: 1

      I couldn't disagree more. CA roots offer nothing but false sense of security. Fooling people in the real world is 100X easier than fooling a computer. Just ask any real hacker. Social engineering is where you get in, unless you get lucky. ssh does public/private key authentication. There's no need to have a client key to establish server validity. The only downside to the way ssh works is the first connection you must choose to trust that key, which is why they present you with the hex key fingerprint. So if you're concerned about the validity of the server you're connecting to you can check it against something else. Having a verisign just provides warm fuzzies and a central place to manage who's key is what. In fact, I'd love to hear a good arguement supporting Verisign's role as opposed to me being my own CA. I would put forth the point that I, as a CA have signed many of my own SSL certificates, and never signed one for someone claiming to be microsoft when they were not, as Verisign has...

      --
      My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  150. NOT A HACK by NoCoward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You were not hacked. You have spyware on your computer. Good lord.

    1. Re:NOT A HACK by boredMDer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you so much as read the entire body of text?
      He never said that he was hacked, he said that there was some sort of DNS poisoning at his ISP's DNS servers.

    2. Re:NOT A HACK by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1
      Eh, I'd say the odds are good it's spyware or a trojan. Nonetheless, it's still illegal and malicious.

      It's also possible to hack Charter's DHCP server(s) and change the DNS servers given out, or add your own rogue DHCP server (i.e., with someone else's hacked box on their network). Probably not what happened, though.

    3. Re:NOT A HACK by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You were not hacked. You have spyware on your computer. Good lord.

      So... lodge a complaint with the FTC against this Lop.company then?

      Hey, someone's got to lay the smack down on these spyware companies! It has to start with complaints to appropriate authorities.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:NOT A HACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you a moron?

      A) Title of article is "Getting Law Enforcement Action for a Large-Scale Hack?"
      B) "DNS poisoning" is a hack.
      C) His ISP's DNS is fine, this is the result of spyware on his -- yes, the submitter's -- computer.

    5. Re:NOT A HACK by rxed · · Score: 1

      haha... funny, and yet 'Interesting'. LOL

    6. Re:NOT A HACK by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      "C) His ISP's DNS is fine, this is the result of spyware on his -- yes, the submitter's -- computer."

      are you a wacko?

      read the article, it clearly states his ISP is the one with the hacked DNS server.

      If he got a trojan, why would he be calling the fucking FBI over it? That would be the lamest thing I have heard in the history of reasoning.

      "uhh, FBI, someone infected me with code red, can you investigate?????" give me a break.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    7. Re:NOT A HACK by cduffy · · Score: 1

      He got a trojan that redirects DNS queries. Hence, he gets the impression (wrongly) that it's his ISP's server and not his personal machine at fault. So, he THOUGHT that his ISP had a hacked DNS server, but in actuality he just had some spyware screwing with his box.

      See here.

    8. Re:NOT A HACK by NoCoward · · Score: 1

      Nice. Are you the dude that modded me down? Nice. It is NOT A HACK. Mod me down, but it is the truth.

      If his ISP was poisioned then he would be hacked. His ISP wasnt poisioned.

  151. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by mitheral · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure one of the consumer affairs reporters at one of the TV stations in town would be interested in finding out that the major ISP in town is letting their users' passwords and other info get leeched.

    They probably wouldn't touch the story. DNS is too technical, heck I'd have to explain this story to some of the support people I've worked with and then a few of them still wouldn't get it. Joe six pack doesn't have a chance, especially since they'd have to achive understanding in the few minutes the medium allows.

  152. How to get cops to do their job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bribe them.

  153. a bit naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who told you that law enforcement is about protecting regular citizens? Law enforcement -specially in the US, is about protecting property and money. Your case means nothing to the FBI. My advice (if you want it): get a good firewall and stop using Window$

  154. the Washington snipper by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    performing illegal male circumcisions, and various amputations in the DC area

    1. Re:the Washington snipper by mwjlewis · · Score: 0

      A very good friend of mine's Father murdered by the MD/DC/VA sniper shootings. Please show a little respect with your posts. Weather funny or not, not everyone reading is Seattle, or the US for that matter.

      --
      www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
    2. Re:the Washington snipper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't whine so much, you people got the game delayed, what more do you want out of this?

    3. Re:the Washington snipper by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      My sincerest apologies to all people ruthlessly mutilated by circumcisers and amputators in the D.C. area, or Seattle, or the World, regardless what the weather.

      If I point out that Saddam backwards has the same sounding syllables as mad ass, am I being disrespectful to war victims and veterans? Relax.

      Off topic? What topic?

  155. Try the Secret Service by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    They where interested in a recent out of country electronic CC fraud maybe this is something up their alley.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  156. Lesson taken from takedown of Kevin Mitnick by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

    If you have ever read takedown (written by the sys admin who single handedly delivered Kevin Mitnick to the FBI) you would know that the FBI is impotent to deal with such crimes. The best way to bring this person down is to not do anything, and to continue to track the person until you get the persons location, then deliver him to the FBI. The FBI is incapable of handling these sort of crimes.

  157. This is not a Charter problem by xrayspx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google, while not having a wealth of info on tdko.com, did have some useful bits: groups
    I'd heard the name tdko before, I was pretty sure, in the context of a Bonza or Gator or something. They'll change your default search page in IE, etc, this sounds like just another dirty trick. I doubt they compromised the DHCP servers themselves, my guess is that some pop-up or spyware app changed your settings locally. If you did try it from multiple systems, well, they're several of YOUR systems, you may have visited to same site or installed the same spyware on each. I think eDonkey F'd with my default search page IIRC.

    1. Re:This is not a Charter problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link in your sig isn't working...that is all.

    2. Re:This is not a Charter problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. There is an issue with certain pieces of spyware changing the registry key for which DNS server to use. I sincerely doubt they hackd the DHCP servers at Charter.

    3. Re:This is not a Charter problem by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much sir/madam. We just let that domain expire, but a quick ln -s and a .sig change later, at least the link works again.

      Y'all feel free to suggest a new domain name for an illustration site, that one was boring and in dire need of redesign.

      x

  158. Hahahaha. by yawble · · Score: 1

    You are afraid that the hacker will notice if you submit the information via a compromised httpd, but find no problems at all about your story making the front page of Slashdot?
    You'd be shocked to know how many times that I've been hacked and found most of my information on the hacker from their posts on /.

    Just my wooden nickel.

  159. Re:Counter-hack, and post links to screenshots on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It worked for fyodor!

    He's probrably no fyodor. I mean, the poster of the story was probrably on at least one date in his life.

  160. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by pdboddy · · Score: 1

    Yes, but writing a letter and sending it snail mail can take a couple of days for it to get where it has to go. And you are assuming that the CEO's personal secretary doesn't screen his/her mail. :P

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
  161. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by aridhol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Simplify it without lying. Say that one of the ISP's servers has been cracked, and that this is allowing user passwords and information to be leaked. Give technical details at the end of the story, but keep the front part clear and simple.

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  162. What did you expect? by still+cynical · · Score: 1

    Why did you expect help or any action at all from law enforcement? You're a consumer^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcitizen, the laws are not in place to help YOU. The law is there to protect corporations and special interests. Now quit wasting our govt agencies valuable time and sit back down in front of the TV. No skipping the commercials, either. (wanna bet when THOSE laws are passed that they're enforced?)

    --
    Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  163. Somewhat similar situation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm experiencing a problem very much related although somewhat on the opposite end. I'm a subscriber of a very large ISP in oklahoma - known nation wide. They have a buggy and or broken major service - that everyone of there customers use. I informed them of this, after about 3 hours of aguing with tier 1 support (pollitely ofcourse) that this is there problem and not on my end. I informed them, simply because I know what the possibilities are with somethien like this, and how bad things could easily get - for customers and them, I was playing the nice guy... Well, they have since done nothing about this - which occured about a month ago (the same bugy service is in place). I know from experience that if a possible security breach was brought to my attention - and especially if it was easy to fix, it would get hit right away... What's an end user suppose to - wait for something like the above to just happen?

  164. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by ntsucks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are the local TV stations for St Louis. It probably a big "who cares?" to them. They seem to like stories about lost puppies and sick kittens more than real news.

    http://www.ksdk.com (NBC #1 in ratings)
    http://www.kmov.com (CBS #2 in ratings)
    http://www.fox2ktvi.com (Fox #3 in ratings, good investigative reporters)
    (ABC affiliate gave up on local news)

    Tack on Charters accounting scandals for more ammo.

    --
    Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
  165. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm truly amazed that ...the FBI blew you off like this.

    Silly boy, laws are for the rich. Not you and I.

  166. equal protection under the law by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    So, if you aren't fortune 500, they don't even want to talk to you, huh? Looks to me like the law protects money, not people. Maybe we can see if Orrin Hatch wants to launch airstrikes against the offending systems.

  167. No harm no foul. by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the powers that be weight the cost of investigating an incicent versus the value it would provide. In your case I would say the value is NULL and understandably your response has gone unnoticed. Hopefully in the future you will incure some damages, at which point you should be more pleased with the results of law enforcement. Good luck in your pursuit!

  168. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by tigris · · Score: 4, Funny


    Heh, just thinking of my local Fox station - they'd have a field day with this:
    ::scary music/graphics::
    "Have CABLE INTERNET? YOUR passwords are being STOLEN! CHARTER doesn't CARE! FOX 5 DOES! Story at 10"

  169. Re:Counter-hack, and post links to screenshots on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he probably isn't a wanker.

  170. Go to the press by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... and it doesn't have to be the New York Times, just get any kind of publicity. I'd be very surprised if you can't get your local TV news to run a story about this, if you tell them everything you posted. Of course, the idiots at the TV station will hardly understand a word, nor will they try, but they just love a story about eeeeeevil hacker pirate people and an unresponsive FBI. They'll run a story with pictures of computers in darkened rooms, with something that looks like the Matrix on the screen, and scary minor-key music in the background.

    And some poor spokesman for Charter will have to go on the news and say some crap like "This incident will be thoroughly investigated" or "We take the security of our customers very seriously" or some similar horseshit. Either that, or the TV news dorks will say, with ominous overtones in their voice, "Charter Communications did not return our calls".

    Then Charter will either have to do something about it, or they will suffer damage to their image and ultimately to their business. The latter won't help you much, but if it turns out that way, then you know for sure that you've got to stop doing business with them. And you've given them a little bit of hurt that they certainly deserve.

  171. Monitoring without consent? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    How do you know that the monitoring is without consent? Just because a first level technician didn't know anything about it?
    These servers could have been placed by the ISP, or maybe its parent company, or even the US government.

  172. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    I agree, local TV stations in my city Detroit, have lots of 'watchdog' programs. Like 1 per major channel. Thier is a reportor that goes out tracking fraud claims. 100% of the time the users are being ignored by law enforcement, and when TV gets involved all the sudden stuff gets fixed...

  173. Who cares? by br00tus · · Score: 1

    It's the job of your ISP to secure themselves, and to secure their network, and to contact law enforcement if they desire to. You want to do secure transactions, and don't trust your transport, thus you were unaffected by this when you wanted to do your secure transaction. If you don't like how your ISP is botched up, switch to an ISP with security. I can see dropping a courtesy note to the ISP informing them of the problem, but I can't see calling up the FBI, NIPC because you are the customer of an ISP that was hacked. Don't you have any better things to do? I work at an ISP and are scanned all of the time. I don't send messages to CERT or the NIPC or FBI though...if I made a call to law enforcement every time we were port scanned I'd be on the phone all day. I'm really not that concerned that there are people who want to make a use of capital that is unauthorized by the capital owners and their flunkies, and I'm definitely concerned enough to waste my time calling every spook in the book to report this UNAUTHORIZED USE OF CAPITAL!!!! Geez, even the FBI blew you off, that's pretty funny... what do you want, a junior G-man badge? Your ISP doesn't really give a shit either from what is sounds like. Isn't this telling you something? You sound pretty anal-retentive to me. If Phish starts touring again, why don't you go down there and try to spot people toking...you can write it all down on a little pad and deposit it at your local precinct.

    1. Re:Who cares? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I work at an ISP and are scanned all of the time. I don't send messages to CERT or the NIPC or FBI though.

      You truly are an idiot. This wasn't a scan this was a hijacking likely in order to grab personal citizen data. What ISP do you work for? I need to know which one to avoid.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  174. . . . post to slashdot / another perspective by seangw · · Score: 1

    Any decent sysadmin should AT LEAST be checking slashdot every few hours :)

    When he sees his system up in the headlines, he may get off his warcraft game and get to paying attention.

  175. Tell The FBI About Charter's Failure To Act by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Rather than calling the FBI and reporting your individual problem, perhaps it would have been better to focus on Charter's failure to respond to a reported compromise of their network. The FBI certainly wouldn't take immediate action based solely on assertions made in a single phone call. But, they could easily obtain evidence of a much wider and ongoing crime by contacting Charter and asking questions about their potential negligence.

    It's being a bit optimistic to expect the guy answering the FBI phone after hours to know anything about network security issues, much less to roust someone at home on the basis of a single call. However, telling the FBI that you'd had evidence that a major ISP had been compromised and describing the impact may have provoked a response.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  176. Mention these 3 words to your ISP by gosand · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mention these three words in passing when talking to tech support at your ISP: Small Claims Court

    I hate our damn system where everything has to be taken to court, but it sounds like you are out of options. Get somone from the ISP on the phone, and make sure to ask them for their first and last name. Then mention that you haven't gotten any kind of reasonable response to your issue, and how you wouldn't want it to have to degenerate to a small claims court case. Ask for their manager, and I am sure they will get them for you.

    If you make them aware of the issue, and they refuse to respond to it, they are negligent. For crying out loud, you are trying to HELP them. Be sure to point that out, politely, of course. Make them realize that they want to resolve the situation.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Mention these 3 words to your ISP by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

      And of course since this guy is just someone who got spyware, he'd hear back these four words...

      you are an idiot

  177. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    Heard of fax? hand-delivery? overnight mail? The fast delivery problem is readily solved.

    Secretary screening? In my experience, not many people are writing these types of letters, they're too busy working their way inefficiently up the ladder. Also in my experience, these letters get noticed and do make it to the CEO's desk or get otherwise appropriately addressed. Exceptions happen, I'm sure. But the method which was described usually does work best.

  178. WAIT! do we want to get the FEDs involved by argoff · · Score: 1

    Every time I turn arround, the govt is making some dumbass policy decision for the "protection" of the general public, twice so in technology related matters. If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't want the law involved. They will surely screw things up likewise. If someone's busting into your house, and your'e about to shoot em, - ok then that would be a good time to call the police, otherwise I am very reluctant to put up with the incompetence. Not that law enforcement aren't good people (sometimes), but they are held accountable to different forces.

    He should have just called his ISP, and if things didn't change in a reasonable amount of time, he should dump them, and perhaps warn others that he knows of. ISP's are a comodity nowdays.

  179. RIAA to the rescue by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1
    You want your ISP, the FBI, the CIA, NSA, and the RIAA Secret Police In The Black Helicopters(TM) to take notice, just set up a Kazaa client on your box and start trading Madonna files. When the wrath of Rosen descends upon you, put your prettiest smile on and claim that it wasn't you, and that you had, in fact, complained to the FBI and to your ISP that some nefarious critters had been hacking their systems. And that you want those evil, EVIL H4X0Rs arrested for putting piracy software on your servers.

    Then, sue your ISP for damages for allowing it to happen.

    In short,

    Be victimized in a crack...

    Be blown off by the FBI and ISP

    Download free music

    ???

    PROFIT!!!

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  180. Strikeback? by bpfinn · · Score: 1

    When you can't get anyone to care, perhaps it's time to try out Tim Mullen's strikeback proposal. He wrote about defending yourself from worms actively attacking you, but I think shutting down a passive attack is worth contemplating.

