That may well be and it's good to know this, however it makes little sense lowering your risk of death due to serotonin absorption blockers when you in turn either run a risk of throwing yourself off the next bridge or don't have any fun living anyway.
They expect to have completely new equipment in place and running in less than a month? One can only hope they're already done choosing and testing the equipment and now it's only a matter of delivery from stock and training the users or else this screams clusterfuck.
It's been so long that any phone producer has come out with some major game changing technology that all this leaking and presentation stuff has become one giant marketing circle-jerk.
When rockstars party, the music isn't all that important. The important thing is that the druges are pure and the groupies ready for anything.
I don't have Twitter at all and Facebook is used through a web browser instead of the app. Which basically means it's hardly used at all because it's so broken.
I have WhatsApp, SMS, Email and the phone. I religiously forbid websites from sending notifications too. I think those are by far enough channels for people to reach me. All the other shit has no business interrupting me in the first place.
What a redundant statement. Of course a sufficiently high tax will prevent them from being produced. That goes for everything. What the hell are we supposed to do with this quote?
A sufficiently high tax on cigarettes will prevent them from having a mass market too, that's why legislators are very careful to find the balance at which enough people still smoke while paying as much as possible for the privilege.
This statement implies since there is a balance to be found we shouldn't do it at all. Yet, that doesn't keep us from taxation in most other cases either. So again, the fuck is this except FUD?
Is the product marketable? Because while there may be some big names being tossed around, all those positions are hierarchy garnishings and don't seem to be having much impact on anything.
Let's be honest, an air taxi will pretty much sell itself if it works. And whether it works is exactly where my doubts lay:D.
It's nice that they point to another backup solution but as far as I can see, they don't support Linux... just like Backblaze. So... where does that leave me?
Oh how naive... You really think Americans of the time gave a damn about some Jews, Gypsies and fags being slaughtered? Get real! You fough to smash a developing power block that wasn't particularly friendly to you and started threatening your own power base. I am convinced that a statistically relevant part of your population thought Hitler was on the right track.
Which doesn't matter much anymore, as people with a hint of sanity and/or intelligence left stopped believing anything they read online quite some time ago. Except for memes... those are obviously true.
Well, I don't have much an opinion about you except I do expect that I'm smarter than you and your disagreeing with me is based on lack of knowledge and/or intelligence.
It's a pretty good bet to take considering your reaction to my post.
I must agree with the AC. A quote would help. I have read a version posted on a news site and I would not bet on it not having been redacted.
What I read, though, did not contain any such thing. All he said was that on average, women and men show different traits and needs and instead of acting like that wasn't true Google's culture should try to play into the strengths of women and then accept the ratio of women working there as a probable equilibrium.
He also said to not only focus on competition as that is a primarily male trait. He more or less proposed that some men who are really focused on status might go elsewhere and make room so to speak.
IMO he never, ever said anyone (especially not the whole group. He emphasised judging each individual according to their strengths and weaknesses) was unable to do X. He just said that the current culture acted contrary to science and oppressed anyone who disagreed with that notion.
And I really have no idea why my first post was labelled flamebait:D.
I've just read his document. I must say, that was a very rational appeal to Google to bring more harmony and freedom into its culture.
I must also say I see no hostility to anyone whatsoever. All he said was "Let's get away from this cult and be as productive (through enabling each and every Google employee to reach his full potential) as we can be".
And he was fired for it. And THAT is exactly where the hate for SJWs comes from.
For a long time I was kinda miffed that I don't have the background to have a chance to work for Google. Now I'm kinda glad... I don't think I would have liked that environment very much.
Why does a room full of strange men feel threatening to women?
Are you saying the men are doing something wrong? That they are by their biology prone to pose a risk to women? And since you stated it that way, do you think that the reverse is not true? A man entering a room full of women he doesn't know feels no apprehension at all? In this case you are either agreeing with the fact that men and women function differently or you are being sexist yourself by focusing on one gender above the other.
Or is it the perception of men that make the woman worried for no reason? In this case, aren't these hypothetical women being sexist by painting the other gender with a very broad and unflattering brush?
I just don't get why we need to make such a big deal out of this. You will always find scenarios where women, on average, do better or worse or equal to men. It just depends on the scenario and what the rules are by which you judge. This is a never ending discussion because there will not and cannot be an equilibrium where nobody ever feels underappreciated, overpressured or what have you.