  181. Call a TV station, then the ISP management by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Make sure you can SHOW the problem to a non-technical person. If you can show the problem, contact the ISP with your best concerned citizen attitude, as if you are doing them a BIG favor by giving them some time to get ready to be interviewed on TV.

    You start with a call to the highest rated local TV station and ask to speak to the "assignment desk or assignment editor" (this is the person who sends out reporters to stories). Explain to this person that a local ISP has been hacked and that customer data, including passwords and financial data, is at risk and the ISP doesn't appear to care. Repeat until you find a TV station who takes the bait. Then take one or both of the courses of action below.

    ONE: Call the ISP and ask to speak to the CEO. Tell them that their servers have been hacked, that their tech support was not interested in the potential for theft/abuse of customers personal data, and that you have reported it to the local media and will be running a demo of what is going on for the reporters. Ask them to be sure to have someone on hand for a phone interview with the TV reporters so they can explain why the hacking happened and what they have done to fix the situation. Get the name and number of the person the TV reporter should call.

    TWO: Call the ISP and ask to speak to their legal staff. (repeat story you tell to CEO) Ask them who is the right person for the ISP customers to send damage claims to, and also ask them to have someone on hand for the reporters to interview to explain what laws have been violated and how the ISP intends to get the laws enforced.

    1. Re:Call a TV station, then the ISP management by irix · · Score: 1

      THREE: Look like the biggest ass ever when it is pointed out to you that this has nothing to do with the ISP; it is occurring because you have some spyware installed on your machine, probably put there when you installed some pr0n search software.

      Your advice is what happens when you shoot off your mouth before getting your facts straight. Five minutes using whois and google solved this problem. Using ethereal and looking at the DHCPOFFER would confirm that his hypothesis about a cracked DHCP server was false.

      If you are going to start calling CEOs, threatening legal action and trying to get publcity from TV stations you sure as hell better have your facts straight.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  182. Mod parent up by moc.tfosorcimgllib · · Score: 1

    I'm a law abiding citizen without a mark on my record, and I can still say: fuck the police

    This is why the parent should be modded up. We live in a free society, a society where you can tell the authorities where to shove it, and not be abused for it.

    No this doesn't solve the problem. The police system is overtaxed, and the entire judicial system in place was built with the purpose of keeping people out of prison and free. Because the system was built that way, people abuse it and push it to the max, and the only real authority is when the major crimes are built.

    They might only have 2 people with credentials to dust for fingerprints, and homocides taking up their time. The whole system is overtaxed.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will add to this, then shut up on this topic.. (it irritates me)..

      The system is overtaxed.. true.. However, one must admit that there are more "officers" who are on more on the crooks side than the victims side. Which means that number of officers who can and would do something are even less. For every person who respects and truely wants to uphold the law.. there are 10 that really don't give a rats rear end and look at it as just a job.. (do as little as you can, get paid as much as you can, take as many shortcuts as you can, and ignore anyone that mucks over my plans, unless the boss is watching).

      We do NOT live in a free society were we can tell the authorities to shove it and recieve no punishment... (have you not been keeping up with the news?).. We do however live in a society where the pentality for saying shove it is not death (yet!).

      The small crook usually becomes (if not caught) a bigger crook.. (Do you honestly think that the guy who stole 40 million yesterday, just "snapped".. of course not.. its a patteren of behaviour that can be traced back to him stealing a lollipop at the corner store).

    2. Re:Mod parent up by knobmaker · · Score: 1
      The police system is overtaxed, and the entire judicial system in place was built with the purpose of keeping people out of prison and free.

      Excuse me? Are you an American? If so, are you not aware that America imprisons a larger percentage of its citizens than any other country in the world?

      America has about 5% of the world's population, but 25% of the world's prisoners. This a fact, and it means that either Americans are the most criminal people in the world, or the police system is putting too many people in jail. Pick one.

  183. use the media by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Call Dateline.

    But the good thing is, since you /.'ed it, some online publications are likely to take it up.

    Public opinion and exposure can help embarass law enforcement that they turned the other cheek.

    Though I could've sworn that the not-so-Patriotic Patriot Act is suppose to cover this.

  184. FBI/Federal attitude... by gandy909 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have 2 things that happened where the 'feds' were involved, and I can say from experience that this is exactly the response you will get from the feds for trying to do the right thing.

    I have a dialup inet connection at home. Sux, but that's my only viable option at the moment. I stuck a 6.1 or 6.2 Redhat box on the modem and set it up as a firewall/default gateway for the other 3 (Windows) pc's in the house. The kids have to play online games, etc, ya know. I stupidly left the ftp server running for some reason. Worked flawlessly for 2 years. One day I came home and the box had crapped out in the midst of booting with a strange error. Finally got it up and things didn't even look right. Yup, I had finally had my first experience at being rootkit'd. Fortunately they had used a screwed up rootkit and it didn't like something about my system or the OS and it crashed on reboot.
    I freaked out and called the FBI right away in case they wanted the box to 'collect forensic evidence' or something. The conversation went like this, and the money figure is the one he used:
    "Hello, FBI"
    "Hi, I got my computer system hacked into. What do we do now?"
    "Uh, did you lose at least $50,000.00?"
    "No..."
    "Sorry, we could care less then. Goodbye"

    My other story, and I was more upset on it, happened when I worked at the courthouse when the 'dad's'(or mom's) paid the support there so the court could track the payments, then we would deposit it and write our own check to the 'mom's' (or dad's) and mail them out. A person we sent a check to lived in an apartment, but had moved and hadn't given us his/her new address. Someone else was now living in the apartment where we sent the check. To top it off, the post office had mis-delivered the check to a different apartment in the complex. (I know, it is confusing) Anyway, the person who got the check didn't know that the person it was made out to had moved. This person, knowing it was a check for a substantial amount of money, went to the address on the envelope and told the person who (now) lived there that they would only hand over the check for a certain percentage of the amount!!! This person said she would think about it and immediately called us. At this point we have the perfect 'sting' waiting to happen, and all the authorities have to do is be present when the blackmailer returns to settle the deal! So I called the FBI and they said they didn't care, and I should call the postal inspectors office. So I did. This guy said if there wasn't 'thousands and thousands' of dollars at stake he wasn't interested in the least.
    So here we have a real crime happening and no one cares, but when some kid goes out and knocks over a few mailboxes they throw the book at em. Those two events alone were more than enough to tell me to NEVER trust the federal gov't nor rely on them to do the right thing where individuals citizens are involved. and this was all before that moron Ashcroft got in charge. (who is unfortunatelly from my state, and boy were we glad to get rid if him, or so we thought!)

    --

    (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
  185. it's all about cc: by SolemnDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Write a letter.
    Send it to charter. List at the end the OTHER people to ewhom you are sending it, and you'll need to send them all snail mail, with the two (yes, two- one to the folks you spoke to, one addressed to the CEO, which will be read by a secretary and passed on to someone whose job it is to keep these things quiet) to Charter certified mail, return receipt requested. Those others will go to:

    Your US congressional reps- both houses, whether you voted for them or not; (i'm assuming you're in the US, if not go for the nearest equivalent of these)

    The Better Business Bureau;

    the state attorney general's office

    the FBI office that you contacted;

    The FCC;

    Anyone and Everyone whom you think might be interested, NOT counting the media. Why not? Because you want to be able to prove that you gave them a chance to correct the problem before you take it further. You are certainly allowed to suggest that it might be possible, but mention first that you need a written response from them telling what they plan to do about this (tell them what you want this to be), and mention that you will seek the assistance of a lawyer if this clear threat to you as their customer is not immediately remedied.

    Keep a copy of the letter. Offer to send supporting evidence AS SOON AS they have officially begun their remedial actions and you have received initial results. (or you may wish to send it sooner, at least the info that you feel comfortable having random secretaries seeing.)

    IANAL, but I have good reason to recommend this method. Incidentally, it works for a LOT of customer issues, and you have to be sure to send out copies of follow-up letters to the same set of people. Make sure to document hours spent working on it, and all the people whom you've spoken with and when. Media is for after their failure to remedy the matter after 1 letter, just add it to the CC list. You might try writing the second letters as two- one to the company, one to the attorney general or congressional folks, and the other to the company, and include copies of both in the envelope to the company. Their failure to help is against entirely different laws. Use the words "acted in bad faith."

    be persistent. It helps.

    1. Re:it's all about cc: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      hmmm. I love the "NOT Counting the Media". What do you think /. is?

  186. Sounds to me... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    ... like you covered all the bases you needed to cover. I'd start contacting some of the tech magazines (Wired, etc.) and provide them with everything you've got. Cast some negative light on the FBI's and Charter's lack of interest in getting involved. If charter has a user group (like Road Runner does at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cable) I'd post it there as well. One of RR's top support guys frequents that group and has gotten the ball rolling on more than one occassion.

    Drawing any negative publicity to this is likely the only way to get it looked into.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Sounds to me... by Artifex · · Score: 1
      ... like you covered all the bases you needed to cover. I'd start contacting some of the tech magazines (Wired, etc.) and provide them with everything you've got.


      No, he forgot to run a spyware detector like Ad-Aware on his box first. Of course, that negates the rest of what you want him to do.

      Drawing any negative publicity to this is likely the only way to get it looked into.


      It generates unduly negative publicity for a company stuck with a customer who didn't properly troubleshoot his own systems before blaming theirs.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  187. Another experience with the feds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tracked down fraud for a similar small telco company situation. We normally shut down credit card fraud accounts and just suck it up; it's not over the FBI $5,000 threshhold. However, early on, before we were more familiar with fraud patterns, we got some fraudster making calls to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Greenland(?), etc.

    Slightly paranoid, we passed the phone numbers and IP information onto the FBI to double-check that there weren't terrorism connections. The FBI were actually pretty prompt about communicating back and forth; hours and days, not weeks. And they were reasonably technically competent based on my minimal interaction.

    The phone numbers called didn't match any known 'questionable' numbers being screened for by national security folks, and the jurisdiction got confusing because the fraudsters were routing through some hacked systems in Germany so we mutually just dropped the issue and soon enough the fraudster quit coming back after we blocked him enough.

  188. $5000 minimum or maximum by TLouden · · Score: 1

    It seems to me like the rule with the FBI is that $5000 of monetary damages must be done before they even start to give a sh10t. A nice laptop/desktop is well under that amount as are many things that a h4x0r might want. Seems to me like the FBI is just asking for a bunch of fraudulent $4999 computer equipment purchases or whatever. Or maybe someone is just sitting around right now working on a system to hit up every company they can find and do just under $5k of damages so that no one can do a thing about it.

    I know there's probably something that makes this not work but it's still seems stupid that the FBI sets such an obvious line for criminals to fall just short of and it's fairly high, I mean I know plenty of people who would consider the risk well worth 5K if they had the skills to pull something like this off and some of them are close to being that talented.

    --
    -Tim Louden
  189. Internet Tax by macrealist · · Score: 1

    An advantage of paying taxes is public services. Pay more taxes, (hopeful) get more services.

    No internet taxes equates to no internet law enforcement. Instead we get traditional law enforcement that don't have the same values or boundries that the internet has.

    Now after saying this, I've not seen any internet tax proposal that was more than just a money grab for some local government. And each such money grab did not offer the adding services to the internet.

    What would be nice is if a large group of ISPs worked together to create an internet "law" enforcement agency that actually cared about catching hackers and stopping them BEFORE damages are done. For each of us it would only be a few more dollars per year in ISP charges, and we would gain an agency that did care about OUR interenet security.

    --
    I am living proof of the Peter Principle
  190. No Sympathy for you... by YE · · Score: 1

    Dude, this is Slashdot, for Chrissake. FBI are the bad guys. The guys hijacking the web servers were just free software guerilla fighters, protecting the right of information to be free!

    Sheesh. You mean you prefer Big Brother to take care of this "crime", thus violating your basic civil liberties to get robbed?

  191. Looks like we're both wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out the moron just downloaded some spyware. No one's DNS got hacked, but everyone got good & riled up.

    That means:
    a) he makes fyordor look like Cassanova
    b) he IS a wanker

  192. Holy Crap by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    You guys are all doorknobs.

    Of course Linux detects ARP broadcasts, otherwise you'd never to be able to talk to other machines on your local subnet! (Making you one very lonely pr0n surf3r)

    I don't know why BSD bothers logging ethernet address changes, probably because Timmy O'Tool is a paranoid little dude.

    The fact that the ISP gateway's MAC is changing probably means that you have a moronic ISP. Either that, or that a box on your local subnet has been compromised and is trying out a clever spoofing attack -- which would leave your internet service sporadic at best until they killed the real gateway.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  193. How to make noise by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Doing it in writing makes it easier for the CEO to pass the responsibility on quickly. All he has to do is take a few seconds to read your letter, and a few seconds to delegate the solving of your problem. He doesn't even have to try to re-articulate what your problem is through phone calls and garbled telephone tag -- you've done this for him already.
    This is absolutely correct. I've done this a couple times myself. I have no idea whether the CEO him/herself actually read my letter. Probably not. But both times I got back letters from high-ranking company officials. And not boilerplate noise, either -- carefully written letters that directly addressed the issues I raised.

    The problem with "working up the ladder" is that you're dealing with folks who are just cogs in the machine. Either they're hemmed in by procedures, or they afraid to stick they necks out. Probably both.

    Of course, it's still likely that whoever you get in contact with will just blow you off. That's especially true if the company has legal exposure. (As an ISP in this situation certainly would!) But at least you'll know that people with actual decision-making powers are aware of the problem.

  194. Just two things by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    First, are you absolutely certain that this is not a case of spyware hijacking your computer? Malware "vendors" maybe obnoxious and they may be evil, but they're not stupid. Your problem here sounds like a classic case of spyware rather than someone taking over DNS for an ISP. Some other posts in this article have pointed that out, AFAICS. It's pretty simple to figure out if that's your problem.

    If you must use Windows, then I fail to see what the point is in getting in your snide comments about the thing not being secure. If you're using Windows 9x, then you deserve whatever it is you're getting - if you're using Windows 2000 or XP then you're just plain stupid. Windows is as secure as you make it, just like any other OS. Using SSH doesn't make you any more 1337 if you don't know how to secure your computer(s). It just makes you look even dumber.

    Of course, if this is indeed a case of spyware you let into your computer (because they hardly get in any other way), then not only are you stupid, you're just plain retarded, and you're strutting your stupidity in front of a few hundred thousand people.

    OTOH, if someone did indeed hijack your ISPs DNS, then using a router and NAT with the IP addresses of the DNS servers hard-coded into the configuration would have saved you from this. If all you have between the cable modem and your PC is a piece of CAT5, you also deserve to be clobbered.

    This may be harsh, but I have no patience for people who like to assert that Windows is unsafe when they really don't know what they're doing.

  195. Of course you couldn't get anyone interested... by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    ...in the attack. You didn't say the magic word:

    TERRORIST!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  196. Politics by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    One opinion you'll find in the incident response community is that you should already be on a first-name basis with LEO's before you need them. In other words, good old American know-who.

    It can also help to have an amibitious prosecutor who wants to make front page news with a computer crime case.

  197. You Should Tell Charter About This Slashdot Item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and remind them that a simple google for ISP hack reveals that ISPs have spend hundred of thousands of dollars cleaning up after a penetration, and some closed shop *permanently*.

  198. Chater - but where at? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Charter is a big company. I know lots of people who may have been hacked in the past two days if this happened around here. What state / city are you in?

  199. man in the middle with RSA authentication by David+Jao · · Score: 2, Informative
    Because I don't enter my password over the wire, there's no way for it to be intercepted.

    What you say is technically true, but ssh1 users are still vulnerable to man in the middle attacks even if RSA user authentication is used.

    The attack relies on an incredibly non-obvious flaw in the ssh1 protocol which was fixed in the ssh2 protocol. While an attacker cannot get your passwords using this attack, he can interpose between the client and server and intercept all traffic for that session. The error message saying the server host key has changed is your only clue that such an attack is going on.

    You can read about the details in this paper. Unless you are using ssh2, you should be very wary of sudden changes in the server host key, even if you are using RSA authentication, and even if you appear to be connected to the correct server.

  200. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you have never actually done this.
    Well, I have. Law enforcement will follow up
    by telling everybody that you went over their
    heads and to the media *before* calling them,
    and that if you had contacted them first everybody
    would be warm and fuzzy.

    And guess who everybody will believe? And guess
    what happens the next time you try to contact
    ANYBODY.

    Good luck. The police and the FBI know better
    than anybody how to lie and get away with murder.

    In Los Angeles, the Rampart police division is
    so corrupt they are losing officers to indictment
    almost weekly... and the DA's office has a 100%
    record of never questioning a statement by any one
    of these indicted officers when they were busy
    racking up their fraudulent arrest reports, even
    when they were patently ludicrous.

    And you tink these "people" want to help you?

  201. The correct procedure... by Ndr_Amigo · · Score: 1

    The first thing to realise is that the NIPC is no longer an entity. What you really want to call is Homeland Security (dhs.gov under Threats and Protection). The second thing to realise is that although Charter's 'frontline' staff don't want to hear about it, get in touch with ANY sysadmin there and I guarantee the shit will hit the fan. It's all about actually getting hold of somebody who might actually give a shit about their companies servers. Something Cliff Stoll details very well in that excellent book plugged earlier :) Google is a good start, and although often somewhat outdated, the list of NOCs at neither is useful (http://puck.nether.net/netops/)

  202. Step 10 is wrong by Artifex · · Score: 1

    Step 10 should be: realize about 30 seconds before Charter calls and threatens to sue you for posting unproven accusations, that you were a victim of C2Media's spyware.
    Step 11... loss!!!

    (See here for more info)

    Poor Heeltoe. I'm sure he thought he'd be seen as a whistleblower, etc., but now everyone will remember him as a classic example of someone who calls tech support and blames the problem on the ISP, when it's bad software on his box.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  203. Forget the FBI, just call the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Tell them that the hacked servers are offering up copyright material. Tell them all of Britney's recordings are being offered for free download


    Then for good measure, call the BSA and tell them all kinds of copyrighted warez are being served.


    The police? They're a government entity. In the USA, we have learned the private sector gets things done.

  204. A couple of comments on what to do in the Future by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) Book Mark this site. This is the first and best place to go when hacked and is a great source of education in general for victims of hacking.

    2) You're right about the FBI. They are very limited in their scope of assistance. The only other victims they would take immediate action with are attacks on other State, local or US governmental sites (ie. State Funded Universities, Governmental offices, etc.)

    3) Scan your logs on a regular basis.

    4) Check this link out. This is the NSA'a recommendations on how to hammer down Cisco Routers, Windows 2K, XP, and NT4 Operating systems. These should be used as a guide as following all the steps in this manual would turn your machine(s) into bastion servers.

    5) Be Prepared for the ISP not talking to or Working with you on this issue. Prodigy, Qwest, and Sprint used to be and in some cases are REALLY bad at this.

    Dolemite
    ______________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  205. Might help. by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    Try calling the your state police. Don't really know if it will help, but what you have just been through it couldn't hurt to try.

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  206. paper url by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    Apologies:

    The location of the paper is here.

    (damn google for giving me an old link)

  207. Check your hosts file too!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that many spywarez install a hosts file, over your original file, and clocks in at almost 1MB. This may also be a source of your problems.

  208. DNS redirecting is not dangerous, complaciancy is. by mlafranc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always ssh to 192.168.1.13, which works just fine, and I don't use proxies, the larger concern is that an important, but a vestigal service got hijacked, namely dhcp.

    Don't wait around for law enforcement. When someone lift's your wallet, whom do you call? VISA or the FBI?. Perhaps you need to learn from this hijack, don't go nuts, screaming rape... Fix it!, put in static IP's, don't use a proxy unless you control it, after all, your ISP could be lookin' at your passwords, and cookies etc. Use SSL and SSH, and know what's going on. When something goes boom, fix it.

  209. Of course the FBI won't help, if it's their hack by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    File it under P for "Paranoia", but a worst-case scenario is that you stumbled onto the FBI's own hack job.

    There could be a whole bundle of subpoenas giving them permission to monitor all communication on Charter's server... or Charter could have simply pointed an FBI agent toward the server room door and given him/her the key. Either way, you have no way of knowing that Big Brother is watching you.

    Hopefully, if it's the feds doing the hacking, they're looking for something or someone in particular. Where a hacker might dig through all the transmissions that include 16-digit numbers, the feds may be looking for all requests that include a particular email address. Let's just hope that it's not *your* email address.

    Or maybe they've got the digital signature of a prosecutable image -- if it comes across, they check out who it went to and who it came from. You'd better hope you hit the "back" button in time! Of course, you have the 4th amendment to prevent anything they discover from being used against you in court... but that doesn't keep them from using what they find out "off the record" to get "on the record" evidence they can use.

    I'm not terribly concerned about the feds (or other gov't agencies) using such a hack to compile a dossier on every Netizen, simply because 1) the signal/noise ratio is too low and 2) the government's built-in inefficiency is the best guarantor of our continued freedom.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  210. Use PACROOT.com instead by barfomar · · Score: 1

    See http://www.pacroot.com/main.shtml bypassing your ISP's domain server and find web pages on the net nobody else sees. Set your DNS server search order to 208.179.42.162 204.107.129.2 12.28.140.20 in that order.

  211. Here's what I found out about it by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I'm trying to post an analysis of what I found about about these systems, but slashdot keeps punking me whining about garbage like junk characters and too few characters per line. I freakin give up.

    Slashdot editors: Rely on moderators to cut down on problems like this, not catch-all algorithms. sheesh.

    --
    -R
  212. RIAA them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just contact the RIAA and let them know the ISP is being used, by these hackers, to distibute millions of dollars of copyrighted digital content.

    Problem Solved!

  213. volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Folks, this isn't flamebait, it's the truth. Moderators, do your worst.

    I love all the "I hate the X&!#@ Cops!!" trolls that inhabit this place; youthful rage directed at "the man"... with no concept of what it would be like to live without them.

    Here's my challenge to all those who hate the police so much: If you think you can do their job so much better than they can, go help them out. I'm serious... this is a put-up-or-shut-up challenge. I want you to spend some time in the belly of the beast.

    When I was a teen, I didn't like cops... but a funny thing happened to me on the way to my current job, I became a police officer, and it's got to be one of the nastiest jobs in the world. As a doc, I deal with drunks/pimps/bangers/dealers all the time, but thankfully they are usually cuffed and/or exhausted by the time they get to me (and some of them STILL fight... ER workers get assaulted all the time by these types. Fortuntately, the pharmacy is mighter than the sword). I deal with them, but I have a full contigent of burly guys +/- drugs to help me out... taking them on mano-a-mano on the street is a very different scenario. I take care of the bad people, but I also take care of the cops that get hurt fighting them. BE THANKFUL cops are out there... you don't even want to know the kind of sociopaths cops deal with everyday, for pretty low pay. You want to live in a world without cops? Go ahead, but be prepared to do your own dirty work. Think you've got what it takes? You'd better be right, because you're betting you life and the lives of your family on it.

    Yes, I can hear the "boo hoo! poor cop! go eat more donuts!" trolls now... save it. You trolls can scoff all you want. Feel free to live in your "no cops" world... sounds great on the surface... but getting your ass kicked by some gangbangers when you're walking home from the LAN party some night might change your tune.

    If you've got a beef with the "racist, motherf*cking police" and want to change things, then quit complaining and start working. Learn something about the police... volunteer some of your time (it's called community service; look into it). Go to a reserve police academy and get sworn, do some ride-alongs, or donate some of your 3l337 technical skills to their investigative unit (maybe they need computer forensics help).

    Try to make things better instead of indulging in typical slashdot cop-bashing... in addition to the satisfaction of helping out your community, you might be surprised by what you learn.

    What have you got to lose? Do it.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I love the idiot `support the boys in blue' knee-jerk trolls which inhabit just about every place: submissive folly which refuses to recognise the very real problems in the system.

      Not a bit of your post addresses the original issues: ineffective law enforcement. The OP never said that there should not be police, IIRC: rather, he gave instances where they didn't serve a useful function, either by commission or omission.

      Certainly, law enforcement is by its nature an unpleasant profession. Certainly, there is a need for law enforcement. The original poster, methinks, would agree. If the cops stopped wasting their time on foolishness (e.g. drug, alcohol, weapons and traffic enforcement) and instead focused on real problems (e.g. rape, murder, theft and fraud), I don't believe people would particularly hate them. It's when the police are the willing enforcer-thugs of an authoritarian state that we lose our respect for them--and quite rightly so.

      As for your suggestion to volunteer: I refuse to supply my labour in order to free up time for a cop to issue a single other drug or speeding citation. I refuse to supply my labour in order to free up time for a liquor-law sting operation. I refuse to subsidise injustice.

    2. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      I hardly have a monopoly on idiocy in this forum, as many of these posts, including your own, unfortunately demonstrate. I'm surprised, because I've read some of your other posts, and you seem like an educated, even eloquent man. This is not up to your usual standards, sir.

      Define "ineffective" law enforcement. If by this you refer to your own personal solipsistic view of what cops should or should not enforce, I expect you will be disappointed. Society decides what law enforcement focuses on, through our elected legislatures. If you don't like the laws... change them; you're stuck with them until that happens. If society doesn't agree with you, then start your own society... or break the laws at your own peril.

      You believe there is a need for law enforcement and "the original poster, methinks, would agree?" Please... "F*ck the police" expresses a desire for law enforcement? Not a very solid defense of the original posters demagoguery.

      It's unfortunate that you view the system as so corrupt that you refuse to to help change it. If you hope to change the system by destroying it in some anarchistic orgasm, you should recalculate your odds. Such entrenched systems often change when those WITHIN them change them. Also, your statement that you "refuse to subsidise" them is wishful thinking; you pay taxes, so you're already subsidising them... don't you want to make sure you're getting your money's worth? I hope you are not one of those loathsome souls who complains about their elected representative, and then never votes... Why don't you join a civilian review board, meet and talk with your police chief, make friends with some cops, and see what it's like out there. Are you so convinced of your own rightness that you won't even try? There's much to be learned when you challenge your own worldview.

      If your beef is with society, then focus your anger appropriately, ie. not at the individual cop who's just trying to do his job.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    3. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      "(e.g. drug, alcohol, weapons and traffic enforcement)"

      Err... what the hell, why not have no enforcement of any petty laws. The very fact that alot of people drive their vehicles like a weapon proves the unfortunate necessity of sane traffic laws.

      Go live in East L.A., then you can make statements about cops wasting their time on foolishness like weapons enforcement.
      Just remember to use bullit proof glass on your car and house! I also suggest cutting off your middle fingers if you want to survive on the freeway.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    4. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Erebus · · Score: 1

      not at the individual cop who's just trying to do his job.

      Wasn't that the same excuse used by Nazi SS Death Camp guards? Just following orders, or some such Republican BS?

    5. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      I fail to see what any of this has to do with republicans OR democrats... You've gotta troll better than that.

      What you are referring to applies to military officers. The sources of their authority to command are twofold: from their rank, and their moral authority (they are held to a higher moral standard). Because of this, they can be prosecuted for obeying an order that they know (or should know) to be illegal or unlawful. Commissioned miltary officers have an obligation to evaluate their orders, and are trained NOT to blindly follow whatever they are told. That said, if you invoke that doctrine and disobey an order, you had better be on damned solid footing, or you will be court-martialed.

      The nazi death camp guards tried to plead at Nuremburg that they were "only following orders," when the orders they were following were clearly unlawful AND immoral.

      This has little or nothing to do with the previous discussion, unless you are trying to argue that the cops should have the final say regarding what laws should be enforced. Legislature, executive branch, judge, jury, executioner... all rolled into one? That's the LAST thing you want.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    6. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't even want to know the kind of sociopaths cops deal with everyday, for pretty low pay.

      I'm not bashing cops; I just want to point out that after age 40-something a cop can retire on a decent pension, while the rest of us just keep on working. So the pay isn't really as low as it seems, once you factor in another 35 years of collecting pension.

    7. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like that firearm prohibition in East L.A. is still working as well as expected.

    8. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by thynk · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can hear the "boo hoo! poor cop! go eat more donuts!" trolls now... save it. You trolls can scoff all you want. Feel free to live in your "no cops" world... sounds great on the surface... but getting your ass kicked by some gangbangers when you're walking home from the LAN party some night might change your tune.

      I often wonder what would happen if we removed *ALL* laws for 10 or 20 years. If you want to rape your neighbor's daughter on the front lawn in the middle of the afternoon while high on crack, by all means - do so. There would be no laws, no judges, no lawers and no cops to stop you. Oh, there would also be no cops to stop your neighbor from shooting you for doing that.

      Maybe it's time we introduce a little natural selection back into the human race.

      Of course, this isn't a good idea at all, but it's amusing to think about every time I hear someone say "There needs to be a law" or "The govenment should set up a program to help X".

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    9. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "ineffective" law enforcement.

      Ummm...allowing a thief to walk off with $4000 of your computer equipment and refusing to look at the security camera footage? Like the original poster posted?

      the individual cop who's just trying to do his job.

      Again: the poster was complaining quite specifically about a cop who was trying to get out of doing his job -- pursuing a thief. Don't bother trying to scare us with that whole "imagine a world without cops" schtick -- if you've been robbed/assaulted and been told by the police that your case doesn't matter enough to warrant investigation or evidence-collecting, you're already there for most intents and purposes.

      How bad does it look out here in civilianland? Not too long ago, here in Cincinnati, there was a cop who was fired because he arrested a guy for interrupting his dinner to report a crime. I wish this was an isolated incident, but I hear too many other stories like the ones being shared here to believe it any more.

      Why don't you join a civilian review board, meet and talk with your police chief,

      Why should I? So that, when I get ignored and dismissed, maybe I can at least videotape it on one of the public access channels and have a permanent record of my humiliation? Because police departments are sooooo receptive to criticism and open to change.

      make friends with some cops, and see what it's like out there.

      Being a cop is hard? Sweet skateboarding Jesus, is there anybody over the age of 5 who doesn't know that? I mean, surely when you signed up, you didn't think it was going to be wacky hijinx with pimps and Crips?

      Here's your worldview challenge for the day: Don't be a cop if you don't have what it takes to do it right. No other employer would tolerate an employee half-assing it because the job is stressful. The stakes involved make that excuse even less acceptable from a policeman, not more.

    10. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awfully sorry old chap, but isn't that what this article is about? Doing you own goddamn police work because you aren't worth the cops' time?

      What do you do to stop the bad cops? It better not be 'nothing' because then you as a "good" cop are just as fucked as the bad ones.

      If I didn't know any better, I'd say you were suggested "if ya can't beat em, join em."

      Fuck you pig.

    11. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, inquiring minds want to know:

      What are you doing to stop the bad cops?

    12. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      I love all the "I hate the X&!#@ Cops!!" trolls that inhabit this place; youthful rage directed at "the man"... with no concept of what it would be like to live without them.

      If our rights to defend ourselves hadn't been systematically taken away by those who wish to have more control over us, we wouldn't need the police.

      Life without police would mean getting to and from work in a prompt manner. People would stay right except to pass, because a few encounters with road-ragers would encourage them to stay out of the fast lane. It would mean you could shoot the next guy who tries to rob you, and not worry about going to jail for possession of a deadly weapon. It would mean you could grow plants of all sorts in your house and not worry about losing your freedom, family and equity in your home. It would mean that when some asshole rapes your daughter, you could go drag his ass out on the lawn and negotiate with his parents for his life... or lynch him if no one vouches for his character.