I will go as far as stating this: The stress this political correctness puts on our daily interactions far exceeds the stress people feel due to society's inherent sexism.
Getting pinched in the butt or being pegged as an unfeeling beast from time to time cannot compare to having to watch every word, every look, every movement, hell every damn thought all the time.
Sure, getting fired because you wouldn't spread your legs for the boss or because you dare ask for working part-time because you want to be a better dad is going too far. There is shit nobody should ever have to take but come on, what's happening right now is 1984ish, just not in a way we would have ever expected.
While I am pretty proud that Slashdot marked this Troll, I'd like to add a thought:
The world doesn't owe me anything is not wrong.
However, stating it like that kinda implies that you think that I owe the world something.
And that is just false. I owe none of you people anything. There is a, usually, unspoken contract between me and the rest of you goombas that we'll all flourish more if we specialize and use our skillsets as efficiently as possible and then trade these skills to let others provide us efficiently with services their good at providing.
The fact that I don't go around murdering and robbing whomever I please has two reasons and it's an either/or relationship: One, I am a decent person. I am this because of a mix of decent upbringing and my character. The upbringing depends on how many goombas basically decided to walk over my parents while complaining about uneven ground. The second one is the threat of violence and incarceration.
As we know, the latter is a kinda feeble attempt and works mostly on the nice people.
So TL;DR, the fact that I go earning a living instead of clobbering whomever I deem weaker than myself is the fact that my parents had the will, the ability and the energy to teach me empathy. Take that away from people and Trump's America is basically what you get.
I guess that would be an idea considdering my zfs storage. I was just of the impression that hardware support was even worse than Linux. Is that not so?
Well, let's say I was surprised how happy I was with the side-effect of a reduced libido :D.
That may well be and it's good to know this, however it makes little sense lowering your risk of death due to serotonin absorption blockers when you in turn either run a risk of throwing yourself off the next bridge or don't have any fun living anyway.
They expect to have completely new equipment in place and running in less than a month? One can only hope they're already done choosing and testing the equipment and now it's only a matter of delivery from stock and training the users or else this screams clusterfuck.
It's been so long that any phone producer has come out with some major game changing technology that all this leaking and presentation stuff has become one giant marketing circle-jerk.
When rockstars party, the music isn't all that important. The important thing is that the druges are pure and the groupies ready for anything.
I don't have Twitter at all and Facebook is used through a web browser instead of the app. Which basically means it's hardly used at all because it's so broken.
I have WhatsApp, SMS, Email and the phone. I religiously forbid websites from sending notifications too.
I think those are by far enough channels for people to reach me. All the other shit has no business interrupting me in the first place.
Why would I allow "news" to distract me?
The word you're looking for is 'awesome'.
It's unisex too.
Pinkie-promise?
I see a price dump for prostitutes, both of age and under, in a few less developped countries in the near future.
Shame...
What a redundant statement. Of course a sufficiently high tax will prevent them from being produced. That goes for everything. What the hell are we supposed to do with this quote?
A sufficiently high tax on cigarettes will prevent them from having a mass market too, that's why legislators are very careful to find the balance at which enough people still smoke while paying as much as possible for the privilege.
This statement implies since there is a balance to be found we shouldn't do it at all. Yet, that doesn't keep us from taxation in most other cases either. So again, the fuck is this except FUD?
Is the product marketable? Because while there may be some big names being tossed around, all those positions are hierarchy garnishings and don't seem to be having much impact on anything.
Let's be honest, an air taxi will pretty much sell itself if it works. And whether it works is exactly where my doubts lay :D.
Backblaze doesn't support Linux...
It's nice that they point to another backup solution but as far as I can see, they don't support Linux... just like Backblaze. So... where does that leave me?
Same here.
What I would have liked is a more granular schedule. Weekly backups would have sufficed for my setup.
Oh how naive...
You really think Americans of the time gave a damn about some Jews, Gypsies and fags being slaughtered? Get real!
You fough to smash a developing power block that wasn't particularly friendly to you and started threatening your own power base.
I am convinced that a statistically relevant part of your population thought Hitler was on the right track.
As far as I can see, the Asrock X399 Taichi supports ECC already and that's a consumer board.
My main problem is that I want high clocked ECC memory and that seems to be a market that has been pretty much neglected so far.
Which doesn't matter much anymore, as people with a hint of sanity and/or intelligence left stopped believing anything they read online quite some time ago. Except for memes... those are obviously true.
Well, I don't have much an opinion about you except I do expect that I'm smarter than you and your disagreeing with me is based on lack of knowledge and/or intelligence.
It's a pretty good bet to take considering your reaction to my post.
I must agree with the AC. A quote would help. I have read a version posted on a news site and I would not bet on it not having been redacted.
What I read, though, did not contain any such thing. All he said was that on average, women and men show different traits and needs and instead of acting like that wasn't true Google's culture should try to play into the strengths of women and then accept the ratio of women working there as a probable equilibrium.
He also said to not only focus on competition as that is a primarily male trait. He more or less proposed that some men who are really focused on status might go elsewhere and make room so to speak.
IMO he never, ever said anyone (especially not the whole group. He emphasised judging each individual according to their strengths and weaknesses) was unable to do X. He just said that the current culture acted contrary to science and oppressed anyone who disagreed with that notion.
And I really have no idea why my first post was labelled flamebait :D.
I've just read his document. I must say, that was a very rational appeal to Google to bring more harmony and freedom into its culture.
I must also say I see no hostility to anyone whatsoever. All he said was "Let's get away from this cult and be as productive (through enabling each and every Google employee to reach his full potential) as we can be".
And he was fired for it. And THAT is exactly where the hate for SJWs comes from.
For a long time I was kinda miffed that I don't have the background to have a chance to work for Google. Now I'm kinda glad... I don't think I would have liked that environment very much.
Why does a room full of strange men feel threatening to women?
Are you saying the men are doing something wrong? That they are by their biology prone to pose a risk to women? And since you stated it that way, do you think that the reverse is not true? A man entering a room full of women he doesn't know feels no apprehension at all?
In this case you are either agreeing with the fact that men and women function differently or you are being sexist yourself by focusing on one gender above the other.
Or is it the perception of men that make the woman worried for no reason? In this case, aren't these hypothetical women being sexist by painting the other gender with a very broad and unflattering brush?
I just don't get why we need to make such a big deal out of this. You will always find scenarios where women, on average, do better or worse or equal to men. It just depends on the scenario and what the rules are by which you judge. This is a never ending discussion because there will not and cannot be an equilibrium where nobody ever feels underappreciated, overpressured or what have you.
I will go as far as stating this: The stress this political correctness puts on our daily interactions far exceeds the stress people feel due to society's inherent sexism.
Getting pinched in the butt or being pegged as an unfeeling beast from time to time cannot compare to having to watch every word, every look, every movement, hell every damn thought all the time.
Sure, getting fired because you wouldn't spread your legs for the boss or because you dare ask for working part-time because you want to be a better dad is going too far. There is shit nobody should ever have to take but come on, what's happening right now is 1984ish, just not in a way we would have ever expected.
I will freely admit that sticking it to the man is on the list of considerations for me. Only as long as price/performance makes sense, though.
While I am pretty proud that Slashdot marked this Troll, I'd like to add a thought:
The world doesn't owe me anything is not wrong.
However, stating it like that kinda implies that you think that I owe the world something.
And that is just false. I owe none of you people anything. There is a, usually, unspoken contract between me and the rest of you goombas that we'll all flourish more if we specialize and use our skillsets as efficiently as possible and then trade these skills to let others provide us efficiently with services their good at providing.
The fact that I don't go around murdering and robbing whomever I please has two reasons and it's an either/or relationship: One, I am a decent person. I am this because of a mix of decent upbringing and my character. The upbringing depends on how many goombas basically decided to walk over my parents while complaining about uneven ground.
The second one is the threat of violence and incarceration.
As we know, the latter is a kinda feeble attempt and works mostly on the nice people.
So TL;DR, the fact that I go earning a living instead of clobbering whomever I deem weaker than myself is the fact that my parents had the will, the ability and the energy to teach me empathy. Take that away from people and Trump's America is basically what you get.
Getting people used to working for no money at all makes those very same people appreciate low wages more than people who demand fair pay?
Le shock!
I should probably also mention that I plan GPU passthrough to a windows vm on this server (Threadripper based).
It's gonna be quite a challenge as it is and I've never worked with a BSD...
I guess that would be an idea considdering my zfs storage. I was just of the impression that hardware support was even worse than Linux. Is that not so?