      Yes, life would be a bit violent while we adapted to the new rules and self-government. Innocent people would have to buy guns the same way they buy DVD players and Cellphones. Family fueds might come back in fashion, but eventually cooler heads would rule and calm things down to a civil level.

      On the other hand, serious crimes would drop drastically as people began enforcing the laws themselves. Victims would transform into Vigilantes. Criminals would have more to worry about since more people would be armed and empowered to protect each other. Today's enforcement by slow-proxy is ridiculous: You can commit murder knowing the odds are 50% that you'll get away with it. After all, the victim won't offer much of a fight and people in the vicinity will just ignore you or call a cop leaving plenty of time to flee the scene. Assuming those they catch are mostly drug crazed or enraged, any careful planner probably has better than a 75% of getting away with a serious crime.

      Centralization of law enforcement has done wonders to increase the random violence against innocents in today's society. Police do little to nothing FOR law abiding citizens, but they sure have gotten into the habit of getting in the way of our daily lives.

      So please constrain your FUD unless you can back it up. We are a society of the unarmed, preyed upon by both the criminal and "the man."

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    13. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by giblfiz · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is that there are virtualy no stories coming to the surface about people who have been protected by the police. This indicates to me that there is in fact a problem with the way police enforcement is being handled. Much of the behaviour described here is quite hanous, but no one seems to have a first hand account of the police actually being helfull.

    14. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      Nothing, because I don't know any.

      I'm not here to defend bad cops, and I refuse to pay for their sins in this forum.

      Here's the deal. If being a cop is not your only job (ie. you're reserve, or you're a volunteer), you are not beholden to that system like a full-timer is. You don't have to worry about about what being a whistleblower will do to your career... you can simply walk away... which is what I would do if I witnessed something seriously wrongful and they covered it up.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    15. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      So you're in Cincinnati? Your police department has really been through it the last few years, starting with Timothy Thomas, and the riots.

      Unfortunatly for you, your city has swung the other way. Cincy cops are so much under the microscope that they have backed off from doing parts of their jobs... they don't want be pilloried, sued, and fired. If you want "ineffective" law enforcement, then you've got it... right there in your own hometown, and you've got only the anti-cop factions in your own city to blame. How do you like it? Do you live in Over-the-rhine, where violent crime is up >50% because of less-agressive enforcement? Those folks sure don't like it, but you cannot have it both ways... you must choose.

      BTW, depending on where the original poster lived, do you have any idea what the odds are of recovering that laptop? How terrible most security camera footage is, and how worthless? (ever see those TV snippets they show you of bank robbers with the caption "be on the lookout for this man!"... I've yet to see one I could use for a positive ID). If the OP lives in a big city, then the cops don't even have the manpower to cover major crimes, let alone a lost laptop.

      I know the OP thinks his laptop is the most important thing in the world... but a cop who's running from call to call does NOT have time for a special, prolonged investigation just for the unfortunate OPs precious laptop. The reality is this: you file a police report and collect from your insurance company, and that's the end of it. "Ineffective" law enforcement? Try realistic law enforcement.

      "I wish this was an isolated incident, but I hear too many stories like the ones shared here to believe it anymore." Sooo... rather than volunteer your time, see for yourself, and work to make it better, you'd rather just take the word of every AC slashgeek (just like yourself) in an anonymous forum... well, that's certainly easier, that's for sure. It makes your opinion equal to that of a chattering magpie, but it's definitely easier.

      You also state that police departments are "sooooo receptive to criticism"... and you've clearly never tried, and aren't willing to ("Why should I?"). Until you show yourself as something other than a naysayer, someone who's actually interesting in community improvement, you'll get written off, and your self-fulfilling prophesy will come true. If you want to influence things, show you give a shit by investing something of yourself in the process. Or, you could just anonymously bitch about it on slashdot... your choice... your way is certainly easier.

      right thing != easy thing.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    16. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      I am thankful for the fact that you risk your life for the citizenry. I have no problem with the way you do your job. Your job is an integral part of keeping us free.

      And my job of being a pain in the ass to any one who wants ID, or to speak to me is also integral to me being free. In a court of law, both sides are brutal in stretching their rights and powers, snapping on every last violation of rights, and in general being a pain in the ass to each other. Defense attorneys scour records for their clients to find every last mistake. Yet, without this constant struggle, there would be no true justice.

      Likewise, without the constant struggle between you getting your job done and me protecting my rights like a crazed weasel is what keeps us both protected and free. So, yes, if you want to talk to me about where I was some night, I won't do it. If you want to search my home without a warrant, you won't get past the door. It has nothing to do with "fighting back against the man", it is to keep you in line and honest, just as you have the job of keeping me in line and honest.

      --
      -twb
    17. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're in Cincinnati? Your police department has really been through it the last few years, starting with Timothy Thomas, and the riots. [...] Cincy cops are so much under the microscope that they have backed off from doing parts of their jobs... they don't want be pilloried, sued, and fired.

      Yeah, shooting 5 unarmed black men in 7 months tends to draw some negative attention. Funny how that works.

      You call it "backing off" in fear of legal hassles. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it with me -- the cops here are deliberately letting Over-the-Rhine fester because it's an effective way of dividing critics: when the crime rate soars, people call for more police on the streets and stronger enforcement, which isolates those who remember that, when the Cincinnati police beef up OtR enforcement, they start becoming the main thing to fear.

      If you want "ineffective" law enforcement, then you've got it... right there in your own hometown, and you've got only the anti-cop factions in your own city to blame.

      Heee. Cincinnati has a long history of police brutality against blacks -- and of police closing ranks to defend their own. Where do you think the "anti-cop" factions come from? Why do you think the cops are so disliked in Cincinnati? Don't presume to lecture me about my own hometown, bucky: I know it a lot better than you.

      The reality is this: you file a police report and collect from your insurance company, and that's the end of it. "Ineffective" law enforcement? Try realistic law enforcement.

      No, the reality is this: if you tell someone that his property theft isn't worth investigating, and then cite him later for some trivial misdemeanor, you're digging your own public-relations grave.

      "I wish this was an isolated incident, but I hear too many stories like the ones shared here to believe it anymore." Sooo... rather than volunteer your time, see for yourself, and work to make it better, you'd rather just take the word of every AC slashgeek (just like yourself)

      Nice ad hominem there. Notice that you don't have real response to what I've said? Am I not supposed to take the word of friends describing their experiences? How about the reporters covering the incidents that do make it to a courtroom -- do I have to join the CPD before I can consider courtroom testimony? Jackass.

      It makes your opinion equal to that of a chattering magpie, but it's definitely easier.

      Bwah! So I have to be Superman and volunteer my Copious Free Time before I can criticize obvious problems? Puh-leeze.

      You also state that police departments are "sooooo receptive to criticism"... and you've clearly never tried, and aren't willing to ("Why should I?").

      Or perhaps I have tried, and gotten nowhere -- precisely because of people like you, who close ranks and discount anyone with an opinion counter to theirs as a bleeding-heart liberal, an armchair quarterback, etc.

      you could just anonymously bitch about it on slashdot

      Yup. Just as I've come to expect from your average police apologist: you've got nothing real to say about any of the points I've raised, so let's go with the AC flame....

    18. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      "Don't presume to lecture me about my own hometown, bucky: I know it a lot better than you." Well, you certainly told me... unfortunate that you haven't demonstrated any of that knowledge yet.

      I was a cop in Ohio, in a department not far from Cincy, so don't tell me that I don't know anything about it. In fact, I WILL presume to lecture you about your own hometown, because your own knowledge is total FUD. Are you simply parroting the speeches that you heard at your last anti-police march? OF COURSE the cops are backing off in Over-the-Rhine, for the reasons I gave in my previous post. You outlined the dilemma perfectly... now what are you going to do about it, aside from bitching? If you want a drop in the crime rate, then let the cops do their jobs... If you don't... well, you've seen the results. It's divided the critics, because some of them are having second thoughts about the collateral damage in their racist cop witch-hunt. Assuming you lived in Over-the-Rhine, which would YOU want, Mr. AC?

      Now, why don't you tell me about all those "unarmed" shootings you thought were so unjustifiable. Did you mean 12yo Courtney Mathis? No... he was dragging a Cincy cop with his vehicle (that cop died from the dragging). Jeffrey Irons? No... he tried to take an officers gun (and succeeded). Timothy Thomas? No... it's unwise to act like you're going for a weapon when the police are chasing you... it cost Timothy his life. Of those 15 police shootings that have been so bandied about, 12 of them were of perpetrators armed with some kind of weapon (vehicle, gun, bludgeon). Also, don't even pull the racial card here... the Cincy force is 1/4 black, and 1/4 of their shooting are by black officers. African americans are 78% of the shooting "victims" in Cincy, but that's also the exact percentage of violent felony arrests that are attibuted to African Americans. That's not to say there weren't sloppy procedures and such, but the Cincy cops are NOT the Klan. Don't you read the Cincinnati Enquirer? They did a whole series a few years back about those "unarmed" shootings.

      Also, don't bullshit me and give me the line that "maybe I have tried." You have done nothing of the sort... you already said so. Don't embelish now. Also, I didn't bring politics into this at all; I never accused you of being a liberal bedwetter, so don't put words in my mouth. I accused you of being an anonymous troll... pretty much fits, I'd say.

      I don't expect you to take my word about police work... Go find out for yourself. This means get some FIRST HAND info, not from your friends, or Jesse Jackson. Do you take everything that's told to you on its face? Any possibility your friend might be spinning the story a bit? How about that reporter on the news... that information about the incident is now fourth-hand... do you trust it? I guess you do, as long as it fits with your worldview. My original challenge stands; get in the arena... then you can speak with significantly more authority.

      The reality is this: You are an anonymous coward slashtroll, without even the stones to post under your actual account. You will never work to better the system and risk the realization that you might be wrong, because you're not even willing to risk some worthless karma. You have no solutions, only accusations that the cops are racists, ineffective, and wanton killers of innocent unarmed black men.

      I've already given you my solution; invest in community relations, bridge-building, and partnerships with community members (like me, AND you). What was your solution again?

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    19. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      That is the most reasonable post I've seen yet, and very well-stated.

      I care about rights, yours and mine, and I always have. I had the foresight to realize that I wouldn't be a cop forever. This is what amuses me about cops who have the "only cops should have guns" attitude in the concealed carry debate... I guess they don't think that one day they might NOT be a cop anymore. It's a bad day if that happens, and they run across somebody they once arrested... somebody who might want a pound-o-flesh for past "wrongs"... I've seen that happen; bad scene.

      I wouldn't violate anyone's rights, and I wouldn't tolerate a partner who did. I'm a civil liberties advocate, believe it or not; something that brought me a bit of flack in my police academy... some lively debates, I have to tell you.

      Hang onto your rights sir... I'll be right there next to you.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    20. Re:volunteer... if you dare. by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Society decides what law enforcement focuses on, through our elected legislatures. If you don't like the laws... change them; you're stuck with them until that happens. If society doesn't agree with you, then start your own society... or break the laws at your own peril.

      That society believes something is so doesn't mean that it is (I recognise that the fact that I believe something doesn't make it so, either...). Currently certain forms of murder are legal in every single state and federal possession: legal but not right. I do what I can to change the way people view things, but I am but one man. And FWIW I don't break that many laws. I do speed when it is safe to do so (it's not a crime anyway, but a traffic infraction, IIRC), but I scrupulously obey all other traffic laws. I don't take illegal drugs. I am well over the age necessary to legally purchase alcohol. I generally obey the weapons laws of my state, even where I feel they are truly unjust. Doesn't mean I have to like it, and doesn't mean I approve.

      You believe there is a need for law enforcement and "the original poster, methinks, would agree?" Please... "F*ck the police" expresses a desire for law enforcement?

      A mere rhetorical flourish, understandable given his experiences. I doubt that he would deny that we do need some laws (in fact, his ire at having equipment stolen points clearly to the contrary), and that we need someone to enforce them. I take his meaning to have been anger directed at the bad experiences he has had and little more. Even I, who have studied the subject and am aware of just how recent an invention public enforcers are, would agree that some form of police force is a necessity.

      It's unfortunate that you view the system as so corrupt that you refuse to to help change it.

      Not my fault. So long as the police force is actively and on a daily basis involved in what amounts to mere thuggery (enforcing liquor and drug laws, for example), I cannot and will not associate myself with it.

      Also, your statement that you "refuse to subsidise" them is wishful thinking; you pay taxes, so you're already subsidising them... don't you want to make sure you're getting your money's worth?

      I pay my taxes because I don't wish to be shot; I certainly don't wish to pay any more into a corrupt system. By which I don't mean solely the police force: I mean our entire republic. While it is certainly the absolute best state in the world, it is just as certainly far from good. It's the least evil of a rotten bunch. Politics is simply the exercise of power for anyone who votes for either of the two major parties, or for most of the minor parties. Dislike a behaviour? Legislate against it. Want some money? Steal it from one group and give it to yourself. The police force is merely one cog in a great machine which daily usurps our liberties.

      If your beef is with society, then focus your anger appropriately, ie. not at the individual cop who's just trying to do his job.

      The problem is that his job is wrong. A man who arrests another for smoking, selling or growing dope is a thug, a pawn of tyranny. A man who conducts a sting operation against a liquor store owner for selling alcohol to adults is no better. A man who writes a ticket for driving a speed which while safe is not permitted is no better than a Mafia enforcer trying out a protection racket. A man who breaks up a consensual poker game is a wet blanket, and a thug. A man who tickets another for smoking, or for carrying a spray paint can, or for sitting on a milkbox, is not doing a good thing: he is, in a very real sense, an extortionist. A man who restricts his fellow citizens' rights to associate, bear weapons, speak freely and/or believe as they will is not `just doing his job,' any more than a hitman is `just doing his job.' If that's his job, he should quit.

      I have no complaint against investigating, pursuing and arresting

  214. Sticker seen the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My other server is your Linux box

  215. damages caused by loudici · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how much damage do you think the poster caused to his ISP's brand by crying wolf and claiming the DHCP server was own3d, instead of realizing he had been duped by some windows spyware?

    i hope charter does not call the FBI, cause my suspicion is that is way more than 5000$.

    --
    Dev elpizw tipota, dev phoboumai tipota eimai lephteros http://euclidian.org
  216. You called the FBI for help removing spyware... by kalanar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's how you remove it:

    LOP Removal

    Excerpt:

    Lop masquerades as an mp3 search engine. It is capable of:

    Hijacking your starting page
    Adding the Lop Toolbar to Internet Explorer
    Adding the Lop Toolbar to Windows Explorer
    Causing frequent Windows Explorer & Internet Explorer crashes
    Popup advertisements
    Adding Lop links to your Bookmarks (Favorites)
    Installing software on your PC without your consent
    Tracking your site visits and reporting them back to Lop (for advertising purposes)

    Now where's my check for the 5 minutes that it took to google for this? Your question of "Why doesn't these agencies handle these kinds of problems?" is ironically answered by your real issue. The FBI is not your local computer repair shop.

    I would run a program like Ad-Aware to remove any other spyware that you have installed. And next time that you're "hAx0r3d" go to google and search for "hostnamethatisHax0ringme.com spyware"

    1. Re:You called the FBI for help removing spyware... by papasui · · Score: 1

      You rock, I found this info out by googling also.

  217. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by the+morgawr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    At most companies that I know of the logic works like this:

    "If someone took the time to call/write our CEO, they must be really frustrated. This can be one isolated incident, what happened to everyone who DIDN'T call? This is loosing us money!"

    This same logic is used by Congressmen. If one person cares enough to write there "must" be other people out there who didn't.

    --
    The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  218. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by rmarll · · Score: 1

    He didn't actually get blown off. They said they'd look into it. But unless he put a ticket in, they have no way to get back to him. Every person that calls tech support thinks their issue is a priority. Which is why they don't want you to talk to a real live expensive tech person.

    I think the submitter should cool his jets and post the story after they've had a chance to look at or ignore the problem. Give them a chance to get it resolved. *Then* go to slashdot/tv/radio/newspaper if it's still a problem.

  219. Re:Notify investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could always post a message on the CHTR Yahoo stock message board

    If customer unrest doesn't bother them then perhaps investor unrest does...

  220. OpenBSD firewall by shking · · Score: 1
    This makes me want to step up my plans to put an OpenBSD firewall in place...

    The BSDWall project already done most of the work for you. Assuming that you have an old pc with a couple of NICs in it and a broadband connection, you should be able to build your firewall in an hour or less.

    "bsdwall" is a Perl script that turns an OpenBSD box into a working firewall. The site includes

    • Instructions for finding and configuring compatible network cards
    • OpenBSD install directions
    • How to install the bsdwall package after your first boot of an OpenBSD machine
    • How to configure and control your firewall

    One minor quibble: bsdwall works properly with the latest OpenBSD (3.3), but the install instructions on on the BSDWall site are still for 3.2. Just substitute the 3.3 install floppy for the one mentioned on the website (or buy a CD) and remember that the prompts on the the screen won't exactly match the website's directions keystoke-for-keystroke.

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  221. Blame the lawmakers by yaphadam097 · · Score: 1
    Cops are grunts, servants of the law. They enforce the rules that they are told to enforce the way that they are told to enforce them. Most of them are ex-military with few other career prospects. They start out with a legitimate desire to help people, but end up consoling themselves with the fact that they do more good then harm and working real hard for meager promotions and eventually a good pension if they live that long.

    Don't blame the cops. Some are good, some are bad - just like everyone else. They are not the problem. The problem is the lawmakers and administrations who try to create rules to dictate morality and/or earn extra cash. Neither of these is a good use for the law. Laws should mitigate the risk of harm to the general public, and/or seek restitution for actual harm done to persons or institutions through intentional action or inaction. Very few laws do these things. Most just waste our time, take from the poor and give to the rich, enforce someone else's standard of morality (Such as the good old "war on drugs" or censorship.) If lawmakers would stop stealing our money and wasting our time with frivilous rulemongering then the cops might actually have an opportunity to "protect and serve" rather than acting as glorified paramilitary drug enforcers.

  222. ISP Support by MyNameIsMok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hi,
    I have had (and am still having) to contact Comcast's technical support for their customers' machines that are infected with Nimbda and are attacking my web server. Ideally, these systems are violating Comcast's (and any ISP's) Acceptable Use Policies.
    So, I first was just sending an email for each day's activity to their typical complaint email (abuse [atsign] isp.net) and receiving the automatic response. I figured I could build up a history of reporting before up'ing the ante with my provider.
    After a month, I started calling technical support. This basically got me up to tier two (since no one on tier one knew what I was talking about). Later, I got more long distance numbers for internal Comcast contacts, but which, in reality, went no where or to a pre-recorded message.
    Next, after two months, I filed a better business bureau (bbb.org) report. _This_ got their attention (when it eventually found the right department). I now have one tech and the tech's boss assigned to my problem. So, now I send my daily (ok, so, I dont send one every day, just one for each day's activity) acitivity to the default abuse line and to the two other people.
    Actually, this has been effective. I went from seeing from 500 to 1200 hits a day from Nimbda infected machines to less than 300 a day (on average). There was even a day when it was less than 50, but I found out later that one of their network nodes went down. ... just my 2p ...
    sTc

    --
    Most things worth doing are worth doing twice. -- me I think or was that my boss' methodology?
    1. Re:ISP Support by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Funny that after all this you cannot spell the name of the attacking trojan correctly...

  223. Re:Not in my town. by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1


    I agree with your point of view... part of the reason the police get so jaded and unresponsive to smaller crimes is that THERE IS SO MUCH CRIME. If people in general would get their acts together and NOT COMMIT CRIMES, then there wouldn't be as much reason to say "F*ck the Police!".

    Remember, it's not the cop's fault that there's so much crime. It's everyone's fault for not creating a decent society to live in. That's the real problem, and there's no easy solution that one person can spout off. This problem actually requires WORK and EFFORT.

    Bah. It's much easier to say Fuck the Police.

    Fuck the Police. /me goes back to searching the web for pr0n.

  224. Driving While Hispanic...true story... by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My husband is white. Obviously white. However, he shaves his head, and has a goatee. For a time, we also drove around in a 1979 Olds Cutlass, one of the cars Latino gangs favor.

    For the time we owned the Cutlass, my husband got pulled over on a regular basis.

    The M.O. was the same. Richie gets pulled over. He is instructed to put his hands on his head. The cops eyeball the car, then finally check him out. The blue eyes are a dead giveaway that the person they pulled over does not "fit the profile."

    The cops then go into a very embarrassed hemming and hawing dance. "Terribly sorry, sir, continue on your way, have a good one."

    I dread to think what would have happened had Richie actually been Latino. We now drive around in a beige Chevy Nova '86 (basically a Toyota Corolla) and he hasn't been pulled over since.

    Lousy fuckin LAPD...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  225. The enemy help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they generally didn't investigate these types of crimes for individuals, but usually only for companies that had lost at least a couple thousand dollars.

    That explains it. $ I used to think the world revolved around love (when I was a kid), but the sad fact is money is the key to the equation. And, even *if* you were a company that lost thousands of dollars, it's not a bank, and would probably not warrant any further investigation.

    Kevin Mitnik was arrested because the companies were embarrassed that they were so vunerable - they had plenty of clout - both monitary and political, thus they were able to make Mitnick look like a total criminal to politicians who, in turn, were able to get the FBI more involved. You know, I'm almost positive that's the procedure for any LARGE company... the CEO talks to the Congressman, the Senator talks to someone else, and a new Public Enemy #1 is created. Beware of the upcoming Patriot Act II ! You could be next!

    Personally, I'm surprised that you actually thought you could get some 'action' out of the FBI. Yeah right... like the enemy is going to help. They work for ever has the money or tells them to from up high... we, the serfs of cyberspace have to do all we can to take care of ourselves. That dosen't meant we can't help each other, but it just means we have to be ever-vigilant and more resourceful than ever.

    Just remember, this government is doing nothing to help you and corporate America is figuring out how to pay you less and make you work more - blood from a turnip!

    Good luck finding the perp,
    young Sherlock!

    anon, but not really - who is really anonymous?

  226. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by phutureboy · · Score: 1

    Heh, just thinking of my local Fox station - they'd have a field day with this: ::scary music/graphics::

    "Have CABLE INTERNET? YOUR passwords are being STOLEN! CHARTER doesn't CARE! FOX 5 DOES! Story at 10"


    HAHAHA. I assume you mean Fox 5 in DC? That is exactly what they're like. They're so ridiculously sensationalist it's not even funny. I take that back. Sometimes it *is* funny.

  227. follow up!!! by ethanms · · Score: 1

    I haven't read any responses yet... and maybe this has been asked for...

    But can we get a follow up to this story in the next several days, weeks, months?

    I would say that the vast majority of us operate from ISP provided DHCP and other services. Seems like many many of us could be vulnerable to this type of an attack...

    And of course since it's just been posted on slashdot every kiddie and his brother will be trying to do this on mom's cable modem.

  228. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no shortage of investigative reporters or broadcast stations in St. Louis.

    Channel 2 - KTVI - Elliot Davis

    Channel 4 - KMOV - Jamie Allman

    Channel 5 - KSDK - They have the n00b reporters do the investigative stuff

    Channel 11 - KPLR - They have hot anchorwomen. I should watch more often... mmm... Melanie Moon...

    The other three other stations in town don't do news. And of course, Charter will probably black these reports out...

  229. Tips for getting it investigated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incorporate yourself, claim that it has caused you emotional and financial damages of over 100,000 dollars and then call the FBI.

  230. If you want to get someone's attention... by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    just trade an MP3 and wait for the RIAA to contact the FBI for you!

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  231. this is for you 'what-if'ers out there by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    For all you hacks out there that ever wondered if you would get caught doing this, here's your answer. Have fun. But whatever you do, do more than $5,000 in damage.

    Because maybe then somebody will listen.
    .

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  232. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

    True, snail mail will take a couple of days, but it will get there -- a phone call might not.

    If the issue is important enough to you to spend a few bucks on, send it Priority Mail or FedEx or equivalent. Not only will it get there faster (especially FedEx etc), it will be perceived as More Important and less likely to get hung up with a secretary.

    --
    -- Alastair
  233. Tech Support by EtherBoo · · Score: 4, Informative
    This may seem redundant, and it may seem a bit trollish, but seeing it from the TSR (Technical Support Representative) perspective, we really don't care. I mean, think of it like this, you do have a point, and whats happening should be taken care of, but the guy who answers the phone, is going to think you're just paranoid. If he talks to a supervisor, the supervisor is going to tell you that we are currently fine, and there are no hacks going on, unless of course we have been notified, in which case, we say something like, "Sorry for the inconvience, blah blah blah. We are working with our NOC to resolve the isssue, blah blah blah." As sorry as I am to say it, it's not worth it to use to care. We don't get paid enough, and as employees, we are just treated like garbage, at least at the place I work. Basically, the only thing you can do is send an email to Abuse, or just sit and wait, realizing that there isn't anything we can do. Tech support is really just for the end user that doesn't know any better. Anyone that knows anything is going to have a much harder time with support. Sorry.

    Hope you didn't give them you're /. user id and pass.

  234. The United States criminal computer laws by EaglesNest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The FBI is going to ignore anything unless you allege that you lost $5,000. In the real world, unless you see some fraud on your credit card after theives stole your number off your computer, they probably aren't going to care. Also, if someone uses your computer to attack and damage other computers (or even deface) that might get their attention. Here's the main collection of federal laws that apply to computer crime.

    http://www.cybercrime.gov/cclaws.html

    And here's the primary criminal law that applies:

    18 USC 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    (a) Whoever--
    (1) having knowingly accessed a computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access, and by means of such conduct having obtained information that has been determined by the United States Government pursuant to an Executive order or statute to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national defense or foreign relations, or any restricted data, as defined in paragraph y.[(y)] of section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 USCS Â 2014(y)], with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation willfully communicates, delivers, transmits, or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;
    (2) intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains--
    (A) information contained in a financial record of a financial institution, or of a card issuer as defined in section 1602(n) of title 15, or contained in a file of a consumer reporting agency on a consumer, as such terms are defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.);
    (B) information from any department or agency of the United States; or
    (C) information from any protected computer if the conduct involved an interstate or foreign communication;
    (3) intentionally, without authorization to access any nonpublic computer of a department or agency of the United States, accesses such a computer of that department or agency that is exclusively for the use of the Government of the United States or, in the case of a computer not exclusively for such use, is used by or for the Government of the United States and such conduct affects that use by or for the Government of the United States;
    (4) knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $ 5,000 in any 1-year period;
    (5) (A) (i) knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer;
    (ii) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or
    (iii) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, causes damage; and
    (B) by conduct described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A), caused (or, in the case of an attempted offense, would, if completed, have caused)--
    (i) loss to 1 or more persons during any 1-year period (and, for purposes of an investigation, prosecution, or other proceeding brought by the United States only, loss resulting from a related course of conduct affecting 1 or more other protected computers) aggregating at least $ 5,000 in value;

  235. Wiretapping by UniDyne · · Score: 1

    This is definitely spyware (lop.com). But I think there is a more serious issue at hand here. Isn't the spyware maker liable under Federal wiretapping laws? You might want to contact someone at the FCC.

  236. Have no fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is from the Charter Pipeline FAQ:
    The possibility of your computer being "hacked" is slim to none. Although illegal entry into computer systems happens every day, it generally occurs in large corporations. Hackers commonly "sweep" a range of IP addresses looking for possible "holes" to exploit. These "holes" are generally provided by oversights in software development, such as telnet servers, mail servers, ftp servers, chat servers, etc. Most of our customers have no need to run these types of services, and are therefore not vulnerable to such exploits...

    So see...don't you feel better? I know I do :-) Honestly, I almost changed providers after reading this. A/C
  237. In the future, use the Bin Laden card by statusbar · · Score: 1

    If the FBI won't listen to you, tell your news agency that terrorist hackers are trying to steal credit card numbers from people in the area to fund terrorism and that the FBI refuses to investiage...

    --jeff++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  238. Interesting by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    The last few weeks of school someone hacked our dns servers and started redirecting people who wanted bestbuy.com and a bunch of other sites to one of those generic cybersquater spam search sites.

  239. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by InfoVore · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm truly amazed that Charter and the FBI blew you off like this.

    Don't be. Serious threats get blown-off all the time by law enforcement and business. Sad, but true

    You need to read Clifford Stoll's The Cuckoo's Egg. It is an amazing account of how he helped track down the Hanover Hacker (a paid Soviet spy).

    The FBI blew him off too, at first. He discovered a hacker was moving through the UC Berkley computer systems at will and using it to crack other systems. He discovered this when he was investigating a 75 cent discrepancy in the departmental billing for computer time. The FBI told him: "don't call us unless it is at least $1 million in damages". Eventually he convinced one agent of the seriousness of the problem (HH was using Berkley and other systems to try to crack DoD systems). Over the course of 3 years, Stoll was instrumental in helping the FBI/CIA and others crack one of the biggest international computer spy rings ever. Stoll was a grad student in astronomy at the time. Great book. Oh and he threw in a really good chocolate chip cookie recipe too.

    Get the book, you won't regret it.

    I.V.

    --
    "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
  240. Wrong.... he is a victim by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    He just needs to deliberately let a password be stolen, and then sue Charter for damages for not responding to his complaint by securing their server. Corporations are only motivated by money, so it only becomes a management concern when it affects their bottom line.

    Calling Visa would work great too, but I wouldn't want to go so far as letting my card get stolen just for satisfaction.

  241. And now you see.... by MortisUmbra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The law isn't to protect you and me, it's to protect the people who pay the lawmakers....corporations. I gaurantee you if someone hacked into your PC, stole your credit card, and charged $1,000 to it the FBI wouldn't do sh!t. Factor in as much money as you want for your time in tracking it down. They wouldn't care, because you are not onpayroll at a corporation, so the damage is minimal. Money talks, same as always, and corporations have more of it than an individual. Now if you were a multi-millionaire and actively donated to political funds. I bet it would be different.

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
  242. FBI Auto-attendent message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (just heard on a regional FBI phone system):

    We're sorry, but all FBI agents are currently out pretending to be 11-year-old girls, dressing like britney spears, sitting in chat rooms and entrapping pedophiles. Please leave a brief message of your crime after the tone...

  243. Use the RIAA to help you... by cyberassasin · · Score: 1

    I am sure if you contacted the RIAA, and told them your collection of 5,000 mp3's had been taken, and are now being illegally shared around the world by the crackers, you wounld get some immediate results.

    --
    Who is the master of foxhounds, and who says the hunt has begun? -Pink Floyd
  244. Rule #1, citizens dont count by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While you may think im joking i am serious.

    None of this stuff is to protect the citizens. unless you are a large corporation or an elected official you are out of luck.

    Im surprised they even talked to you at all personally. Even small companies have a hard time getting any help, they are too 'trivial' to bother with.

    Not saying i agree, its just reality.. they DONT CARE about 'us'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  245. Good experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had nothing but good experiences when dealing with the police and various government agencies (not law enforcement, though). IRS, EEOC, BXA - all have been very helpful. The one time or so I've had to deal with the police (because someone clipped my car, stopped, ran, etc.), two cars showed up instantly, and they caught the guy hiding in some bushes in a side street. True, police are generally nonchalant about incidents, but to a law-abiding person a big incident can really be a small matter in the larger scheme of things. If the police ran around frantically, getting emotionally involved in each incident, they'd be worn out by month end. The vast majority are professional, and I believe they care, but they deal with the cesspool of society all day.

  246. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    He could have asked the tech support person for their name (or an alias, cubicle number, internal extension phone number) and an issue password (like "carnation in label") for identifying your conversation. Or just agree that your problem description will be "Jones said the 800 number in New York had 1,543 callers." (if "Jones" is someone's name he'll be asked about the message)

    Then simply file a tech support report which does not describe the problem in a way which would inform a listener, and mention the above name and password so that person can brief someone inside the office.

  247. Basically... by theolein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It means what we already knew: That you as a single person are of no value to your government. This is the real world in which corporations can get tax breaks, get away with multi million dollar fraud, sic the feds onto you for sharing an mp3, sue you for your life's savings and the world in which you are powerless. It's exagerated but this is why communism was so popular in the early 20th century. The commies promised to put the rich fuckers up against the wall and shoot them. (They did this of course, but thereafter they were the one's treating you like shit)

    The next time you think big business and globalisation is fine and that those pesky anti-war demonstrators should get locked away, think of this again. ...and perhaps you should check your hosts file in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc as well ;)

    1. Re:Basically... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I see your point and in some ways I'm against big business myself but your characterization omits one understandable fact of life:

      We have limited resources when it comes to law enforcement (or limited resources period). This doesn't mean that you're worth shit and that's why they didn't do anything about it. What it does mean is that it has to affect a lot of people or have some large value associated with it. This makes perfect sense. Analagously it's like cops who are working on busting large-scale drug smuggling between Mexico and the US instead of frisking every single individual coming across the border. There are just not enough resources to do that.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  248. seems like spyware by efflux · · Score: 1

    I know this is redundant, but it needs repeating since almost no one has paid attention. This really looks like spyware. Try going to http://www.p5115.tdko.com and see for yourself. I'm sure you recognize these sorts of sites. Notice that all links go to lop.com. A quick goolge search will reveal this info about lop.com.

    It's no wonder nobody took him seriously. Sorry guy.

    --
    Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    1. Re:seems like spyware by efflux · · Score: 1

      On further investigation it seems that all traffic through tdko.com is redirected to www.lop.com.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
  249. Truth about the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    1)If you are/were due a refund there are no penalties. If you owed you would have received a bill for late filing late payment and interest.

    2)The Pitney Bose meter is not a valid proof of mailing- for exactly the reason you describe. Only the official rubber date stamp at the post office(and now UPS, and I believe FedEx)

  250. Finance Fraud Investigation by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    a few chores with finance websites

    So report this problem to all those financial companies with which you were going to communicate, as they might push it back out to their law enforcement helpers. If your data did travel through the trap, say you need fraud protection. If your data is not at risk, tell them that you can't do business with them due to this problem.

    If there is another ISP, start switching. Tell your financial institutions you can't do business with them online until your switchover is complete. Even if they don't think your activity is worth much worry, they may be concerned about how many other people are doing the same thing -- and increasing their costs by requiring more manual processing.

    Or if a federally-protected financial company is involved, report your problem to the FBI as a financial fraud issue. The FBI and local police get involved in bank robberies (although the FBI has cut back, multiple banks being affected should help get their attention).

    Or report to the federal, state, and local authorities who protect or enforce those institutions. SEC? Federal Reserve (money exchange)? Federal account insurance? Bank's insurance company?

    Did any of your financial institutions issue you a card with the logo of a credit card company? Report to that company that their service is in danger from this source.

  251. This is not from charter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is something the poster of the artical downloaded. It's from C2 media Ltd. For a description on it, go to http://www.gowron.org/lopvirus.html

  252. On Purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it possible that charter was not infiltrated? and that they intentionally are pointing all their customers at lop.com's servers? if this were the case, i wonder if any laws are being broken at all.

  253. Re:Of course the FBI won't help, if it's their hac by Alric · · Score: 1

    There are so many, many items I'd like to refute in this discussion. Arrh. I guess I'll start here.

    Shut up with this insane law enforcement hacker bullshite. If you are joking, I think your humor is a bit too dry for the /. crowd. This theory is stupid on so many levels.

    First, if the Feds wanted transmission records on somebody, you better believe they would just make Charter monitor the individual(s). They certainly would not fscking hack Charter's DHCP server. With the Patriot Act and legal precedent being set (like Verizon), it's getting more and more common for ISP's to cooperate with law enforcement quickly and quietly. (I have no hard facts to support this statement, only common sense and grapevine knowledge.)

    Second, let's pretend that the FBI was hacking into ISP systems, and quite poorly might I add. Do you really think the lackey's answering the phones after hours are going to be in on this covert operation? Somehow I doubt it.

    I'm not saying the US federal gov't doesn't hack into corporations and personal computers. In fact, from my understanding they definitely are penetrating selected systems. I just find this kind of paranoia and alarmism ("Let's just hope that it's not *your* email address.") repulsive.

    Sorry for attacking you so much. It's Friday at 4:30 and the project lead just walked in to my office to tell me that I'm going to need to come in on Sunday to finish this fscking data conversion for Monday morning.

  254. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    Depends on the size of the organization... With Charter that might work, but with a smaller company, the same tech. support rep that you spoke with is just going to have to look into the issue again and with no good will toward you for cutting him out of the loop. The appropriate approach is to ask for the Tech. rep's boss, and then his boss, etc, and stay on the line till you get an answer that you like. If you are persistent in the beginning the issue will get resolved much more quickly than if you mail something to the CEO. It will also prevent some unwitting tech. support guy from getting blind-sided by an issue he thought was resolved. Going to the CEO should be a last resort. I know for a fact that people who write letters to the CEO without making a good faith attempt to go up the ladder usually get written off as reactionary, over-zealous, and lacking perspective.

  255. Why? Because no one is monitoring the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can sit here and link countless stories of Police planting evidence, shooting innocent people, crashing into innocent people, lying in court, etc ... but instead I'll sum up the main problem, there's no oversight. The only time there is oversight is when things get so out of hand a Federal board is appointed. Internal affairs is a joke, they'll do their best to protect an officer unless it's a blatant unhideable act.

    There needs to be a civilian oversight board to watch the actions of these cops like a hawk.

  256. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    What he said :)

    Plus you might want to read The Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier by Bruce Sterling as well.

    Both Stoll's book and Sterling's are informative and fun reading.

  257. Just eatin donuts? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've got to wonder what all these Federal Justice employees do with their days.

    Before I started my low-cost cruise missile project, I emailed the FBI and the relevant defense program, letting them know what I planned to do, offering to take on board any suggestions they might have and making my objectives quite clear.

    I got no response at all, save an automated acknowedgement from the FBI.

    After the project captured the media's attention and got broadcast around the world, the authorities stated that they weren't happy and that my actions were "unhelpful."

    Well excuse me! Don't these people read their damned email? If they have a problem with what I'm doing why didn't they simply contact me in the several weeks between when I notified them and when the media picked up the story?

    However, in the wake of the media-coverage and the authorities' apparent dissatisfaction with what I was doing, I sent a follow-up email to the FBI (using the contact form on their website) and the relevant defense agency.

    Guess what -- still no response.

    Has a stack of Federal donuts fallen over and crushed everyone responsible for dealing with incoming email or something???? Or maybe it's just easier to moan about things than actually do something about them.

    Sigh!

  258. the authorities are not concerned by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    until some business is impacted significantly. That is one of the more elaborate attacks I have heard of, and it looks pretty large scale as well. I'm not an expert on the FBI's policies, but I dont think they would even consider looking into this until after significat damage is done. I'm guessing you have been here: http://www.cybercrime.gov/reporting.htm to report a 'cybercrime', and were directed to another gov. agency, who could care less. Its pretty funny that the tech support people asked you to go file a ticket with their site. Thats just dumb. Calling them should start a ticket right away. Any security issue should be reported up to the sysop, who should take some action if they value their job at all. Most of the time I have found that many employees of big ISPs are technically inept and don't put much effort into dealing with problems. I have been a customer at a few service providers who went very quickly into chapter 11 after finding out about an attack like this too late. One was kind enough to inform us that attackers gained access to all of the Miva merchant accounts (online store, credit card info, etc). I was glad we were using paypal at the time.. Your ISP will probably realize too late that they are about to buy the farm.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  259. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    Well, thanks for the warning. Highly unlikely, but if I'm ever in a position to do business w/ Charter Communications, now that I know they couldn't give a flying fuck about security, I'll be sure to stay the hell away.

    --
    [o]_O
  260. Re:nothing at all.. Sad part is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the guy who stole your camcorder proably stole a few more or other items that equal more than 500.00 total. And he gets away with it.. Nice.. Perhaps its time to change jobs...

  261. personally by waspleg · · Score: 1

    i would love to see if this strategy plays out cause it's the best one i've heard thus far

    i myself have talked to the fbi (once as a victim, once as the falsely accused and indirectly ie through my father that last time)

    and have been the victim of extended DDoS attacks which my cable provider (comcast cable in evansville indiana, at the time) totally refused to do anything about, this same guy cracked my server because i knew him and he did it to backstab someone else (yes machiavellian politics are alive and well) (and he had an account) so i had some information on him, i had traced the ips and found out the blocks and failing any action by anyone i posted to the Bugtraq Incidents list, which i highly reccomend to anyone... shortly thereafter i was contacted by other individuals who it turned out were after the same guy for some similar things and i gave them all the information i had and basically sat around and waited for the attack to stop (a 3-day weekend)

    i don't really know what happened with it but at least the bugtraq list is somewhere to vent some of your frustration and show what you have and possibly get some help...

    yea i ramble you don't have to read it ;)

  262. Did you stop to think that this might be the ISP by xenophrak · · Score: 1
    I'm really supprised that no one has brought up that this most likely isn't a hack at all.

    The IP range the author posted was within C2 Media's domain, a web image service (with notable links to spyware, see here http://forums.networknews.co.uk/thread.jsp?forum=2 &thread=4307). Would it even be beyond the unthinkable that the ISP redirected content through a set of caching-load balancing proxies to speed up their web user's download times (or enabling the aforementioned spyware)? Or that they might be using the DNS subdomains for a 3rd party integration project, such as with C2 media? This is a common enough practice when adding outside vendor's networks, especially for content caching.

    The SSH key mis-representation is a little unsettling, but not out the of norm, if you were to attempt a load-balancing solution and not get it right the first time. This is consistant with the above theory. As well, the SSH solution might have been necessary for the admin's of the site, and since you are in the distinct minority still using a shell account and SSH to read your mail, that the admins decided that the trouble for a random user was not a big enough concern to care.

    As for the ISP's response, they might have blown you off because you were pointing out something to them that wasn't the case?

    Just pointing out that more often than not, it's people's (read ISP) own stupidity that is to blame, not the forces of evil. Well, maybe if you consider stupid people to be evil.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, life is not a bitch. It is far far worse.
  263. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

    Drive down to the ISP and fill out a paper form insted. Calling on the telephone is the lamest thing to do to file a complaint. It all goes into the bitbucket. That's how the world works and especially how incompetant businesses work.

    --
    Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
  264. Vouch for Cuckoo's Egg by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

    The Cuckoo's Egg is a bit dated (Using a paper clip across the phone contacts to simulate a dirty line?) but a great book nonetheless.

    1. Re:Vouch for Cuckoo's Egg by guzzloid · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, a nice little hack like that with something as simple as paper clip? I can't see how you can count that against the book. I think it's rather a neat idea. (And probably still works).

      Even though the software and hardware used is now obsolete by modern standards, The Cuckoo's Egg (which happened to be on the shelf directly above my monitor as I read the article) is an excellent account of a hacker solving a mystery using the technology available to him. He had to think outside the box and improvise with what was available.

      The outdated equipment just makes it more impressive, in my opinion. (A technological ancient legend...)

  265. lying in court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A variant of the planting evidence happened to me once. the cops do this dynamic entry raid, whole nine yards, battering ram the door, shotguns in the face in the middle of the night. And etc. They are on a drug raid. Deal is, there's no drugs. Never werer any drugs. I think to this day they got the wrong house, as somewhat nearby was a big rock and roll party 24/7 house, and someone just missed a street number in the middle of the night or something, but they would never admit it. Anyway, they grab some spices out of the kitchen. Next day, we are all arraigned-we got arrested and taken down to the jail of course. We get arraigned, there's the head cop saying to the judge they "analysed" the stuff and it was high grade whatever.

    One of the scariest dang things to ever happen, be sitting there in court, completely innocent, poor, not much money to fight anything, and the cops lie through their teeth because they were embarassed over making a mistake.

    Took me almost 3 years to finally beat it, eventually they just gave up, but I keep thinking, I wonder how many innocent people they put away? Not everyone has the resources to fight them.

  266. IRS can and will fine you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once was 3 days late sending in my tax return, because I'd misplaced my W-2s. The IRS noticed, and charged me interest for those 3 days. But the interest for that short a period was only a couple of bucks.

  267. Problem was how you reported it to the authorities by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    Bottom line...
    They ignored you because even though someone was ripping people off, they weren't getting ripped off. Therefore it wasn't their problem.

    Next time you report an incident like that, be sure to say you think they were sharing MP3s or using DeCSS to decrypt their DVDs. THAT will get the feds attention!

    Its just sad what it takes to get people to do the right thing.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  268. so YOU'RE the guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so you're the guy who got my stolen plutonium research reactor and gear! It got stolen and sold on ebay, but I was never able to figure out who got it!

    WELL! I told MY DAD, and he's coming over to beat you up! And you'll know it's him because his name is Cornelius Iverson Avery, and he works at Global Observations Verandas, who install tourist lookout points with those pay per view drop in a quarter binoculars,and he's REAL IMPORTANT and a REAL BIG GUY and he's been tracking that ebay sale!

    You better SAY YOU'RE SORRY and give me back my plutonium reactor!

  269. Its all about the Benji's by ers81239 · · Score: 1



    I've seen a lot of credit card fraud in my work in ecommerce. The feds never wanted to hear about it unless it was at least $10,000.

    --
    there are 2 kinds of people. those who divide people into 2 kinds, and those who don't.
  270. Day olds just went on sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "After the tone, please state the nature of the emergency. Beep!"

  271. driveby download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    However, your claim that this can be installed by merely mousing over a banner is misleading--this can only happen if you have done something stupid with your security settings (e.g., set to Low or other custom values that are similar).

    You are incorrect. Alexa Internet briefly used this trick called a "driveby download." Others have since adopted it. User clicks on a banner, gets an ActiveX unsigned message, clicks YES and boom.

    http://lists.insecure.org/lists/fulldisclosure/200 3/Jan/0475.html

    1. Re:driveby download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I forgot an important detail. In IE a banner ad can install an app with no warning. No "ActiveX policy" popup, no nothing.

      The default IE security policy allows local drivers to go in without triggering a warning.

      http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Full-Disclo sure/2003-02/0007.html

      From: "smenard" To: Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:20:45 -0400 OK I have been bitten too, luckily when they do they try to access to net and ZoneAlarm says Object800010.. is trying to access ....... Hence further investigation leads to... Security policy There is a local security policy: for Unsigned NON-DRIVER installation ---from experience--- BY default it is EITHER not defined or -SILENTLY SUCCEED if a user does not touch [let alone know they are supposed to] the local security policy. They will get bitten regardless of IE zone except highest
  272. Yeah by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    But most of us don't automatically type "yes", instead, we ask ourselves "What changed", and we investigate, before handing out our passwords.

  273. Tell me. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Do you practice what you preach?

    I guarantee that, although it might be your right to do, it will just create more hassle for you.

  274. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

    Heh, I get Fox 5 in DC as well, and the one I always liked was:

    BABY DIAPERS IN A CREEK NEAR YOU!!!!!!

  275. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You only see those stories when (Fox) News Corporation has no financial interests and links to the story.

    Otherwise, the corporate parent kicks in and filters your news (which is their motivation in providing news in the first place).

    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0423-03. ht m

  276. Law enforcement? HAHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. Law enforcement doing something.

    I had some wanna-be script-kiddie (yes, he was dumber than your average script-kidding) ransacking my website(he ran a site that he was trying to make almost identical to mine though I hand-coded everything on my site and he was trying to use OSS to make his), stealing email addresses, attempting to sell them as a spam list, and hammering my site nonstop in an attempt to lockup mysql and other services on my machine.

    I had IP addresses, and actually KNEW who the person was (he was that dumb to connect to a Members area of the site (in which his IP/User Agent were logged)).

    Anyhow, with 10 pages with of information, and 13 megs worth of logs, and close to 14 different Spam messages with his trying to 'spoof' email addresses and get multiple people in trouble, NO ONE was able to 1. stop this guy and 2. even wanted to help out.

    Long story short, I ended up taking the site offline cause it began to be too much of a hassle, and with no one wanting to help someone (even with all the information i had) theres no point in keeping a site online.

    Kinda like not owning a car because law enforcement wont look for the person who stole your car even though THEY have Lo-Jack, and your car has Lo-Jack. Whats the point in having it, if no one's gonna help you get your car back.

  277. The fix is obvious by phr1 · · Score: 1

    Use telnet over SSL (a/k/a telnets) instead of ssh. What confuses me is why ssh became such a standard, when telnets already existed.

  278. Government snooping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably discovered something that was done as part of a government investigation. This would explain the lack of response from any of the advertised authorities.

  279. Local Law Enforcement is the way. by revcorrupt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would contact your local police department. It may also be a good point to tell them that they might want to search for local Credit Card Fraud problems, because they could be associated with this matter. It appears that it would be much more of a local crime instead of a Federal Offence, simply because it does not have any grand financial loss. Local police departments are not all bad. In fact, most will gladly put you in touch with administrative personnel that are normally knowledgeable with computers. Just remember, Once you involve the legal system, You lose all rights to your equipment!!!
    If you contact Law enforcement at all, they can come in and take your equipment with a court order at anytime, and they are generally NOT nice about it! Most of the collection personnel do not even know what the lawsuit is about, and as far as they know, youâ(TM)re a pedophile.
    Generally, it is not this way with correct cooperation and procedures, however be prepared for anything.

    Good luck.

  280. Call the bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My limited experience from a hijacked http-proxy was no respons from the police. So I called my bank and the got the snowball rolling to a very big ball.

    The banks got some power to get the police to look in to things - they got a couple of good hotlines especially to the department of commerce and/or department of treasury. .tas

  281. Value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The couple occasions I've talked to police about this sort of thing the first question asked was, "What was the value of the loss?"

  282. Well, Duh by Neumann · · Score: 1

    Of course the FBI isnt going to do any investigating. Thats because they are the ones who hacked the server in the first place!

    Total Information Awareness Baby!!!

  283. Re:up the ladder/phones calls are wrong way to tur by arn@lesto · · Score: 1

    Agreed. In writing, however you should not send it via snail mail, use fax. To two places, the CEOs office and tech support.

    Get a fax number from the tech support person for submitting a report. Ask for the fax number of the CEOs office. If they won't provide it, hang up, call the front office and ask them for the number without explaining why. Most will provide this number.

    The report should be as simple as possible with enough details that they can verify that they are under attack.

    Provide a method for contacting you by phone. Identify yourself by your customer ID.

    The cover page to the CEO should state clearly in a short note: that their ISP service is under attack now and passwords and possibly credit card information are being stolen from customers.

    If you must include speculation on how this has been accomplished put it at the end of the report, along with speculation of damages you don't really know about.

    You've done your bit. If the ISP doesn't do theirs after this, find another.

    You should follow this up later with an email or a normal letter asking to be informed of the action that was taken and the results.

    --
    - AndrewN
  284. A small tip by rmassa · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't help in this case but...
    Whenever I used to call @homeless/charter for tech support, as soon as I got a person on the phone I would say "Sorry, I was in the queue for level 2 support and I got disconnected." That would always save me at least 10 minutes.

  285. International Net-Neighbourhood Watch by deunan_k · · Score: 1

    You know how communities with small or non-existant law enforcement agencies handled their problems. Usually, this happens in suburbs or rural areas. We have volunteers patroling the streets at night.. Usually armed only with sticks and a torchlight sporting an armband marked Neighbourhood Watch. A group of these guys, about 3 or 4 of them and usually acompanied by a policeman, fully armed of course would go make their rounds patrolling the neighbourhood.

    You get the idea right?

    Anyway, how about we form some kind of organization in every community all over the world, with close collaboration with the local law enforcement agency that helps investigate this kind of things at the local physical area where the crime was thought to be originally commited from

    This is what I mean.. One guy reported a crime.. Upon investigation, he thought the crime was commited by some kiddie-scripter (or something) in a city 1000 miles away. As someone on this discussion pointed it out, the Charter, FBI and CIA/NSA whatever, not forgetting the Police, don't really have enough manpower anyway. What the local watch members can do is to assist in investigating and gathering of evidence, until there's enough to just simply call 'em lawmen to just come and cuff the suspect and pickup the evidence and ship 'em away to Gitmo Bay (and throw away the keys!)

    I say this because something like this happens to me before.. Back during the late eighties, the time when ole BBS/fidonet days was glorious, some guy in another continent offered to sell some computer components to me. We met in some echomail conference and after several following-up via net mails, we agreed on the price. I've made some purchases before using this method and all of the previous sellers so far have been quite honest and since the correspondence from the guy seems to indicate that he's quite keen, well.. So I went for it. Sent the guy my money but after waiting for almost 2 months.. you guess it, the guy disappeared and so is my stuff which never materializes! Fortunately, I have some echo-mail pals living in the same city, so I asked for their help.

    To make the story short, they found guy, and my echo-pals called me (over the phone!) one day asking what are they gonna do to the guy, now that they've found him.. I quote, 'We found him, so what you want us to do? Kill him?'. Of course I was horrified, but I just told 'em to just to get my money back. A few weeks later, in my snail-mail box, instead of the money, I actually got the goods that I ordered :-)

    Of course I don't advocate intimidation nor vigilatism, but with close cooperation with local law enforcement agencies, this local net-neighbourhood watchmen with chapters located all over the world, it can actually be something effective. Not just investigating frauds and hacking activities, maybe even locating the local kiddie pornsters. But of course, we have to do our bit, and we means everyone!

    Enough of my 2 cents (monopoly money)

    --
    Will sys-admin for food
    1. Re:International Net-Neighbourhood Watch by arilea_dot · · Score: 1

      Well, the system is rife with problems. Like the Proxy Black-Widow problem. If you want to nail someone, make a believable story, and get someone else to buy into it. Some people just like a good reason to feel power over others. Put 'em on a sent and they don't princibly care enough if it is 100% right. Like here in A.J. AZ. (Understand I never looked at the paperwork he had, so I only have hearsay, OK?) This harware guy I met, I'm a total stranger to him, but he needs to do a core-dump right? He tells me his story in about 2hours, I'm rivited and can't seem to sneak out. I'll break the story down for ya.... So, goes like this, Someone doesn't like him. So the police show-up, tape up his security-cam ('cept he has another running on a PC) they move him outside, only then say what they are up to.. and low! a set of deleted CARTOONS of child pornography are found on his HD, and a CD of same are in his stack of cd's. Only Cartoon's! right? OK, nothing else but this can be found, and no finger prints are on the actual CD. (Heck working up to making such a cd, or having that interest, you'ld think it likely there'd be more files deleted than just what is on the CD right? very fishy.) Anyway, based on that, here in AZ they can put you away waiting on a trial for 2+ years, appearently, if every manuver on earth is done as delay, Including: missing counter evidence, documentable lies and un-due process (in the court-docs MAN!, I woun't go into detail). So now the primary vigilantes (one cop, one lawyer and maybe a judge) would be in big-big trouble if it all comes to a trial or even an appeal. But they delay hoping for a key whitness to die of cancer sooner. Maybe someone will get fed-up and leave the state? How 'bout a little plea-bargan for an easy out? Get the drift? So here is my imagination, there are a couple of cops and attornies that are known to be willing to bite the bullit and railroad anyone they think is one of those sly devils that always squeases out on technicalities(like solid evidence). Someone-else wants this guy nailed and does the plant, making sure things progress such that the railroaders are now caught up in thier own fevered misconduct. Now everyone is trapped in the dramma, except those who planted the CD to trigger the hyper-cops.(Ma-ma is there Karma?) My point: bigotry and sterio-typing, sometimes people do things out of blind fear, hate, desire for power and revenge(or just a fun hobby!). These things get out of hand. Specaily if predictable, es-specailly if you can find a proxy to take actions and assume the heat for it. Diabolical. What happens if 2 people do a plant, each not knowing about the other. Then they'd both feel real justified right? Could happen! MAN, honest policemen are my angels!

  286. SUCK ONTO MY PENIS, FRODOR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BITCH!

  287. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by thynk · · Score: 1

    He could have asked the tech support person for their name (or an alias, cubicle number, internal extension phone number) and an issue password (like "carnation in label") for identifying your conversation. Or just agree that your problem description will be "Jones said the 800 number in New York had 1,543 callers." (if "Jones" is someone's name he'll be asked about the message)
    Then simply file a tech support report which does not describe the problem in a way which would inform a listener, and mention the above name and password so that person can brief someone inside the office.


    Why all the cloak and dagger stuff? I don't think he's up against the CIA or the KGB here. It's a case of a DNS hijacking, not P2P file trading or anything serious like that.

    As much as I like Tom Clancy, it seems that too much of a good thing is possible.

    --

    Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  288. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    What the hell was THAT story about?

    Don't leave us in suspense!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  289. needs a private eye by tinguru · · Score: 1
    I have legal insurance form work, so if this happend to me (a computer crime was committeed against me and no one would respond) I would utilize my benifit and get some pre-paid legal advise...

    I would not want to deliberately let my password get stolen unless I consulted with a lawyer, if it were me.

    Depending on the extent of the victimization by the scam and one's financial resources, hiring a private detective or "computer security consultant" to help collect evidence and track the criminals down may be an option.

    If you could hand the FBI a package of evidence with provenance, maybe they could take action later... or maybe you could take civil action.

  290. Don't call tech support 1st do some research 1st by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

    at least do some leg work your self, calling tech support should be the last resort because you know who you're going to end up talking to. I spent 5 minutes doing some research and found that those IPs lead me to lop.com and also to their wonderful bag of tricks: http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/lop.html

    google cache:

    http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:YWJyJu-dhnU J: www.doxdesk.com/parasite/lop.html+&hl=en&ie=UT F-8

    I'm not surprised that they're up to doing this stuff.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  291. Its not just Charter... by zquestz · · Score: 1

    Recently I noticed the following entries in one of my tcpdump logs..

    17:10:20.103603 dns1.chcgil.sbcglobal.net.domain > 192.168.1.7.49372: 3383 NXDomain 0/1/0 (64) (frag 61464:72@0+)
    17:10:21.170817 dns1.chcgil.sbcglobal.net.domain > 192.168.1.7.49372: 2208 NXDomain 0/1/0 (64) (frag 61636:72@0+)
    17:10:22.241344 dns1.chcgil.sbcglobal.net.domain > 192.168.1.7.49372: 27079 NXDomain 0/1/0 (64) (frag 61813:72@0+)
    17:10:23.261662 dns1.chcgil.sbcglobal.net.domain > 192.168.1.7.49372: 53003 NXDomain 0/1/0 (64) (frag 61998:72@0+)
    ... 100's of entries followed. All of them pointing to frag'd packets from ameritech's dns servers.

    SBC's dns servers were under attack and sending out malformed packets for days... eventually I had to remove the dns entry altogether. They don't understand the need for network secruity. They don't seem to care about domains hosted on their dns servers, and they don't seem to understand that it bothers customers when they don't respond to incidents quickly. My 2 cents.

  292. This has probably been said: by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    ...but I'd think step #1 in preventing this kind of attack is to ssh to a raw IP instead of relying on a DNS...unless it's a dynamic IP? Then again, you'd never have known about it if you did that, but at least it would be harder to spoof on you.

    As for no one caring, that's a damn travesty. I don't want to see one more fscking computer-related law passed in this country (yea, I'm an "USian", whatever the hell that means) unless the people who pass them plan on providing the manpower to enforce the rules when an actual crime has been commited. Honestly, if it worked against you, how do they know these guys aren't out sniffing logins to some protected bank system or something? Perhaps their not hacking banks, but they could be; plus it can already be proven they're up to something illegal.

    Manpower, shmanpower, if they don't have time for you then they're not pooling their recources into the proper areas, and their just passing some of these laws from the influence of lobbyists or their own shenanigans. Sketchy as hell.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  293. Re:well, duh! by berzerke · · Score: 1

    ...They're too busy catching Osama.



    I've been thinking. Osama is still probably alive and hiding. This leads me to believe he is a homosexual. Think about it. It says in the Koran if you die in God's service you get 72 female virgins. Now Osama obviously believes he is doing God's work. (Of course believing doesn't make it true.) I don't know about the rest of you guys, but if I knew I was going to get 72 women, I'd be out in the desert with a bullseye taped to me.

  294. You've got to be kidding by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Wow, you're thin-skinned. Doesn't that big chip on your shoulder make you walk funny?

    Did they beat you? Did they call you everything but a white boy? Were you put in handcuffs? Thrown on the ground?

    So they asked to see your ID, that's all. And you're upset? you cannot be serious. Think about it, there's few reasons for most people to be walking around at 3AM, and a lot of them have to do with various social pathologies... things scoflaws are often involved in. The cops were just curious, and you think they're "assholes" for that? You didn't even have to show them your ID; you could have politely declined and walked away (unless you were violating some obscure law, like a curfew... You're allowed to assert your "rights" to a cop, and be as big a smartass about it as you want.... but be sure you're not breaking the law before you antagonize a police officer, otherwise you'll blow any chance that he might cut you a break.) I'll bet if you had groups of youths wandering through your neighborhood at 3AM you'd wonder what they were up to... and those cops were wondering the same thing.

    At least the cops knew something about geeks, enough to make a joke about it anyway... Jolt cola and pizza... heheh... That's actually pretty funny.

    "assholes?" For that? You've got to lighten up, my friend... that angst is going to poison you.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:You've got to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I bet it's hard to get that cap to stay in place on that pointy head of yours...

      You're allowed to assert your "rights" to a cop, and be as big a smartass about it as you want.... but be sure you're not breaking the law before you antagonize a police officer, otherwise you'll blow any chance that he might cut you a break.

      If by "cut you a break," you mean "need to trump up something so he can inconvenience your ass for a while," I'm down. Otherwise, I'd have to wonder what Mayberry PD you work for.

    2. Re:You've got to be kidding by LS · · Score: 1

      Why are you so stuck to this 8 to 5, bed at 11 thing? I should be able to walk around at 3 am without being harassed, even if I don't have any business in the area. Have you heard of an evening stroll? Why is it so difficult for people to understand that some people live differently than others?

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    3. Re:You've got to be kidding by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      You're leveling that lecture at the wrong slashdotter, sir... I worked night shift for years.

      I worked, and enjoyed, my nocturnal schedule, but I recognized that it was very different from the life that most people lead. I also realized that this might garner me some attention that wouldn't otherwise be drawn to a normal person in the typical 8-5 throng... when you're going out for a burger at 4AM on your night off (because that's when I typically ate on my night shifts), you might be the only car on the road, and liable to attract the attention of a 3rd shift cop (you might be the only vehicle he's seen for miles).

      I also take evening strolls (runs, actually, to stay in shape) in the wee hours. Even in my own neighborhood, I was stopped several times by patrolling police officers (once for questioning about some vehicle burglaries that had just occurred... Having a LE background, I keep my eyes open at night for exactly that kind of thing, so I gave them a vehicle description/plate that I thought looked suspicious). Other than that, I've never had a problem. Once I explained to them that I'm a 3rd shifter like them, and am only on my normal schedule, they usually lighten up. Frankly, I think they enjoy the occasional citizen contact and conversation during the graveyard shift, particularly from someone who's not lying to them, or pissed that the Poh-leece are interrupting the "discussion" they're having with their old lady.

      I agree you shouldn't be harassed for taking an evening stroll... but I also recognize that my existence is very different from most people, and that it sometimes raises an eyebrow. Personally, I like having inquisitive, proactive officers working for me, and I wouldn't consider it harassment.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  295. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Whyrph · · Score: 1

    I would be very careful to gather a lot of technical information and multiple refutable "experts" on your side about this. Because if you get it on the air, Charter is going to set up their "experts" saying that the technical claims are invalid. This argument will seem perfectly valid to the non-technical public, so you'll need some fire to fight back with. Preferably a LOT of fire.

  296. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Get [The Cuckoo's Egg], you won't regret it.

    But steer the hell clear of "Silicon Snake Oil".

    There aren't a lot of books I regret reading, but that was one of them.

  297. DNS hacked, its happened before... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

    When I first got a dsl connection I figured I'd better lock a few more doors, so I did the sensible thing (I thought) at the time and bought a 'home' router, a Seimans 2604. It had built in PPPoE and made the hookup pretty transparent.

    I'd had it about a week and was still playing with its settings, when one evening it refused to let me access it from its web server.

    After an hours worth of unsuccessfully messing with that, I got to thinking maybe I had been attacked, but I have some guard dogs standing by that will log that, and at least attempt to lock the purps out.

    Apparently the locks held, but there was a new line in hosts.deny placed there by the guard dog that recorded the address of the incoming attack that set off the guard dog.

    There was also a new rule in the iptables ruleset, also placed by the guard dog, portsentry-1.1.

    That was my clue that all was not well, and that possibly that the router was now a man in the middle. Or something.

    The router went back to C.C. the next day, and a linksys was brought home, which has not allowed any repeats of that, in fact its blocked everything as no further logs have been written since.

    The address of the attack source? One of the verizon.com dns servers I was supposed to be useing. The attack was reported to verizon at the time of discovery, but the veracity has been neither denied, nor confirmed in the past 2+ months since it happened by verizon.

    Make of it what you will. Linux saved the day AFAIAC.

    --
    Cheers, Gene
    A mostly retired old coot

  298. Someone please remove this guy’s right to connec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone please remove this guyâ(TM)s right connect to the Internet!

    It reminds me of a Certified Microsoft Exchange Administrator who refused to disable e-mail relaying on his Exchange server. Even after many requests, he refused. Then he refused to create, and later read the postmaster e-mail because itâ(TM)s not part of the job. Then the company was placed on a black list and all he did was gripe. Note, I later found he had received 3 notices about being placed on the blacklist, but the Microsoft rep, said it was nothing, he blew it off. (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/16/19462 07&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=111&tid=103&tid=99)

    It also reminds me of someone blaming the electric company for loss of data on their database server, because the administrator did not install a UPS.

    Ok, letâ(TM)s get into something useful. Just like protecting yourself with a UPS, you have to do things âoeBEFOREâ you get attacked! Here are some suggestions:

    BEFORE YOU ARE ATTACKED
    1. Apply patches
    2. Remove all services, except what is absolutely need
    3. Follow the âbest practicesâ(TM) from Microsoft, NSA, SANS or someone.
    4. Joint the local Infragard group so you can meet law enforcement before you get hacked. (www.infragard.net)
    5. Create good backups.
    6. Install a firewall and keep the logs on a system that can not be accessed from the internet.
    7. Install virus protection on all your systems. Update the signatures regularly. Scan regularly.
    8. Install âoePersonal Firewallsâ on each system (Stealth, do not allow outbound, unless you know what the program is doing)
    9. Install Anti-spyware on each system. Update the signatures regularly. Scan regularly.
    10. Never use the administrator account, or accounts with administrative privileges to run applications. Instead, create a user account and use it.

    WHEN YOU GET HACKED

    1. Create a paper log of everything you do during the incident.
    2. Create 2 bit level backup of the system. At the time you suspected you were hacked. Use one to find out what the hacker did and the other as evidence for the FBI.
    3. If your losses are tangible and you have real evidence, then the FBI will do a great job of working with you.
    a. Tangible losses are typically greater then $10K. Note, this price does not include the purchase of a new firewall or software to âprotect your systemâ(TM). Nor does it include hiring a consulting to run a scan to perform an assessment. The objective here is to be âmade wholeâ(TM) and nothing more. But you would have learned this, if you ever attended an Infragard meeting.
    4. Report the attack to NIPC (http://www.nipc.gov/incident/newincident.htm). A copy of this report is sent to the FBI.
    5. When the agent arrives, provide a copy of the backup, your best practices documents and security policies when the FBI shows up. Also provide any other evidence you have found.

    PROBLEMS WITH YOUR CURRENT APPROACH

    1. If you were to bring this to a state or federal prosecutor, you would be waiting their time.
    a. You have already destroyed the evidence by using the Microsoft file âbrowserâ(TM) to check on why you were having problems. At this point your attack is considered âhearsayâ(TM) and your hard drive could not be submitted as valid evidence.
    b. Your loss can not be validated.
    2. You scanned other systems without approval, is considered a crime in some states/countries
    3. If you did not have a firewall, virus protection on your system, a best practices documents and a copy of your security policy in place then you may not be considered creatable to administrate the system.

    I would suggest joining Infragard, learning to secure you system and taking a SANS class.

  299. Luckily, a democracy is a mess by SysKoll · · Score: 1

    Yep. Actually, I am not sure I want a well-run gummint that enforces each and every of the hundreds of thousands of laws and regulations on the book.

    Fortunately, as the French say, "La démocratie, c'est le bordel" (Democracy is a f*cking mess).

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  300. get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0. setup your own firewall with internal caching nameserver and DHCP. if your windows box is pulling dhcp address from your isp (and corresponding resolver config), you have more relevant problems due to fact your underwear has already been hanging in times square before you even touch the keyboard. See http://www.zelow.no/floppyfw/ or http://www.linuxrouter.org/
    1. you should ALWAYS use fully qualified hostnames, there's no excuse for depending on domain search order for accessing secure sites.
    2. ssh pub/priv keys were designed to alleviate dns spoofing, and the man in the middle message you received served its purpose. If any admin ignores the message and says "connect anyway" then keys in a passwd to boot, they *deserve* to be hacked.
    3. if you have anything remotely to do with financial sites, you should know to DISABLE passwd authentication altogether, and only use authorized_keys.
    4. never do general browsing/accessing rogue addresses from the same machine/network from which you access sensitive information.

  301. who you gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ghostbusters!

  302. Re:Fuck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the fuckin midwest, they implemented a 10 p.m. curfew for 18 year olds. My friends and I were walking home about 10 or so, the cop comes up behind us lights blaring asks to see id. he said we were out past curfew and we would all be taken in. my friend looks at the clock on his dashboard, it says 9:53. We tell him to fuck off, take off for my house, and get my father outside. that shuts up the pigs real quick, an adult.

    FUCK THE POLICE.

  303. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by smaug195 · · Score: 1

    Baby Diapers?
    Possibly in a creek near you?
    Just playing off a hunch

  304. MOD PARENT UP by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    +4 Informative

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  305. Spyware works on morons by Jarnis · · Score: 1

    This guy is a moron. He's crying wolf to FBI when all that happened is that he got spyware on his personal computer. Running IE and executing everything it puts out in front of you should be grounds for lobotomy.

    Having worked on end user tech support, I can understand why sleazy companies keep putting out more and more spyware crap - most people don't understand or even care. I once debugged end-user's crash issues and found out that he had half dozen different spyware proggies installed. I asked if he had noticed anything strange before, and he did say he was pissed due to his IE doing funny stuff (changing homepage etc..) - but he didn't care as long as he could open whatever webpage he wanted to get into. Only after his computer started to crash every time he launched IE he figured out that something wasn't right.

    Companies pushing spyware/malware should be taken down hard and made to pay for the extra support costs and bandwidth their 'applications' cause.

  306. Holy smokes... by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Constrain MY FUD? Do you really want the Klan back? Because that's what you're going to get. The Klan originally started as groups of southern landowners back when there wasn't any law enforcement... they took care of their own problems, and look at the incredible evil that came of it. We are a nation of laws, not a nation of men; you really don't want the latter.

    Are you seriously advocating road-ragers running grandma off the road? I've got a grandma... you probably do too. Oh yes, you'd see some of that vigilante justice you're talking about if punks ran peoples' grandmothers off the road because they forgot to set their alarm clocks, and were late for the taco bell job. Maybe your son would come home beaten to a pulp, or even in a body bag, because some grandmother's son took exception to YOUR son running her off the road.

    What if your daughter is Tawana Brawley, and lied about the boy next door raping her? Maybe it was consensual, but he didn't call the next day, or may be it was consensual but you walked in on it and she was too afraid of you to admit it (I've personally seen both of these scenarios). On the basis of that, you're going to take someone's life?? Good God man... that's why courts came about, because the kind of justice you're talking about so often went terribly wrong.

    Incidently, I personally agree wholeheartedly with you that police cannot protect individuals. The bad guys far, far outnumber the cops, and bad guys go to great lengths to avoid committing crimes in front of the police, which is why I support people carrying concealed weapons... you'd be surprised the number of cops who don't have a problem with that. That's right... you heard it here first... a (former)cop who thinks people should be able to defend themselves. With some training, I think it's a fine idea whose time has come.

    You Britts will, of course, disagree... but the US is way past the point of no return with guns. 200 million+ are not going to EVER be rounded up, so you might as well level the playing field for joe citizen. Seems fair to me...

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  307. Re:Of course the FBI won't help, if it's their hac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Feds work like the locals around here (Chatham Co Ga and surrounding areas) they might just get some sleazeball spyware stooge to do it for them and avoid all that pesky subpoena paperwork.

    Course they hardly need to bother now, what with the Patriot Act.

    Yeah, I'm paranoid. Right. Jeezus, I could tell you some tales. Maybe I will. Everybody starts crapping their pants if it even looks like I might. Like when I'm being robbed, and my lady is being held hostage again. Like now.

    Blackmail and extortion? No, I just want what's mine, and it's so fucking simple to make me a happy camper. Everybody would win. What's the fucking problem? Jeez, I'd really hate to have to get pissed off or something. There'd be no mercy.

    --rgb

  308. Re:well, duh! by bucky0 · · Score: 1

    First off, _any_ police force won't deal with petty theft. My friend had his car broken into but the cops won't invest any time in it because the damage/loss doesn't meet a certain value. Law enforcement only has a certain, finite amount of time/resorces they can spend investigating anything, so it's necessary (unfortunately) for them to prioritize what they can and can't look at.

    --

    -Bucky
  309. The case illustrates the problem perfectly... by freeBill · · Score: 1

    ...Somebody thinks they're observing an on-going attack. What do they do? Report it to the ISP which appears to them to have had its servers compromised. Then call FBI and other responsible authorities.

    99 times out of a 100 (and this may well be one if the original poster has ordinary spyware on their machine), it's a false alarm. Somebody has a virus on their machine; it's spyware they unwittingly downloaded.

    But, when you're the 1 time out of 100 and you're right, who do you get at the ISP or FBI? Somebody who's used to handling the other 99 calls.

    There's also a real chance you might be getting someone who doesn't care. More likely, you've got somebody who cares, but doesn't know what to do. Hopefully, the most likely scenario is that you've got someone who knows what to do. But all three of these groups are going to sound the same at first. Why? Because they're all used to handling the other 99 calls.

    You need a strategy for cutting through the BS and convincing them -- quickly and concisely -- that you're not one of those 99 callers, that there's on-going crime being committed, and that potentially large amounts of money are involved.

    I have had a similar kind of problem with reporting network problems on a large ISP (Qwest), and I have developed such a strategy:

    1) Find out how to contact the ISP's Network Operations Center (NOC).

    2) Devise a simple test which they can run at the NOC to demonstrate the problem.

    3) Call the NOC and (when they start to tell you how to file a report in the morning) say, "No. You do not understand. You have a serious on-going problem here which must be resolved immediately. If you do not, [insert concise description of the damage you think is likely here]."

    4) Tell them to run your test.

    5) If you know the answer, tell them how to fix the problem.

    I developed this when I was doing a graveyard shift on which I frequently used Qwest's San-Francisco-Seattle backbone. They had one router on the pipe which would go down every couple months. I could detect the problem every time using traceroute. The NOC's response was invariably, "Copy the traceroute into an email and somebody will fix it in the morning."

    I would respond, "No. Your main pipe between Silicon Valley and Seattle is down. If all those dot-commers wake up in the morning and find you've not been passing any packets for hours, there is going to be hell to pay. Run a traceroute to amazon.com."

    The response almost immediately changed to: "Oh, my God. I'll get on it right away. Thanks a lot." Then I would tell them the name of the router which had to be power-cycled. And it would be fixed in a few minutes.

    Here's how you would apply this strategy to the poster's situation:

    1) Find out how to contact the ISP's Network Operations Center (NOC). If you don't have a direct number, try to get it from their support people. They know it. They may not be allowed to give it to you. They may prefer to connect you themselves. Try to act knowledgeable and give them good reasons why they should put you through. Sometimes the NOC will give you their number once they know you're for real. It might help to call it that ("NOC," pronounced like "knock"), but you should probably identify it at least once as "Network Operations Center."

    2) Devise a simple test which they can run at the NOC to demonstrate the problem. This is very important. Preferably a single command which will elucidate the problem unambigously. (This would have stopped this particular poster's problem at the ISP. When the poster gave his demonstration to his NOC and they got different results, he would have known the problem was on his PC.)

    3) Call the NOC and (when they start to tell you how to file a report in the morning) say, "No. You do not understand. You have a serious on-going problem here which must be resolved immediately. If you do not, [insert concise description of the damage you think is likely here]." Be poli

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  310. Somebody who does care! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you use online banking? Call your banks phone line to report the hacking. The bank will be able to do something because they have an actual security department with FBI contacts and they don't like when their customers getting ripped off because it's really bad for business.

  311. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Hey, I didn't say that the standard method of secret messaging should be used, that of emitting a coded contrail over the entire country so the recipient can't be detected.

  312. Re:Call tech support, but embarrass them too by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Depends whether you want to get your message on the record quickly in case someone listens. Later you can build your railroad track to the ISP and send the detailed documentation.

  313. It's something else that is sucking at your site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.
    Competent admins do not ever change SSH server keys without notifying all legitimate users of client software.

    If your admins are incompetent, neither CAs, nor stunnel/telnets will save you.

    You should be connecting using a key that was not passed over any network, if you actually have a need for real security. Your admin should burn keys onto business-card format CDs - both server key fingerprints (to validate the servers to you) and client keys (so the server knows who is connecting).

    If your security needs are so extreme that the predictability of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm when using known client keys matters, then use securid tokens or similar.

    --Charlie

  314. You are correct, I was wrong. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Man, what the hell am I talking about??? I'm on a proxy right now and I can still do my banking without warning. You obviously are correct...